HomeMy WebLinkAbout068-343-029L � E<y Tl LIVI,LLIY
e'
Log 11,84 - '02-16- . 0 ----
Project Title
'Tena itiVe Parcel Map AP68S 29 Robert iitl,skey
State CxWqxa.Ttghs
oue- Nun11.01r ( 811I)°matted to St' to CIeari.n hausC)
Coi�t�t�t k''ersaiie��,ltone,Numbrx
Jolhn N16ndonsa. Public Works 4,2 6
- Project Locat cn. approx.. 4uy :Cee'; sou'G,.mu,5 ; uL wtu LI;LLU Z ,6A.Wt
a£ Arbol Ave. ', it cia, le Ave. on the SE side ,or Hildale Ave,,
Pro j c ct 1)escr;i;ption; Orovi 11c
Tentative parcel map cl:i.v-,icting 6.1 1 ' acres to create three parcels,
one at 4 acres _and two at 1 acre each..
I
YES
MME' N0
13.
TRANSPORTATION/C_IRCULATION. Will the proposal:
`result in:
a. Ge ration of substantial 'addit;�. ^y vehicle
mo e ent?
b. E °iec on oxisting parking fac3.ties, or
d mand r,new parking,?
Co S, stanti 1 impact on existing transportation
s'stems.
k�
d. gnificantN'Iteratioins to present patterns
�£
cirtulato or movement of people and/d. '
oods?
e. iterations to atexborne,'rail or air t'ffic?
f. ncrease in tra fic hazards to motor vehicles,,
14.
icyclsts or p destrians?
r
PO Rc SERVICES. Wil the hay, effect
proposal an
upo , or result in a ed for new at 4tered
gov rrimental services
a. Fire protection.'
b. ;Police protection?G
"�.
C. ( Schools?
d. 1Ar—
Parks or other recreatio l.faGilities?e,,
e, Maintenance of publ.c fac` "Mies, including
+ roads'?
f.
_
Other governmental, services?
15.
ENE' GY. Wi the proposa result i
a. Use of substantial aunts of fu 1,or energy?'
b. Substantial increas in demand up n existing
sources of energy or require the evelopment
of new sources o' energy?
16.
STI ITIES. Will t ro sal result r.n a need
p p for
new systems, or su stantia.l alterations t the
fol! owing:
Power
a. j or na' rai gas?
b. Communicat' ns systems?
t. Water:
ri. Sewer or; septic tank?
e.
Storm w. ter drainage?,
f.
Solidaste and disposal?
17.
RUN
AN H LTH. Will the proposal result in::
a. Cr tion of any, health, hazard,or potential
he lth hazard (excluding mental health ?
b. E'posuxe of people to potetial ;healt
azards?-
18.
AE
THET, CS. Will the proposal result in the
o struction tf any vista,oview open to
M .
the public; or ifa, the proposal result in the
creation of an.a.estheticall.y offensive sate open
to public vzel+r?. �.
Data Sheet
continued
b.Ground Water: - Variable aquifers
c. : Drainage Cl�arac'teristicsDrains southeast to a txibutary o'r-
Dry Creek
d. Annual Rainfall normal) : ZG to 28 inches
e. Litiiting factors: septic setbacks Froin creek
5,.
visual/Scenic Quality-Good
Acoustic Quality: Good
Air Quality-' Good
Biological Environment:
8
Vegetation: Generally a cultivated area ranging from olive tr'e-es.,-_.r,
oranges, residential landscaping to natiVq oaks and. g:casaes.
Wa:l.dlif e Habi�,aSmall. birds and animals .common to the Sierra
•
"L'
rooth.ills
Cultural Environment
10i
Archaeological and Historical Resources in the area: Low sensstivity
area. ` No known sites
11.
Butte County General Plan designation: Loi. Density 'Residential
12.
Existing Zoning:, A-R
`I
Existing Band Use on-site:.:One single iam:ly residence
14.
SurvoLinding Are
a» Land Uses: Residential at sraburIban to rural densities
b, Zoning: -R,
,.
dei at' or.s Lot+ Density Residential ,
c den.. Plan _.. _e gn., �- _
d Parcel Sizes: 1/4 ac. to 10+ acres
Population-0
e.
araotev o Site and Area Rural Residlential
iVearaist Urban Area: OrOV3.11e
17`:.
