Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout063-110-028RIV, IN S: LICEN$ED LAND SURVEYING ..�..�..e.o-�--- �___--- 5A37131ackOBve Drive -:Paradise, CA 95969` -- plione: (916) 877-6253 - November '?0, 99C? County plannin;g.De.partm;ent y r' -Drive '7 Courst Cerate Orovi]1e-,. CA. 95966 RE: 5ubd'ivision/Land Division Application for: Flod-in 5ubdi,Vsion AP # 63-35�iQ; lease find a cagy of the Final Map Por the Attached hereto, 1? roe respectfully request your re - above referenced application. f its comp), iar►ce with your condi,tion(s� a view of the ; map for approval. Please notif the. County Public Workst to clear the map Por Y to this office. if it filing and send a copy of correspondence additional nfor►nation, please notify does' not comply or you. need Us Thank you for your prompt' consideration of this ;matter. 5inde,te1y, SIERRA WEST SURVEYING' �et. Agee r-• Civi 1 EYi,gineer Attachments 0 t, ARTIMLI OROVILL f CALIFS .'YAM!I�YfY11nrMT1iMMawY'MA.flW.wi�KwYHFti}fjf�,*tNViMM.11viMwl tlµ I y, 4 �,�, .�_ VA _ .. .a � �,.,k..t� t < . ?��n a ;�PJ','3 � � � ��� �G .0 ° ��� ,n, a�4xi .,,,i Awa ,.�.,la.. .. , .. i.i_ . ,� � �. ,t. ,. 4r..w ,.,.,,. ,.u, .. ., c.�,. .r .,.. ., ..._ �, , r ,�:. ._ t. _.t1��A .., .�, w ... ,I .. .. -`v _., ., ., .. .., ... .,tl .n� ..a. ., , �:���. �r - � ., b h " ✓ 91!ai✓!`!+t N!'VY•v+ �'h"41t"'1�t�+✓,eVra+h.� 4W nvnGlt�f .NI ��.MW i �Nw�l.l("'I."�'tIr Mu Fiy «fit"Y. M1U 4 rr{!�i 1 li.�{.r.:. ahwfVF'!o-a,., N+11 •A"M tye+1 'IAW, • � � � * � a.• t'F � "� � s R � �RI t� b.+N, >wt W H.'"1'F'!kW V4y �iM'J R hiu<(�µ a '� � �"�' '�, �, �� -�' rr�s r � t � � .ate � , � w � r,,c ll TABLE' OF CONTENTS PAGE I. Summary- II. Project Description- - - - - - - - - - 7 1`. Location- - - - - - - - - - - - - - 7 Figure 1. Site Wcat: onMap- - - - - - - - 8 2-, Setting - - - - - - - - - - - - 3. Proposej� Project- - - - -'_ - - - - - - - - - - 7 Figure 2. 'Tentative Subdivision Map- - - � - - 9 4. Required Permits an Approval s- - - - - - - - » - - 10 5. Relationship to Other Plans, Policies e4 Projects- » - 10 IIIo Environmental Setting, Potential Impacts and, Mitigation Measures " 1. General Plan;, Zoning, and Land-Use 15 2.. Topography and Soils- 17 I. Vegetation and Wildlife 19 4:. Traffic and Circulation - 5. Cultural Resources- - - - - - 22 25 b Water Supply-__ 25 wage Disposal - - - - - - - - - 27 8. �ormwater Diainage 28 9. Police Protection 29 10. Fire Protection - - - - - - - - - - - 30 11. schools - - - - - - - - - 32 _ 12. Mosquito Abatement- - - - 33 IV. Gr •owth-Induci lig and Cumulative Impacts - - - - - - - -- - - - - 34 V, Sj gnificant Envit^onmental Impacts -Which Cannot Be Avoided If the P-raj ect 'i s Impl ementedw - _ .: _ - _ - _ .. :. 36 �j VI. Alternatives' - - - - - - - - - - - - - 37 1. No Project. - - - - - -' - - - 2`. Al'ternativ'e Onsite" Access » - - - - - - 37 3. Les$ Intensive Land Use; - - + 38 4. Redesign to Allow fo;r, a Future 'Collector- 'Redesign Road Bew�en Forest Ranch and Nopel Roads - - _ 39 5`: Comparison of Alternatives- - - - - - - 39 VII. Persons. and Oganixai;ic�ns Contacted - - - - - - - - 41 V I`� I'. _ - - Y 8°i b!l t ography- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -4`3 IX. Appendices 1.0RS` - 7A Raad'`Standards 2., Excerpts from Ground-water Report i a) Earth-moving con' truct,ion -activities; shall`, be restricted to the. dry season'o`i.e.,April through October. b) A11 disturbed areas which are to remain exposed duPirig the wet season