HomeMy WebLinkAbout056-390-018w
C3 SS-ON SUMMMARY.T 'PO; STD DxVISIw1S
1
b arr .1
Richard Cherry t,oglf 90-07-1970`
S SS 10 Via Contenta #D Carmel Valley, CA 93924
..,�..P Same ds app,Licant '
- =`CT DESCRIPTION TENTATIVE PARCEL AAP to divide 16$ acres to create 4 pare-ls
4kO acres, 2 at 44 acres, 1 at 40 acres and. I at, 44 acres.
, ►ICN on both sides of Tan Hile.. House Road approx. 1.5 miles easterly of ";Iwy. 32
Fo"'gt Ranuh area;
PARCEL NUM.."�ER (S) 056-390-018, 053-030-053
Z+ON"s ?G TM-40 GENERAL PLAN AR G&GL PROJECTCONSISTENT?.
C', w-7,AL ;PLAN iCONFQ:E�MANCi P.EPOjtT dune 26, 1990
DATE OF APPLICANT SIGNATURE
M15-4t4""" U`J A'ivlS
1iDo 7CONSERVATION' SACT CONTRACTS?
DATE ;APPLICATION RECEIVED July 17, 1990
rr FF ;
'1;�;E1&1/SURVEYOR/CIVIL ENGINEER--o j
DATZ'?LANNING DIPUECTOR' S REPORT PREPARED
314W WNMENTAL CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION DATE FILED '
ANDc"�TE NEGATIVE DECLARATION DATE ADtJFTEA.-
MITIGA1tD NEG. DECLARATION DATE ADOPTED 11 X41 l
ENV,, IMPACT REPORT DATE CERTIFIED
STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO.
SUB, iCOMMITT8E MEETING DATE...
ADVISORY AGENCY HEARING DAM. i 1 4
ADVISORY AGENCY ACTION116AYIA
APPEALED APPEAL 1ir,r•0RING C:'TE
BOARD ACTION
x
CO>NTS .FOR PLANNING DIRECTOR'S 2EPORT __
RIONE NO: ,
APPLICANT: --
ADDRRESS:
OWI&Rt PH014E NO:
ADDRESS:
ENGINEER OR S'ilRVEYOR: ,5/F7�� � � PHONE NO:���"b��S
ADDRESS :
MAIL NOTILvE OF HEARING TO: .
LOCATION OF FROPERTY: TCN S1JP RANGE SECTION
�� Qp
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL N`t3l-MER � cow �d TOTAL ACREAGE
PLEASE SUrNIT PR,8L-LL7 AR ;x TLE REPORT OR RECENT POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE
(dated VI -thin esu* sib moi „r ,.) WIN APPLICATION. INDICAM BELOWTHE DATE
AND RECORDING jjoo j-%TIUTi ;b, `HMll THIS ,PARTICULAR PARCEL WAS CREATED:
IA`Z'E 3 DOOr, C-33 PAS
NUMBER AMID Sl'ZE Or, PAM. LS BEING CRFATr"D (:including any remainder).-
DISTANCE TO NAT''t1RAL WATER COURSE OR STORM DRAIN. � �/
PROPOSED 18THoD OF SEI:`AGE DISPOSAL- lr��.
('Check ',rith iiealtb Debartut--nt) "
oPo-D SOt, OF VAR:A1� _
( Check with 1ieal bh Department)
DO P5JEP, AND Y -401x- Ln ,S EYIST TO THE BOUIMkRY OF TF± ORIGTrtAL PARCEL?
IF 140T9 EST l*4!r8 L8 D-svjgCt� THEY WILL WE TO BE Exrb=D-
L3O% Co. Plenntng Cdtnm
jUt 1719-qO
., - * �raviU� �ti�blTlitf
4
P0�'� CE USE ONLY:, �
I
$utt6 County P�.anni:ng D6pl t. Receip,t Il
i County Center. Drive {
Orovijle, CA 95965-3387 Applicant
916,1 534 -4f -Vi AP S' 1 �c� la3,!QQ --6Z
Subdivision Name If applicable)
r APPENDIX E
date Filed
LAtW DIVISION APPLICATIONS
SuDolemental Information for Planning Department
1. List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals
required .for this project, ine.luding those required by city, regional,
state and federal agencies:
2, Proposed scheduling/associated. projects: A%Di045 N
3. Anticipated incremental development (,phasing of subdivision units)
future development ;plans)IA20-141�,61-
4# What method will be utilized to accommodate surface drainage? Describe i.
ff .`ta oh -site and downstreamt drainage channels will be affected.
c5 ..
5, Proximity y of wa ter for fire fight1119"Purposes (hydrants, ponds, etc,)
&, Will excavation or Grading be necessary? Cubic yards (est,ililate)
1, Directions sor travel to property (rural and mountainous areas:only)
t,
•
S. ENVIRONMF.t AL IMi'1 'q .h1.?D M1TiGA,r oN masuns
Identify: potentially iignificant environmental impacts associated With
the land divisions What project design features or special conditions
sof approval (mitigation measures) are proposed to alleviate pot�e+.n�tal'P
Environmental impacts? ,0Of"? fool -d—<
Fae
g ; rgVIRONM TAL SETTING^
a) Describe the project site as it exists before the project,
including information on topography; soil stability, plants
and animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects.
Describe any existing structures on ethe site, and the use of
the structures. e1r/�f��.G ! /fir lr.� G'CV4 le -
b)` pes �P_t surrng properties, including information on
plants and animals and any cultural, histrical or scenic aspects.
Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.),
intensity of land use (one -family, apartment houses, shops, depart-
Ment stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, frottage,
setbdcl., rear yard, etc,)...�"/�i'�'!�",� Q
CRRTINiCATIONY hereby certify. that "the statements furnished above and iii
the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this
al
." evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts;statements
init
and information presented are true and correct to the best of my 'knowledge
and belief.
Z 1 4, e'L.
FD
Date signature
OV
For
*Use separate ::heat for longer responses,i
to'sjuowdophao puq'
CIE
Xz
PVjaJECT DESCRIPTION:
ASSESSOR'S PkRCEL HUMBER(S)
A., PROPOSED USE!�R C'S I o E " `'
following items are to be completed by the Planning Department;
cWtRENT :Z014ING: T T`j) - 4 D ___-- LARD CONSE'TtvATION AGREE'Oa: 0
6 -. (?GS 1 . rLP�► 0C.- � Of -SP L -AN
'itERAL PLAN: DESIG±:ATiOH:-
�ortditional Cri.tes-j_a:
A5P.ICUL1URAL-P.ESIDE frZAT YES 00 It is recommended that you perform the
1. Agricultural Compatibilityfollowing t'hecked items:
2. Water and Sewer Capacity~ ARCHAEOLOGICAL RECORDS CHECK
?. Adequate Fixes Facilities
BOTANICAL SURVEY
4. Road Capacity and tlaintenance GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
Access to Commercial and Schools YES 2i0
W.D AND FIELD CROPS AND GA E.°ARTMENT NZ FINE
CRC
AtID GAME DEVELOPMENT ZONE;
1. Predominant 5-10 ac. Parcel 'Size
2. Vicinity of Urban Boundaries _ W1=1 FLOOD PLaI2i:
3. Ag. Viability not Impaired _._.
WIIT3IN AREA, SPECIFIC OR
Staff Detezx^,ination: Substantia].l'y conforms to: LAND USE PLANE
GEllir'iiAL FLAB: 1. • L Mw USB If Yes,,
2. Conservation Name of Plan
3. Open Space rte, WITHIN URBAN RESERVE-'
4. Safety
5. Noise If Yes,
-,--- --- Name of Reserve
6. Housing _.u«
.: 7. Circulation AMC= LAND USE PLAN-
ZONING:
2 3-•-
`►"1-11 S ?f?-C1iC:`G'S" [..�0 l�'Lf7 Cl'Di�.)FC3 �-
rat
Staff Signature
V Date ?
9.0
AS x"iiE` APPLICANT FOR 'tom REQUES= LAND OMSION, I Ah AWARE OF UM AiAVE s'TAp7 D Mrv=OH 'REG ARDL'#G
THE COMFORMANCE 17= M GMEP.AL "FLAN MO ZONIP(G.
Dated _.. 8ignab re of APPliczA
rq i"s repot -d Will ekpire and be discarded sil (6) months from..the data of the staff signature,
S,jri 1000A Cravxso-d 6
-87%
1 ti ';
4 . '
n ,
X Planning Department NAME: RICHARD CIiERRY'
X Environmental Health Department
X CDF (Forestry Department)
AP: 56-39-18 / 6302-53
Attn: J. Craig Carter (on areas north of red line, on map)X Butte County.Sheriff
W� PG&E (check title report for easement) k�
..� Pacific Bell
Butte County Mosqulto Abatement OR
Oroville Mosquito Abatement (areas within large map in cabinet)
S hool Di. trict..(w 11 map)
h`
Water CompanyV(if individual wells are not indicated on application. or map)
Durham Irrigation OR Durham Mutual Water Co.
California !Dater Service Company (Chico area)
Orovi.;lIO-Wyandotte Irrigation District (Oroville area, SE of river)
Thermalito Irrigation District (Thermalito area NE of river)
Limesaddle Community Services District: (Paradise area along Pentz Rd.
tolake)
Del Oro Water (Paradise Pines area)
Buzztail Waterworks (Doe Mill Ridge/Forest Ranch area)
Paradise ,Irrigation District
City of . (chock wall maps for spheres of influence)
Oroville
Chico
Paradise
Biggs
Gridley
C71ILLE AREA ONLY:
Lake Oroville Area Public Utility District (see large Map in cabinet)
Feather River Recreation District (see, large map in., cabinet)
T�IGGS, o District Fire (checkwall map)
a small Portion of Oroville only)RICH�iEGRIDLEY AREAS (SOUTH BUTTE
GOUTY). check wall Map and title report
to see what applies. Some areas overlap.
Drainage DistY t Al
Drainage Distr, " #2
., Drainage Distrl 1100
Drainage District ;#200
Reclamation District #833
Reclamation District #2056
t �
Sacramento and San Joaquin Drainage District
Bunte Creek Drainage District
IN CETAIN CASES
Superintendent of Schools (onl.y. ,for subdivisions)
Dept: of Fish and Came and in rural and
Cal Trans (near State Hwye (near water
9, 149 Chico cutoff 162eas)
•� � Mountain areas)
Richvale Hwy.), 111 (Clark Road) ( ), (Olive Hwy.
r
State Water Quality Control Board(Pro'd `
ects with more than lO0 lets or unit;)United States Forest Service (if project borders USA land --check AP books)
Parks and Recreation. Department (property near Lake Oroville)
State Water Resources Department (property near Lake Oroville _ waterihed)
Rock Creek Reclaimation Dist. (west of Chico Airport, south of Rock Creek and
east of Hwy. 99 (seo wall. map)
,. Chico Area Recreation & Park Dist
(only for subdivisions)
SPECIAL CASES: check title report for any mention of special services or easemehts such
as to Thermal.ito Irrigation, District (numbered items)
r
TA CALIFORNIA-fHI! KSOURCIS Ac ct
DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME
,r.�lrrld a
1=1 ¢illMOWROAD, SUITE A
RXt1CMo CQRdOW6 CALIFORNIA 95670
F)6610 brand fax transmWel Memo 701.`,ttotPsO
.o.w.
Z. tr' C i�
arom r-7 `
Co.
o, 1,•� -,.YVI
Dot. J .
Phone "3,5
3,�- , 7 0-t0-
0
u% �" ^ J ISL �}
og #
(91,6) 355-7020 �7 s��•. cI
lig
February 19, '1 992
1Mr. Tom Wrinkle
Sierra Vest Surveying
5437 Black Olive Drive
Paradise Cal.ifo:ania 95969
Dear hr. Wrinkle.
At your request the Department of )fish arid Game (oro) has
reviewed the Richard Cherry Tentative Parcel Map (TPM) to
determine whether it provides adequate mitigation for project
4 impacts. issues which concern Dr -G include critical deem winter
range, riparian wetlands, Little Chico Creek's aquatic system and
sensitive plant species
We recommend the following additions or modifications be
included in the TPNf
1. beer winter range fencing standards shoald be added
2. The 100 -foot riparian corridor should commence at the
outer adge of riparian vegetation or bank top,
whichever is greater.
3, The no disturbance buffer around sensitive plant
species should be a 50 -foot minimum to allow adequate
space against the impacts (Q.g.) herbicides, fire)
which may directly or, indirectly affect plants
adjacpnt to intensive use sites. 110 would agree to
not placi.nv protection harriers around sensitive
plant, populations if a 50-+c.4. buffer is provided,
To assist parcel ownets in pto ooc ion of the 'plants,
I n information packet desdribih?g (iricaluding a photo
of the plant in blossom) the sensitive species and
its "needs would, be useful,
If we can be of further assistance, please Contact
Mt. Ron tertram, Associate Wildlife Biol6gi,st or
Ms. Patricia Perkins, Wil.dl.ifd Management Supervisor; telephone
(916 05�.�7�10,
y
y ��
a.mes Mese mi.th
ILI
egional_Manager
s�
w�
NOTICEOF F DETERMINATION-,
3i0 Office of'Plan.,& Research Dept." FROM,
Sacramento, SCA t95814 Butte Coen County' Planningrt,N OV 21 V 1 y i
County Center Drive s
Oroville, CA 95965 CANDACE J. GRUBBS, +� erX U04
or
i 0 -7;�C
X 'Butte County Clerk
4SMECTI, Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or 2152 of the Public Resources Code.
1?2jz Title; Tentative Parcel Map
A-?!, Jtitnber- 056-390.018 063-030-053
a '1'
ti :gas Richard Cherry
az-- Clearinghouse Number (If submitted to clearinghouse): None I
Cettat:t Person: Butte County Public Works Dept. Telephone Numbers 538-7206 �+
P;-tet Location! On both sides of Ten Mile House Road approidmately 1.5 miles easterly of Hwy. 32 ForestRanch 1
P;6, Description: Tentative Parcel Map to divide 168 acres to create 4 parcels; 1 at 40 ecres, 2 at 44 acres, 1 at 40 t
acre quad 1 at 44 acres.,
Tj s advise that
Agency Butte
County sible A ensoEy Agency . J
( gen cy Re� g cy)
a
opw, oved the above-described project on November 4j 1991 and has made the following determinations regarding the
0-400-described project,
L The project will, _X. will not, Have a significant effect on the environment.
2 An Environmental Impact Report waprepared for this project Pursuant to the provisions of CEQ
A;�
X Y A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA.
3. Mitigation measure's �X were, were not, made condition of the approval of the proj�:ct:
4. A statement of overriding considerations.. was, _ X. was not, adopted for this project:
1
This is to certify that, the finalETR with comments and responses and record of project approval is available to the general
public at,
Butte County Planning Department
7 County Center Drive
Oroville, CA 95965
1
Daae Received Car Filing and
Posting at OPh
Signatbre
Paula teastire, Asst: Planning Director^R
Revised March; 1980 Title
)~orm kNOD
i
i
l
. ,
RIrhard Cherry
AUVYr 056-390-018, 063-030.053
Te-Diative Parcel Map
kig- ion Measures.
a
y. Place, a note on the map which states, "Deer Herd impact, fees shall be paid at time of building
permit issu incf.of applicable."
4 Place a note on the alternate or additional map sheet of the final map stating, "Automatic fire
Suppression sprinkler systems shall be installed in all residential structures in accordance with
the natiot.ul Fire Protection. Assn. Standard ;for the installation of sprinkler systems in 1 and 2
family dwellings and mobile homes, NFPA Standard 131). The purpose of the installation of
sprinkler systems is fur additional sIety and property protection in the event of residential fires..
"17hs installation will reduce the demand for structural fire protection services in those instances
where they are installed."
I Place a 100 ft. setback from the centerline of the creek as a riparian protection/stream,
pollution zone and a note on the map which states, "No planting of non-naliva vegetation,
cultivating, or earthwork, or disturbance of the arev, within 1.00 feet of the centerline of the
creek shall occur."
4. Place a note on: the map concerning archaeological resources which reads as follows, "No
'bu.ildings, or structures are allowed on the east side of the creek without an archaeological
clearance."
5. Pay $200 per lot to the Butte County Fire Dept./California Department of Forestry Fire,
Prevention Water Tender fund prior to issuance of building permits.
0
,; c
,
DECLARATION OF FEES DUE
(Cal for,,- a Fish and Game Code ,Section 711.4)
NAME AND Ar ?KESS OF APPLICANT
Richard Cherry VILINONO.
10 Via Contenta_AD
Carmel Valley, CA )3924
CLASSIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT!
