Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout073-150-023`y. n� \ � � o ':p �; �� _ � t 'i ��; � � • �r w{y . ., � � � - e. .. {�, � � y . � + . �' o. Ma C,_ j�.� t C -Ll�'4J �.'.1. ., t4�F", ' �': <, y� r:. o =� '�' .. l r y � .. r P w � � J � � b + ' � � � .. J . y�'�' , !:� � - .t r e � .� � � t1y, lq � u` ab p ' � � W � .� ' i PLANNXN0 COSSION SD;^�t=RY _SHV.BT F»03 APPLICANT Gary Honroth Log488-,04-18 05 ADORE $S P.O. Box 145, Feather Falls, CA 95940 OWNER Frank Harvey, 1256 Robinson Rd., Bangor, CA 95940 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Tentative Parcel Map to divide 1.20 acres to create- 2 reate2 parcels, 1 at 30 +- acres; 1 at 90 + acres LOCATION on both sides of Robinson Mill. Road approximately 3 miles south of Forbestown Road, Forbestown area ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER(S) 73-15-23 A-5 ZONING. A 5 GENERAL ,PLAN Ag Resi ,PROJECT GENERAL PLAN CONFOR1`9ANCE REPORT 4-6--88 ---- DATE OF APPLICANT SZGI�P,TU1�E LAND CONSERVATION ACT CONTWAC71S? No DATE �1PPLIC7', 4M4 Rr!,C)3IV'Bt April 15, 1988 . Barnhart -Brown & Associates. AG�',N��'SC�k�V�,Yq%t/C:�'V'lL EIVGZNE�/n, ADriR1~S5. P.O. Box 1576, Oroville, CA 95965 _ DATE,_ PLANNING DIRECTOR'S S REPORT PREPARED CATEGORICAL EXEMPTTOtN -- DAT �' CLED AND DATE .._ NEGATIVE DECLARATION - DATE hDOPl'81)�»� ..... �.w-�- ......_. MITIC-1ATED RtG, 1=EMARATION O11`.I:'E ADOP'S"P_*_ FNV Kill,, v"T UEl'Cli4T DATE CE13TTF�Ei: il'CAW' C;..eiPik`I`1110,Uc1:.' NO. .. ar.r.«...:..: -.. w.n.x« r.scu..,a+....q..N.., ;a.�.w.w..wna, w.va,w.ww. .'...w<...... ...... .,.y..e. #rw,ci....«x=:—+:.m _...y.--w..«»-a ,w.r . .e•..,». ..,.. .x .. ,a.... w.+ ,. :w ..:.... .., ... . .. ...,–..,..,-.w......a..u.a,sa....w,.-:r+�:: «+.+a -+.-r+. .,,. . ..a.. <,+-'. C 1'1Di7:C:atl1Y A(;V 1VOX HEAY�I.N(1 L); �1I17E G- ATW'tORY AGEW"O'Y ACTION WMAM 0TIj VOR PLANNING UTIMMOR' ir"POA,'i' C7�' r Z'E.R.I�z=N1�T7�pN' Off!'.ce of planning and 1Rw�seai�ch 1400 Tenth Strfaet, Room 121Fey t� Ilutte County Sacramento, CA 95814 Hanning Departmo,►lt or OCT 1988 7 County Center Dive Count Clerk C,NuA'E,tOville, CA 95965 -�-- Y C;R ��, �Illt2 Co,�n��lerk County of Butte: By. Deput;r SLJJ3.7ECT cF"iing of Notice of Determination in compliance or 21152 of the Public Resources Code, With Section 21108 Project Title AP li Tentative ParcelMap Name `— State Clearitl73-15-23 ghouse Number Gary Rcnroth (if submitted to ClearinghouSe) Contact person Telephone Number Public Works John Mendonsa Project location On both sides of RobIns or, Mill Flo 538-728 three miles south of Forbestown Road in t e ad approximately I h rbestOwn area eant Project Description the Parcel Map div din 10 parcels, one of 30 acres and one of gp acres. g -�0 acres into two -- This is to advise that tille Buie County .Board`. of Su ervisors1 has approved the above-described projectdongPncy October R _ nsible Agency) " `- the fallowing determinations 1988 and had made regarding the above-described projects wi11 (Date) 1. The project ,X environment.. —' will not, have a significant effect on the • An r,nvironmental Impact was Pursuant to the provisiOhs oftCRQAiPrepared for this project A Negative Declaration was prepared for this proje provisions of CEQA ct pursuant t,r the 3. 1lfit199tion measures approval of the proj`ect, `-were, —"re no't, made a condition of the 44 A statement of OverrieIng considerations for this project, pas f X Was not) adoptees This is to certify that the fwnts and nal Exp with comme project approval is available to the general public at: responses and record Butte County Z'lanning Department County Cc=hter brive Oroville, CA 95965 Date Received for. Filing and r-6sti.ng at CPR 10/7,%8$ 18►1atu. ky ,.. B, A: Xi ch,� , 1Diretor of I► .anVIyJ • �, Title .V�...,r„ �Ir .L' yt., •. ,.W I . klwie li 41uw Gary Honroth Tentative Parcel Mair A-2 73-15-23, Mitigation Nu 1. Designate a 100 ft. septic free setback and building aaures; the creek on parcel 1. g S tljack area alone 2. Place a note on the final mar mitigation fees required by GountylOrdinance ng that hforwigsua,noe of buil at the timesuch Permit(s) ner groes to pay deer are issued. Owner acknowled p ding permit(s) is in effect as of the date of Tentative Parcel Ma g $ that no such ordinance Y P approval. 