shall bo revegetatO and mol, ched. This show 1 d be undertaken fol'1owing the end' of construction and prior U, November 10 c.) Standard dust control, practices, as specified by County staff; shall be utilized dur I'll g all grading -;operations. d) Energy dissipators shall be installed in all Onsite drainage ditches. LOV . a_ r2 b tt) L e) All sediments gerieratPd by onsite construction activities shall be contained by th'e u sei of silt fences, settling basins, a perimeter ditch or other suitable measures. ) p all be limited to a maximum gradient of f Gut and fill slopes shall, 1. horizontal to vertical . 3..1. The area west of he 3Q percent slope line shown on the tentative isubdivision map shall be set asidetas permanent open space in which no devel opment shal l occur.; It is recommended that this area be surveyed, legally recorded, and the development rights :dedicated to a nonprofit conservation organization such as the gaffe County Land Trust. If such an organization will not accept the; development s rights the subject area should be rezoned as Resource'`Cohservation p .. r or Open Space, or be designated as a no-develo mQnt area'oii th e subdivison map. 32 The land owners)/developer(s) shall contribute on a fai'r�share basis to a deer habitat imp;ro,vement fuhd if and when such a fee is adopted by the County ON.' of Supery sots. A note to this 'effect shall be placed on the final subdvls,ion map. 3 3, Occupants, of the proj ct, site shal`1 keep a,ll doggy on leash, confined within ° a fenced' area, or otherwise under positive "restra'nt at all times. 4 i C I we 1 as residential use. For these dor timber produet�on as ., l 01 ides w 1v. However, the s.fte reasons, the above p ould seem to app • three sides b urb n development, and, as stated`,n 1s surrounded on y c.1.d ". .; , non-timber use (sha11 be considered for} areas policy where urban encroachmenthas made inroads into timber areas and where past offi ci al' actions have planned edareas for' devel,opmeht •° Pot i.c;Y d) Promote conservation of '`energy resources i'n reviewing proposed developments, Discussion: The prop osed break-away gates will Ouse residents to Use circuitous routes to reach some of`' the primary, ,destinations in the Forest Ranch, area by vehicle This, would unnecessarilyincrease energy consumption- Policy G.S. a Regulate; dev elopment inidentified winter deer. ranges to facilitate survival` of deer herds.' Discussion: P orti ons of the project s^it.e tontai n winter deer range as identified `on Butte county and Department of Fi sh and Game red Under Section II1.3; resource- maps. However, as further discus the Value of the site for migratory ;.deer has already been compromised by surrounding residential deVelopmertts. DFG has no objections to the proposed project provided that the area west of the 30 slope line is set aside as open space (DFG, 1986). This EIR. hasb.eenincorporated asmitigation measure 3.2 ofthe proviso - policy �a � at Road system pl mini ng will emphasize; presery on of the. eXi sting ;� wh ile working' o 'increase the efficiency and roadwa ntworkt y •capacity of the existing network, Discussion`: The proposed break;=away gates. ,will unnecessarily cause' "local 'traffic to utilrze SR 3.2, wh icii will decrease its aV4i'1able 11 ca.acit and i s of g p .,y ficiency as, through, route. Goal 3.0 raini`mize'the negativeimpacts of transportation in the County, n� son-:1heproposed. break -away gates Would u"nnecessarily 'res in increased vehicle travel, petroleum consumption, air ollutant emissions, reduction of the ca ac of P p y SR 32,E and safety hazards at the intersections of Forest Ranch and Nopel Roads with SR 32.