HomeMy WebLinkAbout061-450-011ti •� _ f
'a
1
t 4,• ,
j'op �,
fes. �•
'` N '
,
_
4
i
ig w
•
1
PLANNING COMilSS` SU'?+ It'LMY :SHEET FOR LAND DIVISIONS
AT'PLICANT' Rudy Pavlek Lvg86-12-04-01
ADDRES-a12015 K.ernite St.. = Reno:,. Nevada, 89506
OWNER Same
PROJECT :DESCRIPTION Tentative Subdivision Map to divide 45-+-, acres to
create,9 - 5 acre parcels°. if possible, less i� not enough acreage
UOCAT�ION at the intersection of Oro 2� nc�r H ghwag and Eden Canyon
Road, Lake Madrone area,
AS'SESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER(S) 61-45-11
ZONING TDI -5, R -C GENERAL PLAN Timber Mt., PROJECT CONSISTENT?
Agricultural -Residential
GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE REPORT
DATE OF APPLICANT SIGNATURE
LAND CONSER-g'FTION .e�CTCONTRACTS?'
DATE: APpLIC Toy' REC-'I'V' ED I7ece�Cu er a, 1986
t:
AGENTISURvFYGR/CIVIL. ENGIt,=- R Ron Graves
ADDRESS: F.O. Box '986,: Orovlle, CA 95965
DATE PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT PREPARED
ENVIRONMENTAL.
DETFRMINATION
:DsTv
CATBGORIC_IA EXEMPTION - DATE TILED_
NEGATIVE DECLAR71TION -- DATE ADOPTED
MITIGATED NEG. DECLARATION - DATE ADOPTED
W. IMPACT' REPORT - DATE CERTIFIED
STALE CLEARINGHOUSE NO. _
SUB. COMMITTEE MEETING DATE I(
ADVIS.rs, AGENCY HEARING DATE ' f
ADVISORY AGENCY ACTION
APPEALED' APPEAL HE.kRING DATE_
BOARD ACTION
COMMENTS FOR PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT S�� a
„�.N
k-=
dote on ap. Owner agrees to 'pay the deer mitigaz:or,
required by
County ordinance for issuance of buiidit4
pera t(s) at the t1 such permits} are issued. Owt.
ackn-wiedges that no such ordinance i�,c a�e�iect as o1
date. 0"L teztati �-t5 nuadi cion map pp
countu
bu
LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND
DEPARTMENT of PUBLIC WORKS
WILLIAM (Bill) CHEFF, Director
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965
Telephoner (916) 538.7681
RONALD D, McRLROY
Deputy Direct0f
November 13, 1989
Ron Cra.ve5 Assiciates
RE: AP Pavlek Subdiv�.rJon
P. 0. Box 986
orovil7.ei CA 95965
Bear Gentlemen: y Advisory Agency held on
At the regular meeting of the Butte Count
1989,. the Agency granted a time extension o3rs
november 13, on the above -referenced property.
in order to file the final map
`The rew date of expirafiior is November 30, 1992.15 da s of the date
if no appeals are timely
filed—within fifteen ( ) y
of the Advisory Agencyis approval --with the Clerk of the Board of
Supervisors, this action will be final.
If you
have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this
office.
Very truly yours,
William Cheff
Director of Public Works
C.-
,3ohn Mendonsa
Assistant Director
atlas
attachment
CC! Planning Department
Environmental Health Department Reno., NV 89506
Rudy Pavlek, M15 ROtnite St,,
xW,Fy�1 �
OF
�JET�R.1"1YL.T'A� �N
Np T'
trz*1
oity
of Planring and Resarch :1zryri - r ° planniutte cg�I
atlepartment
of lice
Room 121+ '" County Center Drive
1400 Tenth Str
Sacramento, CA '1.814 i Crovillet CA 95965
or , ,s
County C1ork
_►+_. County of Butte �� . °�%10R E'�IICR0,
SUS.7EC's Filing
Of Notice of Uel rmira�t.�on in compliance with. Section 2110.8
or 211.52 of the Public Resouce:> Code..
Project Title 61-45-11, Rudy pavlek
Tentative Subdivision -----
Contact Person 'Telephone Number
State Clearinghouse Number
(if submitted to Clearinghouse) sn-7266
John Mendonsa Y Hl.ghway, an
public works ersection of Oro-Quinc ,. r4den
Project Location At the j nt
Canyon Road., Lake Madrane area.
i.sian Map dividing '!5± acres , L ._...
project Description Ten -at
Subdivision
create nine 5± -acre parcels:
AdvA ency
This to advise that the Bute Count iser
Agency or Responsible Age,nc Y)
(Lead Ag 11-3 0 -87 and has wade
has approved the above-described project on
(Date)
the following determinations regarding
the above-described project:
project will, X will not, have a significant effect on the
1. Thep J --
environment' Bred for this project
2, An Environmental imp
act Report was prep'
pursuant to the provisions Of
CEQA,
XA Negative Declaration wasrepaced for this pp ro ect pursuant to the
._---
provisions of CEQA,
iiti ation measures _X were, were not, made a condition of the
3: P g
approval of the pro j
ect o
x. A statement of Overriding considerations was, - ,� was not, adopted
4.
for this project
•i. that the final. tile 8EIR Witt! calmhents and responses and record of
This is to certify eneral public at.
project approval is dvailable to
Butte County Planning Department
7 County Center drive
broville, CA 9565
Date Received for filing and
posting at nPR _ _w._..: ----y I Signature planner
l 'rurpbl,, Se�niar
ni
Title ketvi'eed Harch 1§96
Rudy Pavl.ek, 'TSbi
API/61-4S-11
Mitigation Measures
1. ,A 1.00 ft. and 50 Jt. setback buffer be
established, 'along cacti
side of all permanent and intermittent
streams.
