Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
061-480-014
t 1 a y, 1 NOV 1 i992 ENGIN h l 4G uRVE INO Y . .... .. •.... M .. 5. K. .I .. M +1 1�J%. ...y.J U t9:. i. F r r . • r.' .. : Yh' "F. :. x�r u a ... «s, v. n ,.�: .. .. �_ :. .' ., •.•., v� M c , ,. ',. � 1 '� . r ..n.a p...r w r.�.: H y i w.n w„—«�.» tw i ! ►y... � � �;.41 f � I • OPAAA �PLAMT G' COMMISSION.SUMMARY SHEET FORAM DIVISIONS N e1 Pierce Logi% 91-12-13-01 •, 5; 500 Chinese Wall Road,,Oroville, CA 95966 - F . Lou Cecchi et.al., 5263 Ro•yal Oaks Dr. Oroville, CA 95966 'EATxVE PARCEL MAP to divide 152 +%- acres to create 4 parcels; �Z DESCRTPION: T 1 aiY 25 at.., 1 at 20 ac,, .I at 20 ac. and,_1 at 45 acs and a remainder of 42 across On 'the southerly side of Encina Grande. Road and wEst of Oro-Quincy IiiJyi terry, geek araar , 5,S,-SOV"S PARCEL NUMBER (S) 061-480-014 V:'U"._..SEI. GENERAL. PLAN AR_ PROJECT ,CONSISTENT?_ 'EP PLAN CONFORMANCE REPORT J.l./12/91. DATE OF APPLICANT SIGNATURE M.L51D CONSERVATION ACT 'CONTRACTS? NO CP,APPLICATION RECEIVED 12/12/91 A E.�iT/5UAVEYOR/CIVIL ENGINEER: - rrrhart.-Browri, •-1'(7 Boa 175;_ Oroval�le-95965--and Michael G ,Eyans,(applican't, owner► enginner)Evans, 1 Nice Place Oroyille,_CA 959bo ,TJ; PLANNING DIRECTOR"S REPORT PREPARED E-'Y'� PQ v1iEyTA% CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION - DATE FILED I ErmuNATIOIJ An JDA'IE��� 6NEGATIVE DECLARATION '- DATE ADOPTED _ 1+ILo I IGATED NEG. DECLARATION - DATE ADOPTED EiW. IMPACT REPORT DATE 'CERTIFIED._ _ STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO, SUE. COMMITTEE MEETING DATE ADVISORY AGENCY TiEAr"NO DAT D� ADVISORY AGENCY ACTION A APPEALED APPEAL . "ARING DATE. BOARD ACTXON C"p WNTS FOR PLANNING DIREGTOR' S REPORT � oS . �J A, 8 A,t5IGNED Tn.'.... �`.' .. ._r , ;,DISI` ti t� (Please check ap,--irie,te box) Michael Fierce APPLICANT: PHONE N0: ADDRESS: 500 Chinese Wall Road, Craville, CA 95966 OWNER Lou Cecchi et al PHONE N0 : 589-0152 _._ ... ADDRESS: 52-63 Royal Oaks px i. Or�)ville, CA 95966- �;ITGINLER OR SURVEYOR: �arni7e2" _��rnV��� 534-2911 .,, .,..:.._.. PHONE. N0: ADDRESS P.0 Pox 15 6, Or,.,Villea CA 95965 I&I't, NOTICE OF HEA—LING To.. Micha.?�l G. Evans, applicantowner, engineer 1 Kice Place Orovi.11e p CA 9.5966, 589-5198 LOCATION OF PROPERTY: TOV NSIU.-%,` _ 20 N RANGE _5 E SECTION 5, 6 ASSESSOR18 PARCEL NUMBER: 61 .TOTAL ACREAGE 15.2 PLEASE SUBMIT PRELDMIARY TIT11A rRZPOR"_' OR REGENT POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE (dated within lest six months`) WITH APPLICATIONY, INDICATE BELOW THE DATA AND RECORDING INFORMr-PIIN BY �,'HICH THIS PARTICULAR PARCEL WAS CREATED: 3-x.5-68 1509 571 � DATE SOOT{ = PAGE -,R AND SIZE OF PARCELS BE,"ITG CREATED (including any remainder): TTiJMEr, 42 Ac., Pot 1 is 25 Ac., Poi. 2 is 20 Ac., Pcl 3 is 20 Ari . , Pcl 4 is 454c .DISTANCE TO NATURAL WATER COURSE OR =STORM DRA,INi on prop PROPOSED METHOD OF 'SEWAGE D!.;,VOSAL: individual septio systetn r _ (Check with Health Department) PROPOSED SOURCE OF {CATER; indi*,ridual wells (Check Vith Health Depertt6nt) DO POWER AND PHONE LINES SEXIST m0 THE BOUNDARY OF THR ORIGIN'AT, PAROEL2 No IF NOT, ESTILATE THE DIST.",= THEY WILL HAVE TO BE EXTENDED: 1/4 Mile ? 1020 Revised. 7-94=80 xxx tTENTATIVE PARCEL MAP WAIVER APPLICATION (Please check ap,--irie,te box) Michael Fierce APPLICANT: PHONE N0: ADDRESS: 500 Chinese Wall Road, Craville, CA 95966 OWNER Lou Cecchi et al PHONE N0 : 589-0152 _._ ... ADDRESS: 52-63 Royal Oaks px i. Or�)ville, CA 95966- �;ITGINLER OR SURVEYOR: �arni7e2" _��rnV��� 534-2911 .,, .,..:.._.. PHONE. N0: ADDRESS P.0 Pox 15 6, Or,.,Villea CA 95965 I&I't, NOTICE OF HEA—LING To.. Micha.?�l G. Evans, applicantowner, engineer 1 Kice Place Orovi.11e p CA 9.5966, 589-5198 LOCATION OF PROPERTY: TOV NSIU.-%,` _ 20 N RANGE _5 E SECTION 5, 6 ASSESSOR18 PARCEL NUMBER: 61 .TOTAL ACREAGE 15.2 PLEASE SUBMIT PRELDMIARY TIT11A rRZPOR"_' OR REGENT POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE (dated within lest six months`) WITH APPLICATIONY, INDICATE BELOW THE DATA AND RECORDING INFORMr-PIIN BY �,'HICH THIS PARTICULAR PARCEL WAS CREATED: 3-x.5-68 1509 571 � DATE SOOT{ = PAGE -,R AND SIZE OF PARCELS BE,"ITG CREATED (including any remainder): TTiJMEr, 42 Ac., Pot 1 is 25 Ac., Poi. 2 is 20 Ac., Pcl 3 is 20 Ari . , Pcl 4 is 454c .DISTANCE TO NATURAL WATER COURSE OR =STORM DRA,INi on prop PROPOSED METHOD OF 'SEWAGE D!.;,VOSAL: individual septio systetn r _ (Check with Health Department) PROPOSED SOURCE OF {CATER; indi*,ridual wells (Check Vith Health Depertt6nt) DO POWER AND PHONE LINES SEXIST m0 THE BOUNDARY OF THR ORIGIN'AT, PAROEL2 No IF NOT, ESTILATE THE DIST.",= THEY WILL HAVE TO BE EXTENDED: 1/4 Mile ? 1020 Revised. 7-94=80 FOR :CE USE ONLY: HoUbt County Planning Dept. Receipt l{ ta&c5 7 Cotu:t.y Center Drive j orovi l lir, CA 95965-3391 - Applicant(916) pplicant(916) 518-7601 AP SubdiinonNam,(if applicable) APPENDIX Hi)ftte Mod led .. . LAND DIVISION APPLICATIONS Supplemental Information for Planning Department 1. hist and describe any other related permits and other ;public approvals required for this pro,' -,,,t, including those required by city, regional, state and federal agencies! None ,except `-Uildi.ns permits 2. Proposed ;.cies !ling/associated projects: None 3. Anticipated incremental develolpeNt. (phasing of subdivision units, future development plans): A+ What method will be utilized to accommodate surface drainage? e. Describe how on-site ,and downstream drainage channels will be affected: 1 Existing drain sWales to accomodate drainage, minimal due to .parcel sizes, 5. Proximity of water for fire fighting purposes (hydrants, ponds, etc.): None 6- W f t l excaVat tt>.n or gradittg be necessary'? Cubic yards (estimate): access road requires grading, estima.tel.00O cu, y.s, 7, uli•c�r.i',Iurry for travel to prr aorty (rural and mount'tlinous areas ohly). Take. Hwy _162 east towards Perry Greek., go west ori 'Encina Grande Rd, at Harts `Mill Fire Station, Go 1 Mit to site, ti . FNV l RONMENTAL .IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES Wentif'y potentially' significant environmental impacts associated with the L ild division. What project ,'design features or special condit on;s of approval (mitigation measures) are proposed to alleviate potential environmental impacts? SEE ATTACHED 9. ?NVlRONMENTAL SETTING ;0 Describe the project site as it exists before the project, Including information on topography, coil sta'bilityi plants .vid animals, and any cUlturnl:, historical or scenic aspects, Describe any existing structures on the site, and the use of the structures SEE ATTACHED W Describe.the surrounding properties, includi-:g infor►aation on plants and animals and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Indicate Lhe tyle of Iand use (residential► commercial, etci), intensity of land use (one -family► apartment houses,, shops, depart- meat stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etc,.) SEL tilftACHED (11U'I'IPI(WrloN., [ hereby cert,ifv that the statements furnished above and in thE- attachod exhibits present the data and infothiation required .for this ih11laI evatuation to 4he best of my ability, and that the factsi statements .find Iniormntion peeseet: l are true Arid correct to the best of my''knowledge .and i►eilet. IMt(It Signatut;e For* Ni wCt tlil"L `A "-{t. ,. *0so : vpnrat:e sheet for longer rU;pbnses. 4� H-2 APN 61-48 ✓_' 01T 'QPM for Michael Pierce, Encina Grande, property Environmental slitting The project is vacant acreage consisting of hilly terrain in the southerly portion of the perry Creek area, north and eget of Vake Oroville. Access via Encina Grande Road is thru the property and is a gravelled and dirt road, over 40 feet wide thru some of the property. Vegetation on site is Ponderosa Pine, Oaks, Digger Pine and underbrush of manzanita and toyon and poison oak. Some areas are gently sloping and some are eteepero Rock ofxtc.rops and drain 8 -wales exist or. site. Squirrels, ral-ti-its oti served, some deer 'Nrowse orserved during summer and fall. 1 Surrounding -pvk--y�erties vary in s ze from 10 to 40 ,acres, some with homes or motile homes; Power is north of the site approx. 1/4 idle at Deer Meadow Road. vegetation and terrain similar for this area of Ploomer Mountain and perry Creek, PROPOSED MITIGATION MEASURES r 1 Incorporate standard erosion control measures and construction practices into road and 'driv'eway construction to minimise erosion; Pay applicable deer herd fees; school Fees; firO i' Qs and sheriff fees upon development or at Final'Map recordation as requii•pd.- . r him i °Y `i * , • o y ��•+�rc•t.PA'i ,a+' e'r`r 4'd�TFdF2.M-A.�7G'F-+ �Fg07f2'.%` �d�1__-�RC,'�'S.� I`'Lp►Q d� �S�TfiJC)TV=S7CdTY MAP lI 1-4 to be completed by applicant: APPLICANT NAME AND ADDCiLSS: pR=CT DESCRIPTION: ,ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS): PROPOSED USE:,..---------� y�..fp1loying items =9 'to be completed by is Plaiuting Department: 1; LAND CONSERVATION AGRF� rvn ZONING: X,1 p2 MM DESIGNATION; ��raonal Criteria: H0 It is recommended that you perform the L JLTiJRAI:-RESIDENTIAL YESYE following checked items: , Apiaultural Compatibility � ARCHAEOLOGICAL. RECORDS CHECK taat©r and Sewer CapacitY BOTANICAL SURVEY Adequate Fire facilities GEOLOGICAL SURVEY .fir Road Capacity and Maintenance YES NO �. Access to CO excial and Schools �^— ' WIMIN DEPARMMa OF FISH C7CliA32D AND FIELD CROPS AND GAME DEVELOPMENT ZONE: Pxedamina:Yt 5-].0 ac. 'Parcel Size ._.. Vicinity of Urban 3oundari es WITHIN FLOOD PLAIN .----� ZSC F �. Ag, Viability not IMPairsd AREA, SFECIFIC OR ` staff Determination: Substantially conforms tO4 LAND USE PLAN: ---- t _ GENERAL PLAN: 1. Land Use .. I: Yes y Name of Plan 1, Conservation i `>< . 3. C!pen Space — WITHIN UJ.M RLSLRVE., 4. Safalty If Yes, s. Noia{® ti= of Reserve 6. roua{ing -- _ 7. Cir2;ulaticrn AIRPORT .LAND USE FLAN! ...--.— ------ p_CDn1FE7G t+� KOMms ! 1 tV r+�i T r�� s i 6r�l --- % "7 staff Signature.. �. Dat , ;LAND DIViSIONy I AM AWARE OF � O4�E •� D�gAIIOt '.irGARDIIVG AS APPLICANT FOR VE REQUESTED yyr CONFORMANCE WI7� I GRD+2AL PIAN AND ZONING. u tai lite_ :f CIV_..- Dated SignatIlt b Appli t ' 'Illis reR art will expire aind be discarded 'sial (6) months f't= the date of the staff signature,, ID )OClQA (revised 6��7i 'X Planning Department NAME: MICHAEL PIERCI X Environmental Health Department X COF (Forestry Department) AP: , . 61-48-14 - ---- --- Attn: J. Craig Carter '(on areas north of red line on map) Butte County Sheriff PG&E (check title report for easement) Pacific Bell Butte County Mosquito Abatement OR Oroville Mosquito Abatement (areas within large map in cabinet) ghooT 'Dis rict (wal m ._ _ Water Company (if individual wells are not indicated on application or map) Durham Irrigation OR Dur am Mutual Water Co. California Water Service ompany (Chico area) Oroville-Wyandotte Irrigation District (Oroville area, SE of river) Thermalito Irrigation District (Thermalito area NE of river) Limesaddle Community Services District (Paradise area along Pentz Rd4 to lake) Del 'Oro Water (Paradise Pines area) Buzztai7. Waterworks (Doe Mill Ridge/Forest Ranch area) Paradise Irrigation District City of . . . (check wall maps for spheres of influence) Oroville Chico Paradise Biggs Gridley OROVILLE AREA UdLY' Lake Oroville Area Public Utility District (see large map in cabinet) Feather River Recreation District (see large map in. cabinet) E1 Medio Fire District (check wall snap; a small portion of Oroville only) BIGGS, RICHVALE, GRIDLEY AREAS (SOUTH BUTTE COUTY): check wall map and title report to see what applies. Some areas overlap, Drainage District #1 Drainage District #2 DrainageDistrict #100 Drainage District #200 Reclamation District #833 Reclamation District #2056 Sacramento and San Joaquin Drainage District Butte Creek Drainage District 1N CERTAIN CASES: Superintendent of Schools (only for subdivisions) Dept, of Fish and Came (near water and in rural and mountain areas) Cal Trans (near state Hi y> SZ* 10, 99, 149 ( hi"co cUt-off), 162 (Olive HWy, & Richvale Hwy,), 191 (Clark toad) State Water Quality Control Board (projects with more than 100 lots or units) United "States Forest Service (if project borders USA. land -chock AP books) Parks and Recreation Department (property near 'Lake Oroville) State Water Resources Department (property near Lake OrovillO -- watershed) Rock Creek Reclaimation Dist. (west of Chico Airport,. south of Rock Creek and, east of Hwy. 90 (see Wall map) Chico Area Recreation & Park Dist (only for subdivisions) U.S. Dept. of the Army, Sacramento Dist. Corps of Engineers (near water and in rural and "mountain areas) 8outhdtri Paicific r SPECIAL CASES:chocktitlerepob rt for any mention of special services or easements p s such. as to Thermalito Irrigation' District (numbered .items) APPENDIX I COUNTY OF BUTTE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM' f EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT 1. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent' Michael Pierce 2, Address of proponent and representative (if applicable): 500 Chinese pall Rd. oroville, to 95966 -,chi tion; Tentative Parcel Map div 31 Project de p p 'ding 152 acres to create 4 parcels and a re'ainder 2Y., MAtr<DATORY FINDINGS OF SIGBiIF'ICAI?OE YES !MAYBE IVO DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION T,, Does the pro]`ect have the potertial to degrade the quality of the environment substantial Cy reduce X see the discussion for item 5d. the he itat of a fish or:witdlife specie's, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- susta ning levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or anima community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered p!ant or anima!' or eliminate important exemples of major periods of California history or prehistory? 2. Does the 'project have the potential to achieve shdht-term benefits to. the detriment of long-term X This proposal will not impede tong -term environmental goals. ""`""' ehuironment goats? (A short-term impact on the ehvihonmeht is one which occurs in a relatively brief period of time while long-term impacts will endure .into the future,) 3, Does the proect have impacts which are lhdividualay limited but Cumulatively considerable? )C See the discussion for item 14b. (project A P j maY impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource i s relativel/;small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is. stgnificaht,) 4. Doet, the prdiect have environmental 'effects which Will cause aubstotitial adverse offects on human K' Th's proposal Witt hat have a significant advotse effect on human beings, beings, either directly orlhdirddtty? bETERMINATION ,Ill., On the asts o is initial evai.Uation; IjWE find the proposed project COULb NOT bav2 a significant IME find effect on the ehVirohment and a NEGATIVE DECLOATION Will be prepared, that although the qqro sed projeot COULD have a significant case because the MITIGATION MEA5PUUREs described on the attached effect on the ehVit(ftent there will "not be a significant effect in this sheet have been added to the UWE find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect proleet. ll NEGATIVE DECLANATION Will be prepared. 'On the environment, and WkAONMENTAL an IMPACT REPORT i$ required, O�IATEx 2?, 199L. touNit - NIN�D TfM A;tune OB' iwtOW C'. EL , .a Pa rG� by:kevie0ed . , n nVironmental Checklist Ar JEvalUation of Enva:rohtental Impact I_ ENVIRONMtNTAL IMPACTS ves MAYBE NO DISCUSSION 'OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION s, MIH. will the oroposal result in significant: a.. unstable earth omdltlons, or changes to — x The proposal will not affect subsurface earth conditions. geologic substtuM1.r,res7 b. Disruption, drspllcement, compa ilon or _ ^ X. This proposal will result In some disruption. displacement, compaction and ovcrcoveting of the site as a result of deVelopment over covering of the sol It of structures, drlyeways, parking areas, etc._ in addition the applicant Is proposing a brush mahagement plan to enhance Wildlife habitat as well as reducing the fuel load of the land thus reducing the fire hazard. This plan will clear apptoXlmatelV 70 x of the slit, ManzanlIa. diseased pine trees will be the primary targets. The debris Will be removed, burned or, mulched In to the soil depending upon the area and other citcUmstances, A 04,4 caterpillar Will be Used to create 11' paths along the cohtoUrs at random InlerVals. All oaks, toyon, coffeebery, ceanothus, and healthy pine trees Will be retained, The plan was drafted with the aid of a consulting botanist., blo biologist , and 'the beparlmenl of Fish and Came, As 'dratted, thewill not create sign ificant, erosion, Dvercovering. Will :not. be significant due to the large parte sizes ptaosed, c, bhange ih topography or ground surface A — The proposal has the potential to result In minor chanZa In 'there telfef feajurest topography to accommodate hoUScs, driveways, and roads, Is 'With less than to surf'Iclent area on each parcel slopes 10% plAc9 homesites, The changes In;tupographY Will not be significant With fespecl to the erititit parcel. d,' Destructlorl, ca✓eiring or t;�odlflcation Of _ _ x The Site has no unitoe phYslcal features, any unique,geologlz or Physical features? e, intrease 10 wind or Water erosion of soils, X The. proposal has lhr. potential to create some erosion It, the brush clearin9 program is ►mptoper l ri admlhistered. However, It the program althtr on tit t off 41te7 carried out as proposed an undlsturbed butters ate retained -along eXlsting dfalhhoes, significant Impacts are not likely to ocy:ur. f chanbts Inidtposit"ion of eloslon of beach _, X The proposal Will not affect any Watercourse,. sands, or Changes In siltation, deposition or erosion Which may modify the channel of a flVet or stream or the btid of the ocean or any bay, lrtlet or lakes Sl, LO! sof p0nie aoricultu'rally .prdeluctivo ,:� k-. This broposal does not 'represe'nt 5 sfghiffcaht lo"s"s of Wire tolls outside destg ited Urban area;lr Agficultural soils, h. Exposure ol', pibople or property triii(iologfG x Al of out to county (s In a Moderate tat thquake iMans Ity Zone VI11; construction of buildings to uniform bUllding code "standards lot hazards stick as earthquakt.s, landrlldes, mudsfides, Otolind fallure 'or simlIat Set Oil c zone 3 WIII provide adejuate protect ton to dctUpanl3 In tate hazards? of AdIsmlc activity. i. Alit.. will the proposal result to substantlal.: or deterioration or ambient x._ '°''�' proposal will hot affect air quality because the increase In,the number a, Alf qualilyifs nut 61 Vehicle trins is hot significant, b. theC of otilectionable odors, smoke Tire pt000sal will tint create oblectlohable. odors, shioke or fumes. tion of f umeo c, Alleratlon of alt hioi'ltute or - X The ptoposai will hot Affect the almosohdre. ,movement, ttrtlp'etAM4, or any thnhoe In cl imAte, iocatiy or teglonally7 rD 0 :nvi ra nMbntal Clie.:klist *, Evaluation 0 f l:v'I)` zr9i-mental Impact 3 a. Changes in currents, or the course or�e direction of water movements in either, _� X The proposal will not affect any watercour,�e, marine or fresh Waters? b, Changes in absorption rates drainage ,_ patterns, or the rate and amount of surface X' The brush removal program dill result in some additional runoff be)ng generated from the site. It runoff? should hot be any, more than if rhe timber were harvested from the property which was done a number, of years ago, Grasses and small shrubs wilt grow quickly in the cLwlred area and help retain water. No significant adverse impacts are anticipated because the soil does not have a high erosion iwtehtial and is well drained with moderate permeabitity.` c, geed for bff�site surface Cp impcharovements,incon culvevegetation X No off site drainage improvements will b= required, tis 2 d, Alterations to the course or flow of flood ,___ Waters?or .._ _. X_.. The °proposal wilt not significahtlyaffectany flood control channels watercourses. e, Change in the amount of surface water in any water body X The proposal will not affect any Fratercourse. f. Discharge into surface wat6rse or, in an�t �~ alteration nt hosurface lim — X . Titie proposal will hot significantly affect surface water quality. uatioonbut ted to temperaulity, dissolved oxygen or turbidity g,, Alteration of the 'direction or rate of flow __ of ground Waters? _ X The proposal will hot affect the direction or flow of ground waters, h. waterrs, eithe quantity rghh dirt ctiadditionsuo X The proposal will not directly affect any 'aquifer. withdravaLbi or through interception of a aquifer by cuts or excavations? i. Reduction in the amount of water otherwid,� available for public crater supplies. X,.. The project Will not affect any'pubLic water supply, � is Ex :sure of people nr propertyto jraterw' ds retated hazarsuch as flooding X The proposal will not expose people or property to flooding, A PLANT: LIFE.. will the proposal result in su s•s�it`iai: a. Change in, the diversity pf species, o)� number of ally species of plants (including X The proposalwili not affect plaht life because't!ie site tohtaitis ho significant plant life. trees, shrubs, grass; crops, and aquatic plants)? b, Reduction of the numbers of an Uh Ue �� w C . � y `q ► rare' or endangered 'species of plants? ) The st'e cc`ntains no rare hlahts i botanical survey was performed Un site and clearance has been g ieh. b. Introduction of new species of plants into _ area, be in .