- Objective 3.i , Plan for transportation mode's and strategies that, ensure good air uality reduce noise, reduce etroleum `conium tion, reduce th 4 y p p a need to devote additional lands to transportation uses, and lessen the dangers presented. by transportation of, hazardous: materials i n the ai s sel ected if the new school 'is located on the east side of 5R 32'x, some means will have to. be provided to allow students to safely Cross' SR 32 (Hensley, CUSD, personal communication). This issue', of safe student pede'itrrian access should be jointly addressed and reso1 ed by the CUSD', Caltrans, and. Butte CountyP r. ,af. per rid rw „ r� is i r ; i4 lea 'kel uses, no land use conflicts, topography -,Of the s to and its 1i ' are expected. 2. Evidence of adequate water and sewage disposa`.l ca�aci'`ty. this q,iscussion: Aground -water evaluation conducted as part of study found that sufficient ground; water' it expect ed on the site. Available soils data show that septic tank-l:eachfield sewage dposal; systems should be acce,p table on the site.` Refer to i s Sections. 111 6 and III.7 for more information. 3. Availabila y of adequate fire protection facilities. the Discussion: The nearest fire station is about 1/4 male from site. A second station is about 3-1,/2 miles from the site. Butte County Fire Department and California DiVision of Forestry and Fire Protection staff expect that the site can; be adequately served. Refer to Section III.10 for more Jnformationi, 4. Ava1abi1ity of maintained, approved road access with sufficient capacity to service area. The applicant will be required' to upgrade all private Discussion: r•o ect-generated, traffic to meet County by p j access roads utilized standards. Implementation of the mitigation measures presented in this EIR wi'11 ensure long-term:'maintenance of these facilities. Refer to Section III.4 for more information. 5 Reasonable access to commercial services and schools. Discussion:` The Forest Ranch commercial center' is about l/4 mle ly from the site. The.,'F.orest Ranch ElementarySchool is Curren 1- orated a6o[at 1/2� mi, e,: from'the site, Potential 'Impacts The project would convert the project site from`tlmber� pro- proposed ducti,ori 1,and to residential lots. Land uses an'd human activity on the , would' be substantially more intense following development: Beeatise site the r.oposed projecir is in conformance wi' h the County General Plan lanl p be Use ;desig'na,tion and zoning classification, ` thi s impact will not , �� 16 ,.� .n.�...-.,...,,._..—--_,.�_�.--_ ., ..— �..—.r --,. r, 28 �w >' �e 7777777 41 VII. REPORT PREPARATIOW 'PERSONNIM AN POSONS CUNTAi:TCD 1. ,Report Prelparation Personnel Randa'11 Hauser,..AICP, Principal _ Donald Burk, Senior Analyst Alex Tur n, Administrative Assistant David Lawrence,.Hydrologi.st/Ground-water Gealogist Peter. Jensen, Archaeologist; 2. ;Persons and Organizations Contacted :Butte Coun y Administrativ ce t e Off Gerald Lively, Deputy Administrative Of ;Butte County Planning Department Laura Tuttle, Associate Planner Starlyn Brown; Senior Planner butte County Public Health Depar meat Lynn Vanhart, Director, Environmental Health Division Tam Reid, Supervisor,,Environmental Heal th;,Di vision, Chico' Office lButt e Cbuntyt Pub1 is Works