HomeMy WebLinkAbout064-310-003YES MAYBE
NO
4.
PLANT LIFE. Will the proposal result ir, qulistantaal:
a: Mange :in the diversity of species, or nt4�t���c�r
of any species of plants (including trees,
shrubs , grass , craps and aquatic plants)'t
?C�
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare
or endangered species.of plant s?.�
-
c.. introduction, of new species of plants into an
area, or in a barrier to the normal, replen;is'h-
ment of existing species?
X
d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crap?
5:
ANIMAL LIFE, Will the, proposal result in substantial.
a. CTatnge In the diversity of species, or numbers
of any species of animals (birds, land animals
including rep- il;es, fish and shell -fish,
benthic organisms or insects)?,
=
b. Reduction in the numbers of any unique, rare '
'of
or endangered speciesanimals?
c;, Introduction of new species of animals, intoe
an ,area, or result ins a barrier to the 'migration ,
or movement of animals?
d:; Det,eribxation to existing fish or wildlife
habitat?
G,
N018B• Will the proposal result in, substantial,-
ubstantial:a,
a.1ACTeases in existing noise levels?
b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels?
7.e
LIGHT AND GLARE. Will the proposal produce
Tigni i'cant light and glare?
8 .
LAND CJSE . will the proposal result ':n -a
su.stantial alteration of the present or plan ,ed
land use of an area?`
9.
NATURAL RESOURCESill the proposal result in
substantial;
A.increase in 'the rate of use of any natural
resources?
t�.' Depletion of any non_renewab1e natural
resources 7
1Q .`
RISK: UPSET.. ' Will theproposal involve
a. A risk of e4losian or the, release of hazard.
ous substances (including, b;t;not lzmited to,
oil, pesticides, chot itals or radiation) in':the
event of an accldet" t or upset conditions?
b: Possible interference' with an ,emergency
response plan or emex'gency, evacuation plan?
11.
PO1?L�LATION. ', Will the proposal alter the locat:lon,
srib� u orr d.elsi t y Ibr.` growthrate of the ;iurrian
population?
or
HO(JSINC, Will the pra ia.sa.I ai feet` existing; hour ng, ;.
or create a demand ,for additional housing? �.
YES
MAYD 11MAY
�Yo
13.
TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Will the proposal
result in:
a. Generation of substantial additional "vehicle
movement?
b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or
demand for new asking?
p
-
x
c. Substantial impact on existing transportation,
Systems?
d. Significant alterations to present patterns
of circulation' or movement of a
people nd/ox
goons?
)C
e. Alterations to waterborne; railor air tra:%•1;
Increase in traffic ffc
r _ _ hazards, to rmotor vehic`1, e 8. �
bicyclists or' pedestrians?'
144
PUBLIC SERVICES. Will the proposal; have an of-ect
upono or,result in a need, for new or altered
d
governmental service's:
a.; Fire Protection?
b.., Police protpctioa?
c. Schools?
d. Parks or other recreational facilities?
e. Mai•rntenance of 'public facilities, including
roads?
f. Other 'governmental Services?
15.
ENERGY. Will the proposal result in:
T. Use of substantial amounts of fuel,.ox energy?
b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing
sources of energy, or .require the development
of ne%4 sources of energy?'
�..
16:
UTILITIES. Will the proposal result in a need for ,
new'sys•Cems, or substantial a.ltexations to the
following r
a. Powe r or natural gas?:
�(
b. '; Communisation systems? ...."
c. Water availabaIity:
.�
A . Sewer or septic tank?
�C
0-1 Storm water drainage?
f. Solid waste and dispa'sa i$
17.
HUMAht_HEALTH» Will the proposal result in
a» Creation of a:riy hoaltl haz and ar potenti;al
health hazard Cexcludin mental,' health)
b. Exposure o people to potentia, health
hazards?,
:
18.
