Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout072-560-015y l� ! � � o p. �°� 1 r s _ a m e e. � c � '� ..y ,' et.. , Q v, 1 � � ..,t ! � Gti� � { ' o - _ e _ . � _ ��o _� .. ;� r � .' -.Q o A - ,;� • � • 1 r 3 e �.. a °� y�e 'W / R 1 A . � .• �' �. s o y �;� �. • ,. ',� .. ,,. '`�a„ A� ' _g �. . 1 � � • � e •r � I , � � P p rt , . � � I � - •- 1 � � . :, �5� � � , �� '• � � . ' '. �' m° •� � � � � � +. � 13'11 `�� i �1 � � � ' �� r � l �" w S PARCEL GEL NUMBER(S) 72 -5 GEN. .AN Ag. - Resi. ZONING APL PROJECT CONSISTE DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED 8/9/85 Eng.Barnhart-Brown &.. Assoc- -i.P.O. Box 1516.-Orovill-g. Ga. --95 5 DATE PUBLICATION NOTICE WRITTEN PUBLISHED PLACE NEWSPAPER NOTICE(S) PUBLISHED 0. C. P. (1. B. DATE MAILING LIST PREPARED DATE MAIL-OlJT NOTICES WRITTEN MAILED NUMBER DATE PLANNING XMTOWS REPORT Pa'PARED tNVIRONME, 14TAL CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION - DATE r"ILEA)— DETERMINATION AND DATE NEGATIVE DECLARATION i4 DATE ADOPTED, MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION - DATE ADOPTED &.,. 7�L ENV IMPACT REPORT DATE CERTIFIED. SUB. COMMITTEE MEETING DATE ADVISORY AGENCY BEA11ING DATt.. ADVISORY AGENCY ACTION BOARD ACTION Pjs,,.k�h I,A-A -Qft '14.k.AA hOIA0— APPENDIX H NCTIrV. OF DETERMWATA il of Plann n and Research 1FROM: P iuil De artst TO: �4A� Tenth Street reorn l2l 7. nt Center nriv Sacramento, CA 95814 Or OFF , .. '_ X County Clerk County of Butte ELEANOR M. BECKER County Clerk ��i • Piling of Notice of Determination in cornpjianceY52 dtt-5ec4lon-tiosr- SU83Wr. g of the Public Resources Code. Log #84-08-00-01 u„»p rIV)G+k •►cep - Tentative Parcel Map Ed Davison tate C earing u9e Num Contact Person Tete one` Number house ) (If submltted to Clearing534-4266 Public Works John.Mendonsa .� On the north side of Davison Hill Lane, approximately 1000 feet west of it $ intersection with Lyons Lane, Black Bart areai fro ect Dec” ip: M Tentative Varcel qup oto divide 20 acres into three parcels, �wc at 5 acres each and one at 10 acres.. ^^ butte_County' Advisor A encV ._ This is to a+f� isc that the Agency or ike onsi le Agency has approved the above d --scribed project andhas made the following determinations regarding the above described project; - 1. The project will, Z, will not, have a slgniflcant effect on the environment, 14 An Env lronmental Impact Report was prepared for this 'project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA A legative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the - provisions of CEQA. 1fic EIR or Negative Declaration and recordof project ajVroval May bib i examined at: Butte County Planning Department .7 County _Cetiter Drive n r 11 e CA��'i '• 3 Mitigation measures ., were, were not, made a condition of the approval I f the project. 4. A statement of Overrlding CoM.lderatians waS,. , , Was not, adopted for this project. DAte Received for Filing 10/2385 ---, Si t re Ste, IIeI. A. Streetol: Senior Planner, �k•r r ��• revised JanU4ry 1985 a a ui, ilia, a «.Rate Count LA -Nb OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BCAUTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 'WILLIAM (Bill) CHEFF, Director 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965 Telephonet(916) $34.4681 RONALD D, MCELROY F9j.rj r Deputy Director Plnnnin9 �o October 22r 19$5 OC 2 Ed Davison RE AP '72-29-151 9518 A W.S.R. Tentative Parcel Map Oroville, CA 95966 Dear Mr. Davison; At the regular meeting of tht: Butte County Advisory Agency held on October 21, 1985, the agency granted a mitigated negative declaration regarding environmental impact and approved your tentative parcel map on the above -referenced property subject to the conditions listed on the attached sheet: If no appeals are timely filed --within ten (10) days of the date of the Advisory Agency's approval --with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, this action Will be final. When 0e conditions of approval are complied with, it wi 11 be in order for you 'to file your "final map" with the Butte County Dept. of Public Works for recordation within twenty-four (24) months of the date of appro al by the Advisory Agency. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office. JM/ds attachment CC Planning Health Darnhart/Brown Very truly yours Williato Cheff Director of Public WORS' 2in Men onsa sistint Director Ed Davison; AP 72-29-151., 3 parcels on the north side of Davison Bill Lane, approx. 1000 ft. west of its intersection with, Lyons Lane., Black Bart area Engineer: Barnhart/Brown Public Works conditions; 1. Provide two-way traversable access RS -8 -LD -1 to each parcel from a county maintained road or state highway, Z. Access to be reserved in deeds as per county ordinance and offered for dedication on the final .map: 3. Show 50 ft. building setback line measured from conterline of access easement. 4i Provide road maintenance agreement. 5. $how all easements of record on the final map. 6. Provide street name signs per requirements of the .Dept. of Public Works prior to recordation of the final. map. 7. Provide cul-de-sac at the end of the street. 8; Pay any delinquent taxes or current taxes as required. Health Department conditions. 9. Provide a 100 ft. leachfield free setback around existing wells either within the property or within 100 ft. of the property boundzries on parcel 2 10. Show a 50 fti leachfield setback from the drainage way on parcels 1, 2 and ,3 11. Indareicate on unsuitableeforpthat sewageareas disposalhonlopes in parcels 1xands3of thirty percent The following mitigation measures are also 'required: 1�i properly install culverts at required swale crossings-. 13. Burn under permit or remove construction debris. 14. Dress and shape roadside ditches to minimize erosion potential on access road. 15. Construct out And fill slopes to minimize erosion. Inter-DepnrfrIenin Memorandum TO. Butte County Advisory Agency FROW Planning.Director susJECT, Report on Tentative Parcel, Map of Ed Davison on AP 72-56-15 (formerly 72-29-151) DATe; October 16, 1985 This is'a proposal to divide 20 acres into three parcels, two at 5 acres and one 10 at acres. The present zoning is A-5: The Land Use. Plan Map of the Butte County General Plan designates this area as Agricultural - Residential. There are no specific or community plans for the area. The proposal does not conflict, with County zoning not any adopted or proposed element of the Butte County ntY General Plan nor any Cc ki ntys ecific or community plan. The Department of Fish and Game has no concerns with this tentative map per a September 27, 1985telephoneconversation, Approval is recommended subject to the following mitigation measures: 1. Properly install culverts at required swale crossings. Show the homesite locations on the final. map. Pace at the on the map hat stages no further division of p cj 1Pdk6►d°+ 4. Burn under permit or remove construction debris,: 5. Dress and shape roadside ditches to minimite erosion potential on access road. 6. Construct cut and fill slopes i:a Minimize erosion. NOM Since this report will, not be 'received five days prior to the hearing, a wi aiver of "ac, 20-99 of the subdivisioh Ordinance is needed to allntir 4dt :.sort' Agency action on October 21. SAS/sjs API ENDTX r COUNTYor at~TT ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMIST rOltrt (to ,Tie-compl.etec y Lea gencyj Log # 85-08-O9-01 AP 9 72-29-151 I. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proponent ED DAVISON 2. Address of pz'opottent an- representative (if applicable Ed Davison Barnhart-Br0 n,lspo J Ates 9518A W.S.R. P.O. ,Box _1576 -- Oroyille Oroville, CA _955-66- s CA 95965 3. project description Tentative Parcel Mau , MPT MANDATORY FINDINGS Or STGNICANCE YES Mr:YBF NO a. Toes, the project have he- potential to degrade the p reduce quality of the env` y the :habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or 'wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the ;number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or Prbhistory2 . b. Does the project bcaVe the potential to achieve short-term benefits to the detriment of long-term, environmental goals", (;A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief period of time while long; -term impacts will endure into the future. C. Docs the`p�=eject have impacts which are individtr- ally limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources W}1re the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the efffect of the total of 'those Impacts on the environmtnt is significant-) d. Dods the project have v:irvironmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? 