Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout064-010-015PLANNTNC C WS810N SUMMARY SHImT FOR GIND. VrSTONS 4,rT c ©r DE rrrl- m:tMKT:r cx YES MAY>}:� NO 13 TRANSPORTATION/CI'RCULATION. Will the proposal, result in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehi.c l0 movement? b Effects on existing parking facilities, 'or demand for new parking? _ c. Substantial impact an existing transpox'ta.t;n. Systems. d. Significant alterations to present patterns of circulation or; movementof people and/or, goods 7 e. Alterations to, waterborne,; rail or air traffic? .. f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles bicyclists or pedestrians?c- 14., PUBLIC SERVICES, Will the proposal have an "effect upon) or result in a need°for new or altered ,governmenta.l services: a. Fixe protections b. Police protection? c' Schools? X d - Parks or other recreationial facilities! e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? f. Other governmental services 15. ENERGY. W3'.11 the proposal result in; a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel.or energy? b. Substantial increase an demand upon; existing 'SourceSL of energy," or require the development of new sources of energy? ? 16. UTILITIES. Will the propsal result i.n ,a need for new -systems, or substantial alterations to the fol .owing: a. Poiv'er or natural gas?' b". Communications systems? C, Water: � �I d Se�ter or . sept�.c tank. I e : Storm water, drainage?; f. Solid waste and disposal 17. HUMAN HEALTH. Will the proposal result. in. a. Creation of any health 1iazard or.potential healthh; Atd (e:ccludang mental heaIt1i)? b . Ex 5u,re- of people to° potential health hazards i 18. AS$THETICu. tYil7 `1 rt .p.r'bposal result an the obstruction ai ar.,€ sceiiisc 'vj, or Viet+t open "to thee public] :or wi, tine p apaSal result in the creation of ars aesthetically o-ffensi�re sate open to 'publ-ic V1e�J? YES' ' MAYUB NO 19 RECREATION. 1Vill the proposal result in an iniprIct upon the quality or quantity of existing recrott`jonal - opportunities? L 0 . CULTURAL RESOURCES a4 will the, proposal result in the alteratiQa of ox the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archeological site? b.: Will the proposal rsu1 t in adverse ph ys j cel, Or aesthetic effccto a prehistoric or historic bu'lding, structure or object? C, Does the proposal harze the potential t`o cause a physicalchange which would,`affect uniquo ethnic cultural. values? d. Neill the proposal restrict existing rellgios ox ,sacred eases Within the pot(antial impact area? X . DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL E-VALUATI0 AP 64-01-15 SeO attached.