Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout063-040-020n n • �. 1 71 1- APPLICATION _ FOR VARI A 'BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICANT; Read and follow instructions as sot torch on reverse side of this form. Applicant's Name ��st G L � 7"�9r2.►"2. f7honeN , � 4+ ApOicant's Mailing Address f' ©_,.:fox 3 5 ? fzl! 75t AnFtlicant's Cntr3ra:st irr 17rtapar�ky lt'�wnkr,l4sskie, othur'1 _ C�u.s,.�r.»�t � _,�, ,,„M Owner's Nanta e Phone No, Owner's IYlailirtg Arlcltess Assessor's Parcel Numbarls)a? 3_^- ,b •N Zeal Z . �._� Location and size of parcel (s) /� C-►� Ct'L- t9 F iilO jwy7tLi cam' ,. ,ytq -4. 6 Arc.. oofoiNrrrr - r�ulL..w }.►Ale- of variance ✓ltrt,&+-.: Pxnj,Octr AT'PEI LD LX r Date Filed Environmental Information Form (To be completed by applicant) GENERAL. INFORMATION 1. Name and address of developer or project sponsor; 'ST�rrZfL ?Ca, -- 2. Address of project: Assessor's Block and LOU Number , 3- B 20 f6 27 3 Dame., address, and telephone number of person to be contacted concerning this project 1,,�al/Se e-�..,1 ,r M �`� 4,'4ypo of project; (i.e. rezoning, subdivision) � C.c,.•'-� � .�-,�-,� fir-. 5, List and describe any other related pe -mits anrt other public approvals required for this project, including t o sn required by city, regional, state and federal agencies" 6, Existing zonin district: 7-1,11 — ,5` 7. Proposed use of site, PROJECT bx'SCRTPTIO `?, g, Site size. 1: Square footage of building(s) 10. Num bet Of floors of construct on 11, Amount of off-street parking provided. 12. Attach site devel:opmOht plan, 13,. Proposed scheduling, 14, Associated projects, 15: Anticipated it cremental development, i ON"R - Cb, Flanking Ccrtnm, J, Ui J a Append'c E »atr�'�.rf}�, EiFonia; If residential, include the number of units, sc hediyle of unit 17. and type of household size expected. F 1.7. xf cowlerc� al , indicate the type, whether neighboa hood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area- and loading; facilities 18, If industrial, indicate type, estimated em.lo { andloadin�; facil i ties. p ym�nt per shift=, 19• If institutional, indicate the major ,turicti.on estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived fromthe project. 20. If the project involves a variance, conditional use or rezoning application, q -hy the a.pplicatibn is state this and indicate clearly w rewhy Arp the follovAng items applicable to the 'project or its effects?' Diu; uss below all items checked yes (attach additional ,sheets as 'necessary) YES NO ' 21, Change in existi.tnt; features o� any benches, lakes, or hills, or substantial alteration, of Around cont;oirs 22. 8ig1li,tricant change in sconic views or vistas from v'' existing residential areas or public lands or Loads.. 7. Significantly change Mattern, scale or character of general area of Project. 24. Significant amounts of solid s-raste or litter. 25. Change in dust, ash, smoke, f lMes or odors in Lini,t>y. 26. Significzint change in lake, stream or ground water quality . quenti atterns, ty, or alteration of existing drainage ' 27, Substantial chatn�,o ,i' t', � _ levels in the. vicinit;.,� , n n e�tLstin noise or vx,brat�,o 28, Site on fa l kid land or on slope of 30 percent or mot:`e 29, Use or spas osal of p Potentially hazardous materials, such as twx-A.c substances, Elanimabl. s or explo lves' R Appendix pa;;e 2 of , r " YES N 30. Substantial change in demand for municipal services (police', fire, water, sewage, etc.) . 31.Substantially increase fossil fuel consumption f (electricity,oi1, natural gas, etc.) 32. Relationship to pant of a larger project or series of projects ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 33. Describe tha project site as .';: n. sts before the project, including inform ta,on on topography, ,, g y, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cul uralo historical or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site., and the use of the structures. 34 Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural., historical or scenic aspects, indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one-fami.l.y, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, frontage, set -back, rear yard, etc.) CERTIFICATION: 2 hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the :attached .exhibits .present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the hest of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and inforinatian p:nted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date w S1. a ure ror— Appendix E .. page 3 of 3 NOTICE TO AT'pS.ICANT Z vAIII ANCI Ordinance No.� AN ORDINANCE; AM 140ING ORDINANCE NO 4:751,0 1CNOWtq -13 AS THE BUTTE COUNTy ZONING ENABLING ORbINANCR +L'ARIANCES.From the terms of the zoning ordinance shall be granted only when, because of special circumstances applicable ' to theY property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, the strict appl.icati on ok the coning ordinance depr4Ves such property of privileges enjoyed by other. property an the Vicinity and under identical zoning classification. Any variance granted shall be subject to such conditions as will, assure that the adjustment thereby authorized shall not constitute a grant of special privileges inconsistent With the.. limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and zone in whichsuch property i s a`titated. Any such dond' t:i on l.mposec� upon y assuanc�- of a 'variance must.b e reasonably :elated to the use . of the property for which the variance is requested. A variance shall hot be • granted for a parcel of properiry which authorizes a use or activity Which is not otherwise ex- pressly authorized by the zone regulation governing the parcel Of . propefty,." I HERB BY DECLARE UNDER. pENAhTy OE' PERJURY THAT x i4A'VE READ THE FOREGOXNC INSTRUCTIONS AND S;TATV"NT8 AND UNDERSTAND THEIR MEANING AND CONTEXT. Apph cant i3Ut}e Ca. lsl�nhing Ookrliti; e JUN 0981 Ocaville, ikiQ,lttOW4 APPENDIX H '0NC�':[�_� ILIT tJl� 1)1 i°I`sRM NA` ION TO Sdorotary .`oat 11c�.�otarc.es t� r a,6 Nr�lt°l�h ti'att'���'t, (lo�ilt at1crallwivto,, CA SST. ,a:C1(i 2 0 Ccs lnty (alov'k, Couit't)' 0r RtlttG' 25 C,' o u n t y (" o llt o r I) r l v o. C."t A. 'NELSON, County Cloek Orovi.T.'le, CA 95965 A. JACI 411 O` Depuix lR0,\I Planling 1)0part111011C 7 County Cen'tor Drive (Filed) Orovillo, CSA 05965 Sl7I471 C7 Pili.arg of T\aticc of Determination in Conil�liance %v tTt Sectioll 21.1.05 or 21:152 of the Int blicd8sa rrco �s���0�-0202 roject 'T'itle AP 63-04-20 i� 21 Douglas Starr itr ante s5tate Clearinghouse Number (i s tkimltted to State Clearinghouse) rele )Norte Number Contact PorsOn X16 534-,4601 I3Gtt e .131.air, Planning ;Director .