HomeMy WebLinkAbout061-350-022��
r
-•
y0
t
IN
1 ; - ; }}��.. G•\
-
_ • _
♦ l'
n
'
OP,
�
1
el -
'. 1
•
r.
<';, �:
,� , ,
e
hl
t
.W f of
e S i� .y <'` •
r � '\ � - • _
a -�,
r
.. _ _a
• �. ..'r L
'.fin
PLANN114G COMMI 310N WIMARY SiIk,ST ,FOR LAND DIVTSTQNS
APPLICANT Dora Leonard Log#t 85-06-24.05
ADDRESS 1266 Butte Avenue, Oroville, CA .195965
OWNER Same
PROJECT DMSCRIPTION A TPM to divide 20 acr. os into 4 5 acee parcels
LOCATION At the southeast corner of Bald Rock Road and Enumclaw Road,
13ald Rock area.
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER(S) AP # 61-35-22 (ptn . )
ZONING A- ; 0^ ►,rsn�tGEN,, PLAN, _ _.., PROJECT- CONSISTENT?
DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED June 24,
Ran Graves P.O. BOX 98i5' `�(1"Ie cam" -9
-�- M-
DA'rt PUBLICATION NOTICE WRITTEN� PUBLISHED
PLACE NEWSPAPER NOTICES) PUBLISHED O. C P, G. B.
DATE MAILING LIST PR:EPARtD_ -„
DATE MAIC, -OUT NOTICE$ WRITTEN MAILED NUMBER
DATE PLANNING DIP.ECTOR'S REPORT PREPARED
ENVIROW%TAL CATEGORICAL EXt- MPTION w DATE VICED
DETERMINATTON'
AND DATE �y NEGATIVE DECLARATION - DATE ADOPTED
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION DATE ADOPTED
ENV: IMPACT REPORT DAT -F. CER'TIT'IT;D.
SUB. 0,OMI4VITEE MEETING DATE
ADVISORY AGENCY HEARING DA'Z'E '
ADVISORY AGENCY ACTION I Y` Y _: 1 � � ltitil �Jt✓?�J �'�
BOARD ACT'.IONl F /1 Mrs
BUTTE COUNTY
GENERAL PLAN CONFoRMANCF—k EPaR�`
FOR PARCEL MAP OR SUBDIVISION MAP
Items i -4 -to be completed by applicant;
1. Applicant Name and address r7tcst l.11
2. Project Description
3. Aeaeesor'.s. Parcel Number(s) _ dol-. S -.2�L ISR-r10u
4. Pr000sed Use
The following items are to be completed by the Planning Department,
Current zoningI-.-- z Land Conservation Agreemollt ,
�a
General Plan Designationet—e"— (,
AOplicable_ Conditional Criteria; Not Applicable
Agricultural-Residentipl. YES NO
1. Agricultural, Compatibility C
2. Water & Setter Capacity --
3. Adequate Firs F'pcilitinn ----
4. Road Capacity & Maintenance
5. Access to Commercial & Schools
Orchaed & Field Crops
1. Predominant 5-10 Ac. Parcel Size
2. Vicinity of Urban Boundaries
3. Agri.... Visibility not; impaired ---
Staff Determination., Project does. does not
substantially—conform to th General Plan and zoning.
Staff Signature
AS :i'iiE APPLICANT rOR TRE REQUESTED LAND MVYSION} x AM AWAT8 or THJ7 ABOVE Mvp
DETE9M NATION REGARDING 'THE CONVO.gUar., WITH IlLg, GENERAL, : A*in 'I.ONYNG.
Lla teal.
_ L� �� ___,_,�,;,,,�,_ .Si�n.att�tr�,lot
N
APR
LD 1.000 (revised 6M00)
MOM,A.�3I14�A�',,i' ql�'�`" a�''Ff'`
+:,, �., .�
t _
T
NOTICE OF DETMWJMATJO�•
WNW
TO-. 1400
FROM: Plane
O?fiCc of Planning aL---D
14ta0 Tenth Street, �Etoom l"e or.ovil Cen�.�iz�
9E d14 ► CA 95q'65
SAcramento, ,CA i -
or
County Clerk
6
:.° . i t,
County of Bute "
F 4 4n.
SZ1MEL—T: Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance w ty
of the Public Resources Code.
«K .
,
85-06-24-03 .�
_Jett it a AP i' Mama
Tentative Parcel; heap E1-35-22 (ptp) Mora Leonard
�.I.. ------
tate �,: sarin o0 yup Contact Person Telephox:rit"
(if submitted to Clearinghouse)
John Mendonsa_, Public Works (916) 534`4
roje�ct 1, C& ton on the south side of Bald Rock Roai, approx. 4CO der` -
of its intersect.cn with Enumclaw Road, Bald Rock area;
,
oleoDescription`
Land division of 20 acres to create four parcels at 5 acres each
This Is t0 advise that the Butte County Board of 80etvis0r-
(Lead Agency of Responsible Ag� e.
has approved the, above' described project and has made the following. ==-WICI'a
regarding the ;above described project:
1. project _.., will, X will not, have a sign ifk:.ant effect on the a r=;
rnt
2. _, An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this prof
to the provisions of C8QA.
X A. Negative Declaration was prepared for t`ftls project gx
provisions of CEQA.
Timm FIR or Negative Declaration and mord of project,
examined ut:
Butte County. Pl.anning Department
7 Count Center Drive: OroVille.,
3 Mitigation measures X were, were not, nkide a condition',
of the project.
4. A statei neat of Overrlding Conslderatio; was, ' _ was ceY 16=r ,tor
�� t
thl3 pDject
Date Received for Filing 1i-~�"" " -t''l
Signe,ure
Stephen A, Streeter
11t e
R Ised�
y
a
Dora Laonard , TentatIVO Porcel Map,
AP 61-35-22 (Ptn), Mitigation Meta;MVes.
Note on map: All cubs to be 2'
or less.
t"
2•
Note on map: No earthwork during
the rainy season.
3.
Note on map: All wells, pools
or
water storage shall be fitted With OF
approved drafting connections;
.
Designate property beyon!: 300"
of
Bald RockRoad Anrl exisbing roads as
no -development area.
5.
All buildings and mobile homes
to
be constrcuted with .dire-resistmg
roofing and siding.
}
1
Milli
._
t r.
.6►� dMiNe iI NAg
11 dun,
ro» tic and of Supervisors
y' BuffeCo. Planning Corrm
_ FRaM;m Depeht NOV I I 1�s
artment of Public Works Land Develop
suejecr., Dora Leonar d Tentative P'Section Orov11194 CallfornlA
''arcel Map " AP 61-35-22 Cptn.)
nnT�: November 12, 19$5
`''ou wili be considering an a
deny 'the tentative appeal 07 the Advisor
This item has been setcformap for Dora Leonard AP Agency's decision to
xpublic hearing on Dov November (ptn,)
g h� l „ 1985,
If the Board decides to uphold the a
recommended conditions of a appeal, the following conditions are
approval:
Public Works Department conditions are:
1. Verify legal access.
2• Provide two-way traversable access RSA -
coullty maintained road or state highway,
Dyl to each parcel from a
3. Access to be
reserved in deeds as per county ordinance 4tnd offered
for dedication on the finaT mar, .
4. Show 50-ft4 building setbacklihe nteastared from m centerline of access
5• Provide road maintegahce agreement„
6.
Show all easements of record on the 7°7na1 map,
7.
Provide street name signs per 1^equirements of the D
Works prior to recordation of the+, finale epartmia
map';., nt of Public
8• Provide cul-de-sacat the end of the
g« hoot..
Pay
y any delinquent taxes or current taxes as r
Environmental Wealth Department conditions are.; equred«
10.
Indicate on the map
p that areas with slopes ill excess of t
C30�) are unsuitable for'sewa�e hirt
disposal,percent
:
y
li« Show the usable sewage disposal area
of the Subdivision Ordinance on proven to meet the require►nents
12. pat' cel 4.
tho map that no water well may be
place
unableo
ofsewage di
SPosal area on parcels 1, 2yo 2»aned d within 1001
4�
C'ont1hQQ on next page
:
I`
�r
The following mitigation measures should also be adopted.
` 1. Note, on map: All cuts to be 2' or less.
2. Note on map: No earthwork during the rainy season,
3. Note on map: All wells, pools or water storage shall be fitted with
CDF-approved drafting connections.
4. Designate property beyond 300' of Bald Rock Road and exi sti rig roads
as no -development area.
S. All burl di ngs and mobile homes to be constructed with fire-resistant
roofing and siding.
r
.r
(916) 534.9587.
�ssoc a e P,O,BOX986 OROVILLE,CA95965
Job #85-034
A.P.#61--35-22
Dora Leonard
October. 3, 1985
Butte County Planking
7 County Center- Drive
Oroville, CA 95965
Attn: Laura Tuttle
1 would like to provide the following additional information and/
or mitigation measures
:dor the above described property in
to
response your memo of 9/27/85.
