Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout063-180-003�, � . h � v h , , ' - .. � �jy . p I i� �I I � 8' a. t' �u i t \t �* , ' � 1 •. , . q 1 � �Y DATE TIME PHONE ,3/14/85 Telephoned. 0 Please- Call Was In 0 Returned Call' Q Wilt Call Again Warps to See Yau 0 In€ormatton Note and 0 Repty 0 Comment b R'e-route L] Signature El Investigate Q Return L,—j Approvat Ej Contact- Ma - Ej File cj Forwarded Per Request MESSAGE: RE: Variance 63-I8-03 - planted you to know he had to get a new hermit for well. - will take about 7 weeks By oil L86-30fi (443;) Closed hearing Robert Bay - proposed negative declaration regarding environmental impact and appeal of a denied variance to minimum Tot size to allow a one acre parcel and a 3.40 acre parcel in an AR -5 (agricultural residential - five 'acre ;parcels) zone for property located on the west side of Forest Ranch Road; 300 feet west of Highway 32, identified as AP 63-18-03, Forest Ranch: (from 6/4/85) Motion: NOTED THAT ' REQUIREMEdIS OF CEQA HAVE BEEN COMPLETED AND CONsinitEII, FOUND THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT DOES H SCOUNTY BUTTE NOT TY CODE SECTION 24-49,- CTHERE THAT ARE NO CIRCUMSTANCES UMSTANCES APPLICABLE TO THE PROPERTY INCLUDING SIZE, SHAPE, TOPOGRAPHY, LOCATION OR SURROUNDINGS, AND THE STRICT APPLICATION OF THIS CHAPTER DOES NOT DEPRIVE SUCH PROPERTY OF PRIVILEGES ENJOYED BY OTHER PROPERTY IN THE VICINITY AND UNDER IDENTICAL ZONING CLASSIFICATION; AND DENIED THE PROPOSED VARIANCE TO ALLOW A 1 AND A 3.4 ACRE PARCEL, IN AN AR --5 ZONE (ROBERT BAY), AP 68-18-03. 14' S Vote 1 Y 2 A 3 Y 4 Y 5 Y (Motion carried) $ilT'rL� dObNTY , BbAlt oI? T1�1uRVrs�? s '�iI<IVCI`rr8 M0. 20, 1986 Robert Say -- proposed Negative Declaration and Variance to mini mum lot size to allow a 1 acre parcel and a :5.40 act t parcel in an AK --5 zone (Agri t;t_tlturcil Residential - $ acro parcels) located on the west side of Forest Punch Road, X00 feet West of highway Z21 identified as AP 6;a -le -03, F'orust Ranch. Staff stated that there were several letters received from: Howard 6. Snyder; Elizabeth S. James Walter and Charmion E. Nelson. Sta++ recommended denial stating that this was mora appropriate foe a rezone than a variance application. Staff s attod iha•t' they could Kiat find a hardship. The hearing was opened to the public. Robert Day, Forest Ranch, felt that this was not granting special privileges because other parcels in the area enjoyed smaller parcel. sizes. He submitted traps of the area showing smaller parcels. He stated that the general. geography of the area does permit smaller 0arcols, Commissioner Lambert asked why he did not pursLte a rezone. be transf errod to a rezone application i and wae asked i f the fee caul d pP catx an �� H Say stated that staff felt the variance would be the best wa s told no. Staff felt the applicant might have been -looking at a time factor b,/ cjoing with the variance instead of a rezone and also the fee difference. t1r. Bay stated that after` the fees wei-e paid he spoke to Laura Tuttle arrd asked if the fees tbLtl.d 'be applied to a re one application 'ir, the said no. The hearing war closed. Commissioner Vercruze receiVod a call frotrr Bill Church stating that this property i s adjacent to a gulch and many Wells are adaacenj: to She stated that there the wash. the sthe many of the wells in the ArOA- ar-b contami ratted. e c-tr0 scpticy var, Well and drAi,nago problemt in the area. Commi sti over Vercruse stated that aNre war tl d not approvapprovea iance or a e(--zQhe for thr~ above stated reasons, She reoommenifed denial. ('atrrmi ssi orior Lambert agreed It was moved by Commi ssi ohor Vereruse � Seconded by Gomrtti ssi.aner Lambert and unah i tnaut=sl y , carried for denial a% f crl l ows r . Mote that the eoqui remehts of C50A have beton compl. 0 -ted and considered: and Aft"' If GCii NTY Pt�I1iV" NG °C iMJSSS l' BUTTE COUNTY PWANNI NUC COMMISSION STAFF FINDINGS April 49 1985 APPKIC.;ANT: Robert Day OWNU R Same N='tQG. ES f Variance to m ni, mLAm Int size to allow Via, 7, taro parcel and a 3.4 st*rparcel in an AR -5 zono SIZ0 4w4Z acre LG1CAtION On the went side of 5arest Ranch Road, 300 feet west of Highway 32 1n Forest Ranch EXTNSTI#ANG ZO NINt R F N ZONING HI TCORY» zonvd AR -5 Peer nary 10, 1976, Ordinance Q7 SURRIOUN DINING ZU NIN p q Tm-s y PA- C SNJNwROUNkNDINO LAND USE; M -N -v', Fr vt v�rt Ranch School. , N n i de-rnti a at low densities. es. CMkNNNENAL N=LAN DEGION+rATXON 4 flrlr'a etl �cir 1 N"m i ni i APPLICA LE REGULAVON 0 %tutfE e County Codo Sections 24-49124-10 r,�flf�irlC ttiN1 ��'NF �IV�'Ta. F°►.tLwl 4Jnr tx "Pari{�1,t�5 hex3l be creatoo purzuunt to the rcquiromomtt: W. Chapter 20 of the '8utte Nuc;"ianY Code and the StAtu E+thdi.vi.zi:On "No objeatton to Var°i.anco. R&Wr y i.f Variance is approved, a subsequent parcel split will require Wpl,i ante with the Butte County" Subdivision Ordinance Standards far sewage dispos al andwater supplyApprovgl. C"+ the Parol may require Vor).0aw>w1tion of ►`d$:►•l'i;,i'r mail aturati° n conditions on (shallow water t:. ble moni.towi,nq prior 0.4 rear"rdinq map),. IiU"CTE COUNTY PLANNING Ct~MMlC5'iON STAIr FINDING - April 41 1.985 tr�;.tttuF "No req"iremonts." �Nt�LYS�S�, Variances to the zoning ordinapce shall be granted only whon spocial circumstances applicable to the property, incluudincl 1001 ohape, topography, location car surroundings nubs deprive such prc fjprty ra+ pri vi l t,�q s enjoyod by other property in the vicinity and under i don Li cal. 2uana, nib clasWi.cationw Surrounding properties ;caned AR-5 total IM2,4 acrem. Eighty-ono percent of those properties are the same; 000 0 car l arg*r than tha project site (4,41-mc.). There "pro to special, 'ci.rwumstances applicable to the property which Warrant a Variance, Approval would be a grant of special pri,vxl edges. The-applicant had goon advised that-sq, application for ,ry rozons kvoutl: d hg- appropriate to consider creation of smaller parcels, not a Variance. CC:CJh�l�lhlii�ll" � CIMS a A- (Tate that the requirements o+ C10A have boon completed and c�onsa. dehed and B. Vind irhat, the proposed project door not comply with Butte County £ e de Sections 24-49, that there are no special circumstances applicable to the property including site, Wpc,, ter ographyg location or sarrou»tndings, and tho strict apala.catYion o+ this chapto", does not deprive such property W Privileges enjoyed by other property in the vicinity and under idohQual oni.ng_classificati.ar ,and C. Deny the proposed Variance to allow a l and a 34 acre parcel In an AR-5 zone tDay) If the Planning C0mmiZsi0n finds that wAppr-0 this Variance would not. C015 titutt sOee:iK Pri.vilergm, then it would be proper tot AM Find that, the requirements est~ 'r EDA have boon compluh6d and consi derod and adopt a negative c epl nrati cap F,1, Find that: tht� pro,3oct, momplWs with Butte County Mode Sections- 24-494 that there are special cir cwmst ncez applicable to the propQr°ty inml u d ng si. Q i shape q topography, l W ati.on or mrroundi mqb that the strict application Q this chaptor d0rives such property Of prlvilec s enjoyed by ether propevty in the vicinity and under Ldent:ia6l. wean.i.ng Classifications; and C. Appi-ovu tho Variance to allow a. l and a 30 zero parcel in an Aft-- Zono (Pay) mubje t to the following conditions g5-396 Robert J. Bay to minimum PPeals the P7annin in an lot size to allow g Commissions AR-5 zono (agricultural ono acre parcel denial of variance ong negative declaration ro resident7al and3.40 he west Side oi` 9ardirtg en es i acre aparce acre parcel Identified Forest Ranch m Dict ) proposed as AP 63,18 Ruad, 300 p ) for Property O3, Forest, .Ranch. �, i:eet west of �` located SUPERVISOR McLAUGHLTN FOP A'!