Bepai^tment Bob Jones,. Engineering Aide Stuart Edell, Land Development Section, Butte County Fire Department/California pepartment of Forests y and Fire Protection Daviq 'Minton, Battalion Chief gut,tel p,unty Mosquito Abatement District Jim Shaffer, Re fonal;'Su ervisar 9 p 41 Butte County Sheriff' Department Leroy Woods; Sheriff 'California Native Plant Society Mary Meyer, President;. Mt.:' Lassen Chapter Ken Berg, CNPS Botanist "Chico Uni fi ed Schoo'I' 'Di s, t. ct Stan Pend ey, Ansi sta;it. Superintendent :Sierra We. Surveying Tom Wrinkle r State of California Department of Tra�nsportatiop ji Jim Brake, 'Trafflc Engineer, District` 3 U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil: Conservation Service' Bill Pellersels, Soil Conservation Technician jl42 Y111,, 916 I002RAPHY Butte County Planning ,Department. 1986. EnvironmAntal Checklis Form for the Terry Flodin Subdivision, dated February 14, 1986. California Native Plant Society. 1984., 'An Inventory. of Rare and Endangered Vascular' Plant Species i'n. Califo��ni 3,rd edition, ; Chico Unified School District. 1986. Letter from ,Robin G. Thompson to John Mendonsa, Butte County Department of Public Works, dated February 24., 1986. Munz, P.A. and DO'D Keck., 1968. A California Flora, With Supplement. University ,of Ca0iforo a Press, Berkeley. State of Cal forn a Department of Fish:and,,,Game 1986. Letters County from Paul T. Jensen to John Mendonsa,,Butte Department of Public Works, dated February '19i 1986, and March 11, 1986. State of California Department of Forestry,, The '.Resources Agency:, University of Cali'f6rnia bivisionof Agricultural Sciences. 1981. Soil -Vegetation Map, Cohasset Quadrangle,_ scale - j c 24, 000. State of Cali'forni'a Office of Planning and Research. .1984. CEQA: The California Environmental Quality Act, Law and Guidelines: 3 7.7! TABLE 1 LOCAL AND AN WELL DATA.'FRONj DRSLLERS LOGS _ Depth- Well to Draw- specific Test Depth- Water, Discharge downp . Ca c"it Duration _ (ft) (ft) (gpm) (ft) Igpm/ftp (ha'urs) ` wells 'locate d+T231�/R3E-section-6r(Pro ect lapationi 80 20 7 85 49 27 3 g0 55 90. 65 100 23 15 100 30 , 4` 120 30 30 140 30 50 360 10 420 3110, 30 3 460 420 520, 410, 20 4 560 480 30 4 �I 606 504 a Count ' 14 _ 13 1 T, 0. 0 Average 267 187 21 M.«ximum 606 504 50 Minimum 80 20 4 Median, -- 130 --- 55 --------- 20, Wells located within 4 miles of'!T23N/R3E°section 6 count 525 365 346 83` 82 214 Average 185 115 19 39 1.81 1.68 Maximum 1,000 720 1000 295 40 24 Minimum 25 1.5 .03 1 .01 .25 Median 150 _52 10 25 .21 1 Aq i � � �,� � �r n, � C �• [� jar a � ! � 'i° tf is GT _� ,�_ t �,Y a„ jai � ,� X { w P efi f CIA LYY `xk W ea i�1rS `G i.+�a iFa,IA �..�wl iii �+`Wi i 1 a* r p �rgad ` x Adv' soryAgexacy V Rcruz� �.P.lanill ng Director REPORT ON TtNTATZVE SU-tDZVItION MAP FOR,I 24, FI OD CN ON ands 63. , dune 2'3, 1987' The Flodin T'eritatve Subdivision Map and Envronmen.ta'1 impact Report Was heard before 'theAdvisorl� Agency on June ,,8; 1987, zt. was contn�ied to June 29; the Consultants ,1987 to allow surfxcient time to prepare responses to comments .made: at the. "hearin the summarized b g comments were y'staff and submitted to the consultant June 4, 1987. The consultant's reponses are'exp;cted June 25 or June 26, 1987: tim Thea may or may not b e e'4rece vec'i'in for ans deration o the June 29, 1987 hcariing. Zn the event the responses are not received in timed consideration at the hearing, ,t is'recommd inr map I be, continued, to