�,_ � � � and 17_.oject T�cati do Noxtleast o f the tion o C Cody Drive Knolls DriveL�soutlzeast of ,'I'i Too Lane, l 3 mile southeast of N "pet P ojoct Dcscriptlnn. ,Avenue and HWy. 32, Forest Ranch. ` zoned, TM-S. 68 A �.t�: anc0 to minamum lot size to alloly the cx•eation cE a �. acre parcel on property z This is to advise that tll(' Butte County 'Planhi ng" Commission (Lead ngencya 11ns made, the following tetea•nj*natl_otj regarding the ahovo-descvibcd project: 1. Tho project� gill. hove a 3 significant 'effect n the on'1 ivol,111101lt• w111. not, 2. An 7 nvirnttiricntal Impact Report Was prepared for this project Pursuant to the prov' sions of GEQA, and was certified as required by l5Qu5 (I) , 14, California Adm nr s urative Code. A Negative Declaration Was prepared fO r° this PI-o j ect p he provi.si.ons of CtQA: A copy of the r may ... s',rY J P ��'� Ci-, ni.ng pursuant to tn.ratatt ma he e,cariia,nect at the P11,�95965 Negative TJec.l. Dopavtment, 7 County Center Drive, Orovi.1 , . \cit cc or Gr�emp;:tiatt. aas filed ind.; cat ng this project L. _J c:oiitp't trti►11ni t"otltllentll t'e viettt. 41 A statement oC Overt'idi.zig Cons-11do-rcation Ej Was Was null adopted .trio this Project,� y 5, i`li.t ,gation measures adopted h)` the Local Agency to iedttce_ th.e impacts 01 the approved pro j oct avc; forte J i gna Lt P l a zt n - r�a.ro c tor L APPEWIX G �'4iS+a0 NECA',C'.[VE DECLARATION REGARDING UNVI'RONRENTAL IMPACT 0% 11;�� 614 1, NOTICE IS IMIZEBY MEN that the project described below has, C4/.6rn, R been reviewed pursuant to tie provisions of the California Environmental, Quality Act of 1970 (Pub] is Resources Code 21100, et. sen.) ,and a determitlation has been, made that it Will not have a significant effect upon the environment. Log #81-Q6-02-02 2. DESCRIPTION OF ,PROJECT A variance to minimum jot size to Allout the creation, of a 4.68 acre parcel on property zoned TM -5, AP 63-04-20 21, 3,. LOCATION OF PROJECT: Northeast of the ihtersection of Cody Drive and knolls Drive southeast ofTippy Toe Lane 1/3 mile southeast Of Nopel Ave,, and Highway 32, Forest Ranch. 4. NAME AND .ADDRESS OF PROJECT APPLICANT Douglas Starr Lippincott Surveying P. 0. Box 365 P. 0. Box 671 Forest R1 anch; CA 9594'2 Paradise, CA 959`69' S. MITIGATION MEASURES 6. A copy of the initial study regarding the environmental e:foct of this project is attached' This study was xx Adopted as presented. Adopted with changes. Specif=ic modiFications and supporting reasons are attached. 7. A public hearing on this Negative Declaration was held by tiro decision making body. Hearing Body `Butte County Pjanni g Coninission�, Date of Determination i i Qj tst Appendix - paEe i Of, 2 } Determ.: atation; On the basis Of the initial stud), of environmental the information presented at hoarings, comments reco%vod 0T tlW proposal and our own knoivlcdp e and indopc;nctent :re _ rch aux Wo .find the proposed project COULD NOT have �1 Sign:i,Ficar ef:feCt on the environment and a NEGATIVE DICLAizAT.ION is hereby adopted. We find that tho project could,havo a significant effect on the environment but wi11 ;not in thi!; case because of attached mitigation measures described in a,te,m a above which are by this reference made conditions of project approval.; A conditional NtG,ATIVB DECLARATION is hereby adopted. Date: August 24, 19$1 � SignatV Ron Mast " Chairman, Butte County Planning T'it 10 Go'mmzssvon Appendix page of 2 APPENDIX F BNVIRONM.GNTAL CHECKLIST FORM (To be completed by Load Agency) ERT) Log #81 -06-02-02 BACKGROUND. 1. Name of Propotent 0ougl.as Starr 5 2. Address and Phone Num er ol Proponent: - P. 0; .Box 365 c/o Lippincott Survoy-iri$; iores ' anc rJ�D7 9594Z j3ox 671 arcl 1sC,, 3 . Date OfChecklist Submitted 4. Agency Requiring. Checklist 5: Name of Proposal, if applicable e Ur:i UM6 o m1il1.muin paw size in the TM -5 zone;, AP 63-04-20 V 214; lx. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets.) YES MAYBE N0 1:. Earth. Will the proposal result in significant: a„ Unstable earth conditions or in ' changes in geologic substructures? b, Diss.;upt i ans , da sp l s cements , cc tn- padtion or overcoveri.ng of the soil? c, Change in topography or ground sur- face relief features or removal of topsoil? d, Destruction, covering or modifica- tion of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Increase in wind or watex; erosion �r of soils, either on or off the site? _. f. Changes in deposition -or erosion of beach sands, or changes in sil.ta- tioa, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a riven" or stream or the lied of the ocean or any br y, inlet; or lake? g Loss of prime cgricultural:ly pro" du,ctive, soils outside designated urbari areas? _ Appendix; P paid 1 o MIA �LTS MAYM NO ?, Expos 04' People or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes landslides, mudslides, ground fail,ure,, OV similar hazards? t 2• Air, W,Lll the proposal result, in., a.. Substantial, deterioration of ambient: or. l,oc�a3 a ii quality? b> The creation of objectionable Odors, smoke or fumes? c. Significant alteration of air M movement, moisture or temperature,, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? 3. Water. Will the proposal result in substantial. - a. Changes in currents, or the course or direct. -c, c) water movements? b •ges a.n absorption rates, drai w �ytrarns, or the rato and amount ° surface water rrtnoif? C c. Need for off-site Surface drainage improvements, including vegetation removal,, channelizat:ion or ciiivert installation? a, lilt Orations to the course or flow Of flood 'waters? qW e.Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? f, Discharge into surface water8j o in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not. limited, to temperature, dissolved oxYgen ox turbidity? g, A`.ceration of the dir-ction or ratue of flora of ground waters? ic h, Change i1i the quantity or quality Of ground waters)either through direct additions ot wi_'t;hdrawal:s, or, through interception of an aquifer bt, cuts or dXcavat;i.ons? i Appoix F page of 0 YES MAYBE No i, Rudl-ction in the amount of water otherwise, ava.:lable for public water si:ipplies7 J. exposure 'b people or property to water related hazards such as l looding? 4.P .ant LiEe, C4111 the proposal, result in s��ntial a, Loss of vegetation or change in the diversity Of species or number of any species of plaits (including trees, shrubs, grass, (-oops, Thicroflora., and aquatic plants) ? C b, Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? � c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existlnt; species d,. Reduction in acreage of any agr .