Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout056-240-064• d. �ftb _ . i a 1. 0 • 4, 1 4 i 1 _ y�� f t• • n • . 1 PLANNIN COMMISSION SUMMARY SHEET FOR LAND DIVISIONS 84-07-20-01 APPLICANT Edward, W. _ Rodger: ADDRESS 321 L Locust Ave., Lompoc, CA 934.36 OWNER Eduard W. e Kathryn Rodgers PROJECT DESCRIPTION Tentat :rTe n cel AA_4 14.- 6L acres c,•�,�n ��5 -L,8 acrosand a. 56 acre, :remainder. LOCATION Forest Ranch area.. AS258SSOR I S PARC'IZ NUMBER(S)56"24-6.4 56 28 07 ZCIV' NG TlN W 5 , _ IFNI -� t10 CNN. PLA A i2e s i PROJECT CONS; JTI,L,,�XT'i DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED Jul V 20, 1984 DATE PUBLICATION NOTICE WRITTEN PUBLISHED PLACE NEWSPAPER NOTICEk'S) PUBLISHED -4 O. r. P. a. B. PATE MAILING LIST PREPARED EN MAILED DATE MAI.Ca-OU.� NOTICES WT.IT",C �.��._...�. NU^�EER DA'Z'E PLANNING 101 RECTOR t S REPORT PREPARED ENVIRONMENTAL CATMORICAL FUMPTION DATE FLED 1808 K NATION AND DATE NEGATIVE DECLARATION - DATE ADOPTED MITIGATED NEGATIVE DI CLARAT?ON DATE ;ADOPTED. Z ,. ' ENV". IMPACT RLPORT DATE 0ERTj Itp SM COMMITT82 MEETING DATE ADVISORY AGENCY IM, ARM DATE ADVISORY AGENCY ACTION n�f WARD ACTION COMMENTS ,art ,f ,t� J , -U44 t:Kw tlti y � ,%+ iUrti1'G1 j , yiiww\w �ti�ati . '� hFz 0ecR-- OFFICE Mri' eipt V., 17 / .3 Proj ect;1k �__����'1°t's; �l ^i , �1- APPENDIX E" Date Fi1.ed 10 -9 _ Environmental information Form Bui`fOCoo Manning Cormr (To be completed by applicant) All 20 1984 GENERAL INFORMATIOI`t Orovillo, Lalhornia 1. Name and address of developer :or project sponsor: !=/J ,,4)AI2�.' tN 2. Address of project: '~r�'2t--z .f���� w y Q ,(1 Assessors Block and Lot Number t 3. Name, address; and telephone number of person to be contacted concerning this project.' 5 z:-rA 7111 l": 1-0.r 0-�7' W ..w 4. Type of. project (i . p rezoning', subdivision) _ Lo 5. List and describe. any other related permits and other public approvals required .Esti this project, including those required by city, regional, state And federal agencies: 6i Existing zoning, district: 97 5 7. Proposed use of site: C r` +:. r r PROJECT DESCRIPTION 8 Site size. 9. Square footage of buildings) ,',�v..-w 10. Number of floors of construction. ,' -- 11+ Amount of off—Street parking provided. N y,►: 12 Attach site development plan. r r 13. Proposed scheduling. /)/ 14. Associated projects, �' r , 15. Anticipated incremental development. 0. Appendix E page l of 5 P"' 31. 32. 00. Planning Com J U L 2 0,1984 Substantial change in demand for orayll1q, QojiforhlA municipal services (police, tire, waiter, sewage, etc.). Substamtially increase fossil f-UeI consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.), Relationship to part of a larger Project or series of projects. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 33. Describe the Project site as it exists befog, .s the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic -,I- aljpecs. Describe arft t any existing structures on the site, nhe us e of the structures. 34. Describe the surrounding properties, 'including information on plants and animals and any culturalhistorical or Ocenic aspects, Indicate the type Of land use (residential, oonjmerci., ot intensity of land use (one -family, apartment houses, _ C., Nps,, department stores, etc,), and scale of development (height, fron%'- 1, set -back, rear yard, etc.). r'r-, - CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished aSove and'an the attached exhibits present the- datz. and information required for this initial evaluation to the best ' x that the facts, statements, ani d Of toy abilityo and nformation Presented are true and correct to the bast Of my knowlecige and belief-. � P -I Date ) # I v. .- t, , r 'e Or Appendix B - pqq� a of 3 0 NOTICE OF 1'0:Secretary for Resources 0 1416 Ninth Street, Room 1311 Sacramanto, CA 95814 NOV I County Mork, County of BLit-te 25 County (,'enter DrIlle. ELEANOR M, UCKER, COVAly Clnrk Oroville, CA 9,5965 By A. JACINTh FROM., Planning Department Deputy 7 County Center Drive (TUA ed) Oroville, CA 95965 SUBJECT: Filing of Notice of Determination in Complial,1ce Ivith Section 21108 or 21152 of the PLII).M�c Rejopraw- Code 8 _0 7- 0-0 Project Title TentatiVo Parcel Map Al? 56-24-64, 56-28:07 EdWdtd :Rodgers Stato Clearingliotise Number (If submitted to Contact Person John blendonval PUblic Works (916)e lolle Number5 3 Jell' Projoct Location At —thenoraiwest, corner cif ,State IG—tite 32 and PorRanch area. Project Description: Dividing 66 acres to create two parcels of 5 acres each and a remainder of 56 acres. '111S is to advise. t1iit t1le Butte COLIftl)- Advisory Agency —ca has made the followl1q, determinations regardlng, the lbove -described pro jc,ct: I 1. The project f 11 1 have a. Significant efrec,l,. on the onviroxinjent. Z wi I I not 2. An Mlvironntkll fillf)trict Report was prepared for thisLl PE'Occt lne� jpursuant to t1lo pr� ovisions or CE3QA, and was certiftod as required by Section 15088(g), 14 California Administrative Code, A Nugativc Decl.aration was preparv(1I-or this project pUrsuant to the pmrisjons Of Cr-,QAi , A copy of the Dcclara-Lion may be examined at' t1ir., Vlanni*n Dclparti;wnt, 7 County Centel- Dri,�re, OrOvillcCA 95995. Not'" Of 1 X0T'17t'O' Was MeLt indicating is c-M!'Pt From Onvil-0-timental rov'10W. tll.is project 44 A stat,cnjent or ovorri(lijlg C acloptod rut, a. a s n Ot N11HP,'JW,coat aLlOpted by t1w Lea(t Agency to roduco t1w Ampacts Of tile apv;rovod 111,0ject arcs1.13tr11ze . stalltkLvd con's t ruct .on r'tllo(hs to *11101"L1111'.7.0 orosioll oil the proportyW 01, Notcmt>tr 1.6 1984 StephanA, Streot�ot --fft 1�L E 16� sizes 0 If residential, include the number of units, schedule 17, , and type of household size expected. r Lmq- pi:-: Of unit If commercial, indicate the type whether neighborhood q n�CrM or regionally oriented, ighbOrhood, city facilities./square foo�ag' �YA e of sales area, and loading If industrial, indiate t andloading facilities, ype, estimated employment cper shift, 19* if institutional, indicate binplo ' the major function, estimated YMbnt per shift estimated occ pancy, . Ctd loading faciliCies, and community benefits to I be derived frOmthe Project, 20. If the Project involves a variance, J IA 3. -PP1�cation, conditional Use or rezoning required: state this and indicate clearly wt the application ired �A is Are the following items applicable to t Discuss below all items checked yes (athe project or its effects? necessary). tach additional sheets as YFIS 110 - Change in existing features Of any, beaclies' r substantial alteration lakes, 22- Ion of ground C�ntours. SiSnifi-cant change in scenic' viers existing residential a s Or vistas from V/1 23. Sigilificantl areas Or Public lands Or roads. Y change Pattern, scale Or character of general area of project. 24, Significant amounts Of solid waste or -litter., 25, Change it dust, ash, smoke, fumes or � o CD 'vicinity. odors in V1 26„ Signifi,.,, qualitor 0 iL; i"y, Or alteration In lake, stream Or ground V4.1ter y quant ton V/ Patterns. 0 Of existing drainaK-c% Substantial 3. change levels In the vicitity, in e%-.stin8 noise or Vibration 28. 8ite on filled .and Or On slope of 80 Percent Or MOte, 29, Use Or disposal of Ptentially such as toxic substances ohaZardOU8 mdtOria,18, o flammable8 or explosives. APP-Ohdix 8 page 2 0f a V r �k ; , , , - -, , , , , , — , . Ii %,r,i r i- t- , u I reo tor I COUNTY CENTER bRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 9r)965 Tej0Ph0h0.-! (914) 514.468f November 5, 1.984 Edward W. Rodgers RE: AP 56-24-64 & 321 E. Locust Avenue 56-28-07 Lompoc, CA 93436 Tentative ParC(_,j Map Dear Mr 4 Rodgers6 At the regular Meeting of th,0 Butte County Adv' Isory Agency held November 5, 1984, the Agency adopted the mitigated negative declaration regarding environmental review and approved the Tentati.ve Parcel Map for AP 56-24-64 & 56-.28_p7 ' sQbject to the condit 101's as listed on the attached sheet. If no appeals are timely filed --within ten (10) days of the date of the Advisory Agency's approval—with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, this Action will be final. Whorl the conditions of approval are complied W* OrdOr for YOU tio file your 11 final map'�,With iEh, it will be in the Butte County Dopartment of Public Works for recordation Within twenLy-fou'r (24 Months OE the date of approval by the Advisory Agency. ) " YOU should have any qur,-btions rerjar, :L Contact this office. ding this matter; please 04 -,ds At tnchmon t cc. ,planninrl 8nVirlOntIlOntal ReViow EhVlronmenII.aj, Health t)0j)aftjrIi-,,nt Very truly yours, W I Ulioln Cheff Director Of Public works Duff 0 Co, PldWng C-ftM, 1984 �dwa.rd Rodgers, T1,434TA'.iIW, PARC !3, MAP, to crc ,,tLc S parcels at thr; ,NW cor'nwr1, Of St-'Ate Ott;. 32 and bores., Ranch "N.d Forest Winch area. AP 56•-24-64 and. 56-u8-o'( Public Works condi ti ono 14 Pr'ovid'e two-way Lraver.9able access. RS-�8 .LLI_Z to t?}.ic:h p rc r I from a county maintained road or state highway. " 1. � �l wv .!l ias.� Nn 1 y w..•.�,:„"! izrl .2 offered for dedication on too final, m:rp. 8. Shaw 50 ft. building; setback 1.11ne measured from C aterlinr of access easement, 4: Provide road maintenance agreement. 5. Deed to the County of Butte 30 fti right-ref—way from the centerline of Forest .Ranch Road, 6. Indicate a 50 ft. building setback from the centerline of Forest Ranch Rd and a 20 ft,. building setback i"rom tho right-of-way line of State Hwy. '3P., 7 Shaw all easements of record on the final map,. 8. ProvidQ street nnrnw' sigrn;; per requirements of the Dcpnttment, of PubLic Wurks prior to recordation. of the final. m,,zn. 9 Provide cul-de-snn at the and of the str'eet' 10. Obtain encroachment permit and cc,nstruct standard rond approach pr -viding adequate s igtrt distance at the intersection of Purest R,irc.h M and accQas road, 116 yObta{in encroa�0yl11tent p,--rm�i7t for all drivew4lyo; new or existing, Erna cotic l�ru r. o county W UC�ALl1L��.ds i. la. Pay any c1,-ltngkimint, taxes Y)t, 0jrr.%r t, ttjrces rjs:j 1� u reit. 1.3. Molt the requi.remv';jts oP the Butte County t,jrle pf7 p't. Planning, D q—t. coniit,iuns 14, All p!.troe3 '1�'�'.+ to (',nf,)t,tti t�) th�� `"'1.5 or ro",- 0 Vroni tg, 11-1 iWI l,oldx,. 1 + xI'Ovitlr' a 1(;( ,t.. .t.E civ E=ither within th, pr'3por',,y Or union 100 ft of tkjo property b;�ur�dtri�w IG. 01how a 50 ft, .""rG'tbnek from thi dj,tilntjgw? �'i'.1y cltt p°lt'CEr�;3 r and 'J. 17. 11rove blint tho ,r,uvi.rod quanta t.ieo of el�a,«st,ii^ watczarc, avai.l�;1�,1Ky tri pat'coln p and "`1 i 18. Peove that the regUixcd quantities of domestic water are available, fir place the statemerit on, the map that "there is ne evidence that dorrrt+(jf,i,c water is available" ,for nrrrcel l: The following mi tipgatiol 'neasuro will also be fa condition Op approvals: 19. Utilize standard cormtraction methods to minimize mronion on the Pr op0T.ty. TO Butte. County Advisory Agency FROM; Planning Director SUBJECT: Report an Tentative Parcel Map of Edward Rodgers on AP 56--24-64 and 56-28-07 DATE: October 25, 1984 This is a proposal to divide 66 acres to create two parcels at 5 acres and ai remainder of 56 acres. The present zoning is TM -5 (Timber Mountain; 5 acre parcels) and TM -44 ('Timber Mountain, 40 acre parcels). There are "no specific or community plans for the area. IM, Land Use Plan Map of the Butte County General Plan designates this area as Agricultural -Residential. There are no specific or community plans for the area. The proposal does not conflict with County zoning nor any adopted or proposed element of the Butte County General Plan nor any County, specific or community plan. Recommend approval with the fallowing cond'ititiins. i. Rote sora. map., "No earthwork; or roadway construction during rainy season, !!2. No building on slopes over 20 S. Maintain a minimum of 11000 gallon water storage with draft-ing, connections per dwelling units. Comply with the agreement entered into with Chico Unified School a. District. LMT 1 kt ttt Edward Rodgers REBUTTAL TO ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Log #84-07-90-01 AP #56-24-o64, 56-28~007 FOR APPROVAL OF TENTITIVE; PARCEL MAP (Comment numbers refer to form numbers and address comments under V) GENERAL; The Land is zoned for 5 acre parcels, and we are asking for nothing else, no waivers, no exceptions, no favors, By ILXWI zoning requires an impact report so the impacts of dividing to five acre plats should have already been considered, and a now study should offer little new information. "'his transaction appears to attack the basic zoning process. The report speaks continuously to construction, to construction not yet engineered and not yet designed, and makes unengineered assumptions which are totally unproved. The comments would be Moro appropriate after planning and design- We are not asking for a construction psrmi.'t, but to change lanes on a parcel map, 111. 1 must basically Challenge the ambiguous conclusions of -the comment. The comment concludes actions of cutting As 1,;> ading that are not indicated anywhere in my app A .to access to ponderosa Way, t is one of two pc..zsi'balities. The out already there has stood years without 00ricus erosion. lb and le: The proper engineering answer is "NO" on both, The areas selected each have more than enough near -level benches to construct a single fancily dwelling or install a mobile home earth movoment. There is no way this can be signif- icant, With minor Access an be from. Ponderosa Way or a frontage road" However,Ponderosa. Way was (according to my sources) built in the 1408 and near vertical cuts in this very stable material arq still in excellent shape. These ""exposes,, banks" are cared for by the Forest a► F present no problems in my opinion. le: This erosion as easiimitigated by simple con'trul xnetXiod:s and can be part of any deed conditions or construction permit, The "exposed batiks" mentioned are covered above and clearly not a problem. The last comment under "'e" is not understood as no "access roads'" have been cut. Further, 1 submit that recon- naissance of the property clearly shows numerous logging roads in every direction were cut in the past and have stabilized and "healed"" themselves naturally with Do (, 4Uence of erasion showing now; 1f i have inspected this property and the natural drt,i:nago ditches during the rainy season, These ditches flow ovor and around Ponderosa Way and an in -use logging road through U middle of the land. Due to vegetation and natural rack ohook dams, the water is clear and clean before it even leavoo my land. My land is over a mile and a quarter from Big CtA,00, and my examination of the creek shows no evidence of rvoft moderate, siltation more than normal from the construction already ,years old in Forest Ranch. 3'b; Concur that it will be an unmeasurable amount. 3ft Concur that it is insignificant and do not agro that sediment is any problem with minor mitigation. 3hi This comment on water supply has no basis -in -fact. Most ,of the yells in th! immediate area are clearly not per.cked water and are 7001- deep. An impervious consolidated ash strata does cause peroked water and does supply some wells. 11'.Le deeper aquifer is in fractured rock. With the high rainfall in this area, the aquifer should not be in any strain, l find no evidence to support even a "maybe" on this item. in fint, l find no study of the aquifer in this area on inquiring ;o both USGS and the DWR. 4a A Concur t 50, z have heard of the claim that housinG blocks migration, and that there is an attempt to onange T-5 zones because of t},is possibility. However, i have seen no scientific evidence to back this statement, especially in such a thinly populated area. It has been my experience on Vandenberg Air Force Base, 153 square miles of mostly open land, that if i want to find doer, i would find herds in the housing area lats night and early morning • Barrier'? if 'there are deer on my land i have seen no evidence of them in any numbers. There are houses on the other side of HWy 32 already making the potential, here Little change. 5d.s T cannot imagine ever, an ins :gnificant impact on fish and i find little wildlife in the area gas Tsaid his anywheres even instatement is atown� pBecauseaof many stot out, ps, i can be �. obabl.y takes more f1jel to go from one side of Chico to the othr,1,. ll and 1:2 : 'L w epeat it was zoned TM -5 when i purchased the land. This zoo G rig anticipated small. development. You are attacking that ng zoning in the wrong manner. 1.3a, and 1301 Two p °.r l houses or mobile homos cannot generate substantial ti-Iti-111, and 10.5 mile trip for each one cannot "b. validated. War was established nearly a half century ago and is still there. It doe,. have &.4inage Xacilities with necessary culverts and natural gravel where necessary. The statement on graveling the �road is 'a Mitigation suggestion and not an impact. 14a: This suggestion is again mitigation and Fire is expected to be a prrj Lrsny problem and. not any different `tht.��� any rural area. My -taxes pay for this Protection the salylo ao. others. 14bi. Again, no-one expects more than usually rural p(� os pr�otectiun and extension will certainly not be solved, oy an ,EIR. Any new resident will help by taxes to encouract improve - Ment in polic, protection. 14c: I have contacted the School District's attorney as suggested and have agreed to the suggested fee to be seoured by deeds of trust due and payable on any transfer of these 5 acre parcels. 14e Each resident is taxed to provide -these government services. With increased -taxes, increased government services can results not individually but "cumulatively.11 15: 1 agree that the answer to this item is "NO," We cannot here cure the world or even the country's energy problem. 16c, This is r%,quired for a buildin lit.g permit, I presume. Here ,00 are jLlot asking for a land s wells on twee sides of the p however, there aro good "this is adequate proof. property, and as an expert I say 16d To be expected when any building takes ;place. 18; This is not true. In this fcrest a para.11e1 road will .not even be seen, 11, Cumulative mpacts are prevlously addressedi 1, Gr.oWth inducement is minisoul.e. Many of us do not consider growth inducement of this type as something undesir- able, but instead allowing two new families to Jjv° close to nature a 2, 8011 can eaSily be Mitigatedo and Qthere nn is no 'evidence tofnany present deteriora- tion, of rig Chico Creek from present development, 3. Lack oP intrastructure and services is expected by all living in forest Ranchj even desired, This is not an environmental impaoto but a natural condition. 3' 4. Deer herd - I'have seen only slight evidence of any deer, let alone a herd in this area. 5. Traffic (minor) would be on about 150 feet on the road. hardly serious, even "Cumulative." in conclusion, I feel as if you are saying I am the "straw that broke the camel's back." And, "straw" it is, as my regUost is so very minor in relation to the whole. Most of 'the al-Ioged impacts are so miniscule as to be unmeasurrables and difficult to call an impact. Those deserving can be mitigated on th3 building permit. I recommend that no EIR be required. A1r1+1s ) N1 I X I COUNTY Op )iU u ,�,UTi'1+ k . i N"ViII0IN, 111 NTA 1, CJf CKI,[�'I 1,clltht (`to-ic Corny] t ci to icy) 1ii1CK(�ITIli N1) 1.0r.; n a4 -07-20-0j,', 1. Name of pT'krlrarrrent EAT, d _ ar W: Radge� s Address of proponont and representative w�IiF rlpPl.1LUhIV) 32l >r Locust Avenue Lom - .� �- ac, .CA 9, J6 .i PPDjett tle4a riprie�rr tentative Parcel Map �1AN17A�'U1t'4. Does r�l�1INl►INC:� �' ; h1A11t1, Nrr e prcrree:t ha., the t*otentiul to degrade the the hah of A environment, substantially reduce the hafrilot of a fish kir wildlife species, cause a Fish or wildlife lrni nlntion to drop below se*it'- sustaining levels, threaten animal rra+�,ltnk�nxty� to r'tim1hair ar Plant or ransack r. f a , reduce the nlhcr or rostrict the rare* or �.ndangere d Plant nr animal or eliminate important oxnmples or the major periods ani CaXlifnrnial histnrt, cyr� pr•elriwtezT"}a7 I+. books: the 'l wt hark^ the p,terttiarl to archlpv�c short -ter- benefits to they detriment of long-term, eynti ironme+ntnIR ,al:,'° !A short-term impact on the uni trunmvirt is "nc "hieh Occurs in t relatively hrret' �period or , imp r�hil, iob-tvrn impacts will a ckrrdore Go the I�rl t "re , d�{ c . Ire,+S:, 1 � ,►° the ,ro)v t hav, IM which are indit►idu, a13Y limit`1.wriA, but crrl�ullat Orly considerable? 