1. NOTICE OF EXEMPTION/STATEMENT OF EXEMPTION
A. statutorily or Categorically E)cempt
$25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee
C ]
B. DeMinimus Impact Certificate of Fee
Exemption
$25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee
2 NOTICE OF DETERMINATION FEE REQUIRED
[X] A. Negative Declaration
$1,250 State Filing 'Fee
$25.00 Clerks Documentary Handling Fpe
B. Environmental Impact Report
$250 State Filing Fee
$25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee
3e [ ] OTHER' (Specify)
$25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee
PAYMENT/NONPAYMENT OF FEES.
1 [X] PAYMENT.. The above Fees have been paid:
See attached tece pt(sj
2. [ ] NO11-PAYMENT. The above fees are "required. Not
paid.
Chief Planning Official
By Paula Leasure
Assistant Planning Director
Lead Agency BC Public Works .Dept
November 200 199j
TWO COPIL, OF THISMUST BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED WITH ALL
ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS FILED WITH THE BUTTE COUNTY CLERKIS OFFICE.
THREE COPSES OF ALL NECESSARY DOCUMENTATION ARE REQUIRED FOR
ALL APPLICABYA FEES ARE DUE AND PAYABLE PRIOR TO THE FILING OF ANY
ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT WITH THE BUTTE COUNTY CLERIC'S OFFICE. MAKE
CHECKS PAYABLE TO THE COUNTY OF BUTTE.
rr.o
. 7
.M
. ...... Aswy& coun
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
WILLIAM (Bill) CHEFF, Director
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965
Telephonet (916) 538.7681
RONALD D. McELROY
Deputy Director'
Richard. Cherry RE 55-39-18 & 63.`2-53
10 Via Contenda, #D
Carmel Valley, CA 93924
Pear Mr. Cherry:
!N
At the regular meeting; of the Butte County Advisory Agency held on (November
4, 1991 ), the Agency adopted a negative declaration with
i
envronmental mytlgations and approved the above—referenced project subject
,
to the conditions lisped on the attached sheet.
If no appeals are timely filed -- within ten (10) days of the date of the
Advisory Agency's approval (November, 14i 1991 ) -- with the Clerk of the
Board of Supervisors, this action will be final;.
When the
conditions of approval maare
complied with, it will be in order for
you t
y " p" Butte County Department of Public Works
for recordation within twenty-four (24) months of the date of approval by
the: Advisory Agency:
Recently enacted legislation (A83158, Chapter 1106, Statutes of 1990,
effective January 1) 1991, requires that the Department. of Fish and Came
impose and collect filing fees as specified to defray the cost of Managing
and protecting fish and °wildlife trust resources, These filing fees are
Collected during the environental review process and are to'be paid at the
time the County files a "Notice of Determination" with ,:the County Clerk of
the County in which the project is located. This procedure is required
pursuant. 'to Section 21152 of the ,Public Resources Code'
To increa=e administrative efficiency-, the statute delegated the collection
of filing: Lees to the County Clerk. The fee required in connection with your
PAGE TWO
PROJECT NAME:
AP NUMBER:
CLASSIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT
1. NOTICE OF EJC 1mON/STATi°MENT Or EMEYUON
Ai Statutoriiy or Categorically Exempt
$25.00 (Twenty -Five Dollars) clerk's Fee
B. De, Minimus ImPact - Certificate of fee Exemption
$25.00 (Twenty -give Dollars) Clerk's ,Fee
2. NOTICE OF DETERMINATION - FEE' RBQYJIRED
X) A. Hegative Declaration
$1,250.00 (Twelve Hundred Fifty Dollars)
State Filing Fee
$25.00 (Twenty -Five Dollars) C1erk0s Fee
B. Environmental Impact Report
$850 (Eight Higidred Fifty Dollars)
State Filing 'Fee
$25.00 (Twenty -Five Dollars) Clerk's Fee
3. OTHER (Specify)
( ) $25.0 0 (Twenty -Pave Dollars) Clerk's Fee
The fee should beaid to the Plannin Department b
P $ p Y ('..November 18, 1991
in order for the Notice of Determination to he timely filed. Mahe checks
payable to the County of Butte:'
The project applicant should be aware that if he or she does not :remit payment
of the required filing fees, the project approval may be invalid by law and
may not be operative, vested or final, pursuant to the provisions of Public
Resources Code Section 21080 (b), fish and Game Code Sec. 711.4 (c) and
Section 755.5 (d) (3) and (7), Title 14, California Code of Regulations:
Should you have any questions regarding thi% matter, please contact this
office.;
Very truly yours,
t,t`lliam Cheff
Director of Public Works
JO
,�b Mendonsa
Assistant birflctor
JM,/ds
cc Planning Department.
Environmental Health Department
Sietra gest Surveying
;r ,
Butte Cou n't,
PLANNING DEPARTMENT'
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397
TELEPHONE; (9;6) 538-7601
September 12, 1991
Richard. Cherry
10 Via 'Contenta No. D
Carmel Valley, CA 93924
Re: Tentative Parcel Map, AP No. 056-390-018 and 063-030-053
Hear Mr. Cherry:
ro ect in accordance with the Ca'Lubmia Environmental Quality Act and forwarded of your,
The
; Butte Count Plamm� Department has completed the en nnlental revie of y to
the Butte County Advisory Agency within the required _105 days pursuant to the
California Pudic Resources Code Section 221151.5. in addition, the Planning Director's
report required by Sections 20-63 and 20-99 of the Butte County Subdivision Ordinance
has been completed. Please find enclosed the Environi-gental Documentation/Flanning
Drector'-s Report which has been prepared for your project.
Please review the enclosed. Planning Director's Report with conditions of approval if
applicable. If you note any errors or omissions in our evaluation, please bring them to
our attention.
The Environmental Documents and Planning Director's Report for your, project has been
sent to 'the Butte County Advisory Agency for their action, California Government Code ,
Sections 65950 and 65952,1 requires the Butte County Advisory Agency set hearings and
approve or disapprove your projectwithin six months from the date on which your
application was received and accepted, The Advisory Agency will notify you of the time
and place of the public hearing for your project:
if there are modifications to your project, not related to mitigating, an identified impact;
re-evaluation of your project shall be required.
i
11 r
i
j,
Inter-Departmental Memorandum
TO Butte County Advisory Agency
IR0M Planni:.,, Director
SUBJECT: Report on Tentative Parcel Map for Richard Cherry, AP No. 056-590-018
and 063-030-053
DATE; September 12, 1991
This is a proposal to divide 168 acres to create 4 parcels, one at 40 acres, two at 44
acres, one at 40 acres, and one at 44 acres. The present zoning is TM-40 (Timber
Mountain, 40 acre parcels). 1fie Band Use Plan Map of the Butte County General Plan
designates this area as Agricultural Residential and Grazing and Open Lands, There are
no specific or community plans for the area.
The proposal does not conflict with County Zoning nor any adopted or proposed
Element of the Butte. County General Plan nor any specific or community plan.
A Negative Declaration has been prepared for the proposed project in accordance to the
California Environmental Quality Act and forwarded to the )Butte County Advisory
Agency within the required 105 days pursuant to the California Public Resources Code
Section 21151.5.
Recommend approval of the Tentative Parcel Map for Richard Cherry, AP No, 056-3190-
018 and 063-030-053, subject to the following mitigation :measures and conditions:
mitigation Measures
Provide documentation to the Planning Department prior to filing final map which1 4
outlines quantity, of ,groundwater ;and rate of recharge. Astable water source must
be quantified,
2, Place a note on 1ho oa.pwhich states; "Deer Herd impact fees shall be paid at
time of building permit issuance if applicable".
3: Place a note on the alternate or additional map sheet of the final map stating,
"Automatic fire suppression sprinkler systems shall be installed in all residential
structures in accordance with the National Fire Protection Association Standard
for the tion of sprirnklee systems in one and two family dwellings and
mobile homes
NF'PA. Standard 13 D. The purpose of the installation of sprinkler
systems is for additional safety and prop protection in the event of 'residential
fires, This installation will reduce the demand for structural fire protection
services in those instances 'where they, are installed"
\1
�S t a
l {
4. place a 100 foot setback from,, the centerline of the creel:. � as a r�pai ian
protection/stream pollution zone'and,,a note on the map which states, "No planting
of non-native vegetation, cultivating, or earthwork;. or disturbance of the area
within 100 feet of the centerline of the creek shall occur".
5. Place a note ion the map concerning archaeological resources which reads as
follows, "No buildings or structures are allowed on the east -side of the creek
without an archaeological clearance".
6. Pay $200.00 per lot to the Butte County Fire 'Department/California Department
of Forestry -Fire Prevention Water Tender fund prior to issuance of a building
permits. ,
7. Applicant to provide signed Sheriffs Impact Agreement pursuant to Butte County
Board of Supervisors Ordinance No. 2949.
Conditions
1:, Establish a minimum 50 foot buffer zone around each plant population to prevent
disturbance.
2> No alterationof existing drainage, including no artificial runoff into natural
drainage containing rare plants.
3. Construction of barriers to prevent trampling damage to rare species by foot or
vehicular traffic.
4. No livestock grazing ,in the vicinity of rare plant populations;
►r r,t .t
cc Richard Cheng
Sierra West Surveyjng
Public Works
2,
�:.
k
a
AGREEMENT RUNNING WITH THE LAND ,
RE- MITIGATION OF 121FACT ON SHERIFF'S DEPAR!TME�iT
the undexwsigneci e: ,resently the owner. -if that
56- <f3� �- c is ],�ca.ted i n
laid cc=only known as :to whi z
Cal:farn,w.a, near
the t,..n Incorporated area c- -Rv.ttoouu r
' the legal ae .» :."';ani of wh-- ch is set forth
L' ht l v - herein by t:z.w
A attached hereto and incur rr w y'".+-er
,in
ref er enCe; and
SFr said owners propose to develop their said land, and,
r proposal, have submitte : ?n
development e.
JS,
in connect�on with
to the County of Butte for the fallowing
application subdivision
discretionary land use entitlement:_ other
(
mapl +!1-pacel map use �ceria� 1.7
specify an
WhERrAS, said owners recognize that the cu�au5,at ve impact of
the county of Butte,
development in unincorporated areas o,
aevelopmentt has area --: and is creating
including their proposed
the need to augment the law enforcement services provided by the
is
Butte County Sheriff's Department and has increased and
the Sheriff's Department to acquire
increasing the need for
facilities and ` equi��aent necessary to provide sisch services; and
said owners are aware that4*. the county of Butte is
Wi;EREAS , '" N
funding to at quire such equipment and
studying methods to provide
by establishing developer; fees; establishirig an
faciii.ties
assessment d1strict, establishing Mello—Roos dis'-.:-icts, or some Y
funding mechanism to
s3.
inilarj fair, reasonable and appropriate
equipment and facil icy acquisition or to fund
f i nance such
environmental and other studies as may be deemed necessary to
`facilities and said
determine the needs for such equipment and
the imposition of such a fund 'ng mechanism
owners rer Lsgn ze that
of-,mechanisms will benefit their said property.
or commination
11 EREAS, said ou-nets wish to mitigate the, impact of 'their
�"= -snt's y to
the Sheriff Deparyabilit
proposed development on
adequate law enforcement services bait recogn ze that the
prom*ids
County of Sutte does riot at present ha�re such furring mechanisms
necessary to provide such
in glace or other adequate resources
mitictatiot
14OW, TiiEREFtO Xt said owners do hereby agree and consent as
follows:
lk Said owners consent to the establishment of such funding
of the
c; aois;,is agree not to protest aaainst establishment
their pro rata share theredy
Ana agree to pay
?` i . 5aId' cW s a5rde to cooperate and
Y
k3utte n obtai n i.ng the approvail„ of such ;funk ing mecw.-,,n sns from '
!” .Count p of Bute e the in the uni n;o.orporate.d. area of the
:
other property owners With
y t ���C area
4- 3. 'Said owners agree, prior to [recordation of their final
map,] [issuance of any building permit in c:onnect�on with or
related to their use permit] to pay' such. Sheriff Department
;act mitigation fees as may ,-be,,,,.*posed "bs,M an ordinance of }
.general application adopted by the Boar+ oaf,'":Supers*isars of the
.County of Butte as to discretionary land use entitlements
reviewed and approved by the Count� I is ►inderstc�c�d that such
fees shall be depos.�ted by he County in o a; separa;»s designated
county fund limited to use' f,Q„F the intended purposes of
;r,,itigating *pacts on the .' Sheriff'�s� Depart�ient and providing
oer_uipment and faciaities fora he,;Sher ff's )Department.,
N:
J
v ,w,
4. In consideration, #. e� ecoic and Cather good and
�
,,raluab� a consideration, the trn r igi a `owners expressly' agree
that the foregoing shall be an a4rd6men t running wi -h :.he land
and shall be binding upon their heirs and all successors in
interest o
DATE
(o r) --- (otYrser)
STATE OF CALIFOAX19
COUNTY OF am=
On r u7t 15,51 before me the undsw gned, a Notary
personally personally
n-io red
P lIc in and for, the State; of California,
. on he l;asxs of , satJ sfactoryiav d nce to be l
[i-'1 proved to [ a
the person (•� whose names are; subscribed `o the. 'within instrument
and acknowledged that tjiey executed. the same:
WITNESS 'my hand and official ;deal.
Signature
NV -,%e ( Typed or P-- inted)
sher . agrOFFIC
KATHM MO MARY
NOTAnV PUBIIC•CA!1foW4
MONFERV COUNTY
!�K�AbAMi+�1FE`i�id�WuU
CZ
COUNTY OF BUTTE
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
7 County Center Drive
Oroville, CA 95965
IJ
916) 538-7266
DATE; August 1, 1990'
SUP,JFJ'T: Riuc-'.d Climy - PXVISPD TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBF't(S)56 39--18 / 63-02-53
LOCATION: 4 parcels located on both sides of Ten Mile House Road approx.
1.5 miles.easterly of Hwy. 32 Forest Ranch t ea.
Attached are documents regarding, and a copy of, the above-des :gibed tentative
map for your, review. l you have any suggestions, additions or reearrimendations
concerning this project, please return them to this office no later than
AugUgt 22, 1990
Very truly yours,
William Cheff
Director of Public Works
i,
k,iMefldons'a
Director
JM/k k
attachriients
f cc IPlanning Dept.
;'Environmental Health. Dept.
Eore"otry 1)ept and .; . Ciaig Carter
Butte Co, Sheriff
Pacific 8e11_
Butte Co Mosquito Abatement p, Co.Penn ng C,, pry
Chico Unified School. District kN��iteC�•l�1as~rd�
Dept. of Fish and CameAUG Qn.
s
WO
�g
Cal Tr C)MV11lei C:al t6Mt&
Lb 1i' s114on► a
3
6. (4/80) ort'
\„
1 i ,,q.
1
Sr'A•TE-'OF CALIFORNIA—THE RESOURCES#CYi GEORGE DEUK/iIEJ1AN, 'Govamur
r 09POTMENT OF ,FISH AND GAME-
K"e'ION 2
AtAW 4NIMBUS ROAri,° SUITE A
Rr(SV V10 CORDOVACALIFORNIA 95670 n
X16) 35 -7020
August 6` 1 9,90
Mr. John Mendonsa, Assistant
Butte County
Department of Public Works
7 County Center
Oroville, CA 95965
Dear Mr . Menionsa
The Department of Fish and Garrir.� (t •?G) has reviewed the Richard
r
Cherry Tentative Parcel Map (T#M) N p proposal to divide 168 acres
into two 40 and two 44 -acre p;� ce y, Located in A.P.56-39-18 and
A.P. 63-02-53, the TPM is split, b.� I,,ttle Chico Creek near, Ten :.Mile
House.
A survey for rare plants should be conducted by a qualified
botanist at the appropriate Name bt; year. Known to occur in the
local area are Sidal:cea rob, -6 ..&, ,A abis breweri var. austi nae,
Po;lvcxonum b dwelliae, and cit-h.:r r�aie species may be present if
any rare plants are found, the fo:'i.lowing mitigation measures should
be lmposp ,4 on the TPM
i - blish a minimum !-' •foot buffer zone around each
" pl&nt pop lation to prevent disturbance. s
No alteration of
exa,sting drainages, including
2. :no
artificial runoff ivbd na,[;,ural drainages containing
rare plants
1.
3. Construction of bar.,•`iers to prevent trampling damage
to rare species by ;:oot or vehicular traffic.
4. No livestock grazi.r;,q .in t:;Ye vicinity of rare plant
populations.
established along Little Chico Creek.
The setback
sk should
DFG ds that c
w back should commence
from the outside edge of any ri',,arian wetland vegetation.