` cultural crop? 5. Animal Liffe, Will the proposal result in sttbstantial a. Change` in the diversity of species, or numbersof any species of a animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish sqd sholl- fish, benthic organisms, ii-!sects ox `t Allk micro fauna) b, ltedur�tion of the numbers of any unique„ rare or endangered specie of animals? c- Introduction of new species of animals into an area,, or re�,u.lt in , a barrier to the migration or Afth movement of animals? d, Reduction o, encroachment upon, or to ex,,stzng dish or 'Wildlife t?, f habitat? A'ppendik p - page 3 of "9 ,k9RY _.... .. ..,........_ ,..__. ,. _.,. ._ `If�a MAYBE NO 6, Nom, Will: the }proposal. result i n substwantial': a. Increases in 'noise levels? b, Exposure of people to severe noise levels? r 7. Light and Clary:. Will. the proposal ,ems produce s gni. 'icant light or 8lare2 8. Land also: Will the proposal result in a significant; a. Alteration of the planned land use y of an area, or establish a trend which will demonstrably lead to such alr8ratioti? } b, Conflict with uses on adjoining properties, or conflict with establ.ichad recreational, educa- tional, religious or scientific uses of a"C1 area? ` 9.. Natural Resources, +fill the proposal' rest in substantial: a, Demand for, or increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? Iff b. Depletion of any norxenewabl,e A4 natural resourC`tO 10. Risk of Upset: Does the proposal involve a risk of an ekVlosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not la.tnited to, oil3 pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset �ondtioYts'� l,, Will the proposal �Pop�u]��ation. signcantly alter: the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of at area: or physically divide an established community 12, housing. Will the proposal � significantly affect exx ti ting housing, or create a demand for additional housing? r ,. Appendix F page 4 o,E 9 YES MAYBE _ NO 13. Transportation/C3.r.cula tion.. tgill the propose ult in: a. Generation of substantial additioaal vehicular' inovernent? b, 5igni,ficaht effocts can existing ; parking facilities, or demand for neva parking? c. Substantial impact upon existing tr ansqrt p -ati.on systems? d. Significant alterations to present s patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? e. Alterations to waterborne, rail, or air traffic? Tntrgase in traffic hazards to motor veh�cles,;bicyclists or pedestrians? C 14, Public Services. Will the proposal have ane .Oct upon, or result in a substantial need for new or altered governmontal services in any of the: followirng areas a; Vire protection? b. Police protection? C. Schools? d, parks or other reci,eational facilities? e, Maintenance of public facilities; including roads OtherO g vernmental services`; 15, EnLrM, Will the proposal result in A. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? b, Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development 0i~ new sources of energy? Appendix page 5` of 9 YES MAYBE NO 16. Utilities, Will the proposal result T for 11uc'c new systems, or sub - s�afiCial alterations to the followiy1g ut a , Powexo r natural gas? C b. COMmunication,s sys;f:cros 7 .-�--,Ak C, Water? d, uawer (wil). ir:��unlc line be extended ' Providing capacity to serve new developmen)'� e. S to��m viat.•.r drainage? j 17' . Human Health, ' resu' t in; 13.1.1, the proposal A. creation Of any health hazard or potential. health hazard (excluding ., mental heal; h) ? b, Exposure of people to potential hoal bli hazaz d 7 18, Solid Waste, Will the proposal result in any ss nifi.ca►�±� %;mpaots associated with sol) I wasteisppsal or litter control,? 19, Aes thea ;.d,, , tJill -he proposal result In t � c 6E7FttLtctiofI .rf any public designated or reee;,rrized scenic crista open to t-1 e public + or will the proposal, %-0 sui.t ifs "he creation of an aesthetically offeti0 ve site open to public view? 20, 1?ecreatiion, Will the proposal: result i t, an i.mp�o't upon the quality or quantity of existing public recrea- tion facilities? 21. Archeol, ica.l/Histor ical : Will the w Proposal r"esu. t 1.'T1 an al-tezatioTl of a signiEicar t archeological or historical site strUcture, object r or building? *ppend .x V - page 6 of 5 9. YES MAYBE NQ 22. Mandatory Findings of Signir-icance a» LSuGy the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment,, su6stantially reduce thehabitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a ,fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal com- munity; reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods . of California history or prehistory? ,. 6 ,. ,.. b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short term benefits to the detriment of publicly adopted long-term environmental goals? c. Does the project have impacts which are individually Limited, but Cumulatively considerable? (a project may impact on two r more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small but 1. of where the effect of the total those impacts on the environment is AD significant.) d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause surs'tanti:al adverse effects on human teings, Adk either directly or indirectly? -- Appandik V page 7 0f 9 81-06-02-02 YID. DISCUSSION OP ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION 'I'.i1is 'proposal is Ct is 4w lance to iit:i,jlit�iunj l.at size to all ocv the creation of a 4.68 acre parcel, on property �,o�1ed '1'h1-5 �'1'ltttber �founthe S do Parcels) . Tl10 property iacro s located northeast oP the intersection of Cody ile and Knolls give, southeast of Tippy To'e Lane, about l %3 Mile sOutheast Of Napes. Avenue and 1I1911vay 32, sorest Ranch. theProperty �.s in of- tile roproperty are lesstt:hanr1:g%. �olveveyte`i.. s0 � on tl�e � ` I'hl�e slopes oil 1tt_ost o;f eastern portion af�l3arcel:s,Z;aild-there �1'�ai.r c1P45 Of Over the variance is being � g proposed, has gent i e to modorn,`te slopes. ch The elevation va.rics from about 2, 200 to 21360 alovo sea level. Natural vegetation on the site illclttr�.es pol"cicrosa p:i.ne,' dotigl.as fir; inQOnse cedar, manzanita, poisOn. Oak and deter brush. species common to this area. inclUdo deer racWildlife coon hawks_, qua 1, lizards, snakes and a variety Gf songbirds., s111e1 flora and ;fauna are typical of. the Transition Life 4on.c. The surrounding land] uses include conventional vosicicnces and 1 nobile;homes, :forested land and the Fir Knolls Subdivision (to the south) , Little Chico Creek lies vitllin ij tile to the southeast, Tile Ilutta County General P1.111 designation :for thic>.ttural Residential, 1-40 acres per dwelling unit,s area is Agri - lb,3b In the event the variance is approved; a four p division would