2. Locate homes,-4l.-es at least 100 ft. from
Oroville Quincy llig'hway
in order to reduce impacts from noise
from truck traffic.
3. ;Vote on Map: Owner agrees to pay the
deer ma.ti�;TA-I' .on £cos
required by County ordinance for issuance
of 'bu .,l ding permit (s)
at the time such permit (s) are issued.
Owner acItIlowledges that
no such ordinance is in effect as of the
date of tentative
subdivision map approval.
coun
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
VnLLIAM (Bill) eHEFI:, Diroctor
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE . OFtOVILLG, CALIFORNIA 95965
Telephone (916) 5"tC1.160I
RONALD o, MtELROY
CERTIFIED MAIL
Buff9 CO. MannIng Cmnn Deputy Director
D E G 1 1987
0mvlle, California November 30, 1987
Rudy Pavlek REt AP 61-45-11.
12015 Kernlite Street. Tentative Subdivirllon Map
Reno, NV 89506
Dear Mr. Pavlolc
At the regular meeting of the Butte County Advisory Agency held on
November 30 19$7, the Agency adopted a negative declaration with
environmental mitigations and approved the tentative parcel map on
the Above-referencod ,property subject to tile conditions listed (i
the attached sheet:
If no appeals are timel,r ail ed- within ten (10) days of the date o1~
the Advisory Agency's approval -with the Clerk of the Board of
Supervisors, this action will be final.
When t17e conditions of approval are complied with, it will be in of4er
for you to file your "final map" with the Butte County Department
of public Works for recordation within twenty-four (24) months of
the date of approval by the Advisory Agencya
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this
office.
Very truly yours,
William Chef
Director of Public Works
J�5 n Mandonsn
si nt Director
Vi /ds
nttachmotat
cc t Planning 1lopartment
B11vironlltontai Health Department
Ron. Craves
y Rudy Pavlek, Tentataive Subdivision Map, AP 61-45-111 9 parcels at
alae intersection of Oro Quincy Highway and Eden Canyon Road. Lake
Mhdrone area. Engineer: Icon Graves
Public Works conditions:
1 Indicate a 50 ft, building; setback line from the centerline of
interior roads:
2 Street signs shall be provided by the developer at all street
intersections per County requirements. (Submit S alterno1e
names for each street to the County address coordinator (.or
approval of street names.)
3 peed 40 fMet from the centorline of Oro Quincy Highway to kltr
County of Butte.
4 Construct; Lull street section on interior roads to RS-% ger�rnetr.ic
standard.
5 Provide monumentati.on as required by the Department of Public
Works in accordance with accepted. standards.
6 Provide permanent solution for drainage.
7 All easements of record to be shown on the final map.
8 Meet requirements of Butte County fire Department or other,
responsible agency,
9 Provide 1 Ltt no access strip ing Oro Quincy Highway frontage,
10 Meet the regtsiremonts of the utility companies (i.e:, PG&E,
P•'aific Tt-21000ne, water, solver).
11 Pay any delinquent tastes or current taxes as required.
12 PI-ovide access to Parcel. #1 and #G from private road.
i" Provide public road approach at safe location, Location to be
approved by Detp. of Public Works.
Health Dapt: conditions:
14 Show a 50 ft, leachfield setback from the drainage Way on parcels
1 through 9 whore applicable.
15 Prove with percolation and soil, tests that the required usable
sewage disposal area exists on parcels 1 through 9. Combine
with an adjaceant parcel any parcel not proven to contain rhe
uuable sawape disposal area required by the Subdivision Ordinance.
PAVGEK► TSM'
16 Place a note on the map that no water wel may he located
within 100 ft of the usable sewage disposal area on parcels 1 through c),
17 Grove that the required quantities of domestic water are available
to parcels 1 through 9 by drilling two or more acceptable wells
at North and South ends of the subdivision, or otherwise prove
availability of water in accordance with the Subdivision
Ordinance.