The applicant shouldbe advised that work within the 1 00 -year
floodplain consisting
o, but not limited to diversion or
Obstruction of the natura.,i, flow or changes in the clannei bed
cr bank of any rive{.� st>r :am, or lake, Will regquire iroti:ftcation
to the DFG as required by Fish ;:end Game Code Section 1600 et se
The notification (with .ree), and subsequent agreement, must be q�
compleLod prior to initi.aztinq ahy such work. Notification to the
DFG should be made after the project is approved by the lead
specific mi.tigati.onemeasu:eesstoshe uincl.udedeassconditi.onsU of
of
project approval, by the lead agency.
a
1�, 1 §- ' 1��yr ` w� a �.'y t�flF,, .
d l� 1�j
nr� 1 .a✓ is `.i ,ne6'. 1�.133 I I \ t. 1.� � .�',dl 411
d' �� � i '� ��. •J' afY wd�� Y, �...1t��Y�; �i;�r���-,;,;�1 ���,�'.r-j.�jh' �" �.
��g, J. f � �y, k4-,- b�{"'1!' � ♦ i) a�� �',I� �ICt' /� t/7J�/-}�j.n„ y t�,'.. � � �.,�: ''y tY p.
,w.l+a }�. ...� .,:f Yx/9x3. 'l u i����� �!I 9 rs� t, � r�lR°: �E � /� .�`� ��✓�� �r �"� P N �,
! } ( rr� � i a 1 � � r✓� 0 �,� � (, 1
. r�a� I �Cff' Y� `y �� � �d� �� �tt*_�I i J� . � i � ; �. ^li�1 >�! t � � ,�� � �' .rig ,�,r✓��^'y' `,^,�fr,r, I /
� f ^ X' ✓t � is r � -
�µ
Y 1 / 3�+
t• �"_ J�, � r a
,l a 9Yi ' '7F
. �. �. ...ten-•...+a.c� f
.,
t , I •� �' ,� �, � a . ,. a -1. r I � x/ � ✓✓ ��l1,�y/ ! 1.
a� F �� � ' d � � � � '�� � I,, �� � ! ���� I/ ,1 �. � N 1 ��a fl��� �Y l ���C� i �� •��� �� a'�op'a� ! �r p ._
P , 'i � 8 '1 i70':4 �'i� i E �� � Y •�I. � � � V.. K 1 6: ff
u j ,rlo
29,
,. ,er,,,r ✓ t .� " ..�. .h� ) y �iY'i ,9�[ 11 °"x' I t ����1 '� ,,'I t 1� ,�.,�-�''�
�' � � ��+w4.' �"�a1��5 I .t �yjfJJ.j))'��ll ✓ •�_' i .� ���.
aul'I��I ✓YZ �R�� k�'�yt;Y?. 9�
9 � j •��,. A � , � !!1� 1 �I I; ���j �I, ./a'� -Y�1 � by .' y1 ��
1i<w-�`�",y 11
tt<
� A ^ �•: niJ 1 { . �, ," a i � � � �a -� �"( I `*� �'�
1
d. R t -.„3" r I , •W " ^' C ;H t i✓�,!'' ' - _� „ r wJl h,.„; , v
"� �.aG,1 wa ✓ '' i` �I � � 1 "� l� ,� y�� I n'� 9'� 1 � � ''AyA�;` t a4 ;1'� � Y
� •y [I'f. Y. .121 .w. �' 'r ."�" Jr��i� d �d,�'r �1 rrYb' "� i' ( 4 f"+� a ... r.
Al
1
u
Jt Y�+I
� b� "nG w�S` � ��" � �� �� 1 ,. �l '�� �� Y' C��f r'I' � ' �• � �IGt�e I 4 � �
,i, ✓.1 vti.. dr j/ r ✓',1 -7
�r 1 u n• �° Y, �� i M.✓ 11 f b I f�
°y,.� � �.' r. (', 1 +!`�(iW ✓ (/' I .�N, x J t f I � �".�� �.I �,.5-'p� C
✓. :N >��` "�--+�' .,i, �1i,'.4 "t. !� r ' !/ ��r x�' � �t"'-�" ilia. iy n� � jt. i' '7.�:.
WPM
«.wltb a e�✓;n". �ti 'r o �rx I y t _ .11 �� y �ai 1��7
,�.�al'
•
k � �.o.
..�..�� a��._....,l�y. W,�'-`1�,. ,•m'< ¢ � � �'�� in r " , ( ii 4s" �+�t "`����Jyl. I` t
p y
IX
D I lilU % Aj f rr��� add aak 1
Y
yria � v I J
S l
r
Y r
1 Y r
� ur
�' ' �� JJY ;1 "w♦. 'I ' �, k + 1 "� f 1 A . F Y � r� � 1 �'�
� � ���f a C"Cj ,�.. �' a4 _.'-"-iyk Yr� r•�� �+�� �f" «� �.� � � "r,, ` � � ��,�
. () 6 ✓✓J f
I h
R. Cherry Property Plan! Survey 2
SURVEY FOR SENSITIVE, RARE, OR ENDANGERED SPECIES OF VASCULAR
PLANTS-4 CONDUCTED MARCH 30, AND APRIL 14 1991, ON 268 ,ACRES OF
PROPERTY QjINED BY RICHARD CHERRY, LOCATED IN PORTIONS OF THE
SOUTH HALF OF SECTIONS 3.6 AND ,31, PARADISE WEST QUADRANGLE 7.5'
TEN,MILF; HOUSE ROAD, NORTHEAST OF CHICO, BUTTE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA
A. Habitat
The project property lies prima.i,ly within a Foothill 'Wood-
Land habitat, but portions of the site ih- lude Chaparral and
Riparian habitats. The Chaparral portion is along the western
edge, and the Riparian habitat is associated with Little IChico
Creek, which flows from north to south near the center of the
site. The land slopes steeply to the east between the present
dirt road and the n.,`ek, and then steeply to the west on the
eastern side of thu. creek.
Access to the property is via Ten Mile House Road, which
intersects with California State Highway 32 about ten miles north
of Chico, and enters the western boundary toward the southwest
corner. A power line cuts across the Western margin, and there
is an existing house, with associated buildings and structures,
toward the center of the western half of the site. Except as t
noted, and for remnants of ,an old trail, the habitats appear to
have suffered little disturbance,in recent years
Foothill 3aoodland
Foothill lu7odland habitats are characterized by the
dominance of blue oaks and digger pines, both of which axe 'pre"
sent, The blue oaks far outnumber the digger pines on this par-
ticular property, however. on the dates of the field survey, the
following additional identifiable plant taxa associated.with
Foothill, Woodland were observed: biscuit root, buttercup, ,blue
dicks, fiddleneck, valley sky lupine, clover, bunch grass,
pha,celia, oak mistletoe, dove's foot geranium., miner's lettuce,
yellow star tulip, Hartwog's odontostomum, California knotweed,
Nittall's bedstraw, foothill collinsia, spring vetch, Bette
checker, squawbush, poison oAk, yellow mariposa, bi'rd's 'eye
qiliaj grass nuts, Canyon nemophila, petty athysanus, fwingepod,
purple 8aniclej snakeroot, sanicle, snowberry, clarkia bicolored
linanthus, coyote mint, pipevine, western hound's tongue, Indian
pirik, sierra gooseberry,, snub pea, small.-flowered lc+°.,.a twining
brodiae a Chinese lanterns, needle grass, bird's fo;, Fern, beg
-
gg and
Chaparral
As previously indicated, some Chaparral habitat, which is
characterized by the presence of often dense shrubbery inter
�1
R. Cherry Property --Plant Survey 3
spersed with grassy openings, occurs toward the western boundary
of the property. Plant taxa observed on the dates of the survey
y' include scrub oak, whiteleaf manzanita, Parry manzanita, poison
oak, interior live oak, pitcher sage, yarrow, silver r
hair rass-
g
western morning glory, buckbrush, deerbrush, California soaproot:,
chaparral clematis, dudleya, yerba santa,, hairy -flowered
eriogonum, woolly sunflower, fawn lily, Fremont's silk tassel
bush., valley goldfields, bird's foot fern, goldback fern.,
Hooker's plantain, California coffeeberry, redberry, Hansen's'
clubmoss, Hartweg's tauschia, narrow -leaved mule ears, and
others.,
Riparian habitat
A band of riparian habitat (habitat associated with bodies
of water) borders Little Chico Creek4 on the dates of the field
survey, the followi�a vascular plant taxa were observed in the
riparian sector: big leaf maple, blackberry, white alder,
'incense cedar, pond!-4;+;+sa pine, douglas fir, sedge, Indian'
r1lubeirb, California polypody,, California maidenhair fern, much--
wort, California grape] rush, and Oregon ash.
IntroducedSpecies
Although the site is relatively undisturbed, a few non-
native species were nevertheless observed scattered throughout
the area, These included horehound, shepherd's purse, yellow
star thistle, cutleat geranium, shorardiaj everlasting pea, rip-
ut brome bur clover, bedstraw, and others.
3 r , ,
Bt. Sensitlyo 522Lcies
Published by the nN Vascular l?lanc.�a of
The Invertt"or Californiaia Nati��e. Plane__ rw..
Calitorrtia �` of Rare and iandan 5` a in `
September, 1988, lists for Butte County some 5l a. that..ar
� taxa that are
considered sensitive to varying �:legrees. Many of the takcj„are
also on, or candidates for, fedex'Jal anti stai:e lists of such
plants:
The sensitive species most likely to occur at this
partic*il.ar sit a include Butte County checker (Sidalcea �rob� usta
Bidwell,'! knotweed (Polygonumribidwell ae) opposite-?eaved
calycadenia (Calycacenias_ a,
tia), and possibly But
to
Fritillary (ritillaria eastwoodias), althoughother li t1Wed
taxa
such Mart's whitlow wort (Paronychia ahartii) ,
also poten--
tially could occur here:
Several species on state and federal. ,list•.s of sensitive or
rare and endangered vascular plants have previously beeii reported
from areas within a few miles of the project site. most,
however, are associated with special habitats such as vernal,
pools, which are not present at this location.
R. Cherry Property --Plant Survey 4
The field survey was conducted at the ideal time for the
location of sensitive species that potentially could occur on the
Site. Several populations of Butte Checker (Sidalcea robusta.)
were discovered. This particular taxon is listed in the'CNPS
Inventory as being "rare and threatened or endangered in
California and elsewhere." The species tends to occur in slopes i
With slight depressions through which rainwater trickles during
the wet season. One such microhabitat containing Butte checker
plants is located about 0.3 mile northeast of the power line that
marks the western boundary of the property. The slight swale
crosses the dirt road from roughly north to south, plants being
present on both sides of the road. Another relatively large pop-
ulation is: scattered from above the road all the way down to the
creek toward the northern boundary, and a few other patches occur
in between.
An attempt was made to delineate the margins of the popula-
tions with white plastic tape so that the surveyors could pin-
point the :location when a more detailed map of the property is
prepared. There was insufficient tape to delimit all of the
plants,, however, and although additional tape could have been
obtained, the practicality of this particular identification pro-
cedure became questionable during a subsequent visit when it
appeared that some of the tape had been removed. At this junc-
time it appears that the locations will need to be pinpointed on
a more detailed map when it become available.
C. Mitigations
As long as the natural runoff of precipit3ti()n is not
impaired, the populations should be protected by a surrounding
minimum setback zone of ten feet. Should the road need to be
widened or relocated at any time it might be possible to
transplant the roadside clumps to similar nearby swales, but the
process would need to be monitored to determine if the plants
survived the transplanting. When such mitigations are permitted
by environmental agencies, recent Policies appear to be :;Fared
towavd no .net loss of numbers of plants in this particular
category of` sensitivity. Butte checker is a perennial, and even
thouh the
g P ng of seeds to propagate the plant would .be
relatively simple, it would not be known for at least three years
if such propagatIon at a given location would be effective,
R. Cherry Property—Plant Survey
5
CHECKLIST OF
VASCULAR PLANTS THAT WERE OBSERVED
AND IDENTIFIABLE ON THE DATES OF THE FIELD SURVEY
SCIENTIFIC NAME
COMMON NAME
Acer macrophyllum
Big leaf maple
Achlllealanulosa
Yarrow
Adtantum%ordanil
California maidenhair
Aesculus californica
California bunkeye
Aira caryophyllea
Silver hairgrass
Allium amplectens
Paper onion r
Alnus rhombifolla-
White alder
Amsinckla intermedia
Fiddleneck
Arctostaphylos manzanita
Parry manzanita
Arcrostaphylos visclda
Whiteleaf manzanita
Arenaela californica
California sandwort
Aristolochla californica
Pipevine
Artemisla douglasli'
Mugwort
Athysanus pusi'llus
Petty athysanu
Bromus diandrus
R
Ripgut
Calocedrus decurrens
Incense cedar
Calochortus albus
Chinese lanterns
Calochortus luteus
Yellow mariposa
Calochortus monophyllus
Yellow star tulip
Calysteg a occidentalis
Western morning glory
Capsella bursa-pastoris
Shepherd's purse
Cardamine oligosperma
Bitter cress
Carex sp.
Sedge
Ceanothus cuneatus
Buckbrush
Ceanothus Integerrimus
beerbrush
Centaurea solstitlals
Yellow star thistle
Cercls occidentalis
Western reobud
Chlorogalum pomeridianum
California soaproot
Cirsium to,
Thistle
Clarkia so,
Clarkla
Claytonla-pertoliata
Miner's lettuce
Clematis fasiantha
Chaparral clematis
Collinsla sparsifiora
Foothill collinsia
Crassula tillaea
Pigmy weed
Cynoglossum grande ' ,
Western hound's tongue
Cynosurus echinatus
Dogtali grass
bichelosternma pulchellum
Blue dicks
Dichelostemma volubile
"twirling brodlaea
Dudleya cymosa
Canyon dudieya
Eragrostis curvula
Bunchgrass
Eriodictyon callfornicum
Yerba santa
Erlogonum nudum
Hairy-flowered eriogomm
Erlophyllum ianatum
Woolly sunflower
Erodlum brachycarpum
Big heronbill
Erodium cicutarlum
Red-stemhed filatee
Erythronlum inottiscapoldeum
raven lily
1=raxinus atifoila
Oregon ash
l
R Cherry Proparty--Plant Survey
6
SCIENT,tFIC NAME
COMMON INIAME
Galium aparine
Common bedstraw
Galium nuttallii
Nuttall's bedstraw
Garrya fremonti
Fremont's silk tassel bush
Geranium dissectum
Cutleaf geranium
Geranium ,"nolle
Dove's foot geranium
Gllia tricolor
Bird's eye gilia
Iris macrosiphon
Wild iris
Juncus sp.
Rush
Lasthenia californica
Valley goldfields
Lathyrus latifolla
Everlasting pea
Lathyrus sulphurous
Snub pea
Lepechinia calycina
Pitcher sage
Linanthus bicolor
Bicolored linanthus
Lomatlum dasycarpum
ssp, tomentosurrm
Woolly lomatium
Lomatium utriculatum
Biscuit root
Lotus micranthus
Small-flowered lotus
Lupinus bicolor
Bicolored lupine
Luphous vallicola
Valley sky lupine
Marrubium vulaare
Horehound
Micropus callfornicus
Slender cottonweed
Microster s graci is
Beggar gilia
Monardella villosa sspy sheltonii
Sheiton's coyote mint
Muhlenbergla riga
Bunch grass
Nemophila heterophyfla
Canyon nemophifa
Odontostomum hartwegil
Hartweg's odontostomUm
Orthocarpus erianthus
Johnny tuck
Pellaea mucronata
.Bird's toot fern
Peltiphyllum peltatum
Indian rhubarb
Pentagramma triangularis
Goidback fern
Phoradendeon villosum
Oak mistletoe
Pinu, ponderosa
Ponderosa pine
Pinus sabiniaha
Digger pine
Plaglobothrys austinae
Austin's popcorn flower
Plagiobothrys nothotuIVus
Common popcorn flower
Plagiobothrys tenellus
Slender popcorn flower
Plantago hookeriana
Hacker's plantain
Poa sp.