be submitted to the Carcel lobo ounty of for reviov. Additional runoff wi-11 be generated during storili conditions, but this is not considered a significant factor for pay;cels o.f his size. Improvement of tile access 'roads' will create additionst + tion. The roads Will,likely be soil compac paved; Y gravelled welled rather than le: POtential erosion is a :factor Portion of parcels 2 and 3, > I�articularly :for the eastern may be proposed dor a subsequentitn.gation mcasti�e for erosion ill this arca are Of the A� in 1'o��lese�iridl. aSup�nlsoition, 8oiis Those soils Have a depth range Of 4-60 talus lncltesa a sux?faco o� loafs or gravelly loam, a subsoil O;C (ARY or slow to moderate pertleabilit r - gra high loam, moderately modes oto lady to high ruilo f C and are rated as unsuitable to 'Very high .for timber potential; Annual. rain Cull is 65-70 inches, l'Oduction, 111, A mOdcrate landslide risk exists in this ares. Pl`OPer setback Of the building pails on ;factors parcels 2 bird 3 s�1CJltld nlitig,ate this • 81-06-02-02 111. DTSCUSSTON Or, 9NVIRONNMNITAL EVALUATION (CONTINUPD) 21): Addi ' tional dust will be generated by vehicular use of the dirt and gravelled roads. 3f Little Chico Creek may be affected by the increased runoff tun d pollutants that would be included, in tlie dtainage, 3 The rate of flow of gvoundwaters could be influenced by this project. fllftectS on neighboring wells are a possbili,ty. 9 i However, it is also 'possible that there i,:, no hydraulic connection between the project wells and neighboring wells and therefore no possibility of interaction. According to sources in. the State Department of Water Resources, present state law atlows a. property owner to tap the groundwater on his property) regardless of the effect on the water table on or off his property. 311 Water source for the parcels would be individual wolls, A well has been drilled ori parcel 4 which lids Y.ieldod an avotage of 2 gallons per minuto of water, 8ewagn dlsl)osal, i4ould be by individual septic tank- leaclif ield systcms. Each proposed, parcel of 4.7 to 5 acres would 'need to meet the minimum area t'equiremerts of the Subdivision Ordinanco, be combined Avith an adjaceiit parcel or a redesign of the parcel map submitted. I al Sa! 'Vegetation removal for the parcel $110Uld be limited to what is necessary for building pads; gardens and driveways. The property is quite densely forested at present. Willdlife habitat will be reduced for species utilizing the 31.9,7 acros, The pr . opdrty I wi 'thin the area utilized by the Lucks Mountain door herd as a migration route to the Doe M-111 Ridge a -tea. 8n.- The primary impact of this proposal would be the possible establishment of a precedent in the area, potentially inducing the croation of numerous parcels smaller than the minimum 5 acres in a large TM -8 district throughout the Forest Ranch area. This could have a growth -inducing effect on the drca, with consequent environmental impacts as described In this ini.tial, study, _ The property and suirounding area has boon toned TH-8 since February 19'6. Sut-rouilding Parcel sites vary from about 2 acres to 100 acres, 11: Population density would increase by 1, tesidetca over what would be allowed without a vatian-ce to the minimum 'parcel, size. lac, fu It is about 3,200 feet from the property to Highway 52 via Cody �,rivo, Ot-f-sito -road improvement may be needed for any areas Appendix P page 8a, or 0 81-06-02_02 11.E DISCUSSION Or hNVC.RONNI.hNTAL i:iVALuxrION ('CONTINUBID) which require improvement to a traversable standard. 'Tile Public Works Depa.rtment commented. that the proposed private road intersection, (Cody Drive and. Knolls Drive) appears hazardous. 14as Fire protection. should be adequate at this location. The Forest Ranch Fire Station is within I mile of the property. Clearanceof vegetation around structures and other fire protection measures are necessary with the high fire hazard in this area. 15a; Energy conservation measures should be employed in the development of the parcels and the future residences. l6a,b: power and telephone lines would need to be extended by PFG. fT h, and Pacific Telephone. 19 The visual character will; be altered by the variance proposal and su,bsequont land division to create up to 4 parcels. Retention of tine existing vegetation; wherever possible,Avill. greatly mitigate this ;factor; 21; the to the location of the property within '!4 mile of Little Chico Creek, an archaeological survey may be arranged for the tentative parcel map: Appendix :C page 8'b of 9 i Project �t APPENDIX E .�.. Date Filoa Environmental 'informat �'.on Form (To be completed by applicant) GENERAL INFORMATION l i Name and address of developer or prof ect sponsor, VC-U. C. L ham. 5. IS P-117z& C>. B Ox 47C. :5 % r� c��- �s?�uGsr� L � !'S" S¢ Z- .2. Address of project, Assessor's Block and L, t Number 34•-- 2.0 f. 'ZI 3. Name, address; and telephone number of person to be contacted concerning th is project., 4.,—.Typo of pro,j ect : (i , e, rezoning, subdivision) �t 5. List and describe any other related permits and other publ-1.c approvals required for this Project, i.ncludn; t ose re tired by c�- �; city, regional, state and federal agenciea : G'•�htrtr.�^ 6. Existing zoning district: 7-;!I-- 5 7. Proposed s e d use • ;t-"� p of site __ ..�.._ PROJECT D9SCRIPTION S, site site, /I- 7 9. Square footage of building(s) 10Number of floors of construction, 11. Amount of OfE„street parkin; provided, 12; Attach site develL,PMOrit plan, 15, Proposed 8theduling, 1.4, Associated projects 15, Anticipated incremental. development, Ou4e Cb« Planntng COMt juj 21881 Appendix li 16, Ir residential),` r Aplude Chn number of un.i a . 4 t.,clledule o unit ` ncl type of household sizo oxpooted si.�es 17. if commercial., indicate tho type, WhOtlor srighaorlioo(1or ae;ionally oriented, scuirt� iooaloiL v"fac or - facilities entc, anti lczcin 18. if industrial, indicate type, estimated ('tnployment Por shift: Ondloading facil. ties . 19. If institutional, indicate dle major function) estimated employment per shift, estimatedOCCUR w-,cy, lotiding facilities and community benefits to be del," ived fromth C� project, 20. If the project involves a variance, conditional use or rezoning 1 plication, state this and indicate c;l.ca ly Why the application is. required Are the following items applicabletO the pro,jaat oa` its effects? Discuss below all items chockeel yes (attach additional. sheets as necessary) '?9S P70 21. Cht ngA in existing foattrL e's of any leer �.ches, lakes,,'L ta or hills, ar substantiali IT'a:tion of r,round contours. 