July, 6,1987. .hat the The Advisor Agency should be aW y time frame Y g are that the one year' provided by the Government• code in which to consider an ExR expires July 1, 1987, may be considered upon agreement by theAap10 daY OxteAsion y Approval Septembeda29-v 9187ion Would extend the time line to 1987• LT:7mC cc: Terry Flodin Sierra West Surveying , Aw T lig In �eraD�pn�t emordodu Advisory Agency Fnrx, Planning :'D.irector ==J-GTt REPORT ON TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION .MAR FOR. TERRY FLODIN'ON AP#63-111!128 and 63-12-3,24' » may 28, 1987 This; is a proposal, to divide approximately, 75'adres into 15 parcels of 5 acres each. The prose'zoningµ is TM -5 (Timber Mountain, 5 acre parcels and U (Unclassified). The°band Use Plan 'Map of the Butte County Genoral Plan designates this area as Agra cultural Reszdenti, I. The fire hazard is hngh to extreme.. There are no .specific or community p"laps for the area. 7�t°i exavironmentaI impact report has been prepared. tahi.ch 'identifies numerous potentially significant impacts. 'hese impacts are summarized on page 2. of` the draft environmental impact report, Mitigation-measures''have- been recommended by' the consultant and ar&L listed, on rages 3 through, 6. The consultant states on page 3 and again on page 36 of the EIR if any of the mitigation measures or other,meas;ures,of equal or greater effectiveness are riot implemented, the pro- pos.ed project could potentially result in significant adverse environmental impacts". The AdVisox A enc. � should go throe h the init ga Y g Y g tion measures one by one. Mitigation. mea.sure:s should be revised as necessary, or alternatives proposed where implernentanon is not feasible. Planning's comments on the mitigation measures are as follows; 2.2 A maximum grade should beset; fox dr-iveways, i, e. ; 15 percent. Verification of the :grade should be stibi l lted With building permit appl3.cat ons and :signed by a 'regiatered engineer. 2.3 The County does not naw inspect driveway construction at the time of building permit. By including -driveways in ;the erosion control mitigation measures, an unfairburden may' be placed on the `Building Department without comperisa-ion: The word driveway should be eliminated 'ancl'some' alter, native mi`tigat on ineasure 3.1 The area west of `the 30 percent slope line sYiould be shown on the final subdivision mai as a nodevelopment area: 3'. 3 Contribution' of deer herdfees and aparticipat on in animal control should not be; the' burden,`. of"one in develope,r: In the Pvent,,'the B'Oara �f' Supervisors adopts Ordinances as recomm ended, by D epartment of Pish;and Game,► t . ". 'amu: r ... v �i: r.. ._ C c �� Y 1ZI +xhbdYV'. 2 property, waa�ly species present include deer}arush:, biickl�rush, Poison. oak, interior live oak, scrub oa,k, mountain rr�tahagany, and manxanit:a. Herbaceous species ar]� similar to th:osP fienta aped far' the Yellow Pini zone.` B. Rare and Endariarerec3 0� 'Mu-eatend Species �l Several rare,, en'danger,ed, ;,or threatened.spcacies ..potentially c.au7.d o.eou.r at thus .site and,hpx'evi;ously been reported from withiia a ,few miles .aaf the area. Such species include tWo:orchids (Cal form a". lady's slipper--Cyp ..ipediutn, cailfornxounr,; :and mountain lady's slipper--Cypripe-aum montanum?, Butt County torriing glary---Calystegia atriplicifolia, and large -flowered bush a monkey fiowez---1)iplaaus gxandiflaru: The systoe t .. "search for ithe