Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout072-390-003� � ,�: -*j r .fin.. _ --� .�. •e• r. ��' ,�}•s•. Al r 1. •� yf •ti •w I r '11 O, 1 yy { 1 r #r .141• rt .. 1 • .\ y I 17 0772-3.tAP 8cr t r ' ,. i ._._..y1 ..�.. ,�.. .ah.. a , i i°"u�..�..iw.e�1.TAi�,r.kW.'l.�.v��w��Ht-uravr65'M.++r�c•. �'. tt�M+`u\co,wEw\i.} 1) i I. i \\ r r�: ��,�".�`�>�\"� l���er• �2��w+:,in �`.;+`v1�'G., 1+:y �`q�`Z'.Q\�' 'r� ��i w, 63 4 ;� � ``�"�-���`� � g�,�. � ,�"•�,�� k\o�lla�n'� � as x 1� '140TIU OF bm'P.-R INATTOr1 '0 i I'lj Secretary for Resources '��J 3 0 15$ 1.4.6 Ninth Street., Ronm lilyLAN0I2M,L�CI�ER,Cbi�nlyCiorlt Sacramento, CA 95514 County Clerk, County of Butte gy AMO1NT!- deputy 25 County Centor Drive Orovil]e, �A.95965 FROM Planning Dopartment (Fi] ecl) 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 5l1BJECT: Filing of Notice o.f Determination in Compl�nina wdPh Section 21108 or 21152 01 the Public sg t, Project Title Tentative Parcel MAPAP 28-17-07, 72-39-03 Terri Greerty State Clearinghouse Numbed` (If submitted to State Clearinghouse 84072410 'Tee a " _h Number Contact Person ,r ,john Nlendofisa r Public Works (�� 6i y ..� project Location 100 t. 0 feenorth of inter'sectiort of 5we&s Flat scri��tion.' �av�esii�'�_ r t�Roud ►n he �dl at area. - project Description: Dividing 400 acres to create twenty 20 acre parcels. This is to advise that the Butte Count , Board of Su ervis•ors _ (l,e4d Agency' h 5 made the f ollosvi.n, determinations regarding the above-described projects 1. `T'hc p"rojoct wi1.1 have a tign�.,r.cant ',effect 'ctn �._ 1 the environment* Will not for 2, reject ptrrsutl:riC to the I)rovisions afoCl;QAc, and Mass An Br►virontrlental Tmp7ct f2Cport was cart fled as required by Sect�"on 15085 (g) , l4 California a Administ�T atl A Negat7,vo llec'j.arat3.on wn.s pretiared .for this prbject 0 pursuant to the provasinns Of CI.QA. A copy of the NegntrivC Uoclall at.ton may be 'ex"ntninL-d at tllo Punning opttrtinclit, 7 County Conte'r Drive; Orovil.le., CA ',959.65. I Nxotict; Of I.xemr)t`l.on wry ,tl,le0 ;tdacu�tii�g th°i, �;Ptoject x � oxelnp �j t 1:rot�l envi t onlltental t"oview. 4 A StatC190-ft t; Of (�virra;iI"A Cot ,icietatibil w;Ys l/�I ;rs not ztdopted ror t1lt s project, 5 tli ti gn.ti,on menst;r.e s aaoptod by the i,c,tcl Agel!CY '> o reduce the :�mPnc't;s of the ul�li -oved ;project a l OVI46Co. Planning See nttoehmoat 1984 tf O}Moj16,;Oilildr6la U23 Step on A. Streeter . oxer?'r��t,l. t)n t c t, caow* � /�: fir.►". ; ;'�' ,G.D.A. tngi'neers RB: AP 28-1'7,V & 72-4043220Grand Ave. Tentative parcel 'Map .w1U, IA'Nb r NAI !1> AIL WtAL'T 1 AND tt%U"T,1' OtOARTMIENT off' PURL IC Vbnks 1 _ caow* ,G.D.A. tngi'neers RB: AP 28-1'7,V & 72-4043220Grand Ave. Tentative parcel 'Map Oroville, CA 959615 for Terry Greerty Gentlemeh.. At the regulAt imeeting of the Butte County Board of Supervisors'hel,d October r2.,, 1.984 the U held your appeal of the denial .by the � , p Advisory Agency of the above-referencedpproject and adopted a mitigated negative declaration ,regarding environmental Impact. Approval of the final map is subject to ;the conditions as listed on the attached sheet. When the conditions of :approval are complied with, it 'will 'be in order for lir. Greerty to file his "final ;map" with the t Department :of Public ;Works for recordation witfib twenty-four .(24) mohths Of the ,date �of the guard of Supervisors! action. If you should have any questions regaHi!ng this matter, please ;contact this ioffice. _ Very 'truly yours i l l iam Ch of f Director of Public Works { Orlolh6l signed.by JOHN MENWNSA Sohn l'��'ntlonsa ,Assistant Director dM/ns Attaehincnt ,cc. :clerk ;of the Board of Supervisors (.plahnlrig w rfnvirohmental .IZovll'w knvi,ronmental flea'iltll Terrey Greeny, 1151 Starr Ave., St. 31olena, CA 94574, ; , 71 77 hd.. _.max-.-....... .... . �... .. .. ...... _ ... _ 10 'Terry Greerty TEWATIVE PARCEL MAS', 20 parcels 0pprogima'ttly 1009, feet north of the intersection of Hurleton Swede`s Flat Road and Swedes Flat' Road, on both sides of Nurleton Swedes Flat Road, Swedes Flat area, Assessor°s parcel' Number: 28-1747 & 72-` 'g '03 Engineer. Gi-M Public Works Department conditions are.: 1. Submtit road and'drainage';plans to the Department trf Public Works ;for the required facilities for Nurleton Swedes `Fiat approval and install Road 2, Dined 60 feet al on`g ;Hurl eton Swedes Flat Road to the County of Butte: 3, Construct full streat section on Hurleton Swedes Flat Road and East" West access 'road to RS -7 geometric -standard. 4. Street grades and other features, shall comply with the Butte County accepted engineering Standards. Ordinances, design resolution and other` 5. All easements of record to be shown on the final map. 6. Meet the reqOirements of the utility companies `(i.e., PG&E, pacific Bell, water, sewer): �. 7,. y delinquent taxes or current taxes as. required, { Pay an q 8. Applicant to join 'a road maintenance district when one is formed,. by the .Board of Supervisor$ at their (NOTE'. This condition,was added 19.84:,) meeting of Oct. 23, Environmental Health :Dep a►,tmtnt conditions are; f. 9, Provide a 100i leaichfield free stAback around existing wells either the lbnuridar es on 411 within the lleoperty or :within 100' of property t parcels. 10. Show a 50' leachfield setback rrvni the drainage ,ny 0 parcels 10 2>'9, 10, 12, 17 iES, 15 & 20 ll Show a 1001 leachF'ield setback f,()m the spring on pArcel ll 12, prove that the required quantities of domcstir Water are available to parcels 1 thro0jo 20. 13, Show slVap)py areas on .final .map with 100' leach Free aroa around wet arekts Wi 'parcel 14, Continued on next page r . GO in -{- I-Aw F NATURAL VViAIT`II AF�t� T�EAl�1Y DEPARTMENT oP PUIC WORKS' 13L. W)LLIAM'(DIII) CHEF; biredlt5r �OUN74 CCN7�R tlEtIVE � OROVILL�, CAIYIFQ�NIA 9590 Ttlophohet (916) 534.4661 1 Se�ltember 25,, 1984 RC: AP 28-1707 and 72-3043 ferry Greerty Tental.ive parcel ,M aP 1151 Starr Ave. St Helena, CIS 94574 Dear Mr. rreerty: dv'At the regular meetheld on ing of the Butte Bothe aboves��efelienced tentative September 24i_19 84, the agency denihied Y parcel map. The project was ulened bbcause of the likelihood that Or it would cause substantial enwildlme.fe er hei9nt ehab tats antiall,yr and avoidably ineutemely f71ed- within ten (10) days of the date o If no appeals ar the Advisory Agency"s action --with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors; this action will be final. If you have any questions regarding this matter,) pleiase contact this office. Very trU1y yours; William O eff Director opt public Works hn lyn onsa ssistan't Director— JMCds cc planning Health MA a Vbt PRItte Colittty Adv,i::i6l' Apney ��pa�t Pl.anz±�i�g Di,rei+tolt� civet Ten'tative Parcel Mari of Terry Greo ty, AP and 7239-03 bars Sept,ember 18, 10114 This, is a proposal. to tliviae 400 acres int'O twCnt:y 20 acre 1.)arc:)1.9. The prbsent toning is A-5 (Agricultural, 5 acre parcels) . The Land llse Plan Map of the Butte County General Plan designates this area as Agy'icultural-Resideittial. Therm are no, specific or conmuiti'ty plans .for the area: The project site islaocww,ea within the 'criticnl winter deer range of the Mooretown Deer Herd as shown on the map +attached to the Butt Cot'inty Deer Herd Study 'Panel roport and as indicated by comments received from the Calif-16mia Department Of Fish and Game. The Deer I•lerd Study Panel 'report in recommendation SIS on nage 7 states. "The 'Depa:rttnent of Fish and Game (DPG) will identify deer migration "windows'' through the transportat .on .corridors where parcels will remain. at 10 ast 40 acres minimum in critical winter range: and 20 acres in winter range to allow deer. movement; to occur", The Department Of 'Fish and�Gamo has developed these doer migration windows and .the project site lies across one of the tvi,ndows on Iluirleton Swddes Flat Road and immediately north of another window located on Swedes Flat 'Road. As such, this project does not confom to the recommended policies of the Deer 1-lerd Study Panel nor to the recommendations of the California Ilepartment of Fish and Game. As such, denial. of. this project .is required pursuant to Sertion 664'74 (o) of the California I'1ap Act regi ding avoidable impbcts to I-V311.611fo, If, the environinonttal :impact~ reports pvopatod for this project are certified as -compl.eto :and the project wpproved the fallowing instigation Twasuros should :be a'ttacbed to, the project. - J.. roject:1. Parcels t,-ombined_to yield 40 acre parcels. 2,. All: fencing to bis constructed of, 5 strands or loss o:i barbed sv7xe, the h.ottO JTJ and tnp ware to bo a mi�bi.Aum of 16 inches and a maximum of 48 inches above the ground:. 3 'Utilize standard construction pruetices to %i,nimI.n erosion effects due to construction,, 4, obtain any necessary strrambedl alterntion permits fron) tho Department of Fisb and Gtime nmiti n'g nepartment PmSpbnse to to-inyhont,8 Rocco vod from tlyd Calafbrni+'a Del'artmont ot- 1'isll arid: `Ga*,rov the 'letirry'`ovberty Tcntativc Pareel. Map, AIS 28-17-'Ol and, '12-S,04'3. As ln'6htioned in tiro lett-or from thio Cctiifor-niA bopartment o Pislr and 'Oamo dated Augu3t 1!0, 1184, tide project site is witlibi the crit cal wintet range Of tho Roore'town Deer llerd. Tb is it k-iiai ated in the map attaclie::d to the report °of tho tuttc `Comty beer herd 'Study Panel pr opar.od a.n May bit 1984 with repx,esenta.tivt�s from tho Department or rash and 'Galnu &S 1he't ers 'of the cbmmittee. 1'110 .site 1iO8 .across a rccommOndO,d dbbt, C'ros8irig wAndow as pyo, nt�sc,d .by the llepartmeiit of VAish and �Gamo as a result of the beor 14cr(l Study Panel Cre�tt5:oi o,P 20 acre 'parcels iii +'liis area 11oul.d reduce the amoltantr, Iva itat available for der; and 6c -tract lrom thea oa's ability to be used .3s a naglratory c,:,ossan: Since no alternative ha.s beton Irroposexl 1:d�r deer eros:s ink & orn.,dc,vor lwintov deer ba i tat onhant.ometit os a result of this pro,7cct, significant iinpacts to flie, cleaLt herds will result. 7: i f i f ' 9,A 0!134 t ; �,EbRC�E 'DEUK►�EJIAN, ,�;ovvrnor StATE W tAIIPORNIA�Jkt RESbURUS AGENtf OtpARTmENT of FISH AND CAME � 'RE6104 2 1761 44IMbf5t *004, SUITE 'A RANtNo 'Ct�RDbVA, '�AIIFbpNIA 4Sd70 DUN Co. 016nnirlg carrft OroNifle, i.+�l; u � Mt. David Hironimue 7 County Center Drive tment. 1lutte Ci,runty Planning hepar Orovil.le, CA 55965 beat Mt: IXironimus: '��► to be rtmei�t of Fish and 'Game has reviewed the The Curtis �» ;tossitet-Joe Shreck f engalast `Swede's Tlat Road and Swede's D1at Subdij>ision (Doh-.j,t brapet) Environmental Impact Deports for "their adet�uacy pertinent to the 'merr G:e t tive parcel. Map A."l�. 