HomeMy WebLinkAbout058-680-005PLANNING C..�IISSON SUMMARY SHEET rO 2 ,ND DIVISIONS
e •
MM
TQ�
Butte. County Advisory Agency
_
FROM.
Plann_,ing Director
SiJf3JBCT:
Report on Tentative P
58-68-5 ( ptn ) arcel Map for Renaldo N. Herrera on 1#
DA'T
August 11, 1986
This is a proposal to divide '24 acres to create 4
zoning is FR -5 (Foothill. Recreational
parcels. The present
Plan Map
5 acre Parcels). . `�'he .and Use
the Butte County General Plan designates thirt
ill
theFootarea.Area
Area Residential There are no specific
area as
or, community Flans for
The Proposal does not conflict with County, zoning
Proposed element of the Butte County Gene ral'lar�
nor any, adopted or
ot
apIf
or community plan.
nor any County,
Recommend
division.
a continuance to allow the applicant to
Compliance
consider a too parcel
300 feet
with themitigation measure
of Nelson Bar Road or the
of homesites wi; hi'n
2 of the
access ear�sure
Lunt map must be meto unless modified by
between el 1 and
the
Supervisors.
Baadpar
r
w
F, ,ter
.y
'
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMRACTS
(Exp anatlons of all "yes' and "maybe" answers are required
on attached`sheet(s))
1. EARTH, Will the proposal YES
p p, al result in significant*,
`Unst4bl.e
MAYBE No
a.
earth condi t ions ,or :in changes in
b
geologic substructures?
Disruptions, displacements, compact, .an or
M
overcovering of the soil's
c.
Change in tapography or ground surface
'-"" ---
relief features?G
d.
Destructio.n,,CoVoring or modific tion of any
unique geologic or physical features?
k
e,
Increase inwind or watez• erosion of soils,
either
f .
on or off-site?
Changes in deposition or erosion of beach
_ C-
sands, or changos in siltation; deposition
or erosioii which may modify the channel of
a river or stream_ or the bed of the ocean or
any bay, inlet or, lake?
g.
Loss of prime agriculturally productive soils
X
outside designated -urban areas?
X'
h.
Exposure of people or ,property, to geologic
hazards, such
as earthquakes, landslides, mud-
slides, gs'ound failure or similar hazards?
X
2. ATR. Will the proposal result ,in substantial:
a.
Air emissions or deterioration of ambient
a1 quality?
b.
The creation of objectionable odors,. smoke
or :fumes?
c.
Alteration of air movemdTjt moisture; or
temperatuze, or any change in climate;
locally or, regionally?
3. WATER. Will the propo-sal result in`substantialr
a;
Changes in cuxrents, or the course or
di-reo.tion of water
b.
movements,in either
marine or fresh waters'
Changes,in absorption rates,,drainage patterns;
or, the rate and amount of surface runoff?
c.
Need for offsite surface drainage improve-
ments; including vegetdtion removal;; channel-
ization or culvert ,i.ristallation?
d.
Alterations to the course 6 flow Of flood
waters?
e.
Change in' the ;amount of` surfat�e water' in 'any
water,body?
f.
:Discharge into surface water$ ar in, any
a]tteration at ;surface wa_er quala ty, xnclucan
but not,lim,it.e to tempexat �t�e,; disso'.1ved
gig:
6xygon, or, turbidity?
,4ter,atioz� of the airecti obi nor rate o�f" flow
G
of ground wa, ers?
R.
Change in t, 10, t{uantity rr quill by of` ground watex•s,,
e� tf�e thxdugh direct aodit ons or wxth-
draw a:ls, or through intoYceptidn of an
aquifex by nuts or`_excatratioiYs?
jt
i .
Rducti on in the amount .of date r othe`rty se
-"'�
svaablo f OL T9 public Water upp. 'C
xposue of people 'ox property to water
related hazards such as .loo;ding?
