Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout069-320-019a �Y•�. '1.'r%•7a . T .++r w+' ^e T`+ a� •..�.,. .�.. "t � �I �-t•4F h.. 'v i � v� ; t• '�►�hme H.Ck1YX To tAL rUu6tic - ufd rJrWC rNv' f+A,��,: . ,_ LA►co � N VAg1Ar/�;as-'aoNli/d oxi� n, APPLICANT !R�CC.IV.Ed FROM . rr - •• ,'fld: 'N kCCIJCo'. WOp kf kp ATL dOCUN KiiTi /1KA�.TN j r i Inter -Departmental Memorandum Butte County Advisory Agency PROM: Planning Director S[rB,IECT kREVISED Report on Boundary Line, Modification an Tentative ]Parcel Map for Robert George, AP No. 069-320-019, 028; and 029 DATE: January 16; 1992 This is a proposal to divide '3.09 acres to create two parcels of ane plus acre each, The. {imsont zoning is AR (Agricultural Residential, 1 acre parcels) and PQ (Public, Quasi- Public). The Land, Ute Plan Mapof the Butte County General Flan designates this area as Public. There are no specific or community plans for the area. The, proposal does not conflict °with County Zoning nor any adopted or proposed` Element of the Butte County General' Plan n, or any specific or' community plan. The mitigation measures identified by the Initial Study have been met and, therefore. a. Negative 1]eclaration has been recommended for the proposed project in accordance to the California, Environmental Quality Act and forwarded to the Butte County Advisory Agency within, the required 105 days pursuant to the. California: Public Resources; Code Section 21151:5. Recommend approval of the Boundary Line Modification and Tentative Parcel Map for Robert George, AF No. 069-320-019; 028, and 029; ,subject to the following Conditions Conditions ff : faes shall be paid pursuant to the; X, A Development Impact Fee for. 'Shericiliti provisions of Chapter 3, Article II of the $utte County Code, prior to issuance of building permits or Use Permit lir the case' of a mobile home parlc. Said fee amount will>'be deter'imned and calculated as of the date of application for the° building permiit or Vse Permit. s 2: All Tots shall be subject to the Oroville'Area Traffic Impact Fees and .said owners r agree; ,prior to ° jrecordation of their final map], [issuance' of any building permit.. in connection withor ."related to,' theft tse ermitj; fo pay such Transportatiorf ' Impact Mitigation Fees as..may'be imposed 6' an Ordinance of general application adopted by the Board of` Supervisors of the County of tutte' as to discretionary ;and use entiflement 'reviewed and approved by the County, Xt is understood that: suoh fees shall be deposited by the'County'into aseparate designafecl County hind limited %o use or the intended purposes of ` mitibating impacts on the.; transportation system withiti the C)raville Area Land Ase Plan Area] in accordance wrtfi the, Agreement 'signed`December 9; 199] by Robert R. and Barbara George. 3I:bd Y n. APPENDIX Fide No 069-320--019, 028 & 029 L64:1Na. 91-0541-02 AP Np. 0697320-019, 028 & 02,91 Z. MACRGRODND �" i a. Roder Ceorge 35 Coho�ddtjrtM trtov1110, Calitotrlla;'4345b Parcel Map to divide 3,o4 BCre11 t0 Create, two parcels. at:one rrlu"S actes, each, 3. Project 'descrlptlont`soundary Llhe Mddifrcatldn and Tentative YES a+AvnE ►� btsdu89TON Off' N(1XRONMFNTAL EV�3,UATZON "2iANDATORY FTNDTNGB OF tiTr;NIFTCANCN ��. Does the project have' the"potentP'al to degrade the x This proposal Will not sIgnl'fIcant Iy degCad'e the eifvironmenC, quatltlf of the env[ronment, sobstantIaIty reduce.the- habitat of a i'wl or WIIdilfe species cause;a fish of yrll;dl,I`fepo0ulattoil todrop.below sePi-swAatnPhg; revels, threaten ,to ellmina e a plant, or animal, carmunity, reduce the. number or, resto ct the range. Of x rare or etoapgered pIant'pi anlmal or el;iminake 1lrportant exarpt•as of ma jor' pet cods, o[ Ca 1 i f orni a hi -story or prehu taryt �2. paes the pro ha+z.