The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About063-130-0031 PLANNING COM ISSTON SUMNC "Y SIM"T APPLICANT � John Iwchner ADBRE"S 17 Wi1.1aiorlobux, Lang Chico OWNED Same F,? APPLICATION WR VARIANCID BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING C0 M ON APPLICANT; tteaei and follow Instructions as sat torth on reverse side of twhis form, Applicant's Name john Lechner r.._ .y Phone No X95- t722 Applicant's Mailing Address #17W lliamsburg Lanei Chaco, California,95926. Applicant's interest In oroparty (Owner, lessee, ether) - Part owner. Owner's Name John Lechner, etal.Phare No. X395 1022. Oi vnar's Mallincg Addrass 41.7 . Williamsbu'rg L 91 ..Chico_, „California 95926. _ Assessor's Parcel Number(s). #63-13-03 Location and size of parcellsi g y_ _ e S,ouilWest of East of ;Hi hwa 32 im, th , e Section 7, T 23 Nom, R 33 E, about l-�4, miles South of the community z of Forest Ranch. Parcel Size is 9.12 acres _.i LL Present zoningTM-5 a W6 Typo of variance requested:/ v�er�rz�c x'` Lt�r 't�rs G% ot'e Mrp, Ire r rxr o"! x Lot area or building site Mobile home size Lot width __ Parking requirements Pront yard setb i Livestock requirements' A Side arrear yard ;setback Sign requirements Other (specify) Description of proposed use and reasons frrvarianca:;.1g3i1. 011;. ,.;�irr ew;gxCe.7 -=tenc 4.1: acre-Elarcel.- 1 hereby declare under penalty of perjury that I have read and understand the Instructlois and that the foregoing 5.tate1 ments are true, complete and correct to the best of my knowledge,and belief, Date -1/21/8 Applicant's signature w .. Q 1 Wer Project Pile number, -% W Location and size of parcel(s) t2 / r> �� .�`� car- /� r _._�`�' fry - ,•`�-_t'�c.. 0 d?utie Co. t`101ing Comm, W Verity; A P Number(s) � � ZtiMOl q and Requirements1.°" D3 W w%W Ownership Location Description u. Prot�f of Agency (if nc ededl .... � 14 copies of plot Plait G�rovtlla, yaii}e�rttJ W Cate recieved--yyL ,1 W..�rr nbeeipt No. Application taken by w. a Receipts , 7 Project APPENDIX Data Filed Environmental, Information VOrm (To be completed by applicant) GENERAL INFORMATION Name and address of developer or project: sponsor: L'ohn Lechner, etal, 417 Williamsburg Lane, Chico, California 95926.. ?, Address of project! East_of Hwy 32 in s 1-4; of S 7, T 23 N, R 3 E Assessor's 'Block and,,L'ot Number �3'=-73=�� 3 • Game; address, and telyhort.e number of person to be contacted concerning this project; W. BACHMAN BACHMAN & ASSOCIATES - 342-4136 301:2 T e Esplanade, C 3.co, Cali:brnia95926 4, Type of project; (i.e. rezoning, subdivisioi) variance 5. List and describe any other related permits and other,public approvals required for this project, including those required by city, regional, state any. federal, agencies; Butte County planning annroval.. 6, Lxisting zoning district: TM -5 7, proposed use of site. To allow one 5 acre parcel and one 4.Jl acre, `pa�ceh. P�tOJEC: r..�ESCRIPTI:ON - 8, site size_. 9.12 acres. 9, Square footage of building(s),. 10. Mumber of floors of construction= 11. Amount of off-street parking provided, 12: Attach sit. development plan, 13. proposed scheduling. 14. Associated prc�jact's, 15 Anticipated incrementa1 development . 1�,�eca dwl��thinh�orrr� , . , i, i t�t� eridl�t t� - rt e 1 oC. 3 16. if residential, include the number of units, ,schedule of unit s Lztsi and type of household size expected. 17, If commercial,,, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of seles area, and loading fa,ci.l..i.ti.es 18. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift,:.., andloading facilities. 1.9. if Institutional, indicate the major function; estimated employment pet shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived fromthe project. 20'. 1f the project'"invo]ve°s a vari.atice, coriditiot al. use or rezoni g application, state this and indicate clearly why the application is required Are the following; items applicable tc 'the project or its effects? Discuss below all items checked yes (attach additional ,sheets as necessary) ; YES" NO, X 21. Change in existing features of arty beaches, lakes, or hills, or substandial alteration of ground contours. X 22, Significant change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public lands or. roads. X 28. Si;,gnii;icantl:y cha.ngo pattern scale or character of general area of project. X 24. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter., X . 25, Change in dust, ash) smoke, fumes or odors in Vicinity, X 266 g"A�+ichange stream or ground wa'tev quality or r alteration ' existing drainage patterns. X 27 Substantial change in existing noise or vibrat on levels in the vicinity. X 28, Site on filled land or on slope„ o'" 80percent or more. X 29, Use of disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances, flamma""les or explosives. Bute Co. rlalh4'10 com f. (= : IOU Appondix i; Priu,a 2 oe 3 YES trio X_ 30. Substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.) X 31. Substantially increase fossil fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.) . X 32. Relationship to part of a larger project or series ---- of. projects WVIAONbtENTAL SETTING 33. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants and+ animals, and any ctiltuxal, historical or scenic aspects. Descri.bc ary existing structures on the site, and the use of the structures. ?,4. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, histo ical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc .) , intenvaty of l:nd �x.�e (one-family, apartment houses, shops, department sabres, etc.) , and scale of devel.opmenu (height, frontage, set-back, roar yard, etc.). CERTIFICATION: 1 hereby certify that the statements furnished a ove andn the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statemeAts, and -information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. 1 Date (Signature) C: W BACHMAN For Jong ttCHNEt2, E7'AL, n Pulte. Co. t�lt:�hinc� ��tt;t`:i; ` Appendix page 3 of 3 O ovill�?, aC4E r,+ r. Inter-Departmental Memorandum fia�,tan?xxn:g Commission Cd 'v a'e PRO y><u� I ETIAPironmen�t..a;l Review Department �v I +.: ti SUOJ�Clr:-Criance, John Lechner »f 11I t 63-1, -03 13ATEI Niax-ch 24, 1951 This project is a requested variance to the 5--acre minimum parcel area, required within a, TM-5 zoning district, in order to develop an additional 4.1-acre parcel; from ,,III_ exi_.gti1 g 9. Macre liolitesite The property is located east Of Iii,}Zivay 32, approximately 1 mile south of Forest Ranch, on. gentle Midge terrain. Mr. Leclin.er previously requested a rezone from TNI,-5 to `I'NI.2 on tills subject 9+ acre property in. Nla.y_ of 1980, in order to ou7- onviron- melital evaluation of that earlier proposal teas create threeax cels les., than5 acres in arca.: p p a recommendation that an 1IR be prepared, based primarily oil the growth-inducing and cumulative effects of down-zoning lands Within this uniform TNI-5 district. The applicant subsequently appealed the MR requirement. The Board of Supervisors (on a 3-2 vote) denied the appeal. oil September 23-,1980, voquiring the FCtt, Attached for your reference is a cop), o r- the envirol-tMental stLid\r forthat rezone request (including III'M rtes from the Board of Supervisors meeting) The current variance request coirl,d cause Similary growth-, effects if other area land owners desire to ,devel.;op silialler parcels. However, each individual case would involve individual consideratiGn and analysis, contingent upon the standards and conditions required for the granting of a variance contained in section 24-49, of the Zotiaa ordinance. Special circUmstarnees are necessary for a var!,a.'nce to e granted. Therefore, the cumul.ativo and growth-inducing eff=ects of this project are ex- pected to be limited in extent and a Negative Declaration regarding environmental impact is warranted, Reference; Rezone, ,John tedhne AP rr 63-15-0 1;RD # $0-08-19-06 cc; John Lechiex B�i�hrrlan 0 Associates S i APPENDIX F ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST VORr (To be completed Icy Lead Agency) ERD Log # 80--05-15-06 1. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent John R. Y echner 2. Address and PhoneNumber 6f Proponent: rr 7 Williamsburg Lazne 0. 6T. Baol=an & .Assoo, 3012 o, a osi1 0------- �.nade Chio6, 0a o +2+- 3. Date of Checklist Submitted 4i Agency Requiring Checklist 5: Name o Proposal, if applicableRezon ng of 9.12 sp cres .` o �17"'r�. i o f�.G;L�.7.i'ato a 3 l�c`7]'Ce.l t1 '�V� C7�01� is ^�1'��,�rl, �`15u�,Ue�I�. �,L 11r3et AP # 63-13-03 II. ENVIRONMENTAL 11,TACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are. required on attached sheets.)i YES MAYBE NO 1. Earth, Will the p. oposal result in signif.icaut ; a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures?G b. Disruptions, displacemen,comsoil? pac.tion or over o vering of .t �w c+ Change. in topography or ground sur- face relief features or removal of f3+ topsoil? -d, DestrUCtibl" . covering or modirica.- tion of any 'unique geologic or �x physical features ,Increase in wind or grater erosion , of soils, either on or off the site? f, Changes in aepositior of erosion of beach satids, or changes in sri.lta� tion, deposition or erosion which may mo,Ji -y the channel of a river or stream or the 'bed of the ocean o2' ahy bay, inlet or later g, Loses Of ptitne agticultur.ally 'pro- ductive ductive sols cu;tside des'ignated �, urban area.. Xv ._V A vi A4i YES MAYBE NO i. Reduction in the amount of water of her«ise availabl - for public r,atear supplies? j, Exposure of people or property to water rcalated hazards such as f1oodinP? XVV 4! Plant* Life, Will the proposal result in sU�721t:i a a., Loss of vegetation or than, e in the diversity of species or number of any species of platts (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic, plants) '• ` b Deduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of , >, plants? C. Introduction of new species of plants into an area,, or in a battier to the normal replenishments of• ex sting stj�-,oies? d, Reduction in acreage of any agri- cultural crop!° 5,. AnimCtl Life, the proposal result in -Will substantial; a, Chatge in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of- fanimals animals(birds-, land animals including reptriles, fish and shell- hell01:jranist:s, 0 1: jran i S ,-*. S ,A i'.,�eCt;'ty or micro�s.una) 7 � b. tteduc t ion of the numbers of any unique, turd or endan ared species of aninals �'1! c. lnt todtaatiori of rlew spec:acs of aAiMaIS into �An area., or result HT1 a barrier to the mid r t16n or trio vt%-,,, n of animals? `{ d. Redi*,vt ion of, e4ndroachment upon, or de�terio ,iti ren to existiri fish or , wildl.i.-a habitat? , Appendix ' - page 3 of YES 11MBE NO^ z h. Exposure: of peopLn or property to goolog icy hazards such as earthqu akas', landsli dos, 'mudslides, ground failure, or similar ha --ands? 2. Air Al the pxopob»,1 rosu It. iii a. Substantial deterioration ion of.• ambient or local air quality? .� � h b. The creation of objectionable. odors, smoke ot fumes? c: Significant alteration :of air movement, moisture or tempevat;uro; or any change in climate, eittiar locally or regionally? a?C 3 Wa.ta . Will the proposal result in substantial a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movemerlts? b, Changes in absorption rates drainage patterns, at the rate and remount of surface water runoff? c. Read for off:-8i.te surfaces drainage Improvements, including vegetation removal, chanelization or culvert installation. a. lterstion:s to the course or flow of flood waters? 7X e . Change in the amount: oft� surface � `cater in any Water body; f . D'.scharge into surface 'waters, or in, any, alteration of surface Water qua.li.ty, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? g, Alteration of the direction or } rate of f low of 8rourld waters? h, Change in the quantity or quality through of r tthr oatdrs either hrals, eround dirct a.dditibn8 or ��iitr or through interception of an r aquifer by cuts or bxcavatit ns7 W f Appendix pago 2 of 9 1 AP. i, IA-- YI31' Imo` moisci Will the substantial-, V 1: Incrcwses in 110, S('- lcval $? b, 1;;,.,Posurc of- peopl11 to severe 'k1 Sl - -' levels"? aand- Glare, Will the pt apo a l7. Ecant light o� .� �h �lar prt�dUr e sr I 8. Vill the proposal. result: n a S -L. ;n ii ic=ant I a, Alteration of the planned land use establish a trend of all area, car which will demonstrably lead to such alteration? b, ConflI t with uses on adjaining ct- with propgrtios, or cor.fli establ. hcd r6c!reatiC' educa_ - fic °.�ic�u., 1ti"i O tonal, red ig or uses of an area" `- -�- g Natural resources . Cull the proposal , > substantial.: ,;esult Demand or, or Increase in the rateNX a, of use of any natllLal resources? -- L , nonrenewable b Deple'�ion of any r k, Y, , z i1r�+tLlral: xesoures? , r0 osal- 10: ?isk of Upset. Does thelosian or an exp r ,. i vn olve a risk of the. rel ease of hazardous mabstancts limited to' oil, 1, 3 nc udil but ncab , clzemiaals or radiatyon) pesticides, . . of an accident or upset t11e event �n condi ions? 11; J?opuli1• 1qj1.j t-lle proposal i- - the location, t oantly al cr signs density o`t growt!Z distribution, o ula c.:�u1�t o'f an 1-uma.o p p rate of the area or ,1�vs tally d3. -Vide ' an v _ - camaniini�:7 establ.sjte 12, Uousin t'7L71 the'Proposal aart� ly affect e�xl sLxn housing, , s� additional dama� d for ct create a „ 1.1as 1,n�j E rpend>+�t page of 9 IBM__ ��, • YES MAYBIZ NO, 13, Tt.ansporta"L ion/Circgi.El� tion' Will the proposal 'tCE ,'.". a. Generation of subst nd'al additional vchi� tZ ar movement? b i aigni` cant effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? c. Substantial impact upon ex7,8ting transportation systems? -=� d Significant alterations' to present t p oycirculation un or movement ofpeoplea:nd/orgoods e Alterations to y�taterborne, rail ox air traffic? Nd� H. f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor va. vehicles, bicyclists or pedes tr' ans? 141, Public Services, Will the proposal have an effect upon:, or result in a substantial need for new or, altered governmental services in any of the follotqing areas a: w fire protection? b: Police protection t: C. SclWools? d: Parks or other recreational facilities? e e �1,,ixltt�il" tiCe of public facilities, N including roads? ,, f . Other governmental .servir*es? rr 15ti Bnpr . 14111 the proposal result in a,, use of substat- .Al amounts of fuel or energy,! b, Substantial increase i.n demand iron, exLstil'19 sc�.tces of energy, or require the level. pmeiit of, new sources'of energyr 16, Utilities,'Vit the proposal result in a need for new sys temg , or sub- stoarttia:l, a.lt(_tations to tho folloVin utiilitie - Appendixx r p ;e of 9 IR .lY J✓w,7 M/YYU, N0 a. Power or Ilat ilra b r Commut` icat .101, t" C, 14a, t or'? � c1, Sewel- (Will trunk line be exte -.ded, provi.dtilt, 4,lpa.c:it"y to serve new C oo1olml Water dAai4iage.i �F/t 17_. Human Health, Vill the proposal result in; a. Creation of any llesalth hazard or rootential health hazard (excluding meatal health) ?