four species mentioned, and o,1�her senaititfe taxa listed by the Calify. oknia Native of this ,federal and state agendas or b 'Plant S,ocxety failed to raveal ora previous are, theref0r.e, presumed season's any trace growth of; a listed plant; they tYaem do not appear to not to`be present, and mitigations for be necessary. CHECKLIST OF VX SCULAR PLANTS.VOTED ON THE DATE OF THE` SURVEY COMON !NAM9CZEI;T:EiFIC NAME Agoseris Angelica Agoseris .heterophylla Barley Angelica breweri Bedstraw Oto-rdeum sp BlackberryGalium sp; Blue dick Rubtis Ursa.nus aff.. Bracken D che1,osLtemma pillchelltim California, bay Pteridum aquiZnum California black oak Umbellulaza zcal ifornac:a •` California soaproot Canyon live oak �;�uercus 1reZZaggi,z Gh'`l orogal um pome.t-i di an um Checker 11.y Quercus chrysale��is Cinquefoil F"riti=3aria sp, Clarki:a Pcatentlla p: Coffeeberry Glarhi� rhomboiclea Common hedge parsle Cudweed y Rhamnus Calif, 7'orilis. Heterophylla Deer -brush: GnaPhaxium sp. Dagbane Ceanat;Hus integsrritnus Douglas fir Apocynujn sp English plantain Psetidotscrga men_2 6,t zi Gooseberry PX&—tagv Ianceolaia Hartweg's iris Ribes raezlxi Haaksae,ed Iris. hartw�egii Incense cedar' Nieraoi:um sp. . Calocedrus decurrens Indian warrior Interior, live pad Pedzcular.i dens -i fl ora Leimon s buckbrush Quercus wsszzei�i Ceanothjts 1Ommoni" Lobed violet i triolaobati 6)- I! ENITTRONMENTAL I ACTS xp anat,ions o a "yes" arillmaybe" ans swerare required sheet. s: , ,>'l�., _ •'' on attached YES MAYEE N0` 1. EARTH. WiIS thero osal. result in signigidant,i a. ; nst?',ale earth condit pans or in changes in geologic tub strig:tures? .�. 4' Disruptions , ,displacement,, compaction or overcovering of the soil? c. :Change, in toga ra" h or mound. g� p Y g xe.l ief features .^surface � c . OestirucGaon-: =;covering :o.r mo,dif'�i- ation, of any : uniga�e geologic or phys:xcal futures? ,. _.:. _. .; e, Increase Lh w.ind or water pros. on of sai,�s, either on L Or roff� `sit'ey7 frs Man'ges in deposition' or erosion, of , beach sands, ar changes in silta:tion,; deposition Or erosion 'which may modify the channel of a r'xver. o'r stream .or the. bed o the ocean or hake.? any bay, inlet,, or g,. Loss of, prime, agricul.tural;l.'y productive-;soil; out,sid.e d.esignated, urban areas'? h. Erasure` of people or: Property to geologic hazards" such as earthquakes, landslides mud- slides, ground failure or similar ha2ards? _. ---- AIR. Will'the Proposal result in substantial'; a. Air emissions or deterioration, of ambient air; quality?' b The creatio:' oi' objectionable odors, smoke - or l:ume9? c. Alteration, of- air movement, ftisture, or temperature,' or any change: in climate, iota or reg%anally`? 3. WATER. Will the proposal result in substantial: �EL, Changes in currents, or, the course or, dixect,ion bi water mo vements in either marine or fresh wate xs'?. b. Changes :in abs'orpto%t: rates, drainage patterns, or, the rate and amount of surface runoff? c. ° Need for off-site surface ;drainage improve- meats, including vegetati'on removal, channel- ization'' ox culvert :installation d. Alterations to the cou;r�e''or flow o"� flood Waters 7 _.� Change in the amount of surface watin any *atbody? eT f,,: Dis<ciha.rge into surface waters z or alteration of surface w°at.er quality' 1M ud rig bU st not limited to. temperature, dissal�red oxyg4o orturbidity? � g.