1A profeo may ilnparet un two lat o , kvlrkrT'k' the it "ea r ;ore separate re sourcos rat on varch rens sumo small, but uh-ore the' act of tlre�rtkrtal.rl���th��r impacts on the environmentis s �;nii',ik:.alD d. Sys the ,re,eye I i t 1ur>e environmental effects which will i.rrrSe srrhstuntial adverse effects On htn►mn hekin, either diree�tiv or indirekc't•iv Ili fhRMIl, ' erN i`ta3 he cesrlrla.leatecl by the Lead at =k,� Oil the• ha" a, 1� nc� 1 Of this initial c•1^ar1rl,Ttic�n: 101- rind n I'r'nIr''san d�t•e,,i v t COULD NOT havear m i n i 1'i entr t e.C�ft c t on IS cknc i r. rrme�nt , urci a N (M TVR DUCLARATIt1N tai 111 he l;►N1 hind that although p°t`epErt•e<�, tlru prk,pease�. 1rT`nje°ct could have at si,gtN.L�n �> I�.�I rant SHOW ora the coil ronm6t, there will not Ie a sd, effect in this case h...... the MITIGATION 1�1I.,'1w1REs describedrroil the attached Wet We been ad,ed to the project. A N11GATTU ilUCLAp.A'1'It1N will he prepared. 1�'ttit. find the protrc`sud projvvt MAI have a signiric•nnt of Fact oil the environment, and an is"NVIRONMi:11"1'iAL IMPACT Itia:1ltlty'd` is required,I�Ar1 : August 30, gg VOUNTY rip Bt.rrI=I,, PLANNING IHPAR` MEN'P' Irl, Later;' �ssoc�.a;�e Plannta W ie we>d hv: IV. ENVIRONMENTAL I*ACTS Mxp anatlons of a .l"yes" and "maybe" an_s, vers ar•., required on attached sheet(s)) l.. EARTH. Will the proposal result in significant. YES Unstable eart7 conditions or in changes ill geologic substructures? b. Disruption$ , displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? C. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? d. Destruction, covering or modification of arty unique geologic: or physical features? e.. Increase in wind or water erosion of soil•;; either on or off-site? f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation', deposition or erosion 4hich may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? g. toss of prime agriculturally productive scr:,,i.ls Outside designated urban areas? h. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud- slides, ground failure or similar hazards? 2. AIR. Will the proposal result in substantial, a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors, smoke or fumes? c. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, locally or regionaiiy? 3. WATER. Will the proposal result in substantial.- y a-. Changes in : urre,nt8 or the coui . e or dirsection of water• movements in either marine or fresh wnter�s l MAYBE N0 X b* Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns or the rate and amount o°i' surface r%anofy`? ' C. deed for off-site ,,reface draintage improveW Ments, including vegetation removals cha.nnel.- iza.tion or Culvert installation? d. Alterations to the Course or flow of flood y waters? e, t,h.ange in the amount of surface water in any w Ler body? £; L. ..,charge into surface ?'raters or in any a �leratio of surface,water duality, including 1 c not limited to temperature$ dissolved c '•e:n or turbidity,? g. Alt .ration of the d.re�tion or rate of flaw Of ground. waters'? h. C ge in the quantity Of ground waters, e4 ter through direct' additions of with- d K �trl.aa, or through iiitcviception of an aquifer by Cuts or excavations"? i. Ri�, .tiction in the amount of water otherwise gv,i�lable for public: water supplies"? J. Esc ,sure of people or property to ��,a.ter re ' ?ted hazards such as f1 ooding? h.0 A YES MAYBE No 4. PLANT LIM Will the proposal result in substantial Change in a. the diversi.'ty of species, or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)? C. b. Reduction, of the numbers of an), unique, rare or endangered species of plants? C. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrJ�,r to the normal replenish- ment of existing species? d, Reduction in acreage of any agriciAltural crap? -- S. ANIMAL LIRE. Will the proposal result in substantial: a. Change in the diversity OF species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and. shell. " lsh benthic organisms or insects):? b. Reduction in the numbers of any unique, 'rare or endangered species of animals? �( ;. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat .. G, NOISE- Will the proposal result in substantial., a. increases in existing noisy: levels"? b, Exposure: Of people to severe noise levels? LIGHT AND GLARE. Will the proposal produce significEn�ht Lnd glare? 8, L.1iv 1 USE . Kill the proposal result in a suMan°trial alteraltion of the present or planned land us(, of an area? P. NATURAL RESOURCES: Will t?le proposal rsul't in su, sta.ntial, a. Increase in the rete of use of any natural resources? e.. ll . Depletion of any non-renewable natural resources'? 10. RISK OV UPSET. Will the proposal involve; a. Arads ' G�cPlosion car the release of hazard ous substances (in.cluda.ig but not limited to, oil, pestis ides, chemicals or radiation) in the evelic of an accident or upset conditions? b. possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? 11. POPULATION, IVIll the proposal al'.tor the location, d�.s FIS en, density, or growth rate of the :1,u11tan population' A- I a, HOUSING. Will the proposal affect existing ?lousing, or create a denuand for additional housing? 1 i YES MAYBE NO 13. 'TRANSPORtATI:ON/CIRCULATION, Will the proposal result in: a. Generation, of substantial additional vehicl(- movement? b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking?' c. Substantial impact on existing transportation sys t etas ? d, Sigrificant alterations to present patterns ` of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? 14. PUBLIC SERVICES, will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a. Saeed for new or altered governmental services a. Fire protection.' b Police protection?. c. Schools? d. Parks or other recreational Eaci.lities? e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads:' f. Other governmental. services'? 15. ENERGY. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel -or energy? b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy., 16, UTILITIES. Will the pTopsal result in a need for new systems, Or substantial alterations to the following A. power or natural. gas? �+ b. Communications systems? c, IY^ca;-,i;'i d. Sewer or septic tank? e. Storm water drainage? f. Solid waste and disposal.' .� 17. AMAN HEALTH, 1Vi11 the proposal result in; a., Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding; mental health) ? b, txposu.re of people to potential health hazards? 15, AESTHETICS. Will the proposal result in the Mtiuctah of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view" -4- }.ES _ MAYBE NO 19. RLCREATIODI. Will the proposal.. result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational. opportunities? - 20 CULTURAL RESOURCES. a. Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? b Will the proposal result in adverse physacal or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or histo.is building, structure or object? c. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect uni gtic ethnic cultural values?. d, Will the proposal restrict existing religl 11s ential 3,1npact area? or sacred uses within the pot - V. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AP 56-24-64, 56--28-07 lb;c: Preparation of building pads and driveways will require extensive grading over steep terrain. Access off of Ponderosa'Way for Parcels 2 and 3 will result in cut banks, in an undisturbed McCarthyiken and und,sturbedstatsa il .Grading'eandave a vegetatiionate removalion otent al wilp �n accelerate soil erosion Exposed cut banks all along the east side of. Ponderosa Way create an ongoing erosion problem. Dirt access roads cut in. at the property's south end have not been stabilized and will continually erode. lfe Us eroded off of this property and others on the Forest Ranci. edge will lead to severe s;.ltation of Big Chico Creek. 3b: Surface water runoff will increase slightly after development. 3f: Discharge into surface waters is only sign,i.ficant when viewing, cumulative impacts. Discharge from these parcels will: be limited to sediment, 3h: !Forest Ranch ridge has a limited water supply. The aquifer is shallow and may be perched. Additional. development Will strain the water supply. 4ae Portions of the heavily vegetated property will be cleared prior to development. No rare or endangered species or habitats have been mapped on"site. SlDoor r id: a ThpoperB property 'is located within Uhe winter railgo of the East e County and the Ca:.i.£ornia Department of Fish and dame havo been 'working on policies to guide development in there areas. These efforts culminated in preparation of The Deer Herd study+ now in hearings The report and the Department of Fish and Came indicate that creation of parcels of less than 40 acres constitutes a serious impact to the. herd,. Further comments pending notificc ion by the Department sof M Vish and Game. w8 AP -1-24-64$ 56-28-07 DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (continued) 9a: Distance from Chico and urban services will necessitate long vehicle trips and high gasoline consumption. 11, 12: Project approval would allow for the continued development of Forest Ranch. As more people live in the community, land division activities increase. 13a,c: 21 ADT is likely on this rural parcel map. Ponderosa Way is + 12 foot wide dirt road with no drainage facilities. Jlitjos. At the minTmum, Lhe road should be gravelled through this property to accom- modate additional traffic and reduce soil erosion. 14aa A high to extreme fire hazard exists on-site. No pressurized or community water system is available for use in emorgencies• on- site water storage with drafting connections helps to reduce these impacts. 14b: Police services are provided by Butte County sheriff on an on-call bas' only. Rural developments serve to reduce the 8hpriff's ability to provide protection countywide. 14c: The Forest Ranch school is seriously overcrowded. Continued approval of residential development constitutes a significant impact to C.U.S.D. It is recommended that the developer work with C.UbS.Di to resolve their concerns. An nig will be required if a letter of release is not received from the Chico Unified School Districto l4ef: All other governmental services will experience increased demand. 15a! Commuting to Chico for urban services will use large amounts of gasoline. Great amounts of fuel will be consumed through the cola wittetsi 16c: proof of domestic water will be required. 16at Septic tanks to be installed pursuant to Butte County thvitOn- mental Health requirements l$:If access is taken from an easement albnct�,.,jhway 32, the vista of forest will be disrupted. 114 MANDATORY FINOING8.-OV 8IONIVICANCE c, Cumulative impacts are: Growth inducement Soil erosion sedimentation of area drainages and Big Chico Creek Lack Of infrastructure and services Impacts to deer hard Traffic on vote8t Ranch Road Appendix V page 6 Applicant: Edward Wgers A. A*s8O.*V's Parcel /f 56-24-.64 DATA SHEET EP,D Log # 84-07-20-02b ` -� Pro,7ec Dc,.cripton 1- Type of Project: Tentative Parcel Map 2. Brie' description: Dividing 66 acres to create two Parcels of, 5 acres each and a,remainder of 56 acres 34 Location: At the northwest corner of State ljcq.-c -- and Forest Ranch Road 4. Proposed Density of Oevelopment:_ 1 du/parcel 5.b Amau *L_ of Impervious Surfacing: Limited 6. Access and Nearest ll blic Road(a): Forrest Ranch Load 7. Method of Sewage Disposal: Septic Tank 8. 80u.rrd of Water Supply: Individual wells 9. PvOximity of Power Lines: To original parcel 10. potential for further Land divisions and development: 'under existing development None Environmental Setting PhYsical_Environment: Terrain a. General Topographic Character: Mountainous terrain --ridge, s10 in o 'the west b. Slopes;,,1.5%+ first 500 feet west of Ri hwe i,-) _ _. 20-6016 thereafter Co Elevation: 2800 2000 feet d. Limit 1g Factors' Slopes greater than 20% 24 Soil a4 TypesN : Aikens 60, �► t y �. �� . � ravewn r clay loam, McCarthy c 2 0 4 0 �.0 brown gravelly ' dark. bro y sand, medium to very a. hitch suitability fo tr_f-ti on b. L L Ming Factors .# Modera permeability te-strongly acidic, moderate -rapid 3 Natural Hazards of the Land a• Earthquake Zone: Moderate Earthquake Ihi tisit Zone VIII b` Erosion Potential: Moderate c Landslide Potential.:,_ Moderate � o» �. ransavard! ' H igh-xtreme Soil Potential: Moderate 4 Ryd.rology a+ surface Water. Stream draining into Big Chico Creek on Appendix V (a) Data Sb,eet continued 40 AP 56-24-64 & 56-28-07 b. Ground Water: Limited zesorce c. Drainage Characteristics: Naturally draining to the west- a,.jrthwest d. Annual Rainfall (normal):_ 68 70 inches e. Limiting FactorS: Excessive amounts of rainfall and steer slape5 3. Visual/Scenic Quality: Highly scenic timber lands 6. Acoustic Quality Highway•32 is a noise generator 7. Air Quality: Good Biological Environment: S. Vegetation: Mature timber, Ponderosa pine, incense cedar, Dou las fir; Mack oak, Canyon Live Oak, Manzanita 9. Wildlife Habitat Within winter range of East Tehama Deer Herd Cultural Environment: 10. Arch.aenlogical and Historical Resources in -the area: Low including unknown 11.. Butte County General flan designation: Agricultural -Residential 12. Existing Zoning:—TM-5, TM -4.0 13. Existing Land, Use on-site:.____ Undeveloped timber property 14. Surrounding; Area a. Land Utes: Residential at extreme rural densities b. Zoning: TM -5, TM -40 c. Gera. .Flan desi erna tions t Agricultural -Residential, T :tuber Mountain d. Parcel Sues! 2, to 557 acres; smallerparcels along Hwy 32 corridor e. Population: Sparse 15. Character of .Site and Area: small mountain community 16. Nearest Urban Area: Chico + 14 miles southwest 17. Relevant Spheres of`Influence: None 18. Improvements Standards Urbmi Area:- VA 19. fire protection Service a. Nearest County (state) Fire Station: Station 424 b Water ,Avai labi lity 7 None_ 20. Schools in Area: Chi.00 Unified School.District T Appendix P (b) F iw . L •:. � . ry. � , • ` ,. v; :r tai (-.(i(� k y. 1 '�:�a.°. '..r. µµ }S, :z ..� ..., r`, _. - ° ^ ,: V � u r .. � • J r ` .,sem .: ' • " -. �, .au # 'j:.' N . 1 ,�'. - �.'y,l !°,' , I,t ie,. '::: 6 ,. {��" •xt t, ^ _ va�. �} + ,I +i• '�� �- S^�,� 4. ,�',� ��T+' '' � 'ltd yr AI r,241V, Tdx Akin Code 32 L 'pODOM USA � r✓ {..�rY/7N!/'",a,� � M ,, _ 9 to Aqw r , _ R 20 USA nn .1 U.�a ' a, ' A'.i` „ � '�.r•_i` � •l:«:k4 $6717 Ad. � .� Lor e �. ' (54.52 AC,1 160 Ac r ,'Ci R1.' ._ s 3i r • t54,71 AC) 148 t,4 1037 r ' 14 US4,a y y p d M1 ��� �1 481 AC \A'1,i• t R EY a c. td c, f 5a4 ,^ QC% � �. " � � �iIODD M ��� . , , • • `"s , '� CO AC 21.59;5 'o,ayx cv, w, .. \\ •�^�„y .,t �"'+..'` �I'r`."' il.�"r'a+`^'� IY V w«rR+ ACr 9VA4 4t� « • . .• `4,°' LdT 1 e r,,. '^ r, .mow•- rr ✓'! "te a US ra 4 � l� �t�,4d_ OS�a�3$ �.^•� Q�i� a« (54 C 166 AO •...._r....... _. ,r r� �r 41-115 A p � anti • v iN. /(y.lr r it r 1 � �r�p�y��q•�q[����' ilk `" _. (�.}{« (AJ `W ...,' ;w •�.. I H rA �l "" k: i• 1 .. « '.._+r'w,+.+r....r�..., + ... f a� yet Y •"`�^- ~,.�� r.. ROA _ 40 6V AC ° « 54 72AG1 a CZ VZAe w r l+ ► 28 � �..• ,� _ 4 ., . TRN S, t1;. LfJh"�i .�"O.CAe� , 9 44 ,i ' •"`. ' , t'IV5 - 'ly i..14'.«` -r• I �y;t,'t'i' .J��.tIJ 4.{i3 ��0 MAO � a 481 AO 04160 16.01 At s + ya w s rI5SORlS PAPCEL 6L K �� + c }h" ; , o ► r �-,� R . ...1, County Of- , uffet '+yrs 01 s�' a Lot-IMMO SHOWN .i, ♦ . if' ,t ,h 4 r., i i idIN OPM8 • � ', 9��1 n a 7 -ox Area Code 62-21 56-28 4109.•ft N.OI°46" 2i78.ya a 1.6:36 `L LA 2 M ~ n W 8.65 Ac tt M } h AC PING P -63 _ ' < 63.3 AC, Mn ?06AC n �m 4.53 AC, Zi.yt;w �5 �� f . 1 + �•`�� �0;� • ' -•-c' his 28 9 �p A �' as . 'Bye • cs f x 8411 'CO 4�0 4 co tri yy au'S o l6 ,g ,lC 4 48Ac v .1 7 r4� ",C 2 AC REIoCATtO y 43.51 •"•*x _ q22 66 6 6890 �b/ 21.8 ' 2f:7, L 1. P 1 10 , g 3 1 �! 45.67AG 2nh 8.28 AC. 37 M p ` l3� 19 . z.lAc 4 41 r 2AC. N ° _ 3i5.25 KnY Iw Y ff4] f" ` h 1 13,65 AC. i 5AZ s Ar f�hf��4�B2��t�66',��. 311,61lig -52� 1 I Oh Obi o1 2.06 5 A: 1 44 45 w PIM 6563 _ _34 5Ac 4,B8Ac PM r9-45/46 PIN SJ�A154. _46 C AssessorsMap�No. 6-28 County of Butte, Calif SEB. X96 7 I rig ill! 11 q � 1 a�a 61 � 4 � QI E �e e A f , . toe 17 4 i Al 9 l a �' T �t'f tdvax d, W, Rodgers 16299 Forest Ranch Road :Host Office Box 273 Forest Ranch, CA 95912 (916)894 6007 Mr. Brent 'L. Moore Associate planner Butte County 'Planning Dept. 7 County Center Dr. Oroville, CA 95965--3397 RE: Environmental Checklist, Log #93-08--30"03 Dear Mr/ Moores in compliance with your labesb instructions, enclosed is the archaeologist sur~ray of the subject project ib o requirement,;e en c'�s to the b l gx-cal '>~h recent construction across the street, the RoC]c eonstrucion a; short distance away, and the Loerlce cohstrrucion plus others and no sign of the s;idalees tDbustat It would seem the letter from the Botony professor who visits there with students several times a year should be &efficient. Request you pease reco.isiderithis ;Later as adequate and proceed vith the project S'ncerely Ird�ta c3 W. podgers r 4fid' 4 I Iry "I's karch 30, 1991 Mr. Brent L. Moore Asociate Planner Butte County Planning Department i County Center Dr Oroville, CA 95965-3397 Re: Cultural Resource Survey, Revised Tentative Parcel Map APN 056-240-064and 056-280-007, Log # 90-08-30-03 Dear Mr. Moore: ki,r. and Mrs Rodgers have asked me to to augment the records ,check performedby CAovide field observet nii- versi"ty, Chico. I have had the opportunity atofwalk s State Uni- g s land several times in the past. As m' over the y pre' Rod erot directed towards collecting 3nformati' for us visits previous 'pzental were n assessment, I returned an March:.. 2, 1991 oto +morenthrough�� l.y, evaluate the 15 acres directly affected by the proposed lot e p y of the property, -which took about gesurvey Alit: Rd Rodgers accompanied me ton Goa systematic walking s. out the property boundaries and explained rdevelopment gand usrygted ,of the land during his ownership, The project site is located at the tiorthwestern margin of a re- latively flat topographic feature defined on the north and south by deeply cut, steep-wailed can ons: cant of. the,property is y Sixty-five to seventy per- d gently sloping, the remainder is very steep, The soil is deep and stable, as evidenced by the lack of sloughing on road cuts some seven years old. The a mixed conifer. forest which itlso includesnoaks and,�hda dogwooilY odedEbby cepa for disturbed areas on lot 3 there is little unde'rstory vege- eng covered by , tation, save tree seedlings, the forest floor bi heavy leaf and needle duff. Thusobservation of the soil sur- face was limited to recently disturbed areas areas; heavily used dd faotpaths, and other actvitydare`as�about'tle-a�the mobile home on lot 3) t,'hle the leaf and needle litter hampered observation it didn't Limit observation of mg Jot features. ire x found no evidence of prehistoric remains on the 15 acres. Where soil was visible there was no sign of -tools, waste from tool manufacture, fire -affected rock, or food remains. Occasion- al small boulders occurred througha+yt the property, their surfaces bore no sign of modification throdgh use, nor were they or lesser rocks aligned or concentrated suggesting the preserce of cultural ;features. Features defined by soil modifications were limited to historic era roads. historic uses of the land were evidenced by segmenss of logging haul roads and tree stumps, which occur on all three parcels, and a portion of the historic Humboldt Road, which runs northeast/southwesterly through parcel 3 and the south- eastern portion of parcel 2. The southern end of this feature has been obliterated by Forrest Ranch Road and activities in the south-central portion of parcel 3i The northern end is truncated by State Highway .32. The Humboldt Road is heavily incised upon .the land and overgrown by shrubs and young trees. No trash dumps associated with this road or logging activities were observed, nor ;,ave any been reported by the current landowners. No standing structures, predating the c:urr'erat ownership,, occur on the property: Recent evidence of human activity is concentrated, for the, most part,, on lot 3. This lot exhibits disturbance from maintenance' of 'Porrest Ranch Road along its southern boundary; Ponderosa Way traverses the property from north to south, the drivewa.v for Xathryn and Edward Rodgers'' residence emanates from Ponderosa Road; the diveway to Robin Rodgers 'mobile home, the motile home, out -buildings, and landscaping are all situated on the •r,orth western hall of this lot. Lot 2 is crossed by Ponderosa Way and a he.wly constructed access road and, cul' -de -sac. In addition a Rmall area has been cleared of vegetation in the central portion of this parcel. Lot 1 is also crossed by Ponderosa Way atd ex hi'bits 4i portion of the cul-de-sac at the termination of t1;.e newly built access road Ad lot 3 :has already been developed; potential direct environ- mental impacts of this laud division are limited to development of lots 1 and 2 . [Unce the access road for both of these parcels exists, potential 'impacts to Cultural remains would emanate from clearing and grading of house ipads, construction of out -buildings, landscaping, selective tree, t6mo"val; and intreased foot traffic in the surrounding area. No prehistoric cultural remains were observed. Survey conditions were adequate to identify the presence of large complex cultural. sited '» Given the heavy ground cover it is not possible to un -- equivocally rule out the presence of a small limited use site, however, the presence of such a site is not felt to be highly ry`ry` _ J tJt'7� i likely. In light of the relatively low and localized impacts resulting from Ca establishment of two additional single family residences it is felt that no additional data collection or conditions upon development, regarding prehistoric remains, are warranted' The Humboldt Road is an interesting; historic feature; while this is a small segment of the road and alternative, parallel routes exist in th:ts area the portion on this 15 acres is worthy of recognitiop . The majority of this teal.ure occurs on lot 3•' as this lot has been developed no impact will result from this appl.icati:u.n:, A small portion of the road does occur on lot 2, this locatio;u is not likely to be significantly impacted by lot developmO t as development activitywill in all likelihood be focused on th west half of this lot due to the presence of the access road, cleared areas view, and distance from the noise of Highway 32. While development of the propel-ty will not have a si.gnifican:t adverse impact upon the Humboldt Road, the presence and location of this roadway should be recorded. This may be accomplished by requiring that the route be shorn on the final parcel map., 5incerelyo , N. Nelson Leonard,III Enclosure 1 (resume) cc.' E&K Rodgers 3 n ^• CURkICULUM VITA Versonal Data. Vamet N. 