22, Significant change in, scenic viers or vi bta„s from eklisting 23. S hgnii Cical7t±l tchat F�esk�ai�ter public or scat a;s o roads, or character or �,. FW"Cra.l arca, of pro? oczt . Y " 2a+i 0ignifi.cant: amoun,vs of solid Waste or litter. 25 11ange �* t � ash, smoke , fumes ax cdo , -s in ci. �t — 26, Si.P;n icant; change ii' , stream or t lakestrgr ....�.�., �, ound water qualify or quant ty, or altcration "if existing drainage �Satt�rns. 27. Substant;i.al change in existing noise or v,'bretion levels in the vicinity, n filled laml or on slope of 30 percent or Moro., . Si.t� o 29. Use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as tOXiC substances, Elammables or explosive, Appendix p _ paRO 2 of 3 XE S 30. Substantial ci ancte in demand for municipal :w�;xvices (.police, £ire, water, sewage, etc.) 31. Substantially increase fossil fuel ronsumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.),. 32. Relationship to part of a larger project ,.�. g z p 3e tr o r series of projeQt•.s ENVIRONMENTAL ;SETTING 33. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, sail stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site, and the use of the structures 34. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cul:turai, historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one-family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, frontage, set-backs rear yard, etc.) C> RTIVXCATION. . I herebycertifythat the statements furnished alcove and in the attached exhibits T~eits present the data aiid information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, ,and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief Date a ure) For Ij I Appendix t - page 3 of 2555 Alam Doytoix 11w,Y1. 0 Durham, CA 9593 63-04-21 P CA rJorurizo, CA Viovc-st T;n llk7, : n4r..!r-tons Mr. 8- Mrs. Gr. Murufa R.Q. Box "48 r P.O. 14cy. 205 r:'r�. �:w Ranch, CA 95912 r Vovcsrt Ranch, CA 9594P,r 3-09-4 63-05-28 R. L. & N.M. VIcEwe Betty J. Gate Heidi Ln '14' 0 E Roe Rd. Foreot Ranch, CA 95942 Par—cl s o CA 95969 63.00-4- i r�tt1 S4 S.-barr Douglas United CA Rank P.O. Bax LEO P.O. Box 365 � ov,)S t Ranch, CA 9594 Chico, CA 959 `T 3._0911 & 'Ir Lippincott Sutvcy:i.ng r O.F., % B4Ji VaT1dC5t5rea P.O* Box 671 J P.O. Box. 44, Pa,radi s,e i CA. 9596 a Rei .. s b Ranch, CA 959422 63. 09-2L Iiinda %- in P n i Box 226 ; MarysVille, C -a- 95901 G.I. & R.P. Rcbillar ' 205 Park St,, Gridley, CA 9594$ LT -T. & M.A. Moloney 961 ;gimbold>r Chico, CA 9592 r P.O. Bo384 Vo"est Rincjl CAq$�42 lip. a Vjnsa R. Toe ;tail 19"T2 Trowf'�r Napa CA 94558 P I LE NO. 63-4-20 el 2 TO: BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ST,API FINDINGS August 5, 1983; APPLICAM t Douglas Stasi, OWNER: Mile EXISTING ZOM.* TDI-�� RE. UCST Variance to 111ininium lot ize. LOCATION' At tho intersection of Cody Lane and Knolls Drive, southeast of Nopol Drive and Highway 3.2, forest Ranch. AP NO. 63-4:-20 & 21 SS21i: 19.68 acres total i 65-4-20 is 9.68 acres 63-4-21 is 10.0 acres PURPOSE OF APPLICATION: Applicant states: ',Purpose to d;ivido property into 4 gots From existing 2 parcels. Va.r- lance i.s requested to allow 1 parcel to be loss than 5 acres required by zone, due to sizeu of proporty and surrounding development and to -main. Integrity of present zone will be inai.ntained.11 EXISTING LAND USP" I)onse Porest pine, :fir, cedar, ma.nzanita, etc, SURROUNDING LAND USE forested land; rural residential rises nclud-� ing mobile homes; Forest Knolls Subdivision to the south. SU11ROUNDiNO PARCDL SIZE- 2 to 7 ato the i acre parcelsl�toCt �e ves t PA-Ctto tine south h containing one acre parcels and a _70 acre common area; a 100+ acre parcel to the east, 8Ji2R0UNDIN6 ZONING: TIM -S to the north and wort; PA -C to the south, TM -71 to the east: GMNERAL PLAN DESIGNATION Agricultural. Rosidchti.al.: 2oNiNO HIS"I'DAY6o This area was zoned t-rom A-2 to TM -5 on February 10 1976. " APPLICABLE RE( : TXONS, Section 24 40 of tho Butt. County. Zoning Ordinance states °that, 'Tai:Laneo from tho terms of this chapter shall be granted only when, becatiso of special clrcumstanc'es applicable FILx3 NO. 05-4-20 &r 21 TO BUT'Vt COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION STAPT, FINDINGS August 5,, 1981, to the property,, including size, shape, topography, location or surrotandings, th.e strict application of- this chapter deprives such pepper. ty of privileges enjoyed ,by other Property in the vicinity and Uttdor identical zoning classification." COMM)INTS `: PUBLIC 1VORXS: "Proposed private road intersection appears Hazardous 11 ENVTRONMENTAL HPALTH: "No objection to va-i aance . rr ANALMS: This property consistes of a 10.00 acre par.•eel and 9.68 acre parcel. The applicant wishes to create three 5 acme parcels and. a 4M 68 acre parcol. , .The parcels together do not form a perfect squareand, t1iore-, fore total 19.68 acres rather than a full 20 acres, Surround.ign parcels rango in size frog 3/4 of an acre to {Very large acrea.ge--s . The smaller parcels in tlio TM-5 zine were crested Prior to the establishment of that zone in 1976 The TM- S was intended to prevent further division of this ,sensitive, forested are into parcels smaller than five acres, The Vorest Knolls PA-C, immediately to, the south of the subject property has an averall density of 4,99 acres per dwelling unit', although the, individual lots are about one acre in size Creation of a parcel: smaller than 5 acres could be ptocedent-setting in this area Which. teas zoned intentionally to estab:Llsl litrited, densities. An initial study has been prepared for this property and a. Negative Declaration a.s recommended. AECCMMtNDATION A, Vind that the requirements of the Califor.nla Envi.r.onmental. Quality tact hwae boon complied with and adopt a Negative Declaration; ;arid I3, V:'hid that the subject property, ':s not being deprived of DILE INO. 63-4-20 31 F '10 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMYSSION STAFF FINDING$ - August 5, 1987 privileges ew oyed by other property in the vicinity a;nd under identical zoning classifications because of special circumstances applicable to the property, and, C. Deny the proposed variance to the minimum parcel, size required in. the TM -5 zone for AP 63.4-20 6 2'1. If the Commission chooses to approve the variancd,, then: B, Find that because o3: special. circumstances applicable to the property, including size, shale, topography, location, ox surroundings, the strict application of this chapter deprives stzcil property of privileges enjoyed by other property in the vIcinity and under identical zoning classification; and C Approve the variance to tine minimum parcel sire xequiroanon:, allowing a, 4.65 a.cT e parcel in a TM -5 zone :dor AP 63-4-20 and 21, su,l)j ect to the Poll oWing conditions: I Redesign the intersection of Cody Lane and Knolls ri:livc to conform with Public Works' standards l;or trdf is safety. 