This area is -zoned A-5. We are asking for 5 acre parcels.
it zoned A-5 if it should
Why
not be split
County zoned it A-5 not the propert`Ogn below 20 acres?
y owners .
The
General, Plan Criteria;
2) We have proved adequate sewage capacity by digging 7 foot
deep holes with a backhoe and the Health Department has stated
they will. require no further proof of water because they know
it is abundant inthis area.
3.) The Fire Department ,s only 3 mines away, open
willingWe � � 1 year around:
and aclear saway brush tfrom �structu,resetopC.p. nt roofing and siding,
standards
r
We would also strongly recommend that future builders install
sprinkler systems and 2000 gallon holding tanks on each parcel
with standard dire hose hookups
4.) The roads are built, inspected and, passed by the County to
ma�.nten�,ncedards . 'they all have standard County apprest ed road
agreements as a condition of approval. They even have.
road signs btzilh and installed by the County:
with several direcBald Rock is a tionsdnfwt�avelc�rlartc��c�led year ',round .rc�acl
circulation. The school,
busses fairly ls* "zOottl" up and down this road as witnessed by pie
during the survey of PVOpertios in this area,
5.) Commercial services is very vague and ambiguous. It is 3 miles
to the Berry Creek Schoo), too overcrowding> they aro seeking
additional. AiO .A. 2h miles to the ",deed Barn" and "idea Shack".
It is only 1 � mil_es from this proper: ty to the paved portion of
Bald .dock road: It is 3:1males to the Sugar eine Bay, where they
also have a chain saw, shop and small. engine repair.
The General Store is only 3.5 miles
propane, hardware, U.P.S. pl, selling groceries, gasoline,
I c up service, etc.
The 130rrY Creek Post Office is only 7 miles. V21 miles to the
Lake Mldr'bne Restaurant, 7.4milesto the Harts Mill Fire
station which is open during the ext:2eme fire danger season.
It is 2.4 miles to the first church, 2-5 miles to Gran
and a 130cond church and 7.3 miles to the Mt. Chapelthe a thi.rdge
church.
8-8 Miles to a T.V. Repair shop, 4.1 Miles to an Avon distributor
and Only 5)1 Miles to the Berry Creek Health Clinic.
The Ca? YOP- Cr0ek Store is 7.1 miles sell -
gasoline. Ing groceries and
Thero are numerous contractors in the area, -
"cats'; etc:. Even. a bookkeeper. -arpentersr backhoes,
I certainly would think this qualifies as commercial services.
As We have stated before there are 22 neighborhood watch
Captains an this area for Police Protection as
Brooks. There are dozens Of volunteer firefighterPet sSheriff Hal.
'i
It is & very close knit, independent and Proud community.
People obviously want to buy property and live in this area or
there would be no demand. Why, and do we gave the right to
deny them this right?
I feel this more adeq,14tely addresses Your concerns than my
first response. It was rather brief because Ocause I really expected
you folks to approve the map as there are numerous 5 acre
parcelsalready in this area and obviously the Board of Super-
visor$ is not concerned With the deer herd issue Until the
Oepartment, of fish and Game comes UP with SOMO cold, hard
facts and also recoqniz
eg tlle migratory deer problem Is a
state resource and should not be pushed off entirely on
individual PrOPettY owners.
Please include this it MY application And response as I have
t,Pque8teO a delay until October 14th 80 YOU can review this
letter.
Rospectfuliv,
Ronald L, Craves
Ron Graves and Assoc $
P. S. a
Page 3
10/3/85
L. Tuttle
1 Just noticed that at the bottom of
.mr-_page One Of YOU)- trio the Last. paragraph states the "applicant submjit.ted�the5
following mitigation measures:"
On page 2 of the same memo, Iter,#4 - "Designate
beyond 300 feet. of Bald Ppropertypropertyock Road as no development area."
Actually, if you Wj"ll read the applicant,;°s letter it
states
item #5 - "Also all building sites will be held to Within300n
feet of the roads. Two of the parcels ftOnt Bald Ruck Roach,
designated as a 7aift transportation corridor. It is our .,
d-
tanding both Planning and Fish and Game want the buildings
to be Twithin 300 feet of this road. The other_
the ether y parcels are exist sting roads built tooun Standards,
-toads t serve
inspected by the County and assed. We plan no road buildin We
axe offering to maintain the building sites with 300 fee
these .roads also. t of
4�C 6NBtl
LAND (06) 534-9687
.UAVeVOnt cIs oc aes
P, 0, 80X 986 OROVILLQ, CA 96965
August 2, 1985
Buffe Co. Planning Come%
Butte County Planning Dept, AU G 5 1985
7 County Center Drive
Oro v i l l e, CA 95965
t?rovillo, Celiinrttla
Re: A.P. 51-35-22 (PTN)
Dora Leonard
Attn: Laura Tuttle
Job #85-p34
We offer the following in response to your checkk list of 7/19/85-
1.) The only disruption or overcovering of the soils wi'.l
be drivewaysad the actual. building site. The dravoways
will _,. .x,
culvebts installed. and appropriate drainage ditches end3{
ed. All work wall be done during the non -
rainy season to minimize erosion. This soil is very stable
with granite rock interspersed. All cuts will be held to
two (2) feet or less,
3.) The only forseeab.le change irn absorption ratep, will be
the actual building and driveway. Limiting the Cuts to two
(2) feet will eliminate interception of aquifers. Georg?
Robison has recently drilled a well immediately to the Northeast
and Ted Runge has also recently drilled a well immediately North,
of this property. We have discussed this with Environmental
Health -and they agree water is not a problem. We will be happy
to provide well drillers logs prior to final map recordation.
All wells, ptaols, etc should have standard fire ',,se hookups.
5.) This is a very lour jr,1q ati(,n t-xrea ,A�&-„-rr, -
� erl k�v 3.nspection
at regular intervals over the past three (3) years There is
very little food in this area to attract deer. We propose
to limit fencing to a minimum 18” above ground. on the bottom
strand and a maximum of 4811 above ground for the top strand.
Also all building sites will be held to -within 300 feet of the
roads. Flunting will not be pea:mitteri.
8.) %'his is not in conflict with the preserla- nor planned use
of this property and is consistent with: useL .rw existing
to the North; South and West.
13.) The addition: of four ilomesitos will not create a sub-
stantial. increase in vehicle movement. It is only a shot
distance to Bald nock Road, a year around (except in heavy
snow) county road. All. access roads are built or will be
bu3jt to County Standards .der this density.
People purchasing in this area do so to ►'flet away from cities
and crowds' and do not expect busses, taxis and other public
transportation.
0131534 ��637
�qm
WC6NY�U --
wnLMOO
vdrr�ne Qi assoc --Les- Pi ofBOXOOG - OROVILLE�Cite9l966
page 2
14.) The increaLe in public services will be minimal. The
school at Berry Creek is large enough to accomodate any for -
seeable A.D.A. They also provide bus service along Bald
Rock Road. There is a fire station at Berry Creek and health
facilities are only a few miies to the west. All. buildings
.. "9 iclx,ng
and mobile homes should have fire aresistant xoofin and s
Any added development in any area means more people. This
in turn eventually meEins more policemen, firemen, etc. It
also means inrre;,sed revenue from the various taxes that support
.hese services,
As soon as this property is divided it is subject to re -appraisal
and « siibsequent tax hike. Any further development also adds
to the tax base.
Re ectfully,
Ronald L. Graves
Ron Craves and A8soc ates
Rta 'kg
r•
. .E
k Infer Depurtn I tailitt"I'Memorandum
To, Butte County Advisory Agency
HrtoM: Planning Director
susj?:cr; Report on TPM of Dora Leonard on AP 61-35-22(ptn)'
°ATT.- September 27
195
This is a
Proposal to divide 20 acres into our 5 -acre parcels. The
present zoning is A-5. The Land Use plan i,,"p of the Butte Count General
Plan designates this area as Agricultural -Residential.
specific or communit, plans for the area. y
There are no
Prior to creation of parcels of less than 20 acres, five
criteria must be met., conditional
I. Agricultural compatibility
2. Proof of adequate Y (not applicable)
e water and sewage capacity (hot demonstrated)
3. Adequate fire facilities
4. Road capacity and maintenance
5. Access to commercial services and schools
As noted on the General Plan Conformance Report, Cziterior
Major commercial services and the high school are 20-z5 miles d'
The initial study ,indicates that -criteria 3 and 4 are5 is not met,
astant,
not met.
The nearest year-round staffed fire station 35 at Keil
distant. CDF'statistics indicate that 8.$% of all fire department
-,y Ridges 1$-20 miles
be caused b g, faulty whin Improvement fires.
g These fires can
Structural are for and im ro woo
ural fire ProtectiOn is inadequate, dstoves and water heaters.
traffic Near the Project, Bald Bock Road is in pool condition. Additional
y .ill lharease demands for road maintenance,, Polity 4Wlijo states new land dor `nCe,, Circulation Element
their fair share of the off-site roadns should
be held responsible for
traffic increases that the �nts needed to handle the
y cause..