28-17-07 and A P. 12-39-03',).. We find that ie yenta_ rand' oi` thews �E'sl flat area to mgaoLwedeet ildles3sninaduate,st atec7 and tho.t the mitigation for ,advetse Ym�xa °. Swede's Flat is within critical winter m e -4�tation.re r tdwh DSerinl oematilierdons area 'has a well ,known h�.story, of good 1 ^on this gree has izuppl ied to ;the 179 'the Greerty TpM in _out We have :pointed out some ,off 'our conch ��-tck��rt� sits a8tr'7cle a rbo5jt ended DebraN 8; 1''984 =letter. In addition; � deet cressin� window Apar bared wh�hhere at(1oialterna ve deer crossing h impair deer mov..me WxndOW Sites:. ':i if the Department can ;! o tui the L .s5.stanc,,please contact .7etry Mensch r ) rnVirianmental Services Supervisor, tol.ephone ,(S"1 &) 3554036. Sincerely, 2au"� T. Jensen Regional. Manage I 6 o Co. N.Wng min, �ti �-Depnrfr iw + � Memorandum AUG �; Toi Bettye 1<ircher, pl anhs'g 'Director �,iorulii kflnM, *06rtment of Public 'Works su�3�c7r Swr,des Flat Are, ti ferry Greerty Tentative parcel Map Ap 28-17-07 E� .Ap 7,2-89-08onr� August 2; 1984 Swedes Flat and Hurleton Swedes Fla Road, that serve the area in question; are unimproved dirt r"bads, ''hey a.re substandard in horizontal and rtical alignment and are general.fy narrow, Although they receive seasonal maintenance, they -are not always traversable in the winter ihontht It is public Works'` + Position that these roads are suitable for the historic' uses of thu area; i.e., grazing; hunting, etc,and until improve dwould f not be adequate to serve a developed arta as dependable access foremergency serlride and fire suppression. School but service could not be depended upon during the winter mohths in the rbadslresent condition. William Chef :Director of -public Works Uqfyn en onsa A istant Director JM/ns i 9 �1 c NoTM, b1: comp1,t-rov, s — ED." (Or 1mitt romironmoltal Impact Roport) JUL 231984 Jerk AtS 0�, s x n AGVNC1 n1A1?n1t.l AII.t\ T C�ttt�tj• .:F 3>_t>~tc lrl,n�nan� �. PR(JJ1 cT . TT'1'I t.. merry Gredrty Tebtat ,ve Parcel Map 8 17 -07 and 72-35-03 Lo 71P52-17` 01�.13-01, I° f ..._.. .. #y. .,.. :._. .- .v..ur-.r,+,..a ..i.r+:..,y.4.wrr✓.w..:N Mr.4.�+�.n �r.r.+.a-...,a.+v,+, wwMra.a�..f tea+-r.-rw-'i A )aRT S5 C I Ty'., CC LINTY ; 7 County Centex' I titc Ile Tauttc { I CONTACT; p1lk8ON AREA COC)ti. PIION11 1 Ai Klv icr Dlrectdr of r-itu bi 916 534-4601 Pi MMIC T MISC121 TT -ON O;I" 1\!A7'1�ItF :PCS 2I?c ,5%t 1N]) 13I NI"dt1 5 Tentative parcel. Asr_p dividing 400 acres to create tweet -y 7s located a �xo7t3matC� 1.000 feet north of the 20 acie parce,,. intesecty on of titarleto Sw dos flat Road avid Swedes Mat Rnac, cin both sides of Hur].e':on Swedes Vlat Road, Swedes Vl:at aeeai, i PROJVICT 1.0(,A*,I:ON Cll,Y P1 0,1):C'T 1,0C ATTON 1 Bast ofotovill or l;�lt to 1E �1'T1tiC" C 1:1 Ct111 TIRO iYDM) 1011 ill VTl`W+ m �. 30 days cntlinq A,uqugb 271 104 Al)l)Rl;S8 W111,111 COPY OV DRAT" 1 Tlt IS Ah"AILAIM)"P1,•tlttaing nCpartiliont, * �Usj.ticj prevj.ou�31y certified rl l;tw foie the ToIIo vinr� Curtis 1 11wAsiter AP ,28-17-60 and aoe Shre0k0hgaU.St, AP 28-17-08 Swedos Plat Subdiiyision Mrapor) ai 11c1 � I 7117 72-25-26 � 12-32-1.9, 4, 5 � ad s, CA ` jifty 25, 1984 x ilk ade Couni LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BBAU1Y PLANNING COMMISSION 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965` PHONC: $34,4601 Rl, merry Groerty Tentative Parcel Map AP 28-1.7-07 and ;AP 72-33-03 a Log N 84-•01-13-0 p Ali, interested persons are hereby notified that twin previotasly certified-rinvironmcntal Impact Reports are being utilized for the above project. Also being -utilized is the initial, Studd Checklist which has been prepared for the project. Tho description, of the- above project as as. follows Tentative Parcel Map dividing, X100 acres to create twenty 20 acro parcels, approximately the intersection of lw.�catcil a ro�ianatel 1000 feet tlox'Lll of l•lurleton Swedes 'l?].at flood and :StJedps P1a't Roadi on both. sides ' of Hurl.eton ;Swede's Plat Road, east of Orov.11e, l Thb two previously ccrti.r .ped Vnvirol mental Impact Reports are curt'cs Vi Ross,:Ltt~r, P 28.1.7-60 and Joe Sh-cckengaust, ALS 28-17-08 (July 1975) a,nd. Suedes Plat Subdivision (ltobevt tlraper) , AP 72-29426 ;and 72-32-10, 4 and 5 (July 1,0.8.0) To avoid any uttn,ecossary, costs AM are not d;15lr-1but1ng this document to private ,ind.i.v.iduals or dupl.ic:atr, cop.ieq to public agencies: Copies of the documents a're av;lilabl,e ror putilir: r�:v10 at the .l�:tannirtl; llep<artment at 7 County Center 1lrivo, oliovill•e, the tette County Library brtnch+�s, G111- Stdto `1 nivorsity -,tnd 1:itatt-e Cn11,0,ge i,ibra•ry ''1'ltere ts a charge or, $20.67 for tho documents,� you would like a copy o1: the documents, 00�)' Will be s0ht to y01p :Talion hoCci.pt by this otfi.co or $20,0 plus postage or $1,90 for n. otal or $22.66; Should you have any question's)crntect thi department. Si.f'lcttre:iy, w� David it, Hiroolmus Associate Plunnat ijltl l : Ila t NOTICE TO THS PUBLIC All ifiterttted persons are hereby notif ed that two previously` ; certified i,e,.�`iro,nviental impact Reports arCi being ;utilized for the follow1,*I project. Also -being utilized is the Initial Study Checklist :;+,Mich has been pro -pared for the project. Terry Greertyy Tentative 'Parcel Map - AP 28-17-07 and AP 72-39-03 Dividing 400 acres to create twenty 20 acre parcels: located approximately 1000 feet north of the intersection of Hurletoi Swede's Flat Road and Swedes Flat Road) on both sides of Hurleton Swedes Flat Road, east of oroville. The two previously certified Environmental Impact Reports are as follow Curtis E. Ro s ter, AP 26-17-60 and Joe Shz0dkongaust, AP 26-17-68 (July 1975) and, Swedes Flr ` ".nubdivision (Robert Draper) AF and 72-32-19, 4 and. 5 (duly 1980); Copies of the above mentionedEnvronmental Impact Reports and the Initial.. Study Cheoklist are available for public reVieW at the Butte County Planning Department at 7 County Center.Di`ive, Orovi7le, the Butte County Library branches.;, Chico State Univer sity and Butte 'College Library: Public comments concerning the material contained in the EIRs and the Initial Study Chnck.list are solicited. Such comments can be submitted to the Gutte in+ v Hanning Department at tl o address listed AbbVe until the QIo.qe of the 30 day review period I at 5 p.m.,- August 77, 1934: ' I %TRC8F,R of planning ' i To be published . 3t the orovi LII Md,`-tV.rY cin Thursday, July 6, 1984. YES MAYBE Na 19 RECREATION. Will the pfd-pbsal resijlt in an impact 'Upon the quality or quantity of exi,st'tig recreational 6PPO'rtun,,I,ties? 210. CULTURAL Rt8ouRcts. Will t -h -e proposal result in the alteration of or the :destruction of a prehistoric:o historic archaeological sjtp? b. Will the proposal result in advorse physical or aesthetic effeectS. to A I)rehIstoric or historic - building, structure or object?, c. Does the proposal have the 'Potential to cause a physical change which 'Would affect unique tthni4 cultural values? d. Will the proposal restrict= 01. 4 re igIOUS or sacred uses �,ithin the potintial impact area? X V DISCUSSICIR--or. ENVIRONMENT EVALUAT11ON �AP 28-17-07 & 72-39-" lb,c,d, 3f 4 M Access to the property is by flutleton Swedes Flat Road and Swedes Flat Road. Both roads are substandard and Hurleton Swedes Malt Road in particular will require considerable Uprovomont. The access road serving lots 9 through 2'0 is to be constructed crossing three tribu- taries of Lower Rocky ljoncut Creek, possibly resulting in impacts on them. Improvements to existing, roads gild Constructio)).,of- new roads will result in compaction of the soils4n ,, changes itopography, DeVelLopment of additional .20 parcels it I i this, area, will add an average ; of from 100 to 180 vo1i;icular trips per day to'.Swedes -Plat Road causing in creased maintenance requirements: if the 20 acre p,arcel,s are further; divided to 6 acre parcels a,,z is possible under the existing zo,nej then 'the Impacts W0,IAld be quadrupl-ed. This traffic load would be added to tile roo+ approved parcels along Swedes Flat 'Road, Stoney Oaks 13IVd' and Hurleton Swedes Flat Road. Additionally, 3,1110ther 15,0 to 300 lots could be developed. assuming 5 to 10 -acre Parcels. Current 1985 traffic counts oll swedes Flat Road are 80 ADT at the wo$tert, elld and 3,00 AbT at the eastern end, aPPrOX"mately double the counts taken in 1979. This project alone could account for another doublingi and with other approved lots ill the area being developed a seven to tenfold increase is likely, le. The Property li,es in all area susceptible to high erosion hazards. Relatively 1VO Y StOOP SIOPe in POttiOlig Of the site In the atea :of the access road makes erosion likely, ih. '1116 project: sij-'e lies ill all earthquake prone region, part Of-, the general foothills earthquake tdgiojj. 314. Groundwater resources nay be limited:, Sofflo, neallby parcels bave established ivalt,or suppjest 4a. A light to moderate amount of Vegetation clearing will Occur as these Parcels are dev,610 pe.d. Tile Project is in a key deer wi)lt'(,'I' range area.: : Owl bt8CUS810N tar MVIRONMrNTAL tVALUATION (Co'p't=:) Al) $-17-47 ,& 72-30'03 5a, 5d, Wildli o habitat encroachment and deterioration the project is located in an Area of Special Biological Importance (the migratory Mooretown deer herd winter range) which extends over much of the Suedes Flat area, `rile State Department of r,18h and Game policy indicates that � parcel densities greater than 1 dwelling unitper 40 acres are incompatilile with continueu deer usage of range. County Land Use policies support the protdction of winter, deer range. Obviously, existing development patterns have somewhat compromised the habitat value of portions of Swedes Fiat, particularly adjacent to Hurleton Suedes Plat and Swedes Flat roads. This makes the project vicinj,ty especially important as one Of the few areas of larger parcel sized between the hills to the West and the higher elevation summer deer range to the east. This is a concern Which 11a� `. to be resolved on an area.wide basis, but each individual project has an I' incremental impact on this resource. The project is in a particularly l sensiti-Ve location: (See attached letter from the Department of Fish and Game.) Liar i:, Local 111ttoases in noise and light can, be expected for residential use of this ;property; 8h,, 14a b, c,, o, f, 1.5a. Public/Coiiimerdial Services and Resident' y I J i.. - � for lleisit '>wlie �ro'ect �.s located r.n �n area Hliicli lia:5 been lapped Agricul'tural Residential uses, 20 to 4o acre parcels cdnsistent with the Land Use Element; l to 20 acre parcels are