Bluegrass
Polygonum califorhicum
California knotweed
Polypodium callfornicurn
California polypody
Pseudotsuga menziesit
Douglas fir
duercus douglasii
Blue oak
Ouercus dumosa
Scrub oak
Quercus kelloggii
California black oak
Ouercus wislizent
Interior live oak
Ranunculus occidentalis
Western buttercup
Rhamnus californica
California coffeeberry
Rhamnus crocea ssp. , cltolla
Redberry
Rhus trilobata
Squawbush
I
A Cherry. Property Plant Syurv!gy
7
SCIENTIFIC NAME
COMMON NAME
Ribes roezli
Sierra gooseberry
Rubus ursinos
Blackberry
Sanicula arctopoldes
Sanide
Sanicula blpinnata
Snakeroot
Sanicula,blpinnatlflda
Purple sanicle
Saxifraga califomica
California saxifrage
Selagfnella hansenll
Flansen's spikemoss
Senec:lo vulgars
Gid man of spring
Sherardla arvensis
Sherardla
.31dalcea robusta
Butte checker
Sltene callfornica
Indian pink
Stachys stricta
Hedge nettle
Siipcm sp.
Needle grass
Symphorlcarpos albus
Snowberrrl
Taur,chla hartwegil
Hartweg's tauschia
Thy,sonocarpus curvipes
Fringepod
Toxicodendron diversflobum
Poison oak
Trifollvm sp.
Clover
Tritelela laxa
Grass nuts
U'mbellularia calitornica
California bay
Vicla sativa
Spring vetch
Vitht callfornica
California grape
Wyothla angustifolia
Narrow -leaved mule ears
x.ncxsl y `R: Stern
Field Botany Gonsul.ta;rat
Department of Biological sciences
C&1if-ornia. State University
ClUdo; �:A 95929-05151
(916) 898-5381 or 343'iw0056
i`
W
•
F777 7
r-. 17
, 1 , I " 1. I I
Af 894
'21
fl 41
✓
o
flay a
'000
Ile r
100's
Ile
aj
S,
too"
A,
VI
Nauss,
00 ............ . . . I.
'o
JJL . . .......
h atx L•e o' 4 e ,e- f, z ,-ca ty I i t t I E?
-pop,
-..t-,n=r was contactvd
the purpo,�-.i� o �amducting al a r c ru. 1 o q i C a I suelyley of
Properties wi-lthv�; 1-it.4.1s Chico Cree'' Canyt.- s=heduled ITIOrlot
splittihq into 4uut- poa-cels and possible dev,.-'-Ir-lment. This request
was in response to a letter to the Countfrom the Cali4otYnia
A-chavological. Information CeIntOr at i--ali;or-nia State
University Ltiicc. ro,48eding actibm. , 4- eeanrd seavth was
'd octed by the con te". While !-Pc',ordq envealsd
resk-'Cu
Ito—'s witItl" Yf= ;H:Crcper't,, �eao-b�
and C-- wo,-- a
sen%JUv�F, nvee. e.�4 6 cultiyat tto
action (see atta;�IkCe -,et!.t-:rj
'
Ub ' "
T110 e, jLIICLt pro�PEWty :4 S - 1,DCate8 in a pOr'.- 04 the SiE, 1,14 Of
Section 36, T* A2� N ., R,, 2 E. and portions o4 Lote. 3 amd 4. in
Section 31o T. 25 N. 75 E4 ly thiie is
a canyom and torracevLc-tting with local +Iat!z and ridges. U t -t I e.
1.7,hito Creek is a pL-rmatent stream. and' thetIlb is A recent' -y" devorloped
Permanent Sprioq On tt-m, Ptoperty- veg"pta tion is a mosaic a -F
rhnnar-rel, oak and ripaolian comihunities. 'The zometime�,
thick brush ehade, ct..t?raqe of locializat arrvas ver'y difficult,
s,omet esimpossibl'o.
.ho property was %-urvp-re with qom-mrally b,"ark and forth moanderihc
i,o the 30 to 75 rt zoaced rampe, zjmmLttI'mes closer, SGMetiMt�S a
little;,, t'urthLw aotWt to t��raln and vegetatiot, conditions. The
l Styes sue-veyad wi this tLho e;, r c v l a re, x I I us tea ted cam the
inap. SpeL.41 at' omko" t4as r�aTd to ridne tops, 41ats�O
,1"r�d along the west Littik� ;'.n!-atj Cre!L-outcrops and
L ---Vi And milling
,iA+s were al -- 4cr rz;:�shelt
't-atjees. No '-.urvc,-y W:3s om thoso poortorts
of Parcelt 2,, -' afid 4 ta the east c4 Little Chico trusek,.
j
Su"'VLmy VAs `"rear) kv'orm si,ivs. Nlsws prtzvidE�'d
b�, SiorrA West S)�Irv*d, I a lexatt the parcel., a, t u r o S 0 ;
the laoidscapef bott, kAnd naturaIt and use *+ a commas',,-
ai�,Jf-d im idmntt4yr,,t-, c+m-tho-,r4round ldttivm. Vegotation cova-r
viD
Ivnt -uiAo riablL� el fleo "atie
nb%erva t .,
Cwcae aillcj?,4 t c r ta
r.
I l iGiS P atE?d 1'Jtl the :%f .7, Ci Ttke1[3ofi 4.3ti,-ed
dorinq the, survey for or-` t ina n t r4 t y 04
.D'u l" i iN rv., t . ' N G t" �.«. I F c1 � 1 �'i: ' 1 i f t i. 1 y r t a J • Ir: I
was .3
a� . t W
tj a�krld reC.:a" .i« w
4 ..'' :'i'!*'laahPd) car*al }i.'"+ .. ;a, i'- a;r.� Q�:.�'..�w't•". ,
u
lovat-e:' C'-' the accofr'p6
at-+91c oedv-oclr mortars
field
'� Cts I '_ ,. "'1;,. i. n a a i.. ,
r•; t kr, • " '+ a+ C; 'ter 9, 't a a p p C? c
N _ cE w
t,OT.,»" ; he5e various F;C' _1 site r �
Oi:ckSr^cat3.Q'-fa-1dePCs its1 ep_!�tLi 'w
of tut-a,l ramta3 ns. , nc bted- in the,r`"It 9 ;+ orr 'h..ico St_ I' x --e
e
is a eepor-t of five ll�ret`l strar'.:uc %tikes tFaa!t might be i,: :'+
vicinity. Thele are quare evidently not wt t.hirt the area skarvesre-ef
and may be i,ti t(siated acro„s the crinel.: or dOtNristream whet*e t nL;3re
lower terraiires :adjoining thel cre "k,
'sen Mile Hoose Trail l w' i.hin the m a , tae mare thy. EV*, , c p -s
o� age and ttou ld be coht.1i&Vred 'tit{:„"; r .µr . Howelv,,. + µ -:.S
uhdoijbted l y beilvn and cont ir"Jes to Sad. ' )'�_-- r�c nodi # z oad
or citral S:.'on%,tr,-u_"t1.on Tlwie e'>,ixstin,.: h' "" w,-.* _-es ar` the
appeav” to be 1p%s than 50 jotal-s olc Vic! i"'Istoria ~gigr 1c'.� e
From an attthlydjbological, per's -peat . t 211 puzzlina what tl is
ri
Parcel does 99o°tt exhibit v'one ab of -'4n 'lal twsm" e:.pecial ly w * ^, a
Spring and peb`ar":!!hent; strewn+ ;pr+esent � This apDc� rs to be ,a ca t:r ual
ute area -Por iFdrager-s gathlwing , anprose isiog acbrns or siTrtlar T'
Plant peoducts, and undertawc,�;at,;; a little hur, tz nrl: Settlement: is not
evident wid it npa,y simply hkthat had not- expanded to
the point wtlier,�l1 this wad, � %uital' le r`,a itatidre locale. Also, the
stream has, rxa.iiI;I,y steep sided in tNs 'location and the Indians r,.:ay
have preferred' t►Itream- cie I*�i,ati,tatiom a little downstream whL-�•e Ilk
lower terracas Iottre pr'osent.
l3asr d on the arm1haeolog t"a: nolo not ft:,+el that thLt—e a -°e
archaealoi�ical *.4luee pwa 1: 4hri .a°`t ant +Urther investILIStlon
prior to p r y pa,rt;Jal split re i.rW t. _ .. ., Howevery .a r.of'L r1
bV placed on this lr g tlt no
struc_tu„ S area,��low t „'_ -..'"..,u C<'. m n4' the critII tJ
archagt,,olL3hsca_l �l �Larar►�� ..".cv- Mc r lst� at -"Y qtiostibh regar'-'arc_
this, su.rVty I k,an be rea nuc"' at address,
. ~ , I��� .', /� � ill` i, �1�i ,... :��, i, �•,".--... a„
flyy f
IJ
00'ARTMENT Oi 9AAKSS ANO RECREATION S00044nae Y
ARCHEOLOGICAL SITE RECORD Cherry #1
4>, ()*$4`M Cherry Bedrock Mortars
t. r. butte
2, scso,..:; Paradise West PS 1980 (151__,pnw«�:wa no
3, UTMCa 4,wt: Za * 10 , 611330 �.�,�, 4406240 Noma r ,
-
23N 2�4 �
NE_ M CA Y. x at PI-4x er SE x air s.�t:a, 36 a_� t�� NO c ,
}3
y[ E 1060 t
S. A4wp Ccwtd:.%&IQC- `� MMS l�q t„(40"t NW mfvwrwr 0"so0 4. Ega-vo.
Little Chico Creek. Canyon--From Chico take M4Y 32: east to
r' first: turnoff pas Santos rive gr"'va�e r�)--ca_ a a"`"rTMau ZIL po��rc
1548 proceed into canyon on gravel/dirt road 1.4 miles ontilt eachin.g d rt
`-roan—'turn` or o Kou wes roceE5 own is road a au 'VL(3'eLtt 7.
"_ g g p J
r'�ac.rzn large basalis outcrop, and fence unction:, Site. is on backside
OUtErop n"
ry
L r4.h, o-,ic X r.•eat«;t• Pr0ICPh; wk 9. SheD�fix�tstio.t, Flat Slab of basalt on
easterly edge of large outcrop.. Flat slab contains three bedrock morta s
and, hogs ble mi l7 ng slick-.
h
2� 4 .��. �► o.t e s timat16n t .�
�� , a•�a: _ s.�ca 'A bedrock features
Mortar 11oles are between three aha 5 cm. deep .arid approxi
.. 10 cm in diamter. Slick is about 30 cm across. Mortar holes are �A
about 2q cm apart.
a
t2. Ante nonem. _.
node
y ,
.ErrT, Ritter
!' ta. lttbd 8Yt' t
� a
zr, A►tr�+t%.,.e.:titw.Reddin�.y CA _ t i
� pf Gllfotnto -'nc R•.uu+c+a wv
.00AMUEW Of PARKS M40 neCnEAVON C'w*r Wife" Trit� � 4
ARCHEOCOGICALSiTi+RE,00 RD
Terry NuR 6W.-
ft". 2 -0_ ,. ra. Cher_ ry Bedrock Mortars
Ili. sj" Int.Viq. C- xc e'I en s.
20, aw..uw.�.. ter,., spring circa 130 m PINE t
M_ L.rGaBiOerOfwnw WiNk4w IkmftyP,, ola: Tittle Chico (Creek 400 m East
l
�
f
zz. V—wmd- "d+hy, : lave oak, 'blue oak; poison oa � I
l
c
squawbush, grey pine (sane)
�- Vpa�tio� Coxxrr�aetty f.�, dbxt:
none
Rd.to�ess lot n6o.s•
i
{
24. s•*saA: 'bedrock 5 gravelly loamy-tan
t basaYE
2$., G4Y PliOCenVOlcanl-cs Canyon, ;outcrop
_ - •e --
'swo:: virtually flat { �_ south and, east
F.
i
y
.gin: -+R* r4t:1 ,,,, Richard Cherry—owns land :and has a temporary
residence and leesee at site but lives in Bay area
'
211, n,l„A,_rid midden noted—very little aoor7,ginal evidence in area--a fe`
�
other isolated tRMSL and a chopper-like took. within 300m
none
_ r
Cherry_ Parcel Split =a-APYrL 63.02-52 & 53, APS 56-39-181
iit/a #r I. L90-4
mow.
a::•
r,
-
24. rn�cO�,; systematic archaeoloeical survey
>,
I� x
none
r t
�
�
r�c�tte
a
37. Oi3 kil+ +6Et.,
.w.
i
r « ,
..� .1�. M�_.. ,._; , , .;.:. ,+til . ,.. .`� ^,+•, it
{ +caea� d Cattk�r.rw—'i'irR ewe Ii�g.rocp.
ARCHEOLOGICALSITE ,LOCATION "�' rT• `",
t,1AP° Pres `Cherry
`�•F- Cherry Bedrock Mortars
Y rY+: i�l : � i r . r. ��' ` „✓ �r �/�....�. � Pe+yy � .re'ri�': �%
124
-. ,.. ..�«'k..r+,t IJ/f � `7. �` .M ;!/, ✓%J,/x�. �. 'r `v!� "�xse•.rs4td, r,,++rsp ��
M ARADISE
WEST QUADRANGLE r�,s9 .�,•"�� v �� , � �� ,",� .�,,"-
CALIFORNIA-8 UTTE CO.
�.
7.5 f4lNUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC) .xt�r ,r
n, SW/4 PhALnREE t7'.�a:J�CH'A:tgtE .. "`,
X'1455 �' � s'" e � � �..`.._—..-..y-._--i—=•
✓' w : 1'ri% 7" r' ; e +.
",'"�" a' I + i � � n� rirC i(1 p + � � r '+....� `.,,�ti,'� + 11.y',�\. fr i � ,,rr » ••+� I
/tl r✓n� rite '� r f k " I`� F r jtF`. f � �y+✓" "/ , 1
vz
,� � � JJ/ � ♦ rJr" �. • �S Y ♦1 �ift �i� � 't \ ani , Y I` 't�I' a,'/
,V1
� �."" � � M � J ! �/' w � �,-�,. f �✓ 7 .r.' � � 1 1. /y j� ��i ,.. ��''`J a
Iff
jig
L
T +rr.` ar ,�/ s rte...: w._ ,.=:. ♦ �1 � "*e �. I � 'i �(�I j�! f.i
r
p f � � jf 11 l 7.{ � , `".Y` r `' _ � i F x 17 r}(� �.'�� /` Y t � i✓''"« 1 ,+ "t
► r�. .+��t/)/) .�. �"� � tar's a B� `� 1 ��.� 1 Jf ���t „�r � t - '
}� i1 l�Y��"Iw�f ' d 31, '� �° w •"r '�%�� i� /� �ft(� to♦"t" <..,.r +� ,� i
W, l x F d !�' �/li. r/\,/�,y d► • Y ♦ rr " ''X/ J/J1j r {) r ♦1 (�., � �� " .
/!!! � er �h r Ai%'r•./`r' :..`F.'�/ r «`�• ;\` '�-ir 1 •r _ ell,.. " t'L. :':�r•. "Y \"'c �".•°�.
�J'/ e/'~r � ,r� l� /"/r� � • I �J/ (►y+, 7y `4,} f " � �, Y �r Yr, '" � A 1. � �"_..\�`�•�.Y \ �.+: "P i# i� a7
-x y
• ' . 42< An♦ r""_'*4. }.. � rs53 ft r*•.., �r W � r,�/ 4�t r, ����� "����,r�� �t
i r%/ � ' /`�, � tl j � + :. y t rye ... �, /,.) . I 1 '��—.r!•l \;t` �., �". a
�j � r f+f� 1 .. .. • Yr : i L;r't v r� `���.�. r 7 r r '� ri� ♦ � I � � i ,\`llv�'t r r a
!/ { _� � r �X \ry14 �, , 6 '1 �'r�' 4�� � �1�� Cr�vS•�'� ii�r�..:' td,%r'
, n
" }
p
ry Z
... ,iir
-:� ..
o - X90- C.. ,
a1? .CIO
ASEMENT AREA l
he easement area has two separate easements.
asement A is actually a full taking as it occurs with very limited
ights remaining to the property owner.. Easement A consists of 3.5
cres (streamside and instrean habitat in a linear configuration)
rea A is described as Little Chico Creek on a loo foot wide strip
f land running along each side of the -Creek. Within Easement A,
o dwellings, barns or other structures shall be built. Vegetation
ill riot be altered in any way or means on the property contained.
this deed. Items not ,
Y _ to be Permitted include cutin or mowing,
u_ltivating, grazing, harvesting good products, burning, placinc,
re;Euges, waste, chemicals, diverting or effecting the natural
low of -underground waters; into, within or out of the easement
seas,,
asement area H consists of the remainder of the property which is
pprdkimately 162.1 acres. In easement area E construction will.
e limited to one resident per 40 acres. No grazing will be
llowed and copping will, be allowed only for don;estic use. No tree
ver six inches in diameter at brew;, height maybe removed except
or :oad access and residential. construction;.
IGHEST AND BEST USE'
is parcel is unimproved and has a highest and best use as a'
ecreational: homeste.
