Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout072-490-023I yY.... ! Ir • ° .a , • bey - �i • �• it • \ • � 1 V d , 1 'di • 1 Y, � , ' 1 , • `II• •1 y1. J i N'P's.' CE OF D.ETEitNY2�TA'S20N To Office of Planning and ° sea ch L E _ 1400,Tenth Street, Roo 121 F�o Plann'County Butte Sacramento, CA 95814 "'`C g Department AZAR 2 2 79$3 7 County Center Drive in De artme or - Oroville, CA 95965 X County Cleric CANDACE J. GRUS1 %'Butte Co. Cleric County of Butte BY igdECO Joputy SxrB�ECT c Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public Resources Code, Project Title AP �{ dame Tentative Parcel Map 72-49-23 William Small State Clearinghouse Number Contact Person (if submitted to Clearinghouse) Telephone Number Public Works Department John Mendonsa 538-7266 Project Location North side of Rutherford Lane a feet northeast of Oroville-Dangor Highway, east ofrOrovilley 1000 Project Description p Tentative Parcel Map dividing 12.52 acres lin—to—two parcels, one of 5 acres and one of 7.5 acres, k. This is to advise that the Butte County advisory Agency +Lead Agency or Responsible Agency) has approved the above-described project on Mareh_209$9 � and has made the following determinations regarding the above-described) project: I. Theect ro P j will, X will not, have a significant effect on the environment. 2• An. Environmental Impact Report was pursuant to the Prepared for this project provisions of CEQA. A Negative Declaration was Prepared for tb.is Project Provisions of CEQA. P p P pursuant to the 3: Mitigation measures _ were; X were not, made a condition of the approval of the project. 4. Astatement of overriding considerations r this projOct. -was oX was not, adopted- This doptedThis is to certify that the final 2IR with comments and responses and record of Project approval is available to the general public at: Butte County Planning Department 7 County Center Drive Orovi.11e; CA 95q'65 Date Received for Filing and :Posting at OPR90 � 5 Signatlrre '--. a 'Bill Tur in senior Planner Title Pev ,sed March 1086 n, couniq 1 ...-rILI. CATF1 AI!T.. -- - LAND 'OF h�A7Uf+�l Vr :.D r, -z. DEPARTMENT of PUBLIC WORI(S' WILLIAM (8111) CHEFF; uirector 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE; CALIFORNIA' 35965 Telephone: (916) 538.7681 �(�!"i RONALD D. McELROY MARDeputy Director '-wavillet CbVifornta March 20, 1989 William Small RE: AP 72-49-23 141 Rutherford Lana TPM - Oroville,'CA 9_5966 Dear Mr. Smalls At the regular meeting, of the Butte County Advisory Agency held on March 20, 1989, the Agency adopted a negative declaration of environmental impact and approved the tentative parcel ma? on the above -referenced property subject to the conditions listed on the attached sheet: If no appeals are timely filed --within ten (10) days of the date of the Advisory Agency':; approval --with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, this action will be finn'l. When the conditions of approval are complied Lith, it will be in order 'tl' for you to file your ''final map'' with the Butte County Department of Public Works for recordation within twenty --four (24) months of the date of approval by the Advisory Agency. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office: Very truly yours} William Cheff Director of Public Works Jb�n Mendonsa Assistant Director JM/ds Attachment cc; Planning Department ttvirohmehtal Health Department Barhhart/Browh ►;r ►tel. � , 1 William Small., 'TPM, AP 72-y49-23, 2 parcels on the north side of Rutherford Gane approx. 1000 ft. northeast or Oroville-Bangor Hwy. Fast of Oroville Engineers Barnhart/Brown Public Works conditions: 1 Verify legal access 2 Provide two-way traversable access RS -8 -LD -II to each parcel from a coilnty maintained road or state highway. 3 Access to be reserved in deeds as per county ordinance and offered for de ° tation on the final map. 4 Show , ''t. building setback ;line measured from centerline of ,access easemt ,t „ 5 Provide ~sad maintenance agreement. 6 Show all easements of record on the final map. I Provide street: tame signs per requirements of the dept, of Pubic Works prior to recordation of the final map. S Pay any delinquent taxes or current taxes as required: I 9 Meet the requirements of the Butte County Fire Dept. 10 Move barn from within access easement and 50 ft, setback line or obtain a new 60 ft, access easement so that the barn is located out of easement and the setback line. 11 Obtain variance to 50 ft, building setback line setback for barn. Health dept. conditions: 12 Show a 50 ft. leachfield setback from the drainage way on parcels 1 AM 2: 13 Provide a letter or other documentation from the Oroville Wyandotte Irrigation District stating that they are willing and able to supply domestic water to parcels 1 and 2. Planning. Dept. conditions. 