3. All parcels to be at least: 40 acres in size. TO FROM: INTER -DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM Butte County Advisory Agency Planning Director SUBJECT' REPORT ON TENTATIVE PARCEL,iMAP FOR GARY HONROTH ON AP#073-15-0-023-0 DATE- August 24, 1588 This is a proposal to divide approximately 1.20 acres into 2 parcels, 1 of approximately 30 acres and 1 of a zoning is A-5 (Agricultural, 5 acre parcels)te�TheOLandeUsc ThePlapresMapent the Butte County General Plan designates this area as Agricultural - Residential. There ,are no specific or community plans for the area. The initial environmental documents prepared for this project identified several potential impacts that could result. Most of the identified impacts can be mitigated b e mation measures listed below. However, the potet,tialcimpacthinthto deergherds identified by the California Department of Fish and Game cannot be mitigated with the existing design. The Department of Fish and Game has indicated that divisionOfland into parcels of less than 40 acres in size will harm the deer herds, migratory deer movement affected and foraging space availablwill be e will drop below the Level: needed to sustain herd numbers; The subject property lies outside the designated development zones as shown on the maps supplied to the Butte Co the Department of unty-Boa;~d of Supervisors by Fish and Game and lies in where Department has recommended minimum parcel sizesn ofreas 40 acres the maihtaired. (See letter from Department & the Initial Study),of Fish Game, attached to The applicants engineer has stated that the area of Robinson Mill. Road Will be dedicated to Butte County as approximately 5 ;acres in size, that this is close to 40 acre pp mately 35 acreis . He suggests That read area plus parcel 1 total approximately Department of Fish and Game and that adverseel imp�ctsedwill the Ordiance is adopted by the Count pay ow - Mitigation fees once an insignificant if the owner agrees to a edger, ers Map y M p' r, an analysis of the Parcel Ma indicates that Parcel Ma 1 as shown on a Tentative Map is upproxamatel 25.6 acres (measured to centerline j ) . If all of the right-of-way of Robinson Mill toad adjacent to i�arcel 1, is added.; then the lot size is approximately 26.96 acres; Mill Road right-of-way which The remainder of Robinson approximately 2 1/2 acres. Passes through Parcel 2 consists of t in mind location of Robinson Mill i.Ioadtmaypva yld bfrorripth t locatthatsthe Ptncise the Tentative Map. Afield survey would be locate the road. As a result, proposed Parcel 1 being red in dbounded by sljc, road may in fact be significantly Larger or smaller than that tc the 'tentative Map. shown The environmental documents for this project have been. completed Mitigated Negative Declaration. is recommended should thprojectbaa approved. - P ] be RECOMMENDATIONt A. Find that the project could have unavoidable impact on the area; and wildlife in B. Deny the Tentative Parcel Map for AP#073-15-0-020 Pursuant to the requirements of (Gary i3onroth), California State Map Act. Section 66474 (e) of the If the project is redesigned to yield 40 acre minimum would be appropriate to: Parcels, then it A. Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration; and B Find that the project does conform to the policies County General Plan including the Text and Maps, of the Butte CoApprove the Tentative Parcel. Ma Iionroth), subject to the following fconditionsor -land -mitigation 1. Designate the 100 foot septic free setback area long the cree Parcels 1 and -a building setback area also. k on Mitigation) (Archaeological z Place a note on the final map stating that the owner the deer mitigation fees required by Count agrees to pay Of building permit or permits at the tim. Ordinance for issuance are issued. Owner acknowledges that no such Ordinance effect as of the date of Tentative Parcel. Ma r permit or permits Mitigations) is in P ePproval. (Wildlife 3 All parcels to be at least 40 acres in s Mitigation) i8e. (Wildlife 4. Place a note on the Final Map statin�V potential. Utilize standard erosion c4ntrVerol y high erosion construction of site. Revegetate all disturbedthods during maintained landscaping areas witho ex st h r species which are compatible with g plants in the area,,, DR14 j me Cc Cary 14onrot,h Barnhart -Bt oWn & .Associates r APPENDIX F COUNTY OF BUTTE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM (To bi: completed by Lead Agency) Lon No, 88-04-1:4-05 AP No, 73-15-23 I. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proponent G,AAY:�O�iR!J'PH 2. Address of proponent and representative of applicable)! Gary honroth Barnhart -Brown ,& Associates P.A. Box 145 P.0 Box 151 --Feather...F:al1s,,_-CA_..9-5.9-4-0._ _w Orou ]Vie,.. _CA X59.55-1576.. 3. Project descn tion Tentative Parcel Ma 11. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE Y88 MAYBE No 1. Does the project have potential to degrade the duality of the environment, '.ubstantially reduce thin habitat of a fish or wildlife species. Cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of major periods of California history or prehistory?......." .. . ................ 0 2. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term benefits to they detriment of long- term, environmental goals? tAshort-tern) impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief period of time while long-term impacts will endure into thu future )......... 13 0 3. Coes we protect have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively CnnsideraW0 (A projeL t may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact oR, a -'rich resource is relatively small. but where the effect of the total of those impacts oti in,,,." unwronment is significant.) ............... . , .... i 13 1? 4. Does the project have envi,onniental effects which will raususubstanhal .adve.rse effects on human t)eings, either directly or indirectly) . , ............................ ...... 13 III. DETERMINATION; To tw t`om;)It;ti4d E Lead Agency) On this bawr, of th p, initial PWE find the proposed piojet ; L,AJ'L0 NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and n NEGATIVE DCCLA,AATION will be pre u,-, . d I.,WE find that altho+.!,,A,, Rhe proposed project coned have a significiint oltect ori th4 envj bnment.* �.e, v"�rlt nn be a signlhcanteffe :yin this cause because the MITIGATION MEA$UPES described on the attache w sl"flet have been addnd 16 th e project. A NEGATIVE b5CLA13ATION will be pl*eparr:d, I,WE find rr..,; ;proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT V, PORT is required`, COU P L3UTTE, PLANNING DEPARTM5-N OATtr. ,�_ N t�y� .17_, . $.8_. y av . _.. , �y id �R�� i riittis;" ssac�P�anrier Ileviowed q, PLANT LIFE. Will the proposal iesult in substantlttl. a, Change in the diversity Of species, or number of any spac,,38 of l)htnt?, (rnuluding trt'ws. Q � shrugs, glass. craps, and aqualie, plants)? ....... . .............. .......... ... . b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of planta? ,......, �3 0 t c. Introduc„tion of now species Of plants into an arca, or in �,a bairiar tij 'the normal tepleraishr e,A Of 0XI5ling &PeMUS'? ...... . • • d f, d. fleduivtion in acreage of any agricultural prop? . . . . . ...... . :... . . . . ...... . . . . ....... . . 0 0 �e IV. ENVIRONMENT'AL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "YES" and "MAYBE" answers are required on attached sheet(s).) 1. EARTH. Will the proposal result in significant' YES MAYBE NO a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? ..., ....... • . - .... , .. 0 0 b, Disruptions, displacements, compactiooa or overcovering of the soil'? ............... . .. 0 0 c. (change in topography or ground surface rolief rt)atures? . . ........ .... ...... ..... . . Ej 13 d. Destruction. covering or modification of ;any unique geologic or physical features') , ..., a i3 X- e. Increase in wind or water erosion of soils, r..rihor on or off Jite? ........................ e. M L Changes in deposition or orosion of beach winds. or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the . annel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay.intet or lake'? .......... ... ...... ..................... . .... ... g. I(pis of primer agrictiituially priaducl�vt; soils c+ulwao designatod urban arias" .......... C1 A h. Exposure of people or property to r talo ria' hazards such as earthquakes, htridslide ria ® RI C, mudshdes, ground failure or similar —rds .....,, ,..„...•.,, ..,••. . r 2. AIR. Will tiie proposal result In substantial a, Air emissions or drterioratron of cariibafaat ;ur quality b. The creatio, of obiecttonal odors, smoke or fumes?.. . .... . ..: . . 0 0 K C. Alteration of air movement, moisture. or temperatureor an r chan(4q in ulimdto, locally or regionally') ... ..... .............. . .... . ......... ......... , .............. .. 3, WATER'. Witt the pruposal result u7 substantial a. (,1hanges to currants, or the course or direction of water movements In either marine or fresh waters')....... ........... .. ....... .......... ............... b, t'.Iaatiges In absorption rates. drainage patterns or the mato and ariiotint of c urfacu runoff? .. C� o. Need for ()ff.site surface drainage improvements. Including vego-talion rernoval, ch.anneliztation or culvert installation? ......... .. .. ..... ...... d. Alterations to the cotarS+_' tar flow of flood waters? .. , .... • .. • ... • . 0 C e. Change in the arrtot,nt Of surface water In any water Lindy' .. .... ...... . ........ • .. 0 � I, DIFF C:naregLI InIU surfACe w.tlets, or many alteration of ,urfactu w,s44 rlu filityr, in, ludintg but � trot limited to temperature dissolved oxygen or turbidity`? ...... . ...... , .. - . , . g, Aibsrtalion of the direction ()I rxlte of flow of ground 0 9 ta, C;iwoge In the quantity or gustily of ground waters, either dirt-t :additions or witholi awals, or through inlerceptiul7 of an aquifer by Guto 0i oxcaavatarantr'i .. , .... , ... 1. Reduction In ttae amount of writer otherwise available for public wator I, Exposuto t;af people or property to water related hazard;, Rich as flooding;" . , ,...... , .... q, PLANT LIFE. Will the proposal iesult in substantlttl. a, Change in the diversity Of species, or number of any spac,,38 of l)htnt?, (rnuluding trt'ws. Q � shrugs, glass. craps, and aqualie, plants)? ....... . .............. .......... ... . b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of planta? ,......, �3 0 t c. Introduc„tion of now species Of plants into an arca, or in �,a bairiar tij 'the normal tepleraishr e,A Of 0XI5ling &PeMUS'? ...... . • • d f, d. fleduivtion in acreage of any agricultural prop? . . . . . ...... . :... . . . . ...... . . . . ....... . . 0 0 �e S. ANIMAL LIFE. Will the proposal result In substantial: YES MAYBE NO a, Change In the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (b'irdtt, ill animals including reptiles, fish and shell fish, benthic organi;.rns or Insects)? . , ... , . , , , b, Reduction in the numbers of any .inirlue, rare or endangered species of animalr37 c. Introduction of new species of animals Into an area, or result in a barrier to the migrrtticrri or movement of animals? . , , . ...... . ......... L7 r d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat?,.,... O 6, NOISE. Will tile proposal result In substantial a, Increases In existing noise levels? ,,.............................. ..... Cl Ll X b. Exposure of people to severe; noisE levels? ...... . . . . .. . ......... ,. ... , , ......GI L I JA 7. LIGHT AND GLARE, Will the proposal produce cignificant light and glare? ....... a. LAND USE, WiV the proposal result in ai substantial alteration of the present or planned nand useof an area') ................ 13 j .. 