` THIS 't�I (183)(00) Highway 32, MOTION: ME. NOTING THERE WAS A THE REQUIREMENTS OF NEGATIVE DECLARATION DETERMINATION; FINDING FIND THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT HAVE. BEEN COMPLETED AND CODE SECTION 24w49 ROJECT IS BLE TO IN COMPLIANCE WITH BUT TEI 0 NY THE PROPERTY THAT rNERE ARE SPECIAL CACUMSTANCES A OR SURROUNDINGS INCLUDING SIZE DEPRIVES j AND THE } SHAPE TOPOGRAPHY PPLICA- THIS PROPERTY OF STRICT APPLICATION OF THIS LOCATION. IN THE VICINITY PRIVILEGES SCHAPTER AIJD _ ENd - .. A U 0 AN VARIAN ND L IDENTICAL ZaNING DC ASSIFICATIO . PPRQVE THE E TO ALLOW A ONE-ACE Y OTHER PROPERTY PARCEL IN AR-5 ZONE „ POR PROPERTY LOCATED oAGI;IC�LTURAL RESIDENTIAL AND A 3, N, AND 300 FEET N THE 4O-ACRE RANCH WEST OF HIC WAY 32 WEST SIDE OF FOREST ACRE PARCEL) ' REST AS AP f,Sy1$ ,ROAD, VOTE 7 M -03 s FOREST ' 5 MOTI0I4: TO UPHOLD TWE PLANNING CO r (Motion Withdrawn) VOTE 7 � MMMTSSIQN DENTAL ANi TO DENY APPEAL, 3 MO'i`ION, 4 _ 5 TO FABLE THE MOi'xON (See motion boyoW) AFTER THE BOARD CONSIDERS s THE I" E Q� T PL POS HE TABLING y ,-v RELATTNq TO THE POLICY F Ox/S/GLc- DRAINAGE FOR PRELIt�1T TO RECONSIDER y PERMITS AND VARTANCES�y WATER,. ETC; NARY PRIOR TO APPLYING F vor�. 7 Y M FOR USE 9Y SY 4N 5 Y (M'oton carr' ped) CUCt T1' oAItL OF _ . , �R'v�soRS Suiie 4, 15Aq CHI ADMINISTRATIVE* FFI C COUNTY OF BLJ'1` f OST 25 COUNTY CENTER 014, > C AOMILLE, GAUP»( 'A 05965-3:380 i.(01 rj 534-4631 O '00 a MEM13riRS OF THE 13w Ar?D cdON'� HASKrt., A, WINTuRF JANC DOLAN MAIATINJ NI(',HOLs tlil:,l)A,WFIEUL'6R C 41rR AOMINISTRATIVr, QF'MTA t 0 MuLAUGHLIN LUNFULTON May 21, 1986 Robert. J. Bay 'p.0..:Bur c 291 Forest Ranch, Ca. 95942 Pat Variance, AP 63-18-03 Dear Mr. .Bay: At the regular meeting of the :butte County Board of Supervisors held May 20, 1986; px t1r appeal of a denied Varianc a to minimum lot size ti allow a one a re parcel and a 3,40 acte parte-I it1 an Aid -5 zone i.or property locatr!d can the gest side of Forest. Ranch Road) 300 feet west of Highway '32, identified as AP 63-18-03, Forost Ranch, was denied, Should you have any, questions rag arding this matters please contact the Planning Department at 534-4601."between 10,00 aim.. and 3,00 p:m Very truly youra Martit J. Nichols Chief Administrative Officer MJN 1r ect Public Works Department (2 Health Department Department of Forestry Inter -Departmental Memorandum ro Board, of Supervisors FROM; Planning susJECT! Robert J. Bay, Variance, AP 63-18-03 DATE: May 13, 1986. Pursuant to the Board's motion on June 4, 1955 to table 1 on the subject project; staff sent three transmittal lel.tersatoithe applicant instructing contact the Environmental Health Depart- ment and information that they may require in order thatltheirereCoth the necessary mmendatian for compliance with the adopted ordinance and standard $ can }je com lied with. and there has been no response from the ,a pplicant. P The recommendation from the Planning Commission was as follows: 1 ows: A. Note that the ,end e econsidered; requirements of CEQA have been compltd and B. Find that the proposed project does not comply with Butte County ounty Code Section z4-49, that there ire no special circumstances a Property including sizes shape, topography,.. pplicable to the and the strict application of tliischapedoesanoonder 8 ersuchangs, of Privileges enjoyed by other property in the vicinity and urideLproperty identical zoning classification; and h p C` Deny t e Proposed variance to allow a l and a 0, zone (Robert Bay) Ap 63-18-03: 4 acre parcel in an AR -5 BAK:lr {ry�yi�jVj [ A h A T TJ ..a PLANNI; .; (AMISSION 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE w OROVILLE, ,CALIFORNIA 95965•..397 PHONE: 514-4601 Robert J. Bay ;April li, 1986 P.O. Box 2914 Forest Ranch, Ca. 95942 Re; Variance,'AP 63-18-03' Dear Mr. Bay: Inregards to our letter of August 30, 1985, the Beard of Super-' visors; on the 5th of June, 1985, held a public hearing to consider` your variance request. The Board tabled: the action.�and deterlflineci to reschedule the hearing at a later date when the Environmental Health Department and the Land Development Divisiotsldon ofcthe Dewitt all of Public Works could ensure that your p p oalof the appropriate ordinances: It is necessary for you to contact the Environmental Health Department and the Land Development Division and provide them with the necessary. infcrntation that they may require in order that their reaommendation for compliance with the adopted ordinances is possible .> There may be additional fees in accordance with the Boa,.;ils poli.yy adopted July L, 1985, for that time required by sanit s t: ':ans and I. ie plan checking by the Department of Publo Works, If,we do not hear from you this matter will be placed on the Boat=4 s agenda on May 6, 3.985 Should you have any questions ttegarding t} �.s matter; please contact this office between 10:00 a.m; ;end 3:00 p.tn» Sincerelyx r A. Kircher Director of. Planning �AK:1 _ u tie yy L AND ryr N,A �. .,TURAL WC-ALTI-I 'AND BCAUT`Y PLANNING COMMISSION 7 COUNTY CENT; R DRIVE - OEOVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965.3397 _ PHONE; 534.4601 August 30, 1985 Robert J. Bay P.O. Box 2914 Forest Ranch, CA 95942 Sir:. The Board of Supervisors, on the 5th of June, 1985, held a to consider your variance request to allow a 1-acre e parcel in an AR-5 public hearing zone on Property located on the west rside aof forest nd a Ranch Road in Forest Ranch. The Board tabled the action and determined reschedule the hearing At a later date when tvie Environ ental � ned to De arttne Health P nt and the Land Development Division of t11e Department of Public Works could ensure that your proposal would com l tY aPProPrite ordinances, p Y with all of the In order to facilitate the Board's rescheduling of your u Will be necessary for y Public hearing, it and the Land Developmentub visontacll t the Devaron ental Health DdPartment, provide them with the necessary infoirmationpthat theit y public Works And ossible, y med require in order P ompliance with the adopted ordinances is tat theit recommendation for c There may be additional fees in At wit1�'theBoard's July 2; 19850 for that time required by sanitarians end the Plan check' Pol�.cy adopted by the Department of public works. xng T Would recommend that you contact the aforementioned departments as soon, as passible so that your protect can be completed. Should you have questions , please contact this office;. any Sincerely0 w A. K RC 'P Director of planning BAKfss cc. Hilda Wheelers' Su erviso P r, Distract 3 'CHIP x\z NsTA,Try FFIcr COUNTY QF pUTTC: o gUTTF TY CENrC y}�p o �o 5. G`C7UN R 17 i.' OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA(OIf.9..,J4�� 0 • o' 95065-33801 j j' 4639 COVn�r ICHOLS MCMOCRS F THe BOARD CH10ADM'INISTRAVVEOFFICEFi HA.SKEL A. MIINTURF JANO DOLAN HILOA WHEELCR 8'D McLAUDHI IN_' L60 FUI.iot4 June 5, 1985 Robert J. Bay P.O. Box 291 Forest Ranch, Ca. 95942 Re, Variance, AP 63,18-0 Dear Mr. Bay; At the regullr meeting of the Butte County Board of Supervisors June 4, 1985, the public. hearing was tabled at this Supervisors held; be rescheduled at a later date, to consider our ;x d will Commission's denial of a j' appeal of 010 Planning 1 acre parcel and a 3:t1 acrelparceloin'n' M lot size to allow a located on the west side of one for property, 32 in Forest Ranch. You will obestYc�Ranch Road, 300 eetn Os the hearing. "t of Highway ... .ate. of Should YOU have An ons concerning �' goes �tithis. matter X1601, the Planning Department at 554- please contact Sincerely Martin J.. Nichols Chief.' Administrative officer htJN ; l r f• e artye Inter-D � , F,t"i'a1,emoraadu To: Board of Supervisors FROM, Planting, suaUecT: Robert J. Bay - Variance, AP 03 18-03, Suggested motion onr€; May 22 1985' The suggested motion for denial is as follows: A. Note that the requirements of CEg4 have been completed and conoidered, and B. Find that the proposed project does not.comply with Butte County Code Section 24-49,, that there are no special circumstances applicable to the property including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, and the strict application of this chapter does not deprive such property of privileges enjoyed by other property in the vicinity and under identical zoning classification•, and C. Deny the proposed variance to allow a 1 and a 3.4 acre parcel in an AR-5 Zone (Robert'Bay) '1r CH ADMiN7STRATIVAF'FYCE Cr..?LJNTY OF 13L) 'T'L0 � (a1(01(3)53a534-4631eVYTF 2!5 COUD!TY CENTER LAR. OROVILLF., �.ALiFOFiNiA ,.