'Nelson. Leonard, ill )birthdate: August 7, 194 Address: A.O. Iox 7`1,3, r,.qrlc- Point.•."()rcpc,n Q752-4 �Vcicphone: (503) Z2(i-r,11:5 Marital Status: Married I.S. Citizen: Yes Tr.ofesSion: Retiree Education University of California, Los Angeles 1968-1971 Los Angeles State College 1967-1768 University of California, Los Angeles 1964-1967 B.A, Anthropology Santa Monica City College 1552-1964 University high School 1959-1962 Diploma Graduates .5twdy; Scvnr,ty-eight quarter units in the follow3,ng topics c Physical Anthr'opolog_v (4) , Socio-colttiral Anthropology (30)', Archaeology 36) :Linguistics (4) and Statistics (4) . M.h. Paper: "Tile Process of Change in the Santa Monica. Mountains (5000 BC to 1.800 AD) " 1971: Positions Held Teaching Assistant, UCLA Summier Session 1966 and Spring Quarter 1967. Zurvey Archaeologist,. UCLA Archaeological Survey 1968-1970. ' .e&der, UCLA Departme.1t of Ant:rropolo9T 1963. Chief,Archaeologist, UCLAArchaeologicalSurvey 1970-1973: lbst-ructor, Pepperdine University 1972. Archaeological Consultant, Self-employed 1972 .4 1,<);; west Lecturer- UCLA txtension,, USC extension; Southern California Junior Colleges And State vniversitios. 100-1975 Chief Ax'chaeologist, Ar„haeological 'F{esearch Unit, Univettity of California, P,ivettide 1915 1578. Assistant Director# San Beznarclino County PlUsetim 1978. Chief Archaeologist, San Bernardino Count•.y Museum Association 1978. Environmehtal Analyst, San Parnazdino CoUhty Planning Department 1978- 2n. 1~nstrtuctotj UCR Ertensian 15-18 and 1975 Y RFSL'ARCN tXVEE&LEN'CE Student participant in the UCLA Sutuner Field School in Archaeology; Summit J•tount, Cedar City, Utah 19634 !.Crew Member Santa Monica City College excavation of LAn-1, a millingstono horizon village near Topanga. Los Aitgeles County, California (1961-62). UCLA excavation of Ven -69. a late period rockshelter near Thousand Oaks. Ventura County, California (1.63), UCLA excavation of Xfedea Creek (LAn--245) , n late period cemetery near Agoura. Los:Angales County, California (1966). UCLA excavation of the 'Trantas Cnny' --t kite a middle period cemetery At J Trantas. Los Angeles County, Califo aia (1969) . ' UCLA excavation of''Pinu, a late period trading center on Catalina Island. 'Los Angeles County, California (1969). Research Assistant to Dr. Christopher Donnan, UCLA. National Science Foundation and Ford Foundation supported research on the north coast of Peru. 1969 Field Directors excavation o`Ven-70, a late period temporary campsite near Newbury Park. Ventura County, California (1964-65). Excavation of the Fico Creek Site (Slo-179); a middle and late period coastal village neat San Si"meon, San Luis Obispo County, California (1.965), Excavation of LAn-50; a small storage cave near Lake Malibu. Los ktgeles County, California (1966) Site reconnaissance ;of eleven federal reservoirs in the North . Coast katge, California (1967) Excavation of the gig %u3unga Sita (2i;kn-167) a late period village near Sunland. Los Angeles County, California,~ Site reconnaissance 'of the. Camarillo Data and Flood Control basin. Ventura County; Califo.:iia (1970) z E-kt6v4titin of the nunnttig;'Springs; nanch Sitc, a middle period Village Aite ncat ,tltwbury kark 'VcnLota CuwAy; CalltOtnia (1.970) .ar Excapvac� on of the Big Springs Site {SCAT-SF',..;an in)ond catipsite on Santa 4atalina island. Los A.ngales Countyi Cal:'I'3;.w ?zis (1970). Zxxava Lion of the Yalibu Site (LAn-264'), u mi8die and late period village nr:4%r Malibu. Los Angeles County, California (1971-72) Zi.tereconnaissance of the Santa Monica Mountains. Los Angeles and Ventura County, California (1971-73) ,Excavation of the jicholas Canyon Site (LAn-1$0), a middle period village .ear Trantas. Los Angeles County, -California (1972). Excavation of the ?Malibu Cemetery, an Historic Chumash cemetery near 21al.ibu: Los Angeles County, California (1.972) Udavation of Totqui Cave, a middle and late period rockshelter on Santa Catalina Island,, Los Angeles County, California (1973) ;Site reconnaissance and excavation of site `s in Sutton Valleys a series of Iate period temporary sites on the Westlake North Ranch Development. 'Ventuta County, California (1973-75); r lrxcavation of the Little Harbor Site (SCal-17) a middle and ,late period ��:il.ltge site on datalina Island, Los Angeles County, California (1973). ;Zalvagd excavation of four seasonal campsite located in the upper reaches of vena Canyon, Loft Angeles County (1975) Stivage excavation of the remnants of a mortuary feature in the village of Shimiyi Ventura County (1915). Site survey program on Santa Catalina Island (1976) Rock 'art inventory on Santa Cat Aliiia Island (1,977) Blackwater Well'Prc_ioc:t (co-director) Joint project between Buteou of Lana janagement, San Bernardino County Museum, and t -an Diego County Archaeolog ci�l 00c.iety (1.978) Ohba collection at P ehistor'ic Turquoise Mines near Halloran Springs (1978-19) n .. k Analysis: Li.thic analysis ; batteted stone)/collection from LAn-1 an Early j,,i,l.lingsrxone Horizon site. Santa Monica City College (1963): t-Ithic and faunal analysis/Ven-70, a late period seasonal campsite complex.: University of California, Loa Angeles (1965) 'L thi,c and faunal analysis/81,o-179, a Late period village. University pf California, Los Angeles (1965 to 1966). :ceramic analysis/Uuanchaco, reru (an Early Intermediate, Middle Horizon site) . University of California, Los ,Angeles (1969). Lithic and faunal. Analysis/ collection From 'SGAI-50, a late period seasonal.: camp. University of California, Los Angeles(1970-1972)'. y 'Li.thic anal sis/Torqua wave, an intermediate and late period seasonal camp. university of California, Los Angeles & Riverside (1973-1976). .?,i.thic analysis/Sutton Ranch Sites, a scrirys of late period seasonal camps. University of California, Los Ange:,e, & Riverside (1974-1977) 'Uthic analysis/Pena Canyon, sites, a series.': of late period seasonal camps. Los Angeles '(1970 t,hic analysis/series or intermediate and late period villages on Santa Catalina 7dland. University of California; Ri've'rside (1976-pre,ent) Lithic analysis/early temporary camp in Southern Orange County (1`975). Lithic analysis/cultural remains for prehistoric Turquoise mines near- .1iall.oran springs (1978-79) d fit, i1_ z eologlcal Advisor and Consultant: ittovpr, of Engineers under the auspices of the National Park Service 7,968, IWO, 1975, 197.5: Zy,port witness before State, County and City commission and committees vltb regards to archaeological resources 1968-present. Jp4visor for 'Local: conservation groups and movements 1968-present Consultant fox the Santa Monica Unified School District .for pilot project Involving teaching or culture history and archaeology in elementary ,&.'tool& 1970: 3 t- );airman of the .Archaeological and Cultural: Resources CommitL-ee of the 5t.ate Department of Pa ks and Recreation's Point Magu State Park mvisory Committee 1971. ' }; dvisor to Santa Catalina IslandCompauy; vianagement of arcliaeological ;rtaodurces and archaeological research progl'ams 1.970-p event r' r5ovsultant to California State Division of xighwaye 1971-1974., P..rapared over 100 archaeological assessments for engineeritig, planning, and &nvironmentai firmi; (1971- 1966) z e a Ci".S TO TIME 'ROFBSSION 5bciety'fot California Archaeology District Archaeologist, Aistrict vIY Ventura, Los Angeles, and Orange Counties) 1570"103, 1914-1975. 5 ci.ety for, California Archaeology District Archaeologit.t, District VITT atsd IX (tion�p� Ingo, San Bernardino, and Riverside Counties) 1975- 1976 h, bi st tict hrc saeologisty 5a.n Bernardino county 1978-1D79. Regional Office or the ,State of Cal.;`ornia Archaeological Site Survey, ilivarsile, Mono; and Inyo Counties, 1976-- 1978 ngional Officer or the fitkate of California-ArChaeolt.gical Site Survey; San ndrnardi.no County (197840) . Program a�mttjchn ogical Society, s6dietyfor CaliforniaCalifo is Archaeol,ogyj Society Pot Appli.cd « thtopalogY, the.Ass6tiati6h for the AinthtOP6109ical Study of rlAy, and Old Southwestern Anthropological. Association, April 19770 San Diego. 5, r J ' o'FFTcES 'IIELD ;IN `p.EtOFESSIONAL _SOCIETIES Chairman of the Society, for California Atchaeology's Yli.ghway Salvage Cou�i t;tee 1970--197..3. � h. irran of the Society for California Archaeology's Santa Monica MountaJ,,as Commitee 1970--1973. Vice -President of the Society for California Archaeology 1971-1972, 1372-1973. Actin, President of the Society for California Archaeology, Summar 1971. AWARDS AIM GRANTS. Honorary Advisor far CEDAM international, Honorary Advisor ,for the Idaho `Archaeological Society: Support for field work in Peru from the National Science Foundation and the 'Ford Foundation EDI'f0 MAL S, RVICES TO.'SCHOLARLY PUMC&IONS ,Associate Editor,, UCLA Archaeological. Survey Annual Report, Vole. 10 and ll.. editor-sCtsi ef, UCLA Archaeological Su7 'y' Annual. kdpbrt, 'Vols 12, 1:3, and IC PAPEP- . ;RrAb , AT SCHOL.kRL'Y MEETINGS 1967 "The Santa, Monica MountainsResearch project." Taper del.iV'ered At the annual tweeting of the Society for California A'r'chaeology; San i rancisco, California. 1970 '1The Catalina Island t e. ea"rch Vtogedm " paper delivered At the annual meeting of the Society for California Arclhaeologyy Abilomar, Ca:.iforna-. 1970 (with :loseph L. Chartkott, Robert Evans, and E. Gary Stickel.) "Application of the 'Ecological. Concept of Succession to an At jaeologicaI Problem," Paper del;iverod at the 35th Annual Mei ,Ling of the Society for A►ne.icah Archaeology, Mexico City, Mexico. 1971 "Itiveatignt i:onb into the Aboa igjthl decuri ec ce of neer on Cdtalina lsland, "' paper delivered At the annual, tneeting of thi! Society for California Arctiaaology� 5t,crataentb, California, G r 197.1. "Toward an Und Landing of the I'rocessses of C e in kreh star c SGtt'loment—Stib:jistence, t:terns on Catalina Island." AWer delivered at the annual meeting of �CEDAM International, Long Teach, California. 1972 "Measurement of population Changes in Southern, California Prehistory.' Paper delivered at the annual meeting of the Society for California Archaeology, Long Beach, California. 1.972 Chairmnn of. the SCA Symposium: Chapges and the Measurement of Change in Southern California Prehistory. Annual meeting of, the Society for California Archaeology, tong Beach, California. 1972 "The Santa 'Monica Mountains Moratorium." Archaeological LResponsibilities Symposium. Delivered at the annual meeting of the SocieL•;- for California Archaeology, Long Beach, California. t , 1974 "Limited Use Sites in the Sar.ra Monica Mountains and the Use of Institutional Field Programs in Archaeol-q,Zy to Mitigate Residential Impacts." Paper delivered at the Annual ,meeting of the Society for California Archaeology, Riverside, California. 1974 "The Excavation of Torqua Cave, Catalina Island." Paper delivered At the annual maeting of the Southern Califotnia Academy of ScipInces, Fullerton, California. 1974 "Sampling Stratigy for the Malibu Cemetery Excavation." Paper delivered at the annual. meeting of the Southwestern Anthropological Aosociation, Santa Monica, California. 1575 "Salvage ExCavati.on of a Mortuary Feature from the Village of Shimiyi, Simi Valley, California.' raper delivered at the annual meeting of the Society for 'California Archaeology, Santa Cruz, California. 1975 "The Prehistoric 'Use of the Chaparral Communities of the we' stern Santa tfonica Mountainsd Paper delivered at the annual meeting of the Southern California Academy of Sciences; Los Angeles, California: 1975 "The-Impornnce of Archaeological Site: in Arid Regions of Southern California." Society for California;, Southern California Data Sharing Meeting, Northrid?,,, , California. 1978 "Santa Catalina Island Rook Art." Society of 'California annual meeting, Yotemite, California Publications and Re ortH 1966 Ven-70 and,its Place in ;the Late Pe riod 'of "the Manisa Mountains,." Archaeological Survey Annual Re ort Ve.st„ern Santa .of, California, Los Angeles. ' a1,; 8, University 1968 "The Santa Monica 11ountains Research Project: An Introduction,” Archaeological Survey Annual neport Vol. 10,, Univernity of California, Los Angeles. 1368 "Archaeological Reconnaiosance of the Anderson ford and Enlarged Ruth RcsP,voirs in Trinity .and Humbolt Counties, California." Report ,Prepared d .in fulfillment of a contract with the National Park Service. ' re 1968 (wit), David Abram) "Archaeological Salvage of the Pico Creels and Little Pica Creek Sites, San Luis Obispo County, Call,fornia.", ,Report prepared in fulfillment of a contract with the Department of Xarkd and Recreation, State of California. 1968 (Vith James Toney) "Archaeological Reconnaissance of the Proposed d .Schniders liar, Helena, and l; ltapom Reservoirs on, the Trinity River Drainage. {n Trinity County, California," Report prepared in fulfillment: of a i ,contract with the National Park Service, 69 ''Archaeological; Reconnaissance of the Proposed Dutch Culch Res"enroi.r In Shasta and Tehama Counties, California," Report } of a contract wi,tlj the National Park service: P rt Prep°rid in fulfilltneitt 1970 "An Archaeological Survey of the Proposed Ca marLllu Dam, Ventura California," Report prepared for the National Park Service, Western KO-gional Office, r 1970 (With Patrick Finnerty, Dean beekari Thomas Ding; Chesteking, r and LindaDing) "Cam,nunity Structure and Trade at Isthmus Cove; A Salvage txcAvation in Catalina Island." Pacific Coast Archaeological Society Occasional Paper 1970 O ith ThomasKing) Syllabus to accompany archaeological. site identification in highway Planning, a course presented by the 'Society for Cnli.forn1a Archaeology and sponsored by the Division of Highways, Department Public Works, State of California. 1970(u>ith jame6 N. 11 11) "Activities of the Archaeological Surrey, tot Anp,og ocal. Survey Annual Report Vol. 12, University Of California, Los Angeles. 1971 " � The Ptbcat6es of Chane in the Santa Monica rlountains:" Manuscript submitted in partial fulftlltnent of the M.A. degree in Anthropology, University of Californiaf Los Angeles. 1421 (with reed T. plop ) '`Activities of the Archaeological Survey, Los Angeles." Archaeological Survey hnnual. henort Vol. 1�� Uni�ters.ty of California., Los Angeles. S 6. Ot - v °� - 1971 "t;atural rand Social Lnvironihenta of the Santo Monica Mour►rc�ins . (6000 IAC to 1$ppi,)),it Archaeological Survey Annual_ Vol. ,13, Onivers ty of 'Cal fi`raia, Los Angeles: 1.972 v§ri t-',her B. Donne n) "Activities of tate Archaeolo(�ica? bUrvey, ��foxnia, Los Angeles , University sof tijr°i g Survey Annual Re ort Vol. 14, �`•' f1.'� Archueolo les. 1973 llcatalin,j Island z;rP,aearch� " rehaeo Edited for the A4rchaeology, i'rogram byAG orgioonuccellaII. Vol, 1, No. 1, 1973 (with Thomas F. king and tljc.'tiae J. hora.tta) "Recommended'Procedures for Preparing and FtGvicwing Environmental Impact 1tNr�p Archaeologicalits pert Resources.' Society for California Archaeology, inert to California, gy, Fullerton, 1974+r Santa Monica MounUalns and Santa Catillina /srchaeolo ical Programs at T►"X.A. dt Institute of Archaeology,' 1981 (with Chris-Opher E. Drover) "Prehistoric Turquoise mining in the 1-alloran ,Pring:, Diwt:i.rct, San Bernardino County, California." California And Great 3asin J'ourhal of Ahthropol�sgy. 0 California State University, ;Chico Chicoi California 95929-0515 Biologlul S6ences (916) 895-5356 5 Nov 9Q Mr; Ed Rogers P 0. Pox 273 Forest Ranch, C 9J911 Dear Mr., Rogers: As Coordinator of the General Botany course at California State University, Chico I am appreciative of your Cai.11ingness to allok 0 us to utilize the area west of Highway 32. on Forest Ranch Rd. for p our field trips. Out labs average S - S trips aear to this area. a. On our last trig you asked us if we have ever noticed 5idalcea robusta Heller ex Roush:, growing in the area. We really haven't looked for it but no, we have never seen it on any of our visits. z will be harpy to letyou:know if we do. Sincerely, r Robert Ediper, rex Lessor. Dept Of 13 .olopi,cal 'Sciences M W Q-q 7�9 d3W- mos the' Call6r►ia State OhNersity BUTTE to. PLANNING OLPARTWNT OROVILLE, GALIFOONIA G JPA {�n}1 0 �` Colifornia Q if OM' c .; �� E 51EflM De arfi err iF oolog cai , ,f GLENN SI 011 P .merit of.,'�nthropology 111VentorG>(5P LASSEN St�tc; Cal(forhia State tJn(vtlrsfty, Chico " Mb DOC TOIAMA - Cihicr•, CA 955929 FLNMAS TRINITY SHASTA , (91 E t F6?i5,6256 November 2, 1990 Tlt,+tte County Planning. Department 117 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 RE: AP # 056-28-007/13odgers I.C. L90-60 T24111 R3E, w' aJ:.on 32' USGS Cohasset 7.5t and Paradise •5 quads 66 acres ,pear Planning Department, In :response :u a. requst received October 18, 1990,. a record search for the above -iited pro"t;ct, was conducted by examining the, official maps and records for archaeological sites in Butte County, RESULTS PREHISTORIC AE80URCES: Our records indicate that there are do recorded sites of this type known to be, located wi;tl:,in project boundaries or wi Gh .n a one mile radius of the projoot area. However, sites of this type have been recorded in similar environmental zones i.n the vieinit,,;r o#' the pro ject area. VI8TORIC RESOURCES: Thera are no previously recorded histone archaeological sites .known to, be located within the project boundaries or on adjacent par. cels, However, the USGS quad M -p indicates a cemetery in Section �s9. Additionally) the tow n ti.�' Forest Ranch was active "(1fling '`rt'se historic period, and a pose- btL ice was established h -re in 1.)' 