` b. Exposure o:i .,s People to potential health haza, ds? 18. Solid Waste, Willt'i(_'1-oposal result in any 8igiti.l..caalt impacts associated C'l%tla solid, taste disnosal or litter control7` a' 19 result -n,stnetocs. struWill ctiontof --my public desi,gna:tedop recognl4edscenic vistL open to the ubl,ic or will the proposal result in the creation of an esthcti,sll o�iwen'� '� ve site. open to cal y public 7 p 20. Receeat on;, ' .11 the proposal result Inan i`-`mpacL upon the quality or quantity of existing public recrea- tion i;acilities?X 21, Archeological/' istorica,�. Will the p�roposa , resin an atterati,on of a significant archeological or historical Bite, Wtruct Ure, object or budding 2, 1landa.tory Vindin s Siiii icance<. a. Tees the project have the potsnt.ial to degrade the quality of the environment, s'ubstantiall.:y reduce the habitat of a fish or wi ldl.ifo- spedies o cause a iis17 or, wi.l dlife pOpUl,atxon. to drop below sell ihppeMdix, r page 6 o� 9 Y YES, MAYBE �Io sustaining levels, threaten to - eliminate a plant or animal. com- triunity, 'reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or elltninate important exam ai he major per, ods of California history or prehistorv? ' b, Does the project have the potential to achieve short germ benefits to the detriment of publicly adopted long-term environmental,- goals? 6. Does the Project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (a project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the t -Lal o;1 those .pads on the environment is d. noes the project have environmental effects which will rause substantial adverse effects on human beings, - either directly or indirectly?` Appendix page of t ✓ f � r , 6 �'' , + r 3 ` t " � ,k +nw.a � '\.,.,/ . d' »+Ay .*. + +_.e.S r'J' �� ; r 1 L � t , .,� k : + r +r*'l; + r' '14 w':, "J+, • /r # '„�' , 'yp ,J`/ r •�� r/ "ry„' � ] � + , G�� (r � �� { r��, � �,,+� ,,s'` %�` �'' � r J„�, .,.J � � � •, ; Y ! , r i �A � » ' l ` r ,,.. ° r �/ J h' �,`+� �f 4�, � � r x ' ` vo+r 4 „`, o ° `. $ ��, a +, r Y 4 y ,✓,/;F ''✓ �u a.�a w •"� .; � ' ,t / Lytity +�L� w ,. ✓y:`. ��`rJ� if+. „� 111 l � ,7 ,, •• ��`� a .,'J "�` » 1 L • r. � r' � � � �� yi. e � J�✓ �"+ ��`�” _. ,1 • .wx-- L�+M ..w -A rJ„. + 4:,,, r , 'K ��ri w1 ” J,•..t lJ C J 1 + r ,+ , Y✓' M ,i { i-�., F F „+•+ may"`._'Y�d lr'` rrr r / 4 « J ..J . ,+•� J l� `^+,a`•4#. L'I I Y A r�i �.1• P + �,'��. i � �� e �� yti a'.r L. ��`w.../` � r Y".>r'�f �/� 'r <"�x'-� 1 ,� a�a'.l r \ � �� 1 J� .r�✓�r...J`1{. � � \ 1 dao•_✓f '�,l �t �1 �pa�.d ✓..• ri�,��/.j✓� 1 . +' � (� ;� Of ry (.J�li :•i� ,,�� ,., � ^dl ,. ." C"" f, f✓, </ \", ' ''j J „✓•..• ,1 ✓ �� Jf��I �T L� �� J ��rr `" Y `iw 1. � �4 ` +r�✓� � ✓r,.%✓'J�' � r •./+; J Y�f�, �'� ,i - i � r ,' ��^ ; F �t +/�� r „7' li� CM' .;✓' " / �^."rte. X JF� /�:+�� • • ,�r 'a � •=q+a�ru:ia� , �1 '1i i � �r a..,� ,L 1„ ��C '( fI1 1�+I+OV, '.. '.`�1 , { r✓r"�.:, + yq •`_. +'a �y"�'. `, '� ,„,r iF�4 F'•i �5+ y � �' �+� J r J r' ,,� y ""'J � �` ,1,..�""�.✓ ; v....+ ! �.� �. + t�.i l � � , ,;%�� ++ �"�.., �.r+ 1 � ° '"'>'ti � ' � � � i � L �+ +�� 1 i�'F �'��i �y" > � l , �I' d. fi..? � �%r JJ� r � w,.,,•✓ r �' �.., .TM f ,'d }f!( 4 �+' �+ (rj'"ri�. � r ._..• �� + r/ ,j� �' ,,mr' :�yr;'� 111��' ��i'a f � ,✓.✓ � � I-, F + Y ti+ �,"..- 1 <� 1. .t *� r��ot '� .j � � �ro �„y�✓ -1 ✓°>" Y.SI� 7�s -��/ ��«. �+. p j �Jl � ' 4 r• F a i ,��(a '� +jIf,.»r� •,•,,.</f5"/' w r^ f( +� Md✓r �,,..:...."".�',. ;Jr,.,i��,,,,,•�,.1�.•-„�a r/' �,� .- 'M�"w" 'Ij r^" x+, i" 1 +rJ > '..s,•d41» ,J f.,.,,> 4' , l� d s J „,,"�`•✓!`' ,l ,,,,r+5 ._w„� C�•.��•'�,'^� \l '.r '",`.,.J »..J`°✓„f' ".', ,� � r J �' �'” ,✓` I.r ,/ r �,+ , ... � ; +,�_ .� ( J rrr. � .. •• :yam,, •,✓' k f ''r„ � • J ' :,, + s✓,y+'� ✓ a hf ,K/� � � i4 � ''�._ - ✓,�.�+' f . ' /' ✓ ,f ; i F i R,.., r �,r r � r +,, j^ .. •�� 'ti.,`.' ,...-+'� ,y� �� " t,.,``J .. ,�' 4 / t ++� r� �,✓,�r+`�"' `+cY "{ perky � ✓ , �" �'r � ��y�"'+"' � �* �`'� zTM n „ �,� +� 1 r ! �� ., r rye �� + ✓ � �•+'.� � •�{� r".:t•+^' .�,. �-.,...:.� ' ,,; +'"',✓.+' .,+ ft'r?.,Q 1 ./ Ir + �ty1 r r�„'j r, bs' .' �~ gid' i r y t w j. '.r"ter✓/ P^ a ±_ I.g,. •� I � {Y J � � �f�� J}+ rr�';� �: l I.Jw ..`'J + � �+ i� r /'', r.-.":....�� •*� r' r �� , �r... ,,%+'✓ �"�"'�'".: t" ,7 ':`'.'%r � � r+%I + + �. �ri� w� yr Vis/✓•+' J a'. � �� s, � *4��'^��.,,.5 L l: � _� � (` �. ,...y1,.•u .` 'r,..r,.,, .•/ s+/ y �.--� r �J4 r`.J� L'�' J�...,—«.,"� ,�' ' :..••"'".""�"�L..,;.• `'.s.r..' r i "r'+"� '`«., -r"`'.'tit '.,., 'f',ry y .:Y w•�/ ++�iF yd // ""y'"/ +° ✓r xr,✓ ✓�+✓".-t'y a ,r ✓r`y`o j :w,. „,r'",r... ` .. ,•r„„ � '.."'^ L1:.' � + 4' �+ f�� Y '� } _1`� .;a,,,.+^r � t'� ' ,�'="='+' ��Y ✓ � �.. � 'r � y. y>��- i+ _ o ,...�+.�-„ kii� �.t' w + +!*''�"'vh a ,t l,,,✓i ' w`,/may 'r :..` „� yA +r,,.''."i i;.� ;�:,`.' _. L .""...�. ,,,,, fI+'r' r � � + % �Ya �✓ Win+ �+� �. ,•,M + ,,� �„_+:.r...,.: " w �. ria �� Lr_.r' S: �,., v +, V. lo 4 i��.. w..� c Y71 I tiL° 1 � i ., :f 1 S3, +C �� „�.�,^".,a-�..,,,��`"d�a.i / `�p• J «» -'", .� '.+r .. + � add+ f � � � � >Y `''.` `"r•»� � r+ j '. f"A Y• � +�� ,y ... a ,." a :,r. , F .. +. ;1 ;.r 1, � r.'s',. � , � 4.i �+•l' �L.'+,�ti+ '{��r,.` " wr nr r .l+..r +rAli..' � ++^«) x�+r,.,y.,a ,-. r>.� ",. sa. r #'.ti..•..-.� t Q,r � {'•: i � '. 8�� - � � 1"`"� f ! e�a 1 �+ �•W t �" (.tiN�f � i rf VrN � :,I'xn r... � � r : r `.� d ) � � � r. srx,.+,«.r� ` .� ,a r,� J'r� Ll 1 7.i}',r x • r,✓ (• �3r t .�'et, • 1 p tl � 1 t d 1 t4.M. �� t * j�-. � S'� ,/.r�.. F4>tJ �''r✓.. J �.. Z'.. r:.r pn �r r:" - f,� e C - F✓ s �4 "Y.... t' •�.,. er., ✓•r ) - .dG�1k ,v ". t� .,i '""o ;t• 1 , � nr ti .'1 tr �y, ...� K,4 �� r 4 r + f �+ •,,, �! i �'1 ...,,,'r W d Y r 4 ` r' �,/% J.•MI ,� \ r" $ "r k .�1. . Ut a.. li"i ••� xw :y. ....x r..w a w.. iy( rte' � .t, Y . ":P. �„�r ``!!si x,r �% `�`t u! >f�ir.F'+ Ci(i ati at , n y �+ gr t 1 +� ,'l�kpnlrr�sr✓'` r p e�' / P t f :. ra.,. J;' ~ j� �. ,�' ".+ 4,} _,..y rtr r ++lyJ „• 0 1 I.� ,• + LLI 1 0,� ' Y 4 . .e ry . �3 41.-"4' 41'Itr" (/•} �" �'' �r %/12*i+ .....t ` t ``a' .r..a/ f �3 J / a 1�"�.r 4�I.� ..1 � � :%" a ,��; 44' 1 z�r r/' yr ! I+� � � '� � ; • , � j ��' � ' p�,y.f 'ti. t \ ~ ' � C " 1 {�.•` L.,f;,,�. r `,��r `=, �41 " Li ♦.% k 4 S� i`r (r r t 1 lal4cl•% �{ . I �, ✓ 1 ✓'. �"� y sl `• t('\,: Cs^7`�� f C +.♦r,�l.r�r'xr '" !..'t � r 442d+(p[, RK:z ': 4. }�/ r,'r}( x,i+ '.r IC j}. ^err `I. •�.1-.. •I I7,jf�♦+lt M,'•ar 1 m•il s w�si1, •. trrr,. e (, - x {• 5k LI �s,� yr i+ 'lt �`�` " t »+ *"�. i` I � li r � I ri '�l ��i �,;' � � \ J• !'��e � � a 1 r'm. ' � J'. (( �r � • L ,� � 41 {Irr 111/'r: �� .Cyd All, :�;�'yf�F-fF1{(.r�+y.,54. ' ,tl.1�....�.��'7 �r�y'`+ i.(S�t .:•1,'�, +�y.r�x ,.X+'',fi1�; W5 �. w,rI .,t:r�)f �t�riS,-,y�k4� .ri..s'.rr'.n a,lr ��'a.�'•Y�1. +r�l ��.�.t. �,•. �J„Y V' hc7'04�t',."L.qt .NAi:F^„��Mt ✓r�r\,ir.{.3�r �y l•;�:y�� r .;i�y1Y,,',..,,,".'j4r,.•�r„.r,r�/ ��t ozntx:s �+.'G,(, q•`ltr#�dJJ• //•'p!e�.yfe.�,�t4l Y �'i`'�l,rj3Jr`j�`x,r3�,•`rI.-•��i,1.yrr�.4", r y i �t r •�'� _ Csm',".-'•<✓=t" 1 ,�±� �-�.•$ i r� '��+� k�,�ll�'4r� t � r` ):1, 7 " �\,...� �' � r ,l^; T.-\�:�' I l•�"`"�+ \ -� 1 y r %�,1� � .0 � "`1.`t 'C� i� ` �,U ;, ; ,� 1 ,.» ,• t ?� — ? ` , r O�y a t�`S�W1� . 1 ,�. "1'�' �hrx~;;r.'. .� r s . 1.':;.%'•Sl' • • r 4 .7 4 r wj I + r �y14 �L,,, !1{ �y y p ,.t +7,1�, pn• d ^;� rr`, y r ii.Kr4 P • 1.1+M ti- `n! i t siiJ ' ,:d C1f/+f � . ,:.t+. J)r+✓ft ..%S tC i r i s '°+ I s J�'r. '( p✓,ir� a�t b'{x�t f Pi?f�%rC�J� di r ��y Y i..•.�, ., :w"; F 1 *�•�i� N`1 t Gin, t et�t r'e' [, �~9" "� 'x .' �'!'�' t'Sy. �� v, 1�L: '!f �44�i.�.."�,r.Jt ��• t �d`."•., r .! '. dA ,.a d h✓i 1 + ss' �" � `� f"s �'" '� i 5 '.{i 1✓' �- I4q Irrt i '`¢" �i;%'li � r. 5`JC„�}� ¢� :../ „! x. � +r. . (�.. w'k•, �� r , .�Pw�*„!� �yn.« ,+ ,I.s+,�.�.; 4 Nor i 1 i. � r 1Cen� ' ; •/ t �r � y � tb� i rt'1, i` #r+rr �. [`'" �l E4�F'r � s� v{� ..� ��+.,,,;,� i,�r``� r V �.ri•sa a,• S r. � {.ti:.. �r..... \•l+ ..! �• + �t 4�_r f It. C .. .4 "' '+ t;,y y: Ct i (7 r` .�, �,,f t "' ?ty, �".. �2sC� . <e �' � +•t„fl t'r �� l`M + +'3 �1 r � Mr rs♦ ."�� / Y i Y .^' ,�%� I.4' � r a ��,. � r : { ,� " 1 • r m '=J:� 17 a'.t.d , r � S� 1 r•, 1. r" �y" i I✓ � 1 � ,;;�'v 1' �. u � _ � f sr ,J �+k q ��., %� IJ � t„r� � ti "1. ' t " r ,✓ j.." y +w. r t„ ,� r, +.r �. �^•�M .�r t i i..?" >. t •� �i , � ` I ,� � � � r.�`t+�#r .. I a rw .. �� C�` +�...+ .r '•,1 u ✓ k`h?� _ �s+�, { f +�W. •l.�-t i'i.,,.,. r_a.. a. i.;_,.a., r!t/t,../+ k ,. ,.+• / �.�i •1;,,.A Y �; vw „� �, � _ ,�,� �, 'i..^" �r,� ey G i (,� r #pi N ,fib ,, � "w rP �,,• ��y ,R. -'r l 4,r' / ovu+,x ,� � :,, � � .::r. �.. � . b '� fff � _I r * ; G ''�i ".., � 1' y ,. r � � ''► 5 ei t � e r ., �a `- t (,� u?iS0 r •,..� f}+ r-,1. ++� , ur !\ L '. � 1 . "� 1 :4� 7 �i n/f,+�'•� fx t'+•�.-.. �r MJ 5"S. u« xy+•�..,� �y�( }j .�.•.—, "' ✓ ^� /r Z`' r •r i'Y !i 1 n Ru " :! '� w-7fR'r�6 �:dTICjC"tE1Fl7to_ + t'•yr+.i �. .1 ,� !.. M� Ir 9 -. ' } / •• r er 4)y yAt • r xi. ss a (j ..y� �i ill '"J 1 ., �a,�� i if .. •r 4 iN . �`y,t 3 ' ! %• "�?I .r IY .�� ' r u , 4 `'1 �{ �(f j t it y rA sy ..�✓ r=•'rl+,�/ t,.,r" e ✓ ,,".�..'tr ,• i 1 /I �,. ♦i� �.� r ''"„'14, r r' : ti' :.d' , 1 =i M i.4rw' ,r' � r t yy �� t �� ✓ �w r^ ,� � 1. � t t tY.{,�•� ""'. rt r"-4...� � �s( �� `Y" 4` �1 `� � : r�'`i,� .,' y t'r � x"r 2 w �rr ' • N �• 1 V i1,' 1!�r � r` �r+t•-""i i { � ` ` L_,.•. '{ �-+ r`r �. �j^IE I r ��'1,1'��i�� w� l,,~„�•V,' � 1 �. �,�, ,,y.1 y �"a `�,r.3 �'"7"r+7 '! �� k��`�—�7..�/.��: _.....•. l� F�,I�{✓N r. t w r`��""" �I} �•�. r:j{t4G, Vint �re i. wpp. '�✓ �'::. r , 1., Ill `. `i `t �� } orrl" � ,.✓,.� % " �� t{�11aJ +!I r+, t r 11 "`..A�.b win iL,`' ].� L ' rJ'�r �p iw S.('t i i+•,��'vfr�7 , • �� ++4 �+ Itl''A %S •'j1�.�'•v"..r '�4.,F �t'{ .� • y � {". '1�! ! �•„ r''"", ^alb �i ,j �J rJ� `' ,�r� ; + v .i'r� � � �t�i ' ` � '"''r �tiTgly�''�'•. . �+ r4 .. i rl V' t y .� J"�J.,j�-..'�'� + r t,i 1`..�i' ,�,•r ��tr` �`y' •,'a L9M � i ,."%r"'�+ • _� " ;\::, r�f G j( ?�. -•"+ '�,�� V.: •. � r% re �"r=i: �?= � •k ✓ , ,+ � • x Y 1Xr (13h1 lailuutr ..lG'.a�r-'r C=-7 �ir�1� '. � � l, � x .• '`"" �{f�l i � � ., (rr� a �¢1 ."��}�P, #r =i '+ "•ry7.�P wi t Yrs �rl J}� ��fY ��i `��j 4 ,�•�� r ��.�`"'�+"`„y4 r'� �, r7�, r ( r .^� •�.� r....'+, r,(�;�111y111 r: S�"-.•r.^ y.": �.�,y'..,7 � r `� .... +1� .W�'�' n•' �"�,> �-.�.ra ^"''Y.: , W �rnrya ^^1lff 1 Y ��' % +�� 1` � � ,r'}�,�M4L��rt+''" r C •;{ �� w ;, �,C^ F Jl/ Si'" .i.'� �� M4 � 4 ��,.�. rr, y .,1 � .,. ,� �•J.��µi� t7 N . ry ar3..,+}'".'► r-/: i. �''x�rs`a't. "`" . �,�• � r3 � i � "�,. "y c»,x �.i � �. t✓...rs»>4 w � ( rj, r7. w F«i#t'tcenlAfk �atuv`��►r erg � ,,�"' a +�.r ur,.+1,7 "t,y �,l 4't :r ' 'i 1 ,`\j' Y .:� � yy''+ �':.ati �1."w s ��+ f(SS'n);�j.,t a Y'rr ¢ 'L •�.w'�i��y"14 s+l! w t'!'4r ,{u4 � ``4,,.g ,`""t �- 1`?4 ��4 •�i '",�� v� r� ',;�,�'t ,��,,,ts �r.+ . � r�,ga7'/��j�: lfrj'ti � ��....r�� +"tl .; `• �1ar��'j�;(P^ °�'L'Fr:�'i ��} 3d j � F _ r:..✓'� ✓, �� 7' r r x -r+ , � � ,4" ,..�,J ' [ � «..�� , Y � i �• ,�+'. _ 1,,,; i '* �2ise j;'r:"..l .0 r:'� '"a ,;, yr,,.�s`�. � � A +,,. ��` 1 � � ( r 4 .,,,"r` '" n''•' r �% M r1 � r r ` „ry {�1.1� '� �. r K. ` 1 `4 , r ,, �"�' � +...-.. ..« r X t q yam+ , ,,,..✓�! rJ 1'J+ s �r+�,s 1 +y'. � . ,� t w . �' � r .r � � y, r � y i tl.� y/ ." w ,'''` � i 1 •.a'+ . I ',� �� +�' � / r" r � �' .r.. *.r"! ,� Y .T , r � "t; , 4 a'"' y. 4 x,,, � + ++ w :lit+IJ r 173 �Y4 !'. ✓' t �`rI}e a 1^ - 4, i a, `�, f h.1 �. . r.. +,.. � „ � , J � � � ,rr r " � 4Y 1r� +•. °} w». .�,�� V � ', 1 • � a� ' � r' rr` i Ww: ". C ♦ ., a +..'°'"`J , r "� t , ' • i � .+.r 1 ,.+.• • •ti`' y U ,�, � s � «•• r y t C r ' + I ''.' , X ° 1 - +'e r� � k t \ ir�"z: � { �� 1„ 4 `� ao •.� ..r ��"1S fi �.•s Y P �` R � � , ,'.r .». � r t +i } .. 1 ,� 't •n„ a N- '`r:, u.x .+r fir,. •F i �',• J ,...rr•q �s "` "'' ""✓ v yw''I:'%fir.. �.:. 1-:.,,.,,.,,�""+a�.r' *'� � � „•,r�,_ ""t.° r .�; �'&xr-sr..n.�. -,.r r. t" r '!t�� . t � �" � " r }�� R ,.. • � L �,} . ! � ( ;� r � y�„ N y " 4 i r r 1 ,r� + ti�'J, ? �1•' j 1 .a Y .,,, +�°t/+rri Y�' ` s r�'�•�' �� +u „",. �, �'. r djS ( { s ki ," W. r u 4 n s +` +r�" r - ,t •+ µms. ,...oj✓ 5 .,L. j r•} .*:•I r 7x, i) t 1 `' ,+ 9 UI,'. `4 r,•+.:r d i r r ""•:.+Js,'� 9 �,, y ":�� .`W __ ";.+rt r � :� � " • i I f � I k"��+ t� � �� 1 w� uyx .. ��r �� rF 14 . •r , "" ,M,t'"i r d„ '3 .,re',� � ' ►V. i yn 4 rl +�"�, r �, r e t• ,It..., ... i„ t r .+. er,i f � ' 1r + 1 r°. -e} i t ... / ,,,v •o Atr � a r +v''+ trr }))f?`�9 �+ r. :.. .., .".�' _'� r. °. !. ':�1�F1, fr !• w t :.r r hr v. ApIN1 IA`f i Jo Ira Ll3li� }l.L, qx DATI� SHEET 80-05-19-0,1 I ;1,ypQ ov Rezone 1"'lx'io.f aE::;c x`i pt.i caaA : Rezoningof about �9.:L_ 2 �acyao from '1'rl-� �o !�i; O- :rr to Xac„i1.i ate a 3 pagcel diVlsion and residential develomen.t Lof,,,.vLiu A1? 63-13-03. Located east of. 11 hwey 32 in the Stf iof ecbion 23., R.�.,> 2�1.D.ii. The rub�ect pxopety i about . miles south of the community of Fo:vest Rauch. t� Proposed Denoi.ty of Development: About 3 acres per DU. Amount of Impervious SuvXacj.jil : Minimal—less thap I0 0. G Access Siad Ne4vost Public Road (,$) .Access by frontage road from Highway 32. 7. Method. of Sewage Disposal: hidividual septic systems. 8 Source of Water 'Supply. Individual domestic welAs. 9. Proximity of POI.JQx, Lilies 'Ick. Potential for fu o'tht-v land divisions and de'vk-lopme t,. Potg.,atia' i is parcelp Linder proposed zon3.n ;. Intone at preOen°t B. Bnvironmenta l Sr:'�•l:'-hint1 Fyi y nical Envi.ro lmon-t : ; lerrain a r;eziero Topo;rapldc5 Character: Ridmeto'p as=pect. Nearly J.ovel texraln. Smooth gond surface relief.. b. SlopoS: 1,ess than 5; ., 180cotitig. steeper to easttoward Little 0hicb Creek Can-,Yon. c. Elevation,-, About 2.,400 feet above sea level d. Limitanp Factors: _ Simi t�.r��; factors .assoo� ate�I tT3 t2i terrain. eo l Soil are of the Ail�en�-Oohasset �oils . 11 -AGIStion. These e.l'o Ola.ss Jjr.-V i;ype soils. 'a6 intuvql of E li' yjJ lel r.Znnr.hbtt, Wl tralt din, fuits a out� Yep gest, �- � fT�'`..�'� * �:pr"{��:y 1.JµW1yi�1( ryyy'� y W •'. .r�1 �.44r M.+ ..#'.' j,t ` ,��tJ, �.i 4� �. rill .l. ♦ :. r,1 J. Jat ;li y c, ,w. .L� * J� „i, l.F:� �.. V 4i SO L.4 J. o : cn \Jial Moderate �1• ldro�.o��y The re are ne siitface �ratorcoLtrse ons tel A��pxdix I+'ae._'a bs . kita *I)ee,u contai'a'a-a b Ouantittorl v t t:.. li l-_Tlw rldro lo dval-i',od by ewa �Icr Pat, a" oral, rArea.-is toward tbo gouth eapt and L) I q 11 00-70 1110) ef� atrivallY - L 1 t lil'ailt L, d j"volln at or f or d Ora 0•t, ti a ufLIn tx (.a. VA !llp,.,h-bqaqt if. u A. y1i e Ir A,; B i 0 10 p" 1 8. VcCpj.ajiia: Combine Voothill--ilo,odlaiid, oc ij'o-jub coritai=ltie D:j p p, r tine, oall, malizallIta ppimon oalt,_,amival. gra.,nse�. Rare, pl rts I)o.Motile. 9. .11"Ibit"It.: lJoTreV olevatIL-On, mli` s of t1allsition li:te zone. important, loo-elovation i-rinter rcnf:eo Culturol 104 Arciiaoo'logicra I ,-,,jid ili r I' or -k", a I Rt. hu f I y:,I'N '11. J3,I)tte cclulty Goncral. jlltli iii. ti; t 1-40 acre 11-arc-ols), acre mir.#4um parce�fj),i_ 1:1194l7. l4onkil U.n( Lt,:_I�hqrc a onall 2;1.n :,Iq f 1.a 11- 6 ell 0 G y o x i s t1.. p g onsitc. The,..-rempAnder nwooerty im o"Orarl" Iouth are 9-10 Gqatt6redhomcsl�es, To jart Lark! U;v,, �o noj�th,t- !a Little Chlco.-Ore,elr druinam, b. Zoi-,iag T,11-5 -00 1 5!�H-s A-rL-O-Li c.Ger.. Plan ,a' oncanyonland.-'. d, par 113, aorO8 in i=-iodlate 'WI, de ly o att,arbd-low denmity., o r e ntu 'Pbjjcyj I M . t 15, clvirrl,211,4. Of foo -bb -Ill terrain,- 'Lrl honeq 2, a learrt I'Tt.,ill �.-vca: 9-b-100-15 mileo, poreat RaTioll-I 17. Pelevant 2 P of I ilk b. Wnth'x Traek bov-t'Itztj. welloi 20i. sel",00J."'