� �3G5 338 MEMBERS OF TIM 0OA1 i7 o o ' HAVEL A. McINTURr 00 U'DGLAN �o ' � NILOAy� C W IMCR' ED tAtLAUMILIN MARTIN J NICHOLS L C N I U L T c7N CHISF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICEi� April 17, .1985; Robert J. Bay Q.O. Box 291 942 Forest Ranch) Ca. 95 Rel. Variance; AP 63-18.03 Dear Mr. BaY: Butte County Board of Supervisor At the regular meeting oJune 4, 15 at f the April 16, 1985, a public hearing was set for Commissions taenial of a.mo to consider your appeal of the Panning arcel and a, 3.4 acre a Variance to minimum lot size to allow 1ted acre p west side of Forest parcel in an AR -5 zone for property Manch Road, 300 feet Went of Highway 3 in forest Ranch. ill be held in the Board of Supervisors' Room, County The meeting w Orovjlle, California, 25 County Center Drive, Administration Center contact questions regarding this matter, please Should you have any q the Planning Department at 534-4601, Sincerely, star"tin J. Nichols Gt,ief Administrative Officer t,7N : It !a I, rn I r , r. 1AND OF t'dAiURAt 1/',iC AITH AND Ili A(It1" PLANNING CQM,M19aICJN 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE 01 OVIt,1 I, 1,/iLlPORfJIA 9590-33V7 PHONE: '34-W-1Robert J. Bay P.O. Box 291 April 5,0 198 Forest Ranch, Ca. 95942 Re: Variance, AP 53--18-03 Dear Mr, Bay: At: the regular meeting of the Butte County Planning Comm;i.ss on held April 4, 1935, your request for a Variance to minimum lot $.Lze to allow a 1 acre parcel and a 3.4 acre parcel in an AR --5 zone for Property located on the west side of Forest Ranch Road, 300 feet vast of highway 32 in Forest Ranch, was denied. Should you desire to appeal, this decision you must do to the Clerk of the Board of SuPOrvisor8, 25 County Cenreri'n writing, Oroville) California, prior to the expiration► of he 8-daa period which is at 5:00 p«m. friday, April ]2 19thy ppeal S ould you have ari this office. y questions regarding this matter, Please contact Sincerely, B, A. Xjr-cher Director of Planning than A. 3treater Senior vtanner SAS. -Ir ��,� , l coult LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND KEAUTY KANNING COMMIGGIOCJ 7 COUNTY C EN i ER DRIV� -- oRON'lLLL, (,Atl t ONIA 95966.3397 PHONE: 514-4601 Robert 1. Bay April 5, 1.985 P.O. Bax 291 Forest Ranch, Ca. 95942 Re Variance, AP E3-18-03 Dear Mr. Boy At the i-egula-1 meeting of the Butte County Planning Commission field April 4, 19:35, your request :for a Variance to minimum lot size to allow a 1 acre parcel and a 3.4 acre parcel in an AR -5 zone for i property located on the west side of Forest Ranch Road, 300 feet nest of Righway 32 in Forest Manch, was denied. Should you desire to appeal this decision you must do so, in, writing, to the 'Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, 25 County Center Drive, Qroville, California, prior to the expirati'.on of tha 8 -day appeal period which is at 5.100 p.m,, Friday, April 1.2) 1985. Sbould you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office $i�c�crc�y, t: A, 1 ircher Director of Tlat ning s hen Aa Senior planner SAS Ir � p C'. liarulir► , 27 March 1985 Butte County Planning Commission Orovillej California As a resident of Forest Rancl, .: am concerned about the increasing number of departures f Th1-5 zoning being allowed in this area, ..rom the water su Questionable PP'Y and the effect of growin septic tanks would seem to make it g numbers of Pr adhere to the 5-acre lot limitation uden+ to I'understand that Robert variance from the w'n�,• R9Y has requested a 5 zoning to allow him to split a:less-than_ -acre parcel. (AP S3-18-03) into two lots. 1 "OPe the planning commission Will consider careful] -Y the impact on our dmmuni,ty of glianting this and o+her such lot lits requested in the future.. l�zabeth S James Pore°st Ranch, California i vqt fe CO' P, 41711 APr� 3 �ra�lllo P-0. Box 359 Forest Ranch, CA 9594 April 1, 198- Butte County Planning Commies_ ,)fin 7 CountyCenter Road Orovill.e,. ;CA 95965 Ladies and Gentlemen: In light of the long-standing sewage, road maintenance etc,Problems involving water, Y would like to e�cpress my feeling thatin the Pvariances��suchaas that being requested for the Robert J. (AP 6�-18-03) Bay property not be granted at this time. Before any zoning changes are g made or variances granted_, it would be W 11 that a thorough; well -engineered study Of water, sewage, and road maittenance be made of the tire Forest Ranch area ens thank- you for considering my feelings on this matter. Sitio rely yours, Howard G. Snyder 15470 Bomberg Late Voxes t Ranch Box ' i' Ur a Ranch., CA 9594 lf1a.,t,x�z 27, 985 7 � urr.�r� �euiie �,� �� l�ep�, �C�� 0�rk„n� Qno vi-ue C/1 6 Q �irpy�llp rpir e4h'arzch Rd, Ferre e-i Ranch, AP 0,3-18-03 life be-Leve a van bmce Aequ",i In. 4W made .rmpnopea. The corur,e&-nocedvAe .ahou)d be J a p).4w&On to tepae., 20i 44 the .%nten:& We 6elZeve deve. opmeat in Ae Foaeai Ran.c , c;nea ,Iho u.f d oto ceed w.6,," ,. ey-&eme ca o a.n,Acate av t��. r'o4 water and corL&% n.a,4Loa v� we.Ll4.a Alom ep c".c .EcYr„ d arse a veal eA'y stce&n, r! ow zaz n�aU Aua ,.j alrr.eady ccztt.jomep-ople �6-o 6e Ao&t c!? gent Rj Ae .dummen pwgAeddeA many could' Aave AM ule ll� !ln : l U can, be ".ta&U jhed cvnAa� wa f eh .aupp.ty Ld a JUAed, and Aai ,jep; cj on. A.�A.,-'"d.. WD po4e no hea.Lth nob dow we. AOv eAt 1 a&2e .10,J .:A h.�.e atea. p � Manh r o u 4o t ,,re�vo tui caub:o uj a.ppAu acA �o A bnea wn o� the patuent pn ing JLn :`he Fvr� ►t Ranch a�zea. .Pi Count -w - LAND OF NATURAL W[AITH AND BIAUTY PLANNING COMMISSION 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVIG,''I.C, CA(JrCRNIA 95965.3397 PHONE: 5U AG0'1 Robev, J. Bay March 22, 1985 P.O. Box 291 Forest Ranch, Ca. 95942 Ret Variance, AP 63-18=03 Dear rim. Bays Enclosed is a copy of the Staff Findings concerning your application for A Variance to minimum lot size to allow a 1 acre parcel and a.3.4 acre pa-`iwel in an AR-5 zone for property located on the west side of Forest Ranch Road, .100 feet west of Highway 32 in Forest Ranch, meeting will held it 4, 1985 at Sw00 p.m. This p BApril S upervisorO Room, 25 County Center Drive; Oroville Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office., Sincerely, B, A. Kircher Director of Planning Laura M, �uttie Associate Planter 'LMT.,lr Enc. BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given b will be held on Thursdayy April the 43 County Planning Ccmmissiatl haat. Room, Administration Center 1985 in th,e But County public hearings the fallow�n 25 County Center, Drive, p,- Y Board of Supervios' g items at the following times: _oville, California, regarding ITEMS DETERZvfINED TO BE CATEGORI CALLY EXEMPT FROM EIS*VIRONI`1ENTAL REVIEW 7:30 p.m. Steven C. Curr dwellin on y - Use Permit to allow a g property zoned A- mobile home as a temporary second on the east side of Crouch Avenue, 10 acre as the 39-15-43, Dayton area o• ' 500 feet south of Iareels) located f Chico. Edg.•t'L Avenue, identified 7:45 pm. Ydarren Winiecke - • a buildin Variance to rear yard and side a g to CIE property Line on Y SeC1�tcic to allow and A-2 (General:) located on the southpsrde ofned C-1 Approximate) i i�•i�,1iC Co►►►mercial) Y 900 feet north of Stewart Avenue Nord Avenue (Ilighway 32), Chico, ,identified as AP 43-29-10, --=�_ �•. -"q"tt A NEGATIVE DECLARATION REGAAI7ING ENVIROM CENTAL IMPACT HAS jj "' t Robert J. Ba -� ;v RE� �C_ RECOMMENDED a 3,40 acre Y -Variance to minimum lot size to parcel in an AR�5 none allocd a 1 acre parcel and parcels) located on the, west side ofAForesr'tiaral Residential - Highway 323 identified as AP Side O Manch Roar': t acre 03 Forest .Ranch. , 3.00 feet west of O:ju P'M, William Burke - Re to l R--2 zone from FR -5 (Foothill Recreational (Foothill Recreational - 2 acre 5 acre of Uoncy Run 'Road parcels parcels) Approx. 65p feeC east of 'the)Skocated on the south side 16, th Skywa'y' and on the south b yway bounded on the test r and 22 Y Ed Slough, elentift.ed as s e Particularly described as,. ' 40-46-15, All that certain real California Property situated iounty of Butte � described as follows n the Cstat e of A poi: tion of Sections 4 & S T21N R2E t-fDJ6rt raorti Particularly described a. Beginning at the SE cort7.er of Lot 3 as sItotaci on t s, Roma ,Teem 1`�colain 3nhnsan Subdivision, recorded in Ctre hat certain map the tied fiecoi'der of the County of Butte, State of C Office of the Book 66 of maps at pages 1G and 17, thence S 00 a' an' lune 16 alxfornt 1978 in point in the centerline of Edgar Slough, Edgar slough the following g r Chenceoa03' 15" E 176.65 f•t. to a 55' tJ 99.80 ft °wing c11,-ses and distances S.76#t 5 2,fceAterline of Said 77° ] 7 51'► t� 6,t S 78 15,0111, CJ 85, 79 ft+. N '70' 221 25�' TV 77=34 ft,, 847°121 x,67 ft:, N 59°. 