Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
056-180-004
suite, Count 2 r' 1AN'O OF felA w'RAt V`,fwA1i,.a : � AQi Jul 31 19921.-- PLANNING DEPARTMENT July 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397' TELEPHONE' (916) 536-7601 Tom Wrinkle 5;:..:ra. West Surveying5437 Black Olive Drive Paradise, CA .05969 Re: Borba_Subdvision• AP 56-18-0.4 Dear Mr, Wrinklei I have received your letter dated July 9, 1992 and based on your comments in; proposing the following mitigation. measures: 1;. Place a mote on the addiA:ional map sheet that states* "Fire suppression sprinkler systems shall be installed in all residential structures in accordance with the National. Fire Protection Association standard for the installation of fire sprinkler systems in one and two family dwellings ,and mobile domes, NFPA Standard 13 D.tt 2. Limit soil work to the time period from April 15 through November :15 �of each year. Mulch protect, Hydra seed, or otherwise stabilize all areas greater than 10% slope that have been, disturbed or have been, cleared of vegetation anti are of an erodible material, 3. Place a note, on the additional snap sheet that stat.,s: t►bevelopment of the parcels will be subject to the payment of Deer, Herd impact: fees as adoptedby the Board of Supervisors and in effect at. the time of building permit application.' „ ut Faun .�.� ” ,r, moi' �:•. ir• `. 1.. . ��� F- `. kA(>tD OF NATURAL WEALTH A11,0GAUTY �,_ p Services De L�gNN NG DEPARTQNi NT t ' 7 COUNTY CENTER OPINE OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95865-3397 R TELEPHONE: (916) 538-7601 July 61 1992 Joe Borba, Jr. 7475 Eucalyptus Chino, CA 91710 Re, Tentative Parcel Map AP #056-180-004, 005, 007 .Dear Mr. Borba: An initial study of your proposed project, a Tentative Parcel Map, indicates potentially adverse impacts to the environment (refer to the enclosed environmental checklist). To reduce or eliminate 'these im— acts, suitable' mitigation measures are required as partof the project. Otherwise, an 7 ,< 'rronmental Impact Report (EIR) is required pursuant to the California Environments. �., .%sty Act. An early response to this noAI,, cin, sent to the Planning Department, will expedite the scheduling of your project. Please forward your written response within 15 days from the date of this letter. Should. you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office between 10:00 aan, and. 3:00 p.m. Sincerely, l3'. A. Kircber Directo Planning Division 1 i Craig Sanders Associate Planner - CcBB,xj I Siena West Save yi ng J r ? fi7� kYF ;CALIFORNIA THE g85oUtt(�x5 AGr'NL ,^ PEE Wls N; Oos4oyof DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME Planning oapartrrlont ,zE��'•1 Z A4 177) M//,. S J ROAD, SUITE A UN 19 199E Y,Ik#oo cowovA, cAIIFORhIIA 9S670 (916) 355-7020 Drovfiie,Callamla June 12, 1952 Mr. Stuart Edell Department of Public Works 7 County Center Drive oroville, California 55965 I t Dear Ms: Edell: The bepaxtment of Fish and Game (DFG) has reviewed the doe Borba Jr., Tentative Parcel Map, a proposal to divide 56-18-04, 05 and 07 (450 ac.)into '10, 40+ acre lots,. Located near Cohasset, the parcels lie in critical winter range of the East Tehama deer herd which is covered by a mih of chaparral and oak woodland habitats. Sensitive plaint species are known to o,ecur in the vicinity. This project site contains the habitat types known to harbor sensitive plant species which have been found in that general area. A botanical survey should be made to determine if such ,species dooccur onsite. If"present, sensitive plant populations should be rotected by• A. Establishing a 50foolt minimum no disturbance - setback, commencing from the outer edge, around each plant population b. Constracting barti'ers to prevent damage by foot and vehicle traffic, C. Excluding livestock: d. No artificial drainageintoor the placement of materials and substances inside of the nondisturbance area Only those sensitive plant sites which may be impacted by homesites, roads, etc.,, need this application. This project will have an impact to fish and/or wildlife habitat. Assessment of fees under Public 2esourcbs Code section 21089 wid as 'defined by Fish and Game Code Section 71 1 : 4 is necessary. Fees are payable by the project applicant upon filing of the Notice of Determination by the lead agency: Pursuant to Public Resources Code 4 '`ionrs' 210'92 and 21092:2, the bFG requests written notifba ation of proposed Aft 14 Mme: uteo►` L A N b OF NATURAL VVEA LTH AND BEAUTY -� Dj-,part(ment of Development Services PLANNING DEPARTMENT 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE. (016) 536-7601 .Tune 12, 1992 Joe Borba, Jr. 7475 Eucalyptus Chino, CA 91710 SUBIECT: Status of Application for Proposed Tentative Parcel Map on AP4' 056480-004,005,007 Dear Mr, Borba, The butte County Planning Department staff has reviewed the application and accompanying information for the referenced proposal. The purpose of this notice is to advise you whether your application is complete. The following status information pertains to your application. Please eall the assigned Planner named below if there are any questions concerning your proposal or this notice The application is complete and is being processed. Planning staff will contact you if any clarification or additional information is needed: At a later date you will receive a letter and analysis of your project and a notification of your scheduled' hearing date. XX ton sincomplete; see the attached form for required information received before the application can be processed. The California Department fhis An ameCDof D);requires p payment nt of a filing fee forall projects that resul 'rip potential wildlife, their 1?abit A through �ibar1 be collected b this fJe arttr>et�t on behaf ling fee is ipplicable to your project and uzation and land use conversion. This if of GDT+�� "You wi�R be notified prior to i Before your application can be ?considered complete, the following techs (see checked boxes) must be prepw, ed and submitted to the Planning Department. Your project is it a high archaeological sensitivity area. Contact the V Northeast Information Center in the Anthropology Lab at Chico State University. Have a records search Performed for your project. If an Archaeological Survey is required, have it performed by a qualified archaeologist (a lisp is provided). Submit the report to the PlannJing Department. Your project is in a sensive botanical area. Contact a qualified Botanist to determine if a Botanical Survey for rare, threatened or endangered plants should be performed. If a Botanical Survey is required, . have it performed by a qualified botanist (a list is provided). Submit the report to the Planning Department. Your project is in a sensitive geologic area. Contact a qualified Geologist or Soils Engineer to have a Geologic Survey performed. Submit the report to the Planning Department. Your project is in an area of special biological importance. Contact the Department of Fish & Game to determine if a Wildlife Survey is required. If species of concern are present, perform a Wildlife Survey, as required. Submit the report to the Planning Department. (. Other: Art ILL �3c.ct OROVILL E,CALIFORNIA GENERAL CLAIM tf ANTt . Joe Borba Jr 7475 Eucalyptus t Y $TATE! Chinook CA 01,710 IMPORTANTc l7d,a'T`t f31: CLAIM. June 9 1992_____._SEE INSTRUCTIONS - ON REVERSE SIDE: „ �t IT CLAIM TO DEPARTMENT RECEIVING GOODS OR SERVICES _ DESCRIPTION OF CLAIM (DESCRIBE FULLY TO AVOID DELAY) -,AMOUNT Refund in the: amount of: $10.00 from Planning Department lfl 00 Tentative Patcel Map, AP#56-18-04 05.07 �r (The above a2plication was received from the Public Works Department on May 12, 1992. After review and discussion, the application was changed from a Tentative Subdivision ap to a tentative Parcel Map#)i d TOTAL t, the underalaned, Jeciare Under panalty bC perjury' 'that the aervlCea or atUelea claimed Have been peiiormed or deiivered, and that thle eliinl to true and correct as btatad, bited thNe_........ :u: ..0».gal,u... day of , 11— ... r.....