HomeMy WebLinkAbout068-343-022�:. �v r� A.gya Yo�l ,tiea'i4��L" .� '-a r+'.�d�,Y:;q.{,,raA».;bk w«.ate ,i7 ,[L'E:4i ♦71 -, k _
a
l�r
ENV,TRONMENTAL 'IMPACTS
xp anata ons o �r a styes" and, �'Ma�'be'i Ant drs .'Are required
,
on'attached sheet�s�� 0SS
MAYBE- NO
1. EARTH. Will t}ie' 'proposal In signi£icant :
�resuit
a:'• Upst`ab e�" earth cozldxt�ons br in changes yin
geeio:gi•G sub s'trucure7
_.._..
b.•'''Dtsviptions, .displacements,, compaction or
ovei:coverz.ng o£: th.e soal?
c, Charge i•� topography orxound surface,
re�.ief features?° M.
d. Desrttc an, coveng dr�nodi£�t� dri .o£ any
'or
,unique geologic phy$a.cal feature
e. ;tctease, in Grind oY 14ater' ^erosion°`of sails;
'
either on or o E£ -site?
.f. ' Changes, ;in depositi,ott dt prosi,on .off, j,b each
, d
sands, or changes in $'11 tatsoiieposition
-
_
or, erosion which may, :%od�,fy -the c-4 nnel o
. a aver or stream or the •bed .pf the ocean, or
'
any bay bilet Ot, lakes .
g. Loss of `prime agriculturally pro ductive.5oi1s
oiit,side designated urban areas?
h. "Eof people br property to geol,og c
hazards 'such as eaxthq'uakes,• landslides, muds
'ar
. g ilure simr hazards?
slides round £a
.----
2 AIR. will tike proposal result in substantial:
a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient
oix' quality?'
b.Thcreation of oby ect.ienable oydors,, smoke
`
ore£umes7 ---
CL. AIter' tion of air, movement)moisture, or
temperature, or any change in climate,_
locally or, regionally?.
-�-
3. WAmER. Will. the proposal iestilt in substantial:'
ax
T. Changes in currents , the COUxse o r
direction of water; ro:vemdats in either.
marine or fresh waters?
--
b, Changes in absorption rates, drainage, pat erns,
runoff?
or the rate :and _amount o£' surf'ace
c Need for off-sitesurface drainage improve -
merits, inclUaifig vegetation removal, c}anne7 -
?,Zc"Gtion Ox ciAlvort. installation?
d, Ali erations to the course, or. £low of 'flood
wat=ers?
e: Change in the, amount of surface water in any,
water body?
£, Discharge. into surface- waters, or in• env
alteration of surface i4ater quality; Inc lti ,,ng
bu.t not limi1.ted 'to t,empetature,• dissolved
oicygen or tuxbi,,dity?
•g; Alteration of the di recta on ax rave of £low
'
o£; ground►aters'"�-
h : change n the ^ quantity yr qua. d y of ground' waters,
w� t1i-
either thxotxgh d� rect adds tions or
dx�a r�ra'Is; ar t}irtiugh i ttercep`t on o£ an<
aquifer by `outs or° excavations?
is Reduction �n the' amount o£ �aater otYterw•ise
avail aIe fog.' public water supplies?
j Exposue of people or property .to Water,,
Tel hazards such as flooding?
Z44
7777,
l .
YE.. MAYBE
NCl'
4 .
PLANT -LIFE. j+Ti-11 to` pr`opo.sal, re, stantial
—. --Mange
a. iri the diversity, d`f spy ; x;es , or, number
of any ",species of plants ° (incltVAIng trees,
shrubs grass , _ crops', ,. azid aquaticplans) ?
b., Reducti,nn of the numbers of 'any uziue; rare.'
;• or endangered ispecies of plants?
c. Introduction, of" new species a plants into; an
area; or Ana barrier tome normal replenish-
ment of exti:sting species?
d Reduct•ian Inacxeagc of any agricultural crap'?
S.
ANIMAL LIFE; . Will the•'propasal result in substantial: x
a� Vii"—ang in the diversity of species, or numb''ers
,-
of any species of animals' (birds, 1 and, animals
xncludIng reptile`sfish and she fish;
benthic organisms, or insf;cts) ?
b. Redurti an :irt the numbers of, any` ung Que, : r,ax;e
°o`r endangereA.species of animals?
c'.; Introduction of .,new species of animals jnto`� -
an, ares, or�;• resu�l aA a barrier to the- migration
or, m0Vement of animal:$?
d Ilet6rIOT9', i!on to existingfish or wildlife
habitat?
6i
NOISE. Will the proposal result in substantial„
a.. Th
Teases in existing noise levels?'
Exposer of people to severe noise' levels?
7.
LIGHT AND GLARE. W`i•11 <` e proposal produce
sxgni cant light and glare?
8.
LAND USE« Will the proposal result in a
substantial alteration of the present or planned
land u se of an area?
..r`
9.
NATURAL RESOURCES: Will the proposal result in
subFt.antia1::
A . Increase in 'the rate of use of any natUra1
resources?
b. Depletion of any, lon�-renewable natural
resources?
