The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About072-470-008• � ��' �. .. '. u ,` � -°, v '� •^� ., , •' a � .. �� .� ' r1 „s,�� ' ,, �.i..`,f�. * .1 � a �„ .h '��i • 7 'i . /� ,�. i • w - ° � w'I ., '; � • � � '� ` 1 �,.; _9 i �' 9' .. � � � e �+ � . �,, y Y � ' .♦ r � ��';!' . r ,t . { f �1�' � �� A° � ��0 rip. . . � .. � • � � � ` ' �� p a, % . + . .,.. ciz;,, I • t . 1 � � I � � . � • . ia.• .d�� PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY SaEE7! FOR LAND DIVISIONS $4-04-10-01 APPLICANT Marc McClendon ' F4. rL.t 7_- » ADDRESS c/o 3656 Hildale, Oroville, CA 95965 OWNER Same PROTECT DFYSUIPTION Tentative Parcel Mali divieing 10 acres to create 2 parcels at 5 acres each LOCATION On the nortli side of hope Jane, approximately 1200 Leet west Of: its .intersection With Hurleton Swedes Plat goad, ASSESSOR+S PARCEL NUMBERS) 72-47-08 ZONING Ml 2 CC, N. PLAN Ag - Res PROJECT CONSISTENT? DATE APPLICATION R1 CEI6 ED 11/10/84 Fn i gol ert i4uslte7 3656 Hildale, oyoville, CA 95965 DATE PUBLICATION NOTICE WRITTEN PUBLISHED PLACE NEWSPAPER NOTICE(S) PUBLIGijED o. C. P. G B. DATE MAILING LIST PREPARED DATE MAIL -OUT NOTIOM WRITTEN` � MATLEI? �.:GMBEII DA'Z'E PLANNING DIRECTOR'S 'REPORT 'P=,PARND ENVIRON,lENTAL CATEGORICAL XXEMPTIOK - DATE FILED DETERMINATION AND DATE NEGATIVE DECLARATION DATE ADOP'.[ED d MITIGATm NEGNXIVE DECLARATION »- DATE ADOPTBD7\ ENV, IMPACT REPORT - DATE CNRTIVI:ED, SUB; COMMITTEE MEETING DATE \.__ _. ADVISOn AGENCY IMMING ?ATN S iL _9 � 6 "� ` �` •. y` �"� '`��(` ADVISORY AGENCY ACTION Bt)OD APPENDIX R p NOTICE 011DETERMINATION TtMINATION T F L i W ,secretary for Resources lr 1416 Ninth Streot, Rc,om 1311. NOV 0 9 1984' Sacramento, CA 95814 t -t County Clerk, County of Butte ELEANOR M. DECKER,CouhIYClwrk 25 Count Center Drive .;�el O�roviLle CA 95965 EY De��u1y PROh: Planning Department l 7 County Center Drive (Filed) Oruville, CA 95965 a SUBJECT: Filing of Notice of 'Dote rmination i,i Compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public Res %V%:� 1C�oc� ProjectTitle Tentati e Parcel Map AP 72-47=08 Marc, McClendon State Clearinghouse Number (If submitted 'to State Clearinghouse)_ Contact Person Tolophone Number John MendonsaY„ Publ�e�1Vraxks _(iJ16 � 534-4266 'Project Location On the north side of Hope Lane, approx, 1200 tee west o f• i sine e, s ct?.on _with _Flttrl otc�n�Sivecles r: t Ro d, Clrovi.l Project Dos ription : Dividing 1.t acres to create two parcels at 5 acres each. This is to a dvi%o ;that the Butte County, Board of Supervisors �� (i,tuaicl Agency] has made the following determinations regarding the above-described project: 1 Tile projo t � will have a significant effect on the e'Xllvironmen t w i w iII not 2. An Environmental Impact Report, was prepared For this project ,purseant to the provisions of CHQA, and was certified as rode fired by Section 15085(g), 1.4 California Administrative Code. A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CHQA. A ropy of the Negatives Declaration may be examined at the Planning Department, 7 County Center Drive) Oruvillc, CA 95905« 51, A Notice, or tixemption was filod indicating,, this project i e tempt :From environmental review. 4 • A statement, o F Overriding Cons i derra r ton E] was) ' was not, adopted ror Chi; I,rojoc.t. 5, lofltigl aticn measures adopted by tlie Lead At;t=y to reduce the impacts or theb approvod project are: See attaac hmewt .tg wituro ovesmlwr 7., 19,44 Stexpbon A. Strecter, 1 a l �,, r . � � " 2 L '1' i t'1 ty, .,, NEGATIVE,1))I--'ARATION RRGARD7j G I:NVIRONI,— '1'!al'a IMPACT NOTICE. IS HEREBY GIVEN that tlae project cicscrabod below has been, reviewed pttrstm)'t to the provisions of the California linvironmental Quai.ity Act of 1.070 (Public Resources Code 211,00, et. sen.) and a. determana.tion has been made that it will not have a significant offdct upon the onvironment. ° Log 72-4 72-07-08-01 A,P I1;C7` 2 ; D1SCIt'tpTlgN OSa >?RO: �,�.