condi.ti.onallconsistent: llue to the isolated, rei,,ote nature of this area, its minima public service availability (fire, police) schools, roads, commercial services, electricity., and telephone) , uncertain domestic water availab`ility, and ;. the increased fuel consumption required for commuting, a trend toward psidePts arcels this arealmust er iiexpectan 20aarlower level.es in size mof setay be V' "W's `.; an istypicalfor less i,solatedpropertes near„or urbn;n services, Pile p-rojectig located In an area 14111clt is ` 0inotu-'t�1110roville via a fairly long unimproved, unmaintained road: Residtftts in this area will require upgraded road services, police and fire protocti�on, Commercial ,gorvi.ces and schools at increasing level. as the population grows. The current General Plan Land Use policy for the area supports 20 acre ini.nli iuni parcel is ` . ,appropriate rural residential density unless five k l' sizes as an , (5) conditional uxitori.a (relating to the above concerns) are sitisr�i,od As with the other issues rioted above, appropriate residential uensities � sh'oulu bt dealt with on an aronwide basis (ideally through zoningthat is , consistent with the General Plan) . However, in the absence, ora consistent zone and mij inium7parcel size, each individual, project .must be evaluatod against General. Ilan pol.i.caL-s case by case. 11, This project Will represent a significant increase in the number of i° iiniilesites i►.i the area:, 16, p G,48 Lines and Telephone lines will need to be extended to the new par:cels;+ Appei uix r - Pago 6 DiSCos*81oN UC hNUMO MG ' .03 N`lAL VALUATION (Gott t�) AP 28-],7-07 � 72-39 20 The site is located an an aroa generally considered to have moderato 80 isitkiviCy for a'`chaeological rasoureos. A survey by a quali,, ied tircliaoologi.st .for undiscovered sites is nocessatyy to determine if any rosourtos ekist and what impacts from site development wouldborptobalile,. as tivell as riecessavy mitigations to avoid destruction of are haerzlogical sites if founds 3' „ p' l ,r ,A}P.iolxllt: i� 'I'�•r,r Greextc;no'r. cc*11 _ -: gi— DAT.'A 1IIELTI A. Plyrti,l W t; 31r+M21 t 'l. p, po qi � :' 'S�'tn Tciltative Parcel, Map, A I'ontat:irre ,Parcel Map, o 400 acres: to creat „ 20 Patcol,s of 20 acres eaci ;:;. Al�j)1'Oa1a110tely 1000 feet north of the iixtersection of Iliia]:otoitIyetlras I1i�+* !toad and Swedes slat !toad on both sides of kiutiatmi Swedes piat iito.:ri) Swedes Flat area. "I . vopoSlo(l h"1111*1,� ts1' ��r`^�"a �II,It'tM°lti 20 AGS/DU �, I`lavf iIai;i �I�n7rtal ) ` H rleton Swodea viat Itonci vitt ,. %1c r.`us and tCtSritlt ,l Swedes Plil t Itollrt ri y lildiyi,_ sentic -_ loach,field 5xsteins "f jK@'til�C3. �� 43� V7:it .�" IL'1 tYr,. (� ia�. dual - - � i . 1 OlmcC' of W'nl t ?' w`Ili'.1 .�: i" ".1.11u7.�.�iillfAJ 1yn� 1 q pro-, jjtl',ty of 1'jy, 1,;i At. Swedes 11 atRoad 10. Po to ti .t r� r i"ii 'I-�ix' 31 If,", i 01 Feld � �ivkAol�iuou�.: Depending on dations (1�uachei�log-ml) ,_. t-urther diyis,� f soil cond! � ' •inns could occur, Physical 1,11yiyolirflon'i. I 1. Teimaill _ a. i, J,, > �el�oot'hills With somewhat f'5i�Yia �C,)t1 JjO .-. SrWeOU 5treipi .oiiailitiil ; t.] iiytr;i�SIni_ tile t . ov ii„I rrl� ^Ve5 r.vom 127-S' to, 1660 di l0i'.;: LOcwli:zed .Str etl sle ae,s. � g , Soils � IV aitr%atte�llx� ona>it soil series, sandy a h':� '�t��'► �alli�x��,�'t; 1',i . +, � '•� ; Y _�, �-------�------�--- , gravely loan s, 811a1.1Ow (20.40”) , mte odornly X9104 to slow j5^ er►iicabil ; well. drained) high eVoslen-r iotential. r Slow �1iormet>l��i.lity , S � j �ta'tii 'al fl i�.la y' r7Xlt III(, t�G,aT�t3 rx. lvla�t,}11t�`ll, vault txar:d 1tpt1l'oxi,ir,ttol � ilii:ie tvest;�._ —. hi�o?iriitoterll ll: Veru hi 1_.y.. d. J�3.�r� 1t►i2ox'?lt� ll`16a1 .. W L�:tli�nfe ivo 8011 Potai:1`tii I" ,._,, i:,aw ra. urliac, 1l�i,t�' Lower it lb"Ut,""'k and its 't1�4.htita'ri,os . 4Pendix' Data­;�Jheet continued; b. Ground Water: tinicnow c Drainage Characteristics: I4,1 t a ; o.; and S11TfK rP 1 aw town rd tp_Wor gbcky Nonc t Cres-k d. Annual Rainfall (normal). 35 inrhPG e. Limiting Factors; Groundwater may be limited. 5. Visual/Scenic Quality: Excellent 6. Acoustic Quality; Excellent r 7, Air Quality _. Biological. Environment 8. Vegetation: Foothill Oak Koodland - Grassiand area Wildlife Habitat: Upper Sonoran Life Zone, key winter range for deer, Cul�ural Environment: . 10. Archaeological and Historical Resources in the area: Moderate to y high sensit.va.ty - several recorded sites occur in this area. 11. Butte County General Plan designation: Agricultural_ i;esdenl 12. Existing Zow ng:�A-5 15. Existing Land Use ern--site: Vacant land—­..­­­ 144 and ...__ . -----. I 14. Surrounding ,Area a. Land Uses:111dely scattered rural residences and open land. b Zoning hilt A- 86, ci Gena Plan designations:_ A rr-cultaral Residential ` d.: Parcel. Si.ses:_Gonerat,ly 40 acre parcels, some 8 to 11 acre narcel;5 Population: to tiort—Ti aOU south e 15. Character of Site and Area: Iturtil Ccothills 18 Nearast Urban Area: O'royille,, _15 Miles itoVtliwtst 17. Rei, evant Spheres of W luence : f 18. Improvements Standards Urbiu Area: No { 19i Fire Protection Service: RaflAo { Stat on - 5 miles, a: Nearest County (State) Vivo Statioxl: Kcl"iy..Rdd�o Sta; � 11+ n le:s. bo Water Availability?r Prlyato wells - biro t �uckc_capacityr __. 20. Schools in Area: Oroy1110 schools a:I,d >jmIg r 1'1,10111 titary school Ai�pondi� �' (lel • � OEi�RGE bEUKMEI STATE OF CALIFORNIA'=THE RESOURCES AGENCY ._._ IAN, Govemoe DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME REOION 2 1701 'NIMBUS ROAD,, SUITE A RANCHO CORbOVA, CALIFORNIA 98670 (916) 355-7020 February 8, 198�CA,y'�g� COW ° Mr. Dave Hironimas;\`�` Butte County Planning Department 7 County Center. Drive Orovil.le, CA 95965 Dear Mr. Hironirmse The Department of Fish and Game has reviewed the Terry Greerty Tentative Parcel 'Map (A.P. 28-17-07 and 72-39-03) which proposes twenty 20± acre parcels on approximately 400 acres in the Swedes Flat area. This land getated by a mix of oak/digger pine woodland and chaparral. Ali, ok'O,,4 p. z -° is site lies within critical Winter range of the Mooretown Deer Herd. �4Yy > the herd's critical winter range has been aerinva tL-, n re.- (I�of �l. encroachment.' This project represents adversely sr ,�» , �� �, 3. ious g T 5''ton Of land dominated by 40-acre (or larger) pardel.s which are rrd:ni t;, 11mel sues necessary to protect critical winter range. We recommend that the TPM be held in abeyance Until V aU Gtr,cnty adopts a land Use policy to protect deer winter range. In, a TPM can t hi n. be lti�;d-fied to con form to that policy. If the Department can be of further assistance, please contact u'erry Mensal, Envirormental Services Supervisor, telephone (916) 355-1030. sincerely, Paul T.:Jensen Regional Manager I!t AW Gunk �>• .�. � .....+__'.`�:�. _ LAND O F NATURAL W� �� L r H A N-�� ' PLANNING COMMISSION 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE » OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965 . PHONE 1 534.4601 ` July 2, 1984 LsL Terry Greerty 1151 Starr Avenue` St. Helena, CA 94574 RE Tentative Parcel Map AP 28-17-07 and 72-39-03' Dear Mr. Greerty: On June 5; 1984, the Butte Country Board of Supervisors upheld your appeal of the requirement for an Environmental ; Impact Report for the above=re.Eerenced project. The, 'Board of Supervisors directed staff to use the Shroclengaust and Rossiter and the Swedes Flat Subdivision Env-itonmental Im- pact Reports For review of the project. A deposit of $500 is required to cover the cost of having 1' the documents printed so they may he cltculatod' Lhrough the State Clearinghouse and local agencies and to cover the cost of other eXpertses 'incurred by this department. in . TO - the event that urtEoreseen costs Wt.' incurred, we w11.1 reg quire the submission of an additional deposit to cover those costs. When the project is Completed, we will refund any unused rema,lnder or bill you for any costs in excess of } ' those deposited: if you have any questions, please Eec1 .Free to cot>tact � this office Sincerely, B A. KIRCHUR Director or Planning C 'D;:vi cl R i-Li.roftI LJS AssocntG Planner I blith lkt CC!GI)A. i lANL7 OF NATURAI, WCALfH AND dEAl1TY DEPARTMENT O'F PUBLIC WORKS WILLIAM (8111) CHEFF, Acting Dlrectot COUNTY CENTER DRIVE, OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA; 95985' rolephone; (916) 634.4681 Otil}e Co. Planning Comm. April 17, 1984 j�l,I7 `J'If 9194 Oroville, Calitornta AV-, Ake 28-1 7,:07 and 72-39^03 Terry Gr6trty 1151 Starr Ave Tentative Parcel. Map St, Helena, CA 94571E Dear Mr. Greerty: At the regular meeting of .the Butte County Advisory Agency held y on April. 16, 1984, the agency denied your appeal of the requirement for ah environmental i.mpdct on the above -referenced properiy because there are several uninitigated potentially significant impacts vhich require further study. If no appeals are timely filed --within ten (10) days of the date of the Advisory Agency's denial --frith the Clerk of the Board of Super risars, this action will be final. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office. Very truly yours, z Acting Director y< r3 Qhn r, hdonba ?. Assistant birectbr �T 'T.O Butte C7our,ty Advisory Agency FROMI Raymond F". arrd Jeanne F'. C`pickshank 11 P.O. Box 617 Bangor, CA 991 Parcel 28 - 17 TOPIC: THE REgTiIR TENT Poll All ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT RRPORT IS BEING APPEALED. In this statement we refer to a-project on yotr agenda wi.i'ch is an appeal requesting to be excused from an Environ- mental Impact Report. The appeal is by Terry Greerty and pertains to AP 28-17-07 and 72-39-0A, on a tentative rarce7 map presented to your agency. In our opinion, this appe .", from the EIR cantiot be grante , because the EYR has the intent to protect the environment its present state, to prevent its further deterioation, and + to provide guidance to both present end future residents, of an arehile they strive to prevent the deterioration of the area in which they live We wish to bring to your attention items concerningthe state of the natural environment in the concerned Brea a it is now. The property concerned is approximately 440 acres.. It _comprises `vthat is becoming the final hear-Wilderness 3n Butte county, A true oti',1dernoss no longer exists in this county. During the drought of j975 to 1977 resicients adj�,ceht to the parcels its this 'project experien'c'ed a s;gnif.canl drop in their Wattt Wel levels Some resident's borrowed lmter from other residents becatlae their domestic '"I's could no provide enough Water to mointein their ; ost basic heeds 7 enc W Ad_W +rk9 drinking and, ba -thing. E We have occupied our homesite since 1971• In late 1971) 2rs. Cruickshankobserved twenty-five deer crossing the drive- way within fifty yards ards ofour home;, thisis the largest group of deer observed during our time of residence here. In 19741 observed a maximum d br herd of eight. in 1983 to the pies-' we ent we have seen a n�acimum deer herd of three. We have zia''se d withdrawal % of all other forms of wildlife in r an equivalent this same span, of time. Next we wash to inform you of what "'ill occur as more of this near -wilderness is parcelled' below the size recom- mended by informed governmental depertmeriis Numerous trees will be cu t, thereby reducing the water tirev3,osly absorbed by the flora) and causing a release of k. i much higher quantities of surface Water. Thi surface water ' increases the process of erosion, it will be aggravated by roads and driveWayas and will. send higher quant- 1 ' newly -located ities of sil t down the natural drains from the area. This � 4 will, have a negative effect on the s�"isting properties lower n elevation, especially those prope,.'ties which are serviced 1 by Orovi llo TdY andotte Irrigation ;on 'District ditches. In addition, � existing on these natural. drains will recejVe heavy 1 ' ponds J - - d prior ttr their j~ silting) far beyond the amount anticipate_ pr construct ion. Levels of contaminati0ft of grOLtnd' vta;ter) of surface soils and of the atmbsphere will increase.7?reaent resa.dents will' 4 NOW resij;ents will have to drill, have to sinit deeper i r for water. No one knowd for eerta3l� rile limitations deeper l i EIR. Appeal A 3 on ground woter in this area. The increase in septic systems will re'j,t.ase additional contamination due to unforeseen imper- fectio;ns, no matter how well they are designed and built. There will be a significant increase in dog packs, in spite of any law designed to reduce stray or wild dog p popul.a.- J tions. tven now the number of these redators is too high. ,y For example-� oii February 14, 1984, we lost four Barbados sheep to two dogs roaming together. This animal is a rare sheep, J, and three had been sold. All hee been placed in a limited area for sale and shipping. '=r The possible Location of a road-e►Zd turn) ng 'circle for the parcels nearest our property wi,l brim;t A.manageable` gtzant,ity of silt into our irrigation sprink]or systems- The study made by the Butte County Planning Department has several; points worth disdussing Two natural drains to lower elevations are mentioned, i Actually, there are four natural drains from three of the Proposed parcels onto our property. T140 of t!Zese drain to storage ponds, one drains to Out irrigation head pond. Moving, westtard toward Hurletcn=Suedes Flat Road one finds many more natural drains. The Department of Fish and Game strongly recommends a minimum of 40 acre parcels far tho area in question. The Butte County General plan for ]'sand tTse recomiriends a Mini.mtim parcel site of 40 actes: EER kpp:eal 4 The ;ro&0 use per day projacted b; the Be tte County ,Planning ,1)epa; ,tmemt; appears to 'die r,.,;6 .ist ,c, yet minimal lin our d,i41.C' tX80,on of road with cur neighbors. anything ]less is rational. The rojodted iner+ease in demand for public services is definit,aly realistic, but vindicates a dreaded to x increase foo, eduoat 4on, law eliforeemerit and fire protection. We a8k that you study this appeal to be released from the regUiremelat of an EnVir enmental. Impact 11epo,.rte We ask that yott ii;� st oil the required I IR. We request that the proposed development be fined at a minimum of 40 acres: lit- art atmre of the 'benefits which accompany the in- creased nlzmflvaw 6f ,homes and job Opportunities, b'ut a bea'ut - f4 � i t. .. u]. °n tUral:: enVirolwlera'1: Will be sacr:"f. aced in thusL instance. ' Eventuallyq we will. 611 be�bsers spectfu"Lly suibmitt�ed M Shand F* Cmickshank E ,I ,Tea /h'i�e F Cruicltshanit � 0 To x Butte Coig0t4V Advisory Agency Fromm. Dave Hironinaut4 'Planning Staff Subjects Terry Greerty Tentative Parcel Map, AP 28-17-07 and 72-34-0 ii �s Dates March 20, 084' in response to thea letter appealing the requirement of an Elfd forty this projecto the following comments are presented. 1. Pi oneeei nab and constr'Ucct on of hLaW roads will cause displacement, diasruption and compaction of the sails. This department construdd the amount of .worn to be done to be significant tapprok'imAtel matelyimile �� new road plus impeovements to a more). The new road will cross 3 natural drains,. ncrea►si ng the possibility of ,impacts associated With erosion, siltation, etc. r P 2. Seismic coricetrns wO (mentioned at' a c6iia6kit only: I' is 3. Wildlife concerha reit Lett the Department of 1= i eah and OaM4 , arr latter- eequetting that no action be taka*n until. Dutt4 .County a4dopts a land une policy to protect winter ralrilir (Moor�etbon bat -me Herd). Since thin project cannot be signilPicAhtl'y delayed under C' EGA, the eadoMmee6dati dnas of the Dep lerti aht of Fish and Game regarding 40 acre minimums for now hats, must be eased as A guideline., 4. The Land Use Element of the General Plan 1 i ttiei up iho 44 acrsi V `. nmums as conDsi stent With the Agri cUl Weal 14:nsi d4inti al minimums i designation. ecause of the location of thae` prnjoti4t, 40 acre ff Acre rarce:ls msns) y be .more appropriate !seer deer' herd L3 . piny increase in traffic an the ebads in this iisraeii 16:ausse r rleasaon for concern. Furl atop SWedaes Flan Road and Swedes slat Road are both substandard. Trip generation studies from different jurisdictions'ndicaite that 7 trips pair day per unit It reasonable for rural development, With id � rrr more in Urban areas: b. a lacking, the Will ghould rLalii;e that public Whi"le people living in !Fie are5a f1 services ar y irmand publics sast-ufices in the form of fire and polite prpta*r_+ J tsh, school et i °ptol i dwA:sjte 4: dioobsal Ahd road maihtenance bI kHO1kt ccs Terry Oeomet GDA ro FNGINEEMNG_ ��" �a %`" '' 220 GRAND AVEN.-IE' SUIRVEYING o ORO'VILLEj CA, 95965 �l �A 7 s' PLANNING � , (916) 533-2068 rN� nuo� March 8 1984 4 1000 Co. Plennln9 COMM. Butte County Planning Department 2 O1984 rvvill 7 County 'Center Drive 01 California Orovil.le, CA 95065 i i Rt A.P, #28-17*07 F 72-39-03 1. Gentlemt'n, On behalf of my client, Mr. Torry Groerty, :I respectfully appeal the requiren►ent t,laat an thvironnoht Impact Report be prepared for this projl�ct. Iii reviewing, the chis e cl ecklist, I disagree on several items. Item lb., Th ` ect twill not result in signikicant dis, rupt:a.ons, .displae-em'ent, etc. of soil, rlor will. it result in any si ni i,canty ine.rense in erosion or siltation`. With groper construction tech: iques, siltation, erosion ani altoi%ation, or rate of .flow in ground water will. not be substantial. This ,area is less susceptible to earthquakes than the majority of California and is less apt to incur a damage than the majority of 1lutte County due to location. item 5a. and 5d. are subject to controversy. pish and. Came has, in the past; t-ound 20 acre parcels acceptable. This was the design criteria used. in preparing this submittal, With a minimal amount of mitigating; measures, there would be little impo,ct on the llooretown deer herd. Homesites could be :def ined to create basically the same 'mpacts as 40 acre pareols, item 8 . Lwid U80 This 'project is in I comformity, with stated ,planned land uses. Item 11, population; Placing 20 hor-, ;iter on 240 acres couldhardly represent a change in. 'dt;,.�sity, etc. , of human population when it is in comEormity with planned go4is as set .forth in the County Land' Use element, Item 15'a, and c, : While it is realistic to ;assume seven cars per day increase in trnfl+,ic f:or each lidmesitc in elle suburbs on a pvr parcel basis, 1 believe the count is i�it7re nearly J'ou'r in rural areal.. Based on 24 parcels /1 .:...u.Ji....+n,»?i.e.ri.;..14•+v1:Nnrr'RWewNr:N�•nw>'awr:eMer,:.. r". .-.—r...wrr i.... ..r...",a r. .«...r, .:..,,., . ... .. .. J N1 j k,s } l ish and x r. amounts to lens than 100 A.D:T. Considering' I think its a little na:a,�te Games concern with 20 acre parcels, to open discussion. of poten��tal traffic impacts that might occur if the parcels were fuether divided in conformanc with 14, P,,ablic Services: Historically existing zoning. Item have;,been little or no public services extended to outlying; needed. Witharea s of rural counties nor have they been specific regards to this project, a public report will be of furnished to eachotential buyer making them fully aware pservices Item 20 Its my thelack of public availalale. that archaeological clearance was received on. � understanding this project so this item should not be_r:ause for concern... 4 } kespectfully, f G:D.A. D'NGINUtRING, SURVEYING, T. Vi PLANNING 11 IVilliam IV. Geddis z � , IVtiVG/Jm i32-sa CCt 'Perry Geerty i t1 m f w � Greerty - TPM'- Zoning History - SwedGt Flat Road A-2 August 29, 1955 - all Ordinance 522 A-3 June 2.0, 1967 - all Ordinance 937 A7J2 August 26, 1969 - Same as "M -R" below - Ordinance 1046 1 �C-R Decomber 9, 1969 - See attached = Ordinance 1058' is y f ,t N, GDA Engineering - on behalf, of Terry Greerty, appeals the Advisory tAgency's denial of a tentative parcel map (item on which previously certified environmental impact reports are being utilized)', AP 28-17-03► 20 parcels; approximately 1000 feet north of the intersection of Hurleton- Swedes Flat Road and Swedes Flat,Roado Swedes Flat area (from 10/16/84) MF ( 84-744 Motion: NOTED THAT THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE 'CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL (Cont'd) QUALITY ACT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED AND CONSIDERED IN MAKING TIiIS DECISION. ADOPTED A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION REGARDING ENVIRONVXNTAL IMPACT, USING PREVIOUSLY CERTIFIED EIR'S OF 1975 AND 1980,,NOTING THAT THE DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME HAS 'NOT 'SUPPLIED DATA TO SUBSTANTIATI ITS CLAIM THAT THESE ,20 ACRE PARCELS WILL I-MVE A SUBSTANTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENT -14L IMPACT ON DEER HERDS. THE CREATION OF PARCELS DF THIS sign IN THIS AREA WILL NOT CAUSE A BARRIER TO DEER MIGRATION. IF THE DEPARTMENT°OF FISH AND GAME FEELS THIS PRIVATE PROPERTY IS A CRITICAL DEER CROSSING'"WINDOW" FOR THE AREA, THEN THE STATE SHOULD PURCHASE THIS PRIVATE PROPERTY OR EASEMENTS FOR PUBLIC USE .,NOT CONDEMN PRIVATE PROPERTY WITHOUT COMPENSATION. MITIGATIONS 2, 3 AND 4 AS PROPOSED By, THE ,APPLICATION OIJ MEMO FROM PUBLIC WORKS DATED OCTOBER 11 WERE, ADDED TO THE PROJECT TO ADDRESS IMPACTS. FOUND THAT THIS ARI +A IS ZONED FOR THIS T1'PL" OF "c RURAL RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT. ��•.. TH9AE ARE OTHER PARCELS OF tHXS SIZE AND SMALLER IN THE AREA ANO IT WOULD BE UNREASONABLE TO DENY THIS PROPERTY OWNER THE SAME RrGHTS ENJOYED BY OTHERS: FOUND THAT THE PROJECT CONFORMS F- TO THE'BUx'TE COUNTY GENERAL PLAN AND UPHELD THE APPEAL OF THE ADVISORY AGENCY'S DENIAL OF A TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP FOR TERRY GREnTY, AP 28-11-407 AND 72-39-03, ADDING PUBLIC WORKS CONDITIONS'1 THROUGH 7 AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH CONDITIONS 8 THROUGH 12 AS LISTED ON THE MEMO FROM PUBLIC WORKS 'DATED OCTOBER j.1, 1984,AND OZ14EY WILL AGREE TO JOIN A ROAD MAINTL�.U'TANCE" DISTRICT WHEN ONE 18 VORMEb:. M S. Votei 1 Y 2 N 3 Y 4 Y Sri (Motion carried) bult�S COUNTY '#QAA0\�0 80ft V�Sy <"� M NUTS � ttc�ola� ►. 