— the proposal will not affect L-Risting plant life, an a barrier tothe hormal replenishment of existing species? d, Reduction in acreage of any agoicultural_., crop? X The sit pdoes not )ontain any agricultural props and is p`rerentli, Undevel Undeveloped. S. ANAL LIFE, will the proposal result in �t 'I antis c a, change n.imbers in the div ersity of apecies, or of ah s ecics of animals (birds, `—" y X the proposal will cot affect animal life, because the site does not ` support i} land ahfmals inc�udih' reptiles, fish and 9 p ► signtificant ghimaL`life or habifiat, t T J Environmental .Checklist * Eval.ulation of: 4 - impaat Environmental sheLlfishr_ behthic organisms or insects)? b. Reduction in the numbers of any unique; X The site contains no rare animals: rare or endangered species of animals? c. Introduction of now species of animals into _ � X. The proposal will not effect existing animal life, an area, or to a paOier to the migration or movement of an ma Ls? d, Deterioration of existing fish or wildlife_ _ _X_ The site is Located in an area designated as a nn develo maim area department habitat? on the maps provided to Butte Countyy by the California Jame, Department of Fish and The appticant has teen working with the Program Tor deer of Fish and Game to develop a habitat enhancement p and other WitdLife, Fish and Game has agreed to the Lan JIsroposed deer b the licant. The 7 recommendations contained wi�hin the y PP jurvey for the parcel shall be incorporated as mitigation measures, b.. Noise, wiLL the proposal resu;t in.sutsstantial: a, increases in est#stip noise levels g ? ." TheadProposal tiP o. ntthe vitt a s0stant#al increase in noise —X min b« Exposure of ,people to severe. noise Level's? ��, Y The proposal wiLL not expose people to severe noise levetsi 7, LIGHT AND GLARE, WiLI the pro' sal P roduce �,- X _ The proposa.L wiLL not result #n a substantial increase t4 Light or sign1 scant tightand glare? gtare created on site or in the vicinity. 8. LANb. USE. uiLL the proposal result in a k ,. The proposal wiLL not alter the land use in the'aree, ffis"�iaL at,teration of the reser P t or planned sland use o, .an area? !, NAIURAL. RCSOORC s, Uill the proposal result in su stantta ; a. - increase in the rate of use of any natural _ _ X_X The proposal wiLL loot affect any natural resources. _resources,? b. bepLetion of any non-renewable natural X _ The proposal will hot deplete any hatural resources, resources? 10, RISK OF UPSET. WILL the proposal involve; a. k of or —� X �n Ls, not is - WiLI nbt involve the use a :hazardous materit,lize teif or substances C hpLUdingo but not Limited tri. eareradiattari)din locaThe cOse to any facilities which store ut. such ail�spesti�essiclemiCats6n mat€inialssal theevent of an accident or upset canditionst b.Possible iihtbeferehce ,;,itl an emergehti 11 y X. The ro �at w#ll jl6t. affect an emergehc sehv#ces, p pot Y y response plan or emefq:ahcyek4duation pian? 11,. p0OULATION W#LL the proposal .,fitter .location, ,._, _; X� The proposal will h5t signifiicantly affect the population �tsf thet weir because the density does hot that and being rTls ri utionp density or, growth raise of the human pope atian? prop6bwd exceed planned developed in the wt.b, 12, Boit O, Will the propptat 61fect 'ekistih'g �_ �.. _ . X,, The Proposal. will tlbt significantly affect housih -demand, Twodsmnq or cheate a demand fdie additibhOL housing? 1j, TRANSMATATION/CIRCULATION, Will the prorosal resu in. E' XJl 5 kM,Jkoamontal Checklist * Evaluation of Enviton'RO.ntal Impact Generation af�� substantial additional . X The, proposal Will not represent an incremental increase in traffic p a, _� vehicle movemen,.. in the area. b, Effects on existing parking facilities, or ' exi- X The 'pro osaL will not affect parking becausli the pproposal will have to comply With the parking requirements contained within Butte County demand for parking? Code section 24-35, c; substantial im�act on existing_ X The proposal will not represent a significant increase in congestion and maintenance requirements on area roe,ds, ALL property owners Will transportation sys ems? have to enter into n road maintenance agreement to maintain the road. d, significant alterations to present patterns X The proposal will not alter the present pattern of rircuLation in the of circulation or movement of peuple and/or area, goads? Alterations to waterborne; rail or air X the proposal will hot affect rail or air traffic. e. traffic? in traffic hazards to motor X _ The ptoposal WILL not result in an incremental increase in traffic f, Increase vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? and related traffichazards in the ,area, 14,POUC the proposal have an effect ' in a need for now or altered u on; or, restiTt gogernmenl;VservioesICES In a, Fire protection? X_ _, The proposal will result in an incremen'•aL increase in demand for fire protection in the area. The Butte County F1 re Depfotment/Califfortlia Division of Forestry has indicated that cumulative development in rural arevs,WiLL impact their ability to provide fire protection services. The,,have stated that installation Of automatic fire suppCessioh spr'nkler systems in residential structures the use of fire resistahGe Wilding materials and Water supply, systems adequate, to support the sp,I nkler system Will reduce the demand for fire protection serVides, b, o Folice protect#op.' X police protection in the area, ease in 'demand for the Board of St,� ervisors has adopted in an ihtr OentaL nme;of ah5heriff impact is collected at the tsult p build jhg permit application. This fee will mitigate impacts to this erV�ce. X. The proposal will result in ah incre ental increase in demand far c 3choots7 school serVices 'n the area, The sc�ool.District is empoWered to collect a school impact fee as established by State regUlatiohs. The collection of this fee WILL mitigate impacts to school services, d, park;, or other Pec'reationa '.facil%a es? X,� The proponaL WLL f;esutt 'jh,an jncremehtbL increase in ;demand for park and recreatioh facilities h the area, The applicant shall contact the Feather River hark and Recreation District to appropriately mitigate this impbtt, r e, Maintenance of public facil"sties, including X qn od fop maintenancelofnroad$ ehd oth r public facilities ih the ere , f. roads? Other goverhmeneal services? - X _ The proposal Will hot result in a signifs3a�nt incremental #hcrease h demand for all other governmental servo .s in the area. ss, Mt9,GY, Will the proposal result in: ^ Use of substantial amounts of fuel or X- The proposal wilt not utilize sul,sfantial fust or energy, a, energy b. Substantial 'increase in demand,;t x c. La The proposal Will not substantially increase 't_! demand for energy: existing sources of energy, pc devetopmeht of reN sources of energy 16, UTILITIES. mR�W or'substantial ratter t onsn to the new sy, folloutng= � The proposal will not affect electrics power or natural gas a. prn,er or natural gas? distribution systems. _.X The proposal: gill not affect communication systems.« b, communications systems? X The proposal WiLL not affect public water systems, c. 'later availability? - - - X ' 'he proposal_wiLL have to meet the requirements of the butte County d. Sewer or septic systems? Envirohmentbt Health Dept. X, The proposal WiLL have to provide a permanent solutioh for drainage: e. Storm water drainage? X_ The proposal will not affect soLid Waste disposal, f,. solid waste and disposal? 17, HOt1Ala�H- WiIL the proposaL result int x the proposal Will not create any health hazard. ` a. Creatrd Cexclu ing mental health)•p po ion of a health hazard or'potential hazaThe ro sal Will not expose people to any health hazard. - Exposure of people to potehtiat health �--- b, hazards"! X .�: The propnsa'1, will not result in an aestheticaLly offensive view Wilt the, prcposal resu(t in the consistent With surrounding development: 1g. AESTHETICS. en to the o struction of any scenic Vista or view oi? because it is publ t, or hill, the proposal result in the, creation of an aesthetically offenswe site ope11 to the sal ma result in an inerementaL increase in demand for park public view? X__ The propq ) g, RECREp7i011_ Will the prof Uant3tultof a16 i ,mg =----- and recreation facilities 1 upo--r, tfie quality or 3?q y' recreational oppor{unitie C��iiunAi RESdURCES. X sure roaasale ILL d affect f�fe teaanhdeologicaL sites Ah archaeological ..�0� _ no cultural Or historic resources a.. or destruction of result yr histo the or h-Atbric found,p Were arehaeologieal site. X The proposal wiLL not effect historic §rtes. proposa ll the l result in advei�.ae b. Wi phLL t or aesthetic effects to 11 prehistoric or historic building, structures or .tkiject? Anes the proposer have '�_,�. �potentiaL to X'- Tho` pPopnsal will Bat affect cultural resources.. G' cause a physical changt which Would affect unique ethnic cultural VaLues? X _ the proposal wiLL'hot affect religious resoukces. d, iLt9i Use ►iprosecrled ruoe(. witriet hin the potential impart area? �r :nonmental Checklist Evaluation of -;EnVironmental <Impact v,; OUGGESTEA MITIGATi01N' MEASURES fl, Wow on the additional map sheet the area wit slopes of 30% or greater, Designate these areas no no development zones for structures, and driveways. Designate building _roads envelopes not to exceed 2 acres that wilt contain aLL strUctums. 2. Institute a seLective brush clearing program prior to construction of any home RWuce the mar4anita cover to no more than 30% within the no deVeLopment area. The ctearing the program shall be approved by the Department.o Fish and Game: ALL oak trees, toyon, coffeeberry, and buckbrush shall be preserved as much as possible. ALL oak trees destroyed shall be replanted in a 5 to 1 ratio, Pine trees with blister rust should be removed. Most of the slash shall be removed or burned ih accordance with CDP burn requirements, Some stash shoutd be spread for erosion control, i Td. Ptace notes in the Cculs and in the deeds to advise future residents that they occupy a deer use area. Dogs, must be confined to fenced areas or are otherwise under the physical control of the owner at all times to prevent haCassment of deer and other witdlife: 4. PLace notes in the CC&R's and deeds. stating that fences in and around the building envelopes may be constructed to any standard. Fences in the no development area are limited to no mote than 3 strands of wire or rails with a maximum height of 48" and a bottom rail or strand height of at least 1611 above ground "Level. S. A vegetation clearing and. maintenance plan shall. be formulated and submitted to the Planning Department and Department of Fish and Game for 5 year periods. ThepLan shall also be requihed as part of tie CC&R`s. 6. Place a note on the final mapp stating,. "Automatic fire sup reM00h spPinkler systems shall, be instaLLeT rA all new residentiaL' structures in accorda,,tj,;e with the NatichaL File Protection Associathon Standard fb'- the installation of sprinkler systems in one,.anii two familyy dwellings and Mobile homes, NFPA Standard 1. Contact the Feather nivel' park and Recreatidn District to mitigate impacts to recc`eation serVices, 8 7a +' Xonmcantal thecklist * Evaluati(nn of EtiVi ronmen:tal. Impact DATA SHEET 5. Visual/ScenicQuality: Good.. ,roiect Descriation 6 Acoustic Quality: Good; L. Type of Project. Land division 7. Air Quality: Good. 9. Brief Description: Tentative Parcel Map dividing 152 acres to create 4 parcels and remainderHialog`icaL Environment:.. 5, Location: Located on the south side of Encina Grande Road T mile West of 'Oro duincy Hwy.,Berry Creek area 8, Vegetation; Mixed chaparral to 4. approximately Proposed Density of DevetopMent: 1 DU per 30 acres - q, Yildlfe habitat: SmalL birds mid animals common foothill woodlands. Critical Winter habitat for the nt rvious mat. A�EncoinalGhande aro�1 Mooretowh deer herd. 5. 6, to Oro iluinc Hw Access and Hearest PUbLic Road(s). y Y•' Roadua mild via pp 10. Cultural Environoent: Archaeal icat and HistoricaG Resources in the area, High 'l, Method of Sewage Disposal~ YPidividual septic systems, sensitiv�y area. Butte County General Plan designation: Agricultural 8. Source 'of Yater Supolji: Individual 'Wells, 11: residential 9 Proximity of Dover Lines: Along Encina Grande Road, 12. Existing zoning: U and SH 1U. divisions and d divisions and development: 2 more Pareelsacoufor 13.. Existing Land Use oth-site: None ld bercheatt� p created existing zoning, 1 Surrounding Arrge urr g„ Environmental Setting Land,Uses Dural residential e ' h ential Gen P, UDesignation• AgrlculturaL Resid P_ysical Enyironaent C. Timber Mountain = Terrain Selneerrasl Tooptogr3pteic Character Mountainous d. Parcel Sizes: 2.5 to 320 nerds e, Population: Limited b. cElevation: 155o to '1900 'feet above sea level. 15; Character of Site and Area: Rural foothilli! d.. Limiting Factors: Areas of steep slogas U. Ne$rest.Urban Area: Ohoville, approkimatelyl 7 miles away 2. ails T and Characteristics: 'Engtebright soil series - ' deep, Well tlrained, moderate to laW 17: Relevant Spheres of Influence: N/A 2 to k0" ppermeability, moderate erosion potential. Steep slopes 18. Improvements standards Urban Area: No b• Limiting Factors• Natural Hazards of the Land. 19. Fire Protection Service: a. Nearest County. (Stb"te) Pi Station: station if62 3. e y a, Earthquake Zone: Moderate earthquake Intensity done approximate) 2 miles away. Water iLitY' Sly, VIYL. b, Erosion Potential: Hoderate c. Landslide Potential: Moderate to high high 20. schools Atbdt Pioneer UnionrSthbOl District bnu Union High School District, d, Fire ttazard: Very e. Expansive Soil Potentia~: COW Orovi;lle 41 Hydrology $deface Yater! [phemerat drainages tedvCrsd the as pprop�arty H; Ground Yater: Unknown, pote tiblly limited. The "drains to the c. Drainage Characteristics, parceL south AnnualraQ). 55 inches per year. e q Factors(rio nvironmental Chic) k13 St, * Evaluation oi Envizonmeanthl Impact ENVIRONAMMAL REFERENCE MATERIAL 1, Butte County Planning Department. Earthixuake and Agency, State of California, 1083. Fault AltivitV I%p 11-1 Seismic Safetv.Element. 12• Butte County Board of Supervisors, Orovill.e, CA 011214 Hill, 1977. Agricaltural Preserves Map. established bV 2. Butte County Plainning Department,. Licrue,faction Resolution No. 67-178._ oroville; CA: $utte County Planning Depar{:ment, 1987. Potential.Map 11,-2, Seismic Safety element. oroville, CA' CH2M Hill, 1977. 13. National Flood Insurance Program. FlObd 3. Butte County Pla.rining department. Subs_ dencd and insurance Rate maps. Federal emergency Management Agency, 1989. LandBlirde_.PotpntLal Man 111-1. Safety Element._ oroville, CA: e,,I2M Hill, 1977. 14. USGS Quad Maps, Oroville Dam, Calif. 4. Butte County Erosion oville, CA• Win2n9 . 15 ° o 119251 /Orovitle T 1926) SDepartment, tanPl reai United States Department of CH2M Hill, 1977. A tUrev Butte County Plai-tning pepartment-. Expansive Soils Y6. Soil SurveV of Chico (1925)/Oroville Map iilnl,_ afetti!;_element. Oroville CA: CH2M („19261 Area. United 'States Department of Hill, 1977. Agrioulture, 6. Butte County Planning Department. element.; Noise element oroville CA. 17 But Cou�lty Planning Depyrtment. Butte 14ag INN -1, Scenic.HiuhwaV County Fire Protection aurisd,ictions and CH2M'Hill, 1977. Facilities Map_._ Butte county fire 7 Butte 'County Planlhing Department, Scenic HighwaysDepartment Foaporem entyj 1and d11ifornia Department of Map V-�l. Scenic H,Lahway Element: Oroville, CA: CM Hill, 1977. $, Butte County Planpiing Department. Natural Fire hazard_classes Mab 111-4, Safety Element.. Oroville, CA. 4Hj,!M Hill., 1977. 01 butte County Planiping Department, Archaeological Sensitivity Mari. orbville, CA: James P. Manning, 1983. 10) Butte Count' Planiiing Department, Scho of District Map_ oraville, GA ii. NoethWestein District Department of Water Resources. gh1co Nitrate Study Map, Nitrats Concentration in_SI'iallow WellD.r The ;Resources %or --- rr �^ AN '�IATt)RAt WEAI,H' A,ICJ 9 AU1Y PLANNING DEPARTMENT 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (916) 538-7601 October 20i 1992 _ ,Michael (.c. l;vans I' One 'Nice place _ - Oroville, CA 95966 Y flw,: TpM for Michael 'ierce AP# 061-480-014 Dear Mr. Evans: I haVd reviewed the file in order, to address your concerns. Mitigation No. 5 .6 your tetter of June 23, 1992, in ,response to the proposed rnitigatiOWI, agreed': to all mitiga�ions:except MM 05. You agreed to a one-time five-year period. The requested change to MZvI #5 was not accepted and the Iniiii) Study and Planning Directors Report was prepared without change. The minutes of the Development Revi . Committee do not indicate any discussion regarding a ardin proposed amendment of MM #5. There, is 10 informa:tion in the file ,, P regardiizg a change that would 'be acceptable: _ When the Notice of Determination was riled on September 22, 1992 Mr. Pierce had not P . October 5;'1992. a>d the $1.2Z 0 fee• However this fee was aid an if you would 'like to discuss this issue. further, please contact this office: Sincerely, Bill Fa t;l Y Directo Development Services' Michael Evans one Nice Place:OCT ®'� Oroville, CA 95966 oroolej rAltlo!�la, �1 (916)589- 8 C C,L. #54:8284 r.. 06toter 1, 1992 Mr Ali l 13 en, %'arrel, Director Development Services dept ,r-oun'ty (,enter Drive orovwl.l.e, A 95965 Hot TPM for Yichael bierOe Dear ter- "arre l , The al7ove project received Tentative spproval, on August 17 99 wes r, epresentir� Iqt, Pierce at the Advisory me(= ting; and turtden,,toad -the Planning Director's report dt ped Tul.y '17P 15192 wam the apj)roved mitipration list- Upon rete1pt of the J"iled 0 or Determination# two tha 6g:S s rota c C iti ata.cin 1Vo . k a; icon changed and �,c_ not the _;artreed gtion.. rn%t3 2) The 1,050 00 e was not paid by, Fierce copie i are attached ±cr your review, Prcceedurali'y, T request clarification of the ste.tus of this application and what is requ- red to correct the miti 'atior, in error. matter - Thank you for' � czar attention o this mat ter. ainc�r ljt`r Ma �: ae1 G. Evans 9i -P65 act Ni Pierce r LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND 5EAUTY �1 -- Department of Developpanent Cervices t PLANNING DEPARTMENT Y COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CAL.IFOIINIA•95965-3397 * TELEPHONE: (916) 536-7601 July 7, 1992 ;Michael Pierce n 500 Chinese Wall Road Oroville, CA 95966 Rei Tentative Parcel Map on AP# 061.-480-014 Dear Mr. Pierce. The Butte County Department of Development Services, Planning Div�cion has completed ' the environmental review of your project in accordance with the California Environmental � Quality Act and forwarded to the Butte Couuty Advisory Agency within the required 105 days pursuant to the California Public Resources Dade Section 21151.5. in addition, the Planning Director's 'report required by Sections 20-63 and 20=99 of the Butte County Subdivision Ordinance has been completed. Please find enclosed the Environmental Documentation/Planning Director's Report which has been prepared for your project. Please review the enclosed Initial Study/Ph=ling Director's Report_ with conditions of approval if applicable. If you note any errors of omissions 'in our evaluation, please bring them to our attention. Documentsal and Planning Director's Report for your project has been - Code nt to. the Butte tCounty Advisory Agency for .heir action. California GcW e Butte4Coun. , Adviso Agency set hearings rings and eut a rove or disapprove our project es the tY rS' Sections .65950 and 65952.1 requi,ect within six months from the date on which your: pp PP y p p e s°x month time limit for your project application was received and accepted. Th rr ;. dated by state law, will. ol,'cur on January 3, 1991 The Advinory Agency Fill notify �; o p g your project: you of the time and lar... of the uilic hearing for If there are modifications to your project, not relI6ted to mitigating an identified in;.pact ,re-evaluation of your prof a shall he :required; I w 7 5, r Int`-r--Departmental Memorandtun To. Butte County Advisory Agency 7FROM: Planning Director SUBJECT' • Report on the Tentative Parcel Map for Michael 'Pierce AP #061--480-014 DATE; July 61 1992 0 osal to divider 1.52 acres to, create four' parce"Ls of esent This is a Pr p 25,aad 45 acres with a La . tseeplan Map ofl1the��Butte 20, 20, Unclassified. The zoning is U - ,area as Agricultural CountyGeneral Phan designates eci.f1c or community plans for the Residential. There are no sp proposal does .not conflict with County zoning ,or any adoptee area The prop Genera], r1l an nor any or proposed Element of the Butte County �.,.._, t lan. prepared� specific or comrwan_. y P -� e Declaration with mitigation measuresohatheeeCaiforn x A Ne ap=yv ro `ect in accordance lint for the proposed: P 7Ito Environmental Quaff- -ty Act and wire lcjs days pursuant the .Advisory Agency within th q Section 21151.5. California publ�.c Resources Code Sect y . tditi anon Measures and Recommend approval 'su 0 es =iso the following _ng g Conditions MLTIGA'CIOI3 MEASURES sheet the area with slopes 'ipf 30% 1. Show on the addition �l these areas as no development zone for or greater . Desi gnat envelopes structures, roads adsa nat rdsdthatWWill ontairi all stru res. 2 riot to exceedr to selective brush clearing program coveroto no 2'.