8.. The Wagon Road noted oij 3 the 08CTS quad map is a P "rt,i.on :" the historic Humboldt Road, cotas'tr,zcbed by John 1 - (Well 'ane. others in the 1860ts as a travel route to the mi,tw t n Idah-ii Many popular stage s.. ups and resorts were estaba.xshod alon•q; this 'road. PREVIOUS" ARCHAEOL06i'cti,. ,IMSTs°I'ATIONS According to our' reeords, the project area, has Piot hoen previously surveyed for ou tueal resources, LITERATURE SEARCH: Reviewed W( lrc. the Official records and pas for arohaeological sited and surveys in butte County, Also reviewedwere the Nab .opal Register of Historic Places, the California Inventory of Historic Resources ( 1976) , California H3.8t'orical Lam marks (1582)t California Points oP Historic Intdilest, A Gttttury, of Cai. Po- ;rqa post Offices ,r 21 Edward w. Rodgers Post Office Box 273 Forest :Ranch, CA 95942 OCT I October 11,1990 BUTTE CO. PLAN"" I IIARTMENT Plannilig Department ORUVILLE, CALIFORNIA Attn: Brent L. Moore 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965-3397 Dear Sirs Reference our recent 'tel,econ on the Environmental: Check list for: Tena-rive Parcel Map APT" -,.9,,--240-064 and 056-280-007 Log t':r�1�03-30-03 Request the findings and the data (pg.9) be re- evaluated aild corrected, and changes be lows'made as .fol-- . 21: 3 change to 'ono" from "maybe'" based on the above Ir provide a "negative declarationl�. Change the required mitigation measures as follows on page 8 I. l`m a Registered California Civil; Engineer, haveb , and my specialty Watery waste, and wells: I have been a �p � ' pa-tici aht in the current DWR study of ground waters in the Butte County foothills. spoke yesterday with Wayne Gentry, Chief of the DWR Red Bluff Office, on thei subject, and I am to receive,a draft copy as soon as possible. They agree with me; there is no water shortage in the Forest Ranch ridgs only in h*he shallow -40118. . r have also spoken taith Earl Watson, main well driller in the area, and he knows of no dry deep holes or any deep wells going dry in the area (600 to 500 feet close well log is attached. qty closeyneighbor W.g. Batt, just across Highway.. 321 more than ten years ago found water at 628' (his log is missing), and his tVell has never, gong. dry. A new 'yell on Forest Ranch Road: by Earl Watson to the nets toerke house under const,ruct- ion, found ''rater last week at 800'. water piped to these parcols in a 1-„x already have my i line. 3 . As to the deer herd impact, the 10cation shown is totally difforont and more than 10 miles away, NY site is in a "transportation oorridorlr accord- ing Pith and Came: Roll Reit ah,is in a different data_ goryr and not deer restrictive. Please check. ..,M1ti 4••,+-�.aawiyw.e. r7 , ff� a � STATE OF C.ALAFORNIAGwilces . icy THE: RESO1A,CL,S AGENCY Do not ! itl DFPARTMENT r .} .ATER RESOURCES No. 131917 t�7cu'; Ytd 4 t. ur l WIPER WELL bRYLLEIRS REPORT g rAu++��lttl+lt�k�ti+r. Stilt, wo! JAIL >rtr tlthnx !!"o1i An. S ,.. .. Y i r J X�t _ (22) WELL LOG: 740 740 V40. BLIX 1�/ Totril drpth ft. Depth of camp)etcd Wcil "„,_„-ft. t from it h! (t. h'onnatiun (Describe 6 etilur chnmct , sirs ++r-inntcrinl) t ?�r+. tom✓ .4 r. �A/.4' 47. tY zllt. ./ `- 4 1. . 4tiffi .3.. {, li •) �. • t +, Or WELL w r {Sett instrnetitan5); 3 Creott nn•nrrrs Well Number_IJu c u iS' lL IriW tz 4dlilfcrrnt from iibove Foxest L Lgf'.h Rd. - » +* i 7rrxnttubr,,� -,: �r �. i7 Rurii;c 3 Ii _ 5artinn 31. iDi,twuA^ 6tntr,,S'7i114% malls, mllnp, ls, rel etr, 1Lri: on ��QX'CS.w and o 9% o iar is tirrl r174 - _ 1 - A -. nL` {: '",/C � 1 , rs / 1�,. � w "" (3) TYPE QF' IV05E Dcevenlng Recvhttnlcdion ❑ rinrivrtlhtl Well © derttn •ftiin 1i�rrlteiia�k and +n7ceduro in it \4/ Y.riOS Qspm A 12) E, )rrJ�atirin t� tntinitriai ❑ Tot Well Styx [� Jiorrfcinal Cl rather Q - .:' " ,. ... _. . r - i1L t1. LOCATI; $RF -T- I tttl ZQiv "s1:.``Ct t+7t sY limens (1 'ritYrr Sw Air X)tiv € Fiuckrl ❑ (0) GRAVEL PAM yca C3 No USh Diameter of ho I'St kctil frinn. - _ __. lrt - it, _ a7.y CA.$' NC. ISS ALUD, Meeh, a Muir, Ctimmie 4, (!!) PFrit't)IrATlt)\St Ty1w, trf rerfor Ono or sf2e of ddrerh V'rrrw TO f R#,. bia. _- In, C'aae Or 1Vaft From fL T[ ft Sldk xize — _ ir9) �4-`gLL SEALi20 C5*,ne rtrkP ur 1.:v idry' ,s0aIl ter jmt^idyled?? jyti�rji,1]� No 0 If gra; its dt+ltlh -, ft. Werk- tCtitt sznlctl a:tyJEi U VS,1.L Uki x [] till lntrtlal $lcilarx ..! sns ial+ 13 Wnrlt. 6rgttestarted 10) X77 ibtL+trr rf>f ext uatrr+ If kthtutl ► 5iinda - -Alter~ well rampMtrnn_ ._ NtVEL1.-011 sx��r/M*L�l Vlh Uell teat' rill r ifll oltN261dtCHr)rr Cr rittr hr rHi• herr r1T tlt kNatrlydaa nn' be tr, - 4Leverti' (Lf) sl,EU, MTSt, u , fi"rs waKJ Srxt nrxdr. Yrs art if ycs, by uh7mi?- Tw xtf lr# i'nn1• t t+� r 14,Ih r [p Alr htt rhttfth 0 %Att:' : �-% Ili tt�^ --. �. rt. At tut of rust Y; f7faN°ta;tr:r _.,,,d.+., `,....uel itdn arlur�. '� lirltira yLattrr .telrtprrltitrr t-rtr^r7im.1, Art kmi tl7iltle}. Ve, :AY �w' li +l.'Yt l)i' N11�1111�• ,.. ... ys'xa,, t lr« tot C• msttoY _: 1'r \rr.. Ti rt s._ntiaulr rnpy,tn ihi� report r t'tL .. ! ) ,n a l,io%}�.i3 ZZs �:5 Lix' �, f✓t7_ tia• NA, 86 4 . 'i sf r} ion�i'Gr�� r�°4�1r1nn) ixkrtct or priritetll -- ,�tJrl-rr+t K .. 2 _ .�. ... .- . , .. � ±1-21-c CihM1 .. 'rr +"+ * •'� _.. .. .� - a -^... Lteense �r3. _ ., 1)tc of Ihl+ teptsri t'aw" 180 liory 7.744 IF AbDiTIONAL SPACIr is NEEDED. USE Nt=XT CONsEiCU' IVtLY NUMOtntb rclilM 42 1 MEN= MMM f m TUPPICATE Do 210"'f! S copy THE RESCA"."."'t ownal- 11 DEPARTMENT OF WATER RE: 0, WATER WEIM DRILLERS, REPORT xxv. State Well 1,40 zzrat, le- 1- 111, or Date Other Well No- VTLL' LOG: Total de 0L-�� Iic;th"'' 'A of. completed wel 'be by color. character, size or material) t/ from ft be It. Formatirin (Desen 0 0 01'r, J2 i -J., le LCX AVON OF WELL Bee fristmetions): --Owner's Well Nurnber, 0 tf, Aj aA-1 0 - 97 _11 utit7-.7 4 �dfrrent from above—/z 'Z r-eL- '9 t"; til- ectinn 'a r9. f. -T I fr,.r,- roads, railroads, fenr--t, etc 1X2 Fw - A,, It i ,� 7' I A- ;7</// "18" /'w' ir j 'I (3) TYPE OF WORK. - New Well OKDeepeulng 0 Reconstruction ❑ 0 Haris=tal Well tract n. 0 (Describe procedturr, in Item. Izy j (4) PROPOSED 11-7Se Domestic y. Industrial ❑ Twe ' W, U 0 tock, Nl�a VM" LOCATION SKETCI� \vjOther P"ACC: at rrsc L7 Ce C V3 b;K s; piva:Y14r of bots Olh- Lam. (7i CA,51%i(�. INTrALLE Steer 4W., ?:Aemc 4`4 -1 Typ' of Pe. f trretn Per s To Dia. c4a� -'rorg" Is, 'I ,& -77- Wall fL ft-fuin (9) WELL SEAL - 22 )Val r,;rfate tar,;tary seal provided? Yes Ck No [3 It yes, 0 depth --. --ft. ,Were strata sealed against pollution? Yes 0 No 0A Interv-1 Method of %-:ihnz� %Work sta,19 (10) WATE11 LEVELS-. NVELL DRILLER'S STATENIENT: Depth of first water, if known ------2-2r-k. This teell tray drilled rzn r ny furisdictitin t2ral chit report it true in the best of knowledge and bet( 5tnruic.g �.Jafter�-etl cnrn�vletion (11) WELL T.11.7STS: SIGNED — Wisa well test made? yes< No fJ if yes, by whom? 0 Type of test Pump bailer OX Air Depth w water at start of test- �411--11P. At end GE te$t-r--!—/-L-"-'1'(Person, fins, or corporation I (Typed nr printed) Water terriperutum— Address--loe" Z c%cmlml anal,,wstst =de? Yes CA so 0 If yes, hV whom? City— Was electric h.rz made? Yes n.,.Na 17VII, es. attach copy to this report License No. 1:21,1 :-%. 9 Date of this OWH 100 (PEV, 7-161 IF ADDITIONAL SPACE IS NEEDED. USE NEXT CONSECUTIVELY NUMBERED FORM l - -`- - LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 9596$-33k," TELEPHONE: (9]6) 636-7641 October 3, 1990 Edward W. and 'Kathryn Rodgers P.O. Box 273 Forest Ranch, CA 95.942 Re, Revised 'Tentative Parcel Map, APN 056-240-054 and 056-2$6=tili7 Log 490-08-30-03 Dear Mn & Mrs. Rodgers: An initial study of your proposed project, a 'tentative Parcel Map, indicates potentially adverse impacts to the environment (refer to he enclosed ei-lvironmental< checklist). To reduce or eliminate these impacts, suitable mitigation measures are required as part of the project. Otherwise, an Environmental Impact Report (EIR;) is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. An early response to this notification, sent to the Planning Department, will expedite the scheduling of your project. Please forward your written response within 15 days from the date of this letter. A list of local consultants is included. These persons can determine the need far a survey by conducting a records search, conduct archeologicaland botanical surveys or arrange for such surveys. In the event of an ETR requirement, a subsequent letter will be sent outlining the procedure for the County to select the consultant to prepare the EIR +�Sf; i , j MOM MrA?C- OF CALIFORNIA THE RESOURCES AGE GEORGE OMMUtAN, Governor P.ARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME 41�6100 2 1710 101ASUSROMY, Sur(E A ••� 11*011f' OORDOVA, CALIFORNIA 95670 355-7020 Sc>opy`R September 1$,, 1990 Oroe�At Mr, John Mendonsa, Assistant Director Department of Public Works 7 County Center Drive ! arovil,le CA 95965 Dear Mr. Menc onsa t The Department. of Fish and -Game (DVG) has r!viewed the Edward W. .and Kathryn Rodgers Tentati;;e Parcel LMap .(T'=M) a proposal to di -aide two parcels (AP 56-24-64 and 56-28-07) a total of 66 acres., into three five -acre and one 51 -acre parcels: Located at Forest Ranch, the. TPM lies within critical winter range of the East t Tehama deer herd Subdivision of land into small parcels has an adverse impact on migratory deer. As lands within critical winter range are divided into parcels smaller than 4.0 acres, deer use becomes impaired, migratory movement affected, and forage and space needs drop below the level to sustain herd numbers. -subdivisions have adversely affected more than 40 percent of the rwinter range (i.e., critical and designated winter ran es) in Butte County. In an effort to resolve the subdivisioh7deer oonflict in Butte County, the DFG has recommended a series of acctions for the Board of Supervisors to implement. The DFG also identified a "Designated Development. Zone" (DDZ) where development may occur,. provided certain mitigation measures are adopted and implemented by the Board. 7'he TPM does not lie within a DDZ. It represents an intrusion xzto an area of, large parcels which would add to the significant :cumulative loss of deer winter range caused by residential eficroachment in Butte County. Therefore, DFG recommends that the Vi 4 be denied. if we can be of further assistance; please contact Mr. Ron Bertram, Assoc'ate Wildlife Biologist, or Ns. Patricia Perins, Wildlife Management Supervisor, at (916) 355-7010: sincerely, ,l ee 'Jame1 D`. " Messe smith Re" ional Mana er 1 51-0 iP4. R i x lie fu� tAN'D OF NATURAE YJf' rr,iTH AND BEAUTY DEPARTMENT OF P,'3LIC HEM.TH i DIVISION OF ENVIRt;" `art+ , AL HEALTI H Address jl 196 Memorial Way O7 County Canter Drive 747 Elliott Rood Reply to Chico, California 95926 Oroville, California 95965 Poraais'c', California 95969 Telephone, 916/891477.7 Telephones 916/5:18=7281 Tolophooes 916/872.6308 September 20, 1990 Edward W. & Kathryn Rodgers RE: Edward R. .x Ka'—. m .Rodgers P.O. Box 273 Parcel �Iap Forest Ranch, CA 95942 Cor Forest, Ranch Rd. & Hwyy. 32 Forest Ranch Area AP# 56-24-64 & 5`--28-07 Dear Mr, & Vis, Rodgers:_ This department has advised ti,- Butte County Departr",.goat of `,ablic Works, Land Development Sec,f . that we ate prepared, to ac,.-. on the above app] icati.ot Based on present information, we can recofin end apprGval or eonditiooal approval, Recommended 'Cond U' ons for A rpp oval 1. Provide a 100' leachfield free setback around nxisting wells either tai thin the property or within 100' of the pra,;:erty boundaries.; 2: Show a 50' leachfield setback from the draiti,�pc, way. 3, Prove that the2required quantities of domestic, water are available to p , aand 4. Prove that the required quantities of domestic;. water are available or place a note on the map that states ''There. is no evidence that do,testic water is available for the remainriEt:,00 If you have and questions, please contact the Chit -lb office listed above Sincerely, - �J,6 ✓ , Bieyis to. FtattOng Qxrrrn 'thomas Reid 3 R. E,1l. S Supervising Environmental Health Specialist 26 1991 Division of Environmental Health Orovilley uifortiia TR/g1 til cc: Public Works.; Planning i i( h 77 r t court 7� LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAOTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE- OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE; (916) 533-7601 September 25, 1990 ;Edward W. and Kathryn..Rudgers P.O. Box 273 Forest Ranch, CA 95942 Ike: Tentative Parcel Map APN 056-240-064 and 0567280-007 Log #90-08-30-03 Dear Mr. & Mrs. Rodgers; An initial study of your proposed project, a Tentative Parcel Map, indicates potentially adverse impacts to the environment (refer to th enclosed environmental checklist). To reduce or eliminate these impacts, suitable mitigation measures are required as part of ithe project. Otherwise, an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. An early response to this notification, sent to the planning Department, will expedite the scheduling of your protect Please forward your written response within 15 days from the date of this letter: A list of local consultants is included. These persons can determine the need for a survey such conducting a the records search, conduct archeological and botanical surveys or arrange for b conducttn a surveys.event of an EIR requirement, a subsequent letter will be sent outlining the procedure for the County to select the consultant to prepare the EIR, I APPENDIX i COUnTY 01' BUTTE ENVIRONMENTAL Ciltdx GIST FORM EVALUATION'OF ENVIROMMAERTAL IMPACT PlI e No, 56,.24-64 Log No, 90-07-1 §8-30-03 AP No: 56-24-64 BACKGROUND 1. Edward and Kathryn Rodgers 2. P,p. Box 273, forest Ranch. CA g5942 3. Project desctiptlon. Tentative Parcel Map to divide 66_acfes to create three five ,acre parcels and A remainder of 5i Acres. It MAWDATORY:_FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE ves wAvnh ►+n, DISCUSSION 'OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION' 11 Does th of theect have tht.pote tial t substantially degrade the -- --x-- This proposal will not slgnificantiy degrade the environment, _- habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wiidllfe population to drop below self-sustalning ; levels. threaten .o eliminate a plant of ahimAl Community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a fare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of majorperiods of californla history of prehlst>otyt 2. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term benefits to the detriment of long,ter^l X. This prdpdsal Will not Impede long-term envIllonmetital goals, environment goals? (A short-term Impact on tht: enVlrohme-t Is one which of -urs In a relativelj brlef p+ rlod of tlmc: while tong -term Impacts Will endure r,ito the future,) 3, Does the ot'OkIct have Impacts which are Individually flmi"ted bt.t 'camulatiVeiy considerable? (A project X' 'rhls proposal maY have a slgnjj'tcanl cumulative impact on the environment, MAY impact ,q two Of teore separate resources Where the Impact o.� each resource is relatively small; but where the et,•nc, a the Iota' of those lmpadts a is slgnlflcan�,) sVironment A'. Does the project have environmental effects which Wi x This proposal will not have a sfghtlicant adverse effect on human Will I cau a substantial adverse etfpcts on human heinsas, - beings, either dfrectly or lhoilrectryt TTZ DETERMINATIeJN on NC DaSIS 01 OS 111(iAl CValug (ori; 11W€ find the proposed project WJLD NOT have a slgnificant effect on the enVtr0nment and a NCdATIVE DECLAftATI04 WI1I be ptooared, Case Hnd thathalthoughTthe Mtoposed project cWL0 have a slgnlll ahs effect 'on the environment, there 0.11 nest be a sighlficant ej Wt In this M A eA urtt escrlbed on the Attached sheet have badh Added to the project. A NEOAT VE btCLARATION rrlil be ONPAhtd, Ilwc find the proposed rfrojeict MA`:' have a significant.'effect on CherjVlrOMIr nt. M"; ali,ltW`1trj t *AL IMPA& ktPORT Is Irtoulted. �7UYfY TE, P/ TMtNf OATO September 25. 1 90 By - Reviewer by ; "nvitimbental Checklist * Eva of, ''Environmental',' Impact 2 IV ENVIRONMENT,7-�,IMPACTS „ ° yes uvr�� DISCiUS81ON OF ENVIRONMEkTAL__EVALUAT!ION t_ FAkt"� Wf ;--tne.proposal result In significant, .a. Unstable earth conditions, or changes in geologic substructures? X_ The proposal will hot affect subsurlace earth conditions. b. nlsruptfon, displacement, ti mpaction or overcovering of the soil? x_ ThIs proposal wild resul I. Insome disruption, displacement, compaction and overcovering of the site as a result of development of structures, driveways, parking areas, etc, oue to the topography of the site,_homesite locations will require some earthwork In terraingeneral the project relatively ridge Theordinance t h attsicaIs atGarci anysignif significant Impaccaused necessarythwoto ated ssociated deVeloolno two additional homestes. c. Change In topography or ground surface_,_, rellef features# _ k oUe to steep slopes assoclated with the canyons, residential development is limited to the tldge top areas. d,, oestNctloh; covering or modlflcation of any unfque geologic or physical features? _;., k- The project 5-1te has no physical fta,lures which ate Unlque to butte County. e. Increase in wind or hater erosion of soils, either on or off sitet x_ Wholesale exposure of toll during the construction phase of development by the allowed pr000sEd project WIII temporarliy raise the arcs lon rates, whon considering the factors of the site Such as shallow Solis, vegetation type, slope size, and Inclination, and - the frequency and Intensity Of faihfall, soli erosion potehtlal is vary htgh. it is anticipated that the eUtte county Grading ordinance wiIf coltttol erosion during the construction phase of development to a less than s',gniflcant level, Chahf, sands. of, dbaeS In ngestlnrsllftationi,odeposibeach X r� H,ds Dorset cksidue tiolthetparcel stzesland dierosion"streams, l n Or erosion Which may modify the channel of e from Ce tram Surf water flows, ace a flyer or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, Inlet or taken g... rots of prime aglicUlturally prodUctive soils outside designated urban areast X This proposal does hot represent a slghiflcant loss of prime agricultural tolls, The property Is charactterited by residua) soil s from lava flows, rough tock outcroppings, ouldets, cobble stones, b and shallow sos ovetiying Tuscan formations. such soils have marginal agricultural values and limited grazlhg opportunities. h. EXpdsUte of people of ptbperly t d hazards such as earthquakes, to dslides andslltles; � x Ali of Out to county Is in a oderAte iarthgU"o ititensl ly zohe VII I. constfuctlon of buildings to Uniform tlullding Code standards will muds Ides, ground failure or simllat haza�ds? provide adequate protection to occupants in case of setsmlc activlty. 2. Alta. Witt the pr;,posal tesul"t In sobstahtlal: A. Ait emissions or detetIctation of Ambient alt quality? x Increasing the densltles of tesidehtlal development on the project site Will result In cumulative Impact on air qumItydue to related ►hcreases In traffic generated and Indirect air pbliution resources, The callforma Alt Resources control hoard' had Identified SUtte County as a honallainmont area in 'meetlhd tfle slandards of the California Clean Alt Act (of Ozone and catboh MonoXrde. The county Alt pol`►Utlon control Plan pfovides no mitigation measures for such A small residehtla( pro)ecl, b, The cheilion ai objeetlonabfu odors, smoke or tamest • ,• k allty Impacts wlII probably rasult dUrIng the cc nsttUctlon phasos of .developing residential housing. Iiitrea"sed u omenf emisttons as Weti as Increased duct wtil occur i ve We AM att cUiineatthwotka5taq W get of development. 3 mvirohmental Checklist:," tvalvtAtion of Environmon,tal 'Impact ZV ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (continued) YES MMAYBE. . w LJJ 0%.; JAr3.LV1tl yr ,G1yy: LiCV1x14rJryx_-tLJ (Con tIhued) C. of movement, moisture of _ _ , X The proposal'wlII not affect the atmosphere. leaveIatur3, or any change In clinate. n glAlt Alteratioon ya L NrrE with the proposal result In substantial.