411 34'1 IJ 48.63 ft , N 53b 4 157.21 ft: ft: N 710 53' 48k1 t4' 100.74 ft ° 1 401 211' � 57:39 if 93.39 ft,, S - 271 11 ., S 81 40' 5411 t� 51,72 ft t M 03r 29" to 108.76 ft. 59 °B 105.67 ft,, 5 Oxib 16T ( li �� S IOU 0.3 ,58i1 S 59° 54' 1111 t+ 120 , S 33 34.1 20" � 72.7b fr �0 N 53.49 ft.; S 340 IS 6N 46 2 73 ftii s 76° 26' `� 8 390 3S 3 ' to 104,78 ft; , F82 ft � i ' 0211 id 114.3. f't., S 62 331 1�r► W 10 411 W 16j.05 ft 36 t� 216,87 f' 02 N 50" 101 071'' y j 19 27tllj�eat 75ly Et of the Sk wa ; theftc l and N 766 easter) line N ° r „ Y paralie with and 100 feet snuthetl y y; thence along said runnii. , thence leaving said skyway and. Y o rite Croticll bitr h; N 89 28' 11" E 198.90 ft. and N $6° 04' 37" E 199.64 ft: • to a nd southerly extension of the easterly line of that aeti L'a.Ln de!;cribed indeed from Plesant G ' point on the B. Benson, recorded June 17 Taylor and Evelyn M• parcel of len 000 03' 13" W along said easterly line Band the Q O.R. e 67 to Charlene ' Page. 679;: thence N A elastance of 480.41 ft. to a southerly . thence along said southerly line1of =Humbug Roadthe tot}� extension thereof southerlyLot line of Humbug .Road.; beg 3; thence southerly along the E line of said Lot e NC corner of said beginning. 3 to the potoa Containing, 42 acres, more or less, southeast Chico.. The above mentioned applications maps and negative v declarations 4 cding environ- mental impact are on file and available for Butte County Planning. Department public va,'ewing at t}�c o , 7 County D�:ive, Orovillc CEice of the ' , California, BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION 3. A. 'KIRCHNR, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING'_ _ TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE CHICO E NTEPRSE RECORD ON THURSDAY, MARCH 21, 1985. Y WI itti Adminletrative OMCC 1163 [.,AST SEV1GNT.H STREET rdIICA CALIFORNIA 95926 Area. Code (916) 891-3000 &*tO Cv . Pl ann;ng Cann MICR 11985 l�rowelio„ Cs�liflq County of Butte Planning Commission 7 County Center Drive Urovillej, CA_ g59G5 SUBa,ECT ROBERT BAY Variance Applicati Assessor on s Parcel No 63-18-8 Dear -1g- Dear Commissioners. As the result o agreement with the � the De agreement having specified Chico unified �8chool Distrt entered into conditiar�a relative in District is naw satisfied that the trarie sub - an meet certain an `ldverse impact upon schools iiz the District protect, the is no ante itself will not have longer necessary mitigation measures relativer the Counf Cors:y.,uently,t event the variance is to the y to consJ.der school Granted variance. however, Parcel map or other and the Developer a , an the the Chico Unified school bit involving pplies for a such additional strict g discretionarx review, Project ,consderedwill w� en sh to have the impactof Very truly yours, Robin G Thompson RGTdkh er Business Mara g ,/Comptrol;ler cc Neil E- McCabe Butte County planning Department Admtebtrative omee H63 EAST SEVENTH STREET CHICO, CALIFORNIA 05926 Area code (916) 891-3000 February 28, 1985 Sutfe Co. planning C.rx MAR 1 1885 1Droviile, CxliforsaF County of Butte Planning Commission 7 County Center Drive Orovill:e, C?, 95965 SUBJECT: ROE8RT BAYVariance Applica ion Assessor's Parcel No. 63-18-3 Dear Ccsmmssionersr As the result of the Developer having entered into an agreement with the Chico *Unified :School District. to meet Certain specified conditions relative to the subject project, ti,e District is now satisfied that the variance itself will not have an adverse impact upon schools in the District. Consequents it is no longer necessary for the County to consider scxhool mitigation measures relative to the variance,- howet>�r, in the event the Variance is granted and the Developer applies for a parcel map or other project involving<discretdiscretionary the Chico Unified School District will wish to have thevimpactof then such additional praje,ct considered. Very truly yours, Robin G Thompson Business Manager%Comptroller RGT/kh cc Neil H. McCabe 4A3 tte County planningDQ �, ..part�fl.,ht A } �© -ftb* ansa of Nur,nr VdVAL,T1.1 AN PLANNING c0MI01SS10N 7 CbLiPtTY CENTER Dt2►t'e February 4, 1985 _ OROYILL'f, CALIFORNIA 95965- ^« I"HONE: S34-46o1 3a,7 Robert J. Bay P. 0. Box 291 Forest Ranch, CA 95942 ItEt Variance AP 63_18-03 Dear Mr. Bay; , An initial study of size, indir yowl^ proposed Project, a Variance to tes potentially adverse impacts to t minimum lot to Appendix', items 3 and 1 he environtneni suitable mitigation To reduce are (refer ('thervlse g tion measures are required as laminate these an env�rpnmental impact re part of the impacts, to the California EtYvironmental Quality FIR Praject- �I requited ( ) Is re u . y Aet` pursuant An early response: to,th - x TpPnt; expedite thes natxl�catinn> sent to the Your written xesfanse within duling of Planning bepart- 15 tla s your project. Please fortlard Y from the date of th 1fyou have any Pi questions or e6mments) ease yoltris letter, et this office. fice. B A. XlkCH R b rector of planning Laura L�f, Tutt;le Associate Planner L�tiC.l.i�t ,Tine. > I . 49 APPENDIX G NEGATIVE DECLARATION REGARDING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the project described below has been reviewed pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1070 (Public Resources Code 21100, et. sea.) and a determination has been made that it will not have a significant effect upon the environment. Log i 84-12-20,02 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: AP 63-1$-0:1 Variance to create a 1 acre and: a 3.43 acre parcel in an AR -5 zone LOCATION OF PROJECT on the westside of .Forest Ranch Road, 300 feet west o Hi by 32, to Forest Ranch NAM AND ADDRESS OF PROJECT APPLICANT: Robert J. Bay P. o. ;Box 291 Forest Ranch, CA 959+2 MITIGATION MEASURES 6 A copy of the initial study regarding the environmental effect of this project is on file at 7 County Center Drive, Oroville. This sandy was,, Adopted as presented. Adapted with changes. Specific modifications and supporting reasons are attached. 7. A public hearing on this Negative Declaration was held by the decision making bodyy, Heaving Body Date of Determination Determi,nationc On the basis of the initial study of environmental impact, the information presented at hearings, comments received on the proposal' and our own knowledge and independent research,: We rind the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION is hereby adopted, We ;find that the project COULD have a'significant effect on the environment but will not in this case beca,xse of attached mitigation measures described in item 5 above which are by this reference made conditions of project approval. A conditional NEGATIVE DECLARATION is hereby a NOTICE OF DETERMINATION TO; Office of planning and Research FROM: Planning Department 1400 Tenth Street, Room 121, 7 County Center Drive Sacramento, CA 95814 Orovi, CA 95965 or lle County Clerk County of Butte SLDM1rCT Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21.108 or 21152 of the Public Resources Code. roject Title 84-12-20-02 Variance AP 63-18-03 Robe'rt Ji Ba State Clearinghouse Number Contact Person (If submitted to Clearinghouse) Telephone Number B, A. Kircher,.Director of Planning (916) 534-4601 Proi-ect-Location On the west side Of Forest Ranch Road, 300 feet west of. Highway 321, in Forest Ranch Project Description Variance to create a 1 acre and a 3.43 acre parcel in an AR -5 zone x This is to advise that the Butte County (L Agency or TResponsible Agency has approved the above described project and has made the following determinations regarding the above described projects 11 The project Will will not, have a significant effect on the environment. 2 An Environmental Irr,,,act Report was prepared for thls project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. A Negative Doelaratien was prepared for this project pursuant to the Provisions of CEQA The MR or Negative Declaration and record of project approval may be examined at.. 3. Mitigation meant -res were approval of the project. , were not, made a condition of the 4 A statemgnt sf Overriding conslderatilons was, . was not, adopted for this project Date Received for Filing . Signature Title itevised January 1985 Duffe k/ _%O -Nw LAND Of N ;1URA! WEALTH ANI t ��iIIY --�: PLANNING COMMISSION. 