AES`1HETIC5.• Wixl,, t}1$ proposal result In the•
Of aA scenic vista o�r view 'ope]7 to
"obstruction
the public, ar �Si 11 the prbposal result' in the
c°z;eation of n aesthetically` offensive• site open
to public view?
-=.`
Y.ES MAYBE
NO
19,. REC ---------- w.JM. Will the proposal result in an impact
upon the quality or quantity of existing secreattional
opportunities'!
20. CULTURAL RESQURCES:e '
a. Will the proposal res Al in the alteratlpn
�.
o£ or ,the destruction of a prehistoric 6,
,
historic archaeological site?'
b. Will the proposal. result in aclverse phys3cal
or aesthetic effects to a p-rehistoric.or
historic building, structure or, object?
c. Does the proposal have the potential �to caus'e
a physical change which would affect
unique
ethnic cultural values?
d. Will the proposal restrlct eX1Stlrig, rell+ip41'8 .:•�
or sacred uses within -the potential impact J
area?
V: DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL'BVALUATION AP 64-31-03 04'
See attached. -
iq Landslide Potential= High in .canyon.
d. Fire Hazard '= High.,
e. ExPansi`Ve So] 1 Potential w Moderate,
4
Hydrol ogy
a Surface Water' L14z;tl-e 8Utte Creak Canyon and Watershed
(Little 'Butte Crook traverses the southeastern corner of
the property)'.
b, Groundwater. Downstream surface water contamination' is a
concern throughout the paradlse Pines area
c.' bra;inage Char^acterlstics- Direst drainago :into the
canyon .
d. Annual Rainfall E normal ) ; 60-'70" .
e: Limiting. Factors= vewa9e systems 1imlted to the western
half of the site:. _
5
Visual/'Sceni;c quality: Oood,
6
Acoust i c qua1 i tyr= Good.
?.
A r r qual i ty • Good,
B i O] o9 cal Cnv i`ronment'
8
Vegetat',i on : M i zed con i f Brous forest (r l poly i ar7 .hab i tat al one
creek) . Ti rrber product i on capab i t`'i ty - mad i Um ,to h i,gh (rating
of 4 On a scala of 7J:;
9,
W i 1 d1 i fe Habitat: Good hab i tat eX:i Sts on Si top; although, , th i's
s i to is not within ident ified' 'key, 'deer rarrga .
Cul "tura
l Env i ronment
I Oi
Archaoological and Histor1cal `Resources in the area. Survey
was conducted and clearance has been granted (refer to
letter).
11
to County- General �P Plan des igrlat i on . ow r�n
Birt, s i I
. =LD.. tY
Residential and Pubtic (proposed Amendment: Low Density
Re- I deny: i o 1 and Grazing and Open L nd ?
12
Ex i st i n9 Zon, i no:. RT,1 olid R- ,G i
13.
Existing Land Uspr on-site-= One residere9 ;proposed Parcel 1).
Qtherw,i e Undevel''Oped'r Open forest and "wat,ershed.
14
-Surroundine Area.
lir ,
a. Land Uses: Paradise Pines Unit No 13 corft,'guaus on ithe
north anis west. Canyonlands on.. the south and east.
Paradise P i nes L)n i is No an6. farthor a ata -
1
b: Zoninw,`' RT -,i on north and west.
c. Gen Plan des i gnatl oris: Low Dens i tY Res `r lent i al and.
Pub l 'CL
d. war -Gel S i zes 1/4 and 1 /°3 acre parcels int farad i se Pl nos_ .
e. Populatlon. Low cienslty;
15.
Charact6r. of S i tend Area ?'eve l oped Rara,d r se Pines • Thi s
}pro Ject rept-esetiis an' expsns i.otl of the 'ad�iaoert't res. i cent i a�.
suhciivisial=�.,
NUrban Area: Perac3 i se; +/",. 6 in les :
17;
Relevant Spheres o Influence= Del Orr Water Grim"pan'y.