9, NATURAL RESOURCES. Will the proposal result in substantial: A. increase In the rate of use of an.,i natural resources? .. , ......... . , . , ...... ; . b. Depletion of any non-renewable natural resources? . . ..... . . . . . . , Cl Cl Z 10.' RISK OF UPSET, Will the proposal involve a. A risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to oil. pesticides, chemicals or radiation) M the event of an accident or Upset conditions'?_.... M 0 9 b, Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan), , 0 0 11, POPULATION, Will tite proposal alter location. distribution, density, M growth rain of the human populatiun? .I...,.,,, .............. .................. 0 0 12. HOUSING, Will the proposal affect existing hottsir, or create a demand for additional housing`? .. ........, ... ..... ❑ C... 13. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION, Will the proposal result in; a, Generation of substantial additlonal vehicle movemenll b, Effects on existing parking 19011itles, or demand for hew parking'?,, r;. Substantial impact on existing transportation systems'?.. d. Significant alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement 05 people andlor goons") .......... ... ............ ., ©' e. Alterations to waterbOrne, rail or air traffics . , d 1. Increase In traffic hazards to motor vehiules, bicyclists or podestriansi , , ,, 14, PUBLICgavernment services: SERVICES. Will the proposal altered have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or a, Fire protection? , , . , , , , , YES MAY ft' NO b, Police protection? , .. , , ... c. Schools?. ......... d. Parks or other recreational facilities.. e, Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? ,.,.,.., I. Other governmental services? , , , . , , 15, ENERGY, Will titer proposal result in. A. Use of substantial arnounts of fuel or energy? b: Substantial Increase in demand upon Cxi,ting ,;twit iss of energy, rrr rc+rfinic: titre development of new sources of energy? . , .. . El Cl Dt 16. UTILITIES, Will the proposal result In a need for now systems, or substantial alteratlonstothn following H, Power, or natural gas? .. . .. . . . . .. . .. . . b, Com,alunlcations systems? ... s... o. Water aval :-bflily?.................... CI C;I 1XI l tt Viewer or septic system! . , , ... , .... . e. Stoim water drainage?, ... ... f, Solid waste and disposal? ............ 17. HUMAN HEALTHY Will the piroposa,l r()5uit in. a. Creat:Ken of any heaalth hazard or pofential )traith hazartt (excluding mental h ialth)9 L�7 Li b, Exposure tateo le to I� p potential health hazards) ... „ , . , .. 1$'. Ammr:TIC,S, Will the proposal result in thn obstruction elf arty Ccenlo vista ctr vlr�w open to to puuitlii✓ 4Icv, > , ......... , . , . . ..... ran ul ten :tr stheticalty ttfft?rtr ivr} F„ittt open the Public n thEa G or will the ri1 osal resuft 1 t: 1S, RECREATION', Will the proposal result in an Impact Uljoi ihrt quality or quantity rll t;xisting recreational ropportunities "o ... , , . , . 20, CULTURAL RESOURCES. a. Will the ,-r,)posal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prohistorie ur h,gtoric archaeological situ fi. Will the propqbal result in adverse physical Or eesthotic effects to a prehistoric or historic building structure of object? ,: .Y,,,,.,;..,. .... .... f� Cl Dd c, hoes the proposal have the Potential toCause aphysictalchange which would aff(ictunlgi,o ethnic cultural values! .. : , . d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacrad uses within the potential impact aroO ....... ........ 