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVC - OROVILLF, oALWORWA 95965.3397 PHONE: 534.4601 December 20, 198 Robert J, Bay, P.O. Box 29 Forest Ranch; CA 95942 RB • Variance AP 63-18-03 Dear Mr. Bay: This is to notify you that we have received your application for a variance to Minimum lot size to allbiV a 1 acre parcel and, a 3.4 acre parcel in the AR -5 ( Agricultural -Residential 5 acre) zoj t�, located ofthe west side o� Forest Ranch Road 300 feet rest of Highway 32 in Forest Rand An initial study of potential environmental consequences anticipated in connection with this oro j ect is being completed by the Butte County Planning. Departm it and will be forwarded to youi Should you have any questions regarding this matter; please feel free to contact this office Sincerely, �B: A . Kircher Director of Planning BAK:m.c DISTRIBUTION LIST FOR R0IEW RE -VESTS County Public Works - 1—✓''County env. Health IRRIGATION WATER 7— City of Biggsyggs- ridley Water pint, Butte Water Dist. City of Chico City of Gr, Gridley % Durham Irr, Dist. _. � Oroville-Wyand. Irr. Dist. City of Orovi'i 1 e r7r`— Town of Paradise `_% Paradise Irr. Dist. Richvale rrr. Dist County _7—,.7-'9ttaterens ortation Dept. p p �I�S'irC r %` "Cable Mtn. Irr. Dist; —7— Thermalito Irr. piss. WATER RrATTON t,,LILITIES Berry Creek Water Co. Bloomer Mtn. Mutual Water Co. / Chico Area Roc. & Park piste Durham Area Brush Creek. Estates Butte Water District Roc. & Park Dist. ""%`" Feather River Red. & Park Dist. CA Wafer Service Co. (Chico Paradise Rec, & Park Dist. Richvale Rec, '& Park Dist, urban area. & part of Oroville) Del Oro Water Cc. Parks & Red, Dept. _'" (Paradise Fines) State tato Fish & Game Dept. p Feather Falls (Louisiana SCHOOL DISTRICTS Pacific) / Foreet Ranch Mutual --7"` Gran MutualSRanse�n Sub.) "� / Biggs Unified r _T_ BButte Community College utte County 7— Green Acres Glenwood Dr. -Chico) Sup. of Schools .._7 A State University, Chico Gridley Farm Labor Camp — Lake Madrone Water Dist. %"` Chico Unified Durham Unified egalia Co. eater Dist,, Me Merry Mtn. Mutual (Clipper _� Feather Falls Union �`'�Golden Feather Union Mills) Mulberry . y Water (SE Chico) —7— Gridley High Gridley Union / Northweeds Mutual (Forest Ranch).`� Ramirez Water Oroville Elementary Springs of Living Waters`%"-" "�"Oroville Union High Palermo Unified (Richardson Springs) / Stirling City w .— Palermo Union ..7..w Pioneer (Diamond International) Union Thermalito Union S_ Vista Mutual (Durham) COMMUNITY, SERVICES SEWFRg . _. Lioe Sae JIe Comm. Serv. Dist, Richav'le Sanitary Dist. DRAINAGE /. Butte Creek, Drainage Dist. H. Burbank Pub. Utility Dist. (S. provil°e & belly, Ridge) ELECTRICAL POWEP w Skanson Sus. (CSA 21) Pacific Gas & Electric � Sterling City Sewer Maint, Dist. FIREPROTECTION / ,../ Thermalito Irr. Dist. (CSA 26) E1 Medio Fire Protect. Dist. RESOURCE MANAOEM NT „_„Z trr County Fire Department- State Division of Forestry /✓'State Water Resources Dept. U.S. Forest Service hiOS UITQ ABATE1 NT DISTRICTS _ 5 U.S. Bureau of Land Management /. Durham, OroVille, Or Butte County .OLCE PROTECTION / ,'State Highway Patrol —C i I;,, i,,County Sheriff � �- 'TE IN TY�N I�GJf o1 . .:; • COUNTY CE�TrR T 1.6ROVTLLE CALiFOR Or N pHOtiE4: 534-460. , Robiri Thompson I' To: Chico Unified School D' - �"�'n istr ct DATE:, Fe,brW-1— y 2C x985 S. 1,163 E. 7th Street , ' � .. qr Chico,. CA 9592,6 ?2E MoJT;C.'.;,, 1�i 4�I�";; "AND ' E1V'VIP021 -I h` AL,EVALUATIdN " Bncldi q(l s preliminary data our off ice has, received oz= ner aced concerning, the folla1Jing ftojec:t: I �>C ' t OberP .. Bar � A 6� ;1. .Variance to—min -Mum: lot .•a a.cxe rce 1 and • ... , ed on 'the .tae:s arc-et' an nn AR-5. zany located t sa;cic o `� ' acre . .: • • f • xoxost �fiaricli Road X00 .ee` west `of Hi ay 3 r• ' it 'Fo i y rest Ranch. 4Je are, malting` an assassmeint' of possible envzronrrE tr . nal ptaparing an. environmental document', either a rlegat ve impac es `and �r3.�Ll �e { . Negative ;Declaration or :Ueclar tx on; 'tfiti at ed an �nvi"ionmental Impec't Report. Please provide any factual'state.tents, ideas for anvG4.!.i ratio z g , nr opings yot�'cah "offer "in your. area of concern or dxb6rtlse lehat' rel.ato 'to either .. Physical social, or economic impacts that this' -�s.' px ojee mG este ' Please:=respond ilithin 14 days of the ab6ve no•Led date. If- no response is generated by, thi ine a�,ry, then it .shall be a sumod t2J ,t th•;ro .are. •no', significant environmbntal impacts which ate potential irc,m ehp, project. We appreciate any asci -at you can Provide, Sincerely, : a7z ,. z 2 , Y •- Craig Sanders Palnnxn TechnxcLan Commends . . , . (W14ito Or type in , t ., WITTE ccau17► r , N roc col 1. 7 Cou�1rY art.' 'fit«1SSI0;! rvE �. PHO' 534-40QaRovrLlw� cALz� �zA 95965 TO. I Ublic j4orks John %1� 8u#teCo. PianningGa=���: 1)ecern:hc;x 2 .ndonsa 1, '1984 JUN Pr,O'rty;q" ,« ,, OrovJ1© a CAlifsart� ��C��C y� }B Enclosed A UD is px•e].mirax•• �. the follbW ng � da`a aur Office has received prvjec t: Robe x•t J , Ba,, _ °� S7tGa c7nce� Vax•iance 4P I.n #RSI to minimturt !ot 1x.:,-p2 size to ��T17.artv a_ acro arcel acrd a 4 _ arccx in an AR-S - ._ located on —� ... exf. Road tTie 7,iest Side of Foxe; t Ranc?� 300 feet hest of ah 32 in pores t Bandl. We are rta�:in an asso� prparin an asme,1t of posib�e t g environt;tental ri envitoQnaental dooumont, either ;a 1I�, • , . mpac'ts and vriL be e xv �cclar.��tiOn 0r an aviroh�rer> t .x Tm.. -�',olve DBcIr�.tic�n, tiwtigated Please 1 ac t Report, ' pz'bva.de any fac•ttc YOU Can O:ffc r statetTmon'4:;, idea,3 yot,r ares of corcerr fcr iTavt? ,tiatzon phYsica] , socia],, or ecetTraT+t e a.rr cerx c e` p*P"L .c•,e -that relater opinions ' tIlat th .� r�, j, COte1 V}>er F eG :iO I'e project my ssvlX�ic�tT�. gellp &a fd }r .tr 14 of thc, above-noted � this ,� rq;zi ry, t i t date. r#' no significant oh�2rorz;.,r�.Tt z Of O}ta.1Z bI ry� d tjlgt -esp n$e � <..��t r ;a s G ]. t}:�.rre ax•c profit"c apprecfatr? b an. ,IO�wEsi �'t� irom the t. n siut.anre yOu Can provide _ S,ixtr�.relyr Cra- I crs Pa11min �'echnic an r a ",t a, Or type ...... BUTTE, CoL.tp4ry p P1 ' COUNTY c�N iIZfiJC GQi�i'RIV �.CS$I0N F��tc�t�E534-�E6U_� To.JAN 8 X85 �nvaronmentalHca1 th 0M* Cwar a Lynn Van,hart ATE D0Cr ra ►c'r 21, 1984 PRW�;r" a VPrt7 EN" III � f��UA�i'.CC3� Enclosed is preliminary .. the follot" In Y data Otlr dtllce � Project., fig„ received -------.--:_._,.� -J. 0a _ i�"'trtc�r�tkc�d coucer•natt�; , Va mance to m namttrn AP 6-5-].t3 oher•�, 1o't sa.ze to allow z 12-20�-02. arce [ in In A acz•�aarcel a a zoite, located on acre Road 0 feet ,,rest the west sIde. oaf, Forest R�z tc�t �d o Ha�ntra 3 n dor a tc est a..nC1 41e are ►stn pre pax a -a assessn;en t o £ it g an env.ironMental POS :sxble envi rontaertt;el Neg tine pecl a either p�cts and aocumertt +�a.l �ttt Env n 1F€r ntit�e DQc:l,arry 1 be 4r�t '�.on or rtta1.pa^ t ?eport.tion, titi�.i eGl please pt'ova:de at, � � Jrcu c.�n bff Y ac wval state; e� ti l° .irea n:f I nCr$C• t � ��yy y .t S ,� Y'sical t so'cIa T a 4 CViIcerrn li"' 1" w1 �M. c'I ti or, Y or econoTFtx C L e.atrLr l tit i ti ' c~ opxn Qrt; a r�tpr c Ls h-�i alt; o ;p, ojc_� P r " to ea pleE.�� rer ., either �p�nc! t. �t}rirt C h . a - f ES11orated t; + } C�iZYa of the c�f7Cr4"t-�x tSt:Ct y Wth i.s iYnt�srµ�rir44°, t}t�.n :i t � d��te� r� }� iii 4'3 113.1 J.li f�4L :.4 W.Z.J.rOn'-JgJ i.Ct� M , , r 'IX nQ i eU o'lIs .,ttal tre rc^ ;trrr�. that 0 �e is ,ir.;�L�„ t1a t•,f,tch there ar r� ,ri r Zrc no appreciate • a n -e v :tial rd� the Project. di�� � 7.''d'1. t � ,� s. tyle C�2i �rClit.tCt€�,. Sincerely Craig. `Sanders /1��yyayyinyyy.nn,ot'L Tpc:hnic'. arl 1984 ClJNa111 +1 ta:�/- / - 1 �. /�) (' 1W4r��G7 F `"1'- ----_ . '.. �f t'ray iCt�l�OiMltCt n4v d 'i tib! i4, L L.CCkLAAA kA +L'#-•--r..a� ,—ti r 1� G+l rr1e1� �h.�- 'S eta,t r.FR �* .�. t rk i r f t.w Ltt'rn 'Ek; _. s i S w ; n) $��a, Cf��'ty�TY PLAN (.;� // IING . �Jl.rsszoil, .LINTY _..,. PHONER 5 !-1 oRovrLLrs' N 95 ►; �6bx 9G,, a : Department of Pox Suite Cc, e s � x�Y Planning DATE' 9195 zDs AND e1 x� Pre, Iminar ata file %l ottIng dOur �. sect: office hr�y rou Robe cr, cl or on'x'rttra concerning to: mxnamt:-.ot — 6-"� 1izetb Ilc�xv a #84_x20-02 �1P'$zone "" ? ` a` _VaancTtarce. id-•-slacaerI acre 00 Fejt on the ��est 5,i,elo west o F1� `hj.