Department of Fish & Game has identified this property as cr
.range of the Burks hottntain Deer herd. itical winter
P
». g
. F&G recommended three houses be allowed oft thep93racresg this parcel,
300, of the road,
Government Code Section 66414 requires denialPlacPofWathiri.
MAP which will cause substantial arid. avoidable impacts to wild'
Recoriunended Action.., life;
Deny the TFM. Find that the map does not 'comely wit} the
p General Plan
and will cause substantial Arid avoidable impacts to h the General
Applicant submitted the following mitigation measures:
Report on TPM of Dora Leonard, AP 61-35-22(ptn)
September 27, 1985
Page 2,
1. Note on map: All cuts to be 2' or Less'.
2. Note on map: No earthwork during the rainy season.
3. Note on map: All wells, pools or water storage shall be fitted with
CDF-approved drafting connections.
4. Designate property beyond 300' of -Ra3-d Rock- Road6 as no-development
area.
56 All buildings and mobile homes to be constructed with fire-resistant
roofing and siding.
LMT/ss
APPI: NDtX r
COUNTY OP AUTT:I
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
(to be completed by Md Agenrv)
r,. # 85-06-24-03
T BACKGROUND Ai It 61-35-22 (ptn)
1. Name of proponent Dora Leonard
2. Address of proponent and representative (if applicable)
project description Tentative Parcel, Made
I1, MANDATORY FINDINGS Or SIGNIFICANCE 1r,: MAYBE NO
a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the
duality of the environment, substantially reduce
the habitat c f a f'is'h or wildlife species, cause a
fish or wildlife population to drop Below self-
sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plaint or
animal, community, reduce the number or restrict the
range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or
eliminate important examples of the major periods
of California historyor prehistory?
b, Does the project have the potential to achieve
short-term benefits to the detvimen;t of long-term,
environmental goals? (A short-term impact on th,
environment is one which occurs in a relatively
brief period of time while Inng-term impacts wil!
endure into the future.)
C. hoes thu project have impacts which are indivi�%i-
ally limited; but cumulatively considerable? (A
project may impact on two or more separate resources
where the iMJ)act on each resourne is relatively
small, but whfre the effect of the total of those
impacts on the environment is significant,)
d. Does the project have environmental effects which
will cause substantial adverse effects on human
beings, either directly or indirectly
f D11_T811MINA ION rTo be Completed by the Load Agency)
On the basis of this Initial evaluation:
I/W11, [ind the proposed project COULD NOT have a stgni.fica:nt effect
on tH,e environment, and a NIGAVVE I)IICLARATION will be prepared,
I/Wri find that although the proposed project could have a signifi-
cant e- ect on the environment, there will not be a significant
affect in this case because the MITIOATION MVIASURTiS described on
the attached sheet h... been added to the project, A NI;CATIVE'
DC:CLARAAT'iON will be prepared,
./IVT. find the proposed project MAI,have a significant effect on
the envi ronffient, and tin IINVI RONrItINTAL fivip-clilith.poRT is required
CWi :, Jul .8 g85 COUNTY OF Bi1TTT , PLANNING DEPARTMENIT
L r �ubtr<l.e
�3oa .ate P' anti ..
ft
qieived by
k
ENVIRONMENTAL IMP S
- o a 1 "yes" -and "maybe" answers are required
expfanations
on attached sheets) yES
;NA_ Yl NO
1. EARTH.. Will the roon�.tionsult in ox in changescint.
earth
a. Unstable
geologic substructures?
Disruptions, displacements, 4ompaction or
b.
overcovering of the soil;? ----
A in topography or ground surface
Change
""'"
C.
relief fe= tures?`-"
d. Destruction, covering or modification of any
...._: .
unique geologic or physical features? -
Increase in win d or water eros-ein of soils,,
e:,
either on or off-site? ---
beach
AL J
f Changes in deposition. or erosion of
in siltation, deposition
sands, or changes
or erosion 'which may modify the channel of
the bed of the ocean or
a river or stream or
any bay, inlet or lake?
agriculturally productive soils
+
g, Loss of prime
designated urban areas? ----
outside
h. E:cposure of people or property to geologimud-
such as earthquakes,
hazards
slides, ground failure or similar hazards.
2 AIR,. �til,l the proposal result in substantial;
or deterioration of ambient
a, Air emissions
air quality?
b. The creationof objectionable odors, smoke
or fume s 7
Alteration of air movement,, moisture, or
c.
or e in climate,
ti temperature, any chang
X
w, locally or regionally?
3. WATER, W'll the proposal result in substantial.
or
Changes in currents, or the course
direction. of Water movements in either
X
marine or fresh waters?
in absorption rates, drainage patterns,
V. Changes
or the rate and amount: of surface runoff? _-.-.
surface drainage improve-
.-- --
c Need for off-site
ments; including. vegetation removal, channel:-
fixation or ct►lvi`t installation?
£to�� of flood
d., Alterations to the course ox
waters?
e. Change in tho amount of surface water in any
water body? or in any
f, bisc'harge into sur face waters, _ .
�.nclud ng
alteration of suTface water quality,
but riot limited to temperature, dissolved
' oxygen, Or turbidity?
Alterat" OD Of the directas on or rate_ of flow
�
g .
of ground w,.Iters 7
h Change iso the quantity of ground waters,
with-
either tljrtrugh direct additions or
or through interception of an
drawals,
cuts OT eXcavatiotS?
water otherwise
�----
i, Reeductionin the amount of
for public water supplies?
available
i. tXposure of people or property to water
j as flooding?
Ilk
related hazards such
YES
MAYS
4
PI,A.NT LIFE. Will the proposal result in substantial:
a. ? ange in the diversity of species, or number
�tf.any species of plants (including trees,
shrubs, grass, cmpvr `, and aquatic plants)
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare
or endangered species of plants?
c. Introduction of new species of plants into nn
area, or in a barrier to the normal
ment of existing species?
_
d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural.crop?
5.
ANIMAL LIFE. Will the proposal result in substantial:
a. C—`� hange—in the diversity of species, or numbers
of any species of animals (birds, land animals
including reptiles, fish and shell fish,
benthic organisms or insects)?
b. Reduction in the numbers of any unique, rare
or endangered species of animals?
c. Introduction of new species of animals into
on area, or result; in a barrier to the migration
r movement of animals?
d. existing fish or wildlife
,Detdrioration;to
habitat?
r.
6.
NOISE. Will the proposal result in substantial:
!.—Increases in existing noise levels? a"r
b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels?
1i
LIGHT AND GLARE. Will the proposal produce
significant light and glare?
�.,.
8.
LAND USE. Will the proposal result in a-
su stantal alteration of the present or planned
land use of an area?
9.
NATURAL_RESOURCES. Will the proposal result in
su stanti-al
a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural
resources?
b. Depletion of any non-renewable natural
resources?
..._
10.
RISX OF _UPSET, Will the proposal involve»
a. A Visk of eXpiosion or the release of 'hazard -
out substances (including, but not limited to,
oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation),in the
event of an accident
anor upset conditions? ^�
h. Possible 'interference with an emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
11i
POPULATION. Willthe proposal alter the location,
istrl u on, density, car growth rate of the human
population?
-.
1.2.
HOUSING. Will the , affect existing housing,
%oposa
or croate a demand for additional houtting?
r
• YES., .MAYBE N0 :
I N W'11 the roposal
13.
TRANSPORTATION/GIRCULAT 0�: P
result in:
a. Generation of substantial additional vehicle
movement?
-
b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or
demand for neer parking?
c. Substantial. impact on existing transportation
..' -,
Systems? •----
-
d. Significant alterations to present patterns
of circulation or movement of people and/or
goods?
e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic?
--
f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles,
k-
bicyclists or pedestrians?
14,
PUBLIC SERVICES. Will th.e proposal have an effect
upon, or result in a need for new or altered
governmental services:
a. Fire protection?
b. Police protection?
c. Schools!
---
d, Parks or other recreational facilities?
X.
._.�
e. 14aintenance of public facilities, including
roads?
f. Other governmental services?
15.
ENERGY. Will the proposal result in:
X
i7--U-se of substantial amounts of fuel .or energy?
b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing
sources of energy, or require the development
of new sources of energy?
lei
UTILITIESi Will the propsal result in a need for
new`systems, r substantial alterations to the
following!
a.power or natural. gas?
----
X
b, Communications systems?
c. Water availability'.
d. Sewer or septic tank?
,
e, Storm water drainage?
-
J. Solid 1�r4ste anddisposal'?
,.
17,
HUMAN HEALTH, Will t'he prop()sal result in:
read o� n of any health hazard or potential
a,.
health hazard (excluding mental health)?
b,. Exposure of people to potential hearth
---
18.
AEST�iE`�ICS. Will the proposal r0sult in the
C�li5truction, of any scenic vista or view open: to
in the
the public, or will the proposal result
creation, of an aesthetically Offensive site open
to public view?
-`
YES
MAYBE N0
19. RECREATION. Will the proposal result in an impact
Upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational
opportunities?