� the0otentPa'I to achieve'_ j This proposalWi11 not impede long-term environmental goats, short-tr�rm benefits (4 the detriment of Poad-tarm, enviroorrknt goais2 to short-term:AAVact on, the environment is one Which occurs I[i & {el�atively brief per iad' of'time while Ions-ter'm Impacts "v[l i l and tit e"It) to the future,) ; a. pots the project have Imoat ts WhI6h.ara tndividuaily x ThIt' prcposa'I may have a stgn(fi;carit"cumulative, Impact 'on the Ilmfted but c0mul,atlyaly nonslderdble7 "iA projrct envl,4onment. may Imp -act, orti tn�o or more separate resources Wherr the Impact 0 each fell �e_ is relatively small, but 'Where the, effect. of the totaP of those impacts � On, the environment It signlCicankEJ �a; Kaye ehvtronment-at effects Whtch Thls proppsat WIII "not have' a sifn, Pilean. t ndverse�a(feet on human t 4, pots :'the .Dtoiect Wlil eausq tubstantPal adverse 'effects orf huma!% beings, ` either directly of i'hdirectly7 TTT. DIETEAMTNATIt�N 2 / on a bas s a thls�initlal :evalzra,tlori; l/WE.f"rhd the: pr p6setl pro)cct i%7ULp NO hjVe G l 13M lcan.t . elfect on the enVlrohmeni acid a NEcArIVE DECLARATION 4rCli be prepated, " D have a&,s hl�l�cant efftct o11` he envl�rorament;., thele i 111 not be a sidntfl"carlt �7ffpct In ihis ICWE find khat, at though the proposed Pfoject'Doul g case trecause life Mf7t.G�iT1a1J" ropose described on the attached }heel haiv'e been added to the project. A NEaATIy9 DEaLARATPprf will be prPpated, kt � 11W the_,pr osed project AU1v-have,a slgritll'eant eit�ett or► lite etivl'wonmeot.; and an ENVIR(MJMtr#At t.MPAGT RgPbRT (steggired, 4, .find (bUN1Y/4 Vf7E: Pt ING Tut " ;DATE` 7Pa�l fit, 't94t Dy"" ©rent L, Moore .i t}ev I cured by: r :. tRONMEEQTAT IMPACTS vEs MArnE r,o-, DISCUSSION OF ENVY R0NMEWrAtEVALUATION t, EARTH; WIII I hei proposal result In'slUhl ficant a. unstable earth conditions( or changes In x The propc-sal :Will ndt affect subsurface earth condlIIon s. geologfc substructures? b, oisrUptfon, 'dIs iacement, compact lot or. [he _ k Thls proposal will resUit to some dISruptton, displacement. over covering of soils canpactjon and overcoveririg of the site as`a result of development or addl,lonal"huresites, driveways.;parking areas, ¢ic. T e protect site 1,s' characterized by a relatively Ievet terratn locateTon a hill top which'WIiI require minor earthwork to provide building pads,. The density home of one pet acre is will reduce mpacts to a fess than stgnt�f leant 1'eYe`t� C4 Change ln, topography or 'ground surface k The protect s►te is characterized by relatively level hilltop which relje,f f.eatUrest yvitl 'requite: only, minor. :grading;. to accommodate the proposed res a developnient. The proposed TPM Wiii allot( two additional hsentlai at the'profa,rt site which wit also requ(,re scmz gradtng, Cf, oestructlon,Coverirtg.o( modltIcatfon of aniY is The p'roj'ect site has no unique physical featprIas, ea Unlq,ye geologic or ,physical (tureiz a. increase totnd or watereroston o1 solls,� x rhe p'roposal'wl►l moa cause�etosion el that on or Ott s uet t, changes In deposition of erosion o:beach' "— -- z The proposal will not affect any Watercourse, sands: cr changes ,fn sfItatJon , deposition or erosion etch may modlfy the, channel of a river or s ream or' the bed: of 'the,bcearF Or ant+ ,bay, ihlet or taker g, LOSS,of .pt1tne agrtcut tura'Ily praductiVe.� x, This p'ro,osa�t` doe��" ;,not rep'(esPnt a sC9nlf1canE, pri sofls':outsld0 designated urban area,$ agticufturat softs < The protect sl:te is Located wlthin ;hie urban i area,oforoviaje., tI. Exposure '01 Poo p10 or property 10, geologic _ X All of But County Is in,a Moderate;.Earthquake Intenslty zone vitI hazards such .as eat°thpuakes, landslides,.' the project s.lte Is located within`200 feet or a concealed fault (fine mudslides, ground(allure oirstmilar` and several ljnea'ments, and *1thift one of JWo miles of the swain hazartls; �i H111 Lineament. and the Paynes Peak tileainent, A CeologllcSUrvey t Wi l tie required to assess the seismic r U5,"Of the protect: sl to and propose mLtlgatlott l.Wasur'esror siting requlreroenis,a5 necessary-. AIR. `WIl► the propo;'ai ,resU:It In substantial: a, A r emissjoris of deter.iof9(jb of'.ambient X, The p'roposed;pvotect, Wili result In a cumulative impact on air A r que11tytf. �. .'