- ubstantial:a. a. changes in currents, or the course or X - The ptoposat will not affect the course or direction of water direction of water movements In either _ movemahtsc In either marine or fresh Waters: marine or Iresh waterst b. changes In absorption +ates: drainage x_ The proposed project Wt 11 cause some minor change$ in the absorption due to Impervious patterns, or the rate ar.9 amount of sot face rates and resulting amount of surface runoff to driveways, foot tops, etc, runolll surfaces related paving, parking areas, No signilfcanl altering of the basic drainage patlefn Is anticipated, C. Need for. bit-slle surface drafnate x _ No off-site surface drainage Improvements I anticipated In order to Improvements, Including vegetalfon removal, acco-qWate the proposed project, chanherization or cu,iVert ifrstallation# d. Alteratlohs-to the ,course of ftorr.of ffoW The proposal Will not affect the flow of flood Waters. waters? e, changea amount of surface water In afiy _ _, _ �?l The proposal WI I I not at fact the amount of surface water In any Water a ngebIntY body, ►, Discharge Into surface waters, or fn 4by X `he proposel 'wlll not Impact surface Water quality. alteration of surface 'Water duallly, including but not Limited to lemperaiure, dissolVed oXVgett Or 1utbIdJt,0 g. At let At Ion of the dfreralon,of rate nil flow' X_ The proposal WlIi not atIect the direction or II6v of ground waters: of ground Watersd h.. change In the quantIty or quality of ground er �� The proJact sate is current y dependent upon groundwater, Higher there waters, either through direct addltiorss or densities may overdraft the eXisting aquifer, Currently, is withdrawals; or throug14 interception of an aqui?cr by cuts or exuavatibnst no statistical data on the quantity of groundwater or rate of recharge of groundwater In the area, A stable Water source should be quantifled which will provide the Water demands of the proposed density. Recharge and drafting rates 'should be determined. L, Reduction In the amount of water otherwlse X-. see A above, available for publl4 water supplles'r J. Exposure of people or property to *Met- X --. The project site is hot located 'within a; flood zone area, The related hazards such at (loodtngt Will not sloth In a exposure of people or pfoperty to Weteosal q LANt-.. iFE. W01 the proposal resuli In Susan as a, change in the dlvefsltt of.specles, of X- 11ie diversity of Dl'ht species Will be expanded as tesrdehtlal hong- f t 1 dl "' ,�, --aive landscapes ar�� Installed humber of any specleY of pants the u ng . trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)i b. Redaution of, the numbers of ao unlpue, rare _: -. x T e project Aitc is Located to close proximity to sidalcea Robusta or endangered speclot of pl.'antsi Wtich hat been found to be a rare plant Itt older tb detetmine It Y till~ proirk;t site contalns.ahY rare Of endangered plant species It Will be necessary to petfotm a botanical sutVoy the Botanical survey will determine the heed for any further mltlgatign measurer. C. inttaodUdtloo ohhow.b rtfets lb illettsroima ""``" x The Proposal Will hot Affect existing Plant . life, ra�'iranrtt®ntal Check] iso * Eaaluati an o>E Environme>lgtal Tmpac ZV• ENVXRONMENTAI, MPACTIBr+o Icon t l Hued)' YES MAvn DZCII88I0 S NOF EaRpNMENTAL HVALiJATION (cortt tnued) replenishment of existing speciest d, Reduction fn acreage of any agricultural. crop? 5• ANI sra, s a s,in LIFa_ c,E Will the proposal result In x The site does not contain any commercially crop, y viabin agticultu a Change the species or of specNes'and landearllmelsn x ._ _ The project site Is shellfish�� 6enythc�orsaty f nciudln9,Pepttleslsribirds. g nisms or insects)? located within a beer herd range for the Ea Tehama beer herd, The area has East for the East Tehama been Utilized as the Winter beet herd, ranges Of Flsh and came commission Identlifiedadevelopmeflfinnthebl000�hitlls as encroaching Upon migratory deer ranges, The putte county Board of sUpervfsors appointed a committee to Identify the deer herd range e eutpe cnunty-ont The comnittee documented the Impacts of development on the residential migratory deer ranges, and recommended measures for protection Of migratory deer habitat affected�lby roardenf development, To date no policy has boon adopted b Board o► supervisors to mitigate Impacts of development m(gratory deer herds, The proposed project N3 located Within havtha on the designated deer herd been owever, no Impact Zoneerd county Ofa ulte urtroeritld deer hnt Theerange mitigation fees the qul I ma res a U maps, in the boz b. Reduction in the ,numbers of any Unique, rate g p beeal to lace i paidfa time of uildingipermit jt' � m act tees shad be Is I► applicable.• or endangered specles 'of animals? x The. site ranlatns n•� C. Introduction of new species of animals into An rare animals, area, or in a barrier to the migration or movement of animalst see sa above, d, beterjoratjon of existing fish or wlidl to habitat? X- see 5a above, s.- nx!I Will the proposal tesult In substantial: a, thereases in existing noise levels? b, EkposUre Of people to severe — -- �X The proposal wilt not result In a substanital increas;� created on slle or in the vicinity, in noise noise levefst 7, LI CHT ►o CLARE. Will the ptoposai pfodUce s an can Ti'0Ttt k The gropers Will not expose people to "severe Mnl a IeVeis,, and 014te> a. attLus — WIII the t )t The proposal will hot result In a sUbstantl5► Inctease In light glare created on site or In the vicinity, at a era oh of the p ese it drrplannednland useaoflan area? 1 k The project site is dost hated by (he Etude county ceneral pia as requires a mInImUm tequjtttUral-Residential, The ptd►ect sl�,e is zoned TM -do wh[L-h of forty adzes per dwe ling unit and TAI -s which requites a mintmum of tive acres dwelling tentattve parcel �• map contoim3 to both hegtaliplanTdeslgnatton and the zoning ciassilication. The proposed With the ATI RAL itESbtRC.5. Will the proposal result subs project Is consistent ChdrdCtel of .the surrounding area, tan a r lit a. Increase in the rate of Use of any natural e"source; b. bepietlos of any '<non-rehewable i �+ x The pFopsat oWili n of affect tiny nate al tcsoutces, resour'ee t naturaN ;. The ptOPOsal Will 'hot deplete any natural resoUrrest r � n�'.ironat3ntax Ci><eak iso *' Evaluation -_ of Enviraninatial impact IV ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (continued) Y[;3_ Mnynt w0. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ALQATIC9N (Continued) 10. RISK o� UP�ser, Will the proposal involve: a, A risk of explosion or release of hazardous _ substances (including, but not Ilnited to, oil, pesticides, The proposal will not involve the chemlca s or radiation) in the event of an accldenl or upset located close to an use of hazardous malerlals V facilities materials, files which store condlticns? of Utilizen�such b. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency eyacuation plant T1. _x The proposal Will not affect POpULATIQV. Will the proposal alter location, 1s r�u Ton, density or any emergency oervlces. growth rale of the hum Population? an k _ The r of becausepthelpwopesedtprojectllsncorststent 12, tiouslrrc,Proposaland al idemand the Area withpwtpiat has being developed In the area, or crea a todditional housfngthoUsing, t3, -- _x The proposal will not slsitllicantly nATI(7N/CIRCUTATION. Will the TRAMPt affect 1101.10 ng demand. resu in proposal a• Ceneratlon of subtantialaddttional Vehlcle movement.? — —. 2L. The proposed Project Will vehicle trips per hour generate approximately four additional generated by the roposedpro)ect wilt noP.A. substantiallypeak. existing transportation Such traffic menet b', Effects ortexlstIng has adequate capacityto accormlodate such'traftr t the network. The existing transportation DeheraRlon WtthoUt gene to i ori network accommodateserVI a degradation of the level Parking facli Parking? Itfes;, of man (Or new pimpac sof e„ _: X The C. substantlat `�^ to Copp pro osal will not affect parking because the proposal will have. comply With the parking requirements contained within Butte county Cade section 24-35, transportation systems? on existing __, X_ See 13A above. d, 5lgnlflcant°alterations to present Of Of patterns etrcutatI or moyEment ople and/or goods? of pe "�" X The Proposal Will not signiticantly alter e, AljAratlons to waterborne, rail .tier Preset;t tfatfic patterns, or Air t, f t ,ase In traffic hazards k The proposal Will not affect Walefborne, rail or, air trafflt, to motor Vel;scies, bicyclists or pedestrians? 14, PUBLIC sFRVtCEs. Will x The,propasaj Will not signl'ticanlf fnc'rease it y atilt hazards, the ptopos.v,f have an effect upon, or resu In a heed fog government services: new of altered Fite ptotectlont he proposal will result Ina incremental In t Noted tlon in the arks, The out to demand tot tila 61VIsion of rural areas Count pf:re DCPaft tment/callfarnia Forest has Indicated that CUMUlAe Will Impact their dVifti efli�ep ability to p services. Cal hat proposed as a mitigatlon measure otecttin hotres in rural all fesldentla! Areal develop a tire suppfesslon sprinkler system, It Is recommended the following note be placed ti Sprinkler additional r cyst map sheet or the final the of SUppresslon sprlhkler systems shaII be pinstelledin lit ft acco s(denlial A�soclailon dwell s orltthe Inst -al latlon National+lProtectiono. and two family kfetfe l ngs and mobile homes r a(d 13 Inose M06$11 pose of the installation of sa�et p operty protection sprinkler y and sptlnklatysC�rtA!'sslsnfordaddj►tonal event of reslde;tttal (IPn This Installation *ill reduce the demand tot structural (hre L'r71 r+wtTitq@n7t:2a Ch@C1:13 oEVa'1Li3' ion cif %En ►iipn rit3ntaxIntp Ic ZV EYZVI><tQNMENTAi, IMPACTS (conti!iued) DISCUSSION OF ENVIAONMENTAL YES AYB • ND EVALUATION (Continued) gtotecH ch services In those instances where they are installed." The project site has no pressurized watersystem to sttppott a hydrant. system Which Impacts the ability of the fire depattaent to protect Property Improvements and requires the use of water tenders. To reduceds RPPI1Cahtppay #200 0o pe slot tot thetButte CountytFiterUeep�tment water Tender Fund, It is anticipated the above Mitrgatlon measures WIII reduce the impacts on fire protection service to a less signlf[canl level. than b. Pollee protectidn7 X The proposal will result In a incremental licrease In demand lot Police protection in the Vea which cannot be serviced by the 'Present Sheriff's laepzrtment since 1480 the population Y or Butte county has Increased b over 25%, while the at same times the Police force has been decreased in personnel by 50% due to fiscal dlfilculties being eXperienced by Butte county, currently, butte C,bunty has the lowest officer's pet Capita in the state, At recent.l.egistattve committee Hearings on Butte county's Fiscal Crises, county officials testified that police protection services are presently Inadequate, and d6 not meet the lervfce eXpeclattons of the public, continued rural developmeht has resulted Ih cumulaltye impacts on poflce protection services Which Continues to reduce the sheriff's Department capacity to ptovld� adequate police services. Development Impacts on the sherlif's department 11 dounly wide and lopmen t he cumulativeimpacts a Protection, ofndeveot on poli hat been dd dative Count Administra.tive orrice, In the report 'County kevlew.• of nutte. Annual Flscai C. $Chools7 X . sheP oposlWilresul Iinrementlincreasidemand for ac l area,the Hrncfees Collected i School disttlets anticipated to reduce school Impacts 1� 1ess1 thah eIt a stgtt{llcant lve(. d. par4s or other recreational facfl'itiest The proposal Will result In a (ncrernenlai Increase In demand for park and recreation (acilfties in the area. e. roa.ridst tenahce of public facilities. lnclUdlhl roads _?rl.�. The pteposal Will result In a Incremental increase in the need tot f, {1Thet maintenance of toads And other public facilities in the atea, governmental servicest _�. the proposal Will result In a Incremental lncrea#e In demand for at 'i Is. NEttcv� Will the proposal result Inr other governmental setVfees Ih the area, a. Use of substantuai amounts of fuel or - e ---:, X the proposal Will 'hot UttlIze subs°taht al fuel Or energy. b; sobs'tatltlai increase lndemandllpptle!c{#tlhg saunas of energy. or regUlre the X _ The proposal Will trot sUbstant►alfy Increase the demand for energy, development of new sOthAes of enetgYt 16. UtI 'rt ES. Will the Proposal resUlt In a needof new systems, or substahtlal alterations to the followings a. ObWdf or natural hast the proposal WlIIhot affect elect rldAl Power or natural distrfbutlon s ystems, _ gas tt. uhicatluos systems# X the prbposal will pt atfect commuhtcatloo systems, e. hater avaliabilltyt _ The proposed ptoleet will utilize Wel' water Which has not i.TlvnwaJ;tiitioA 'G1 Erav xoi raonail x?11kJ�C I a,asr.�cc sirarrirrrw -Lrlro-.,r rn (continued) VFs MAYBE _NO OF ENyIRONMENTAD —IIA`TTtLN (Con tinUed) historically proveh to be a stable source of wader. Prior if) final recordation of the MAP Quality And quantity of Water shc;uld be documented, d. "sewer or septic systems! x The project ,sites are located In areas cnatseterized by shallow soils, rock Outcroppings, and lava caps. 'the soft characteristics Of the project sites are often prone to septic and leachfleld system (allures due to poor soil percolation capacity, Failure often results In the seepage of wastewater Into the surface layer of soil and onto the ground. Leachfield failures may eater nearby streams, conthminating water supplies and fostering the growth of algae and related organisms. Strlcl adherence to the But ca.mty OVlrohmental Health Department requirements Is anticipated to Mitigate the above concerns, e, Storm water drainage! x The proposed project will hot heed substantial storm drainage impfovements to accommodate the proposed`deveiopment, f. Sofld waste and disposal! R The proposed project will have a cumulative Impact on the Butte county Sanitary Land Fill and the dlsposal of solid waste within the county. 17, RyAAN IJEALTH. Will the proposal result in. a. creation of any health ha heal th)! ar potentia( hazar�! (ekciuding mental heal : X The proposed project wilt not create any significant health haiards. b= haiatdt of Pe0PIO to potential health _ X See iia above. 16AEStOD t�tCS, Wit 41 the pt'OPOSAI r6t.11t In the prwliiAny ye scenicVLIsta or VleWtOpenhe !tion X fi}1e proposal V�lii not result In an aesthettcaliy attenslV+: View. nic +ubl of An aesthetically ojfensIVe site open to the public view! � 10. gnat riDrt. will .the proposal result In an Impact upon ne gUAIIty or quahtily of existing X The OtopbsaI may result fh ah incremental increase in demand jot park recreational opportunitlest and tecteat}on facilities. 30, dJLTLAAL. Rt=$O tli3> a, Will the 0foposai result In the altetation;_ or destruction of a prehistoric or historic _ x `—" The project Oto Is Identified as an area of hlgh sehsltlVity for archaeological site! archaeological resources. bud to the atchaealogtcal 3ehsltiVity of a belt! p prform a records check of I. the be artineht of Anthropology, CaliforniaCal state: Universlty, rrroughljh determine Resig if icali totdet t sites may kid located on the properly. A records check will dctermine whether ,an archaeological sur ey of the property will be hecestaty and Whether Y aiV further ml(iga Ion measures will be needed, } b'. W1 11 the ptoposal result In'adverto pphyslcai or aesthetic etfecl3 to a pfehistorie of X._ the proposal will not affect historic sites, htstofic building, structure or objecti C. twos the proposal have the potential to dAuse a physical_ change Which would affect --" The proposal will tot affdtt cultural resources, Unique ethnic, cultural valuest d. Will the proposal restrict existing fellgloUs N sacred uses Within the u The proposal will not affect relldloUt fesourdd$, potential ,impact areae 8 nV rQnmentar,l, Cheolklis t * Ev�Iuatioxt of Environmental,' xmpa;at :rV. ENVIRONMENTAL f;"HPACTS (continued) YES MAYBE No DISCUSSION. OF ENVIRONMENTAL'EVALUATIO)a (continued) — SUGGESTED MITIGATION MEASURES 1. Provide documentation to the Planning Department 4. In order to determine it the project site prior to filing if which which outlines quantity, contains any rare or endangered plant species it cl groundwater, drafting rates and rale of will be necessary .to perform a Botanical survey, recharge. A stable water source must be The Botanical survey Will determine the need for ,Quantified, any further mitigation measures. 2. place a note on the map which-sta"less ~beer Herd s. Due to the high sensitivity for archaeological apart fees shalt be paid at time of ouflding resources 11, well be necessary to perform a records Permits Issuance it applicable," check through the pepartment of Anthropology, California state university, chico, in order to 3. Place a note on the alternate or additional map determine It significant sites may be located on sheet of the final map stating "Automatic fire the property. A records check will deterrtlne suppression sprinkler systems shall be Installed la whether an archaeological survey of the propiirty all residential stluctures in accordance with the will be necessary and whether jhy further rational Fire ProteelIon Association standard rot mitigation measures will be needed; the IM(Al latton of sprinkler systems, in one and I%o family dwellings and homes, NEPA 6. Pay $200.06 per lot to the outtu county Fire of Standard 13D, The purpose of the Installation of Department/calitotnia Department of Forestty-Flre sprinkler systems Is for additional safety and Prevention grater 'render Fund, orcnerty ptotettlon in the, event of residential -, sites. This installation will 'reduce the demand Jot structural fire protection s0 Vices in those Jnstances where they are tnstalled," .w ty. y a X714 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Continued) YES jAAVAE t o. DIRCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL 'EVALUATION (continued) DATA SHEPT 10. Archaeological and Historical Pesources In the area- llgh sensitivity Area X. Prolect Descrlotion 11-. Butte county General Plan designatlon: Agricultural - Residential 1. 'type of Prolect: Tent.stive Parcel Map 12, Existing ioningt Tm»40 & TM -s 2, Brief Descr'Iptlont TPM to divide 168 acres to create tOtl# 4041- 13, Exl%ting Land Use on-site: Resldentlat and Vacant acres 1016. 1r sufroundin® Area: 3. Locationt Off o: Ten Mile House Goad approx, 1 1/2 miles east a, Land Uses: fotest, rural residential or state Highway 32, b, Zoning* TM -40 & TM -5 4. Proposed Densfty of Development: 10011,/40 acres 6, cen. Plan besignati= Ag -Rest' S. Amount of Impervious surfacing." minimum d. Parcel, sizes: 5 to 160 6, Access and Nearest Publlc Road(s): T6n r1116 House e. Populattoll LOW Populatlon 7. method of sewage Disposals 5ept1.t:,CLeachUleid is, Character of Slto and Arca: Rural e. source or w4ter supplyt Prlvtlte, w@ 16, Realest Urban Area: 9.. nes: 41Vleit�it 91' Powerl0 property 17, ReteVant spheres of tnffuence:. N/A InflU Potential Ll sand devetopa+ent: N/A 1s, Improvements standards urban Area: N/A 19Y Fite Protection Service,, r. Envfrrxnnental setting av Nearest county (state) r=ite station: Volunteer station #!24 at Fore<k Ranch. Phslcal rnyironmentr b.- Water Availability: Water.Tender Only 20. schoots In Area: Chico Unified schoa.,l bistrlct t, Terrain a. ochdrall Topographic Character: kelatlVely flat sid,ge b, slopes: Vary from 2 to ss c. Elevation; 2660' to 2800' ASL d. Limiting Fact'orsr.None 2. Soils a. typos and chat Adler IstIcs: Solt is mostly chara,cterized by the Al ken stoney Phaset stones comptisc apptr,itrateiy sox or more of the Volume of the soli'. aft Is approximately six feel deep in the proldet atea. AASII)lal toll from lava flows, rough rock oUteroppings, boulders, and shallow Bolls OVcrlying TUscan fotmatfoni also exlst3 on the site. b, Limiting Factorst Shallow 'seiiY 31 Natural Hazards of the Land a, Earthquake zone: Moderate Eatth4uake Intensity zone VIl1 b. Erosion Potential: hllyh c, Landslide Potential: Moderate d. Pfre'Hazard i;7ttremb y C' Expanslve soli Potential: Low 41. Hydrology - a. Surface, Watett None on Project slid. b, CrbUnd Water: UnknoWh C. Drainage characteristics: Project site drains Into tine chl6o creek Drainage basin d. Annual Raint`alI (normal): .Jo -3 gg c. Limiting FaLtors: Potentially lljnited gtbUndWaier s. Visual/scenic Qualltyt Ucelieht ep Acodstic Qualilyt Good Alt Quality., Good Biological rhvironmanlr Ii. Vegelatlont Oak woodlands acid pine forest Wlth rocks outetops, rock bluffs, 51 wildlife Habitats small birds and animals common tb ,foolhlti areas, cultural _r hyitonn*h r L. r °r a re�b K,.s�h 10 E�vironmental Checklisti Evaluat ion ak Enrwironaaental pmpaGt IV. ENVIRONMENTAD IMPACTS (contl'nued) _YFs JAAYBE NO DISCUSSION _OFENVIRONPiENTAL 'EVALUATION (continued) r tNVFRONMENTAL REFERENCE MTa•1°kA,tAI 11 a II -I Earth ake a d Faultt ActiV f Y. Sel mi M7 7tyby'CH,M t " utte Nunty General Plan revise "pr I Il 2'Butlte County Cen°ere I t'�an revel sedl�l-77feby MWI i 3. hip ill -i SUbsldence & Landslide Potentlaa; Sa fety efilti'I E3ut ce County General Plan revise I �77, by 4. ;dap 111,2,, .Er s1 n Cote tial; of ty Ele t, Butte c.:ounty General t��an rev ted 1-g77, eby ClI 1 I Ma1,11(General aF�f aIve n re glls'ed I -7�7fe t H eHnitl.l Butte 6'' Plan reY`lsedisle77Nob' ecW; pIt( Butte CoUnty Genera 7. Map V- Scen l e H l phseen C H ghivay e n{ 6utt+e CoUnty General MnParevised 1-7 , by Clzh1 Hfl I, 8. M p 111 Natural Flre Ha�arp Clas�es fetY ei�ltl`1 ut to ,ounty Genera P an rev sed 147, , by 9. rch eoiogIcal,ser��1sgfttr�trity Map by lames P Manning, for Butte County Ptdnning Department, 198 , epa,r Mont, 10W ac horztDistrict Map, Butte CoUnty Planning 11. Ces u°ce t e� or$ h, a Aap' b tate concent r t i In 5 e artrnete �tesouaces Agency; date o Cal,efor'niaaist, �ct, rn 11, ic 4t l 06eserV6 o ad o d kes6�Utlon 6ecetn eT 5,'19Wte ntyBoari 'pervsors; r000datrinsWe era 11to Ma s, ationai Flood insuran e 13. Py I mergepncy Management Agency, 1`98e. 14� USGa Quad Maps, Cohasset, 109y 15, soil IIiia ; C ico rT925�/Oroville (1926) Area, U.s, iePart0 nt of Agr (cul tures. 