18.
improvements _ Standar^d a Urban Area: No
19,
F ire Protect`i'ii"n .aero
`g_
Troy Estates Tentative Subdiviszan, AP 64-31:-31 4 and 7, (John
Franklin) 33Tots„ 400 ft , plus east from Carnegie Road., along, Troy
Way Magal,ia and
Paradise area.
Public Works co d.tions: -
1
Submit road anal drainage plans to the"'Depa;r'tment o£ F'cb.:L' «orlta:
for approval and install the required` facilities.
2
Provide 20 ft. radiusproperty line returns at all stroot
intersections.
]nda.^ate a 501t. building :setback line from the centrr;Li,nt' u.t
all roads.
4
Street' signs shall be provided by the developer at �r1. street
inter sections per County
requirements. (Submit 5 al,tornoto
names for each street to the County address coordinator for
approval, of street names.
S
Construct ,roll. street section On Troy Way from Carnaaj.a ROad to
Colter tsfay to R8 -4-A geometric standard. Minimum structural
's -action to be 2" AC and 8 AB, SC 250 prime, fog .seal and 95%
rRhlative c0pact on. Submit design to County Dopartmerlt of
Public Worlcs ,for approval, "R" value determinations and other
data
may be required to support: section' design.
6
Construct full street section on culdesac streets to :RS -4-B
read standard with 2" AC) 8" At, SC 250 prime, fog seal and 95%
relative
compaction.
7
Provide monumentati.on as required. by the Department of Public
Works in
"accordance with accepted standards.
B
Street ,grades acrd; ether features shall :comply with the Butte
County Ordinances, design resolution
and other accepted
en�,inear.ng standards.:
9
Provide permanent; solution for drainage.
10
All easements of record to be shown on the final map:
l
Meet requirements of Butte Opunty "ize Department or other
reaponsible:��ency.
12
Street li.gh'ting shall be provided an accprdanoe with J3uLte County
requI.rements,;
accepted design criteria, an recamt»endatLons .af
pw.
13
Pay off asses smen is :
4:
meet the regriiremehis of the utility companies (i.o., PG&G,.
Ncifia-Tel epbone eater,
, weer .."
Itaxes
15
Pay, anydelinquent taxes ar current: as ;regtirecl.
16
Develcsper dial install all necessary t,raF is safety signs
in.cl.uding stop signs.
r.
STATE: OF CALIFORWA--THE RESOURCES ,AGENCY
DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME
0f:�$ii119 0[UIfMEJIAN�oYdrnar'
REGION 7
1701 NIMBUS ROAD, SUITE A
Buf4� Co.RANCHO Picnnin9 Comm
CoRDoVA, CALIFORNIA 95670'
(91'6) 355-7020
FEB 3 1987
orov w; caufGM14
January 26, 1987
Mr . John Mendo-rlsa ,
Assistant Director
Butte County Department
of Public Works
7 County Center Drive
Oroville, CA 95965,
Dear Mr. Mendonsa
The Department of Fish and Game has reviewed the Troy Estates
Tentative 5ubd�visian Ma r
psUbdiVision��pTheaTSN�nsttesubd�v�de
36.8 -acres' into a 32 lot
near the intersection off" Carnle Road
Paradise Pines
ated
and Colter Way in the
area of Paradise: The
arty, dgsignated migratory deer
TSM'site is not Within
range.
through the eastern portion of the T;sm.
Middle Butte Creek flaws
The Department has '210 ob]"eCtons to the proposed fiSM,xovi,ded
a 100 foot build' -Ing set)6ack buffer is `along
side o Middle Butte Creek to pr<.atect
fishery values,
establ, shed _es�ch
the- creek's wildl;fe and
,
I the Department cin be ofurt)<
Terry �yensch, E,nvironr�ental Serv:
trace., please contacTt
' {Ya
(916) 355--7D30.;
.� .rvisor, telephone ,
Y'
LT
L7ames b:. Messersmith
Regional Manager