. -".!l A �(�o .t Ranch x;1(1* eel ull ti 4, M IxY DISCUSSION OF MMMNMEN�AL EVALUk\' XON 1 SLtt►tntary, 'xhe project j s a rezoilrz of 9,12 acres c,s O,f land from IM S to 'Ii i M 1/2 to facilitate a pra'ro,c I divr i.ort of the subjCc t property for residential use ',1110 project site is located. al.ollg ridgetop just south of Forest Ranch adjacent to highway, 32. The butte County Gener,7 Plan land use clesigmation is Agricul,tt ral-Res i elenti ct (1-40 ac res/I)U) , T}le request is consistent with the general plan. The character of the area is predominantly eipeil, Foothill torrain. There are several homesitt;s in the immediate area along the .frontage road which provides access to the site from Highway 37. Sewage disposal will be by septic tank and Leach' field systems. The proposed source of domestic w t:ex- is by individual wells, :impacts include: l . b, c e, f; 3. b, r; 4..a, �Ul OF the construction routed impacts to the earth will occur to a -mall degree , Tlteie are Few limiting :f:ac:tors associated with this gently sloping, terrain, for this project. Overcovering ofthe soil will rodLce the ii ilt"ation rate and Proportionally increase runoff. Vegetation removal, and soil disruption Will expose some; soil to increased 0' rsosion by runoff iqaters, Sumo sedi- ment may be generated and d--posi.tod alonlr ophemoral streams which lead to Chit;o Creel.. SUrfqCF, wateruaJ.i t = q Y may also be effected by urban type pollutants washed ;from devoloped area, 3.h; 161 c , Groundwater te,,ourcos are unknown and are considered to be limited in' the 1•orest fknnch area. Reference, Grotudivater Potential :for 5 -acre P,5rcels in the porest Ranch Area; MR 1976•) Producing wells .in the Area are usually those which are situated to take advantage of terrain, ie, located alon low areas, g The subject property 13 located along a ridgetop, 1bn►�si:ic wel.i s in the aroa arc: very deep and somewhat costly and many don't produce aditqua:te amounts of water: 111ere is an existing well onsite supplying 1 ti.n� wate1^ to the e,kisting residence. A c, •tinuous domestic water supply must be shown before the creation of 5 'oY less parcels can be approved, If a continuous; adequate domestic Water supply cannot be shown, the;rr the creation o.f 2 1/2 acro parcels in this area c:anhot be justified, ti,b,. Rare plants have ;beton Located within the patst year i:n, the Little Chico Croek Canyon, (Re ferer)ce: �lsrym-Ftall lqi rhdrawl, from unci 1 4'ry �. ` i ', Subject ty is Cornsen'ation. gtce inen.t lart-Terri:l'L Rezone 1't1e subjoct proper w thili the rnnie of sew�eral: ,rare tnd/o-r endallgerod IAaatits and a botanical survey is recon►tnondedl 5,d. '11icre will l:)e a ctttnul.tA,ti.ve v0dr.rc:tion of important l.ow_elevation t•icige land wilcl.licr; 11c, tbitat, `l'lic 13uck's Wur ttairi 11ord utit�J this lowOlt: vrttioti habitat as relater tlrrn r;e , �3 a �� ry.,.i+_ h6VX F .. paqe 8 of Di.scus.sion, W Cont. !lie Dopartnollt; of, Vis'lt ;lml Game Con -siders dcxAfoJ pm('nt; oil logs than 20 acro p"ircel s to be detrenx'antal to wil dl i"1*0 populations. 6.a, ResidwitialY t),pc noise wi;11 increase. The acoustic character of the arori will, not bo 01tered. "More is a, imise corridor along Highway 32. 7. New light sources will be introduced into the area, Oo-II,ide security lighting should be directed away from neighboring, residents to ensure their comfort and. privacy. S.a,b. Minimum parcel. sizes in the 1-20 acre mange must inect the conditional; devel.opigent Criteria outlined by the Agricultural -residential use designation to be consistent with the general plan. Conditional Development Criteria: . Adequate sewage disposal capacity. 2. Adequate domestic water supply= a. Less than 30% slope. 4 4. Reasonable accessability to commercial services and scliool.s 8i Adequate tire protection with access, The rmniq to Til 2 1/2 of one parcel: within a large TNI -8 di.stri.ct wall create an isolated district which allows'a more intensive Land use than the surroundingZ-oning allows. !lie subjedt property was rezoned as part of -lie 1976 Porest Rmich Rezone, 1110 present zoning was :Formulated anid applied to the area to reflect the natural limiting factors of the land (sewage disposal, lvater availability, slope, etc.) The basis for the original zoning has !lot changed over the past A years , 71 e approval of the 'rezone could stimulate further applications for reductions an mi.ni:lli parcel sizes ovor a wider.' area and. ultimately tlioso requests aoulL? shill off' till small ridgcl'and ilito the steep canyon Lairds designated Grazing -Obeli Land and zoned 1�1-40 and T,IN1»26. Approval of the rezone would establish a tolling precedent for mi.nimwn parcol. sin in this aren (There are ti o I. acre parcels adjacent that mere created before the ]=otest Ranch 12otono was ,adopted,) 11. 1.2. Tlie canyon area. 3.s, one of a. how popultition density, '111i;s rezone will create a demand ror additional. rezones rand land divisions. 11ii.s stimulation of addi tion al development is growth -inducing to the canyon area in general, A small amolant of traffic will. 1,10 generated, 111cre may be sclfine incroased Inoffic movonont at the intersection of the i"roitt;age road alld Highway 552. Some ty;dffi.c: hazards will result. Aj pondix r -linage 8a of 9 11,{.. Rosiden'ti,al development, in Ou'trlyingn'., aO is growth i.xaciucing to thc va.:10us puUic 6ervlce-s- Fire , Prot octi'c�ai req Lt velneaa'ts .ire of pttt t i.cul.ar con(IOVII (1U,(, tea Fire, extxemO fire hazards in the canyon area. The nearost :Caro protection station is the Forest Manch station, JI -Y/- 111i.l.es north. Adequacy of protection should be asso sed by -the Butte iCount, Fire Department 1.6d; 1?a. Soil. conditions may limit the area suitable for leach fields. Sewage disposal characteristics are the ultimate determining factor in the actual land, di.vi.sion. Specific soil _ testa 'wi.l.l be required i.n consideration of the actual hand division. Any divisions must meet the rerlua.remants Of the Rutty County Envi.ronmmerital. Health. Depar-bluent. 21. An archaeological site survey of the ridgeland area is r recommend9d oPb. This rezone has the potential to establish a new, more a s: ,. ve development nt pat tern and density in thearea, m.odif i.ng .tile l; `� w " .: "s+ Ranch Rezoningo �;he TM -5 district was form�x� �zted and c tabl.iwsL),P L;. reflect the natural limiting factors of the land and to ma.Litai:n a suitable rural residential density for this ou-tlying area. 22c. Those impacts wt,!.,,h are r4i:`t.ve1 y CO-nsi.derablo are those indicated by yes or rr ybe resNt, on the initial study. checklist The E.I.R. requireu.ert is 64r, .-ari.marily on the potential for growth -Inducement. An analysis of the cumulative effect of -this rezone on the Forest Ranch ridge follows t The Forest Ranch ridgeis predominantly zoned TM -5, a large, single zoning di stri:.ct that begins just south of the project site and traverses the ridgelands north around the community of I'orst� Ranch and beyond further north for a distance o1: four �. miles or more. This TM -5 district covers an estimated area of 2300 acres total. Currently, an estimated 300 parcels (averaging d acres each) exist within this bingl e district. The theoretical.: maxiMim development potential within this da.strlct� under current TM -5 zoning) is an estimated LWJ0 5Y -acre parcels (sig additi=al. 160 parcels). T11e proposed TM -•2/V: zoni-ng p^ t teen could become established thrr�ughout �t1lis ex sti ig TMS--�-) district (cumul ati vo request for replacemert of the TDI --5 district if the proco�ient becomes established find subsequrint rezonings ��:tL1al.ly are sought, A,% Appendix page Sb of ti D.i, .err w;:� ion cont. ooclirmd on lh.o Doo ,l~�i..�.�. rjr.t('at� r:"k'�cellt:7y� a.�, '1i3.is CIC:cLIr'�'C'(:� l.i 011 ull t.obxxn;a.tcd 9 fir,-t ca�c ra; �'ce;lR, xdd.i.t Lon,al. (:,0() + _ c.rGz dao L r;a; l,l s.�l alr y�t:'ce1: aaart .tutu,r�c i:osa,�lcrtc:e��, tt a,rcawl,°°i rate of 200 "' . Rosult axit development impacts frum 'l:�a:i� �ao'LC t,l..ax? cumin at ve growth are: ( not; � incl*u.din growth � �,rowt,h from development of rxa,sta,4g vacant properties) I. Traffic increases, on the order of 1200-2500 average daily4 trapSic units (ADS) oz, more (based on a generation rate of 2-4 trip ends pez, resi,derxce if tho standard � urban rate of ?-10 wears rea.liz�,ed, much greater traffic; Would result). This increased traffic would be pre don nant,l_y f =neled onto Righway 32, whish has an ext st'ng traffic velum; of 1500_1750 ADT (1979 Cal,Trans, count). ' 2� 11=eased erosion from road aa)d dl'iveway development) and frox grading of an additiona.l. 600+ half-acre homesa.t es. ?. :Lcreased d.rawwdovrn on limited groundwater re8ouviceo from additional residurjr Ces. ��. Increased tree c.utti.ng grad vegetation removal for homesit o cleaving (an estimated � �C►p acye,�. � f'or COQ g- acre bomesites) 5. Increased wildlife habitat inoompati'bil sties, and: � -, ses of habitat and open land. 6. Increased residential densities, Population growth, and. Possible 'incompatibilities with existing Land uses and residents,. Aesthetic impacts because of increases in donsit y may result. 7. .i;zacre.ascd public SCT'Vice demands especially fixye prof echo service. (Shoxistix�g fire x'atEctora is protrided p� ; mar:ily by a volunteer station Appendix V page 80of 9 DETERMINATION �.7 �./ to I. (To be completed by the tend Aqency) On the basis of this inifial evaluation: 0 x find the proposed project COULD NOT halve a sigh f.-icatlu iS rtcamtnenclet�. ► and a NEGATIVE DE;CGARITOp effect on the envi,ronme.nb a 0 I find that although the proposed pro ' ec b r oul,d h ave significant effect on the enviroxunent� thew will nota be a significant effect in this Cate because the m�,tigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project.'. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION TS 'RECOMIENDED. I find the Proposed Project MAY have a significant etf;ect on the hnvironment, and an UVIRONNiMTAL IMPAC` REPORT is required. Date (� q Lure)- �c5r' VIVI.ROMEP,F AL 118M ! D8PAf TNIFAT ,.------------- ReViowed byt Earl. D. nelson Qv` Environmental gevi vt Director Appendix F pace g, of: 9 --rte- BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES September 23, 1900 1505 PUBLIC HEARING., JO'UN R. LECHNE:R - APPEAL OF REQUIREMENT TO PREPARE AN EIR I1T CONNCECTION WITH A REQUEST: TO REZONE 5.12 ACRES 'PROM "TM -51' TO irTM-2-1/2rr TO PACZT.7TATE A THREE PARCEL DIVISION Ati'D RESZi1xNIMAL DEVELOPXENT, ` LOCATED EAST OF WY 52, APPROX. 1.--1/4 MILES 5011111 OF THE COMM1,1 +.. OF FOREST R,'`CH, AP :63•-15+-03 The public hearing on John R. Lochner appeal o� requirement to prepare an EIR in connection with a request to rezone 9.12 acres from "TM45i" to "U-2�1./2" to ;aoilitate a three: p excel division and residential development located east of Highway 32, approximately 1-1/'4 biles sourly of the co=linit- of Forest Ranch, 4? 63-13-03was held as advertised. Dick Xfblcar, environmental review depart tmer.t, set out. the background of the appeal. This project is based on small rezone from an ecistirg large 'TTM --5" zoning district of 120 aces. There are cumulative considerations. This was the reason an ETR was required. Keating open to the public. Ap;¢earing 1.; Mrs. Margie krovenchere. Mrs, Provenchere spoke in opposition to the rezone, Thee is a known fact that there is a shortage of hater and sanitary problems in the Votest Ranch area,. This Vould set a precedent to starting tearing down the '111,1-5" zetie. 2 Bill Burch, .ir. Butch staged he was representing the Forest Ranch, Cotiunity Organization'., He requested that the Board deny the appeal of ins. Ledhner. .The sentiments of eve -vone at the meeting held by the organization ,vas that in .1.976 the "TX'15" designation was establithed. V- telt that wheneVet there was a reduttion in the size of the pascal requitet.ent an Flit should be required. O seussi.on of the !.`ran 8ayt EIR that was preparod in tha ., Forest P,anch area held at this time► Fagg 25', September 23, 1980 } September 23, 1,9811 _:�=_ :: = =.ate.===max:= = =:==== - 80-- 'Mr. AioIcar stated that ETR addressed a different area. The d EIR was prepared for five--acre parcels. This is the first smaller rezone request since the original zoning in 1976. T'he,;e was an ETI: done icor the original. rezone but it was bazed.on five acre parcels, T,he main impact on this rezone is the cumulative, impact of the entire ridge and ;tharefota the impa„ts need to be identified and addressed. . Bac 2' Cal Bachmann Mr. Ba,chnon was re p>'e,ezat;ing i'!a . Lectznar. Mr, t hman stated there had been a great deal of discussion regarding` theTisk-5 zoning district. The parcel that is in question is quire flat and is not dropping into the canyon. The request for roiii,r, this property to "T�i-2'-1/2" was suggested in the 'Planning`Departtment. At the time the .zoning was requested it was ori&ally for �'7�i�}3" zr,ning. This is the spl.iting of nine acres. There is one existing home and the proposal is to construct two more homes on the property. There would be no probl.ebts : i.th the conrttruction of these homes . There would be very little removal of vegetatiun. There is one existing well.. There are some areas of "M-5" zoning that could not be split in, that area. This parcel, has good soil, and percolation. He did not feel an ExM, was needed. 3, Jamtls SchwaVta. i` t. 8cIiwarLttz:.tt:art ti.wt Mr. Ba t4 hae4 spoken about the relative flatness of the prop¢rty. About tt;o acres on the property is off the back of the canyon. The soil conditions are quite poor. He does grow Kiwis on his property, he soil is acid and kiwis can survive in that: type of soil.: The majority of the people ift that area still prefer "TM-V zonirkeii Thera are many 20 to a,,J acre parcels id Forest Ranch that could be divided. He would like to see an EIEC required There was a shortage of water on the 'ridge were this property is located. Chairman Lemke stated that the rea8di% the Exit was being required 'was because of cumulative effects if everyol.ja in the area were to divide lower than the five acre, ttUhi.rtlrl. From the testimony presented, it did not look lik.a the project would be approved, 14'hy then should the boar-; require the Oxpense of the ,Ex$; , Supervisor Dolan stated the cumulative effect starts with the first division of land, tveryona that is in Vorest. Ranch at this time could wants to remain in zoning; but if this were approved it could be the detarmiring factor of reducing the other parcels, in size. She felt an ttR should be required. �r MAchalt spoke in apposition to the 4. NZ chael 'achah, _ y problem with Ha ,telt an xR was needed,: TheVa is dnfinxt�i.' a p Ptd appeal. They are cortcerne:d about tlyta septic systems the well. on tine pxopexCy: I possible contaminatiotl of other wells, }(r. 2Zolcar telt that apparently the water ar�d septic questions and an EIR would provide that inLormat�on: should be looked into -stated there were love ownexs l chnez tat err : This p Le lend to a t:hraa parte] division' 5 . ,7ai,.n Lecf'tt�r. , `1r . of the prep parcel wo'.ds Lound is the 'crest 14,knc:h areal It is one of the most level acre They have had no problt';� with the well. 'There is a well on t:he property, t of the water eras checked • Trta 1Q to 65(l tees thew'�e3. et deers The quala, y gays that dowt aricultural The well. driller, Mr: Willis, Y � or the resdrvat3ion Of as stttttcient wafer atl the his araa.5h6uldabeLde��eloped instead of the pr .e hand and felt that: t i agri cultural land. pee 25 September, �31 L9a the r W.r_ �P �__ =— � D en t) - ' tb, tri. �" ealth. ep�xtrte Mr. Bachman stated that "a pha taq , T 'Ft the septic re ua.rert�xnts thP`te abul.d be no 'probl,etn c,i,t ubi.ic and cott�ined to the Boa!'d, • Hearing "lased to the p th notion of Supervisor Wheeler, $ ec.onded by Supd-,, 'sor �o? ' rec�tt�txement: f:o prapa're gal of .Jahn R T echner oz and carried, the app cruisers Dolan, �thaeler and Wins Lan; an tj] t was denied. Ayi t �Lp ervisor Moseley andaixnlan �,2mke NOES'. 5up h Recaipt Project # APPENDIX L' Date Filed Envi%onmental Informat�ion Vo -m (To he coitpl.ated by applicant) ) GENERAL INFORMATION 1, ]`tame and address of developer ox 'pro I oCL sponsor John Lechner, etal., 417 Williamsburg Lane, Chico, CW.iforrnia 95926, r- `L, address of project East of Hwy 32 ia,. SW �4- of S 7 , T 23 N, R 3 E. AsseSsor''s tloc and Lot Number 3 Dame, address, and tel hone number of person to be contacted concerni-.ig this project Y. W. 13ACHMAN -- $ACHMAN & ASSOCIATES - 342-4136 M2 T- .6 Esp MA -de, CIicoo California95,926 f 4. Type of project: (i,e, rezoning, subdivision) Variance.. _ 5 List and describe any other related pixinits and other public approvals required for this project, itic'" dine these required b�+ city; ragion4l, state and federal. agencies! Butte County P1aniiincLqnproval. 