14 Designate leachfree areas as no development area on tile, final map. 15 Note on sheet attached to final map: 'All construction for human habitmtion shall conform to the Uniform Building Code. Mobilehomes shall be installed, tied down and braced in such a manner as to resist` lateral, forces from earthquakes. Residential development of Parcel 2 shall be limited to 'single story structures. 16 Access ,to Parcel 2 shall: be via Caroline if practical. (Agricultural -Residential, Mobile Home, b -acre parcels) The Land Use Element of the Oroville Area and Butte County Land Use :Element of the General Vlan designates this area as Agricultural -Residential. The Safety Element indicates that this project is in a high to moderate fire 'hazard area. As conditioned, the proposal does not conflict with county zoning nor any adopted or proposed element of the Butte County 'General plan not any County, specific or community plan. This property is 'located within the special studies zone which is bounded on she east and west by Paynes Creek and Swaine Ravine lineament respectively. Division and development of properties within the special studies zone is subject to the requirements of the Alquist-prolo Act. As mandated by law, a geologic survey has been prepared which concludes that ground cracking and some vertical and horizontal displacement may occur within the property boundaries in'`the event of an earthquake. The geologist recommends three mitigation measures all of which have been agreed °o by the applicant and ate shown as conditions of approval: The 'Northeast information Center was contacted concerning the ;requirements for an archaeological survey. They have granted clearance and do not recommend that a survey be prepared at this time, AECOMMENDAT'ION A. Find that: li An initial Study'was completed and in compliance with CEQA. 2. Said Study and coilunents received thereon identified potentially significant environmental effects of the project may ha re had, but r Butte CountyAdvisory,Agency Page Two September 28i 1988 a. Revisions in the project plans or proposals made by or agreed to by the applicant would avoid uch effects or mitigate such effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects would occur., and b. There is no substantial evidence before the county, that the project as revised may have a significant effect on the environment. 3 A, proposer Negative Declaration has been completed in compliance with CEQA and isapprovedand 'adopted,_ B. Find that said Negative Declaration together with any comments received during the public -r,--View process have been reviewed and considered C. Approve 'the proposed Tentative Parcel Map to allow the division of a 12 acre lot into 1 parcel at 5 acres and l at 7h acres each on .AP#72-49-23 (William Small) subject to the following conditions: 1. Designate leachfree areas as no development area on the final. map. 2., Note on sheet attachod to final map: "All construction for human habitation shaII.. conform to the Uniform Building Code. Mobilehomes s'all be installed, tied down and braced in such a manner as to resist lateral forces from earthquakes. Residential develapmefi of parcel 2 shall be limited to single story structur6-s, 3. Access to Parcel 2 shall be via Caroline. 4, The metal barn shown on the Tentative Parcel Map shall be relocated out of a,iA required setback areas or a variance shall be obtained from the Planning Commission prior to recawdation of the map. 5, Meet the requirements of the zoning district. LT j me cd: William Small Barnhart -Brown Af,3PENDIX-F COUNTY OF BUTT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FO,R (To be completed by Lead Agency) Log No. 88.04-18-01 AP No. .72-49-23 L BACKGROUND - 1. Name of proponent WILLIAM SMALL 2, Address of proponent and representative (it applicarle): 1 i ? atn__Sma.11...r.. —.._.`B.a.=ihart-srawnm &—Asssac attr.-q P.O. Box 543 P.O. Bax 1516 �Por�o-1a,.-�-C.A_.:9.5•1�.�----� .—.�-OrQFr?-1-�—�-X� 9-596�5�-= ..�.