Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout058-330-016Rutfa Co. P1 if 73iJ I:TF C0 -JN SEP I T.:.ANC7T>Tci:MI±.NGT S�1 7'C1�'� I♦'OR ' 1ii C 3 1� M./1Ti' QR StiL7313 :r V:D` C C)N M /�'I' Orovilla, Giqutafalq' Items 1. 4 t.0 be completed by applicant: ` APPLTtrANT NIJE AND JDDR1sSS: 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION* -- 3. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL MM "BZR(�) •• ` - �� USE; 4. PROPOSED The £dllaWinE items are, , to be completed by` die -Planning Department. X ZONING.: LA14D CONSERVATION A(11i1:tE1dT;:�✓-- CUii}? GENERAL _ PLAN DESIGNATION: Devalo meat Site Desiariation Criteria: YES 110 it as recommend} ecktldti O P oma' erg - the Poll or�in& c t . ens i (✓ _ ~"' AROJAEOLOGICAL RECORDS CHECK - 2. 2 ---- BOTANICAL SURVEY 3:: V �� GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 4, ti 6 Ll-�j- 7: � -- —" WITHIN DEPr�It11�TT£' OF FISH AND GAME D1aVugI iVMT ZONE: WITII7N FTAOD PI.4114: - -- WITHIN ARE*-,: SPECIFIC OR ?C 1Z. LM, USE P.LAPT: Sta££ Determination: Substantially conforms- t�a�: - Tf Yes,�'�'fc�'�•�---�-`� Plan GENERAL PLtN: x� Land .Use Name o£ 2. Cons ervation----- . 3.' Open SPace WITHIN URBAN P.ESIJRVE.� 4, Safety If Yes! - *-lame a£ Reserve G, Hciusnp 7., Circulatian PORT LANA USE PLAN: ----�- } A ZONING, G1.2 N'c ea,u�EtaTs: 40....IK% ,.�, Z� I7atq --%y t Staff Signature 0'. r ----------r-' pop THE J2%$'ESTED tAn, I AM AWARD OFT bVl; STA11' DExERMI1IATION REGARI)Ti1G AS THE APPTaICMq DIVINING, h 1lE COI,I>:OP 4ANCE WITY TtiE G?rNE12 L "PLA? Alt 1411 Aatnd SiDtiature of ex' are orad t,e lrsfrardWd .ix, (6) matttFis from the; date o;E tl� staff sainature ylris 'reportiYl p UD 1000 (re1.sa-$7) f )Lrls MAYBE NO A. PLANT LIFE. Will the proposal result in substantial ai Range in the diversity of species, o.r number of any species of plants (,including trees) shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants;? , c.- Introduction of new species ofplants I into an area, or in a btirrier to the normal replenish- ment of eXistinG species? d. Reduction in, acreage of any agricultural crop? 5.' ANIMAL LIFE. Will the proposal result in substantial. a.Cid tinge in the diversity of species)' or numbers of any species o.f animals ,(biro;, land animals including reptiles, fish and shell fish;,. benthic organisms ,or insects)? b. Reduction 'in the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? c. Introduction of new species of.animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals'? x d. Deterioration_to existing fish or wildlife habitat? 61 NOT -SE. Will the proposal result in substantial: Increases in existing noise levels? b . Ex osure' of eci 1e t.o severe noise levels? p people ?C 7. AcantLl;REht }aldl the produce proposal siCni g � g n 8.' LAND USE. Will the proposal result in a 5ustan tial dltGration of the J)resent or planned land use of an area? 9. NATURAL RESOURCES; Will the proposal result in substantial: a. Increase in the rate of use of any 4 attn�ai resources? b. Depletion of any non rienew ble naturdl resources? 10. RISK OF LiPSET. Still the proposal i.nvolvo; a. :A ris,.r o explosion or the rel ease of hatord- atis substances .�includi�ig, but not limited ta,' oil,, pest i:cidesi, chemicals °or radiations in the event of an accident or.>tpsetconditions? b. Possx'' ,e interference with, an emergency response plan or emorg ricy, e.vdczation plan? ll. PO,U'14alt the ;proposal ,altez• the .Location; a stribUtUn,° density,', orgrowth rate of the Human }loptilati.oti? .� (lt Cl INO. will. Che Proposr�� �tff'ect existilig hoos;i.ng, or ctoate a demcfth '-onal s11g? 1 itr addl a. L houi, f YES MAYBE NO 4, PUNT LIpE. Will the proposal result in substant=ial. 