HomeMy WebLinkAbout061-080-136•
• .. .�• a �, - I � �a
TiS
S
b
f
f
n
I
a
,
y
i
George Robiso
APPL10ANT
ADDRESS P.O. Box 1
OWNER______sam�e -_---
PROJECT DtZCRIPTION- T(
cels. 3 @ 20 acres
,MISSION SHEET FOR LAND I7IViSIC?NS�6 _07
ive Parcel
--A I C- 3!
5
o
a'
and Bald Rock Road
p8SES80R' S PARCEL NUNIBER(S) 61- 0 8 -].3 PROJECT
CIaN. PLAN, A& Res
DATE APPLICATION REP -1 N YG. F dro- i..1e, GA 6 1984 J 5
Assoc. Box, )Sb
B,o� �: Gx ale 5 � PUBLISHED
DATE pUgLICAT ON NOTICE-
iVLACE NEWSPAPER NV' 10E(S) VUBLISHEl7 - 0 C . P. a • B.
DATE MAILING I,IST PPEPARtD _._._ I3[,"idBER
DATE fi1AIT,•-0UT 'NOTICES WRITTEN.
DA'L'E PLANNING DIRECTORIS RLIPORT PREPARED _
. _ ----
CATEGt'IICAr, EXEMRTION DATE >!ITF-D
ENVIRONMENTAL --_
DETERMINATION NEGATTIVt DECLAtaTTON - DAr ADDPTED�.�_�--.._._.
AND DATE _
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION _ DATE" ADOPTED.. ?�L---
Nv. ImPACT REPORT DATE CtRTIVIED -
,SUB• COi-l.4Taq%E I�JETING DATE --l- _
ADVISoRIC AGENCY HE' ARlf;° DATE .. ---� •- a
ADVISORY AGENCY AOTT014
BO.4RI5 AC'TI(J N-
II.
AVPIMD1 K i
COUNT 2V 1i11'1"U
J3NVll�0YM NTAl. CHI'CKI.Iti'i`
{ L"gid `i��-77-- ei ca - Asir y J
l.eaJ, a 84--07-25-01;
P J, 61.-•08-136
I . Narnc* cis' ltroponertit _..... George 6Robigson _._,.
K Address or proponent and representative Iif applieahlc'J
P. 0. Box 175 Ron, Graves & A.88oc
Orovill CA 95965 P. C"
: Box _98i..
.� Oz ov 1 A CA 95965„
5, Project description _ �entat�ve Parcel Map
h _ _ y `t,� t?I' �itiNi:TJCAivCI t"I:i MAN 111, NO
11AzxI1Ai't►Tt"1 T?itiltlA .�ati _..�..�--- _..,.._ .�-�--
a. �lietes the project have the potential to de€ va& the
quality of the env i rGrime'nt , substantially rc di" r,
the habitat of .a Vish or wildlife species, e."auunp a
CIA or wildlifo hop"Itition to drop below seal(
s,utat+.airinglea.els, threaten to eliminate as plant or
animal vommrinity. . reduce the naamher or restrict the
rianl,e5 of .a r'irr or rhdaan-e'red plant or animal or
l►minatea imper"r'iz ', . .Ar 101 UC they major perind.s gip.
or ('aiii-ornia history or larehisterv? IJ\•
h. Does the project have than heatent i aal to chr.vv(,
short-term benefits to the dvtvimerat or long-tprm,
environmental goals' l;'e short-term impact on the
environment is onv uhreh occurti in a re"'lativuly
brief period of time while long-term impacts will
QS00 into the tutur s.)
t. true+s the project have imparts which pare indit'idaa
sally limitedl but cumulatively consideriablu? (A
project May impact an two or more yepararte regoure•eG
where the impact on each resource is relativc:l;
small, but where the effect o f the total of those +�
impacts on the Environment is signtlieaant.l w_ l
d. Doesthe faro j any t have environmental effects which
will K. aaus substantial
ubstantis1 ad,FM1 a sv Y. ffects on human R'
beings, dither diree tiv or indirectly''
DI..'I'litIMINA`l TO'N' (To he completed hd the Lead Age'ni f
On tht basis or this initial ev alnaationt
I Wli find thv proposed proieet t,()ttl,lt \WIT have is significant effect
on than environment, and a &HUNrIVE MICLAi2iVB ION Will he prepared,
I1wu Cines that although the prnposed project could have a si.gni.f"
Vatnt effect on the enviroarment, thore� will not be as significant
effect in this case hec rrl.;c the TUTIa,ATICK Z'IT;ASIJTtlil'l described on
the attached shoot have boon Wed to the project. A WATIVII
OLCLARA1'1t1N will he lrrel;aarOtl.
l,'T a rind the proposed project MAN have a signi nvaant effect on
the environment, and ;an ENVITlOWU N'l'AL IMPAS l'ltaatlllT is required.