>„ 3. Project description,. Ten ttj_v_e_P,a.rc_e. _Najvt 11, MANDATO13Y FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE YES MAYBE NO 1: Does the project have potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wikiiitz population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range 0..'a rare or endangered plant or animal oreliminate Important examples of major periods of California history or prehistory? .......................... .,. CI 0 M 2, Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term benefits to the detriment of long- term, environmental goals? (Ashort-term Impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief period of time while longterm impacts will endure Into the future.) . , .., . E3 C] X 3. Does the project have impacts which are Individually limited, but cumulatively considerable7 (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource Is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is l significant.)... .... .,. ...................... ....... ___ ......... Ci C1 4, Does the project have environmental effects Which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? ........ .............. , .... , . , , d CJ IIi DETERMINATION: (To be completed by the Lead Agency) On the basis of this Initial evaluation. 1/WE find the proposed project COULD NOT Have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEOATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. IMWE Iind that atthough the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the MITI GAT! ON MEASURES described on the attached sheat have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLAMATION will be prepared. MIR find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVI110NMENTAL IMPACT REPORT Is required. COUNTY Or EUTTE, PLANNING DEPARTMENT L_ August 9; 1.988 g_.�•-.—. �iaura a . • 1 ; t; OCiae1 anrier RevCewed by;r,. , . 3, WATER. Will the proposal result in substantial: a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of vaster movements in eithor marine or V. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Q l' (Explanations of all "YES" and "MAYBE" answers are required,011 attached sheet(s),) 1. EARTH. Will the proposal result in significant.! YES MAYBE NO a. Unstable earth conditions or In changes in geulogic substructures?..1.,.......,,.,...1... 0 O 9 b, Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? ..... » ............ Cl ❑ i c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? .:.......... .. > . , .. , } , , , ... z , . 0 ❑ u' d. Destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? ...,. 11 © 1 e, Increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off site? ............ .. , .. , ...... 1 h9 f f. Changes in deposition or eeosibii of beach sends, or changes in siltation, d13posltloh'or' EJ 171 IAC erosion which may modify the channel of a riverorstream or the bed of the ocean or any bay,lnlot or lake? _ .f. ......,. ............. .................... ..;>,.,».}. 11 L'� N g, Loss of prime agriculturally productive soils outside designated kirban areas? ......,.... 0 d h, Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, D Ci Cid mudslides, ground failure or similar hazards? . .......... .. . . } » ,...,........... f 2, AIR. Will the proposal result in substantial: of Air emissluns or deterioration of ambient air quality?............. ...... ............. G] d b. The creationof oblectional odors, smoke or fumes?......,.....1...... . ....... c1 Nlteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any change In climate, locally or regionall.y?...,,..}..... 1.11»1.1...vf..f.,#,11.1Y..Y.I....... »..}♦»a.}I}Mi4».1..•Y.'.l.» 3, WATER. Will the proposal result in substantial: a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of vaster movements in eithor marine or fresh waters'. . » . ...1 Q l' b. *,hanges in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff?, c, for surfacedrainageImprovements, Including vegetatlon removal izatoff-site c eed c ...... .. ... ..} . ................... ti 0 d» Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? ... » » ............................... . Cl 0 Lift , e, Change in the amount of surface winter In any water body? ............ » , .... , ... , , .. , . D d f, Dirge into surface waters, or In any alteration of surface water quality. including but t limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity4 ..................... f ....... 1 d g. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? ................ ........ EJ 171 IAC h, Change in the quantity or quality of ground waters. either through direct additions or withdrawals. or through Intercepti n of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? . » . , ......... 