18 Obtain approval from Regional. Water Quality Control 13c)tttci .r
sewage disposal.or
19 Indicate on the map that slopes in excess of 30 peicenl: tirL
unsuitable for sewage disposal;
The following mitigation measures are required:
20 A 100 ft, and 50 ft. setback buffer be established along each
side of all permanent and intermittent streams,
21 %oCate homesites at Least ,100 f t , from Oroville Quinc
order to reduce impacts .from noise from truck traffic• Highway in
22 Note on Map: OWPer agrees toa '
by Count ordinance for issuancep} Lhe deer "litigation fees required
y of 'building permit(s) at
such permit(s) are issued; Ownthe time
er the that no such
ordinance ;s in effect as of the date of tentative subdivision
map approval,
Quito C"O. Planning Canty,
Fl. -B 23 13$7
Orodla, Cc+litQr4
Archa�eoiogical Reconnaissance
of the Proposed Pavi'ik Subdivision,
A.P. #62-12-56, iw.1ir Barry Creek,
Butte County, California,
Prepared For:
Rudy Paviik
12015 Kernite Street
Reno, Nevada 89506
prepared By
Jensen & Associates
Archaeological Consulting and Research
41 Skyrhountain Circle
Chico, California 95928
i
Introduction
in order to assess the archaeological impacts of a
proposed
subdivision involving approximately forty-one acres of 'land at Lake Madrone
within Butte County, California, the firm of Ron Graves &Associates, acting
on behalf of the property owner Mr. R. Pavlik, contracted for a complete
records search and on—foot reconnaissance of the parcel in compliance with
recommendations received from the Butte County Planning Commission.
Accordingly, on Thursday, February 19, 1987, the author conducted an
on—foot reconnaissance of the project area, for the purpose of locating and
recording any evidence of prehistoric or significant historic use and/or
occupation.
The Pavlik parcel consists of a roughly triangular piece of land located
on the north side of the Oro—Quiiicy Road and Lake Madrone/Berry Creek. ,
The current proposal calls for subdivision of the parcel into nine separate
residential lots, each of which would presumably eventually be subjected to
homesit« and perhaps other developments, In view of the potential adverse
effects of future construction to cuitur�al resources which might exist within
the area, and in consideration of the general archaoologicalsensitivity of
the region, Butte County regulations required that cultural resources be
fully inventoried and formally assessed prior to project approval, pursuant
to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 19660 as amended
(16 11. S. C. 470`)
Procedures of the Advisory Council on Historic
Preservation (36 CFR 800), and other legislation and orders.
The remainder of this report details the results of the required
archaeological survey and inve�ltory and provides appropriate
recommendations. All fieldwork procedures followed guidelines provided
by the State Historic Preservation ogioe (Sacramento) and are in
conformity with accepted professional sta:idards.
2
Locaitfen
The Pavlik parcel 'is located within a portion of the northwestquarter of
Section 27 of Township 21 North, Range 5 East, M.D.M., of the USES Berry
Creek, California, 7,5` quad (;gee attached project location map), The
parcel consists of a total of approximately 41 acres of timber— and
brush -covered land within unincorporated territory of Butte County,
kti:icords Search
Prior to going into the field the arcnaeo'logical records of the Northeast
California information Center (CSU -Chico) were examined for any existing
recorded prehistoric or histot4le sites within the project area. In addition,
the National Register of Historic Places (USDI 1985) was also consulted. The
records search produced negative results for the project area and
Immediately adjacent lands, although the project vicinity is an
archaeologically sensitive zone within which numerous prehistoric and
historic sites have already been recorded (cf., Jensen 1981; 1985).
Ethnographically the project area falls within territory which was
occupied by the Northwestern Maidu or Konkow Indians (Riddell 1978: Figur:
1). Although the ethnographic data do not identify any specific sites withiti
the project area, the goneral s thnog, Olt' information in combination with
the results obtained from previous archaeological surveys and excavations
within the region (e.g., Jensen 1978; 1979; 1982, 1983; 1985) indicate that a
number of prehistoric site types might be located within the area, including
the following: (1) aboriginal middens located on knolls or ridges above
major stream courses (2') aboriginal milling stations located on rock
outcrops Within the vicinity of good acorn �.uilecti'on areas; (3) surface
scatters of lthic flakes and implements resulting from short term use and
occupation; (4) isolated finds of aboriginal lithic flakes and artifacts, (5)
Native 4merican burial and cemetery sites, and (6) various types, of
3
historic sites dating to time periods between about 1850 and the present.
Such sites have been recorded within the immediate ,project vicinity and
throughout Konkow Indian territory and the Oroville locality generally.
Fieldwork
As noted, fieldwo. k for the project was conducted by the author on
Tho r,sday, February 19,, 1987, vegetation consists of a dense, nearly
impenetrable mixture of confers, oaks, madrone grasses and brush
species including especially manZanitq and teanothus. Minor ground
,gig and other disturbances were in evidence on less than 5% of the
however, the activities which resulted in the ground disturbances
'd st ,,iining, loggiryg and minor road grading) %could not have totally
obliterated evidence of past prehistoric use or occupation if such evidence
were pVesent.
"The on --foot survey involved Criss—crossing the parcel (Mm east to
west in survey transects ranging from lr � to 3.5 meters apart, Examinatiot
of the surface involved inspection of disturbed areas (including a single
road cut through a por'ti, n of the area, rodent 'middens, etc. ) for evidence
of subsurface cultural material. However, it shoi.Od he noted that moat of
the surface of the parcel could not be direcetly observed due to extr mely
dense brush and other vegetation and considerable dead -fail accumulation.