•
to )reef, 2- 13 -�o 6S 1) Ot'ldllT6 5erv('e'0
rc
1'r ? ae N 0 (a, e-1 L'L5 4�r �JrICLL
3 LL e5 it+LrA
P
c'e�L
See. Govcrinm'wt) t0 J, 3 e, « f' �
: f �l
-+./. '� `ice- r ��-^ .a'✓ln�
R
IY l
N' 444 1 1
year --
A unt
LAND QF NATURAL 'WEARTH AND BEAUTY
�►� " DEPARTMENT OF PUi3LIC HEALTH
DIVISION OP 'ENVIRONMENTAL HEAI,.TH
Add:eys 196 Mornoriol Way 0 7 County Confer DrIYo 0 747 EII(ot1 Road
Chico, Collfornlo 95925 oroville. Colifornia 95965 paradise, Colifottrla 95969
Ror Iy to Teiophonot 916/891.27.7 T'oloohone., 9161'5;18-7201 Velephonet 916%872.6308
September 13'. 1:990
Richard Cherry RM Richard Cherry Parcel Map
10 Via Contenda, #D Teli Mule House. Rd., ?6rest Ranch
Carmel Valley, CA 93924 AP4W 56-39»18 St 63-02--53
Dear Mr, Cherry:
This department has advised the Butte County Department of Public Works,
Ladd Devel.opmert Section, that we are prepared to act on the Above application.
Based on present information, we can recommend approval or conditional
approval
Recommended Conditions for A rpm oval
1. Provide a 100' leachfiel.d free setback around existing wells either within
the property or with rl 100' of the proper'.y boundaries.
2, dhow a 1001 leathfield setback .from the highwater line of I -;e creek:
3. 5'hota a 100' l.eadhfield setback From the spring aro+a,
4,Prove
hkk rethere quantitates of domestl-. watbr arrls- availAble or
I � 9
p ;gyp that sitates V,Ilhera is no 6,vidltnce ti-mt domestic
water" is available for paiscels (NOIX- 40 -afire parcels).
YOU
y g g r ase �cotttact the Chid
Ifc�tl have
� an riseationst i.+ 'e ard�.n thi;:, letter, p
le
of fi.ce.
Sincerely,
Thomas Ro-id'R , E. - S y
5uves otiofEnvironmental health 8pelr
ialzat
Di�.a..n
cc. Public tJorke,
Planting L
Sierra West 5urveyir►f;
r,
J6
Wite coun
(URAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY
1,PLANNING DEPARTMENT
7 COUNTY C.ENTER'iDRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397
TELEPHONE: (916) 538-7601
September 17, 1990,
Thomas R. P7rinkle
Sie7,ra West Surveying
5431' Black Olive. Drive
Paradise, 'California 95965
6
Ret TPM for Richard: Cherry AP# 56-39-18 and 63-02-53
Dear Tams
After ] eVidWillg your resgfle=+t' for a Mitigated Negative Declaration!
for the Richard Cherry Tentative Parcel Map prior to receiving a
Botanical SVrvey; I am sorry to ihfbrn you that the Botanical
Survey is regttired prior to making an env irorime>z ->al determination.
Cali Ornia Public Resources Code Section 1,5004 Subd. (b) requires
envird)hmdhta1 review occur as early as feasible in the planning
process. Furthermare, the California Supreme Court in Fullerton
Joint unified sohool, District vs. State Board cif' Eduieatiun ruled
that -all environmental review must precede the decision to approve,
the proj ect_, in the Reichard Chs,rry project, rare and endangered
plant species are known to exist within the vicinity Of the project
Oite. As suche a Botanical Survey becomes vital information to,
C-hclude whether an Environmental Impact; Report or a Negative
Declaration itt appropriate In addressing possible envirdnmer,tiil
effects caused by your IWOject
Without a 8(itanical Survey, specific information can not ,be
developed about bow t,' . project- may adversely affect the flora a,,id
subsequently, will be used in the decision making process t.o
approve off' deny your projoct, The Botanical. Survey will facilitate
the generation of concrete suyg�>stions Fs to how the projr-ct may
be modified to avoid significant' ehvironMentA l impacts rather than
hypothetical suggestions as your, request proposes.
��- 0
1A,CgNSFIi LAND SURVEYINslow
GT-M
07 Black Olive Drive - Paradise, CA 95969
#0bone: (916) 877,6253
g!!1'f'O SCC, I�9l;ftTllTlg CQi'IxY'lr _ T_�
SEP 719K► September 6, 1990
Re Cherry parcel Map
C rc 41% Califars:icl: AP 56-39-18
AP 63--02--5
Butte County P1k3nr4ng Department
County Center ';rive
Orovi,llu,, CA 959,0;5
Attn. Brent Macre
Dear Brent
This is a Tette.', wd ib regards to the ;Depa7vtment of Vial);
Game'sand o list 6, 1.990, 'i;x'lis letter deals '
with the possible rar6�spe�ies of plants that may be on the
Cherry Property..
We acre willing 'to ccmp';'.y with their proposod mitigation
,measures it rare plants are found. Prior 'to recording the
final map W8 agree to the following--
'stab2ish a ma,nlmum 50-foot bU;f'fer zone around each
plant popiliation; to prevent distutbanae «
2; .Na alteration of existing dralbages, incl'Uding no
art;ificij481 runoff into natural drainages containing rare
p ,;;an t s
�1. t bhstruction of barriers to prevent trampling damage to
rare species btt foot or vehloular travel.
'4, No li:vestook i4razing In the v.icinity of rare plant pop-
iz�;ati,cns « i,
1 bell eve thelkt by agreeing tO those mitigation measures,
this project can be ptocesse'd an receive tentative approval
from the County.
Thank you for your consideration in this matter.
� 5inceral.�;�r'
rtV
w.
T shtaL R'. Otic ale
TRW,/k
Nr. John Mendonsa
gut?,e County Department of
Puw is Works
7 County Center Drive
Oroville, CA 95965
Deal, Mr. Mendonsa
Thank you for the opportunity to review the Cherry revised tentative parcel map for
4 parcels located ort both sides of Ten Mile Nouse Road about 1.5 miles easterly of
State Route 32' in the Forest Ranch area,
As a condition of approval for this parcel map, the Ten Mile. House Road connection
to Highway 32 should be upgraded to nor public road approach standards, An
encroachment permit will be required,
1► there are any questions; please contact Mt Christel Little at telephone (916)
741-42.91..
Sincerely,
i�•.i1 L. Baker, Chief
�n+'ironmental Branch
C
II
1 r kt,:. "dri db . 7'` ,e' a :�yy� i +gid i;r ,j -..z s. 2 c t +', „+ a e .#•._
i 'rM �'.,1 y �. y T •k M',rR 4�
q4! � 3 •i J t1� �1 �`�{,���' n,h .k �...{le '" C 7� JI ly M x �P t t i...,
i Y 1 {. 4:N lyR M1 dZ.1' ^I4 `:FSd Y T � P �" '+'•Y
is : : x » �¢ � -� #,Gxt,�, p a � �t e �... E � ��.7k,+ iX ° T ,e��a*"i' i " r' # �'� • � a . , �, } � raaas�
x x
Mn
lilt
MrP P 'v ¢� i• ��rr
:.r
Li., _ -
.�� r *� �
'' R
`Z
rt~ 'z ' � S: T "tr+- t # '� r is Yw ,, * Y• W 7 r= •~� u,� UN
'w � r P,. �° +,. Y; � ltTr •,`Yr tr M � �. e < a'�i�_ti,t,'3• D Y 7 �� tt tit. ,
.t � °' ..,+� r A? - � p... 4 R W � i 1 ',:"�Y' T.m je L� ; �, *( � ( '.'•
'tr �� -m x..; �„':P d f .`� - �' y.. 3'wais.�'4•tk+'^# r T¢ -F�t it¢.Y 6,4 �L`..... ar ^-re,~+r h'�2 a' T r~ '.;Se `" » +`'";'n
L SPP " ,� i �,V+ ,.�� rwx ..� ..4�� 1•J �'e'.� ��a$; r�hYh �k�
IiZ���.�57 {M1"f %`,a ���•x °e:, �>j,#a'a ,a �T'.P�� y, tY:: t'tS yv t yt�Y
,i �c ret ✓ � i � t x- r.f� � >�}ftr• .1 t 4 3A: r°'f i'�rot� �`"� �''�
,� u" > a_ u's •� a x 6 t T a S k a' 'S
• � � Y. � o rJ' t a t.'�f r A r a] �� }'r � J' 4 d c. t^t � � � � P r : 4' - f a ,t 4 � ^�`t't�• t ,�. w n � "#y k �e '" � � At °�a+��
P tr „ kr D .r,t l� 1 et r•x e" , r'1' y -t PI' t,�y�r �k� t �r r ¢=+ p, �_ P a �a },{^
rh », 1- 'r tr o- i .n-� < '` � 's kr" � �'` n. ,� �' •w r 'ry a � '� " z.� ° is. �Y{,t�
� 2P _ r� e. l x""l ° - ,P, 4 a n• .. � d;, C c a M1 3
•'+f H'x><Sr ati 2y yA m$ r �v,� ^x i; y mt�.f 1 k w „ ar t d_ w ,� h, dM,,,w
-0, d f'
try .,.°.+`}
�:��4t
� _ � •:� � ° �" dP gr 'Y,YrryrS � i� 1 �at :. t 6Pr t + *`¢+ r � �}'" + r; �' i?a t e � r+ '<�.
j"-71
}aN'3f
sC .'14
r {.
-y" t Y' +�•I a l�k w "asM "_ i• -s y�� � 3? '9 a p r'� 7
',o- e v �• 4 "Y,a.. rot 'F: ,`y r X� Ft ,57u _ yr �,`Y ;'� r s �:,,,q " f �- { 4 vY x }t� q,l�i e m �� tK9P�p��y ':�"✓ �';i W,t„ir tea t v!•;' u
l 7 t d 'y" � � e v d is t �'Y Fi `� ii}��i � r•'� _ 'Y. 'r Y 't
� �Cq'Ti ► 1 ,, *,
+ F
.J,
4 iil
5 Cultural Resources
A cultural resource records search and a field survey of the project
site were conducted in January 1987 by Jensen and Associates`,
Archaeological Consulting and Research. In addition, Native American
representative ;Ms. Priscilla Hunter was contacted and asked to supply any
Y
information which she might have concerning heritage or other sites
17
w1thin the project area. No historical or archaeological resources have
been previously recorded on the site, and the field survey revealed no
y M
such materials. No response was provided by the dative American repre-
sentative. The site is thus recommended for archaeological clearance.
The archaeologist's report is available for review at the Butte County
Planning Department.
Potential Impacts
No archaeological or historical materials are known to be present on
the site; however, subsurface materials may be uncovered during excava-
tion or other construction activities_,
.".q tioo Measures
5.x if subsurface cultural materials are oncount,,.,ed, all constructiac
activities in that area shall be halted until a qualified archaeolo,
gist can examine these materials and make a: determi nat'i on of the'i r
significance,
6. Nater Supply
..
An evaluation of ground -water conditions underlying the project site
air
and the "surrounding area wits conducted by Lawrolnce and Associates;
engineering geologists and ground=water. hydrologistsi, The following
discussion is a summary of the technical report prepared by Lawrence and
Associ ates . A copy of the full report is avai i abl a for review at the
n
Butte County Punning Department»
The `ground -water ev.O uatri on was based at, i n- ncuse data plus heV i ew
of well logs obtained from the Department of Prater Resources. A total of
525 logs from 64 sections surroundiOg the project site were evaluated,
`.
Fourteen" of the logs were from section 6, 1`2314y 113E;, within which the
project site is located.
The project site does not overlie a well-defined 'ground -water basin
filled with alluvial sands and gravels, where the depth and volume of
gl^ound wate.r in storage is easily determined. Instead, theite is
underlain by "hard rock." In hard rock areas
ground water occurs in
cracks and fractures and its
movement is linear and tortuous in these
fractures, unlike movement, in ground -water basins with homogeneous sands
� and gravels,,
Therefore, it is very difficult to quantify the amount of
water in storagE or to accurately predict its actual movement. Notwith-
standing these difficulties, it is still possible to make reasonable
%ssumPtions about_ bard rock areas that allokt the nuaT l:ative evaluation
of yield recharge, and the long-term availability Of ground water.
Well depths and depths to ground water as reported on the .1.4 well
logs from Section 6 are shown on Table 1, Figure 4, contained in Appendix
2. the data reflect perched or semi -perched 'wat,e an a dvt.,p
h
regional water table. The latter lies at a depth r levels
p of 300 to ,a 5
00 feet,.
Figure 3, Appendix 2, illustrates the configuration of the water tables.
Well yields in Section 6 and regionally are shown in Tahle 1<,
Appendix 2. L ocal'ly, tho median
yield 'is about 20 ga11 ani �r��
a of c
(gPm) witl-1 a ran 4-5n '
g t�pm. Regiortc?ly, the me�#t �ryield �rA On'1ytri r
:flt:tr a range of 0.03-1w60
9P4 Because a, the sme-911 samplt� size 4n
Section 6', and because the regional count predominantly reflects Wells
drilled led in the same geologic formation, the regional median irield is
probably more accurate as an indica,tol° of expected yields from the
project site.
Theween wells can be otential for interference 'between estimated :based
on formation transmissivity and other factors ''he curves on Figure 5
Appendix 2, show that a well i11 the Project area :pumping cootinuarrsl
►o. d � P P 9 y, for
100 days at 1 gpm Mould 11av r. for all Practical
interference beyond :about purposes; a neglig5ble '
600 feet; Under typical residential cor"�ditttorl5
wore wells are pumped
Period' rather than continuously, the
p ontial for well interference would be much less,
f
The amount of water available for ground -water recharge in the area
f can be c111culated based on average° annual rainfall less evapotranspira
ti0h and runoff, In the
project drainage area, about 1.4 feet of water
per unit area is available for recharge. This equates to 0.85 gpm (1224;
gallons per day)' per acre throughout the watershed: Water constmptian in
�� 2.6 �,
areassimilar 'to the project site is uslaa'lly governed by water availa.
bi 1 i ty rather than demand.' Minimum domestic use can be estimated at 3010
gallons per hOUsehol;d per, day. Thus, the amount of available recharge
appears to far exceed the demand on 'the ground=water reservoir.
r
Ground -water quality in the area is expected to be excellent.
Nokwer, it should be noted that there is a potential for saline water to
occur in the vicinity because the Chico formation, which outcrops to the
we -e of the site, is a marine formation' which typically contains saline
water, in most areas of the northern Sacramento Valley. Surface water
quality tests of` Big Chico Creek showed no evidence of 'saline water being
present in the drainage basin.
potential Impacts
The ground -water evalOtion found that sufficient ground water
should be available to serve residential devel oprpel):� oo thc, _ �� jr, t ;Fite,
althougl, the depLn to ground ► ;.ter and !, 't v pry c%rsiderably.
Test weal Is on each 'lot would be t.6 t rin,l ,, Kn i; ply determine whether
or not the water supply requirements of the )3uzce County Health
1`Pp�irtment can be uiet Well i tAerference, including interference of the
a
xK planned wells with each otht?r as well as With offsite wells, is riot
expected to be ;significant provided that the wells are at least 1.00 feet
apart. 6iound-water quality in the area is expected to be adequate.
Mitigation Measures
6.1 To minimize the potential fcir well interference, wells shall be
located no closer than 50 feet from interior and 100 feet from
exterior lot boundaries unless' a variance is granted by the County,
7. Sewage Disposal
Sewage disposal will be providk5d by individual septic tank/leach
field trystems,. The systems will have to meet the standards in effect at;
the timO the project application wat,. submitted (Tuttle, Butte County
Planning Department), Under these standards, the leachfield area must
'have at least two to three feet of soil above the ground water, ta.bl e.
Leachfield installation is permitted in areas with 7 feet or mote o�
soil, with a 100 percent rrspl acement area. Where the soil is '1 ess than 7 ')
tiff
F ��'��' �,� �kli�#11w±4�� aY�V[Kt'CiGA±I4�II7� _,, ;; r�kYrec�rre, MulIIC1hAI,ARaCF A�,Y�Icu�.lalrAt; � i
Ir'y yaa EE ?aJl�1�° iiTA4 iF tpA4'T 'RCPORTIN WA"rcR INYtOY GAvoN6
JCOOLD J. ECHNKE, PH. D.
d;'ONSULTING HYDRO,LIDGISY "
. szmouTI:Rcr) cAuro RNIX. t oLamaT
'I'.c"PHatmm rimcc 19161 246-sb49 Res, :1415-2362
1059 VIA VCRUNA ,GRIVCi
CHICO. CAU PC3RN1A 95!;26+
1.1,I911st 151 1979
Mr. lUchard Cherry
Butte Meadotgs Stage
Chico! Cali.Coi-nia 95926
Dear IRick:
Enclosed tmo copies of the well data which we discussed
Monday. Apparently, $,rt unditater has been encountered at three
different depths ion Ypreiit Ranch kidge in the vicinii;y of your
property, The estimated target elevations for the three aquifers
are 1j,310, 1, lD2a, and 840 tee (miL�an sea 1 eirel) .