+,:Doc:, F to.". it ..:..:..: ,..c..:•s.u.,,y calls, ..:..Dolce ....6.......s D'.......,o....u, signature of clalmont i. the underalgned, hereby 'dertifY that, to the beat of my knowiedge, the servldea or orticioa ap rifled above have been tiedorrned or de- livered and that There to i gUdget Appropriotion of specific Board Apoidvai E3 (Chock ane) for the {tame, Dated ihI*...... e......l:lie:o,D :e.e.l e., d0' 6f .,.D..,unp.+e• ....,,,ui 10.:.11,l at wu.n.DUD aw.•uDY:.. 1 lr 9itf• «N,ueee,. a ...,:.•1 p et Read yrizedbepoty�� t ba ertmhorAuiho _ _ code�RxF' `l9OO :.. •,,:..u...«0AYAbLk FRoi,...; uFUND' DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE AUDITOR'S USE 4 `iLY. Dept`, $. SUB. PROJ. SUB, O'Bi. OLAIM NO. INV, NO. INV, DATE��ENCUM8. 08088 AMT, lid Ad�miniatr�tive Offfct! OFFICE DF TTm ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT 1163 EAST SEVENTH. STREET ADMINIS'T'RATIVE SERVIC'E'S CHICO, CA 96928-5909 (916) 591-3140 (916) 891-3000 June 1, 1992 Pfanntng pepadmant` JUN 3 1992 Mr. Stuart ]?dell, Assistant Director Butte Count C?rovt(ia, Callf�nt(� y - Department of Public Works 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 Re Chico Unilled School District Response to "Joe BORBA., Jr.+ - TENTATIVE PARCEL 1".P" (A. P. No. 56-18-04, 05 and 07) Dear Mr. Edell: . District representatives have reviewed the information contained in your memorandum dated May 15, 1992 regarding the Joe Borba, Jr, tentative parcel map for property lo- cated on the northwest side or Cohasset Road, 2000 feet northeast of Limpach Road. District representatives have determined that the proposed project will negatively im= pact Chico Unified School District and, therefore, warrants further environmental analysis: SCHOOL FACILITIES FOR NEW STUDENTS GENERATED BY THE PRQ- POSED DEVELOPMENT Sellin The Joe Rorba, Jr. tentative parcel map proposes ;ten residential lots. Applying the District's A student yield factor, this development will. generate approximately four school age children. Utilizing current Dist net actual student enrollment data and projected student enroll- ment data from already approved new residential development, each elementary, junior high and senior high school in the Distfiat is filled to capacity. To accommodate a 50+ percent increase in student enrollment in recent years, the District (1) reutilized °existing school facilities, (1)utilized interim elementary school facilities, (3) placed relocatable classroom: on existing elementary .school campuses, (4) instituted mul& track year-round education in three -f ting elementary schools, (5) occupied one new urban elementary sci3Ool_ on a yatr'"'tounel schedule, (6) occupied oat new elementaty school on a traditional school schedule, (7) isin; the process of constructing a 'd.w,od elementary school, (8) has placed interim ,facilities on the secondary campuses podding file avai .Ability of new school facilities, (9) acquired a site and l�.,is planned to build ;t 'new junior high/middle school and (10) has planned to expand one exi6ting senior hir► school Mr, Stuart Edell, AssiRtant,Director June 1, 1992 Page 2 The District continuer to be a participant in the State School Building Program wherein constructingthe r of facilities is ;shared by the State; and by the local dis- trict in a in ratafashion. The State-wide need to construct new schools far exceeds available pro rata State funding; therefore, needed new Chico Unified School District school facilities have not been provided in a timely manner. i ocal Chico Unified School District revenues generated from school irr►pact fees, coupled with the proceeds from the general obligation bonds approved by the voters in; April 1988, will meet the student housing needs generated by local birth rates and previously approver .residential developments but will not meet the student housing needs generated by new develop- ment. The District anticipates housing increasinig numbers of students in interim facili- ties until funding becomes available to construct new schools. impact q,,t Proposed Development on- Chico tln7 d &hool .district ,Schoois Since District elementary, junior and senior high schools are filled to capacity, it is evident that students generated from the Joe Borba, Yr. tentative parcel map caEaIpt be served by existing facilities. In addition, there is currently no funding mechanism that will enable the District to provide facilities for these students: Based on the Distri.ct's .45 student yield factor per average (1,280 square feet) house- hold, the ten residential lots in this development will yield approximately four students that must be housed in District schools. The District projects that larger residential units will yield more than .43 students per household and smaller residential units will yield less than 43 students per household. To adjust for the higher student yield factor In larger than average households and the lower student yield factor in smaller than average households, the District utilizes a mitigation cost based. on square footage of habitable space in each household; - Miti�ati'on of Impag on Ch' Q Unifced School Ustrict Schools The District is onoo ed to County approval ot�the proposed tentative parcet mag apli cation unless the project fuh`v m ti ag tes its impact on the District: The 1991/92 per habitable space square foot cost to full; mitigate the impact of each residential unit is $5.29 per square foot. This amount will be adjusted as needed to re- flect the impact of inflation, school facilities needs, regulatory changes and other cost influencing factors. The full mitigation cost of $5.29 per square foot of new residential development will include school impact fees (currently $1.,58 per square foot).The i school impact fee will be supplemented with an appropriate amount of cash or n lieu, equivalent (land or school facilities) approved by the District, The combination of school impact fees and cash or in lieu equivalent must fully mitigate the impact of the development on District schools. Since the school mitigation cost established by the District is based on habitable squam footage of the residential unit and District representatives are not informed of the hab- itable space of each residential unit in the proposed development, it is not possible to confirm the total cost of the mitigation at this time. The following calculation is pr6, vided to allow one who is knowledgeable of the habitable space of each residential unit in the proposed development to make her/his own calculations 7 af�i #elemm o�d� Environmental Health Dept. and Planning7. Dept.�� Kathy .Parker, Land peveloptnient ` Joe BORBA, Jr. Tentative Parcel Mac -'AP' 56-18--04, 05 & 07 May 27, 1992 The above noted application Was received in this office on May 12, 1992 as a Tentative. Subdivision Map application for 11 lots. - At that time aa, receipt for x$1,601.00 was Written (PW- $470 / PLAN -$6'43 / EHD= COUNTY OF BUTTE ` DEPARTMENT OF PUOLIC YV S 7 County' Center Drive Orovi_l l e,. CA 95365 (91'6) 538-7268 May 15 1992. Joe Borba, jr, RE: AP 56-X18-04, 05 & 07 7475 Eucalyptus Tentative Parcel Map Chino, CA 91710 Dear Mr'. Borba. This is to notify you that your application for a tentative map for the above'referenced property is being submitted to the Planning Department for environmental determination and to the Environmental Health Department for its nevi evv`. This application will be considered complete when we have reciiived notification from the Planning Department and the Environmental HealthDepartment that all necessary data have, been received. These departments will contact you regarding any additional information they may requi ra Very truly yours, William Cheff Director of Public Works SAUAa t. Edell Assistant Director SE/k cc . P1 an,_:i ng b.,epar: menu tnVironmental Health Department Sierra West,' Surveying LD i`jd 1%9L J+ ' 1), RRA, `FEST SU, 7 )3lack 01'vc Drive Paradise �J'CBN$El) LAND SURV&ING _ §.�. , c;A 9i�369 ?,WAS: (916) 377-6253 Planning Department JUN 1 9� Orovilla, G©S OMIC May 14, 1992 ia, + Stuart Edell. County Dep-artmeul of Public «pori` A)unty Center Drive, oyi l l e, CA 95965 :J3orba Parool Map; AP 56-18-4, 5 & 'i Stu. Please find (14) copies of our rev?,t�'ed Parcel Map for Joe Borbe, Z-; .' property on AP 56"18=4. 