20. CULTURAL RESOURCESi
a. Will the proposal result in the alteration
of or the destruction of a prehistoric or
historic archaeological site?
b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical
or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or
historic building, structure or object?
C. Does the ttoposal have the potential to cause
a physical change which would affect unique
ethnic cultural values?
d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious
Or sacred uses within the potential impact
area?
V. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL VALUATION AP 61-35-22 (ptn)
See attachment
i
i
i
{
" C
RISC USS ON; AP 61-35-22 (ptn)
.1b,c: Construction of 26,500 zquare +eet of roads and vappo.-oximately
16,000 square feet, in homesite construction is a substantial amount of
soil overcoverino. Roadw7y construction will require an O-xt(zinsive
amount of grading. in order to assess this impact, a grading plan
should be submitted, Thea plan should include, allCLIt and fill,
original and projected tontourz, methods of Sail stabilization. MC -10t
of parcel 4 has sl. capes x -Acro is availab10pes in o
coss Of :50%. only V4 a
for well and hoffiesitb construction.
jel+t on-site toils have a very high erosion potential" Any incrULNMO
in impervious surf aces q dirt road ruts, or vegetation 1-camoval Will
exacorbato this Gond tion. Small amounts of the soils oroded Will Mae','
deposited in area drainage ways,
The "Erosion and Sediment Control Handl3cjok"', 001, outlinos method's
for grading and soil stabilization which Will, greatly roduce orosion
problem%.
ih: The property is located 41000 feet south b+ the Big Bend fault
and has a high landslide potential. All construction to comply with
the Uniform Building Code for soi%miaally active areas. Landscaping,
dro.inage facilities and stabilizing roads help to minimize threat of
land movement.
Ib w Roadway construction will intorcept and channmlize natural sheet
flew. The resultant points of concentration are highly susceptible to
oro%ion and Will need stabilization. Arty iMptrvioLt% surface within
the homo-,ito areas (r-00+ toPSi Pavementi otc-) Will generate storm
water runo+-. This runoff has the potential to cause zubstantial soil
orosi on,
:5t It Drainage improvomentz are roqUired in connection with roadway
construction,
Z3h; 'at -rho property it outside of any cbMMUhity VU-1tor SUPPIY service
aro" individual wells are proposed, Proof of Water is roquit --d
prior to croatibri Of Lparcol less than 20 acres.
Oak Srush and timbor cover the property, Vegetation removal Will
precede road and home&_'ito, construction 'And cause an overall' rodurtion
in habitat quality.
St4dt The Califat-mia. Dopartmont of Fish and Game has identified thio
vicinity as "ritual winter habitat +-Or l3facks Mountain Door Hat'd.
4
Nt&.,,i8emtial developmont On Less thL'AM 20 CA06 0 a-V"V' PArCel'-'-
compromisot the habitat. When tho project creating this parcol was
r*Y!owodj the Department of ri,sh and Gamo indicated that ohly 3 hOQ5OZ
on the q4 acros should be permitted. they recommended rzlustorinq: 7- a+
the homtsites within 300 +eot of Dal d Rck' ROad) an ideMti+iCd
transportation corridor,
Appehdix V Page '6
I
AP 61-;35-22 (ptr)
8. Conditional criteria have been established in the Agricultural
Residential general Plan designation Which control divi t+i, on of
property below 20 acres.
This project does not comply with those criteria. Spec,i-fically, proof
of water must be submitted. The fire hazard is high-rMtrome Water
storage with drafting connections should be installed. Goads should
be designed for access and use by emergency vehicles„ Tr►dividutl 1, s
do not now have access. Information showing roznca alighgjOnt, grado
cuts and fills should be submitted.
Access is off of I~ald Rock roadq which is rough and poorly gravoled,
MaJor commercial services and the high school are 20-2S miles distant.
These issues will need to he satisfactorily addressed .in order to imalte
a finding of General Plan con-Pormahto.
!'Z':As rioted in item 8, RalO pock "Road is in poor-fair condition near
the project Additional traffic will only increase the need for
maintenance. Applicant will have to demonstrate that all. weather
traversable access tan be constructed to County standard,. Sight
distance at "Enumclaw" and Bald Rock is fair. The U,8. rarest Service
district ranger has indicated that "Enumcl a14y" is a forest service
road, on which they held an eXclusive casement.. This access problem
will have to be resolved.
14: Rosi denti al. development will place greater demands on all
governmental services. In this rural area, police protection is an an
"on-call" emergency basis only. Foothi l i d0velopment , 25 miles from
the near-est Lcrban aroa, cannot be served cost effectively, The very
limited
servi'c % in the area m�cy fal! short of demand. Increasing
exacerbate this situation.
l X . t�1�1N17ATC1Ft�,� t�il� T N���b��S 7 ghl:C � I C�RICL
a. Continued apprOval: of land' divisions within 'identified deter ranges
reduces habitat, severs migration coeridors and i~aises f, wn
mortality rates,
prat~estian canptarode Iontiout adequate
b. roothi'll devel,t► ment On e,;ee slo es wit
ho
g term environmenta'l
pre5(zrVatic)n goalsa
LMT l kt
i
Applicant:
Dora Leonard Assessors Parl
61-35LL-22
Log # 85-Q6-24- 3
DMAHgE r
A. �ro,�q�l.�,b�scr p khan
i..
Type of Project: Tentative Parcel Map
2.
Brief Descri pti nn. Land division of 20 acres to create four
parcels at t5 acres each.
S.
Location; On the South side of Sal d Rock Road, approximately
400 feet west. of its intersection
with Enumclaw Road, Bald_
Rock area
4.
5.
Proposed Density of Development. 1 dwellinq unit per !3 acres
Amount of Impervious Surfacing: IE3,50rsquare feet
161000 for homesites. of roads,
6k
d
Access and Noarest Pub l i a Road (s) : Bal,d Rocl: Road f rAntage to
Parcel $ 1 and L,
' 7w
private easement to Parcel % ._, and 4
Method of Sewage Di sposal A Septic system
L•-
'i
Source of Water Supply: Individual Wells
Wn
t-';' t, i gni ty of Power Lines.- Along Bald aocl Road
r l.�tential for further land divisions
and development: Mono
+. EnYkr_Qnmgntal �`! t.�i ng
Terrain
a,_ General Topographic Character: Gently lca ater,ply sloping
Mountainous terrain.
b; Slopes: it��1
c. El'oyation 29'20-2600 feet ASL
2.
di Limiting p actors : Slopes over :O%
Soils
a. Types and Gharac,, eristi,.:s: Chats -
s.C� 40deep, gray to
Yellow brown, coarse
sandy loam, moderate -rapist
ility, medium-high suitability for timber.
b Limiting `actors: Modorate acidic
5.
Natural Hazards 0+ the Land
a. Earthquake zoned x+000 feet south of the Sirj norMd fault
b. Eroaioq Ptjtentiaa Very high
C4 Landslide POtential High
d r r"e Hazard; Hi.gh-SEgtreme
psi $NPpAnsive Soil Potentials Low
App6ndix 1; (a
AP 61-35(ptn)
4.
Hydrol og y
a. Surface Water. Small tribmtary to Sdal7 Crotmft to the>.
southeast, Berry Crook
northwest.
b. Ground Water. Unj,norNn resource
i?rai na e
c.gCharacteristics;Soils are natciral l y well
tir ai ned
d. Annual Rainfa; l (ncl al) « 60--65 inches
e. Limiting Factors. +Vane
5.Visual/Scenic
Quality: Medium
6.
Acoustic Quality: Good
7.
Air OQai i ty; Good
�,i cel c�c�i cal,,,,�nv. ranment: _
8,
Vegetation. Grasses, California Blatt, Oak, Incense cLdar,
Ponderosa pine, Sugar
9.
pine; mi�tn{anita.
Wildlife Habitat: Critical winter de%r 'I'd
110"htai n Hard) area tE�ucE
0.
Archaeological and Historical ReSai.trces i n tet
including unknown-- area: Low
i .
Butte County Soneral plan deli great i on c Agri �-ul tural
Reyysi denti al
q
EXi��3ting zoning.- A`+5:
IS.
14.
S>tisting Land Use on—site,., Undeveloped
Surrounding Ares:
a Land Uses« Single family resiGtential at f~t11"al densities
b. ng « A -S south of Gal d Rock
Road, A -2j TP-i6o
Gen*
c. Cen. Plan designations;Agricultural Residential, Timber
I•lpuntai h
d'e Marcel Sipes: 2 1/2 — 640 acres Majority of larger
parcels, small parcels along road%.
e. Population. Ex: remo y sparse
M
IL.
Character of Site and Area;. S?;treme rural
Nearest Urban Area: tlrbVille +/—
17%
24 miler, sot,tthwo t
Role '; S�sheres o; In+lUahco: Natio,na�l forest WOO
15.
feet oast
Standards Urban Area: N/A
19.
Fire Prbtect.ibh Scrvico
Nearoot County (S+;�`
Stati an te)'irc stationt" 461 Seg^ry CreolM
b dater Availability: Pumper t ra rjj
0-
Schools in Aeoat Pioneer Union
High le�t.,tltalµy,, lravill;e Un rt
ApPt idix F '(b)
,
' •
....�._;yx.__ , .