16. 8eopa,rtnentyof Aar�c ture�orovl I le 11926 Ates, U, 5, 17i, u1: oun Fi e Protection Ur sdictions an aitCf�sa ,utte cou t� fie �egart�trient an �a nn�ngepa pcmen t . u . etyun t y rn a artment of Po estry. t� „, COUNTY OF $U ITE' � DEPARM ENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 7 County Center Drive Orville, CA 95965 (916) 538-7266 August 30, 1990' and W. & Kathryn Rodgers RE A 56-24-64 % 56-28-07° P.O.. Box 273 Tentative Parcel Map Forest Ranch, CA 95942 T9ear. Mr. & ;irs Rodgerss Thd.s is•to.notify you that your application for a tentative map for the above -referenced property is being submitted to the Planning Department for environmental determination, and to the F,nvs.:onmental Health Department for its review. This application will be considered complete when we have received notification from the Planning Department and the Environmental Health Department that'all necessary data have been received. These departments 411 contact you regarding any additional information they may require. Very truly yours; William Cheff Director of Public Works J %lendonsa Assistant Director ,Nj /kk cc Planning Department Environmental Health Department LD 11.20 (11evised 2/88) AUO 3 010 �Qrovtl�O« Cali�ot7{ ,. '.r. - ,._. �,W,.. a. , .�.. r,,.,..,• .r-. a r . . cr. -n -... .,...: >.. •' a,. ., .„,, :. r .r �,. ar A �... y.•: - - r q. 1, ;P v.: ; i ri. m:' • 48.i rrt. . 't.'..' .'.K #Y T-,'xr,)L S M1.. ,,,.. )V !, .� ..:q. .. •,v+l 4'riYY.•.. �' .. . .. -« .. .. >� ... ... , , ;i« .:.� -cS'sS'"A, n .t” .. , z. '�,.. �. .'n ..: ,;. t ,«n,� a ,f'a.a Y:�. :: 3 ,F«,. u.. yk.> ,� , .. 4V„ �.. ,, -,«•.. rN i. Rr. / O _. ..... d. .i.,. G. .�.. j.. „a .:m, l,, ,..' ..:,:. ..!-. ,f w � w"., .. ..•. v, t� J .{ 1, ,,Y F', +V«. V.°. �� �". ...,.. . M'�.',�. .. . �... .. ... . ,. r..r,. ,:�.:., � r: �. � •� �.. . � :, Y.«}. ,,. ._.. '.,,w .) n `'-, .. ,..w�p1,,...r. � . ,.., ,, r. . Y ., :.-' ., ,..-:' �..: x. ., . � - r ,.,.h,. :'... -....:'r ..d-:. . i ,:r,u..n.H.fi....Ys.. .,.r .. aa., ,. ..-,. 'fr ,H.. , . "f:. .. +¢ Y� .,.. . i. h.. , .:, rf.-.,.. ! i..,...a. :,.�... ,.:.' '� ., .,... ..,: ,. , , ,.!. �..�. , ,,... ... . :� .. '- 7' ,. :. r '� .a, -i. ,.: ,.' ., _. _Pr.,.~' rr, Y, . , � r ri,.:.....f r. -F , c.:.v,..i�.t.t".Pa.1., , , r .i.1.',�„.�Ft.. ,„r.,1.,.\,..r.'. r ... .r -,a,- ,,.. , •.. r,.,.. .,,.., . � �,. 'Y1+r ...-'.�., , . ..i ry. n,..ii .r+ ax..... .... �i�-..�, , R,. .w_ : r,r.�. , .°.j ).} �.a.. - „{qj.. Ji,, _. 4”.t L . ,. :51ryry4,d ';«..,....� ... ..k.r..s.4.,. ,.'( r�i1+�. ,,fI Y v�} �+'`M:.t' ,F,t !nS.T. .`«,. .,t jf1�} r #"i it `• l.l.(. X;rr. Rr J .l"d �,it It+ • LL1 h4. :#p�..:.. , it. ,. _.. - p _ c r _:. ..- - ,. ... ....'.. ..� :-- n ., "::; .... ., -. s•... .: ,,• _:.,�: '._fit^ t:. ,'p4' 4 r...� .. �,,..,..s r - ;r.`,�. � � � uA. '4 :: ... ^" -; ', k,;.!e ... {, •. ..'n, ,... a e. ,r „C ;.'.: 'li 1 P��.L'. ::,�4 %:T .., r .:._ d.. �• Li. .'f'r �.. . a • n `.s i' na ''."y' r r ° y 0 3 M rr. : t -w •'�� ., ...V. f r,�. USA �tn « ,.. lry '. 1. G16bY, ,, •ll' t, : ° `'� w � � � ., ,�+ s Q 8,29A:i�i „ , ior rg4.. Af;� hoe: a ., I R. /N r , Ad �8 USA V 55TYITAC, o saJ+s Lor 2 O 7 l �64« 5P ACJ 160 AC • 37 IZ /sen«so „ <. L0r.3 i4B 04.1-7 AC.j {O AC _ i x•/21, 367AC € CD 08 104 2 �9 20 AC n 21.481 AC r USA P/M 4.1.25 P/M 41.50 i _ tor4f3 96+/3A le4,9AC1 1 41 + LIT"TE7"ATESGREO ' zz� 0 BOAC 21«595A ` W 4 lo 1 `•.-.- ` ti Z� m 20 AC 20,a/a ACi �� O 12J5.44 1409.45 Y QA us 4 25 Lor _ 2dA l act—/54 13 156 AC ��+/4 6 AC. A D 54 8.1 gy,�z 20A flOb.M y �j a 1 m�pD r� _ti�p� <zs z11 7 18 AG �l tt &7`4,75 �, `= G19139� J ?'zS,by 20 he 4O.38ds a ! o '9.JS 7JY7.G0 [or, 25.571 Ac« t 4r «5 s a 1�trg : Es • h PM ^9 f14 � ;r �r- 1 tf nrrq IF 2. 7RItS, r0j ..5 YS�y 3'--7 ' wry- -" . :.:, • .... LOr9 % I; rr5x 15 ,; IAG /`� h 1 c� 5Y 35, 11 a.. 0i �/y�✓. ✓ i f� ,r133tbe .: 11 480 ,4C 'r )C yr ,�1$N6apa J1,IA a 37dC i tri ti 2+� 1F' f ter"j��� 5i13A�1 L 1 R l(1 i.5 �:A __ �SS�SS t Map � ♦ ai arse~Qr.� 4 1` pJM42,/33 - `' - Ci8 8 io.4aAc NUT1�--ASS�SS�'J� S P�lFIL��. BLt�CK y co Nt/MB�RS sMoWN � Cgc�r►ty� of 8uft� Cc�a , ,r itt AANVARY, x'9`157 ' IN CIACIES 1. u— � > 4 r S70N �U? �.Rv Cr.,�a 'PI FQ M S?rv,"-rS2C1rl.� x"dwro W. & Kathryn Rodgers LOGY 90-08-30-03 .� P. 0. Box 273, Forest Ranch, C4 95942 Same TENTATIVE: PARdA MAI' to divide 66 acres to create 3 parcels at 5 tss" .Oacllj with a remainder of 51 acres located on the northwest corner of Forest Ranch Road & Hwy,. 32: Forest Ranch area. -240-064 and 056-280-007 SFAE;:-NErr056S:r -s---� c 174`40> fiM-5, Cr.F,AL �1� A Resi ?'RC=CT CONI --�*- -iyUR. 7/30/9Gr DATZ OF A-PpLSC-ANT 5TGNAwLTF. �. •���,IC..TIOt�CETVED. 8/30/90 t5r'R't7E`0R/CIVWu E,`IGINEER ... : 7 T A riMTG Oi:P,^CTORS -- / rr+� U.TEGaRiCAL �. =- Lv--IrO I7r,'1E FILED - nm .. w .. . ,..... D-C-�-"-IAT Ori Uri w .,...�,,r:,.....'EC+'I' .:, ADO?' r) MlizGt D tr.G. r)--r-LAr,.ATION -- b1TE ,1i?aF"_-�;0 rC T—pOR'?' - bP.Ty' ERT. SED C.'L t'-=- wcCmLira.::+ "40. ;Cb..'-,rnlrtt` :==!NCr Vt8OM AGENCY r...t�t%,1C7 Y% AG Cy AW "LC APPLICANT: Edward W. and Kathryn Rodgers PHONE N0: 916 €394 X007 ADRESS:?6�Q9 Foresb_Ranch Roza (P-0- Box 773) FcraGr. zz ��_95942 OWNER s A rtc PRONE NO : ADDRESS: ENGINEER OR STJRyYOR : U�: n s i i s r e m i s t c r e d e n e r PRONE N0 Y PDRESS: F ?+fAIL NOTICE OF "lVaING TO: 5 SECTION 3 2 LOCATION Off' FRO�RTY' MrNsHlp T 2 4 N /RANGE E 036--24-0-064-0 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER � � ^ � ^ -a=-+�J'' TOTAL ACREr��'rE` OR RECENT PJLi'r OF TITLE_ INSUFfiSCE . (dated wiSE �in lAst six =rxths)WITH APPLXCATION. INDICATE }3ETA1d' 7 DAA AND RECORDnIG ,1, rORMATION BY WHICH THIS PARTICUL4R PARCEL WAS GRE'A`SED DATE . June 15 1966 ROOk Y431 _ _. PAGE 177 D UMBER AND SIE OF PARCELS, BEING CREAM (nclud itg any remaiiidel4)t 'With a remainder of 51 a: EISTANCu. TO NA':Ci3R,AL WATER COURSE OR STORM. DRAIN• Dti x.020 ry FORS WCE 'r Sr ONLY t iiiit (is Comity 1' L4rit►inp 3.7,Receipt 7 Comil y (entv.- Orive II Applicant l�-- Orovi IIo, CA 95965-1197 `�'`f�• t��y (916) 518-7601 AP {I Subdivision Name. (if app tcabte) APPENDSX ii D'oo Filed `I,AND DIVTS;> ON APPI.ICA'TION5 8upolemental Information for Planning, Department 1 kip t .twirl describe arty outer related permits and other public o,ppro t►alit t•t+tlitired or this project;., including 'those required b� city, regional;, stnio mid federal agencies .nano' 2. Proposed scheditlindlassociated projects: AS�4P 3Anticipated inc:,rementclil development (phasing of subdivision units, rm,ure development pln8).-'harts r,. What, r .thod will. be Utilized to accommodate surface drainage? Describe~ how on.ysi,te and downstream drainagEt charihels will be -affected. minimal 5 PvuRithity cif water for fire fighting purposes (hydrAnt:sr ponds, etc: ): 35()0 .gal . at riser 5007a-nd other sorest Ranch storage 1). Wit I I rtxe,nvat hitt or grading be necessary? Cttbic yards (,estimate); none anti 7 some construction starts by other Permit i t DIt•00•.ions for travel: to property (rural and mountainous areas only) Cceb'Att .QE >;cr kl $6gd-,SucLar' _Pine and. RiohyaV 3.2. kt, HNVI ROM OTAL i^1I1AC;TS AM) .MLTI(tATlO is A90RES-c'r'- rcic,ttt I i'y p4-)t c-nt irslly significant envl ronmetztal impacts associated wits, tlif+ ,l•uicl civision. What project design, features or special ccnditicits I of appruv,11 (mitigation .treasures) are proposed to alleviate potential i+itvl rnnrnc'hir,! impacts? None 814fti°ficant (see negative declaration determination rt, OtLROMIUNTA1,5,'?i'LhiG'c 6978 filed NOV-19,1984 0 i Doscsribe t hl projpet trite as it exists before the projt:,;t, rtr jud ivg inrorin Lion on tup-091•aphy, soil stai)M Ly, plants AI'd 'rriitn'lls, atticl my eulturtl, hilitorical or scenic aspects. I Sc rihe ritiv t-,xisting rtire.s on Lho site, s:rrar., and the use a: t 11ctC ruet,uroS attached h� Oosr•ribp tiie surrounding propertbts,,including information ori Isi.nnr,t awl at1iinab; and any cultural, 'historical, or scenic. aspecl:s- IlitiLvaire the type of land use (res;',,dential, commerr.ial, stc.), int !itsity of land use (one-family, apartmkiat houses, shop:4 d-,part- in+ t :storbs, rtc,), and scala of development (height., frotltat;e *;w #sack, rear yard, etc. ), attached i:PRT1 VICAT] ON'i t heret, certifv that the statements furnished ahove, and to t lit' of t,trhricl P,'�,I,liits presant the data and information required for this heel ki l evri ltiatiti i to t.tie best of my ability, and that the facts, statements and Intorriintion presented are true and correct-: to the best of my knowledge .anti h(Mor' gignhtutro For 411s 5i+wir:ite .sht.et for 'lott�*er rCtspbtises �oaB,IueWdqaAQO PU61 0656 9 � O n d � M r, Attachment to Appendix i4 9 a) Site is typical foothill ridge Land with a forest of mostly second..and third, growth trees. The soil is rocky volcanic mud with no clays. The trees are mainly Conifers: Douglas fit, Ponderosa pine, Incense cedar, California nutmeg,sugar pine, mixed with some dogwood, manzanet brush., black oak, maple and live oak. Lilac poison oak and other small brush ,abound, but few native grasses. and many wildflowers. There is little erosion as the soil is stable and oermeable. Animals; animals are very few, except for 'mice. lizards, squirrels, and birds. In the four: and a half; years we've been on buildings of the: entirec66 acres: Th.e main house, iristalr the .sand we ve- se -n. no snakes and Z deer. There are fou l- ed by 1985 construction permit, a mobile home installed by 19888 second dwelling permit; a barn installed by a 198<5 farm stru:ction permit and a small well pumphouse The original house has a fair view of the $ig Chico Creek Valley. 9 b) The surrounding land is as described above, with single family dwellings on large lobs of two acres or more. Most are on five acres or more. Highway 32 runs along the hast side of the pl;ojecty with Forest Ranch road (ol.d a'ighway 47) to the southwest. {"� •" + , AM ;crux 1-4 to us co#aeted by apvlicaur; p�,ti���a auk ,AppLiwa laIME ;AND ADDRESS:' Lf ��i�i�' .::L �G � J z�'S..�•�'�, l�_��� ..., -. wj7TECT DE,iCRION• J r )jSE5SORrS PARCFI, h• 3rR(s):61 1� ChM gj,,t .owing items ,are to bA, coapleted 'by the Mu;ning Aep.XL E�.ntx 727 " /7 r�w` "�ir.�d'IT 7.ONIiiG: w_ __ � .....��.--•.�, �i`,�% " 5 LTJ CONaEitYATION AGFdmtENT: PWI DESITOue ..arc f s �i ' R •' x� '?�!.! E' rL G' tA•*r�J ._ �..._.....:i _....r., cra' ;l Lull t� terias �ss,�"Cl2L'RAi+-l7ESIDEtfi1 cAI+ YES NO It As LL40wmended haat you perform,the :rs �foll�aw*S checked itemsd A cttltcir,j7 Comp tab _ '� ARCHIrh"OL'OGIC4 RECORDS SCC ....... 143.rar and Sewer Capati: 3+ .,� ....., BOTANSG�I SL�k2yEX �r ?''. AdE:ivate Eit•e Fa:ilitia,t GEgC.OGIC.IZ, S(IR1fiESt I:oatl Caps .ity and 24a Atezmnce. , Commercial mid Schoola _� � NO AcceS� to '4omenc IWITHiN DEPARTMENT OF FISH G UC3AR�J 101) FIELD +"I�iIPS iRND W&M D'ZMOP.'•3r�lT zc1N lrpdod.►ir:aast 5-1Q aa,, Parcel S:ixa 2 • t�*mnm FLOOD ?xL V%, , `V.icinit.y of rlxb?an l�oun�3an.e5 i.._..._..i;, .. 3a, Ag. Viab,i].ity not lzqu 3.red HI9�ICN kM, Sr=ECIkZC OR Data=Lnatd.on; Substanti.al'..y tmdoras toa r.MM USE PLAN __i_ .. ,+ Ga"Nt"RAL %L�ii: 1. Land Use :;,.... If Yes: _._11�✓»�,-�Ei:Yl. .T 1 ...... _...._ 2. Coitsex7ation � .., Raw, of Flan► 3. Cp9n Space HlTliiN URBAN FESEAVE. .. ` 4.fet3''..: _ ;r.,...... rye .iS - 6. 5dusing Ait:l.'Wr L&D UsIrl t��f�_ q 7.L.G�✓j'�.�,�/���✓6�ti�iLr2rL�/�j�"7��7� / +� ifw.+.M.`\� •�.�..ii�:�C.. �.M�`��'��.�GL�Ir��y ��Ni.r.1..r.i•�Wr.YYIr���� �:y..sM�"'i 1 � , i'r.�a�.i.w.w•....s..iMF.�•��r�.•.1..�...rw�.w.�prr:���w.�.W..�r�. .-. r....� .. Mr.r.."rw..���.Wr'+,•..i�.n.N...�r.LwwarY�.n,w..ii.tir,, r�.r jr Ara TIM APPGTCAN� FOR MMxtQUESTHU LARD DTVi81ON� 't .iAK AWAt OY ABO E 5�M Dtbt 1Z 1VATIW R'�.�'i-ARD7.,tG S.`LM WNI.ORMAftCE wIGVML VW.N MM ZONING /Qt81i= re of Appl�casc ' Oat. d � <ikh ' .epott wii"1 ekpie and he ti~.caicded t:Lt (b) months tom the data of aha stalE Signdturei 6-87) v Planning Department "Cr;, Environmental Health Department NAME'.EDWARD W. & KAVIRYN RODGERS CDS' (Forestry Department) AP: 56-2444 / :56-2Sw 7 Attn: J. Craig Carter (on areas north of red line on map) ; Butte County Sheriff PG&E (check title report for easement) Pacific Bell { :butte County Mosquito Abatement OR Oroville Mosquito Abatement (areas within large map in cabinet) ,"^.cao, Distr' ct ( all map) - rh(c1) U,0 e Water Compan�d (i£ individual wells are not indicated on application or map) Durham Irrigation OR Durham Mutual. Water Co. California Water Service Company (Chico area) Oroville—Wyandotte irrigation District. (Oroville area, SE of ri,ier.) Lzmesaddle IrrigatS ionDistrict (Thermal(to area NE of river) Services District Paradise area along Pent'z Rd.. to lake) Del Oro Water (Paradise Pines area) Buzztail Waterworks (Doe Mill Ridge/Forest Ranch area) Paradise Irrigation District CitY of . . (check wall maps for spheres of influence) Oroville Chico Paradise Biggs Gridley S7i11E, AREA ONLY Lake Oroville Area Public Utility District ;see large map in cabinet) _ Feather River Recreation District (see large map in cabinet) El Medio Fire District (check wall trap, a small portion of Oroville only) B100 RICR'ALE, GRIDLEY AREAS (SOUTH BUTTE COUTY): check wall map and title report to see what. applies. Some areas overlap. Drainage Distract #1 Drainage District #2 Drainage District 4100 Drainage District x200 Reclamation District #833 reclamation District #2056 Sacramento and San Joaquin Drainage District Butte Creek Drainage District N CERTAIN CASES; Superintendent of Schools (only for subdivisions) .. Cal. Trans (near State Awy. 32, 70, 95, 149 (Chico cut—off in areas) Dept ame (near water and in rural and mounta De t. of rash and �• ); 162 (Olive Hwy. 1Richvale Hwy.), 131 (Clark Road) State Water Quality Control Board (projects with more than 100 :lots or units) '>C United States Forest Service (it project borders USA land chock AP books) Parks and Department (property near Lake Orov�:lle) State Water Resources Resources De artmen't P (property near. Lake,Oroville -- watershed) Rock. Creek Reclaimation Dist. (west of Chico Airport, south of Rock Cl -eek and east of Hwy: 09 (see wall. map) Chico Area. Recreation & Park Dist (`only for subdivi„ions) SPECIAL CASES: check title report for any mention of special se! ces or easements such as to 'Thermalito Irrigation District (numbered items) '0'U'n LAND DEVELOPMENT DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNre CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965,3397 TELEPHONE; (91'6) $30.1266' FAX: 19 16) 536-2140 JUN 0 2 1993 lune 2, 1993 Q�ovilie, CaiifornlR Rolls, Anderson &Roils RE Edward W. & Kathryn R dgers 965 Fir St; AP56-24-64 / 56-28-07 Chico, CA 95928 Tentative Parcel Map Gentlemen:' Please be advised that your request for an extension of time i'n which to file the final map for the above referenced tentative mala has been placed on the Butte County Development Review Committee's agenda for Phonday, June 21, 1993. The meeting will commence at 9:00 a.m. in the Board of SUperyisors Room,County Administration Building, 26 County Center D,rive;,_ orovilie, California.* if you should have any questions, please contact this office at 916-538-72.66. Very truly yours,, Stuart Edell Manager) Land Development Div. sElkp cc Environmental Health Department P1'ann'i ng giVi sign r' Edward W. & Kathryn Rodgers,,P.O,. Box 273, Forest.. Rahch, 0A 96042 NOACE: OF' DErxB1ZM=NA O1`•7P6 "- CGz Office of Planning and a �P'R Butte County 1400 Tenth Street., Roo 21a Planning Department Sacramento, CA 95814� 1 7 County Center Drive JUL��� Arovlle, CA 95965 or XX County Clerk CAN C - GR 136g, OuHoCo.t'�erk tj: 'County of Butte By 1��1/�'►'tCy/�-®pll'/ XT73,7EC7Q- Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance With Section 21108 or 21152 of the :Public Resources Code, Vroject Title AP # Name 7'gnca.tve Parcel trap 056-240-064/056-280-007 Edward W. & Katheryn Rodger -a State Clearinghouse Number Contact Person Telephone Number �If submitted to 'Clearinghouse) John Mendonsa ('916) 538-7266 )Project Location located on the northwest corner of Forest Ranch Road & Hwy. 32, "rest Ranch area. P"toject Description Tentative Parcel Map to divide 66 acres to create 3 parcels at 5 acres each, with a remainder of 51 acres. This is to advise that the ,Butte County Advisory Agency, _ (Lead Agency or Responsible Agency;) Baas approved the above-described project on 6/17/91 and has made (Date) 'the following determinations regarding the above' --described project: 1. The project will, XX will not, Have a significant effect on the - environment. 2. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of dt%i XX A Negative Declaration was pr!apared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA, 3, Mitigation measures XX were; were not; made a condition of the approval of the project., 4. A statement of overriding considerations was, XX was not, adapted for this project, This is to certify that the final EIA with comments and responses and record of project approval is available to the general public at: Butte County Planning Department 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 05965 Data Received for Filing and Posting at OPR_..7/2 9/ 1 •" � � Signature U 11 Craig Sanders, Associate Planner Title ReVl$dd Hdrelt 1986 i Edward & Kathryn .Rodgers Tentative Parcel Map AP# 056-240-064 and 056-280-007 Mitigation Measures: 1. Place a note on the alternate of additional reap sheet of the final map stating, "Automatic fire suppression sprinklers systems shall be installed in all new residential structures in accordanc(e with the National 'Fire Protection Assn. Standard for the uistallaton of sprinkler systems in one and two family dwellings and mobile homes, NFPA Standard 13D. The purpose of the installation of sprinkler systems is for additional safety and property protection in the event of residential fires. This installation. will reduce the demand for structural fire protection services in those instances where they are installed." 2 Pay $200 per lot, to tb .- Butte County Fire Depti for the purchase of a water tender. 3, Provide documentation to the Planning Dept. prior to filing the final map which outlines quantity of groundwater, drafting rates, and rate of recharge. A stable water source must be quantified. 4. Place a note on the map which states: "Deer Herd Impact Fees shall be paid at time of building permit issuance if applicable" . Record on the final map the location of historical Humboldt, Road in accordance to the requirements of the archaeological survey: DEC.1 RATI Oil OF FE � (California Fish and, Game Code Se ion 711.4), NAME AND ADDRESS OF APPLICANT 'Edward &_Kathryn qj69 I P.O. gox 273 Forest Ranch, CA 95942 =- G NO. CLASSIFICATION OF EN VIRON&MNgTAL DOCUMENT: 1. NOTICE OF EXF_T II''ITON/STATEI�f.I~'NT OF EXEi1� MON A. Statutorily or Categorically Exempt $ 5,00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fein [ ] B. De Minimus Impact - Certificate of Fee Exemption 525.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee 2 NOTICE OF DETERWINA'Y'ION FEE itEQUIRED [x] A. Negative declaration $1,250 State Filing Fee x;25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee 1 B. :Envronmental impact Report „850 State Filing Fee " $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee ' 3- C l OTHER (Specify)_ $25.00 Clerks Documentary Handling Fee PAI NT/NON-PAYWINT OF FEES: I. [X a PA`X'1i Yt. The above fees have been paid: See attached recept(s). 