5 & 7. We - equest., that any refund of" Ates 1),: sett directly to arre Borba, ;a s- . a t ; j•µ e (o Glt y r-" 4:F✓r z .,';zi j K4e-r�if; 4v- 7475 Eucalyptus Chino, CA 91.710 you Por your: assistance in th.i.s matter. : Srtcc;rely, Thomas R. 4 PI'Akle Kat i e U'l1, 0' i r __ �_ �,. �. L h I �� � ,_ 1 PLANNING C SSION Som'EX SHEET FOR T ©iVISTONS y Ap .V,L ICANT • Joe _Borba, jr. ADDRESS 7475 Eucalyptus , Chino., CA 91710 Oi"xlER: Same ,F?.OJECT DESCRIPTION: Tentative Parcel. Map to divide 450+ acres to create 10, 40 acre lots._ LOCATION: Located on the northwest side of Cohasset aL 'LOQC feet northeast of Limpach Road, Cohasset area. A,ssE6SOR' S PARCEL NI314BER(S) 56-18-04; 05, 07 ' Nxfi1G "ull GENERAL PLAN Grazing & PROJECT CONSISTENT Open Land G=-aETXAL :FLAN CONFORMANCE REPORT rfay 8, 1992 L,%jjD CONSERVATION ACT CONTRACTS: DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED May '15. 1992 _ A5GE14T/'SU!;WEXOR/CIVIL ENGINEER': Sierra West 9urve,,y jg ., ADDRESS; ,+_.., 5437 Black- Olive Dr., Paradise-, CA a ATE PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT RREPARED ENVIRONMENTAL CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION-DATE FILED - DrTERMINATION AND DATE NEGATIVE DECLARATION DATE ADOPTED P` V MITIGATED NEG. DECLARATION - DATE ADOPTED �✓ `� w .ENV. IMPACT REPORT DATE CERTIFIED _. STATE CLEAR±NGHOUSE NO, 5 8 r« Gfl1�iNiJ;TT E MEET•I34 TE m� A:DVx6ORY AGENCY liEARTNG DATE A>VVISORV AGENCY ACTION 11 01 8+ ENVIRONAMAt, IMPACTS AND MITIGATIONI 45Uit p " Identiic ottntiaily significant environnental alracts associated With the land divisi on. What project aes:gn-saru_es or special conditions of approval (mitigation measures) are proposed to alleviate potential environmental.mpact:s?10,4i V IRONMENTA),' S= NG'^ a) Describe the project site as it exists before the projiact, including, information on topography, soil stability, pZ.mnts and animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structuresonthe site, and the use of the structures. �!�-f,JcS f7F' / dsty�s � F f b? Describe the !-,urroundi;ng properties, including i0formation on plants and animals and any cultural, historl al or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential .conmercial,�etei)j intensity of land use Gone-family, apartment houses, shops, depart. ment stores, 'eti' /Q C. rear .ale of development he ht 'frontage, setback v earvard dor-� rx CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnishedabove and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts. statenentt �ani p y d belzefation resented are true and correct to the best of m knowledge Date , 5ignature uy For *Use. separate sheet for longer responses. ,' 4r�s `oe5 }uawdoleAea Pua 1 �1.ioe 404fto A B'LTTT'� C:OL7N'SY G N>�RAT— I -Lt:& ` CQ'!F-0EMANCE' 2.ET'ORT' " CW;:, MAP Qk SLMr—) 2 V T S: gN MAP. Items 1-4 to be completed by applicant: I., APPLICANT 0" AND ADDRESS: �"OC i O 2rs i' `7 tz,)i..R tL--- 01-\V ►gin , T`Ip� eA r--, I Ct ,Cxa q's 9 (�9 2, PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 3, .ASSESSORt5 PARCEL NUMBER(S): OS - I RU U0Ll ; OQhd. 00�T 4. PROPOSED USE: 71so following items are to be completed by the Planning Department: a%Z�MNT ZONING:. u LAND CONSERVATION AGREflKENP: WERAL PLAN DESIGNATION -?-1 112 0fMQ LAN s rinen�Ste DAsanation Criteria: YES NO 1 SSG _t� t`'r`R G�-i ii _ �< � —�-- It is recommended that you pe.rf",z the following checked items: 2* x X ARCHAEOLOGICAL RECORDS CHECK 3, X_ BOTANICAL SURVEY 4' r. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 6. YES No $• WITHIN DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME DEVELOPWr* TONE: r 1O. WITIiIN FLOOD PLAIN: ra 1Z WITHIN AREAi SPECIFIC OR Staff Determination: Substantially conforms to: LAND USE PLAN: GENERAL PLAN: 1, Land Use If Yes, 2. Conservation X Name of Plan 3: Open Space 4. Safety WITHIN URBAN RESERVE - 5. Boise if Yesy _ 6. H60sing �-G : Name of Reserve 7 . Circulation`_. , ,✓' ZONING . i`3 r�, Co f.K`C� f?� v.+ • AIRPORT LAND USE PLAN: t skaf't` Sitltdtur ✓.. _ :�-* ,,.rs-,.yr. Unto A3 FOR THE, P.ERASLPL,1N �ANDzONINDIVISION) I AM + ti� AWARE OF Tliu ArioVE STAGE b..�rttt iT.IAT tS'. v,'`� tNG CtiitFf7ttAr CEr�JITH THE G+ Dslted ....,�--•-�___, Signatiird of Applic fthis rcpott will okpire and be discarded siX (6 months tram the date of tho staff sianaturd. 1✓. ...SIA. A - P X Planning Department `` NAME: JOE BOHA. JR. Environmental Health Department J Calif.State Forestry/Fire Dept. (and on areas north of red & n Butte County `Sheriff AP-. 56--J.8-04 05 07 _,A_ line on map) L U.S. Dep t. of the Army, Sacramento Dist. Corps of Engineers � , P.G.& E. (check Title Report for easemeht) Pacific Bell (check Title Report for easement) ! Butte County Mosquito Abatement (See map in cabinet ) ., S . 001 Dis rich Water Company., (if individual wells are not indicated on application or map) Durham irrigation OR Durham Mutual Water Co. California Water Servi%:e Company (Chico area) OWID-`Oroville-Wyanaotte Irrigation District (Oroville area, SE of river) TID - Thermalito Irrigation District (Thermalito area NE of river) Limesaddle Community Service's District (Paradise area long Pentz Rd. to lake) Del Oro Water (Paradise Pines area) Paradise Irrigation District Cuzztail Waterworks (Doe Mill Ridge/Forest Ranch area) City of: (check wall maps for spheres of influence) Oroville Chico Paradise, Town of Gridley Biggs ;:, 1/ILLE AREAS ONLY: L.O.A.P:U.D:�-- Lake Oroville Area Public Utility District (see map in cabinet) Feather River Recreation District (see map,in cabinet) El 'Media Fire District (check wail map - small area only) - L1GGS, RICWALE, GRIDLEY AREAS - SOUTH 84ME COUNTY; (check wall map and Title Report to ,see what applies. Some areas overlap. Drainage Dis eict fl Drainage District #2 Drainage District #100 Drainage District #200 Reclamation District #833 Reclamation District #2056 _ Sacramento and San Joaquin Drainage District Butte Creek Drainage District M CERTAIN CASES: Superintendent of Schools (only for subdivisions) Calif. State Dept. of Fish and Game (near water and in 'rural and 'Mountains areas) Caltrans (hear State Hwy. 32, 70, 99, 149 (Chico cut-off), 162 (Olive Hwy: & Richvale Hwy.), 191 (Clark Road) State Water OUa17 tY Contiof board (prof ects with more than 100 1ots or USA - Ungted States Fore '�'Service (if project borders USA 1andcheck AP bo oks) Calif, State Dept: of Parks and Recreation(propet`ty near Lake oroville) Calif, State Water Resources Dept. (property hear Lake Oroville - watershed) 1 Rock Creek Reclametion`Dist: (West of Chico Airport, south of Rock Creek and east of Hwy, ;99 see map CARD- h Are Rr" tin a Dish. (only for subdivisions) SPECIAL CASES: Check Title Report for any mention of special' services or easements such as Tib or, public utilities: 3/g2 2 Joe Borba Jr., Revised TentativeParcel Map, AP 56-18-4, 5 and 7,, 10 lots located on the northwest side of Cohasset Road, 2000 ft: northeast of Limpach Road Cohasset area. Engineer: Sierra West surveying Tom Wrinkle was present. He said that the Planning Dept. had agreed to changed wi*,Irding on the mitigations. He was given the Health Dept4 conditions to, read. Ms.. Leasure stated; having reviewed the environmental review checklist and conversations at this meeting and the Planning D..rector's Report of August 7, 1992, 1 make a motion to adopt a negative declaration with environmental mitigations for the Joe Borba Jr. tentative parcel map to create 11 lots on AP 56-18-4, 5 and 7, finding that the project could have an, effect on the environment, but will not have a significant effect in this case provided the required mitigations are complied with, Those -mitigationmeasures ea1u92 s a lPlanningDirector's Report ofAugust 7 mitigationmeasure#3should be revised as follows; the second sentence should read; "Erect a barrier or fencing around the No Development Zone." The motion is made finding that the project is in conformance with theButteCounty General Plan and. Butte County Zoning and that 'the project is subject to Dept. of Fish and. Game fees. ;Having found the above, 1 further move to approve t1le project subject -to the following conditions and finding that approval will not be detrimental to the health; safety or welfare of the people. of ;Butte County provided the _-requiited,-conditions are complied with. Land Development conditions; 1 Provide two-way traversable access RS -8 -LJ -1 to each parcel y from a count maintained road, or state highway ,h�. 