Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
056-360-011
F Mam-MG COV STO�i SU.-.A,*»r 5 Zm, z+pAAW l3TV' IC3P7S } ._=.,u.aCAti�William Vaccaro Log4i '90-09••06-01,', ,.. 446 Southgate Cour, Chico, CA 95928 .a �r-?, Same ��,25CT 1. Z.SjM *7PT_ION TENTATIVE PARCEL ,MAS' to divide 42.4 5 acres to create. 2 parcels %cC;;1 1 W on both sides of Altatina Drive, southeast, of Tina Court, Forest Rgn :h area . "S SSOR f S 2-URCM NVI-MER (S) 056-390-011 Lzaw; G Ur '' �?�AI, PI2..��'T A -Rosi PROZECT CONSIST .:.,,..j'rw7 !' ` M 'PLA.1i COlsiFORDiAMICE,'ti,�'PORT 6/22190 e DATE OF ikPP ,IC;�NT L-IGIII TUP2 ,..._....,', ------ LAIM. coms.-'nTi"A.TION ACT COwn"RAG"3'S? . A??LICA,TION 7-__=tTs7ED 8/31/90 ?,w� V ;`rOri/w3'Jxi, ENGIN=R Sierra West Surveying AZV SSS: 3437 Black Olive Drive, Paradise,, CA 95969 DA= 71AMT lG... DIRECTOR' S RBPORT _'DP_rPkRZD In .•,;�...,..._... "TiT:-ii, tATEGO�ciC� .GLam.T.DN — Da^sn",c, ^'�'.:.,E�7 �DO?TED ,+ MEGA D :C,.0 -R LION D tOP TED .19,V- MT- ACT REPORT - DAME STA'T'E C�r.�c=�c.T`�'G'r.'t7L1SE �E. SUB. CGI•.1a T TZE !'IS ` IDtG De IT _AGx.i�JCw F_ AP, �ivG I)A :'` 17 1 G1( ��z��sc�RY �G�tc�� Ac���O�� ��u�ta _ Wl� r�wt� �ar►i��ilaN> _ n�'� �'�,_ ��,�, eA h TIE -m �T. I bjazcT6 tl a REP 1: l b 1 t& . FRELI?MINASUBDIVISION h?ps.VE.R APPLICATION (Please check amprapriatlE box_) 4fo APPLICANT: a,)Ia m � �e � I�i�7rr NO- ADDRESS: GS;ADDrSS• TIS e�"�Jt�� �d•�l�i�, C.2/ M,r ER 'N PHONE, NO: ADDRESS: -.�' Elar,DqEER OR s-�rRVExo3 • eto4 ADDRESS: 5-t/57 �?' �t! .fls C� P' Yi/ ►5 _ � �1 141L NOTICE OF DARING: TO: LOCATION OF I-ROR..r.K^7 y" T6r�1;S P � MGMN SECTION %a ASSESSOR 8 PARCEL IAMIEEP: � rQ� � TOTAL ACREgG �4Z- T� - M]EASE sl alcT 1 T IE RFPZ)R7 OP, RECENT POMMY OF T rrl'!E I SUR014CE -D! CkdatTE AIM Rh COR+il3lIG INFOIR lL TION BY s�'MCF rTn7S PARTI ICUTAP. PkRCELLNASiC � A -TJX DA TrE SOOT, PAM IvTLna8R AJJD Sim Or- -,'v 'LS SIN^v Ct't&A (inc?ai(lin y re=inter): DISTANCE TO 1,iF `1 Li?4 WATT, 03IMSE OR STORM D 2UT: SPG% PROPOSED )-2TIIOD or SEti:ArE i)18'FJSAL: c%irlc r r �0�-'JSEI) SOu`RCE : e10 r/ e 04 i'. Chi. i - ti `e s DO POKER AND 'Plibl,Z LT+ S E):'Sm TO BOUN-SAY GE t"rs^} O IGMI, PARCii,x' 5 r ,1 •L r -r t- :.; D t S rs"- SCE ',� Ey �i 11 w tri 1U ns tJ TEI puilo . F�atming �i I.I' I OT ES_,�.�� �_ ��. o ty, ,! I :f liff� e�� —.` • uT lei"... j bV~ "ems t o I �,'ann�'_se g-' Gro'.*ile, G4 95965-`1397:pp+Ican: ( 916 ) 334-4 ! i hF f ,µ� r Sub3itrisior. %if applicable) DA to Y" lied - h.4XD DTVISJOK t2?i.7CATI0 S SupD3 =iental 1n: orra� lot Tor Pi anninr De oarunent his6 and describe any other related€Ae*_"iI33 ts 2715 other public approval require' 70� this project-,l-�7cl'Ild1T! those.required �- state and ie6er.a1 agencies, ,tared bti city, zegiona? - P'h R • . ouosed scbe iu1 i7ngh-v ssoclG4hC projects., ,° t Ant:icivatec inc.reMental d.=velopmant "`s" subd vision rut:ure develdpmsnt plans)ml n units ta.,=_ln o What mp ,, =' il _thod vill be utized to 6cc6=pdatt surface arainage? Describe nog. on -sits and do 'ns ream arainaee khan - � channels t�3. be ar=ec.ted. , varer i oe r fire iht ` _ xn^ pS1CDbse5 vi1 *, etc. ice/ 7 ,�j • s./ `°• grants �eonas Ei cot"rli 1417 O i'eG,'.n be ncCG'5S8-V . y %:reat�o;rr e t2 n"�=� �e: Lt� � ,:ts-a_ ani r:�:L-.;:alho3:c � � •' ' ` • 'n EWIPOiv'ENTAL I:M ACTS ASD T.ITIGATIO?I MEASURES., SURES , den:iYv voLenti,P-IIV significanz environmental imAacus assD^.2teG 4i:tf the lane di ,2sion. Vnat p_oiect ops sr. features O.- special conCitio .M1 of approval (TtiiL. anon ;..unsure. are proposed to alleviate Potential environ-mental i.r=actS=� hd +0V ��rj�I �•,hti" as Describe, the project site at it exists before the pro ectj including inzormatibb ori topography, soil stabi it}-, plants and animals, and an;, cultural., historical or scenic aspects: Describe any xastinc structures on the site, 2 c the use a y( the s Cr U es . 19;—,Tye. *pe-5' K b)` Describe the: surrounding proverties, including info:-mation or. Dlant.s and ar3ima,t an'd any ctlltura"t, historical or scenic aspects,. indicate the .Nape o� fano Use (residential- cor-=erci2s.1 etc., inLersit3° of and use (bne-iaMiIYt apartment houses; shops, Gerart- meat steres, etc. )', anti scale of aevelopment�}(yhheight) rontraggs, s tb2C�:, rear- Varr" etc ) i � � � of il�/ /47 / V 7,47�6. ^ �C / CETIr,iCA?IOh: hereby CLI.tIZ- that the 8-1-2te-ments .iurnlsned above anG it ..� r the coached ex kbits present t.:ha date and. information re'C1t!'.rE'G IO: this rx'1.i ti,a'1 evaitta ion to the best, OT mY ability, and that the A acts, statements ab6 -n ormation presentee are :.rue and correct to the best of my 1mowleage �+ An6, belief Let Scnature *use separote sneYt ;o: targe resttor.,ses: �1Cr '59t',A4i11i1016nep pue7 61S O SUBDIVIDEP,'S STATEMENT Pam e} Dat e P ect-� k" I. Existing use . (s) of the lana 2. Proposed use (5) of the I and 3. Improvements proposed (Sce -'L;l-i . 20-21 County Code) 4. Public areas probose 6' Tree pliantin/or rer g no1ral (approxi number) stsr=/a� Prelim 6. ry cop}' of an), condition, restrictive reservations or covenarice eyisti'ng or proposed shall be attached to this statement,. attached none Stat- typ of division, i.e,rivate P road urban, rural$ e etc. i M I, IC'- FC7R f'A22C ML3P . !07Ft ST-M0TVTS2c7N MAP R .1--4 to be completed by applicant. APPLICANT NAM1; AHI1 ADDRESS'; i I i A M\/A C C A P 0 441, SOIJ-rH A2 . C H 1 CO CPQ q Cq 2-a �pp=Ecr DESCRIPTION: 'Z F'/fi f2 C Wil_ _ S U-7 S'-f PARCEL MAP - .+ A 5SESSQR' S PARCzL Z� (s) :_ (� 3 q 0 -- D I 1 i 6Q I iJ ( St-rel; � ?�toPosED usE: f2AN � E••�r'-T'T "7'y f'E. r"3 U_-- r S C following ite= are to be completed by the Planning 'Department: ZONING: u LAND CONSERVATION AGREE2M: - N 'PLAN DFsiw=om 46.2 I e 0 1-1 Pe'SLt� P N i I A'I YES NO It is recommended thatyou perform the following checked items: l�grllcultural. CcWpatibility Water and Sewer Capacity x - ARCHAEOLOGICAL RECORDS t ECX Ado-quate Fire Facilities x BOTANICAL suRYE7C GEOLOGICAL.SURVEY A;. R.aad Capacity and Maintenance %< r-� Access to Co= rcial and Scsoolss X,_, YES NO WIMUN DEPARMMa OF FISH Cep AND FI.n-ZD CROPS AND GAME DEVELOPMENT ZONE; Preuominant 5-10 ac. Parcel Size r� 2. Vicinity of 'Ur"aan. Boundaries WIMH FLOOD PLAINS Ag. Viability not Impairedwi=N eb2FA SPECIFIC (JR �StzLf£ Determination: Substantially conforms to: LAND USE PLAN: . Gr' MLkL PLAN: 1. Land Use + If Yes 2. Conser.-ation. - Name of °lan �a 5. Open Space ` w{ uRSAN RESERVE fit. Safety a %G. If Yes, 5. Noise Name of Reserve 6 Housing, 2� _ - —. 7 ., CL—cul.--tion 'I-< AIRPORT LAND USE PLAN:—— �n,�t3tll:.(� COiJ�� N1 tTS e _ ; •, . Staff Signatuta,r—�'� r^ � � ✓�..'s-c-_ . Date 5 ( A5 THE APPLICAI i'T,*'FOR' THE REQUESTED LAND DIVISION, I AN AWARE OF t1t ABOVE STAFF D i' ON ARDL`1G' MM CONFORMANCE �7r = 11M GENERAL PIAN AND ZON.0G. �Signature ' caE' Anplic�tt Dated — S� , *IIi1is rep ott viii exaire and be discarded :sit (b) clont�i A from the date di the 'stat..-t si " cure.,, LD 1.000A (revised ti=87 .•, r: X Planning Department NAME: WILLIAM VACCARO Environmental Health Department GDF (Forestry Department) AP: 56-39--11: Attn: J. Craig Carter (on areas north of red line on map) 11— Butte County Sheriff PG&E (check title report for. easement) Pacific Bell Butte County Mosquito Abatement OR Oroville Mosquito Abatement (areas within large map in cabinet) tool District (-wal map) N Ca I Pin 19 Water Company Uf individual wells are not indicated on application or map) Durham Irrigation 09 Durham Mutual Water Co California Water S¢,rvice Company (Chico area;) Oroville Wyandotte Irrigation District (Oroville area, SE of river) _ Thermalito Irrigation District (Thermalito area N$ ofriver) Limesaddle Community Services District (Paradise area along Pentz Rdi to lake) Del Oro Water (Paradise Pines area) Buzztail Waterworks (Doe Gill Ridge/Forest Ranch area) Paradise Irrigation District City of . . (check wall maps for spheres of influence) Oroville Chico Paradise Biggs Gridley �WILLE AREA ONLY: Lake Oroville Area Public Utility District (see large map in cabinet) �-� Feather River Recreation District (see large map in cabinet) El Medio Fire District (check wall soap,, a small portion of Oroville only) B-IW4,, RICHVALE GRIDLEY AREAS (SOU`M BUTTE COUTY): check wall map and title report to see what applies. Some areas overlap. Drainage District #3' Drainage District 1#2 Drainage Dittrir_C: 71100 Utoinage District #200 Reclamation District #533 Reclamation District #2056 Sacramento and San Joaquin Drainage District Bunte Creek Drainage District V4 CERTAIN CASES: �- Dept. of Fish and Game near water and in rural and Su erintendeht of Schools only for subdivisions ----�- p ( mountain areas) Cal xranF (near State Hwy; 32, 70, 99, 149 (Chico cut-off), 162 (Olive Hwy, & Rzchvale Hwy.), 191 (Clank Road) State Water Quality Control Hoard (projects with more than 100 lots or units) United States Forest Service (if project borders USA land "-check AP books), Parks and Recreation Department (property near Dake Oroville) State Water Resources Department (property hear take Oroville lle —= watetshed)� Rock Cheek Reclaimation Dist. (west of Chico Airport, south of Rock (Peek and east of Hwy. 99 (see wall map) Chico Area Recreation & Park Dist (only for subdi.vi.siona) SPECIAL CASES. check title report J:or tmy mention of special services or easements such as to Thermalito Irrigation District: (numbered items) J L\ _ sT�t= • ' M r 1 ;, 5 �.3077 .x w �^ , P,T ['fit ..r �!R�'"n♦� �.CI.. �'1� ,.1"-''� A►� M�"�f e •7G7 ,a 7' �'�.,�I'' ' f C`.�� Ike` 's^ •. Y 1.~ Y.Y ':a z_C-_•i Fe% 0. ' -, r'u, if ��-{ r k'•t , , , I.i 80''.x•1'41" G l[�'° � •�,����,j�� � ems, �® I d2 Y . ] - _ ,• ' y. 0% •Zem • AIV $ l • F? W , ,. kr..G�.'?y.,.:.-.. ., ,.,, .. r c. 4'•'.-: 1� �A + S�'> : •ilfrs�. l.Y,_ rr; •„ I 1 _ •-" _ ..,. ;. . ♦�,�� '. »_•r w ,- . vy,, . . :i'�, :'w+r+r. +w,,.. n., • 1 • • . •.•� ,i� .• 'y �. aw=- ►J 1:�� yy pr A PA, `�� .� . �F�{ ppyy 'r+ . A � �m ,$e ,m � .,.: SSL•, .�sf amu,).- �, ...t.T.� � ` ° .wa.••.• �rtt .'• • / ,1"�.t tom,►., ,, , ' g ,°. , .. 1 AtP Jf, �' �;, . '�i�u..,: a, . - 1>.it�'re-, Flu �/ x G'yt-t4.�,1.,, cy r.. �, _. •. ••GSf F, ; -i' A.1*1,('� I rf.�w"t 'I.•'.k=. �'..��'�.� �N • ,�• r f, ` '�, �` ' !roft •+�;y J!1 b t , •-, ',' ; J.;.;"•�' •�d%' rH I-- MAP WAS F•r� rtl f,,,�• ,r.. •r ti ��r � .. ,_-. .. 'II -a.r ,: y� t. .tt �� k • � ��,�..; �. •. i Ak,_�.��r��r'r��•�•�w��.•�•�'.'»HM^. r..—...�� ..� :+-._. '" YLC yr LL. , 5w' IG •,• ,� * + �'.. •# •�:♦�. �•k•t1�t r"+: r:; � ;ti.,y�,. ti. 'ML -7 +_, �� :r.. ,_....� � • � "�L,FY .")!_*Lt."., :t • n • - ' •h �• � :• �.• A ♦ • �,, .+ j�'� OcRwp «s• DF ts�l5lr.. kti ,,,.. r r .� .. .:-• " �. !i' «: ,..,�. .,. ACl'J+.TTN� 2 +'-•.G:Q �+r +•'�"`WtK"�".'�:1' � a �� •.�� �,• �;�:y i ,, � .t��j., •r�.yrr';�`+" � - �,}•r .�: i l{ � �.R.. K N' .:. � P O ; ,.� •. _l X1.1 .•�+.� `'� ,� 1 •�"i• ' � 'i`It''� j J '� � • •iS�''•• .. ,: t � h^�`C ,, a .�: � 4 ., � P• , . •a, • +r. � ... Ss✓� . / , J! e.G.n w� ,,�• r ,' 1 .. � .� s 1 � � •-, I�I:.T-.A.! L rte' � .., / { �.., � � '�► F* • fC7 Wd.`� �"yIQl A, . �Y V� ;i�.:'C It;•.+. •1.1� ., •• ' g ': .� � w E.�+6C..ti V,►J"T'r _ �w ;t�� LI"•„ � : � ,-+'.• � • r' �e�►� :� $ 4.► . �' � � �% ' r'LY,%G�.i ! T�� f� SiB W.C.:-off r , ..w.... ;•..�.. � l� W . f (:,• �`'h {:a�I:a l�- �,1°•• +•ter n wL:, 11�� �� �� t,�r r',' '�"Z'�'•�--�4.+ :�..r ��'� i�•'�.�+I.�... �w{:�.�Y�ti� �c��I 114 f iV/ •� X � C , �-�-�jl,,l � A.'� '�a•,GyWfJ�, 'r• �IfJI',Yc� •1,�•�� - ,a w � •" :+ :. ,t, �LKl; � �// ` r %-.:ESor•+,-,°; G� � r�•'RGf t.,.. I - I� �� rte., FT:' Q�3�' y `,,...+-i �k�'C �al' vtj' 'si was=f+s' +•a _ p +- .. ',E�.s.3�it•'iC��.:.. _- - i.<r d M•'•,.' � tQ .'`.j j�.'1>:w �.• /b f �1 -. ... � _-' `� �` �G�_ %�ii5 (: `�'� � 1`4t •� � �..�1 1: -r� ;� � t tN . ^ � r �' �`• W�i".'aCi,MN Lr>:.�'i,S.C7R;} , �.; IJ III 1p/� � i- Y ., ••. W i A. 404 .... .. _ �'.� Yj•%• • ' •id •iv4w;O,y w ; ,•f17" '�" t'ti::'M_ II�I_'500' E$�s'3 Aj.l , ...n -{f. h1l✓I�t 1^.0 . d lJT'lL.�`f'(t= A_ 1T" {mss- c. 't►1r_-} • �r,� ";. i,,, � • 'a.' / lf� V Yfti-C-ACF1 �: • w aw ?R`• / �E tom+ 7�1 Td 'C♦.tJL. P4-r�+1 +te' ....�'�"• ~ ia'Sw:�'`+t:., ?�::�+r.:a�'�•t.. ";9„m t'1LG%7'T►1�'"S� 'Y�Y �' �"�,1� d::i®fww e+_ .��1�'E� �'ws•• •,�. • 1�C'g4 •t ,. ph.:. N ,:, 7 '1 f� b "�"'.��'.f:. (..t• �+,ea ' 1 �1:�' �` 'r �' %'L f3.'+`• �`i,' •�"`�•i`�.t,Q�,. i 'r*, ,r ✓%�� ,K ti 1 �4��,� 1 V- �L',A+,. '('GJ �`�CliS_ Xrra..IP.�{; •, t• • nti�' ,.. ► f - } I' �.' ` /�cw '�i: ._�' Ai -mg! l cQur—t w ;� l.•7' ++- 1 �.' "a •-,,.,.,.,"''as 1h, ':vfr 4. ' � �-y°2 fes,• w � �'' r �••�kPA r Y •� le" �O t<`Vr'` l c>m f NCC.E. `7` F�-Iia-'1"' \S; • � $1 vWr�.'".R"�r �G'�CTk+=t �'4". �-''�'. ME£yittG 'WA'T�IZ f� �"✓/�•ll...j1.,P�.>.�;." , &r � '/� "�S,,�' . k �:. ,_� r �/� � � ,/� , I•-1 t@fR�+2Zt 1id'I� �" �^t'tE�IA``:`'c�, " �� r ` r1, �\ �„ 1�-..t+.t��,IG.� a �l ,-•l1^F..t i&r�•+Tb tJF2C'x,_f.,� T! TL. L �o . / '' r' `' ' � ! A� � lfNf�tF•�. C7�-tom Cs ,T' CyA"�`t"" hG,�±x..1t a' M / 4 ' , PFT ".1=��.r 41, 1 : t Cr�t.lf^ }Ykl, :, Ht i2r✓�+ Cc�a �� T»;�.� � �.. `• :>.{'4 a � ."'TZ , 10 I�.q.,y"y"�''`...'�. F, L..if+.IF=- L+7�A..i� '..,., a.�.ar.��i+wiw�sw•�ms.� '.�+% ) . �" � ��i� �`�i[��th.'i,k"tin.:.�y•��+� ' ` "=+`I'�� IGS "...G..i..i lA.. •�. x � �: � ' ' ' r ��es.e� ..._„: _ lvf pct•• _ �N .. , , • ;� ,: , , ��`` ,..,. . -....: . .. ,., V 1'. ,, '.� 1 - } - �: "� r '' >.' , b•"F" �'! ,I.a'+'r y 1 , yT�.c'� k y��.'.. ,:«.. �.V';�YA .....rl y ' ~.' Ys', .,.... 1 . .._...fie•. w.;. ujV ...M:,.. .. �L^.�.�.::i.. al. .d...• -,. :,. ..°; a..., A:['i.l / e. .�, `-. ,7F , f. Vii. l'..,, iM,`!ft+. ) '.rf..aJ;"ia/•C"1.:� i.. Yn. A'.f3�':vY�:ML< EUTTE COLprr'f ADVISORY AGENCY MINUTES PAGE 3 OCTOBER 2¢, 1991 2, Gary 'Wright, AP 62-64-20, 21 and 23, BLM, 3 parcels located-on-the south side of Dald Rock Road approx.. 700 ft east of Tree Lined Road, Berry Creek area. .Engineers Barnhart/Brown_ Associates No one was present to speak. Mr. Reid stated: finding that the project is exempt from environmental review, I make a motion to approve the boundary line modification of Gary' Wright on. AP 62-64-20, 21 and 23. Approval is subject to the following conditions and finding that approval will not be detrimental to the health, safety or welfare of the people. of Butte County proviied the required conditions are complied with. Public Works conditions i 1 Prepare necessary deeds for recordation. Submit to Department ?