6i existing zoning district, TM -5 1. Proposed use of site To allow one 5 acre parcel and one 4,L acre, parcel.. PROJECT M-SCRIPTION 8, Site size 9.12 acres. 9,. Square footage of buiid ttg(s), 10, Number of floors of conntruction,, 11 Miount of off-street parking provided. 12 Attach site devel.opmet-it :plan, 13: Proposed scheduling. 14+ Associated projects, 1.5, Atiticipa.ted, incremental, dei�elopment; 8ulf000.Comry, r�r.nv�lar:, t✓�I�t�tr�1 _ APPENDIX E 16, 7f residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes, and type of household size expected 17= if commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, and loadir.p facilities 18, If ipdustrial, indicate typo, estimated employment per shift, andlo,ading facilities, 19. If 1'nsLi,tutional, indicate the major function,, estimated' employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and, cominunity benefits to be derived fromthe project. 20. if the project involve=s a variance, conditional use or rezoning application, state this and ,indicate clearly why the application is required. Are the following; items applicable to the project or Its effects? Discuss below all items checked yes (actech additional sheets as necessary). YES NO X 21= Change in existing features of any beaches, lakes, or hills, or substantial alt:( -.ration of ground contours, X gniftca change scenic vi waw or vistas .from existing _'tCc_ areas or public lands or roads X 25 81gnifi,�-_antl.y change pattern., scale or character of general area of project. X 24, Significant amounts of solid waste or litter= X 25, Change in dist, ash, silioke, fumes or odor's in vicinity. X 26. Significant change in ;Lake, stream or ground water quality or quantity., or alteration of existing drainage patterns. X 27, Substantial change in ekisting 'noise or vibration X. 28, Site on filled ].anal or on slope of 30 percent or more, 29. Use, or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as tnxic substances, flammables or explosives. 13irt�'t� C�. trttnni�tg �oimr,�. . , ] 1981 �Jr+�v�tta, �atiiar�i� Apjaeti i tk %, ?a : 2 of 3 XR5 NO X- 30 5r ::astantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.) X 31. SSubstantially increase fossil fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural as etc.). X 32. Relationship to par: of a larger project or series of projects EN I YRaNN1ENTAT. SETT INS; 33. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspiat;ys . Describe any existing structures on the site, and the use of the structures. 34. Describe the surrounding properties$ including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical or Scenic aspects4 indicate the typo of intensity of landl use(ote-family, commercial, ses, shops, I department stares, etc:)' and scale of development (height, frontage, sei:-back, rear yard, etc.) CERTIFXCATSON: l Hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in t2ie attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best cf my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presE,vzed are true and correct to the best- of my knowledge and belief 1.J2�%8i: � �-CJS-t--✓ Aare Signature) For LTOM LEC8NER, ° 2TIAL 8UH0 Co. l°tunning �:Cilirilt FEB 111981' AppendiX Z - page of 3orovillok 'o—atornta I NOTICt OF DETERMINATION TO /7 Secy:e,vary for Resources 141.6 Ninth Street, Room 1311 Sacramento, CA 95814 LX7 County Clerk N County of Butt( FROM: (Lead A enciy) 25 C,oura Te x -efr rive Enyirormental Review w�par� men rt�rta 7 e C I i oxna zx _ 3 Coux tv. Center. Drive Orov X71 e , Ca7_if orxiir-92 SUBJECT: Filing of Notice of Determination in Compliance with: Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public Resources Code ERD 7ao6 # q-02-11-01 hr6j e�E Title Variance AE it 63-13-03 john Leclrner tate Clearinghouse Number W (If submitted Lo Sta.Le CTar ing house ontact erson Earl D. NE3lsox1, Director Te ep one Number 4-4777 Project Location East o.f R"Ti i.wt.y 3 ,, s.pproxiin e; y I mi e sout), of Forest Ranch. Project Descr' ption; Var.i.anee to the 5 -acre ninimum parcel area required within. a TM -5 zoning d stric t t irr order to develop an additional 441 -acre arccl from an exi.str.n , 9.l -acre homesite. This is to advise that the Btxt 9 COUnty - planning Commission \LGCLLL .K1�,411C:y f has made the following determinations regarding the, above-described proj ect I. is7. The project----� have a significant effect on the %7 will not environments 2. 7 th An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project. to e rovis� pursuant otts of CEQA, and was cetti fi ed as required by Section 15085(g) , 1,1E California Ate titiistrative Code. A Neg- ati.ve Declaration. ways prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA, A copy of the Negative Declara- tion may be ex"aiiined at the Enviro tment~al Review Department, 3 County Center Drive, Orovill.e, California 551965, G ie NEGATIVE DECLARATION REGARDING ENVIRONMENTAL, IMPACT 1. NCTIM IS HEREBY GIVEN that the project described belowhas been reviewed pursuant to the provisions of the California Evironmental Quality Act of 1970 (Public Resources Code 21100, et seq.) and a determination has been made that it will not have a. if nifioant eff ee't upon the environment Log 81-02-11-01 2. DESCRIPTION 'OE PROJECT Variance to the 5-acre minimum parcel area required within a TM-5 zoning district, in order to develop an additional 4.l-acre parcel` from an. existing 9.1acre homesite AP It 63-13-03 LOCATION Or PROJECT: Past of Highway 32, app'r'oximately 1 mile south of Forest Ranch, 1N» NAME AND ADDRESS, Or PROJECT .HPPLICAN"T' John 1,ochner I;a,chman ej Assoc, tt 17 Williamsburg bane 301.2 Esplanade Chico, CA 95926 Chico, CA 95,926 5 MITIGATION PMASuRES e 5. A copy of tl�.e Environmental. Review Director's initial study regarding the enviro:bmental. effect of this prof Oct is attached. This Adopted as presented. Adopted with Changes. Specific modifications and supporting reasons are attached, 7: A public hearing on this Negative beclaration Was held by the decision ma)ting body. Nearing body 'Butte County__Planning Commission Date of Determination Determinations 0n the ba8is of the Environmental. Dirodtorl s initial study, the information presented at .hearings, comments ,received on the proposal and our awxi knowledge and independent researchi. Appanaix G = page,l of 2 i�wliClk�� r�i1 Box 173 .P40. [PC;lr�,:aa`t' .Llc'1+.Ait1, WA. 91-2. 63413-1 7aolb.�r4t; B. Katz .I��:n7.�,t. �oul�.�.,nsah'. To P-0. Box 3297 r � Rei s '`"°1 Chico l CA 95927 Chico, CA 9592 J.P. & M.M. 5werda Claud L. Willis P.O.Box 2y Hwy. 52 Forest Ranch, CA 95942 Forest Ranch, CA 95942 53-01--2 James F. Bdcasb A.R. & C.M. Volpato P.C. Box 55 1 279 B , 8th S t . �'ore,� t Ranch, CA �594�' ' Chico, CA 95926 53-13- 5 John Lechno A.J. & I�.ir1.B�x].'l 1 Williamsburg iratxe P.O. Box 213 Chico, CA 95926 , 'ores l; Ranch, CA 959+2. 63-13-6 Bachman & Associates Alan Lien Bocast 3012 The EspInnado 1620 Sheridan Ave, Chico s CA 95926 Chico, CA 9:3926 63-13-71 Maurice & Joan H&hne 955 Myrtle Chico, CA 95926 63-13--15 Dan & Vicki Bath P40. Box 211 Foj^est Rancho CA 959+2 GPeg Johnston P.O. Box 3682 ail l c o � CA -11 e 631 LFI Hw;,r. 36 Post Office �'f .11 Crsc l Ch. 96061 TO: Planning Commission FROM! Cnvi.ronMental Review Department su84FICr. Variance,, John Lochner Air H 63-13-03 PATE: Marcia 24, 1181 This project is a requested variance to the 5 -acre minimum parcel area required Within a TM -5 zoning district,in order to clove' p an additional 4.1 -acre parcel from an existixg 9.1-acij homesi.te. The pl•oporty is located east of Highway 32, approximately 1 mile south of Forest Ranch, on gentle ridge terrain, Mr. Lochner previously regtiested a rezone :From TM -5 to TM -2-1', on this subject Jk acre property in May Of 1980, in order to create three parcels less than 5 acres in area. Our onviron- mental evaluation of that earlier proposal was a recommendation that an EIR be prepared, based primarily on the growth -inducing and cumulative effects of down -zoning lands within this un*fOrm TNI -5 district. The applIc:ant subsequently appealed theF'1I requirement, The Board of Supervisor's (on a 3-2 vote) denied the appeal, on September 23, 1090, requiring the hTit, Attached ;dor your r0feronce is a Copy* of the environmental study for than rezone request (ncluding minutes frolll the Board of Supervisors meeting) The current varidnce request could cause simila°x grotvth-inducing arcels, area owners desire to develop smaller et Acts other vvr h individual case would involve individual. parcels. F�tolveve consideration and analysis, contingent upon the standards and conditions requ,"red :EOr the granting of a variance contained in sckction 24-40 of the Zo�� Ordinance, Special circumstances are necessary 2or a variance to e anted. Therefore, the cumulative Ind growth -inducing effects oL this project are ex- pected to be limited in extent and a Negative Declaration regarding environmental impact is warranted. eieronce AeLone, John Lechner AP M 63-15-05 ERR 80-05-19-;06 cc' John LOChner httchman Associates ErfVIROI M�:I�iTAL MEIMIS'� �D1ZM Lead Agettc'y) (To be completed by ERD Log 8o-05~1.9-06 BACKGROUND 1. Name of PrOPOr int J'ojur Rr � ec`ntter .�. I4um' ex O 1'roporteni: 2 , Address and Phone G if. i�Bacl1`a�ai 'w 1�SSOCc 17 i1a1.1:1a1`. oburg La�� o � � �s� wLas d� , Ohi co , 0e. 3, Date of Checicl.'st Submitted Agency Requiring Chackl.l.st , 4 • �� Lica e Re�eS.nF 12 acres rraT, 5. Name of Proposal, app �idPn'u s7. �.• i iac r l �- c w n.Lrcel clivis to Tei -2 _tO ENVIRoNMENUL 11 PACTS„ Vis,; and "maybe" answers are all. y require. (Ey.planations of attached sheets.)` on - YES MAYBE 140 Proposal result in oignnificant 1; , Earth'. I•Jill the pxo p a Unstable conditions or in �• �.:... iearth changes in geologic substructur,es? b . Disruptions , di spl,acements, com- b,the soil? or Overcover3,,ng of C. 'Change in topography Or ground sur or removal. Of � face ,rel c :f features top'soa.17 icdOveca - t,on Or Destxucny, , tion of a unique geologic physical. f0afures? e, Increase in wind or water erosion the site? x� of soils , either Un or off f, Changes in deposition Or erosion san-ds, or changes in sil.ta of beach tiah� deposition or erosion which chzoitel Of a river or may IV[() Itfy the.. strcai�, of the bed of the ocean of i y any brx5�, itIl.et or lake? -=----t ., �• g, Loss of prime Agriculturrll.y pro designated ductive soils outside urban S,l 0,ft•7 1. MIN MM 4w yt's No h. EXPOSt 170' of People or property to fSeOl.ogic hazards such as earr.l quakes , landslides, mudslides, ground :ailuro o or similar hazards? � 2i Air, Will the proposal resu.lC :i.n,; a. Substantial doter.i.oration of ambient or local air quality? b, The creation of objectionable odors, smoke or fumes?tx c. Significant alteration of air movement, moisture or trmperaturo, or any change in climate', either locally "X or regionally.? 3,. Water, Wi'l. the proposal result in s'ubstan ta.al a. Changes in currents, or the course: ,* or direoti do of water movements? ..— .--. . b, Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, of the rate and amount of surface e,��,•,.tr water runoff:?' c. Need for off-site su tace drainage improvements including vegetation re :oval, channel.i:ation or culvert installation.?�C. d Aluorations to the course or flow s of flood waters?X e, Change in the amount of surface wager in any water body? X t'. Disthargo into surface waters, o in any alteration of surface wager quality, including but riot limited to temperature, disolved s oxygen or turbidity? Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of- ground wa.t_ev s 7 " h. change in the quantity or quality of ground vjator8, either through direct addition6 or withdrawals, or through ;ifttorception of an. ' aguiEet by cuts or 6kcavations 7 Appendix F W page 2 of YES MAYBE NO i Reduction it the amount of Water . otherwise available for public watur supplies? -, j . exposure of people or property to water rel.a.te�. hazards such as flooding? 4, Plant~ Lite. Will the proposal result ri substantial.: a. Loss of vegetz,tlon or change in the diverLity of species or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora. and aquatic plants)? r b. Reductiot of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered, >a red, species of plants? C. Introduction of new species of in a barrier plants into an area, or to the normal replenishment of �.: oxisting species? d, Reduction in acreage of any a;ri cultural. crop' r )Ji�'e . will the ro osal result —ti proposal � in1 ub stave- a, Change in the diversity of species] or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals hel:l.- including reptiles, fish akd shell- fish,bet�thic organisms, insects or is ,i s1i, , mictofauna) h l; lteduc tlotj of Cie numbers of any, unique, rare or endangered species to f arkitaals? ._. roduCt] CCL of net" species of n,Aimals a.ntu an s.toa, or le5tlIl in a 1.a.rri.er to the tn.if;rar: ion or � d, '0ekhtV t, ort o t. , encroachment _upon, dr :t dcteir.R.�r ir.,rt t;ta ur:i. Ping esla or w1l.l dl ii`e habitat?,._. r Appendix, 1, _ Me of YES MAYBE 00 G . l the propoi-,6 ,� is esul t in snubs Etnt~Wi a, Increases in tzajSttk 10,,elsn b. letrOl, t e Of People to satrere noise s s? X 7, Light and Glare, Wia l the proposal Produce significant light or gyre? 3. Land Use. Will title -proposal result in a. significant: a. Alteration of the planned land use of an area, or establish a trend which will demonstrably 'lead to such :' 4 alteration? r*&'� b , Conflict with uses Z adjoining proporti.es, or c oni lict with est abli 'l -ma reciAeational, educa- tional, reli -ict s or scientific ' uses of an area? 9, Natural i?.esources . Will the proposal, result in r,ubst:antinI a. Demand for, or increase in the raise of use of any natural resources? 14%, b, Depleti-on of ar:y nonrenewable natural resottrc :? 1.0 , Risk ofUpset, Does the proposal involve a risk of an e5tpl.os ion o the release of. hazardous substances (including; but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemocd.ls or radiation) in the event; of an. accident or upset conditions? ll< populatip't-1, Will tile proposal si.gri ica;t.t:ly alter the location, distributiotl; det7sity, or growth rate of the 'human population of an area. or Physically divides an establishers commuh3i ty? w; 12 , HbUs x1i , : �4jj.l the proposal sigtliftcan.tly af' qcta existing Mousing, Or create a demand for addi.ti,onal ;',� housing? .ppendix la page 4 of 9 YES MAYB1a 11( 13. Transportation/Circulation.,. Will, the propos• rosl t in . c. GeneratioVfi:711.C11�,c1'Z'�I1,1C10V�.ill��.��clnC:�,cll. additional. � b. Significant effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? c Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems?' y U d, Significant alterationsto present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? e. Alterations to waterborne, rail: or air traffic? f. xncm`se in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? 14. Public Services, Will the proposal have an of e-Ct upon, or result in a substantial need for neer or. altered governmental services in any of the following areas; a. Fire protection? b4 Polite protection? r, C, Schools? d, Parks or other recreational facilities? ti. f e.' Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? f, Other governmental services? .. 