2 Access to be reserved, in deed", as per county ordinance and offered for dedication on the final map. 3 Show 50 ft. building setback line measured from centerline of access easement. .4 Provide road maintenance: agreement. 5 Indicate a 50 ft. building setback from the centerline of Cohasset Road, 6 Shaw all easements of record on the final map: 7 Provide street name signs per requirements of the Department of public Works prior to recordation of the final map. BUTTE COUNTY DEVELOPMENT RPI'VZ,EW COMMITTEE MINUTES MARCH 22, 199' 8 Provide cul-de-sac at the end of 'the street. 9 Obtain encroachment ',�?ermitand construct standard road approach providing adequatesight distance at the intersection of access road and Cohasset Road. 10 Obtain encroachment permit for all driveways, new or, existing, and construct to county standards. 11 Pay any delinquent taxes or current taxes as required. 12 Meet the requirements of the Butte County Fire Department: Health Dept:. conditions 13 Provide a 100 ft. leachfield free setback around existing we Lis either within the property or within 100 ft. of the property boundaries on tjarce'1 9. 14 Sh�Dw a .50 ft. leachf ield setback from the drainage ways on the property. I$ show a 100 ft. leach field setback from the highwater line of the creek on parcels ' 1-8 16 SYloca a 100 ft. leachf ield setback from the bluff line on pcarcels 1-9. ii Sl ow the usable seldag,e disposal area verified to meet the requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance on parcels 1-11. 18 Vetify that the required usable sewage disposal area exists on parcels 8, 9, 10 an, 11. Combine with any adjacent parcel ark parcel not verified to contain the usable sew,a t disposal a,'ea required by Subdivision ordinance. 19 prove that the required quantities of domestic water are a�aai.lable to parcels 1-11. Planning Dept: condition: 20 Place a noise on the additional map sheet that states; -11 development impact .fdo for Sheriff Facilities shall be paid pursuant to the provisions of chapter 3j Article ii of the l�iztte County code; ptior to issuance of building permits or use Permit to the casae of a mobile home park. Said fee amount will be determined' and calculated as of the date of application. for the 'building' permit or Use Permit." Mitigation measures:' 8ETq% COUNTY' bEVttbPMENrPAt VIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES MAR,I 22, 1.995 Place a note or,..the additional map sheet that states: "Fire suppression sprinkler systema shall be installed in all residential structures in accordance with ;-he National Fire Protection Association Standard for the Instaillatilon of sprinkler systems in one and two family dwellings and mobile homes, NFPA Standard 13D. 2 Place a note on the additional map sheet that states: "Development of the parcels may be sLIbject to the ,payment of Deer 'Herd impact fees as adopted by the Board of Supervisors and in effect: at the time of building permit application.,' y Show on the additional map sheet, as a "No Development Zone," -all suitable habitat for juncus lei,ospermus as determined by a qualified botanist including a 50 ft. buffer.. Erect a harrier or, fencing around the No development Zone sufficient to prevent vehicle and pedestrian traffic and grazing: 4 'Limit soil work to the time period from April. 15 to November j.;5- Mulch protect, l,-iyd.uo-seed, or otherwise stabilize the soil all areas with a slope of 101% or greater that have i been disturbed or have been cleared of veiletation and are of erodible material. NOTE: 01Minor changes may be appoved administratively by the Directors of Environmental Health, Planning or Public Works upon receipt of a substantiated written request by the applicant and only, as to those 'conditions or requirements recommended by their respective departments. Prior to such approval, verification shall be made by each Depnrtment or ,ivision that the modification is coni istent t,tith: the application, fees paJ.d and environmental determinAtion as conditionally approved, changes deemed to be najor or significant in nature shall require a formal application for amendment Motion seconded by Mr. Erickson and carried unanimously. ��*��*�,�*4c�c���c�ak�:��***�'�;��*�C�*�e�r����e��1c*k*�e�es4�k*�C*kil•;'�e*'s>;�`�r�r����r�e�eif�k Butte Coun LAND DEVELOPMENT DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVIt'V'" 1 COUNT{ CENTERDRIVEt OROVILLE, CALIFORN1. TELEPHONE: (916) 638.726(' FAX, 1916) 538-2140 CBRTTFIED;MAIL February 8, 1993 Joe Borba Jac. RE: AP 56-18-04 7475 Eucalyptus Tentative Parcel. Map_ Chino-,, CA 51710 Dear Mr. Borba Please be advised that the Butte County Development Review Committee will hear your application on the above- identified. property on March 15, 1993. The committee will be reviewing the findings from the Planning Division and will be considering your tentative parcel map. The Land Development Division will recommend the conditions of alpproval +' as listed on the attached sheet. The meeting will commerce at 9:00 a.m: in the Board: of Supenrisors 1 Room, County Administration Building, '25 County Center 'Drive, Orov' lie, California. if you have any qt esti:ons regarding this matter, please contact this office at 538--1266. very truly yours, 7 w Stuart Edell Manager Land Development Division Development Services Department SE/ds attachment cc Environfiental Health Department Sierra 'West Surveying ,,,,,,,Planning Division ,i 1t�nri'tparimLh4 5 C' 18 '992 Oroville California L WEALTH ANUBEAUTY LAND OF NATURiA LAND DEVELOPMENT DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES X 7 COUNTY CEWER DRIVE OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95906.3397 1-ELEPHONE-,!916I 6384266 FAX: (9181 $30.2140 September 17, 19:32 To Whom it MAY concern: RE- AP 56-18-04, 05 07 Joe Borba, Jr', Tentative Parcel ,Map, 'Gent l.emen The above mentioned application has been amended from '10 lots to 11 lots as shown on the attached application. Please review your previous )mments and notify this office, in writing by October 17, 1992, of any changes in your comments if you should have any quest i ons i please con't'act this office at -918-538-7266. Very truly yours'; Stuart Edell t Manager Land Development Div, at t a0ment cc" Per checklist of S/'15J92 i u court ., 1AND OF NATUARAL VVEALT,-1 41"1 A U Department of Development Services, PLANNING DEPARTMENT "- 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 959035.3397 TELEPHONE, (916) 536-7601 AuguA 14, 1992 Toe Borba, Jr, 7475 Eucalyptus. Chino, CA 91714 Re Tentative Parcel Map on AP* 056-180-004, 005, 007 Dear Mr. Borba: The Butte County Department of Development Services, Planning D: v, -".un has completed` the environmental review of your project in accordance with the California Environrnentsal Quality Act and forwarded to the Butte County Advisory .agency within the required 105 days pursuant to the California Public Resources Code Section 21151.5. In addition, the fl,,Inning Director's report required by Sections 20-63 and 20-99 of the In. County Subdivision Ordinance has been completed.. Please find enclosed the Environmental L?ocumentation/Plaa►ning Director's Report which has been prepared for your project; Please review the enclosed Environmental Memo/Plan ing Director's Report with conditions of approval if applicable. If you note any errors or ornissions in our evaluation, please bring them to aur attention. The Environmental, Document/Planning Director's Report for your prgiect has been sent to the Butte County Advisory Agency for their action. California Government Code; Sections 65950 and 65952:1. requires the Butte County Advisory Agency set hearings and. approve or disapprove your project Within six months from the bate on which your application was received and accepted, The six month time limit for your project mandated by state lawj will occur ao December 16, 1992. The Advisory Agency will notify you of the time and place of the public hearing for your project, If there are modifications to your project; not related to mitigating an identified impact, re-evaluation of your project shall be required. c.1 i Jae Borba, Tentative Parcel Map, AP 56-18-04, 05 and 07, 11 lots located on the northwest side of Cohasset Road, 200E ft., northeast of Limpach Road. Cohasset area. Engineer: Sierra West surveying, 1 Provide two''-way traversable access RS-8-%D-II to each parcel: from a county maintained road or state highway:. 