HomeMy WebLinkAbout063-900-040IV. ENVIRONMENTAL
I AGT5_
xp anations of a 1"yes" and -"maybe" answers are re,guired
on attached sheetts)
YES
1. EARTH. Will the proposal result in. signi icant:
MAY BF, N0
a.
Unstable earth conditions or in, changes in
geologic substructures`?
b .
Disxuptions , displacements , compaction or
ove°rcovering of the soil?
c,
Change in topography or ground surface
relief features?
iC,
d.
Destruction, covering or modi:eic.ation of any
uni ue eol.o is or physical sical features'
q g g�
k
Q,
Increase in wind ox water erosion of, soils;
ether on, or o
X
f.
C1 -ranges in t•�.poszt�e�
on or erosion of beach
sands, or changes in si_jtation, deposition
or erosion which may, modify, the channel of
a river o•r stream or the bed of ;the ocean or
any b`aY, inlet or lake?.
g.
Loss of prime, agriculturally productive soils .._.._
outside designated urban areas?
h.
Exposure of people ox property to geologic
il
hazards'such as earthquakes, landslides, mud-
slides, ground failure or similar hazards?
>C C.
2. AIR. Will the pr.opasal; result in substantial.
a,
Air emissions or, deterioration o ambient
air quality?
---
b ,.
The c:rea7::an of Objectionable odors, smoke
or Eumes,
c•
Alteration of ai.r movement, moisture, or
temporature; or any change in climate
l.acall or
y regionally?_
X
3. WATER. Will the proposal result in substantial,
a. Changes in currents',
or. the course or
direction of water movements: in either
marine or fresh wat:ors?
b.
Changes in absorption rates,; drainage pattern8,,
or the rage and amount of surface runoff's
c.
Need for offsite surface drainageimprove-
menu , intruding vegetation 'removal, channel-
ization o culvert install at`ion?
rl.
Aitorations tothe course or flow of flood
-
IVaters?
e:
Change in themaunt of, surface vat ersin any
y
t .
tvat e' r, bo dy
Discharge into surface Maters , ..o.r in, anv
alteration Of surface water duality, including
but not limited to temperature, dxssolvec�.
o�t��gea o.r turbadity:'?
J
Y
g •
Alterat om of the di recti an or rate o flaw
of ground. waters �
�
h
Chan e in the u�ntit or
g # y quag.wby of t�atexs,
..�
,around
eitner through: direct additions ar l th=
drawals', :or,through n'tercept oln of an:
C{uier by° cuts or'XGavatipn5?
�_.
�..
R'duron an 'the amount '`often 'dtinerwise
available far public water Stipp, lies?
j .
ExpOS'U G of people or ro ert y �a wate.r
p p
related hazards such a,s 'flao'tling't-
AEK
'SEs
MAYBt
NO
13,
TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION`: Will the pTo;posal
`result in
a. Generation of substantial additional vehlele
movement?
b. Effects on existing parking facilities; Or
demand for new parking?.
c. Substantial impact on exist ng transportation
systems?
d. Significant alterations to present patterns
f oand
l. atz.on or novemen�G people: /or.
Of circulation
g
e. Alterations to,waterborne, Vail or air traffic?,
f. Increase in traffic hazards' to motor vehi:;cles,
bicyclists or pedestrians?L
14;
PUBLIC SERVICES. Will; the proposal have an effect
upon, ar result in a need f`or new ov altered
governmez 'tat services -
k
a. Fire protection?
b. Police protection2
X_
c. Schools?
X
d. 'Parks ov other recreational facilities?
e. Ma,inten.ance of public facilities, including
roads?
f. Other governmental services?
15+
ENERGY, !trill the proposal 'result in:;
i<
a, Use of substantial amounts of fuel .or energy?`
b: Substantial increase in demand upon existing
sources of ene:rgy,'or require ther development
of new sources of energy?
16,
UTIft'r tS. W11, 1 the proposal, result` "in a need for
new systems, or substantial alterations to the
following:
X
a. Power or natural gas?
b. Coh1muniCat ions systems?
C. Water avai,l.abil ity;
�
d. $owe^r o.r .septic talk?
r?C
e . Stora water, drainage
(X;
f. Solid waste and dispos,aI?_
r
17.'