1.5.,i n� r CIi.11 the proposal tesul.t jY1 a. U"4e of substantial amounts of fuel or energy` b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or reruirc the dovelopment of neq sources o e energy? 16. Utilities, will the propo:�al � esttl �s 7' r7. ileecl l or new sy4tenj8 , or sub- stantial alterations to th". following' Utillties Appendix F page 5 o 0 b, f,Yonmonication gystoms? c. Water? d. SeCgcr (will trunk line be extended, providing capacity it to serve new kik devol.opm6nt) Y e. Stora wator dra.l-riage't 17.. Ruman Health. Will the proposal result int a. Creation of any health hazavd. or , potentia, health hazard (excluding s',s men.L.a1 health)?, b* Exposure of people to potential ?. health hazards? 1 Solid Waste. Ule proposal result �n any s inificant impacts associated tai.th solid waste disr)osal or litter control? 191 Aesthetics. Will the proposal. r6sul.t TR the o struction of ,any public designated•or recognized. scenic vista open to the public,' or will the proposal, result in the Creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view?. 20. Aecroa tion. IkTill the proposal result. in an impact upon the quality or quantity of exist lftg public recreay tion facilities? 21, Arc�eolo<ical/lxsto; ical Will the proposal est; t in an a terata;on of a significant archeological or " historical site, structuto, object 'building?� or 21. i44ndatory. >i`indtngs of ai pznifiqance a. Does the `- o' ct have the potential to do,rade the quality of ;the environment, substantially^ redtite, the l abitaL of a fish or wild ife � species, cause a fish or zAldl fe � population to drop below sc1P. I ppendi� V - Page 6 O- 9 N YES 'MAYfir N0 sustaining levols, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal comms triunity, raduce the nuntl�er or •restr;i,et the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of �C California 'history or prehistory? b.Does the project have the potential, to aohieve short term benefits to the detriment of publicly adopted longi -term environment♦a.l goals? _ c. Does the pro j ec ti have impacts which are: individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (a ptoj ect may itttpact on two or more separate resources where the Impact on, each is relatively small, but resource where the effect Of the total Of those impacts otl the uxIvi" ontuent is `- significant.)---� d, Does the, project: have environmental 6ffoct8 which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings ► u either dLt0ctly ox indirectly? - appendix r F 7 of + _ r r:}, r� r--c•-' xr ,� 1( „r r f r,: /,ja. � �., ,. � � ,, � r� y�r w *' �n ! ' �� `` �a"' L, .{ rid {� ! r`' � �� • � 1 � , '+ „n 'ter 1 �r r 1 r r>4n r >, -:( +s> .. 1 «tea=:+ .e• rrw. +:. rt...r� r aJ.•t.rr v-r ,..ry.. `• -y. r , I.a I« 725;x` �, r �,� r,^f4rn A'/1M c 9� Fri.>v (' 1 �� x"r y+ � «'."tC�^��'. Jj `K" w�, r : ��ls �, • i«h, a "ly�� t•. r �; .r ry � , r r'ON P'" C t. (, W" r � q r7' �a ,4? i � � • ' j ✓ '�rY u A br' pC//xr alJ rt _r rl\ r �1. ' r �.. t � t. ✓'� rrr 4.11 r y,( t W A �. Fj� a.dr, i+• .kx �-.++r. 1'Y h-.Fi C'!.)r. .41�`>. " 'r is '. �l � ,{l. 1 : � >>..... r+«.� � .,,J.. a. � � � M 1 r l q � n•.1��'+r �,f .•.r,'� tlMyI,MrK.I+�� tip+ �;+�v iC j `vii( y 'T .. � a^•+.! ,fit 1, .�trr''"}� i qj 1 � a•r ,y,y+ L t r" � ;'1 ..,r,xti �..�r{k, �1S1 r ,�+'{r " It xi r °ay>.'�� `� tl '`. W +` �1 �gn' �a+. b� r•• �... tIF "'w � I li„ �, 1 • . +> x / , !f r� X+ > n A 1 !rI fj 'lt ` I 1 �1 • . . to, I + .' t^ ��/ '',' ti { ./.11• F 1 '1tJ r i 'l7 l�,'�: r•.•,.. �:.� �Ir ^^,+�„`, rl 1A) �yr •. r %Iln i�.^l�'� ;^�'j. "UiO.• • �". uh i r•ir -�, irr jl((i id` 1'�`± C". �'� j7,0_7104+x•i "'°�+'7, ^'�^ rw !`, ',. r.t?...•r,•� •,-•-�s r'� rw,�°V + i ♦ i ! 1, 4 I•-„,�K,I ,w r,..+.+': Vu)' �(�"c �,ry�"1+ � t 'r � "1 �r l� :r� �� • �"�i. �/�� `� r� r`y��r �: �'r+,� r � ;�lYr� 'e�'YfTrV Stt��j ^" '} ��• `� r ' ,` ;,{ ,,j r l„!l � ., ti i 'Mj r t. .� t °W 1r �.1r"".� `u, y ,_• s +' � r .r(c� ti L ! '•rr,p a '•,.• 1 •• wrl - ,. � `r�l + n � � i �211 n it N 4 n 1' t r✓t C .- �. �.•y7 814.,�BIk3 w- (` ° 1 • it v w fir, r 1 ' '+.. i� �__ '� r! " 'A r ...+. e -. �r' ` t (r� � rr:2 � �1.`-•'• `' �i:"E t ” ,i YJ 4 W • r: ?• . 1 ,` Yf�,."1 �:� l n :rbc w i •` 4 ,'^•. '' '� d 3'(I' R ," •� + ; 4 s'I"''r"?, o a..r+'"� 1 ,r "'Y /' y r ii•�+ { IIi!' k r rt'Y+'� � 4; y'.� �"_ r e�rl .� =.. .. �� , � � ry '� Y-...r -,"� raax .r' iI�.��)�f[r(rt�`(•,-(" Pi�'�✓� ir��l .' "+'r:, r �`1 �! 1 �' d�t X.Ma:Ir��IjiA" r�'< ti ,.'.T, 1 •u �•".�. ,`_ r "tiai� ,rl ,art'+�,W 1� .'S �,4+ +r+� y��lr.`r=J> �r _�y i y r Lp)_ ti �•yy� .�, r� e 0 ( ,.. +� 1 i � ��' 1 �. .S. x-r: t - ,: >'', � ♦ �i..�.""`1 Hi �... �"� � ' r 1 "�'"w.,,.. r.�i I li.w«`r ;a„� a f�•:rr V� rr t ' �'" '.��r� � � �,� y}r��"'Y�itr , ' �111� f41 ,f.��'•; . J5 i p Lot, 4 ? 1 1" ,F ✓ w y 1%-- f 1 x �� r • i �.. � �' 4 + "' "' r �Cer,M � a i .r .r Cr °� •!:'. � V' ' r 1+� o d++ � i" r .+� ��r' r� r'' r ,•� �� 1,'� i iV ..r„• ro 7 t , %3 �'i �� k',/ ,1 j�fir �`�j1 �a✓+t ,^Jt'� ~4P�� r 1 �."� t w... 1 - ,+'i t "µ Jgf.r�' nr !4% h:✓ in!T�l�il/ '� i�w',ry� ~ � ��*.J tin” _1h, "^',Yi . ,,,,,,•5) ,fix f r r }%(j\ �"'�'Y �'... �' s'/ � :' ^Irll „'�;. ..rip w�� • !yy` r '17 10 rr � ��... . � ,� . � {. . +,�•+ � 1.�. l4� ,'*" i, � �' i �� Y �� 'x�$t� v ♦ ii ""s ;,C \\r `r .,.7 � � e �.r ( ��r:.:. �", s,� C'n'_A' k« ,f'��c*=e""� i, .,l ^ �i' �, '�or'�» .. -R 4 "' r%""+, rt- 4r! gi�p,. "5 ... .,s+„tr�1: h�3...- 'Y.. #* .+i k. r"�t{✓.. ,y;r� r >. •}.. ," f ` m,... .tb"y ,. •r t r+ ° �t ' ' 1 ,y "i LU •� ` r=r` "•F. 1 �!r /� `+.." w !( f Fr..rrl :,.y 1'rf r C � ^77 1 t4a ` nny `1 �'� 1 t •.e✓ t � , � ry . I y 4 ;.YvH�' . i 1 syu,+7%" ' C WT •" )' » r '��G� « *l'S{Y �Jt .Me 't , urbr '`�'ytr �,y. � J / ; It i i 3b tr � "'.,�.' �. �.t � �� j•X3 1° i �5' of � .'{ . 1. }}' r Yr iy S FYX07A' � � it W. 1 •%i�� 1�' '411. t`X ��•'�,.r •l�l Q`Ja:M� r �ir If 1.," w'eh��." r"l� Qt itr w+}fi r t,r tl «PXY '` JI 6i�.1 L�� Y t,%r•+ri ^i x lr�,1.rr�`r" u �,..,_,.J r,�--• AH{ �" { r1Fl r r r' 'r-,1�`{ . k1 '.r.� r ' �,,, t' �' � 41 r a` ^ .I+ F�• � r i, "% .'''. . w � r , � p r. ,�C»...-•.. .+� ^>e=• _ ,.. ..M•...�...,....'�. w=Wit"'-rP••,•-.• . Y ti,,+ 3 .,..�...�._-- - .+`' ! i A . a >E� j' l t"� n� �: ''�r�� Cdr f 't Y p.'. +g.� �.•r `e �i'� ' 1 � r » r �, r✓ � 'r'� I�/"/x`, •fr � �r 1 -0� 7' �'.. � { r"'�, r �P r, r J,; jtx" tri ""'I a � 1 ;"-`° '1 �+ „t r i; (f '3.. �\ , X, t r, w ✓ r ��,' C u y 1 rf LO I w v a f (! r,•/� `�-. r.», Z ' rr{ .1`_W r x. " % ! r/ `yy`s,,-,Y� r 1 1 r y ! • dam— r .Yr' w,.� '`y!�*s ''- �-� .� •,,,�'', •fir T "F_,:,,; r r � �• 1 4 r !.r 1 �. � 1+.�' r�l i/I� Cty,•V•`» « f -.. r .•.'..~ .�" e S 1 . .-•..' Y r � �� Z . ",fit � , w a, d r, / V V ° _L( yiµ _ F.^''., �e '%� `..+�7 � ,ti.`r - `�� !t s� CC x .� i � r w e ✓ r _r w '. V y3t�' I t 1 !'r -";,<r ,.,� r � •w - ••:".» - I...« . � � , rW � ' !' , � ; rW:y -�.� � � ' r�}��,,,, j � {'`«... .T 1 '+r+• wy r µ� ^^.�t•' r; �.+ �•'" � �� .� 4." � !• � l ,,.> �� ". Q Y.t 1, y}a'�v r+.°.�'•t Y'' 4 1 `�. fir,rr •.�>; +u,/illl iJ l i tr! p.c'7tm+' jSa L.,�...�":rnr..a, • x:r �"� A ,i r;a•3�,."''.,a•.•+ + ^.t r. � `� ,� � � "{ �, � ,r✓" v!'Y^ , • t ',,7'� r' � t'0. .+. w'v.. �� r xsf ;,.'., C5 p +`+ % ,�*`.- -- �.«.,. s t ^-� j v.0 { . "'� •y r ✓ Y �, y,,, •4 ,-! r ry r'�,'•r W 4 1 4. .' ' Y urt'� � ! air r� Y 4,"'v�.'' ti.� .'s �. Lw3 � +C �13'no wihl• .�tiy ^..� V -ti.i� r.J rr-+ "1 �u�� rt td ��^'```Y. r � '� ' �'� � � ! rY I�r ^�. '� !', r � f ` t pfd' � .,y r ",l �.� .� rL . r 1. � • 'F''`� 'S O SC`i ,ter...+ 4 ; ! � l `a" (, v i r/ ° t•u , :-. .Y.f ♦ ''•'e r Y.1C�r (}r � `r` .�. i +J � ^r ( "�.p r +� X14 r.n °+.fir r'3. ,r a+1 w.,.rr7 S r Y W � {_ � !' _• r ,+, 4rC •Y J � �"';• � t,r r � .).�1�, r r. ,x "'+ �{ rx,r. ,w, «..i„ P""�"..+`A,v rte` _�I � �-+w�" 7^{ «.. w...:-..,. �•.....`.,i+«rL � a'.a..r � w.. ... 4:�.�.....�,.�_� 1� rr .) 1 r�" � � . ..� � ..:�ti ,•1 ice` h '�'t r l �i�` A� r qy �"vA✓Y w w w�„y 6 {. •ryw :.. "� w " ii t i � ��c -"'"i>' rr. •yd7 S /.:� ,✓•,�•+°` ! '+ »I4'T "" rr �7"-, 1'reyJ t ^ •K S n r�.l r' +' r " 1 I,Y�� ),,,,,.+r! ,7 ` r; 1 J .F rI '�..+`.. ! ✓ �r� V '"'1 `.P... X .r r ."'r �' r c '�,r 4 Y� Tri ' � x }'1711.`12rh119{111 �tl{1x"i llx...M1 � i Y of r r �� .� �. � "�. � �"�,.{', ) n* • (yie,� : 0. V �.r r � / ">" `. � x ,� ! - � j `� �, f , a5 i`�� ' � r � � ,. r QF x- ,, , x r/' � � ' ^1 ,W+ ,µ, �..., FIs „�.• ',� ! r ` rte'•,, . • + Co Alf rr .. ,... r g rl � �r ' +F r` � ✓ �c+r7j . � SC r .+ -7' 1 ,. '4.'„_"' � '�} x, �� ' d+r'" ��.. �, X,+.'�' 'r.•-� J`¢ ,� .� '.1� �ri�` r „�1� �J.'"v iJ r�''r �{�, s 9q. �' +�� .,r - �• � - r. \ � � �+ „� � � '. . vr� 1: 1. O. ° ry t "•irll U ° .. � ',�, `.' C 4 � n ,e;9 t � yr � ? nw rJa ,"' "fr � t v t *. ,x x •,.r t w i.t � ,�' •tl. a i,(�•.+�, ✓ `t 1 `1'. �' + . ry`• y �� `w l yP ,.� rpvyp+,( .., � au,..` 't„• y1 So 1'� 1�1 �� ir��'t �` \ d• �K , S `Irk � C {.f. - `..* �a � ter'. p r..w-.+,..rah�ay n..�r.l ,...» � � >'Y st ` ♦r. r....ar=.»' ^«'r`•`' w.y+r t A r+`a� «" �. x .Trayr it " up+ ! / 1� row,.> t .f ti °� t,. '1 •f + ja r t $y.' ff ;yg r' -✓t +'"'p .2J , "w .,�. � 1 �r �"rtl'y'(1 �,1 F 4 r�r;,�+r�y��,t� � y'1 1- j« `t • r•g - 'f,i F. r +4`{K$4 �i� ''r�d,4 l.fl`, sir",. i.MS {C,r." J C�, ( �+' ?=.i „r i 'p' r A`pa ,:,rd�"'`✓a'I ,. I.y ° r+4•r, ze rr r 4 1� ®r r� �F t y �•rrryf ya%. Ir 15 /t ()}�tx• l wr+� � ,L.x 7s*,c • �' �� ,� , �"w.�, � �^t. ,(tJl +-•. zCt ,� t; ,. x �r. ' � ,",! Vf'x ) + ti ' � :a .x ^, x � + .,4/ ap _.p .. A l t "" 1 ' x \,.� �,.,•.+w 1 J pa / �' �`.r a," F J 'hv 4 �!' � j r 2'13WwYkYa +4 k.r ` ..t.�p. i iY r • ..r rr «. �+��. Y • ,.,.. r . � {Y „ ! �.-_�..,� �,+�.,. ( .�.,:::,yr.. �... K'.s t T .� � :��:.,: r t` ar - - �{ r .'a• .,,:t;rr;;r- r r ' l ♦l � i 1 , P . � � „),,,•w. < � P "" Y, • � . ., � 7 ,fE` � � ,a✓'e " � / tf. ,S ' r f () �°�'e5,f e„"I...I 9.�%^ "`": '4 '- r ,`+,r/ rg •. ,• ,� �. ' { A "�y4 J` ',ar,u # ""%.'r:f`t',. 1 r �' 1 . '. / 4I : „a: �,°-.�.., a / '✓*r r "' '" ��• + r''',/ � � 1�� .,.�'"'"„✓ �.v ^ ' P r I � n �,,,,�% "' i f'/,-rll/✓ 4 � "\ " S l �� - `i !. rt /+ // �i "' r "n` /"^,z,� c, y 1� r" ...�'y #'/ '>" r 'I'•` ✓ Y //- .l l✓ f � ' 'J,w.,"`�-��V- �\J 1�, I 1 "�lY q i w"y:, «r/ � 'i � r� -Mr i 1 w y ♦�� i ,� '+' "rte �„f / J� J 1 r `i �.." 'l�`»,7e�'.i I~'�.� �. � + � � �f � � Y��i ,..+ � �„®r�fsT� �} . � r� i % { ,�I� i � ] t " ,1 1A r + q l � �.1� ,J ^r,,.�ir ,e -,r l.,y � r �"" ' • f 4 t1�`w `�� rr t �� Y� �rl�it i'>, lti .Y � \� r, � f' '��'�w.r '``"�. r, �✓��+ri' / ! � „y.,i'� y 1. O� �Y!/ � J ) /!r 1 � 1 , j i . y �,'_.. r h � r"' ��r+',J L/. ✓ r ,• ,. t �� /" ��,�+ � l 11 �l r' � f , i.- •�, � j Y .+ . �..•"�r��'`� r. r0"% 7' ✓rf�� . ' .f�" :."a -t!>; � �',�; . ' " III / � � i � 1 �' ''� f, �.,� � ,t' . y «« .�.,.•''� .+ ° C ti"� °;'G � �« •s-.. "� (Y Ili l � � '�•.- � �t 1 l }��` Q /� /� +� ; , f w. �.✓`.r- r. "" , / ! .%fa ,, w ,I �II S (l 1 ! .� '1'.—....,It{ f`tVTL+^ 1. 1 ��; rr .!;�� r rY " /i,, ;y `� �I t � 1I! r' j '\ , ...e. .ems / �` //•�'� ,! 11 � � ` , j YI I �V+\ td x� h ' ' '" ,� yr+ ,r+ j -: ✓ 1;/� ) // �� /jr/ YI � 1 rt r•.,"��.,M �1 lv�'r,•� 4i d , � r `( �(� qa err � �i' I ,� ,.r"I'` �+ � �� t t � *"`j'^� � + y �I"' i`!r ix �4� ("r" .' �•"Y 4j'�r� fr'i (11"1Y' {, +'� ,♦ i 1""'�' � t�,'v"'�'' ,•,�%a.,�, ...,,,.r!' � �°"'"" «rte t rs 7,"'�i r,,,»�•'^�,: �.tw— / ,✓ ter"' ,� -'/Ila +"kyr" v` . r f � i � �r / i+r'� ,�"•'°'.y.,� y �-'�,,,a ✓� ..r.�, rites s� _,.�"�«" "ti �r ..-'" � s.wr l'� �, � �� •',%) r ., ,✓" res :r 1 .Y� ,J r1 x•.n °-" . yrei 1 , 1 ,/ it "w �•,"+`'".,, `"'S„ 1..".«..✓`'"�'^'l r ,�, 1 ry 'ir. �, l j !Y " ° r `/ � � sAti , rr �"I:�M ,✓ ,r.._ ! ,i ! �,J K:%+' ,i �, r rt/ ``r" - I 1 "..� 'r l�j°C 4 � � � � ° / f�,F� �`�l ih,�iff, ✓ ,,,r.+✓;,+'� f+'' r yr r may, j,,,,r ✓r" a,Y` l " r -... � w„„, � r✓ J i . r I,i:. ,. ,J �,r a ..++//'`, r :. �' ��IG r ..ate _�_°✓. .}'"" �� "5 �� r f� ,,.s,. .✓ ` Y Y s+..°..✓ �, i i✓'' �. i` , �✓ , / .w r+ r --°y„ �,,,, ,+"„\ fv� Mr a y ,.t �"u•,ti +.+. r, r+ "V✓'frj rr /,///) �""",,/.� a 1'",r”` r �'.r °r .y .r. „-.�•;• ti *'°.t,_,�µ' '�,''1;"*.."` j Xi �" � r a+•� / Ji•f i �''�/�r % �,+". ,.frr .I,"✓+,:r v1J/ :t r .... � " '. V �, -��• y tr ' ,..�+,-•, � s.; t -z -.,,.r, t ✓ fi r �'��i. � "c... � - ••� Y,Y: � � , Y J � r i • � Ati V °m° ""wcc:.r+'rY I r .�� , r' , Ir ' � l r I ✓ r ' 1 "i t i s ;',� .{� jt'� -'�"� tl Y,+ -V W+�� r' v y r '•"'V�� `�'",w"'� r i+ ,�f ! �" ,q �° r �� t .,� '� ae `•� ,� r""� r ➢�++sy jYf l ✓.c � '.��.�"'•..y,• , Ywr , IFw µY Y t Y 4 ,r,: 1 ., .. +wr.• v` :r " i "% .... ,.. "°^. _.11'{h. .., y„�, ;.. �.:.. �:..+... it -,. � r. ,/ -j,. r f-. � -.. ,M':i f?+ i, ��. r �.`.Q* i •FrA.{�. , �"I, L'�§T°d".ti ,(4Lis'� d�C�dd '80-05-1�w�tr A. Typo o t` �'r',��pt,,: L : _ Rezone BBI of ,lj(,:'" x'• p l Lon :, Rq onins; oLabout x.12 ii ores, frora T!a'lk- to '%'xu �?. to' facilitate o 3 r2arcel division anal residential develo-paent. ,d,,, "It iQ,:: ,All ;s 63-<1- 3-03, Toani`i;cd eo w b of II � y_3,2 in tl�o ;� T o� " �,..�.w... e Section 7, 1. 23 N. � R. 3 L. , 14.D.M. 2'he sab jeot property is about It miles mouth of the community of Porest Ranch. 4. Propo:>ea of T.),l,sk.lopmc.ri•L:..bout 3 acres per ;DU. Imourit" Of :1`mperv:i.outa Minimal-leso two a:n Ttior' d(, -'):Access by frolatage road from Hlydi`t'3'ay 32. g �.' d individual se ti.c sx `tans. - �`te'thod of i��'-v�'aY'�> "� �� ?r5u.i` ._ � "� �'' 8. Souro., of Wabor Supp l,,!: Individual domestic wells, Pro -x .mit-r of pont, �v ; I :5,V + 10 Potential L T' furt w ," la Ild. olv;isioxis and Gdov(.Iopraont: potential is 3 paroelu tunder, vroposed None at present. I Tevraizl c7e>' r-11 S,x�. it Cllaraoh;v: Ridgeto'n a8pect lr ear:ly 1OV6 : torrain.; . Smooth ground, r3uri:ace relief. !. .c . "-, Less, 4,ha-d Becoming stray er to east toyard Little dhir o Creek 0anyon. About 2j_4 -do feet above sea level. td. Zirtzi#:iY.' Vta,c^l*wr`,:_Veer limitingfactoro associated with terrain. #"Oil r a. It pr !ln'! Soila e,re of tha Alken-Cohat—m obi is association. Thpioc are Class IV -Ll ty,, soils. • gid. ,L.,1r13 , t•t" �''r~+:! caI'�': Ff i.. F'�+� l 4. �.6 i 4 V' �+i wryC� t• �f.J-' ' ir'.F }.�k�:4�L�1 '. - .� :�akiort fid4 trend.in�;fe.y,i t: about „ ,.7% 4 Miles 1-1 16113 i .1, xi, i F�,�.L'lx i SL�t'ih ` y ht �'!. .�.�'�i 1..:�,�'E•i.; iw'i""t:.l �7U'�E�i��.k.�; ..�� llo dorate ell Id„'CI'r o1, taI y�yy / y y{ r y y y♦y �n y q y�y }y y y 'rj. rJ th-v'r Jrj [r pj5.1 r��h "'1 Ci .L�G :11 Q. :7u1 t4cG' {'f G'Lt Gi+4 l�L lAJ: 17 i.1 W1J. :U e•p. i't¢a Shcec"t +ecixa�. �u Lz -a I:;�..":��,��,.„�t�..:r:1��•--n-�- 011alco 8,611d 70- ti. ai;s^ 'c rt to�ra:vd 1"ho Sou 1,. 4; :�wi urJ `raat.K .�:... ;.L,.,„_.-„..�-.,,.rm.o...r.w•++—w.�r.. a .r 60-70.�.li, 1 i•i:]�1'�,�,Y`.-yJ ` �3 ma cL ~ Fyrau xd�ra.cr for � � 10 y iii gb b eattt , vi- ew 'a�: H.1 w s,Gl�a��ra� .._ �. . .Y .. Air a".D1+.-1 z tom 3 d or Oalt `CTLl17 CC1�1"LtZl:l til C`"ao 4 . Vr: ;cat; k ct:: ->7cd Footh .11- f 00al,aild,�_----- on alt annual "'1^u.0 s G a.; Rare nlonte �?aos b1e T or elevation tion l.iM ax tran:�a taxz life zone._�__ x r� •a__ nT _ oto ev on �ryni;er rwi . r 1 arce1r__ . d �r•':i acxei�_>�tn F ce Thvve ' 9 G all. Sill , rC.�iL�E'1. M Y M Y 41� 1W r: ( I+f r.��•� C cs:i:otin an �.i;e, l`he l°e a� +,he x, �T.• {'�h ire x-10 seatteTpa ha�eoi.-re8. Ta eWri : � . C� -*,Von. i,i'�`tlle (�Ytira OxG0 dr ,ii7�a�"0 'gyp w e9 � S r1�:'.l�•G0___, �3�'C� ry{y +{ -a '• w V "J. • b ;b:Laul tu'm:L� 4s ie.�ti.e1 a1 orr z (ir77,'?+1�G'r� TJEs311�� aft C11�ta11�unCC. • 'area e ls8431°L Li v rr •,y t" f ” • �YCrG'S ].;C« L i - r. ,. , r -•� - r ... ` t11 _1'1 7l hOMOS ifte r .x, y0ob.rX. , r Y y i�i• Cir-'�.4j _ T:t.L�. C� . 19, Aaacll k ii { ii sn W A, v r,a ; Faa IIx , DISCUSSION OF MI1)':CRC3t7i'�IEt1� AL tVALUATION Swinial)r: The project is a rezone of 9,:12 nacres Of ].and from 'tit -5 to 01l,l 2 1/2 to f-acilivito a 3 parcel division of the subject property' for residential use. 