'number a.' C. ange in the diversity of species, or of any Species of plants (including trees? K shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants). b,: Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare x or endangered species of plants? Introduction of new of plants into rin c. area, 03• in; a barrier to the normal rPplenisla� merit of existing species? d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural e5.'ap? S. ANIMAL;LI1;E. Will the proposal result in substantial: a Ciange in the diversity, of species; or numbers of animals (birds, land animals of any species I reptles,'fish and shell fisc,, X benthic organisms or insects)? b. Reduction i'n the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? Introduction of new species of animals into c. an area, or result in a barrier to the or movement of -animals? d:. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? 6. NOISE. W* the proposa.. result in substantia]: leve; s _�- a: increases in existing noise - b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? 7. LIGHT AND`GLARE. 1jill the proposal produce s gni .� cant�1`ght and g,l.are? 8. LAND USE. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of alae present or planned land use ,of, an area? 9. NATURAL RESOURCESSe Will the, proposal result in substanti al a, Lncrease in the rate of use of any, na-aural resources? Depletion of any non=renewable natural resources'? ..� l0, RISK.,OF UPSET: Mill t}c proposal involve. the release n hazard- a: A, ris,Qxplt�sion of aus substances (including, but tot limited ta,: oil, pesticides, ctemical.s or radxaton� in the Conditions'? even=t of an accident oxo; upset b, Possible nterferonc.e aaitli an emergency evacixatiori plan? response plan or emergoncy 1. POPU? ATION. 1��11 the proposal alter the f theahumari " rate rxtan, dens.aty', or growth x population? 1�; HOUSING. 141..11 the proposal affect existing housing"," tonal h ousing? or cxeate a ci;emand for addl : -AOL y" ALA B Nom?: ON/C1RCUi ATIQN. Will the proposal 1 TRAIJSPGRTAT result in : Generation of substantial additional vehicle. 't a, movement• �, irking facilities, or e, lStiag p b,. Effects on demand for ,yew parking? existing transportation ; c Substantial impact on systen. ?�-. d. Significant alterations to present patterns 'Or movement of people" and/or of cirrulatort goods? e goods?t ons to waterborne, rail or sir ttalesc? f.; Increase in traffic hazards to rnoto bicyclists,or pedestrians`? aveL an PUBLTC SERVICES- Will the pr'onewaorhalteredef£ect 4, o upon, or result in a need governmental services a, Pine protection? - b police protection' c,. Schools? :�. recreationalfacilities? X - - d;, Parks or other of public facilities, including e, Maintenance mads? . Otjier ;governmental services? 4 5. ENERGY. tiVi11 the proposal result in:' , F of substantial amounts of fuepri e ist ng� e b. $ubstantial increase in demand up require the development v or sources o,1 energy of nev sources of energy? thefor UTII, 'TIES I�il1 the proposal rter.ata nnses,atoneed 6 . al new .`�"sy etas , or substantial following;: mower or natural gas? a, b . CO M)t�lnicati ons systems?` �c. Water aV,"i7.a,bil it} septic tank? d. Sewer or e Storm eater drainage? _ 3C , . Sola. waste and disposal? 17 . Iii1A:a-=1 �, IVB the proposal result �n health; hazard or potential creation a , of an? mental health) heal;t? lzhard excluding to hcalt}i b E:�p ostrre of people ,po,tentaal; hazards? rl�e'pxoposal result in the r o .r IVI. E v ew op e.ri' t 1$. AES, scon�c vasty or` x astruotIon of a'y ro os;al resul.t"� in the p c x r xll Mae P oft the pufa l .� , offensive s p croatio.n o.f a itaesthetically to public vier . 4 YES T4A No; 1, Will the proposal result in xecra1ona1. of existing _ — 19. REGREAT' or quantity upon the va"Ity opportunities? CULTURAL RESOD—RCES. 20result 'in the alteration t �e p ra rasa or • ' a Wi7.1 . , .p.. a p rehistaric of or the .destrut� on of site? li sical fi Y _..�. historic archaeological r osa`1 result xn advers'e Wi11 the p p rehistoxic or b or aesthetic eeCtstructupre or object'? --- c bAi!d�llg, gtentxal to cause stor noes the proposal have the p which would affect un�.que C. sinal chane .. a phY religious ethnic cultural values? restrict e,cisting r d, Will"the proposal act _ within the p'oential imp or sacred uses area?' I�I5G JSSTON OP ENVX tONMENTA� E iALU_y w AF�pI icant: RA chard WrobeI Assess.nr's Parcel 1t AP 58-33-16 L:afl DATA_ SIAEE�T A P, ro: ect-999S.