��.�`�`"• Tentative Pa -mol Map dividing 10 acres to create two parcels cit 5 rtcres each. 3. LOCATION OF PROJECT qac the north side a•f Hope Lane, approx. 1:200 feet AveSt. of :its antoxso-tion wlth Htatl:cton Swedos Vl,cat Toad, O;roville. 4. NAME ANTIAI7DIMSS OF PROJECT APPLICANT'. Marc McClendon, Robcr ; lius° cy 721:1 11-cather Palls, Mar Rt. 3656 llildralc Orovill.o, CA 95965 Orov:illo CA 05915 5, ;`LITIGATION MEASi RMS See atta.chine at 6. A t,.opy of the initial study regarding the onvi.ronmental effect oi' this project is on :F i 1. e at 7 Cotua.ty Center 'Drive, Orova.11 e i This study was ' Adopted as presra,tect. Acloptr cl Ivith changes. Spccif: c Modifications and i 'supporting •roasons rive atta,che'di 7. A public hcar•:ini; on this Ncgriti v+e Declaration was held by the decision making body. Hearing Body l;ut le Courtly 13ttrtrct of su orX tsovs Late of Determination Novombr.r 6, 1.181 17otcrmiarati.orry On the basis or the ini.tiri't stUdY of envi7'01L11Iental imPact , tho Nrormation presented at hea,rixigs i coma omts rec:oivecl on the proposal and our own knoigl.odgo and ilido aondont, Toseardi We .find the Propo s od pr o j oc:t COULD NOT have a si tni f.lC arat 0 e.ffoct on the onvi r•onment, and a NEGATIVE, 1]1;CT,ARATION is hereby adopted 110 .find tb at tiro ProjectCOULD have 'A'S tgul fic.ant° affect on the envi- oriment but will not in tiyia c.asc7 laoc��ii;ac uC att achod mitigation moasores doscvIbett i.t] itom 5 above whish aro by, this rorcrenc.o in,,Wo conditions of PV01' esct approval 11 conditi-onal NHGATIVLI DEChAltt'MON is hereby aciop Lcit \7 t i;raa bt��4 `i Al Sarac'eni g Chalilnutar lltrttO COMItY I0a:rd- Of St.alr01'ViSO'I' ty llcttc All 72-47-08 Miti ration Measure i. 1. Place a note on tho final map stating "rorlmeter fencing is limited to 5 strands or less or barbed wire; the bottom ) and tap wire to be a minimum of 16 inches and a maximum of 48 inches above the ground". 1 1 ffil tie -� —....:.:_ '2_ ° lAtWq Or NATURAL y'.'EALTH AND BEAUTY .o DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS WILLIAM (SI11) OFIE1=F, Director 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95465 Tciaphunrl (416) 534.4681 November 7,, 1964 Buito Co. Manning 01mm 1Orovillc, C:.alit�rbia Robert M. Huskey RE: AP 72-47-08 3656 Hildale Tentative Parcel Map Oroville, CA 95965 for Marc McClendon 3 Dear Mr. Nuskey At the regular meeting of the Butte County Board of Supervisors held November u, 1964, the Board 'upheld your appeal of the denial by the Advisory Agency of the above-referenced parcel map and adopted a mitigated negative declaration regarding environmental impactfor Ah 72-47-48. Approval of the final snap is subject to the conditions as listed on the attached sheet. When the conditions of approval are complied with, it will be in order for Mr. McClendon to file his "final maps' with the nepartitiont OF Public Works for recordation within twelity-four (24) months of the date of the Board of Supervisors'' action. ti If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office. Very truly ;Yours, I l William Cheff Crector of Public Works p n Mendonsa Assistant Director dM/ns Attachment cc: Clerk of the Board of Supervisors 1,ann7ng Environ(ilental Review h c McClendon, 7211 Foathor -Falls Star Route oroville, CA 95965 Envlronmerital Health Department Marc McClendon T ATIVE PARCEL MAP:, two,parcels ,x Nope Lane, approximately 1200 ft. west ofp is intersectionthe rwl�th�de of Elur1eton Swedes Flat Road, OroVille area. Assessor's Parcel Number! 