�.st� Lute home, Reduce the man "She brush caitstruct'on of Y h no deve5opment area. more than SCS within t,e roved by the Department of Fish L clearing progrwil shall be approved feeberry, and biicklarnsh and Came, All oar trees, toyonj ossible All oak trews shat' be preserved as much as p destroyed shall be 4 replanted in a 5 Must o thto e slash O� ll �yi.th blister rust should be rem_ be removed or binned in accordance with GDF bairn re<lure'�xent's Some slash should be spread for erosion con tro a.. Place notes in the Cc&Ri s and in the deeds-advise t 3. to ' rr residents that they <pcculpy a deer use area. Dods mush. 1 confined to fenced areas or are otherwise under .the physici�l control of the owner at all times to prevent harass�nent bt Bier and other wildlife. 4. , 4 Place notes in the CCIdRIs and deeds stating that fiances in arid around the building envelopes may be constructed to arty standard. Fences in the no development area are Limited to no more than 3 strands of wire or rails with a maximum height of 4811 and 'a bottom rail or strand height of at, least 1511 above ground level. 5, A 'vegetation clearing and maintenance plan shall. be formul�01 ;ed and submitted to the Planning Department and Departmatw of Fish and Game for a period of not less than 5 years. At the end of 5 years, the plan shall be reviewed by the Department of ,Pisa and Game to determine if it shall be implemented for another 5 year period. The plan shall also be required as part of the CC&Rls. 6 Place a note on the final: itap stating, 11Atttomatic fire suppression-prinkl.er systems shall be installed in all new residential structures in accordance with the Rational ' 'Fire Pro -ection, Assod.tation Standard for the ins':allation of sprinkler systems in one and two family dwelli <ts and mobile homes, 'NFPA Stalidard 13D.11 7.. Pay mitigation fees to the Feather Raver Park a,nd Recreation District as staked in that agreement executed on July 2, 1952. CONDITIONS 1. A development impact fee, for Sheriff Facilities shall. be 'paid pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 3, Article II of the Butte County Code, prior to issuance of building permits or Use Permit in the case of a mobile home park. Said fee amount Wi11-1 be determined and calculated as of the date of application for the building permit or Use Permit. ii F*OTICIE OF TEP-NMATIOI6 11 TO: ,Itz, of P1 nneng & Research Dept. -SDR- X County Clerk Moo Tenth Street Sacramento, CA 95814 MOM: ]butte County Planning, 7 County Center Drive, Qroville, CA 959615 SUBJECT: Filing of Notice of Determination in corn 1' a it ec =,�t 1 or 21152 of the Public Resources Code. Project Title: Tentative Parcel Map S i; 2 AP Number: 051-480-014 IbT^met Michael Pierce C-010ACE J CRUr3C:,G, ? =EP',1,0 By State Cleair nghouse Number (If submitted to clear ;,ghouse)none ` Contact Parson: Stuart Edell Telephone ## 538-7266 Project Location: on the southerly side of Encina Grande 'Road and wrest of OroQuincy Hwy, Berry Creek area. Project Description: 'Tentative Parcel Map to divide 152 +/- acres to create 4 pai,^.els; 1 at 25 ac.,1 at 20 ac., 1 at 20 ac. and 1 at 45 ac; and a remainder of 42 acres. 10 This is to advise that the Butte County Development Review Committee has approved the above-describedproject on and has made the following' determinations regarding the above- described projects 1. The project will; -X will not, have a significant effect ,on the environment'. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. X A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA 3. Mitigation measures X .. were, ware not, made a condition of the approval of the project: 1 4. A statement of overriding considerations —watt ._ X _ was not; adopted for this project. This to certify that the anal tlk with comments n-4 responses and record of project approval 1s available to the general public at The Butte County PlanniYig nepartment, ", Couaty Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965 Date Received for Piling and d Posting at OPR Signature Paula S. Leasure ssistant „17lannina Director. Title `Michael Pierce 14 Tentative Parcel Map AP# 061-480-014 MitiZation asa.sure 1. Show on the additional map sheet the area with slopes of 30% or greater. Designate these .,areas as no deyelopoment cones for .structures, roads and driveways. Designate building envelopes not to exceed 2 acres that will contain all structures: ro ram prior to construction of any home. 2 Institute a selective brush clearing p g P Reduce tha manzanity. cover to no more than 30�/o within the no development area. The brush clearing pr��ram shall be approv3ed by the Dept. of Fish and Game. All trees toyin, cc�ffeEt�erry, and buckbrush shall be preserved as much as possible.. oak , Y pine trePS with blister y,,;. All oak trees destroyed shall be re�lan h shall beremovedratio. Pine in accordance rust should be removed= Mast of th with CDF burn requirements. Sortie slash should be spread for erosion control. residents th?Lt they 3. Place notes in the CC and .K's and in the deeds to advise fu�vrs or otherwise uncle occupy a deet use area. Dogs must be confined to ,enced area the physical control of the owner at all times to prevent fiarassment f deer and other wildlife. Place notes in the CC and R's and deeds stating that fences in and ground the 4. standard. Penes in the no building envLiopes may be constructed to any development area are limited to no mole o strand heian 3 ght fo gat lea tails 1.6„ above cnaximum height of 48" and a bottom rail ground level; e etatian clearing and maintenance ;plan shall be formulated and submitted to the 5 Av gp. of not Plannign Dept. and Dept. of ffish and Game for peil'od for lArtnei I5syear's, the plan At the end of 5 years, the plan shall be implem shall be ;implemented fot another 5 Y� period. The plan shall also be required as part of the CC and R's. Atutomatic fire su ze,�sion s r%nklet systems + final nap 'stating, " Pp p note on the 6. Place a c s stems e . shall in i' R tion of sprinkler y _ one and two, installed in all neve"resia�nti.al structures in accordance with the National Protection Assn. Standard.. for the installa family dwellings and mobile. homes; NFFA Standard 131). ,ti titian fees to the Feath0t River Park and Recreation District as stated in 7. 1 ay mi g that agreement executed on xuly 2 10y2:. ~ DECLARP.TiON OF _FEES DUE ( California Fish ` and Game Code Sec" on 711.4 ) -NAM E ANI) ADDRESS OF APPLICANT Michael Pierce 500 Chinese Wall Road - Oroville, CA 95966� CLASSIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT 1, NOTICE OF E: EMPT CON/'STATEMENT OF EXEMPTION [ 1k. Statutorily Or Categorically Exempt $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee: ]3. UeMinimuS impact - Certificate of Fee Exemption $2.5.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee 2, NOT -ICE OF DETEP11INATION - FEE REQUIRED [Xj A. Negative Declaration $1,260 Staie Filing Fee $25.00 Clerk's DOcumgt :Cary Handling FGe B. Environmental Impact Report [ $850 State Filing Fee x.25, 00 Clerk's 'Documentary ;Handling Fire g [ ] OTHER (Specify) $2`5.00 Clerk's, Documentary Handling Fee PAYMENT/IZON-PAYMENT OF FEES: PAYMENT. The above fees have been paid. See attached receipt(S). NON-PAYMENT, The above fees are required: Not paid. chief Planning Official By: Paula Leasure Assi istant PlanningDirector g Lead Agency y c Development RevieW Coubittee WOTLS OF THIS FORM MUST' BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED' WITH ALL ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS F�'IL'Ei) WITH THE BUTTE COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE THREE COPTES OF ALL NECES8ARY DOCUMENTATION ARE REQUIRED FOR FILING HE Bt]TTECO;INT�IRTO THE FLILING CLERC' 5 OF'!ICE.OF ANY 'ENVIRONMENTAL 1CiOCUMENT WITH T_ 'i ALL APPLICABLE FEES ARE DUE AND PAYABLE CHECKS PAYABLE TO THE COUNTS OF BUTTE, d lop • iii. r. r:oNlNo i nRr:avr &,4m.c roY u' ruNue Wool)($ LAICo uia. ICnMITG VAntArytdl nuaa.lc �.• oOCVMCNT{ crry IlCALYH 6TH APPLICANT PEGEIVEO'FROM Noi RCcunolto - OUTTE COUNTY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE 111NUTES S AUGUST 17, 1992 )Jr. Farrel said that this item was scheduled so that this committee could consider both the issues of the EIR requirement. and General. Plan conformance at this time:" mr. F'arre3 said that the applicants have been helpful in making %nown what they would like to do with the property. That is to set in process a division of the property that wil'I ultimately lead to comme:.;ial, industrial and institutional use of the site. The General. Plan designates the area as Open and Grazing Land The intent/ of this proposed land division is fox urban development. Although the future appropriate land use of the area may change, at this gime the General, Play! policy is not for urban uses.' The Ag Commission and Farm Advisor have indicated that_, although the minimum_ parcel sizes of 40 acres are xnet, 40 acres is inadequate for grazing on this type of land and does not ,comply With the intent of the. General Plan. Therefore Mr. Farrel ree7ommends denial of the appli-ation because the project dohs not comply with the General Plan in intent and because of the pard. sizes, said that it should be emph` ,C 7e,. p-cpusa1 may bt4 the propel use of the' lane the xia'enre :Jut is inconsistent w th�Oeueral Plan policies at this time. If this project i,s Ropisrttlee. to the EoaYd county staff Would be ha,pPy to Lae applicant on agricultural agreements or assurances th':t could. ensttre that this project stays within the agricultural intent of the General 'Plane and they Gould be offered to the of Supervisors: possibly y uify} a conformance finding* Td hisproposalY�wo dd neanoala-tgeextension- o± the south Chico industrial and commercial area. Mr. Ea 'se'l' made a, motion finding that the project is incon ;istent Withthe General Plan a Ms. Leasure and carried unanimously. Motion seconded by and, should be denied. 3. Michael PTerce, Tenta-�iVe Parcel. MZip, AP 61"46-144 Y 9 parcels and remainder located on, the southerly side of. Encina Grandz R'oad and west of Ord "Quincy 14WY. Berry U`eek area Engineer: Ron Gz'aves AsS6l'-J�tes Mike Evans said that Ron Graves has replaced Barnhart/Brbwn Associates on this project and he represents the applicant and Graves Associates Regarding the l fti no access strip al.ung Oro Quincy Hwy -e :he would like that condition (411) modified because the pro,perty owner to the south is interested in having �icces.> to the old Plumas Railroad. ,aband_oned r3,ght , of way; WbA,ch R8 a traVersabl'e road along another Old road that cahnlbcts to trO N.. 1, BUTTE COUNTY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES 6 AUGUST 1.7, 1992 Craver able roadalong another old road that connects. to Oro Quincy Hwy. If the property owners make some trades and access can be mane safely, they would like the option to cross that 1 ft. no access sty:ip� Mitigation meazures have been worked out to protect the deer habitat: xx. EdaI'L said condition 911. can be modif-iod to allow an exception to the 1 It. no access strip upon the approval of the Public Works Dept. )fir. Erickson noted that Health Dept. conditions, Mr. Edell said that the possible access onto Oro Quincy Hwy. is in. an area of over 30% slope, which is supposed to be designated as a "no development area." Mr, Evans said the traveled road way itself is less than 30% although th.e cutbanks are greater than �0%, He can remove th, zoadway from the .hatched area on the map since it is less than 30'x;. If a r-oad :gray Is put in there, it will have to be accurately surveyed anyway and shown as an easement of xecord: Mr. Edell said that would be acceptable. Ms. Leasure stated: having reviewed the environmental review checklist, the conversations, at this: meeting, and the Planning Director's Report.of July 6r 1992, I make a motion to, adopt a mitigated negative declaration for the Michael Pierre tentative parcel map to create- 4 parcels on AP 61-48-14, finding that the project could have an effect on the envirohtnent, but will not, have a. significant effect in this case .,provi6ed the 2equired mitigations are complied with Those mitigations are ,listed on the Planning D j: the Report of July 6 159,2, a5 type,d. The motion is made finding that the .project isinconformance with the Butte County General Plan and Butte county Zo'ning� that the project is subject to, payment of Vish and Game fees. Having' found the above, i further move to approve ,the project subject to the following conditions and finding that approval will not be detrimental to the hea�.th, safety or. welfare of the,:people of Butte County provided the required coh61tions are complied with. ublic, Works cbndati��" Ons* - w Provide tU-6- tvay traversable access itS-8�I,D'-fix to eaeh parcel from a colnty mdintained road or state highway, 2 Access to be reserved iii deeds as per county ordinance and offered £oar dedication on the final map. BUTTE COUNTY DEVELOPMENT RE,-VIEW COMMITTEE ,MINUTES 7 AUGUST 11, 199 Show 50 ft. building setback line measured from centerline of access easement, 4 provide road maintenance agreement. Indicate a 55 ft. building setback from the,centerline of Oroville Quincy iiwy. 61 Show all easements of record on the final maps Provide street name signs per requirements of the Department of Public Works prior to recordation, of the final map, 81 Obtain encroachment permit and construct standardroad approach providing adequate sight distance at the intersection of Encina Grande and Oroville Quincy RWy 5 Pay any delinquent taxes or current taxes as required. } 10 =heat the requirements of the Butte County Fire Department., lI Providea 1-foot no access strip altlng. 0roville Qui:ncy_Hwy. frontage ,except at a location that may be ,approved , b,y PUbl c: Works; Health Dept. conditirns; 12?" provide an area for wells and 100 ft. leadhfield.free setback around .those areas on parcels 1 throwh g I 4i Show a S0 ft++ . le, chfielc�, setback from the drainage way on parcels 1 thr6ugh 3. 13 -ed uantit3es of domE:stic water. are available to alY 14 Prove that the requ± _ q parcels; PlanningDept. cond:iti° 15 A development impact fee for Sheriff Facilities shall be paid pursuant to the p.rov1§16ns of Chapter 3, Article I'I of the Butte County Cade; prior to issuance of building permits or tse Permit in the case of a'mobile home park. Said fee amount will be determined and calculated at of the date of application for the building permit or Use Permit. Te ' 161G, loW,, ng mitigation measures are requited : 1 Show on the additional map sheet the area with slopes of 30% ter greater. besignate these areas as no development zones for structures, roads and i>t1i`iveways i. Designate boi.lding, envelopes not to exceed 2 acre that `moi l �'contain all structures. BUTTE COUNTY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMTTTEE MINUTES AUGUST 17, .1992 2 Institute a selective brush clearing program prior to construction of any home. Reduce the manz.,..,ita cover to no more than 30% within the no development area. The brush clearing program shall be approved by the Dept. of Fish and Game. All oak trees, toyon coffeeberry, and buckbrush shall be preserved as much as possible. All oak trees destroyed shall be replanted 'in a 5 to 1 ratio. Pine trees with ,blister rust should be removed. Most of t q slash shall be removed or 'burned in accordance with CDF burn requirements Sc, q slash should be 'spread for erosion control. ? Place notes in the CG and R's and in the deeds to advise future residents that. they, occupy a deer use area. Dogs must be confined to fenced areas or otherwise under physical control of the owner at all times to prevent harassment of deer atdl other wildlife: 4 place notes in the CC and R's and deeds stating that fences in and around the building envelopes may be constructed to any standard. Fences in the no development area are limited to "no more than 3 strands of wire or rails with a maximum height of 48" and a: bottom rail or strand height of at least 16" above ground level. 5 A vegetat oii clearing and -naintenance plan -shall be formulatedaand submittedto the Planning Dept, and- Dept.,.of Fish and Game for a period of not less than 5 years, At the end of 5 years, the plan shall be reviewed by the Dept. of Fish and Game to determine '-it shall be implemented for another. 5 year period. The plan sh, alsa be required as part of the CC and R' 6 Place a note on the final map stating, 'iAutomatic fire. ,alpression sprinkiet systems shall in installed in all reV residential 'structures in accordance with the National Fire Protection Assn. Standard for the installatibn bf sprinkler systems In one and,two family dwellings and mobile homes; NFPA Standard 13b.1' 7 Pa mitigation fees the Feather River Park and Recre • y g anon District as atated.in that'a reement executed on Jul 2, 1992. 4. Rori pr-ater, TebtatiVe Marcel Map, AP 25•-32=12' 2 parcels located on the east side of Power, R,ou8e Hill Road approxi 4800 ft, south of 'Palermo .Road, Palermo axes: Engineer:' Eibh Graves: Assotiab:es Mike- Evans, was present representing the applicant and the net,* engineer, Ron Graves Associates. He said, that the map Was revised from 4 parcels to 2 parcels because o:E< soilsi Then it was tevised to comply With the proposed Palermo `rezone for 10 :7 cl I� 15 4 T5 t, ` ,e3s. art„ ,"`.'l�ra•:•v.� �1cou, ... 1AIgD © P IJAT"U%A'l VVEALT'H Agip BEAU T I -- LAND DEV�LOF►T JIENT• DIVISIOn DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE . OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965.3397 TELEPHONE: (9 16) 639-1 :56 FAX; 19161538-2140 Planning Department cr9T1FIED MAIL August 18, 1992 AUG 19 102 Orovllle, Calfor8la RE: AP 61-48--14 Ilighael Pierce TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 00 Chinese Wall Road crov lle, CA 95966 Mr. Pierce ,)Car meeting of the Butte County Development Services At the regularthe Commmittee adopted a .,,ommittee held on August 17► 1992, approved ta.e iveAbove-referenced with Projectvsubjecttal to theicondoitionsnlisted on t}�.e abo�,re-referen P the attached sheet: v filed -- within ten (10) days of the If no appeals are time 1, approval (August, 27, date of the Development Services Committee s app this action 1992) -•- with the Cletk of the Board of Supervisors, will be final: _ When the conditions of approval aralcmapVi dt �tthe1Buttel County order for you to file your fin p Department of Development Services for recordation twithihe n twe�nty- four (24) months of the date of approval by Service's COmmen lttee State law requires that the 517esa�em ned°ftoEish defrayd the cost'se Of and collect filing fees a p These managing and protecting , i process the environmental reviewt '' fish and Wildlife trust resiources filing fees are collected during and are to be paid at the time the County' f .les a Notice of Determination" with the Cnlxnty Clerk of°istCounty pursuant the. to project is JOCL' ed. Thi3. procedurerequired Section 21152 of the Public Resources Code. To increase administrative efficiency, the statute deleg ted the. collection of filing fees to the iCounty Clerk-belThe fee required in connectlon with your project * August 18,, 1992 ,,,chael Pierce Page 2 51�-48-14 - ' CLASSIFICATION "OF ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT NOTICE OF EXEMPTION/STATEMENT OF EXEMPTION A Sta6ttorily or Categorically Exempt #25:00 Clerk's Fe=e Certificate of F'ee. B. De Minimus Impact - Exemption $25.00 Clerk's Fee NOTICE OF DETERMINATION - FEE REQUIRED X ) A. Negative Declaration $1,250,00 State Filing Fee $25,00 Clerk's Fee ( ) B. Environmental Impact Report $850:00 State Filing Fee $25.00 J, OTHEEt (Specify) $25.00 Clerk's Fee rhe Fee should be paid to the Planning t�epartment by August 31, '1992, in- o�4der for the Notice of DetW:mination to be timely ;piled. ake ehecics payable to the County of Butte: 'he project applicant should be aware that if he or she does not t,3 ren filing fees, the project approval. remit payment of the req' ,nay be invalid by law and main not be operative, vested or final, urswant to thy: provisions of Public Resources Code Section ?.1089 (b)r Fish and'Game Code Sec. 711.4 (c) and Section 753:5 (d) (3) and (7) Title .14 California Code of Regulations, Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office at 538-7266_ Very truly yours, Stuari: Edell MAnaigeteLand Developmetit Division Department of Development Services SE/d8 cc Env' ranm Division tta1 ponith Department ental: Y,!a Ron Graves Associates` MICHAEL PIERCE,'TENTATIVE PAROL MAP,' AP 61-45-14, 4 parcels located on the southerly side of Encina Grande $load and west of pro -Quincy Hwy.. Berry Creek area. Engineer: Barnhart 'Brown Assoc• ..'Ites / Mike Evans, Public 'Works conditions. 