2 Access to be reserved in deeds as per countyordinance and offered _for dedication on the: xinal map, 3 Show 5.0 ft. building setback line measured from centerline of access, easement.. Provide road maintenance ;p,ijreement. Indicate a 54 ft. building setback from the centerline of " Cohasset Read 6 Show all easements of record on the final map. 7' Provide street name 'signs per requirements of 'the Department nf Public Works prior to recordation of the final map. 8' Provide cul,-de-sac at the end of the street: 9 obtain encroachment permit and construct standard road approach providing adequatd8ight distance at the intersection of, access road and Cohasset. Road. 10 Obtain encroachment permit for al,'. driveways, new or existing, ` and conmtruCt to county standards. 11 Pay any, delinquent taxes or current taxes as regPired 12 Meet the requirements of the nut,toa County Fite Depa,:tment, 4 bythe 'Minor changes be pHealth, Padministratively t nm ntaltan i g or Public Directors of Envxro upon` receipt of a subs"tar, iated v itt6'n request by the applicant and only as to thwee conditions or requirements recommended by their respuct'i`V`e departments -Prior Pr�.or to. approval., verification shall be made 15y each Department or D'iv'ision that 'the modification is +dnsistent with -the application, fees paid and environinent-a determination as conditionally approved. Changes deemed to be major or significant in nature shall require a formal application for amendment Inter-.DepartmenW, Memorandum, TO: Butte County Advisory Agency FROMI Planning Director SUBJECT Report on the Tentative Parcel Map for Joe Borba AP #056-180-004,005, 007 DATE August 7 1992 (\1 att r-6-5 17his is a proposal to divide 450 acres to createter 40+ acre parcels. The present zoning Is U - U'nclassified. The Land use Plan Map of the Butte County General Plan designates thi^ area as Grazing and . )pen Lands. 'There are no specific or community plans for the area; The proposal does not conflict with County Zoning nor any adopted or proposed Element of the Butte County General Plan nor any speck or community plan, A Negative Declaration with mitigation measures :has been prepared for the proposed Project in accordance to the California Enviro►amental Quality Act and forwarded to the Butte County Advisory=2115L5. within the required 1,05 days pursuant to 'the California Public Resources Code Recommend approval subject to the following mitigation measures and conditions. dv1T1'IGATION MEASURES 1, Place a note on the additional map sheet that states., "Fire suppression, sprinkler systems shall be installed in all residential structures ifs ,,wcordance with the National Fire Protection Association Standard for the installation, of sprinkler systems in one and two family dwellings andmobile homes, NVPA Standard 13 0, 2. Place a note on the additional ,map sheet that stators. ,Development of the parcels will 'be subjHerd to the payment of Deer impact fees as adopted by the Board' of Supervisors and in effect at the time of building permit application."' 3 Show on the additional map sheet, as a "No Developmewnt Zone", all suitable habitat for juncos leiospermus as determined by a qualified botanist including a 501 buffer, FrDevelopment` , prevent vehicle and yw+' �- 'pedestrian traffic and grazing. �.fencin aroun the lvo Zone sufficient to 4, Li'm. t soil work to the time period from April. 15 to November 15 Mulch protect, 14,yd.ro4seed, or otherwise stabilize the soil on all areas with a slope of 106/0 or greater that have beendlsturbed' or .have been cleaned of vegetation arid are of erodible :material, APPENDIX I COUNTY OF BUTTE ENVIRt I*IENTAI, CHECKLIST FORM EVALUATIO-N OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT f1to No. 056480-004 etc: AP No 056-180-004 I BACKGROUND I, flame of prdponentz Joe Borba .Jr:. a, Address of propohent and representative (If Applicable)E 14651 Grove Avenue, Chin,i 'CA 91119 j, project db&cription: Tentative parcal oiap dividing 450 Acres to create len 46� acre psrcols AFS idAYBE �O° DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL 'EVALUAT;[ON' II MANDATORY FINDINGS OF _SIGN;IFICANGE 1. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality X Seo the disddssion for item 4a, of the environMent, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustalning levels, threaten to eliminate a plant -oranimal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangerod 'plant or animal or eliminate important eXamples of major pariods of California hiatory or pebbistoryt 2. Does the project have the potential to achieve'shart-term - % _. Thit,pYoposel will not impedo long-term environmehtai goalt, benofits to the detriment of long-term anvironment goals? (A shop t -term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief peribd of time while long-term impacts will 'ehdure into the future.) a, ltheimpacts Are individually _X_ Sao the discussion for item 14a, Wich imtetlbutt h(A project may Impact on two or mere separate resource's where the impact on each-vtouroe 1 a relatively' inial.l.,.but ,Nhore'the effe4k. Of the total of those impacts on the environment It &ignlficeht.) 4r Does the project have'envirohmental affects wGfich will _ _. X Thi'i proposal will not ,have n sighificant adverse affect on hurrahbeings. aautu substahtial adversv effect& on human beings,'either directly of, iodieddt)yr IIIA DETERMINATIaN. Dtt th basis of this ib.itiil evaluitibh;i TJWE find the peo0osed p i g 1poojectaCOULD i p p Thot 1a tI E find that although the pY poled havec4 tignificaot effeei. no the anvl nmentw there Will be ti nifieihtiW46t in #his ease tacausa' the _, AIT1GATION MtMURtt detcribed on the Attached shoes; have baoh added to the projoct. A NEGATIVE tZLOATibil will be prep6Yad, i/NE find the proposed project MAY have A significeht effect on the Anvironment, ehd an ENVIIIONIOTAL IMPACT 4060 i& requtrdd, COUNTY bF BUTTE, WklliG WAR f 00'et ,lune ads lggp-- Craig S hdars, socia lahner 114 -Viewed by:.. ! .. Environmental Ghp-cklist * Evaluation of Environmental impact rV NVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS vts MAYOE —NO , DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTALt EVALUA'T'ION 1, 1dA a4 Will theg ropotal result in si nifieantt' P � a, Unstable earth conditions, or changes in geologic k The proposal will not affect subsurface earth condA tions,, substructures; b. Disruption, displacemaht, compaction or ^� X _ _ This "propnsdl will result in some disruption, diltplacemtnt, dortipaetio:. and overcovering of the soil? ovarcoyerioo of the site as a result of development, of structures, drilloways, d parking al'eat, etc, It is estimated thatapprogi!nately 5 to 7°h of life site could be disrupted for homesites, driveways and roads. This is not soon as a significant impact as, long as areas of steep olopes are not disturbed. is the c, Change in topographyor ground surfada relief x The pito has a varied topography, It characterized by A ridge top to features? east with a steeply sloping canyon down to pock Creek to the west. There are many, suitable home site locations that will not require major rhnngea in topography. Ckcessive soil removal can be avoided by avoiding areas of steep j dope, d, i)estruction* covering or modification of any X The site hes dome very scenic canyon lends and bluffs. These areas can be unique geologic or p5ysical featr+res? avoided and Will be avoided due to steep slopes, o. ptl water erosion o+i sails, R proposal may cause 'some erbsion due to disruption, displacemont, dither bb or off"sitet compaction and dvarcovering of the site, If still