2� �. ,� ��� t4;6734'G-D-A. Uginsering on bebikli of Tern Greert )' Agcncyls denial'of q tentative y Yr'appsa�l ©€ flee Ad*isory j parCOL ma (ite* o which P pCeriaeu`sly ; certified environmental impact reports are being utilized), AP 20-17.07 and 72--39-03, 20 parcelsi approximately 1000' feet north of the int'erseetion of Hurleton-Swedes Flat Road and Swedes Flat Fuad, Swedes Flat area. Motion; MADE A MOTIk* OP INTZ*T To UPHiOLb APPEAL 00 TrMy GREEDY' TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP, AND CONTINUED BEARING TO OC2WER 23 FOR FINAL MOTION. M S Vote: 1 Y 2 ti 1 'Y 4 'y 'S N (Motion' d4c ri6d) m { 1 { l I o, �� r1 fi.'• jNyw,r•�r) •�] Hwy ,w■ t y■(p, y�.]��// T pN ` [MT F y V� �V�Iii 11 YOARD" iC ,♦l R „i 'l.l � r �O 40 '16i 6 tQ 1 r � A is • f � r • "fie `' � • _ AL b r .r.C»R ....r P,NI�xNty (3�SId3N SSUMMARYBX�i1+E!xT :i�'0A1,.ApPLICANT'a� Terry Gree-rty Log488~-03-21-05 1151 Starr Avenuo, 'St. Helena, CA 94574 ADDRESS— Same ._». TPM to divide 400+ acres to create 20 20 acre pROJEC'.T DFSCRIPTION-...—. Parcels' ..�. LOCATION ;approximately 1000 feet north of the intersection: of .Hurleton Swedes Plat Road and Swedes Plat Rd., on both sides of Hurleton Swedes t 28-17-07, 72-39-03 A8SESSlOR.' S PARCEL NOVIBER {S) _ A Resp A-S�-_, .._, GZNERAL PLAN � P110J •;CT C�C�t� SXIiENT?», ZONING ._».� �.._ .. GENCES 11VOR' D 'Z'Ia OF r�t PLAN'(:ONI;ORt�1A I APPLICANT S'„Ct,k"1A`I'U E LANE CONSr,, RVATION ACT CONTRACTS-?,---, DA11%RT~' March 18 1988 A�'Pi�.Xt;?1 x0I Ron Graves & Associates AGENT/SUAV'EyOR/CI-VIL C NGINL"k1R, a» ._.s . _.......,.....: ,... P.O.. Box 986, Orovillej CA 95965 DATE PLANNING DIRECTOR'S RtPORT ENt,. ? ;'rtTf�J 'N't`AI7 CATPC ORICAL tXtMPT SON I)VI't PILED�<,� �,� .�..... OE'I'EVM*. TATI0N AND 1) aTV,'»� .» NFGhT"jVB* DECLARATION - DATA ,a V1,1GATE0 t OG. DECLARATION I' A"I't l AD0I'TY,-',D ENV 11,14'1A."T IU,Pt)R' ' .YM. 1vY.rn •Ye r » 4Y:i`+ .arxn ... -»4.a- ..4 .x ♦fia N:'.s»�... iY.r..s i.H-*iMFYw}W*.WMyLYif.i�M�� :�a..�,,, Yf4 e.wR ♦ �xw As�iV Miyr.srAiSFyiF�:-giyi�F�•Y-Yma�}�.{i,:yf»�.� .r+:.y}. N.�aip.+�}'. �1 •v. .. y'� (q r: l.:+ vji,:,nI .l.N w �.�11�J:r lis y. }�� �% �( i�I1p i1�.' 'VNCNr I�i�At' I (. Lfe.: �t(� f ��� t `y j�r� y� j� �'j��(" i,w Jll �.'SO R.t� R]VJiJ: CA. t'1i. .L V1Y �.nrwcy`.+.r.�.*.w••,,raz �. a.. �v.Y�.Lr....:i.. w.v.Ya,.».+,.n..awaFw=-.+ cw.,x.:M: 'w.��.wk.=e+ude..w'. .F.Ww:1�k]a. Y..w++Pr:+ .:� t wla, yyµµ1 �Y1 R/xfh)1D ACTION i,,,(.�rwgjI",,W,vw pokti PLANNING C,IR IC..TOR1 S 10TUY$N.`Y.. w.a.. - -.Y�.� la"irN4MY+WWui.r.A/i0iiw.IF.uJr#i.' `��+}.VfFW+M1;1�ITiWIie Y.. xaKCnw W.n�+M`.M ya.Y.wM41+i»�:R WMWwW.+r:au.o'»'4w'+rYVLw..,.M+-Y1ri�W.+.++Y.w.W.uiitiM.w'FY+"V�!°Y'a^iwiw.l.�WWt�1M. ' . n.': � _ .. .., a :..:. .'.........-� ._... ... .. ..... .., .. �......' .:.. ,.I. . ....:.:_ �... - __ INTER-DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO. Butte County Advisory Agency FROM,: ;Planning Director SUBJECT;Report on the Tentative Parcel Map of Terry Greeny, AP#028-17-0-0.17 DATE: February 22, 1989 This is a, proposal for a Tentative Parcel. Map to divide 400 acres to create 20 lots of 20 acres each. The present zoning is A-5 (_g parcels) The Lana Use Platy Map of the (Agricultural - 5 acre Butte County General Plan designates this area as Agricultural- Residentiali There are no specific or community plans for the area. The initial study performed for this project identified potential impacts to wildlife and a Focused Environmental impact Report (FEIR) was required. The final. appeal of the FEIR was denied by the Board of Supervisors August 16, 1988. To date, no action has been taken by the applicant toward preparing a FEIR. The California Elivironmontal. Quality Act allows one year to certifythe EIR. (PVblic Resources Code Section 21G80.2.) A The one year period maximum'Ma0-d 2l xterlion is possible. 90-da erten expires . A 90-day extension would be of no help to the applicant since it will take from.6 to 9 month minimum to select a consultant and prepare an.FEIR Similar time limits existunder, the Permit Streamlining Act, Government Code Section 65,943., A decision must be made no later than the Advisory Agency meeting of March 20 1989. RECOMMENDATION. A. Find that the envi'ronmeiital documents for this protect have not been completed, and; B. Dena the Tentative Parcel. Map for Terry Greerty, AP#0?.8-17-0-01.7 and x#072-39-0-0.03 pursuant to Public ReSOurces Code Section 21080,62 and Government Cade section 65943+ DH t fC'a cc-. Terry Greeny Rod Graves and Associates car ire LICENSED'LAND 19'Mr3) 5;t�al)5F�7 � sanvvoas Lt 50 P.O. Box 986 oIl17Vt. CA 95905 A CALIFORNIA 01 . IRATION 100 GOLD DIICa MLI QIV6 Buffe Co. Manning ComM. June 3i 1988' JUN 1988 Ororqlle, California Job 488-014 Butte County Planning Dept 7 County Center Dr. Oroville,; CA 95965 attr,: Dave Hironimus rt --t A.P. #28-17-07 & 1. response to YOU Appendix IF" dated 4/18/88, We did not realize - YO" were waiting for our response on the Appendix �' , We thought you were waiting for an archaeological Check which has alreadv been done as we notit4ed you by telephone. This is a project that was approved. for 20 acre parcels. All the soil tests were taken, the roads built, test wells dxilled, all surveying completedi sn short, everything Was rompletod as Per county requirements,, but the final map was not recorded before it expired. We submit the follow-i.ng as . Your Appendix ''F" Pet ou Recommended mitigation measures 1.) Not necessary as one has been clone. 2.) We `respectfully decline to do this aS we feel, the projoct should be "grandfatherod" in for lack of a better word,, because was as reason #2. technical over.,, 3aht that the ma was not recorded in time: a.) Same 4.) We agree to do so. 5:) We agree to do so PleaYour earliest convenience so we can ,get. an with san;ycapptalstorle sotheat r actions that may be necessary., 'hank you Res ectfully,, Ronald: L. Graves Jinn Caves and Associates do Terry Greer` Inter-Departmenta]. Memorandum TO: Advisory Agency FROMt Planning Staff SUBJECT: Terry Greeny, Tentative Parcel Map, AP 028-17-0-00 anA 072-39-0-003 DATE: July 11, 1988 An initial study performed for the above -referenced project revealed that there were potential impacts associated with this project regarding archaeological resourcesi water quality within area streams, and wildlife, specifically migratory deer, The applicant has agreed to attach mitigation measures to the ;project that will reduce or eliminate potential impacts to the environment for all of the impacts identified in the initial study except those regarding migri-itory deer, While the original project approved in 1984 also required an EIR, documents certified in July 1975 were used. Since 198,, additional information has been developed identifying impacts to migratory deer in Butte County- which: are not addressed in any previous EIRs. The information consists of maps prepared by the California Department of Fish and Game and direction by the hoard of Supervisors regarding implementation of the maps and General Plan policies involving; wildlife. A consultant has been contracted to prepare an Energy) Natural Resources, and Recreation Element of the Butte County General. Pian and an tIR which will address migratory deer; The first draft is due in 1989, and will not be ready, in time for consideration of this project Additional information regarding � re �tig g 'ildlife impacts can be found in the initial study and letters attached thereto, Rec6mmondation': Because of the above stated concerns, it is recommended; that the requirement for a focused<EIR be upheld. DRfI i lr cc: Terry Greeny Ron Gtaves & Associates Encs. t. t' ucou�zt LAND OF t�lr',TUIxAI ���C:AI rf! AI DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH DIvISION OF GNviRoNm5N`FAI- HEALTH j County Caniar Dfl/A7 EM -11 Rood 951961 � I�eradile, Califurnitf 95969. Address ❑ 196 Memorial Way orovlllo, California 95965 Chico}Calii I r Y u�tt - --NATURAL We,,LT-I ANIS Cl AU7Y L A N D O F �r PLANNING_ CQMMISSION 7. COUNTY CENTER PI2tVE OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA V96x+3999 e.. PHONE- 590601 April 18 1988 Terry GreertY 1151 Starr Avenue GA 99574 St. Helena, Re Tentative Parcel Map AP 28:.17-07,, etc. tog No 88-03-21-05 - Dear Mr. Greeny: � inn of ro osed project, a land division of. rse An initial study of your P indicates potentially AOOi acres to create '20 parcelsr 1.m acts, suitable tat imp acts tc� the environment (rmina�eotthese enclosed environmental checklist) To reduce or el aft o the project. ursuant Impact Report (EIR) is required p mitigation measures are require as P wise, an f �nvironn►entai Imp uality Act to the California Environmental Q Planning his notification sent to the 'yo response to t, ur project. An early expedite the scheduling ofdays from the Department, will out written response within 15 Please forward date of this letter o project lies in an area where archaeological s�.tes have your Proj orpotentiallyi.inra exist. In order to assess the been recorded if any, you may contact the otential for adverse impacts aanaopria � moue what, evaluation. mti9etiow measures would with Section, Town following office for a records sea rab'lyewsth,It' S Y A site plan and/or location tap (P a able to the ,e payable Y mutt be sent w,_ hi and Range') mu.