A 'well at the upper enol of, the meadow, above the road:,
should be approximo,tel.y 170 feet deep and a well located neR,r; the
swimming pool should lie approximately 15D feet deep. Before you
decide to drill a wall j 1 suggest ,your contact me so that we can
mutually agree on a pl-bper location. .1 think your idea to place
.another cistern in ;your spring area wh -z6 the pond is now loeatt3d
should approximateY:� dotible your ava.iltiVle water supply. An i.xiter-
deption ditch, leading, ,into the pond areli, should,.ft�vthex enb,ance
,your gate supply. _:I su ;gess thlat ,.you° establ;isla''� 1 max1mum
sustaineyiell, in aallone per minute, 'before our pall rains begin.,
As al' mys, it has been a pl.eiisure working with you
ff T can be of additionaq aosstance, please call.
SinCeri�lyy
4erold d. pehtike Ph,1l4
JJB s bb
.Encs
��v11s►
IV
R �J 'J\ y� ♦� 4j/� � \r� .1w +Siff �.y r
c
Rq � ��('�G+�
J`"+- ;4► mow'
,339
y ,mss
<! to 3zh , 3
'I
I� S•i
1
� (� I �
�I �� f
II r
1
j/. j
C3v/ 7.f `
.3
G.���.-���,..-r�•r ��'' � `n -��� r.S c�-z� C.r'rG'�/a.k/+ar�'�i7'�l�- r
r -
i
a
� Y � L.+' ���In ij::R'i SGP' . • �j' �� Lr I���, R y
i
}jyn
I
r
oun
LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAC,ITY
PLANNING DEPA11TMENT
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 55965-3397
August 17, 1990 TELEPHONE: (916) 538-7601
Richard. Cherry
10 Via Contents #D
Carmel Valley, CA 93924
Re: Tentative Parcel Map
AP No. 056-390-018 and 063-030-053
Log #90-07-19-02
v
Dear Mr. Cherry:
An. initial study of your proposed project, a Tentative Parcel Map, indicates potentially
adverseimpacts to the environment (refer to the enclosed environmental cheeklisi). To
reduce or eliminate these impacts, suitable mitigation measures are required as part of the
project; Otherwise, an Environmental. Impact Report (EIR) is required pursuant to the
California Environmental Quality Act.
An early response to this notification, sent to the Planning Depa_-tm.ent, will expedite the
scheduling of your project; Please forward your written response within 15 days from the
date of this letter:
A list of local consultants is included These persons can determine the need for a survey
by conducting a records search, conduct botanical and archaeological surveys or arrange
for such surveys In the event of an EIR requirement, a subsequent letter will be sent
outlining the procedure for the County to select the consultant to prepare the EIRE
Should you have any questions regarrling this matter, please contact this office between!
10;00 a:m. and 100 'p.m
Sincerelyy,
B, A. Kircher
Director of Planning
$rent L. Moore
Associate 'Planner
Enc:
Callfornla oft UUUC:,1Bo 11 BUTTE SIERRA
GLENN SISKIYOU. Department; of Ahth(opolov
I
c ii nventicai P LASSEN SUTTER California State Univprslty, iy h cl
Inventory f MODOG TEHAMA Chico, CA 95929
PLUMAS TRINITY
SHASTA (916) 895-6256
=•r
_., August 13, 1990
Butte County Pl affi-niwng Department
#7 County Center Drivepr"nrn,7t
Oroville, CA 95965
OR1rMmn
RE: AP# 63-02-52 t 53) AP# 56-39-18/Cherry, bM018
I- C. # L g o- 4 7 tfArY,;�
T23N, R2E, Section 36 and T23N, R3EY Section 31
USGS Paradise 151 and Paradise West 7.5' quads
168.0 acres
Dear County Planners,
in response to the request of July 31, 1990, A record search
for the ibove cited project was conducted by examining the
official maps and records for archaeological sites in Butte
County.
RESULTS:
PREHISTORIC RESOiTRCES: Our records indicate there are no
recorded sites or this type within the project boundaries.
However, one site of this type has been recorded approximately
one mile northwest of the project area. CA-BUT_287 is.
recorded as a rockshelter with a bedrocic mortar station.
Other sites have been recorded in similar environmental
settings it the general vicinity.
HISTORIC RE80URCES: There are no prsviOU81y recorded historic
archaeological sites within the praect boundaries;
However-
One site of this type na been recorded a little over a mile
southeast of the project area. CA-BUT-870 is recorded as the
Centerville powerhouse and associated features. Additionally,
the USES quad map indicates several things that may be
unrecorded historic resources. These items are the Tenmile
House site in Section 35i Hell bOWIJ Wt to in Section .39, and the
1`on Mile Mouse Trail that runs through the project area. The
historic Humbol,t Road, now Highway 32, liftked Chico with
Susanville, and was built in the 1860#8 to conne-et with a road
already it use from Susanville to the mining operations in
Boise City, Idaho. �'4any popular stopping Pl,acW3 'And resorts
grew up alO g the Humbolt Road. ,Akt Tomnile House (one-half
Mile West of the project area) the braver+rs could obtain food
and water, At Fourtyeenmile House the Lucas Pamily provided
for every need and Were espeoially" famoos for their fine
meals.. t4th the ,improvement of Humbug Road to Big NeadoWs
,i
1
i
1
Bich had a more ttocessibl.e summit, and was several miles
shorten the Humbolt Road ceased to be the main stage road,
although it: continued to be used by private vehicles.
PREVIOUS ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS: According to our
records, the project area has not been previously surveyed for
cultural resources. Three small surveys have been conducted
very near the project area (10 Files # n--L--191-A, B-L-4A, B-L-
132). No prehistoric or historic mat-,ials or features were
observed during these surveys. However, the 1981
ree,�nnaissance conducted by James Pi Manning over 185 acres
(B7-L-1.91-A), immediately north of the project area, does
mention previous archaeological surveys one mile south in
which lie records five prehistoric sites. We have no site
records for these sites.
LITERATURE SEARCH: Reviewed Were the official records and
maps for archaeological sites and surveys in Butte County.
Also reviewed were the National Register of Historic Places-,
the California Inventory of HiRtoric Resources (1976),
California Historical cal Landmarks (1982), California Poinl�s of
p
Historic Interest and Historic Spots in California (1966)
RECOMMENDATIONS! Based upon the above informationthe
sensitivity for cultural resources is estimated t be high;
The-refore, because of the sensitivity . of the project t area we
recommend. _that a pr0fessio 11 -1; aVc'haeologist conduct an
archaeological survey of the areas of proposed development.
Thank you for your concern in preserving California's cultural
heritage.
i Si.M +erely, '
i
i
Kowt(W-41akotb a, Coordinator
ec Sierra West Surveying
APPI5NDIX 1
Cotroty OF BUTTE'
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM'
i s EVALUATION OI? ENVIRONMENTALIMPACT
C
� iNo.
56-39-18 & 63-30-53 Log No.
90-07-19=02 AP No. 56-39-18 & 53-30-53
X EACKGROUND
1.
Richard cherry
2.
to via con ten la pro Carmel 'Valley. Ca 91014
3.
Project description; Tentative Parcel Map to divide
168 acres to create, lour 41, plus acre parcel3.,
1 MANDATORY' FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE-
, .
YES. MAYnhNQ- DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMEN.ML EVALUATION-
I .
Does the project have the potential to degrade the
quality bf the environment, Substantially reduce the
x This proptlsal will hot significantly degrade the environment.
habitat of a fish or Wildlife species, cause a fish
or wildlife popuratiort to drop below set f -sustaining
level9, threaten to eliminate a giant or anfmaf '
community, reduce the number or restrict the range
of a rate or endangered plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of maJor period$ of California
history of prehisto"ryl,
Does the protect have the potential to Achieve
short=Cerro benefits to the detriment of long-term
Tail$ prcp+7sal will not Impede long-term environmental goals.
�' 1
environment goals? (A shq^t-term Impact on the
environment is one which occurs in a relalivelY
brief period of itme while long-term impacts wtii
ell w6 ,oto the futute.)
3.
the project ave
b
1lmtletl but cumuiaflvelY considerable? fA ptbJet
Which oh0deteate IndividuallresoU(A proces
x '""�` This proposal may have a s19hPflcaht cumiklative impact on the
on twoes
or morect$
m�mit'ed
herc
r:nvP,rbnmeht,
the impact on each resource is relaliYely small,
but where the effect of the. total of those Impacts
oh the
e environment Is sight leant.)
A.
bobs the rotect have environmental
p . onmentai effects which
will cause substantial adverse ettects on human
r.x_ this proposal will not have a slgniflcatil adverse efface on human
beings.
beings, either directly at Indirectiy3
IZI., DETERMINATION
pn the
basis Of his 7hiifal evaluation:
I/Wt find the ptopo$ed ptoldct COULID NOT have a slgnlffcant effect on "t the bnvlrohment and a NWATIVE DtCLARATPON Will be prepared,
i/wh find That although the proposed proJec't �uLbhave asPgniflcanl r.ifAcf on the envitohmeht, kherewill not be a slgnitfeaht effect in thin
cafe because the MIT I CATION MEASLAts descrlbed the
oh
attached sheet hive been lidded to the 00adt. A NLoATIVE IICLARATION will be prepared.
:
IM find the proposed project MAY have a ,significant
effect on the rihvttonmdnt, and an FNvIk0NMtNTAL IMPACT REPORT Is reeulred.
0ATEt August
16, 1990
c ttv P I r Tia
y•
Brent C oore
keviewed by:, rsr� t &,Q "A.1
...�
I
ronme ntal.
Impact `
Checklist,, * Exhiluation of
EilV ronMent al
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
V&s tiAvnp NO
DISOU88ION OF 'ENV'IRONMt�]WTAL EVALUATION
1, !AM.
will the ptoposal result in significant;
a.
Unstable earth Conditions. or changes in
,9601 ogle subs Irrtcturesr
it
The proposal Will not affect sub.itirlace earth conditions,
b.
Ofsvuptldn, displacement, compaction or
overcovering of the sol I?
'— x
Yltis proposal Will result in some disruption,
P displacement,
compaction and ovetcoverlhg of the site a4 a result of development
5the
Ot stiles homesitey,lo Aliotnt will bud
earthwork. topography
a.
,general, the terrain of the project site is characterized by small
bench areas between
canyon areas, The proposed parcel map will
create parcels of ao plus acres which Will reduce extensive
earthwork, _currently, two 'Of the Parcels are already developed and
ThelButtercounty uire
cradgngdordinanceeIsdantllc1paetedotoemitgate5a,ny
significant impacts caused by necessary
earthwotk associated with
developing 'two additional homesites.
C.
Change, In iouography or ground surface
ret:lel feature3t
x
Due to sleep slopes associated. With the canyons, residential
development. is limited to the bench areas,
d,
odstruytIon, cover Ing or modiIlea 'tion of any
uhiryue,gaologit Or physical features?
x-
The project site has no pliysicai features which are unlgUe to Butte
county.
r,,
1net eade Init! ad or water erosion of tot Is,
elitliet on Or off sltdt
,,� x _
wholesale exposure or soil darling the cons turtlon phase of
development allowed by the proposed project will temporarily rise
tails s the
f
asc$halolov vegotartldhntypd,lsllopeesifze, and inti ihation,.land.
theyrrequtndv ,til intensity of rnlntall, soli erosion polentlzl j3
Hill control ItonldurIngthe construdtfnnCpphase
(it developmentnto
a less than significant level.
t,
changes in Ceposftion of erosion Ot beach
sands, or changes in siltattoh, deposition
x
the proposed pro)ecl Will riot cause stIlatloh or erosion of streams
or drotion which may modify the channel of
rivers oratid minim Ue to the patceI size or do pint acres per
um development,
a river or stream or the bed of the ocean
Or any bay. Infer or laket
g.
soils OUl 'Prime agriculturally prsoduettve
't
tde designated urban atcast
Xhis
,_;
otoposal does hot reprsf:sn
eseht A iflcant loss of prime
agilculturai
soils. The property Is chatactctized by residual soils
from lava tlows, tough rock OW OOppings, bouidets, cobble stones,
and shallow soils overlying Tuscan formatlans. Such tolit have
matglnal agricultural Values and limited glazing opportuhitles,
r�
�bosi'r of pbpot . or propeilY to geofoglc
hazards su as n�cw. i riT+leo
x
All Of Butte County is Ih a Moderate Earthquake Inteisity donelvtII,
mudslides, grourili talvutd o* similar
pbnosltuction of buildings to Unitofm Bdrldlrtg Cade sta0 at0 Wttl
Idr_ adequaie protection to
haza�tdst
oc;uhr,j•r a rsl; of selsml'e activity.
-AIR, Wl
l l the proposal result in tubslarltlal a
i
A,
Aft emissions of deterlotation or ambient
Alt quatltyt
k
Increasing the ddrisltles of rosidehlial development on the
prbr.z"t
site Wt tesulI in a cumUlative impact an alt quality due to related
ihetea es In trarflc generated and Inditecl alt pollution resources.
Identifiedbutte
County lAsna lhonaitrtahtnmOnlcateao th meeting the uthe
standards
dA111 0"rnla Cleah Aft Act to t'Zbne and Catbon Monoxide. The county
air ppilutioti conlrof plan b'tovides ho mitigation measutes for such
A small r,s dhliAI Ot ject. bud to the sizd of the prziject the
R
{"
cumulative impadls arc considered Insignificant.
r
ift-vxronment4l. Checklist * EValtxats.on Of ,Envir6nmental. Impar
X�' ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS(.continued) Yrs raAve No DISCUSSION OFENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
(continued)
b-. The creation of 613106100able odors, smoke x_ Some short term air quality Impacts Will probably result during the
or rtmsr construetion phasos of devoloping residential housing. Increased
vehicle and equipment emissions As well as increased dust Will occur
during earthwork stages or development.
c. Alteration of alt MOVemerit, moisture or x , the pfoposal Will not affect the atmosphere,
temperature. or any chahgo In cl►male,
locally or regionally?
d. WATER. will the proposal result in substantial:
a, Changes In currents, of the course or x The proposAI Will not affect the courso or direction of wager
direction of W,atet movements in either movements In elldler marine or fresh Waters,
marine or froth Watets'7
b. changes [rt
patterns, abiorptlon rates, the rale and amount of surface drdlnage rales. and x The propos ed'project Wilt cause some minot changes til the Absb(ptlon
resultlho a ount of surface runotr due to Impervious
_
runoff? surfaces related topav ng. parking areas, driveways, toot toot, etc,
No stgnif[t3hf al tering f lne basic drainage pattern is aniiclpated,
channe rp-rts. c culvert eLatallaliont p p ge Improvements Is anticipated in order to
[mprovni3, inriud►ng vegetatYon removal, accommodate the to osed protect,
C. Need lot of rslte sutface drainage x No ott�-site surface dratha
d. Alterations to the course or flow or flood X The proposal Will not air "I the flow of flood waters,
waters;
a,Change in the amount of SurIace water in any x_ The proposal wil l not affect the amount of Surface WAter In any Water
water bgodyf body.
f.
Discharge sface Waters, or in any X The project site has the Little, Chico Creek traversing the middie
of
Surface Water quallty, or tile area aes►dential davelop"menl alon toilck s
f th'
inctue.r,tr but not limited to temperature,
dlssolt '7 oXypen dr' turbidity!
g. Alteration of the direction or rate of (low " x ...
of ground waters(
it, Change In the quantI ty or qua► I ty of ground x .,,.,
Waters, either through direct additions or
wlthdfawals, or through Ihlerceptton of an
Aquifer by cuts or 4XcaVa1ion0
I. Reductl0n Ih the Amount of Water otherwise X....
avallabIt rbr public water supplitMo
). 6s�,toer of people of property to 'water
led haxatds such as floodlhot
is
3
. g e ree lae.
potential lot degradation of 'surface Water qyuality doe to etos►on and
sedimentation Associated With consltuclion activities and the
exposure of bate and /of disturbed ground, Runott from the paved
ground surfaces and toot tops may carry organic hlatetiAlt and typical
urban pollutants Into the creek., Excessive fertlllzat[on of
landscaped Areas and iralgat►on runotl from residential yards could
generate nutrient ric flows down stream, thus resulting In
eutrophicatlori of the creeks and dtainage system. `rb colligate the
above concerns It is recommended that A too toot setback from the
centerltne of the creek be established as a rloatfAh protection and
stream pollution tone and a mute on the map Which slates, 4N6
planting of non-nntIVe vegetation, cultivating, earthwork, or
disturbance of the area Within loo feel of the centerline of 'the
crook shall occur.
