HomeMy WebLinkAbout065-480-002PLANNING COMM ION' StJMMAFY 'SIIE,"8T. I'Oi LAN IVISioN,s
rIAYa�
h�
13,
TRA.NSPORTATION/CIRCULATION.' Wil1l the pr pbsal
result in;
aw Gene.ration of,substantial additional vehicle
moveent?
m
Jk
b, Effects on existing par>cing' facilities, or
demand for nely parking?
c. Substantial impact on existing transpbrtation
.
system?
,iC c�..
A. Significant alterations'` to present patterns,
of circulation or movement of people and/or
goods?
e . Alterations to 'vatexbbrne, -rail or air traMc?
_
i. Increase in traffic hazardfi to motor' ve}iicics
bicyclists or pedestrians?
SCC
14,
PUBLIC SPRVICES. 11111 the proposal have an O,%.ect
Upon,$ 7 or result in: a heed for now or a1t;ered,
governmental services:
1 1' ire pr0teCtlonl:
b Police protection.
c. Schools?
d. parks of other' recreation,!). .faci;lities?
+aintenance of public facil?tiesa including
.oadsg
ther governm natal services?
15.
th'O p p xe5ult a�'mt
.._.rte �.
a, Use bflll
substantia,losal
a.mburtts of fuel ,or ever ?
gy
b. Substantial increase in, demand upon existing
.L.:
sources of energy, or require the development -
of ni1'l ' sources of energy?
�._
�.
lb.
UTILI t'IES Will the propt�sa1 result it a need for
new, Irstoms" or substa- tial altera'ti,oiis to the
followings
a. Pnwa" oriatural has?'
b , Communications syste,n!� ?
k c.
c: Water ava:a-ab 3a ty,
d. Sewer br aepti'c tank`s
>k
e. Stortri Vate'r drainage?
Xc
f, Solid haste and disposal?
17,
�}uriAr HEALTH. Wi1:;1 the proposal. tesult in,.
a. Creation ai< any hea'l.th a.za.rd br potontla,
Health hazard (excluding Mbntai health)'
bl exposure .bf peopl,e tb potentia.l 'health
,
hazards 7
int
A
AESTHETICS. Will the propotal result i.I the
b59txuct on of any scenic vista or vietiv open tb
tb,r'-, public, or wi.l'1 the propbsal reSUlt in the
_
cteatibn, of an absthetic ally offense's site bpen
to public vibv?
19. RECREATION. tiYill: the YES
A3A NO
upon the,,quality ox quan�itsal xesuit in an impacts
0 0
ppartunties7 Y £existing recrOat%c�rial
20 . CULTURAL.; RESOURCRS
�---.-1
.
a: Hill t e ,proposal result irk the alteration
of 'ox the:'riestructon o ration
a
historic archaeological' sateryehastoric p
b.
ora the propo:;a1 resulrt iri' adverse swc
or aesthetic e���ects to P y al
a pre�i�s
historic l�uildan g, structure or tyrac or
c• Does the proposal °`b,�ect?
have the potenti.al to cause
a physical change which'
^—y-
would afft,ct unac�ue
thnir cuituxal. values?
Mall
the proposal restrict existing z•e1:4,"
or sacred uses; with n the ous
areapotential impact
U. nYSCUSSION..di-.EN1lIRONMENTAL EUALi1ATT0
N AP 65-4$-02
See attached..
I
L
;
i I
i
i
u 'l
�6
;,
.g,.
�� t.