R levant Spl exeS ai Txafluence: Crovi'l1e
18.
�s Standards Urban Arca: 'Yes, .Oroyi�l
p4provemen'e
19.
Fire Protection Servi o-,
a. Xeaxes Cqunty, State) Fire';3t ion ward �31vd.;, I�e� son Ave-
b, Water Availabiiity7 OWID
20.
Schools in Area:
a
AT',I'ENAIX F
Comm OF guTT>3
FNVIAONMENTAT, : CHhCKLlST F.0gj
(ta lie camp;leted hy, LiaAgency
log l 85-06-27-03
T, UMOROUN'D AP # 68,23_3-29
1.
Name of 'prop onent :Tpd Rum
2.
Address of proponent and representative (if appj
1'ed Runge Ron Graven
Y.,O, B.ox 2.042 P0. iox x!86
`vi eLrA -6-
rove
'31.
3.
i?xadct description Tentative Parcel MaU
TT. MANDATORY -FINDrNGS OF SIONTFTOANCB YTIS MAYBE NO
a,-
pees the project have the poteritiul, to degrade the
quality O the envivonmen�t, substantial.j.y
reduce
the habitat of a fish or Wildlife .speciescause
fish or wid].ke pbp, ulation to drop below self-
sustaining levejsj .threaten to eliminate i plant o`r
animal community, reduce' the number or restrict the
range
of a rare or endangered, plant or anima] o.'r
eliMinate important examples of they major periods
of California' history or prehistory?
b
Does the project have the potenuiai, to achieve
short-term benerIts to the detriment
Of long-term,
environmental goals'? (A. short;tel'ail impact On the
environment is one. t!nich occurs in a relatively
brief period of time while long-term
:impact' tvi11
endure into the ,future,)
c.
Hoesthe pyoject, have impacts which aro-.i.nd"ivi,du-
Ally limited bit cumulatiVd1y consi.derablO (A
impact
project may on tWO, or more separate resources
Where the impdct on: each resource ,is relatively
small, but Where the effect of the total. of those
impacts On the
environment is sign.ifi.cant.j j
cl. `
Does the project have environmental effects wliacli
will Gause substantial, a:dvef 56 effects on human
beings, either, directly or. 3ndirectly?
`qE
11"[ . [IFITFRA[INATTON ('Co be Completed by the Lead Agency)
On
the basis of this initial evtluatibn;
„
T/IVE find, the proposed pro•jec� CO1[LTl NOT have a significant effect
o.n theent�iranment, and a NFGA'PTVF :17HOLARATION "
will be prepared,
fln;d that although the proposed project could have a signiCi-.
cant effect on the environment, then°e Will not be
a sirttaca'nt
effect an'tlais Case because tilts r1ITfGATzpN 1`4f.1 S0i1F5 described on
the
attached -sheet have been, added. to the project. A NICATTVF
DULARATION' will be 'pxepar,ed.
T/)YF Cind the P=roposed Jroj'ect MAYhave a sSgriifacant effect on
the environment, and an, ENVTRONMVIN' AIA
4
IMPAGT OPORT is.r`egLi" d,
I?A'I'1':
, 1y 2`5, 85. _� w COUNTY or tUTT.11 PLANNING DEPARTNjFNT
t auxa ut,.tl e,Assoc ate p7 ginner
Rovietved. by F
k
t
Iv . ENV! RONI NTAh IGTS'
xp ana'tions o a "yes1-' :and "maybe" answers are required
CF
on attached sheet,$)� -"
YE5
.MAYBE' NO '
1. EARTH.' Wili the proposal"result in .signzf?icant:
a. Unstable earth conditions or, in ;changes in
t.
gen].ogxcII,,substcuct'ures''
b. Disruptions,.displacements, compaction'o,r:
overc'.overing of the soil?
c. Change n topo;gxaghy or ground surface ',
features?