Survey'Results and Recommendation
No evidence of prOistoric or significant historic, use or occupation was
eiicounterd during fieldwork. Even though muchr of the parcel's surface
could not bo visually inspected due to vegetation cover, there is no easy
remedy for this situation. At this point, no additional field survey is
9
4
recommended as no significant springs were noted and in general the parcel
includes lands of fairly low archaeological sensitivity. Archaeological
clearance for the proposed subdivision is therefore recommended, with the
following provision: should subsequent development or construction
activity expose surface -occurring or buried Native American or early
historic cultural matowlals, a qualified archaeologist should be contacted
immediately in order to evaluate the impacts of the project to the cultural
materials encountered.
Referen,kes
Jensen, Peter M.
1978 archaeological Test Excavations at Three Prehistoric Sites within
the Mendocino National Forest's Chico Tree improve"iment Farm,
Butte County, California. Report on File, Northeast California
Information Center, CSU -Chico.
1979 Archaeological Reconnaissance and Overview for the Proposed
Southeast Chico Development Project. Report on Fiie, Northeast
California Information Center, CSU -Chico, and Cook & Associates,
Oroville.
1981 Archaeological Reconnaissance of the 61500 Acre Galen and
Campoodie Timber Sale Areas,
Bvt a and Plumas Counties,
California. Report on Flle, Plumns National Forest, Quincy;
California.
1982 Cultural Resources Overview and Field Survey for the proOosed
ColReportins We onon rile, Foc�sin D1 IlllDesientGroujec Project, County, California.
North Central California Information Center, CSU-Sacromentaia, and
1985 Archaeological Reconnaissance of the Proposed Masek Subdivision
Project on Keefer Road, Butte County, California,
Northeast Califo-nia Information Center, 8U -Chico Report °n File,
1985 Archaeological Recons'oissance of the Proposlad French Creek
Hydroelectric Project, Utte County, California, Report on Pile,
OroVille Wyandotte irrigation District and Northeast Califiornia
Information Center, CSU-Chieo.
Riddell, Francis A.
1978 Maidu and Konkow, IN, Handbook of North American Indians, Volume
8: California, Robert F. Heizer, Editor, pp. 370-388. Smithsonian
Institution, Washington, D.C.
United States Department of the Interior
1985 National Register of Historic Places. Federal Register through
December 31, 1985. Washington, D.C.
/ ,+ rrlJ°yg9d
/ r .,.-� � ��!/ ��� ry ��� O� .,,,J•+.... �� � ,IJ . � �'A! � pw-•- • � ��.J,'.---f ��...%U �r^'-a o �*Y... �
:� � �///j. '''�''' / " y� `� r "�' ,fes •f.. "Y: � r .11f�; � I � 14 a
+x207
ido tb
q �w"y • i ( . rtlg (Q �.. J� i OVA k
w,6 t. `i tl 1i d'vC 1(�'�� '�i J�%/,' �""' � A J', !�r �,/(J� ,,...� •^ ,di, rti„��' (, . ('°^" n ,
T 1 'jY� r ✓" "'1 a rxs ��1 ti✓ ^ , s q "�
. � ,I . A�`,"✓,/`�J,1�f%'��,,--��•• ��� p" . $�luQ,. r ( 1 " (111'+' '� "",�''"`. � . r l�»�^ �� , r ..:�Z{�
u•.""�'7� // /' ? `r�, _. ,�. r-+•.- .: ..Y+ r+-'. iwA �w ......�.y,�, r.�... �,-#.c.ec ^'.�/�i-f���° .. r..�-....- rr. e--` :.. �'��� W.
p I w�G r +#'✓` +�f! n - ��hd JI.� +1g2
N' �illy
Ab'
CIII''��/r .00
�✓ iy,'� a "°....�.\'rr `
V r r1 1 ,,��` d 4�k I �d ex.
f��. - �''` ��h r , 4- :ter-✓ �� *--,�`.a�1 ,,�,
1 ' . \�.,Y' ��_ °.. "� ..' � I •I.1,� 1� j�i J� /l I � �. S {1� � �,L� �� r%/, ' i r>7 ,� `..�•-=ti7�/ .r
i, •°t ,. _� .- , � r�3" ' j7- w ♦w..,� +AAS i! gyp+ f ,�.4.K^ I•a +)' •-""'-�^"J}d r� �T a'
paV11k ParGI F d4' /�#Ia,1tY�#. Ar�-
j
Me
Iv
hw
,
j 1 '
a- '"': �4Y�1. • �J'`` ' „+,•"+6 � •�: d �i .� ?SBA `' + �, �,. L"`"""�� yy
Q'f�. �t x2?rr1 i yi i}I. y r� r � 1{�7 � ��' /r, 2 ✓ x }
, *� `
r
r 411ad eo lic, �,� 4 1 ski "rp ` ri 1
/y Jrrthr : a .ry ,� 11 , .# Pb U s ;
O195q y 4. a y2 y
BerfY Creek "`
rF Y
W,
"� +y �1 r f' Gh1 CHcb.� � . - 'k,i, �y.. 1 1 ,.. � ' i < • \1 N y
,
i
14urrF 01eak � I/
' FIM'
i I4 •
1 Max 2225
�� � �-: Q May �-,. a y � ' ''� u . ,•�. F
)/ y
Rd�.t�' ' 1 M`!+yd • i1 ii i
' 8ht 27AQ -.