DAM SeptemQ 5 r 1984 rt JN'TY OVBUTTE, PLANNiNC nVPAlt'1`l HNT
�,.• .. ,.
Tuttle
"'kr 0),,t e Iylanne
Ile+
,.TVA ENV IRON14ENTAL 19ACT
a 1 'yes" and "maybe" answers.'are required
p, anations o
attached sheet(s)1 YES
r-
MAYBE NOon
l. EARTYi. Will tfle proposal result in significant:
conditions or in changes in
A
a. unstable earth
geologic sUbstructAAres?
compaction or
b. Disruptions , displ •.cements ,
the soil?
overcovering of
c Change in topography cr ground surface
relief features?
d. Destruction, coverinor d ficftti011 res? o"f any
unique geologic physical
wind or water erosion of soils,
e Increase in
either on or off-site?
beach
in Or eros iondoeposition
f. Changes liepc`sition
sands, O c�7anges in siltation , p
chann(°L Of
o erosion which may modify the
or the bed of the ocean �)ll
a riper` Or !stream
any boy, inlet or lake?
agriculturally productive SOUS
loss of prime
g' outside designated urban areas?
to geologic
bsure of people or property'
il. Exps11C}I as earthquai:es landslides ,, m�id.�
hazards
slides, ground failure or similar hazards?
---�
2. AIR. Will the ,proposal result in substantial;
deterioration of ambient
a. Air Omissions or
air quality'.
The creation of objectionable odors, smoke
b.
or fumes? moisture, or �---
c. Alteration of air motioment,
in climate.
temperature, or any change
locally or regionally?
WATER. 1Ji11 the proposal rethetcin suborancial=
3.
a. Changes in currents, o
in either
direction, of water tnoveahents
marine or fresh waters'. drainage patterns,
b. Changes in absorption rates ,
the rate and amount of sarfaco runoff?
ea
or
c. Need for off-siteurfacedraremo�ai�m channel-
menu r includingvegetation
iwation or c:ul,�ert• installation? --_-
flow of flood
d, Altera.ti.ons to the course or
waters?
Change in the amount of surface water in any
e.
water body?
k. Discharge into su�•face waters, or in any ,
ti'ater c,ual i uda ng
dssolvodity
alterata on Of surface
but not limited to tempea store,
ozygen Or turbidi.ty?
Alteration • f the direction or rate of flow.�
g of ground. waters?
in the quantity of ground waters,
11, Change
either thraugla direct a.ddi.tions of with-
interception of an
drav'aals or through
aquifer by guts or excavations?
water otherwise
..
i.r Reduce inr� in the a.aatount of
fob public water supplies?
-
available
xpo,.,ure of peopl. Or Property t� water
ng .
.
re'l ated hazards suca� aslood�
'YES
NU1yn'R
No
4
PLANT LIFE, Will the proposal result in subst�Yn,tial.
a. C age in the diversity of species,
or nujp�,)Or
of any species of plants (including trees,
shxubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)?,.
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rarQ
- —
or endangered species of plants?
C. Introduction of new species of plants into all
area, or in a barrier to the normal replenish-
ment of existing species?
d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop?
S.
ANIMAL LIFE. Wili the proposal resin in substantial:
a.: Mange in the diversity of species; numbers
or
of any species o.0 animals (birds, land aniinc".l;ls
including reptiles, fish and shell fish,
benthic organisms or insects)?
�(
b. Reduction in the numbers of any unique, `rare
or endangered species of animals?
c:. Introduction of new species of animals into
r
an area, or result in a barrier to the migration
or movement of animals?
d. Deterioration to existiilg fish or wildlife'"
habitat?
X
.,
6.
LAOIS'.. Will the proposal result -'In substantial
a. Increases in existing noise levels?
A
b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels?
7,
LIGHT AND GLARE. Will the proposal produce
slgnifa+ant 1 tht and glare?
8.
LAND USE, Will the proposal result in a
suFs ial alteraltion of the
present or planned
Land use of an area'a
9i
NATURAL RESOURCES: Will the proposal result in
substaz al 3
P,
a: Increase in the rate of use of any natural
resources?
b. Depletion of any non-renowa.blo natural
resources`
10.
RISK OF UP8ET. Will the proposal involvac
a+ A r '
:T explosion or the release of hazard-
ous substances (iheluding, but not limited to,
oil, pesticiejes, chemicals or radiations in the
event of an accident or upset conditions?
b, Possible interference with
�-
an emergency
response Plan or emergency evacuation plan?
11.
PCPULATIO14, Will the proposal alter tete location,
Usfr b zion densitv,
or growth rate of the human
population?
12.
HOUSING. Will the proposal affect existing housing,
or create a demand for additional housing?
VES. Mt1YJ.?.la NO
13. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. will the proposal
result in:
a. Generation of substantial additional vehicle
movement?
b
Effects on. existing parking facilities, or
demand for new parking?