` Alteration of the direction or rate of flow: M� of _ gr.ound waters ? h. Ch.ang.e in the quantity or ,quality,. of gr.cund' waters, ' ugh direct adtitions bx,wither either thro ,an dr.awals-; or ;through ntercep.t, on01j," agfifer by outs o-reca�rations? i., Recluct' n in the' amount of watet oth.eriaise available Eoxpublin tv.r atesupplies? j.Exposuro Of, people or property to water ' ing? related hazards suchas flood �.� 2-7 7 -777-77 ll .. YES MAYBE RO 4, PLANT Lx:FE ! ;: i+Till 'tlie. propos a7 result in substan 1al :number .p a ange in the. d'ivexsity of species a .or of any species .of' .plants (including trees , . °and-aquat.ic plants)°? .. shrubs, grass:, crops, b . Reduction of the iumbexs u: E an-,� unique', rare: orendangerecspecies of plants? lntroductien �f new .species of plants into: an �. c. area, Or in a barrier to the normal replenish- ment of exists nb, ,species?, d,. Reduction a n;; acreage of any agricultural drop`? S . " :4NIMAL tipt Will the proposal rot t , in substantial nu*berg a.' C ange in the aivarsity of species, or als,(birctsl'and animals , gec es o anim oinf cYnu' species, reptilos�stell , d�hand h p bent)i'a c organzs�s or insects) b, Reduction in; the numbers of any unique,` rare or ''endangered species of animals ? , species of animals x�zto; c Int•`oductian of nett/ or 'r68u in a b`axr ex to the' migration a an area,, .t d. ax` ma�rement of animals . --�. Deter�.a�ration to eY�.sting; fish. or S�i1 t ife X habitat . 6 NOISE. Will the proposal -result `.r, substantial: levels? W. Increases iri eYistin,g noise _ b E C, 6suxe of people t'o severe noise levels? _.... , 1 7, LIGHT AND G'LARE,'. Wi11 the px.c�posal produce s gni zcant liglit and glare? -- 8, LAND IJSE. tiVi1l the 1j, ,ria- result stantial alteration of the present ax` plaxzned su land. use of an are a., -`..`. 9. NATURAL RESOURCES,, Will: the' gxoposalresult in su.stantial:. a, In�.rease in the rate of use o� any, natural re6ources? b<. Depletrin of any non-renewati7 e 'naJLural, resources? 10. RISK Ofi UPSET: Will. the. proposal involve;: o e�cplosion or the release of haard7 a, A; rise aus substances (inducting, bait n.ot l�,mited to, - `esticide.s rn the oil'�..p ;' chemicals of xad3.ation) event,<af at accident . or upset condi.ta:ons? b... possible intex1erence with an emergency, , response plan or emergency' evacuation' plan? --- ... ll: POPt7LATIt�N'. W -i11 the proposal 'a7 ter ;rhe ;location, n tion dense t ; or growth rate o E,.'the ,human. �s tri .0 X p opulatidn? �. HOUSING. VjLil1 te' proposal''. affect e a.sting housing,. �-. or create a demand for-'addit.ianal housing? YES 'MAYBE' NO l3 TIW8N ORTATI0T3/CIRCt)LATION will the proposal:._ :result in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicle , movement? b. Effects on existing pal Icing facilities, or demand for. new parking? c. Substantialimpact 'on e:�isting transportation systems? d. Signifi..cant alterations to'pxesont patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? e. Alterations to waterborne, rail ox air traffic? X. f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor• veh,icl.es, bicyclists or pede'stri.an:s? _ 14, Will the proposal have: an upon) orEresultiin a need for new or alteredeffect governmental services; a,. Fire protection? Police,protection'? _�. c. S d.' , Parks or atlYer reereationaJ facilities? X e. Tlasntenance of u p b:1ic facilities5 including roads,` f. Other governmental services? 