� quality due, to related fncreasos. In tfat(tc generatetfby the 'proteci,, ''The Calilolhit Aft Resources Conttbl Board has, Identifietl BUtte County' as a, Nona'ttainment Area In meetln'g the s'tandattis of ti,e C41tr¢rnia Air Quality Act. ,The Butte county Alf Pollution control Plan roes not address air quality Impacts oC sepall tes;ltlentiai y' develooments for ptlsslble.mftlgation measures b. The creation oG obrestlonabte odors,. smake� �,-'s. k some short term air 'trustily mpadtsWiI probably resUlt du'ttng tris or fumes? co�rst�uctlon 0,hases devaioping re ldeftlat housing. I'.icreased , �o( d ns as we ars rrcreased dust Ur ng slto and•eetparatCon grad[ ,9 WII h �#.6Ccur,, " c. nJ tera,tlon of air movement„ rr�lsture o'� �X The proposal wf l l not. of feet tfie atnosphere, �eemp11A,ure, or any Vo -tri climate, Y or regionallvt 3.. WAt'Eft WfII the proposal re3utt to ''subs lariat°al ss I1 3 ; rTIM enta;1;-ChecklisE oz de dal amtact T IV' 'IMPACTS '(Contlnued) NO DISCi ggioN o r Enw atomigNTAL EyALUATiON_ (cont hued) a, Changes in currents, or the course or Ic The proposal wiil not a"tfect any WatercoUrse, directlan of Water -movements In either matfne or fras(s #,a(df sr, b, Changes In absorption rates, drainage -x -- . The proposed; project will not 'significantly change the absorption patterns, orthe rage and amount of surface rates: or the rate and amount of runoft due to thefproposed density tunoflt of one dweliIno Unit per acre, c, Need tot _ o'ft-sit© surface drainage k.. It Is'_ anticipated no drainage itaprovemehts *�lI be necessary to Improvements, IncludIng1rVegttatfoo removal: accommodate the ptoposed project. The proposed density of the channet'izatlon or culvetL,dnstallationr project will (educe Impervious surfaces on the rile and allow storm Wateralso slopes into r to be retained on site. The project sitealsosl oroville and any storm Watef runoff. Is anticipated flow Into , the tl, Alterations to the course'or flow t (.rood X Wi i i not atter' the coU rse or flow of flood waters. the, Wa-tats-1 ` protect,sfte dralnS into the Lake orovitle-which cnnlrolsreleases onoliiet, sale er RIVet to control flciodi'g conditions. e. Chan'oe In "the amount of surf ace Water (many X tnot of water to Lake water body?: o resUltg 1f posslbfecinerrdaied sounl tl p Ilewas rm Waler runot6. I, Discharge Into sur -face waters, or-Ir1 any ." X The proposed.pfoj0t wilt not impaect surfacWa e ter guallty, aIWation of sUttate Water quality, but not ifmited to temperatUfe. Incf�ing btr - lndt ved ygen or;tutbldit" g, AlteratIon of the difectlot' of rate of f-lovi x - The proposal Witt not affect the dlcectlori�q( .flow of ground water`i. of groUnd Waters( h> , _h in th'e guantIty of qU'a"lfty of groUnd k- The proposal wt I not dlree,t v after any aguiler, waters, elther through direct addltIOnsor withdrawals, or through IhterczptIon of an, aquifer by cuts of excaVationst i, Reduction in the aMUnt, of Waley. ot.herwtie X the "Proposed- brotect vrill not slgnrflcan.tty Impact public Water ' ava,ilarite for Obliti Water-sUppite`St supplies,. J, ERposUre of people ;or property t0 Water- ,x The ,proposal wlil�not- expose people' of property lo,;Water hazards or related hazards such as flooding? 