diaturbahce is: avoided on t be significant. Overcovering will not be pduo to the 'h significant parcel I f. Changes in iJeposi4{on of erasion of beach sands, X The proposal could hosuit in some liltation, deposition or erosion of erg8 i or changes in siltation, deposition or -erosion drainage ways and of pock Creek. This can be avoided by limiting development which May modify the chihnel Of a river or stream to the ridgo top and utilizing standard erosion control practices during or the bed of the ocean or any bey* inlet Or construction, iaket g. Loss of prime agriculturally ptoductivo soils % This proposal does hot repretaht a significant loss of pr4e agriculturai 1 u tl ated urban areas?' o tilde esigh b n soils, i h. Ckposure of people or property to geologic ^� k -. All of tfutto County is in a Moderate ti rth uaka intahsity Zone vile. the hatards such earth 1aht4tid®s q , locatedthe Tuscoh rob '' p p Y yy /q to f mile, onsi A pas t Simi mudslides, ground Tatiana or similar hazards? bol performed �ionotline, a fault lino of UhkhoWn ac4iVit A polo is rSu['va wa g g y' ktownThe porattyc d fills be en the property to that cut and limited to a makitnum gradient of i.g i l am ass properly stabilized. Constructioh of buildings to Uniform Building Code standards for seismic zone b Will provide adequate protection to 6ddVpant9 to case of selsmic activity, 2. Q}it Will the proposai tasult in subst&htials: i,. Air emission's or datitrib-eation of amblont air k-- the proposal will not affect air quality becauto 06 ih.roaso in the number qualityl _ of vohicle trips is hot "significant., b. The creation of objectiohable odgr%s Smoke Or __, F k -. The proposal Will hot create objucticnable odot5, smoke or fumes. fumest a, Alteration of air' mdvoment, moisture of _. . x ,,.. The pro0006i Will not affect the atmosphmra, tiimporetura, br, any l.hangb in 'dlilhata, 'locally - or regionA.11y? JWATER« Will the proposal result ih i0bit0t0ll= a. Changes to dur"ronts, or the course or direction s k the prbpos6l li4i the poteh4lal;to affect the Anderson Fork of liock Crbek, of Wafer movements in bithor marine ot" fresh Designating a "No Development Zona" from the chnter of the drainage Vali Waters# mitigara possible iMpatts. Any road erbssinga will have to be designed to prevent etosi'oh and allow uhrestricted fleNs« i 3 b. Changes IA absorption rates; drainage patterns, _ _ - X the prs+p*%61 toy result in an increase in surfAcd water run4if tlUe to reduced cr the rate and Amount of surfata runoff? sbsorptloh frA.'s impervious surfaces, and in is Change in the drainage rtttern - 01 the site., 4fbwevu01 no significant adverse impactsnre anticipated beceust of the largla partel sizes prldodsod 'by the project, C. Need for off-site surface drainage improvements, _ _X lio off site drainago imvrovemants are anticipated for this pr, ject, Including Vegetation removal, thdnnal#sakioy cr Calvert installation? d. Alterations to the Coarse or flow of flood ,,,A,,,,,, The proposal will not significantly r;ffect any flood Control channels or, ?in r, Qrropoar0401;u+wilt e. Change -the err4unt of surface WSEar, in bitY k- .� The, r p raain someeddik3ohel storm ,:_terunoff being directed v/Uter body?'_ to either lick- Crehk or Anderst`-Pork. The amount wfil not Eta significant JUG to the Targe ph:ol sites, I. Discharge h 9e into surfaca waters, or in any - X _ The propos(l nay significehtty affect surfaco water quality duh to siitetl4n' alt4ratior. of surface water quality, inelUding resulting fdan aroaion causer:- by road and driveway constructitrq`and grading but not limited to temperature, disso'ived 4xygeri, of building sites. This should not be a slgnificaht effect Otte to the iife or turbidityi of the paetets that are proposed and the use of standard construction ptsctices to,rhinimite Urosioh, Altor�9 tivh of df :,,gtion or rate of Mm of ._ _ X pr,)posav will ndt signifid6htly effect the direction or flow of ground groundv,atcrs7the khe h'- Chhngo in the quantity or ruelity of graunt _ X. The Ultimate' devel.np y pm6nt of the pro ort Will result It, the Nithdrawal of Watarb, either through dirdtt additions or soma groundwliter for domestic purposes. A hydrology report Wet preparetl in 01ithdrawal9i or through thterception of an 19t' Assessing the potential supply of Water on sits, The, report 1hdlcated Aquifer by cuts dr 4rsCavatfohsT that auffieilrt ground wa or:rauld be found on 'site. I. ioh I" the , Amount of vtatji- Otherwito Aeductble _ X. The project "'ill not affect alit public water supply, avaiJ for public water applies?' ' i. Ekposure bl 0e601e or prdpeoty to water -related the:p;bpesill will hot'axpose people or property to floodings hazards sacci as flooding? 4. PLANT Llft. Will the proposal result, in subitantialr A. Change in tre dfvePAfty of 4pecle6i or number of � —x The pwrfect Sita is ideated in a high sent tivity Area fcr rare end any species tit plants (Including troes, shrubs, s,ndehgared plants. A butanieai survey of the praporty was perelirmed in Julie gresi, Crops, end aquatic plants)? 1086, the sfte hat the pot.uhtihl •to support two sp6ciat ttatus plant sp6c1bs, Juneus Isibspewnds S1deldoa the end robusta: survey vin`s peefor,`ied too late in the 'season for Junbua totasparmus. No sigh of tidlileea robuitta were :found, fioiiaver, the drind remaibt of a Jiihcua loidspariiut ptAnt were identified, tt ippeArs that J. letoxparmus does bdbUr on site; The uiiteht of the populdtioh Is not knowb:, 'the plant Occurs fh wet or swvtoy habitat which does limit the lotationa 'pile that it may occur oh site. potential impaeti Can bastiy Ila hitigateli it the development phase by avbiHing all Wet i areas, A qualified bdtahi'.t should irientlfy all ar6as to be evyided. b; pdquctioh of the hombers of Any uhiquo, card or,_: X_. . - r. Sett the ditoouibh icor'item 46. 6ndchgbrod sp4Cios of ptanti7 c C+ lhtrodU-Elan of new zoacies of plants into An - >, - The proposal will nct effect bxiiling 'plant life. ardk; or In a barrier to the normal roplenishment of A isting spbeir.t3 gedudtidti in 'acreage of any agricultural cropT _ _ _ _ X .., The bite drags hoF contain ,,any agricultural Crops and is pebtGntly undev61tb6d. 6, ANIMAL LitC. Will the lebpdse.t ra`sult in substantial: 4 r�iira�s�n+ntal Checklist * Evaluatis�n at E;nvircanniental Impat a. Change in the diversity, of spncios, or hUmbisrs k Seo the discussion for item 5b, of any species of Animals(birds, kind animals including' reptilasf fish end shollfish, bentlilc organisms or 4nsncts)7 u. sleditction Int the numbers of any unique, rare or `_ _ k:. The cite contains habitat suitable for Golden tagles, Peregriita lkaldons, and endanoerod species of animtlls7 Prairie Falcons, An ornithological survey was performed in lieptomber of 1967. No evidence of these sact p eat was fouhd, The proposed project will still Allow substantial amounts of ;the project site to remaih as suitable hatC, thtroductido of now species of animals into 'an See the discussion for item cad, area, or in a barrier to the migration or movement at' animalsl' d, batariortttforr of existing fish tit` wildlife _ r X The situ is located in an area deslghated As critical winter'dehr range for habitatt the East Tehama beer Nord. The Department of Kish end Game ret!affhAnds parcel sizes not lest than 40 acres. Development of the site will reejlira payment of mitigatio+ fees when such fees aro adopted by the butte 6uoty goard of supervisors. 6. lid 5E, Wil'l' the proposai rosult in supstitttialt a,. ineraeiss 'in exIlMhg nose levelsT .. _, ,�X The proposal will not result in a sabstantial increaso in noise created on Situbr in Lna vicinity, b. Exposure of people to severe noise laiteisT �. X; The proposal' will hot expose people to cove -re hoise levols. X. Utl t ANb GLARE. Will the proposal produce ttgnifleant � X The pruposal will not result in a substantial increase in iiilllt or glare light and glare? treated on alto dr in the vicinity,_ Gc LMD USE, Will the proposal result in a e;ultstanti'at � _ _ % The propbsal will not alter the land: use in the area and is cbnsiefeht with Alteration of the pketcnt or plahned l:>;nd use 6f 'ah areal the euteoot Gener,ai Plan policies 'g, tiATWAL IlCtM 2ES. Will the propbsal result iiri substantitlt a, Increase in the rate of use of an natural y `— X .