1 Provide two-way 'traversable access RS"8-LD-II to each parcel from a county maintained road or state highway. 2 Access to be reserved in deeds as per county ordinance and offered for, dedication on the final. map. Show 50 ft. building setback line measured from centerline of access eagement 4 Provide road maintenance agreement. 5 Indicate a 55 ft, building setback from the centerline of Oroville Quincy Hwy, 5 Show all easements of record on the final 'map. 7 Provide. street =tame signs per requirements of the Department of Public Works prior to recordation of the final map. , Obtain encroachment permit and construct standard road approach providing adequate sight distance at the intersection of Encina Grande. and Orovlle Quincy Hwy q Pay any delinquent taxes or current tastes as required. quired. 10 Meet the requirements' of the Butte County Fire Department. ll Provide a l foot no access strip .along Oroville Quincy Hwy, frontage except at a location that may be approved by Public 'Works. Health Dept, conditions; 121." Provide an area for iaells and 1.00 ft4 leachfield free setback around those areas on parcels 1 through 4. 13 Show a 50 ft. leachfiela setback from the drainage way on parcels 1 "thrmugh 3. 14 p+' 7ve that the re aired quantities of domestic water are available to 911 cels. Planning hepta Condit'ion_t 15 A development impact fee for Sheriff Facilities shall be paid pursuant to 3, Article II of the Butte County Codef prior tothe . issuance ofons buildingChapterof permits or Use Permit in the cast? of 6 moile dat mobile e P park, S'aid fee amount will be determined and, calculated o ,application for the building permit or Use Permit, "JI1CHAEL PIERCE, TPM ,J)6 fol owing mitigation measures are required Show on the additional map sheet the area with slopes of 30% or greater. Designate these ar as as no development zones for structures, roads and driveways. Designate building envelopes not ti exceed 2 acres th8t will contain all Structures. 2, institute a selective brush clearing program prior to construction of any home. Reduce the-manzanita cover to no more than 30% within the no development area. The brush clearing program shall be approved by the Dept, of Fish and Game. All oak trees, toyon, co£feeberry, and buckbrush shall be preserved as much as possible: All oak trees destroyed shall be replanted in a 5 to 1 ratio. Pine trees with blister rust should be removed: Most of the slash. shall be removed or burned in accordance with OF burn requirements. Some slash should be spread for erosion control,. ? Place notes in the CC and R's and in the deeds to advise future residents that they occupy a deer use area. Dogs must be confined to fenced areas or otherwise under the physical, control of the owner at all times to prevent harassment of deer and other wildlife. 4 Place notes in the CC and R's and deeds statoirg that fences in and around the building envelopes may be constructed tr oay standard. Feiices in the no development area are limited to no more Oit-m 3 strands of wire or rails With . a maximum height of 48" and a bottom raft or ,,trand height of at least 16" above ground level. 5 A vegetation clearing and maintenance plan shelA be formulated and submitted to the Planning Dept and. Dept. „of Fish and Game for a period of not less than 5 years, At the end of 5 years, the plan shall be reviewed by t -be Dept. of Fish and Game to determine if it shall be implemented for another 5 year period. The plan shall also be required as part of the CC and R's. Place a note on the final map stating, "Automatic fire suppression sprinkler systems shall in installed in all new residential structures in accordance with the National Fire Protection Assn. Standard for the installation of sprinkler systems in one and two family dwellings aild tobile hbmes, NFPA Standard 15D:" 'y Pay mitigation fees to the Feather River Park and Recreation District as stated in that agreement executed on July 2; 1992: Sulfte LAND OF NATURAL Wi:ALTH ANI) B8AUTY I jiment LAND DEVELOPMENT DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES AUGZ 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLC. CALIFORNIA 95965.3397 " TELEPHONE; (916) 5313•7266 Uraritr, Gai�torntls FAX: (916) 538-7.140 CERTIFIED MAIL July 31, 1992 t4 chael Pierce RE: AP 61-4$-14 500 Chinese Wall Road TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP Oroville, CA 95966 Dear Mr. Pierce: Please be advised that the Butte County Development Services Committee wj,ll hear your application on the above -identified property on.August 17, 1:992: The Committee will be reviewing the findings from the Planning Division and will he considering your tentative parcel map: The Laird Development Divison will recommend the conditions of approval as listed on the attached sheet. The meeting will commence at 9.00 a.m. in the Board of SUpervisorsl Room; County Administration Building, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please r,ontect this office at 538-7266« Very truly yours, Stuarts Edell j Manager 1 Land Development WLvision Development Services Department. SE/ds attachment: cc: Planning Division Environmental health Department Evans 1,ou�Cecchi, 5263 Royal Oaks Dr., 0.roville, CA 95966 ti MICHAEL PIERCE, TENTATIVE PARCH MAP, AP 61--48-14, 4 parcels located on the southerly side of. Encina Grande Road and west . Oro -Quincy Hwy. Berry Creek area. Engineer: Barnhart Brown Associates � Mike Evans Public Works conditions: Provide two-way traversable access RS -8 -LD -II to each parcel from a county maintained road or state highway. Access to be reserved in deeds as per county ordinance and offered for dedication on the final map. Show 50 ft, building setback line measured from centerline of access easement. G Provide road maintenance agreement. Indicate a 55 ft, building setback from the centerline of Oroville Quincy Hwy: 6 Show all easements of recurd on the final map. 7 Provide street name signs per requirements of the Department of Public Works prior to recordation of the final map. g, Obtain encroachment permit and construct standard road approach; providing adequate "sight distance at the intersection of ,Encina Grande and OrovilleQuincy 'Hwy 9 Pay any delinquent taxes or current taxes as required. 10 Meet the requirements of the Butte County Fire Department. 71 Provide a I foot no access strip along Oroville Quincy Hwy: frontage. v/.: ♦ �/,.fix •/ N.. -' - LAND OF NATL'_RAt 1t.?EALTi-i AMID €BEAUTY 71. Department of Developpm�ent Services PLANNING DEPARTMENT ` 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (916) $38-7601 July 7, 1992 Michael Pierce 500 Chinese Wall Road Oroville,CA 95966 Ike: Tentative Parcel Map on AP# 061-480-014 Dear Mr. Pierce; The Butte County Department of Development Services, Planning Division has completed the environmental review of your project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and forwarded to the Butte County Advisory Agency within the required 105 days pursuant to the California 'Public Resources Code Sectioir 21151.5. 'fn addition, the Planning Director's report required by Sections 20-63 and 20-99 of the Butte County Subdivision Ordinance has been completed. Please find enclosed the Environmental Documentation/Planning Director's Report which has been prepared for your project. Please review the enclosed Initial Study/Planning Directo?s Report with conditions of approval if applicable. If you note any errors or omissions in our evaluation, please bring them to out attention. The Environmental Documents and Planning Director's Report for your project has been sent to the Butte County Advisory Agency for their action. "California Government Code Sections 65950 and 65952.1 requires the Butte County Advisory Agency set hearings and approve or disapprove your project within six months from the date on which your application was recwx.d and accepted, The si,;t month time limit for your project mandated by state law, will occL: on January 3, 1993. The Advisory Agency will notify you of the time and place of the public hearing for your project, If there are;modifications to your project, not related to mitigating an identified impacts re-evaluation of your project shall be required, v ,_ Inter -Departmental Memorandum TO: Butte County Advisory Agency FROM: Planning Director SUBJECT% Report on the Tentative Parcel Map for Michael Pierce AP 0061-480-014 PATE J ul ly 6, 1552 $Phis is a proposal to divide 152 acres to create four parcels of 20, 20, 25,and 45 acres with a 42 acre remainder: The present zoning is U tinclassified. The Land Use Plan Map of the Butte County General Plan designates this area as Agricultural Residential. There are no specific or community plans for the C area The proposal doers not conflict with County zoning nor any adopted or proposed Element of the. Butte County Genera Plass nor any specific or community plan. A Negative Dec'larat.i_cn with mitigation measures has been prepared for the proposed project in accordance to the California Environmental Quality ,'pct and forwarded to the Butte County Advisory Agency within the required 105 days pursuant to the California Public Resources Code Section 21151.5. Recommend approval subject to the following Mitigation Measures and Conditions; MITIGATION MEASURES 1. Show on the additional map `sheet the area with slopes of 30 or greater. Designate these areas as no development zones for structures; roads and driveways. Designate building envelopes not to exceed 2 acres that will contain all structures: 2. institute- a selective brush clear ng program prior to construction of any home. Reduce the marizanita cover to no more than 30% within the no developm-ant area. The brush clearing program shall be approved by the D `lrtment of 'Fist and Came. All oak trees, tcyont coffeebe, r and buolcbrush shall be preservs+4 as much as possible. All oak irees. destroyed shall be replanted in a 5 to I ratio, Pine trees with blister rust should be removed. MosL of the slash shall be removed or burned in accordance with COIF burn requitbionts; Some ala6h should be spread for erosion contrtl.. Plac`: notes in the C:C&Rf s and in the 'deeds to advise fixture residents that they occupy a deer use area. Dogs must be confined to fenced areas or are otherwise under the physical control of the owner at all times to prevent harassment of deer and other wildlife. 4. Place notes in the CC&R's and deeds stating that fences in and around the building envelopes may be constructed to any standard. Fencos in the no development arec-_ are limited to no more than 3 strands of wire or 'rails with a maximum height of 480 and a bottom rail or .strand height of at least 161 above ground level. S. A vegetation clearing and maintenance plan shall be formulated and submitted to the Planning Department and Department of Fish and Game for a period of riot less than 5 years. At the end of 5 years, the plan shall be reviewed by the Department of Fish and Game to determine if it shall be implemented for another 5 year period. The plan Shall alio be required as part of the CC&R's. 6 'Place a note on the final map stating, '$Automatic fire suppression sprinkler systems shall be installed in all now residential structures in accordance with the National: Fire Protection Association Standard for the installation of sprinkler systems in one and two family dwellings and mobile homes, NFPA Standard 13D,1' 7. Pay, mitigation fees to the Feather River Park and Recreation District as stated in that agreement executed on July 2, 1992: CONDITIONS 1. A development impact fee for Sheriff Facilities shall be paid pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 3, Article II of. the Butte County �"ode, prior to issuance of building permits or Use Permit in the case of a mobile home park. Said fee amount will be determined and calculated as of the date of application for the building permit or Use Permiti r t; b'FQ'i'FLRSkERRECREATION r E�IVD ��,` ���';'R:XG7[ 120011+I;ye.-m Stmit Omville, CA 95961 (916) 533-2011 AGPM3ff�N+ 7` ,`BETWI ` F EATHETI j i.aMF MICREATION & PARK -DIS MT AND DEVEIOPER(S) FOR xn,fIGATION OF IMPACT FEES WHEREAS, the undersigned are presently the owners of that i air; ;,Ommonly known as AP No. Gil " C/fr"'— �� which is located within the ,jurisdiction of feather River Recre-otion & Park District, near the legal description of which is set forth itt Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference; and WHEREAS, said owners propose to develop their said innd, and, in connection with their develoament, proposal, have submitted an application to the County of Butte �or the following t-ap parcel map . use permit . other (specify ); ,and W.H2REAS, said owners recognize that the cumulative impact of development within the jurisdiction of the Feather liver Recreation & Park District including their proposed development, has created and is creating the need to augment the recreation and pg.'r services provided by the Feather River Recreation & Park District and has increased and is increasing the rased for the Feather River Recreation & Park District to acquire facilities and equipment necessary to provide such services; and WHEREAS, said owners are aware that the Feather Fiver Recreation & Park District, is studying methods to provide funding to acquire such equipment and facilities by establishing developer fees, establishing ao, assessment district, or some similar, fair, reaschibl,%� and .appropriate funding mechanistr� to finance such equipment and facility acquisition or to "fund environmental and other studies as may be deemed necessary to determine the needs to," such ,equipment and facilities,. and said owners recognize that the imposition of such a funding mechanism or combination of merhanisms will benefit their said property, and VMMAS, said owners wish to mitigate the impact of their proposed dove ilopment om 'the r'eather River Recreation & Park District's ability, to provide ;adequate reed tion; and nark set nces but -recognizey h Feather River ecreatimt i and Park District does zt;ht .t present i, ive such funding mechanisms nplace or other adequtite resources hocesw4 t'•provide 51;,c1i itiga Mori: NOW, TREREFORE; said owners do Hereby agree and consent as follow:.. "aid owners consent to the establishmeiit of such funding meelzanis,;as, agree not r..j prot,i,'r° ., §tablishment of the same, end agree to pay their pro rata share thereof,, i;, ,Said uwners agree to cooperate and support the County o£Butte in obtaining the approval of such Nriding mechanisms front other property owners within the ;jurisdiction of the Feather River Re oration and Park District in the area, A'W OF CALLA e—\ -before roe, the undersigned, a Not vrf Public In and for x: z *5+zte, personally ID— "` p=r :ally known to mt (c( proved to Mo on the basis a satts, W, fAt ryev]dence)tobethePeraon(s)whoson 010(a) Is/are sub - a = r?se_d to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that. the they executed the same. i t a t e e e o e a o'w.M o a we a e a A a e e e(mil �al 6. twimoup 4 bt•'FICtAi;;Pr1L m n )-y NOTARY Pli�iLIC-CALIFORNLA e Prtnblod (iftLO to Bum couht�y1 e gommistfion E+3�a 5! pT, U19 d r' gr�tW.t; my hand and 08 cls ea * a o o a m w+ `' *=�:�*3\�''+�..7�-1 (This area ft+Y okitafai ltotaria) seaij s"r,ArM. OF CALIFORNIA ) CL +UN-TY OF r7t stn before me, _ r pgrsomally appeared personally known to me (or proved idence) to be the petson(s) Whose name(S) Is/ate subscribed to the within a -n an the basis of satisf9ttory cknowledged foto me that helshelti,ey executed the same in hislherAheir authorised capactty(los), t7 n,ment and a { n b i strati t ,per on(s) or the emtil� upo end that by tiis�mer/th s natures) on a ® e p N a® w a DANIEL F. HUNTPS�■ son(s) acted, ex cuted, he rristrum rat. .., NOTAt1Y PUBUCrOAUOORNIA a But1eC hyOCL I,' 6'i`dNES d d ofpera! a Commisswnt3x4ri W.olltsMif1111/111111rMM�Mtr!!11!♦��� (This urea for alticial notarial s01) a.w, 3. Said owners agree, prior to issuance of ;any building permit in connection with or related to their use permit to pay to Feather River Recreation and Park District impact mitigation fees in the amount of $942 per unit. It is understood that such fees shall be paid d rertly to Feather River Recreation and Park District into a separate designated Feather River Recreation and Park District fund limited to use for the intended purposes of mitigating impacts on the Feather River Recreation and Park District and providing equipment and facilities for the Feather Diver Recreation and Park District. ,. 4. In consideration the foregoing and other good and valuable consideration, the undersigned owners expressly agree that the foregoing shall be an agreement running with the land and shall be binding upon their heirs and all successors in interest. DATE signature STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF BUTTE On 1992 before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of California, personally known to me, C J proved to me C 7 on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(O whose ramex are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged' that they executed the same., WITNESS my hand and my seal. r , '91gilHiQr e of Notary Name (Typed or Printed) REW/jcs � �,yysv. Michael G. Evans �luli���, �.wa ;a Une Nice Place JUN 24 1992 Oroville, CA, 95966 g (916) 589-5198 tZrcaYiE, C��:`�eesla C.C.i„ #5482t'� r June 23, 1992 Mr. Cram; P Sanders vutto County Department of Development Services, Planning 7 County Center Drive Crovil.le ► Ca 95965 'Nes T P tr. for Mt Pierce 61-480-011 Dear Mr. Sanders, On behalf of Mr. Pierce, l am responding to your environmental checklist and proposed mitigations dated June 161 1992 (June 27, 1992 ay With the exception of number 5, we agree to the mitigations as proposed. Number 5 specifies a clearing plan for 5 -year periods. The " proposed OCR's and recommendation from the totanl8to biologist and approved by Fish and Game was fog: a minimum df five years t; (see neck, 21 January 1992) We will agroe to a measure with a one-time, five-year period. Please schedule the pro jeot for the Advisory agency. Thank you. - ,;�' �n reX 1 Michael. lwans Oct M. Pierce , "1 } H , BUTTE cOUN�`Y Planning Depatiment DEPARTMENT Envy r nBLIC menta HEALTH Helth JUN 1z Division �� 7 County' Center Drive orovllla, Uliiarnla Orovi.11e, d- 95965 (91.6) 538--7281 June 19, 1992 Michael Evans' One Nice Place Orovil.le, CA 95965 R1 Pierce TPM - AP# 61-48-1.4'- Dear Mr. Evans; , �s department has advised the Butte County Department of Public' Tha P �- Land Development Section that we are prepared to act on the Work above application. resent information, we can recommend approval or Based on p royal. conditional. app keeommended conditi0i's,fOr Approval leachf.ie -ld free setback a 1. Provide an area for wells nd 100' around those areas on parcels 10 2 3, and 4. 