Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout072-140-024w F�f T©» Butte County Advisory Agency FROM=' Planning Director gUVJMT; Report on Tentative Parcel Map for Ken. Tennigkeit an. AP 72-14-24 December": �sl, 1984 DATA'" This` is a proposal to divide 29 +1- acres to create1 .1. four parc:utij,� three 11 Rr'- AR- at 5 acres each and one at `14 acres.. The present zoning is YAgr cultutraL: Residential y `Mobile Homey 5 acre parcels? . Ther 4M th. sped.+i c or community plans for the area.. The Land Use Flan Mai : 0 Butte County General Plan designates this area as Agriculturiii-Residential. There are no specific :nr community p e Or' } the: area. ;. The proposal does not canflrict with County xoining nor` any at Couto propasecf 'element of the Butte County General Plan nor any specific or community .plan. y -" Recommend.approval subJect'to the fallowing mitigation measur: 1 Mi,tigatian_Measures 9.i 1. Perform geological purvey and incorporate any recommenzia»s ti the geologistinto, the project -prior to r�ecardati;gn of p map. 2. Incorporate standard erasion control measures and cnnstr-uc., practices to minimize erosion p ltenti.ail includinga s a. Install' properly sized' grid deei gnsd culverts b. Fevegetate exposed soil surfaces. C. Constructian to take place during the dry season. p.. �., Perform an archa�olagical survey and i n,-porate arn� _sect mnirs dat'i x I I t :*t the g � P ecordati of the arc�taeo16 ist into 'the_ f-We�ot prior to ,r�,. f i n`al map. DCtH ,1 1 cc» Kern Tgnn ig . ei Barnhart, gown .and As% c lV.' ENVT ROIVMEN'1,� 4L ACTS Txp" anations of a . 'yes'" and "'maybe"answers aro required "- on attached sheet(s)) YES MAYBE NO I., SARTH. Will the proposal result in significz►7lG a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic subsltructttres? b. Disruptions, dispiacuments, compaction or ovexcovering of he sall'? _ t Ci>> Change in topography or ground surface relief features " d. Destruction, covering'or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Increase in wind. 'or ,y'ater, erosion of soils, either, on, or off-site? Y c C: Changes in deposition, or erosion o beach sands, or. changes in `siltation, deposition ox erosion which`may modify the channel, of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any, bay, inlet or lakel? g boss of prime agri cuT aurally productive soils outside designated urban areas? ' h Exposure 04 people or property two geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud- slides, ground failure orsimilar hazards? -- 2., AIR. Will the, proposal result in substantial: T.-- Air emissioxis or deterioration of ambient air quality? b. The creation of objectionableodors, smoke or fumes? c. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any change in cligate, locally' or regionali.y? 3. NATER, W1,411-1: the proposal result iii substantial a . Changes ' in currents, o r the course or direction of wai er 'Movements in either'' marine or fresh waters? b,:' Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or, the r,ate and amount of surfaace run oiif? c..; Need f,or O:c S ite surface drainage improve- ments, including vegetation removal, channel - a rata on or culvert instal latiazt? d.` Alterations to t'be course- or flow of flood tvatevs? e . Change-, in the amount olf 5u;rface w ,ator in any dater body? ischarge . into, sutf'a e V ters, on in any al�t.eration. o sttl` a:e �va� er quaT y� ancltttlang but not `;limi.ted b temperature, dissolved oxygen ox' turbidity? "" gj ! Alteration of 'he direction er rata o flour of ground waters'? 4": Change in the quait ity, ound waters', either t°fixo► ��gh direct`additi6ns, of with dral�ral s; o r through interception o an aC[t1i;�er :% cats , o'r'M'CC.aI+ ations ?" �r-- Reduction 'in the ,amoUlt of water otherwise avail01e for` pub1ic V supplies?' :,� Exposure o� peaple or property I to 1Water�' related hazards -tach as flood ng1 _ L4 YFE NO 4. .PLANT`' LIFE, w 11 tete Proposal result: in sub�3��ntial; C ange in the. diversity of species, or n�i3�M�ex of ally spoca.es Of- plants (inc:l:uriing txee8 shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants),? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare Or endangered species ofplants? c. Introduction of new Species of plants i'nto an area, or in a barrier to the normal re, pleni'sh- ment o exstang species? �. d'.iteauct an In acreage off; any agrxcu� turai Crop:?, r 5. ANIMAL` LIVE. Igll the proposal result in :substantia { a. C ange in t1l diversity o oF' species, or numbers species o animals (bi rds 'land, animals ludanY a incing reptiles, fish and shell; sisal, benth c orfzomisms or insects) ? b . Reduction in the numbers ofany unique, `rare or endangered species of animals? C ntroductx ort of species a£ animals' into an area, 07; result It in a barri t0 i:h,e mi r.ativn ., g _. or movement of, animals? d; deterioration to hexistin gr abitat'? fishyr wildlife X G. N015E. ° tviil the pro�aasal result. in substantial ; a. lncxeases in existing no levels: b . Exposure o:Eevp7.e �e severe pA noise levels? 7.' LIGHT l NTi GLARE. ZYill the proposal produce cant lig g �,�zt ani glare? 8 «., LANs USE. jklill the pr.op.dsal su staRial. al�teral,tion o the present or panned land u.se of an area? 9. NA` M.E50URCES y }Pill the proposal result in ; substantial. a. Cncrease in the rate 0f use of any ` at�irax . resources? b. bepl.e•tiom a any,non . z=enewsb e na Cural resources .` , 10. RISK OV UPSET.. JYiZl the proposal inval re; aA risk air explosion ox the release o hazard aus substances inclut}ing,; but ,not 1,*L jted to, oil pesticieles, C,iemxcals ox radiation). in the evento articc;ident or u b. pset cvltdition.'s"? Eossible �iiter�`erence ;titiritlt an emergency response plan or emergency, eVacuatien plan?° 1. ....__ POPULATION., tt��Ill th:e, pro'po$al aI er the 1t� txan, tributi�an; density or, gt'owth r�:e o the }luman Population? ' � 1.� ' HOUSINC.�� Wilt � os w= til.,e pro p p ai alect oat sting flousin o� create aemaxii it additioal „. zlg': housi414 4 ��W O, MAYBE NCO l . T;RANSPORTATTON/.CTRCUL 'CIO Will till pr, otos a1 result in; a'. Generation of substantial addi'ti.orial vehid o movement? b Effects on ' exis ting Parking facilities, or demand for new parking' C. Substantial impact on existing transportation systems? d. Significant alterationsto present patterns of circulation or Movement of people and/or goods? t io sin, or eT erbone, tail or air traffic?fo tlerat traffic . hazards to Motor vehicles, b1CyCl]St8 ,Or pedestrians`? 14 , PUBLIC SERVICES, Iq l,l the proposal have an ei"feCt UpOnj or result Iii a need for new or a7 tered governmental mental. services a. PiTe protection?' b . Police protection? ----- �. C. Schools? -.... d.; Burks Or other recreational filci.lities?� __4L e. Maintenance of public facilites, including ---- roads? Other governmental Services �?~ l5 ENERGY. Will -the proposal, result in, Use a, of substantial amounts Of fuel .or enexgy? b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing, sources of energy, or require the development of new ;sources of energ},?'; 16. UTTLTTSES, Will the propsal result inneed for ,a new systorrts, or substantial alterationso the :following a, 1?o-Byer or natural, gas? b. Communications systems? "— CL. Water: --- - d. Sewer or septic tank? e. Storm ivatcr, 'drailiage' ` f, Sol id waste and disposal,?. ^– 17.< 1719W 13RALTH. Will -the proposal result a, atzon of any health hay and o potent'al hoalth hazard ' (eicltclxng menta: health) ?� Exposure of,poople to pot.entia� fiealtli '.," hazards ". 18.. AETi'TCS, 1�i11 Elie proposal result in tltie o structlon of any � scenic' visb'a or'vio1v; o yon o the publ:LC or tvil,l the proposal result in the Cz`eation of an­,a:estl�etically offensive 'site "open' to public va:ew? . 4' k MAYBE NO, l9. RECREATION.1.1 the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quanit it,y of existing recrcationa i Opportunities? `, �.� 90. CULTURAL RESOURCES. a: illthe proposal result in the alteration' of or the destruction, of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site?` bi W:'L 1.1 the proposal result in aav'e:rse physical,or aesthetic effects tq a pr.eti.istoxic or historic building, structure or object?