Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout058-480-002PLANNING COMM~ xON SUMMARY SHEET FOA LAeIVZSyQNS it Intor De ortm" O p t'ar. 'ems®ra ndum IV. ENVIRONMENTAL I ACTS exp anati ons a a l `'ryes"' anal "maybe" answers are required on attached sheet(s)) YES MAYBE NO 1. EAR71J. I Will the proposal result in significant: a: [instable e� rtli Gonda tions or in changes in geologic substructures? ,>C b Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcove,ring of the soil'? Xcr c. Change in topography or ground surface relief ,features`? d. Destruction, covering or,modification of any unique geologic or physical.. features? �C e. Increase in wind or water erosion of ,soi-l.s,J either- on or of -I -site?,. is Changes in deposition or, erosion 'o f beach sands„ oi^ chang`es in siltation, deposition or erosion which may, modify the channel of. a river or stream or the bed 'of the io,cean, or any bay, inlet ar lake? �Cc g'. Loss of prime agriculturally productive soils outside desianated urban areas? lI Exposure of people or property to geologic; hazards' such as earthquakes, landslides; mud. slides', ground: failure or similar hazards.?c 2. AIR. Will the proposalresult in substantial. a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? b. The creatioin of objectionable odors, smoke or fumes? c. Alteration of air movement, itoisture, or temperature, or any change in climate; locally or regionally? 3. NATER; Will the proposal. result in substantial.: Z --changes, in c uxrents.j, ox the course or direction of water movements in either waters?� marine or fresh. b. Change's in absotption rates,,, drainage patterns-$ or the rate 'and amount of surface' runoff? �G c. Need for off- site surface a,rai.nage improve'- ments, including vegetatitin removal, ehann�el- i zataoii or ul.vert installation? �. d. Alterations to the course or flow, Of flood wat, ers;?;�. e: Change in the amount of surface water, 'in any water body? f. D.schaxge ntosurface t�iaters, .or in, any alteration; ; °surface, water quality, including but no lim wed to ,etnperature, dissolved oyge or turbidity? g. Alteration of the direction ,car rate of £l ow of ground waters? h,. Change, "in the q.uanttyar gua1�.'ty of ,grouric� �+iatears, either throng}a direct additions"or w th- draWals, or through interceptiosi of an _ aquifer .by cuts .or exta, ati.o7is T i. Reducti an the amount :of water �otherwise�' avallab"le fqr public; water ut;lpplzes? j: Exposure�of people or property to water related hazards suoh. as fl,o0ding? YES MAYBE NO PLANT LIFE. Will the prop,os;al..result, in substantial, a: GTa`nge in the diversity species, or number of any. species 'of plants (including trees, shrubs , grass , crops , and aquatic, plants) ? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare species of or endangered plants? C. In of neW,species of plants into an area, or in a barrierito the normal replen.ish- ment of existinb specse5? d. Reduction iri acreage of any agricultural crop? x - S. ANIMAL LIFE, Will the proposal result in, substantial: a, Change in 'the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animal& including reptiles, fish and shell fish, ben-th c organisms or insects) b. Reduction in the number's of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? c. Introduction of new species of animals into an. area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movgment dl animals? d. petetioration to e,Cisting fLsh or Wildlile V habitat? ✓.. 6. NOISE. Will the proposal result in substantial, a, Increases in existing noise levels? k b. Epasure of people to severe nois5e levels? 