2, Show a 50' leach£ield setback from the drainage way on parcels 1, 2e and 3. Prove that the required quantities of domestic water are 3. available to all parcels. If you have any quest arding this letter ons reg, Please contactMe. Ed Overhnuse at the above listed 'address or. telephone number between 8:00 - 10100 a.m, weekdays Very'. truly Yo/uuts Philip E I Nelson Supervising E.H.S. Division of Enva.ronmental Health PENIsg cc: P�.anatig Department'. Public Works DePay lent � '•rM Suite coun r - LAND OF NATURAL V'1EA.1TH AND BEAUTY' Department of Development Services PLANNING DEPARTMENT 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE. CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE. (916) 536-7601 Dine 16, 1992 Michael Pierce 500 Chinese Wall Road Oroville, CA 95965 Re; Tentative Parcel Map, AP 061-480-014 Dear Mr. Pierce: ;An initial study of your proposed project, a Tentative Parcel Map, indicates potentially adverse impacts to the environment (refer to the enclosed environmental checklist). To reduce or eliminate these impacts, suitable mitigation measures are required as part of the project. Otherwise, an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. An early response to this notification, scat to the Planning Department, will expedite the ,scheduling of your project. Please 'forward your written response within. 15 days from the date of this letter'. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office between 10.00 a.m. and 3-00 p.m. Sincerely, B. A. Kircher Director of Planning Craig B. Sanders Associate Planner CBS:Ir Enc, ccs Barnhart -Brown & Assoc: DEER SURVEY OF A 152 ACRE .PARCEL EAST OF LAKE OROVILLE, BUTTE "COUNTY, CALIFORNIA BY , Albert J. Beck, Ph,p., Jill Woods, B.S. and Jeff Souza,-B.S. INTRODUCTION Eco -Analysts was retained in January 1992 by Michael Pierce to survey a 152 -acre parcel east of Lake Oroville for deer use and to make recommendations to reduce or eliminate impacts upon deer using the site. Prior to the field survey, the t000retown Deer. Herd Plan and maps were consulted for information on the area surrounding the project site. The area is indicatedas. Critical Oeer Vinter Range. Assessor's Parcel Map 71-01 was reviewed to determine sizes in the vicinity of the project. ,,..;at ve Parcel Map is located in the northwest quarter of Section 5 � • ;� + .,rpt -•� � and L powl;t4m, 0the cast half of Section 6, Township 20 NRange 5 East, , ISI M.D.B.&M. It Is i. ", -n'�'-Mgnated as Butte County Assessor's Parcel 61-480=0144 Parcels andtaaive Map remainderwparcel. Leaosed chrcel field1zes of 3nd home0to sites5areris forndica a new . indicated at the northern edge of the property. Slopes on, Rpproximately 90 of the 150 acres exceed 30 percent. Assessorls Parcel Map 7i-01 indicates th&t parcel sizez :n the vicinity of the project vary from 2.5 acres to 320 acres,. Eleven parcels, J"tluding the project site are over IGO acres; and 36 are below 20 acres in size. Si— teen parcels are between 20 and 3D acres and another 16 are between 30 and to acres. Additional subdivision of parcels is proposed or being considered for parcels to thentrth. SURVEY TECHNIQUES AND RESULTS We met Mr. Pierce,, Mike Evahs (Surveyor for the project) and associates of Mr. Pierce on the site 9 January 1992. They posited out the bouiidariss of the site and discussed potential building areas. Jeff Souza, Jill Woods and f walked the site by W;M9 roads and pati+.t, and then examined game trails on the parcel i The habitat type on the site is a, mixture of Mixed Chaparral with some ` dements of a Montane Hardwood -Conifer Forest The majority of the site is covered by manzanita that is about 12 years old and about 7 feet high, open ,areas contain 'very low buckbrush bushes, toyoni coffeeberry and poison oak. Rocky outcrops also have a few grasses and forbs, mainly squirreltail grass, buckwheat and bedstr`w.Trees on 'the site are scattered and the conifers shoo signs of drought and blister rust; Trees present are 'digger pine, Ponderosa pine, black oak and canyon oak. There is no permanent surface water source on the -mall drainage channel on the site carries rainfall off rapidly and no wetland vegetation has formed in or next to this channel. small temporary pools of water were observed during the survey and the area adjacent to them examined for deer use. Two sets of deer tracks were observed along man made trails' through the project area. There was evidence of recent browsing activity on some of the bu kbrush and poison oak bushes. No deer pellets were observed. CONCLUSION5 The project site provides some food for two or more deer. The dense, mature manzanita stand that covers most of the site limits the quality and availability of plants preferred by deer for food', Manzanita clumps may, provide thermal shelter, although no evidence of� bedding was detected. No water would be available during most of the year, but is available within one-half mile. This site has limited value for local, or migratory deer in its present condition. Development with homesites and roadways at the northern edge of the site would not interfere with use of most of the site by deer. RECOMMENDATIONS The area indicated as exceeding O0 percent in slope should be designated a development exclusion area for buildings and roads; building envelopes of one to two acres should be designated to include homes, outbuildings, and sto- rage areas A selective brush clearing program should be required prior to construe-- tion of any home on the site. The 1.2± year old manzanita should be raduced to cover no more than 3o percent of the development exclusion area, Mechanical and chemical control of the manzanita is desirable6 auckbrush, toyon and coffeeberry bushes "should be preserved when Pos- sible. Clack and canyon oaks should be preserved when possible: Pines with blister rust should be cut down and removed or burned, All slash should be: burned according to bepartment of Forestry and Fire Protection conditions, `the Conditibhsi Covet'►ahts and peed Rostricti'olis for future residents should advise thein that they Occup,? a deer use area. Oogs must be confined to fenced aroas of homesites or otherwise undev, physical control of the owners at All time to prevent harassment of deer and rather wildlife: r i 4. w,' COUNTY OF' BUTTE y DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 (916) 538-7266 OATS: April 290 1992 SUBJECT Michael PIERCE R13VISED #1 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER(S)': 61r48-14 LOCATION;: 7 parcels .located on the southerly side of Encina Grande Road and. west of Oro incy Hwy. Berry Creek area. Attached are documents regarding, and a copy of, the above- described tentative map for your review. If you have any psugolgasetreturnathemi tost� is off ten notions later Channing this project, May 29j-1992 Very truly yours; William Cheff Director of Public Works Stuart Edell Assistant Director Vit/ kp attachments Revised app. & Revised maps ccs plannjp;9 Department pioneer Union Elementary Environmental Health Department reather River Recteati.on Dist. Ca'.if. State Dept. of ForestYy/]?Dle Cad 3. State Dept. of Visl & Game butte Cdunty Sheriff Calif. State Dept. of Parks & Roe. P.G & Calif. State Dept. of 19ateic Resources Butte Count Army Corps of Eftgineets pat iic .»ly Mosquito Abatement, Southern pacific 'Transportation 06, LD _ �1 1 60 f I APPLICANT: Michael Pierce et al. PHONE -No: 53-8541 ADDRESS 500 Chinese Wall Rd. Orovi.le , ' (,A )5966 ORjER : same I ffjNE No ADDRESS; undetermined at this time ENC INEv'R OR SUP.31EYOR : PHONE NO . ADDRESSt MkiL NOTICE OF F -E- RING `SO: Michael G. �Va7, One Nice Place i orovillei CA 95966 116) 589-5198 LOCATI-ON OV PROP ;RTS t`OWNSHI 20 1N RM- GE �� E ;SECTMI! , 5' 6 61-41-14 152 +_ AS' ESSORt PARCc:L NUMBER: _ _ -. TOTAL ACT.tFAGE + .. POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE (fid SUBMIT �h n s�� months)WITTH APPLICA ION. 3DICATE BELOW THE DATE '7 141 AND RECORDING Mi MRMATION BY WHICH. THIS,PAR .:'YCULAR PARCEL WAS CREATED: DATE 3-15-6$ Booz 1.09 PAGE 571 - tea... NU148ER AND SIZE OF PARCELS BE:M(3 CIM'tiTED (1ncludibg any ;remainder); 7 '@ 20 acres minimum each DISTANCETo NATURAL WATER COURSE OR STORM .)RAIN: L on property 1ndi �. septie systems PROPOSED ME'kHOD OF SEWA'SE DISPOSAL: �. (Chet%., with health Department) WA PROPOSED SOURCE OF TER: Indiv. Wells (Ch6"' c . `with Health Depattmerit DO POWER AND PHONE LINES VISI To THEBO t',QA'RY 011�' THE O.RIGn1 kL PARCEL'S No IF MT. ESTIM 1%�+ mile q -y .��� rc� THE't WILL NAVE mo �� EXTENDED: , yIqq-y THE DISTANCE - v1'lT'YaiJ Out 4'PT Y6'Nr LD IOSO Aevised `7-44-80 L- L/ 7'" / + Article 2: Declaration 2.01. Declarant hereby declares that thf: ` real properties describe`: on Exhibit A.j hereinafter referred to as .' the' Property'', shall be subject to the folloW;ng declarations, limitations, covenants, conditions, restrictions and easenents and shall constitute covenants which shall run with the land and shall be binding upon ,declarant and its success-ors and assigns, and all parties having or acquiring any right, title, or interest in or to any part of The Property. Article 3: Road 14a3n'enance Agreement 3.01.a) Road maintenance agreement. For so long as *'•ncina Grande brine and Truman ,journey's Way, as described on txhibits H and C, hereinafter ref erred to as "work's" shall: exist in private ownership, the parties hereto, their successors and assigns, shall bear the expenses of maintair. ing them in p ' s greed that + ` rood. repair. It i, a the cost of maintaining said "works" shall be paid by, the parties hereto, their successors and assign's, in ,prop ortion to the number of l-An d parc,--�'l.s oWned by each owner . and/or their successors and assigns, and each owner shall upon w-,jtten demand, contribute and 'pay his proportionate share of any monies paid out by any of the several owners or of any obligation 1TI of sa, d "works". The parties to this a,grei ment agreF that the parcels subject to thin, agreement eire,lproportionallyLAresp,onsible for maintenance responsibilities as outlined above provided that driveway access to the homesite developed on the subject parcel is taken from Encina' Grande Drive and/or Truman Journey's W'Qy. Provided that driveway access 4--9 not taken from Truman Journey's Way, the parcel. is not subject to its proportional share of maintenance responsibilities as outlined above for Truman Journey's Way. b) "Reasonable maintenance or repair'' shall. .not include the enlargement of said "works", and this agreement shall not be construed to require any owner to contribute to the cost of, any enlargement of said ''works''. c) Any owner may bring actions in court of competent jurisdiction ;i,,n the County of Butte to enforce collection ofariy monies due from any owner, as their proportionate share of the east of the reasonable maintenance or repair of said, "Works" and in any such action or actions the prevailing party or parties shall be entitled to recover a reasonable attorney's fee to be fixed by the court in such actions LV 4 d;) For purposes of this agreement, the decision of the owners of majority of the parcels to the a effect that specified repair or maintenance work is necessary shall be conclusive on the remaining owners and the decision of said majority as to the reasonableness of cost of such repairor maintenance work shall be conclusive on the remaining owners provided that said cost does not exceed the average of three independent cost estimates secured not,more than 60 days prior to commencement of the work, or as agreed by unanimous vote of the owners. Multiple bids not required with three 16Qrths of owners 'consent. e) The declarant will authorize the creation of a maintenance and repair account in a local bank or savings and loan. Monies deposited therein shall t be expended only for maintenance and repair of "works" and the number of authorized signatures required to withdrawr monies shall be two (2). An annual road maintenance fee of $200.00 shall be Collected on each and every undeveloped parcel served by the roadway's and a fee of $400.00 for I each developed parcel. issuanca of a building Permit for any enclosed structure in excess of 400 square feet of float area, shall constitute a developed parcel. 'v v is f) Receipts for all monies received and of all expenditures mad'.'shall be preserved and made available for inspection and copying by any owner, ti in person or by agent, for a period of two years g) The word "owner", as used herein, shall mean one person in whom sole title is vested. It shall also mean two or more persons who hold a unity of interest as Joint tenants, as tenants; as tenants in common, as partners, or as husband and wife with title vested "as their community property.." For the purpose of determining if the owners of a majority of the parcels are in favor of a proposal;, the affirmative vote of any spouse, joint tenant, partner or tenant in common shall constitu'-q approval by that parcel, irrespective of the number of co-owners of that parcel; Article 46. Land Use 4.p1. Cleanliness and offensive activities.- All premises within said property shall be at all tunes 'kept and maintained in a clean and orderly manner and no trash, garbage, or otherwise waste materials shall be dumped or kept thereon excepting in covered ,sanitary containers to be emptied and dispersed of at regular intervals 4.02. Additional restriction53 No wrecked, abandoned, or dismantled vehicle not in use may be VL kept on the premises,'excapt where stored in enclosed buildings. Vehicular use .of the property shall be limited to the access easement, driveways, parking areas. Motorcycles; and all- terrain vehicular use shall not be conducted in a noisy or harassing manner on any easements or outside of privately fenced areas of the property. Pets and animals shall be allowed as per the provisions of Butte County zoning: Not -a: a dog running loose or chasing game outside the boundaries of its owner's property is considered wild and may be controlled in accordance with Department of Fish and Game guidelines The owners agree to reasonably post the premises with lawful "No Trespassing" signs to discourage outside parties and trespassers. 4.03. Enforcement: Enforcement shall be by prozeeding at law or in equity against any person on persons violating or attempting to violate any covenant either ;:o restrain violations or recover damages. Article 51 Brush Clearance and Maintenance Programs giOii Brush Clearance by Declarant: The declarant is desirous of minimizing the potential fire;, hazards that dense manzanita brush poses to the VII property and is desirous of improving the habitat for deer and animal life. The property is located in an area designated as "High Fire banger" and designated as a "Deer Use" area. At the time of recording of this declaration, the declarant has completeda brush clearance program which required 70% of the property area being cleared of rr,anzanita, diseased pine trees and the debris burned or removed or mulched into soil. This task was accomplished by a D-4 Caterpillar clearing 12 foot wide paths along the contour of the clearance areas at random intervals, then hand clearing with chain saws to remove manzanita, leaving all oaks, to:yon, coffeeberry, ceanothus and healthy pine trees. Some: "islandsl' of approximate radius equals 50 feet were Left intact for thermal cover for game. The stumps ware then removed or sprayed with roundup to minimize regrowth. This clearance program was recommended by a consulting biologist, A consulting botanist and the Department of Fish and Game. 5.02. Brush clearance Maintenance by Declarant and/or Successors in Interest: The declarant, having cleared the brush from the property to minimize fire hazards and maximize game use habitat as outlined above; is desirous of maintaining this property in its cleared state, To VIl 1 maintaining this property in its cleared state. To minimize" erosion on the cleared site, some crushed debris has been retained to dissipate rain fall energy and spread nutrients into the soil. The de:=clay ant or their ;successors in interest have agreed by the recordation of this declaration and by their purchase of parcel(s) subject to this declaration, that a maintenance program as outlined below is for the benefit 016 the property and the owners thereof. The recomm,anded maintenance program requires the owner(s) of certain parcels to perform additional clear-ing by chain saw and/or spraying of roundup or California Division of Forestry approved herbicide during certain years as follows: Parcel Year 1993,1994 2 1993;1994 3 1993;1995 1993, 1995 Remainder 1993;1991 l Article 6 Site Plans, Building Envelope besig natinoand Fences 6:0'1: site "Vian`s: The declarant has designed the parcels, subjedt to this di.c aratioh to h&:ve ftorltage along 'Oto Quincy Highway, a public road, I7t l:�,hlc i h Grande Drivepriv'ate approved access a, Truman � � y � ay, a private' road road and/or' ruman cfurne W Each parcel has an arlea approved by the. Butte County Health Department for installazlon of a septic disposal system. These areas are designated as usable sewage disposal areas (U.S.D.A.) on the Final Map. Declarant. or their successors in interest shall utilize the designated U.S.D.A. for i { this purpose and any other reaidential related uses allowed by tate Butte County zoning Ordinance and these declarations No water wells may be placed within 100 feet of this designated ZI.,S.D,A. Water wells, septic systems, utilities, and structures for residential uses upon the parcel?; subject to these declarations are required to 'be constructed"under permit(s) issued and ;inspected by Butte County: Applications for such permit, shall include a site plan prepared by the owner sof the parcel seeking said permit (s..) , or his authorized agent. site plans shall include:the parcel number, approximate diineizs ions of- the parcel and shall designate a "Building Envelope" area; wherein the U . s . D . A. and allowed reslidential uses shall be limited, to, This designated building envelope area shall not,'ekoeed four (4) acres in size and shell be cionf gured within the propel.ty 'boundaries ':such thcat tnE: drivdwa htorfae cwith Oro y iQuincy Highway, Encina , c3 , Grande Drive,tandfor Truman Journeys Way is also includedwithin the build' envelope area. The well site may or may not be included within the building envelope area: 6.034 Fences: Perimeter fencing around the parcel bouild'ary or in any area not within, the designated building, envelope area shall bL ;� �>> ,ed to 48 .inches in height with the bc�ttonC strand located a min'Lmum of 16 inches above the ground. A maximum of i:our strands of ware may be Of barbed or r barbless Vare 110 mesh or solid barrier fencing allowed outside of the designated building �s envelope area. F'encring constructed within the designated bu*ldi ng envt?lope area ma y1 of any size, height or character_the owner chooses. Dogs shall be confined to a fenced, designated building envelod area unless under direct control of its owner. e Article 7;Qenv_..r � al Provxslons D 7.Cil: Term, These covenants are to .run with the lar'id tend shall be binding upon all parties acid a'll pex`s6118 claiming under them for a period of twenty C 2 Ci) :eears from the date this declax-- ,pion i recorded , after �ghieh ti;,�e s id declaration shall be auEotnatically extended for suacessiw� periods of ten 1p � ) years unless an irisF.rument r;,gni.-d by a nirimum seventy five (75) percent of tht owners XX I t, Fxhib;1 a " if„ Parcels 1,41,314, and "Remainder,” as shown on that certain Pacc4el Map recorded , 1992 in the Office of the :Butte County Recorder 'i'n Book Maps§ at Pages _, lying in Sections 5 alid '5, in Township 20 North, 'Range 5 East., M.D.B4 al,.d M., Butte County, California. i End Of Description i j jl f 1 XIII - I� I i vjj�tta onnty Plannlnrr Dc -t. Oount;r ^enter. Drive 9rovillp. y '04 95985 11 Wr vor r1ch el Pierce �"'' R;! A. •r Jam. '3a,nders, rcloced please find the fol.Iiwitf document r - Archa.eolorical re'port ty Cultural Resource Specialtion, ran,, 19, 1992 =Beer iaurvey 1�y A. r'cok, Jan, 21, 199 iv , Metter Fel-, 18 , 199 - qre plant nurvoy 1'y ;r%, Talley, March 21, 1912 -Archaeological records aboaki Nov. 25o 1991 - raft COR's including Tru -1 cleartanco and mamv,oment plst�*� April 15o 1992 -PPv1sed Y, 7 -pa cels ,pywt� i "arad umn the reports ,provided, the applicant has elected to pursue a RVISS M appla:mt,i,on for ? parcels off` Pu acres, mini.tnum Bich. 7� �e aRR "I �,11 TV* and Fees, Kmvo Teen u" mitted to DPI for continue rocestinv . The map is also ',eine forwarded to 1. 