4. PLANT-IFt— Wlil lie oroposal rESUtt in:, ttoodino" �� ��. su s_.an a r, . a, change In the dfvet -1ty, of' •pecles, or __ .r � The diversity or Plant species WfII,btu expanded ts'tesldenti;at lion number of any spddlet -of, plapts OhctUding�� native landscapes are instal led,- No substanttat �'reductlan of We tree, shrubs, glass,, crop's„ and agUatic number of ex'itting species'Is totItIpaled due to the_pattdl sizes plant s}� :. ,� regulred biy t1e elting zoning cla3sltfcatliln, 'ti, Reduction o't'>ihe numtiprs of raro,; "_ _ The prolect x'.i to conlafps no: rare or +�ndangete . pt ants g ed spect ,tit pf antsy plants? c, intfdduca of neinoecles, of plants Into; x The ptoposai rll,ll, not At Oct existing plant. Itis, ao atea, or In A b to the, ngrma fepienishmenE of extartier sting specfes7 d« Reductdo cut tura( In acreage of 5dy. agri .. x The SCto does,noi'contain an y to* Mta"lly V'IAble agrltul i0fa1crOOK COO?n 5, ANIMAL LiFS,', Will the �2� propos'at respit in' subsliant al, a, 'Change In the divetsltY of Sfsea'ies, or is 7h"e pkop'osaj _'will not, atfecfi dnimal Ilfe because tJre slid daes no's nu'mbors of anY specie of anir>als bt[ds„`supe It slgnlrf,teant;animat"tile :or,.63bitat,;, ` �. vraau>yxr<al Check�i;sti~ *-,Evaluatioaz cf En�,ir>ulaaoniGnl Imp;zat v? . ENV'IRONMENtAt IMPACTS (Con 0nued) YE -S MAYuE No DISCUSSION OF ENVTROAiMENTAij ETTAL'ITATICiN ;'cont l nUud): land animals', Includtng repti.fes, fish and . shellfish, benthic;orgarfls,ms of iris,ts)? b; Reduction In the numbers of any unique, tar'ex 'anlmaisi The,sfle contains no rare animals. Of endangered species, of c.' introduction of new species of anlmals into X The: proposal will not atfecl eXlsting animal life, an ;area+ ori ln'a battler, o the migration or movement of, antmais7 d, bet6fiofatfan of eXlsting. ttltat? fIsh of�:wiidfile X;..- Theyslto corttalns no significant, wildlifehabltat: Sw NDI'tt Wlil the proposal result in substantlai au rncfeases in ex i'sti,ngnorserevels? x The rproposaf will not result In a subs'lantlal Increase in noise cfea;ted ort sate ,or In the VfcrniYy. b. EXposUre of eapt p e to seve,te noise leveitt x The 'proposal will not expose people to severe no levers. 7, LtCFi7. nH¢> .CLARE. Will. 'the proposal produce s gn rcan 9 attd glare x'The proposat Will ,not result in a substantial Increase in light or grate created on site or IR the vlclhtty. - 8+ LArri USE. Wlli the proposal result lrl a 'substantial a, era on of the present or planned, land use,iot an x The project ^site I's located within the groVllle Area Land Use Plan, The PIan1 designates this area as Law Density Residential and PUb►IC, areae The protect site is zoned AR' -i and the most. easterly 20 feet' of the project site fs zoned PO. The proposed pfoTect Is ccins'i§lent with the sufroupding deelopment within .the afea,' The proposal' Conforms to both the �ceneraY'Plan De rgnation aoa'zoning cl;assift,catldri RESOU2Cts, Wiii the 61 OP rGftltt lit . su s.an ra a, lnc(ease in'the rate of use of any °naturdtX The proposal w)if'tiot, Direct any naturai resourcesr , ba tlepletlon. of any 'non-ferev(abie;,natura`t x The proposal will not deplete any natural resource's. ' tesoUtdO.P 10' Risk or: I:i�sET. Will the proposal i'nvoive a.. Ailk of 'esiptoslon'dr rel ease. of Hazardous- nc substaes tlrtclUding, bit�not (rmited to,,, X. ; The prop $aI wilt not Invo lve the Use bt hazardous'matetlafs nor' i,s It located. oif,pestlCtdes, chemia'ais of radia;tlon) in close to apy f;actI tees whl.ch stor6 or ut111ze such matet'lals. the_" event or ' an 6;006Mof Up5ef canditionst . b, Possible intetference wl.til an emergehcy ,response plan -or eroergenCy evacuation pIan7._ x The proposal=wltl not atfecl any emergency services. � ft, 06PULKtt&4,:.will ,`ahe proposal a tet location, strbuNon- denslt or"gt�cn+rtH late of the human' y x - Tile proposal will ndt si9nir cant) affect he o u���atTon o' 1 e aced Y t P P l f. because the prapbsed density does nae eXceed plattned';and being Pb .that neve �oped fl1'>,the.ar6a, �12.E �rous►wc. Wil�t'thO Pfoposai of"fect exlsting housing, or create a demand fpr addlit,onai