� .. e:�t �t �r� dee of $10.00 Information Center for this s , California Archaeo,,logical Invento'ty Information center c/o DepartmOt t of Anihropoiogy' c�.".;tte University California .... Cheo v CA t'3G�y29-0400 Attentioltt Curator of Records en+t an archaeological survey be Should the o a'wGo. ecomm- ],lrt'hen beanecessary for 110 to contact an conducted, Terry Greert April18, 1988 Page 2. individual who is professionally qualified to provide such an p' evaluation. A list of qualified consultants is lnoluded. Those R individuals can be "hired to perform an archaeological survey or arrange for such a survey. in the event of an EXR requirement, a subsea letter will. be sent outlining the procedure for the County to select the consultant to prepare the HIR. If you have an or comments, please contact Y stions goes this ^ office any weekday between 10:00 a.m. and, 3:00 p»m. sincerely, H.A. KIRCHER Director of Planning David R. Hironimus Associate Planner !' DRH/sj I, Enclosures c: Ron Graves &Associates; P.O. Box 986, Oroville'CA 95965 f f S 1 C , t r APPENDIXIF COUNTY OF BUTTE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM Lead Agency) (Tc be complete by 1_09 Mo. 8$"03-21-05 AP No. 28-17--07, etc. I. BACKGROUND 1, Name of prop anent 2. ,Address of proponent and representative (it applicable); Ron Graves. & Associates; �..-. p,q Box- 986 1151 Starr Avenin _ _.._ :Orova-lle� CA 95865--0986 w tative k _ e1_Ma_- 3. project description. __ HT1. .. e -- -- Ii MANDATORY FINDINGS OF aIGNIFICANC 1, boas t[ie project have potential to degrade eC es causeta fish or wildlife populauonOf 1he environment, ,tordro�p reduce the habitat of° a fish or wildlife spec below self-sustai �o�range� traarare ten � ondt ngered plant or animal or ehmirtaie rrnportarrt+. number or restrict e.,. examples of major periods of G31ifornia history or pre is ory .... ecc the 2. foes the project have the potential to achmvact ort-termon the environmentisonce detriment hich occur n a Will. , Q - , environmental goals? (Ashort-term p ng -term irnpaats will endure into th3;(uture.} ecce. relatively brief period of time while Inulativ ly ted, but cum 3, Dpgs the project have impacts which are aara1e�resourcelimVswhere tile impact on each resourceo (A project may •mpact oil Iwo of more sep . is relatively small, taut wrrere the effect rat the total oP those impacts on the envirenr ten `13 significant :. ....... .,.,...,. ecce. ..» 4. Does the project Noteenvrronrn0n+aI effeiwhicil will cause substantial adverseseffc cls on Q' )� human belOgs.'erther z3rrcctty or indirectly? t p d Arinrroy) On ttie ba;irs 'of this initial evaluatton 111, DETERMINATION (o ���. curn feted by thc. Ger, r�► ro rased traject COULD Nab iravc ,r tiigniticant effect on tile envirenrnent, end a N GA N ItW1=find tile p p p bt0f.ARAT16N will be prepared. grit effect 0 0 v"' 1 not a although the proposed project could have a si01wA5UN S desarlf ritithd on they attached sheet �have IANfsund that be a Sig nif'i+ ant effect in this case because the M17f GA ilo Wi been ridded to the project. A NEGA� IVE a�sl.A�AiION will be prepaked have a srrin'trcant etfec� on this,_ -10116 0t, and an E,.gVItlbNfvftNTAL IrW� find the proposed prefect MAY IMPACT REPORT is required. CCUN OF SUTT5, PLANNING DEpAfIi MENT . ._-•--ecce. .. �,� r �.�,,. ��.9.13�8,�.,,..R Associate DAT5! D Ake _.__ .. avid R;rj j oviewo6 by: y IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Expwnations of all "YES" and "MAYBE" ari .w.ers are required 4n attached sheet(S) ) 1. EARTH, Will the proposal result in significant7 YC f fUTAYDE NO a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? .. , f i b. DIVOT)tions, displacements— compaction or overcovoring of the soil? c. Change in topotiraphy or ground surface relief features! .... , .. d. D lstrucb-A, covering of modification of any unique geologic crr physical 'ftaratutii ,7 y. Itic rease in wind or waiter erosion of s0s, either on or cuff site? , .. , . , I ..... • . .... C 1 f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, dripor furan or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bpd of the aoonn or tiny. 0-4 0 bay, inlet or lake a ................... ... g. Lass rel larlta3e agriculturally productive outside drwSigriffied urban arnw;l .... 11... Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakot i, londslidcs, Y ` C3 G mud:slides, ground failure or similar hazards? ..... , » , . • • a s ... • . ... , ...... , 2. Alta. Will the proposal result in wutasitritiat �f C1 a. Air ernissions or deterioration of ambient air quahiy`r . .—.—...... . .......... b 'The creation of objectional odors, smoke or fumoa 1'., ... , ....,... .». ,,ionally'y..................... ............. t CI 1�9 c. Alteration of am Movement, moisture, or taint erature, or an change in cl,uriate' locally or 9 3. WATER, Will the proposal result in substarr' 31 a, Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements In either rriario, 1r fleshwaters')....,.....,.,.. ..,.... ... I .............. ... .... .. C. b, Cha.rigos in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surfaco runraff?: . Vic, hlesJ for offsite -,urface drainage improvements tnclucin'g vegetation removal, on or culvert installation'a . • . uht3nne .,»„ ....... .,. Lf � d, AiterationS to the course or fit1w, of fluted waters? . e. Ctaange in the amount Of surface water In any water body 1. rlisplaargA Intra Surface waters. or in any alteration of Surface Wator quality, including but 1:3 0 not limited to jempurature dtssolvPd oxygen or turbidity g, Allt,Mtuan of the direction or rate of fltrw of ground wat(lr.') . • .... , h. Change in the quantity of quality ref ground waterS. either 11`11-01.10h diroct iadditiorv.i or v ql—. irawais, or through interception of an aquifer br , Cut" of excavali000 f. Deduction ill the arnount of water r.therwise available, far public water Sutapl I1 1. EAposure of people of propeaty, to water related hazards such as flooding A, PLANT LIFE, Will the proposal result in substantial; a. Change in tlae diversity of species, or number Of any specie s of pli3 nts frncluditirlIreus. , sh rubs. grass. (,roes, a17d agaratie plants) , .. .. , ... , , , . . , . , 4— 0 b, Reduction of the numbers of any unique. rare or endangered nprtcies of plant i? , , . ... , d c, Introduction of now specteS of plants into err area, or In a barrier to the normnl replenishment Of existing species? . , ,1, . , . , . , , , .. , . , .. . �,;,.,..,. .... , d, Reduatidn m acreage 01 tiny agricultural crLp . . .... .... . . . • aY ANIMAL LIFE. Will the pruposal result,In substantial., YES MAYBE NO a. Change In the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shell fish, benthfc organisms Or insects)? ..........r b. Reduction in the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered specles of anlmnlV ,.1.., 0 0 25 c. fritroduction of new speclos of animals Into an area, orresult in a barrierto the mlgrotion or movement of animals?--. .... .Y.. .., ... %,..,.... ........., ... PO 0 0 d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat?...,. ...Y ..,,.X 0 0 G. NOISE. Will the proposal result in substantial: a. Increases in existing noise levels?............................. .......YY.,,.....Y .. 0 G1 G b; 'Exposure of people to severe noise levels? ........................ . Y ...,... Y ........... 0 0 7. LIGHT AND GLARE. Will the proposal produce~ significant light and glare? ........, %, . * . , 0 0' Y�3I CG O ' proposal ult in asubstantial alteration of the present or Tanned land t p 81 LANtiUSIf=Y Jiilt, r.res..Y.Y.:.,Y...YY..Y,.,..,..YY,,.Y.,..Y,.Y....Y,,.. use an area? ......... 0 9. NATURAL RESOURCES. Will the proposal result in substantial a, Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources?....................:.......,....,. © [ b, Depletion of any non-renewable natural resources? ... Y ... Y ......... X ....... .1....... D CJ 10. RISK OF UPSET. Will the proposal involve: a, A risk of explosion or .release sof hazardous substances (including, but not limited to tail, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) In the event of ars accident or upset conditions � 0 l Q b, Possible interference with ail emergency response plan or emergency evacuYltion pian').. 0 0 &56 11. POPULATION. Will the proposal After location, distribution, density, or growth role of the human population? .X.Y..f.,.*...........%.."..,.,.„YY.............,..,..Y.*Y......: Cl f29 12, HOUSING, Will the proposal affect existing housing, or creato a demand for additional housing' Y'... laY T'RANSPORTATIGN/CIRcULATiON, Will the proposal result In, a: Goneratforl of substantial additional vehicto movement? . . ..... : ........ . . ........ b, Effects on existing parkirrto 'facilities, or demand for new parking` ... Y , , c. Substantial impact on existing transportation systems? ... . .......... *. . ...... Y,, .. d. Significant alterations to present patterns of c►roulotlon or movoment of peopla and/or goods? *...f�..114Y.Y,YY.%fYl'Y.Y.rs1.i,.1.%i'.5 Y.1, ..X.%X?YY.. i,Y ...1!n• YIY, . YYY.1. . e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air trafflo? .............. 1 .. , . :.. , Y , , .,, .... , , ; ... i; Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pW }siptriani7'f s yy ' % f a.i * .. ,. % ed G.7 C WIII th® prop have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or 14, PUBLlc SERVICES, YES MAYBE NO altered government services: G6 0 C_1 aJire protection? , ... , .. , + ( 0 b, police protection a. C. Schools d, Parks or Other recreational facilities? r e. Maintenance of public facilities, Including roads? ... a . .. a la;l , a ... r f. Other governmental services? ....... ....... 15, ENERGY. Will the proposal result in'. [.] c 41. l.J"a3 r. z3i,t��tatlit�1 amounts of fuel at' rinrgy 7 or ri+r i� ` g irt'� tori b, Substantial increase tri demand upon existing sources of enrvr y." f�I , CJ development of new Sources Of eriergw? ...... • a a " ... . . ri ,ti 16 UTILITIES. Will the proposal result in a need for now systems,or sulaw � tial alteruttr,r, �tr� Inc following,G a, power or natural gas! ......... r . ....... b, CommurncatiOns systems? ... .... , .. c, Wa'4er Ova labrlrty-7 ......... tem? ...,. .,......,...,,,, d. Sewer or septic system? ......, aver drainage?. ..., ... e. Storm w a t7 C.1 t. Solid waate and dibH fiat? a'.,r.,........ ............... ,. 17+ HfJMAN NEALTH. Will the pruposal result In, 0 a, Creation of any hi3altl� hazard at potential hrialth hazard (exctudrnrJ rx,intril 01 0 b Exp.�sure Of pOople to potential ttctnitl nazttrds`a , sIrA rviqw en to 18. AESTHETICS. Will the proposal re.a It in in tura ob nation tiof trnon friesthet caliy�taffi+ts —Jft "te open 0 the public, or v,.'i-tile proposal result to pulolic view!— . 15, RECREATION. Will the fwrposal result in all Iriil�act upon thu-11dai., . ; ai,itntrt it raf existtrtg recreallonal apportunilresl 2t1, CUL"I'UAAL 4ESOURC S, rehislirtrr, or W .'.nrre t s. Will the pioposal result in file alteraliran r>t r the dt�.... ion of a p .... , .... . arohar�'ologicalSit e? .....,a ..,., .. ..r.. . C.l 0 b. Vu,ll the prcpgsa► result in adverse ptiysir.al or aesthetir~ effects to a6i?r"hiutcartr, rrr historic ,Ori .