C. Substantial impact on existing transportation
systems?
d,
sSignificant alterations to present patterns
f circulation or movement of people and/or
goods?
e. Alterations to waterborne, rail, Or air traff'ie?
f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles,
bicyclists or pedestrians?
14.. PUBLIC SERVICES. will the proposal have an effeQt
apon, or result: in a need for new or altered
governmontal services-.
a. Fire protection?
b. police protection?
c. Schools?
d. Parks or other recreational. facilities?
e. Maintenance of public facilities, including
road~? --=
f. Other governmental services"
15, ENERGY. Will the proposal result in:
a. Use of substantial amounts of fuelo`r energy?
b. Substantial increase in: demand upon existing
.sources of energy, or require the development
of new sources of energy?
16. UTILITIES. Will the propsal result in a need for
new systems, or substantial alterations to the
following t
A. Power nr natural gas?
b. Commun:icati.ons systems?
c. Water;
d. Sewer or septic tank?
e. Storm water drgiliage7
f, Solid waste and. disposal?
1i. HUMAN HLALTH. Will the proposal result in.
a Cregtaon of any hoaith hazard or potential
I
lioaith hazard (excluding meatal. health) ?'
b. Exposure of people to potential health
hazards?
18, AESVETICS.will the poposal result in the
o stru Mon of any scenic vista 0I° view open to
the public, or will the proposal result in the
creation of an aesthetically offensive site Cipon
to public view?
,4.:
RECREATION. Will the
proposal result in an inipact
U'Ponthe quality or quantity itY of existing recreational
20. CULTURAL RESOURCES.
a. Will the proposal result in the alteration
of or the destruction
of a prehistoric or
historic archaeological Site9
b. Will the proposal result in a*dv(-,,rsephyseal
or aesthetic effects to
a Prehistoric or
historic building, structure or object?
C. Does zhe
Proposal have the potential to cause
a PhYsical change which would affect
unique
ethnic cultural values?
d- 'Vill the
Proposal restrict existing religious
or sacred uses 4%ithin the potential
area?
DISCUSS 'ON -9—F--E—!NV-1 �ROIM'!ENTAL EVALUATIONAP
61-08-136
1b: Preparation of four homesito locations 8/29 will r
disruption and overcover4ng of exult in
soil 8urfacesi soma
lc: Provided development occurs towards the northwest of each
Parcel, extensive grading will
not be necessary.
le,ft On-site soils have a very high erosion Potefttial, Any
increase in imperviou8 8urface8o
removal x dirt -road cuts, or ve
will e acerbate this condition. Small. amountsg
eroded will bedepositod
ofetation the soils
in area drainage ways.
The property is located 4000 feet south of the Big Bend
and has a high lindslidepotential. fault
theAll construction 1,
Uniform Building Code for Sei,91-nica.` activ 4-0 comply with
drainage facilities e areas.
and stabil Landscaping,.
Of land movement. i2ing help to minimize threat
4ae Some mature trees 14111 be removed prior to hOmesite
development..
5C,d: Butte Cot
Itty and the Department of Fish and Game have
developing pol,(-
1,1.08
been
to reduce conflicts between :residents and wildlife
needs. In thi.5 area of
Critical
I winter habitatfor the
Mountain DOf"t.- Herd i the Department of Fish
now Bucks
and Game recommends to
PArC012 Of less than 40 acres. This map has been forwarded
the Dppr,!�,:j -,lent Of Fish and
to
Game for input, To Mitigate impacts to
the 40 acre Minimum Parcels
ne,o�*Lj,sar and fehciho restrictions
y might be
13a,c., UP to 28 AOT can be nerated Ono Bad Rook
road is Paved from Oro-Quincyge1,jqhway totRoad. The
14a6 A high to extreme fire iZintlPoad - dirt thOteaftet,
fire station (#61) hazard ex'sts on-site. Berty s located 2 Miles to the southwest., Cr6ok
'DAr
N �®RY �V-tNDINr-S OF SIGNIPICANCIE
as Continued approval
deer ranges tod of land divisions Within identific
and taj8os 11COS habitat,mitrrataton corridors
-d
severs
litymortarates,
4
Applicant:_ Geo.rge Robi
A*ssor's Parcel # 61-08-1.36
DATA SHEET ERD Loe # 84-07-26-01 ---'.