'llic project site, ;is located alon�q -ridgetop jLIS south of Forest Ranch adjacent to l ligltway 32, Me i3u t to County General. Flan land use des:igna`tion is Agricult Ur,'11- Zesidential (1.40 acres/])()) . I'lie request is consiFtent with the general plan, The rhtihactur ofthe arca is predominantly open foothill terrain, There are several tomes i,tes in the immediate area along the :frontage road which provi der; access to the site :from Highway 32: Sewage disposal will be by septic tfink and leach field: systems, 'lisp proposed source of- domestic 'water is by indi"ridual wells Impacts include Lb,clej; 3.b j; 4.a. All of the construction related impacts to the oarth will occur to a smzll degree. Iliere aro fete limiting .factors associated i�itb this gently stoning terrain for this project. Overcuovering of -the soil will reduce the infiltration rate and proportionallyinc-, 'SO t•WOU. Ve9et6tiott removal and soil disruption Will expose some -,..1 to increased erosion by runoff waters. Some sedl- ment may be geriee4,,-tod and deposited along ephemeral streams which lead to Little Chico Creek, Surface water goa:lity may also he e:f,fectod by urban type pollutants,washed :from developed area. 3,h; 1G.c. Groundwater resources are unk-n�wn and are considered to be limited in the Forest Ranch area, (Re-forence; Groundwater Potential for 5 -acre Parcels in the Forest Ranch Aron, WR 1016.) Producing wells in Mite area :are usually those which rare situated to tale advantage of terrain, ie . located along low areas. ' lie 80 j ect property is located along a ridget- to . Dimes tic wells i n the a:k r�ri r�r o very deep and somewhat costly anti many don't produce adequate ra aaur.ts of water, There is an existing wall onsite supplying waterto the exa.sting residence, A continuous domestic kllilteV supply must be shot,,n before the creation of 5 -acre or less parcels can, be approved, If a Wntittueus, adequate domestic water supply cannot be shoran, then the creation of 2 1/2 act.°e parcels in this area cannot be justified.. 4.b, (tare p1nnts have been locatod within the pest yoar .in the Little 0iico Creek Canyon,, (Reference! Isom -Kill Withdriwt from Land Conservation Agreement; Parr-` err 11. (te;orle.) "Cyte SLI]Ijcxct property is Withiri the mange or several rare and/or endangered plants Kincl a botanical survey 11.4 11ccommencod. 5,rJ. 'Cliche Will bu ,,I ca111L11.AttW lvduck,ion of Itnportarlt low—elevation ridge - land wildl=ife fribi tett, Tliv buck's 14XIMt,iirt Cher Herd uses this low otovat-ion lihbitat is wintur range, npvehLux P _ kayo 8 of Da,scuSsRAI - dant, "117e Department t o 1 l l ^�h unc] i 4 80-05-19-06 l.fi•. Jjesidr:nti al, development: '.h OI tlyirI9 areas JO grow th- nduc,iri, to the vori.ous public sOxvic o - Ylve protection rel iromexat;> €trcx of parti,caalar concern duo t', the oxtremo fjire xaazar in the canyon area. The nearest fire prot;ec'tiOrA station is the :Forest Ranch station, 4,Y: z�iles north. Adoquac;y of px,o't oct lona `hould be c ssessed by the ButteCol)-n-ty Fire D ap artnmen t 16d , 17a:. Soil conditions may limit, the area suitable for Leach fields. Sewage disposal characteristics are the ultimate determining factor in the :ac ua. l Lan division. _Spoci �i�: ;soils -tests will be required in cotsidera;tion of the actual lane'. division. Any divisions must meet the xeguir.ements of the Butte 00-a:n-ty Environmental Health Department. 21i An arcli aeolog cal. site suriroy of the ridgela.nd area is recommended. 22b. This rezone hno the potential to establish a new) more intensive development pattern a,nrl density in -the area, modifvinG the 19` 6 Forest Ranch Rezoning 'Phe; TM -5 district WWI i'0TM',Ilatea a,id established to reflect the x,atural limiting lactoro of i,ho land and to maintain a suitable rural resideati.al deny ty fol, this outlying area. 2c. Those impacts which are cumul ,•t:i.vel.y consid,�::*able are those .ind:Loated by yes or maybe resyonsos ora the initial study checklist. The E.I.R. requirement is based primarily on the potential for growth-induc ement i, An analysis of the cumulative Forest o� th�.0 rezone an the Forest Ranch ridge follows: The ;Forest: Ranch ridge is predominantly zoned M-5, a large, single zoning district that begins just south oX the project w;it,e and traverses the ridgelards north around the community of, yovost Ranch and beyond :further north Tor a distance of four mires or more. 'This M-5, district covers an estimated area of 2300 acres total. Gurreritly; an estimated 300 parcc-18 (averaging + S acres each) exi.s�t within this single district. The tllooretical jaximum developmer.;t potential within this d.istricL, under current:, TrIµ51 zcrlint's is an estimated. 460 �)-acre pa.;rcol,o (an additional 160 parcels) . 'l.°I.o propo.�ed ml`-2� 1': zo.11i11g patteLn coaild become ectabl.i.shed k,t�rcta.ghr�ul: this exit tirg '1tw"� di.t;rJUL kc,a>xrL�.iiativo a�aoqur�st fr,r ,xlrceraerat of '7�C'l-5 d:a't�r.ict if ttie proccrl��Artr becomes r:o L,abliol,,e:d. and subca quit nt Vezonir G.1n actur'Uy aro sought! as Appendix 1` .. page Sb F;0�-t°;; o2�ctlrrcen rc� 011 ��zO ,�,}Joey+M�:i.;LJ, y�.��1.�.�;O V(-'cOJXUgly). are .ifrgthj.I o"Io�,Urr�ed add tJ.oz;,cjl E)OO+ par('103 szac .f"izttire re a dcxac s, at a g c°sr rate off: POt +� el). Resul baht developm,cxjjt, impacts :l VOM. tIAS Potential, cumulative growth axe- (not including growth from development of existir4t. 'vacant properties) 1• Traffic increases, on the order of 1200-2500 average daily traffic. unis (.ADT) or more (laased. on a generation I rate of 2--4 trip one-, per residence, if the .standard urban rate of 7-10 were realized, much greater traffic would result;). This increased tralfic would be Pre- dominantly funneled onto Highway 32, which has an existicount) . ng traffic volume- T- �,ns of 1500-1?50 ADT (19?9 Cal - 2. Increased erosion from. road and driveway development;, and from grading of an additional 600.1- half --acre; homosites. 3; Increased draw -down on limited, groundwater resources trOM, additional residences. homesit�e c rr e cutting;am veget�tL-.i�on removal Xox + Increased t C,-xring (art an mated. 300 acres fop 600 acre homes, Increased wildlife habitat incompatibili 3.cs, and losses of habitat and open land. 6. Increased residential densities, population growth, and Possible incompatibilities with existing land uses and residents. Aesthetic impacts because of lTiareases in density may result,. r. Inoreasrd public ,service +demands, especially fire pro�tec-tion service. (The existing farerot edtion is provided pri- marily by a voluulteer ista.tion�. Appendix V,_ page 80 o.0 K I IV, MT&RMINATIOiV (To by completed by the Lead Agency) On the basis of this initial. evaluation C I find they proposed project, COULD NOT have a significant effect on tale environment, ani a NEGATIVE DECLMZATION 7 5 x� edm�leilcl,Et1, [� I find that al.thoagh the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not. be a significant affect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet havfe� beeeenadd&d to the proJecti A, NEGATIVB DEC,L4R. TOMO j �k7 S'C�Vldl'.L7.'l.L�i1J,L'IL y. ( I find the proposed project MAY h�lave a aigni.ficant / effect on the environment, and an, ENVIRONKENTAt IMPACT REPORT is required " (Signature), -< For; ENVIRONMENTAL REVILU DE:PAR'Tt ENT Aevinwed bY: �C+JI L .: ,�+' * '' ✓ Far] D. Nelson, 1A r Erivlronmental Reviev Director Appandix F page 9' of 9 80ARD 01� SUPERVISORS M:[NIMES) September 23, :1.980 1505 PUBLIC HEARING: JOHN R. LECHNER - APPEAL OF REQUI:WE NT TO PREPARE AN EIR IN CONNCECTION WITH A REQUEST TO REZONE 9.12 ACRES FRaM "m±�t-s" TO "rT.1 2-1/2" TO FACILITATE A THREE PARCEL DIVISION AA`D RtSIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, LOCATED EAST OF HW 32, APPROXI 1--1/4 MILES sOVra OF THE CO�2WNt ITY OF FOREST RANM-- AP 63-1543 The public hearing on ,John R Lechner appeal. of requirement to prepare an EIR in connection with a request to rezone 9,12 acres from "TM -4511 to "T�1-2m-1/2" to facilitate a three patcel division and resident:1,al development_, located east of Highway 321 approximately 1-1/4 miles South { of the cotnuni.-y of Forest Ranch, AP 61-13-03 was held as advdrtised. Dick Nolcar- etivironviental review departtent, set out the backgroun$ of the appeal. This, projact is based on small rezone from an existing large "T'ri--5'' zoning district of 1,20 acres. Thete are. cumulative considerations: This was the reason an EIR was required Hearing open to the public. Appea.ring: 1 Mrs. Margie Provenchere,, Mrs. Provenchere spoke in opposition 'to the rezone. There is.a known fact that there is a shortag 6f water and sanitary problems Sn. the Forest Ranch area. This would set a precedent to starting tearing damn the "TM -511 zone. 2: Bill Burch. fir. Burch stated he was rapresentin the Forest Ranch Coumunity Organizator.� He requested that the Board deny the appeal, of Mir. Lechner. The sentiLnents of everyone .zt the meeting held by the o ga; ,Iization was that in 1.9761 the 'IT,1-5" des,ignatiori was established, ; i , ',,--It that whenever there t as a reduttion in the size of the parcel —"-juirehent ati EIR should be required DiscusSion of thi Dan days EIR that was prapared in the rbrest Ranch area held at this bye, Page 257, Septet;:ber 23, 19$Q I R r September 23, 1.980 _ 80- Hr. Molcar stated that M addressed a different area. The v EIR was 'prepared for Eive-acre parcels. This is the first smaller rezone request since the original zoning in 1976. 'There was an EIR done got the original. rezone, but it was based on five-ac,rt parcels',, The main impact on: this °rezone is the cumulative impact of t.ha entire ridge and thorefore the impacts need to be identified and addresuetl, 7., Cal Bachman. Mr. Bachman was nesptea euting ,tr. tectitt.or. Dir. Bachman s`tAted therehad 'been a great deal. o£ 'discussion regarding the "TM -5" zoning district. The parcel that is in question is quite flat and is not dropping into the canyon. The request for zoning this property` to "TDt--1%2" was suggested in the `Planning Department. At the time the .zoning was requested it was orig�aally for "I'M -3" zoning. This is the spl.i.ting of nine arses. There is one existittg home and the proposal is to construct two more homes on the property+. There: would be no plrorlanis with the construction of these homes. There voul:d by very little removal of vegetation, There is one existing well, 'There are some areas of ►'TDI -5" zoning that cohld not be split in th,'tt area. This parcel has good, soil and percolation, He did not feel. an SIR was needed, 3. Jataes Schw,arta, Mr, 3alwatta ua atetl tbat Mt. Bachinp i bact spoken about the relative flattestOfthe property. About too aches on the property is off the back of the can7m The soil condi.tiots are quite poor, He does grow kiwis on his property. The soil is acid and Kiwis can survive in that type of soil, The majority of the people in that ,area stall prefer zotti,ng. There are many 20 to 40 atre parcels in 'Forest Ranch that could be divided. He would like to see at Exit tequired. There was a shortage of waiter on the ridge were this property is located. Chairman Utake stated that the reason titie EIR was boi.ng' required was because of cumulative, effects if everyone in the area were to divide lower than the five acre uliniimut;. Vtom the testimony* presented, it did not look like the prole 0y oduld be approved., Vhy then should the Board reaui,re the e�xpetise of the W w Supervisor Dolan ;stated the cultulative" effect starts with the first division bf land. tlatyone that is In Forest Randh at this time could wane to 'remain in ►►'ArwSr' zonin.,, tut if this 'gees approved it could be the detet•,aini:tg factor of reduc�r,,the other parcels in site, She felt at Birt should ba requited. 4. Michael Machah, Mr. rRflchah sponte in opposition to the appeal. he felt an EIR was needed. Ther'4 is definitely a problem with the tael.l on the property. They are concerned 'about the septic: systems and contamination or other 'we1).s, Mr., ;;olcar felt that apparently, the water and septic questions should be looked into and an EIR would provide that information. 5. John Lechner, 'Mr.. Lechner stated 'there were five owners of: the property. This parcel would lend to a three parcel, division; it is one of the ,most level acreages found in the Forest Ranch area. � There is a well on the property. They have had no problem;, with the well. The quality of the wager was checked. The well is about 450 feet deep. The well driller, Mr. Willis, says that down to 650 feet there is sufficient water in the area, He was for the preservation of a ricultural land and felt that this area should be developed instead of the prime agricultural lane: Page 258. September 25, 1980, — — Mr. Bachman stated that in checking with. the Health Depatttaent, there Would be no problem with the septic tequirements; Heatiag closed to the public, and confined to the Board, On motion of Supervisor Aeel:ety soronded by Supet-viso'r D61&1 and carriedi the appeal pp of Jahn?,, Lochner of the requirer;Ent to ptepate ati M, was denied; AYES r Supervisors bolan, Wheela and tiv ns toil NOBS t Supervisor Mo`stley and Charman 'Lemke FILE. 110. 63-13-03 'BUTT1.; COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FINDINGS - April, 22, 1981 APPLICANT: John Lechner OWNRlt:_ John Lochner, Andy house, Margo loot ser Carol Meyer and Joan Carnes RLQ1Jr,-ST: Variance to the minimum lot size requirements to allots a 4.1 acre parcel in a "Tr4. 5`' (Tim - bert Mountain - 5 -acre parcels') zone EXISTING ZONE: SURROUNDING ZONING; " TM -5 to the north,south,and west; Cil to the southwest, Tm-20 to the east and TM -40 to the southeast. LOCATION; On the east side of the State Highway 32 frontage road, approk mato1y l mile south of Nope. .Drive, Forest Rancli. AP NO. 63-1.3-03 81Zi 9.12 acres, PURPOSE OF APPLICATION The appl*cantw'sshesto-divide his property into 2 pa , o 5 acres and one of 4.1 acres SURROUNDING PARCEL SIZtei To the north are Ijarce1s generally of 5 to 8 acres in size with on -0 parcel of aPProxima- telt' 2 acres -created prior to 1967: To the West, across RWY- 32 is a 17 acre parcel. To the south are 2 parcels of appr6Ximately one acre, one of 2:65 acres and one of 5.54 acres. These parcels were created by a Parcel map recorded December 21, 1973; im- mediately south of these parcels are parcels of 40 acres and larger. To the cast is a 240 acre parcol. ZONING HISTORY: Site zoned W-5 by Ordinance 1679 on Feb. 10, 1976; previous zone was A-2, since August. 