`j
h
.10.1
RISK OF UPSET, Will the proposal involve:-
a. A ris�t¢ explosion, or the release of hezara-
aus substances (including, but not limited to
ail.,. pesti:c des , chemicals or, rad ration,) in the
event of an accident or upset :cand:tions?
b+ Possible interference witi an emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
Zl.'
POP[1LATION. Will the proposal alter thelocation,
to batioxi; density, orgicowtli rate` of the human
population?
12...
HOUSING, Will the proposal affect exa,sting housing,,
6" create a demand for additional Ytousing?_
r.
Oil
YES `A4AYBE
N0
13.
TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION; Hf I1, the proposal
result in
a. Gonexatioxiof substantial :additiornal vehicle
movement?
b E.ffeets on existing parking facilites,or
demand for new parking?
c; Substantial pact- o`n'existing transportation
Systems?
d.. Significant alterations to, -Present patterns
of circulation o;r movemont of people and/ox
goods?
e.- A1tratons oto waterbarn.e�, rail or =air traffic?
f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles
bicyclists or pedestrians?'
14.'
PUBLIC SERVICES, will the proposal have an effect
upon, orresult in a need for new or altered
governmental services:
a, Fire prote.tian?
b Police protection?
�.
c: Schools?
d.` Parks or other recreational facilities?:
e. Maintenance of public facilities, including
roa.ls?
f Other governmental services"
----'
15.
ENERGY. Will the proposal result in:
a: Use of substantial, amounts of fuel:or energy?
j
=
b. Sub>>stantial increase in demand upon existing
sources of energy, or require the development
of new sources of energy?
X
16..
UTILITIES. Will the proposal result in a need for
P
new systems,, or substantial al.teratio.ns to the
following.:
a.. Power or natural ,gas l
b. Communications systems?'
c. Water availability:
d4 Seiner or septic lank?,
e.` Storm water drainage?
f Sa-1id waste and disposal?
..
17.
HUMAN HPALTH. Will the proposal result in
a.: Cceation of any health hazard orpo:cent 2. al.
health hazard (excluding mental health),.?,
b.: Exposure 'of people to'potential health
hazards ?
18.;
AESTHETICS, Wild the proposal result in the
as structs an `of any scenic lista or view open to
the pub1ic,`or wil the proposal result in the
creation of an aesthetically off enSive Bite open
to public view?
w • 'YES
MMEW NO
.t+'.n+M
19. RECREATION, Will .Z;he p'roposaI result in an, impact'
h wy
upon the c{uali.ty oar quant-ity of e�csting r:eoreational
,
opportun' t3es?
20 CULTURAL RESOURCES ,
a° Will t, a prapasal result ixi the alteratiam
of 'r the.destructio:a of a prehistorio:.or!
historic archaeblogi�cal,site?'.,"
b. Will the proposal result,.iii adverse,phys3cal
of aesthetic effects to ,a prehistoric ;or
historic building; tiructu"re ar abject?
c Does the proposal hare r the petent'al . to, cause
a"physcsl change`wh'ich would affect uniqub
ethnic cultural -clues?
'the
d. Will proposal restrict existing. religious
or sacred uses }vithin the potential impact
-,area?
V DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMtNTAT,' EVALIjATICIN
y
177:" �...........
a
,A pl .l, cant 3 Rober-t K, ." Thama;r> Assessar "s Parcel
AP 68_343-22`
Log if 87- 0' 1 -27- 01
DATA .SHEET
A ,[ _to. gg*-, naso• 1 of i' an
1 .
Type of ProJibdt;Tentat1) Ya parcel i4ap
2 .
Sr i of Description-. D i v i d1 ng + acres ;1 nto 4 lots o 1" l + scres
each.
Lacat i on: On the. north side of Eclgewot�d Dr+ i ye appr•ox i rnatel y
1 l 60 feat west o f i is i nterseat i 0�n � 1 th H i t de 1 p Aven,r.ie , east
Oroville.
4.
'
ProposiOd Density of Development= l dwell irrg un11f per acres
S.
`
Amount of IM oras Surf ac i rig= 160000 sq;. Ft: 1-
6.
Access and Nearest Public Roach s) Frontage on Edgewood Dr i ye).
access 'Pram new, road to he constrwcted'-,
7,
Method ;of Sewage, Disposal` city' o f C1rov i 1'1 e
S.
Source of deter Supply: Cl . ' .I.D.
9 «>
i'roxi m°i ty of PoHpr Li nes;' To ori g i nal . ow-c.el
10.
Potential for further land d1visions and development- Diwi�Sion
r"iiil Permit construction of 4 hoLises.,.
B. Environmental Sett 1n
P _ s LQ_AJ environment :
1.
Terrain
'a- General` i opograpi-oi c Charaoteri $ase of foothill sl cep i ng°
north'Alesterl, tv an unnamed Swale;
b. Slopes: 5--10%
levation: 81'G -35G ft• A.S.L.
d,.; Limiting FactorsNone
2.
Solis
er. 'types avid Characteristicsw ROdd In0 gravelly sandy Ioom, rod
bj^owin , 7•-12" grad irig Into a very compact sUbso i l > under 1 a 1 n
by , hard pah, adequate surf ace dra i na�3d, sw i ted to or{chzWds .
b. Limiting Factors- hardpan retards subdrain;age"
3.
NatOral Hazards of the Land
a. earthquakd Zone=