`a * 32 in Forest 1',10 a re waking R a.n C .I1 R� Fareta- a 4 �u tSs 'ht o �� . �3 Yl a Il eYZVIx"t12]1r1� Zt dlO tr � ` ui gnt cc h� , nvo'Jt kile e vixor"� 71 ��ar tion or UR►.�lE, eiLh r T �zt ti,r��)ae.t will t.� hva,"ronMOnta,l w five D .. ltd ll bre pleas'. ��� c� Fe L Clara'�ior.T ?`inti r rov z You ca;� o� fe�e �ra�r f��tctua� � � �J°�'`' • gay _ t7 , xC2 You-• ,. 7telLntV 2dn 5C7!. E'er oxUttG�rli t72Vi?3ij !c ar;Lt that e thz to c�panicrte meted bYnthi t�,� .y.� ref tne� . tr�aa p �je t g n�'rtxte her ger ara �, h 14 d� may sx xfic� �...��a xy, then Fl o+re-rs! tod �n ez:trir"�al�r,KK it r'Idall b �tc�{f,• xf u:G 1 im 6t tS to h1C t: i��s!«l+,c,,t h 4 its tld, i Lu r2�c+jr c, t.. e Tt voteo' I7l. ;' a cZl'E to cj. "1+ tctll4" VOU G4!!i . fl" C. tilt pro ,irov:l:r�e., ,pert, S51 - IT : ri r'r!�t BUTTE -00UP4TY6.At1p11 tical �M COUNTCENTER :DRIVE `- OROVT I,. of CALIFORNIA PHONE 534-4601 g`6 TO,: CALTRAi15 P.O. Box 911 DATE: bece Marysvil4 nlbOT 21., 198 ! CA 95901 RF,; T OfJ! rr x,11 Gtl � M PROJECT y vr�zttATION Enclosed is preliminary- the followingdata our office has received, Vv ' Baty - AP 63-1 $a���rtk'�]tN Project: Robert J. o g �l soneernir�; .—._� an.ce_ _to r 4 'ttr X84-I,2- m�.nimzim lot sa.ze to allow a I acre � OZ arcel. in an AR- 5 e _. )� ctrl and 20 zone located an a 3.4 acre Road 300 feet wgest o • the west` s7.t7c eu`.�'f �°res�`2� `rte rr..nK4 lli hwa 32 gin_ Forest Ranch are mal4in --�---- g an assessment o.E possible preparing an environmental do �,nviron;rsntai ,xm ac ativ0 Dei larnt cn or 9 either a rl i ' is and Will be an nvironm�.nt Impact Peport,,Deal trra�i n, Mi please gated Provide an factual statem,nts ,you cath offer in your, area of Concern or .for phyajua,] inve;t4ra�tion, or a racial, Or economic es;pertz ,e that t>_� pinions impacts that this late to e :',Iter please respond Within �*I, .� I"z'o�ect may geilarate. 9enetOted b d-P1 of the above ..n Y this inqu2,C'yt thou �t�(� C� 3 t.�. significant eyt'vi"04:4ental. imtiacts wk�act� are Potential , If no rosp=n o is �. it .�Ital,l. be assumed that th�:rr p n t�.al from t �y are no 41e approuiatn an h. project ,Y a.,sis lance you tanX-rovido. Sincerely, Craig .1danrlers PaInnIn Tec�jnicia..h Comments: .� ..... k typ,'- in T'etltrtt 'thl,s M"MU - BUTTE• C(] INTYOANNING COMMISSION COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLR, CALIFORNIA 95965 PHONE! 534-460 TO Butte County SheriffMTV: December 21, Rr: PROJECT RI -MV. -I ANT) Rrv� rtrty=tinea t�v�c,tr��=�tv Enclosed is preliminary data our office has roceiv ed or �,cit�rt��tted concerning tate f011owing project: y ,. Loi _#� $� -'I ?;.2p-0 Robert J. Bay- p 3— —'8 . t 2 V<xriance to minimum lot size to allow a x acreTjrie� end a ,. acre 2a*rcel in an. -IR-5 zone, located an tl1e west.5i d of forest 11an!:h Road 500 feet west of H� h�va 32 in hozrest. Ranch. We are an environme tgan sessment of passable enviror►rranta impac Es and will be P rep ar � ,. taldocument, either a Negative Declaration, ti�tiga�ecl Negative Declaration ar an Environmental Impact Report. Please provide any factual statements, i6eas for investagatian or opinions ,You can Offer In your area of concern or w�'pertise that relate to either physical, social:, or economic impacts that this profit?ct; rray generate: Pleaeo respond within 14 days of the above -noted elate,s if no response is generated by this inquiry, then it shall be a4suWed that there are no significant env ronmcntal, itng,acts which are potential, from the pro,jeet We appreciate ally assistance YOU can provide Sincerely, M, Cvaig /�anders - PaInning Technician Cotrimentra --------------- i ,.. ir�axrraAYwruYrlw-i�`w91 (Write ar typo in Space provider; k7el urn thio s�rcet: j BUTTE, COUNITY0Awl I NG COMM i ss I oN r 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE -- OROVI LLE, CALIFORNIA 95065 PHONE: 534-4601 TQ: CA State iIighway Patrol DATE: December 21, 1984 P.O. Box 1779 Chico, CA 95927 RE: PROJECT.' PENTEM AND �. _.. ENVIROFIME,N`I'AT. 10/Ab IATION Enclosed is prelivilinary data our office has received or i,envrt►tnd concerning the following project Robert J.Bay y- AP 63-'-.5z , - .;Los- #84-12-20-02 Variance to minimum lot size to allow a 1 acre L a God. and ,a 3�4 acro parcel in an AR--S zone located on the west side o C Forest Ranch Road 300 feet west of Highway 32 in _Forest Ranch. We are making an assessment of possible environmental impacts and will be preparing an environmental document, either a Negative Declaration, MltigaLod Negative Declaration or an tnviionmenL,al Impact Report. please prcYvide any, factual statements; ideas ;dor investigation, or opinions you can offer in your area of concern or expertike that relate to either physical, social; or economic impacts that this project; may generate. Piease respond within 14 days of the above-nott:d date. If no response is gonera'ted by this inquiry, then it shall be assumed that there are no s n £icant environmental which. are p,�+ential .from the project. We appreciate any assistanac you can provide. Sincerely Gx•�.a.� l�ariders Painning TOchnicla Comments: _.. (write or typ,�i in npade provided, & return thin ohedt. BUTTS , coUPITY .�I�lnl PIG COMMISSION COUNTY CNTEF2 - DRIVE - PHONE: OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 9.59,E 5�4-4C01 Ta 1A State Water P.O.Box 9s"0 Resources De .�• Orovlle, A DATDecEmbE,, 2-1,°1h?1 CA '0 5 9 6.. 5 PROJECT i2.G;VCtti� EIV[�1----Y'�'i-=�'f Vll II'A''ON Enclosed is pr' limit ar the following Project: data our Off ice Robert Jreceived or • has Variance to Ba,v - �P�63.,"1gge.er`Ced ooncerna.ng m%nmo,� 10� size T,a'r 1�5,j� creel' to a:L1oty a Z2-2p 02 in an _AR-S acre 1'1�c.el and z°ne located a 3.4 acre _R_oo_ad 300 deet west on the tyest side o Hi o' Forest Ranch Iztya 32 in Forest Ranch We are m��]cin . P�'e�arin 5 an as, eUsmen� of Negative fan env rnnment possible e<rontnent� eclarzt-L - n o al dpcument � either a pie . impacts an Dnvironmental Im gative and "fill be Please r pact Report, lar��tion, 11 ,tigated Provide an,. you e y factual statement" ec an offe` in Your area n Ui ideas for , . PhyUical, social f concern, or e� � , ins es tz:�atior� u or economic injpact, t 'per i"'e that r or opinions PZe.z,e xe,�; that this xnraect maate to either Pond 14ittiin 1 genera,o, generated b days of the J Line this xn�quiryt then above-noted date. significant cant envirnnirental im i t 8htal, he pact., %,hicl� are assttmod that l no response is tie a potential i there are no ppreciate any iic:m the ,y assisianoe you G� Project. SiticerelY, provide. Craig 11ders Pa innIng Technic. a 1 COM mer, ts,: • (14t'I to Or tY :e ru `� Pa(,O Frnvaric,1 r� �arh thi 'hoot') AP111:N1) I X I' COUNTY OF BUTT BNVI'RONN1ENTAL CFIEChial:?T FORM (to Be completed Y Lead Agency) Loi_ # 84-12-20-02 I. BACKGROUND AP 63-18-103 1. Name of proponent Robert, J. Bay 2. Address o' proponent and representative (if applicable) .. l? . 0._Box Forest Rancha.__CA 95942 3.. Project description Variance It. MANDATORY FINDINGS 01" STG\IyFTCANCp YES MAYBE* NO r bees the, project have the pot•enti al to degrade 'tho quahetile lhaYiOr title nronment, subst-a.ntially reduce fish or wildlife speelen, cause 11 fish or wildlife Population to drop below self- sustaining 7;VMS, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal co;nmunity, reduce the number or restrict the range of a -rare or endangered plant or >animal ar. eliminate, import nt examples of the major periods Of California historY or prehistory? b. Do's the project have the potetiti;al to achieve Short-term ben0fits to the detriment or Yong -term, onvironmentai goals" (A short-term imr.act on the enviropi ertt is one rahich occurs in a relatively brief period of time while long-term impacts will .