relief
d': Destruction, covering or mndifi,cation ,of,any
; x
uri;Lquo geolog;ic,,or phy,s,ical features'?
e, Increase in wand or, water erosion of -soils,
eithe'r on'.or qff ,sa e?
f. C�-lange.s in, deposition or erosion;. of beach
sands', or,'changes in Slitation, deposition
or erasion which may modify the channel of
a river, .or stream or the be.d of the ocean or
lake?
y"
anyb,ay inlet or
g,• Loss .of prime, ,agricultura.11y ,productive soils
outside designated urban areas?
h. exposure .of pe'oplo or property'to, geologic
hazards such as eWrthquakes landslides , mud_,
Aides, ground failure or similar hazards?
w,
2. AIR. Wil the proposal result in; substantial t
a'. Air emissions or deterioration of ambien'
air aualit}�?
b. The creation of objectionable odars,;smoke
or fumes?
c. Alteration of air ;movement, moisture, or
temperature; or any' change in climate: }
'l.ocaly
Or regionally?
3. WATER,, Will the prnpasal. result in substantial:
a. Changes in currents, or the course or
direction of water ' avemen. in;eitheI
marine or fresh water's?
x
b . Changes in al�sarpton rates, drainage pa.tterris ,
'runoff?
or the rate, and amount of surface
Ci Need ;)r off-site surface drainage improve -
menu, including vegetation r'emoval,' chanziel-
zzaton or culvert ins`tallatian? _
d. Alterations to the course o'r flow of flood
waters?
e . Change in' the amount, a Sur'£ace water in any
water body,
f. nischarge. into surface waters, or in any
alte.xation of sur.zae, �aatex, qua] 2t�! s incdu ding.
but,,, lamp. -ted to tem e.ratU e diss°olve
p.
'
y'o en oryturbid.ity?
VY g
g: Alteration aaf` the direction or rate of flow
of ground waters.?.
h.. 'Change i:n the quantity, of gro�.�nd waters ,
:.
either through direct additions or with�i
drawals,; ,or through intercept inn of:' an
aquifer by cuts or e: cavatians?;
,Rea' in, the° amount.. of water otherwise
available for public w'atex supplies,,
Exposure of peop.e or property to Water
related hazards such as floodin-g?
,
YES
MYBE NO
4.
PLANT, IPE. Will.:the proposslll.X.es•ult;in substantial
a. -Change, in the :apecies, ox number,
:of anyspecies of, plan4,s. c'iuding �t�rees,
shrubs ; *!gray`s crops , and :.aquatic olnts):
�
b. rRe-,ductian' o.f the ,number, s,, o; .an}*. unit�ue,; rare'
dr ,endange,rect.speciss of= plants?;
c. 'Tntroduct� on o'f .new ypc ;cies of >p:lants into n
or to .aa ,bartie t4 ,the normal replenish-
me.nt, o,f iexsst na spec .es? G
s
d .Roduction��� an �acroa�e, of,,any a.grcultuxa� C.,911 P., 7
5.
ANIMAi; .'L' IFt Wil l the, proposal in subs tant�."al :
,result
a. C ange 'iii the ds.versity of5°ecies, �or number
of any species of anzm°lg.(birds, land animals
rP`
Iftclu In'g rep. 3. e- is aril s}rel fish,'`
berit}i'c organisms of irisecfis)'7`
b1.`
b . :Reduction' in nhe numbers of any "6 iqu6, rare
or endangered ;species of animals?
c. introduction of new Species of anini s into
'a
an area,. ®r ,result inbarrier to 'the' 'migration
'or movementT of. animals T
d. ,aZie cerioration to existing 'fish' or Wi] &life
Yrab� tat?
i
6.
NOISE. Will the proposal result in substantial:
T. increases in existing noise levels.,
b.aposure of people to ls?
p'v`ere noise' leve
7.
,LIGHT .ANJ CLARE•. Will
1l the o oral produce
p. P
sign i.cant 1`i ht and glare?
g
8.
al .result. _in a;
sul)stantia!' alteration. of ttie present or planned
land use- of • an Axea?