` k c Does the proposal, have the potential to cause a physical change,which wouldaffectunique ethnic cultural. °values?. d WiJ.1 the proposal restrict eXisting religious Or sacred uses ��i.thiri the potential impact area? V. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTALEVALUATION AP 72-14 24 See attachment i Y I S Applicant; lien Tenn gke t Assessor's Porcel # 72-14-24 Lcrg 4 '84=10_09_0 DATA SHEET A. Project Desar.pf.ion 1: 'Type of .Project: Tentative Parcel, 'Map .mow. Brief Description: D, vi ding 2.9 acres to , create, four paroel• s r three of s 3* acres- each and one. Of 14 acres Location On the east, side of Oro --Bangor Highway, appr-oYimately qr ;Cr -feet east Of Miners Ranch Road, Orovi, VA p aret►. , 4. 5. aces per .dwelling unit: Proposed Density of Oevelopment; Minimal, Amount of Im erviaus Surfacing._. 6. Access and Nearest Public Road (s) : Property fronts on Oro -Bangor Highway. Parcels 2, v and 4 will access Ciro -Bangor Highway via a pr%v .te road. 7. 8» Method of Sewage Dispersal:l n,dividual 'septic systems Source Wager Supply* of RtJ.I:D. 9. 10. Proximity of Power Lines: To existing ,home ,on site Potential for: further land divisions and development: Under* the existing - zoning Parcel 3.(14 acres) Could be divided into, two parcols,, �+. Envi rgnmen kal y5ett i ng' Ehysi cal _Enyi r�onment e I Terrain a. b» General Topographic Etharacter: Rolling" fbbtl;, '0-15`!. Slopes; _ C w Ei evati on: 700-850 feet (SSL 2. Sd» 'Limiting Factors: Steeper sl apes 'near a 1, a T es and: Char 4cteevati cs: Auburn yP soil Series. W01 i duIed with moderate permeability. a. b. Limiting Fartdrs:8eneral,ly shallow u sos Natural Hazards o the ,Land a. Ear'thqual;e Zane: Moderate Earthquake lntensi.ty Ztrne vT, r. Cx eFrel and Hills Fault 5peci,ai Study Zone located' ` pprox i ilnakel y I, 4 mile. west;, b. E roSILQn P;.Otbotiel: High c» Landslide' potentia' Low sl. fire' Hal ard: Hi g e. 5;parasive SOIL Potential: Lour p.P�n;d,°x (a AP 72-7.4-2.4 Hydrology ` ,• Surface Water.-' ditch andi syphon tra+rorse the properly, drainage swala al Ong horthwesterly boundary which, is a tributary to north Hancut Creek located across Dro-Bangor. Hhghway from the property. b.' Ground ;Water: Aquifers of unknown quantity Z. Drainage Characteristics: Lat,d drains to thetouth.wost toNorth Honcut Creek. d» Annual RRainfal l (normal) :8-i� inches e.: e• Limitih Factors:: Setbacks pDrWylar SN from swalps syphon `and Pram cut bank on easterly ,boundary of•pt- er-t t,, ` Vi seal lScen c Quality: Good b. Acousti-c guality: Good 71. Air Qu►litya Good' Si �t'1 oq c�1 �Crz�`i r•onment : B. Vegetation- Loner Sonoran :Life Zone x lands. cl x ve arcrroards anti Bras 9. Wildlife Habatat: Small birds and animals`comm fon to the -sierra l l,s.ated Residential doer .on--si to likely. Area not r i thi:.n,, designated gn winter deer herd: areas. 94 tMr-a!_Env_ironmeht: 10i. Archaeological and Hi stor-:i eal 'Resources i n the 'area: High archeological sensitivity area. i" l Butte County General. Plan desi gnat:i on:, Agri cul total: -f�esa tfei"Rtial, Es:i,sting Zoning;. 1 AR -MH -J Existing Land Use on -s' . te. Dix Ve orchard and a residence eml related.shop's. 14, But•-rouhdi ng Aroa a« Land Uses p Residential uses at r(dral densities, ec:atte�. orchard and orchard rrerranants and ripen land» b. Zoning: -: AR -MH -!5 c. Gert. Flan desigrtatione: Agritrultural--Residenti.a,l d Farrel, Site • to 200 � more carr less, acre ; parcels, t�tcs. smaller parcels being located to the north and traest. e. P'opul ati ;qn: Scattered al ortg Cli^a--Bangor . 1 -ti ghWay, sparwsew the 'i 0thi l i to the 15. t61` s east.' Character of S/i to and Area:Rural resx`dent al area NOarest Urban 17.Rele+tant Spheres of influence: Drovall a D.Ww 1 .I). mprotlemen;s i StandarrJs Urban Area: No r.e 1'rotectson Serwi:ce: a. �+Icarbst County .testate>' Fxr . , e �� b. Water AvYiab'ilit Stttah h,lly Ride Sttrt I� re tanker arily Sahotals in y Area: Drow�lle Momentary 5choctl bis 'riot and dro+ i 11 e: lJni, on, Hi grh Schoq , Di strict, nPPen i�c >� (b