'TEk\1INATiOi\, (Tb be completed by the X.oad Agency) On the basis of this initial evaluation; I/#V8 find the proposed. project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATTW, DtiCt.AIIATION will be propared. I/wt find that although the proposed pro�3Cct could have a signifi- cant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect it, this case because file fiim'CIATION M11ASURPS described on the attached sheet have bean added to tho project, A NEGATIVE' DECLARATION will be prepared. E/118 find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and all E?NVIRONNInNTAL IMPACT REai'ORT is required. UAI'1:. Se tember 20, 1955 C CONT r t1UTTI., L NT DEPARTMENT ... . err tre.eter, Sehi6t Planner Reviewed by. 4 ,4 V, ENVIRONMENTAL IMP TS xp anations ot a "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheet (s)) YES MAYBE NO 1. EARTH. Will the proposal result in significant: -a-7—Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? b. Disruptions, displacements; compaction or overcoverng of the soil'? C. Change in-opogra by or ground surface relief features? z3, Destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? of soils, Increase in Wind or wager erosion Tither on of off-site? Changes in deposition or erosion oa beach sands; or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream Or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake'} g, Loss of prime agriculttt.rally productive Soils outside designated urban areas? h. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud>�- blides, ground failure or similar hazards? proposal Will the . substantial-* aIR Air emissions Ordeterioration ofambient air duality? b. The creation of objectionable odors, smoke -- or fume? c. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature; or any change in climate, locally or regionally? - 3 WATER. W* -11: the proposal result in substantial - a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of `water movements in either marine or fresh waters? b. Changes in absorption'rates, drainage patterns, =-- or the rate and amount of surface runoff? c. Need for oEl-site surface drainage improve- ments, including vegetation removal, channel,- ization or culvert installatibn? flow of floe d Alterations to the co arse or Waters? - e, Change amount of surface water in any binthe Water f. Discharge into surface waters, or in any including alteration of surface water quality, but not limited to temperature,, dissolved ozygen or turbidity? gF Alteration of the directa,on or rate of flog of ground Waters? h., Change in the Quantity of ground waters, with- either through direct additions or drawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or eXcavations? Deduction in the amotunt at water.othe�rw`ise� available :dor public water SUP pl3.es? j, Exposure of people or property to mater related hazards such as flooding? YES MAYBE NQ 4.- PLANT -LIFE. Wil1 the proposal result in substantial.: a " Change in the diversity of _species, or number of any species of plants (including .trees, shrubs , ;grass , crops, and aquatic plants) ? b. Reduction of the.numbers of any,unique, rare or endangered species of plants? C. Introduction of now species of plants into an :area,, or in a barrier to the normal replenish- ment of existing species? ._ ..� d. Reduc-Peon in acreage of any agricultural, crop? S. ANIMAL LIFE. Will the proposal result ,in substantial'* a. Change in. the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals includin re tiles, fish and shell fish, , benthic ar organisms or insects)? b. Reduction in the numbers of any unique, rare or endan eyed s ecies ofanimals? p ., c. introduction ofnew species of animals into an axea, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals'? d. ,Doteti.oration to existing; fish or wildlile habitat? 