� of Public Works for checking-. 2, Verify that partial reconveyance and/or modification of ti^iist , deeds has been accomplished, if necessary. 3 Verify that there are no delinquent taxes due prior to recording deeds or map. 4 Preparea map showing approved boundary line modification and submit to Department of Public Works for checking, approval and recording; 5 After recordation of deeds, contact the Assessor's Office and request that the necessary parcels be combined so that no new parcels are created. i. 6 Show all easements of record on the map. Motion seconded by qtr. Sanders and carried unanimously.. ------------------------ I B TENTATIVE PARCEL MAPS FOR coNSIDERATION: AP 56-�9=11, 2 parcels on both sides of Altatina 3 William Vaccaro, TPM, Drive, SE of Tina Ct: Forest Ranch area., Engineer; Sierra West Surveying 4 Tom Wrinkle was present. He said that Public Works was going to change the condition regarding the Altatina Raod approach: Nri Mendonsa said he modify that condition to�meet the Cal. Trans requirements.. Mr. Wrinkle objected to Planning Dept. condition #6 to note pile brush, ort i the property: I BUTTE COUNTY ADVISORY AGENCY MINUTES PAGE 4 OCTOBER 28, 1991 There was a discussion of the appropriate wording for the condition. Ted Crawford of the Fire Department contributed to the eiscti5sion. The wording was agreed upon to allow the applicant to burn the brush safely at the proper time. Mr. Wrinkle asked about Public Works condition #10 regarding ,the Chico area traffic fee. Mr. Mendonsa said that should be paid at the time of building permit. Mr,. Sanders asked if there was a problem to deposit funds with the County to pay for Altatina Rd, approach, Mr. Wrinkle said he has already talked to Cal Trans and thinks that some work might be required but he doe=n't expect to have to pay for the entire road approach. hr. Reid staled having reviewed the environmenLal review checklist, the Planning Director's Report of Sept. 18, 1991, end the conversations at this meeting, I make a motion to adopt a negative declaration with mitigation measures for the William Vaccaro parcel map to create 2 parcels on AP 56-39-111 finding that the project could have an effect on the environment, but will not have a significant -:ifect in this case provided the required mitigation measures are complied with, The required mitigation measures are items #1 through #5 as listed within the Planning Director's Report, The motion is also mrde noting that the project is subject to Fish and Game fees; Havi..,tg found the above, I further move to approve the: project. Approval is subject to the following conditions and finding that approval will not iental to the health, safety and welfare of the people of Butte covided the required conditions are complied with: Public Works conditions; I Provide two-way traversable access RS -8 -LD -11 to each parcel from a county mairita nes °oad or state highway. 2 Access to be rise, in dE ds as per county ordinance and offered for dedication on t, final map. 3 Show 50 ft. building setback Line measured from c(.iterline of accc�ss easecent ; 4 Provide road maiht.ehanc� agreement. 5 Show all easements of record on the final map.; 6 Provide street name signs per requirements of the Department of Public Works prior to recordation of the final. map. 7 Pay any delinquent taxes or current taxes as required 8 Meet the requirements of the R::tte County Fire Department. 77 BUTTE:COUM, ADVISORY AGENCY MINUTES PAGE 5 OCTOBER 2.8; 1991 VACCW, TPM Construct public road approach at intersection of Highway 32 and Altatina Drive as per Cal Trans requirements. 10 Place note on final, map, per Ordinance No. 2692, regarding Chico area traffic fees. Hdalth Dept: conditions: ll Indicate ondtheo, map that areas with slopes in excess of 30% are unsuitable i € Pa 12 :show the usable sewage disposal area proven to meet the requirements I of ,the Subdivision Ordinance on parcels 1 and 2. 13 Prove that the required quantities of domestic water are available to each parcel. or place the statement on the map that states "Me -re is no evidence that domestic water is available.'i 14 Show a 50 ft. leach'field setback from the drainage way. Planning Dept. conditions; 15 All brush and vegetation during road or homesite construction during the fire season shall be removed from the site. Brush cut during the non -fire season shall be either removed' or burned prior to the start of the next fire fire season_. 16 Show on the additional mnn sheet all of Parcel 1 beyond 500 ft. of Altatita Drive as a I'iro Development" ,zone. 17 Provide protection to existing oak tree population in accordance with the Dept, of Fish and Game Requirements, 18 Place a note on the additional map sheet that states, "No livestock grazing shall be allowed on the site." 19 Place a note on the additional, map sheet that states, "No further division of Parcel 1 shall occur." 20 Pay applicable Sheriff Impact fees as adopted by the Board of Supervisors: The following mitigation s.teasures are required; 1 Limit construction to the months of April through November„ Re vegetate or mulch protect any disturbed or expored soil ren slopes greater than 10% prior to Nov: 1, 19006 2 Deposit funds with the County to pay for or improve the;.Altatina Road Approach to Cal`1'rans standard's. - � G '4i t BUTTE COUNTY ADVISORY AGENCY AGENDA PAGE 6 OCTOBER 28, 1991 VA;CCARO, TPM Place a note on the additional map sheet that states, "Fire Suppression sprinklur systems shall be installed in all residential structures in accordance with the National Fire Protection Assn. Standard for the installation of sprinkler systems in 1 and 2 family dwellings and mobile homes, NFPA Standard I3D. The purpose of the installation of sprinkler systems is for additional safety and property protection in the event of residential fire's. `Phis installation will reduce the demand for structural fire protection services in those instances where they are installed." Place a note on the additional map sheet that states; "All residences are to be constructed, with siding materials that are non=comb+tstible and roofin -materials that are Class "C" or better," Place a note on the adiitional map sheet. that states, "Pay any applicable Deer Herd Mitigation Fee in effect at the time of the Building 'Permit application." Motion seconded. by Mrs Sanders and carried 'unanimously. 4. Earl Baker sir.; TPM, AP 31-254-19 and 21,, 4 parcels located at the S14 corner or Grand Ave. and 5th St. Thermalito area. Engineer. Barnhart/Brown Associates mr, Mendonss said this item has been continued for some time because of'the 'Traffic and Shoriffts mitigations: Mr. Reid stated: having reviewed the environmental review checklist, 21, 1990, and the conversations atethinmeePlanning Report py g o I make o motion adopt a negative declaration of envimimtal impact with ri tigati.on'measures for the Earl raker Je.parc;el map to create 4 parcels on � AP 31-254-19 and. 21 finding that the project could have an effect on the. environment but will not lave a significant effect in these case -provided the required mitigation measures are complied with. That measure is item Alas listedwithinthe Planning.Director�s Report. The motion is made noting that the project is de mihiinus with impacts. Ravin found the respect the abovei I furthermoet to approvo fish e wildlifend theproject., roect. Approval is subject to the following conditiohs; and finding that approval will not be detrimental to the health; safety and welfare of the 'people. of Butte County provided the required t6ftdit1on5 are complied with Huge coun DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS. WILLIAM (Bili) CHEFF, Director 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE OROVILL.E, CALI'FORNI'A 95965 Tolephonc l94. 538.7681 RONALD D. McELROY October 29, 1991 Deputy Director i ' Y4111liam Vaccaro_ RE* AP 56-39-1 ;i 446 Southgate Court TENT. PARCEL MAP Chico, CA 95926 Hear Mr. Vaccoro• At the regular meeting of the Butte County .Advisory Agency held ;on (October 28, 1991 the: .Agency adopted a_negative declaration with environmental mitigations and approved. the above referenced project subject to the conditions listed on the attached sheet,. if hO appeals are timely filed witliln ten (10) days of the date of the Advisory Agency's approval ( November'7, 1991 ) -- with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, this: action will: be final: When the conditions of approval are complied with, it will: be in order for you to file your `'final map" with the Butte: County Department of Public Works for recordation within twenty-four (24) months of the date of approval by the Advisory Agency. Recently enacted legislation (AB3158 Chapter 1106, Statutes of 1990, effective January 1, 1991; requires that the Departmentof Fish and Game impose and collect filing fees as specifiedto defray the cost of managing and protecting fish and wildlife trust resources. These filing fens are collected ducting the environmental review process and are to be paid at the time the County 111es A "Notice of Determination'' with the County Clerk of the County in Mich the project is locatddv This procedure is required pursuant to Section 21152 of the Public Resources Gude. To increase administrative efficiency; the statute delegated the collection of filing fees to the `County Clerk; The fee required in connection with your project: is checked below; a , V,AGE TWO - r -ROJECT NAME; AF 'NUMBER; CLASSIFICA'T'ION OF ENMONMENTA. , DOCU NOTICE OF EU4riTON/STAT� OF Ems' TON MENT Categorically A.'Statutorily or Categorically Exempt $25.00 (Twenty -Five Dollars) Clerk's Fee ( ) B. De Minimus Impact Certificate of Fee (�) Exemption on2• $25,00 (Twenty -Five Dollars) Clerk's Fee OF i7PMINATION FEE`RI,QUYMA Negative. Declaration $1,250.00 (Twelve Hundred Fifty Dollars) State Filing ;Fee. $25,00 (Twentq-Five Dollars) Clerk' Fee ( ) B. Environmental Impact Report :$850 (Eight Hundred Fifty State Filing Fee Dollars) -- $25.00 (Twenty -Five Dollars) Clerk's Fee 3. OTHER (Specifp) $25,00 (Twenty -Five Dollars) Clerk's Fee The fee should be paid to the Planning Department by (November 11 in oder for the Notice of Determination to be timely filed. ' 1991 Pai' "11 to the County of Butte. y Make checks The proje4t:a licant should be aware that if he or she does not remit a me. Of, the required, filing fees, the project approval maybe i P y nt may not be operative, vested or final invalid by law and Re8ources Code Section 21089 (b,); fish andsuaht Codeheec, provisions c and provisions of public rection 75' ) ( ) O (d-� 3 and �7�. Title 14 , California .Code of Regulations.. Sho,tld you,have any questions regarding this matter, , off:'.ce please contact this Very truly yours, William Chef£ Director of Public Works 1r John Mendonsa OM/ds A81Jistaht Director cc Planhl,hg Department Environmental Health Department Sierra West Surveying r DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS WILLIAM (Bill) CHEFF, Dlreotor 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE-_OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965 CM. TIF IED MAIL Telephonet (916) 538.7681` RONALD D. WELROY Septe,nber 18, 1991 Deputy Dlreorgr - William Araccaro Pr: AP 56-39--11 446 'Southgate Court TPM Chico, CA 95926 Dear Mr. Vaccaro; Please he advised that the Butte County Advisory Agency will hear M your application on the above --identified property on October 28, 1991. 'fhe Agency will be reviewing the findings from the Planning Department and will be considering ;your tentative parcel map. Public Works will recommend the conditions of approval as listed on the attached sheet.. Room, Count l commence at 9:00 am. in the Board of Supervisorsf 'rhe meeting will County Administration Building, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville; California. office, y q regarding r, please contact this if you have an questions re ardan this matte Very truly yours,; Villin n Chef f Director of Public Works John endonsa Distant Director JM/ds attaC�ment- cc: fanning Department tnvirdnmental Health Department Sierra West Surveying A ■ Butte count PLANNING DEPARTMENT 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE- (916) 538-7601 September 18, 1991' William Vaccaro 446 Southgate Court Chico, CA 9592$ Re: Tentative Parcel Map, AP No: 056-390-011 REWSED PLANNING.DIRECTOR'S RMoRT Dear Mr. Vaccaro: project in accordance with theCalifornia Environmental Quality- The Butte County Planning Department has completed the en ionmerltal review of your Act and forwarded to the Butte County Advisory Agency Within the required 105 days pursuant to the California Public Resources Code Section 21151.5. In addition, the Planning Director's report requited by Sections 20-63 and 20-99 of the Butte County Subdivision Ordinance has been completed.: Please find enclosed the Environmental Documentation/Planning Director's Report which has been prepared for your project, PIease review the enclosed Revised Planning Director's Report with Conditions of approval if applicable. If you note any errors or omissions in our evaluation, please bring them to our attention: The Environmental Documents Planning Director's Report for your project has been Sent to the Butte County Advisory Agency for their action. California Government Code Sections 615950 and 65952.1 requires the Butte County Advisory Agency set hearings and approve or disapprove your project within six months Froin the date on which your application was received and accepted. The Advisory Agency will notify ynu. of the time and place of the public hearing for your project. If there are modifications to your Iproject, not related to mitigating an identified impact, reevaluation of your project shall be required. William Vaccaro, AP 56-39-11, TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP, 2 parcels on both sides of Al.tatina Drive, southeast of, Tina Court. Forest Ranch area. Sierra West. Surveying Vjjbl.ic 'Works conditions. I Provide two-way traversable access PS -8 -LD -II to each parcel from a county maintained road or state highway. 