boas°regi X The proposai Wttt no"t, signif1rantlY'aftact liousing'demand'. , f�* TR"p6RTAA144bMaXATION,; Wt'Ir 'i he oroposa► resrJ�[Tln: a, cenefallonof subsl.arttial addl[fanai vehicfei moVementt x The proposal +will represent ari dr6aThe (neremental increase IO'tfatfIC In.tfie pfoposed pf' OCt',Wtli gen6rate e'pprokimately zo vehicle (lips per day.. Tire-projectsite, is ocated°on th6`east side of rile dtovllle Urban -area w1tb Vefy few ;etvIje6t Which vt,lI.require the Env xoxt i nate' Tiripacti Check 3.S Eva�Ua, xon of :�neiraxiute>ptal IV. BIMRONMENTAL IMPACTB,tcontlnuedi Yes. .�uv —moo DISCUFSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVAMIATTON _ (continued) occupants of i he proposed de.YeIopment to commute to oroviIle or Chlco for employment and other services. Although the existing street and roadway network May, accommodate 20 more vehicle trips per, day, indiVlduafly,; cumulatively the exl�sting street network wiil not, In addition. _due to the lack of funding transportation improvements have no( kept up With the growth fn traffic to date, currently,, approximately 4060 new residential lots ar'e being created by subdivision 'tap In the OrOVille urban Area. The Oroville Area has the potential (Or several thousand lots being created. The proposed project wail contribute to, the. .cumulative: Oaf fIr. Impacts wilhln the OroVilieurban Area, The Envlronmentai Impact Report W R),p[epafed in 1993 for the zoning and the OroVlfle Area Land We + Plan indi'caled that the present circulation system's capacity was not betance,d' wi lh the traffic volumes generated ;by the land uses ailoW d by the ceneral Plan designation and Zonl�ng'cIAs$1f'icatlgtt� `rhe 1963 OR recommended as a miliga;Ion measure that the county and City of ONViile undertake an area wide traffic ,study to eXamine and plan for future clrculatton needs; tt s' recommended that the Wa Transportation study,identify future transportation ddrrldorg, igl galtttasportat oen icovem ntsr system to finance necessar Y 'The proposed prosect and resulting clmWiatfve iraf{fc imoacls wlf,l also Impact the e%ISAI ng treeway Interchanges along State Route 70, The i9a3 EiA: stated that ,by, the year, 2000 without substantial traniportatton jmprovemenis the Level of Servtrte on! freeway interchanges and local. stieet.s would dechine to 0 or' lower, The cafffornfa"Transportation 00mm ssion's policy for interchange`s �. requfres.locat Iuri3dlctfons to finance the improvement costs 6f lnterchanges it soa%i currently. tie aountY of suite has no program to assess 'financial responsibility, to local development for lnierchi nge impfovemek costs. At the t'iaie of subdlYlding in order - to evaluate the cumulative kraffic impacii on the orovllle:urbdn area A tfanspottatton system computer w111 need to be dev a oiled aTfd ,model a slue, p impact •analYs:Is etformed, ba Effec s, on eCisting:parking fact litie"s, ori St The proposal w114 not. at,fect.-pafking because the,,prdposai wilt ,have demand for new Rarktng4 to cer(ply with the parking requil:emants contained wlLhin nutte county Code Section 24-35. t.. 5ubs.tin tlaf#cVadt on ex, ng, x See 13a. portatiori s teras , trans ys d. signiticantatteratl, ns top esentpattern's, k see.13a� of �cfrculation or a�vemnt. ol,peo111e and/or; . go4ds`� ' e. : Ai�tetatlons to waterborne, ra'1l ,or. air' 3t The C1 [Y of OroVtlle'hat, 36'eral at.