29 1955. GI NtRAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Agricultural Residential. APPLICABLU REGULATIONSt The Tr1-5 zone requires a m ni)hum lot size of 5 acres. Se -.tion 24-49 of Zoning Ordnance No: 7.750 states; Ir 1111111W MC1" j, TILI-41 NO. 63-13-03 0 BUTTE 'COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FINDINGS April 22, 1981 Variances froni the tornis of this chapter shall be granted only when, because of special circumstances applicable to the property, including size, shape, topography, location or Sur_ roundings, the strict aplilklition of this deprivog, ebapter such property of privileges enjoyed by other propeliy in the vicin- ity and Under Identical zoning classification. Any variance granted e4 shall bd subject to, such conditions as will assure that ilia adjustment thereby authorized shall hall not constitute a grant of _--pecigi privileges inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in tile vicinity and 7,c)ile in which such property is ituated. Any such condition imposed upon issuance of a Variance must be reasonably related to the use of the Property for which tli6 variance is requested, A variance shall riot, be 9VIbLed for A parcel of Property Which. authorizes ri Use oi- activity which i.,3 not otherwise expressly authopized by the zone regul,,1l1011 govvern, in g the parcel of property, (Ord. Mo. 175 0 8 1 8411 4r, Cot-IM11INTS P - ublic Works:, ill. A variance does not legally divide property,, 2 P ar c 0,1, ilMl te created 'pursuant to the requirements of the State Subdivision Map Act and Chapter 20 of the Butte County Code." P'nviroilliental Health: "No 01)Jettion to variance, hoWovet, any division or development 85—all comply wI th the he Buttte County Subdivision Ord-Inanco and the Septic Tank Ordinance, and the Health Dept.. requirements, Any lot less than 5 acres will require proof- of wator." Divisioft of Forestry, "No obj Joctions, no ftv'o protection requiromentsill Sheriff: "No ob -'ctions.11 ANAMI8.1 Tills project, is a requested variance to the 5 -acre minimum parcel area requited within a TM -8 to,iiing district, - I in order to develop an add - it. iobal 4i1 acre parcel from an existing 961 acre homes,td, The property 15 located east Of Highway 82, approximatoly 1 mild South of Forest Ranch, on gontlo ridge terrain. Mr, Lechildt PrOViously requested a rezone from TM -8 to TM -2 1/2: On this subject 0+ acre property, on May 19) 1.980, in order to create three parcels loss than 5 acrus in area. The environmental OValudtibri Of that earlier proposal I I Was a rotommendatibn that an EM be prepared, based primarily on the growth -inducing and cumulative effects of roz-oning, lands withiii this uniform TM -5 district to allow 8malljdt lot sizes, L T) ,eappli- cant Subsequently apped1da the Eliz toquitomohti The Board of,8uporvlsots (on a vote) denied the appeal on September 23, 1980; vequltlibg the _2� x FIL NO. 63-13-03'' BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF ,l41NDl:NCS - April 220 1931 The EnvaronntentaI Review Department has recommended 6 Negative' Declara- tion based on the facia that each application would have to meet the ,requirements rapproved, thus 1�initing anyodo growth-inducing quoted ngvof 11) order tobe fects . The 1 subject parcel, was created prior to the imposition of the TM-5 zoning, as were most of the other parcels in the area—and all of the parcels less than,S across According todeeds on file in the Recorder's Office, the applicant and five other persox s took title to this property on Diay 9, `1,980. 11The previous rezone application was filed 10 days later. The property is located on a ridge top, relatively level on top, but dropping ofd rapidly into a canyon to the east. 'There is one existing hotne on the property; 'There does not appear to be any special c :r- cumstances applicable to the property such as site, shape, topography, lo- cation, or surroundings which ivould warrant the granting of a variance, The applicant lists no special circumstances other than a desire to create additional parcels NOTE: The previous rezone s'olication is nearing its one year deadline withou, lie required er vironntental documents being filed. Unless the applicant notifies the Planning Department, iri `writing, requesting wIthdr'awal of the rezone application, it will be necessary to set an additional hearing 1:o consider automatic denial of the rezone. RECOMMENDATION'A. p, nd that the provision of the California Envi_ronmenta]. Quality Act have been tomplied with; and B. 1~ind that the subject ect properly i s NOT deprived of 'privileges enjoyed by other property in the vicinity and 'under i- dontical zoning classifications because of special circumstances applicable to the property; and C. Deny the Proposed variance to the minimum parcel size reruired in the TM— S zone for ,john 'Lechn.et, AP ' 63-1.3 03 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES APTil 22, 1981 ITBIM ON WHIC11 �yT1i;�Tn' � � '" 1�E:C±I,A,ilATION A. REGARD 1W71"')YI ONME, l') -79=10'17 -]SAA; B 875 PUBLIC HEARING;- JOHN LEC14NER - PROPOSED ECA TVE DECLVA:,rIONAND ,APPEA> OF -PLANKNG COMMISSION "S DENIAL OF VARIANCE TO ALLOW A 4,,1 ACME PARCEL IN A `°T:ti-S" ZONE, AP 62-13--003, ;-O)?ERTY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF HWY 32 APPROX.4 MTT:, SOUTH OF FOREST RANQTj FOREST RANCH AREA The public hearing on John Lachner proposed negative detlaration and appeal of Plann�-ag Commission's denial of variance to allow a 4,1 acre parcel .ta a "TM -S" zone, A:' 62-13--003, property located on the east side of highway 31, appro:-amately 1/4 mile south of Forest Ranch,, Forest Ranch area was held as advertised. Bettye Blair, planning director, set out the background of the appeal on the variance. liitaring open to the public. Appearing: 1. William Burch, representing Forest Ranch Community'A$sociation. Mr. Burch stated that the subcommittee ort lana use voted eight Lo :aero to oppose. the project. The subcommittee presented findings to the as:sr— a,ation; which included walling t'-- property, and the association requ a:. immediate appeal ded. T . ritd has a petition, signed by metubr a, �� vicinity Embers of the association. Thi out: of the perimeter of downtown Forest Ranch. It is truly in zoning area. A rule is a rule and felt it was very difficult L, define breaking the rules. This could set' a precendent. Iie ,felt that people in purchasing the property have a built in responsibility to understand the condition of the pur:^hale in the sense that there are certairl. -rules and restrictions as to the use of that property. He fel-- the purchase vas made with the full knowledge of the zone. He requested that the zxppeal be denied. 2. Cal Bachman, representing the owners of the property. Mr Bachman stated this was a request for a Variance. This wou",d not be establishing a precedent,. They met with everyone on the initiatidn of the zezon:e after the application was turned iti. 96 could not argue with the point that if a rezone was .made fot: 2-� goes, that would ,set a precedent, He felt that this parcel being a nen 9..12 Acres is ptabab.l.y as level as all ` the par,.e-%ls in the "'Tl -5'" ton -tag, The best fuse of: that land is the creation of trap hosaesitesi. He did not knov;hat the new petition said. the last petition made statements that the property was bought. with the idea of possible subdivision: Three-fourths of the people signing t:hdt petition Vera oft one acre parcels of land or less that was created by a parcel map. The stateiuent has been made that: the well on the property is not su£fciett: The owners of the property discussed this matter with, Claude W.liis, who indicated there was no. doubts there would be a good water supply, He felt that because of the location and topography ,s variance should be granted: Therh is about ,7 acres within a road right - of -Way. After taking the road into consideration this is a 9,8 acre parcel, They felt that five acres in the bank And 4.1 acres in the (front: would be reasonable, BOARD OF SUPt VZSORs MINUTES - May '266 1987 Y 1 Heaving' closed to the publ; taAnd confined to the Board. SuPexv'isor Wheeler felt that the owners were trying to laircumve'at the Pr6cpss by aPP1Yin13 for a variance. She did not think they were be ing- deprived of the enjoyment Of ;the property, It was the a gal moved by Supervisor Wheeler, secdnd 2d by $upervisUr Dolan that PP of 'John Lechner to the Planning Commission's denial of a variance to allow a 4.1 acre parcel in a 117M-5" zone, AP62-13-oo3. property located on the east side of Highway 32, approximately 1/4 mile south of Forest ,Ranch, Forest Ranch area be denied. Chairman Moseley had some reservations about denying the appeal. They are aciking for a variance and not a rezone. This is not setting a precedent. She had no problems with upholding the appeal. Dan Blackstock, county counsel,, advised the Board ties 1 had to make specific findings for a variancei tIs suggestion to the Board was the Board had no legal g grounds to authorize the variance: Chairman Moseley felt the findings would be that the owner is being deprived of his rights. Supervisor Wheeler stated that the applicant could make an ' application for a rezone. That is what the applicant did. she felt that applying for the variance was circumventingthehis is why Thereis no legal way that the Board could make the findings for the ariance $dper+risor Saracens felt tha4the applicant mentioned a feta factors. There are other smaller parcels that are contiguous with this properly and not taking, away agricultural land. of lid' that can be used property. The count Is looking to the u g Land,. He hat, z question as to whether the Board was taking:.. away the owners tights because of the . smaller parcels of land: Y Supervisor Dolan stated those kinds of situations were thoroughly anal zed; including water and traffic impacts, In the Forest Ranch area. Sloes p , erosion were also considered when the rezone was accomp3ished The rezone in fore Ranch does allow for diviaiirig of. land to take place ere there is capa�-Lty of water. To allow one parcel split is not to ecessarily alleviate the pressiYre on the agricultural land. This propertyµ , is also contiguous with larger pAtddI8 in the a,,ea. 930 CON'T'INUE TO JUNE 9 1981 - CLOSED HEARING, JOHN LECHN I ERj PROPOSED NEGATIVE DECLARATION REGARDING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT AND DENIED VARIANCE TO THE MINIMUM LOT SIZE REQUIREMENTS TO ALLOW A 441 ACRE PARCEL IN A "TM-S" (TIMBER MOUNTAIN • 5 ACRE PARCELS) ZONE ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE STATE HIGHWAY 32 FRONTAGE ROAD; APPROX110TELY ONE MILE SOUTH OF NOPEL bRIVE IDENTIFIED AS AP 63 13-03, FOREST RANCH � The closed hearing on the John Lechner proposed negative declaration regarding environmental 3:mpact and `denied variance to the minimum tot size requirements to alloy a 4..1 acre parcel in a "TM-,5" (timber mountain - 5 acre parcels) zone on property located on the east side of the State Highway 32 'frontage road,, approximately one mile south of Nopel Drive, identified as ,AP 63-13-03, Forest Ranch was held as eontinued Supervisor Wheeler stated unless there was a change of mind f'riom the Board members this matter should be continued until next week. The matter was continued to ,lune 9, 1,931: C,00D Off' SUPERVI505 MINUTI s, joho, to 1'981 984 CLOSED HEALING: ,JOHN LECHNER PROPOSED NEGATIVE, DECLARATION REGARDING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT AND DENIED 'VARIANCE TO THE MINIMUM LOT SIZE REQUIRE- MENTS TO ALLOW A 4.1 ACRE PARCIL1 IN A ' "TM -5" (TIMBER MOUNTAIN 5 ACRE PARC -ELS) ZONt ON PROPERTY LOCATED' 01$ THE rAST SIDE OF THE STATE HIGHWAY 32 FRONTAGE RMA APPROXIMATELY .ONE MILE SOUTH OF NOPEL DRIVE, IDENTIFIED AS .AP 63-13-03,, FOREST RANCH The*hearing on the John Lechner proposed negative declaration regarding environmental impact and denied}}voriancL, to the minimum lot size requirements to allow a 4.1 acre parcel ik a "TM- 1' (timber mountain - y 5 acre parcels) zone on, property located on the east side oti the State Highway 32 frontage road, approximately one mile south of Nopel Drive, identified as AP 63-13-03, Forest Ranch was field as continued. Bettye Blair, planning director, set out the background on the continuance, There was a tied vote on previous acti,ono Supervisor Wheeler stated she had -.-,-poke with the property owner and engineer,, they are awaiting ,pct,, )n from !k- Board e Supervisor Lemke stated y "p " had listFned to a tape as well as reviewed the f110 on previous act Vity On motion of Supervisor Whee"ler, sec.',nded by Supervisor Dolan and ' earried,,, the John'Lechner proposed negative detlaration regarding environ-' mental impact and denied variance to the minimti- lot site requiaements to allow a 4.1 acre parcel in a "TM -5" (timber mour=fain 5 acre parcels) zone on property located on the east side of thy State"Highwdy 32 frontage road, approximately one milesouth of Nopel DriJe, identified as AP 63-13-03 Forest Ranch be denied,, AYES: 'Supervisors Dolan, Lemke and "vlheeler NOES: Supervisor'Saraceni and Chairman Moseley 800b OP UCRV'180kS MINU!tS Juno 9,1Y81 , . w S y COUNTY MONINGr +OOMMIS_MON ...«. «�....w«, .w ..�..m........e............ Notice is hereb; give %y the Butte County planning Commies oo that public hearings will be held on Wednesday, April 22, 1981 at 7:30 p.m., in bhe Butte County Roord of Supervisors ° Room; B�itte Oounty Admx-aistrat;ion Center, 25 County Center ;brave,, Orovil.le, Califoxmia, regarding the following: ITETLOZ WH.%CH IWIRONMEDIIIAL DOCUMEVTS 1. Joha R. Lechner - Rezone from 'IT14-5" (Timber Mountain-»5 acre parcels) to "TX-2Y5" (Timber Moa tgit -2A ac:0e Pamela) property located on the east side of the State Hwy. 3,� frontage road, approx. 'I mi.lo south of Nope'l lire, identified as AP 63 13.-031 more particularly described: as All that: ce Vt,8in real property situate in the Cojint.y of Butte., State of. California, described ao follows: A portion of the SWX of the SWY, of Seco 71 T23X` I RU: Mph&:M, and being a portion of Lot 10, of said Sc�c. 71 and mora per- ticalarly deoevibed as f'ol.lows t Commencing at; a 4 inch by L� inch by 18 inch: stak8 marking the. 8W cornor of said. Sec. 7 and ruaning thence S 88 1>1 la 222.4 ft. along the S line of said. Soca 7 to an iron pipe in a fence Line m6rkin& the ea tterly edge of the existing Hdu bol.dt Rde thence N 19 59' E 515.86 ft. to sn iron pipe Maeki.ng the true point of bogi,nning for -this deacription; bbOnce c6uta,nuing from said point of beginning, northeasterly along said fence ling to an iron pipe which'' begre X 26 48' B 3.31615 m from said point of beginning; thotce leaving aforementioned lines S 88° 15,1 E 114560 .:fte parallel with and 6000 ft. not4herl.y at right angles from said S ;ine of said Soo; 7 to an iron pipe; thence continitin S 88 Il t t. 198 ft.3 more or fess, to the eastox,l.y line of said SWX of Lhe SWX of said Sec. ?j being the eastorl.y lime of said Lot 10; thence soa.herly along said ea�erly line 300 aft. more or loss, to a point that beaEs S 880 '15' Z from the true point of beginning; thence -N 88 '15' W -1494 ft. , more or less to the true point of beginning. JI&Cdepti.ng thererwom the fo Pl.owing described property.- A. portion of that certain parcel of land 'Lndatod in the M104 of the SWX of See. 7$ T23XI R3V3j it BMT and being ti, portion OP Lot 10 of said ace. 7, described in that; certain Dead to Ernest tealet, etux dated April 221 19581 reeorded May 8, 1958, in hook 941, a t page 115 � Official. Records of :&Atte County, Said pcPt ion is more particularly described as fol.l OW8 p Beginning at a point on the S line of soid paarcel from which 'the $W corner of said parcel bears N 89 1?' 00" W 115.85 ft., said point io also distant 1,50.00 ft. easterly measured at right angles from the base lin. at Vnsin.eex's Station ItBir 755+42.78 Of the department of lai4,l ie Works,Survey .groin Hod Springs to Forest Manch., Road 111-But-47-13 (The CaliXornl.s State Zone 11 Coordinates .for said point of beginning arta Vis-2 086 513,55 and 'Y= 798 s8a'i.38) y thence From skid print; of be- ginning along the S line of said Parcel N 89 17' 001' W 11!5.85 f t . to to point on the existing easterly r;gh t of way of Humboldt Road; thence along said r.Lghlt of way V 25 46 t 00" E 331.15 ft. to the NW dornet of said parcel; thence along 'the N line of said parcel S 89i7" ow, E 82-07 ft y thence S 20 150 0011 ,i 3'18.32 ft too t;h.ev point of beginning. o Said portion. contains 0.68 of an acre, more or leas, in addition to any pravt thereof now used and acknowledged as public rand. Containing r).12 acres, mora ' or lees, l''orest Ranch. 