- + • building, .,tructure Or eject! r ....... , , t eiuse11phys.ic,.a,lc,. „r...w, ... >. Chand7;lra 0. Does theproposalhavethspotentir ethnic cultural values"? . r r . ... y yy . religiou � or sacred use;t within the poicniial Impact d Will iiia propdsai rr 5trlut Gxlst ! g ..... • .. r .. + . a r..r., r......»..+ y r. r.r t area'C .. a.. ... t.. DISCUSSION -Or ELVIRONMENTAL QVALQA!Y!QLq AP J$-17"Wj etre 1bqc,d*3b*f;_DeYeJopmeot of an add Itlofial 20 homes ltoo on the subject property drIveNWxy roads and othor improvements, Hill load to chances in drains -a patterns on site and Inc -ease `tyro potential for erosion and Witation of on-sibe streams ano tribut arley. It zh6uld to noted that the access roads to the lots easterly Of Hwrletor-swedes Flat Road has been wont tructed, and crosses three tributaries of LoHor Rocky Honcut Creek. C011040wctlren of the roads may have peciWimed 0 streambed alteration permit from the Department of Fish and Game, DocumentatIon of these permits should be required. 1h: All of 13utte County in Hithin a Moderate Earthqoaho Intens' Ity Zone VIII. 7he SUbinnh property Is located one to two miles east to northeast of faults associated with the Foothill &hear Vne which supported the 1975 Orovill, eapthquakev C0MztVucWort Q buildings to Unlfuim &Oldirig Code standards For. Wizmicos llY awtiver Woas should provide adequate Protection to occupants in case of zeiroar Ic activity, 4az A liaht to modswate amount or vegetation VearinQ will occur as them* parcels ,are developed; The project I yin a key dnew winter range area. 5awaydt This area Is located in an A of spectol Biological ImporOnce, This arra Q the critica, w0ter ranow for tho Mooreto= 'De6v Herd. The prorars ty W located within a dee- w1groat lon window that bQen M"Vified az ire ina neyescar v for the m1oration of deer WOW the winter Tahoe areaa The State Department of rich and Game has racommenOnd that nonewparcalo less than 40 acres be created in puch areas) and that densities & oreater then "one Welling unit P -r 40 merps are Woompatible with continued doer usage 6f the range. County land use policies Zuppowt the protection of winter ,-teem range, Ond state la" rQuIres denial Of Projects such nz this If an avoldaly1w, ialpaf:,t to the WIWI% Nill occur, 1XI4,OK0 development patterns to the south of this project have zomewhat &MpromWd the habitat valuq of po at aprtions of US �d we des Fleal but this projeut.Mlll represent an extension of the =01lerr, Parqslz to the norath of Ahat areas The PrOJOU vIC101ty In important) as It Is rano of the pow areas op loraer parcel sizes bet "emn the hills to the west and the hicher ,elevatlort t��Ummf�:'r deer, ran0e tc�' tl'le C­Ust- The PrQJOct is not i0catod within a dezignat ud development area an shown on the mops Prov idod to Outto County by the Depawtmsnt of rish and Game. 018ny of tha above commen,_ Jr'' it b4MOd cin input from the Department V Fish and Gamo Foom 1584 and l"O were ived in 'Wunctlavi with thea ter lainal OPPrOval of thiz �eat. Add I t I ona I I n I %) OrMotion Baas recoivod In DrOaMber of 1q$7 (1 00 attac5ed letter) and W-tO-Whe WfOrMKION Has Paquested upon OPPIWWyn F thIZ current P00JILKi The tree information requested from the Wp8rtmant ov ON and Game hOs nut Won received rz of the date Of this writinu, The sl�-WOral ztrJr--0R"V and dr al that crows the property provide Wilbribm habltat. ThIQ JobAst whould be prvtocbbd thwnuoh bullding-rree zetbacks, Q' A Gaya Local i-ncreases In Moi se and 1 k;ht can be epetr:1:,,ra.l from res iMent1a1 use o thIs propewty project i s I Oc4ted I n an area wh . ch has been p 1 anti Ad ,Vor° a9r I cu l tura l -re s i dant i b l uses, 20- to 40 -acre parce i s, r, 0ns r .g., ttln t r,r l 1 I M the land Use Element; I' bo 20 -acre parcrMl s 01-e, consistent. Due to , ,.r,q i so i atecl, remote riaturc+ of thri r; rrr i n i ma 1 publ i s service availability (f i r„e r pol i t_,e commercial ser -vices e � tr l c i ty rand telephone), uncer t,� i n elt" mets t i wr:rter aval l ab l l i t,/, aneJ the increased fuel c0msumpt i ori t,o(-4u 1 rod i of r.;;o rmut I nk-4, a trend towards parcels sinal 1 o- I- t141an 20 aar o° r,, l n ;s.I Z 111.11E be pre-matGjr c, . Residents in th I S --ir,ea must expect a 1 vkjer level o l sery i rue th'al is typical for less l sc. l vrt: ed pi-opert i es r1(3aroq, urbar1 s rar v I crws . Iwlhr i l e t1 s project i a request fear PQ-acre^q-j Marco 1, sur ,l r patice 1 s r 4pu 1 d be too small for Use as rangeland or a+,jr +,:u 1 twre, 011(J suL�Sequent request f ol- d 1 v I s I can tO Smr 11 er parc e1 17,' -5I rr 1-41 d be expected.. It 1z recommended thiat the subject properj.-y 1,q r;azonad to at 1 oast: a 20 -acro- m i ri i rnum lot size. Due to w i 1 d l i fcr r e"ns a i t may be rnot •e appropriate to r,edes,r gn the pt izjoet to yield +10-acr-e parcels and :,e acc,rrd i ngl y 11 : Thr i s project will rKepr ke'sen t a �_--, i ren l fi cant i nc�►�e a.:=.i. 11-1 t -he number pr of I n this ,area. 13a l c$ f t T hr~a pro jrrct site is located In an area wh i cl r Is remote -Pt-om Or ov i l l r;N via fairly 1 rang, urr i niprOved`, unma i nta i nod mail. Res i dents It, t.hhl :,5 Ot,ea wi 1 l most likely deoland upgraded read sere l ep_s-, police and fire protection, commercial servi crus and =htacl s at ! ncreas ° ng levels as thO Prapr,r 1 at:, r ts('r Oro; ws ., WJ-r 1 11 tru f f i U c0unt:s In flo_ nr^ea r rre Presently qu I i;ry low, ti -rose cr.))Ijgts since 19vo i nd i care "hat Sviedes Flat Pz�ad Lc, thras ks er~ r Is do-teotias fewer g+i 4$*w r tr,lpe pet- day ens,a. .arhlllrrce ar � hei e .+eon s I gn l f r c,�rr i.� i hcreases kwnah year, rra the easterly pert i crnz ct' Swed+_-�,, r l at Road. be,eel Crr:. n)ti nt: Of at"' add i t i Corral 20 patN4.0,1 s in this arrom w1 1 1 add �ar average of from 140 tc, 200 vehi 1 cwl arm t°r4i r,;� prer da tc,, SINedes I* l at Road and 1-1urW l et:tin-Swede Flat load a plus t r'tr; r i rr I eased maintenance r`, qu i remontFj Mrid I MCr-oas I nt r tra r f I,* hazards crryr thraso r„taarts. x fF the 20--acl-e parwceI s are furl;iher divide into 5 --acre pmr r.,e1 as Is pass i bl e candor the e'x i s t I r a zcrira.,$ thrr✓rh thQ I r. acts wou 1 +1 be >~ U0druP Jed. `rt'r i s tr ai�f I c 1 c sr� wr rca 1 d t ani+ ted t+� tho 1110- - ai proved Parcels a l che,) `Swedes t latf Roa.i, t�erny M -4k,, Poulevar,d arrd k4LIrlet(,)rr_SwLj.. F'Iat Arid i t i ,.' rn r l 1 y , another 150 #era �)0 0 110t.83 cO L' I d be I n the zre» _l t ostium 1 nrj b-. to 1 I.i-aorr� parcels). C�r.:rr:'r+�-i l: traffic courts on viedes F1,, -.d_ Poad ;ire i 0 ADT - t the waster n end arra gid✓ t:i ADT mt tlhca eastern er'r+.'. "ht^ west end traff1c Courts Errs al5pw'L*-iMCJte'1Y double th oL-e OLint.� ttJ: en i n 1979, r. , I I o the eastern end c",� ,t I a lmutel y flwe times as Th I s Project, o l cr$ ctctl d MCCO ht for developed onOhor doubling,�Iyr and with Lzrthiar mappr oved l o,ta in the ar•om be 1m"'4 - von -foal d i nCre8SO is likely. 1 1: Th l z rarKw ject rwri l l rep1 e8eent tin t ncr„easo in Barrer old fat- publ i w r r r a r-ur�w l ?ir t: <a. •15a Because of the deteriorated cot, j i t i orc of Sweden }-' l w:jt Road, 1 1,l •M ' likely that commute distances to Orrav i l le will lie excorydl nGl y l-carfitj tk(o to accessing the property via the easterly end of Swodom r- l atf foot] via hlUr i etar►-;swedes Flat Rood. Increased commute cf i I:.: trr e will increase fuel Consumption, 16a,b PC and C l i nee and telephone lines will need to bis 'eaten+, od into the new parcol s . Ppa « The subject l:rr"`opi:irty I--- located In an area of h i alp arch000 1 oto i ca l ser r i t i v i ty . In o -,der to ,asses; the potential for', edY01-SO 1 mpacts and to dett-+'m i ne what, If any, mitigation measuro-. would be approl�r i ate; it is necessary tpo contact the Nortl�reast Information Center at Cal l fern i a State University) Chico, For a r'e('AUf1earch and i t i v ty caval uat i on Should the�.rsrriter^ recottrrrrr nd tha L an arra, caeca l orj i cal survey be conducted r i �� tnt i t 7 tt-ien be n -ices ar y for-aqualified ar et�ae 1 obi ct �:o perform at) �ar=�,t�eeclt��lca s:itr"vey of tl"ie property. 11. MANDATORY pINDI''NGS_ OFZ SIGNIFT�A 1* See items 15 and 20. 3 -"wee Items is $) es lit '13 and 14. Recommended. M l 1,,'I r4rit i gn Moasures 1 No rn i t l rtjat i t,n MeE aSuro i Z recommended at tint i s time re0ard i no arrchaecr'l bo lcal impacts. in order to assess the potential for adverse impacts and to determ t ne what if any, m i t: i fat i tin measures would k r.•:* apprr"apr- l ate y tl'te app l i t-al"t Should contact the Northeast InA�'Or°mat i r)n Canter at California State Un i vew',a ty, Chico, for a records sear^oh and s ns i t i v l ty evaluation. Show i ti the center retzommond that an ar iiaetitl aO i dal SUrvey be conducted, It will then be necessary fvc 10 filuralified archaeold„i - O st to perform an . archoeo l oq l c a ..r"vey of the property. Redesign the projF zt to yield 40-aore par rmel �� 3 Applicant mitis to of l y t oj_ old d 1 l i Jen t l Y Arcjr"�'Ax,r j 4 0-0wx,re m i n l rtium lot size si'no1e-,f .mtly; -"One 4 how, a 1 00- 70 ot but l d l nom firer✓~ setback rriahasur(3r�j f"r-ort, the h i �hW wad er marle, of any stream' IC'cat L -"d On the PrOPOrtvs and SCJ t:rwom any epl7ertrer°a 1 str�etr a 5nt „:r into arty requ k r^ed Strryeamb( c!d alteration nt)t­eemerr t.3 pUl"ISLIrilit ,to Department of � i 1,y and Come reOu l a!t i ons. A Applicant: Terry Oreerty AP it 28-17-071 etc. Loci It Se-03-:2,1_06 DATA SWCCT A. Pro ,,ect Reser i_pt i on 1. Type of Project: Tentative ve Parcel Maj 4 2. Brief Description.* Divldln� approximately mate 1 y ocres Lo create 20 parcels of 211 acres ea&l. 8. Locat 1 on Appr ,ox i matel y l O Q O Meet north of t-hre into- t-sect'i un of Hurl eton^SHedez Flat Road and `1 Swedos Flat„ Road, an both sides of HLrrl etor-Swedes Fl o't Road, SWrsdOs Plat or *8. q Proposod Dens i ty of Devel opment= 20 acres ►ger° dwe I 1 I rig url l . !. Amount of lilipery i ous Surf ac i no Ni 1 n I ma l 6. Access and Nearest Public Road(s): HUrl et On-t Hedes. Flat Road via Swedes Pleat Road. 7. Method of Sewage D i sF�osal . Ind i v i dual soot l � �° 1 cachf i e d S. Source of Water Supply. Ind v i dual warl l s 9. Proxim icy of Power Lines: At Swedes P l ,a („ Road 104 Poteri is i a l for further land divisions and deva l opmont; Depefld I ne on so i 1 Gond 1 t i rens < 1 enchab I e ;_mea), rUrther dlvisionz COUld occur. B. Env i r onmentn 1 Sett i nes Phys i cnT Friy i rotirraent-- 1 Terrain A* Generval Topogr8t h l c Character: ` Rra l l 1 i=re footh i " l z with samaHhat steep) s wr eo m rahanne l Craver i n the I tri,. b Slopes: 0-Si)' t:. L I evatl on: Var i Qze , from 127 1 1:0 16t4o feat aL: ova Seo Le ,el - d. LI mi t i n'g Factors : Ah Surface Water; Lower Rocky h'. ndut Cr eok i_,I d Its tr I hutar i es tr�ave+^se the property. b,. Groundwat:er' Uri itr.oi,irr., C. Drainage C har aat:tQr 1 t, i c s: in f i l trat l ort +: ild st . fa r t l r,iq toward Lower .)r.;'• , HorrcWt Creek and ot:hirri f on-� dra r rimaewayz, d. Annual Rainfall (normal): Srz-4LOO. e. L i rn i t i ng f=actors: Groundwa aer may be limited; se F L a ,-k ­. from dra i ragew�, . 