1, a t. ,' „fY1:1 p'CBCIJSSI(ON Op CRONMENTAL EVALUATION AP 078-15-0-02a 1b,ejf,3b,1': This project will result In some disrupt lotti, dlsplacement,. compaction and overcovering of' the Sol I t-'hl'�Ouoh development of a building site on the proposed 30 -acre Sinale the building site is located on a ridgetop) it Is possible that two different tributaries of Natchez Creek could be affecto- d by erosion resulting from development. h: A I I of Butte County I s w I t -hi n a 11dioderate Earthquake Interry I t , Y Zone VI I I - 'The subject property 1 s 1 ocated aRPrOx 1 M8 to 1 Y three m I 19!',, o, f the Footh I I I Shear Zone and f au I is assoc I rated H i th the 197b Ojov I I I e earthquake. Construct I on of bu I I d i nes tri Un I Form Ow I I d I no Code standards f or se I sm I ca 1 1 y act I ve area,,- I e -I prov I de adequate protection to 0CCUPaMt5 In case of seismic a411.1v1ty. Fid'. See the attached letter from tie Department of Fish and Game dated May 101 '1988. The Butte County Board of Supervlrpors has directed that the designated development zones be ref lected In (,V)e Butte County General Plan and that the land use maps be amended to reflect these wildlife, concerns. 6,11,12: Creation of a parcel less than 4-0 acres wIL-hIn the criblcrtil deer habitat areas could result In reCILIOStS for sitnllal- development not only In this area but throughout the critical habitats of tho .hree deer herds located within Butte County. If such development is ,]lowed to occurthe cumulative e+fects HOU Id be on a regional scar ta rather than just on the lotal level. 13a,c,f- While thlt project would add 7-10 trips per day to Robin sir 11111 Road and would not be considered a significant Increase, on Its own, additional development In the area, as discussed In Items 8, Ir and 12 above, would represent a cumulative Increase in traffic, In tt',e area, .14: This project will represent an Incremental Increase In demand pub Ic services 10 8 rural area. Should additional - development place at a result of this division as discussed In Items 6o 11,) 13 oboyes them slqnlflt,.ant Impacts to all public services would J as c Residents on the property would bui-4n more fuel than average accessing commercial areas and schools located as fal" as 20 Mllet, tl-10 Subject property. 20a4 The subject property Is located in Mn area of high archaeological sensitivity. A records cheek and son8ltivity evaluation has been performed by the Northeast Information Center,,, located at the Department of Anthropology at California State linivers ity) Chico, and It has been determined that the site Is sensitive. See attached report from the Inf�orhlatlort Center dated April 1,41 1988, As 8 result-, ,an archaeological SUVIV-0y OF the proper' tv is necessary In order to determine IF significant resources exist and, If go) to develop appropriLato mitigatlol-I measures* NANDA 0 Y l INNING OF SIG iu1EICANC-F- 1 Seo Items vd and 20a. Rec otnmcynded M i t igat i n0 Measures 1. place a note on the final map stating, "Very control high 0110810n methOdS during poten tial• Utilize standard erasion al Fie`. egetate all disturbed areas either°° wit-"' construct Ion err site- 1 i ng or wit t7 species which are Conti > rl. i b 1 e with maintained andscaP existing Plants in the area." 2 Redes i V-1 -the FSI ojec•t to yield 40 -acro parcel m n l rnumta 3. IVn m i t i gat i on measure is recommended ;at; this to t l m`� r x09'11~d l n± per+orm ati archaeologic impacts• it is necessary i to deter n i rro it ,significant;, archaeol og cs l sur uey of the property on the property. If ,ioj adequate archaeological sites exlst must be developed. Mitigation measures Appl I c.,aht t Gary Honroth AP it 073-1,5-0-1,123 Log it 88-04-'IFI-orS 'DATA Si-iEr=T A Ero-leqfv- Descr I of i on 1. Type of Project: Tont&t-ivo Parcel Ivlap. 2- Brief Description: OlvidIrIg 1�(O acres into two parcels, one Of 30 acres and one of got! act -es. 3. Location: On both s I des of Rob I nson I'l I I I Roafj Oriprox 1 ma I -o I y three M I I as south of Forbe-stown Road In the For,bostbwn to tsti east of Oroville, 4, Proposed Density of Developineht: 30 acres ( max I 1711JM ) . 60 acres leer dIN91 I i no un It (averrtrje). 5. Amount of Impervious Surfacing. MI n I ryia I 6. Acces- and Nearest Public Road<s),. Property H'0Mts on Rob I (ison MI I I load. Me(;-,od O'F Sewage Disposal., Individual soptl(". systems. b. Source of Water Supply: IrdividUai wells. 9. Pro* of Power Lines,. 