HUD2AN HEALTH: Will the Proposal :,result in:
a. Creation of any lhealth hataxd or potential
%
health hazard' excluding t"al heaXtlz� ?
,men
b.`Exposure 'ofpople� to potential 'health
x
hazards?
15.
AESTHETICS: Wi1:l tire. proposal ''result in the
0 s CruCt.xOri of any sce'naC 1a'ista: o,f 1 1,, W ;open' to
the Pub a c, or tivill .the pr+post result in %h.e
creation of an aesthetically saifensve site open
,
t0 pubsc view?
YES
No
19. RECREATION, {t►ill theproposal result in an i�ttpaG
upon the quality or
c{uant;ity, .of ,existing recreational
- opportunities?
20. CULTURAL P SOURCES,
T. 171;11 the p p sal result in the al ter��ion
of OT the dostrurtion
of a prehisaaric= or
hist:�ric archaeological :sate?
b: Will the pr oposal result h adverse phys_cal
or
or aes effects;
X
des,theti.c to a, prehistoric or
is }aua ldixig, structure or object'?
bogs
c the Propos4l'have t?te potential to cause
ahysal change which would
affect unique
ethnic cultural values?
d Will the proposal restrict 'eXsting reiiqus '
or sacred uses within the potential impact,
area,`?
V DTSCUSSIOM OFEiVVxRONMENTAL rVALUATIOfV
- AP 63-09-40(ptn)
See attached.
Applicants Vernon E. McMath Assessor ° s Parcel 40
63-09-40(ptn
LOG #
b--ATA-Eb
A Pro,
lettpt i ore
1
TYPe of:Proaects Tentative"Parcel Map.
2,
3.
BriOf Description: "Creating tWo parcels of 1 aero each.
Location: Northwest
corner of Nopel,Avenwe and Vigi Patr'ico,
approximately $00 feet southeast o,f G1 earcut l qrt+
Forest Ranch area. , i n the
4.
5.
Propased'Density rOf Development: 1 dwei ying un ,t Iyer acre.
Amount of Impery , ous Surfaq. i
6,
ng: Approxi mate 1 y 1
Access and Nd"arest Public Road(s); Property, fronts ori NGpeT
Drive.
7,
8.
Method of Sewage :Disposal: individual s®pti`o sstains.
�Jater Supplye Individual
wel'Ts«
Proximitf
Y of Power Lines., To propertly.
10,
Potent i al fors further 1 and, div 1 c' 1 ons and deveTapmerrt: None
Under ex>I St i Zon i n.g
B inv'i
ranmerit�� Ulm
nsa
P>t s'Lc--&L—EMi ronrnrara e
Terrain,
a." General 'Topographic Charracter: Slopin .h�llsjdes ,
fb. Slap es. 10
to 259.
c . E1 c vat l an Appr6x Mate l y 22,00 feet . above See Love 1, .
d• Limiting Factorsli None.
i*.
Sri
a• TYPes, and::Charactdrist cs• q.iken Sail Series genera!
well dral.;ned with
slow
Glee p":, permeability end appraximbtely,60«t
b» L 1 ro i t.i ng FadtOrl 1 S t of permeaks t 1 i ty,
.
h9at0ra1 _ Hazards of the^' L nd
� . Earthquake I Zones hIoderat"e Earthquake tr7tensity done VTXT
Erosion Potents"al:
Moderate.
c. Landslide Potential: Low,
d. Fire Hakard: Hlo«
4-
e - 8!koans i ve So i 1', Potent i a j;' Moderate .,
Hydrology
Surface 1�Jaterx No on site. A tributary ofi Little"Chino'
Greek runs. adjacent tip
,
the {parcel 'to the west.
b. Grourtciwater ` L i m i"ted resourc;e,.
C.- !Drainage Characteristics:' P..
arae i ore In i to +r i but o
L i tt l;e Vit, i co reek . y r .
d". Annual R- athfa t nQrmel
e. Limiting F ctorsd" Grnundwater� Proof o .ddaquate ;•jatc�r
w " 1 l ta.e" ,
i r ;
" equ i r:e.d.
_7.