2. [` NON-PAYMENT. The above fees are required. Not paid. ` Chief Planning Official ByPaula Leasure Title: Asst, . PianginDirector Lead Agency. 8titte . County PublicsWo,�rks Dept. . i CI 1 �= OFIM'Yi BE (Xhti1PiE7F17 Ax'�iD SU&tiiI'IID tiN�'iH AIL EV4`IItOi. D+OCLXMENTS FILED 'r�t rM TTE THE BUCOl'J'NT'Y CLi .RKS OFTICE. I RR EE COPIES OF iiLL NECESSARY DOCLIMEI\ITATION ARE 1EQMED POk FILING, NO a -. - N ` ,.., ,, JAL AFF3�'�CAF�tEF yEF�S AItL D�`E A� �FA�'A�i+y�7±:��PR�,K?/R� TO ,Q MAKE tyE�V`CAL. D�+OGU�tiiFv�I' Y`YbLJT1t7 yr TIE B p COV1V CLLI\MS OFFIC1 . tY AKA C.14ECL\S t".�11]UL.C',t O iH d O V NTY 05 B V'� �l t I ,B co�r�ft � � •te r W}�n." ' 1, A f t D Q F N' A T U I: A 1. Z H A l'.i (rd ii w v T V DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS WILLIAM (Bili) CHEFF, Director 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE- OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965 Telephone: (916),538-7681 RONALD D, M.ELROY` June 17, 1991 Depoty Ditee of Edward and Kathryn Rodgers RE: AP 56-24-64/56=28-7 1'. 0. Box 273 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP Forest Manch, CA 95942 ,bear Mr and sirs. Rodgers: At the regular meeting of the Butte Country Advisory Agency held on ( June 17 1991 ), the Agency adopted a negative declaration with environmental mitigations and approved the above-referenced project subject to the conditions listed-,qj) the attached sheet. If no appeals are timely filed -- within ten 110) days of the date of the Advisory Agency's approval (. June 271 1991 ) with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, this Faction will be fina;l. When the conditions of appruval are complied with, it will be in order fox you to file your "final maps' with the Butte County Department of Public Works for recordation utithitr twenty-four (24) months of the date of approval by the Advisory Agency. Recently enacted legislation (AB5.158, Chapter 1706, Statutes of 1990, effective 'Januar y 1, 1991, requires that the Department of Fish and Came impose and collect filing fees as specified to defray the dist of managing and protecting fish and wildlife trust resources. These filing fees are Collected during the ehVironmentGtl review process and are to be paid at the time the County files a "Notice of Determination" with the County Clerk of the County in .Mich the project is located. This procedure is required pursuant to Sect,iJft 21152 of the public Resources t6de: To ' the collection of filing ngsfeirsmto thCaCciuntytive f'Clerknc�t The �Yfee � egUit dlIgated con with your �• connection project is checked below'. I F �yiir ,y ;� i■ i�rliriis�nil 1 I 1 W�lI Oki' PAGE TWO PROJECT N/kME; AP NUMIBER, CLASSITIUMON OF ENV IZONMENTAL DOCUMENT 1. NOTICE OF E1Q2ff'TION/STATTMENT OF EMPTION ( ) A. Statutorily or Categorically Exempt, $25.00 (Twenty-Five Dollars) Clerk's Fee B De Minimus Impact - Certificate of Fee Exemptica $25.00 (Twenty-Five Dollars) Clerk's Fee 2. NOTICE OF DETERMINATION - FEE REQUIRED X) A. Negative Declaration $1,250.00 (Twelve hundred Fifty Dollars) State Filing Fee $25:00 (Twenty-Five Dollars) Clerk's Fee E. Environmental Impact Repot $850 (Eight Hundred Flity Dollars) - State Filing Fee $25.00 (Twenty-Five Dollars) Ciexk's Fee ?�. OTHER (Specify )_ ` $25.00 (Twenty-Five Dollars) Clerk's Fee Tne fee should be paid to the Planning Department by ( July 1, 1991 in order for the Notice of Determination to be timely filed;. Make checks' payable to the County of Butte. ane project applicant should be aware that if heja=she,does not remit payment of the required filing fees, the project approval may be invalid by law and may riot be operative, vested or final, pursuant to the provisions of Public Resources Code E•r.tion 21089 (b), fish and Game Code Sec. 711.4 () and Section 153.5 (d) (3') and (7)1 Title 14, California Code of Regulations.; Should you have any questions regarding th?.i matter, please co,htact this office, Very truly yours- William Crieff' Director of Public Works w Jon Mendbhsa A sistant ,Director J`M/ds te Planning Department Fnvirohmental Health :baht A F 1A h: 'J CiF l>1ftTUFa.L ounfq phizA:,TH A+I°4D i3 EA 1.1'1'Y DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS t1vlLlaAM (Bill) CHEFF, Director 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965 CEPTIF'IED MAIL Telephone: 1916) 538.7681 May 9 19511 RONALD D. M[ELROY Deputy Dltectoi Edward W. & 4athryn Rodgers RE All 56-24-;64/56-28-07 I 'P. 0. P,- x 275, TENITATIVE PARCEL MAP Dore,„t Ranch; CA 95942 i I' Dear Mr. and firs, Rodgers; Please be advised., that the Butte County Advisory Agency will hear your application .on the above-,identified property on :June 17t 1991._ The Agency vi'."l be ,reviewing the findings from the Planning Department and will be coirsideFing your tentative parcel map. Public Works will recommend the conditions of approval as listed on the attached sheet. The meeting will commence at 9:00 a.m. in the Board of Supervisorso Room; County Administration 6uilding,_25 County Center Drive; Oroville, California: If yeti have: any questions rryarding this matter, pleasa- contact this office. 'fiery truly yours; William ChefF Director of Public Works J6h i Meildonsa LL Assistant Director JM/ds attachment cc; Planning Department &1vironmentaX Health Department ,. game Co. LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY r-LANNINC REPO 'MENT 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - QROVILL.E, CALIFORNIA 95065-3397 TELEPHONE: (918) 538.7801 May 3, 1991 Edward and Katheryn Rodgers P.O. Box 273' Forest Manch, CA 95942 Re: TentatiVe Parcel Map/APN #056-240-064 & 056-280-007 .Dear Mr. & Mrs. Rodgers: The Butte County'Plan,iing Department has completed the environmental review of project in accordance with the Califs rnia V'nviranmental Quality Act and forwarded to the Butte County Advisory Agency within the required 105 days California Public Resources Cod,; er+ y pursuant io the ..ion 21151.5. in addition, the Planning Director's report required by Sections 20-63 and 20.99 of the Butte County Subdivision Ordinance Dari ctor s Re port d. hl I as been ease find enclosed the Environmental. Documentation/Plannin Report prepared for your project. g Please' revie%* the enclosed Initial Study/Planning Director's Repo& with conditionspie of a applicable. � you. note any errors or omissions in otr evaluation lei approval 'if bringthem to our attention. , p .se The Environmental Documents and Planning Dlrectbr's Report for your rb'Pct i sent to the Butte County Advisory Agency for their action. California Ga eianmert Codi or dtsa rove q he Butte County Advisory Agency set hearings e approve ry' g Y Ings aril and '5952,1 requires t Sections 65950 n Your project within six p months from the date on which your andlplace of thee ublichear7accepte oud. `1'Ire Advisory Agency will notify YOU of the time g Y project. If there are modifications to your project, not related to sniti titin an rd rd-dvaluation of your project shall be required.g • g entihed mpackj EDWARD:RODGERS , AP 56-24--64 ;6nd 56-28-07, 3 parcels and remainder located on the northwest corner of forest Ranch Rd. and State Highway 32. ' orast Ranch area. Engineer: Edward Rodgers -Public Works conditions: l Verify legal access. 2 Provide two-way traversable access RS -8 -LD -II to each parcel from a county maintained road or state highway. 3 Access to be reserved in deeds as per county ordinance and offered for dedication on the final map. 4 Show 50 ft. building setback, line measured from centerline of access easement:. 5 Provide road maintenance agreement, 6 Nied to the County of Butte 39 ft. right-of-way from the centerline olt Forest. Ranch Road. 7 Indicate a 50 ft. building satback from the centerline of Forest Ranch Road, 0 Show all easements of record on the final map._ Public Works prior to recordation of the fi P 9 Provide str„et name sighs 'per re uirements of the Department of final map:.. 10 Pay off any assessments, 11 ,Provide cul -de --sac at the end of the street. 12 Obtain encroachment permit and construct standard road approach providing adequate sight distance at the intersection of access road and Forest Ranch Road 13 Pay any delinquent taxes or current taxes as required: 14 Meet the requirements of the Butte County Fire Department. 14ealhh Dept, conditions; 15 Provide a 100 ft. learhfield free setback existing tells either Within the property or within 100 ft, of 6e property boundaries. 16 ShoW a 50 ft4 leachfield setback from the d 'aitjage ways. 17 Prove that the required quantities of domestic tater are a.,n4Uble ►-c',parcels 1; 2 and 3: 18 Prove that the required quantities of domestic Water are available or place ate on ep is evidence that domestic water isnavailablefor the remaindtti ” n EDWARD RO.DGERS, TPM -Planning .Dept. conditions 19 Lot area on final map shall conform to the current zoning classification requiremetos. l4itig itionmeasures: l Place a note on the alternate or additional map sheet of the final map stating, "Automatic fire suppression sprinkler systems shall be installed in all new residential structures in accordance with the National fire P;rotectiozi Assn. Standard for the installation of sprinkler systems in one and two family dwellings and mobile homes, NFPA Standard 13D; The purpose of the installation of sprinkler systems is for additional safety and property protection in the event of residential fires. This installation will, reduce the demand for structural: fire protection services in those instances where they are installed." 2' Pay $200 petr lot, to the Butte County Fire Dept. for the purchase of a water tender. 3 Provide documentation to the Planning Depti prior to filing the final mapwhich outlines quantity of groundwater, drafting rates, and rate of recharge, A stable water source must be quantified. 4 Place a note on the map which states: "Deer Herd Impact Fees shall be Paid at time of building permit issuance if applicable." Record oft: the final map the location of historical Humboldt Road' in - accordance to the requirements of the archaeological sruvey. Inter -Departmental Memorandum TO Butte County Advisory Agency FROM: Planning Director SUBJECT: Report on Tentative Parcel Map for Edward Rodgers AP # 056-240-064 and AP# 056-280-007. BATE: May 3, 1991 Ti,;s is a proposal to subdivide 66 acres to create three parcels at .five acres each. with Plan Map V - y p zoning ' , �f the Butte Count 'h Gener � t pj nn is TM -5 and TM -40„ The Land. Use p a rem�am � designates - Residential, g s this area as Agricultural - The proposal does not conflict with County zoning nor any adopted or proposed element of the Butte County General Plan nor any County, Specific or community plan. The P site was identified by the Planning Departments botanical atlas as a possible habitat for Sidalcea Robusta, Dr. ;Robert Ediger, Professor of Biological Sciences at California -State University has written a letter stating he and his classes which take field trips to the project site 5 to 8 times per year have never seen Sidalcea Robusta. , In addition, the property in the near vicinit whith have Of the ,rare plant. Based on the observation of DreRobert Edigerlded and the was also t that surrounding 'properties which have been surveyed where found to have no rare or endangered plants it is reasonable to conclude the proposed project will not impact an ' p p Archaeological Survey was conducted of the ro ect site and archaeological clearance was given su are or endangered ]ani s 'cies. An Axchaeolo cat Project !� bject to a mitigation measure to record on the final map the location of historical. Humboldt. Road:. f An Initial Study was conducted in accordance to the California Environmental Quality Act and a Mitigated Negative Declaration is recommended for the projecTh applicant Provided ..g addressing all the issues of the initial stud pp cant has mita ation measures ; which are considered to adequately mitigate the negative impacts to a less than y significant. level. All environmental documentation has been forwarded to the $u.tt& County Advisory Agency within the required q d 105 days as in by the California Public Resources Code Section 21151„5, 064 and 056-2$0-00 Tentative Parcel Map for Edward Rodgers ,AP# 056-2 Record wend approval of the Te 40. 7, subject to the following mitigation measures and condition: iti ati- n Measure, 1, Place a note on the alternate or additional map sheet of the final ma stating; "Alit -natio fire suppressit;,n sprinkler systems shall be installed in all new resicential structures in accordance with the National Fire Protection Associations Standard for the installadgn of sprinkler 3YStems in one and two family dwellings and mobile homes, NFPA Standard 13D4 The Y2� I y ! mcontinued_ purpose of the installation of sprinkler 4rystems is for additional safety and property protection in the event of residential fires. This installation will i` reduce the demand for structural fire protection services in those instances where they are .installed:' i' 2. Pay $200.00 per lot, to the Butte County Fire Department for the purchase Of a water tender. 3. Provide documentation to the Planning Department ,prior to filing the final map which outlines quantity of groundwater, drafting rates, and rate of recharge. A stable water source :must be quantified. 4. Place a note on the map which ,states: "Deer Herd Impact Fees shall be paid at time of building permit issuance. if applicable." S. Record on the final map the location of historical Humboldt Road in accordance to the requirements of th6 archaeological survey: _cam wn i ions 1. Lot area on final map shall conform to the current zoning classification requirements: B>:,Mstma ccs Ed Rodgers __ `, _ .,. _ _ .... 41`x•._. ✓' APPENDIX S ' COUNTY Ol' � BUTTN ` ENVIn R, 0NNCKLIS"t VO);t�i � . EVALUATION !DF ENVIR0i' ", ENTAL IMPACT: p fe No 56-29=64 Loll No, 90-07-196-30'-03 AP No. 56-24-69 t y ,BACKGROUND i., Edwatd atld Kathryn RWget's 2� P,CI. DOX 273, forest Ranch, CA 95942 i, Project deictipllonr Tentative patcel slap to divide ;66 acre„ to create three live acre parcels and a remal'nder at st acres a VES µAWS y DISC11 BxON bV 13WN 1R6NNEN k-MXC1.1A'i .aF SiGNI1FiC:�i C lNDATCIRY I NLDN48 t,; Does the ptosed have the paten'tal to degrade the X 'This proposal Will not flunilicantly deatade the envitomnen'f, quality of thu envirorsment, substantially reduce the cause fis;l habliat of a fish at wildiite spccles, a Of WI km f6 017pulatio4r to drop belaw self-suslal"IA9 Ieveit. tnrealefs to eliminate a plank or animal coiimunity, reduce the numuer or restrict the range at a fare Or erldangetedplani Or animal bt e,�lminale. ex;Iftotatprehill of ma' jot pax'1 ods o lapInty ;a hlslnry or prehlsturyt a a tla laa actll'nta - eve t1 -- s ptoposa{ will not tmPcde {opp-Ierl _envlronmenlal goats. short --lite ortineftlxata tthed0olentntlof long -Term the envitonment goalt? CA' short-tetm Impact on envitonment Isone whtch o-,:ut in a relatively brIet !setIod of H1110. t+hilb lung -team Impacts Will ehdute 'qto the tuture.t boes tho, ptolect have Impacts Whioh are Individuall � Thls prgposa ma y have a sl9niflcalii cumulallba Impact on the r---- 1. atively contiddtablei fA Ptoiecl Ifmllerl but eumui envtrunmenI, ' may impact dh lWo of more xeparale reiolftces where tale Impact Ixl each tesoUtce Is 'to -jai small, ' , f rtat but Wlsete Ilk! etf'ec. of N lose i acts Oh btUndill. is thlitotal haveeifeclt which bpf�i�gPtopgsr,{ Will not have a 3lgniti+arit advedse et(eti on (iriman" ! bolshthescllbi b4taave 1, + Adverseneff effects as's huinatl beings, crtflar diteckly or inditecll'yt , , nTTEYtMTLNATit)z� bij Ie rasps ni InTs nl Itat evatuallont ; ,t i/Wt U nd-khe pr000sed,ptolecl WJLD WOT have a sl0hitiiant eiteel on the environment and s NeCATfVE bEdaARAilrxi Will be i'licand, l/Wt Irhd'that,,although the ptoposed orblecl daji.I) have a sidn{fica i effect on, dile RnoVlr�hme ore juteAWIII t be-CLARATION Wf'li be prtepAted��t Have been added 1 thepr I case hecduse the MItfr,t41SN MCASLAES de%etibed on:1he Attached shag : 114 tlrtd the ptoposefi 06166 MAY have a slgnlfl,tant effect on the envitoninent, and ah I:Nvth"t"rAL IMPAor 01,0111 Is irsjdlred�, 4 iib ry Er ?; N0 trutHr gyt bATEt 5ep[r3mti� 25, 1996 L�fen Moar b 8 wea Revied r 2 ttyironmOntal Checlk1.ii » Eva3uai:it»t .o'aE E>zyi onmexlt MME—ROHM �1N;PA(:T8 res MY -ME W) DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION {, �rrtrts• 11111ta le pthe earstlacoresult In oolf inges` In x rhe prcpasal Will not Affect subsurface earth Conditions, geologlc 1luUslfuclures4 b:. DlarUptlOh> displacement. corrpaClinn or ..., Thi'a M OPOSal Will result in some Ulsruption. ;ispiaccment, cony5actlon and overcoverl'nd of lilt site as a result of development ov�rcover ng of the colli of alrbclures, dtlyeways, Parking areas, etc, Oue to the topography of the site. homesl'tr loCAllois will rtl,tulie some earthwork. In gerietaf, lite terrain of theproject slid is mosily A relatively flat ridge lop. The Butte county Ctading ardltlance Is anticipated to 11111161 t arly significant impacts Caused by netessaty earthwork' assoclatcd.With deVelOping two additional homesitds change jr, lopoolaphy of ground surfaceR . buc to sleep slopes associated With ilia canyons, tesleehtle4 re ftf fenluresf deydla4.111 Is IIMI led to the ridde top areas, i d' Uestruciltih. coveting or mocn diflatioof any _ Lt_ Tho Project site are unique to Build . has no physical features which Unique ObOlogic dl,' physical leitlutest Courtly, e; Inciease In wind nt' Water erosltln of sol,is. .2i:.. Wholebhle exposure of toll durlfig the cons_tturtion phase of tither on o� off silc7 development allowed by the proposed p'roldet will temporarily false thf; 010 16 tales. when considering lilt factors of the site recti as shlillow soils, vegetation type, slops slze, and Inclination, and V, tlequ�ncY and Inlensily of tli- li oli erosion potential it very (sigh. It Is anticipated Ilial, the Oki � County Crading ordinance wlll control erosion during the construclltsll Phase of development to a less than slgniticanl level, a f. Cltangtt In dePRsltibh of erosion of beach_. The Wtoposed prolect Will hot CAust slilallon or etiasinn of streams, sands, or changes 1n sillallon. deposIitlon flyers or creeps flue to the parcel sizes and dl'stattce from su tace 'mhy modify the channol of writer bows, of 'erasion wilfch a liver of tlteam or lite bed lit Int ocean or any bay, inlet or lakel ._. g, lobs of prime idOcultUtallY produc'tive �, k aN ll.0 IUUrralatolls. lthetpropetly it chh"C driz d bylre residual solll softs outside deslohAled Urban ateasJ llom Jaya flows, rough rock oulclbPPings. ouldets, cobble stories, is and shallow soloverlying ;M Can fofmallons, such tolls have marillnal agricultural values and limited gfAzln'p opportunities. h, rXilMute 61 people or 0tbperty 'ib geologic_ ._ - x till of Bildt county Is to a ltoderale tatiliquAke Intensity zone Viii, tta2Ards such as earthquakes, lands�Ides, Construellan of hulldings to unitotm Building Code standards Will mudt►Ides., ground (a11lure or s m11AI sstovlde aUequale ptolectIOil toodcupants 111 case of Dl,;lsttic act IVIty. Ilatat.Jst z. Alk_ Will the ovopol,al tesu)t In substantlall a, „_, x Inctohsing the denslllet bt ftsldi"Ilal dtvelormdAt on the project Alt emiss)or;s or daterloratlon of hmblen't all gUalllyJ alae Will result In a cumulative irttiact jwt alt quality due to related Increases in ttallic yeherated anti Inditel all pollution tesoutces, 'lhd l;alltofhIA Air Rdsoutttt Conl!ol Board had Identified Butte icoUnfy as h hohatlAlnmehl area 111 meelltlg the r,latidalds of the talliothf'a GleAh Alt Act lotbto'le-add CA bon Monoxide. the county hit pollutl'nn tooltol plah 0royi'Jis no hN igailon measures for itildh a smart rdsldenllal ptolect, b flit creation of oblectldnable Oddis, smoke ..