, _._.� .1, • ate. -�;� __
,
�.„,r;
� .,......_
�,,,_ _n�.,;w,,,:.,�r.•!„® ..
�
1^
;R
a
o
A
h �
•
H
J
a
A
At
PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY SHEET r4O,R LAND DIVISIONS
APPLICANT Carl Ritchey
ADDRESS 4331 Poothill Blvd,,, Oroville, CA 95965
OWNER Same
PROJECT Dr4SCRIPTIONTPM, ,
To diy�.de Z0 acres to create `q. Parcels into
5 Acres each.
LOCATION (�r� the south side of Enumclaw Road, Approx. ,1200 ft. west of its
intersection ialth Bald Rock Road, Bald Rock area.
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER(S) 61-35-22
MIING _A-5 GEN. PLAN AG - Re s i
PROJECT CONS ISTIVT'
DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED May 14 , 1985
Eng: Ronald Graves *1266 Butte Ave, Orovi e,
DATE PUBLICATION NOTICE WRITTEN PUBLISHED
PLACE NEWSPAPER NOTICES) PUBLISHED - O. C. P. G. B.
DATE MAILING LIST PREPARED
DATE MAIL.-OUT NOTICES WRITTEN MAILED
_ NUMBER.
DATE PLANNING DIRECTORS REPORT PREPARED
------------
------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL_. _.
— CATEGORyCAi, EXEMPTION -- DATE FILED
DETtININATION
AND DATE NEGATIVE DECLARATION DATE ADOPTED
MITIGI.TLD NEGATIVE DE -
CLARATION �. DATE ADOPTED '}7
BIM IMPACT REPORT DATA; C,ERTII4 jtD
SUB. COMMITTEE =TING DATE
ADVISOR' AGENCY HEARING DATA
ADVISORY AGENCY ACTION
BOARD ACTION
COMMENTS "' p
i
:Dz, rznMxA
NAJ'J. 0 t
Office Of
Planning and. Re?v
1400 Tenth Strch
eet
Sacramento Room I d > � -�vrj. But;LQ County
CA X358]4 pl(�41 1,19 Depar'tme:nt
or 7 gr�unty Center
Drive
XXX County Clerk � �� Orrtv;f,.l,.l,e, CA 95965 County of Butte
SUB.TzCX c
L, t Its. E3ECKER CCL1111y Clerk
Fil n A. JACINTH
Ing of Notice of � etermin' iia ""`-�-�-Deputy
or 21152 of tiie Public in compliance
Resources Code: tl.lt Section 21Q8
Project Title
Tent=ative Parcel Map
61-35-22 Name
01 -ace ulearinghouse Number Ptn
(if submitted to Del Siemsen
Clearinghouse) Contact Person`'` -
- c to
'Telephone Number
Project l;oc at; on John Mondonsa
feet westits", the south s 534--4266
of ntersection with BEnumclaty
Road�-1-1
`� ---
Project Description ald Rock Rd. proxmately 1200
5 acres each.TPM to divide 20 Rock area.acres to create4
parcels into
This is to advise
t}rat the Butte Count Adv'
.^,ar---.-..
ency
liar approved the above-descri° ed Aponsi
(.head Agency or Iles
Project on 8-25-g ponslble Agency)
the following'
determination$ regarding the above- (Date) and has made
1, The project described project.
environment.:" -Will' -Z—will not
have a signi=fic=ant effect on the
An Environmental
pursuant to the Impact Report _Xvas prepared for
.provisions of C}QA: this
project
-- A Negative Declaration was
provisions of C9QA, prepared for this Project pursuant to the
3, Mitigation meastires
approval of the .-�t�ee, here not, , made a condition of the
4: A statement of overridi,n
for this project, g consideratit,ns _was,
was not, adopted
This is to certify that the
Project approval is available �tolrheR'tWh comments and res.o
general public at p n$08 and record of
Butte County Plannin
Cot:nty Centat g Department
Dr,
bate Received for Fl,in Cravl.le, CA 95065
Posting at OPR � 0-2-86 d "
Signa re w
S�e�hen
A. Streeter
Soi�ti ox Planner_.
Rnt� sett hIarah 1086
Del Siemsen
AP#61.-35-22 ptn
TPM
Mitigation Measures
1 Note on Map; All cuts to be 2 feet or 'less.
2. Note on Map: No earthwork during the rainy season.
3 Note on Maps All wells, pools or wator storage shall
ha fitted with CDF-approved drafting connections i2
required by CDP.
4. All development and buildings on lots 2,3 and 4 are to
be located within 350 feet of the southerly line of
lot l with the remainder of lots 2, 3 and 4 to be
designated as a no development area
5. Note on map: Recommend all buildings and mobile homes
to be contructed with fire resistant roofing and siding.
6. Note oh map: Recommend fencing to be limited to a minimum
of 18 feet above ground, and maximum of 48" above ground.
7. Evidence of water snail be submitted prior to recordation.
of final map.
Wf
r
V
1
1 � •
1 s
i
PIT
Goan
DEPARTMENT QR 15UBLIC WORKS
WILLIAM IBM) tRlIVI"D', Director
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVt , UROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965
BufteCo.Planning Tniephorie I9141 55A.4681
t, q � U RONALD D. MctiL'RnY
I\UG 2 �yab rleputY Director
pravlll9, �i�i{Orad
August 26, 1986
Uel siemsen RE; AP 61-35-22 ptn.
I 8791 Stanford Lane Tentative Parcel. lap
j Durham, CA 95958
Dea° ` Mr. Siemsen t
AL the regular meeting of the Butte County Advisory Agency held On
August 25r 19861 the agency granted a mitigated negative declaration
n1' environmental Impact and approved your tentative Parcel nip on
Lhe above -reference ' property :subject to the cot-itiitions of approval
listed on the aLtac hed shoet.
Ir no appeals are timely filedy4--wit:hill ten (10) drays of the date of
the Advisory Agency's approval-.-wil.11 the Clerk of the Board of
Supervi,sorsi this action will be .final,
lt'hen the conditions of approval hre,complied with, it will be in order
for you to file Vour "final map" with the Butte County Department
of Public Works for recordat.l.on within twenty-four (24) mont=hs of
Lhe date of approval by Lhe Advisory Agency,
ii' you have any questions regardi.ng this trotter, please contact this
Office.
Very truly yours,
will,lam Chtr'H
Dcroct;,tr of Public Works
r
John Mvniionskr
fNis; i,,3t, tut_ Director
cc t a�lannin Departrite
irony:lent I >lctalt h Deportment
Ron Graves AssocinLes
Del. Siemsen, '1UTATIVE PARCEL MAP, .AP 61-35-22 ptn . , G parcels on
the south side of Enumclaw Rd., approx. 1200 ft. west of its
intersercion with Bald Rork ,Road. Bald Rock area. Engineer; Rort
O-AVOIs .and Associates
Puy,_ :c Works conditions:
1. Provide two-way traversable access RS-8-�LD-I to each parcel, ft,-om
a county maintained road or state highway,
2 Access to be reserved in deeds as per county ordinance find offered
for dedication on the final map.
3 Shop= 50 ft. building setback line measured ,from cenLor;tlno of access
ea gement
4 Provide roud maintenance agreement.
5 Sheer all easements of record on the final map,
6 Provide sLrect name signs per requirements of the Depti tmont cif'
Public storks prior to recordation of the final. map.
Pay off any :assessments.
S Provide cul-de-sac at the end of the street.
q Pay only delinquent taxes or c:irrent taxes as required.
10 Meet: the requirements of the Division, of Vorestsry re: Timber
Harvest Report,
Planning Dept_, condition:
It All parcels are to comply with the A-5 zoning.
Health Dept, cndiLions
12 Show a 50 ft, leach.[ ield setback from the drainage way on parcel. 1.
13 Indicate an the map that areas with slopes in excess of 30 percent
are unsuitable for sewage disposal,
The following mitigation measures Ire required
14 i on neap; All cuts to be 2ft.. or less.
15 vota on map; No carthworc during; the rainy season.
16 Nott, on map, All. wells, pools or waLvr storage Shrill be fitted
wIL1t (W--approved drafting connections if required by CDS",
STEMSEN, TPM
17 All development and buildings on :Lobs 2, a and 4 are to be
:located within 3501 Lt. of the southerly line of lot 1 with 11111
remainder of lots 2, 3 and 4 to be designated as €i no
development area.
1.8 Note on map... Recommend all buildIngs and mobile homes b(� tjannt°j-ueLed
with Fire resistant roofing and. siding.