A. Pro,j act Description
• Type of Project: Tentative Parcel Map
2. Brief Description Land division of 9356 acres create three
parcels at 20 acres,each and one at 33 acres
3. Location: Southeast corner of the intersectioOf n
Way and Bald Rock Road Green Cedar
0
Proposed Density of Development 1 DU/2G acres
5. Amount of Impervious Surfacing: Slight
6. Access and Nearest Public Road(s): Bald nock Road Frontage along
northwest boundary
Method of Sewage Disposal:` Septic system
-
8. Source of Water Su.pp Supply: 1 � Individual wells
9 Proximity - of Power Lines:- Along Bald Rock Road
10. Po°tenti-al_ for further land diva ,ions and development: Unknown.
Environmental Baffin
Ph sical Environment:
1 Terrain
ai General Topograp1lio Character: Gently to steeply sloping
mountainous terrain
b; Slopes: 10-30%
e. Elevation: 2400 - 2975 -
d Limiting Factors: Slopes over 30
Soils -
a. Types and Characteristics: Chaix, 20-401' deep, gray to yellow
brown, Coarse sandy 1,oam:; moderate-ra id
p permeability, medium-
Yiigh suitabilityfob: timber
b• Limiting Tactors: Moderate acidic
3» Xatural Hazards of the hand
a» Tarthquake Zone.iL. 4000 feet south of the Big Bend fault
b. Erosion Potential: Very high d`re hazard: High-Bxtreme
c Landslide Potential !
xigh� e Expansive Soil Potential
;Low --`
4.
I�ydrology
Small tributary to Bean Creek at southeast section
a, Stir 'ace Water : cornet, Baan Cteek; southeast:, Berry Creek northwest
APP Gndix '
Data; Sheet
continued
0 AP 61-08-136
b. Ground Water: Unknown resource ----
c. Drainage Characteristics: Soils are naturally well drained
d. Annual Rainfall (normal) : 60-65 inches _
e. Limiting Factors: None .—._^_.----w-- _
5•
'Visual./Sonic Quality: Medium
6.
A.00ustic Quality: Good
Air quality:__ Good . --
Diol oRical
Environment .
S.
Grasses, calif.. Black Oak, Incense Ct t,l, 11" Ponderosa
Vegetation: �aJ
Pine, sugar ar Pine
wildlife Habitat: critical winter deer herd area (Bucks Mountain
Herd)
ci,l.tural. Enyironmen G :
10
Archaeological. and Historical Resources in the area: Low�-
including unknown
11.
Butte County General Plan designation., Agricultural -Residential:
Existing Zoning:_A- 5
r land Use on-site; Undeveloped
1 Existing `-
1<<N. Surrounding Arai'.:
a. Land Usezz: 8ing1@ family residential at rural densities
b A
Zcni��� -5 south of Bald Rock Rdad, A -P ► TP -160
c. Gin. Plan designations:.. A r'icuitural.-Residential Timber.
Mountain
acres major, of larger paraelc,, small'
d. Parcol tSizus:Parcel
e.. Population: Extremely.!parse
15 Charac� r of Site and -AreaExtreme rural
16, Nearest Urban Area: nroville + 24 miles . southwest
17. Relevant Spheres of Inf l.uence :—National forest 1000 feet east
18. lmprovemonts standards 'Urbar, Area: 1`iIA
19. ViMze Protection otion Sr el.
a.. lles.rest CduntY �Pcatc) lwi.re Stat on: _ #61 Berry Cruel,. stat,.ion
b. Water Avail.abilit _�. ump truck
�, . Pioneer union Elementaryi Orovi;lle Union High ,
fib. �choals �.n Area. - -
Appendix V (b)
•
GEORGE ROBISON
ATTORNEY AT LAW
P.O. BOX 17.5
OROVILLB, CA 95965
(91 6) 533-9138
auf•fa Co. Planning Coma,
%EP 1- 1984
Orovillo, Caiiforn o
SeptOliihor 13, 'JI -984
County of Butte
Office of planning Com.
,Attn: Laura M. Tuttle
7 County Center Drive
Oroville, CA 95965
Dear Ms. Tuttle:
1 have received the copy of the l.otLor prepared
by maul C. Jensen, dated September 4, 1984, concerning
my proposed division of AP #61-08-136. Apparontly Mr,
Jensen is tieating the "panel re qr-1►` as though it had
been adopted by the Board of Supervisors and constitutes
the later of Butte County. r believe that that is incorrect.
T h e map proposed complies With ell of the zoning applicable
to the property and complies with the general. plan. Further,
as x indicated in a prevl:ous letter, there is no evidence
on the property itself that the property is affected by
any de -,,r herd.. 1 have made a specific study of the property,
as compared to the broad brush used by the Dept. of Fish
and Came. As you no doubt are a% -,are, the Dept. of Fish
and Game identifies Bald. Rock itself as critical reinter
deer range. They have identified the entire area rather
than specific areas.
Regardless of the numberof parcels that are
.f
made on this parcel mnp, the act is
that close to half
of the property will be left in its original. state. As
I indicated previously, 1 really don't see any possible
impact on deer herds.