72-47-05 Engineer: Robert Huskey Public Works Department conditions are: 1. Provi.ie ttva-way traversable access RS-$-Lf)-I t4 each parcel from. a county maintained road oi- state highway; 2. Access to be reserved in deeds as per county ordinance and offered' for dedication on the final map. 3= Show 50 ft: building setback line measured from centerline of access " easement. j 4. Provide road maintenance agreement. 5. Show all easements of 'record on the final map, 6. Provide street naive signs per requirements of the Department of Public Works prior to recordation of the final map. 7. Obtain encroachment permit and construct standard. road approach providing adequate sight distance at the intersection of Hope Lane and Swedes Flat Road, .f' not already constructed. 1. 8. Pay ar,y delinquent taxes or current taxes as required,; Environmental Health Department conditions are: 9• Provide a 100' leach field free setback around existing we'lls either Within the property or within 100' of the property boundaries on Parcel #1, 10: Prove Witt) at 'least (4) percolation tests nn parcel #2 that the required usable sewage disposal area exists on parcel #2. Combine Witt! an adjacent parcel any parcel not proven to contain the usable sewage disposal area required by the Subdivision Ordinance: l'lk Prove that the required quahtities of domestic water are available to Parcels 1 and 2 by submitting well logand alowns per available on Well on Parcel M, g 12. Ho�viesites if shown on final map shall be accessable to the: usable sewage disposal areas by gravity flow. Tits fo'llowing mitigation measum, as proposed by the applicant is also a condition of approval of the final map Place a note on they -rival map stating "Perimeter fencing is limited' to 5 strands or less of barbed Wire, the bottom and top dire to be a minimum of 16 inches cry i a maximum of 48 inches above the ground?i, 84-78'1, Robert M. luskoy on behalf of Marc McClendon, appeals the Advisory (688) Agency's denial of tentative parcel map (proposed mitigated negative declaration regarding environmental impact), AP 72-47-08, two parcels, property located on the north side of Hbpp Lane approximately 1208 feet West of its intersection with Hurleton Swedes Flat road, Oroville area 84-787 ' Motlon: DOTED THAT '.rHE REQUIREMENTS OF THF CALVORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL (Cont'd) QUALITY AC'T' HAVE BEEN COMPLETED AND CONSIDERED IN MAKING 17HIS DECISION; ADOPTED A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION RtGARDING 1z'NVIRONMJ3NTAL IMPACT USING; THE MITIGATION MEASURE PROPOSED BY TI -10 APPLICANT REGARDING PORIM4TDR VENCING FOUND THAT THIS AREA 19 ZONED FOR THIS TYPE OF RURAL W�SIDEWTIAL DEVELOPMENT AND T'11AT TUERE ARE PARCELS OF THIS SIZE T'IIAT ALREADY EXIST IN THE AREA AND IT 110ULD BE UNRtASSONABLU TO DENY THIS PROPERTY O11'NER THE SAME RIGHT'S .ENJOYED 13"Y OTHERS. POUND 111 AT TAA PROJECT CONFORMS TO THE BUTTE "COUNTY GE1,41 RAL PLAN AND UPHELD THE APPEAL Or THE ADVISORY AGENCY'S DENIAL OF A TENTATIVE PA14CED MAP FOR MARC MnCLtNDON, AP 72-47-08r CREATING TWO PAI CELS, WITH pusLIC J ORKS CONDITIONS l THROUGH 8, AND VNVIRON14r-NTAL HEALTH CONDITIONS cJ THROUGH 12. PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDI'TIGr 13 I5 EXCLUDED. 2 ,COGNI ZED iJLW MAP DATL:D NOVEMBER 3ER S, 1984. M S voLe., 1 Y 2 y 3 Y 4 Y 5 N Wotton carried) b `t';; COUNTY 9A ,opk�[i)i1 �t� �S ,ylCNl1'li5 - November '6� 1984 ;,r;. ,amu-•• � �.