_
YES
4 . PLANT LIED .Will.' the
I�fAYBE Np
-~--
proposal result in substant,'al;
a•'Cha, in the diversity of species, or
number
of any species of plants
shrub's p (incl.ud'ing trees,
grass ,` crops , and aq,uat c plants) ?
b, Reduction' of the numbers o.
x
or endangered species of plants? ___._W
an.* unic{ue, rare
c• Introduction of new
species of jan into an
area, or in a barrier t'o the normaltreple
menu nish-
.�.%<
of existi;ng species?
a. Reduction in, acreage
of any`agricultural crop?'
-
5• ANIMAL LIFE . Rill the proposal result in substantial;
a� C11 nge in the diversity
,of species, o:r numbers
of any species of animals and animals
including reptiles,
fish and shelllfish
b'enthr,c organisms or insects)?,
b. Reduction in the numbers of any unigUe, rare
or endangered species o
'
animals?
Co Introduction of new species of animals into
—'
an area, or result in a barrier, to the mi gxa.tion
ar movement of ainimals?
• Deterioratidn to e.41s
habitat? "' ting fish or wildlife
b. NOISE-,11 the proposal result in substantial;
a
b. Eeposure ofnpeople xto
ellevels�levels?
searere1noise
7. LIGHT AND BLARE. 6V11 the Proposal A produce
significant light and glare?
8 • LAND USE. Will the +proposal result in a
su stantial alteration
of the present ox planned
land use of an area?
9. NATURAL ADSOURCDS; {Pill the proposal sig stant� a1; F P l r.esll t i.
a: Tricxeas�e in, the rate of use o any nat`ral '
T euc7UZ C.es?
b: Depleti;an o any non-renelvab e natural
resouxc,es ?
10,• RISK. OF UPSET. Will the
a. A ris of
h e�tplosan Or, thesreleaseof
1. Pus substances ncludinr� h�°�zarcl-
�- but
ai1 k, not , Iimlt0d to,
pe5txcides,chem�icals ar, radiations inthe
event of an accderit or upset candations?
b.` Pas ible'int�er erenee. wit- n emergency
response
p1ar� or emergency oauat3on plan:
POPULATION. ' dill the, proposal al 'e location;.
astr� utxon, densxtor
�
growth rate of he,human
population
12 , EQUSING tV11 i he proposal affect era s ting nous ,ng;
ox create a'ciemand fo;r additional
housing?
Y
''
3
A*
YE'S
MAYBE
NO
13.
Wi,11 the proposal
resultORTA"TION/CIRCULATION.
int
a. Generation of substantial additional vehicle
movement?
b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or
demand for new parking?
c. Substantial impact'on existing transportation
'sys tems ? _ l:
d.Sign ficailt alterations to present patterns
'
of circulation or movement of people, and/or
goods?
e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffi.e?
f. Increase in traffic hazards to motci!e vehicles,
bicyclists or pedestrians
14.
PUBLIC SERVICES. Will the proposal have an effecl
upon, or result in a need far new or altered
governmental services:
-;a. Fire protection?
k
b. Police protection?
X
c. Schools?
X
d, Parks or other recreational, facilitiesl
j4
e. maintenance of public facilities, includixi g
7
roads?
f. Other governmental services?
_
is
ENERGY, Will, the proposal., result in
a. Use of substantial, amounts of fuel. ,or energy?
�(
b. Substantial increase in demand upon exist .ing
sources of energy, or require t;te developmont
of new sources of energy" -
16.
UTI11,TIES, Will the propI result in a need, for
new'new s,ystens; or substantial alterations to the
fallowing.
a. power or natural gas?
b. Communications systems'
c. Nater availabil ity;
—'-
d. Sewer ox septic t-ank?
'drainage?
e. Storm vtatar
f. Solid waste and disposal?
i,
HUMAN HEALTti. ` Wi11 the' proposal result in:
a.. Greatiari of any health hazard ox pot.en„tial`
health ha 'ard (excludi i mental "health) ?
j�
b .Expos lre of'"�eaple td }iotential 21 eal l:h
hazards?
