HomeMy WebLinkAbout068-230-017'
Richard Hobbie, Tentative parcel Ma AP Fi8�23-17 2
P+ , pare. 1a at' the
northwest corner of Loma Linda Drive and Buehler; Ave. Orovlle area.
Engineer: hon GravesAssoc;ates"
u ;
Public. Works conditions:'
1
Provide two-way, traversable"access RS-rJ-LA- to each parcel from
a county maintained. road or, state., highway.
2'
Access to be reserved in deedsi as per county ordinance and offered
for dedicata;an on ,the final map.
3
Show 50 ft. building setback line measured from centerline of access
easement. ;.
4
Provide road maintenance agreement,;
S
Show all easements of record on the final map.
Street requirements of 'the Aepartment of
PubliceWorkspror'name
to�gecorda'torio the final, map,
7
Provide permanent solution for drainage;
8
Provide cul --de- sae at the end of the street at Buehler.
9
Obtain encroachment permit and construct standard road approach
providing adequate sight :distance at the intersection of access road
and county maintained road
10
Pay any delinquent taxes or current taxes as required.
11
Meet the requirements of the Butte County Fire Department,.
Health
Dept. conditions;,
12
Prove that the 'required usable sewage disposal areaexists on
parcels 1 and 2. Combine with an adjacent parcel any parcel not
proven to contain the.useable sewage dispot?,1 area required by the
Subdivit'
ion 0rdinan,cc.
13
Prove that water, is available to each parcel.i if water is to be
`
Provided by Oroville Wyandotte Irrigation District then provide
g , Ovide
a 1e;tte.r of other documentation in that they are milling
and ab1i�, to supply water to the parcels.
t
ENVIRONMENTAL ' IMPACTS
p anata ons o a l "yes" arid' !maybe'aanswers axe required
on attached, shy et(s).j
1. EARTH. iY%ll the YES.
proposal result in significant:
.
MAYBE NO
a.; �Jnstab1e earth conditions or in changes in
geologic substxucaures?
b . Ilis rup 11,1. , di-s.pa acements', compact:ion o r
ovexcovering of the soil'?
c. Change in 'topogr,aphy or 'ground;;s�xrac�
relief .features,?
-
d. Destruct;ion, cavering',or modification, of ally
..-
u�ii.gue geolo'g�c or ,physical features'?
e. Tncxease �.�x or
ic§
wind; water erosion of soils,
either on or„off-site?
----
f. Changes in deposition or erosion,o£ beach
x
r;anas, cr changes in siltation; deposition
or erosion thich may, , dify they channel 'sof
ver,nr stream or the, tied of the: ocean or
any. bay,, inlet or, lake?
g.. Loss: of ;prime agxcultura;Ll y productive soils
...c..
-w
outside designated,urban areas?
h. Erasure of peopl6 or prOp'erty. to geologic
hazards such as earthqua.lrces, landslidesmud-
slides, ground .failure orsimilar hazards?
2. ATR; Wiles the.praposal result in ,substantial:
a. Air, emissions or deterioration of ambient
air quality?
b. The. creation of o.jectonable Odors, smoke
or fumes?
%�
c. Alteration of air movement, moilsture, or
temperature, or any change in climate,
locally orregionally?
3. WATER.Will the proposal result in substantial:
a. Changes in currents, ax the course or
direCtiOr of crater movements in either
marine 0 fresh waters?
b, Changes in absorption rates,, drainage patexns;
or the
rate and amount of surface runoff?
c. Need dor off-site surface drainage improve-
ments, incl,udi'ng vegetation removal, channel-
zzation or culy,ert installation?
d. Alterations to the
course or flow of flood
waters?
e. Change in the amount o surface water in any
water body?
k
f. Discharge, into, surface waters, or in any
alteration of suxface
Water-quality; ihcludi'ng
.' but not limited, to"'temperature, dissolved;
A oxpgea or,turbidity?
he
g. Alterationof the direction -or rate of flow
of ground Waters?
h. Change. in the;qtL n.tit or
Y quality of gt6q-nd waters
ea thex through direct adds tions- ov v th .
dr.awals , or throughinterc°eption of an
aquifer bey cuts ox;'excavations?
i. Reduction in the amount, of water'othexwise
available :for public water supplies'?
j.Exposure
of people .orr property to water
related hazards surh as flooding?
�YES
MAYBE NO
4
PLANT LIFFf;." Wx11 `the pxnpos]�I�re.su3 z an °substantial:
a.C an,ge in the diversity o^f
^ 77
species;, or'.numU'er.
of =anye species of plants (including trees, ^
shrubs ,^' gr'aSs , crops; and. aauatiC plants) --7,
b.^ Re.dud'ut n of the, numbers .61 °
ny un que., ,�rar ,^
or endangered species of planus?