2. Any development or division shall. comply tvl.th min.rrnum area requirements or 13utte County Subdivision Ordinance, and require- ments Of the Butte County Selvage disposal Ordinance and Health Department regulations 3: Applicant must also comply with all other applicable State and local laws, , rid regulations statut_os a } ._.. '... ••TmaU1S11111lJI/LM,� ' C i1 j PA-' TI N TM -5 1 �h ✓ i . • . I 1 1 i « k m {�Ill�ti0dd 1 1 d" � � / � . !,_.._.,....,..,�,�� „ . �•. � �� L, Via'" � j a� � y .q � 1 " � r i TM -20 iZR°a a V N*y i= PLS iVo... z.� BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING C0IV;;, ail L�*ARINO, Y t JDATES, �. LXISING ZOIEt •� Y { .; `:1 t.++r..' i+"'Vy .moi Y... 's.• ,4u a jY j'a^ yr+'2'r's l/ �� 7 / �! ten✓ i'yY�,«" r°''a SCALE m.. .:r,•w �.... • .t tr«Y.. � t.�„p 1.. a'Lw B.U,TTI COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINuT1 S •' August 51 1581 B: ITEMS CN 11111CH NEGATIVE DECLARATIONS REGAf, 1J1r,G B NxR( NA1'NT11L I1+1 WCT HAVE' B EN R nR9rNDEM I. Douglas S.. Starr Variance to minimum lot size to allow the creation• c f a 4.68 acre parcel on property zoned°,1VTbi'-5!', Timber �lourttaza� - 5 acre parcels) located on the northeast corner cf Cody Drive and Knolls Drive) identified as AP 63-04-20 and 21, Forest Ranc.lt, { David, l-]ironimus reviewed Staff Findings dated August 5, 1981. Staff - recommended denial being unable to make tllty findings required by the Coixni: Code. There was no correspondence. Y Lar Nelson commented tliat t1i.e impacts were those of any "orestednauntain- ous area, but were r .,)t e 11 large 'enough to require an evironmontal impar -t report, The hearing was opened to the Public, Gary Lippincott, surveyor r ep2 esentin the applicant, l noted that ro 007 Bille Road, I p perties to the west anti nofth are all smaller than 5 acres . p 1 Property p W s that the steepness of tha swould prevent development to the east. In res oilse to ]"is comment that there was no need for conditions on the variance bc.,,ause of conditions that will bzinpuscd by the -Advisory Agency, Charlie Woods reminded the Commission that a variance—unless ess given a specific time, runs ivith the land and that Might a subsequent owner ]wire plans that tvoul,d be different from t:liose of Mr. Starr, Douglas Starr, P; 0. BOX 565 Forest Ranch, said that when fie purchased the property it vas Iand-locked; that lie had obtained access and also lead talked to all the surroundin g property olv tnets anA had obtained support of he T`orest Ranch Land Ilse COmnittee for^ his project, Noel J. 'lvilliainsP. 01 Box 584, Forest Ranch, with property otx Cllerzr_ Lene off Cody, said 11e liad encouraged NIr: STarr to ,go through with the var ancO procedure: Tom Va.ros,P, O i3ort�orest Ranch, also spoke in favor4 g the sural -1 parcels in the area r. of Forest Ranch, said that Opposed. Claude lVillrs a lifelong resident con:sulnmated; adding ghat lie haderrefused to attend. a recontemeet�n�no fiv;as the POtOst Ranch Land llso Committee, at the home of 'the applicant; re ardih this Project' that t g ..� p j ' he water potential for this project is as rough, or rougher, than that for Lechnev. Wllis then n ,uestxoned liojs 1 BUTTB C41tNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - Augus'.t• 5, 1981 the Cojpmi.ssion could approve this variance when only a few months 'ago a similar one had been denied for Mr. Lochner. Staff noted that tlle Lecliner variarice involved deenscumgnis includingfire protection concerns as apart o£tlpiding�msaone Commissioner Bennett commented that the difference L, Go small--.22 acre-=that he could not see why it should nb't be approved. He then made a motion Which was. seconded by Commissioner Schrader to 'A., Find that the requxreme�lts Of the California Environmental Quality Act have been complied WiLh and adopt a Negat.11 Declaration- and . B. Find that because Of 9P.ecial circumstances applicable to the property, including sizer shape,topobraphy, location, or surroundings, t;11e strir„t application Of this chapter deprives such l rup,exty of privileges enjoyed icy other property in the v-.tc1nity and under identical zoning cl,assi i.cationy C�nd. C. Approve the variance to the minimulii parcel size requirement, allowing a 4.68 'acre parcol, i.n a *1i 5 zolle for AP 6. - 20 and ?1f subject to the following conditions: 4 14 Redesign the intersection Of Cody Lane and Knolls bS 1; ve to conform With Public Worlts' standards for tr.a:CLic `aPety. 2 Any development or. division shall comply 1ti,ith minimum area requirements of Butte County' Subdivision. Ordinance, and, -require- ments of the Butte County menage Disi)osal. Ordinance Arid 1 eal th bepartment rogulatlons . Applicant 'must alsci` comply jgith all other applicable ,State and 10L 1 �,W48' statUteS, an' 'Zogul.at'onS 101-loo-ler, Lambert; and Chairman Max. NOES No one_: Mt No one, Moti.on carriod: 1 f Caunlzy ' Pl�nntng Cammias�orw " �hLANNING bEpARTMENT S INTERDGp.4RTMENTA,L REVIIr l cU si 7 Caunly Cbntbr Drive Caltifarniu 's�,4�s6 ,,. CJ esyi! , �' anhar'L ;��,��,���un��'Ga7, TO. pt�f-Env:+anit{t-�-tiu�a:�.. --!Oil �,b.�,.a X981 JUL Ea'19�1 JUIN 18REQUEST: gstiM iS21]1t7L�1 o tt tvtllaa CollfomfA AP N0. ; Carovtl{e,+Cnlilo�nla yi,:b in 1= DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT; 1 •� - Ll (�� � n�" F ,�1L3�'' } �t]T�—��jY�' h� ,�-"ci` , , . , . ri t l ri��, �7:..,��+Y� �, ar+rc� •i"iarr�»`1 cii P LOCATION, tet- •,�,.,•.. � /�, m a mla7 'l , n -app ; -I APPLICANT'. AD D R l "S OWNERZ � R PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION SCHEDULED RETURN DATE R5CIUESTC0: ASAP LTUIy Vii, ' DATE DISTRIBUTEO: ATTACHMENTS; CO of application & plot pian. NIrTURNI=D; 7 COMMENTS` t �y ►, �►� .` ------------ 14 1 4 c:ra� TonvR. R taR Healthfe" xcz e Tho bo may,.• :�, +'�'^ "' i. r GA ., LIPP THIEL E, LIPPINGOTT 0INCQT' L, S. 3634 L. 5, 2760 L1PPINC0TIr SURV'EYlNG 1007 DILLE ROAp.6 P,O. BOX 67i PARADISE, CALIFORNIA 95969 TELEPHONE 9116 87 4 LETTER Or TRANSMITTAL' TENTATIVE MAP PRESENTATION TO: ADVISORY A iENCYDATE %r ' d, 7 1�7fl' 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE OROVIL,LE p CA. 95965 t A,P , No NAME tcrr/✓J JOB NO,//� APPLICATION 1=I` Preliminary Title Report (1 copy) ❑ Copy of deed (s) ❑` Cheol: to "TREASURER OC BUTTE COUNTY'S i;n the amount of �. for application fees/ E.I.,R+ fee.., p33.t1 by r �.cc,rvt.-r✓�4 Application form's filled out and signed. ff-pourbeeh copies of Tentative Parcel Map. ❑ Four copies of boundary Line Ad JUsbltent Map: ❑ Copy sof percolation tests ❑ Copy of Deep hole tests ❑ other DATE PRE88NTED - .. ---------- AbVIS' ORY ACENcY APPROVAL Dy Butte Cor N3lahning GamM JUN 1�1 Oro�ill�r �aiitarl� k, Q Z:. 