�— Bate " 6 LAND OF NAIURAl WCAIfiI AND BEAUTY ` DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS WILLIAM (Bill) CHEFF, Director i 7COUNTY CENTER UPIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965' Telap6mtet (916) 634.4681 Butfa Co. Planning Ccrtlm, Ol 1984 October l., 3,3,984 orowlle, cauiomla Marc McClendon RD' AP 72-1l.7-0$ 7211 Feather Falls Star Route Tentative Parcel Map Oroville, CA 95965 Dear Mr. McClendon: At the: regular meeting of the Butte County AdVisoij Agency held on October 1, 1984, the agency denied your tentative parcel, map on the above -referenced ,property. The project Was denied because adequate mitigation measures were not proposed by the applicant to mitigate the identified impact on the migratory doer herd in the area. g :Cf no appeals are timely filed --Within ten (1;0) day's of the date of the Advisory Agoncy'rA denial --With the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, this action wil-I be Final.: if you have any guest; ons regarding this matter, please contact this "office. Very truly yours William Cheri` Director of Public Works 1 V)hn Mandonsa t s:sista rb Director dM%t1s cc Planning/ hr„alth R. Ilualzejr W Memorandum Board of Supervisors FROW Department of Public Works Land_ Development. Section SUBJECT: Marc McClendon Tentative Parcel Map AP 72-47-08 bATE4 November, l', 1964 You will be considering an appeal of the Advisory Agency's decision to deny the tentative parcel map for Marc McClendon, AP 72•-47-06. This item has been set for public hearing on November G, 1084. if the Board decides to uphold the appeal, the following conditions are recommended conditions of approval; Public Works Department; conditions are: 1. Provide two-way traversable access RS -8 -LO -1 to each parcel from a county maintained toad or state highways 2. Access to be reserved in deeds as per county ordinance and offered for dedication on the •Final ruip 3. Show 50 ft4 building setback line measured from centerline of access -easement 4. Provide road maintenance agreement. 5. Show all easements of record on the final map. 5. Provide street name signs per requirements of the Department of Public Works prior to recordation of the final map. 7. Obtain ncchment permit and construct standard road approach providing adequate sight distance at the intersection of [lope Lane and Swedesriat toad if not already Constructed. 8: Pay 4nY delinquent taxes or ctirrent taxes as required, Environmental Health iDpartnrent Condit°ions am,- 9. re:9. Provide a 100' leach field free setback around existing wells either within the property or within 1001 of the property boundaries on parcel #1 i.. 10. Prove with at le (4) percolation Costs on parcel #2 that the required usable :,,i gage disposal m-oa exists on parcel P. Combine 'n adjacent pi4vcol arty orcol not prtaven to contain the usable sowaHe vr1 nosal area re!giairrd „n , Subdivision Ordinance, Build Co,,Mann ng to i,l,Yl x 1984 �,arira►nia '"ontinued on next page; brnVillow t. .e, rr K:1 Marc McCleti,,..n November 1, 1984 Page 2 11. Prove that the required quantities of domestic watFr are available to parcels 1 and 2 by submitting well log and gallons per minute on well on parcel rr1. 12- Homesites if shown on final map shall be accessable to the usable sewage disposal areas by gravity flow. Planning Department condition --taken from the Planning. Director's Report dated duly 24, 19847-fs also a recommended conditio-, of approval: 13. Building sites to be clustered along Forbestown Road. The following mitigation measure is proposed by the applicant and should' be adopted L Place a note on the final nap stating "Perimeter fencing is limited to 5 strands or less of barbed ',:ire; the bottom and top wire to be a minimum of 16 inches and a maximum of 48 inches above the ground.'