5- V i sua l /Sten i s Qua I i t:Y " Exec l 1 e -n t:„ 6. Acous't,ic Qual i•ty �Xco11ent. 7 Air Quality: Good E3'ialo ical Cnvironment Vii. Vegetal: i on moth i i 1 Oak Wood i and - grasal and area, 9. W11d'i1Fe Flab itat: Uppa_tR Jorma.=arae L1,fe ,cane, kOY for tKopretrown Deer Herd Cul t.ura1 Envlrcan►rlerltt� 10. ArchotBo i og i ca l and Historical Resources in the nt,ea . lylOder:ate� to high serisl t r v i ty - several reccr^ded I fres occur, In this araa., 1 1 . $utt+e County General i'l an dos i �jmati on Agr i CLI I l wrra i -Res I dent i a l+ 12. X I st l rrg Zoning." A -rte . 13. i7x i str i ng Land Use s-s'r te= VMLent 18-1d, 14. Surrounding Ar•nA; a;. Land. limes: Widely .cat, t r4v,:.' rut^.a 1 rres i d'p � �rrcr s and rrrt u land. 01 b, Z10;ilrig .' ,MR) A-5. 4i e. G'tn . Plan drr , I gna?. C ice- Agri, cr rl kur;Ell -Rsr•rw i vent i a d-. Parcel S i zes t Ger yra l l y 40 -.,re parcels, --Omp_ a- to 1 r0-atrye parcel e 'to nwvh miw _,outl~►. e:, �'opu l al`t i ori : Saar ;e 1 . ChOr"acter", of Sibe and Areat Rr"rr-sy l r+oot+.il i l l s 1 G y Neores,'b Urban Ari a k �tr�i r 1 1 1_ t 1 n 1 I es rjorNt.i-r3" 17'. Fie i ovant; Spheres or Influence.' Nv io 18, Standards Urban Aroo bio'. -11. lVi rt' Protech: i orl Service., a • Nearest; County (St:ato) lM I r -t ;$ta kr l on seat nal Stat i .err 41,54i 5 i x M i 1 es a. Ftan�roj­ Stot. i c..+m #tb* i "statlCm t64i over rncIc-y_.n ntll0,,,, b. Water Ava I lab i 1 I t:y t i= t r'e ti yuak enp �j,a 3 ty ori l y+. 90- Sr -1-10014.4 s In Area; eonoor Union El olllt rlitar-y $,,o ar�d ��r� w i l 1 rM UniCmi High Schcol 0i;gtr-Icts. _gam y ,3 d ice. P1a�9 C� (916) 355-7020 a 1987.► Csli4or�+ �Iro'v�1.e, DEC -8�r Mr. Williain W. Goddis, L.S. G.D.A. Fngi,;oeritig Surveying & planning 220 Grande AvPnuo Oroville, CA 95965 Dear Mr. Gaddis: As 000 your regilest, the 1�GPart,nent of Fish and (Oe;?attment) IUIS r, viewed Terry Greertsy l s Tentativ(Parcel ''Diad (TPM), a proposal to subdivide oppeoxirn.ateIV QOi r t s into twenty parcels oz lJ acres each. The proporty io dor;ignated "Ajri .ulturo—Residential in this General Plan and its zoned "A--5'► The TPP site is located in the S erj(�s 'E`lat area immediat?ly north of thcI junction. of Hurleton 8wer,Qs Plat R060 and a'4VOULs Fiat Road The De:rart ont� r,. a ., I vir?w�.ci th.. QPM in and racornmc:nd.-I it be r en.leo (,or, attached P�'b:rud):y 8 1-484 lettor.) Ho vuv,4r, tlue TPH was a0ptoved by thu? Countyi Now, a, We Undetstind froln your letter, altinougs l'i interior roads were constructed and wells all°tl '' y Property, the TPM waallowed to expire before ha condition-, could be complied With,._ NOW thy: apvlzcant must rt-V to th0. County for a liow TPb7. c After a careful re'viow of the TPHt we see no reason"to cttantge uur recommendation not can we propose any mitigation mersuxes that could resolve our conco tns The subjoct, property is within the critical winter range of til.� Mu'Otetown dear herd. A i)ortion of the property along Hurleton 8wacles !~lat Aoad is within an 688ential &-er migration "window" that wa$ identified eor the Butte County Deer Study panel's t-la raorty prepared , l3utto Cnunt� The rei5ort wss : at thw kw.quc:;;t of the >3� y Domininj"M parcel -Size must `be �naititaine.ri Board of Sia ervi:sors, to rot6ct deers use At th�5e e. araa a �tl acre -Subdivision of labels into small parcL_ls has an adverse irn sact upon migratory neer use Of their rango-s. As lands :within critical whiter ranges are divided into parcejs smallor than 40 acres, door use .bocoinog impairot�, mir�r torr move mane at f or.,tet1, and the availability of 'fog age drops below that level necessary to sustain he nut�bers. As (parcels became tivo ac1•es or 10ss3, tho lands arcs no longer considered c s' _being able to suppot`b migrttoey deor 11Sr Suutiiv sic ns have ady'VS-ely a` fected more than 40 percent of thra Winter tango (i e., critical and designated W`nt,�r tangps) in 8uttO County. In an effort to rc.�nl�re thc� su,. conflict .in Hutto Count `djviSicn Y. ti10 O"Pa 'tment has recc�mmehcj a��&i strias o actions for the Board or supervisors to ilii ., w The i)ePart�ent also identiti.d Fel )llltjnk. Whom rtev l01ment may contir7tr� "17es3i�rateel D v,a1h u►<<asItil1(c�ne'r ures arra + �3Uatecf and im I r;c-nteLid�3a1 rertai,n m� r;J, Critical wino c,rr,t�,cf �y thO Beard. �J�Gtort Znn�s ran��:a cu is icon � h�: p Y.,d fI04 i n should be llmltoa �c�aignat ci L1evp�1, 11ttlr.�nC C�� a �40 acro. minimum parce'L :i.�'nC�3 kt�c subject "."�t�l i� t, wits � � l�r�lr.�a siz4�rOmmend thrs PrOPO r't�r�ki� l rnxOt rnat�� L�uvOIOPI.Ilent to a Ci t. minimilpi Iqv re qrat any Y [ira�+r u ,. Y ihGonvak�i:~nce Mils in,�,r Ca3sasw 1E Was tully aw-aro of i`vt,r c� t�tiL► 7r 1or to Proc-- c7liC GfailGi?�i1:5 ati�: � �lin� ,ii:lt tha �'� c lrnmi t'idati ars if w« Can b4 ()f ttrzthar Y r PatriciaPyy z•1.��.a t���4• r•/ (9lD) 355-70`10.4 r1c SupNrtrxe:+�L , tR3�.,`� �at•�,rsnu copy OH91nal signedby: JAMES ©, MESSERSM(TH; r w1�Ysn.�a n s�l:.�aacx t?1 i h bt.th 't t�I�liil nr l o'Ipt: y ,M Mr. bavp :Uironimus ]Butte county Planning Department 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 Dear Ar. :jironiInus The Department or Fish and Gane has reviewed the Terry Greerty Tentative. Parcel MaP (A.P• 20-1707 and 72-39-03) which pr.^poses twenty 201 acre parcels on a_rprox mately n0O acres in the Swedes Flat area. 'Ibis land is vegetated by a m3Lc of oatc/&/ger pine rm:cllandand chaparral. the project site l All of es within ctl' oal winter range of the ,oOretawm Deer. ?7erd. Oter 31 percent of the herd's critics]. winter rangehas been adversely impacte:l by xesicien�ial encroach, -nt. This aroject r�resPnts a serious i evasion into a large �^ortion of land cora nated b " 40 -acre (or y Larger') parcels �vhich are m nl;ru n rarcel sizes tleressary to Protect critical w rater range. tae recom p-nd that the VIA be held in abeyance until Butte Count• aca land u.�e policy to protect deer winter range. The VIDA can then be nods iaa � to can- form to that rolicy if the Departmm.en � further t assistance, 91.n) 355-7030. �r � j � �' t can be of. assistance, please contact Lie r< dense Divironmental Services Supervisor, ej.. hdneSincerely Paul T. Jensen , Regional Manager ;c Office of Planning and Rcsoarch 1400 ,Tenth Street r'Rort Room 121 1�tatLcr County Sacramento, CA 95814 111t41)na,rr ,L)epartmernt Ur' 7 C�ot+nty Center Drive, X County Clerk Qr'ovIll;, CA 95965 County of Butte St.m ,TECT;= filing of Notice of Determination or 21152 of the Public in comp).i4ttco with Resources Code, Section: 2.1108 Project Title AP # Tentative Parcel Map Nato State Clearinghouse Number{ 28-17-07, etc. Contact Per Terry (�recrty (f submitted to Clearinghouse) 'Telephone Number Public Works Project Location John r�iendonsa 588-726 Swedes Flat Approx. 1000 feet 6 Road and Swedes Flat north of intersect on o Projectoad Swedes Flat area . Road Hur eton- on bosh sides of R Descriptl. Tentati Teton -Swedes Tentative Parcel Maier twenty 20 -acre parcels, p to divide 400+ acres to create' This is to advise that the Butte Count ---------`"- has approved the above (Lead' Agency or Res ons�ble described project ort P Agency) the following determinations regarding t and has made he above-describod, (Data 1. The project coil]. Project; environment:' ) have will not a-signif'2. cant effect on the An Environments. �. S>ypact Repo�:t was pursuant to the provisions of CE Prepared for this QA Project A Negative Declaration teas prepared for this Provisions of CEQA, project pursuant to the 3 Mitigation me asuro .were; wei�e aao approval of the project, hot) made a condition of the 4, A statement of o for this Proverriding considerations Jett . tea;; ,. 'Was not, adopted This is to certify that the final gIR t,rith co project approval is available to the public and reshonsos and record of geiiesal public at - Butte: Gdtrrrty PI at., i count g Departmmll: Orovill Center Drive CA 95965 bate Received for: riling and Posting at COPR ;8 ion BUTTE (j0UNTY DEPARDIENT, OF PUBLIC 140RVS LAND DIVISION REVIEW REQUEST AP No.. _ DA TE : .1�lareh 1 7 1 AUS RETURN BY: PROTECT DESCRIPTION: - AI-ZL$�.. , APPLICANT; i ENGINEER; ---_Ron � " socia es CONDITIONS AND/OR COMMENTS; r% v.�.. w� 7— "Soe SA ----,�... �. ..., � urs, res 4 • moi./ J" --�.: {p 13�rf� y�.�.��.i,/,tr�G, •.se/ t suite M., DEPANTMENT OF Puj`„II.IC HEALTH (9E btamar.el DIVISION OF ENVIIIaNMI,,NTAL f•IEA4TH Adares9 _ �,ay Pit y t,. Ch>c� Cal'+forma 9592fi 7 Counly Confer Unvo i (7r y Co. i Ta;e little: 9 Orriville, l"alFforni�, 05 al U11i.tt R,00 nnirlgt. , C lfi.^89t.27Fr' Tnlephano. 916/mmm=CdI1f6fjjcj 05969 p P h 88 5-18-7281 Telephone' 910/872,6308 Oroville, California w'10reh 28, 198 Box GrOer ;•,Torry, AN North of IIGJ( l c 1,oll Swedos Deal. Sire This daparLIMCnt; hL- advised the Butte Crsrts�t. l�ali,trtmene r�[ it vel.apment Section 'that We are prepared to dct an the abr�vf pub-11c' Works Laud Based P 1 A e application. 3asr,d on z'esetj.t �.n�crmatxort �� Or conditional approval.. R2cotunended Conditions for _A , we can recommend approval _ royal the ,i �, �. t lc r as r--atlas"-Ir•,,,rltt�l c i at.a Ian wo .la r�:G> tt wit iaT 1 r °i titin 1:t"I) Of the pr+�pc rty b(,)unr ,,j:ri �t, can p`ttyce;l s t and 20. 1, f, , 1,) 2- Shot, a 50' leach£iolr1s/ 10, 12, , I ✓ , 18 19 an b U. i rom the drain a8e way ren 'parr dI8 1, 7 3z Show , 1 �I' 1 chfieltt S'Otlarack f, M Uhrx,s rvt fli rllr l�,at°rrx'I 1z � Prove o required IIUWItd.L. et= or parcels X thru "cf f.. tr�a a� i., 4>vailal�le tri Shaw the sWaM, l)y ;areas ata fina.I mala areasOn p '�. wa (i .;Cllr beach t"rc#C:" Eli•c'�t arrau Parcel nd w ct: 4 you We ane Flu stuns regarding thla Ir�I Fel tG?lt� at the agave ,lasted address or Leia hr,�� f�t�;a�,c..r laetLt4aan, S.flfi- � �r�(tt,arfn° �th4ard C�vrrhra►fr,t, t C .00 t1 1 et�l~rlri cry �'tl�.y r"c',t�'r;;, .i ► w' y;.;. ! award Et Stzyi:Cad if',, 12;'� Supe"Igiing 588 Ivariat DIvisionOf Invironmontal 11000th as : 'Jann i°n t ._ � Dopartlnant Y