1,•E_ - _ - ..- ___ SSSS _ e IT. } RECORDING REQUESTED;' BY - OFFICIAL HECOP ' BUTTE COutl i f-GA. IF. COItOS REQtir' I: BY Ann, WHEN' RECORDED' MAIL TO -JUM COMM TM Co. NANO Douglas S'. Starr - AER,. I: ( 44 ADDRESS. P. 0. Box 365 CLARK CiTr Forest Ranch, Ca. 95942 CLERK-RECORDER E5i sT„:E L j, 81-13736 FEE: TitlaOrder-NO F_acrowNc._—� SPAGF' QBOYETHIS LINE FOR: RECORDER'S USE MAMTAX STATEMENT-S,76 - Documentary transfer tax $. P1.24... . . . ............. ] Computed on full value of property conveyed, or NAMZ Sarre as above 0 Computed: on full. value less: liens .and encumbrances: ADDRESS remaining thereon at time of sale. CITY,& STATE - L Si¢natureofdeeiarantora¢entdetermirdngtax-firm name: owner cbanGe TRANSFE ,tent ,Wip s� - a. R ��t u Z brant teb filed- t: mailing 7`� PAlD` e _ntto t oRiant^ _. WESTERN TITLE FORM NC. 104: - _ - oddre� FOR rALUE RECBI`/ED LDWARD CHARLES McLAl GHLIN, a married man, dealing with his sole and separate property and CHARLES .EDWARD McLAUG•HLIff, a single :man,, GRANT - to DOUGLAS S. STARR, a married ,man, as his 'sole and separate prapertyt al that,reaipropertysituatein';the »corporated area, of the Countyof Butte State of -alifornia,described asfoilows PARCEL ONE:: The North half of the North, half of the Northwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 8, Township 23; North, Range 3 East, 1` .D.B. & it.. TOGETHER 14IT-H a right and easement over the West 20 feet of that portion of the Northwest quarter of said SSecticn 8, lying. South of the land herein described and extending South approximately 1980' feet; more o^- :Less, to an existing road', as said; right and easement uTas reserved in Deed executed by William E. Fitzgerald„ et at to Glenn C_ 5oeth,, et ux,; recorded October 26,; 7953 in Book 693 of Official Records,, at page 35, records of Butte County, California_ PARCEL TWOS Tlie South half of the North half of the Northwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 8, Township 23- North, Range 3 Fast,. N.D_B.. & ii. TOGETHER GiITH a right and easement over the West 20 feet of that portion of the and q ," d. rsortllwest natter o.i= said Section 8 Ivznt;, South of the land herein describe extending; South apprnz-imately 1650 feet, more or less:, to an existing road, as said right and easement was reserved in Deed executed by William E. Fitzgerald., et a to Glenn E. Soeth, et ut, recorded October 26,: 1953 in Book 693. of Official Records, at page 35' records of Butte County, Ca1ifornia. 1�dward Unar.Les 1tTc Charles Edward. Mc Lang STATE OF CALIFORNIA Coupty Butte of- ss_ 0, April 26 19 81 before r..., he undersigned. �,t Ed�rd Charles FOR NOTARY SEAL OR sra�aP a: Notary Public in and for said lState, personally aPlrar. McLaughlin, known to me to be the person- _whose name _ i c OFFICIAL. SCA6, subscribed to the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that 4 WALTEiI D. . - CALIFORNIA - - «•' NOTARY P�SE4LIC - {ALIEflRNiA _ die_ _e7CCClltedthe: same PRINCIPAL OFFICE IN sem/ Buffe C. Fia IiI BUTTE -COUNTY mv--' MMISSICN EXPIRES CCIOBER 1, 1983 m juf Notary pu rc OfQYl ei l✓al3:OI1I 0 x BUTTV, COUNTY MANNI""Mr, CCI0115STON Notice is hereby given by the iutte catinty plaani.rxg Commission that public hearings will be held on Itifecjnesd.ay, August 5, 1081, tit 7.30 p.eit., in tho nutter County jjoarri of sup'arvior5'r poom Butte County Ac1r�ini stratio,:x Ce. . 0 25 County Center Drive, tiro. irilloo California? regarding the following; .,IT211.18 tl priti4lN i? TO Siff? taoli, CAT t��i T AMIR' IPNTh FVI1�1Y 1. Carl Ia -*h-r Enterprises, Tnc. Ilse permit to allow four parkng lot lights and one txaff c directional sign to be located id -thin rhe regta;ired 50`tbac k area. along Esplanade, Inst Avenue, alfa Calunors Avenue on property zoned "1C_241 (Cenora.l Commercial) located on the fast side of Esplanade between, hast Avenue and t�o 44-12-1-400 Chaco. a nors llv=ue, identified a5 AP ITEMS 07 1 itiel"rIC1C NNGATIlrp 1IRCLAUTIONS Ct.I?(IRRMIEG V1FtC)A i)a 'lC�l1� 3� ?�At i yl1AV `?2 ?Ct) 9Mi?NTt%i? 1. 1)013 las S. Starr - Variance to minimum lot ;size to allow the prea.tion of a. 4.68 acre parcel On property zoned "TNI -3" (Timber Mountain - S acre parcels) located on. the northeast co!,ner of Cony nr 4ve all(I X110118iiriv o� identified ed as A 6.3-04-2o and 211 Por ost Ranch. 24 Cal. forni,a Hater 5ekvice Company - Moe permit to allow a well for Publico Quasi -Public use on Property zoned Mi -W' (A v i. �- cUItUralwBUburban Residential) 'located on the southeast Corner of West Sacramento Avenue and Saints Amann Court, Menti.fied as AIS 43-39-14 (portion), Ct ico . 3. tater Ciampaoli. M Rezones from 11R„3"" Nedium ilensity lies identi.a:l) to ""IA -C" (Pl.an�ned Ares -Cluster) to allrtiw a 45 unit: residential development on proPOrty located on Ot 1,o'r'thwesterly c.,��)xer of,7crshua Tree roadolid POsada Way, i.ciet1e:i.fied as AiP 44-61.0, 9, 1t3, l,l, mono Particularly describes as, Lots 8$ 90 100 arta 11 of 'Voshua Troef" Sub, per map Of ,record I'T' �za,p D001c S3 M! tinges 26 Mi 27 on Pile in the Office of the Rut•te County itoctea ser Containing ning 3w6 acr"os, more or :less, 4. 1 rbc:rt L. hrov:n i Rezove 9r6m "A-40"" (Agricultural - 40 acre parrel.. : wV' (Suburban 'Residential 2 acre Parcels to e"Std Proper`y,1aca tea 01i the �n.ottboast corner Of Cohagset Road. ane 'ihorntretr llr� , o, ideti�.i.EiOd as. Ate 48-01 47, 200 211 27,E :and 230 mors: parti.culaTly detcribed as,.- The s:The 5 1/2 of tie.=^ SIV 1%4of Soctioil g, Tfight TIE M1ii3V0 eXcopti.n,g therefrom tha4 po-rtjox► jocai.orl within the City limits ok China Can�:a nin 7 5 5 a.ctes, more or loss, Chico„ - Ju1y 27, 1981 Mr. Douglas S Starr P n Pox 365 Forest Ranch, Ca 99.442 Re; AP 63-04-20 & 21 I)car *4 Starr ylncl,rsed .4 a copy of Staff Pinctings ct cerning your z1ZoW the cro�ttion of � 4.68 ° minimum lot size to �� �� ,+..- �► (TimberMountain _ e Xzaxcei Qn prnporty t application for a. variance a.nce t r xonr TM. S (Tim�.ver Mountains 5 acre parcels) located on to 1, northeast corner of r Coda nri.ve ate 1�no,lis nrive, Forest Ranch. A pOlic hearing on this project has been, set for tho Planning Commission, at their ro,gul.ar mecting on August S, 1.981. This meeting will be held in the hoard of Supervisors I Room, County Aftinistvit<ion Building, 25 ve County Center Dki, orovillo, and is scheduled to begin at 7t30 P. M. Shtour oul yhave any questions, F`lease feel free to fico. Sincr�rely, Bettye Blair /lid Director of Planning , Tinc t Wo the urloix: ,,s .o lod proP CTAY Co hcl c ly V, , .