. Buten Co. PlannPng Coioom, Orville, Calitofnia r V YES MAYBE NO r 19. RECREATION. ll the proposal result in -a impact upon the quality or quantify of existing recreational opporrtuniti.es? 20. CULTURAL RESOURCES a. Will t e proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? h, Will theproposal result in adverse pi�,�s3cal or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric oa' X historic building, structure or object? c. Does the proposal have the potential. to Cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact x area? _. Vs DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTA EVALUATION AP 72-X47-08 le, if Development of an additional hnmesite will require some disruption Of the soil resulting in some Increased potential for erosion and eventually siltation oa the local surface water. Because only one homesite will be developed and the large size of the parcels, these potential impacts are not considered to be significant. lh; All of Butte County is within Moderate Earthquake Intensity Zone VITT. The subject property is located approximately one mile east of known faults associated with the Cleveland Hill Fault Zone and the foothill exists Shear ZoCode requirements will insure that adequate protection ne. Construction of sjn le-fat.l dwellings to meet Universal Building for any residents Sfi See items le and if. Sc, dt The subject property is 'located within the critical winter range of the Mooretown deer Herd: The Department of Fish and Game has recommendod that the project tae made to conform to the provisions of the majority report of the Migratory Deer Study panel which 'Was formed by the Butte County Board of Supervisors. (Soo letter .from Department of Fish and Game, dated May 14, 1084, attached) if the project is made to conform to the provisions of the report, then any impacts associated with wildlife would not be significant. left Through not significant; this project will represent an incremental increase for a demand for public services In a rural area. YES MAYBE NO 13. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Will the proposal re 5ult in a.er:tion of substantial additional vehicle mov nt? _ b. Ef2i sfor newon 5ting parking?king facilities, or c Substan ial impact on excssting transportation systems? _SC d. Significa of circul t alterations to present patterns a *on or movement of people and/or goods? X e. Alterations t waterborne, rail or air traffic? `— f. Increase in tr ffic hazards to motor vehicles; bicyclists or p destrians?` 14, PUB., IC SBRVICES. Wi, A the proposal have an e feet upo , or result in a e6d for new or altere g es ' a�v 1ir�nprotectiones;� b, F Police protection? c . , Schools? b d.Pas or other ecrAtional facilities? G e, mainrkr tenance of public�facilitie., including roads ? .,4 f. then governmental services? 15. EN)jR Y. Will the proposal resu t in a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel,or energy? b. S"bstantial increase in d. mand upon existing s urces of energy, or rewire the development onew Soulcts of ener• ? 16. UIMAT LS. Will the prop al result in., a need for new sy tems, or substant al alterations to the follow ng a4 not et or natural s? b. Co,munications sy tems7 ` C. {Vat r: d. SewBr or septi tank? X e. 5to rm water d ainage? x t. 861i d waste nd disposal? 17. '.-IUMAN H�ALTH., Will the proposal result in> a. cre tion f any health hazard or potential hea th I azaxd (excluding mental heal.:h) ? b. Exp su of people to potential health hati s? 18, ALSTHVICS. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the ptiblic, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically oZfensive site open to public view? .4 Ar ss�r' s Parcel # 7 2 - �1_,__ Z --U Applicax)t: Marc 11CCle. _n DATA SHEhT ERD Log #8Q -p4-10-01 A,, Project Description Tentative Parcel t�1a1—., –� �. Type of Project:---- 2. Brief Descxip�% on: ntivriinP 10 aCrnS lslto tt�0 PYA each.. -� feet 3. Location•bSt. Ln the north side of I-loie Lane a roximanithez0�ovlle�area. of its intersection i_ith_hurleton Swedes Plat Roa , s ac/d.u. y., Proposed Density of Development: Amount of impervious Surfatla ng Minimal via I -lope Lane to l'1urle�ton Swed_ Access and Nearest% Publyc -mi e) Flat Road app. 1/4 utile ro�.�.tnately Method Of Sewage 'Disposal :_-individual seP—t?c v -t et rt 8. Source Of Water supply Individual wells _._--�.---- Proximt;�* of 'ower Lanes: To ex'stili dwelling on ro ort 10. Potential for further 'land divisions and deVelopment �•imited due to soil t es ;and General Plan olicies . lnvironmental Setting r p� c �l Pnvi.ronmen'�.; _ 1, rr'�;rraan a. General 'fopo raihac Character: Rollin; Sierra foothills_ r_.._.__-- b.. Slopes10-20� AS _.-x- rrP r �- open . c. lleva es on some Gaza. d. Limiting F"It;ars i. Stee'o� s1 nport�.ons Soils Mostl I;ngleori ht series,well drained' aa ',�rpes and Characteri.stacs r some t�"r ronaut intrusive series ;tom inoderatel slow ermeabilit . ,._.�-_– �voll-drained w� th slo�a permes.bility the north, generally _ i'ac't,ore, Somo areas of slow permeability f� b. Limiting liatural Hazards Of the Land uaite larch Zone! Modorate. WISP a, I'lire b. � Erosion pot;ent:i.al : Vdr h d. r e. Expans: rw, Soil, pe't entiel: c. Landaiidu Po't�ential. Low 4. HydrolagY e Scotlthwest Cotn6t of t11 xo a. Surface Wa.t,er' tributary 'to •North 1,ioncut Cook Data ,Shoe L continueiz b. Grout, Grater: Aquifers of unknown quantity c Draini;ge Oha acteristics:.Pro_nertr�ra1ns to west and,no-pth egg to North. Honcit Creek, thence to _Lake Wyandotte d.. Annual Rainfall (normal) : 35 to 40 finches per year e. Limits g Factors: Some erosion and siltation potential to 5. N'o,, th honc t C e �r�nu ar es Visual/Scenic uali y: 6. Acoustic QualLby. 7 Air gaality Biological Environment. 8. Vegetation: Interior Limp, OaR, Rhin Oak, i'a l i fora i n R1 ar_IL-Oal--and.... 9. q WIfBI11'atitat: Lower Sonoran Life Zone, ciritical winner doer habitat Cultural Environment: 10. Archaeologifal Fu,` Historical Resources -Ln the area: Low OrrhaPn1n9jCaj sensitivity area 11. Eutte County General Plan designation. - 12„ Existing Zorint;, M -It 13. Existing Land Use on-s,te One single-family dwelling 14. Suvro=ding Axe,i; a.Ladd U`8est Olen lands, S attered res dential uses at rural densities b. Zoning M- c. Gen. Plan des .f=s,atio.r. a].._keside t; ni- d. Marcel Si s FGerlerul J 5� ..ro_parcels. some much ltir�ca� _ e Population •_—)oarse 154 Maracter, f Site anc Area:- 12urai oPeit laid rapidly developing into rural res:i,dentz l 16. Neavest Urban Area: arovill;e 17. Relevant Spheres of Influence: None 18. Improvements Standards Uvbaia Area.-. No., 19. Fire Protection Service: Station 54 in potbestown at. N'eanoat Ocanty (State) Fire Station: Station 64_ at Ward Blvd Orovil b4 gator Availability? Tanker only 80. Schools in. Are; : , groyille 111omelitary School Di tri:ct and Oroville "-union 111911 �Tgo1 District Appendix V (b { STATE OF CALIFORNIA --RESOURCES AGENCY EDMUND G. BROWN X, Governor w DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME <; REGION 2 x� , a 1701 NIMBUS ROAD, SUITE A RANCHO CORDOVAN CALIFORNIA 95670 (916) 355-7030 Qufra Co Planning Co fim. May 14, 1984 MAY 16 1984 � orow"e, i Mr. Craig Sanders g Butte Counter Planning Department 