2 Access to be reserved in deeds as per county ordinance and offered for dedication on the final map. 3 Show 50 ft. building "setback line measured from centerline of access easement. 4 Provide road maintenance agreement Show all easements of record on the final map. Provide street name signs per requirements of the Department of Public Works prior to recordation of the final map. 7 Pay any delinquent taxes or current faxes as required. 8 Meet the requirements of the Butte County Fire Department, 9 Construct public road approach at intersection of Highway 32 and Altatina Drive as per Cal Trans requirements, 10 Place note on final, map, per Ordinance No. 2692, regarding Chico area traffic fees;; RealthDept. conditions: 11 Indicate on the map that areas with slopes in excess of 30% are unsuitable for sewage disposal. 12 Show the usable sewage disposal area proven to meet the 'requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance on parcels l and 2: 1.3 Prove that the required quantities of domestic water are available , to each parcel or place the statement on the map that states "There is no evidence that domestic wager is available i` 14 Show a 50 ft. leachfield setback from the drainage way. Planning Dept: conditions; 15 All brush and vegetation during road or homesite can'struction during the fire season shall: be removed from the site, Brush cut during the non=fire season shall. be either removed or burned prior to the start of the neat fire fi seasons "ACCARO, TPM } 16 Show on the additional map sheet all of Pariil 1 reyond 500 ft. of Altatina Drive as a "No Development" zone 17 Provide protection to existing oak tree population in accordance with the Dept. of Fish and Game Requirements. Place a noto on the additional map sheet that .states, "No livestock tlrazing shall be allowed on the site." 119 Place a note on the additional map sheet that states; "No further division of Parcel l shall occur." 216 Pay applicable Sheriff Impact fees as adopted by the Board of Supervisors. The following mitigation measures are required Limit construction to the months of April through November. Re vegetate or mulch protect any disturbed or exposed soil on slopes greater than 10% prior to Nov. 1, 1990 Z Deposit funds with the County to pay for.gr improve the Altatina Road approach to CalTrans standards.. 1 Place a note on the add;t10 lal�mdp sheet that states, "Fire suppression sprinkler s stems shall be'-4ns.thlled in all residential structures in accordant �wif ,the Na4oh .-Oire Protection Assn Standard far the anstalt�o►��of sprink er systems in 1 and 2 family dwellingsand mobile hom s NPA Stand �• az`d �lOD. The purpose of the installation of sprinkler,,.' t ms is for,adaitional safety and property protection in the ;event of residential fires, This .installation will reduce the demand for structural fire protection services in those instances where they Installed." 4 Place a note on the additional map sheet that states, 'All residences are to be constructed with siding materials thab are tion -combustible and roofin materials that are Class "C" or, better.+� Place a note on the additional map sheet that states, 'pay any applicable Deer Herd. Mitigation Fee in effect at the time of the Building Permit 'application." �— `' b"li F '•qtr a +� �, } '. Inter -Departmental Memorandum TQ, Butte County Advisory Agency FROM; Planning Director SUBJECT: REVISED Report on Tentative Parcel Map for William Vaccaro, AP No. 056-390-011 OATG September 18, 1991 This is a proposal to divide 42.45 acres to create two parcels of 21 + acres each. The present zoning is "U" (Unclassified). The Land Use Plan Map of the Butte County General Plan designates this area as Agricultural Residential. There are no specific or community plans for the area. The proposal does not conflict with County Zoning nor any adopted or proposed Element of the Butte County General. Plan nor any specific or community plan. A Negative Declaration has been prepared for the proposed project in accordance to the CaliforniaEnvironmental Quality Act and forwarded to the Butte County Advisory Agency Within the required 105 days pursuant to the California Public Resources Code j Section 21151.5, Recommend approval of the Tentative Parcel. Map for William. Vaccaro, AP No. 056 ,A) 0t1, subject to the following mitigation measures and conditions: �. Limit tr- ict on to the months of April through November, fZe-vegetate or mulct; pros --,of an* +l storbed or exposed soil on slopes greater than 10010 prior'-,) November 1, 190, 01 Irl) 2, Deposit funds with. the County to pay for or improve the Altatina Road. approach to CalTrans standards. (M) 3, Place a note on the additional map sheet. tliat states, `f: .t.�; suppression sprinkler systems shall be installed in all residential structures in atcordt,'nce with the National Fire Protection Association Standard for the installation of sP..*akler systems in one and two family dwellings and mobile homes, INFPA Standard 1.3 D. The purpose of the installation of sprinkler systems is for additional safety and property Pty in eevent of residential ginstances will reduce the demand for structurlfi a protectioservices in those Where they are installed." (M) 4, Place a note on the additional map sheet thoi:l states, "All residences are to be constructed with siding materials #hat are non-combustible and roofing materials that are Class 'CO or better", (M) 5. Place a note on the additional map sheet that states, "Pay any applicable Deer Herd Mitigation Fee in effect at the time of the Building Permit applicatiotV. (M) 11 brush and egetation during rad rho a is to onstr ion shall nUt 4he led p o site. ) M j 7. Show on the additional map sheet all of Parcel 1 beyond 500' of Altatina 1-,; ive " as a "No Development" zone. 8, Provide protection to existing oak tree population in aLaordance with the Department of Fish and Game Requirements. Place a note on the additional map sheet that states, "'No livestock grazing shall be allowed on site'. 1:0, Place a note on the additional map sheet that states, "TVo further division of Parcel. t 1 shall occur". 11:. Pay applicable Sheriff Impact fees as adopted by the Board of 'Supervisors. CBS bd cc: William Vaccaro Sierra West Surveying Public Works Y .a i ♦ Mw . v . gill oun s A 7,- L s Y J u PLANNING DEPARTMENT 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE.- OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (916) 53F,-7601 SAptember 13, 1991 William Vaccaro 446 Southgate Court Chico, CA 95928' Re: Tentative Parcel Map, AP No. 056-390-011 Dear Mr. Vaccaro.- The I,raccaroYThe :Butte County Pl an hg Department has completed the envirollmental review, of Project in accordance with the Californ,,a. Environmental your the Butte Courity AdvisoryQuality ,Act and forwarded o California Public Resources Co et e Section required 105_ da report required by Sections 2Q-63 and 20=99 of y pursuant to the 5. In addition, hep as been coin leted. Please find ;enclosed the lvision Ordhi Director's Envtrornlental anntn Dire the Butte County Sulidi g P a n i Director's Report which has been prepared for your project. Docunaentatiou�P:ai&,Lr Please review, the enclosed Planning n g Director's Report with conditions of approval if applicable. If you note any errors or otnissiocis in our evaluation, our attention, please bring them to `u g P sent to�the oButte t%:.oal �n � Adv ss and Planning Director's Re ort £or our j,a. �,�• tY ory Agency for their action. California Ca e�mentaCode Sections s 65950 and 65952.1 requires the Butte County Ad- iso A en approve or disc r,•„,e ,, Pp your project within six months from the date snnh vhtch s and application Was received and accepted. The Advisory Agen wll n and place of the public hearing for your project, Your. �Y ott£y you of the time If there are modifications to your project, not related to rriiti titin re-evaluatioti of your project shall ire required, g an identii~ied IMpact AGREEMENT RUNNING WITH THE LAND RE MITIGATION OF IMPACT ON SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT WHEREAS, the undersigned are presently the owners of that land commonly known as AP No. sip --33- It which is located in the unincorporated area of Butte County, California, near (ClI1C1J the legal description of which is set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by thij reference; and WIiEREAS, said ownersro ose to develop their said land, ai.d, P P in connection with their development proposal, have submitted an application to the County of Butte for the following discretiunasy land use entitlement: silbdivision (specify � �,�`�'� � �-� use permit other map. f:✓ -- z�acel Taa �� (�C�'LL. and WHEREAS, said owners recognize that the cumulative impact of development in unincorporated areas of the County o.L Butte, including their proposed development, has created and is creating the need to augment the law enforcement services provided by the Butte County Sheriff's Department, and has increased and `is increasing the need for the Sheriff's Department to acquire facilities and equipment necessary to provide such services; and V7HEREAS, said owners are aware than the County of Butte is studying methods to provide funding to acquire such equipment and fac- liti4s bit establishing developer fees, establishing an. MR ello-oos districts, or some assessment district establishing le and appropriate funding mechanism to sildilar, fair reasonab finance such eq u 6 pmen,t and facility acquisition or to fund environmental. and other studies as may be deemed necessary to determine the needs for such equipment and facilities, and said owners recognize that the imposition of such a funding mechanism or combination of mechanisms will benefit their said property. WHEREAS, said owners wish to mitigate the impact of their proposed development on the Sheriff Department's abil4llty to provide adequate law enforcement services but recognize that the County of Butte does not at present have such funding mechanisms mit p y to provide such In i gation r ether adequate resources necessary NOpa', THERtVORE, said owners do Hereby agree and consent as follows IA a ednot co Sa,iowners e nsent to the establishment of such funding mechan:3.sms, qn to protest against es,abl.i.shment of the "same; and agree to pay theykr pro tv!.Aa shay -e thereof 2. Said owtars agree to cooperate �,`I su Bui:te in obtainin the f ,lft pport the County o f g approval of such L,unding mechanisms from other property owners within the un if »;srporated area of the County of Butte in the - 6 �, 'p area . �Qi 3. said owners agree,prior to [x c �;prdat on of their final map,] [issuance of any building permits in connection with or' related to their use permit] to pa�� s�2',h Sheriff Department impact rittigation fees as may be a.lri,s..:, ci by an ordinance of general application adopted by the Br, c" of Supervisors of the County Of Butte as to discretionary land use entitlements reviewed and approved by the County. a,,),s understood that such fees shall be deposited by the County ,�,nt„a a s;sparate designated. county fund limited to use for th,y intended purposes of mitigating impacts on 'the Sheriff -'s bep,artmtant and providing equipment and facilities for the Sheri:, f It..; r;,p3rtment. 4. In consideration the and other good and valuable consideration, the undersigned rowners expressly agree that the foregoing shall be an aqemen: running with the land and shall be binding upon 'their hairs .end interest. all sucr�essors in „, DATE z;•,r.� orb . r f. (owner) ( �' �. owner) STATE OF CALIFORNIA V COUNTY OF BUTT Pubes! +s y , 1991 befora me fihe undersigned,a Notar lic' in and for the State of (,al.ifoa,nia personally appeared. , personally known to me [ 7 proved to sae u-"=-'sa�6 [ on the .alis of sa43.sfactory evidence to be the persont;s) whose names are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged that they executad the—same WITNESS my hand and official. seal, w» OFFTCTAL UAL M U6 ICwL. DENNIS NOTAt7PCALIFORNIA I 911 Ll gum. COMP =' my comm. upires VAY 6* 1994 Name (Typed or Printed) sher.agr d ti" Hff : AE50URCs5 AGENc+J tE , rIMENT OF FISH AND GAME { iA mL�AP*D, $elft A w A•lt kms. S: opoVA, cAUFGRNIA 95670 it7 �26$--7020 July 23; 1991 V(r, 'Toin 11�lrinkl e` Oiarra West Surveying 54 7 Black Olive Drive paradise, California 95969 U gr Mr. Wrinkle In a letter (September 1E, 1996) addressed to Mr. Mendonsa sof the Bute Colmty Department of Public Works, we recommended 'denial of a Tentative Parcel Map (TPM) for William Vaccaro. Our denial was based on the fact that the TPM concerned AP 56-39-11. .A large portion of that parcel lies outside of a Designated Development. Zone (DDZ), Considering the TPMS location relative to the DDZ, we are prepared to modify our previous :recommendation The Department of Fish and Came (DFG) would not object to the attached TPM E-844 if the following are made conditions of Parcel Map approval 1. 1I1 of Parcel 1 (it lies outside df the DDZ) beyond 56,U .feet of A11tatina Drive should be a no disturbance open space area. 2. All mitigation measures, recommended by DFG to the Board of Supervisors, for habitat fees, fencing, etc., should be applied-. 