7. LIGHT AND GLARE,. V1111 the proposal, produce sYgn �csnt light and glare? S . LAND USE .: Will the proposal result in a su stantial alteration of the present or planned, � land use of an area? 9. s NATURAL RESOUR.CE5:� 'Will the prop as al result in. T5b stantial: A,, rncz'ease in the rate of use of any natural. re5o:urce5? b. Depletion of any•non-renewable natural resources?. 10. RISK OF SET,, {Vill the pJ;opo.sal involve a. Acis" of`exploSion or the xelease of haxard4 ous substances' (including;, but not limited to, oil, !,pe.st,icides, chemicals cr.radiations ,n the event of ori accident o,r upset conditions?' b, Possible ntetferv,, e.w'ith an emergency response p'1 an or emergency evacuation plan?; 11, POPULATIL��1. IVill 'the ptoposal alter; the location istrjbut on)L dens iityr or grotut i ratse ho .hum popaIation? 12. 4OUS'1NG. Will the pro�iosal. affect •e;xist,ng housing,, or create a demand for additional housin -4- +► ii 1 YES D 4AYBE M13. TRANSPORTATION% CIRCULATION. Will the pz'oposal` _ ..— result in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicle movement? U. Effects on existingparkng iGcilties, or demand for new parking? C.Substantial impact on existing tx'anspo`xtatiort systems? �`C- d . Significant alteratioixs to present pattern's of circulation or movemen`G of people and/or goods? e. Alterations to waterborne, rail orr air traffic? fe .Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Will -the Proposal have an efeet upon} or result in a need for new or altered governmental services ; a. ,Fire protection? b. Police protection? c. Schools?� d,. Parks or other recreational. facilities`? � Maintenance of public facilities, includ::1.g roads t f, Other governmental services?, 15. ENERGY. Will the proposal result in, a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel .or energy? b. Substantial increase :in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of hew sources of energy' 16. UTILITIES.` Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations tr,` the following:, a Power or natural gas? b. Communications systems? c,4 Water ava.ilabil itys d, Sewer,,,O,,r septic tank? e Storm water drainage ? f: So`l.i d waste and 'disposal'? .S K 17, HUMAN HEALTH. 19111 the proposal result in= A . Creation of any health, hazard. or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? X 11, b Exposure of `peop,, e to potential° health I arils'? 18' AESTHETIC&, III!: 11: the pxapnsa-1 result in 'the sttruc f� on of any `scenic vista t vzew open, to, the public'.or 111a11, the proposal result in the creation o an aesthetically ofiensive'sate opon to pub i c view -4- YES willthe 1AX2,'NORECREATION- xes proposalupon thet7tYr uan,iult in an impact,tyOpportuniies Isting recreations a . CULTURAL ' RESOURCES. a• Will t e proposal result in, the al of or the destrteration uction of a prehistoric or- b. archaeological ,its? b. Will the proposal resui In,adverse h si or aesthetic effects to or 'cal G a prehi:;toriP hiistaric vui.ldin c. hoes fihe g, structure ar ob7ect? proposal have the- a physicapotential to chan l' change which ehwould afect unique n1c cultural values? • Wi11 the proposal restrict exi,stzng religions or sacred uses within the — area? potential impact V. "DISCUSS, ION OF.,EIVVI`RONMSNTAL EVALUATION ....� . AP 8-48-2 See attached i JSF EN'4�TRON1"!ENTAL EVAi Ul TON AF' 58-48-72 D C AZO" I b, c 7.e i f 2b G f s©eve 1 crpm� nt .