2. John Hogan - Use permit to allow a 219 =it mobile home parr on propea�ty zoned. "A,-2" (General) located on the northwest side of Coha8se•t Rd. approx, 3/4 mile south of 'VijAs Rao; identified as AP 58-18-03 (portion.), Cohaozot. ITEM ON WI-110;5 NEGATIVE 7�EC'URATI014 R ,`GURU `L MOOMMED john Lechnor - Variance to the minimum lot size requirements to allow a 4.1 acre ps:ocol in zzi rll p.5" (Timber Mo antain�5 acre par- cels) zone one property located on thr: east side of 'the State Hwy. AP 63--13-�03, Vorest Ranch, � n� , identified 32 frontage road a proXa I 'adule_ S of No -01 Dr3.ve' ident,if ed as The above ment3,Araed ��pplLgat ons, pet,`:tions, maps, draft environ- Mental impact reports and/or negative reports are on file and i p g M'oe oP the But to Count;r Vaa.].a'ble: foa. ubl.�.c� viewing at the 0 Planning �rC�nbri5ve, Orovillei California. EnvronmenLlImpact �epot�arealso ovtaa.l.able at college and county libraries. BUTT COUNT% PtANNING 00TVISSION DmCi.41JA ov : lLANN1NG. . 120 BE l'ti Tjl8M.,,D l;N ;i' -M' 09100ENTEMIRMB AMORD OX THMSl7AY i .APRIL, q , 1981, John 17 Wa. l li amzl�,xattit JYJvA "j:r- C IC' ., 1111S Lu Yn.i"-iJ.�r you f,113� 10.. pareels') loxlvY located iorl i I I : :wa i..l.� 4��"�F 'Lia`�2� �i�k. w4- ECJ �� VJ � 1. M � � � � �a 4l �G ' �,�J I1: �F.J «I,..0 ! v�; �,.. L { A ' (, A +'e i ♦ y h..L}{aYf � A.1, 4A q y q� y .� �.2 X \d=.p4ry y �y �+y q } )N ) IU .4. Y�';�!>4+,I�n �'..wB l�.�..d.47 ��galY Ai�Jhwx7i��, 3a ��G{ae<\'i„ have, bcon wuacij- by r, c) yyyy�ryry y Be 4 aro, J3j n J. :IL. - birettor of >kIV: V' a ; `� E_REQUEST pLANNIR"� DEPARTMENT S IIVTERDEPAf�TMENTAL F�EV'IEV1 TCS:, sheriff REQUEST; Revie�(<�t�iinel'ii ACS NO.: DESCRIPTION Or PROJECT. Vnri n ACL thA ininitmini. Ini: m+agn rn mn4,tiemAnj-st � n cTeEiCt;e. n 4_'l =rlA n nn e'l, fn t;hA er. LOCATION; an at tall -tip nP wy, p -nl)n ow,, Z milt4a g lith .af. 20r-eMtranch* containing -9.12 . acarog APPLICANT; .rMin -T,e ADDRESS: I "f. --1rli latztLi.C,tt .1 �h C A OWNER: PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION SCHEDULED RETURN DATE REOUESTED: ASAP March "901 DATE DISTSIRUTEp; ATTACHMENTS., CPPV cf application& ply of plan, RETURNED: COMMENTS; k) A' PLANNING DPPARTI111l NT'S INTERDEPARTMEN 1 -AA hs---VV_rnt:uUca+ Tb: Divisionar Foro.9tr REQUEST: RQy'jgW& Comment AP NOR : U-13-0 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT. Vs-ri G haMild", m 1 dt art? rdrr�,_rom tg `;oLnrpa�'o Vie. -.1 =, rr Umber, k1mun l;ati LOCATION,—o.as`t' side of HVZ. 32 .13V=X �11j4 mi 7. .a adi7lY� i7f, Fn,p�►- t�enc+lt� �_. acme APPLICANT; ADDRESS: 1) w I11=Sbl??^a=T Chico OWNER;am- a,v annn t"ornrir, . � PLANNINGCOMMISSION ACTION SCHEDULED . e��vllt�i t>�#i##tili RETURN DATE RQUESTED; ASAP Misch 1981 DATE DIST 1I1IBUTE47 ATTACHMENTS: COPY of aPlicatiOtl & Plot Plan v t 6PLANNING DEPAR i'MENl S INTERbr-PABIMENTAL REVI!W RE TO _L�nxi V'ar�lar°L -- .I:,nv°a.ro ' 8utfaCo. - rasn�anT€t7. L'1t Div, of Env REQUEST: JIVJotiy & (`dm i F E B 19 198, AP NO.: -0' - C?roville, Califnrnle DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Variance -t;o iti,,eA minimum.ot area xe ui�et�nl;s �o a 4�.'1 acre wi-n-a1 � n -ihe '�'�M- �^ -_._e creak- _ t r mo retain-- ac e c lece ) zone " sicl,e o� TZwv 2 a1�7arox-- LOCATION. east '1 miJ ee 8outh of 'oxeWb Re ch, contai=Lng 9o'12 acres .........- ©uit� Cn. Cl��►nin� r�cmn� APPLICANT: Jo Le _.. ADDRESS;imbane, Chi OWNER: Ba PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION SCHEDULED RETURN DATE REQUESTED: ASAP ,March 5, 1981 .� GATE DIsTAISUTECI. ATTACHMENTS: Ct�py� o aiapllaatinh !�t'plc�t plan;. BOW CO.,D vo of Env, HAalth RETURNED: LL I N EB $ 198 COMMENTS;?, ' �� Or villa, Ca -1 ornia _tea►z, %4ee�V, � ��mkd � - :ti —7 ..�:�.n:-(-�.....�+�:c. �.► .1. P;,w-�__.�..�._....��i tri. �.. �n �' / kk/ PLANNING DEPARTMENT'S INTERDEPARTMENTAL REVIEW REQUEST TO: --Aplin M exg donna,- 7. kij'9 W or� � �� • ��trr��rr>Yi �,-- - REQUEST: rieviuw & ,' .= AP NO, : 63-11'^0 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Vurignce tc 214 C10111eA c li4.prniA >)7 off' u Oil aero purool in the "TM -5m (Illimber Mountain -5 acre paroola) zone LOCATION., east airte of gwwy. ..�2s rox. 1)4 riles south of r'oreat R.anoh. c onta .nitig 9.12 Acres APPLICANT: John. Lochner _ A��hRESS, 17 Al.liamsbgg Lane, 'Oh ca r f% Grame PLANNING C;ON'Hi:(' C" 4,11;N Ar.TION SCHEDULED RETURN DATE REQUESTED. ASAP %t=oh 1981 DATE DISTRIBUTED:`ob� ' . ATTACHMENTS: Copy of application & plat plan" RETURNED: 2 COMMENTS, " oPz yz7' , - "a " ci/'L ;`" C""f�., r "✓ Z+ Z7,-�� s'.I i '/ 'ice Infer-Depurf,mq t,.gI Memorandum Vol Planning commis5ioll EnVi,roiimenta.1 Rev !OW Department su13rEor; Variance, John Lechnev - AP It 63-13-03 onres March, 24, 1981 This project is a requested variance to the swacre minintuttt Parcel area required within a TM-5 zoning district, in order to develop an additional 4.1.-acne parcel ;from an existing 9.1-acre homesite. The property is located east of Highway 32, approximately 1 mile south of Porest Ranch, on gentle ridge terrain. Mr. LeCh.ner previously requested a rezone from '31-5 to TM-21 on this subject 9+ acre property in May of 1930, °tn order to create three parcels ;toss than 5 acres in are"'t, Our envi.ron- nental; evaluation of that earlier proposal was a recommendation that an ,BTR be prepared.; based prima. ii.y on the growth-inducing and ctamulai;i.ve effects of down-,zoning lands within this uniform TINT-5 district. The applicant subsequently appealed the EIR renu�rement, The tuard; of Supervisors (on a- 3.2 vote) denied the appeal on September 23 1980, requiring the EER, Attached for Your reference is a copy or the environmental; study for that rezone request (including minutes front the Board of Supervisors meeting) . The current variance request could cause simi.iar growth-inducing effects if other area land owners desire to devvl op smaller parcels. However, each individual case Would involve individual consideration and analysis, contingent upon the standards and conditions required :for the granting of s variance Contained in section 2449 of theIRA 'Ordinance. Special ci,rcuntstances are necessary >sor a to `e granted. Therefore, the Cumulative and growth-inducing effects of this project are eat, pected to be limited in extent and a Negdt ve ;Declaration, regarding environmental impact is wa.riiantecl, Referencei, Rezone) john I,echner AP 0 63-1.3-03 ERD 9 80-05-19-06 cc t J'olvil Lochner Bachman 4 Associates Elk Inter -Departmental Memorandum P ranhelfal ROVIOW da�t Planning Commission Environmental RbYiOvt Department BitAio County SUBJECrt Scheduling DATE,, March 24, 198 The following project ,ts ready to be scheduled, for hearing? John Lechner - Variance - AP ERD Log # $1-02-11.01 Thank you LISA P Buffo Co, P16fiFiNO �btYfti/a = it%i� 2 1981 Clrovill�s t„ �afoetri�: April 15, 1081 p �Ir . Johrt L0cIiner �.0 17 Williamsburg Iane Chaco, Ca. I'd Variance on Ar 63-13-0,1 Dear Mr, hecbner I;nolc)so�1 is ilcOPY Of St-,Ir llin iinlrs cone-OVning your application or rt vari.j nett to ma,nlmurl, lot size require- tJ" mOnts to allow a 4.1 acro 'varcel in a ,HT 1. tura (Til*,ibet I' Mountain - 5-tzcr(, p.jrcels) zone for property located 011 the east 5i0o of tJ)e State Ili- gl t ay 12 frontage road, `le aY)17roxirt,ctOl)� 1 rte south of Nope:l Drive, in l:orest LI Ra1tc1. W�fL7 A public hearing on this project by the I'lai1ning Com- mission has been sot for their regular mbeting on April 221 ].nql. This meet3.ng, t+r1ji I e hold in the Boar(I j of Suporvisors" P,00m, County Admini.gtrat.i.on Center, 25 County Ccntot Drive, Otovil.le, to begl.n at 7:30 Pj ht, Should you 11 Ave any cluestiOns, please feel free to contact ottr ogficc Sincerely, IfC►ttv(� tlair �lirectox of ;renin Pm -it 0111dw Tbx X1 Co, Clo"Imlig comm. )rb"'zt norwh, Co.. 9591;, F� t� 1 drovi9ln� C,;�li#p�piq Ap, U C 'D, 1981 C'dxallonan o i U4& CourLtd ACCInn n Coy ��. s dart 7 Cottn�ty Center to r 17 ,ui.8e.o, Cu 9596,) Su>� d'e c John Lerduwu AP 1,3-03 De OA S'!A. Fore �� l�ancdx ?`LLQ memo L.s alcditza3. r;rxr, /t ae,6 AUC -1 c4, on. z/je jo•:i.a k)/ ww- r,b,?.az- kan 4 C4, =rzurtitr �560� Ctti4�n'd tcanrd {�aet�t�au a,, u r x tolt&& `',avo,inrg, &21,64n .Uo- toaad DI SupenV4,160" � a, 164z,ng pruz -494 o oAe,3 .in. YAC a rk 3 ,pian Mrd rel . Remed on W to p.Uo t h pa,? nq ri.; goxei. n y Flit ru rdr� t; �,�ten � j Vip, pulvtt,t .gin rdu"V on t ej s 9* a v✓lw.3. It tot�& Grppor�n. idtrar� tlte nppU t ntn t a ` en at in zoo is to t rt a y*aOACO ( 3PLU. hil y"!t o PoA cv e 4,8 Znq P,,,3-3 ucJ owp than M,&. X 1-5 zonl ng jba Jjtp elAea, rra�rrnr °jd, raia p rr tiv6 antd w ottia�� 5 rla 1'4-W mai &A -14d dh0 ownaa t6 &Ppawny nzab `r%d l'yor"t Vw da iora rjp a:i?ic c ion, fft rle irrc:� of Me CrcdJtain�.rzr� j�p��. obin.'rt zhou& C.n an irden ri, r *zox�Q ' tdt� rznrduc s J a mr iZ v4�,rr iar n rrn,& dj .i; soczG�rd �� crd',Cat;.dda tr p r rerd�:rtt r�rtr! 'Jai:. ai. lzt ,z ; onr nn n d i A o�i'cl ion irar a�u' p'ezt �'Ln 7'6-5 zo►uraft p t t;7-�wnrl z.ra ' r +rt x J),gan.. At; r.aaztcJaj rddra FOA .Elis 86o&) n�, 17o 1081 TO BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING C"Ckj�,13sSION UP, AP -63-13-03 Ne, the undersigned residents off FOrOSt Ranch, do heroby formally ol" poso the request for va.ritulco of 7$1--5 in regard to tiro above parcel. In compliance with the County general Plan, we wholo- - heartedly support the maintenance of TM -5 Mr .. Lechnear previously xequestee a, variance 'to ti={n environmental iml)act study for -the purpose Of Zone change, Or vatianor, for the purpose of lot 8pi.ittjh g. We unanimously objected at that time, Soptemi7or 23, 1980, and did appear at t11e Board Of supervisors mt:et�t��; at which the subject was disaxiseed. Attached is a c(,-)py of that discussion tint! the decision by the Poa.rd, on a 4 iso I vote, supporting our Position, r'ur'tirer,- l�tx� echter has teat demonstrated his wish or intent to live on the Property, but, on the contrary, has purr ha,sed the proporty with the inton.t to sub-divido and sell, Ue was TU11y aware of -the Zoning; at the time o purchase. Additionally, tine property was not purchased lay One person Only, but by a group of 8 1:0011lc, under diJ'C't,^etlt entitI08, each with a hila.re of po,,,,, Those individuals «wore also aware Of the TM -5 Zoning Alpri l 23, 1981 e" LJ j 01m .jeahnar '17 Willi nulflbur6 Lane IIJ111. Ito Vari6lnoe A JeurtheBunteouTl„1, c'�d+i J_e a y C or r73. sicin t! r L"iPa ira Z!g Oil i"pr:i..�l. e,, ? eniod your roqur ;t, for 6 vrir�i~nota �� tk�e ;ter r�atr� 1c�L t r r u i ear>r rx t o X11 w n 4.1 txOIC ptrrce]. '.�,1” a 3T1 {�7 y Cit'��y'� .0 E"aqt n i.�d°��o% 4y0" ��y y��t�; {ami y�: £j��;/�J � J, J.�t�T�iJw.. W -Vi nqu 1 h 'a.) 1�4 V�..'\.2.. L.; do Y Sao (" �. I'W�nT,�Cdha , Drew �,houlct you ctos.Lro �O Oppen, tk in deci;sa yin YOU r;r ry� In t1� tii t; .tx , L -O t h,(: Ojjj.,.,rk of the Board: of Sup �-�Visora, County iyt i�tr" r X37 yve, Orovil-le, California, with h « Copy „� t c: our off4,00'1 bra O)r. bothe {� Eippoal PLdC`itl(i W�' iall jS � I✓ ;a .C)C� p.rj. 5 4.6 .�1� )T,'J.l �, pirntiol, of the,t, 19810 ' you have any questions coneornin9 t;hi: raaur;lesso feel, free tU Content this office Bettye Blair »a �l:i red'�br raf 1 �.�T�ni:xa� BB:jr, BACH MIAN & April 23, 1981 + A".)�7Cl/`"11 CS COUNTY. OF BUTTE $OAkD OF SUPERVISORS Board of supervisors APR 2 7 1931 #25 Caunt,y Center Drive Orovilleo California •- QR4V1lL,CALIFQRNIA 9596.5 RE- John Lochner, variance AP# 63-13-003 Hwy. 32 Honorable Meinbers On behalf of my client, Mr. O-Ohh April 22, 1981 decision Lechner, , x with to appeal the of the Butte CoUrity plan:nin5 Cornmzssa on to deny approval of the above-rel:erehce j variance. Thank you for � your consicleratiori of thio matter. very truly yours, CIO . (ga"Lall-i C. W . BACHMAN AX 1680,1 CWB/ch 5NGINEERING SURVEYING PLANNING 0MGNING �C1i2 Yh� E�pl��hado, Chi��o, CalNorni� 9a��?6 � Telephari�, (�1'5j 3�2-d13� May & 1981 ohtr► Lechner Lang chiao I CA 9592 I Ile: Variance AP 03-13-0 'j Lear Mr. Lechner : l At the regular moet ng of thc Butte County Board of 'Suprxv,isor8 11c d. furl ', 1;)S1', s p4blic homrindata wa � so� s�t foxy }ay P'G, t 1981 at 10toO .m. to coves der an appeal of the I`lanning, Com_-» miasioY n denial of a varisnc e to allow a 4.1 acro parcel in a OTT -5" (Timber Nounta;in-5 a( -re parcels) zono� property lo- otted on the east sid-e Of Hioh�gay 32, approx6 Y� mile south of Forest Manch, ioorest Ranch area. �Iho meeting will be bold in the Board of i;upervisorg' hoots, County Administration Oentor;, 25 County C1onter Dx`ivoi Orovillo, Csalifornf a. 110ull you have, arty quostimis conewming this mAttor, ply: aae aontact this office Sincerely Cl"A. NELSON C+, tan ;y Cievk-Ro otder and :-olficlo Clerk of Vl o 8ui !te County Board. of Nrxpor�r:�. sora Byi lit .�..::.�. Assint;ant Cleric of txyn oard 56) 1f-jay 27 1981 John Lechner 17 14i 11 iamsburq lane Chico-, Ca. 95926 k get Variance AP �3-13�03 � near `Mr. LCchner: At the regular meeting Of the Cote County Board of Surervitars ho-ld May 26, 1981, the public hearini was continued to June si Ts 1, G]osed> to consider nsider your apT�eal of the Planni na Commission's .0of a variance to alloy a 4.1 acre parcel in a denial tosj side (Timber Mountain � 5 acre ly parcels) /il enSouthcof Forest Ranch, id- of lfi0hvjay 32s approXimat�.ly 1� entified as AP 6�3 ~ 3-08, forest Ranch area, The meeting Will be heldin the Doard of Supervisors' Room, n _Center, 25 County Center' nriveti Orov County Adir►inistratiaill e California. Should You ftave any questions regarding this matter, please con= tact this off;.ce. Sincerely, CLARK A. NUSO County Cl erit"'RutteoCounty Boardficofi Clerk of the . $upervsons.' By Assistan""" t C-r k to t e Rbard /lr +�!Y . Gaunt 4AND Or, 4.i.; a ;R V,/!All iH AN() 6F;AtJ;rY DARK A. NELSON' COUNTYCLERK —+ RECORDER ADMINiSTRATION BUILD04G, DRAWER 269 ORCIVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965 Tolephono. 5344561 „ Asslstcnt County Clark, Niche Wndg4%t 634 4551 Asitstont Clerk, Ooiktd of SupervWors, Cathy Pl'tts 534-4571 AtslatantRe¢1stme of Vothrs, Elonnor pockor 534.4761 Ooslstnnt Rocordor, Gwon Porland 534.4601 June 3, 108 John Lechner 17 Williamsburg Lane Chico Ca, 9592 Re, Variance All 63-13-03 Dear Mr. Lechner': At the regular, meeting of the Butte County Board of Supervisors held June 2, 1981, the public hearing was continued to June g, 1931, closed, to consider your appeal of the Planning Commission's denial of a variance to allow a 4.1 acre parcel in a "TM-51t ('timber PIountain - 5 acre parcels) zone, located on the east side Of Highwav 32, arproximately 114 mile south of Forest Ranch; id- ehtified as AP 63-13-03 Forest ranch. area. The meeting will be held in the Board of Supervisors' Room, County Administration Center, 25 County Center Driive, Oroville California. Should you have any questions regarding thtis matter, please con- tact this office Sincerely, CLARK A. N8L5011 County Clerk-kocorder and Ex-of f" Clerk of the Butte County 'Board of Supervisors By Assistant Clem. to t e lZoard I1r R, June 10, 1981 a John Lechner 17 Williamsburg Lane Chico, Ca. 95926 Re. Variance AP 63-13,0 Clear Mr_. Lechne.r (% Li At the regular meeting of the Outte county hoard of 'Supervisors held June 9, 1981, the appeal of a denied variance to allow a � 4.1 acre `parcel in a "Tht�5 ", (Timberi��way 3� ya{�proltin��te�yl iC4 Mountain 5 acre zone, located on the bas side of H , mile south of Forest Ranch, identified as AP' 63-13-03, Forest Manch area, was denied. Should you have any gUestions regarding thia mattar, please F contact our office. Sincerely, CLARK A. NELSON County Clerk -Recorder and tx-officio Clerk of the Butte County Coard of Supervisors By sant:•e lc to U6, tar" /lr cc C3utte County 3:-"al't:h Dept. Dept, bf Public Works (2) Piro Department