6. NOISE. Will the propose. result in substantial. a. Increases in exis;Fing noise levels? rw b. Exposure of people to severe noise leVCLO, 7. LIGHT AND BLARE. Will the proposal, pra:d ace si,gni iEant light and glare? - 8. USE. Will the proposal result in a SAND stantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? =--- 9. NATURAL_RESOURCES: Will the proposal result in substantial: A,' Increase in the rate of use o.- any natural resources? ---- b. Depletion of any none -renewable natural. resources 10, RISK 0F_ UPSET. Will the pro osal involve: a.`� A r s a explosion or the release of hazard- ous substances (including, but not limited to, oil:, pesticides; chemicals or radittion),in the event of an accident or upset conditions? P b. PosAible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? _- 11 POPULATION, Will the proposal alter the location; distrIBUE16ni dexlsity, or growth rate o£ the human population! 12, HOUSING. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? ... .. ..... ........_.. . _... . ...: _ .. ......_ - ,rte YES MAYBE NO 13. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Will the proposal result in: of substantial additional vehicle a.Generation movement. b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or 4� demand for new parking? Substantial impact on existing transportation --- �" c. .systems? d. Significant alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods?X ' Alterations to waterborne,,xail or air traffic? a. f. Increase traffic hazards to motor vehicle s� or edestrians?n bicyclistsp 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Will the proposal; have an effect upon, or result in a need, for neva or altered governmental services: a. Fire protection? ---- b, police protection? c Schools? __.. d. Parks or other recreational facilities? -�- e. T4aintenance of public facilities, including roads? f. Other governmental �-rvices? ` 15. ENERGY. Will the proposal result in: of amounts of fuel.or energy? T. Use substantial b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing development solaces of energy, or require the of energy? 2. of new sources 16. UTILITIES. 'Will the'prosal result in a need for substantial alterations to the new systems; or following: a. Power or natural gas? -- b. Communications systems? c. Water avail 4bil "tY. d. Sewer or septic tank? =--- e. Storm water drainage? f Solid waste and disposal? 17: IjUW HEALTH: Will, the proposal result in44 otentia'1 are" -a n of any health hazard or p health hazard (g excl.udin mental health) ? b Exposure of people to potential health hazards? l$, AESTH_ E �, Will the proposal result in the oGstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public; or avill the proposal result in the creation of an lestheticallY offensive site open y�^ to public view? �'\ YES MAYBE NO 19. RECREATION. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational. opportunities? 20. CULTURAL RESOURCES. ea _W—ill ta proposal 'result the a Itertion of or the destruction of a prehistoric or :historic archaeological site? b. Wx11 'the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or object? historic uilding, structure or c. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values,? d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? 1. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AP 72,-29-151 See attached, j V' p7SS'11S5lOPa 'nF OrN�/Z �Nl1�iVTAL EVAis �/ TION AP 72-429--151 1b,e; Two additional homesites with related driveway and road construction w11l disrupt and-overcover^ a small amopwnt of the acrgaW3 CaC,a in grading activities and minimal removal of vegetation are necessary +:o reduce the erosion potential w .. 1h• Sesmlt. hazards will be accounted for through the building perm .fit process. runoff to ies of Powell Cr e,f ign pryant dQt will scharnesgtoetheesurface watersbarernot expected Creek. Significant i 9 d' so long as steps are taken to minimize erosion. aht Evidence that adequate water for domestic use is available must be demonstrated to the Environmental Health Division. ,j Seasonal high flaws i n the drainage i nage swal es could pose flooding hazards. Homesite locations shown for Parcels 2 and 3 would avoid this potential problem. An alternative apPi-oach ►would be to designate tho 50--foot leach-field-free setbacks from the drainage $wales as no--developmant areas for dwelling units. 