-110rloo 01 1 �» lwi� rr "t rl' for Vii, 4•68ac pax,ce.1 1004"t 1d the North Vies,tj corner OP seotion S. C;-rl/�524-vz/- '621, zed �a ol �' �... 46"AlV. t ��. Ze Iw" el �11 ACK5J ale A v"& va,/ /60 �d'rf, GTS W1/�1�%� i`G✓" G'•'v° f' + t 1"" �� r zef IV 1 -yAa "'� � Y T 5•� P M �.. r Wo the undersigned property owners do hereby r""UppUrt tho wrinnee of cu I, ,s S. ,Starr Tor a 4.68ac pctmel .loon,t( d in the North West confer of ri ecta,on 8, r 6"w zx %1� , �✓ Is t t^rq L i d� o 0 r a . / cep,'e' 4 sl- r v' SC/)/ 60� r—Le� I, 7e�� ' . =w'Zar�'t. C�:�l,� ' �, --` � �� ;� lY� Y 4 � ��� �� f� y' ..'��'✓'� l.r,f.� rx r,�. � � �S AMMTION' IN SUPPORT QF VAR���: We the underai geed ptapertir owners 40 hevObY SUPP tt variance of Douglas S. Starr ��� s, �6� ��xe p�rc�Llo,lrated in the North West corner, of Section « } p0 8OX VO ' P-171 kY" •:r 4 f r '�! �4Q 4. ��x.: Nr �! YVudtl�4.n'i.�4 ,�,,,� .. tl� v.y fR' � � � � �•VF p/` r �'j rJ•�j �+ � t�, . h •� ��. � �."6.•�"�' i D D.+ / .yI"�> +f%G. b.w. r•' d Na 1,„ yy t X & aye' 9 bx (N r 14, � 4 ✓x✓1 ..}�v�'� rye i K PL.AN11tING L,,-ARTMEC�"1'S IN �R '� �r _ . .. T OcOA t7 MENTALS E&UQ1a.EST C;bunly ;oT pu#tn Pl nh#nr uomnii zi n TO; Div i sl o11 of; 7 Counfy C onfor brlva: REQUEST: Bzx[i'�nmwji; AP NO.: Q44-20 & 21 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT Varianoo to the n ni.mmuxa lot si. , a 't o allow the creation of a 4-88 a6ve i2a3l g"1 on cropy. IITM. —�"(T mbpr Mo , a n 5 acxe rood s) LOCATION; at .the intiarse6-H cap of Clody D3 iv"s ai),d Knolls DP±- -pprwt. 1/� mile southea8t o Nopel and 32, rorsst Rash APPLICANT: ADDRESS: r�� rac._�____. OWNER: Sam PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION SCHEDULED RETURN DATE REQUESTED; ASAP SulY 3 ',98 DATE DISTRIBUTEb� c ATTACHMENTS: Copy of applicatloh Lplot plan. RETURNED. COMMENTS; `No iih act on firs orotectidg. No objeatio s to this trar an.ce No ,fire protection requirements. Hutto Cn. i"Imtn!y k.r�� Qo y�+ Haw%ina. r.v +�rovlllu��II#ornP August 6 1981 Mr. Douglas 'S S. Starr P.C. R6x 366 roreat Ranch, Ca;. 9S942 Pe: Vari,anco on AP 63-04-20 ; 21 Door Mr, Stag' At the regular meeting of theButte County Planning Commission held August S, 1981, your app Ili.cation for a variance to minimum lot size to allow the, creation oi' a. 4.69 acre arcel on Property zoned "TM-:," (Timber Mountain � 5 acre Rarcol.s� located on the northeast corner of Cody Driyv b and i,nol'; s Drive, Forest Panch, was approved. b, If `there fire no a,�rPeals within rhoo8-rltry anneal Which :is after •00 p.m. on August 13, 1,.81, anceow your va.r a.nce Will he considered granted after August 1.9, 19310 the date or the off' tial aprroval of the minutes of the Planning Commi.ss ori :for August 3, 1981. should you have any questions coricar ring this matter, please feel free to contact this office. Sincerely, BRTTxr, WAT.t Itv t,Re: r I I e waOM Planner !IX 1 iii ►, _ _�_ August 31, 1981 Mr. Douglas S. Starr P D 7 o- 365 95942 �. Forest Ranch,C Rn lrar�aancY on AP 630-04-20 F 21 Tear Mr.Star pnelosod aro trite coxIg ats and one cony of your Variance sta . 91" "*Zr'i to Illovi t"1to creation Of a 4 : 08 acre parcel on 11roperty MINT ('Timber-Mountain } 5"Acre k parcels) located «n the nOr'tlIM-4st o�xr��r of c�oc�y Drive and Xnolls 11t: ive) rOre5t and You 't���� 1 ploa'se s gn►�both copios an- re >ur�t them to ��s: Ivo. will then havo them, vat, da.tc(I by the ch, 1"lan o ! the planniltp Commission and tate original will 110, ro tur-ned to yoq :dor vour record,;. Sittltrlcl ybii jitLve tiny q estionss pleaso fecal free to contact our office. Sincerely~ Dettva Blair D reotar of Plannity / hal VARIANCE BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION DATE r---- ,. `i ;ifs VARIANCE MO. a wm ASSESSOR'S PARCEL N0,' Pursuant to the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance: of the County of Butte and the speciai conditions set forth below,, DOUGLAS_ S, 93TA ai Is hereby granted a Variance NAME to allow f 4 yJgn paccrfoyrydancep yw iit�h}aptp l itcation filed, (y dta a .y� y�yt o Wpb y , Cy ¢ { { 7 A)�S./'PprtY 4A b[,Ft L"r'44 $41'1,'-5 (k�.im,11c,'^ :41'4 31N' xn' rNgAtcro 1),ti h+el.5) �„i�catV✓{El ,} A 6, 10 'r'4 � ✓,a ','w' aS SPECIAL CONDITIONS: M Pkleninn he" ctia4.oiat, x-AV�n fAtFb'i.ic: �`�1�"i^� ' :3'i;::���t,�i,�3.�"r�r., �"t'3`i~° �d��'����,5 'il'�'P?'�,k • tinyr1f,,vo1o?,',"1,ont or fir- "MV-P `mH iii'is o, nlrdimaneo, 411' � 0 qXxiii-oia nt s 4`f t1te gs,;dt c' 'rnx,,.lLjt:1t �(Jjng i►gu���;9���, d►��1�<�?d.r.'.t° a`s7j lie a t h tle7,ti rt'Ie t; t ogitja t oils M 't1plienntmuft1190 ap?�laitlall t0(;,,r .1ta o i(I lorv. 1aisii$Yyl"Z- so and Eogal ryaio"t� ais�; �. MI : I hereby declare under penalty of perjury thatl have read the foregoing conditions; that they are in fact the conditions which were imposed upon the granting of this variance, and that i agree to abide fully by said conditions, a _;M Dated:- K: ,;,,^Applicant - NOTE.; issuance of this variance does"not waive requirement of obtaining Oltilding and Health Department petrtiits before starting constructions nor does it waive ahy other MgUiremerits, GC; Health bepartment Department of Public Works (2) r r Aire 0e06rtnidint C►ialrniari bf Pl®hnlhg Coininisslon" Jq O fYAI fl At.D BI s P.I D0 tj A I IJ A r + 011 ! a PLANNING GOMMISSIn'N 7 COUNTY CENTERDRIYF . oFiOMLE, CALIVORNIA 95945 PHONE 594*4401 September 170 1981 Douglas Si Starr P 0. Box 365 Forest P.anc'h, Ca, 95942 .P,et Variance on AP 65-04-20 21 Dear Mr., Starr Enclosed is your validated Variance NO. 81-26 to allow the creation of a 4.68 acre parcel on property zoned "TM-51' (Timber Mou.'ntain - S acre parcels) located oil the northeast corner of: Cody Drive and Knolls Drive; Forest Ranch. if you should have any questions concerning this matter, please feel. free to contact this office. Sincere lvv PETTYP BLAIf? DIRECTOR OF PLANNING By C'ar..'le cods Planner Ill Ctitlr $n c cc; Butte County stealth Dept; Dept, of Public Wotl:s (2) t'ire Department Inter-Qepart ®ntal Memorandum TW he�e �r PA. w. '�,� r'. • 15.1'• I w -- TM - 45, ;y V • W .. �TM , 5 ♦� ��''*. ',b "-,.. N; r uq4 it I II 11I fV r 1 w R • IY i ,e \ �,�✓'� �(Gy� � I • 1-11. • . • • .. • T' ` `1" ` 1 i�iai i i ••i r• }f t 7 �r h • t _ aro � � f �'•"` F • . f ; Tye ';!� r fff 5. _41 .� C 1 j 4 1 '1 TM -20 FILE N o.a ,.3 `�J �,. BUTTE COUNTY pLAN.I�iI�G. G.C7l�M�SSI�N ---mom -�- .HEARINti�G' DATES�r�r ��, ��r N APNIIIIIIII- PLICANT. 27D1 s S7, ow�l�R� .andM11�/lp�y�R�MN�pIL REQUEST.,- �'n' �tl ,�71 ,, �, COUNTY OF BUTTE County CenteaJJriva Oraville -Califorda— 95965 - 6F'FICE oi+"" PLANNING COMMMION .. � c a Linda Nevins Pio. P -x 2268 OX closed --No orc Mary VA -1 o, CA 95901 Ar I A