9
NATURAL R 5.OU 'Cgs ''ill the result 3n
,proposal
su stan,ta
a. ..I•ncreasein the rate o, -use of any natural,
resources'?L
b. Depletion of any nonrenewable natural
resources?
1U .
RISK` OF UPSET,. Will the p.rgosal. involve w
F. h
a. A risk""T explosion or t e release of hazard-'
ous substances (including, but not limited to,
oil, pesticides,;, chemicals r radiation) in the
event of an accident a.r upset conditions.
b. Possible interference with an emergency
:r, ponse plan or oinergency, evacuation plan?
11.
POPULATION- Will the,,pxo}iosalalter the. location,
distribution; den-siay, or growth rate of the Shuman
w
.`popul,ation?
12:
HOU91NG., Will the proposal affect existing ho'us'ing,
or, create 4 dmnand for add a tional housing?
''
h
r'1
5
YES
MA.
NO t
13.>TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION'.
W 1"1 the proposal
result . "i 57 _
a. Generation of"substantial additional vehicle.
movement?'
b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or _
demand for nein parking?
c. Substantial impact bo, ;e transportation
systems?
d, Significant "alteration's to present patterns
Of circulat"ioai or ;movement of people and/or
goods?
e. Alterations to waterborne, ;rail or air txaffic?
;,
f. Increase in •traffic hazards to motor ver�'idles;,
-
:-
bicyclists or pedestri.ans?i
t
14.
PUBLIC SERVICESWill the: propos al have an effect
upon,, or. resulT in a ,deed for new or a.ltere;d
governmental setVi'ces
a. Fire protection?
b . Police Vrotec,*ion.
c « Sciiogls ?
d. Parlas or other recreational facilities?
"Maintenance
e, of public .�ac'ilities, including
roads?
f. :Other governmental services?
15.
ENERGY. iY111: the proposal result int
a. se of substantial amounts of fuel Or energy?
b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing
sources of energy, or require the developtent
of new sou), of energy?
16.
UTILITIES: Will the props al result in a. need for
new systems, ar substantial alterations to thefoilOwing:
a. Rower ..nr. natural gas?
b. Comrnunicat:ionsSysgems?'
c: Nater availability, :
d. Sewer" or sept'i'c tank?
e. Storm water drainage?
f. Solid taaste and disposal?
17.
HUMAN HEALTIL {fill, the proposal result in:
a. Creation of any, health hazaxd or potential
health hazard (exclQ ing menta] health)?
b, Exposure
,
of people to pbtential Health
ha2ards?
18.
AE5T14tTTIC8, Will,the proposal 'result Sri'the
obstruct, o i of any scenic Vista',. or 'v ela open to
the publa`c; o` wil:1 the prd osal result in the
P
creation of an aes,hetcally offensive site open
ublic
top vier ?
-;4_-
YES
M&BE NO
10. RECPE'.ATIOil Wi11 the proposal result in an impart
upon the quality 'qr. quantity a£ "exis.ting re.cr.e;ational
'
opportunities?,
20 . CUE'1�URAL RESOURCES
Ail, Will the'proposal result sari the a'itex;:atacin
o. ox `the` des it o� a pxehrstoric' or
' h stotiG archaeological site'?
,.
l'. W11 the proposal result in adverse plys:.ca1
6?,;'aesthetic effects to 'a prehistoric or
h'�.st:cixic building i. strUctuire ox abject?
c. iJoes the`propoSal"Nave the potent:aal 5to cause
'
ao Physxc�al. chanxe whs.ch'`Would affect unique
ethnIc dultural 4tral ues?
;;
d. Wthe proposal xestr.ct existing x ligiaus
a`r sacred.' uses ws tlxan the potential impact
Y
area?
...
v. bISCUSSION OF' ENVIRONMENTAL EUALUATIION 4
�3
' i8' �3429,
See: attaChed.;
4,
�r
r
r
:. ... ....:.:. .. .. .:.... .... .. . ... _..,_.: _rte -r . .
