HomeMy WebLinkAbout066-310-012h � G O E' TD E'rr--T `NIX � C N
I4
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL 1�ACTS
I xp anataons o all Oyes" and "maybe" answersare required
ori attached sheet(s)�
`YES
MAYBE NO
1. EARTH; Will the proposal result in significant.
Y
Unstable earth conditions or in changes in'
geologic substructures?
b .
y
Disrup ons, displacemen�s , c,ompaetion or
'soil?
overcovering of the
c.
Change, in topography or ground surface
relief, features?
d:
Destruction,, covering or mod:gication,of any
X
unique geologic oxphysioal f;1atures?
e:,
Increase in wind or water erosion of soils,
either on or off-site?
17,
Changes in depos�.ton Ior erosion of beach'
sands, or changes in siltation, deposition
Or erosion which may modify the channel of
a ,river or stream or the-- bed, of the acoan
any bay, inlet or lake?
g:
Loss of ptime agricultur-ally productive ,soils
outside designated urban areas?
h.
Bxpcstire of people or property to geologic
hazards such as earth wakes" landslides, mud-
q hazards?
slides, g Tou nd, £s ilure o s im�1 ar
en
2; AIR. Will the proposal result in substantial.
a:
Aix emissions or deterioration of ambient:
air quality?
b.
The creation of objectionable odors, smoke
c:
or fumes?
A1teratlon:of air movement, moisture, or
temperature, or any change in clianate,
-
local y or xegonal'7y?
3. NATER. Wil' the proposal result in substa.ntiala:
a.
Chan*es in currents;, or the course or
d�Todtion of wat�+r movements in either
mortise or fresh �rters 7
ti,
Changes in absorption rates) drainage` pat exits
o;r the rate and amount of surface runoff?
_
c.
Meed for o.f'f site Surface drainage improve-
slants) including veg,etat ion removal; ohannel-
iiati'n or cul vert a:nstalla.t�.on?
d:
Alterations to the, course or flow of flood
e+
Change in `ihe ainaunt of sttrtace gator in ,any
wato"r body'?
f :
bi5uhar'ge into surface lv tera) or An zny
altera.tior b'f:sur°Edna 'water qui a ty, incl t d'�ng
buo temperature, dissolved
t iiot limiter t
iC G
glterat�on
oxge or turbidity?
of the ,rirecian or rate.l of fiW
of grouse W'-te "s 7
h:
Change in the Auant.it,y quality: ,crourielater.s
either through' direct additions Or 1Vnth�
drwa s ox througlx antei•c�ption of all
aquifer) cuts or e�ca4�Cat ons
Reduction in t'he amount of �v, ter oihov is,
aVa�lar blo for tjublit grater sLtIpPI .es`
�.
J
Property 'o 1�ratet'
Exposure of peottle or 't
telat,ed hataNs sudh as' f1ood�ng
YES
PLANT LiFB, Wig the
MA'YBB NQ
ptal resuz t in substantial';
a. Mange %n the, divers' ty o species, or
nutrihcr
of any species of, plants :'(including trees,
shrubs
, grass , crops ,- and aquatic plants) 7
b. Reduction of the .numbers a an* ,_.._.
unique'--
o'x endangered species of plants?
c. Introduction
of new species of plants unto sn
area, ox in a barrier; to the
normal replenlh�
merit of existing speces7'
dj Reduction in,
acreage of any, agricultural crop?
5:
ANIMAL LIPD. �tiTill the
---.. proposal result in sb.stntial;
a. C aiige i'n the divPrsi ty cif spe cies
�C
s o�* numb s
Of any species of animals (birds, land aniljtt�,l.s
iricudirxg reptiles,
Irish and shell dish, R
ben.th] c organisms insects)
or ?
b. ; neductiori it the 'numbers 6- any unique, ra,o'
or
endangered, species' Irl animals "?
Intracluction 'c� ne�v species
of animals into.
an area, ` or result 'in ,a barriox to the mx,�;r '
or movement
o animals ? on
d, Deterio'ration to
x
e; isting £} s}7 or wldlil e
habitat?
•
Nps. }1�i11 thepxoppsal ---
result in substantial:
a. lncreas.es in exis ti11g noise
` .
�
levels?,
b , Bxposure ai people to severe noise I'oVols 7
—
7
LIGHT AND GLAgn, Will the � r oral ,
t�ttce
gm ficant light and glare? pro
;
- -
,
LAND' USB tiVill the prciposal•esult, in a.
'.su s`w .i - ..
an.t� a a
l l tet atzo . of the present
Iand use of a7 aria? ar planned
9 .
NATURAL RBSouRCI.: Will the
$u stant al, , proposal rostilt, ;in
a • rncrase In the rate ous of 'n; Y natural
resburoes►
• De Pletiori' of Mny Pion -ren otva,i Ie natural,
roso,urces
lbw
RIS}C:UPsET Inl1 the Propcsal iii erre
a• tis ` of exp osi6h
or 'the re�,e.ase o ha
ous s zard-
ubstar�ccs (x�oluding, but not l s!tnitetl to.�
oi] Peg Ci
, c}lemic l s ax` Y`ac}iat�onj in the
event of an, accidont or> upsot co ld t',o s„
b ,, n
ess�b�
_
o in orenca tv3,th an emeegeney
ros.ponsep�lari er emergency :.�Vacudtioft� puri
�<
11:
POPULAT N L+T ll the proposal aI for t`he lot, tinri, ;
xstr� ' c}ensty;
,at, ;or grri�rth rate o the }:umai
'Pop uIat10,
Wi1.1 tl� p 6POSa aftoot e st ih hotxsitt ,
0r create a demand dordd3 Liana
}totsin7
•
YEs
r4AYBE
NO
TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Will the proposal
result in: _
a Generation of substantial additional vehicle
movement?�
b tifecit onexisting parking facilities; or
demand for new parking?
c Sub,staritial impact on existing transportation
systems?
x c
d Significant alterations to present' patterns
Oficulat on or, movement of people and/or
goods?
x
e. Alterations to Waterborne, rail or air I• affic?
f- Increase Li traffic hazards to. motor vehicles,
bicyclists
or pedestiaz�s?