11 L'� N 1, Deduction in the amourit of water otherwise available for public water supplies?. 1, >=xposure of people or property to water related naxards such as flooding? , ... , .. » .. , .. D Ci Cid d. PLANT" LICE. Will the pruposal result In substantial. a; Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (including trees shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)? .. f . f ., ................... ........... b, deduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? ........ 0 replenishment of existingspecies? Y .. , , . , } . , , , . , ... ........ ai ... .. the normal 0 o. Introduction of now spces of plants into an area, or in a b,..., » 1., or », normal d, Reduction in a..... Y.•...lacreage of any agricultural crop? ................................ 0 6. NOISE. Will the proposal result in substantial: I 13. TOkNSPOkT'ATION/CIRCULATION. Will the proposal result in. a. increases In existing noise levets? ..... , , .... .. , . . » .... , .. . , ... . • .:.. 13 _ 5. ANiMAL LIFE. Will th -'proposal result in substantial. " YES MAYBE NO a; Change in the of animalsecies of birds, land,, es, Or.numbera of organisms and ❑ b. Exposure of people to severe nose levels? .... .. ; , .'.......... Y ..... . ....... . . ...... Y ❑ animals including reptiles. fish shelf fish, benthic o insects)? L+�l 7. LIGHT AND GLARE, Will the proposal produce significant tight and glare? ............... b; Reduction in the numbers of any unique, tares or endangered species of animals? .... , . ❑ b c, introduction of new species of animals Into an area, or result Ina barrier to the migration or 1:3 0 ItI movement of animals? ........... ............ ....... .... .«..... ._., ..,,.. d, Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat?, . , .... , . . . .... . ...... . .. « «.. , , . , _ , , ... ❑ ❑ 6. NOISE. Will the proposal result in substantial: I 13. TOkNSPOkT'ATION/CIRCULATION. Will the proposal result in. a. increases In existing noise levets? ..... , , .... .. , . . » .... , .. . , ... . • .:.. 13 _ 13 -fit i b. Exposure of people to severe nose levels? .... .. ; , .'.......... Y ..... . ....... . . ...... Y ❑ II L+�l 7. LIGHT AND GLARE, Will the proposal produce significant tight and glare? ............... t] e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or Air traffic?, ...... , , , , _ . , , . • , . • • • • . , A b 8. LAND D an area? USE. Willthe proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use n . .., ...... ........................ Y.Y...,.Y,..Y....,........ 9. NATURAL RESOURCES. Will the proposal result In substantial: a. Increase in the rate of use of any statural resources? .......... ... , ..... •• , • . , • ❑ ❑ 121 b. Depletion of any non-reitiewable natural resources? ... ... ............ . .... 1 ❑ N 10, RISK OF UPSET. With the proposal lnvolve: A. A Brisk of explosion or release of hazardous substances (including, but not lnjited to, oil pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions ? C7 II W b. Possible Interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?. , 0 0 9 it POPULATION. Will the proposal alter location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population? .................. ... , , .... .. 4— ...... , Y , . Y , .............. CI 12. HOUSING. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create.a demand for additional housing? .............. ................Y.......1..........,.,....,............,........ I 13. TOkNSPOkT'ATION/CIRCULATION. Will the proposal result in. r ieration of substantial additional vehicle movement? . . ................ . ......... . .. C1 ❑ �k'� b, Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? , ., Y........, Y : , .... , . , i n c. Substantial Impact On existing transportation systems! .................... , . • ..... , . , , .. Ct d. Signifficant alterations to present patterns of cirqulation or movement of people and/or goods'? ... ,...Y. ......... ..................Y.... kY A1........... ...,..............Y...1.... i� N1 e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or Air traffic?, ...... , , , , _ . , , . • , . • • • • . , A b T. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? ..., , Y , .. d 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result In a need for new or altered government services: YES MAYBE NO a. Fire protection? ......... .,, ,,. ..,... ❑ Cl I . Police protection? ............................. —, ............ .,,..,,.x., -. ❑ c. Schools+l,.....n............ i,.... ... ....... . d, parks or other recreational facilities? ....................... ❑ ❑ int e. Maintenance of public facilities, Including roads? .'«... : .... .... . . ... . . . . ..; ,.... , .... 0 C] I. other governmental services? ... . ........ . ... . ....... , , . ❑ ❑ 15, ENERGY, Will the proposal result In.' a. Use -of'substantial a-nOUnis of fuel or energy! ........................,:,..,............ ❑, 0 b, Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? ...................... . . ... . ..... . ......... d O 16 UTILITIES, Will -the proposal result in a need for new systems, orsubstantial alterations to the following: a, Power or natural gas? .......... ........................... ,...,,,, ........ d ❑ b, Communications systems? ....... —.................. .............. .....,,..,... Cl fd IBJ C. Water availability?.... .................................. ......,,...,..,. d ❑ �I d. Sewer or septic system?--- ............. . .... , . , .......... , . , .. , . Cl d �1 e. Storm water drainage?... . ........ ...... ,,,.,........ . ❑ (l' I. Solid waste and disposal? ...... ....:......�.. ,.,,..;,..,,... ,.,..,...,,,,.....,.. (� _❑ 17. HUMAN 'HEALTH. Will the proposal result In: n. Creation or anyhealth hazard or potential health hazard (excluding monlal health)? b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? . ........ . ....... . .... , ................ ❑ ❑ I 18, AESTHETICs, Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista, or view open to the public, or will the proposal result In the creation of an aesthotically offensive site open topublic view!............. ........ ,........ ........ ................... 0 Cl . 19, RECREATION. Will the proposal result In an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? ....... , ................... . . . .......... ( t 20,'CULTUAAL AESoURCES. a, Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of c prehistoric or historic archaeological site? .. ............... ..... . ...,.. ,,,, ...., I CJ b, Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure or object? .......... ... ..... ............ ......... .......... ......., c, bobs the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values'? ...... ......... ........ .............. ..........:............. .. d, Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impart area.? ......,.....,.,.,�. ..................... C1 DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION A.P# 72-49-23 1b0v6rcoYet',IM0 and compaction of the soil's surface is estimated at ,one act -e: The most likely homesite on Parcel P is approximately 300 feet north of Rutherford Lone) beyond the thick brush at the southwest property corner. 01srupt'lon ,and compaction of one, acre on a 5-ar.re parcel Is, not significant, 1c: The toPQoraphY on site has Gentle undulations and is suitable for h,omeslte construction. Very little arod'ho will be required to prepare a building pad. Grading will be required for construction of the driveway off Rutherford Lane. Two swales, converging at the southwest property corner, have created localized areas of steep gradient. rill ,n8y need to be brought In to construct the driveway. Teir': According to the Safety Element of the Bu -,%-Pte County General Plan, erosion potential on site is high. The Department of Water resources has classified the Auburn Soll Series as having a slight erosion potential. Erosion was not evident on the day of the field visit, as most of the highly erodible areas, wero obscured by brush. Erasion is most likely -alopo the drainage swat at the west propei-ty line and through Parcel 1. Soils hruve been stabilized by heavy Growth of Oak, Fine and underbrush. All leach- frt�e areas should be designated as, no -development areas to protect areas of crodiole soils 1g.4 The Auburn soils have a medium potential for ramee use, and some success In supporting olive orchards. Although 5 -acre parcels will be oil the smaller end or the average parcel site in the area, they will not be out of character not*, reduce the agricultural viability of orchards to the northeast or :z.outhoort. 4h9 The proporty Is located within the Special Studies Zones desi,onoted by the State Geologist$ Division Of Mines & Oeolooys pursuant to the, Alqui st-Prlolo Act. The Special Stud ie-; Zone surrounds active earthquake faultss 1'.1"lly to rUPtUre within this period of history. A geologic report has b ,.,-*. I..