G. InCroduetion of ,Aew" s - p,eCies of i,nte° � "
LX
,planus ,;an
area, or in a`barrier to 'the normal replenish-
ment of existinG. species?
j�
d. Reduction in acreage of any ,agri,culfiura.l
5,
L:, 'LIFE; �1Tx11 the proposal result! in subst€intial
--- -
'zn the diversity ci,
.tinge spe',c� es ox numUexs
Of ;any°species of animals (birds, land animals
i
CludkA, rep it s, sh and shell fish,
benthic organisms or an,sects)`?`
b«
ion
Redactin' the numbers of .any' uzi giie,' r^are
Pr ,endangered species o an5.mals?
c. TntrPdtYction of",neta species o, ana.mals into
tit"
n areor,result in !a barripx to'the ,migxataon
ar movement of animal,
d. beteriora io i tP 'existingg fish or zV3.
tldl;ife
habitat?
6.
BOISE. IVill the pragosal result in sul stantzal
Increases'in' existing. ,rkoise level,s7
b. E;tposuxe of pe .. le to �sevexe
noise levels?'
7.
LIGHT, AND. I GLARE. Will the propasal produce
significant light and:. glare?
8.
LAND USE. 11il1the p'roppsa result in :a
su`�` staiitial =�.l:tovation o the
present or p1'anned
land .use of an area?. ,
9.;
NATtiRAL ..RESQ!URCES: 6V'ill thero.pasal result in
su stantial.
.a« _ Increase, in the L rate of use of any .;natural
L.
resouroe,?
b: Depletion of ,any non. -renewable natural
resources?,
iQ«
RISK..OF. UPSET. Will the proposal involve:
a. A . = of .explosion or, the release of hazard-
Pus substances (including, but "t limited to,
oil pestici^d'es, chemiCalS 0 , rad'ation)' in the
eventof anaccident orupset conditions?
b« Passible interference with°an emexgent;y
response .Pall1ar emergency" evacuation platil?
11:
POPUL1�ThON. Wi11' the proposal alte�x the la�ca°tion,`^"
'distrz ut�on
den;"sit ar
y, growth rate Of th,e human
population?
12.
i�OUSIIVG. Will the proposal affect existing housing;
or, cx�e�ate a demand :far additional housing?.
�C
77777
V+
13.
TPAN$PtORTATION/CTRCt!L.kTION. Wi 11 the proposal
MAYBE
No
result ,in:
a. Generation .of substantial additional vehicle'
movement?
b. Effects on existing parking facilities, I or
demand for
new parking?
c. SubstAntial impact on existing transportation
s,ys terns
d, ;Significant alterations to present patterns
of circulation or .move;ynento.f people and/ox
,goods ,:
e. Alteration S to waterborne, rail or air traf fic?
f, Incroase in traffic }iazards to 'motor Vehicles,
bicyclists
or pedostxtans ?
1�1.
PUBLIC ,SERVICES: Will the proposal.' have an effeot
upon, or` result in a need for new or al t.ered
gove�cnmental 'services
a, Fire pratection7
b. police
protection?
c. Schools?
X
d. Parks of other recreational facilities?
e. maintenance of PUbIir l acilities, including
roads?
f. Other governmental services?
--'
1S.
ENERGY. Will the proposal result in.
Use
a. of substantial amounts of fuel .or energy'?
b. 5ubsttltial increase in
demand upon existing
sources of energy, Or require the development
of neW sources of energy?
X'
16.
UT11 TIES, Will the pro.PLOSaIL result I a need for
new systems, or substantialto the
alterations
following:
a. Power or natural gas?
Communications ` systems
c. Water avaxl,aba l'ity:
- -
d . Sewer bx, septio
e. Storm water drainage?
Solid waste and disposal?
17.
HUMAN HEALTH. Will the proposal result i'n:
a. Creation Of any health hazard or potential
hearth ha;ard le�ccluding mental health)
b . Exposur7 of people ;to 'potential he a!
hoards..
l8:
AES'THETICS, Neill the pro osal
p result in the`
o struct
on of any 8t nic -vista or view open to
the public, or will the
u
proposal result in the
creation of an' aesthetically offensive 'site
to public v1 env .open
.4-
YES
MAYBE NO
?9. RECREATION. Will the proposal Tesultin an impact
upon the c{uality or quantity of existing recreational
oppo.a"tuniies'? ,.
tl 20. -CULTURAL VESOURCES.
a. 71111 t e�proposal result in the,; :al, ter atXxiri
of or the destruction o!f a prehistox•.c or
iistoxxearcYiaeoldgi cal'sits
b. Wall' the .proposal ,result in adverse phys cal
or aesthetic ,6,f f ect8L to. a pr6historic or
histr�ric buildin struct ?
re o o
g, u r bject.
A9�C.
c. Does the pxopo`sa� have, the potential to cause
a physical •change 'which would affect'unique
ethnic cultural values
d, 'Will i1he proposal.-, restrict existi'ng. 'ireliglous
b sacred uses withiii th potential impact
'area?
V. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION' AP 68-23-1:7
See attached.
� � r
"T
0
f(
Applicant:
R i chard...Hobb'i a Assessor "s Parcel
1 .
2 .
Type bf Pro, jec. �.; Terttat`► ie parcel Map, f.