3. No native vegebA'oyn removallexde t as is necessary ` g 1 exc P for house, es construction. To protect Oaks, the following restrictions are needed: a. Establish a 50 -foot no disturbance buffer gone, commencing from the outer edge of the canopy .and equal to one-half of the canopy radius, around each tree-.. No disturbance includes irrigation and any root damaging activity. b. Retain all snags except those which pose a direct safety hazard c: No pruning or cutting of oaks ekdept ',fdt safety purposes: Deciduous Maks should be pruned during the winter dormant 'season only and evergreen oaks during agly - August only. �It i i x . Tom Wrinkle July 23, 1991 age Two 4 No livestock grazing, 5 A botanical survey to determino whether any sensitive slant sped_es are present If present, sensitive plant populations should be pr;xtected as follows: a. tstablisr a minimum 50 -fool-- no disturbax ce buffer zone, commencing from the ,)ute:r edge; aY:ound each plant population-: b. construry arr_ers to prevE-.nt damage by ,foot and vehic r -t- Lc. 5 No further division, of proposel3 parcel `I ((host easterly location) shall occur This project will have an impact to f..;sh and/`or wildlife habitat. Assessment of fees under Public 'Resources Code Section 21089 and as defined .by I* isL.' and Gam;e Code Section 711.4 is necessary. Fees are, payable by the project applicant upon filing of the Notice oi` Detetrminat! on by the lead agency. If the DEG can be of further a.ss'ir stance, pleza.;�e contact 14r� Ron Bertram, Associate Wildlife B;iolog; st or 14s Patricia Perkins, Wildlife Managemi?alt Supez•vilbir at (516) 355-701.0, Sincerely, 1; James D. 1,I+lesser8mith l egionali 'Manager �} ZNTER--DEPARTMENTAL MEMOItANLyUM TO *Tell McCabe, County Counsel FROM: tett e Kircher Director of Planning DIEM May 14th, 1991 SUBJECT; Modification of suggested mitigation measures in an adopted EIR Th 1584 the Butte County Board of Supervisors approved and certified a focused EIR for a project to allow 3 public, road n1proaches on Highway 32 north of Chico. The primary focus of the cument was the physical er :Rot of constructing the necessary improvements. However, the dd-- uiaont also discussed a "study areaiP that would directly benefit and use these new road accesses. Without public road approaches approved by Caltrans and the California Transportation COMmission, no further land divisions in the "Study areae could be supported by the State. The document,, on pages 30 and 31, identified potential impacts to the study areas roads and recommended 6 mitigation. measures that should be applied to future projects within the area. The mitigations are as follows: 1; Construct project area roads to county standards unless roads exclusively serve as driveways to interior lots; 2 Require that funds be deposited with the county for improvement of public road approaches. to Caltrans standards as a condition of approval for all proposed land divisions and subdivisions served by those roads; 3. Form an assessment district to maintain all` roads to County standards; protect area 4 All road systems; both public, and private; should provide for adequate emergency access for evacuation of area residents and access for emergency vehicles; 5 Land development applications should assess the potential impact on traffic accidents and estimate theimpactson law enfbrcement 6 The county shall assume responsibility for mainta9nih4 only those roads built to county standards: (NOM the effects of cumulative ADT on Highway 32 and the Chico Urban Area are discussed in chapter X1v of this document.) -2 r `a nued-- Ritigation measure #3 can not be implemented for private roads According to John Mendonsa, Assessment Districts can only be formed to fund public improvements and then they are generally formed to construct new public facilities; not maintain them, A CSA is Usually formed for later maintenance. ! he Planning Department is currently reviewing a land division Within the "study areae and has recommended the ;mitigation measures contained within the EIR. The inability #3 is holding up the project. If a new initial mi y- I' s n measure for .the ilit to stud is com fete Tentative Parcel 24ap, and the EIR is not being used as this environmental document for the project, should the previously accepted mitigation measures as written be used. or should we use the EIR as a base document, supplement it with new information and approve ti;e project after X-., c ing the finding _.fisted in section 15091 of the C9QA guidelines, particularly (a) 3 Is them: a a pptopziate way to 'modify or eliminate mitigations Without, taking tha hole document back into hearings before Board of Supervisors. the BAK:tma 1, INTER -DEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM OFFICE OF BUTTE COUNTY COUNSEL Opinion #9"024 TO; Bettye Kircher, Planning Director BY; Neil H. McCabe, Assistant County Counsel SUBJECT: Modification of Suggested Mitigation Measures In An Adopted ETR DATE: Jiune 10 1991 This opinion is written in response to your memorandum of May 140 199:1 and to confirm discussions which I have had on these subjects with. Craig Sanders of your department. You have asked ;for our opinion regarding the appropriate way to modify or eliminate mitigations in an adopted EIR in connection with the environmental review of a subsequent project. Here, the EIR was prepared for a previous project to allow additional: public road approaches to State Highway 32 Northeast of Chico; The current project is within the study area of the p but is y different in nature than the previous projects The current project is -a parcel' map which would create two or three parcels approxittately 20 acres in size each4 it has been determined that at least one of the mltiga`,ion measures contained in the previous EIR, namely the mitigation which would require the formation of an Assessment District to maintailt all project area roads to county standards, is not feasible Cor the instant project in which the roads would be privately owned. State CtQA Guidelines Section 15153(a) provides: $'The Lead Agency may employ a single` EIR to describe more than one project, if such projects are essentially the same in terms of environmental impact. Further, the, Lead. Agency.may use an eatliet EIR prepared.in.connection with ah earlier project. to .-alp-ply to , a later project,, _ if _ the circumstances of the projects are essentially. the satne " (emphasis added) here it appears that the circumstances of the two projects are not "essentially the same." Thus, it would be more appropriate to employ the procedure referred to din State Guidelines Section 15150, namely incorporation by reference of E� j� only, those portions of the previous HIR which are pertinent and appropriate to the current project. This latter methodwould also be consistent with the fact that you now have done a new initial, study relative to the current project. if you choose to incorporate by reference portions of the previous EIR into the environmental documents for the current project, you should follow the procedures spelled out in Section 1515o, should be specific regarding those portions of the EIR which are being incorporated and should make the previous EIR available to the public for inspection. The current environmental documents would be subject to the 'normal processing and public input requirements., Please feel free to call if you have any questions regarding the above NHM/slt (91-024:opn) II SIERP.,NEST SURVEYING LICENSED LAND SURVEYING —EMMI — 3437.1iback Olive Drive -Paradise, CA 95969 i hone; (916) 877-6253 . LN 0 v. , W April 29, 1991 Re; Vaccaro Tentative �j.�t�j4� tENT Parcel yMap atie fwA �larS A� 4-J. .7 `1 y Attn. Craig Sanders Butte County Planning Dept, 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95985 Dear Craig: After reviewing your Environmental Checklist Form dated October 22, 091., the suggested mitigation measures and the Highway 32 Environmental impact report# I have come to the following conclusions: SU(iQl,'STED "M'ITI_ GATION MEAS1rR.Iss 1 Pekform Botanical Survey. This has been done and sub-- mitted to your Depart ent. 2. Archaeological Records Search. No survey, required. 3, limit road construction to April through November. We agree; not' bea osmit,atltAll roads to County Standards. This sljoul:d la an ,measure. As you know all s a a Parcel maps and subdivision maps approved by the county require the appropriate e County Standard Road to be constructed: 5. Contribute pro rata share towards the Altatina'Road Approach to the Cal -Trans. Standard. Agree to this mitigation measure .as the basis of the highway 32 Environmental Impact, Report. 6. Form An, assessment district to maintain all project area roads to County Standards. Do not'igree to this wording. Alter reviewing the E.I.R. prepared for Highway 32 it is apparent that the maim concern was to have adequate publio road connections to Highway 32 and not private road approaches serving large numbers of parcels. Cal -Trans made it clear in their comments that their coi.cerns were related to the p o eqf, site 'inside of their right-of-way. Comments by the Butte .County Planning Department as well as the con- sultants for the study area as it developed were that roads be developed to County Standards is understandable. This does not suggest that assessment districts shall be formed.. It is a standard condition by Public Works to form Road Maintenance Agreements. Such is the rase on Altatina Drive and has worked successfully. In. the summary it statas "Althoulrh this E".l.R. is not in.ten,ded. as a master E.T.R. for all future development in the study area, the document suffice for some projects and require only suupplemeAtal information and analysis for other developments. TR FIC IMPACTS " Ii creasiad traffic volumes on Hi hwa , 32 g y generated by the proposed project are not considered significant'", etc. Study area - capacity and:: service volume: '"The project A $ at full buildout, would amount to 2.0 percent of the projected areawide ADT. This is not consid- ered a significant impact." Study area - project roads: This is not titled property. W"e have two issues: l Pr,a i ect vOli ch is within the County right-of-way. Study area `which is 1543 Acres adjoining the Highway 32 2. - r i ght—Of -way . I ct�nnot find anywhere in this F.I.R. that 'substantiates' that the County's current requirements pertaining to parcel map reads inadequate or should be ►evised. The intent as I review the Highway 32 E.I.R. is that public road approaches ;kv: installed eventually► as property develops, proper dra;ir.ar,ge and: maintenance of roads be estab llshed and proper erosion controls be in place. I; believe the current: standards 'which the Public Works Department is placing on subdivision maps and parcels maps is adequate to mitigate any concerns which have been addressed in the Highway 32 R.I.R. should you ,have any gquestions regarding this matter, please tall or write. Sin+c'exely Thotaas ki Wrinkle T1tW/ku n . c Traffic impacts ' 'flanyl of the site-related impacts would be reduced below a significant adversity level by project design; topographical s' constraints, Caltrans' requirements and proposed mitigation ateasures. The present project would 'add another. 107 residences to other projects planned in the area. The destinations of project residents will disperse project- generated traffic throughout the Chico urban area. Since project traffic (1.,070 ADT) will amount to Approximately 6%-11% of the total traffic volume (16,700-10,100 &DT) on. SR 32 between Bruce Road and. SR: 99 by the ye&t 2000, an increase in traffic hazards to other motorists, bicyclists and pedestrians should. be ininimal. Traffic auai.ysis o` t'" xect on of SR 32 by the Butte. County rlanning, Department Jts that potential cumulative increases in traffic. volumes may be greater, totaling, 8,1013 ADT (see 'Table 6). This magnitude of traffic volume would represent an increase of 189%-270% above the maximum ADT (41300 ADT estimated by Caltra is and 3,000 ADT in the Chico Area Transportation Study), further decrease the Level. of service on Highway 32, increase traffic hazards and require additional highway and traffic control improvements at considerable cost to the City of Chico and property owners served by Highway 32 (Refer to Appendix "G" .for applicable text of potential cumulative impacts.) The aboveestimates represent a 'iworst cases' scenario,; actual. buildout :may result in far fewer reside4ices. Furtharmorei high (10) trip generation factor was used for this; RIR, Depending on the socio-ee.onomic ptofile Of project residents growth of Forest Ranch, development of mass transit; and costs of fuel., trip ends associated with r yth: residence may be closer to seven. A discussion 61 additional cumulative impacts may be found in Appendix "G" ; which is referenced hi.;°rein as part of the Cumulative impacts Sectiolft 4iti atg Som. 1, Butte County should eencoura the formation of assessment dittridts for rOM ma ntenancey d'ralnage And fair-share coi tribe tiods toward off-sit o Sgt 3x and Chico area road impt ovements iP 40 r '� " . �`L��. Vaccaro Property --Plant Survey 2 SURVEY FOR SENSITIVF,',, RARE, OR ENDANGERED SPECIES OF VASCULAR PLANTS, CONDUCTED MARCH 30, 1991, OPS 42.5 ACRES OF PROPERTY OWNED BY WILLIAM VACCARO, JR. IN THE NW j OF SECTION 36, T23N, R2E, ALTATINA DRIVE, SOUTH OF HIGHWAY 32, EAST OF CHICO, BUTTE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA i A. Habitat The property is located within a Chaparral habitat, but includes some patches of Basaltic Grassland as soCated with the Tuscan formation. Some relatively recent clearing,of the chaparral has i occurred, with an unpaved road having been constructed to each of twosites .on the propetty. Access to the project area is via Altatina Drive, which originates on �,.he south side of Highway 32, roughly eleven miles east of Chico. -,pat -t from past fires, the clearing of some chaparral, and road construction the area appears to have been relatively undisturbod, with typical native flora. Cha iarral chaparral habitats, which tend to occur at elevations between 540 and 21000 feet, are characterized by the predominance of shrubs that may form a dense, 'Ossentially impenetrable growth that is interspersed with small patr.:hes of open grassy areas. On the date of the field survey -identifiable species that were observed included parry manzanita, whit-ileaf manzanita, poison oak,, scrub oak, buckbrush, California bay, hitcher sage,, digger pine, ,Nutgall ' s bedstraw, snowberrt;� woolly sunfl.otrer, western morning glory, flannel bush, Sheltun's coyote mint, deerbrush redbei'ry, western hound's tongue, fawn lily,sierra gr�oseberry wild iris, Hartweg's tauschia, hedge nettle, toyoil, interior live oak, California black oak, western redbud, CalifOtnia buckeye,, verba sant6i, California soaprootj t'alifornia coffeeberry, clemat.Cs, and narrow -leaved 'mule t►;?r;3. Basaltic 'Grassland Basaltic Grassland habitats, r,rh.ich occur on slopes where patches of basalt are often, exposer',, are similar to valley Grassland habitod tos , They may, hot raver, include species that tend ' The may, p soils and foamations. Such habitats are characterized by the predominance of a,;rpual species that ere adapted to a ,Mediterranean climat--. The annuals germinate during the winter precipitation, develop rapidly, and complete their life cycles by the close of sprin.