-grade ra lroad, 'crossing, s. The ° tratt.Icf fn6rOmen1;1 acrease inpn traffId A-t these Crostingsrwl[1l intensify 106" co0 lir ts be Ween.lrain movements and traffic, resulting iii traffic xonA lr`affic model for the Oiov11,1 a an area i3 C's-tlon, antfcipat�d to:,evaiva.ie pote'ntlal confficts'between�traI'n movements and ttatlic. fH �� increase i trafi'tC 7 hazatds to motor k See ''3a: Vehicles. ti�Cycltsls op pedest"tions ; 14", P[ULfG SFRVi'GIsS. Will the p ppOSal "have an, effect upon, or result in : al need` for new or, at tared government serYlces: ,, ,- a. Fire protect°Toni= x The p(sipoaal elf i re3tYtt N.4 nOtmental ingieasd In demandfor fire 6 zatrrcarunnta:> OheGk�ati E��a],attioln o Envr'7mm�t�1 iatpact IV. ENVIRONME'N'TAL _INPAC:TB tcantlnued> YeS MAY— B too DISCUSSION ''0F ENVIRONMENTAt EVALUATION (aon;t i nued) _ protdcifbh in the area, The But te County Fl re, Department/California D,Vis on of Forestry has indicated that cumulative development to the county Will Impact their ability to provide fire pfotectlon oci ce sitelt locatedwithin the:OWID serVice area Wery oviThe protect edntion purposes. bs I''o11do- protect tont x; The proposalwill result In a Incremental increase In demand for police protection inthe Area which cannot be serviced by the present sheriffs Department, since i98o the population of Butte county has ' Increased by;oVer 25x, while at the same time the police force has- asbeen decreased in petsonnelby 5e,% dUe to f'iscaf di'ff(culties being been experienced by butte 9oUnty. Currently, BUt'te County has the lowest officers per capita In the state, The Butte County sherlft hat determined that police protection servlcer,are presently inadequate, and do not meek the serVice 6pectatlons of the pub It. The �herii-f has established base Ilne level of •service, of i sworn police . - officer per i000 popula.t(on« The proposed development will result In cumulatl"ve impacts on police protection services which continues to reduce Cha sheriff's Department Capacity to provide adequate ppolice services and prevents the base Ilne level of -serVice Iran being, meet. The cumU16t:ive Impacts of development on police protectlon has ,been aocumdhtdd by thecounty AdministratiV,e Otlice:. in the report "county,of Butte, Annual Fl5cai ReVieW." The app11canI W1(I need to•provide appropriate measures to mitigate C, sChooist k mitigation impacts on police protectIon;seryices to meet the basr, line level of service, „ 'rhe p,roposal'Will result in a Incr�ementat_i crease in 4mzind for school services in the area, school Impact lees collected by the school districts only partially mitl;gate the impacts on educational 'The ser ices. applicant Wilf need to cooidinite vl th the school dis�rIcts in developl'ng mltlgation measures _Ofch fury mitigate the impacts on educational serVices-, ¢. PatM of other f.ecreatIona IIlet II(1est X. The proposal WI 11, result in a: Incremental increase in demand (.or park and recreatloh facilities in the area, e, � Maltit2nance of pub tle t"acIIftles, IneiUdtng 5C „ ' The pt.oposal,will re3ult In a, incremental increase in the 'need of folds, fi malhtenance of roads ,and other public facilites lnt tho,area, I« Otfier goVOM)enlat ser'vltest x. The proposal whit fe5Ult In a Incrempntai rV%Oase Irl tri'mand for aI other governmentalserVlce's In the a,Pea, is, ErvERcy: W04 the praposai fesutt ItI a. t15e of substantial: amounts of fuel or' .�_ tt„ The proposal will not utilize substa'nttal fuel or energy. energYx � y b. substantial fhprea5e•�`Ind��nanduponetitsting' x' The proposaiWiil hot` substantially �lncrease the demand forenergy:, 5 fees of energy,- or.?.requir_e the - developmento( new sources of energy# . ib. Uri LITIM, Will the, prioposa'l. result toe need for neW' Sys eID5, at 5Ub3LdnLta � ew,l sing: t aftefation5 to the' a, Ppwefor natural gas,?