As 1 indicated previoilsly, l believe that some
consideration should be given to the termination of hunting
as a means of reducing pressure on the deer population,
rather than terminating places for people to live. I person
ado not hunt and 1 beIJ.eve that it is unreasonable
for the Dep L-. of Fish and Game, or anyone else, to expect
me to buy land to devote to their desire to hunt.
The bulk of this parcol i, covered by manzhnita
growing from granite, Tha;, is .he portion rehash would Hast
likely be developed for residential use. Since deer do not eat either
manzanita or granite it should be expected that the forage for deer
M
Y
Page 2
September 13, 1984
will be improved as :Lawns and gardens are planl:.uu, rather
than decreased.
Very truly yours;,
George Robison
GRrcar
cc Ron Graves
i . .
GEORGE ROBISON Buffa Co. Planning COMM.
EP 121981
ATTORNEY AT LAW
P.O. ROX 175 Oroville, Californlai
OROVILLE, CA 95965
(916) 533.9138
Septembvl11, 1984
County of Butte, Planning Com,
Attn: Laura M* Tuttle
1 County Center Drive
0'roville, CA 95,165
RE: Tentative Parcel Map On Assessor's Vo reel
No. 61-08-13h., tiour Log No. 84-07-26-01
Dear. Ms. Tuttle:
I have received your letter dated September
5, 1984, and Appendix F attached thereto. n. rosponse
thereto I hereby offer the Following comments.
During the Past year I have traversed the subject
,property and the parcel immediately adjacent thereto on
many occasions, In fact, I have crawled through the man—
zanita and brush, which is evidenced by the ribbons that
I tied in the brush as I went along, and cut several. trails
across the property. in addition to my Personal examination
of the property I have met 1vith several other people who
hove examined the property, including the surveyor. Several
of those people are avid hunters and I would consider
them to be experts on deer habitat and migration routes,
I don't expect ativ Sir,
I.,nificant chatir- in either
topography or ground surfttUa relief features. .1 new road
of approximately 1,000 -feet w:11.1 be required for the division
but that road does n0i' Mluire significant cut or fill,
The route takes a very gentle upgrade to the higher elevation
of the property; the result being that there is v( ry little
in the way 0." earth movement except on the ro,_idway it—
self. The existing -road serves federal land lying to
the South �)E this property and the Department of interior,
Porest Service, has refused to abandon the easement.
Thereforr,j that roadway is being 'Upgraded and slightly
real.igned. The realignment results in less earth movement
than wwild have been required had the road been rebuilt
it its original location.
There no doubt will be some increase in wind
or water or sion of soils on site. There should be no
impact off ,. te, 110"Ver 1 it 18 expected to be minimal
in view of Lhe fact that large Parts of the Property already
are covered faith exposed granite, The chances are that
development of the Property will result it, some reduction
Page 2
September 11, 1984
RE: Tentative Parcel Map
0
of water erosion because it can be expected that anyone
developing the property would attempt to preserve or incronse
chi available sail. I expect to build on one Parcel aly,.301r,
and expect to bring soil in rather than do anything which
would reduce the soil.
There is nothing on the property which would
indicate any potential for landslides, mud slides, ground
,failure or similar hazards. I -would say that it would
be virtually i m,t o s s i b I e for there to be a mud sI i de on
-Phis property and that it is highly unlikely that there
would be a landslide. The northerly facing portion of
the property has a very gentle slope and the Southerly
facing portion of the property includes massive granite
shelves and massive granite Outcropings with very substan—
tial trees growing therefrom. There is no indication
that; there has ever been a landslide on the property,
including the Southerly Portion of the property which
has a very steep slope. It, would be impractical to con—
struct any improvements in the steeper areas so a change
in that topography is not expected.
My sever al months observance of the property
indicates that there is no wildlife livilig year ground
on the property, apart from squirrels and lizards, There
,is virtually no food on the property of the type cnnsumed
by deer, although there is evidence that deer have passed
through the property: There is . n I o indication that deer
are in the area at any time Of the year on a continuing
basis. In fact, the only sign of deer is on the roadways
and some, of the more open areas through wh-''4ca any type
Of aniWili or human, can easily traverse. There is no
sign that deer have even bedded in the area or done anything
other than simply migrate across the propert�t. So as
to facilitate that migration, ,Tr)po8,
to limit fences.
I I I —
With
With respect to deterioration to existing fish
of Wildlife habitat, this observation obviously does not
Pertain to fish. My observation is that the wildlife which
would be most affected by development of this property
is ligard8 and bear. It is clear from looking over the
property that there are bear in the: area during the period
that bear normally eat me ft 9a ft i ta berries, However, boat
does not seem to be a major concern of the wildlife peoplej
As to the migratory deer, I intend to Post the property
with both no trespassing and no hunting Sighs, I do not
Page 3
September 11, 1984
RE: Tentative Parcel Map
intend to hunt on the property or to permit anyone else
to hunt on the property. if there has been any wildlife
hunted in the area be'f'ore•, this action will reduce that
pressure rather than Cause a deterioratioll. 1�'urther,
prthe property is developed it can be expected tlitit some
manzanita ential
and brush will be removed w roomed th he '1'Iro �r. result
that grasses and other shrubs will be imp
will be an improvement of elle habitat.