Ear of Descr r pi ion : Dividing �api�rox i mate"i y 7 acres 1 n to,trio
3.-
parcels of anti 4 aches each.
Lacat i an : At the northw0st, corner of Linde Lorrt�.. Jr i Vo and
Buehler Avenues 1n the Oroarea..'
_
4.
I111e
Proposed Density of Devel opinont: 3"1 /2 acres per dive"l l '.i ng
5.
Amount" of I morn i'ous Surfacing -. M in i ma l
Pub i i c Road( s ), P^operty� runts on Pr i ua e
6.
Access and 'Nearest
portions of Buehler Avenue and L i nda Locn�a Or i vo,
of
pub i cl y-tnai nta.i ned „sect'i ons of those: streets extend to the
?..>
property.
E?�ethoci _of . Sewa9e f� i sposal : :nd i v i dual =sept. i c systems f,
8.
Source of Water Supply: Orovil7e-WYer,dotte Irrigation
District.
10,
Prox i m a ty cif Power LI nes" To property .
Potential for further land divisions and development.*.
Exte�r,.ive levelopmbnt could occur under the existing I�-B
an
zoning and Med l unt Density Res i dent i a;l Gen'ara l Plan
des's gnat i on .
B. �h .i r'_ nm�antal Sett nw
,�kvsi cal Eny'i rontnent'� ''
1.
Terrain
�.
P, Genei^dl Topographic Charctet^' Rolling foothills:
b Slopes U20,� �
C,: E.l;erration= gpproximatelY 38[l to 430 'feet above Sed I_avel
d;. L i m i t i rig Facthrs : Some areas of 'steeper s l o�se, S.
2,
Soils
a.. Types and Gharactei^isties. Perkins and Corning soil
Series., gerieral'ly we 11'. draitired with moderate p.erme'abi1 ty
s^ Sotne'areas of shai'1OH so
b: Li:mit%:ng Factoi ^ its.
3:
Natural Hazards r_f the l..artd
arthyuako Zone. Moderate E�artl;auake Intons itY 2ehe
ae
b.. Eros i oin Potent: i a'l : Moderato.,
c.. Lands 1' i de Potent i al : Low.
d„ l=ire Hazard: i0 asstf.ed:
E'cpans i ve So i 1 Potent t o 1 H .'
4.
i-Lvdrt�I'OY �
Surface Wa . Drra i nada s►�al a art the-northerly portion of
ra. yer
tFte pr*oPertY.
_7�
b.. Groundwater-: unknown .
c - iDrra 1 nage„ Character i st i cs : i r"aAerty ;drains QnQra J i y Ea
the north ;toon-sl to dr'a
i 0 eke swa
'd. Annual Rainfall Cnormai ): 26_2.a
e'- i-1 m i t ng factors: Setbaoks.' from dr�a`i nageiNays
V i -Pua`l /Scenic., ua! - Good
b.
. . __.
Acoustic Qual<< l'ty: Gaoc .
-
A i r Qua 1, i 'ty s' Good,'.a
Bial 0911 ca i env i rcanrrl n
8.-
9.
vegetation: Grasslands with scattered oak treaR
V! t dl; f o (-hab i tat=
Sma 1 1 b l rd .and animal s dbmMon : for foatl7
gra `?") ds. ".
CUi tl�rai ,'
ronment-
10 ..
Arct,ac di oga cai and ;H i stor i cal ResoUrces n the area: Low
Bubte 1 County General Plan des.1 gnat a'nn : Medium Dans 1 ty
Res Identia3.
12-
EXisting Zanin9-
1S.
14.
EXisti:ng Land lJst3 on -sine: One single -farm 1y dWe11 ink.
Surrounding Area.
a Land Uses: Sin;le-
b.fam i i'y dwe 1 '1 i rigs at suburban dens it' es.
nn Mn o" R, -a,,, R-1
and A -R.
-
c . Gen Plan des i gnat i cins: Medi um
Lbw Dei1s i t:y . Res i dent i a J . Density Residential, 'and
d- Parcel S1Zes. Generally- to Saore Parcels" i th AaJ,�e l s
as sina3l i
a aA.pr Cl ' l mz tel y 1/2 acme tthe north a 1 cang
o k
Quii ncY Road* _
e; Popuiation,: Iguburban densities.
15.
16.
Character of Sita and Ar�►a:, Urban fringe.
Nearest
Urban Area: Oroville,
17.,
1 s.
Roil evar t Sp,hbr�as of � Infi�Llbhte: OWID, 0'- i 1 1 fir.
improv
19.
s Standards Urban Area: Yes. ,
P�e .,Pr' teat
roteat1on. Service«
al.: Ne'arest County C State. F`i re -Etat i on :a t 1 Y Ridge Stat i. on
#64.
b• Waiter Ava "r 1 ab i 1 ty : Or^ov i 1 1 e-WYandatte l r i" i gat i on
D 1$trict hydrants.
20.
Schools in Area« Oroville 2l men;tary School D`istrIct and
Oroville Union l-i1gh S0-hob1 01striot.
r
-8