-e rttilure Into tile future.) C. Does the project have impacts which are individu rrlly la.mit•ed, but cumulatively consider`ble? (ti project stay impact on tva or more separate resources where t",e' .impact 0'n each resouree is relatively Small, but where the effect or the total or Chase impacts oil the onvironmettt is significant.) Al. DOE-; the project have environmental orfec:ts +uhiclt will cause subsranrial adverse. effects on human beings, either directlt• or inc{11.ectiv:' {T1. z){,'1'Ttttllh,"l'It�v '('T'o hr, completed by the 1,ead Agency) � .a on the basis or this initi,ll,OVC.1u.itiont 1/WE find the proposed pt•n j rir t t;t)t11:1) NOT have a s Lgw i ricttnt effect on the onvironment, and it NTWAI'Mi DECLARAT;TON will be prepared, I/CVV find that although the proposed prrajcc;t c'oulcl have a sigbifi_ cant effect on the c-,nvironment, tilere will not be 11 significant crfect in this case because 'the, WTIGATION W*,ASUAr;.S described on the attached sheet have been ,added to the projOct, r1 Nl1GA7'1V.n. ili;tl,ARATltx` will be prr~pared. UWE,Gnti lith rilI,o�"tnlydrtPrO.I1ctNt`91:MAI havkc `t Si:Bni.fi,eant affect on x A1. .TMPAc:'i' RI,Ir(1RT is required, bATI 1!abru ry 1,, ig85 W COUNlY OV 1i,,T'111:, PLANNI'NC i1BRARTWNT .:y Reviewed b ` IV'. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPS CF: piaaat o31s of all "'ryes" and "maybe" answers are required On attached sheet(s)) 1. EA'?TI4 Will the proposal result in significant: YES ' "'Unstable mAYD13 NO T earth conditions or in changes in g, olo Zc, subs; � uc < `' tures? b . �` eruptions, dwsplacements compaction or -- _.._ �rcoverzng of the soil? c. Change in topography or ground surface �` relief features? Y d. Destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e, Increase in wind or water erosion of soils , either on or off-site? � f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach " sands, or changes in siltation, deposition, or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? g: Loss of prime agriculturally productive soils outside designated urban areas?; h. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards sach as earthgti.akes, landslides . muds elides, ground failure or similar ha.ares? 2. . ,AIR a. Air�emissions�or5deteriorationSofsambient' t air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors, smoke or fumes? c. Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature; or any change in climate, locally or regionally? 3. WATER, Will the proposal result in substantial: a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of watet movements in either marine or fresh waters b. ..amu,. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, ,... - or the rate and amount of surface runoff? c, Need for off-site surface drainage- improve- ments, iAcluding vegetation rewo,al, channel. nation or Culvert installation° d, Alterations to the course or f?.ow of flood waters? e. Chant.— in the ,amount of surface water in any water body? f, Discharge into surface waters, or in any Alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved ozygen or turbid.ity2 g. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? ; h, Change in thr quantity of ground waters, either though direct additions or with drawals, or through interception of an Aquifer by cuts or ex;avations ? ` i, Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? j, Exposure of people or property to water related tiatards such as � loodin.g? , YES MAYD E No 46 PLANT LIFE. Will the proposal result in substantial., a.Mange in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)?; b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of nlants7', c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenish- ment or` exis,tinb species? d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? S. ANIMAL LIFE. Will the proposal result in substantial: a. Change in the diversity of species, Or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shell fish_, benthic organisms orinsects)?_ , b. Reduction in the numbers of any unique, rave or endangered species of animals? c. Introduction of new species of animals into' an area or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animal-s7 6i ,Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? 6. NOISE. Will the proposal result in substantial: a. .Increases in existing noise levels? b;. Exposure of people to severe noise'level;s? 7. LIGHT AND? GLARE. Will the proposal produce signi7z.c' ant 1.lght and glare? 8 LAND USE. Will the proposal result in a gUbstantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area'?, 9. NATURAL._, ESOUROE5; Will the proposal result in substantial A. Increase in the rate of use of any statural resources'? b, Depletion of any non-renewable natura". resources 10 . RISTC 0� UP T. , Will the proposal involve a. A risk of explo, aIln or the release of hazard- ous substances (including, but not limited to) oil; pesticides, chemicals or red.ia,tio:) in the event of an acca.dent or upset conditions? b. Possible interference with an emergenev response plan or emergency evacuation plan? 11, POPULATION. Will the proposal altox the location, 3' trlbutioij dansity or growth rate of the human population? 1 ,, HOUSNO. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or Create a demand for additional housing? .. y d 13. 'CRANS%�ORTATION/CT resu't RCUL.4TIQN. Will the in: YES MAYS "'– 13 Na . Proposal A a. Gine Generation of substantial movement? additional vehicle b. Effects on existing demand fear new par king�k `ng ,f-acilities) or /* . C. Substantial impact systems? . on ex�stzn.g transportation d• Significant alterations to Of circu.lation or movement goods? afepeoppatterns le and/or e• ,Alterations to waterborne, rail f. or air rtraffic? ?Increase in traffic hazards tbicyclists or pedestrians? o .otor vehicles, --- A — 14, PUBLIC SERVICES. Will the upon, or result in a proposal ;have an effect governmental servicesneed for new or altered A'.Rre protection? b. Police protection? c• Schools? —: ci, parks or other recreational facilities? e • Maintenance 1 •,. of public roads? facilities, including, - 1 –w- f• Other governmental services? 1 S • ,ENERGY . �Yi11 the ---- proposal result in a• Use of substantial amounts of fuel .or energy? b. Substantial increase in demand upon sources of energy, existing of new sources energyuire the development 16+ UTILITIES, jV i 71 the new systems, or substantpallajterationsresult in atoeed for following: the a, POTIor o.r natural gas? b: Communications systems? C- bater availability: d. Seweror septic tanks e. Storm water ;drainage? _ f = Solid Waste ancl disposal? 17 HAAyi l l the propoa, resulta. eany $eal ` hahazard or health hazard Cejrcludin potential: b: Exposure 0:6 people to potitial health)? hazards? h 18: AESTHETICS: –_..._._,.� Will the propo al result in the o`bstruct.ion O.� an y scenic Vista or view open to the public, or i� ill the pr rSsaI G;�oa�ti.on n result in of art aesthetically offers ` o to public view? eve Site open YES MAYBE No l9. RECREATION. Will the proposal result in an impact Upon the quality or quantity of existing recreationttl opportunities? 20 CULTURAL, RESOURCES. a• w ll tHie proposal result in the alteration Of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? b. Will the proposalresult in adverse phyy cal or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure or object? r. c. Does the proposal have the potentiai to cause a physical change whish affect ' f would unique ethnc,? d. Wil1'itheuproposal restrict existing 'reli ious or sacred uses within the potential impact area;' V. DISCU55ION OF EIJ L NMENTAL EVALUATION AP 53-18-03 See_attathmen I I TJ SCLliiSl~ON,.„Q gNYrRQNM5NTAL PVALUATTON AP 63-18-0,3, Aiken 5dils, when subjected to 70" of annual 'rainfall ham) a hierosion potential. Development o•h one house and driveway will s yghtly increase 4n --sine erosion and deposition into the crook gib, i6ot Additional storm water rLtnof,F will be generated. Drainago' improvements are required on 'parcels less than ;a acros�. 35h4i6a.A Department of Water 'Resources mapped groundwaraer resources on the Porost Ranch ridge in 1975. They concluded that resources were severoly limited for parcels of less than 5 acres. Underlying aqui4ors may be perched. Tf so, well's may dry up without an alternate water source available. _ e,12: This property was zoned AR -S February i97S as part of the Forest Ranch rozone. The rezone was community wide, based upon environmental sensitivities, i.e. limited water supply, virtually no publ.i.c�services, marginal soils for perry high erosion hazards, impacts to wildlife,. Approval _of this Variance would affect the 182.4 acres zoned AF --5 in the i mmedi ate vi ci ni ty * 'Approval o+ the Variance would be precedent setting, stimulating similar projects 1:7-a A recent traffic survey prepared on Forest Ranch Road indicated su+fxciont capacity a+Misted for the planned densities.' However, development at increased densities would require roadway improvements including striping and widening. O o house will not trigger those irr.