� 1� 7.+as7 • ' �, ,,��aa r
OWX
� r3 goaamN.
Y
6
• s G d v �
Ip
tsti III Kttl Gdntfitll Sld dl ix 39"%rl
IFYtniOtt'(3040010A4 s
' bun�ar,nr ril*1 eneS,rr,n�l ra 1?i°�2'g0"
ROAD cLASSIFICATIUN
1141L prim r)r igh�a�y, Light,duty road, herd or �?s
INTER -DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM
T0:
Butte. County Advisory Agency
TROM: Planning Director
EC`1': Report on Tentative Parcel clap for Rudy pavlek on Al' 61-45..-7
SuBi `L
DATE: November 17 1987
to osal to divide 45+/- acnes to create 9
.,cels. The
present
a P P - 5 acre' pfircels) wid R -C
This
zoning .s TM -5 (Timber Lan use Plan Map of the Butte County
(Resource Consevvation)•
designates this area as Timber Mountain and Agricultural.
General Residential. dTherre are no specific or community plans for the area,
P County any
County,
ro osal does not conlect General Plan nor with Count tonin nor an adopted or
Thep
proposed r' Iemer,t Of the County
Butte
Specific community p
Rd^ommend approval subject to three mitigation measures;
1. A and 50 ft. setback buffer be established along each side
of anent and intermittent streams:
1,oc.,
�4tes at least 100 ft- from Oroville
2, Quincy Highway in
order to reduce impacts from noise from truck traffic.
Owner agrees to pay the deer mitigation fees
g
3. Nott on Map: ance far issuance of building permits) at
required by County c,
er
the time such permi4(s) are issued. Owner acknowledges that no
approval,fect as of
the date of tentative
such. ordinance isinef
subdi:visoti map
DEH:
cc! Rudy Pavitk
Icon GraVe
'e
k
Y
}
Apl'tiNrlrK 1'
ct1u� N`rY O i3[1'rmr_
CN20NDt:NTAL CuFCKL15nd1FR
A er
cy)pto c011rdLog, it 85-1.2-04-'01
AP 1161-45-11
l , BACKS.RO[lND
I. Name o i proponent e Dl' PAVLI✓K ------ �.
2, Address of proponent and representative C
f applr4tah'le�
Rs7.ta_Gsave
P.O. Box 9-8"6
y
1201__.5_ Kei:nite Stee+ �� --- �yYoville, CA4.95965
RFno,� NV 88506 _�..� ` ��5ubdivV� inion Ma1'.y
3, Project d"Cription Tentative ...�_ �.—
ar SrtlNLVICLAN J-
y"ii.�i rtA�"tli N
lT, MANDATORY FINDINGS._�.-�. _--
.� ---� - - _potential to c10t',rade tit('
ii. hoes the project have the ntially redilev
quality o E the environment, sr►iastas peel , ra►tl5d ri
the habitat Of 1 fish or w'"I' ife 1 eb-01014 self -
re or wildlife 1opul-Ition to , threaten to eliminate a plant ctr
silstainini; ;levels,
animal cotttmunity, reduce the rtu�bnt or
ynima;l�ot.tlrc
range o : a Tate or endangered l periods X
eliminate important e�cantp prehpstory"major p of California California hlstOr of t
b, floes the pr'oje'ct have the porentaal to achieve
short-term benefits
s"tol tile dotrterm timpact Or nOnttile'
er,vironmenta► l
env rot►tnt:nt is Otte which o4cuys ia� a m impacts Will
brief period of time while long-teryn4 x
endure into the future .)
L . [lues tiro prnj� et have irttpac is which ,tee inclitridt►-
ally limited, but eumulativelr� cans�deTrtbl.e' ll
impact On two UT 111o1'e SE'j1F11'htC' 1"OSt7111 LG`
ltra j ec t may 3:mp.
when the tnr�yact ort ea�feet4o rtheltotalaoflthose x
small, but W �e re th`
i.ti,rc,ts or> fire vnviranment sil;nifict>nt:1
rl" Frogs the proloc•t h<t'o ens"la'r�ntnrn rse frct.;ranthi►natnEli
Yl—
will causio Silbstantial�^.totc indixE�rCl�t"
beingsl l�lthRyr �11rEEt1
lll. 111 I1I�.11tiA'l ltlti (`1'ct hrctmltletit*x
1 ley the Lrtact :1�oncvl
ftthc� 15,zsi. c�f'thi.a initial et,tlttatir,tr:
1Vi? rind tltc p�'
►'oposeJ 17tr'"c't .t'a Ltl.jrl;Cl,Al2A't'1ON�rt1filltrbe ptrepttleclL,�t
r .,t tttc'ttt ,tncl Y, ;+rl�t,t'I1�
a rt,r►tsccl ptoieet Could have* aiitt nirlw
scribed on
X141: 1'.irrd `that ct1 thOu>It the t 1
;t si niricant
t ;fret e f t Esc t cin t1W env t r Otana tlt ti
thc�rc tvr 1l tlot bs
��t feet in tih1 e tse b e.uisc' tlt l lc��ll lctAtiteNptic��lee�ti,'c 1do.