19 Note on ma Recommend fencing Lo be limited to e tnin i mom of 18"al7ov e ground, and maximum of 48" a�l:ve ground.
20 8vidence of water Shall be submitted prior to recordai i.on of final.
map.
um
and
111ter-DePuftmentul enc
Butte County Advisory Agency
TO3
planning Director
�RoM; of Del. S;t,etnsen
u sed Report on Tentative a(ptn)Map
Re on AP#61-35-
sue�rcrs (Carl RitcheY�
0ATEtt August 13, 1986
heard November 41 1985 under the
ously have been re
The map -eras prev, Lot lines and access
name of Ritchey. the amount of road construction.
located to reduce
based on
recommended denial of Mari adistance from
planning with the general plant
Bald Rock Road and
nonconform', access, condition
fire services, to wildlife.
impacts
The map was approved. road
zova�- and reduction in
the previous app subjeot to all
Because of a royal is recommended
construction, pp
,� and. mitigation measures attached to the
condi cions
previous map`
LT:jmC
cc; Dei siemsen
Ron Graves & Associates
TCS.. Advisory Agency
t;RCIM planning Director
Report an Tentative
parcel map of Carl Rit�,ci►ey an A,-'StJE+ i CT: Z's -2 , (ptn) .
RATS October 25, IgQ5
The
This is pr✓apcas7I to divide 20 acres into fc�ur ���tcr �' parcels,
The
Use -
present ;ani,nc{ i.s A -r ((�gricttltur L l macre p rat s�) l.hi. y area as
plan Map of the
sirderttialttntheCenerelna�s�pecan �fic orecomnt�tnity plans •Far
AgricLtltura7 he
the area.
Prior to creation Of p�rr+els of legis than ifs aG:res, randitian�l
fi �,c�
rritrMria must be met.
Agricultural compatibility (net applicable)
2a r�rc�af + de5e-wag* c�p�ci,ty (neat demonstrated)
gttate water and
;. Atiectuyte fire facilities
4. load capacity and maintenance
5 Access to to mmerci �tl
servir eGr and schools
s not
As Hated ctrl the General Man CranfOrmancechealrt, C20�2S�miles ldistattt�t.
rlajor commercial services end the high s
The initial, study indioetes that Cri.teri.� � and 4 are not maty
the nearest year-round stiffed fires st�ttian is a�„ h;elly Ridge, 1�3�-�ct
miles distant*
CD st tistics indicate that 8.8% Of "ll fire department
es Manses rrc fnr' structural and improv t�ovesynt rand water eheater5fires c n be
r P wiring y wQC1
caused by l i.ghtning, fAttlty
6tr�rctural fire protection is r l adequate-, re dtec Li cert car spri, n4 i er5 would
significantly improve st=ruatt.
Meat the prof eCt, id C acEs Road i s i n p
oar condition. Additional
tw~ ffi c will lti
irrrre se demswt+ s for road
onsmshot ld he�held resr I-tpon siblel+oromen+
oli.cv,)..]t:►,t�rtes neia 1rtd divas
their fair �hAre. 04 the sate rind im,�arravemertt�+� heeded to handle "s
traffic increases that they c useh
hepar t
merit Of f=ish Artri Ame hay, i dertti find t:h sC�r�hc►µm�p��roatirrg�,thi.r�
wi.r tc�r range sof the Buc!°s� ttattntt�rin Beer Herd,
D. t"C recomntended throe hoLts:�es be allowed on the 9Z acres,.
l.;.aced within .x,00' of the road. Fish an�l�same e�ttOmit%ntd, denrdls��e���c>
p hp
-rd
hosed on cadvW"sr"- E f'F ct; of
residential, nt w ht Citi Section
ster"vzv�l rtes, end �v�iS.ab lity of habitat; Nave
66474r,vi regtti.res dani l of a map which will: cause 5 xntial and.
avoidable impactt5 to r,►i.ldlife
Detly the TpM: Find that the map does not comply with th* General 5'lan
and will cause substantial and avoidable impacts to wildlife,
Applicant submitted the following Mitigation measuruot
1. Note on map: All cuts to be 2' or less.
2. Note an map No earthNork during the rainy season.
Note on mapt All wells, pools or water storage shall be fitted with
3.
W -approved WSW 19 connections. n 1
4. Designate property beyond 300' of eXisting-road as no -development
area.
OVO".k V
All buildings -%nd Mobile homes to be constructed with Kre-resistant
roof, g and
+Oncin oh,"fijimum W 184 above ground,
q t and ttjja-ximvm a+ 48
above groun&
7. 5vidonce of water shall be submitted prior to recordation Of final
MAP
QMTQr
act Ron Gravos
1266 Butte Avenue
Oroville, Ca.
FORM
1,NVIRONMINTAL Cjjr cy)
(to e complete by Agen Log It 8.5-05-15-05
AP ft 61-35-22
1. B_AC_GROIIND
rarl-.R
1. Same Or proponent (if applictibIC)
o f I)TO ponent and representative
'Ad'dress Ron GjL§�V-@L§L--
4331 Foothill-R.e.•---:-1266 Bgtte kM911T
lie CA 95965
or�—Vl Oroville) CA 95t3fi.5.
J),Oject i.1'I
descrt"i-011 Tentatiy-elarqe-� —kla?---
LIA1 III -1 Nn
01. "IC ANCE,
, 'NIVIC.
E t � dei
tit(,
ATOjjy FINDINC -!L-- "I to
have the IYOtcllti. Uj,lly reduce
Proj ect sub5tllntl
I)OCS the cause It
Fl .tv of the ClAvirotiment, jes$
quali . Of it f i s 11 0 r wi-AAllife species,
habitat in to dVoP.belOW
01. wildlife populatic . nate a plant Or
fish n to ellit" restrict tile
,,,,,np levels
threaten
s levels, t aj,imaj or
Lis t t" the number or
lriinlal coillmunitY nred plant or or periods
of a rare or endange Maj
important ex
range ailiple8 01 the
eliminate or prehistOry�'
history
or California i I potential to achieve
tile I)roie(:t have the lona-
term
b, Doos its to the detrilllent,o'* the
short-term banef (A short-term impact On
iltal 90a'-$0 occurs in a relatively
env irontile one �4hich rill impacts will
environment is 1 0 long-term
biii�i- Per'oe' Of time whil
endure 'PtO tile FtAture
. 1, acts wil-len,
Iject have '11TP, considerable"
Does tile 1)1"), ly
but Cu'll"lat've I sepa-rate r
ally 1111lited! pact on two or more %
m , 'Ls -relatively
pro�ect May Cich resource
, .' the impact on C , total of those
small where i�rc the effect 0 f tile
tit is sign
but W1 I
itilpacts t)JI the vn�'Vrollmo L'Cts Which
avLl environmell'tal Crfo, human
I) o C s the Proict-It Crr�cts
ds tatitiindir, V
being'; "lirect
I ON, (TJ)L' c(3
11111leted by the i,otlsl Agency)
i Ii I1! -'O U 10 11
, -1, - a t
oil the ba"15 or this 1111ti'l-I VVt1lu, have a ,1911" ricant effect
� 111101eet C10111,11 NOT Ila ON will be PVeP4"6a'
find thv, propOsCtl tttlti 11 �I.0 . 11-1 1A
M,AI
I n the, enviv011"'Cilt signifi-
(I Project Could 1,
find thilt althougi) tile 01,01 not baa �,'v'�Jficaht
there will qjjRr.
& % desci,ibod On
environitir"
effect on the A N17,(,A:Tlvr
�se because tit(
effect in this ea ve been th ed to the projoet4
w sheet ha
the attachei}1 CI,AIPATIkiN I. pared. effect on
be P e' ficant
i0et MA) illlvc a s] is required.
find the proposed 111*0 N 'I t�jjl,&CT RTWORT
timent, and at,
INC
the Onvil') -)I ANN
Couw OT-
lund 18 i
DAV!
Laura Tuttle
Reviewed by
I
IV, ENVIRONMENTAL IMP GT5
Xp ana'ea.ons o a 1 41 yes and "maybe" answers are required
on attached sheet(s)) yEs MAYBE NO
�. EARTH. Will the proposal result in significant:
in changes in
or fumes?
Alteration sir movement, moisture, or
in climate,
—a—. --Unstable earth conditions or
temperature, or any change
geologic ,ubstructures? -----
nisruptio,;ls, displacements, compaction or
WAFER. Will the proposal, result in substantial:
or
b.
overcovering of the soil? ----
Change in topography or ground surface
c.
d,
relief features?
Destruction, covering or modification of 1ny
Changes surfacerunof
or the rate and amount of surface
c.
unique geologic or physical, features?
of soils,
e..
Increase in wind or water erosi.oI
ization
Alterations to the course or flow of flood
either on. or off-site?
in deposition or erosion of beach
e.
fi
f.p
Changes
sands, oT changes in siltation, deposition
channel of
alterationof surface water
limited to temperature, dissolved
or erosion which may modify the
river or stream or the bed of the ocean or
g
h,
of ground vraters ? round waters
Change in the quantity of gwith°
a
any bay, inlet or lakel productive soil
of prime agriculturally p
either through direct additions or
through intOrceptlon of an
g.
Loss
outside designated urban areas?
to geologic
i,
h.
Exposure of people or property
hazards such as earthquakes, landslides mud-
-2 .. ...
tlides, ground failure or Similar hazaru.s?