'rhe proposal Will not affect the dirt0lorl or flow of ground waters,
the ptoject site Is currently dependent upon grotindwatot. Higher
densities may overdraft the existing aquifet. curtehtly, there It I
ho sl'ailstical data on the, quAhllty of 'Otoundwater or rate of
recharge of droundwa,ter in liie area. A stable water source Should
be quAntified Which Will provide the waterdemands or theptoposedj
density.
{
see A above,
the ptiolect site is not Located within a flood 'Zone area. Tile
waters related hAzAfrtis Stithlat Iloddlol exposure of 1>eopld or properly t`b"
Mvironutental Chdckli;st * Evalutatiori ore Env rt>nmental impact
4'
s v . n vvxAvDlP1Z vxAsa 1MYAVV&; (Continued)
_vis MAYBE NQ
DISCUSSION_ OF ENVIAONMENTAL_ EVALUATION
(continued)'
4, PLANT 'LlFr. Wf1i the proposaj result in
su6"sten-Fra l s
a,
change in the diversity of Species, or
number Of any SpeCleS of plants (Including
X _
The diversity of plant species will be expanded 'as residential non -
native landscapes installed.
trees, shrubs, gross. crops, and aquatic
are
Plants)?
b.
izeduction of lh,% ni,mbetS of any UMQue, rare
or endangered spades of plantst
x —"-
just north and south of the project site sidalcea Robusta has been
known to exists which is a fare plant, In order to determine it the
site contains any rare or endangered plant species it Will
Fject
necessary to perform a botanical survey. The botanical survey
I determine the need for any further mlligation measures.
lntroduet(on of how les of plants into
an area, or in abarrier tD the normal
_ x_
Tie pfehosal INCH hot affect existing plant life.
replenishment of eXfsting Species?
d,
educlfon In acreage of any agrfcultut2l
crypt
x __
The ;slle does not cohtaln any cbrmerctafly Ytable agricultural Crop.
$, ANIMAL
Li FE, ill' I l tile proposa I result In
Suostan,.ra1:
a..'
change In the divetstty. of species, or
numbers of trig spedles of WildI s,tbltds,
�, x
The project site Is located within a Deer herd range tor' the lust
Tehama Deer °herd, The has
land animals Including rept les, lisp ltnct
shellfish, behlhlc Organisms t or inlects)t
area been utilized as the winter ranges
fn". isli and cAme Catmi scionridentllfl d devehoplCall(oinnlA t)epartment
n ►oothli'lt
a; encroaching upon migratoty deer ranges, the butte County board
o;,3Upervisors appointed a cololtlOe to identity the deer herd range
In butte county. The committee documented the Impacts of residential
development on the mtgratoty deer ranges, and recommended mitigation
measures (Of protection ut migratory deer habitat affected by
residential development, to date no policy hat been adopted by the
board of supervisors to colligate impzcts of development on the
migratory designated oer herds, The proposed project is Iodated within a
dear herd development Mne ftz), however, no impact fees
have been d saablished to fund deet herd range mitigation mda`sures.
The County of butte duttently requires all maps in tho.toz to
pplace
the folioWing able on final maps: "Deer Herd impact fees shall be
Paid at time of building permit IS ande It appl1c,bid,°
U
b:
Reduction in the humbdrs of any Unique, rate
or endangered Soddles of anlmats.t
L x
the'site contalhs no rare ahimals.
C,
Introduction nj hew 'Species of animals into
5ue 5a above.
All area, o a barrier to the migration
_k_. _
or movemt aulmaist
d.
Deterioration of existing lish"or Wildlife
see Sa above
habItat,I
__ _.�..
6. hblsll.
Will the proposa result in. Substantial;
a,
increases In eX stlnjj holse Iet,Ist
.r.,.,:,.. �x,_._
The proposal will not result In. a Substantial increase In noise
created on site or in the yi'clhity,
b,
exposure Of 00co le to severe noise leveis7
_ x..
The proposdl Will Mol eXpoSc pdople to severe noise levels,
71 sl9 r rcpt t'LARf. WIi1 tha ptaposa.l produce
ign and glare#
_ x..-.
The proposal will hot result In a substahtaal increase in light or
;"
glare created on site or in the vlclhity.
c:�
:nv!ronmenta1 Checklist * Evaluation of Eritt ronmental Impact .�
5
A.a
Jr MV.LAV1Sl1`9.ZX.VA.0 LM1?AV.VLS_(Con(Inued)
YES MA ,NO
DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
(continued)
a, iArn vsEWill the prdp6tal resuiI In a substantial
IMahn — of the present or planned land use
x
The project site Is designated by the butte county General Plan as
of an
area? '
Agricultural-Residentlal and crazing and Open Lands. The project
site Is zoned TM -40 which requires a minimum of forty acres pet
dwelling unit,. The proposed tentative parcel map conforms to both
the general plan designation and the zoning classification. The
proposed project is consistent with the character of the surrounding
area. The project site has been under a Williamson Act contract for
120 acte parcels, PatceP Aiap can not be flied until SL; it time
contract period is exrired.
. ' L4A7Ci1At RESOLACE5Will Che proposal result to
sub:5tanllalt
a.. Increase In the rale of use of any,
.natural
resources!'
x__
The NOPO aJ Will not affect any, natural resources,
b. bepletloh of any non"renewabfe natural
resources?
x
The -Proposal Will hot deplete any natural resources.
10, ajs>s_or UP§E7. Will the proposal Ihvotver,,;
a. A risk of exploslun or release of hazardous
substances (including, but, not limited to,
X
The Nopo5al Will not Involve the use or hazardous matetials, nor Is
oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in
located close to any faculties Which store of utilize such
materials.
the event of An act dent of upset
conditionst
b, pespbhse plan of em rgencytvacuationrplan
x
The proposal Will hot affect anY emergency services.
r.15PMATION. Will the propotal alter location.
tlrsltioution, density or growth rate of the human
?t '-
the otbpcsat Will hat significantly affect the population of 'thehrea
because the
poputationt
proposed ptoject is consistent With what has been planned
and being developed in the area.
12 H"j INO6 will the proposal at fed( existing housing,
or crea e a demand for additional housingt
X._
The proposal will not significantly affect housing demand.
i
iS. TRAYROk7AT16NMIRCULATiON, 1/1II the proposal
r es in i
a': Ceheratlon of substantial addttlohalvehicte_
movement?
k ::
the proposed project. will 900i'd to approximately two additional
veilIc►c hips- per hour pot lane on a P,M. peak, such traffic
generated by the propbsed project will not substantlAlly impact the
existing trAhS0OtlAll0h nelWofX._The existing transportat Ion rlelWork
1161 adequate capacity to AecOmmodAte such traffic generation without
a degradAtlon of the level of service.
b: Erfects on eitisling'pafking'faellities. or
demand for n411 parK1n91
X
the priiposal Will not aitect parking because the proposal will have
to Comply the
With, parking requlremenis contalhed wi thlh nutt.e County
code lection 14 35,
C- Subs! h tlafbn Impacton existing
x .
See iia 6bove.
d. significant alterat.toill to prosdhi patterns
Of ditduIaIIOn or movement of people and/or
x
the propbsAl will not stgntilcan J atleP preset ftaffic patterns.
goods€
w Allefalions to Waterborne, rill or alt
traffics
_ ,, X.
The pToposAf Will not affect wAj4f'or11e, tall or alt lPaff:ic,
1:. ihcreAse ih lratfid hizatfls to widt
vehicles, bicyclists or pede3tflahst
x -
the proposal Will hot sighItId t Y°I-ttcrease irafffc: haiards,
6
t l -r .. act
�y��r�nmental C hecbcl3st * EVaUat�dn o nvxcanmen a
mg
ENVIRONMEN'PAL IMPACTS tcontinuee) vt rmoat No
DISCUSSION; OF .ENVTRONMENI.PAL EVALUATION
tcohttnuedp
spa, PUBLIC SERVICES, WIII the proposal have an effect
upon, or resui in a need for new or altered
goverhment services;
a. Fifa proteCtlont
The proposal will result iii a incremental it+crease in demand tot Ilte
protection in the area, the Butte county Fire Department/ealIlorhla
Division of Forestry has Indicated that cumulative development In
rural areas will Impact_ their ability to provide fire ptotectloh
services. COt: has proposed as a mitigation measure all residential
homes in rutal arjeas develop a fire suppression sprinkler system.
It is recommended the following note be placed on the alternate or
additlonal map sheet of the final map stating: " Automatic fire
Suppression sprinkler systems snail be installed In all residential
sttuclures In accordance with the National Fire protection
Association standard for the installation of sprinkler systems lh one
and two family dwellings and mobile hones, NFPA slaridard. iaD. the
purpose of the Installation of sprinkler systems is for 'additional
safety and 'property protection In, the event of reO dentlal fires,
this hislallation will reduce the demand tot stiuctUral fire
protection services in those Instances where they are Installed."
The ptoject site has ho pressurized water system to support a hydrahl
system whichImpacts the ability of the lire department to protect
prooetty Improvements and requires the use of Water lenders, to
reduce the Impacts on the demands for water tenders It is reCommended
the appftCatlt pay 046,00 per lot to the Butte County Fire Department
Water Tender Fund. It Is anticipated the above mitigation meAtutes
will reduce the impacts on tire protect;an servi-ce to a less ltian
signit►cant levet.
b. Pot i+'a edt1dri7 _., x.
'rhe proposal Will result In a incremental increase in demand for
police Drotdctfoh In tht Area ich cannot serviced by the present
-
the alien uf outle county has
ime the Oollco force has
IlitriffIseased byartmepnersowiltleotitsth
beeh decrease p I y fiscal oi`rficulties being
experienced by Butte count, Currently. Bo tte County has the lowest
offIcets per capita
In the stale. At recent tegtslattve Committee
Clearings on Butte
county's Fiscal crises, County officials testlffdd
that poilea protection
setvlces are presently Inadequate, And do not
r
meet the service
expectations of the publIC. continued rural
development has resulted In cumulative impatts ort ponce ptotectidh
serylets which coht'Inu's Lo reduce the sheriff's bepartmehl CAVaeity
to ptovide adequate Police tetvlces,
bevelopman1. impacts orf the 5herlff's department is county Wide and
Cantiol be mitigated bV one IhdlvldUal prosect, The cumuldtive impacts
of development on pot ice ptotectlon has been documented by the count
AdinthlstrallVe off lee, In the report Cotihty of Butte, Annual Fiscal
>zevieW."
C, sehoolit x-.
iIidproposal Will result In a ihcrethWaf therease in demand fbir
r..
school services in 11.' ~area. ttowever, school Impact ices cotlacled
by the IOCaI school d.ii aids is anilelgated to reduce school Impatts
to less than a slgnlllcant lowal.
d. parks or other rdeteatlonal (AdIlt'ties X_
the ptopotgj wilt result in A incremental increase in demand for park-'
and t6cteatldh Lac`llitles In the died,
e-Nalrileriahtd 01 001te fact IItles, ihclUdittp k - -,
the proposal Will tesbit hi a inctemental increase In the heed (tit
roads?
malhtehahce of toads and other public laeflities In the area.
I. Other goVtthmenIAJ serViGesZ _ _ x .
The proposal. Will result In a 1hcremental, inctedse in demand rot all
_:
other Ilovernmentlti 'Sdfvlttt In 1.110 area.
7
E�vrozrmental Chea�Cls s+ :Evalitaiotx 6f :Environmental
Impact
ENVIRONMEN'T'AL IMPACTS '(continued)
vEs MAVqE No,
DISCUSSION O„' 'Y°'lTRONMENTAL EVALUATION
t�:onl i nuedT
15. ENERGY, will the proposal result In:
9. use of substantial amounts of -fuel of
x
The proposal will not ulllize substantial fuel or ener9v.
energy?
b. subs tan IIaI increase I demand upon OXlst1119
X _
The proposal will not substantially increase the demand for energy,
sources Of energy, Of rcou1re. the-
-
development of neW soutces of energy(
1'6, trrll:ITfFS. Will the proposal result in a need idr
new systems, or substantial alterations to the
following,
P
a. Power or .natural gas(
: x
The proposal will hot affect electrical power of natural gas
dislributton systems.
b. Communication3 systems(
_ X
The proposal Will not afiect communication systems.
c. - water availability?
X
The _,proposed project W11.1 utilize well water which_ has not
histortcally proven to be a stable source of watef. Prior to Mia]
recordation of the map quallty and quantity of water should be
documented,
d, sewer or septic systems?
X -
The prdletl sites are located In areas characterized
by shallow
sells, rock outcroppings, and lava caps. The soil
characteristics.
of the project sites are ofteh prone to septic and
leachtfeld system,
failures due to poor sol] percolation capacity, Failure ofteh
results In the seepage of wastewater into the surface layer of soil
and onto the ground, Leachfieid fallures may enter nearby streams.
contaminating seater supplies and f.osletlhg the grdwth of algae and
related organisms. SLttcl ,adherence to the Butte county
tnvitotimental Health department tequlrements is anticipated to
mitigate the above Concern$.
e, "storm Waldt dtainagOt
k
'rile ptoposad project will not need substantial stntm drainage
improvements to accommodate the proposed development.
f, Solid Waste and dit0osalT
x,..
Tlie_proposed
county
project will 'have a cumulative Impact on the Guile
sahitdry Land hili and the disposal of solld WaiteWithin theMM.
county.
i7. F"iAN HEALTH. will '--:proposal result (ft.
A. creation of any health hazard of potential
„ x_..
The proposed protect Will not create any sighlfIcant health Hazards.
hazard (excluding mental hoallh)t
b. iFkposure of people to patenlTal health
x
See 0A above.
hazards(
the
is fop
~� `kms.
The gfoptsal Wlit not result In an aesthetically oftenslve view,
Oflany sCL411C �alspesuOf the
wllop n
pub]IGrWill
wiitvirito
of an aesthetlrially offensive Site Open to Inc
public yltlWi
19, ktc Ar Tli*11 WI I the proposal tetult 1n An: NOW
X ._may
I
the proposal m result In il ncremental Increase in demand for par4
a
upon -tie dualily or ouantIt'y of eXlsling
and teeteatfon facilities.
recreation hl Opportunities?
ia. �'t1,72A1�'Esl7tJnCfS;_
e
i
rxroaimental Checklist +ti E .aivatioinof Envik6n npntai impact
IT. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (continued) Yes NAYBe No DISCUS91ON Off' ENVIRONMENTAL EVALTiATION
(Continued)
a, will (Ire proposal result In the alteration x.'the protect site is Identified as an area of high sensitivity ion'
or destruction of a prehistoric or historic -� archaeological resources. Due to the archaeological sensitivity o(
archaeological site? the project We It Well be necessary to perform a records check
through the Department of Anthropology, California state Unlver5ity,
Chico, In order to determl a it significant sites may be located on
the Atchaeolloogital survey ofcthesproperty will
tie necessary andtWhether
Illy further mitigation measures Will be needed„
b, will the proposal result to advetse.physlcai x The proposal will not affect historic sties,
or aesthetfc effects to :a prehlstotic or
historic buliding, structure or object?
C. Does the proposal have the potential to x The proposal wilt not affect cultural resources.
cause a Physical change which would affect
unique ethnic cultural valucst
d. Will the proposal restrict existing x The proposal will not affect religious resources
religious or sacred uses within the
potential Impact areas
V. SUGGESTtD MITIGATION I MEASURER
V :Ptovrkfe dotumentattorl to the planning Odpartment 4, to order to delermlhe IC the project site pay $200.08 per tot to the Butte :count 'Fire
dtior to filing filial map which outlines quantity 00A ht any rare or endangered ;plant species t.l Department/catlfornia Department bf pores ,r -
%
grboured m and rate of tethatge. A stable Will he hecessarY to perf0rm a botahtcal Survey. rite ptevehtWh Water Tender r-und. y
raiet source must be quantified, The botanleat Survey will determine the need for
r
any further mitigalloti measures.