—CI-Rt-lo 1 2.. Type of Pra,ject Var i arice ©r eF Descr pticyn= Tn allo the creation of a three acne rind a i acre parcel In a zone with 8 10 acre m i n'i mum 'Int size. 3. Locat i on'. On both .s i, des, >of El Bran Lane, apprC+x i tnatel y 500 feet south of Hoffman. Road, on the northeast s i,de o f Lake Concow s i r. the Concow area north of Oroville. 5 dwelling 4. Proposed Density of Development'. Averages acres per , unit 5. . Suracing: Minimal Amount of Imperviousf Nearest Public Road(s) Via Eloran Lane and Hoffman 6. Access land Road, approximately l m I I e to Concow Road 'which is"publicly ?» ma i nta i=ned . Method of Se -Wag Disposal- Individual' sept{c tanii systems 8. 9. Source :of Water Supply Individual Wells Proximity of Power l..'ines= Powefo lines will need to be eKtendod 10, onto the property. Poten't ial ,for further land d vi;s ions and development= None under existing 'Zoning. 8» Environmental Settios� Phys i cal' Emr'i ronment' 1.: Terrain .; a» Genera'i Topographic Character*. Gently rolling valley and mounts i:nous sett, i n9 . b. Sl open: Generay''lY 2,0-30x .slopes with areas of 1b-15% s`�oP'es and some areas over, 40,%•` c. Eilevswk;1 n- 20102120 ft, A.S,L» d'. Limiting actor-= Areas Of s.�eep sl apes. 2. Soils. a. Types and Gtiara�cteristics= Modesty soil ser Losy somewhat excess i ve l y dra; ned w i th,' rap d pe;rmeeb i ty 20-0 l nchas deep. b» L lniol ting Factors The somewhat ex'c,es i ve drainage ;may contribtito to weer qua! LtY degradation experienced in nearby ' l sic e, Concow by the TherMa 1, i to rr i shat i on R i str Natural Hazards of the land Earlrhquake 'Zone Moderate i esrth�f lake; mons i tyi Zone V I%I I a b Enosion,'Potentibl- Vo ry High c L sands 1 ;i de potent i a,l = High d F i_'r-0 i lazarwd - fi gh 'e,. Expand; voi 1 f caterit i al?,_: Lrs�d 4', Hydra logy a Surfa.ce. Water: Nva WIral dra i�n'age�., ways; ex 1st. on th,e' s i t t o. .east w�, i ch f 1 oW, to t�!nco w Lake i tamed i tato l y to the s �L h [J b . Ground Watdr = n. nawn t` r iiin In Butte Gounty, the intensity to be expectOd from 11 solve local V,izl'1tl ions all CaI`�h�LIaCG is v7II, 14, of VTT to I1 on the Modified Mercalii SC11.1 o. The intensity„ as measured on this scale, is o��'� expxeuake a h during al Brt q -- ctures of the damage done to _stru scale is paraphrased 'below Fart ,of the vil tlnreinforced buildings- With 90041 workmanship weak chimeys and mortar suffer cracking; n break; sonic plaster falls., 1lITI Damage ta, and same partial collapse of, well-built but unreinforceci buildings; some damage to reinforced buildings; -stucco tanks 'twist falls; chimneys and elevated and fall': ZX Heavy damage to, and some complete collapse buildings; serious damage to of unreinforced reinforced buildings; general damage to foundations; Structural damage. may occur and ls'describerl in the (;expressed in terms of various Modified hiercall scale, kinds of buildings and related structures): e. Land Use: Several thousand acres of open space, p ri_ woodlands, and grazing mrY1y consis"ting of forests, land, lvatlid be converted to rural residential uses, creating potential land use conflicts. f. Acoustics. The overall quality, ysusq 'tibleuonlyatoapartial luould decline. TI Is impact P mitigation (see Section 4. �. g. Aesthetics. The overall quality of this scenic, open present high levels space area would'declinc'from h� Circulation., Substantial traffic increases: on existing roads be narrow, w�ncly substndard` local access, .would sustainedunder 'max�muzri development potential, paxt�.cularly d Goncoiv Load Le cels _�o s'erv�ce an vary ous roads .1101A c co st'ian: and travel time,. decline_, sricrcas`ngxaffa Traf£ic,hL'i rds }voul.d also increase, pn.rtacularl'y at ti05vevor p.r,intaxy area - access Hi t tay Ill ntarsoct on, , 70j i.s capat1'lc o.i" accommodati'n eansiderable (Itghruaj lanes cxst (control.lcdccess ex.pr,es,s- inerea,s;es snce w ay')