I 8,
AESI'iiET_ SCS+ }1x.11; 4}xe' p oposa r.esul t in .the
0 5trticl:xon'of airy Scenic v'sta or view op ri to
the pubIio, or will .thea pxogosal' result n the ,
creat�Jonof ari aesthetically often x,v,e s� te. oVon
to° public view?
LE
MAYBE N
i9. RECREATION. Will the proposal result in an impact
upon the duality or quantity of exiMing "recreational
Ise
opportunities?
20. CULTURAL RESOURCES.
a, V►i17 tie proposal resul't in the alteration
of or th.e destruction of a prehistoric or
historic archaeological site?
C
b. Will the proposal result in adverse.phys Cal
or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or
historic buil- long., structure or object?
c. Does the proposal have the potential to cause
a physical change which would affect unique
hr
ethnic ctxltura_l values?
d,. Will the 'proposal restrict existing rel .Mous-
or Sacred uses k'ithln the potential impact
area
V. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AP 58-68-•05
See attached.
b. Groundwater: Unknown. Near -surface groundwater 1s
unlikely.
c. Drainage Char-acteristics: Site drains mostly southeast to;
Hotlapp Creek. Some drainage to the
west towards the West.'
Branch of the Feather River Canyon.
d. Annual' Raanfa l (normal,),: 50 to 55 Inches.
5.
e. Limit ng Factors: Possibly 1lmlted groundwater.
al/Sonic Qua Hight'. Lake
near Orovllle recreatlon
at -ea.
Acdust i s (qua 1 i ty : High - l i tt I :e resi dent i a[ or lira ff l c us`e i n'
the
-
,area
T.
;Air �ualit Motle.rate
Y - to
B 161661
r: l "Edy i ronment
S.
Vegetation: Grassland with scattered oaks predominantly, oak
woodland throughout
area. Some riparian vegetal ion 1n the
area . _
9.
411 dT i fe ilabi tat: Upper Sonoran !L If eZane; cr^' i t 1 cal w inter
deer ran e for the Buck's Mountain Deer Herd,
Cultural'
Epv;i rontnent
10.
Archaeological: and Historical Resources ;n tha area: Recorded
arc haeologicalsites
11.
exlst in the area and possibly on site.
Butte County General Pian d6signation: Foothill Area
Residential.
12,
Ex1sting Zonin,9: FR -5.
1S,
Existing Land Use on-site: Gr�z109 land: Majority of
property is undeveloped open land.
14.
Surroundins Area:
a,, Land Uses: 81m11ar project sit
homes: e'w1th w(delY scattered'
br Zoning: FR^5o FR -40 and i=R-;1 0.
C. Gen. f''1an dos ignatia's;, Foothill Area Residential and'
Graz
i ng and Open Land.
d.. Parcei S1zes: Varies widely, general'1y very targe (80+
e,,. PopU 1 at ion =; Very l ow derl''s i ty - wide 1 y d i "spersed
15.
.
Charactk_r .Uir S l e and Area: Open undevel opeci pasturage
16.
ii
IVe rest Urban Area. Orov 1 1 l e �- 20 hi i,1 es; ` Farad 1 se, - 15 MI l ens
by road.
1T.
Relevant Spheres of 10f1uence: Kane
1E3.
I"'Prov�emoehts Standar•cls Urban;; Ares: Wo;
"Prdt
Fire ct
o 1 on'= "Sery i ce.
a, Nearest Cainty C State) Fire Stat i an • Station "" #S an
C:ancow Rp.ad a sessona l Stat i ori il36 ' at Oarbo' Gap, Oro'v 1 l l e
Station #68.
Z0 ,
b : Water Aya i 1;ab i l:i ty : !. Ca as 1 t o
p y ro trues, wa 1 1
School"s i n ' Area : Go l den` Feathi.e�
Un i_on. Scl�o"o l 171 str"1 ct and
Orov 1 l l e Uri i oii i l l gh Schon 1 b 1 str l dt
-9-
N
V
_ _. _.. ..� ��. i mno�iie�.TNF RFSOU