In summary, we propose une ] ud..Luw4-5
any potential adverse impact.
1. All earth movement to be done n a time
other than during the rainy season of the Year,
2. Any cuts or displacements necessary for
road improvements will be kept to a minimun and appropriate
ditching will be provided so as to reduce potential soil
erosion
3 Any site preparation for improvements will
be made at a time of year other than the rainy,se son anature
pre-
cautions will be taken to minimize any
of any water runoff.
4 Every effort will be made to reduce thn
the use of approved soil erosion reducti
present erosion by on
techniques. This may inctrucLion of berets
include the cons
te faces that serve as runo�.
across some of the grani°
chan►>✓ls.
5. All construction will comply with the require-
meats of the Butte County Public Works Dept.
G. Although for property,of this size a harvest
plan is already required for timber harvest, we would
be glad to indicate on the map that the Planning p
would be re, <ired to be given notice of any proposed timber
thee, we would be glad to place a note on
harvest,
the map th. any development pian would have to shoe the
location n� ��,�y mature trees that. are intended to be removed.
and that a .r,py thereof t,e provided to the planning fcpir ry
at the same time that a building, permit is app
I We would be glad to show fencing restrictions
on the map, .%it as pointed out above, there is no indication.
on the prod ty that the property serves as a winter habitat
of any kind for deem
vt
1e propose to past the property no Lrespassing
no hunting, which may actually result in less pressure
on the dad if there are any there, because i.~ there
Page 4
September 11, 1984
RE: Tentative Parcel Map
have ever been any shot on the properly in the past there
will not be any shot there in the future.
9. The it movement of this properly should
help in reducing any f'ir'e hazard to adjacent property,
For instance, there are homes under con strucroO�rtin wthe
ill
immediate area. and the development of t, is p �' y
facilitate access to the area and incrc-:ase the potential
fire breaks.
I believe that the foregoing addresses Li'le points
that have been raised. If it does not sufficienCLy address
those, please let me know.
Very 'truly yours,
z
Georg; Rob son
GR•car
cc• R, i Graves
raj
:i:
i 11
F s 1 STAT CALIFORNIA, HE RESOURCES AGENCY
FISH AND GAME
DEPARTMENT OF.
REGION 2 SUITE A
01
17NIMBU5 ROAD, 4 5670
RANCHO CORDOVA, ChLIFORNIA
(916) 355-7020
Sept(BTIber 4, 1984
e
[3u fie Co. Planning CWM
198
fJrovillo, alt{�rnia
DEUK���.ef:
mottle, Associate planner
Ms.
,Laura M. artment
Butte Gounty planning hep
7 County Center Drive
oro�iille ► CA 95965
pear M'1- 21itt7 e; George Robin X11' s ' e 20 , and
the DepartMnt Of F� sYt and
Game has reviewed ce18 of 20, 20
(TpM) to divide 93 acres into four p c of Brush
at -ed at the intersection cf Green
Parcel Nlap Tlie -abject site is ].octelY four. miles ,oath
33 acres each: approxiva e of the Bucks Mountain
Cedar Way and Bald Ro. ck Road ► . �
Ttze area ] s n the cr-It ca winter rang
Creek, PEoel' s report
DeLr �Ierc�: Deer Herd Study
Butte county r riculture-Residential
artment concurs with on lands designated as g transportation cor-
The Dep nds developnnt along specific these
which recx�mme be clustered o f development along
(AR) in the General Plan finds that the idth other constraints (e •g
�� The report recon hould be deterTan by.
ri.clors s etc.) which will be devefunded loped atud�'e
,,t.ransportation corridors setback, se arately
e soil dept?, stream nn ttee ora p
slop ` trough either an ad hoc ce Plan. and Bald Mountain
o)unty in the General would appear to
" The TP[�1
he subject site is classifiedtion Corridox pat: twc and three were
p,oad is a Aas;gnated "transpo' s report if p creels one and four
ntent of the Pan d development within p
COttpplY kith the intent
parcel
ed into One
ong the Bald tbuntain toad• If We
combin �roj �� ; ,;
were clustered nt on the subject L tomenta,
Opportunity to comme Menschr Bnva.ronme
vlease contact Jerzy
�1�hank yn� for theassistance .. 355-°1030
can provtide further telephone (916)
Services superviWrI
sincerely
c�--- N , V -
Paul Ti* Jensen
Regional Manager
A 'NDIX G
WE
M REGARDING ENVIRONMENTAL 114PACT
N Arr'm,"'P, nErtARATIO
1. NOTICE IS HER't-BY GIVEN that the 'project described below has been
reviewed pursuant to the provisions of the California Environineatal
Quality Act of 1.070 (Public Resources Code 21100, et. seq.) and a
determination has been made that it Will not have a significant
effect -upon the eliv,-Lronment. Log # 84-07-26-01
AP 61-08-136
2. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: vid4ng 93o6 acres to cate thre
ee pa-rels
Tentative Parcel Nlap di 1. re
at 20 acres each and one at 33 acres
3. LOCATION OF PROJECT:
Southeast corner of the intersection of Green Cedar Way and Bald
Rock Road, Bald Rock area. PLICANT:
4. NME AND ADDRESS OF PROJECT AP Ron Graves & As-soc.
George Robison
0 p. Or Box 986
P. 0. Box 175 Oroville, CA 9.596S
Oroville) CA 95965
5. MITIGATION MEASURES:
See attachment
of -the initial stl regarding the environmental. effect
6i A copy
othis project is on file at 7 county Center DrIVOO Orovillei
f
This study Was*,
Adopted as presented. Specific modifications and
Adopted with changes.
r_,UT-porting reasons are attached.
7. A Jc hearing on this Negative Declaration was held by the
d
0 islon mak-.ng body,
Ilearing Body Butte County Board of Supervisors
Date of DeterMInatiOn _AoNrember 27_, 1984
Detormiliationt
On tht-, basis of the inlitial study of environinent;ll ( impact, the
inforiftation presented at hearings) colaments receiv , I d on the
proposal and OUT own knoi4jedge and independent rosezvrch:
We find the 'opo project COULD NOT have ft Significant
effect oil the elivironment, and a NEGATIVE DECT,A1;UkTION is
hereby adopted.
alae find that the ptoj dtt_ COULD have a sign' fic-411t Off f"Ct
on the OnVirOnMOnL but Will not '7' this case b0caU50, Of
attached iidtigutiOft no,&sures dpsC04 od 1.
n item above
oj Oct
Which are by thisreforonce Made conditions o project
or e b y
apm,oval-. A conditlonal NEGATIVri MCLARATTON
actopted
Signature
-
Al S race,,' L
&Ittf., County Boaret of Supervisors
IMU
o5o J 11T14
f
AP 61-0on-136
Mitigation Mcns:ures
I. All earth movement to be limited to the non-ra;inyy season.
2. Any cuts or displacements necessary for roast improvements
will be kept to a minimum and appropriate ditclti.ng will be
provided to reduce soileros:i.on.
3. An site
Y PreParat:i.nns .for improvements Yf;ill be m(ade at a
time of year other than the rainy season and p:reCautions
taken to minimize any change in the nature of wa'LLr runaff.
4. Any development of site .improvements will uti.;iiM, 50.11 erosion
reduction techniques such as construction o E beryl$ across granite
faces that serve as runoff channels
S. Limitfencing to 4 strand barbed wire no higher than 48 inches
nor lower than 16 incites off the ground.
W:
FROM:
SUBJECT
is NOTICE. OF DETERM I NAT TON*
Secretary for Re -sources
1416 Ninth. Street, Room 1311
Sacramento, CA 95814
County Clerk, County of Butte
25 County Center Drive
Oroville, CA 95965
Planning Department
F L E D
DEC 4 1984
i' LE/A NO� r
R K BECKEPWQU,11�/ C.,_7K
A� JACI Th
BUY �,_ Deputy
7 Count)?' Center Drive (Filed)
Oroville, CA 95965
Filing of Notice of Determination in ConlPliAlWo with
Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public Resources Code
QA - n 7 1 it
Project Title
'Tentative Parcel ±1�_ AP 61.--08-1:36 George R01) Ison,
State ClearingholTite Number Uf Submitted to State 6
loaringhouse
Contact Person
k Number
John Mendonsa, Public ;Vorlzs (916) PM'l
Project Location Southeast —corner of the !nt 7—SecE7t'&j-1-0--
C—Gr- 0 —0
Bald Rock area.
Project Description,,,
Dividing 93i6 acres to create three parcels at 20 acres
each and one at 33 acres,
This is to advise that -the Butte County -
Board Or Supervisors
_(Lead
has made
the following d0terminati-ons regarding dinthe above-described
proj Ot : 0
1, The project Iqill agni.
have siri
-3 cant effect on
thO environment,
will. not
2, An Environmental Impact Report was Prepared for this
project pursuant to the pl,ovis'lons of CEQA, and was
certified as required by Section 1508s (g) 14 California
Administratilre Code,
4,
5.