'�
S
Applicant Ted Runge As: sessor's'ParGel
6a�:S4-�-29
Log# 85 06-27..05 r
PrOAect
DATA SHEET
r
DescriA -on`
s,
1
TYpe' of Pt'.Oj t, Land division. '
2
Brief `l7esc,ription= T��ntativ0 Parcel 'Map div,+.cling 4 acres into,
four, I -nacre parcr l,s:o
3
Location: Approxitnat8y of
r the;
int61'ipiiLidtloin,of Hilldale and; Arlapi Avenu®s, onthe south side
of Hi.l.idale, Orovil.l.e 'area.
4
Proposed Dens'ityr of L?c�velop;nont, 1 dwelling unit/acre.
5,
Amount; of Tmperviau Surfacing.• +/ 65,500 sqquare°feet«
6,
Access and Nearest Public Poad(s.7: Private road access off
HilldaYe Avenue.
7.
Method of Sewage Disposal: OMID.
8.
Sot;reA, of Water Stipply� Individual wells.
I.
Proximity of Power sines: To or gina`i pareel.
10
Potential for further e land di risiorts and development: General,. ,
Plan would permit 24 dwelling units 'on site, 6 dwelling
units/acre;,
B. Enviranmgmt.
1 settkn
Phvsl .a? Virp'm
,�� l�.i���r' .-ent.
1.
Terrain. -
�
a.. General: Topographic 'Character• Rolling foothills.
b.' �;�1
Slopes: 0%.
c. Elevation*340-4001 A-,8,11,
d Limiting Factors:
2
Soils ;
T'pe e and Cliaracter^ist,ica: Redding Gravelly Bandy Loam:
b. Limiting Factors: Slow permeability,, sha]low. soils.
3
Naitura;l, hazards of the Land
A. Earthquake 'Zone:: in Foothill Shear Zone, Moderate
Earthquake 'i nteinsity, Zorie v I i .
b. Erosion. Pot®ntiall Moderate to high.
c, Landslide Potontj,al=' Low.
d.` Fire Hazard. Ur�c;lassified:
e. Expansive Soil F'otenti.al High.
4
RydrCiogy
a. Surface; Waters Smaj, creek is.soUth property line.
b. Ground Nater: Unknown resource. ,Hearth Department is
requiring proof-of.w'ate.r
c.' Drsinae Characteristics: 1) r` s
ins to outhwest.
d AnTival.Rainfal1 �riornal ): 26�-28:•:
e. Ll;iting Factors,: Availability of groundwater, creek
setbacks. �'
G
visual/Scenic Quality: Fair,
6
Acoustic quality. Good.
7.
Air Quality: Good.
,7 .
Biologic-
l . nv; ronment
8.
Vegetation. Grassland, Oak Woodland.
9
mamals.
Wildlife Habitat: Pair; ;small birds and m
�ul.�-cural
,`Enyirontrl�_
1,0.
Archaeological and:+ Ii;dtor•ica;l Re�tburrces in the atwea: Low
seneitjvity area. No known site .
91.
Butte County :General Plan doi.gha an;: Lnw, Density
Residential. _.
i�ti,ng Zoning,. A ,V
1:3.
EXisst,ng Land Usen=site: npen,:lAnd «
14.
SurroL►nding Area:
a". lr,.d Uses: Single-famil-y residential:. Steven's Market at
Arbol and Highway, 162.
b. Zonings A-R# H-C along 1,6a frontagoa.
c, Genii Plan designations: Lara Dtm kt3'r Resideritlal,
Commercial urban Reaerye.
cl. Parcel Sizes: Ranges fr°'om 1' to 21 acres' 2�5 .acres
ca�nttrtan-.
e. Population: Low density area.
1'6.
ChAractor of Site and Area: Ruiral residential.
1.6.
Wearoet.: urban Area:' City .of Oroville.
17«
Relevant Spheres of Influence. City .of O`roville, NBPUD, OWID.
i`8.
Improvements, Standards Urban Are : UJariimxyrovemehts
required.'
1'9.
Pira f'rotoction Service:
A. Nearest Coiabzty C State 5 'Rice ;station e Station '64, Nelson
Avenue A6,
b. Water Availobility: Fire hydrant 500' east on Hi�ldale.
20.
Schodls ins Area: Oroville Rlementary and High Soh,00l
Distr3<ctas. _
I,