--X.-
2 AIR. Will the proposal result in substantial t.
deterioration of ambient
i-,—
emissions or
b,
air quality?
The creation of objectionable odors, smoke
c.
or fumes?
Alteration sir movement, moisture, or
in climate,
temperature, or any change
locallyor regionally? .._�
WAFER. Will the proposal, result in substantial:
or
`.
Changes in, currents, or the course he
direction of water movements in ,itl�r
marine or fresh waters? drainage patterns,'
in absorption rates,
b,
Changes surfacerunof
or the rate and amount of surface
c.
Need for off-site Surfacedrainage
hannel-
meets, inudingvegationremoval,
or culvert installation?
d,
ization
Alterations to the course or flow of flood
waters?S�zrface water in any
Change in the amount of
e.
fi
water body?
Discharge into surface waters, or in any
quality, in.clud'n,g.
alterationof surface water
limited to temperature, dissolved
but not
oxygen or turbidity?
Alteration of the direction or rate of 'low
g
h,
of ground vraters ? round waters
Change in the quantity of gwith°
either through direct additions or
through intOrceptlon of an
drawals, or
by cuts or excavations?
i,
;aquifer
Reductionin the amount of water otherv:ise
available for public water supplies?
suc}lrasrflood ,nerty g? water
J.B posedeof lraza dspeople
relat ?
-2 .. ...
RM
4, 'PLANT LIVE.
—a—U--- '" I I the
ja��e in th Proposal result, in YES, No
Of a e diversity subst.,
an species . 0:6 species, tial:
-shrubs Of Plants or n
b.Reduction rass, cro 'Its (inclu Umber
oft Ps and aquat 4ing trees
any ic Plants)?*
C. 'ed species of of unique
Or endangel he PluMger
Introduction Of f Plants'? rare
area new spe Ies of plants
) or in a barrier to into all
meet of eXist.1
d I Reduction n' 0 the normal replenish -
in a ' Specie ?
ANIMAL LIP creage of any agricultural crop?
a. Will the pro
e In the dive Pora
l result
of any t
he
0. rs ity Of species !'I Substantial
animals or numbers
lnclu4iptiles I (birds, la
benthl, organisms , fish arid shell land animals
b* Reduction in the Or insects)?- fish,
Or endangered numbers
0:6
C, ligered species 0 � any U
Introduction ofnewsf animal, oniquej rare
pe
all area, or result Cles of
Or movement It 111'a bar r, animals into
d. 'Deter- Of animals? er to the migration
loratIOT,
tat?
habi to existing fish or Wildlife
NOISE.
a----.. Will the
Increases i Pr,"PtO�aj result
b. "IPOsure n e,
'tz, Ing noise '11 substantial:
f People to severe
Vvete noise levels?
LIGHT. AND GLARt, Will:
Igni icant the proposal Produce
8, LAND USE 119 t and glare?
--I- Will the proposal rest1j, t
su scant -
land use alteration of the present a
e Of an area? resent or Planned
9, NATURAL planned
as U tI a 1 T 'Vill the
Z propos a, result in
rin"'ase in the rate of use
esources� Of any natural
ba eP I e t i -t-)- n- *
10d resources?0:6 any non-renewable natural
RISK Op
a UPSET" {Vi
l7: ri8;
; �18u� 0 �011' T explosion 1 J- the proposal
Ou involve
s substance, (, Or the rel easd,of hazard
ncluding,
O'l) pesticides, bu
- of an Icides, chemicals
t not limited to
b, Pos n accident or radiation) i
sible accident or Upset in tile
Conditions,
response pi with all emergency
,I. Pop"t 411 or emergency Ovacun
�TS—I J. UN Will t UJI Plan?
t Proposal, alter th ion
Population? ) d'ensItY� or grOWth rate oe locat
12, HOUSING f the human
or create Will the propo
a demand additional
affect
dditional Ile-ViSting hou,i,g,
Ou8ing?
�X
ls, ENERGY: Will the proposal result in:
a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel.or energy?
b. Substantial increase in ,emand upon existing.
sources of energy,; or .quire the development
of new sources of energy?
16, UTILITIES. Will the propsal result in a need for
iew systems, or substantial alterations to the
following:
a, ;�,)wer or natural ;gas?
b, Communications systems?
c Water avail.abil it)T:
d. Sewer or septic tank?
o; Storm water drainage?
f, Solid waste and disposal?
17. HUMAN HEALTIi. Will the proposal result in:
a, reatx�on of any 'health hazard or potential:
health hazard (excluding mental health)?
b, txposutO of people to potential health
hazards? �=
18, AESTHETICS Wian the proposal result in the
to or view open to
the puclt n of y i p s ive site open,
the public,. or will the proposal result in the
creation of an aesthetically Offen, p 'n
to public view]
YESMAYBE
NO
13. TRANSPORTATION/C'IRCULATION. Wj,ll the proposal''
result in:
a. Generation of substantial additional vehicle
movement?
b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or
--�-
demand for new p,�rking?
c: Substantial impact. on ✓,fisting transportation
-..—
systems? -.—
---
d. Significant alterations to present patterns
of circulation or movement of people and/or
goods?
e; Alterations to waterborne, z•ail or air traffic?
_
f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor ve�nicles,
bicyr,lists or pedestrians?
14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Will the proposal have an effc,ct
upon, or result in a need for new or altered
governmental services:
a. Fire protection?
b. Police protection?
c. Schools?
d. Parks or other recreational facilities?
e. Mainteaance of public facilities, including
road;':
—-
f Other governmental services?_-.-
ls, ENERGY: Will the proposal result in:
a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel.or energy?
b. Substantial increase in ,emand upon existing.
sources of energy,; or .quire the development
of new sources of energy?
16, UTILITIES. Will the propsal result in a need for
iew systems, or substantial alterations to the
following:
a, ;�,)wer or natural ;gas?
b, Communications systems?
c Water avail.abil it)T:
d. Sewer or septic tank?
o; Storm water drainage?
f, Solid waste and disposal?
17. HUMAN HEALTIi. Will the proposal result in:
a, reatx�on of any 'health hazard or potential:
health hazard (excluding mental health)?
b, txposutO of people to potential health
hazards? �=
18, AESTHETICS Wian the proposal result in the
to or view open to
the puclt n of y i p s ive site open,
the public,. or will the proposal result in the
creation of an aesthetically Offen, p 'n
to public view]
YES
MAYBE NO
19. RECREATION. Will the proposal result in an bilpact
'quality
upon the or quantity of existing recreational
oppertunities?
20. CULTURAL RESOURCES.
a. Will -TE -e- proposal result in the alteration
of or the destruc:on of a prehistoric or
historic archaeological site?
b. Wild, the proposal, result in adverse physical,
or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or
historic 'building, structure or object?
c. Does thG proposal have the potential to cause
a physical change ;which would affect unique
ethnic cultural values?
d.. Will
the proposal Vestrict existing religions
or sacred uses Wit, -'a the potential impact
area?
V. DISCUSSION OF ENVIPOMIENr L EVALUATION AP 61-35-22
Sea attathment
pT�1���rJi�t„„�1F �T�1tli�tif�ltl�l�l�"�L,��VI�I�IJt�T�Clhl �� 6i-35-42,feet of -
i.b,c: t'o tr t�atjon of 54,31--zgran� r Iran is rad t( tand art � ,k m r% .}
16,000 %gLkarO feet in h�amesita
ng Rr� �-xdway construction will regUi r� ,fin L- tenni a
a� av r r v ra� grading p
amount of g4-0 Axaa� �x tf� i5 i mpac't�,
ra.da�n�t• �n ae-d�r
should be sttbmittedn The plan sI'ould intWdti� all Cut Ard +ill,
original and pruj(MatOd cantour%, mo't:hods o4 Sail -tat iI),ti»,-,kt onn
i jan site saiy.5 ha,'� r ry tri te r e t ttrc�n r srt ►u I Will.tial- Any ���;e
in imperviclu5 surf saes,, d--rt road cutis,
this mall amounts aet odid
d pt1 t r1 a,n Area dr-A naq<s ways,
.rid Gpsdi.m t1t Control %1 t d>wac :, �? 1, Cut; i.nes methods
Thet'0=i n r- t � r dE.t=0 erooi on
+nr r1r. dirtg and �t�i.'1 stabili;�.A.t: mn: whi.ah will +� �
pr ob l eiWs
111t Tbp, pr pt r-tY i;14 IOC .tetl 41000 POOL ��}Uth Ot th s 'r1rl W t
and 6 .tvy high 1 to lids potrs►tiAl . »ten trot t n � r»t mp�ay With
drw is ?.
ally active a��-il:�dSC adt�t'1L, uniform Vaildinc1 Care CnreiWti�
t � xntd tt 1pm��
g +tri.�itiL-, ard r
lana.' ttltS E„'i31�rE
3b: VtladwaY C-Onztrttct.icin will i`n'her"pt and s~h ann--1 j: ,.c� r�r�tturiAl �ohevbl ;»+
�,mwp The resultant, pr�ant� �t t Csn �rttt"��tiort �trc tY dill,/ .
