HomeMy WebLinkAbout071-160-002IV. ENVIRONNItNTaL IMPACTS
xp anatxons oa�x3i "'"yes"and "maybe" answers are required
on attached sheet(s))
1. EARTH.:
. Will the proposal result in significant:
a. Unstable earth
MAY.9E NO
'—•
conditionsor in changes 'in
geologic substructures?
b. Disruptions, displacome;nts, compaction or
x
overcovering of the soil?
c. Change in topography or ground surface
relief features.
cl. Destruction, covering or modification of any
K
unique geologic or physical features?
e. Increase in Mind
or water erosion Of soil,s,
either on Or off-site?
£. Changes in d-op6sit on or, erosion of beach
sands, or than in siltation, deposition
;
or erosion' which may modify the channel of
a river
or stream or the tied. of the o:ceari- or
- any bay', inlet`ox lake?
Loses of prime agriculturally productive soils
Out-Side designated urban
areas?
h. Exposure of peple or property to geologic
haxardsFsuch
as earthquakes,, landslides;. mud-°
slides, ground failure or similar hazards?'
.� AIR. Will: the proposal. result in substantia.:
a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambie1.
air quality?
nt
,.
b• The creation of oblectio rs,,,xb7 a odors, smoke
or fumes?
c. Altexat,ion
of, air movement, noisture,.or ..`..
temperfature, or any change in
-
c1%ma'te
locally or reg�lally?
3. WATER Will the proposal result an substantial:
a. Changes in currents, or the course
or
airec;t on of water movements a, either
- -= marine` or fresh
1
waters?-7 Changes in :absorption atterns
io rates) d�raina g `--
'rate p,
•----
or the andamount o surfaceruno:ff?
c Need for off-site surface drainage improve_"�`--
ments, Yn'cluding vegetation removal, channel-
itatton or
l
' culvert installation?
dy Alterations to the course or £low of £food,
"`-
04 t,ers
e � Change in the amount. of surface tivater ih any
Vw t.er body?
,= bi,sc.harge into surface waters, or in any
al;teration of surface Wrat Lt quality, inch ud� ng
.
----
1 but ,not limited to temperature;dissolved
'»h Or, t111hi dlty?
91 A1 aeration of th.e di'rectibn ux rat'e of I,
of gratnd waters?
h* eiri
g q; Chan the uant�: or ' .._ round haat ,
{ Y ua„ x 1, t of tiv
e'thez through direct additions or �g
th-
a�w•
dral,s, or through intercept ion of an
aquifer by Cuts iXei
or rations?
• Reduction i.n the' amount of Witelbtheri+l ise
. availabsla for publ.i.c wager, sub 11 e:. 0
Ex
5 o�ure of
+ P people bt property to 'water
re:l.ated hazards S11Ch 68 f oodn
YES
tr(AMC. NO
4.
PLA14T LIFE. 1+Ii11 the prop result in, subs tants al i
a . C ange in the divers i ty of
;spe c.l es , ,ar number
of any species of plants (including trees,
shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants?
b. Reduction of the numbers o driv. unique, raro,
or endangered species of plants?
cIntroduction of
new species of plants into 411
area, or in a 'barrier to,, the normal replenis,jl.
ment :ore isting specic,a?
,d. t�or�
Reduc
�.n acrca e of an
g y agricultural ct�ep a
-
x
S .
e in the diverpiop''sa s s • ANIMAL LIFE, Will the ro osal reczes �n subst tii�tial.Y p or nui�tbq
jCF-an
C'Sfany species of animals (birdsland an;jillfilncluding reptiles, fish and shell £ash;
benthic organisms or
.insects)b. Reduction in the numbers of an? y Unique, r
urq
or endangered species of animals;?
c. Introduction of nese species of anima] $ 1710
an area, or result .in a barrier to tl e. m -a ration
Or movement o f anima�.s
.
d. Deterioration to e fisting fish or, wildlife
habitat?
y
5.
NorSE: Vi11 the proposal result' in substantia 1
a. Increases in exis.Ing noise jeVels?
b. Exposure of people 4 severe
X
LO no go levels?
X
7:
:LIGHT AND GLARE . Will ;.the ;proposal Produce
s1gn1 scant light and glare,?
8.
LAND `USE. �Pil'l the proposal result in a
Su. sstantial alteration t,be
;of present or planned
land use of an area?
-
NATURAL 12E80URCE8: ilfill the px`oposa] result in
Subs a.ntaal
a. ITic,reas0 in the rate of use ofany natural
- -resourCe5?
b-. De- plet;iort f any rion-renewable itatur:,1:
_
resources �
�.
10.
RISC 0 UP5E '. IV,
ill the ptop,:,aj iatvc L r
a. Ares. o
explosion or the releasd of hatard-
ous substances (incl'u'ding, but not iim� ter to
pestiCIde.8 i chemicals or ratiiatian) in the
passible interforenc or upset conytions
b , event of an acct dei: e twith et tonrgenc
:K
response plan o!r
p em' igen
e cy e' cuation. plan?
I
Pt7.PULATIoN, 1Vi11 the prc5posal alts ilio location
1 t x�1on t ens � or r
y t pith ���, a �� 1 }1 Man
populat�.on?
Eigi�SINC: Will the propo-sad, affect oxa.sting housing
at create a demand for addit'aonal ttotisiri,g'?`
13:
TRANSPokTATION%CIRCULATION, Will they Proposal
result in:
a. Generation of !substantial additional vehicle
movement?
b. effects on exjstind parking facilities, or
demand for new parking?
c. SubstantiaY impact on existing transportation:
_
systems?