I. pate a note on the map which Slates: `Deer Herd
IxOart feel's shall be pa:ld at time of building 5 Plato a too loot Setback ricin the eehtetline of
P+*tmlts Issuance It xpplica6le,~ `` tiie creek as a tipatlah protect 1011A if Cain pollut1011
zone, and a nry(e on the map whlth 514tes• No
J Plate a note on the hitetnate or additional roan planting of lion -native vegetation, cultivating,
sheet of the final map stating, ~Automatic Fite eatthwork or Irdisturbahce of the area Within loo
supprCsston sprinklet systems shall be installed in feel of tild ceiltetllhe of the creek shalt occur..
all tesidential structutes in accordance With the
National rite Rrotecttoli .rssocfalion 'Standard for c,, due to lbo high sen'sltiyity for archaeological 1
the Installation of sprinkler systems In one and `l tesoutces 1t Well be necessary to perform a records
two family dWelll es and mobile homes NPF$A check th►ougl, the Depattment Of Anthtopolog�,.
standard t3D. The purpose of the inslallailbn of Cali(ornla
state Uhlvdt%IIY. chico, In ordet to
Winkler systems Is tot additional safety and detefmine It sighilicaht sites may be Totated cin
broper[Y ptoleclion In the cent of residential' ten. propet'tY• , A records check Will determine r
Met. This fnstaililtion will reduce tole demand whether nn archaeolog cal survey of the, properly '
for stturtutal (Ire protection services In those WI II be necessary And Whothef any further
Instancos where they are Installed.~ mitipatlon rneasutes Will be needed,
Ali
h
1 I
J.7
1Mrk1l:Wb (continued) YES MAy9
No. DISCUSSION
OF.. ENVIRONMENTAL .EVALUATION
(continued)
Applicant:
Richard cherry
Assessor's
Parcel a 56-,39-1g
Log 0 090-07-19-02
DATA %IrL'T
o:
V090h:tlon: Oak wood►'i-Is and pine forest with rock
k,
protect I>escrtollon
outcrop;,. rock blurts.
2.
Wildltlallabllalt'Small birds and<animals common to foothill
Type Project: T+.italiVe Parcel Map
areas.
.
2.
bOrief pltont TPid to divide 16a acres. to create four 40+/-
Cultural rnvtronment:
3.
acres lots.
lots.
Location: 011 of ten Mile House Road approx. 1 1/2 miles cast
of State Highway 32.
10.
Archaeological and Historical Resources in the area
; High
S. S
Proposed Density of Development*, iunit/40 acres
Amount or Impervious Surfacing: minimum
11.
SensItIVity Area
butte county eoneral Man designation: Agr)culturai-
6.
Access and Nearett PUbIlL Aoad(s): Ten Mile House
i2.
Rettdentia( is Grazing and open Lands
Existing Zoning,, TM -40
7:
a.
Melhod of tcWaba bliposalt septic/Leachfleld
source of Water supplyt Private Wells
13.
rxl ting Land use on-site: Residential and vacant
io,
P(oxI llal otPfw lhern st Adjacent10 property
d peYctopment N/A
14,
surrounding Area:
b Caning: st fo rural resldentlai
Zona g, T 4orest,
8i
rnVironmental se►tIng
C. cen, Plan Desi g g -Rett
A.
Parcel slzcs: 5atoo16o
Physical lny roninenTs
e. Populaliont Low 06OU19lion
15.
character or site and Area., Rural
1.
Terrain
10.
Area:
a, General 'ropographlc Character: Varying from relativel
tial:
1a,
ant S
anda Irhttluehcet ea*
Improvements standards Urban Area* N/A
ore
canyon bbl toms to extremely steep cliffs and ridge
tops'
19,
vementsarest
F�Ipr17,
lCCllon SerVICC:
b. slopes: vary from 2 10 5%
a• Nearest County (state) Fire statibri: Volunteer
Station #24 at Forest Rahch.
c. EleVatton: 806' to 1600' ASL
d'. Llmiling Factors, None
b, Water Availability,; Water Tendef Ohty
2
soils
20.
schools to Area. Chico Unified school bisirtct
-
a. Types and Ctiaracteristicst-soil is mostly'eharatletlxed
by the Aiken stoney Phase: stones Comprlsd ipptoklmately
so% or more of the volume of the soil. Still is
approximately six feet deep In the project area. Residual
soil from lava flows, rough rock OUlCtOopi'ngs, boulders,
and 'shaliow tolls overlying Tuscan formations also exists
on the site.
b. Limiting Factors: shallow Solis
A.
NaturaI liazards of the Land
A. Earthquake toner Moderate Earthquake itttehs'ity zone
Vill.
b: Croslon 06tentiaM. Highr
Landslide Potentlidi: Moderate
Fire hazard: W t.eme
e, Expansive Soll Potential: Low,
4.
Hydrology
a, Surf aceWAtOlLitt'leClildOCreektnnsthrough thdmiddle
ofthe ptofect site.
b, Oro lid Walerr Unknown
c. brathagd Charatletisticst ntolect Site d taFhs Into the
Lit 10, Chico Creek Drainage basin.
Annual WNW
Petll3
e, Ud. lfhd Fars,otnfaylimited grouhdwateVisuallseeiiic
5,
uailt� rxoeltenl
5.
Acous►ld 00atlty: Codd
7,
Air Wality. Cood,
titolbgloal rn'Vlrbnmel'1L:
1
Ermental Clheckilst * Evaluation of Envikornmental' Vapact
10
'I.. �ivxitcvtdazr:lvi IIWkK;'.Vb (Continued) vts MAYBE 'No DISCUSSION,OF__ENVIRONMENTAL EVALt7ATION
(Continutd)
ENVIRONMENTAL REF,ERENGE MATERIAL
I, Ma i1- Earthquake arid Fault Activitty: Sel$mi
�aety Ele ent, Butte county General Pian rev isecd
-77, by C'H,M H M ! .
Min EH,V i'll ButteueCounty General tI an r vlsemdi : -77, by
CH�h1 -i i i I ,
M p 111-1 Subsidence & Landslide Potentlaas S f'ety
CHement, (3utte County General Plan revise I-77, by
CHA Hill,
4. Mau 111-2, Erosion Potential. Safety Eleme�nnt, Butte
Coppnty Genesi Plan revnised 1-77, by CH,M rit I (.
5. CoUnt'y(GenerapaPfAnereviisled I 77feb+ 9A4 HILI>Butte.
Pa h 3
lanl relIy"l eod's1-77, Noise,7. Butte County General
-uttee Cc Uh y G neralhPlan>reviseniit�-� ghbyyC ,h1 Hilt'
8. ;Mi.o In1I-�4, Nat& Fire HaiZa�rrClan est. S.fety
&IpeL,tl'f .Butte aunty Cenera an revjsed I -7T, by
9. forhBuot eBcountyepIannfng' Department, 1983,Marin`ir19.
epartment> County Planning
10, chool Dlstrlct Map' Butte
11. ChICo Nltrat Study Map, Nitrate Canabhtrati n in
Shallow Wet s. 1983. b Debartmert t of Water
Resources Northwes5tteern ,yIt tt ct, Ttte Resources
Agency, State of Calftorhia,
12, micuttural,Preserve Map, establishedb Resolution
b�-17&, Butte ounty Board of Supero sors,
ember 5, i 98Z>
13. 'F'load Insurance Rate Mas, atlonal Flood InsUran e
Program, Fe eral Emerge cy anagemeht Agency, 1989,
14, USGS Quad Maps`, Cohasset, 105.
15, peopartment oht'%gricu Lurercwllle (192'6) Area, U.S.
16. soil survey, of Of I ie (1926) Area, U.S,
Department o AgriCU Lure.
17.Rut- Court Fire Protection. jurisdictions an
a � ttf �. Butte Cau tV fire De artment. and
Anh?rgloepaePtmeti�ent of potestry. autte County
Lill. 1
DATE: duly 17, 1990
SUBJBCT : Richard. CHERRY - TENTATIVE 'PARCEL MAP
AsSrSSQR'S PARCEL NUMBER(S) 56-39-18'1 63-02-53
LOCATION: 4 parcels located on both _sides of Ten Mile House Road approx.
1„5 miles easterly of Hwy. 32. Forest Ranch area.
Attached are documents regarding, arzi a copy of:, the above-described tentative
trap for your rev er. If you have any suggestions, additions or recommendations
,.-• nccrrdhg this project, please return themto this office no later than
1990
Very truly yours
WiIliam Cheff
Director, of Public Works
r
1
J Mendonsa
sistant Directo
i
JM/kk
attachments
Jut.
Orovtlla► Califom
Lb 1160 (4/89)
+ r
COLMY Or BUTTE
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC 14ORKS
7 County Canter Drive
,+
Oroyille, CA 95965
(916) 538-7266
DATE: duly 17, 1990
SUBJBCT : Richard. CHERRY - TENTATIVE 'PARCEL MAP
AsSrSSQR'S PARCEL NUMBER(S) 56-39-18'1 63-02-53
LOCATION: 4 parcels located on both _sides of Ten Mile House Road approx.
1„5 miles easterly of Hwy. 32. Forest Ranch area.
Attached are documents regarding, arzi a copy of:, the above-described tentative
trap for your rev er. If you have any suggestions, additions or recommendations
,.-• nccrrdhg this project, please return themto this office no later than
1990
Very truly yours
WiIliam Cheff
Director, of Public Works
r
1
J Mendonsa
sistant Directo
i
JM/kk
attachments
Jut.
Orovtlla► Califom
Lb 1160 (4/89)
+ r
7
is
COUNTY OF BUTTE
DEP16M MENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
7 County Center Drive
Oroville, CA 95965 s v
(516) 538-7266 �>
i
July 17, 1990
RE: AP 56-39-18 / 63-02-53
Richard Cherry Tentative Parcel Map
10 Via Contenta #'D
Carmel Valley, CA 93924
Dear P Cherry:
This is to noti+y you that your application fora tentative map for the
rt is being submitted Co the Planning Department
above -referenced property
for environmental determination, and to the Environmental, Health Department
for its review.
This app
lication will be considered complete when we have received
l Health
notification from thecessarYgdataahavenbeen received the roThese adepartments
Department that all additional information they may require.
Frill contact you regarding any
Very 'truly yours;
William Cheff
Director of Public Works
In Mendonsa
In
Director
TA/
cc:
Planning Department
Environmental wealth Department
Y'
IATA �Uitd'�'t+. i'�at�nin�
TLD 1120 ('Revised 2/86) 5raviila, fom .
{
i r'Q,b. rxcE OF DET ;
EPCM:E NAT _r OIC
Office cif Planning and Research FROM; Butte Count
1400 =Tenth Street, Room 121 Planning Dertmant
Sacramento, CA 95814
7County Cer,clr, Ml;ive
0'r Oroville, C, �j5�'+r .
_. County Clerk
County of Butte
S"' J*XMC-x s Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Oectton .21108
or 21.152 of the 'Public Resources Code.
rom
P,�;t,6ect Ti; "ye AP 1t Name
Tent,at vie Parcel Map 056--390-018 & 063-030-053 Richard Cherry
C T g _ <.
sftsia��r�tted to�Clea�ingehouse) Gontact,Person Telephone ;lumber
_, B. A. Kircher (916 5. ) 38-7601
FvojeCa Fjocation
V � se
1"xo a+y,Ten Mile HouRoad approx. 1 1/2 miles east of State Highway 324
•�f f _
j `t Description e
1PM c divide 168 acres to create four 40 plus acre parcels.
This Is to advise that the, Butte County
project am.. w
(head Agency or Responsible Agency)
has approved the above-described on and has made
(Dr,te)
_ the fllowing determinations regarding the-above-described project:
ZThe project .. will, will not, havz: a significant effect on the
environment.
An Environmental impact Repolt was prepared for this project
pursuant to the provisions of CBQA,
r A Negative Declaration was-pared for this project pursuant L'he
provisions c:, CEQA.
3. Mitigation measures were, were not, made a condition of the
Approval of the project.
4,+ A statement of overriding considerations was) was not, adoptt
for this project.
Th.,'-s is to certify that the final ''IA with comments and responses and record b
pteiJect approval is available to the genera).. public At!
Butte County Planning Department
1 County Center Drive
Oroville; GA 95965
Date Received for filing and
Posting at OPR
Signature
_ter
Titley J
r .r r -
x n Butte, count
_ +NSA. `d .'� � r: A.. - _
' I 1 4
ti .� '.
-. '' DE:PARTM,ENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
WILLIAM /,R11)) CHEFF Director
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE :OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965
CERTIFIED MAIL Telephone: ,(916) 538 76Bt
RONALD D. MicELROY
September 27, 1991 DePuy DImetor
Richard Cherry RE: AP 56-39=18 and 63-2-53
10 Via Contenda, #D TPrI
Carmel Valley, CA 93924
Dear Mr. Cherry•
Please be advised that the Du'tte County Advisory Agency will hear
your application on the above -identified property on November 4, 1991.
The Agency will be reviewing the findings from the Planning Department
and wiil °be considering your, tentative parcel map, Public Works will
recommend the conditions of approval as listed on the attached sheet.
The meeting will commend; at 9:00 aim. in the board of Supervisors'
Room, County Administration 'Building, 25. County Center Drive,
orovillei California.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this
office:
Very truly yours,.
William Cheff
Director of Public ►Jades
Johb Mendonsa
Assistant Director
JM/ds
attachment
cc; Planning Department
Environmental Reolth Departmeht
Sierra [Jest Sur fc.�y'1nQ
RICHARD 43HERRY TENTATIVE; PARCEL MAP, AP 56-39-18 and 63-2-53,
4 parcels; located. on both sides of Ten Mile House Road approx. '1.5
miles easterly of Hwy. 32. Forest Ranch area Engineer: Sierra West
Surveying
E?"blic Works conditions:
1 Verify legal access.
2 Provide two-way traversable access RSS- -7D-1 to each parcel from
a county maintained road or state highway.
3 Access Lo be reserved in deeds ss per county ordinance and offered
for dedicattion on the final map,
4 Show 50 ft„ building setback line measured from centerline of access
easemerc.
5 Provide road maintenance a8reement,
6 Show all 'easements of record on the final map;
7 Provide streb:t name signs per requirements of the Department of
Public Works 'prior to recordation of, the final map.
8 Provide cul -da -sac at the enol ()f the street.
9 Obtain Cal Trans encroachment permit and construct: standart ro3d
approach providing adequate sight distance at the intersection of
access road and State Hwy. 32
10 pay any delingfilent taxes or cuutteut taxes as required.
11 Meer the requirements of the Butte County Fire Department.
Health Dept. Conditions;
12 Provide a 100 'ft. leachfiel.d free setback around existing wells
either "within the property or within 100 It, of the property boundaries:,
13 Show a 100 It, ltachf ield setback from the highwater lints of the crin�l't«
14 Show a 100 ft-, 'leachCield setback from the: spring watvr6
15 Prove that t'he required quantities of Jlomestis water are available or
place a statement on the map that states "There is no evidence that
domestic water i$ avialable" for parcels (NOTE' 40 -acre parcela.)
Planning Dept: conditions:
16 Establish
�amii
um 5ffoot bufer ne around each "plant po.pri;latiob
preventto disturbance.
17 No alteration of existing "draintip, including no artificial runoff
into natural drainage containi%ng rata plants,
VN
� l
ifs
t,
CHEW, TPM
18 Construction of barriers to prevent trampling J,rmage to rare species by
foot: or vehicular traffic.
la No livestock grazing in the vicinity of rare plant populations.
20 Pay applicable Sheriff impact fees as adopted by the Board of Supervisors.
The following mitigation measures are required;
I Place a note on the map which states, "Deer Herd impact fees shall
bar paid at time of building ,permit issuance Tf applicable.
'Pince a note on the alternate or additional map sheet of the final
map stating, "Automatic fire suppression sprinkler systems shall be
installed in all residential structures in accordance with the
National Fire Protection Assn: Standard for the installation eaf
sprinkler sy,ptems in l and 2 family dwellings and mobile homes; NFPA
Standard 13D, The purpose. of the installation of sprinkler systems is
for additional safety and properry protection in the event of
residential fires. This inst8lidtion will reduce the demand for
structural fire protection services in those instances where the
are installed;" y
3 P180e a,100 ft. setback from the centerline of the creek as a riparian
protection/stream pollution zone and a note onthe map which states,
No planting of non native vegetation, cultivating, or earthwork, or
disturbance of the area within 100 feet of the centerline of the
creek shall occur."
Place a note on the ma,p concerning archaeological resources which
reads as follows, "No buildings or structures are allowed on the
east side of the creek without an arahaeological clearance."
Pay $200 pE%r lot to the Butte County Fire Dept/Calif. Dept: of Forestry-
Fire Prevention Water Tender fund prior to issuance of building
permits;
r ;