'recti, for revs-ftw and o the 74for comment. The 4rchaeoo ist and 1)otanist were aware of the pending rovvisions and have no findings of oonnequenco that eithar roap deoir-n will affect. The C 1 '; have incorporated the Road Vaintenance Agreement to comply with the requirements of ptt'�110 locks And idorti fl3 ,:s a, cor. t,em— plated `-rush cloarY ng proiTram that If itniOlmented mi a milks, vat'lon will °A aMof the property uses of the applm,cant as any :successors in i.nterev-4. o andbrs #P- - P. April 16, 1992 Also included is the requirement for a site -ola,n and designation of a )-ui.l.dinp anvolope area. '"he applicant will r,e sel.ectinp' one of the parcels arid; preparing a site plan, applying; for a septic and well pormit and installing, those facilities on the one parcel. The Health Dept. will he req,uostinp proof of water and we will have a sample ' Plan. Me have elected not to include the sample into the "l X I s for the wording' appears simple, clear and workable as is Following is the riiti,fra-ti.on pl.ar for the clearing and the ether propoaed mitigation,,-, for this pro jectr I. p=rior to recordation of the Fin2l !'Kap, applicant is to Imple- ment the followi,nf� `rush clearance program intended to minimize onsite fire hazards and maximize onsite wildlife haT ita.t s '4ith a D-4 caterpillar, clear random 12 foot wide ;swathe; throu,�*h the rr:a,nzanits preserving coffe;e`rerryo t6yon, scan-� oth s, oak and hea.l.tli-y pine trees. Swathes to 1-e along the coatour of the land. Some; "rush to re piled and '^urned under permit, ;some piles to remain for wildlife ha)-ita,t, some '-rush to �re crusbed an left.n place to dissipate rainfall energy and provide nutrients for the soil, after caterpillar 010) ng remove additional manzanita. 1-r chain saw leaving islands of ' Frush for wildlife cover, Approx. 1�0 0 of the property Is to 1,e cleared. Arf�As within n. feet of drainage ways aro to 1-e avoided. Puilding site area olearin ; may 'he included in the cleared areas, or tit" ' i^e Left as is. Stumps to 1,e sprayed with calif* civ. of Forestry approved herbicide or Roundup. 2. Applicant to prepare and record concurrently with the Final Map, Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions for implementation of 1-ruph clearing maintenance prorram for sut-sequent years *°y ar,dl;icant and' or successors in interest. Ik Issuance of "huildinp, permits 'on the parcolo will require d:esi�raatlon of a, '�uilding envelope not to exceed tour (4) acres in: size per pa"t oel. place a note on the Final Yy ap alternate sheet to this efteot and incorporate this requir- oment into the 0017's for the pro iaat 4 those parcels - o he limited to Dept. � epees ��:tYl,:,tructed, oil ol` ioh and Game reguaition hei hth, style and. location. "'anderso Pei 3 4pril 16o 1992 4 cont. dace a note on the Final Mal) alternate sheet to this effect . and incorporate this reqUirteMent into the GOR's for tho project, 5, incorporate standard erosion control. measures and utilize construction techniqueo that will minimize erosion on site during road and site construction aotivities. a 15. Place a note on the Final DIap alternate sheet statim th, t isouanco of 1-ullding permits on these parcels may require payment of any Doer Herd, 8heriff Dept.j School District or Fire Deptmitigation fees in effect at the time of' issuance of said permit. 7. Names constructed on these parcels shall not hav& comlAustil-le roofing materials Home construction on those parce.Ls will require the instal latia" of a minimum 2500 rallon water storage tank with a.Butte County Firs; Dept# approved drafting connection and he situated in a approved locationon the parcel, Place a note on the Vinal 1,4,ap, alternate sheet statim gist a residential fire suppression sprinklers are recommended to 1-e installed in all residential structures as per Fire Dept, and 'Ouilding Dept. requirements. 'We are moeti3. ng with the vloomer Mountain Road users as, arout the construction requiremontz for Eftelba Grande Drive and the Oroville Ulfrh School District and Pioneer School District for a solution to the ilr'conoernz and we will orovide any additional mitigations to these issuas when avallablto Please reviovi the above and process thLhL project as allowed. Please notify me of your comments on those items and the status of the applicatl'oh when you can. Thanks for your aie)neideratiobso elk. i Y-I� pP fiALIFORNIA—TFiE RESOURCES AOENI PETE WILSON, Gowmor DZP,AP,TMENT OF FISH AND GAMS Tw7, 4Jlhk�1S ROAD, SUITE A *. 3p"A9jltrW CORPOVA, CALIFORNIA 98670 X916) 355-7020 May 18, 1952 De• Stuart 'dell Department of Public Works 7 County Center Drive 4 Oroville, California- 95965 Dear M-. Edell. The Department of Fish ;and Game has reviewed the Michael Pierce Revised �`1 Tentative Parcel Map (TPM), a revision of a TPM which we reviewed on December 31 1991: Our original review recommended that the TPM be denied because it ;proposed the creation sof 20 -acre parcels in Critical winter range (40 -acre minimum parcels recommended) outside of a Designated Development: Zone; We also recommend that the Revised #1 TPM be deni0d since it proposes' seven parcels compared to the five of the original map. 1f we; ,can. be of further assir.tance, please contact Mr. Ron Bertrain, Associate Wildlife Biologist or Mr. Jerry Mensch, Environmental :Services Supervisor, telephone (916) 355-7030« Sincerely, Jame e"sser itti n Re51onal Manager cc Mr. Ron Bertram_ Department of Fish and Game Rancho Cordova, California Mr. Jerry'Mensch Department of fish and Game Rancho Cordova, California } 4� Dear Mri Evans, In response to a ;requeat received 96veiniber 7, 1991, a record search for the above cited project wa's conducted by examining the official �naps and records for archaeological E,ites %n Butte county. RESULTS PREH`,T_STMTC. ,'S'ESOURCE3_ Our records indicate the'rjS are no prevl i'ously recorded s iteg of this type located within the project boundaries. Rowev'er, twenty sites of this type have bee)a recorded ithih a one ;mile radius, of the project area. Thtase si, ss include bedrock milling stations, habitation locales (villages and {: campsa:t:ps) some containpithouses, and lithic bcne 'and shell scatt,_ �rs . TWO Of the vil,1 ge sites also contain dance Yibus,ee: HTSTO'Ric RESoURcE(5: our records indicate that there ares no sites of thii", type recorded within the prajc!ct boundaries, HoOever, on6 of the .prehistoric occupation sites nientioi ed above t CA,-BttT-4t.90 also contains A, historic component co.hsisting of a historic barn., y 0808,quad y p �dic�ates a, Berry Creek School, a n �dditiona4ll the L7aoa ' uad hia ' in Sedtion 32, a Jameson Ran�.h In Sectiov 4, and a Schae�:er Ranch in Rection 8; These sites may contain unrecorded historic cultUtal resbutces Aedords show that they Berry Creek School was stab lishoo in 1.909 A18o,, there was hi'�storic mining activity+ near the project area at B-idwells Bar..Bid�')ells ,Bar on the Trask :map of 11591 .is 'Spel'led Bedwells = camp started by L76hn 811dW0.11 in ,,.. . 1.848 at this loda -lbb developed into A mini:ng tawh and the Early I d � 9UTTE SE%dffofta Department ofAnthtopology �..�rSy.IOQICa) (� j' �QU GLENN LASSEN SiSKIYOU SUTTER Galifom(a State Unlversi Chlor FYI �. UIS .E;iMyG'ntQry j MOOOQ TEHAMA Icy, G,1,15929 PUMAS TRiNrrr J946) 898-6256 SHASTA 1 I November 25, 1991 mr.: Michael Gi. Evans r 1 Nice Place +O.rcville, C.A. 95966 RE 'p AP14 0611 480-014/'Plt=E; T20N, R5E, Sections 5,6,' USES Big Bend Mtn. 15' Vad 152 acres (Butt- Count)k) Dear Mri Evans, In response to a ;requeat received 96veiniber 7, 1991, a record search for the above cited project wa's conducted by examining the official �naps and records for archaeological E,ites %n Butte county. RESULTS PREH`,T_STMTC. ,'S'ESOURCE3_ Our records indicate the'rjS are no prevl i'ously recorded s iteg of this type located within the project boundaries. Rowev'er, twenty sites of this type have bee)a recorded ithih a one ;mile radius, of the project area. Thtase si, ss include bedrock milling stations, habitation locales (villages and {: campsa:t:ps) some containpithouses, and lithic bcne 'and shell scatt,_ �rs . TWO Of the vil,1 ge sites also contain dance Yibus,ee: HTSTO'Ric RESoURcE(5: our records indicate that there ares no sites of thii", type recorded within the prajc!ct boundaries, HoOever, on6 of the .prehistoric occupation sites nientioi ed above t CA,-BttT-4t.90 also contains A, historic component co.hsisting of a historic barn., y 0808,quad y p �dic�ates a, Berry Creek School, a n �dditiona4ll the L7aoa ' uad hia ' in Sedtion 32, a Jameson Ran�.h In Sectiov 4, and a Schae�:er Ranch in Rection 8; These sites may contain unrecorded historic cultUtal resbutces Aedords show that they Berry Creek School was stab lishoo in 1.909 A18o,, there was hi'�storic mining activity+ near the project area at B-idwells Bar..Bid�')ells ,Bar on the Trask :map of 11591 .is 'Spel'led Bedwells = camp started by L76hn 811dW0.11 in ,,.. . 1.848 at this loda -lbb developed into A mini:ng tawh and the Early county seat. The post office was established for the town in 3.85.3:. ,.)REVIOU.8 ARCTiIMOLOGICAI. INVESTIGATIONS_ According to our records, no portion of' the project area has been previously surveyed Por cultural resources The closest surveys of this type have been recorded immediately west of the project location (I. C. File # B--L- 1,16 and B-L-173), and immediately south of the project are (1... C Tile # 231) Report 116 contains the results of ,Ja'mes P. Ma.nning's 1,980 archaeological reconnaissance of approximately 160 acres of sand owned by Corey Wright and Gordon Rublel. No ctrch,aeolog'i.cal or historical sites we're obser+'ed during the inspection of -the property'. in 1983. James P. Mann;Lng conducted a 77 acre a,rch.aeol.ogical survey of the Sheldon property, (Report In a.4itio.rek�istoric�vvi7�la �e recorded recorded vvillage.pit;e:, one p y prehist r other r g ed qhs well as an area containing five bedrock mortars. 210 significant histotic materials or f eatuxes were recorded, although the site of a historic: cabin was Located (late 193'0's or 1940's) . James P. Manning and Tim, thy Chew, conducted an archaeologidal reconnaissance of �,�8, acres of land owned by DoneldaFosdick in 1981. (Report z)31.) ind.icatiobs of logging and gold mining act lkrities were observed the remains of two wooden structures. The Materials found 311.1.r1 association with these two structures Indicates that they were .occupied sometime after 1930, but they were not formally recorded. In addition to the historic cultural resources encountered, one prehistoric site containing bedrock mortars was also noted and it was recorded at this ta;'m,e LITERATt37, 3 SENRCH Reviewed were the offi.ci,al rer ores and maps for archarological sites and survey, in But•.te County. also reviet4td were; the National Register of Historic Places, the California - Inventrory Of' Historic Resourbez (1§76), California ornia Hi:stori,cal Landmarks (1990) California Points of Historic lht:erest,, A Century of California Post Offices (3.955) , ;A Collec:tiot Of PltacEas in lButtd County, Cctl ILebrni a (1917) and Historic Spots in. Califor,0 a (106'6) RECQMMrNDA1StTONS : Based upon the, above information and the local topogr,a,phy, the sensitivity oi` the project an,a is estimated to be extremialy high for prehistoric, and moderate t6i high for historic cultu. Al resources. In View o ` these findings,:Mwq rgd1ommend that a.prdJNy8sional archaeoldgist conduct an archaeolo,i al survey of the,.entire ., rotiect area prior_to any { p project operations. The professional archaeologist will be able to 'locate and assess any cultural regbUSrces 'which may be present within project boundaries, T1s wel�L ac suggest appropriate mitigation measures for those resoUtd)tb. �,dditional.ly, the local `Native Aterican group should be doi�tactix'e:�ourc�e td ke—yarding ` the possible exa.sttynce ;of unrecorded etftnographic, sites which tay be located 'With, in project boundaries. Out' records indicate that the closest Native ikttri,can group let the - ll II f' „r ,r CULTURAL RESOURCE SPECIALTIES Archaeological I (entory Survey Jant,rry 19, 102 Michael Pierce TPM;APN 61-,.450-014. T2'ON, 'Mo Portions of Secti.ons 5 and 6. USES Orovi3l.e Dam 7,5' Quadrangle, 1970. INTRGDucTION This report details the result.' of the record search and archaeological inventory survey of approximately 152 acres of .land owned by Mr. Mit#aOl Fierce. This property is located along and east of the Ornville—Quincy Higl way 2?j njiles north of the Canyon Creek Bridge over Lake Oroville. Etc na Gra,nd+e 1Zb,'-d, (Ponderosa Way)> extends into the tenter of the parcel, Tp .s� otA, of varying ,he proposal is to s liL the parcel, into several 1 acreages ;c:reating indiVIdual lots of irtegular shape. The project nrea is verY' brushy and is bisected by two small: creeks. A review of the Quad map prJo'r 1-ry cOnducti1ig'the field Werk indicated that this area may co tal.h, tdlltur�il material a, ong the t:reeks as Well as on ttie level. .a.t ea5 of 'the 'ridge top'.1. r -77-77j According to the various California and Federal Environmental Acts, Rules and Regulations, this :level of development cc,+nsti,tute's an u-ndertaking which could adversely impact the- hecultural culturalresources 'which might be located within the sub jecl; area. Evaluation of the project's effect on such resources 141 required pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic: Preservation Act and. its implementing regulations (36 CFR Part 800, Section 2 (b) of Executive Order 11593 Section 101 (b), of the National Environmental P'olicy' Act, and the Archaeological Resources 'Protection Act. For this project, these regulations translate in.',o the following archaeological study objectives, Undertake an inventory and evaluate the National Register of Historic Places eligibility status of properties which may be directly or indirectly, affected by this proposed development. 'These objectives in turn, require completing the following tasks whichatediscussed and analyzed in detail behove"s ' 1. A record search to determine �.f any p reviously recorded sites exist withiin the project areal 2. A pedestrian field survey of the property iti order to identify, record and eva.luate'previously unidentified resourcesy icA 3. Preparation. of a report which identifies the project's effect and recommends apP p ro ri.ate mitigation measures for an si na.i;icant sites identii:x.ed within the :area of potbn tial y g impact. (Jensayn 1991) The rethainder of 0M tlapbrt details i~he resin; s of the record search aridarchaeological field irive%ntorY survOy, ;provides a professional assessment of tt�e cultural resources which might 2 be affected by the proposed undertaking, and proposes apprupriate mitigation meas4res, where required, All .Meld work procedures have followed the guidelines provided by the State Historic Preservation Office and are in 1:onformity with accepted professional standards,: LOCATION The Michael Pierce project area encompasses an area of 152 acres located approximately 1.5 miles northeast of Orovi.11e,Califoraia, just east of the North Fork Arm of ,Lake Oroville and borde#,ed by the Oro--Quincy Highway. The parcel is situated in the northern 1/2 of the southeastern 1/-4 of Section 6 and ,:he southern 1/2 of the southern 1/2 of the northwestern 1./4 of Section 5; T209, R5E, USOS Oroville Dam quad, 7.5'. This area of the foothills of the Sierra Nevada moulttains. has been suojected to extensive impacts resUl.'iig from early historic and subsequent 20th Century mining,,, farming and cemmerce activity. Overall, and based upon a review of existing topographic and other maps* the project area appears to ,e one of extremely high sensitivity in respect to prehistoric. resourres and high for historic resources. RECOA'D8 StARC Prior to Gond uctxn the field survey 1rork, the archaeological records maintained by° the Northeast tnformation Center at CSU-,rhico were ekamined for any exal§lung recorded prehistoric or historic sites within or 3mmddi,a.tely adjacent to the projOct area, The .records ;indicate that there tire no previously recorded hi.stotic or prehistoric resources on the Pierce 'property. 3 ;1 STlaTF; OF .CfiLIrORN]A DISPARTMEW OF WA i UP WOURCES " 1763 Ut NW r7u 1CY 46 r� l5 f:_ 273r,' ,C33 (nrrry G2 K rar,lrsll cr2r r:h MI. 25 183E .w �•�? ; e �. y•ijr�1.� --f r >� ' r�'��r/r_ 1� • k. l ! j J � l� �'��.��,.•��" � �� �Y')1, 1 ll�� (,,. f, •� VV� t" ' �. {? q% U.�, ' !' I `4 J,'V i� ,fit'"" %� "f dr+:. �7(�i, 0 A�1 �krotllor ✓ t�c�I 1 • ,4r���Alt\r� It' ,�`a 1 �,•t��1 i1.t1�y111r' �,r w�i/ .:� ��t4'Tt }r 4 ;�tl.+.. +% }f � �� � �r d �' I i,f\ � :l",I ����� + l � tt{ I� J � \✓ � / >" �d' ".t✓�,<a ��.t %li\.' I I' ex.- - iq � ,��• J� rj���1�,A_,, � � � � t �� fr.1 yr, (vN�� �d�tit A1 265oil, i r i r 49f Qp;q Aa' t J �" a.•u. ;p v, �« ', �!� y , Mlrr a ^r .fi`V t(+,a ,. .»,1*t' ' !U?9 R �. `tfjYJ w V �� 1 /{tV '�� / ��n td �) 7�l r�l;p� r• C, t r'fi ...All s+',h{i}vim"l��l's Yj' p� A 'C t Ct r ..4•°' 1r 'D; r'��''��. � A�✓ �1•\�1�'��/��'k\t\.�•' `� " �t ' �(1'n.51 / 1.�^ '�\,t, �'"^;S �1t'�� I�i r� �A� �A +.^,,^ �.� ��`W�„�r,a rt,` � ..f. . • :� MICHAEL PIERCE PROJECT ,:',�,:, 1' . .a.°��'✓ >Y °. �pp. ...I �� �,.. /141.9 "-. - k ! f r � 111 LOCATION HAP t�4►�n INS;� w „.,.est l'i//, , ►/r, �r b`' . ✓��,ams�fir 1���1� �y�' . It� t°uit/.r.r.: �'+ f lt» 1. i w/• / `%ia�eltit + )t�ty`1 t.tlrtl)� QU!'1 t.1 Lam'» �t,n�c�•-OROVILLE DMA I7RlN ( >�Xf CO ,t f tr 1 site "s'✓ !r " " CALM=ORNI'AM- BU'r qi ►� jl E5 TOPOORAPHIC) r(� IV�'INU1"G �Efl ( t y� r{ a Sw>4 1310b NU Ih7Nr 16' UAURAt CLU: rr >t,•b� ��. rL� �y »t'�i`�,) t/ 11 1 .a .'7i� a I � �'r� � 1 l •., �j{ Yl} �JYtI "/,.1`N JGv ,tt r; C l +rx1 y 1tit) if �1 %{ �`Hnp 1' t i a n , r` i •1' �� ( %r / a .t !� v�+`)0:`:� ',j ,t1t i, )t'lt, �lr` 'f l4� !rt him ` •, , ^" f' tl' : Itr f t `. ! nj ,l/J11 ( r' , rJ` r I� (1 ��y x><� � 1��,'1 r�rl y �"� 'j¢t+ m�� t f � dt+t' 9K.3 �� R e� • p ' l r ,it'i e t j..,:s » �� �i/r% o �. t�, i..tblFTA :.rbn" too �. fid' J(¢ . I tis itlf Ny e ' f+f� 1t/1 ff' ✓, '� *ii)!jj^? � ��'� '�� :. �1�, { t°"yirti:1 Y' `'4� il,l §At �fl' klf'/ rte` ✓ "J,11 �)lr fi'!/)L�J�h i 6 �: "r � �, • YI i,� �+ �I ` u.At•�,� .� .. 1 j'u.�>« � rV» dRi v �„ A �.. 1.74'.. t } F� 05� a �, N e` r^ J✓ ail �` t r' 4� rw) r �. J rrc Mbun » C �.1 p l Fitt feel u C al/li �., ✓�`." ,�;`}�fl (� W "i=J t f n r r! a i�"�� r � •Yt.s A' � YN'fi � '�' � mj � r �rSL, t, � ie it `t 1 ,r` e� � r +v '� ti j r'4�".,';::,..�✓��'�,s�r°»'�1�' �r r F r' "��vr��v'. `�"'4`'";;:i • 1 i'S. kk �:',. �• e:i r���1'.�_ tr7.,, + �, I, J��1 .-• A»;.M1y, y4- y �'..•�'4+.✓ Y � f � ' • � K 1 1 � !< M. r 1 � ,+ A j.1 ti f �X �✓� r�,�'y t � �� rj/r,rGtXf rr, ` 11 ,! �+pe >.� 43j,✓ »r� : ry .r� Pik M M.a.�✓"✓ A� -. yr ,.t ! r IF,i1 . 1�tl1,Y t •. +, + ili.l i'r -'.1� ' 111/I ��r�'i°;'l.! \,1"-got -b,l y�- +t... . . X t A v 7 1wY r tt »_tiy� ✓, k�.4`y` - ' r E rfy.. % ,' iIr s>.. ..,}ft a{.,,. ,,yy�l `�'' t..«� ' t� r' :• 4 -r r\l\ } • jr. �'c 1";. .,per �>�, U � :t� ` :t ; ` � .' f_.l lli1V�,/'. � ! ."yam, ra.� �f'a f "%„i 3a >f t t� ` ���` � � u J� -r" /4q `� �� ,.,�� a� 1rr 7 r �>++tttuww+rW..✓✓.✓✓ ��I' 1 +.� �..»`�� " �' { I�t fi F •f ��"�t ,1 Y ,Iter mY,^� r '1 l r r 'r t �°. "�Vi,� �, �� +\ y,.4 r r, S ,,. e�M�_o � MUS a / l c:�° a • .. "e .. t .v. o / � Irl r ��a' r �� Coto, » a i. Previous survey. No para of this project- has been formally examined .for cultural. resources. 2 Recorded sites. The records indicate that twenty-one sites recorded within a one mile radius of the property. These sites include milling stations, habitation -qites, lithic and shell scattexs.. One Historic component is present tin one of the above prehistaric sates. 