-, r -P P�hnkeo Roolstered California Geologist 41246, His report concludes tliat rock fal Is, liql,10f8C.tlcarr j ground slumping or slope InstabIlIty are not hazards on this property. Howevors Ground motion may be a slonIfIc'e-Int, hazard to buildlnos- The Geologist made the roll yaw lng recommendations ,which will become conditions on this map' 1. All c%onsti'luctiAsn for human habitation zhall conform to the requirements of the Uniform Building Codc-a. 2. tylobllet:, homes shall be Installed) tied doi,,Im and braced In such a manner at to resist lateral forces from earthquakes. S. Single -fermi ly res idoncez shall be limited to slnal o story, With Implemontation of these mitigation mo4surez, the prosonco of the Spec, loi Studies and potentially active earthquake faults ohould not be a sionifIcant hazard to persons or property. 3b: Construction of a homesite an Parcel "is not expected to modify drainage patterns. Road construction may include Increasing dulver-b size, but this will retain the existing -1119MMeOt of the swale8. Sdsj* AccordIng to the fedey'al flood maps, -these SNMIeS are not subject to flooding. The 0WIb ditcl., along the east property line is a controlled flow, which will not overtop its banks. 3f: There are two foreseeable sources of dise-zharge to sur -face Hatm,­. The first of those is septic systems and leachfiolds. 00zlonotion of 5Q -foot leach-fr-ee setback areas from each swab and the OWID ditch adequately addresses this concern: The second source Of dIschar9t is runoff from the new driveway fres be Constructed. Runtff will: include sediments, small Pieces af gravel and road bass) and a minute 8MOUnt of Petroleum products. Placement of the driveway equidistant from each swa]O will minimizer tills concern. 4a,,c* Both swo M`e lined Kith heavy tree and brush growth. The heavy brush extends b-ti,4een both swales bt the southwest property corner-, and wher- ear lot line Is staked. This Is the same area that 18 most IIV 'see drivewny constr,wctjon; access Is from Rutherford Lane� Ing no rOas . onab;e alternative. Althouof-t the parcel touches C 4 to the Porth, ;4 dace not have loonj access to that r-oad. DrIvr, ,y cof amount of vegetal ion lstr-uct'I on W' " requi0r;) Clearing a substantial 'Impacts to wjj, C`�--arlrla V;howld not result In any sibn1ricart quality Or ZIOPe Stabill2ation) Provided that she driveway is c,% red betNelnn the two swales. 4b,,5b., Accor -,d) .g to Lh-!- Natural DIver 5ity Dote Base Prit,toutj and �:!zh & Came Areas or significan+, Biologico, trVor�toncej that -e -are no kr1,,)W- rai-o or endnnget-ed plant:: Or ani ural c, on this property. 0: The G"emeral Plan dez;gm4tlon iz A9rIcuItur4aI_R0sjdentIaj, a range of parr el rizem s rr�oj allowing tea 40 z­ros. Parcel sizes ft'om 20 to 40 acr-es are Considered compatible 441th ,­"' s Cern era l Plan des lonation. Parcel size!!; Of I to 20 acr-os are considered condltLoral ly toj_,_-J,4,tQnt, PrOvIded that five criteria have been met* Thoze, Criteria are I,sted on the General Plan COM-Pcr,manco Repar-t-. A,, noted in the report) fire facilities and fira services are Inadeqijaite In the sr` Itheasb Foothlll�,- of Oroyllie. Station #64 Is the naores,,* Yoar-rourld n ned fire station, and diZ,tu,:,sed undor4 rcem 14. The Map can bo. found I n concerns are I f 1 orated aPProx I mate I y 5-1 /2 m I e-- to the not th,. F I re conformity with the Gancoal Plan Pr-Oyldl�d that all m i t i gttlLn meas U, are compiled wjth%4 I n es Alaro� metal born has be -en -Z'011structed Within the UO -foot front yard . This barn shall 1:�e rolocated, or, a variance secured Pr6jyl the planning Comm lzr-lon rl-hor to rerror _:atipan of the map. vehicle trips per day m 0 'iia: bevel beveloptnent of pal to nPPr xi at lY 10 add ddtional RUthOrford Lane, iSC; Rutherford Lane from *12 tO 20 feet wide, and had been surfacrid I n the past- w I th mspha I t c0ncreto or ch I p sea I . Tho sur Pocing, - 6� has long since deteriorated, and it now only visible in patches along the road. A condition of the map will be to bring Rutherford up to stand.lards specified in the Subdivision Ordinance. Along property frontage) Rul,herford shall be widened to 20 -eet� with 411 Class II 80greGate base and a single seal coati From the southwest property corner to Oro -Bangor Highwayp Rutherford will require grading and At! minimal amount of road base. 14a: Properties that are not served served by pressurized hydrants ants are required to pay into the o water tender fund at a rate f $2DO(per parcel. By policy of tKe Board of Supero I cors, paymont Into the fund will offset 'Impacts to the fire department. A second -,ource of water in the event of emareency is the OWID ditch. i4b,f: The add!