�, with a few often bulbous perennials developing and floweyl.rtg ;Cater. Species observed on the date of the survey include Ho6ker'is plantain, Johnny tuck, California sa.ndi 4ort,, valley goldfields, goldback fern, bind's foot: fern, wile onion,,. blue dicks j comtion 1 Vaccaro Property--plant Survey 3 popcorn flower, Austin's popcorn flower, slender popcorn flower, Hansen's spine moss, pigmy weed, evening snow; bicolored linanthus, slender cottonweed, petty athysanus, hairy-flowered eriogonum, hairgrass, bluegrass, woolly lomatium, purple sanicle, small-flowered lotus, red-stemmed filaree,, big heronbill, yellow, starthistle, old man of spring, California saxifrage, bunchgrass, and others, B Sen,iitive Species The Inventory of Rare, and Endangered Vascular Plants of California, publishred by the California Native Plant Society in September, 1988, lists for 'Butte County some 51 taxa that are Considered sensitive to varying degrees: Many of the taxa are also on, or candidates for, federal and state lists of such plants The sensitive species most likely to occur at this particular site include Butte County chec)Cer (Sidalcea robusth), Bidwell's knotweed (Polygonum bidwelliae.), opposite-leaved calycadenia (Calycadenia oppositifolia)r and possibly Butte Fritillary (Fritillaria eastwoodiae), although other .listed taxa' such as Mart's whitlow-wort (Paronychia ahartii) also paten- tially could occur here: Several species on stage and fedbaml lists of sensitive; or rare and endangered vascular plants have previously been reported from areas within a fow miles of the project site. Most, however, are associated with special: habitats such as vernal, pools, which are not. present at this location,. The field survey was d nduotod at the ideal time for the location of sensitive species that paten.tially",ould occu)ii:)n the site. Despite a systematic search for the taxa mentioned, as well as for other sensitive taxa, no evidence of their current presence, or presence in the recent past, was uncovered', and they are therefore presumed to be absent at this time, Accordingly, mitigations for such species do not appear to .be required. 441 .'..t Xingsloy R;. Stern, Bh.1, Field Botany 'onsultan bepartnent of Biological Sciences Californiastate University Chico;. CA 95M-0515 (9,16) 80e-:)881 or 343-OOs6 Vaccaro Property--Plant Survey d CHECKLIST OF VASCULAR PLANTS THAT WERE OBSERVED AND IDENTIFIABLE ON THE DATE OF THE FIELD SURVEY SCIENTIFIC ;MAME COMMON NAME Aesculus californica (' California buckeye Alra cgryophyllea f Hairgrass Allium amplectens" Wild Onion Arctostaphylos manzanka Parry manzanita Arctostaphylos viscida Whiteleaf manzanita Arenarla calilornica California sandwort Athysanus puslilus Petty athy: Anus Catystegia occidentalis Western morning glory Ceanothus integerr;mus Deerbrush Ceanothue • meatus Buckbrush Centaurea salstitlalis Star thistle - Cercis occidentalis Western red,bud Chlorogalum pomerldianum California sooproot Cirsium sp. Thistle Clematis lasiantha Clemati- Crassula tillaea Pigmy weed Gynoglossum grande Western hound's tongue Dichelostemma pulchellum Blue dicks 1 Eragrostis curvula Bunchgrass Eriodicfyon calitornicum Yerba santtZ Eriogonum nudum hairy-flowered eriogonuni` Eriophyllurim lanatui» Woolly sunflower Erodium'krachycarpurrm Big heronbill Erodium cicutarium Red-stemmed filaree Erythronium, multiscapoldeum Fawn Illy Gal.Ium nuttallii Nuttaii's bedstraw Garrya lremoriti Flannel bush Iris mar'-osiphon Wild Iris t asthenia californica Valley goldfields Unanthus bicolor Bicolored linanthus Linanthus dichotonyus Evening snow Lomatlutn dasyeaepurn ssp. tometosum W, oolly lomatlum LomatlUm utdculatuirt Common lomatium Lotus micranthus Stnall4owered lotus Micropus calltornica Slender cottonwood Monardolla villosa ssp, sheltonii , Shelton's coyote mint brthocarpus erianthus Johnny tuck Pellaea mucronata Bird's foot tern Pinus sabiniana' Digger pine Pityrogramma triangularis Goldback fern - Plagiobothrys austlnae A.ustin`s popcorn flower Plagiobothrys nothafulvus Common popcorn flower Plagiobothtys tonellus Slender popcorn flower Plantago hookerlaha Hooke'r's plantain Poa sp. Bluegrass Mercus dumosa Scrub oak Quercus kelloggii, California black oak a P Vaccaro .P' pperty—Plant Survey 'r SCIENTIFIC K, ME COMMON NAME Quercus wislizenii interior live oak Rhamnus californica California coffeeberry Rhamnus crocea ssp. Iflicifolla Redberry Ribes roezlli sierra gooseberry Sanicula blpinnatfflda Purple sanicle Saxifraga valifornfca California Gaxifrage Selagin0a hansenii Hansen's sn1ikemoss Senecio vulgarly Old man of spring Stachys strictG Hedge nettle Symphnricarpos,albus Snowberry, Tauschia ha,-iwegli Hartweg's tausctia Toxicodendron dlversdohurh Polson oak Umbellularla californica California bay W,tathia angustifolia Narrow-;eaved mule ears ,r lzR WEST SJRVEYIN LICENSED LAND SURVEYING $437131aek Olive Drive - Paradise, CA. 05969 Plicate; (916) 877-6253 a Date November 21., 1991 Job # 6159 C flinty of Butte I'lo-nni,bg Department '7 ''County Center Drive ,Chico, CA 95928 Re Subdivision/Land Division Applieation for: William Vaccaro _ AP # 56--39-11 Attached hereto, please find one set of blueprints f'or the above referenced application. We respectfully request ,your review of the map for its compliance with. your condit.ion(a) of approval. Please notify the Public Works Department of tiie County of Butte to clear th:e. map for fi1_i.ng and senct a copy of correspondence to this ,of f1 ede. notifyit does not comply or You need additiohal i formatiPL on, Thank you ,for your prompt consideration of this matter. I Sincerely) gr>cRRA WEST SURVEXING Gordon Shields or Tom Wrinkle „.""I 751991 .. bpAarlv�Nr BUM M r L.MINI OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA a .. .�. COUNTY qr B'd1fTE ENVIRONMENTAIr 'CHEC1ECLI$T EVALIIATION,OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT APPENDIX i Log NO: 90-09-06--01. AP No. 056-390-0111 i.. BACKGROUND 1, Name of Proponent: WIIlam Vaccaro y. Address of proponent and represerstative (it App,llcabte)s sierra West surveying 3, Project dosctiptloh: Tentativd Pateal map ZI. MANDA';CORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE' Yrs MrvrsE w DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION i. ehave the potential to degrade the p ai the h environment, subs reduce the qual(ty off the __ k This proposal will not sinniflcahtly degrade the environment.: habitat ova fish or w14 dlife species, Cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below sell-iustalh ilg levels, threaten to ellminate a plant or animal Community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or antral or eliminate 1:ottant examples sof major periods of califottlla historV or PrehIttopyt 2; boes the project liaVO the potential to achieve shott-tern benefits to the detriment of long-term _ k _ This ptopotaj will "not impede long-term environmental goals, environment goalst (A short-term Impact on the environment is. one, which occurs In a relatives" brief period of time while long-term impacts WIII ehdure Into the future.) • a, Does the project have impacts which are Individuallyy limited but cumulatively eonsidetable) (A project - . x T.ils proOotal Will not have a signlficant cumulatlyd Impact on the eds Wherr: the impact on each envFronment. resoutcdpirslrelatively smallI, but whete the effect' of the 'total of those impacts on the enVlronment is 519111f cant,) 4. ones the project have ehvitonmehtal ettectt which wi I cause substahtlal adverse effects on human _ x 7hlt proposa'I will not have a sigiiltiraht advete @ttect on human be hot, either directly or lndtrectly7 beings. III.. 'DETERMINA'T'ION on the ass o t rs nitial eValuatiobr ,r �✓` QWE find the proposed project COULD Not have A Ol ghiflcAnt ejfect on the environment and a NECATIVE DECLARATION wlII be ptepated, !/We find that Although the proposed project COULD have a 'slg,0 scant effect on the ehVlrontneh't,,there `Will not be a signiticaht effect In this case because the MITICAtION MEASLRtt described on the attachesheet have been ridded to the. PtOdct. A NEGATIVE btctAAATiON wlII be prepared, i/Wt find the Proposed ptojett MAY have a slghlftcaht affect on the enVlrohment, and Alt ENVIROWENTAL IMOACT gEPORY Is tequlted. GOIJNlY pP �Dlli't t,, t�tiy�Fli1,46 bEPARbAENr t7AtE: by ora,gW. anaer�ys j tteviewed by:tt 1�.� ,a EnV rolnaiental, Checkli'$t + EVa1uatt'3.on of Entire ro>suricntaZI>ri.pact IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS yn` uAvnr: N0 DISCOSSION„O'F ENNVIRONMENTT�L EVALUATION i« EARTH. Will the proposal result In significant,: of unstable earth conditions, or changes in geologic substructures? X- The proposal will not affect subsurface earth conditions, b. Disruption, displacement, compaction or over -covering of the soil? X This proposal Will result in some dlsruptlon, displacement, compaction and ovet-covering of the site as a result of development of structures, driveways, parking areas etc. over•coverlog ' � The Will be limited to 2 homes and associated structures and driveways The disruption of the sola will 'Primarily be limited to the construction Phase of the property development. Due to the large parcel sizes, this is not seen as ,a significant impact, c, change in topography or ground surfaceX_ relief features? Depending Upon Where the homesites are located, there may be some _ - changes in topography tequired to create level bu$lding sites. d:, Destruction, covering or modlficatioh of any Unique geologic or physical:featutes? x_. The side has no Unique physical features,. e. Increase In wind of water erosion of soils, el either on or off site? x The proposal may cause some erosion due to di displacement, compaction and over-coveiIng of the site, especially in areas of steeper slopes, The Soils on site have a high potential for erosion and any disrupted, areas with Slopes uvar toil should be mulch - protected or eeweg+?tated prior to the falney season to amounts of et,oslon, prevent undue f, changes in deposItIan of erosion of beach sands, or changes In slitat'on. deposition k Two ephemetal dralnage ehahnels are located on the south -Western part of the or erosion which may modify the,channel of A rivet or stream of the bed the parcel, These drainage channels could be affected by erosion and siltation if so this dlsruptlon Is allowed Its the Immediate of ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? Vicinity. To prevent this, a 5o foot no -development zone Should be established on either side of the centerline of the drainages. g+ Lost of prime, agrlcultur'a)ly proguctl'Ve solls outside de#ighated urban area ? - x This proposal does not tepreserit a s'ignificaht loss of prime agricultural soils. h, Exposure of people of property to geologic hazards such at tta - .. X- All of Butte county is in a Moderate Earthquake ihtehsity zone ytll« The mud Slides, ground hIk r� orndslmfLai N zardst Tuscan Mdhocl roperty is toca'led approXlmalely a miles east of the constfuctlon of buildings to Unllotm BUllding code standafds will, provide adequate prateclfon to occupants In tato 61 sets�iclac� activity, m ti ity, 1, A10, Will the ptaposal result In substantialt a, air emissions of tleterloratlon of ambient�^ air quality? X _ The proposal Will hot affect alt qual,lty becAUse the thctease In lite number of vehicle tri'p`s Is not slgnl'ticant, b. the.umes? cteallon of obleetionabfe odors; smoke- fumes? x The proposal Will not create ob)eclionable o8tir ,smoke of fumes. c, kitefatidh of air movement, moisture or temperatute, or any changh In cllmatc, _' X ,. The pt000sai Will not atiect the atmotphod. locally of regionally? 3. ir,TER Will the proposal result in substahtlaar a Changes in eurtent3, of the course of ditectlon ,of Water movements in bither k . The proposal WlII ho). arrest Any`Walercourse, inailne or troth ivaterst ;,mvixox>Imexital: Checklist* EVatluatZ0J of Environmentatl: Impact 3 TV. ENVIRONIONTAI IMPACTS (Continued) YES MAYU No DISCUSSION ° OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (continued) b. changes In absorption rates, of Patterns.or the rate and amount of surface iorI? k The proposal may result In an Increase in surface water runoff due to reduced absorption from. Impervious surfaces, and In a change in rutterns, the 1,.rainage pattern on the site. However, this will not be seen as a siti,lificant Impact due to the large parcel sizes arid small amount of over -covering tha will occur from the proposed development. C. Need for off-site surface drainage "— x It is not anticipated t hal any off-site drainage lmproyements Will regeationre be necessary, channelizats,I or oily o ?al, C. Atterstions to the course or 116W of Iload x The not significantly attect any flood control channels sa O at laln selsll e. change in the amount of surface Water In any x The ,rroposai will not affect any watercourse, water bodyf 1. Discharge Into surface Waters, or in any x The protect Will hot result In reduction of water quality In any alteration of surface Water quality, stream or surface water, There are no year-round streams on site. Including but not limited to temperature, and no lakes, The closest creek is Little Chico creek 'Which is dissolved oxygen at turbidity2 approximately t 113 mites away, g. Alleratfon of the direction or tale of flow n �_ The proposal will not affectthe direction or flow of ground watets. of ground waters? f# Change in the quantlIor quality of ground IX of The proposal will hot directly affect any aquifer, waters. either through direct additions at withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts at ekcavat[pnst 1, In thea amountof o otherwise x . Individual wells will provide domestic water, sten available I, relaledehaia People oocdipfl7o water= - x.. Th'e Proposhl Will hot expose people or properly to flooding. UGhbaspf 4,a ArJr- LrFE. will the proposal result in suds antra a. change in fife diVersity of spec) on ,,-k The proposalWI Will trot affect plant life because the site contains n o an species of plants flntludi g y s[gnlficant life, f�ees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic pinlsjf b. ItedUction of the numbers of any unique, rare of endangered species of plantst _ X . the Highway ax Ok identified 3 potentially fare and erfdanlid—Ol species in the victhity., )Uncus LelospetimUs,And sidalcearobus a�, A botanical 'survey Will be tequlred to see I( any of these plant populations dxisl on site, should any rare and endangered 'plant be Identified, then appropriate mitigation measures wi11 have to to adopted to protect those sites, c, Introduction of hew specles of plants Into an area, at In A barrier to the normal repierilshmeht of existing specldO d, ltedudtlon in acrearle of any agrlcUitulal crop? X The proposal Will ilot' Watt exlsting plant life. X The site does not contain ally agritultUral crops 'and Is presentl not developed. The a"rea is hot generally sUltable for AgrlcUltUray crops. J i! ; �nme;pt�tl Cheokiibt 'gvaivatiori "ot Oreva:ronmantal,' inlpatbt ' 71:7. ENVIRONMENTAL 1 Mi?AC B (continued) �_ _ MAyni: timet. DZSCUSF3ICON OF EI+YV'iRONAlELJT;F►Ie IT ION (Continued) dr ANIMAL L1FF, will the proposal rest)! t, I substantial: a, change In the diversity of species, or _,L_ The proposal WIII not change the diveisit)+ or number of arty species, rt: nuers of any species of animals (birds,though it may displace some species to other areas, land anlinais including reptiles, fish a.nd Shelifish, benthlc organisms or insects)? b, Reduction In the numberof any uni[lue, rat ti„ X Tha site conlalns no rM arlmals, or endangered specters of antinalsz t.. malt introduction of new Species of aht'alt in. ' ,,,,,_, r..2S:.._ The introditctlon of household ports, especially dogs, may displace an area, or In a barrier to the some Wildlife In the area, in particular, itesldent or migratory or movement of altfmalst deet. d. of exlsting fish or wildlife ' X site It The as a critical migratory habitaoralion habt#at7 deer wintering range, The maps .that Wart p T rovided to the sutte dearCoun from lhetoaiiltot nia (Department Of Fish aro came show this parcel to be split by a det;lghated develr)ment zone. - The area West of Aitatina drive on parcel two Is wfihtn the designated developmerit zone and the remalndet of the parcel east of Altatina Drive is shown In a nonrd velopntent zohe, The California peaar lment of Fish and Caine has responded with comienU on this pruJect and have recommaked that the prof%it be denied based on their findings that it is not within a dtsaighated development zone. The protect appears lir meet the criteria for being deitonaled a deveIOpmehI zone. In 'tiiat It is bounded on )brae sides by parcels less than' 20 acres and It 1s not In an area Or,( will block deer movement, Tire oepattmurlt of Fish and came will havdi to 'evlse It's resltlon Ott& to anY action being taken on this project. 6. W)i`re, Will the proposal result In substantial) A* 0cloases,to extsllou noise teyefsP X _ The proposai Will hot result in a substar.+tl.al Inctease 111 noise treated on site or ,In the ylclnity. 7. b, Ltt�i7` t9pbsure of people to sever nolse IevelSt A1�O CLAttE. Ikl ( � the X The propo"sal will not ekpoSe top to severe noise levels. r_ propatlal tiroduce X The proposal WlII hot result I ale substantial lntrease iii tight; or signrc,+n ig and !)tare! )darn created on Me or in the vietnity, 6. '1".�1! r Will thepfopnsa'1 t'esull In a substsntlat " �, max_ The ptuposal me64s the 01101a and polities of the AOrrcuiturfl= T er attoh of the snresehl or planned Iand use of an Residential Ceneral'plan designation, area? g, t1AAiAAL 'T '_Ti_i"_. at$tx,acess Will the proposal fesul l 'f"h , A. tnctease in the rate of Usee of any htitural - x The ptopbsrl will hot affect any hAtutat r(lsou les, tesoutccat !1. bep!eti h of bh-t hoh•rt'tewable iiatura) X. _ Tod proposal Will not deplete any natural 're;tourtes, reseGrteS 10. J itr 0 UOs'ti,t Will rho 'ftr000sal Inyoiver a, A tisk of e)!ploslon'or.rplease of hazardous X . The proposal, will hof Involve the use of hazlirdbu.materials, nor is substantes (including, but hot Iimitetl to, —" ' located close to any faciiltles which stole or 4tillee sUth oll, pesticides, chemtdals or rhdlatiohli In materials. the evehl of ilri accident or upset donditlohsl M iv tron�xtttil l„ %--Cklist i� Evalu tit., tninn�i o&`E'nviro.ftdntal ?utpaat 1" Zv.. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (continued) YES iuvn� .. Nn r DISCUSrB]:ON ON :EN't►IRONMENTAL 'EVALUATION (continued) b, Pestible withdmititgency rf ee ._.•-_.- x The proposal wit l 'hot iirfect any eme, ;, s.tv)ces, plan 9enwi It. ECOULAT I (x�1. Will the proposal After location. "–� 9 The proposal will be In conformance wl... Ie populailon density of 1,enslty ..r btowth rate Of the human the adopted Ceneral Plan, populatlontB 12. t•+7__,si_Me W111 thepFoposar affectexlsUnghousing, X The proposal 11111 not significantly affect housing demand• or create a demand for additional hoUsdngt 13, 7AANEPGjtTATION/CIRCULATICN. Will the proposal A. Cenerationof substantial addlU.wal vehicle z, The proposal Will represent an Incremental increase in trait is In the movdmentt area. The protect, upon full but Id-out , wlII generate between 14 and 20 vehicle trips per day. Vehicle access to the site is via Altatlna Drive, which is an unIMProVed dirt Twelve parcel's currently take access tiir of Altaile orlVe and approval of this 13129 An Ii-rivilronmental offJoftHighw y ImpactlReporitwasmpreparedtIn 1404, to address potential impacts to slate Highway 32 by road encroachments, adlat,ent dew;lopment, Arproprlatd Mitigation measures that 0te recommended b)r'the EIP. Wit be Ihcorpolatdd Into this protect, b. Effects tin extsting'parltifig lacIlities, or _ X _ The proposal volII riot atltc't parking because the proposal WIII have demand for few parltingr to comply WIth the rlarklrlg redtlitements contained WI thin Butte County code section 14"351 G. 5u scant a I Impact on-exdsting X,_ The proposal will represent an Incremental Increase in congestion and trelmottation systems? — maihtenance,te Ulteniehts on nl"tatlna DrlVe and the Intetsectlon of 4 Alta;°ina and Highway 32, The M; that Was preoated for the H ghway 32 Gorridor'poses mftlgatlon measures that wl I I address these impat,ts and reduce them roan Ilisi,tlnificant level, d'. Significant titteratlolts topresentpdttern's x The propos.al will: -not Alter thepreserft pdttern of clrculation. In the of cIrcuIatIort or movemtdnt of people and/or Oda yoodst e;. ,iiterations to watci•borhe, tall of alt ft The Noposal Will hot affect tali or art Ftaffic. traffics f. increase in Balli(`, hazards to motor' _ _ x Ste the discUssion for 13c. vehlcln blcycllsts of pedestrlanst t4. POC411 0 MVICEs. Will the 0,4posal'have an effect upon, or result in a heed lot new or altcre;d 000 hment se"rvicest A. Me ototection7X - -. The proposal -WIII tbsul( iii a incremental ihcreds"e In demand for hire N otecilo; In the area, Th6 butte GSunty Fire 0epattmenl/Calitotn a DIVIslon of Forestry has Ilidicated that cumUlatlVe deyetopmeht 1ih sural aseas;wl.tI Impact their Ability, to ptovide fird proteetfbtt e Ice , They have stated' that installation of automatic flte supptnsston sprinkl.et systemi" In residential 'trUctUrtis, the Use i5f a lirtl,'icsls►ance but ldinrt mAtetl'als and Water supply systems adequate to lupi)ort the sprinkler wi. am Will tedUce the demand tot f 11"e t P,oteclton services, In ade, IbA, helms should be cohMUcled. (If b, Police r•rotcctlont' �---� k . fire. resistant materials, and brUsh should be cleared tttm Withy .Io legit Of all residences, My brusih thotlld be "temoVbd from the 0,000rty, Wolnl A Incremental increase In demand for r polite proial lir tilthe aIn i Ct> ecklis AtE�va�:vitztti cin ;;off Enviriynine>;itaa I1ttp�tCt t v x.�oninentall' Wit, ENVIRONM ;,NTAL IMPACTS ;cont{nucd? YES MAYeE NO DISCISSION OF ENVl:I, „1+iEN-T-AL E AL ATTTON (continued) x 'the, proposal will result In a Incremental. Increase In demand for ' C. schools? ._�;.._ school services in the area. d, park or Other recreational lacll'tlydt x --� r park The;PropoYat will result in a Incremental increase In demand for and recteatlon facilities 1n the area. e, iAalnEenance of public facilities. iilclutling X- The PropnsalWill result in a lnctemen'tai increase in the need for maintenance of roads and other public facilities In the area, roads? f, other governmental serVicest x The Proposal %1111 result In A incrementri Increase In demand for 'all other governmental services In the area. a Ia. ENERGY, Will the proposal Tesuft int amounts of -:fuel or r` The prthosal will not utlilye substantial lu3i or energy. a,. use of substantial energy? b. 5ubttAntlal Incteasetn demand upon eAlstfng X v Ihcr�a a thu.demand for energy, substantially The proposal Will not subs sources of. enetgy. or require the deVeiopment of new 5OUrCes of energyt 16. n wL l stems, will fr the proposal roltetatiotist In a nto the following: X The proposal Will not aliecl electrical i%ower or natul �,tl gas a, power or natural gash __ -- - distribution systems, x The proposal' will not affect commuhlcatlon systems. Cixmiunicatlons system0 C. water ava'Ilabliity? x_. The Proposal will not affect public water systems. X The OOPosAl will have 10 meet the tequlremehts of the 8utle County d, sewer or septic systems3 ,r` ovironmebtal Health Dept. x_ Thd proposal WIII haVe to Proyide a permanent solution for dtalhage. e. Storm water dralnaga? The proposal will not affect 'solid waste disposal. 1 Sbi'ld Waste and dispolAlt 17: Lu&iAN HEAL 'Hs Will the Proposal fesUlt In: or:poterntlAl x The .Proposal will 'not create any health hazard, a, ttbiitlon of any health hazard haxatd (excluding mental health)t r ure of People to polentla hralth X- The proposal wfil not expose people to any health hazatd . b, Expos hazards? 1s, ArsTHV,tIbS Will the proposal result in (lie - X 1 0 f The prnposaf NMIi not result in an aeslhevelo e i ensiVe View becausf, It 1s cohslstenl With surtoUndtng develoPmenl, -;ruC on of any cenlc vista of View open to the puu'tI., or Will the proposal result In the creation of an aesthetically offenslVe site Open to the Ubilc ylewt pE ME TION will :the Proposal result in an Impact = r X op ., Y incrtmentaf inctense In demand for park r osellna resu t n Ah fAcilities, upon ie _ gUA1tty or qua11t1, 1 of eXItting TThheO Oidteatlon fecreatlonal opportUnitles7 ZrApact xivivortmeTl,tAl Checklist O.V. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (continued) yes �IAYpE r,o. DIf3CU88 XON OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (coat lnued> 20. CULTLRAL-RESOMCES. A. wlII the Proposal r'esul't lni thea __ al x The prAiect is located lr an a ea that has a high archaeological through at haeologlcal siteprehtst6ric o7 ;historic Potential, Archaeological Information4cen er;satethe"call1odnIg'Statemed University campus. The need lot an archeological survey would be based upon their findings and tecommendatlons. it a survey is recommended and archeological af,ttlacls are, discovered on site, ODNOP late mitigation measures wil" have to be adopted to protect these resources. b. WIII the proposal result in advOrse physical Lx The proposal will not affect historic sites. or aesthetic effects to A pnphlstorlc or historic building, structure of objects o. Does the proposal have the PMentlal to x The proposal will not affect oultpral resources. cause a physical change which wn uid affect unique ethnic cultural Values? d. Will the proposal restrict existing _ _, x.. The proposal will not affect religious tasoutcet. religlous or sacred uses within Ilio potential impact areas i , ®11 NMI S �!' Eva1U'atiori o Eity�i on�.'tx nta alp mac nzittenta9 Checkli Env DISCIIs�BION_OF ENVIRONMEPJ'Y'AL VALU____ ATTON UI, IST. ERV'IRONMENTAL IMTACTEl tr,*i)tlnued) vis Avnr NO �—" iconti SUGGESTED ; T-TIGATION .!iEtAS'tJRES maps t that states: •Pay additional map shoe additional 9. Perform a botanl.:al survey to tee It any rare and extist. Adopt any sugpdsted Place a note_on,lhe 9. y p ee In effect at the an a pl (cable bei rr MI tlg t= the building Permit Application." endangered plant species mitigation measures that are4 secomnnd lime of vegetation cut during road of homesltd 2, Perform an Archaeological rewords search through Sithe ate to. All brush and tonstructfon shatI not be piled or kept on site, Nottheast Inforatallon CentO At California university, chico. Pet fortnah archaeological survey 11 required and adopt any mitig'at'irin measures that result from that survey, e. t,lmotiaposod ,anths of April lhrouglt struR or alUlch protect ant' kate Stopes of exteto-yerygee � Setut�er .bed soft on greater than to% - pt l or to November ,1 . S9SS, q, construct at roads to County standards, S' approachtto the trans tandarrlthe Altailna Road C3 b Form an assessment dIltrict toriia',hl,ain all prolect area roads to courtly Standards, Place a note on the add'ittor"al tRap sheet that. States; ` rite suppresslon sprinkler systems shalt be Installed In all residential Situttures. In adcordance with thv Natlonad 1=Ire_ protection Association statrdatti fol Ott Installation of sprihkler systems In one artd tv'r6 family dwellings 'and �mobi le h6mat. NFPA standard IU),' Tile putpose systems is lot Addittionals salfletyoarldofpropertyl of residential tires. This P rntetttris, to the ih:ttailatlon will event reduce the demand for stl`Ueturat lire protection in those thstances Where they are services Instal ted, Al e, place a note of the additional heap sheet that `AII residences are to be constructed With Stalest an, tooting "Atetlat# thlittarerClassn"O�oisbptter f 9 ;b-VjVonMejatA1 Checklist * `Evaluation of Env.itonmentai> Tmpaiot Applicant: Wil i lain Vaccaro Lotesso9o$09arce01# 056-390--011 3: Hazards the Land DATA SHE't'' aatural Ea'rthquakeof ZoneZone Vill' moderate. At least 4 Inferred faux-ts A, Ptoleet Description within 10 miles of site. b. Erosion Potential: High, Type of rroject: Tentative Parcel Map,, C. Landslide Potential: Moderate. Hazard: 2. Brief DdLzriptioR: To divide property into 2 p d, Fire Highs parcels of 21+ each... e Expansive Soil Potential: Low. 3. Location: ApproximateIY 1 'Hy, 32 on Altatina Road. T2 miles east ofw The Intersection of 4. Hydrology a. Surface.: Water: Little Chico Creek Altatina with Highway 32 Is 12 miles northeast Canyon lmmOdlately east of the site, from the junction of Highway 32 with Highway an ephemeral creek runs through a 99. smaller trlbutary canyon south of the 4, Proposed Density of Development: 1 DU/20 acres. site.. b, Ground Water: Limited source, S. Amount of Impervious Surfacing. Minimal. Less difficult to obtain consistent, 6. than 2.0 percent. Access,. And dearest Public Road(s). 