` X, The pfdposal:�, wl If not of tcat, eiectilcal �`NOt 'of natyrb`tgas distributlon 'sysLems,' b Commu'tcatlons systemst x The ptoposal W[(I not''affect cgrnrnuril_sation Systemi. Ci Wale l r,avat a61t € t Iy ;x. The propa5ai W(ii not. affect public Watef s'Vsiems, ` d. Sewer- or septic systemst X The proposal Wllf have la meet file fegUiremenis or the gut t'r Caunt,y, xar of Ea i�s��aut� ' 'y Era ra; conmentai Chdck1it,,t Evaluation >tttal Tmpr ct S%. ENVIRONMENTALIMPACTS (conllnued)yEs: ��v©r n+o DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION. (Continued)' Env,ionmental Health Dept. sanitary sewer, w!11 be provided to the . protect sito :bylake OroY[lie Area Public. Uti [i ty blstric,t. e. storm Nater :drainage! x The proposal will not have a significant. impact on stprm water drainage. f. saftd waste and atsposalt x The "roposal: will not have. a sIonIIIcant. Impact on solid Waste P p mp _ 'di s os a 17. si3uArJ HEALTH, WlII the proposal result in'; a. creation of any health hazard or potert ial. 'x The proposal will not create any health hazard. hazard (excluding riieplal health7t- b. Exposure of people itor poterltlall healttrThe --- proposal-'will not expose people to any health hazard." _ hazards! �' is, AESMiFtlcs. Will the proposal result In tfic x The proposal_ will not result in "an aesthetically offensive view s rue ion of any scenic VFsta or, view opeq to the' because 11 is consistent With surrounding development. public, or �rl'!I the proposal result n the creation of an aesthetfcaliy Often$ ve site open to the: public vtewl _ 19. RCCaERrior�. W1I( the proposal resUtl Ips an.lmpact �( -_ Thaq'Coposai 'may result to an lnCtementat Igcfease i'tt-demapd for park Upone quality, or quantity- of 'existtng' and ricreatlon taclIrl tIts . recreational-opportUinitlest�' 20, CULTMAI Rg96ACEs a, Wltl'lhe' pt4pasaI r-sult,.in�the'altefattcrn k The p'ro)ecI, illi is Identtfi.ed as art area of UnkhoWn tensltlW-tY for , or destruction of a prehfistor It or hIttarit archaeological resources+ archaeological sNtet b, wi l lthe 0toposaI' esul t Ih adverse Pphys f tai x The proposal wilt riot al f ecE, iii shot l c sites . > or ae'sthettc effects to a prehlstori.c or, f` ; " ' hlstorto buildtn9, skructut'e or _ob-tactl' cr Does'the proposal have the' potentlat to x „„' The propasa�,,wll1 not affect ,rI tural resources „ came a P Y,.icai,change Which tMould a(leCt unique cthntc cut ttiral YAgs d� Nti” i" the pr'oposa:'t restrtct OXisti00 `1 z Theop prosal'.'wtlf ho't attest: rei►gious.,resources,, gi°ous 'ar sacred user h,l n th ° , potential Impact afea7 smwgsTSO MITIGATION MEASURES . Propose m riga1, Ion trersures to ml Ligate aIIIIpaGtS �;ic.- topollce�f'r�tect.lon services to theAPP rovaloi the,auttc bounty-herllf.." s s pYdposed mi tI0aklon m(fasifres wh;ieh' tufty 4 ra�tlgate 'tmpacts±brs_edu,cattanal services to the` x approYal"oi the sthot,t di ritKts'' conduct a t,raf;lia, imeact iinalysfs to"determine , - atfproprlate mitigation me'asurcI5, y A' 'Conduct atccotoglc Sur�yey to determine sets�ti risks of the proje4t site -and deter Ink siltingor #„ ml t;tgallonrr�asure reoUlremenls as necessatY. r t t�1 ; c�rinien al Ch'E3CI�list <* 'Evaliiat ©R< of rxvi arose ntal Impact V. ENVTRONMENTAi IMPACTS '(continued) YES MAYeE, NO DISCUSSION OR F;NVIROVXENTAt EVALUATYON (continued) DATA SHEET hio(OnIcal'Envlromlentr A. 'atolect Descrlpt{on o1 vegetation: oak woodland, chaparral. 9, Wildlife Habitat: small blyds and 1. Type of Piolect, Boundary Line animals corrm n to foothill areas. µodification and TerltaitYe Parcel Map 2. atlef Description: .eL;AVTPM to dlvlda'r oflitural invliommnt: 3,.b8 acre's to create 2 parcel at one acre each, to. Archaeological and HlsturlcalResources �S" Locatlbn, East side of Kelly, lodge In the area. Low InclUding Unknown Road in East Oroville.Area, SensltiVItY Area 1.Proposed Density of Development; f t -. Butte County general Plan designation: urttt/acre - Low Dens"Ity Res ident! al/Publlc ' 5� of ImpeNl`ous surfacing: 12. odsting zoning; AR -1 & PQ' m mol 13. Existing Land use on -slue,. Vacant , 6, Access' and Nearest Public 'Road(s)': iR. surrounding Area: Keffy Ridge Road. a. Land Uses. residential; pubilc 7 . method of sewage Dispo;al L.Q./,. P.U.n b. Zoning, AR -l. AR, PQ sewer ` ' c, can. Plan Deslgnatlon: Public " a. source .of water