+ --!on of one house will increase demands for governmental services to a minute degree. 14az Residential aoMsti'-1QttIoh Moy be subJect to the payment of` school construction fees. 200.- A records search hos been prepared by the staff of the Norbhitaast information Center) California State University, Chico. They recommended against preparation of an archaeological survey. 11. MANDATORY.EINDINQSOF SIGNIFICANCE 41 According to Oehnke, construction oi± one single-family house in close proximity to the Speclnl Studle-s Zono Is not a significant I impact4 1, Designate 811 leach -gree areas az no-dovolopmont OrOO8* 24 All construction for human habitation thall conform to the Uniform Building Coder 31 Mobile homes shall be lriztolledy tied down nric= orated In such a manner as to rasist lataral forcet from earthqunke8, 4: Residential do olopment. on Parcel 2 shall be limited to 8inglo 5. Netta driveway on Parcel 4 shall be 10C.14-Od OqUidl,;Mant from the two swalas* 6. The metal born tzhall be relocated OLIt Of tht -,etbaers�) or a varlance shall be obtairtes from the Plannin Commission prior to r,7--cordation of maj.,). i Appl i cantt W I 1 T i am Sma l 1' AP #72-49-23 Log #38-X01:.18-ol. DATA SHEET A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION I. TYRO of Project. Land dlY sign. 2. Brief Descr, i pt i on: Tentative Parcel Map dividing 12 b2 acres into two parcels of 5 and 7.5 acres. 3,, Location.' North side, of Rutherford Lane approximately 100C Peet mortheas.t of arov i 1 1 e-Banoor Highway, east Orov i 1 1 o area T19N, R5E, SE 1f4 Sac. 80. 4. Proposed Density of Devel opment'One dwelling unit per parcel 5. Amount of'Impo"lous Surfacing: Minimal..' 6. Access and Nearest Publ' i c Roads: Frontage on Rutherford Lane < pr i vate > Oro"Oangor 1s Nearest public road, approximately 500 feet: 7. Method of Sewage Disposals Septic tanks and leachfields. So Source of Dater Supply: OroV i 1 1 o --Wyandotte ri' i gat i ren Distr ic1, 9. Proximity of Gower Lines To original parcol. 10. Potential for Further Land Division -s. and DOVelopment. Divis.on will permit construction of one additional house: 8. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING Whyslea l Ehyironmon: t , Terr-a i n a. Genoral Topographic Character: UndL►lOtinj. b S l opraa 1 0 W 1 59 c. E1 cvati on 775 to 835 foot above Sea Lovel d. Ll m i t i og Factors: None. 2. soils a- Types and Characteristics. Auburn$ 10-25" deep, strong brown -yellow -red, silt l aom, hioderata permeab i 1 i ty; w a'l l' draining, medium poten t. .al for range use. b L. i m i t i nn motors: Nor,a: 36 Natu".al Hazards of the :Land a. ltarthquake Zone= C'l eVel and Hills Special Studies Zone! b. C;rosi oh Potential High ( sl l Oht $ according 4o Departrrrent Cf Water Resources), , a. Landslide Potential LOW, do t=ire Hazard High to Moderato. e* Expzarisi Ve Soil Po•t;ent i;al » L.eLv to none,, . Hydrolosy a. Surf`8CO Watery On -s i to drn i ►gages. OW D ditch on Batt PrOPel-*ty line, Honout Croon. 2000 foo -t east and 1000 f'0et ..gam rr b. Groundwater- n/a. OWID will provide water. C. Drainage Character! st i'cst: Drams ns West to the: west fork of Honcut Greek. d. Annual 'Rainfall (normal) 85-40••. e. Limiting Factors= None 5. Visual/Scenic ©tial i ty - Good. 6 Acoustic Oual i ty : Good, 7. Air Quality: Good B i ral oea"► cal . Environment. 8. Ve oetati o.n'c. Ndi rare or endangered plant species known to occur, on site 9 Wildlife Habitat: Lower Sonoran Life Zone. Cultural Envi ronme t 10. Archaeologlca1 and H l stor i Ga l Resources in the Area: 141011. 11, gutta County General Plan Uesignationt Agricultural- Residential. gricultural-Residential. 12. Existing Zoning: ARMH-5 is., 5xitting Land Use on Site= ane barn and house. 14 Surrounding Area a. Land Uses; Rural res Idont 1al, alive orichard vacant, horses can pasture "armed i Blit eel y ,st, kennel to southsast. b. Zoning; ARMH-5 3 AR -P-1/2. c. Oeneral Plan Desi gnati ones Aor i cul tura) -Res i denial al d. Parcel Sizes: 15-20 acres. e. Population Sparse 15. Character of Site and Area Rolling foothills. 16. Nearest Urban Area:. Oroville, 5+ miles northwest. 174 Relevant Spheres of Infuencet OW10. 18. Improvement Standards Urban Arad;. n,/a. 19. FC re Protect i OM Service a. Nearest County '( State:) Fire Station 464 5-1/2 2 miles north b. Water Availability: Water tender or OWID ditch 20 Schools in Area: Oroville ilomentary and High School C) i str'i cia . LtvIT / s j s