1.2 miles adequate supplies. c, Drainage Characteristics: All east of Highway 32 Via Altatina Drive, Parcels parcels would eventually drain into either front or lie within 1/4 mile of Little Chico Greek, 1/2 mile east. Altatina, d, Annual Rainfall (normal): 40=45", 7. Method of Sewage Disposal. Septic - Leach field S. e. Limiting Factors: Soil eroslon. Visual/Scenic Quality: Right undeveloped 84 9. system. Source of Water Supply: Individual wells, Pro;Kimity of Power Lines. Existing to Uarcei , 6, canyons and ridges. Acoustic c Quality: High: no traffic near 10- Potential f& further land dlvislons arid parcels-, ,fight traffic on Hwy. 32, under current zanln,a. 7, Air Qual"itys High, Enyitonment` B, EnyironmentapmSettinpone --y i1toionicai Physical Enyironmtsht:, 8 Vegetation: chaparral and Foothill Woodland, Mostly brush and mannanita on C. raphic Characters aa. General Topog _ Variable 9 , te, oak and somepine l`dl lfe Habitat: $ in area, hrub T chaparral, deer level. to ,steep slopes; steep wl key Winter range for migratory `medium hi l l sides Arid Veet) canyon.', he'thth rds, a critical habitat. b, Slopesx 5% to 2096 over Mott of site; greater' thatr 3096 i' s, some area(00 Cultural EnVironment: c Elevation: 1440 1600 feetSL, # ng'_ Factors. Steep siopes on d, LimitiP 10. Archaeological and Historical kesources in par�ceIs 1 and 2. the ,area: Sensitive area due to proximity 2_, Soils a, Types and Character!stics: 'iijomes�-P0ntz i1: of Little Chico,Creek_Canyon. butte County CQheral Plan designattoht Association (SCS Class Vli), soils rough broken. shallow to eery shallow, , , 12-. Agri cultural,'Residentlai, Exlst(n zani , "U" NacIastifled). and stony, well drained 13 ExIsting XIg Land Use. ori--s.i t+e t UndeVe l opod b, Limiting F,actorst SteepySIoo.s; shaIIow, open band, Aitatlna Roatl, an impraved tolls, road,, connects the parcels to Highway 32, viraxune►an a1 checklibt iv, Evaluation, of E�a�� rcin aenta � .gmpact ! ;` 1 14. Surrounding Area: a. land lyses: Primarily undeveloped, open space with scattered residences. b. Zoning: "U" (Unclassified). C. C,en: Plan Designation: AgrlCUltural- Resldentisl and Grazing-open Land. d. Parcel Sizes: Various: 4-120 acres; genet a' IY 9-10r acres In Immediate 15. area, e: Population: Sparse. Character of Site and Area: Rural, undeveloped 16, foothill canyonland area, Nearest Urban Area: Chico (12-13 miles) 17. 19. Rei'eVant Spheres of Influence: N/A: improvements Standards Urban Area; N/A. 19, Fire Protection SerVlce; a. Forrest t Ranch; y5 -6 tmi les rnoerth,t`�tlon< 10 20 minutes. b Water Availability'., Indlvidwil wells, truck capac I ty 20, �. Schools ori Area: Chico 11n i � red School District, Chico; Forest Ranch (elemerlitary only), yl AVItOnme1fttA1 Chet klist* Eva<luatian of Eiivi oameritat]. impact 1 1 ENVIRONMENTAL REFERENCE MATERIAL i� Map it -1, Earthquake and Fault Activity: Seismic Safety Element, Butte County General Plan revised 15, SoilMap, Area, U.S. Chico (1925)JOroville (1926) Department of Agriculture. -77, by CH,M Hfi1. 16.. Soil Survey of Chico(1925)/Otovlile (192.6) 2» Map 11-2, liquefaction PotentialSeismic Safety y Area, U.S.Department of Agriculture, Element, Butte County General Plan revised 1-77, by H111 17. 4 BUt a county ` Fire Protection Jurisdictions 3. ,M Map Ill -i Subsidence & Landslide Potential: Safety and Facilities Department Forestry. Ma MAP, Butte County fire and Ca1�Ifornia Department of Butte Eicmnent, Butte County General Plan revised 1-77, by Department.- County planning Ch HIil. 4, Map II1-2, Erosion Potential: Safety Element, Butte 18, Environmental Impact. Report for Public Road Apltir�aches to State Highwav 32, County General Plan revised 1-77, by CHzM Hill. March 1984, S. Map 1114, ExpanslVe Soils: Safety Element, Butte County General Plan revised 1-77, by :CHM HIIIu 6. map IV -1 11Nolse Noise 1llement, 'Butte County General Pian revised 1-77, by CH,M HiI1 7. Map V-1, Scenic Hlghways: Scehle HighWay.,Element.., Butte County General plan revised 1-77, by CHA HiIf. 8. Map 111-4,. Natural pi re Hazard Classes: Safety Element, Butte County General Plan revised 1-77, by 409, CH,M HILI. Archaeological Sensltivity.Mao by James Manning, .p, for Butte County Plashing Department, 1988. 10, School' District Map, Butte County Planning Department, _11, Chico Nitrate 5tui*y Map, Nitrate CohcentratIon In Shallow Wei is, 1983, by De artmeht of Watel` Resources; Northwestern Distr�ct, The Resources ;Agency, State of California, 12, Agricultural Preset et Map; estabi lshed by kesolutlos No, 67-178, Butte County Board of supervisors, December 8, 1987. 1 edel gtl,FraEegn i Flood lnsurahcep«am mrecy gea MehaInent Aaency, 1988, 14, USGS Quad Maps, Parad`180 West, 1980, ��Uo� Won em TE SIERRA Department o1Anthro Anthropology Lt ;4iffornia P , GLENN SISKIY00 991091091 �C � P LSSEN SUTTER California State University, Chico r )nventory MODOC TEHAMA Chico, CA 95929 PLUMAS TRINITY (916) 895-6256 SHASTA 14ovember 29, 1990 Matte C,o)Unty Planning Department #7 County Center Drive 0roville) CA 95965 RE: AP# 56-39-1 1 /Vacca.rio-; S : C it- L90--6 T23NI R2E,, .Section 36; USGS Paradise West 7.5' quad 42.5 acres Dear County Planners, In response to a request received November 9, 1990, a record search for the above cit,�d project was conducted by examining tiie oP'ricial maps and records for archaeological sites in litte County. Ri3SULTS. RhE,HTSTO?TC RESOURCES: There earl. oo rvevir ult�*.y recorded: Jites e""known t,,e bo orcated witliin the pro, ect boundaries. However, therd :is one recorded site of this type known to be Located withi li t ane -mile radius of the project area. Our Piles indioate that this site is a bedrock milling station. HISTORIO RESOURCHS: There are no previously recorded historic archaeological sites known to be located within the project boundaries or within a one-mileradius of the project area., Hovever r the USES quad map shotes the site or ' 41;ho histo -ic Tenmi.l.e Hcuso near the projectt, area, to the west of 14umboldt Road (noxi Highway 3�) This road vias constructed from Chico to :8Wsarl ille ninety -.'our ini,lea,, s i as to tonnect with a roan ,already in use Prom Susanville to Boise City. The Idaho towns or B'ei,se City, Silver City and Ruby City were in the heart of the 'Idaho mining boom, of 1862. Many popular stopping places and resorts grew up along the ii'umboldt Road. At Tenmile House the tramplers oould obtain food: and water, PRFtTZOUS. Ai'tCHA.E(1LOGiCAb IMS'TIGATIONS: Aceording to our reoora .180 the proj'oct area has not been previously surveyed for cultural resoueoe$4 UTi•RATURE SCARC11.. Rt:viewed were the official: records and maps for arohaool.ogioal sites and turvoys in tutte County. Also reviewed were the Nati-orral Register of Historic Plaees j the California Inventory of Historic Resources (1976) California fli,storical Landmarks (19.02); (",aliPornia Points of Historic Interest, and Historic Spots in C il."Lfornia (1966) . RECOMMENDATIONS:: Based upon the above in11or'loation and the focal topography, the project is located in an area considered to be ;sensitive for cultural resources. However, due to the n"Iture of the' project, we are recommending that no archaeological survey be conducted of the Project area prior td dt• operationsHowever, should any cu- turas. resources be encounter d during project operations, all work should, tlease within the area of the P,'*Lrad until the Alite and materials can be inspected by a professional archaeologist. This person would then be able to assess site ,significance and suggest appropriate mitigation measures. Thank you for your concern in preserv[n4 California's cultural aaeritagc F incer.ely, "Dr., +lakoto Kouta, Coordinator w oryr.-ex8t Information Center c s: Sierra Vest Suri+•eYin,g _ :r i r 47. co Un! Nt LAND, OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 October 22, 1990 TELEPHONE; (916) 538-7601 William Vaccaro 446 Southgate Court Chico, CA 95928 Re Tentative Parcel Map, kPN 056-390-011, Log 090-09-06-01 Dear Mr. Vaccaro: An initial study of your proposed project, a Tentative Parcel Map, indicates potentially adverse impacts to the environment (refer to the enclosed eivironmenta checklist), 'T reducer or eliminate these impacts, suitable ;mitigation measures are required as part of the projects Otherwise, an Environmental Impact Report. (FIR) is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. An early res onse to this notification sent to the Planning Department, will expedite the P scheduling o,f your project, Please forward your written response within 15 days from the date of this :letter. A list of local consultants is included. These persons can determine the need fora survey by conducting.a records search, conduct archaeological and botanical surveys or arrange 1'o g such surveys. In the event ofa n Elk requirement, a subsequent letter will be sent outlining the procedure for the Count to select the consultant to prepare the ETR. Should you have any questions regarding thi I0s00 aim- and s matter, please contact this office bevee 3:00' p.m., any weekday. n Sincerely, B, A, Kircher Director of Planning Criag B: Sanders Assistant Planner BAY,038trdm Enclosure 4 Sierra West Surveying, 54,37 Black Olive Drive, Paradise,. CA 05965 1.,..Hf'., $'LR .. Wj�,A 1� , 11• -� 4�`r dal �y eyf w. r ,t ,. '� .. 1:, • �• N g 4�. �M1p< 1 t i ♦ .. 't•. Ea -i ^, .�_ ,. i a • '4 h�k�, ;� It 2• 1:Ya' j; `7 ,gyp a, , t .. e' ':t ,t + 5 1t��1 � '-' a a „'. P P , .- ` �,. q • • e j �•�.e a � 7,tr 4i tiaP�I "� 1 5 n -i '" rti j ti _ wx it + iv . 8 w j fir, � r ...11•i.�Ff��'.k'�`_� ars ._.... .., .. •�� ..-. _ - ,:f• �.,)F •;,a. .. Wj�,A 1� , 11• -� 4�`r dal �y eyf w. r ,t ,. '� .. 1:, • �• N g 4�. �M1p< 1 t i ♦ .. 't•. Ea -i ^, .�_ ,. i a • '4 h�k�, ;� It 2• 1:Ya' j; `7 ,gyp a, , t .. e' ':t ,t ii e � J r4� 4. � •q.. • �f f ' eY �tM1�tl • _ o �'i� �y �; 00 V. 'w • I• dM -AWA 5� M' it + - 1 ; �f x ! +i L a rF•h \ x1 :1 t •.• 1 .t / �- ew' 1 ��° d + ; '�i y�fA! �;tom aF :• e 4 qr� " A'r , E - .� , Y ^Z ,r + ro,, � Y � �✓ p L,i r t t r { if,., +, �. Y SS , {� 1 ♦ - h,j�, R #�a.Af. L� K} Y Edi 17E f �.� t. e ..( � fd j.� " � '' t i i, �}xrE4 �''pwy f +♦ a�: i+�h,+' � 4 ° � A [�-.. a. < a _ r '%�7"y�'�;a Wyk bj.l Y+r ° r �♦ r4,, f *T ♦ t` { + 1 ' �j' 'i' r?r.1r t Yh lIX' d \ t C�fi 5' �,+i � A '.rx i - ♦ F ' t� i v� � � '�" �ary.S'RP �,.ts 1w � N .t fAl ('"� �' ,�� d z,� d � i � to s.ai ♦ 4 s !� r � 2 �' � i T fou �f " bi� , M*� � � y �17/ .. - 4 ' � 1 yq . dr'��y � �v •Dd r��1T!° t�. � � s,� f f � i c r,fr,i iA � A Y�d.0 �� �� � ., r , �. �' r (.�•N ry 6 k+.lPy �M�{�«E�e k9' <7 if Y� r� + kca a � � f l� fk ' it ww M1 6iE � + '.� o . ! •, i ! + A;°, � � \'S� J..! � def r yM.,1 t� +a "�fi2 � "� �" ..a.. �4...nr..i'. mb '�5.awa�+......v.'��,",._ _ .+t,a.' d..<;xvr. ,r."•1'."i ::'�#-.,'M1'wNw fit?. k; � �,.....?'H'� .. IT e t r�+ i' t a t a A d '• , 6:p"low W 7 h a y F q x",'f i ... �`i�.�,kd"f,,, L i ' a s v < y ' Y :+ + 1 •e y Ye1 } �'f rye rt� f E y � Lr}'� s �� N " d. IL � ;r 1y � ° _ ' • d ar Aa d � N • * d� 1 df � • �" t 1 t ° c<+ji Y u • b I * • • , d. ` � `E \ i•' E �`G e� 7E .°♦ irk �,� °is . �• of x � � 'b r X+r i, Dii3CUt3gIq ; 79-12-14-64 2�it17{0 a'° � ;'. ' TAL ALURTI'0P1 (conCinuadj Y 11! Ar6$-wide doz3aitiee in t 1, nd divisions guoh ,� end develapden a outlying arde� pat go thin inokedb9 dQvelo smniier vie indoor patent l'le�fs doe parcels. y n6 nree'as,ida growth pppp +arts to the project tbiv publicis road conndotion to Righ Albatil pd which is bo 04 c+ulatitvrenaey Cnl't to a etreets ratty has rc uestedghxa t nerved by t,hia hi� w tlevBlopmc t tion• ,ronaegtxjio8 o opprovn oC and traffic hesarxTtt a Cobh tion. u6htlut the eras � of the listed in Item Cumulative increnae i�ou1d be autl'increaeed 2c�c)., a several issues to ba studied (Others public s 9 i3 araa� particui"iy firezandn wtii be Bette lues owners Protection. rates in this M12of the ?htteaoof Altatina Rood Jost property pipe H r 2d then hr the on iy� access totthe altnta 1.2 to l S n+dynrdq before a toad Should e,tsorillty for mairit nto Count dedication. y a Wrcaod ao to g this �41ies�c. Although o unty Impravemmi s water c xor aril teletshane lines 'reeldence" a'"`d pasniblY natural now se �st"U) 2esidenttr i3ac► rve th f supplies ind3vidu racy Chegstr to install W. a project pplieta ma ui wells will coed or n 3' be, limi.Ed). provide3 water Contained foal TheCthough Broundwetar, mist be ter in d. a oa n r deterxsincd. p biiity for on_ suet sews e: Chaparral lbt This 6 dispoital systems hazard lin prtGairiaus swag paces a hi occur espeeimxlY ae silt where Increased deveh wildly fire lhpcnont dattsities '�= Dae present.i .... afourid in Che viciai.tnrtaco#rled archAaol�r ictl , .' �otetrtiull 3' Ina etytire g site hen ar' aii6uXJ� seT�IIitive archaeolo carom on in oattsrecently been a'ury y assn iderad Bra:Ying worksl completed an Ehegic l ares. to be Ni h p=v sob biro s hlchaeoing'too �hway 32. S t o aatess:road, inCYudi and stenqj' 22cr the entranCo atotnati �1vif�ynmenwp p Bw � 1. nt ori a cumulative arodh would occur wider baaip ihr ude, h may be a b. Inc roa-addle dieplacemarit DenCrOlkeed oca , 9's end boll of soil °` tensed end to local qualit roni00, rraip, Y und.ocoustic ettvitbrimarit. Appendik Y pace 8b of q J r, y� 4 - • , 1 'f v � 4 J iw V. h yy F F r � "`. w ��►,"I,gS,!'A N y •.. r{ 5 � jM ?fie ��. v g 13 fire Dapsrtwt I Ate . � �l ( ',i � �EA'1X, fCrr7.�"•1V ��.�AsPi M .9:. s'��y� '1 l�Wd�it.. � ♦ �'i re �_r gWay, iro8 &M travel stwiel that subdivisionseBt u 9 rotate , �Eo l t laa�� 60 JAMAry tz, 148o for tion FroQos, u p uirouts. i ✓ , { g.g� 4 n+ar. Pinrina 6erbds - HigWay 32 to A1taLina Drfwh Engine 24 11 Minutes x s. 12ad *gin. Bina 44 - 22 pinut4% 3rd engin. ening 42 - 23 minutes ` ' rlol a inner ,ls",s parr too ac.i f� Rubar AA 83-01 c recti too ac:) 152 Highway 32 to Crown Point, Rd. to 8ipckberry r 1st engine, Engine :24 ,. 