1S. ENERGY: Will the proposal result 'in, aa, Use of substantial amounts of fuel. .or energy? X' b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of .new sources of energy? X' 16. UTILITIES, Wili the proposalresult in a need for new systems, or subst.ntial alteratians'to the following - a. power or natural gas? Communications systems? CA Nater availabil ity: d. Sewer '6:r', septic tank? e.Storm water drainage? Solid. waste and d $posal? 1' H1JrtAN HEALTH,, Will the proposal result .in: . a. -Creation of any health hazlizd or pflterit al, health hazard (excluding mental health? ,k b : Exposure of people to `pote tial health hazards? ls, AESTHETICSproposal`restilt in the o on of any scenic vis to or viell ope1 11n to the public, or will the proposal � esult in the �p creatipn of a�� ae's" thetically offensive si te': open to tib lio view? 4_ _. 7-777-7777 1`ES MAYBE", NO 9, REGREATTON. 1Vi11 the. proposal'xesult in an,%mpact o existing recx�.aar�na upon the quality ar quantity oppartun;.tie s,? 20. CULTURAL RESOURCES Wali'"t'e'proposa result in the alteration a. h& or. ai' or `the des tructian; cii` a hl hisoTc archae6'1'og'a cal site? b.,,; W.i1l.thepropo$al resriltxri adierse physical ar aesthetic e'ff0tt , :to a prehistoric o "- hastorie building, structure or, ob3ect,? Doo;s thle proposal have the potential to cause c.; a °physical change wh%eh wpuld affec'�r ixnique ethnic cultural values? de; the proposal tes`trict existing x�lig ous 'Wil:l ax sacred uses Idthin the potential impact ar e a? DI;SCUSSTON OF ENVT.RONMENTAL EVALUATE AP 63-. -28, 63-23-3< & See attached. . ek .1 i i I t { t k I I , � AWL t I I n 77777-7 f g2knt: Terry f� l od i n Assessor • Parcel -11-'28 ,65=1�2 _and 24` Ld # i6w01x,25-U."! ®Ai A :SI tfrE`G 677�.i�Pt 1 o�rw ^ «'yp�; of Pro,Jsct Viand'd t ri i� s i ori, 2'. p ntative 5ubdiyisivn Map dividing three Brief r3ascri bort•: Te par^c:ca t s Vit. 6 y 1' a to 6 �cr as i r7 �o ;15 1 tits .off S �icras each . ., l.�icattorr At, the west` end of A:J. Sjtohr F?oacls 13C1Q feet most ' of tis intrsctiora with Forest fionch Road: The'pr4perties connect A,,, J, stohr with Nope t ar i ve 4: Prespdsed Dens ty Of 13aae 1 opme , t? i d . to 16 ages AmbIUnt of .Einpery i aus Surfac l n$ • Roads y 2-1 /91 c : P dr i ves,, 1 0,01j.; homes i tes , l _^l /2 to 6 ac. 6 « A00800 sndi I�oarest 06bl le Rgad(s) d' Access firom A . J : Stohr end Nopea .: 7. IMethad gf StatagFi ri sposal :` Seipt i a 'systems. 5. $amerce cifiwdr Ou-01v 1ndivi,du81 well 1,s. 5t, pe -Ox I nits' dr~ powdr Lines: rd:'ppr^ce1 63w,j1-26 and 40;jac6nt to °'14, Potent i alr for` fiurther " l anc! d i v i -ions ares and �e�+o l opment The mep w1 i t 1 al 1 ow construction of: 14 houses. .. Env ranmgn'tal "Setif i nsa Phosical mir'csri; 1; Terrain a. General Topagraphia Chesracter:. Upper r die with 5teepl'y � op ng s'1de hl 1 ts. ,1 b. Slopes:' 8; 12, 20-50�. Sufficiently Qdrltia slopes dor homes i to deYd' opment c. El'avaticinAPproX.s 220.0-2l0: ci. Llmitirty''Factorsa S1 Wpbs dvei" 50.' 2. Soil ca. Types anal Characteristics=. Mixed McC;�rthY 11lsap cong,lomeratei,20-q0", grovdliy,sandy, 10 m/loam clay7,slaw. to rep i d ' perm-oab i 11 tv we 11 draining , moaderElite eros i tint:-azerd. b, `L i ns i:t i ngactcirs fit: iVatur~a1 Y=iazaards :0the Land e.. Egir^1 hgluaker one 2 m l' 1.es ;east . infers©d au 1't;. b. Eros on Ptiterit i ai « S:1 t ght to h t'.ph. c Lands1 i,cil . ,0 en. va = L.ow !ro mociorate, c!, F1 rye 'Hazard C HT 9­1hto e�ctreme u. Exparrslrr .So6;1 PotPnti'al: ! t�lncierate. Hyda^o 1 any ml we`t. 5=I.l ©, watel 81 g Ci l co „Creek 1/'g,m . .. -10-