� ovements, but will cumulatively impact Forest Ranch Road'p 14a,bt rorost Ranch is an isolated community without bene+'it of most A er r _ community fy grows, p wtdp0l ice M,. service, With sthe e;.i sit i ngt L budgot struure f i reandomand o protection is only cost of focti ve in, ur=ban areas i Appendix F pEtge. 6' AP 630-03 14ca Forest Ranch Elementary School ;'.s se�"erely paver orawded« "rhe facility is too small -for the eXisting enrollmer+t. "rho property is not large enough to afford sufficient p-ay areas separated from access ways. Chico Unified School District has notified Butto COUh'ty that continued approval Of residential development will have! L�, si gni °i i cart' negative impact on their facilities. If an agreement in not reached with the Chico Unified School District., then an E.I.R. Will be required. 20a: Butte County archaeological resor uces' map survey(,woulhebsite may have been used b native americans required. However, since the site has been plantedaia an orchard and the surface dzsruted p s a survey would not reveal avjyth j ng I I , EI PENCE C. CUMUl ative impacts to, Chico co Unif.ied School bi stri ct, area water supplies and development proposals on less than 5 acre parcels are possible. iI I Appdndi)t V Pogo y Appl i cant: trauert aY Assessor's parcel Lag 84-12-20-02 'Aw�op`rra�,s►��Er ect -ion 1: Type. of Pt-oject « Variance Brief Descriptions Variance to create a acre, parcel in an AR -5 zone ricr� b Location On the and � 3-4-3 ' west Of Hi west side of Forest N'anch Road Highway ,' . , 00 feet �' W i n Forest ranch . 4. Proposed Density of Develo , S« Amount of Impery ous pmeri�� « 1 dwel l i n 6- Access eUrfacing' I g unit per Parcel and Nearest Public Aoadfs>a Slight 7, Method of Sews e Forest lgdOch �o,,d 8« 5otcroe of Waterg Sispasal: Individral '. 'ra>•imit Pp Y'nindividUal septic at �y 1c« �,� Y of F'aWer LinL-s: tdntial +or To origin al parcel 11riE�ndwn -- zoning land divisions and developments g requires 5 acre parcels �C. i~r�r ranmental S�t� tt3 �'hx�i��tl vi.rb ��� rtment? i« Terrain a. h; R graph;, Character: General Fl vat 2-1$y. Upper- par -esu ranch ridge y}.ww Sx a epi can : 24t•.r0"-.�� 1r Y' « Soils 60 d« Limiting Factors« �wyh�oneeet Types and Characters draining"stiCst AiF;enl slra r pormeabilit° , medium to high potentia'1 far, well dark brownb yellowi�-h�- timber by I_im� a red, loam c,ya r 4 g FactOr5. Nohc- Y, moderately acidic. Natural HazArds f a4 earthq� Ako Zone he Land lane V b. erosion potonti�l a MOderate hazard c 4 Land sl. i. do Potential SY light to hL c h dependent da Fire Maard High tri S>, I�ladet-ae pendent on slopes 00 E>c ansive ,treme p Sbi 1 potenti a� moderatr" ApZSenc�i�t � ��) �- AP "63•-18 4. Hydrology a. surface Water; Creed: crosses property, parallel to Forrwst, Ranch Road b. Ground Watert Department/ of Water Resources determined groundwater is limited for parcels less than 5 acres. c. Drainage Characteristics: Drains to creek on -cite, within Little Chico Creek, watershed 4. Annual 'Rai nfalI (normal): High annual rainfall creates severe erosion e Limiting Factors: High annual rainfall creates severe erosion potential 6. Visual/S�y' g y .a2 AcbustitwcG?uality: ehit Quality -. Hit hWa , school and trailer court addto ambient noise levels 7. Air Quality,. Good' EiolagL�5_ �En�irnnm nt B. Vegetation' old walnut, apple, pear orchard Herd 9. Wildlife Habitat. Immediately east of Fast Tehama neer area, groat variety of mammals and binds. �uIL4tr�3 _Env_irohm�n 10. Archaeological and Historical Resources in the area: High 1 i:. lau•t•te County General Plan, designation: Agri. cultural -Resi dent,i al. 12. Existing ioningt Aft --5 1,�. E„isting Land Use on --site: tine htinesite creed: 14. Surrounding Area.- reaea. Land Usos: Mobile home pari: south, Forest Rite a «h School a. north, residential at very low dehsities b. Zoning: AR -5 (den. Flan designationst Agri cultural-Rosidential, Timber c, Mountain d. Parcel 4.8,- 6+ acres t5. e. Ropul ate. on: Sparse Caractor of Site and Areat', FOre'st Ranch community environs l 16. 17. Nearost. Urban Area: Chaco +/— 15 miles Relevant Spheres of Influence: Forest Manch community water je. Improvements Standards Urban'Area-. Not applicable M. Fire Pt, c,t.ect:ion Cervico: �,� . a. Nearest County (State) Fire Station.. stati or, -24 2t~). b. Mater Availability. Unknown Schools i.n Aroat Forest Fanch Elettlontary, to north, Chico Unified School Di stf^ i sat Appthdix V Gb r 4 t r ,.r APPLICATION FORR ARIANCE BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISa;10s\I , APPLICANT: Read and 'follow instructions: as set forth on rmlrse Side of thl fc,rm: Applicant's Name Rb L Ctr_ y��'10._y _ "' Phone No, _._1.l..: (0 ,c Applicant's Mailing Address -2111 X33 aI Applicant's interest in property (Owner, lessee, other} Owner's Name and Address Contact Person for Project (ft other than appiloanq Assessor's Marcel ;Nuinber(s). Present Zoning I ocation and size of parcel(s) Mo _ C 0 L �o1-e. S v►r Street address r *7 0,9 12clmrl, ►2«A_ Directions for travel to property (rural and mountainous areas only) :.J J Type of variance requested; Lot area or building site Mobile home size Lot width - Parking requirements -_ Front yard setback Livestock requirements side or rear yard setback Sign requirements Other (specify). 4 _ Oeserlptlon of propos d use and reasons for variance because of special circumstances (rotor to Instruction No. 6 on reverse J side) tl. act tl - Hutto do, planning besoription of existing land use .. i-2�5i cis l CJCOVtIId� txisting/proposed sewage disposal methcd _ r a 1 . Proximity of power fir.t patine lines., 0 i6-f?t! Water Source: Proximity of 1� ater for fare fighting purposes (hydrants, J: &k% L. i ► ,� Will excavation or gradv+g be necessary? Cubic yards (ostimatt:}, List and describe any other related permits and Other public approvals required for this project, Including those required by y oily, regional, State and >*edt sal agencies' Gtr TO (011owing questions ertaln'oni ed P y to variances to the minimum parcel size required within the zoning district: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES* Itlentlty potentialiy signlficant environmental Impacts associated with the variance, What project design features or special r tfnditioris of approval (mitigation measures) are proposed to alleviate potential environmental impacts? Z ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING* —J Describe the project site as it exists beforethe project. including Informs tionon t e�ritphy, site, and th plants and: animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Describe ^ an r structures. X enist►ng structures on the site, and the use of the LL Describe In scribe the surrounding properties, including Information on plants and animals and any cultural, historloat or scenic aspects,. Indicate ''the type of land use (residential, �- commercial, etc.), intensit of la y ad use ,), VIO family; apartments, shops, r epart� meet stores, etc,), and scale of development (height, frontage,. setback, ..rear yard.., etc,),. * Use separate sheet for Longer responses. -1 IL CL hereby declare underenalt of that shave re P y perjury ad and understand the instructions are true, and t',hitt the foregoing statements complete and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date } ""y �� Applican,'s signature - Date Property owner s sighalure Variance humber Request; VarlanCe to Location and "size of patcel(s), located on the Vw ,.J V ,E R OF ----- - CD —app„ Number(i) (,rr1 and Fequlrements Ownership � Proo,Ilwocatton Description Proof of Agency (if needed) ✓� _ ib copies of plot pian W tD ti gate -J _ceived, , $ Necelpt Number APAiication Taken BY cz I1J' tJ LL IJ O K ,r{SCs� kuz H , MWAM.- VC, ct wCle Io 1 M UM )Of 1 e 4-o e i-ecii e a Pro,po5e d use- 1.. otj Id �eu5a��5 lot Voir ian i'h lvd o"��r Boa r� � s a � �' � II l' C. ► � �''{- �j aid vv der t Sa��i 2ori►`y�s Cas r ►'�u�'` .ov smaller P`rc size o c v,-- oul4a Co. Planning'C"ft C C' 8 1984 a� Due 716 14�5 C/65a Oroville Calitordla C 5� or 1 q h s 64t, c lm o h e. I' a rnp (�roha e Oita �3601 PA c Lop, ck �, Ue lop