13 minutes Engine 44 - 28 minste'3 � , 91na, Engine 42 - 29 minutes ))� a AP 63-o1-1�8 • Oamer. TeaT'Nirrhola - Crown Point RJ+ interseetlan 1th Burro 1W. y i it engine, Engine 24 - 25 iainutes, by way of Doe NiC'i Rd. to Burrow Rd. ' minutes, Highway 32 to Crown Point Rd. to gurraw Rd. 3rd engine, Engine 42 • 32 minutes y4 ry t 2nd engine~ Engine A4 - 3 + , a AP 83 -of -160 - Mer, Robert Johnston ?' ' 1st engin, Engine 24 - 21 minutes by way of Doo kill Rd. a 2nd angina, Engine 44 - 47 minutt5, by way of Doe Kill Rd: 3rd engine, Engin* 42 » 48 minutesx by way of Doe Hill P2dr n Ranger -ARL E 14 CAKMAKT in -charge and r., County Fire Warden 0 4wlf� u 4. ChB, 1'huriaan I ` . 0orth Division *' i cc: N. Reed l �i COON Fid s 1980 , C Y yp, 112$�C£�Y424 OB >:tFYIi40M2E'21TAX, �"VALUA$I0H (continued) -101 durl.ngltheiconat action haaeg feMaianpotntial ibothissiAroa and �i'e Bread -I iriA'rrinneil n...... a. �.sths project, Cellae ah inare6iae SA erosion�nYot construction sitas. 011gVthtl {9d({0TMI$yid�hefonal9g(SearUbO daRII d ¢ �akreald would o irequired orin©cessaryaA ong Ajtatina Road and in areas Where development odours nn near swoles and streams or s`fors exceeding 15 pate deeut, Impl0mentRtian of a mentor drainage plan xor t118 entire site development Would drainage problem reduce sattoral potential lb! Structural designs should confor afuoe subsurf&ae taints m to seismic safety standards, w,xfat Wit 10 miles at the projddt site. PA: Aro, vebieular traffic generated b this project . cumulative reduction in io6al ail, quality., willadd to a fib: Reter to Item 9b ronideneto 'one It' New o3 po,eies or plants be ihtroducol into the area for landr;a!a in plants Will VZOU it of chaparral vegetutfoz would be removved iineon area where soils s,xo ahall.a and subject to emnion and%a dz I�oaa➢ of ver etption atcd dl velopmont of 1:omesitds Will reduce ociahas1: upon wildlife rabitot. Coo lzrtroduattion, of household pats- May p l �onpec2nlly dogn,�i tpa tli,s laa°ae some wlliilifo in the area. The prapert 1100 in eA area identitizd as ijt oro doer rea. r,habitat: far LUrfng construotitlhR noise levole in the area will fnereasa, tlpoA co>wpletioni increeaed no levels would be sustained from vehicular zaovetlent and,, residential unto. Boz The praJeGt tits Is currently toned -�., szxl ha$ an iesfdential land use ciassffica#'>ph+ Agricultural not be ooalsiatelit With land dpdivision ^F this ueteral 1�1unh�I,cndpiJdad will A-2 tope also it not cohnistent with this land use cRtpgozy, 'the 9ayh' 15a 3h1 itet Sent natural resoUruea would be used in construct on of residencsa and associated ticcesH Coeds. acvspYeticn, the use of nonrenewable reajourcec for heating,sUpon, aonditicning anti appliance apei'Otign Would occur at R stl6lained level in on outlying area. RReports 1 trans i:Urrent residents In the general pz,oject area, as wall as from tlts entire F ridge, indicotet that ado uat�+ arent. Ranch r diffacult b to ntltain Xroagizzdi Thal Wcnia3� Theadequacyonfigi�iuni#- Water on they site should be verutilg Appendix f PaBp SFS Or v7� x , eh Ali �irrr;A�riar� x M , ialinwin to 'th au pprod sed attont;or to erose ltb oda a Y the Applicant t'n°fuel or on 3r Erosion pra�ect npproyaji� ructailto rhasas Ia of ronsLrurttonw xhpil he a a�o.fl8atat ltz ex o#I s shad 3nclud at: the titre' Rovo do. stab attpnnta hn#quos, faces or uae 'tur crab#llze aII ilrarind other �r Pavements pktad areas w#Lh s aurnmi tar bars, i or ueraclin_ of Ci equbl3Y offeetiygy Stabilize starm aa`ar s taulYertai rtprnh rock"SCI hnnneis cturos: or a rec to with ind't d: Conduct quully t,'rtrt R' enerBY di. ipakinnttnn e Incas rxposed eurtht�rk riij*riv arcs, the wintcoil aurfncos a���1;ebdrjel'1°son on No r rainy Sanson. I 2' Place unprotectdd during Properly sized a courses cCossnd nd tnstat,.ad 3. i�Os# by roads or drnrli]Yoits in an sn and build reads Ys. Y drainanc r contours ' much p that eo a,= cutsi as ase.iblr andorcr to Goad. grades s ae" to tiro top ratn hail rat oxcrcd i n9 steeptinaprbankaenci�8 4,. LoCatn bultdtn 1' tie fagta y CS On ;j aas of Lass than 2p of otasion h • Si azards. deatpn domon ! stn��sso natain strates mi,po" ioless n loPina �`eiratati is not a s#te dnvetnp;trnt� an who rr+�o►ai 6' Perllneta • ssent�tl a barrtew iancinv thall for I} the harraat )RaYomontnattwitrted hick would CroaLQ the conform to thr ort Ah oresit Y countyopira PL Lmaht�Cslifos��ra rrcornarend 1M Nat@r 5u i� rnla pepartmant oCy not o rhas a,fpqu ' A 'water. x qu rod. 11g00parurPlY rot, G ret Y cnnhartiuhcttY of 1'rotrct#on aiii be nnc#C Ituiln or 10r t• a nater s Point sdllb bd ,Irkstaitadns i a f detnorage must be gn +�snnectia'n, s bra to Ciro nlncated lrr dapartdontustnt d'opnrimant a ut that it Is readily aranasiblo Pment. iR4na};�yp, _ to Jf CALIFORNIA—BWSINSSS. TPANSr1iftTION ANO ROUSING AGENCY GEOI�G DEUKffEJIAN, Gove mor A,' D0 i�TMENT OF `I Rq�ISPAT ON -�, F10, 11, MARYSIALLE, CA 9sw! T515 Phone 916-741-4509 16TOaone 916-741-4498 October 12, 1990 03-But-32 P.M. 19„4 Vaccaro Parcel 31r. William Cheff ;Department of Public Works bounty of Butte 7 County Center Drive 0roville, CA 95965 Vear 'Mr. Cheff ':hank you for - the opportunity to review the Vaccaro tentative parcel map to create 2 parcels, one on each side of Altatina Drive, southeast of Tina Court; in the Forest Ranch area,: Before this parcel map is finalized, the existing road approach onto Highway 32 Will' meed to be upgraded to our public road approach standards. If there (ire any questions, please contact Ms. Christel Little at (916) 741-4291, Sincerely, :,aan L. Baker, Chief Environmental Branch 'B ' ��o , �hnning pro�i�iq, �lifbrrliai 1 _ ,) "�1rf 7-7 IU LAND OF NAT uR AL W!!� EALTH AND BEAUTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH q 7 796 MemSr►ol DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH Address .�C! ;boy County Center Drive Q 547 Elliott Road Reply to Chicon California 95926 Cioville, California 95965 Telephone, 916/891«2727 Paradise, California 95969 Tcicphonet 916/538.7281 Telephone.. 916/872.6308 September 25, 1990 G7illiam Vaccaro ; 446 Southgate Ct. 444 ."V �lliam Vaccaro Parcel Map Chico, 'CA 95928 patina Dr., Forest Ranch 56-39-11 t Dear Mr. Vaccaro; t 1- This department has advshe:Butte County Department of Public tJ application. Development Section, h r we:are prepared to act on the above_°rks �; application . �+ , tant rp pBased on present informatapproval. ereacQmmend approval, or conditional Recommended Conditions f lug oval 14 Indicate on the map that areas vi.t, h slo cent (30%) are unsuitable for sewage disposal excess of thirty per. 2. Show the usable sewage disposal area proven to meet the re, Of the Subdivision Ordinal , on parcels 1 and 2. qui remer, i:s Prove that the required qua dies of domestic Mater ate a to each Parcel or place the 1tement ort the map that states"-.,Lila�ep sL� is no evidence that dam estic tater is available.01 re 4. Show a f< ty (sp) fast leachfield setback from the drains � g way. If You M Office:have any questions regarding this letter; please contact the Chaco Sincerely, Thomas Reid, R.EiR.S, D -"vision 0.6 Environrlerttal Health TR/gl , cc: Public Works; planning, Sierra West Inter-Departmental Memorandum TO Hoard of Supervisors FROM: Staff SUBJECT: Jere Greer's Letter of March 12, 1987 Concerning the Highway 32 Environmental Impact Report DATE: May 11, 1987 Ms. Green has applied for a tentative parcel map on AP 56-39-1.9. The property falls within that area served by the Altatina public road approach at Highway 32. The road approach was approved by the. California Transportation Commission after the Board of Supervisors certified the. Highway 32 Environmental Impact Report (EIR) Ms. Green was notified by mail February 12th and again on. April 30, 1986 that the map is subject to the mitigation measures and requirements of this EIR. The specific mitigation measures ,fere restated in the transmittal letters. The letter to your Board questions two of these ntitigation measures: Formation of an assessment district and assessment of the potential impact on .law er>forcement. These mitigation measures are taken verbatim from the certified E19 page 31 as followst IlFor an assessment district to maintain all project area ruads to County standards." "Land development applications should assess a potential impact on traffic accidents and estimate the impacts on law enforcement." Recognizing the importance of the mitigation measures, the Board made a motionattheir r-��gu1,arly scheduled meeting April 10, 1984, which reads in part We certify that the final Environmental impact Report has been completed it compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines. and require the formation of an Ast"m;ssment District to maintain all project area roads to County sfandards,adopt.Resolutibr 84-12,11 A unani nous vote approved the motion, The purpose of an area wide t1k .is to expedite processing of individual projects. Once a Master Enviroritental tMpact Report has been prepared for a large: or a group of small prnjett:s, each individual project need only to comply with that EIR in order, to be approved. If this is not: done, the Appropriate alternative is to prepare, an individual tnviirotmen tal Impact Report, Mt, Greenrs parcel map was scheduled before the i:dvi.sory Agency Oetobo 20, 1986; as an item on which environmental had not been completed aid time lines' were about to eitpire. A waiver o timelines }. 1 under the Government Code was received January 7, 1957 and again February 23, 1987 stating `please accept this letter as my formal waiver..,, 'under the Subdivision Map Act and Permit Streamlining Act; pursuant to the Government Code.." The Advisory Agency had this item on agenda at least 6 times before a letter was received from the applicant agreeing to the mitigation measures in the Highway 32 EIR. Each continuance was .at the request of the engineer. February 18, '1987 Mr. Dan Hays requested one final continuance. to June In order to prepare the botanical survey and complete all other mitigation .measures. The continuance was granted only because the applicant agreed that all mitigation measures would be r..et and agreed if for any reason they were not that the map would be denied and not contested. To data the botanical survey has not been received„ and the applicant is now objecting to two mitigation measures before the Board. The Advisory Agency has not yet acted on this map. County Code establishes a process whereby maps are heard and decided by the Advisory Agency, It would only be on appeal that the map would come before the Board for a decision.. County Code does not provide for Board action at this time. The Board should postpone; action until the Advisory Agency renders its decision on June, 1, 1987. The Board should be aware that if these mitigation measures are not adopted, there are unmitigated significant impacts. The law requires a re -opening of the Highway 32 B.I,,A, or preparation of 'a subsequent E.I.R. Either action could be handled with the County's consultant selection procedure, upon receipt of monies from the applicant. The document prepared and mitigation measures submitted would be subject to the approval of 'the California Transportation Commission: UV-, Ir I cc: Jere Green County Counsel Auditor Public Works • e0V CkLIFORNIA—THE RESOURCES AGENCY, ' GEORGE DFUKMNIAN, Govemor ;ARTMENT Of FISH AND GAMS -1,ni 11 .00 ROAD, SUITE A ' -41§) 'CQRDOVA, CALIFORNIA 95670 Ott 9 P r41fnlRg Comm. ,j X55--7010 o. [ *1: '�n�ilCaa C�itfar�+a September 18, 1990 John Mendons.a, Assistant: Director n apartment of PubliccCounty Center DriveWorks x roville, CA 9.5965 sear Mr. Mendonsa The Department: of Fish a.,nd Game, (DFG`) has reviewed the Vil.liam Vacarro Tentatiie Parcel. Map (TPM), a prop(,sal to divide a 42.45 acre parcel into two parcels of approximately 21 acres each. �rocated near 10. Mile House east of Chico, the TPM lies within critical winter 3,ange of the East Tehama deer herd, subdivision of ;land into small parcels has an adverse impact on mdgratory deer.. As lands within critical winter range ,are divided into parcels smaller than 40 acres, deer use becomes impaired, Iznigratory movement affected, and forage and space needs drop below tLhe levelto sustain herd numbers. Subdivisions have adversely affected more than 40 percent �,f the winter. range (i.e., critical and designated winter ,ranes) in Butte County. in an effort to resolve the subdivision76eer conflict in Butte County, the DFG has recommended a series of actions for the Poard of Supervisors to implement Tho DFG also Identified a "Designated Development Lone (DDZ) where development =ay occur, provided certain mitigation measures are adopted and j=plemented by the Board, 'tae TPM does not lie within a DDZ, It represents an intrusion into an area of large parcels which would acid to the significant cumulative loss of deer winter range,caused by residential encroachment in Butte County: Therefore, DFG,recommends that the TPM ba denied: If the DFG can be of further assistance, please Contact 1,jr, Ron Bertram, Associate Wildlife Biologist, or 16s, Patricia Perkins, 4Tildlife Management Supervisor; at (51.6) 355-7010-. Sincerely, Fames µD, Messersmi z /Re, g' nal Manager s r COUNTY OF BUTTE UEPARTMMT OF PUBLIC WORKS L 7 County Center Drive Orovil_le, CA 95965 (916) 538-72.66 August 31, 1990 William Vaccaro RE: AP 56-39-11 446 Southgate Ct Chico, CA. 95928 Tentative Parcel 'Map Dear Mr. Vaccaro This is -to notif-y you that your application for a tentative map for the above -referenced property is being subrnttted to the Planning Department for environmental determination, and to the Environmental Health Department for its review. This application will be considered complete when we have received notification from the Planning Department and the Environmental. Health Department that'all necessary data have been received. These departments will contact you regarding any additional information they .may require. Very truly yours, William Cheff Director of Public Worts l Jo�„'Mendonsa Aad Lttant Director JM/kk cc, Planning Department gnvironment,rµ� , �iealth Department Sierra West Surveying Lb'1120 (Revised 2/88) AUG 11180 t•