5c,ds California bopartment of Fish and Game has been contacted to comment on this tentative map. Their comments will take into account the smaller parcels to the south in determinln9 the significance of this winter deer range. Normally, no new parcels less than 20 acres Irl s l ze are recommended by the Department" of Fish and Gama for non-critical winter deer range areas: The tentative map appears to meet the five cnlyd i t oval zonini"a and.-development criteria for aorlcultUral-residential designated land, Nearby parcels may be encouraged to seek land. dlvis ores of five-acre */- parcels. 9a,15a: A higher use of natural resources and fuel would occur for, these parcels due to the outl Y i ng i oratl on v; 13'cc Additional Vol) icul^�^ traffic (up to 14 +f- average daily trips) will be added to Black B<, Road. As greater amounts of traffic are added to this road, off---site road improvements, particularrly on sharp curves, may be Necessary. 14a-f: An increased demand for YarlOus public services •'11 occur in an area currentlY receiving a low level of such services. This situation is not expected to improvep given the County's budget cutbadks. The California Departmeht of ForestrY does hot require .a water supply for this land divlslon. 17bt The Butte County `losguito Abatement District comments that the area historically has produced a mosquito found In cavities containing water. They ehcour^aoO the property owners to fill all cavlti'es containin0 water with sand to reduce the number of mwtquito breeding sites POO: Archaeological clearahce'was Bi-'ahted as noted in the attached .:6- fi Buffo Cru;w May 6, 1981 Iona Snyder 6652 Wellsboro Way Citrus Heights, CA 95610 Dear Ms. Snyder, At'your request on Thursday, April 31, 1981 I conducted an archaeological reconnaissance of your property, AP#72-29-38, Iodated adjacent to the north 'side of Black Bart Road, approx- imately 1.5 miles east of the intersection with Lumpkin Road, east of Lake Wyandotte. The property is approximately 80 acres side and ocvers the 82 of the NES of Section 24, T. 19 N., R. 5 F., Rackerby Quadrangle, 7,t5' series. The proposed project is to divine the property into four parcels'. Prior to conducting a reconnaissance of the property I consulted the archaeological site record files maintained at California State University, Chico to determine if any previously recorded prehistoric or historic sites were located within or adjacent to the property boundaries. No such sites had been recorded I or the immediate vicinity of the property area. The 'terrain of the- property has a general south to north slope and covers three small ridges separated by intetmittent-drainage channels. The ve etat .on of the property area ,s generally moderatelyde��se and includes cake pine, manzanita, Incense a �. Cedar, madrone, toyony. back brush, -whual grasses and wild flowers My reconnaissance of the property area was complete in that al: areas of the property considered likely to contain mater ,alc or features indicative of prehistoric or early historic activities were carefully examined. A systematic examination of thm property area was not possible due to the dense vegetatioh and steep terrain in portions of the property, but x was able to examine &11 areas of the property considered. sensitive for prehistoric or historic materials or features. No prehistoric materials or features were identified during my inspection of the property aroa. The only historic "material's or features observed during my inspection of the property were related to gold mining activitiesi In the northwest portion of the property I found an e tploritory mining pit, approximately 8 feet in diameter and three feet deep. These types of pits �lere dug to test an area for possible deposits of gold bearing =gti May 6 i98 Page 2 gra.,elst vo other materials or features were found in association with this pit, which probably indicates that the pit yielded negative resultsAnother feature related to gold mining was identified in the northeast corner of the property. This was a collapsed mine shaft at the bottom of a steep ridge. These types of shafts were excavated to located veins of gold wit:►in the surrounding rock formation. No other materials or features were identified within the -� property boundaries that were associated with this mane shaft, but just off of the property area z located a collapsed stamp mill. The stamp mill was utilized to pulverize the rock extracted from a mine into smaller fragments, which could then 'be washed to separate the gold from the other materials. This stamp mill-was constructed sometime in the early 1900s, this date being based upon the absence of , square nails utilized in its constructiono A small rock dam and waterway were also constructed along the drainage channel. The proposed project will not have any adverse impact upon the stamp mill site and no, mitigation measures are proposed fox this site since no significant prehistoric or historic materials or features were identified within the property botindaries it is recommended that archaeolr,,.ical clearance bl, granted for the property area. Sincerely yours; S; t: James P, Manning; Archaeology Consultant u Appl i cai,' yt Ed Davison Assessor's Parcel #k 72--21-151' Lag 4 85+-08-09-01 A erode Ori s�ti on, 1.: Type of Project: Tentative Parcel Map. 2. eriof Description: Division of 20 acres into three parcels- two of 5 acres, one of 10 acmes. 3. Locat;'i bn: North side of Davison Hill Lane, approximately 1000 ?peel of Its intersection with Lyons Lane, Black Bart 4. rezuy' 4. P'roposb-d Density of Devel opmant: One .d . u /5�-1 0 acres. 5. AtAount of Impery ous Surfacing: Minimal. 6. Access and Nlaarest Public Road(s)= Davison Hill Lane, Lyons Lar -e, 3l ack 'Bart koad, Forrbestown Road. 7. MatLlod of Sewage Disposal Individual septic sy4t-ems S. Source of Water SuIpply Individual wells. 9. Pro t i m i ty of Poser Lines". Av'aitable to Parcel 2 10 Potential for further land divisions and d,3velopment: Further d "v ; s i can of Pard 1 possible under A-5 ---on i ng Pi �ys i.c.,&„4 N 1 . '�r,►.Wra n a. General Topcj6. na,racter: Rolling Tooth l l l terrain. b.. ';iopes: 5--40%j 5-209. C . !_.evatlon[ 1'975-P-075 feet A.S.L. d. Limiting Facte3rs:' Areas of steep slope, drainage swales 2. Sol 1s a. Types and Characteristics: Argonaut Gravelly Loamy Clay Loam: Creehstone origin; Englebright Loamy Clay Loam b. Limiting Factors. Sall depth and quality 18 li'mid•atlon for septic systems. S. Natural Hazards of the Land a. Earthquak.b Zone: Moderate Intensity Zone VIII; Cleveland Hills Fault 6 miles west. b Erosion Potr n t i al : Modo "rate - High. c6 Landslide Potentials Moderate: d Fire -Hazard: r4ioh. e. Exobhsl've Sol 1 Potentials Moderate. 4. Hydrology a Su"face Water. Drainage swalot traverse site, Powell Creek and tributaries to the north and west. b. Ground Water: Potentially limited aquifers. C Dia nage Gharactoristics= bralnope to north into Powell Crook acrd eventually Lake Orov i 1 l e. di Annual Rainfall (normal), 45-50 inches. e. L i mi t i'ng Factor's. S. Visual/Scenic Glualityt Hloh. 6. Acoustic. duality". Low ambient noise levels, r� 7. Air Quality Good, Biological .Enyirori =nt: S. Vegetation: Foothill Woodland with some chapparal and Yellow Pine forest ,plant sPecies. 9.. Wildlife Haivi tate Lower Sonoran Life Zona; MooretoNn Deer Hord wl rifer r•an96; Bald Eagle range to north. - Cultural En_m i ronment: 10 ,Archaeoldgical and Historical Resources in the area: Archaeoloeicai clearance granted in May 1981 for Iona Snyder tentative map. 11. Butte County General Plan designation' Agricultural -Residential. 12. Existing Zoning: A-5. 131, Existing Lancs Use on-site? One residence with 1100 -gallon water tank and fire connection; open foothill terrain. 14. Surrounding Area: a. Land Uses: Foothill terrain with dispersed residences along Black Bart Road corridor. b. Zoning A-15, A-2. c. ven Plan designations: Agricultural -Residential. d Parcel Sizes: 3-40 acres, generally 10-20 acres except for 5 acres or less to south. e Population: Very low density. 15. Character of Site and Area". 16,. Nearest Urban Area= Orovl 1 1 e, 15 miles. 1'7Relevant Spheres of Influences 18. Improvements Standards Urban Area: No 19. Fire Protection Service a. Near -est County ( "State) F i r•e Station 4-5,4� Robinson Mil 1 b. Water Ava i 1 ab i `! i ty a El even-hundred-ga'l l on water tank on Parcel 2$ fire truck carmac i ty» 20. Schools in Area= Oroville School Districts.