G�
P ELIC SERVICES': Will the proposal havaan effect
upon, or result in a need for nets or altered
-
govern services , _
re protection?':
a Piro
bti Police protection?
_
c. Schools?
d. Parks or other recreational .EacilitleO
e,. rgaintenane of public facilities s inclt�d.ing
roads?
f Other governmental, services?
X
z.
18o
ENERGY, IV 1 the proposal result in:
ae of substantial amouttta o l fuel . or energy
b Substantial �nciease i an upon existing
sources of energy, or rer{uire the development
of° new sources ofener.g",1.
j(
15.
UTTb1TIE 8,Will the ptopo`sa1 result in a need for
new Sy or substanta.al ;Alterations to the
iastems,
io'l.l. oang _
a. Power or natural
b Communications eystams?
Ob Water v4ilabilityi
d. Sewer nr gap tio t&ftk?
e tort 'Water drainage'?
f. Solid Waste and 'cis'posal?
17,.
10,M, .4EAL'Tx. Will the proposol result in
C'I.L Creators o f anihea1't t haard or potential
health hazard(exclutlit�g menthl health) 7
b. Etiposure of people to Potenti'a1 ndaltl
h9a z aids ?
1$..
7155'�t )r'r' CS Will, the ro os. result LA ago
obstruction,
structio1 of ;any scenx,cp�rista o'r vieW open to
t`he public; or will. 1�ie proposal result i the
creation of an aesthet-�ca11.y o, ensue sate aper
to public Griew?
�
MA--. �-EE
i9. RECREATIUN. Wi11 the
NO
proposal', result iii ari mpat
P the opportunities?ty 'or Quanttry of existing recrGatainal
20.CULTURAL RESOURCtSI.
a'i11 the; proposal result in the' alteration
of,or the destruction of
a
historic archaeological site ehxst°ric or
b. Will:; the.; proposal result in adVerse physycal
or aesthetic effects
to a
historic building, Prehistori:C or-
'Orr
�haveuth.e
c. Does the, `proposal pot6ntre
balcto cause
a physical change Which
would affect unique
ethnic cultural value,?
A . Will the proposal restrict exis ding � el.i gi ous'
or sacred
uses within the potntial impact
area?
Ttl SSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALi rATION
AP 6631,..12
See attached. _
w
�t,
Applicant: Safor Corpol^anon Assessor •s ~ ��
Par�.e i
66= 31-1
Log # 86-11-011102
DATE SHEE L
A. Pro iec't De'sr•
1 -
2:
Type of Project: Tent,at i ve :Parcel 1,11
Brief Description:
Dividing 2..4,acres into t-wo parcels, one
Of 1.8 acre and 0he of 0.?
8.
acre.
1 -00 -at iron : On the south 8.1 deof L a'k er i dge Girt e
.l y
approx I mately 1 b 4 feet T3 est o r" Laker I.dge Court_ , i t) the
Paradl:se Pines -area
4:
north o1 Paradise.
Proposed Density of Develdpment:: PJ/A.
5
6
Amolunt of Impery i ous Starrfac i n g= Potential •i
Ancess
and >�:earest Pub1' i c Road(s) : Property 1 rants on
er i dge C) rc 1,e
'7«
t3
.
Method. of Sewage Dispnsai: ndividua;1 septicystem�..
Source di":Water SupP1y: De
9:
1 0.
Ora Wate^ Company,
Presx i m i t,}r of Po er L i Hess To property .
Pgtental far Further land divisin ns and de�tel opmenit: 1 he
ei'IStIng ZOnIn0 and General Plan '4Il1
per m'It commerceia1;,
deVe1opfient of .the ant1re
property.
Phys i ca 1 f✓nv'i r-onmPn -
1 •
Werra i rt
a« General 7opi7praph i s +Character
Woodedterra I ;: Mie 1 ate i Ve 1 y 1 eve r
n . spase:) y
b►'' Slopes- 0-�
c� i✓le- YatiSn= A r� i
pp x at e liy 9406 feet, t.
d« a
Lim l t i ne i=actorst baVe Sea Leve 1:
None
.,
.
�
a- Types and character-is.tics: Aiken -o a Met
f�lcid O ate hAssoc i
1 y doe, p to de
rocks, P residual 86 11 Move l roped on bays i c
i th ,moderate to s t ow
!oa permeability. soft, gram-jt3H
h► sari ace 1 avers and strong 1 y a l d hst^cI c 1 ay
3 •
subso i t s
im,itin9 i=actors= Areas of s1;oW permeability,
Natura 1 i-iataros `o f the Land
a. i=at^thquakd kine: Moderate arthgUake intensity zone''VITT;
ice. I» r+os i citi i .
.'Potent a1 . 5!'1 i ght .
C. Lands l i de Potfaht 1,61 Low,
d, P i re Lazar=d ►' i gh ;
e« Expansitiie St 1 Pota�n.tisi : ihc►cierate.
4.
Nyd^a 1 ogy
a. SL re dater= Nene on s I to ;
b. Grotrldwaier=
Unk;naWn -
a a Iyr ra i naee' C15a'raCtQr i st i Cs: F'ropehty dra ns
to+ lards
51 a OtUb.i l , I roads i de d i tches ;and tFieeS,it yWa,1jjto
P1a za subcliyls1Oh drainage system4
i
y�
1
i