A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project
pursuant 'to -the provisions Of C8QA. A copy of the
Negative Declaration may be examined at the Planning
Department, 7 C0Ur1tY Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965,
A Notico of vXemPt-,*L0n !Ms Med indicatins; this Project
is exempt from etwironillen
,
I �tal rovio,144
A statement or Overriding Coles ' dura tloft Eli" Iva
adopted for this project. s was not,
Miti oat*an measures 4doptod bow the Lead Agency to reduce
the T;he approved project impacts or t a r
See attachment P, -
November 28, 1984wy
to Doti A. Streeter
b C., Jr It, I � 00 r� J�
?12
0 0r� tl e:
Mitigation Measures
1. All earth movement to be limited to the non -rainy se,,Icson.
Z. Any cuts or displacements necessary for road improvemkin.ts
will be kept to a minimum and appropriate ditching will be
provided to reduce soil erosion.
3. Any site preparations for improvements will be made at a
time of year other than the rainy season and precautions
taken to minimize any change in. -the nature of water -ru-
,,off,
4. Any development of site improvements will utilize soil erosion
reduction techniques such as construction of berms across granite.
faces that, serve as runoff channels.
5. Limit fencing to 4 strand barbed mire no higher than, 48 inches
nor lower than 16 inches off the ground,
b.
4
coun
But e
_ LhND r7lr 1'3A i IsPA',. \A!t°ALt II A14U BLAQTY
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WoAKS
WILLIAM (dill) CHErF, Director
7 COUNTY CFN'rFR t)RIVE , OracVJL.t. IM, CALWOFxNIA 95965
Tclnphong:(916) 534-1681
November 29, 198)r
Ron Graves and Associates Lig; AP 61-0 136
P. 0. Dox 986 Tentni,,1,vri Rarcet Map
Ocoville, CA 95965 for 000V8e Robison
Gentlemen
Please be advised that there are two additional mitigation Lneasurea
�1 which were adopted for the above-refevenced project by the Adl•isory
Agency on October 29, 1984, aril which were inadvertently cltnittrd
from the letterto you dated Ootobar 29, 1984.. The miti rati t,n
,,,z csures .are as fol.lova
'j. A—, -.% ton%ent of site improvements will utilizc soil
erosion techniques such as construction of brains across
granite facea that 6erve e,s runoff chnruael:s.
18. Limit fencing to 4 stranu ? a.-'�,ed wire no higher 'tkaatl 48 inches
nor Lower than 16 iilc..' off thy: S .- :t" l .
If you have any questions regarding this matter, pleas: f-!tact this
office.
Very truly yours,
William oheff
]director of 'Publ.io 1-forks,
J�r►et plc nE]C1rr sa
A
JM/ds �sistanL Director
cc Planning
Health I
George Robison, p. 0. h ewe 1'11i) O rt,vx llp
otme Co, Planning calm
NOV p 91984
lJrovllo, C;ali?arula
TO:
FROM;
0
Butte County Advisory Agency
Planning Director
11
SUBJF-CT; Report on Tentative P -cel map of George Robison
on AP 61-08-136
DATE: October 177 1984
This is a proposal to divide 93.6 acres. to create three parcels at 20
acres e,ch and one parcel at 33 acres. The present zoning is A-5
(Agricultural, 5 acre parcels). The Land Use . Plan Map of the Butte
County General Plan designates this area at AgricUltural-Residential.
There are no specific or community pians for the area.
The proposal does not conflict witi-i Count:,, zon I AlrW nor any adopted or
proposed el.-ment of the rBUtte County General Plan nor, any County,
specific ter community plan.
The Department of Fish and Game has reviewed this TRntative Parcel Map
for compliance with the proposed deer herd study recommendations. They
concluded that "'The Tentative Parcel Nap would appF-ar to cbrj-ply with the
inten'st. of the panel's report if Parcelv- 2 and 3 were combined i r
into one
53 acre parcel and development within I- ,r -cels i and 4 were clustered
along the Bald Mountain Road".
Recommend approval sub.-Ioct t,3 the followIng condition/mitigation
measures.
gpndition".
J. Recombine Parcels 2 and 3 and cluster development on Parcels I and 4
along Bala Rock Road.
Mi r
j. All earth movement to be limited to the non-raiMY season.
2., Any CUtt or displacements, necessary for resat!improvements Will be
kept to a minimum and appropriate ditching Will be provided to
reduce toil erosion.
improvements will be made It a 'Circe of
Any site prL-parations �or imp,
year othoe than the r&Ihy %eaxSdh and precaution-- ta"t�k to
Minimize any chahgL- in the nature of Wat,"r -rUnc+f.
utilize sail ercasio+�
is will acrO55 q n to
site i.mQrovempn uc,titan o� berms
r ra
�,nw deVel, flpment of such as constr
40 technique-- channels•
reduction uno+f higher
than 40 inches
Maces that serve a5 r
barbOd wire n
�Fenci,nr� to � strand the ground.
Limit Mian 16 inches ofd
nor lower
LM'C :1 Ott
cG: George kohison AsSac
lion Graves ans