3# Nearby surveys. Two surveys were completed in the 1580's of nearby parcels. These surveys recorded three prehistoric sites. (l . C. File Vs B -L-116 and B -L-173 ) PROJECT CONTEXT Several types of information were considered relevant to evaluating '?,ze types of sites and site distribution which might bee encountered within the project area. The information: evaluated prior to conducting field work include<s data on regional prehistory, ethnography, and early, 'historic -era developments in the region. � Prehistory Available ethnographic records do not reveal specific ethnographic vil,lagao or sires within this Project area. The entire project liCs within the area once occupied by the Konkow branch of the Maidu, a Peiutia.ri spealcin°g people who together with the Southern Maidu and the Mountain Maida octup;ed large areas of the ,interior of California. (Riddell, 1.978) The Maiduan peoples were probably not the earliest inhabitants of this areal They are believed by some researchers to have entered California from the north sometime around 500 AA. Before this time the area may have been occupied by a Hokan speaking people. (Kowta 1988:190) Xn preh btoriL Mmes the Konkow were peoples who subsisted by i 5 hunting and gathering,. Many of the 'plan,t;� and animals utilized by the K,onkow had multiple uses, serving as food,, material and religious needs.. Roots, stems, leaves and seeds of plants were used as food, for basketry, and medicine. Buckeye and acorns were the primary plant staple. Many small animals were hunted or trapped. Fish were taken with netts, weirs, harpoons, hooks and poison. Insects such -):s grasshoppers, crickets and ants were used as food.. (Riddell 1978:373-375). The location of village sites varied with the topography. In the foothills, permanent settlements were generally on ridges that 'separated streams or c.reek.s, on crests, knolls and terrace., or pal t -way down the canyon on :small flats. (D_ W.on 1905:175; Kroeber 1925:395). Sometime after 800 AD the use of the rockshelters, found in the volcanic Tuscan formation in this area, intensified. Many bone awls for the use in basketry are found from this time period, The bow and arrow was probably introduced into this era. g p .. y � area Burin th�.s o -d. This is evidenced b the many small, projectile points of the corner notched and stemmed variety �, rad '�Ltc°ut:k; wor'tar ,vcre use., to ��bcess .. �r,un.d ;�.n :tlz,: :�r , food (acorn and Buckeye).' Many of the rocksh:elters have multiple mortar pits in the floors. Archaeological Backgrotund Several milesnorth of the project area;, the Messilla Valley is of importance, _chronology for the archaeological sitesrepresenting the Oroville Locality is based or excav,*tioh. and analysis of sites encountered with the relocation or the Western Pacific Railroad: This chronology is comprised of four 8&gaential complexes predating the historic period; the Messilla,Bidwell„ Sweetwater and Oro'ville Complexes. (Kowta 1988; Olson and RidAell 1963; Ritter 1970) 6 r, 4 I� Messilla `Gom .rlex Dating prior to 1000 BC, the Messilla Complex is characterized by leaf shaped, stemmed and side notchl.d points. These points are large and were most likely used with a spear thrower than as arrow points. There may have ,been seasonal villages and locations such as rockshelters utilized at different times of tho year.. The people of the Messilla Complex were most likely very familiar with the property which is in the present survey area. Linguistically;the people of the Messilla Complex were mast likely speaks+rs of a Hokan dialect, related to other people., of the millingstone cultures of the northstate. Bidwell Couiplex Sometime between 1 AD and 800 AD there was a change in food processing implements. A shift fro►i the use of the man,o/metate to the mortar and pestle occurred. Many bora- awls for +.fie ir basketry pa:odij- �.on ~re found from this time period. There wAs r'a uai,rt_from hatdL rle,ed gathering/hunting; to- ae�otftg buckeye/hunting. Stab and ,bedrock mortars ,.Cara into use. (Ritter Sweetwater Complsx The Sweetwater. Compiex is' marked by a dramatic population increase in Ott study area. Although the people were still hilnters and gathorers, they utilized a. wide range of picnt and animal resources. of the plant resources) the acorn was the most doeinant The use of rockshelters and caves intensified during this period. The Sweetwater Complex is characterized by the use of very small projectile points and use of bedrock; w mortars. The Maidu most likely intruded into this area`at this time, forcing the, earlier Hbkan speaking peoples to the fringe ar1'as of the valley and coast range i i Oroville Complex .°' The last group of people to occupy the area of our study are theresent da branch o� p y the Maidu, the Konkow. They represent the Oroville Complex, 1600 AD to 185.0. The acorn was still the dominant food resource. The projectile points were small arrow points. Slab and, bedrock mortars were in use. Rva_rine resources were utilized, fish , clams and mussels were eaten. Deer was the largest game attimal taken, Population reached its highest point ,just before White contact in 1830. (Furry .1990) In summary, the examination of the ethnographic and archaeological in£ormat.ion in the area of the proposed _project indicates tha possibility of encountering the following types o prehistoric cultural resources:, 1. Occupation sites with or without housep-ts along the banks of drainages, 2. , 8urEace finds (isolates) of basalt or obsidian ,flakes and. artifacts. 3 Food processing stationdI , which would include bedrock mortars and single mortar pits in boulders. HISTORICAL BAC OROUN1 Pre Gold Rush This was a pat=iod of explord.tion, 'fur trapping and early settlement in the north valley. The immediate impact of these early contect.s was the decimation of the native population t"hrouglt the introduction of diseases; 8' The earliest documented exploration OE the foothill arn:a of Butte County was by Captain. Luis Arguello in 1820: For the next two decades the trappers of the Hudson s. Bay Company and the American Fur Company were trapping in the area. (Wells and (,"ambers 1973:128). Trappers from Oregon in 1833, spreading malaria, decimated much of the indgeiiotts population. As many as 759 of the native population may have died. (Cook 1952:322)_. During the period of Mexican rule in 'California several persons received land grants its what is now Butte County. These land grants included the Farwell 'Grant and the Arroyo del Chico Grant, later to become 13zd weW s Rancho Chico, and Samuel Neal's Esquon Grant, For the most part these large grants were used to raise rattle. Samuel Neal is reported to be the first to raise cattle in northern California. (McGie 1982,35-37) Aftex the discovery of geld in 1$48, the influx of people to California; changed the slibsequont history of the region. The following decddc.,G, are mai, =ked by Indian removali gold mining, agriculture and commerce,, By the early 1.8.50's the town of Oroville was a thriving minin S g center, iRgCORD;1t1O 8TkAT901 ANb FIELD VOMC if dreh:aeological resources are encountero'd, their location world be plotted onto 'a USES topographic map Any isolate or feature would be assigned a temporary field number. Sites Mould be retirded on the appropriate SRPO record fortt.8. For recorded sites, the environmental setting Mould be described in terms 9 of the local geology, landform, slope, soils,, and vegetation Measurements of all gill tural resources will be in metric units. For recorded site -s, documentation wil` include sketch maps and compass bearings to important locations, Fieldwork The fieltA ork portion of this survey was undertaken by John Furry of Cultural Resource Specialties on ,January 144 through .January 16, 1992. All of the project area was subjected to an intensive pedestrian ,L,a-'!d survey, which was achieved by walking y a non -s si-emat�c transeot�.� ��• 4p aced at 20 tne.ter 1nh,.ryals. Vegetation was dominated by an oak woodland, dense manzanita,grasse.s and clusters of brush, and scattered pines. The pro,Ject area is bisected by many trails and u,'nimproved dirt roads. PROJE IT FINDINGS ]luring the co'Utse of this survey, no prehiotorical of to ;storic cultural resources were encountered. All areas of the ,Id,ge tops acid creeks as well as the rock outcrops were intensively' examined. 9ECOMMSNDATIONS AND MITIGATIONS in view of the negative findings of this archaeological inventory survey; it is recommended that archaeological clearance be r granted to all areas of this proposed project., Should in the event during the development of these parcels 10 Furry, ,John 1990 Archaeological Reconnaissance of Approximately 'Six Sections of the. Blakeley/Swartz Property. Butte College. Jensen, Peter :199`1 Archaeological. Inventory Survey of the Proposed Happ Su:bdivi.sion. Chico] California. Kowta, .Makota - 1988 The Archaeology and prehistory of Plumas and Butte Counties, California;An Introduction and Interpretive ModelAortheast Information Center, CSU.,Chiro;' Kroeber, Alfred 192:5 Handbook of the Indians, of California,. Bureau of American .Ethnology Bulletin 7�8;'' Smithsonian Ins. Washington, D.C. XcOie, Joseph 1982 History of Butte County (2 vols.) Revised edition, Butte County Board of Education, O %ovilld it r - ti it l' REFERENCES CITED Dixon, ,Roland B. 1905 The Northern Maidu. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History. 17 (3)c 119-346. New York. Farris, and Clarence Smith. 1882 The History of Plumas, Lassen and Siera Counties, { California. Reprinted 1971,.Howell-North Books, Berke` t;,?. Furry, ,John 1990 Archaeological Reconnaissance of Approximately 'Six Sections of the. Blakeley/Swartz Property. Butte College. Jensen, Peter :199`1 Archaeological. Inventory Survey of the Proposed Happ Su:bdivi.sion. Chico] California. Kowta, .Makota - 1988 The Archaeology and prehistory of Plumas and Butte Counties, California;An Introduction and Interpretive ModelAortheast Information Center, CSU.,Chiro;' Kroeber, Alfred 192:5 Handbook of the Indians, of California,. Bureau of American .Ethnology Bulletin 7�8;'' Smithsonian Ins. Washington, D.C. XcOie, Joseph 1982 History of Butte County (2 vols.) Revised edition, Butte County Board of Education, O %ovilld it i1� r, ?i4 k.,yR 6i. 147"T -Y nl i w r RARE PLANT SURVEY FOR MI;.CHAEL PIERCE; INVOICE' Consulting fee associated with the survey for threatened., rare or endangered vascular planta conducted on March 21 1.992 for Michael Pierce on ;property located oil a portion of thenorthwestquarter of Section 5 and a portion of the easthalf of Section 6, 'T20N, R5E, Oroville'Dam' Ouadrangle, U.S_.G.S. Topographical Map. t - 1`0 hours at s20iOO ;per hour: AMOU14T DUE . . . ,. s2Ci0.00 Mary L'. Bailey y Mary L. Bailey,' Field t30tan st 0807 Vilest branch Lane " OrovI11e, C.A. 95965 (916) 891-,4103 u p' 1 I, d t �:har ��I•wb�:N. F:a,re tlnt- :il7r,v,eY.. SURVr,`.'' FOR THREATENED,'.r' `sEOP -ENDANGERED SPECIES CF 'VASCULAR 'PLANTS C0NDt;CTEDY`MAr.C`.h �4—L ,, 912' o""! APPRoximnTE"L'L 152 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, OWNED BY MILCH'EL PIERCE LCCATED IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 5 AMD A PORT-10M OF THE EAST HALF OF SECTION 6, T20N, R5E, U . S . G . S MAP', OP,OV ILLE DAM OUADRANGLE Project begicriction The proposed pco„ ect is a al v i s ori of the propec ty I .n tc 20 to 45 acre parcels. A brush management program. is be9.:,c considered by the owner. In which a considerable portion O the dense shrub growl-h would be Cleared In order to reduce w'1 l rn l re a a n 5 e r as arie I a 1.0 , :`PC0ve w 1 l dl e ri, 01 ta4 Z1CCeSS %l3 t:l'1e ..,..`� S,'. t;., _s m`in't �x L_ 1^x"1 C Cra"'7'M;E' Poad (o t:hee�4 i so Known as. Ponce�fosa W'=y on U . S G . S opogr�,-psi C ;1 Maps) . port ion o. tine site may b,� accessed directly fi"cm Oro-Oulncy Rlghy.ky. Sabi tats r,Sb:tat, :alta r". SOme are as c..je-e 'row pine habit »-; Maii'Iv 1r,' h-A am . acu ti t. i ng Oro-Cid ::ZC+ 1cent.%iiciatiol of plant Specwes was poro.crmeo 4i'sIr..g reproductive or Vegetat i Je s't-ructut ea, Ms we l I, =., u I n some A n-sl an:C.es 'the dried iet`.t, C`£? x � i� i�:�. �,�: i ^�� 5 ir= hgh ptp-,dI ous x Crl i:qac r>z^'.parr :. ' as a S 1''u. ,t ural . V milt<ed chaparral is ch.arac..eri.,o� homogeneous brushland vegetat:raft octilinated by shrubs with evergreen, l eav"t's. Cew4n coater Can 80"-, i t r= Ica, i „` 'a etenSe i iIf I rw ;r i;npene -abI t; SFS t t' F.' y alr`trlt!tl l s at i n t considetable leaf lit;t:er Intl st�tding aeld Materi.�LY. Wood" sPocios identIf'IFid dutlmg the z—uvveo inrtlude wh;tolea ..,...�- martZan i to 1: uUuk bruNh , troyinim car, yon �coak 1 mor Ior 1 i ve Mak i black oalw, coffeeberry, California bay, and others: Herbaceous species Identified during the survey include wood rush, grass nuts, soap plant, ryegrass, dogtall grass, squirreltall grass; Shooting star, bird's beak, bedstraw, fawn Illy, blackberry, hound's tongue, clover, buttercup, purple saolcle, gumplant, and others. Yellow Pin a Forest This habitat Is characterized as having at least 500 of the canopy cover being from yellow Cor Ponderosa.) pine. The only area ow actual yellow pine habitat occurs on the 'slopes adjoining ;Oro-aulncy Highway. Elsewhere on the site, the habi`at is presented as more of a Mixed Chaparral -yellow Pine ecoto e. Woody species identified during the sure ey include ye l : ow piste, dougl as f l r, m, -,drone,' canyon oak, incense ceo:ar, black oak, squaw carpet and others. Herbaceous species identified during the survey include peren�-t i m 'fiescue grass, ,white-s:ermed Yy asfara;,: sweet pe-) creeping sncwberry, Bol ander-'s *wyethla, Cali ornia Strawberry, Ind an paintbrush, Zntilan warrior, a ure pentstamon,. and others =n areas that are 'either Sr' or of Iow qua:1ty, p=ne regeneration may depend upon distutDance a:ld �Jf chaparral, G good pine seed crop, and favorable weather, The project area may be able to support yellow pine rather than chaparral with proper br,4sh managemen ,t Ev I tier t 1 y) the area has ctis orlc.all':r supportectyeilow pine hcabita't prior 'to logging ,and rjther human -related activ'itles,. Where chaparrai brush, is completely removed it May be p,-8slble to rOInstate a yellow pine type habitat within approximately 10 years., Per° i odi c ;;round fires or we l l -managed brush clearance proj2rams can encourage the dvveicpmonz of a habitat more aptly suited to wildlife, especial l._.+ for deer during' migration. /f oo ' Thtra�t�ttpr.J !are rac' ��rld�noerpd � _+�� i �� Several species of sensitive plants presently included on federal, state or Cal lforr is Nattve plank, Society l fists of such plants commonly populate the represented habitats. These plant species include Arctostaphulos `ruel, or, True's ` manzanita, Fritillgria eastaaoodlae, or, Butte fritillary, and C arkla mildred ae, or, Mildred- s dlarklai Possible plant species which may be present In the relpresented habitats include AsteaaA_lu9 PauPprc1J'WS, or pa;Ulper locoweed, Calvcadenta opOosltifolla, or Butte caly.cadenia, and Mimulus al_a.uce:scens, or sh i e t d-brarted mon!.;ey I� l owe. No threatened; rare or, er.da ngered plant, species were located on the project site during the course of this survey. Mitigation As no species of threatened, rare or endangered plant species were loLateCr j0 s:nsi.-:tJ. e plant %-= t.igay1ors need be - The proposed c-�-LoC+. iwCl7i the wale on the pro,:ect si `.,e is consi der e«'#:+ adewuatr. Brsjsh , lel atrLL crerpfj.t ;'here is a prOsosct brush :-anarretnent p'. ,for sie; in which :b4 the chaparral Would by cleMtrec, f i re ML= rd � � w �,.; ',ex 1 �� p: 3t+:�:7 ':aim �� 1 ... ... or t+; C: t f .ager ThI.. .sf,3u,wh �---c'A.ngt S'.op0-S on t1"ir: sc'u".``1F.t p o" w ! tw <M of. +. h e p'C o„1 e o t S1 t-4 n d.. a s e vegoraz with a higher fretlooncy bf is w rior live oars, h.s aLea should be consldoroo for reduced brush clearance. ":he few areas of ;Fellow pine habitat existing aFon rc-Ca irc4r Highway should probably receive minimal bvij:t A y sr,, there are same 1 arrier trees, inost notably b aces Oa' s, I n the vidl_nity of the drainage Swale in the hOrthwes4 seit i on of the project 81 to , wh l rh shcW d evt alr,. i in any pragram at biruoh clearance. Maveral Pvs,:Oaut ons should be considered.. Primary among these precautions Is to try to reduce soil erosion pOtential Some amount of debris should be left on the soil surfacep, too thorough of a cleanup of the crushed and broken vegetation will le,=ve ' I insufficient; debris to disslpate rainfall energy, to give eroslol protection, or to recycle nutrients back into the soil from plant materials. By not clearing the brush down I.o the soli surface; there will be rpcduced removal of roots and coat cl=owns resulting in 'numerous resp outs. This Would necessitate r"eclearing of the brush at perio-11a int.:rvals. The equipment used for brush clearance may i ncr•ease erosion patential by compacting the soil and reducing inflltratlon of rainfall, and by 1sturbing the soil sur'fac►> unnecessar4l 'girosion channels may be created by operating the erau Anent parallel to the slope: 3sage of the straight blade on the bul ldoter Cart contribute ;.o soil e-oslloa on steep 51 Upes, as th l,s type oaf b i ad e generally to i l l cause more so i . disturbance: If possible use of a Crush raKe inswead of a stra>gh't blade should rye consirtered. Removal of the ;brush shoula oe performed at 3; t:rte of veMr when the sol I is dry, enough to easily f.al x away f_cn any remove: roots. S f c l eara,-ice is none at a "'Imo t, hen the soil is apt `o adhere to the uprooted plants, suoseguent • = .- plete, take longer, Aand burning of brush piles �X 4 1 l b� e n..om have an incleased possibility of 'sn'6 dering emoers, �u,rnir�a of the brush should be w i thhei is until that time of yesr our ing which the possibility gar i,ri l ref ire 18 reduceCj, ;rr;t t : such titre as this Is po8s91ol,e, tlhe brush c- n b`' pushed piles or windrOWs, creati.n z a wl ldl ife refi',,CJ.'e. y� ,� r w ,r � , 4� � 1 •.� der j5 All, PLANT LIST p ?^ r={ i ` a, tit�� fcc»`.c-c, rnge1 Ira, ma rove e-.ctr�= � hvlr� tri elri Whltpleaf manzAnita g 7.Ltt,_t?:[tt"13^ gec urrens incense cedar -Ca"{aCnr,>rt J5 �-ibja Vlobe MY. 'lhdi an paintbrush c: _P rt�tt�1E tJs Bu.ok brush eana 1atJ3 i Amon i 1 Lemnon's ce'anothuti .Ce nog hus aros::r_att�s Squaw carpet vCerci!j canadenalvaC+ [?1^tn5,cLIata Western rebbud Ch l ansa "tJrn ar�rt'p� I tai ll ,9 :soap plan ,, 'weep L"n4a ' SSta1 1 f'r nr r! 8oufto's tongue -'nosuriis edh i nli'lls Dogt a l l alrass s:r t7'=r r•c tC� eUT2:,,Gw;"� st`wL' �'�+.TTs'ttJC C�ASJCSJ� i'rf?S`Pr"yi ryE'Cj-r�$� »clooh !v Tim linrt.t.,m, Eycs . r��''.E'.r� t � � c u� �v:�r'c ; �� SuD~ � or.� eL ' l t` Q � scs 1 ``. ettrr mu � i anopslni ' Fawn 1 l ;� Vpsc SS ca, i- or, n1c la k4 i irJ( n1, L s. E aWberr �'•� J r. �":•�_ b i c.: iJ t L:Jr. ssp . n i t.l.a^.. » ;bs ` '^. Big . ^ Y,s?�C'ru Ge CUTilp !1 Toyon {"Jnt?r l riJfi oPrf�Jr'ix:IJlft l amatn geed ^ls rtat'rosi rh ,w Ground le'ls r Art`Ctx S"�3, r Sweet pea m1' ! c ttt 4i t r i cul a tum Common l o,nat l um ,ott, ttbnlnnatiis Lotus e;~ti l.a- rornrssa v a , r-su b 8 0�8 i 1 Lt Wood rush, r.r t: Cal itarmia Mel is Pr;,cularas dPnsirtcc�a Indian x.,sarrlor pQ ctP ren a asreus n 1Yt_ Avure penstemon _:, -�P- on heterach0_11_12 Purciy's penslemon I ah yar�nrOr._vI1lr�sum Oak: mistletoe Ijs Yellow p ne p�c.�u;s Sabi n i a:na Grey pine :r.raracanm;- t r 1n u l er I s var. sPmlpa "dA cllverback fern _' fit.<rr�r�ramrr:� tr4�nouarls var. triangularls Galdback fern ag erecta Hooker's Plantain l�ncealata Engi14,1 plan a.ln _plcio Ps0- jdn`suas�mPRa T esl.: Dcugl as fir Oue c u s chr vsoi eS r, r,nL ��srsleci r Can7on oak tiy��e c s ,� 1 ar-ak_. Black; oak Oue�wlsl'Tent' interiorliveoak "5p. Bu4tercup r k,� ssp . z amen) har-, nus Croke _t ssp . Ll I C, 1.:.�c: l i.a ,yu aan zsl b1 1.n r;.L:da Purple rani-Fa S,� •.':r cr=,;SSlr,:acs1.S w flaclflc san,cle ? t Dior .�tZo�t. Sdulcrei tal l grass �rrErn�r~cir.arros eycutus CLeepin� snc�w:�errr r^o I san ae.k:: srs C,Iove S nuts ,. •.. I ca irlver.l�la hoianderl, tol ander s w Ijethl Pit �. F'EB 18 192 10' 10 REGION � & Qoa2•lrl brand fax tridiloatal memo 7871 r10t p�®r. tx CAGI'OlINIA--THE RESOURCES AG;Eu From ----� -• .0, Vn Z .ARTMENT F FISH AND GAME co; ��U l Colt J � F iblOt+t Deet. f. W oRi N 3 d� cj i lW us -ROAD, SUITE A. nt M rex x $A1gVj I WRPOVA, CAl1FL, '!A 95670 (,916 355-7020 4 February 18, 1992 Mr i Albert J Beck tco-Analysts i Vt" Village Lane Chico,, California 95925 Ueur Mr. Beck: The Department of Fish and Game (AFG) have studied your report of a deer survey on the Michael Pierce Tentative Parcel Map (TPM) which proposes to divide AP 61-480-14 (152 ac.) into four parcels (20t 20 25, and 45 acres) plus a remainder of 42 acres. Locate ear8Barry MCreek, the eeparcel lies within critical winter range o the The DFG recommended that an earlier version of ;he TPM be denied because it lies outside of a Designated Development Zone and proposes Parcels smaller than the 40 -acre minimum size: recommended for 'critical winter range. However', we would not object to the TPM provided that the following measixres are imposed as conditions of approval on the Final Patau. Mapt 1. adoption ofall the rec6mmendations# for critical rg i I r January 21, 1992, deer survey report. winter range 'impact m'tigation Listed in you 2. Oaks unavoidably lo6t due to site preparation should be r6,pI.aced at a '5 to 1 ratio, All other oaks should be permanently protected. 