Nl.CN rVII.,
the.' ntta0lod shoot itatFc ltccn ,u.c
1fULAltA'rl CIN 1611 1rr•
giliflt oil
oral: rind A11L, prollOS01 1'►°�slYvct �1.� 1'l�la�i�11'At.> 1til'c1'1nl,e►o�uit'od,
, 1,t Nt 11.E
".�"` that ert4 i t•c�nmcnt >
ttttd a n i, ti
eY 31, 1986
C,'t�11i,n (tl• FlJ'C'll., i)1�ANN1.�G llia'AlZ"Chlt?I�"1'
DATI. becembw y _ W.� hex
nada 'Ra H ori3.>mus, ASso
to p1.an
Review cl by.,
IV
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
xp anatxons of
on attached sheet (s)) 1ys" and 'maybe" answers are required
1. EARTH. Wi11 the proposal. result in significanYES
a.t; Unstable earth conditions
,�[AYB$ N0
or in changes
geologic substructuros?
b Disruptions, displacements, compaction or
overcoveri.ng of the soil?
c. Change in topography oT ground _surface
relief features?
-
d. Destruction, covering or modification of any
unique
-�
geologic or physical features?
e, Increase in Wind
or water erosion of soils,
either on or off' -site?
f. Changes in deposition or erasion of beach ----
X .
sands, or changes in siltation, deposition
or erosion which may modify the channel o
a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or
any bay, inlet or lake?
g. Loss of prime agriculturally productive soils
outside designated urban
X _—.
areas'
h.. Exposure of people or � pro pert) --,-
p - ) to -geologic
Hazards such
,k
as earthquakes, land. ;!Ides, mud-
slides, ground failure Or similar
,hazards?
2; ATR. Will the proposal res ult in substantial -
a• Air emissions or deterioration
_kG
of ambient
air quality?
b. The creation of obiectonabl.e odors, smoke
or fumes?
X
f
"—
c. Alteration of movement, moisture, or
temperature, 0, r:ty change in climate,
locally or regionally?
3.SVATER, Will the proposal, result in substantial.
a. Changes in;
i
currents, or the course or
direction of water 'movements in either
marine or fresh waters?
b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage terns,
X
Or the rate and amou-t of surface runoff?
c. Need for off-site surface drainage improve-
mPnts, including vegetation removal; channel
ization
or culvert installation?
d. Alterations to the
course or'flOW of flood
waters?
e. Change in the amount of surface water in any
'water body?
---' —-
f. Discharge into surface waters, or in. any
alteration of surface
water quality, including
a but not limited to temperature, dissolved
oxYget1 or turbidity?
gl Alteration of the direction or rate of flow
Of
.-
ground waters?
h: Change in the quantity orr quality _ ofound watrexsy
either through direct
-- ---
additions r with`
drawals, or through interception of an
aquifer by cuts or excavatiolxs?
iReduction in the amount of Water otherwise
available for public water
supplies?
. Exposure of people or property to water
related hazards such at flooding?
,«
YES
MAYBE
NO
4.
PLANT LIFE. Will the proposal result in. 5ubstantialA.
a. Change in the diversity of species, or number
of any species of plants (including trees,
shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)?
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare
or endangered species of plants?
X
C. Introduction of new species of plants into an
area, or in a barrier to the normal replenish-
ment of existing, species?
d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop?
s-
S.
ANIMAL LIFE. Will the proposal result in substantial.:
a. C angein the diversity of species, or numbers
of any species of animals (birds, land animals
including reptiles, fish and shell fish.,
benthic organisms or insects)?
b. Reduction in the numbers of any unique, rare
Or endangered specie., of animals?
x
c. Introduction of new species of animals into
an area, or result in a barrier to the migration
or movement of animals?
d. Deterioration to e-cisting fish or wildlife
habitat?
6.
NOISE Will the piuposal result in substantial:
a. Increases in existing noise levels?
b. Exposure of people to severe noise lovely?
X
7.
LIGHT AND GLARE: Will the proposal produce
significant light and glare?
X_
8.
LAND USE. Will the proposal result in a
su stantial alteration of the present or planned
land use of an area.?
'y,
9,
NATURAL RESOURCES: Will the proposal result in
substantial:
a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural.
reJsour,ces?
X
. Depletion of any non-renewable natural
resources?
lb.
RISK OF UPS T. Will the proposal involve:
a: A s off: explosion or the release of hazard-
ous substances (including, but not limited to
oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the
event of an accident or upset conditions?
b. Possible interference with an emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
ll,
POPULATION, Will the proposal alter the location,
alstilbul on density, or growth rate of the human
population'?'
12.
HOWNG. Will the proposal affect: existing housing,
or create a demand for additional housing?
YES
MAYBE NO
} l3. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Will the proposal
result in:
a. Generation of substantial additional. vehicle
X�
b. Effectston existingparking facilities, orX.
demand. for new parking? �....
c. Substantial impact on existing transpoxtationG
systems?
d Significant alterations to present patterns
of circulation or movement of people and/or
x
goods?
ei Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic?
f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles,
bicyclists or pedestrians?