� � k.. some "shbf't frim .ilr yuAl3ly lmnacts Wi11 probably result durtle the duntlrruct'Ion phases of tvelopinfl fesibdntlat housing. lhtremsdd C,r fumed Veit tlb_And equOMenl emisslo11t As Well as ihcleated dust will occbf rl11 earthwork stages of develtiptitnt. ,w •---- 3 iro nmental Chec.klisf. +� Evalua ie `af Efivixonmental Im aft p TV. ENVIROIRONTAZ+ IMPACTS (continued$ Yrs a u L No DY8C OSSION OF 'ENV'TRON j , NTAL EVAU ATIO (Continued) T, C. Alteration of all movement, moi?slure or x The proposal Will not affect the almosphere, R temperature, or 0Y change In comate, locally or regionally( wa_ Trp. Will the proposal resUl't Ili substhnllalr a„ changes in currents, of ilia course or _ X the proposal will not aflectthe cola se or direction of water direction of water movements. In el (hot movements In either marine of fresh wAters, marine or' freshwaters b. changes In absorptloll rales, d:atnage X_ The proposed project Witt cause some minor chanoas Ili the absorption pill lefni„ of the fate a d amount of surface rales and resulting amount of surlace runoff due to 11nPelvious surfaces elated to pawing, parking areas, driveways, roof lops, etc. No illihi allerirtg of the bat le d(Alnage Pattern Is anticlpaled: C. Nendffr far oft: -site surface_ drainage ` — 1icant No`a suftace drayrsage Irnp'foVemunt+ Is ant.lcipalad in or def to lmprovemcrris, Ilfcfuding Vegelatlortrerrayal, accommodate the Proposed project, channelizallort or culvert I611aliallon3 d. All.eratfons to the course or IIoN, of 'flood X _ The proposal will not affect the flow of flood waters, wnry:lst e, change in: the amount of wflAcewale, In any X ThG Proposal Will not affect the amount of stlr(ace water in,�nV wal6+r water bodYr bodV, I Discharge Into surface Waters, or in any __ -X The ptoposel Will hot Impact suflace wafer quality, alteta(ldo of surface water quality. Including but not tlmlted lo,100ctature, dissolved oxygen or lutbidily? g. Allefalfon of the direction of rate of flow x The proposal WIII not at fact (he dlfact )on of Mow of groupd waters. of ground waters( _. h. Change In the quantity of,gUAlit�r or ground direct x � The Project site is cutrehtly dependenl upon groundwater,- Higher watart elthet tjlrough a'r1ltiorts of through ihtercep lon of densities may ovefdrali the exls Ing aquifer._ currently, there is Withdr;wAls, of an a'qulfer by cuts of excavations"? no stallsilcal data on the tjUantily of Utound-salet of rate of rfiharge of o)tNtidwaler In the aloe, A stable iter soutce should bequantifle�t which will ilia water_ demands of the proposed de�nslly. jlechatge and drafting `rales 'should be determittAd. 1 k lse fter ._ See ' •abovit, available. publicuwater suppllest _k I Expo Iure of poople or property to water -the protect site Is not lbe led wlthin a flood tone area, the d related hazards such as floodingf proposal will not, result In titre exposure of people of properly to water related hAZ&fds such as hooding. 4, i—+Ni 1 M 11 the prt5pusal rl:stfl t In a change In the dlvefsI(V 61 ipdcles, or .r.^._ -, X Thi! Ovatilty of plant s_Isacles will be ekpanded is residential none hirmbcr of .any sptl>:les of plants tinclu dlhg native landscapes fife Installed. treat, shrubs. , jejej crops. aril Aquatic {itanlslr b. ktlild!16h of (lie numbers of any UnloUd. We ,, � ss tit' ro►e' I sl le I s located. In close prax(mf iY to sldaltea gcbus(a I dr ttrldanuered species of pian(st witch has 'been found to be a late planl, to order to delefmine If the project si(e conlalr;t anyrafa or efjdangered p(aht species It Will �Ilibcosialy to ObHotih a Uolarilcal sutvby The gotphitil ermine lite mica for aIIV further mlt�galr��n maa'sures, C. Inlroduct"1'6n or new species of pjAnli into x, the ptoaU's;l will h4l Affect dxlt(lhg Plant sirs:. a+ an atea, of In a battler Ib lite normal r 4, '.� Fironmaintal Checklist Of EVaY,*UAt .on �of liilq aninenta7 Itipact< ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (continued) Jrsl A6= • to DIS01189ION OP'ENVIR0141i�7.UNTA4L . L. VALL�A`i'I ( con t l ruled j Teplenithment of exlsling spociesi d. Reduction in acreage of arty agricultural X The still does not contain any cortmetclally viable agricultural; crop. drop? is, PF, wlII etre proposal result In subsian it a, Change In (hp diversity of species,. or_ z 'rhe project site is located within a Oder herd range for the East` numbers of any spec as o animals (birds, Tehama Doer herd. The Aida has been utilized as the winter ranoas land animals Including r pilles. fish and tot the East Tehama Deer held. In lens, the CAIi(Otilia DOrrlmetri, ihalillsh, benlhlc otganlsms or Insects)? of Fish and dame Ccmnlsslon identified development In ilia foolhllls, As enctoa hing upon Ifilgratoty deer fullges. The bulbs county_Board of stiptiry sort apf:olnled a comniltea to identify the deer herd ranua In-lUIW txofiIY The Commlllee docUmenlod the Impacts of residential the detelopmenl on mlgppaidry deer rdndes, and tecornnehdod mlI1011 on' measures, lot protect on of migratory deer habitat "alfac►ed by residential development, To dale no policy has-been adopted by ilio 'supetvlsois hoard of to millgete Impacts of development on Ilia mlotatory deer herds. 'rile liresposad project It located within a deaiBnated deal held d,Walopmeni zone (DOZ), however, no impact lees have boon established to fund deer hard range mitidalion measutas. The County of Butte cuttenlly teoufret all map's In the DOX to plAdd the following trate on 11nal maps: ^bear Herd Impact fees shat) ,be paid at time df uu(ldint Patmil issuance It aPpllcable,- b. Reduction neieei enumbet'iies �dltalsrQue, rare k_ the slid contains no lain ahImals. c, Introduction of new specks of animals Into _:, , �f set So above. an area, at in a barrier to the, migration or irwvement of animal sf d.161fAjtalion of exisilnl fish of wildlife , _ `#, k See as above,, s. ziIst will the piullotaf fesuWtn subs anilal A, inuteaies In existing noise levels? __ ....X the proposal Will not, tasUlt in a tubstanlial Increase Iri htilse, cleated on ilia or In the vicinity. bits people tosel,prd noise levels? _—_ ~�� �— sal will not expose people to tavern noise level(. 71 r A�peUrepof l..._.l'—A"0. The ptopoThe tai will rot retuit in A tilbstahllal Indfoase in light or �� " sign( roan g't�and glatef gime created an In ar In the 'V",clnily. e. I"ose, wilt tho ptopo xl retuil In a itibstAhtlki it the ptolecl tilt is designA(6d by Ilia ntlile Comity Central Plan As a igratioN.of Ilia present of platihed land use of an AgticWlutal�-Rotldontlal. Tho' project 'ilia It aoned TA -46 lwhich areat requires a in himum Of (Orly actes pill dwelling "visit and TM -s which k te'qulfat a m hlmum of live acres pot dweliing unit, rho proposed 16hlalliVe paft:el map itonlotms, to bnth ilia galietal plan designation anti the ziihing dials If1citioil. 'tilt; proposed project is coilSlsthnl With the Character of the ittitountting area. p, twcttm . ii siits:gs. Will the proposal result In A, to nutcet10 the rate of Ilia of ally natural _ � ,, rails 0,00o al will hot affect any'nalattil iesouteps. b. bdpleilon dl any hon=tenewabla natural ,L. the ptop.dtai will hot dtfilale any natural res Woes, resoutcesl , Y i c q,- �;, (" lmv��checklist, Ewauatioh�Imp�pe4ot ENViFt{i:"ENTAL 'IMPACTS (Conlinued) YES 4yug utrsUutsrsJLUV urs, Day nurm'P —4- .a•�+,r�r►r��.�,. (continued)' tt1, 3 t x OP DPW, Will the proposal '-ivofVe, e A, k risk ut explosion or release of hakatdous x TheProposal s,1111 not Involve the usa of hazardous matetlals, nor it Iodated close to any (act li Cies winch Store or utilize suth substances IIacluoind. but not il[,%Ited to. oil, pesficjdas, cheml(:als or radlailon) In materials. the event of an accident or upset tundttions7 p. posx`ble Inlerferent,e. with an emergency X the proposal Services, response plan or emtrge; 6 113n it6monhal Chockliati * Evetluar�icn A EBVi»aTtaatcn> L Iwpac ' XV, E;IiVIROhWENTAL IMPACTS (continued) YES -NQ DISCUSSION OF DNVIRONMIE�,NTAL 'E'VAUATT (continued) protection services In ,those lhslarlP,i where they tre Installed,' The Project site has nopressurIzed wd''ar sYstiam'to suopotl a hydrant fystem which Impacts the ability of the fire department to protect properly lmprfrt,iienls and requites Iiia use of water lenders. To ;re educe the Imps,, on the demands tot walor lenders It Is recommended the o0l Icahl pay S200.00 per lot to ilia butte County Flre taeparlment Water Tender Fund. It It anticipated ilia above mlilgatton measures will reduce the impacts on lite proldcllorl service to a less than. significant level, III police protection! X The proposal will result In a incremental increase in demand tot police protection In the area which cannot be serviced byy the present Sheriff's Department, since 1980 Ilia population of bhtl0 county has Increased by oVe 25%, while at rile same time the police Nitta has been decreased In personnel by 5o% duu 10 fiscal difficulties being experienced by butte County, currently, butte county has the lowest At recent at Officials i•1eAtinas onrbuttelcoun y'seMeal'ctlW, count tesllfled 1 do of and do not that pollee protection services are preW111V Inadequatea and meet Ilia service akpectatlons 01 Ilia p continued r.urai development has resulted In tumulative Impacts oh Police protection services which continues to reduce the 81101111`1 Department capacity to provide adequate police "services. bevelopmeni Impacts on the 517er1!l's department is county w�de and cannot be,mitigated by one Individual project. The cumulative 606tt% of development on pot 10 pr:oldctlon has been documented by the Cnunt1 Adminlstratlye office, In (tic report 'county of Butte, Annual Fischl r RevleW.' Ca schools! The propoial will result In a fncrementa Inctease In demand for school services in the area, itowev6r, school Impact fees ipacts ce "schoollImpacts by the local school districts Is anticipated to reduce t ' to less than a significant level, d. parks or other tecreailonal facillllest k � _ The proposal will tatUlI In a inttementai increase In demand lot park and tecreallon facilities 10 the Arad, e., stalntenanca oi.pUtilis faCllittes, including_ The Proposal Will result In a intremenlai Increase'in the need for in the ftladst malittenancd of toads and What public laelilllas atria. I. father i)ovetnmental selvicest X The ptbposal will result In a Iftremental Increase in demand lot all other governmental' serdicds In the atea. 15. _W rtnY. Will the proposal result In- a. Usti of subllarlllal Amounts of fuel or x, 'ilia Ptopotal will not utillYe 8ubst8!)tlal fuel or enetffy. energy"t aslant sal ihcrea"so In demand upon ext st nn b. st' _: X Tlie tc osal wf ll hot subs p P" lahlIAtIV ihOdAild the demand tot enelUY= lotllcei of eneffly, or letluife the daYoIo fiddot of new sources of 6110190 ld� l.rrlttTirS. WI11 the pl•op'bsal tesu)t art a need tat now sysleml, or substaCllal alterations lb Ilio til ittwrlig: A, power of naiutal gait ,___ X_. The ptopotal Will hot affect electrical Power or naiUral gas distribution systems b, "coeinUnlcallons system%i - ,,._ k„_ The proposal will not alf'ect towunitalion svii1eint. r C, Waiar avaflablillyt w - "ilio pro)lo:ied project will u111120 well water which hat not y E y � :> �_ nvir,ontilantal, Check), st F:va,liaitiltiz cif • Enviroiutlen al mpzta� IV,, ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (continued)'YES u_ qq No` DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMiMj 'rAL E;VALUATIONf (continued)` hislorlcalIV proven to be a slabic source of walet. Prior to final recordation of the map quaI ty and Itllanilty of water should be documented, d, sewer or septic sy"stemsr x _ The,pro)ecl tiles ate located in afoot characterized by shallow sol s, rock outcroppings, and lava caps. the still characteristics of the project sues ate often prone to septic and ICAChtleld syilem failurres due to moor Boll perc61411011 rapacity, Failure of+en results In the seepage of wasleWaret Into the surface layer of all and onto the ground. Leachrieid fallulris maY entet nearby stteams, contaminating Water supplies and lostwino the growth of algae and related organlsms. slflct adherence Id the gutta county Enyylronmental Health Department reffulremanls 11 anticipaled to r.. Storm water drainages x Ml lgato the above concerns, _ The proposed protect will not head substantial storm drainage Improvement's to a.commodater the proposed development. f. sollJ wasCe and riLsposalr X The proposed pro)ecl will have a cumulative Impact cn the oUlte County sanitaty Land Fill end the d;lsposa! of solid Wzste n6ihln the couhlV. rr. IILOAAN HF'AOW Wki[ the proposal result In a, Gteallon of any health hazard or potential hazard (excluding mental Health)# x- The proposed project will not create any SldnlIIcant: heO th hazatdi, b. Exposure of people to potential Kralih hazardst x see lTa above, Ia. AESTH Ts S, Will the proposal, tesiltI In ►ho s ruc ion ol,sny scenic vista or vleW open to t(t{t X The ptopdsal WI:I 1101 result In an acitheilcally olfensjv, �a view, olbfaIt, htrlleallVraftahslVesuiltenap aes it tolthe' public vlewt 19. rcxe ION Will the proposal result in an Imvdir upon e quality or quantity of exislrnp _ The prtrposal May setup 11, an lnurcre�(tai Increase In dembnd lot �i ttk recteationai opporlunille!'r and t1 rcallon facillllos, Zo, CULtt:nAL RESbtJiGt a. will lite proposal result In the alteration of destruction or a prelilstot Ic or ,Ill stot Id _9 , Thri ptolect ilia is Idehllfied As all Ate a of hlgh sensl+'lvll1 tot Archaeological fesoUtdds, atchaeological ills: r We to the atcliaeoiollical sensitiv(trr of the project ilia it Well be necotialy It perlotm a records elleck i llttough the boaftmenl of Ahlhtopology. California sidle L.ailva arty, chico, in ordat to determine 11 slg!ilricAtt sties may be �ed-on the properly, A recorrds cPpck atchaeological `survey of lid property.Wll1 lots will deterMine whether An be hetasssaty and whether any futiher mlIgallon measures WI 11 be hieddC b, wifi''ihd ptoposai tesull In Advetia bhvslea I or ar"ithatic aftecit to.A prehisltoric or x .�' Thd proposal Will hot affect hislotic illcs, histotld building, s'Irucluto of vbjddtl boat the proposal have ilia potelll.lal to C306 s phYtICAI than"ye Whi eh Would. Affect the proposal 'wall nol ri'lfeel cul lural resources. unique elhnle cultural valuest d will the proposal restrict alsting religious bt sact'ad uses wlthfn the -' X The proposal Will not affect rcllrrl0us tasaulcet, potential impact ateet IVa ENVIII014IENTAL IMPACTS (con(inued) Yrs _ uAYiIE -NO DISCUSR'IC'. OF MIRONfiINTAL £VALUATIgI� w ti IconIIhued! ., SUf3GI,'STSD MITIGATION_ MEASUR'HS 14 Provide documentation to the Planning Depad,lmont A. in order to, determine it the project site prlor to tilling final map which outlines quay:lily contains any rare or endangered plant specles It of groundwater, dialling raiet and rate of�. 6 will be necessaty to pelfotm a botanical survey, recharge. A sinule wales source must be quant 111 ed., Vie ut.tanical survey will dm,ermine tate need for any further millnatlon metsilres, i. Place a note on the map which slates; •Deer Herd s. Due to the high send!).!.', for arthaeologlcal lxoatt tees shall. be paid at time of fill ding resources It well be neces.ary to perform a records Petmlls Issuance 11 applicabfe.^ check through the Department of Anthropology, California stale Universlly Chico, in order to 3. Place x note on the alternate or addillonai map determine It 0 011 1cant sales may be located on tlsdell at the lima map tit 'Ing 'Autoaldtic fire the property. A records check wilt determine Iuppreilifnn sprinkler systoms shall be Installed In whether an archaeological survey of the property all "yesdenlial structures In accordance with Ilia will be necessary and whether any, further National 111`0 s+rotecllon Assoclalioh'standard lot mitigation measures will be heeded. the Installation of sprinkler systems In ane and - two (amity dnellings and mobile homes. 1dFPA standard 130, The of the installation of 61 Pay "oo.00 per lot to the build county Fire oepartmenl/CAllfornia Department or Forestty-Flte purpose Iptir)klet syst@Ms Is for additicnal safely and , Prevention water Tender Fund. property protection In the event of resldolitiai r-- ilrr.s, 'this installation will reduce the demand of iltuctutal fire ptolectlon services In those nslantei whete they ate Installed.• +� a 1 j 81 '9 Oxy;. Env rr�nmefnta Checklist st: * Evaluation of"; Environmiental Impact Iy. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Continued) J �� mon No DISCU8'SION OF ENVIRONM - ITAL EVALUATION o, Archaeological and Hislorlcaf Resources in the area-' High I)AYA stirrr It. puude coudeslgnatlOW Agr'lcultul&l Btte cou areanty Ocnerai Pian Residential A. s act t>esc(lotioll tz, r3, Exislinfl Zottlnfl: TM -40 6 TMS EXi sling Land Use on-site: Resldentlal and Vacant f, type of Project: 7GntatlVe Parcel Map Britt Description: TPM to divide 66 acres to create three, five, 14. surroundiand Uses: forest, ru:ei residential x, acre loll with a remAlndet of Si acres. Location; Fnrest Ranch Road and Highway 32 b. zoning: TM�40 6 TM -0 c, Can, Plan [eslonallont A9-Resl - q Proposed Density of Development: iuniljs Was Anae+Jnt of Impetylous SUrfaeln9: minimum d, Parcel sizes 5 to 140 f LOW popUlarlon s, a, Access and Nearest i'UGIiC koad(s)f Fotest Ranch $toad septic/Leachflaid s5-. e, character of site and Arc{lt Hufal 7. +.ojh6d Df sewar.',� Disposal; b r cc qt v..r.r.ei a}k•;r,ty: private Wells 4F Neatest u(taan ATPa' Chico P., `G4srt[ 6piterta+61' Lltf luence, 1.40. .l;U �. , e'r. ••'im ti 1"i Powe. 4,.mt t .' C,�t' '!: ,,x4 dt d4vislotts artd UOV6YOpolonl: W/'A 1b rt, ,f1sv0nents standards lltG:d A{eQ,s N/A if s, Potential tot further land 14, Piro Protectio.. service: Nearest County (Sla(c) Fire Station: Volunteer e, nVlrorxnenlal selling a. station o24 at f6reill Rani•h, Water AVallabliity; �Ia1ei rr-pder Only _ Physical tnVitotynenli 20, schoolS in Area: chicO Unrffed 5cituot DI"strict t Tort' aIn neral Topographic character: 'Relatively flat ridge b, siopest vary flom i to 5t( C. clevatlon:. 2600' to 2so0' ASL d. Limiting Factors: None 2,' soils, a, Yypes and Cltatacterlstlesl soil IS mostly characterized Phase: atones comprise approxlmately , by the Alknn Btohey t1* tack 6epl) outcroppingsI.bouliders soil fr aivasIlows, and shAl low Sol is overlyInij TUscan (ofmatlons Al,sb eXlsts ' on the site b. Lliniting Factors! )Jona j, Natural hazards of ilia Land a, carthgUakd 20nht Moderate Earthquake inl0nitil1 zone Vlfl. b4 Erosion Potential: High C. 0hdsllde Potential! Modetate d< Fire )lazardt Ektreme a, kxpansivc soil Potentlal: 1.04 4, iNdrowov a, surface Watktr: None on fabled glie. ` b, Cround water: UnknoWn a., Dralnage CharaCteristicsz_iitolect site dtalns Into the Chico creek brdlhdae,basin, Annual Rainfall (normal,it X0435" c. Limiting Factor.lt Potentially incited drottndwbtet s. Vi$Uai/scenic QUallty: EXcellenk 6. Acoustic Qualltyr Cool , 7, Alt Qualityt Oootl ntatonicat. m rorimchtt rs. VOgetatlont oak woodlands 'and pine Idlest with rock Oulci'60, 9, rock blUtis, wildlife ltabltattt smAlf birds and anlmals commoft to foothill areas Cultural rnvitor>tii`snt_t 10 xtvircnzktatttal checkl a� * Eualutalrion q Entir onme»t a o 1h ��, f ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (continued) _rte M�vn w DISCUSSION_,OF E ]__ENV3, M ��. RO HNTAL_ EV'AT,UAS['IO, V. (contrnuea) ENVIRONMENTAL REFERVOC'E HATERYAL Ma 11- Earthquake ad Fault Actt Ity:. set mi Sa ty lerent, Butte ad Genera Plan rev se ! -77. by CI•�,M hl I I I . 7 ' �p,n1-2, 'WL l`4i COUJItY General `f�` "an reveisedlcf_59, by ,r.b.i riII1. ` �p 111-1 5 bsldence & Landsl1de Poten�tlad,. 4fety . a el�Itl.t butie county General ,P1aR reuse 1- ., by n E �4 tda� 1It- Er s; szy71'nIer>�tfar; t�ety Cie t, Butte' CG iity Thr , ev sea l'-3. Y Int TA 1 I RR_nty Genera fan revl�ed I Vii.; u, H 111'1. u tte . a tfi-3, EX at.Ive lolls fe,y fe .pt B 6, Ma p t'v-1 tlolse: tJolse -lel e t 9u= -ter county Genaral pian revlsed 1-77, by C ,Mil i. W E the t q to V- , scp i s H I h+�ays ; scents 1 ,01gay H A H I y I wuite clonnty cenera� Plan revised t�7,« y C L. p (.II -a Nat raT Flre Na yo' C1asles: S fety ncWt. utte Bounty Genera ah 'rev sea i -W by rrch en`og cal se 1ti ly p b fsg nint7, or ut a �ounty �'1�annYnatDepMaart�entlame, 19f3P �,Man io. School District Flap, Butte county Planning Department. vy St 198 , b�raepartme to 2 "'&�ay?j IttVcal S, 1 dap• I p %', I haterNItte ConceesourcesSr_or h e rn [�Is ct, Resources AgencytSEa� P ese �e oap�aes ablls�Iedb Cf n C rr M�{ vy Resolution 12, tc��t7 By rteotrnty [1orYtd of SuperVlsars) recem or 51 1987, 13P Ftootl Ins ranee R to Ma s, Natlohafi.Fl od.insuranGe Program, f-egerai EMeraeticy a.aement'aency 1988, 14, USGs tQ,uad Mao, cohas8ot,, 1978, 15 eepariiaht ot)l Anr f cu turePbvi 116 (y9 b) Area, U. S. f 9 16. got( rinre eyoof AUr7cuj?urerOrovll le (192,6) Area, U.S, epa,17, gut' Couht F i " e pt6tect loft. Jut I sd lct lorit and Fa ii`1 s �a �utto Cau t lire De a meet an ?rri?Set e to hent of o e:strY. a ie LountY I nntl I : It .