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95670 Dear Mr. Sanders: The Department of Fish and Game has reviewed the Marc McClendon Tentative Parcel Map (A.P. 12-47-8) which proposes to split a five -acre parcel from an existing 11.71 -acre parcel. This parcel lies within critical winter range of the Mooretown Deer Herd with onsite habitat consisting of oak woodland and some chaparral. We recommend that the project conform to the provisions of the majority report of the Migratory Deer Study Panel which is expected to be adopted by Bunce County as a general, plan policy to protect migratory deet. if the Department can be of further assistance, please contact Jerry Mensch, Environmental Services Supervisor, telephone (916) 355--7030. Sincerely, Paul T. Jensen Regional. Manager ou Mo Co. Planning Comte, JUN 2'1'1984 �%�'a-''✓t�� Uroville� Colitam��, STATE OF CALIFORNIA --THE RESOURCES AGENCY GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN, Governor DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME REGION 2 1701 NIMBUS ROAD, SUITE A RANCHO CORDOVA, CALIFORNIA 95670 (916) 355-7020 i July 9, 1984 Bu"O CO, Planking Conyn, J U L 16 1984 Mr. David R. Il ronimus CMV1116, calitOMI4 1 Associate Planner Butte County Planning Department f 7 County Center Drive �Qroville, CA 95670 Dear Mr, Hironimus: The Department of Fish and Game has reviewed the Marc McClendon Tentative Parcel Map (A.P. 72-41-8) which proposes to split a five -acre parcel from an existina 11.71 -acre parcel. This parcel lies Within critical winter range of the Mooretown Deer Herd with onsite habitat consisting G_ oak woodland and some chaparral. We recommend that the project conform to the provisions of the majority report of the Migratory Deer Study Panel which is expected to be adopted by 'Butte County as a general plat, policy to protect migratory *leer. Building Sites should be clustered along the Forbestown 1toad Gild a miti- gation fee be charged for any building permit (as recommended in the majority report) if the Department can be of further assistance, please contact Jerry Mehsch, Environmental Services suporvisor, telephone (916) 355-7030. Sincerely, V. x ✓°' Paul T. Jenser Regional. Manager TO: Butte County Advisory Agency FROM: Planning Director SUBJECT: Report on Tentative Parcel Map of Marc McClendon on AP 72-47-08 DATE: July 24, 1484 This is a proposa', to divide 10 acres to create two parcels at 5 acres each The present zoning is M -R (Mountain or Recreation Subdivision Residential). The Land Use plan Map of the Butte County General Plan designates this area as Agricultural -Residential. There Are no specific or community plans for the area. The proposal does not :conflict with County zoning nor any adopted or Proposed element of the Butte County General Plan nor any County, specific or community plan. Recommend approval. This project will reduce potential impact to deer habitat if the following mitigation measure and condition are adopted._ Mitigation measure proposed by applicant and modified to meet the recommendations of the Butte County beer Herd Study Panel report: i» Place a note On the final map stating "Perimeter- fencing is limited to 5 strands or less of barbed wire, the bottom and top wire to be a minimum o+'16 inches and a maximum of 48 inches above the ground". The following cdnditinn it recommended by the Department of Fish, and Game and is in conformity with the provisions of the Deer {-teed report. Js Building sites to be clustered along Porbestnwn Read. This condition can be implemented by roqujeing the homesite on Parcel 2 to be shown on the ,northerly one-half o+ the parcel on the final map.