14. PUBLIC SERVICES, Will the proposal have an effect
altered
upon, or result in a need for new or
governmental serices
K
a fire protection?
b. Police protection?
c. Schools?
d Parks of other recreational facilities?
_?C_
e. Maintenance of public facilities, including
X
roads?
f. Other governmental services?
---
15. ENERGY. Will the proposal result in.
Use of substantial amounts of fuel .or energy?
a.
b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing
sources of energy, or require the development
k
of new sources of energy?
16. UTILITIES. Will the proposal result in a need for
new systems, or substantial alterations to the
following:
X
a. Power or natural gas?
b. Commvnicat'ions systems
.-�—
c. }Vater availability:-�--
d. Sewer or septic tank?
x ---
e. Storm tgater drainage?
f, Solid waste and disposal?
--
17. HUMAN HEALTH. Will the proposal result in:
CTeaFi—oji of any health hazard or potential
ai
health hazard (excluding mental health)?
b. Exposure of people to potential health
hazards?
-r _
1.8. AESTHETICS. 'trill the proposal result in the
o struct qn of any scenic Vista or view open to
the public, or will the proposal result iii the
open
Creation of a aesthetically offensive sate
vian
to publicW?
YES
19. RECREATION. Will the
MAYBE 'No
proposal result in an impact
upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational
opportunities?
20. CULTURAL RESOURCES.
.
a.; Wil the proposal result in the alteration,
of or the destruction of
a prehistoric or
historic archaeological site?,
b. Will the proposal result 'In adverse physical
or aesthetic effects
to a prehistoric or
historic building, structure or object?
C. Does the .._
proposal have the Potential to cause
a physical change which
}
would affect unique
ethnic cultural values?
d. Will the proposal restrict existing religic),jS "--
sacxed uses within the
.arpotential impact
area?
V. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
Al?
See attached.
G
4'
f
DISCUSSION OF'F-ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUA-rioN AP 61-45-11
1b,c,epf,3bpc3f316e: Development of nine homesites on I, -he subject
property will result In some disruption, displacement, cumpat-hion and
overcovering of the soil which will result in potential changes in
absorption rates, drainage patterns and the rate and otriount of surface
runoff which could result in an Increase in erosion of, soils on site
and siltation of nearby waterways including Berry Creek) located just
southwest of the subject property. Berry Creek has suffered
considerable siltation in the past, and additional sources of
siltation shOLIld not be allowed. It may be necessary to construct
siltation traps on site In order to control siltation ol, Perry Creek.
1h: All of Butte County is within a Moderate Ear,thquaka Intensity,
Zone VIII. The Subject property Is iocated approximately Fi to 5 miles
southwest of the Big Bend Fault and a similar distance oast of faults
associated with the Foothill Shear-, Zone which supportedfake1975
ir-ovIlle earthquake. Construction of buildings to Uniform Building
-.44mr-idards for gel sm 1 cal I y active areas should prov I do adequate
+7,o occupants in case of seismic activity.
5a) d: The 1: for siltation of Berry Creek discussed In Items I
and 3 Could life forms In Berry Creek. Additionally')
the subject property It, within critical winter doer herd
habitat for the Sucks lylountai,, Ui�t--, 14-Rrcl, The Department of Fish and
Game has recommended no new par-cais less than 40 acres in size be
created in such areas: The project site Is located along a designated
transportation corridor, along which some oe-vf0,-,1Pment may take place.
This project may repr',esent further expansInn of O'&Arcel sizes
into the critical doer habitat area Specific comment:L -this
project have not yet been received from the Departril.e.nt of and
Game.
6b: The proposed lots fronting on Oroville-Ouincy Highway area subject
to noise from heavy logging truck traffic on the highway. it may be
deslr8ble to locate homesItes as far from Oroville-Qulncy Highway as
possible.
I Sa, c $ f: This project will rept-esoht, an Increase In traffic on
Oroville-Oulhty Highway and an lncrease In -turning --lovoments at the
access road onto Oroville-UuInc-y Highwayi Due to the small number of
lots being created) thI,-- should not be 8 significant Irripaoti
14. This project will represent an Increffierit0l Increase in demand for
public sory I cos In a rural area,
16c: The opplicant's applicatlon form Indicates that domestic water
will be obtained from the Lake 1118drohO Water District. Recently there
have been questions as to the amount, of water available from tht Water
District, and comments received from the Butte County rinylronmoht8l
Health Department require that the applicant prove that the required
quantities of domestic water are available to the project by de-IllIng
two it more aecept8ble wells at the north and the south ends of the
subdivision,. Regardlozs of the ultimate source of the water; the
project proponents must meet the requirements of the motto county
rihvirommontal Heal Department.
r
208:The subject property is i n anaea o high archaeoloin gical �c
sensitivity- An archaeological survey er ty
determine if si9nocaappropraiateomita9ationsites
measuresexist � eop the pr
and i -r so, to develop
TY. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
a: be,a Items ba, d and 208
SuAflai. ed t; caa ion MeeisL,res
irements of the Department of Fish and Gameobeearding
1• Meat thA raga constructing slltestion traps,
impacts to Berry Creek by � , or other measures as deemed;
8tt-e3mbed alteration permits
appropriate:
1 east 1 00 feet from Orov i 1 l e-�L�u t ncy Highway in
2. Loc�ite homes i 'cr' at
order to ret'uc'� s �+'oacts from nc, i se from truck tra `f i c.