+rnsa.arl and will nOLqkj .It,, . ��'twi�an.
�1vly 3 mp(� 2rvia t5-, f:i. r+azo Within
t[ m cwt ;roas5 GrOOf tops, p't�tomr'ni-, �i;n. � tvil�. ���rar�rr��ttA storm
the
tr!
water r°t,.tncI+f. . hi r ?�.ttr� h t.�t pit ► �. ;to cc,,-.5 �Ltb
Mtilta 1.
; i nt c imps +wr�:t rttr qtr r�r gttiri d in € anrr t.wx,an iraa'»h r���,: dwa
pr
7h; I The propor ty is Outsido 0+ any aantrt ni ty t.rFt i r r �; LlppY
Y ;+Cx r"iM is ilr' ii i "t l:.+.l wel,i
h
prior to 'Ir. ,,At'ion n-
ra
w (fit' Ct�a�Kt 'a ", tt t.gt �.tlt u *tire L'r"d7 will
fir.. Iax t=,tCw_•h And timber rr�.r t't
r�Laod end haalt-'Vite Gari anti r tYtfi v.rEP wit
:t r1 �" Rb
,r
t`i't, C�°LkIi,fot«ni�lvpa.ri.mr iit
�i irvta,tw* r
rte; _ry�ti�...1 tgint e hr�bLt�ir Herd.
duv,'21 c P'lien tin _> ttr� r a end k arx t Fse t l
k r tfrM t _bit t Wh n the prmjo-'1
r'evi4,ed }the DOp "JIV.t'1w,11-It:: *+ t'w'J th an Oi'i�mrr int:liccti to`�t1t3�,� w �1z�11`"s� r'i
r
an rni'' 9,1 �� rr.5� t>itc�!��.t� b* pej,.ttiiintLid. `t'hoy r L.r.omrrLide'r r�l�t�t�r�t1� � ��
the hoaIr!Ui't'W5 itic;bMq t~taldand admbini no, p rc1z I al-1 i
�:��t�r�:a j��-�r�.c�l� "Ct�� �'.i'���►�y parr~"w=�, i�:. p'�At't tj,. tips. ji nak {
arlcol
A pend x F ' Pap 6
AP A-22
ti
8a Conditional wri lcr•in havo been established in th+;1 (ir�r iru,�t] tttr gal
ltins,i,dOnti,al General PlAO d0sigPatxcarr which control djyjIrRan or
prot',iort.y below �rC) acre5s
Thin pr6joct doom not comply w1th those criteria. sprar:i f i,nal ay,, proof
of water must be slabmitwed. The fire hazard is higha'-Wrrr+len Water
storage with drafting connections, should be ihstali eW. Poadn should
he deGignod far accost and =rm by emargonay Ywhic7on 1s divi.rlQ, 1:03
do n6t now have aicoss„ Information showing road ! J.1 rrrjrrmnty grade,
auto and fills should be submitted.
picc,.ono i m off Of Bad Rack ("octad, which is rough and pw rr,,, L y Qr ywl epi.
Major commorr.„;
al servares and the high school are 20.n,r
.� rnr1o�; dist cent p
Thr"t >,o' ji-1.1 need to Lie, satisfactorily addresh - d j" order to 11ke
finding sof Uoneral Plan tonsformapae„
13 As noted in i tans 81 'UaZ d Rock Road 1Z in poor�x.+1j r° Condition near
th* project. AdcJatict1al traffic will only i,ncr eato tho noed for
maintW ance. Applicant will have to a fmsonzt.ra e that all weather
tr avQr % ablm frraWs cam bo constructed. Sight; distarhQ at "Enumcl aWl,
and 2,01d 500 W Mira `Thp U.S. FrarM Servic di trict ranger has
i,r-tdicAtod that "Encarrtalaw" is a forest service road, on which they hold
an WC160ve eavemont. This access pr~nblom will hive to be resolved.
14 Mid6oti al oevei apment wi l placu greater d min • am s,l'+,
90YO Mental serviav5. In this rural ar-ox, police pr- titin is can an
"on-call" OmOrgooay WMCS only. roothill dovel opilten r, .r ,T i Liz from
tho moarov urban as yal cannot be s rv0d 00st V+k•yrRti.vely.
PaPtiGularily in Wow, of budget" crat=bac s, 0r Vics HMO aro
directod t0wEa.rd `s urh ah areas ao W Wt hsv Of suburban/rural c'11"`nas.
a. Conti.ncrod approval of land div, si on, wi ,hin idQr'rt j .t: jud dor r a1"1N1rryq
reduces hab:ltattj rev fits r11i,4;rat','ion rurr"idorn, and r°'air..rl,s 40wm
norutal a y ratm,.
K —Foothill dowel C.rpt11r: nt, on btQop al t» pyt W'". tl"1oi:,,st', $ doq ro'I. e
Weir onmental r«3rot;uation czn orado 100C"{,tar m Cnyi4 C„tr llrQht1yil
LOCH
Appendit V page 1
Applicants
Carl. Ritnhey �1=:�+��a�a�rrr" ` Parrvl. 4
61-15-22
1,
Typ of Projects Tentative Partol Map
Descriptions Land division Of 20 acres to cr oat o 'Four
w ttBrief
u�lb
1paprrpcel yy{{ a amryo% each.
i p y� y
1 y� o Of n ym w Rood,
trri�Sv'i�Sa M1ul1�Y i�1\ the s4rV .q.�th �V �4�4n 4J1 �11�511VF_��1YY 1�0. *w1 Y. �. ��'� I t�,����F 4.�lri +M1, Fx�r��S�..V �•�'.
Y.
i x+00 +eot womt tri' its irrtx:ersect3 an with Bald ��rrf, F. F +wSF:�Cii bald
4.
�'rra�rt� Rock re ��n�i �:�/ Of I��v�1.a. opment� 1 dwelling a "I t per acrev,
�*
Amount of Impervious fur fa.carrtrla r� �' 1� ����.��� � 'fr_itrt r,, r•�sad�
6,
16,060 +t r homosi to r _ _ �l d
Access and Nearmt Public �'.rr�L'l N) tt lazomn%nt,. ��a ,i, r,�f �r
,
Road.
Method & SOWI90 Da. Wsal s Wti v Wtem
a.
Soorce & Wator SUPPIYI Vdivi,dual will'
9.
d
Pros i mi. ty m+ Power Lines: Along Bald Rock Wed
ter
r;a
�'r�t�rtta>.��. Vicar 3<ua thor'M !and diviziOnt and dw.vulOmerwtq
Be r;rt
C rt raj; it e graphic Character: Guntl Y W Wply s"Ping
.;
mountainous ter'G Ai. p a
i
h. lvpu%n
eet Am.
jxE- I -.Vaii a 4 2600-2700 feet -
dr t.,.irCrita,r1g Fclr.tOr°z. SlOpet n
a T pes and Character is-hi Chaix, n641'01 dop,, gray in
yellow brown,
m r�mV abi,lit.Y,, m�ydiucothigh suii;,A�ility i -rr. timber .
""
Moderato
Natural al Vic-' R -Ar ui � of thr�i Land
r.,�'
a ar°-t1- quake M0 4000 +0& ,r.�t_tth'� s thO D)41 k OMCI +cult
be Erosion %Wti al R VOry h0h
m, LanKlida PWQtialf High
a. G i" krr \I't Soil pr`%i,'.er" h i wail n Low
App�ridx F Cad
- AP 61`:30
F _ _
to Pt ai -;b–
aM T��r"r✓y traiai.'L
y�i�ha v 4an1~na,r4n r'G y rnask�tr° ,�
d r as n act Gr cl
Cha i is
Li, ra�.nt=gid
1� AOM,a� faxn a1�. tlttat�l1C��
ouali -Y*
n rnr t 1. a
n
plc i Cor-nzFk
5ax,
powiertfi
1�#at� �. t��, » r- �, � �
1�1o+, hair w
t kr -11r? µ ,t1jt»4r? t l sir —; i ri
l'o. t1r h r rel
di.rig ,Xnl:r�rai�an �Y r�
jn.
n 1ia
Carria1 `t=�� err
1zt��
A�-
n1. 1rtrlvt�arr:
. 4 t. 3tin � s t n"'� t` ''"' i d '
r 1 L.nsxtx
1 ,w Y'it+,r
a1Ar ua:e
aa.rr+ w P, tvstk'wa�S� { a1 - ck�►°..
LavAel iJ", `' rra t G d lr � �w.1 Re "5
��.. a Gi h
rw
i
An doj goat 101,
Irl" ,t�r'
bp640�� CCien .j
�' ai^ n�n-(
°�
d.
it�il i am�prr 33
ti^m ^tt� r-1-r a t;ht'VIt-st
At-
a'(.
laitc
ru
^^yyk t1tt,�`.K'l��.x �3``�,{..�,i1++:!.k �M
•x. ta.Ai
r� 1 r tota, k ky d Fjt0, ti T
tin t,am n�. � y 1r" v i1r3 Yuri
I. c:trx
AQP