3. Those portions of the site which will be subJeated to residential use should be surveyed for the presence of acnaiti+vo plant OPOOi6a , X any u0naitivo plant are present, the populations should be protected_bY. barriers setback 50 feet from the outside cadge of the population If We can be of further�ansis tance+ please contact Mr, Ron Uetram Associate Ba.0109a.st or ` Ms Patricia Perkins, wildlife Management Superva.sor, telephone (916) 355-7010► 5incerel. ies n, Me gat itY s Regional Manager January 8, 1932 PLANNING DEPARTMENT JTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALiFORNIA 959653397 TEL -,PHONE, (916) 5384601 `Ivlr. Michael Pierce 500 Chinese Wall Road Oroville, CA 959056 SUBJECT: Status of Application for Proposed 'Tentative Parcel Map AP No, 061-480.014 Dear Mr. Pierce: The Butte County Planning Department staff has reviewed the application and accompanying information for the referenced proposal. The purpose of this notice is to advise you whether your application is complete. The following status information pertains to your application. Please call the assigned Planner named belowif there are any questions concerning your proposal or this notice. The application is complete and is being processed. Planning staff will, contact you if any clarification or additional information is needed. At a later date you will receive a letter and analysis of your project .and a notification of your scheduled hearing date. The application is incomplete; see the attached form for required I nformation to be received before the application can be processed. The, 0aiiforrtia Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) requires payment of a filing fee for all projects that result in the potential loss of fish, wildlife, or their habitat through urbani,tation and land use conversion. This filing fee is applicable to your project and will be collected by this Department on behalf of CDFG. you will be notified prior to your project's hearing date of the exact amount due. Failure to pa,; the fee will prevent your project from becoming operative, vested, or final (Public Rest.,.: rces Code Section 21089 (b) )., following items (see checked P g Iiefare your application can be considered com lE•te, the foxes) must be Prepared and submitted to the Planrun Department, lely� our project is in 'a high archaeological sensitivity. area. Contact the • ortheast information Center in the Anthropology Lab of Chico State. 1~fniver'sity. Have >,i records search performed for your project. if an Arca,.,haec?lo_. tical Survey is _ required, have it performed by a qualified. archaeologist (a list is provided). ubmi t e report to the arming Department. Stour project is in a sensitive botanical area. Contact a qualified Botardst to determine; if a Botanical Survey for rare, threatened or endangered plants should be performed. If a Botanical Survey is required, have it performed by a qualified botanist (a list is provided). Submit the report to the Planning Department. your project is in a sensitive geologic area. Contact a qualified Geologist t or Soils Engineer to have a Geologic Survey performed. Submit the report to the Planning Department. (—�� your project is in if,.t area of special biological importance. Contact the lJ Department of :Fish &Game to determine if a Wildlife Survey is required. if species of concern are present, perform a Wildlife Survey, as required, ,Submit the report too the Planning Department. Others _ L N.E. Information C Dept. Of Anthropa CSU, Chico Chico, CA 95929-0, Office 895=6297 Taranto 895-6153 a BUTTE COUN'T'Y Consultant a.st SPECIALIZED SERVICES Archaeological Consulting and Research 1. Jensen and Associates Archaeological Consulting and Research Peter M* Jensen 41 Skymountain Circle Chico, CA 95926 2. Professional Archaeological Archaeology and Cultural Resources Services Management Alfred Farber 6635 Quall Way Paradise, CA 95969 3. Holman & Associates Archaeology and Cultural Management 3615 Folsom Street San Francisco, CA 94110 4 Public Anthropological Research Cultural Resource Studies P.O. Box 160756 Sacramento, CA 95816-0756` 5: Dr; Keith Johnson Arca.aeological Consulting and Research CSUC Archaeological Research Program Dept. of Anthropology CSU, Chico Chico, CA 95929=0400 895-6193 6, Susan Lindstrom Archaeological Consulting P.O. Bo)t 3324 'Truckee, CA 95734 1. James P. Manning Archaeological Consulting c/o Eco -Analysts 1025 Viliage Lane t -L'-, ti A 6iVilit N.E. Information C Dept. Of Anthropa CSU, Chico Chico, CA 95929-0, Office 895=6297 Taranto 895-6153 FEATHER RIVER RECREATION & PARK DISTRICT' OROVILLE, CALIF6RNIA 95965 ILLE " YER5' STREET V �h¢St PHONL• s (916) 5334011 'MUNICIPAL AUDITORIUM, IMOD �i January 13,1992 tf County of Butte '%)apartment of Public Works 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA. 95965 lel;: Michael PIERCE - Tentative Parcel Map J�'r Dear Mr. Mendonsa; Th,: 'Feather River Recreation and Park District would like to express our .concern over the growing population of the Greater OroYnlle area and the affect this will have on our District. We have found that this increase in population is severly affecting our ability to provide a sufficient level of services to our constituency. This particular subdivisi )n is of a small size, being four parcels; and we feel there is an impacv wo our District from this project . We need to do something about this increasing problem before it becomes a crisis environment. We believe that this steady increase is good for the area and that we can, alleviate the impact on the District through developer fees and for the larger subdivisions, the creation of Lighting and Landscape Districts. We believe that the Planning Department should recommend to the Planning Commission and the Planning Commission should recommend to the Board of Supervisors that developer fees be established for the Feather River Recreation and Park District and the other 'special districts which are affected by this increased population growth. For the present and the Michael Pierce project, we feel that an equitable settlement should be made to the Feather River Recreation and Park District for the increase in population which this will bring: Thank you, Sincerely, Rod Weyand Secretary to the Board of Directors AW/js I DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME 17&1 4V1, US ROAD, SUITE A Y}e4B #'C7 ;,,)RDOVA,. CALIFORNIA 95670 g) 355-7020 December 31, 1991 Mr. John Mendonsa Assistant Director County of Butte Department of Public Works 7 County Center Drive Oroville, California 95965 De` ,,r Mr. Mendonsa The Department: of Fish and Game (DFG) had reviewed the Michael Pierce Tentative Parcel Map (TPM) , a proposal to divide AP61-48-1' 4 (152+ acres) into five parcels varying from 20 to 45 acres in size, located in the Berry Creek area, the TPM lies in the Bucks Mountain deer herd critical winter range. The TPM lies outside of a Designated Development Zone and in an area where 40 acres minimum parcel sizes are needed to avoid further significant losses '(caused by residential encroachment) of criti;al fainter range: No parcels of less than 40 acres should be permitted in this location except where the parcel to be created is bounded by an Identified Transportation Corridor: The DFG recommends that the TPM be denied. Pursuant to Public Resources Code Sections 21092 and 21092.2, the DFG requests written notification of proposed actions and pending decisions regarding this project. Written notification should be directed to this office,. If We can be of further assistance, please contact Mr. Ron Bertram, Associate Wildlife Biologist or Ms, Patricia Perkins, Wildlife Management Supervisor, telephone "ri1,dWN��'AY,1''.: �• -�' ., �, California On9comMo BUM SIERT Department ofAn&dpulogy Araeological � GLENNo SSEN u SUTFEA California State Univoesiry, Chlao Inventory Mcooc PLUMAS �EHAJAn TRINITY Chico, CA 95929 (916) 898-6256 SHASTA November 25, 1991 Mr. Michael G. Evans 1 Nice Place Oroville, CA 95966 RE APN 061-480-014/PIERCE;• I . C. n L91-33 T20N, R5E, Sections 5,16,• UsGS Big Bend Mtn. 15' quad 152 acres (Butte County) beam Mr. Evans, ;,.. in response to 5t request received November 7, 1991, a record search for the above cited project was conducted by examining the official maps and records for archaeological sites in Butte County. PREHISTOR;.0 R�.J�,l�'rS our records indicate there are no �,.. previously recorded :�s`� �, of th'i: type located within the project boundaries . However, t'w'ee -i s `NF of this type have been recorded within a one mile radius of the,project area. These sites include bedrock milling stations, habitation locales (villages and campsites) sortie contain pitholcses., and A thic, bone and she11 scatters. Two of the village sites a_ 7o contain, c?anee houses. HISTORIC.RESouRCESt our recoras indicate that there are no bitc.:- of this t of the e recorded within the project boundaries. however, one type ., prehistoric occupation sites mentioned above, CA-BUTri490, also contains a historic component consisting of a historic barn. AddItionally,the USGS quad map indicates a Berry Creek school in Section 32, a aamispn Ranch in Section 41 and a Schaefer Ranch in Section 8i Th.e'se sites may contain unrecorded historic cultural resources. Records show that the Berry Creek School was established In 1909. Alsoy there was historic mining activity near the project area at Bidwells Bar. Bidwells Bar Oh'the. Trask map of 1851 is p i p4 Y L'ohn Bidwell in 1845 at this location clevel ped into d mining town and the early PREVIOljs AR.CrAEOh+OGICAh_INVESTIGATIONS: According to our records, no portion of the project area has been previously surveyed for cultural resources. The closest surveys of this type have been recorded immediately west of the ;project location (I.C. File tt B -L 116 and B -L-173), and ilmediately south of the project are (I. C. File # 231) Report 116 contains the results of James P. Mann ing's 1980 archaeological reconnaissance of ",.ierov mately 160 acres of land. owned by Corey Wright and Gordon Ruble. tai i-;% :--eol.ogical or historical sites were observed during the inspect1,-,,.°, -f the ,property. In 1981 James P. Manning conducted a 77 acre archaeological survey of the Sheldon property (Report 173). In addition to a previously re.corded prehistoric village site, one other prehistoric village site was recorded as well as an area containing five bedrock mortars, No significant historic materials or features were recorded, although the site of a historic cabin ,was located (late 1930's or 19401s). James P. Manning and Timothy Chew conducted an archaeological reconnaissance of 138 acres of land owned by Donelda Fosdick in 1981 (Report 231) Indications of Logging and gold mining activities were observed and the remains of two wooden structures. The materials found in association with these two structures indicates that they were occupied sometime after 1930, but they were not formally recorded. In addition to the historic cultural resources encountered, one prehistoric site containing bedrock mortars was also noted and it was recorded at this tune LITERATURE SEARCH: Reviewed were the 'official records and maps for archaeological sites and surveys in $utte County. Also reviewed *.fere the National Register of Historic. Places, the California .Inventory of Historic Resources (1976), California Historical Landmarks (19 9 0) , California Points of Historic Interest, A Century of California Post Offices (1955), A Collection of Places in Butte Coxmty, California (1971) , and Historic Spots in California (1966) . t RECOMMENDATIONS: sen Bated upon the above information and the local RE 0 ora sensitivity of the project area is estimated to be extremely high for prehistoric, and moderate to high for historic cultural. "resources. In view of these findings, we. recommend t -`a a__professionll archaeologist conduct an archaeological survey 9f the entire project area prior to any project_ operations. The professional archaeologist Will be able to locate and assess any cultural resources which may be present within project boundaries, as well as suggest appropriate mitigation measures for those resourdes . Additionally, the local Native American group sho'ald be contacted regarding the possible existence of unrecorded, ethnographic sites which may be located within project boundaries. Our records indicate that the closest Native American group .s the e Cta t� Aire CiepartmentWater Requiire"nents for peveiope Bait. :De�roloper � f r�i��=`c- r �..� -.._ parcel 'Number t cation Acquirement Class 1 if) Ileu of a preysutized water system; the following options VIM satisI the Fire Departrin t require eats for;rlater: (A) areach oastr�.w rrra raga( witty pbu,3nesst�udh a N*of g' t direct all weatnr+ se c 1 si m t nacho moeVrg s dard S- .The ons of tp sh hedatarm brt: ua rtmerd;or, (B) Payment into the apptOP wet t ert� _ at $too per lot for a total fee Of$r /9, ,(A) Construction of storage iacflities or #B) paymeht shall be 'dr�rttti at the time of Construction r„ habitable buildings as de- lrt0rt to the Uniform Building 'erode. Payment shall be made prf or to the Issuance of buiid!6permits for habitable buildings. 'j Requirement Class 2 x roved numbers of hydrants is strongly recommended. Average required A pressurized water system Frith an app 1-,,-hes, and residual flow gpm» If this is �nydr rest' spacing _ feet, hydrant size not ted nically.feasihie, the followingop,o �a�110 soursmoreu iipF�dwilhdre�nit redh requirement (A) Water staraga tanks viilh a g j meeting Standard 5-29.'Tl•,r3 Marts ai i -ups "°a ` lned tr�l the Fra Deparppr rte; d by the Fre Dapautmatri;#�.+r, (6) In ground swimming poc4 a uk)�d Wth a drAng oonnactbn or dreNng access as � ;O My nOt exceed (C) A dry starsdp,' ^I$ F 'tsatl to a rer�ble water sores as appra�red by the Fre Depwtrnent. Such a starxip�pe s 1,000feet In h, There must be at lees( welling gallons require twvoasepae and sources) `Provisions must be m de to InsurerinI ,tha the thereof (Example: 11 dwellings would q water stored is ahway:: available and accessible for use under all weather conditions, Requirement Class4fic location the be A ressurized community water system for fire i r�te.ctloh Isrrequired, d, Thee requi ed hydrant spacing hydrants wfllfeet, madeby .he d=ire Department 1n crnsuitation with the developer,g + �p hydrant size y inches, and residual flow Spm Requirement Class 4 Protection feel, hydrant size inches ng the Water fel fife rotectiort is required. The strongly recommended. system i„ a hydrant system capable of mee !and tire flow requirements, Average required hydrant spacing residual flow _._.,fptic m. It this is not techhically feasible, a system Involving lhd nt The avi%a le water r to water storage maybe subsu ttmeeSuch a he flour requirements.subject ov approval satisfactory lto he Fire bepartme.nt'M be flow from such a system mus m made to Insure the systomr p oaid$d is maintai ddOp dents mayeacapable o asupporting theirro n s It It so is roqiilred when each lot could have a t hi��btte„�otrae fly the system serves Blore t ep debit systettlj tetig the eed for a CSAICSD l)mfnati t� v t~1 Requirement C age ? �` qulred, to Beta of bearing the cost of Installing afire A pressurized Com , Unjl veer system for fire. Prot tIo isr 4 t t it drantfund, At 1.79 per foot of sttee3 frontage (fie hydrant(s) the devdiap6 "aY pay into the i I, y total fee _II!�1 Jv-t.�ihtnfpt_ iLEl+C1NSBiI�ITYr T Ei PRkb NOT SE I R TO OC ANCY 0 ANY BUII_biNG ON TH 15 TH1S S THE THE ptI QUIREfV�1~N `S MtJS .f E fv1LING OF THE NNAL PARCELS, THE GC7, IJIT 6N,'f•15T SHOW ['ROS OFpFjIA pERpRMANrE~ BON ON OTHEA FyINANCiAL. CASE, THE OE-vFLOPtff MU CASE,ARRANGEMENT!To COVER THE COST ()F THESE �IrCiU11r MENTS. w Additional Cp M tslRegr,tirement5 t y L Mrs Department Signature.�.�_- Co"mpiete requlretnerits In Butte County Subdivision Code Section 13.00, l v DA'L'E: December 10, 1991 SUIT- Michael PIRGT - TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP A,SS, SOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS) 61-48-1.4 IOGATIONt 4 parcels located on the southerly side of .Encina Grarr _glh.�-tad aiid west of Oro-.Qal*ncy Hwy. Berry Creek area. Attached are docvnents r,•egarding, aril a (!L,,y of, the above-descriax:r3 ` eritKi,�:ive snap for your review. If you ;rmve any suggestions, iditions or recommendations concerning this project, plEasri return them to this office no later than December 31,'1.991 Very truly yours, William Cheff Director of Plubli : ,'�'brks J Mendonsa sistant Director° JMlk attachments x6 -IN w BUTTE CO, PLA!N O WAWEN ANY' qF,AU- CAI ORNIA LD 1160 (4/89) . J s c a " COUNTY 0F BUTTS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ,. 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 (916) 588-7266 December 10, 1991 Michael Pierce RE: AP 67-48-14 560 Chinese Wall Rdi Tentative Parcel Map Or_oville, CA 95966 Dear Mr. Pierce: This is to notify you that your application for a tentative map .. for the ' above-refeenced property is being submitted to the Planning Dep for en-dronmental determination, and to the Environmental Health Department for its reel ew. This application wi11 be considered complete when we have received �otifiGation from the planning Department and the Environmental Health Department that all. necessary data have been received These departments Will contact youregardingany additional information they may rewire: Very truly yours, William Cheff Director of Public Works i Mendonsa sistant Director JM!kp cc� Planning Department NOW Envirorinental Health Department Barnhart -Brown & Assor`tates (UjPIS Michael G. Evans Lou Cecchi M �! t, tNltV OEPARTMENs L TORNIA liD 11211 (Revised L/gg =" 4+YM1z�.S„G ..-.My:. ,,.v...{,na*:+� k.. `'M.r.er+r �� •• - �« ovyk�'n.T��Wk:s..n+wi.�.,r:.M,,.. ,.,k,4.�;4.r•,- wy• r • ci , -48 T 2 D N. R. 4 6 5 E. M. D. B (5M. 61-46 j 61-4T I ;f ssj.z., saa.lr r `f , 2t 53 52 ` •, S _r . It ff �� j ;)4 � . O � : �.� ��:J s SSAc - N/ , 54100 441 4` j ., q 28.IOAG) 21.82AC ,0 t t .r 1379.38 •f i dd5.23 ' IUT8.T3 Q t .- y �� .' ,.� to ,13 1r. Y a �0 a�i 23.68A v b�"r 10. 11' 12,76v S.45AE Phf98-69a� lass ,� �y j`'o r1�-•r�. ), 33z.,� ' n4 s. s1 4 0.5C r, >`� h ~l" ° •+�—.�CO4Nt)E�i' �,RS47-11 } 4/0,60AC ; wr . RS47-4 I , E61 - j6-3,��r . ISOA 1 ,y , 'Js I.j �!�• \�c n �, 11 "-41200' z 15 ; r 1 2E5d a7 158.40A 744.40 7 .BFCC ,v` lam~., t147.26 u s sr+ v.n C£ f 8O --- 752 N �•• , z6ss),ys 9 r�Yi6a .y: •y ' , I 20 4,42AC" r _ 8ACti " aT f (1 P f \: f6 2 � " ';�,+Q a At /7 22Ac ;, 25 ,i,` 163.40A4 • n r0«G3 NC T✓:,These parcels dre for assessment pu,-poses ohfy 80 AC " ►3�0, 23 w , ) ..1 and may not constitute 16901 Parcels. 'f' r� , 'fS,Ot •.y ` 49 M \.�nP11Y .'qeE.�, f� 1 I � � • 24 'ij35 12ACq� ' 4 a -y' yy T r9 ,ff, lY NF GS ,,``•.�786AC 5''{2.213 t / t� � ki��:111'./�'� ;+,. CA£Pk - .""r-•� v ,lt.; i � '2�i.0I tia r; �fy w wi �i..,. ;,,' /Lj•Y'3 `... r'."`'1 -. `+ M .2 rr'. x ` rft. .gyp.' N1 �••-_,.♦ �.. _ .v.:5arua+e I •.� "Yf \, : ` �. y 1 l N 4i �' .;`.x ,;tT3i.iG:. - •...x't. s� TERi r r�i r \uJ• 'T�`fr•��ti � �.� t S-� q1� . .:� ,, ��. �',b '�". •'�i' �+�+f(i2)+C 1't'r k-u.4.,.'.s�.o�AC 24. .27AC •'any SGN. A..��` ftG. t R$•59-d TTo +.....cnC i � ,r ,>r..f.r s..•...L�, 5s..bris Map �Or 61-48/p4'i e`.r A i. , *_ `yf county of BUH6 Coln 31 9r kit i { • t , ;,.... ;.y..•.:,„ ., �, �. .. .. •a „ , �::«. ,4w ,.. . _ .,...eB• ..x� -.. �x�rs�•�"Yr �"wtw+Y•)rrxe�., t�rx..�+".rnruc;�'f.if, k �rtwarcC�.'k�w."'rcf�•"e'"'^d"�J"yl}. -, " ` � ., ., mak:.. .,..., .�.-+,..-...;.. G'" ,:... �`��-...•r»+-•c"�':�"+w.:: '".�..«w.- - -� 'N" ...;.ww..u..,....,,::.�".1'•«.. . c......�:...... Y..„,... .�.-...�-v.'_ ."t '". _ _. , .,_, .. �:, .., ..�,�yu...,,....w .•!°cif .:'i'•^,'%' _.. _...�.,.,�G.i . ,.�...:�.�..+^.. µ!.C.^••. _ . "'._ ._..., ,.. _ -. .. ... .... _. ._.. _. ... 1 � .... _ ,_ ;,.. i. R14r;; ra err. --, Z�15 •� 195,'Z, 287aC%•;' 07 31. 32 HARrs /b1i+cam , G,j: IMF 11 r��t.7i ' 093.7 5/ 3 33O- - 12 ' nn 9"n x ,e rr 'ti 10:5341 �'• � 3'J.1� Of1G � r / 1 � � -0.35 AC, � � �i I f f)1©2Ac- _, �Pc�::�� I •'Rs4t.12 p fi-881 ee n PM86.86r> PN 9!,?0 G,�• 42 1 RS A7_�:• _ f — — _ — -- _ _ -- -_ — r3,38 \ 88o:z3 ,079.76 3 « 2* 1 i�f N"ClIlk, ,�rra3lr.7sr\'Y'1i23,s&.� l ..c.11 ac ,c• O 't1 GRE n1 0 J2 i�7 0 0 ' r, 98z 19 � + r r PA,i9H-6 ^ , ssMAlll L.�� _ i��r�� �' PI RS 41 a'' `1 72.9 dt` l3 �1 o 'S'G J 3kc. Wb i `� : , -14 ��, j i ; RS 47.E 1 �' IM, J6A,c .. / 23tL77 N 9l; -41'50"E L; I , QPM y IF 4� aez.s �i59a d ii �8 : 61-6 ' 'o.osae 4» t,.� r 1--` fq ' CO -+, V 3 60 c 120 AC � `C, � �: 12G m �,� �9 1 ` IS 1 42 6 11, 6Ar� N 4r N �. �� RS 3J•50 9 4 l 12-16A �I )040.13. l i 1080.12 _ I 4: Z4n 1 _ _ .. •� - CO 419.25 z r 266 ; /36. 4 AC. N ry• n N TRANS TOca ry 1 IO•tl2Ac `° 4► 3Z j r 4766-4eP ,r r o c oouaetounlrnF Rojo .O 1 RS 36.10 , RIS 47-53, PM 83.8 n •2699 1147 105612 r05fi.1 r' �r 2572.96 _ / T rosa4a • " � � S d 5 56 W ��� iq y (. I /51 16r�. `,J 1 + l.,y Is osac' 160 Ac 93. 65 Ac '1 _ _ 320110 �. Ed I! T q 0 092 0,67 r67) N 96601 3tl" � zax3.te J .35ac 2401,2 / b /726.56 b n 99047 i 567,34 a, or z `ti. i 3 d.g (ti9i sl M 5 c `�.---, l� ». • ftees+c, ^ '` ZZ.2T9At 2 ",27.7�7QCtui� "' �J 4 .�—r. p p02044 -ict8057, , 131033 0 08 57 .. 934 3944 b /23 '1 y��r7i 40 b c: 16 . � $ C �2T.744 1 0 ,� N ------... ce i 4 a ^ 1808.74 « O 3 !; 3 Od 99 6 94 d C !24 r t 4, ,» ° 1400.69 . � r SYCA�IOR6 Ckt a h _• �.. i 5 ttzl.t�.. Phl88,s7 « 70 r r 125 ,+ ,50 0 1 R S 69 o rorl,lo 2,e. r PM 2�92 6 "' BO.7c Pm •fid •� IS1,(�14AC w Rs,71- 6 139.829,�G _ 6rg 9 n "a 15 721Ersu,ltl S °'09 26 W S 46.91. La9Ae p n [2:6] CJ V Assessor's Map No, DJ w County of Butte; Calif, Marchi, 1960`