supply; bWiD tf. Parcel Slzes: 1/2 to 2.5 acres �. Proximity, or Prower Lines-- 'dlacent io „ property e« Population: Suburban/Rural 10. Potential Yor [Litther land dIV11lbos Population and developmentNone'.: ts. Character of site and Ate*; RUfal tri, Near est 'Uiban Area: Orovlfle tfl'� Enylrorvnental .setli`ng 17. Relevant spheres of Itiliuericet OrNIOj, - Lake Oroville Area Public Utiltt� Physlca{ Envirorxrentr:; District, and City of 0foville, 16, taaprovements standards Urban Area: No i. Terrain 19. Fire Protection service: a« ceneralopographle character: a. Nearest Oto Relatively flat hill torib. Xtslate') slopes: o to M1 b; witef 1111W:; OWID a Elevation: 1056110 todb° ASL Rydrant Limiti"ng,Factors: None ib, schools In Area: Union ion High"' 2« Sofls school District and Orovlile Union' a. Types and char.aeteristicsz EI°ementarY school DistrlicC, AuburnSoif 5ettet, clbderate p1.ermeaitl i l ty, `dna In wit l :' gopd so11 . LI br � Limiting Factors, none, , a. 'Na(ura1 kazards of the land a. Earthquake Zone: Moderate Eat thquake lntensitYlOoVlll, b', Erosion Potential: Adderate - c. Landsi�lde Potential:'None d. Vito tfazard: Modernfe- e. bmani Ve ,Sal l potential : Loyr `,Hydrology a: surface water{ Lake 'Oiov:li16 located apptoX mately loo feel - .east of proieet site. b. Crounct' Water: generally - aVAllable. s� braInago characterCs. tics` proper"ty draihs toArds the east.,' tl. AnnUal•Ralnfali oiorinal). 3e e. Orri tiro Pastors: None I Visual%scenic Quality: txd6ltent G. Acoustic Quality: rood �, Air Qua ity; c0otl SUTTE'COUNTY DEPARTf ENT OF REAL.TFI 1�1 tC?r aT Er i-iPa I th l' < CoUrity Center Dry t ve , Oroi l l e , CA . 95 705 Ron Grave% Assoaiat�ss P.O: Box 584 Ear'ewi 11,6- CA 759"65 Pa TENTAT fVE PARCEL . MAP/BOUNDARY LINE fIODIPI -ATIQN - GEORGE. . Rober`:., 10atF_: i` an I.h.e �as� tido taf Vvi lv rtidr't- PioAil' .. Poro" Nimate;ly -2. -410#`c feet ' seatx t or ` the lntersec 4 lcc n ;a i },eI I Rid;ct� I�cr.ad �.s�sd Mi�lie�re7� Ave�,t�c?, Fast .C}a-taw.�,iI16 wt, T' it ei, r J{ _ 19: 9C p AR „ D.eay, I~ir t•` Ave5 i'hi.s Depa.r`tanent_ h.as ad!vise'd "thy But"te County l�epa tmelit a, f�ublio Woh ks 'L.ari.r� De�xelc�pmen'1, 'S¢�tiari that we are - pr eaar~ed -to act Orl the PP . Based cin t. n' i rnr rr ma i ion; we c,an recammEc,ti appy ria 1 a r c s�sditional Rpr0val Recommended Gorid tions �bf Hg iiloval provide a lett"er csr other' doqumt entatia ra��i .�,r. 1 statinb thAt td Agble tra t•a ,i .1v e uretic blrit rto F1citc is 677' v ".I'�. CI=S Cr. tiv ' s'tat_ snq tract the'v are. willing serir~e' tc� ciarcel= 3B—I 2€. F'1aa a r�rs an the ai4p that'stab=s "`Developmen:t or 'par cels require' cornet-tiQ tt� a, pub,l is 4' puce 1�tst an the ri a that tb -s "Di=velr r�rr�e� a'i'i wceis ._ S" c• 9': swi,I l r 46,'4i`t o crs nect tars to a p rbl w k;er~ 'UP"ptv' s. p xt i Mr COUNTY VL �V ��',E DEPARTMENT: OF PUBLIC WOF2ICS 7 County Center Drive OrovilleXCa 95965 (96) 538-726 DATE: Mag 17, 1991 SUBJECT: Robert GrAROE - TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP /BOUNDARY LCNE'MODIFICATSON ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NtJMBER�''$ .'69-32-19, 28 & 25 LOCATION: 2 t)arcels located ori the, east side of Kelly Ridge Rd: approx. 2300 ft. south of the intersection of iCel.ly Ri gt Iici and Hillcrest Ave East Oroville.'area. Attached are documents rsQar�ding, arra a copy of, the above-described tentative tpap for your revieV. If your have any suggestions, additions or'recommendaCions concernaixg this .project, please return them to this office iio.later than .yours, Very truly Wi. am Cheff Director of Public, Works i% I' .4)5bn Mendonsa i sistant.Director ,attachments "•t+i i ° x 'Y; }!4✓: ": M,+A-F A KL Sr E5 } 9 n y ' { �.� i�I��yt � � A tii%J� ' her �,i t •I fiu v f 41"< e yy �({�''''' 444 DEP 4 ��ppz� 'yk8�tz,fic.p Yk9d 1A'Y� "., 7 LD b�6t7 ,x.4/89)