Alterations to resent patterns
. t a Ler _ P
S _ naf�c�n �._ p
d �.g:
of circulation or movement of people and/or
goods?
e. Alterations to watorborne, rail or air tratfi0
_
f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles,
bicyclists or pedestrians?
.. �.
14,
PUBLIC SERIrICES. Will Ithe proposal have an effcct
upon; or -result in a need for new or altered
goveninyntal services:
on?
p ct
a, Pira rote
bo holiCe pz•otection?
c.: Schools?
ea
d or ' other recrtional facilities?
:_.X_
, w � y_
mance of ublir.. facilities,, ine.ludlng
p
f governmental services?
...,�.
15.`
ENERGY.' Will the prapc�aal result in:
a Use of substantial amounts of fuel,or energy?.,.
Substalitia`l increase n (Idmdnd upon eXisting
sour(:es ofenergy; oY require the development
-
of rle-t+► sources of'-ene•rg)r? -�
16
UTTLITIES,. 11ill the propw a] result in need for
-systems, orsubstantial alterations to the
' fallowing:
a: 'Power or riatixral gas?
b. LOmMuni cations ,syste"191
C"
c. '- tl►ater availalai�ity:
�-
d.. Sewer or septic tank?
e: Storm water dtaiitage?
f. 8ol.id waste and disposa1?'
17
HTIM:AN titALTH'. Will the proposal resin
a creation of any health hazard or p0te'it t,ial
hslt�i hazard �ea�cltt<ia.ng mental health)?
b: E::Iicsure of people to potential healbh
hazards?'
AESTMETIC 1vil the proposal result in the
o`6str art o any scenic vista or View open to
the puvlic5 or Will Che proposal resu] t in thc�
tically of
creation of an aesthefeve site' c�perC
to public View?
}'E5 MAS, 1'D
Nc
ro osal -result in an imp act
'7 9, REGREATiUN. tiVil] ''the p P of eXisting re.creational
A uantit:Y
th quality ar
upon e �
opPe�rtun ties!
ro osal resu7:t in the aj teTation
Zp. CUL'TURAL. RESOURopo xeh stork or
Wal] t e proposal
a.
of or the des,truc#;ion °f a p
arcohosalgxesultca sinead}rerse physcax.
historic
b. Will the pry
a prehistoric or
or aesthetic effects to
structure or object?
hi�teric building, otential to cause
the p
C. Dce's the propAsai, have
whLc would a fec un3<que
�.-
�i physical change h
ethnic cultual values. 1eligious
eYistin�
Will. the proposal restrict act
Within the 'potential smp
.
eracxed uses
axea?' 71G02 aha 03
EVALUATION
DI5CUSSI4N OF ENVIRONMENTAL
See e,ttached.
x
S�
i
4 ., .. ... :. - .-
RPplcants Conrad 5prin9er= AssessorParceel it
71 716, 0,'L) and 09`
Log # B6-1 0,-29.. oll
'DATA '. aT
llEE
A. ProleC't Description
1 -TYPe
of P: -oject: ose Permit.
2•
Brief Descri tion _ p - To allow
. a 29 -space mob ilq hone park, a
b -unit hes i dent i sl, bu i 1 d i
rig' an )rea for sL-brwai e of boats
and recreational Vehicles 'i n conjunct i on w i th On oye t sfi nS,
store and storage structure."
3:
Location: On the Best side of Lumpki'n Fond a t Prox1mateTY" ono
mile north
i
of the nterpr i se Brt cage on the 5auth Pork of Lade
OroVitle, sbutheast of Feather Falts.
Proposed Density, of Development: 1:6`2 dwell! l 1 I ri;D ur7 is
acre., pe. .r
•
Amount - of Imper t i ,us Surfsc'i ng.*, g-Potent"i 1 l y 0 to 40%4
Access
and ;Nearest pub l is Road( s) :
Road. Property f rants on Lump k in
7
Methad of Se►�ago Disposal: On -sate septic syttems and
1dachf 1 plds.
S.
`
Source' of" Water Supply: Orl-s i to we l l .s .
1 0!e"
Frrok i m iP ty of Power Lin,_
es : To r^o e 11 1
p p rt
4y.
i'otent i a 1 for
-fUrt! ter 1 end div 1s i ons :and "neve 1 opmeint
Add i t i on{ 1 commerc i e 1
uses requ i re. a, I.tse perm it In .the N -C
z ofe .
ill • +" 14fn�rgn
t'f"1Cy!EZ"� •� � r.+.�.TOtt � n�
,�'h si,c,�, tirants
1
'Terra i ri
a- Denera'i . n;;�sagr`apFi i c Character': hio_tanta i Mous terrain above
Latae dre�vt 1.1'e.
b. Slopes: General t y 1 5 to 20 with ,areae of 5 tc 10 at or5,g
thr-?
road neer the existing store budding.
El r�ivdt i on»
1 125 to 202 feet abr,+ve Sea Leric 1 ., .
d- L i tn'i t i no, Facfrot-s: Areas of 'steep 's
1 ops; ».
yP Modest r
a. T es and Characteristics: y foil series
20 to 40'" ' genera1'ty
deaps excessively draIhed wiL,h rapEd
pe"r`meab i 1 i ty and' high eros r
c�n',pbtent I a'1
b. L i hn t i Ing Pastors H I gh eros i cin Ootent a I and
dra I babe. excess i rte
..
Natural Hazards* of the Land
Earth ,ie; ,
a • q" 'c a done :" iit,derate (?ar"thqual�a i;ntans i ty. 2bne V j' 11 .
b. os ion 'paten
t i a I : Very high
c Lphds 1 i de Potent i s 1
d. F i re Hazard'. , ii i gh to; ekte�emb