� Tha proposaj will not affot:t any hatural resources, YncreasesT b. De la,,ion of ie non renewable natural r6tourcest p 1 �_ � X The drdpoia7 will notdeptate shy natural rtsourdes, ytl4 RISIZ dF UPSET. Will the proposal involvet a `— k _ flair is Located roto oanyl i bst►neds (ihclodiho, butrhot limitedhtot oil, closofacilities Which Stores or utilize such mhtaria, teriais, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in theevent of. an ,accident or upset conditions'?. - b. Posslbje interferrnco with an pmergaH4y response _ _ M X the propbsal Will hot affect any emergency 'services, plan or kmcroency ovaeuaticn plant XS, PM LA'fjnIj L WIM the~ oireposal altbr` lora'tioh, 7f.-._, The proposal will n6t tighifithhtly sftect the population of thi artla because distribution, canal#y or growthra, > of the human that tanned in the Lbha!isol, tlrea and proposed ' p populatlon7 beth developodiMea. the pro f. ectceed , 12, 116USMI 11+11 the oroposwl affect existing housing, ork __ the Proposal WM'tot bignificahtly e:ftedt housing demand;, create a demand foto additiunet,hdusihit 1 , j`AA:4tP41tljdN ct fl(-A*tbN, Will the proposal Yasult Ont 5ow ronmeh'ta Checklist * Evaluationof Environmental Imjjpact a, Generation of substantial additional vehicle __ .. X The proposal will rapresuht a minor incremental increase in traffic in the mavement? area, Cohassot hoad has the capacity to handle thin increased traffic, This Impact is not toe" at significant,. b. Effect,0 6 existing p eking facilities, or, demand — X__ The proposal'will not effect parking because the proposal will have to comply for Crew arking? With the parking requirements contained within butte County Code ceotion 24- 35. C. Impact on existibm tran's ortatioh usturitiel imp p fC- the proposal will represent ]n increase in eongestioh 'Ad' mtintrghahep s y rujuiroments on area roads that is hot shah as tlonificart. d, of ii nlficent alterntfdns to resent atterns o presentpatterns ,_ , X The proposal will not biter the preseht pattern of .ircll'lation in the area. circulation or teeatio t of and/or goo1 e. Alterations to waterborne, mail or air traffict _-k The proposal will not affect rail or Or traffic, ft Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, X Thu proposal will result in a minor 'incrdmehtal in"obi+ in trafftd and bicyclists or pedestrianst related traffic hazArdt in the area that it hot expected tb be slgniticant. 14, PUHUC SERVktt. Bill the propose.] have an effect upon, or r'.sult in s heed for hew or altered government servlceil a. Fire protection# _, Wit,-_. 'fhb- proposal will ratult in an incremental increase in dam3nd. tor, lire p:otectton in the area that Will occur along with the actual devs opmont of theproperty. The butte County Firw i6pirtmentiCalifdrhia bivlsion of Forestry has indicated that cumulative eaVelopmdnt 16 rural areas will Impact thou ability to provide fire protection sor, des, They have stated that Ihit ailitich of automatic fire suppression sprinklae systems in retidontial structures, the use of fire resistant (building materials and Water supply systems adequate to support the sprinkler system Will rodude the demand foe, fife protection services. The installation of fire sprinkler syztemi combined with the raquirod building codes and tLt exittin9 Nevolopmehi staNdirds for the Cohasset area will mi'igate this impact, b. Polic pl",otectioti'? `_ �r_ K_ the prom+set will Nesult in an ihcremetftal increase in domarid far pollee . Protection that Will Recur along with actual development of the property. The project will be eohditiamad to pay sharief Impact teas as adopteci by the Board of Supoosdes; e, sth"lt? R �_ The 1-0 osal rri11 rosull; in an Incremental Increase in demand for xehobl in he arae. tho is Unified serVldes project Within the the rhico 5cnool District and eevolopmont ilibwed by t41s map t.iil be subject to the collection of devdldper impact fees at allbwn, by the 5tatp. this will mitigate the impacts of this devolnpniaht, ti. parks or other rticrea,tithnl facilities? k.,.,. The Oropotal Will rotult in 'a Minor inarbmahtal "inti,a'to in demand fur park and recreation 'facilities ih the seta that will not be tighifie4nt, e. Mafrten'e'hde of public fatuities., including X the proposal will result in a Minor tnerombntal indreaso in the heed far rbads7 idaistehdhce of rdadt Ind 'other public faciiit'tet in tho area that will mat he sighificaot, f, Other govornMa6tal servid4tt „_; ^- lhd prdpossl Will result in a Minor indeerrehtil ihtei�isa In demand for all tther govoenMbhtAl servicbt ih, the arab that will hot be slghifieeht. 15. fit€AdVI Will the proposal r4su9t ih7 a.. Use bf sUbttahtfai mouhtt ,'of fuel or ehergyf ^� X" the prbpoisl ,W'ill hot Unlike substantial fuel at, dnorgyr b substahttot iherease in demand upop, u>tit"ob _ _ j xThe ptapkisbl-will hot Substantially INtraase the deMshd for energy. sourcet of enbrgy, ot•„ requit"e the 04%1-1ltpi* t, of teW source, of ehargy? ;i y 6 :virontnt'i-Mal Checklist * EvalUatlah I ._ '� °Of Environmental ImpaGk: YG. UT L1TttS Vill the propotal result 'in a need for now or fphstantlal alterations to the fo110win9 systems♦ The prcpbsal will .not affect, electrical poWOr or natural gee distribution e< p6wer or natural gas?' "` systems, b. Cott .snicbtiohs systpmst _, >l-.. the, proposal Will not affect •dommuniotibn systems, q. N2 er availability? The proposal will not effect' Public water systems. A hydrology report prepared fnr the property indicatod that Aduquatt amounts of water Nr dgmd tic purposes should be available. d. $6,40t Or septic 'systems?X� . , The pro 4saP l will have to meet the raquiremehts of the huttn C6unty ' Enviroomenta'1 Health Dept.. e. $teras Water sirtfnaget ,�:.: .�._... X The rn ossi Will have to rovidD a permanent locution for ireinege. _ p P p -% Solid Waite and disposalt x The preposal will not affect §olid waste disposal. 1 17. HURAN HEALTH. Vill the propoiai r'rlbult (h:' dreation of any heatth hazard or potential hazard X Tho propdiat will hot cre6to any health h8tai-6 p, (axctuding menta: health)? b. Exposure of people to potential health hazdrdif r _ ., _ X ?he propetilwill "not akpose people tawny health haS,Ard. 1g. tCSfHtTjCS. still the proposal ra§Ulf in the obstruction „r. _ _ _ x The propoiel will 'not moult in tah a6tthre.tiEally ofi'ensivi view be"U" 1t it consistent with ourr6unditig devalopmant, of any scenic vista or via* "open to the ^ublIc, or will tho proposal rosu'Mt in the :reation of an d0theti'ce1lY affahsive site open to the pulMe viewt k5� AtCAlori. thean impact upon the �� �k _,, in an iMprbmenMul inctia a in domand fnr park Tfso ppo mica l wilt not ' Vill f MOOtrgri-ecreatil qualitye anal oppoltunitiast aHB kekrw�tion 1nci9'itiesul4 pA 4UVtUpAL htSWRtES. a, Will the proposal t'esult in the alteration or __ k'- The laropbdei' will not affect archboltrill'cal i'itei. While tho prsjact, is located iv) an area of high ArOhas6lb1ical itlsitiv".ty, a prevlops survey lot, destruction of i prehisturic or historic hot ihohtify an signifleaht duitural rasavi'co s. the siteAny arrhaaaingioel site? b. N11,1 the proposal result in advarse phy,•ical ow _, Y R,-. �� old b' a oc :aGtea. the p p villi ft t aesthetic effects to a prehistoric ar hisko'ic handing, itructure or obfectt t. Dooii `sle pwopdtbl bavt: the P'AnAtial to cause a The, prbpDsat Will not afloat bultslral rel 'irca's: hicA WbUlo of {act uniqud physical 9 ethhio C41 CLLhal ValUa;? d, will the Proposal ros*,rt rnjMguw � i .X- the pedobiai`Will not affect raiiolbdg, resourtbb. sacred uaoa within the potoNtialtarea J 9 w ,avironmwimal Checklist (Evaluation of Erivironmehtal Impact SUGGESTED MITIGATION MEASURES I. plataa nota on tho additional map shoot that States' - "Firosupprot4 Wo tprihklar systems shall be installed In all rhsidential structures in accordance with the National Fire protection Assbelatidn Standard fa'r the installation of sprinkler systems In ono and two family dwellings and mobile homes,, NFOA Stoodsr,d l3 D.."r G. Home :It* locations Bholl be limited to orals df i5'/. 