No mtlOation measure is recommended at this time regarding
aP+chaEological resources.arharchae
aeolo9ical�scttessexist on theessA^y
In order to determine
propertva and If Soy to develop appropriate mitigation measures.
Applicantk Rudy Paylek
Assessor •s Parzol 41
61-45-11
Log * 86-12-04-01
DATA. SHEEP
A. io.iect Desnr,t i on
11- Type of Project'. Tentative Subdivision flap.
2. 'Brief Description: Dividing approximately 46 acres
parcels of 5 acres each, , Into nine
3. Location: At the intersection Of Orbville-Quincy Highway and
Eden Canyon Road, In the Lake M8drone area nOri<heast of
Oroville.
4. Proposed Density OF Development:
5. Amount of jmper-�-Surfacing"5 acres Per dHelllng unit.
V i ous 1 n, 1 me I .
6. Access and Nearest, Public Road(s): Property Fronts on
OravillO-Quincy Highway.
7. Method of Sewage Disposal: Indlvldu,-31 :�ePtic system
8- 5OurcG of Water Supply: Applicant states Lake 1,jadron% Water
District water facilities will be used.
9. Proximity of power Lines: To property,
10. Potential for further land divisions and development: None
under existing zoning.
B. -Environmental Setti-ne
1 - Terra i n
a. Genoral Topographic Character-* G(,, arally mountainous
terralms.
b4 Slopes: COMeral`IV 10 to 80r. slopes.
C. Elevation: 2000 to 2860 feet above See Level.
d. LimitinA rattors. Areas of steep slopes.
2. Soils
a. Types and Characteristics.- Chakanakee and Holland soils.
'rho former Is 12 to 20 Inches deep, the latter, 60 to 100
inches deep, with the former excessively drained with
moderately rapid permeability and the I atter well drained
with moderately Slow Permeability.
b. Limiting ractors: Areas Of shallow soils and slow
Permeability.
S. Natural Hazards of the Land
84 Earthquake Zono., 110d0t-8te Eat-thjuako Interisity Zone V111.
b. !Erosion Potej-jtjaj: Vet -Y high.
ci Landslide Potential.*, Moderate to high.
d- (zire Hazard t High to extreme.
,.
1
Expansive Soil POtOntl8ilt Low to modorate,
4. Hydrology
II
m SurfAte Wditer:, None on site.
IN
0
b. Groundwater: UnknOwn- tloo Of the
Drainage Character isLics: The easterly pot -
property drains southeasterly to Lake Madrone'), the
westerly portion of the property drains to I. -ho southHest
to Berry Creek., (normal): 55 to 60".
d. Annual Rainfall jatjvel,� high rainfall COupled with
e. Limiting Factors: Re
high erosion potential.
5.. Visual/Scenic Quality: High,
6. Acoustic Quality: ComproMlsed by truck traffic on
Oroville-QUIncy Highway.
7. Air Quality: (300d.
Environment:
B. Vegetation: Whiteleaf Manzanitai Ponderosa Pine' California
Black Oak and MadrQne. Cal winter deer habitat for the Bucks
9,. Wildlife Habitat- crit,
Mountain Doer Herd.
Cultural I !nt'-
10. Archaeological and Historical Resources in the area: High
archaeological sensltivlty area.
Butte County General Plan designation'. Timber mountain and
Agricultural -Residential.
12. Existing Zoning: TM -5-
-13. Existing Lind Use on-site t Vacant.
14. Surrounding Area:
a. Land Uses:
Single-family residences at suburban densities around Lake M6drone to the southeast. scattered
single-family residential dwellings at rural denslt'IGS
,elsqHhereb _
b. Zoning TMS-1 , Tlvl--b, C - 1 i R -C and U.
c. Gen. P10h d0siOnatiohs, Agricul-tural-Residohtlals Timber
Mountain and Commercial.
d. parcel Sites: 1/4- to "its -acre parcels around Lake
Madrone) 5- to 10 -acre parcels tr6ns1ticaning to
parcels farther from Lake Madrone.
0, populationt Generally sparse.
Char-icter of Site and Area: Retirement and summer homes
around Lake MadrOne lm an area othorwlse devoted to rural
ce
timberland uses.
i6. Nearest Urban Area: OrOvIlIG-, 4 Lake Madrone Water District,.
Relevant Spheres of Infloen-
184 improvements standards Urban Area. No.
19. Eire Protection Serviedt
Near sst county (state) Fire Station: season8l station 062
at Harts MillVolunteer Stations 460 at Brush Creek and
'$
#61 at Rookerfellor R08d9 fQ manned station 464 at
K01 lY Rld'ZOI yFire tankers; 001Y4
b Water A'va I I ab I I I t , -
20. Si!1`10619 In Area! Pioneer U010M FIOtMOOtary School Dittrict and
Oj,,O%_,jlje Urlon H101" School 01ebric-,
" 5 "