�f � oust Q� Qsr a kaon t chop 1 acement , property Hill 'resw~t 1 i n a sma 1 1 compaction or overca'Verino of the soia la which should not ke significant impact. All of gsttte 8auntY T s locate d 'n ,a�V�io,ocated a rc uFnatol y 4 h Zone V1:1 X a The subject property the Campbell H1 Intensit'� be associated with "I1� ml � es east of faults khat mayqf the 8,19th It fault system, and apprOX i m ,tel Y 8 m i 1 es n:o�'^Consl:rUctIon ofebu i 1 dings ,These faults are all of unitnpwn activlty• tc' Uniformu i 1 di ngode1^ stcotectai aandrdstores i r�entsa In. case t a� seei sm' o should,'proyide adequate pr Oct lvitY• of rad« The sit, }ect pt^opertY i s located i.n �n area;surro¢n t1gti,cal winter habitat far the East Tehama Meer Herd.,Duo ° dtlyela tat this protect stiould not have a sianilicant efl"ac on deer habitat 1n the area» 8 The subject Property i s currently zan®Th siebr�ss i gnat i tan naro'1 then designatlan is'A-orlcul urog etidential. 1' 1 ut i can;. res�kl � of1. the 1'�'�3 L i mna 7 o9Y Study which addressed p�atent i a'1 po sources into the Watershed of Magalla aare parraloir anhisaarermd ecvnfrsrmse Lake ot.e. tt�e scsuth- Tha devil opment of Study Was compl cued: ted the xonina adapafter the 1J mnologY Add l t;1 onn+�1 Y a this pro ject Hill ,no"' r^esu" t i n another b4� i 1 d i rig site, Drat'wl11 separate two exIistino dWe11Ines . -� c f • Devel opmerit of an addi t i canal hcamnhaza^d1 1 Due toothed ION 1 Y 1a y =thereby i ncr.e�as i.rt9 to trar-fic in the area�sthis impact should not be ei�niflcant. wte of the area. roads), an Though riot sioniflcant this pricesoject wt 11.rine0trural area j'naremental 1 n,crease i n demand f►r public sery as The sub. Oct property ,is located in an area of high 0,616-0148,1 son S 1 t i v i ty. , An arahaeo 1 do i as 1 survey ` has been, orf armed, ar7d clear^anc is reoomrhenr ed. X� tY1e�f�DATOR`l F�,NDTNGS OF 57CNIi=1►{�i:E �� a: See Item0a.,, I Applicant." Joseph A. Graz i onO oks' sessor "s Pares), it Log8E�-�q1-09�t� QATA ShlET_ A. utas_ i%€iir .Dascr i i c rt lo Type of .P.ro,ject:. ;Tentative Parcel Map, Boundary U i no Mori i f 1 cat'i on .. 2�', Brief Descr-*Iptionlz Dividing 10,04 acres into twro. r aree 1 s of 5, acres each. (Boundary Line lYlod i f 1 coat i on w i '1,1 rjzui t In a third parcel of 6.89 acres.) C ocat i on On the West s I de of North 1 ak e' Road, ei Prs sc l matel y 1600 feet south Of Coutolen.c Road, ;1n the Maga1ta inrea. 4. t Proposed .Danslty of bevelopmen� 5, acres per dwo:i1ine LAni.t. 5. Amount of Viipery i crus Surfacing."M i r i ma1'`: 6. Access and, Nearest Publ' i c Road( s ? ProPeritY fronts on, Northl ake Road., 7. Method of Sewage D-isposal-``, Individual septic systems. 'a . Source Of Water Supply'". individual Wells.. 9 , Prox I m i ty of 'Power L i nes = To property 10.. Poto tial for. further, land, ;divisions and devel oprtaent: Norte under exist i ng zon i no., S. ;��lyj„r,pnr�t3nt�l Settin�a Pys i C' 31 Er1,v r -o f? _'1 r "i'erlra i n r :. a. General Topographic Character,: Mountain r i d ie trop with relatively gen l e 81 . ,s. ; t:,'* 81 ope,s : 0 to ,'1 591 genera i l y $-1,01X* Ci . E1 evaat i.on » At j�rox 1 mately 26807 dee i 'above sea 1 eke 1 . d.: [..I in i ti ng 'Pactors: None, 2. Sdils , a . Types and Character i st cs: Mostly Aiken 801 1'` 8er" es' generally wet 1 dra 11 ned:' W i th s1 owper-meab'l. 1 1 ty. Gohassat So IT Ser i osl gk4hera 1 TY -1 '!wel 1' drained w 1 th t4oder4iwe Permeab i l i ty, _ on: the easter) y portion off" the property .. ;near the road. U. L'' It;ino ac, ors- Ares of s1tlW per�lneat l7 i. y. S. Natural Ha:� 'rds of ti 6 Land a.' Barl:hquake Zone hioderata Bar'tiquale,rits+�s'i tycina �J T I, . ' b. Eros. i ori Itstent a l: S l 1`�ht . c. Landslide Potential: LdW ' di' P i re Hazard: H !,,oh X01 1 Potent.l al = 1�ladei~ate . h . EIydPo 1 oby a. 5urfstze'..Water� None on site. b. Groundwater= ibhkncal�in .