616pb br fess. 2. DeSignhto the ares Nest of the bluff top as enNb Dovelap;nent Zane". One road shat` be allowed through this Bone to access the creek. lie place a note on the additional map shout that sto$esi "Doveibpment of the parcels will be subjedt to the payment of beer Nord impact teen as edopteo by the board of Supervisors and in effect at the tl'mo ;of building partiit application." fi. Contact a quaiitied botanist to identify ail suitable, habitat for jundut Iniospeemus that, is within thw devoiboable area of the site, Show an the additiahbl map shebt a 501 No 7isturb4hc4 Zone around' fill identified hakitat. 6. No livestack yraiing shall bu allowed pn Sita, Impact Checklist * � ►al�uafi^n of Environmental raw ronmental DATA_SNEET profieiescriation t n q,' ,iydrology sufac{,. dingAddorsongranchtlas the Westerly re' a. ofro the site, TM buteribt 1,neWater, Rock Crook luay 1. Type of Project: Lan: division located on site, Anda^son Lurk reaches hock Crank approximately 4 mites to the south. grief Description' Tentet'1ve-Parcal flap diVidfng a5D-acres to create fi, Ground Qatari Unknown: although a geologist report found from 200 to g, tho 404 e Orcdloil indicates that adoquata wallet may be more the nerthwatt side of C ohatset ad. ipproximately 400 feet deep, e. prainage Characteristics: The property drains to the S. L I mile south of Villas ad. west to pock Creek. d, Annual pn hfa?n oneal)t 35 to 40 inches per year. A„ Proposnd Density of Oavnlopmantt Maxim" of 1 dwol'ling unit par 40 e; Limiting Factors potential erosion and siltatiarl Into acres. Amount of Impervious Sur-facingt Minimal.5 . _ hock Creak, quelity Y outstanding views of High, there are Men Visunll' Access and Nearest. public Road(s).-Thi property hss access to Cbhasadt thn valey,Seentc G: Road, High - Acoustic 4 uality. Hi 7: Method of Sewage bispnsalt individual septic &Yttems. Method 7 Air quality', Good: gy Sooeco of Neter Supply, individual tvalib,bfological.6viv_,L.nt: g,. proximity of power Linv,- To prapertY, Wiil have to be axtendao to o, Vagntationt The ridge top a'reat and canyon bottbms contist of M Live oaks various fn, Of servo how parcels''that may he created. California Scrub Dak,thrub tntoeiar ,hs California nlack Oak. Ceanothu's, ehd bard and litter 10. None under hotontial f uPlehrpoiietasvand mehtehit:f i Covered are and grasses, The bluff arae d mainly barn and mahzanita end oaanothan ih. current General peortHerdvlims�etio'nt. litter covens red steal, grasses, e ndnrigered plant's, and a entire area .t of concern for rare g„ Env#rohmsnta'#..Soi.Ling -' g, Wildlife Habitat, Critical wtrter door herd a"ran ( Cess Tehama habitat, riparian physical Enyironment< roar Hord ), Golden Cagle and Prairie Falcon Creek, in rook Creak. habitat along Ronk fiahIriot Torruin n. General Topographic Charaetitr6 aidgs top arch crapping off bottom along Cultural Environmehti ante stale p canyon walls "ehd bluffs to a canyon r,.:i WiLoricei ResouNcaa in ,lilt arae, High cock Creak ' h SloPos, Varying from 0 !o 10y. oh.'tite ridge kap to 3b to 40 ib` sensitivitgycArea. A survey of the area was perfarmod ih t9$1'w at the canyon bottom With areas of 30 to VM slopes Along No aighificaht cu#turai resources were found, the bluff: ih betweeh, ea level to 2121 !get above sea I100 feet above s Elav I1. butte County Genarel plan ddsl naEiont Grak lig and 0pah Lands c. Ieevation3 d. himitifig tactors: Stoop ilbotis on most of the property. I� - Existing toning, U Uti tasiified, 2, Soils l'ypus Charectaristicst Alkali soft serios Along. Coha'ssot lar tx#sting Land Use 'on-site: Open land. a#. and gbed, 5upah toil aeries rovers most of the ridge top arae series mixed with Yoomas 1�:. Surrounding Areal Uae.si A home perk eltists immediately to the and along pock Creak, Stovetl soil to#1 seriet throudhbut the westerly tibrtion of this property ay Lend mob'i'le east bf the property, Tha raMait,dar bt the land bd bper it rural in a bend along the ridge top. Iron Mountain %oil series in land scattered with single family rnsidonces srsat of steeper bluff*. These soils are gonov WY well to 'rapid permeability, the spilt alto densities, b� toning,. U, TtA•2, TM»5, C»i. ddd fehamo County to the draVridd with moderttn Also 0aherally rbcky and sfiaild.t in places. sbilii and high rock northwest h, Limiting Pectoris Arei,s of shallow Gen. plan Dusignattont Grating and 0prn Lend to the content, c. west and south, Agriculture, r@sidantial and a the east. Tdhama Codtlty to that Natiuhal ►iezerds'of ilhe Lod .. Xothquake tone: ilodat-,t'co 'Eerthquaka ih#.ehslty tone VISI cbmmer[i'sl d4ator to northwbst. to- the east n. b, Erosion POEah"tial, Moderate to high. i'< Pytrcal Sizes, Generally 1 to 5 acro paroei 5b to ai:re parcels to the aouth and C, Landslide potunNslt Low to moderate. and sbutheait, .r,Co mph, d. Piro iiazariit Soil a. pansivo'Soil HotelttiaV LOW to m.der,tt. wott. b; Population, Sparse, ,i.. f•.Ip 10 tnvironMentati Checklinot * Evaluation df Environmental Im pact ENVIRONMENTAL REFERENCE MATERIAL 11 R:atte County Planning Department. Earthquake and Fault Activity Map 'll -1, seismic Safety Element. 12. butto County Board of Supervisors. Orovallej CA: CH2M Hill, 1977, Agricultural Preservan Mapatablished by Resolution No.. -67-178. Oroville, CA: 2-. OlAtte County Planning Department. Li uefaction Butte County Planning Department, 1987. gobeogoyilial Ma: 11-,. Seismic Safety element. oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977._ 13. NationalFlood Insurancederoyram. - Rate ffia�� �Flo�d enc 3o Butte County Planning depattmenc. Subsidence._ and Management, Agency, 1,989. Landslide Potential Map 1111, Safety Element. orovlle, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 14. USGS Qttacl Maps., Campbell Mound, Calif. 1969 4. Butte County Planning Department.. Erosion Potential Map 131-2, _Safety Element.. Orov.11o,. CA 15. Soil Map; chico (19251/oroyille X19261. CH2M Hill, 1977. Area: United States Department of Agriculture. 5. t. Exban"sive Soils Buttw Count PlanningDepartment, county Map 111=3, ment._ oroville CA: CH2M 16. Soil Survey of Chico (1925110roville Hilli 1977. .(1926) Area.. United States Department of Agriculture. 6. Butte. County Planning Department. Noise element Map 1V-1t..Scenic Highwav element. Orov3lle, CAt autte County Planning Department. Butte CH2M Hill, 1977, Count Pire Protection Jurisdictions and Ma Butte county £ re 7, Butte Count Plannin Department, Sce y 9 p. Department De artment and. _California Department of Mao_V-1. Scenic.HiahW'av Element. Oroville, CA: Forestry, 1ggg. CH2M Hill1977.nic.HiahWays' 8: Butte ,County Plant,'i Department Natural Fire Hazard classes Map I 1-4, Safety Element. Hill, Orov,il.le, CA: CH2M 1977, 0• Planning' ounty Or"vLilleo CAX aameshPi Movi�ai Sense°,iyitV. Map.at)ning, 1983. lO. Butte County Manning Department, School.District I, Sari Okov lle, CA 11� NorthWestern District Department of Water Resources.. Chico Nitrate stgdy,.Map, Nitrate Concentration�Shallg_w Wella The Resources Agency, State of Califorhiaj 1982i r IMICRA WEST SURVEYING CBN511 LAND SURVRYI180 ...a . 07 Black'Olive drive - Paradisoo CA 95969 ---- —= $77-6253 July 9, 1902 t fp x Craig Sanders Ljaiti. County Planniyag Department (ottniy Center Drive Orjuvi l le, CA 9",x,055 r Borba Subditri�ion; Ai' ►�0`4 .. i; I have reviqwd#i your Skivi,--TF mental Checklist Form dated dune 30, 2992, or the Borba 0ubdivisioii, I; Pit:a.se fxn:s bel�pr�' my res'o anse to the sugg' e steel mitigation measfrres i 'AIT1. GAT 1ON 1. Agree. _ 2. tto not agree - 1f you want, you could state "ri►eet the ' niforn► gui lding Coders dor all constrldc`tion :3; Do not agree - There would need to be a substantial reason for Chits mitigation. Projects like this have not been subject to this mitigation 4. Agree, 5 This has already been 06rhpleted'. Pleaar allealc your r:eoords for thij5 information, As discussed, I will try to contact the Botanist ,tor a lob 'tlon map. 6,4 Do not agree: Meed a justa;i`i able reason ;rot this rinitigation't r ti Please review, and respn'nd as soon as:;.possible. Siiaet'e`ly , Thomas It, Wrinkle TRW Jk'u I