'ro property. ,to,. P0 for further land divisions and developtyien.b., LI de"' existing zoning and General plarl policies. Phy.s• —ED-2-In-aMer I- 1. .gra i n General Topographic Character: Rugged MOUnt8lnous tG-V'r.0 I o 4 b. SlopostSome areas Or 5-169 with many areas of 30-60r. slopes. "-r1 e vat I OM 1700 geet above Sea Level. d» Limiting FaCtoMs'- A sas. of s)r;oep slopes. P— soils Types and Character" IsJ-.j0t;-. Mostly Wyandotte Soil ew with some Sierr0 '-.eries� both geoerally well dr�alno ed iovvth mr"deratelY slow Permeability. I*lost <lolls are from 26 t -j 40 Incl -les deop, b. I-Imitin() ractOrst Areas of shall ori sty i t s and moderatp.,V r, I ow Permeab I I I ty. 3. Na -burial H817M'ds OF the Land a- Ear thquake Zone: lylOder8te? Earthqutike Introns ity Zone, viii. b, Eros I on Poteelt, I a I = Very I,1 I glj. c» Lands] I Lie F'OtOri b I a Low tt) d. F I re Hazard *- H 1 gi i. a. I:-XPLAS 1 ',"z 80 1 1 PotiEynt I a I = Low. Hydrolooy a, Surface Water; An existing pond or, !§ItO ,Ind trlbutar -ss Of Natcl-102, Ct"Oek which traverse, the site. b. Groundwater: Unknown, potentially limited, C. Drainage Characteristics*. Pr-operty drains �o the tributaries of Natchez Creek on site theno(I -.OLlth to Honcut Creel<, Natchez Creek and Honcut Qilouk form the County ooundarles south of the subject proporty. d. Annual Rain Val I (normal )t 40-45". e. Limiting Factors: Setbacks from dra i naoevioys and high erosion potential. 6. VISLAal/Seen ic Quality: Good. 6. Acoustic Quality: Good. 7, Air QUaIMY" Goy-.ld. 13_L_0J.QaJ cEnv ronen,- a. Vegetation: Grasslands, Interior Live Oak, WhIteleaf planZanita, 8uckbrush and Ceanothus. 94 Wildlife Habitat: Critical winter habitat for, the Moor-10tMwri Deer Herd. _Cu-Itura I 1:� vir �vno-wt--!- n 10. 11 . 12. is. 14. 20 . Archaeological and Historical Resources In the area: High sensitly, Y area. Butte County General Plandesignation'. Agricultural-Rosidential. Existing Zoning: A-5. Existing band Use on-site: One 51ngle-family dwelling. Surrounding Area: t rural a. Land Uses: Scattered single-family dwellings a derisltles and open land. b. toning: A-5. 6. Gono plan designat ions t Agri CUI tur-al -Resl dont-I al d. Parcel SizesGet-ierally 40- to 160 -acre Parcels within the 8Utte County area, One 24 -acre Parcel exists adjacent to the SUbjeot property to the south; as do several scattered smaller- home51te parcels alonr Robinson (vil 1 1 Road. Some small parcels exist wlthlM Yuba. County Itnipodlate ly to the east of the $Ubjemt properf,-yi e. I-16pulationg Sparse. Character of Site and Area*. Rural open land. No800sb Urban Areas: 01-ovIl1o, &-iPProximately 20 miles. Relevant Spheres of lniluenc-a: (None. I-mprovements. Standardr. Ur,b*n Area: No. Fire Protectloh Set -vice: A. Nearest COUOtY (St,eue) Fire St.ablOn'. Seasonal Station 454 at Robinson 1111111 Road, approximately three Miles north. Year --round ' Statloti 4515 In Bangor aPPr0XImate fY sl,v tniies, and Stotlon #64 In (Iroville aPPrdxIM8telY twelve In 1103-8. b. Water Availability: Fire tankers only. Schools 10 Area! 5angor Union EIe0Bmt8VY SCI -1001 0i-M*-,rlct Z? -"Ad Orovilles Union 1-119h School 018tt-,Ict- mm STATE OF CALIFORNIA—THE RESOURCES AGENCY GEORGE DEUKMOIAN, DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME REGION 2 1701 NIMBUS ROAD, SUITE A RANCHO CORDOVA, CALIFORNIA 95670 (916) 355-7020 (14: MAY 10 1988 Buffe, Co. Planning Comm Mr, John Mendonsa MAY 1,') 1988 Department of Public Works 7 Count.) Center Drive Oroville, WforW4 OrOville, CA 95965 Dear Mr. Mendonsai The Department of Fish and Game (Department) has . reviewed the Gary Honroth Tentative Parcel Map (TPM),propoto divide 120 acres into two parcels of 30 and 9a 0 acressal. The TPM site is located near Robinson Mills; the Property lies within critical Winter range of the MooretoWn deer herd. Subdivision Of land into small parcels has an adverse impact on migratory deere As lands within critical winter range are divided into Parcels smaller than 40 acres, deer use becomes impaired, migratory movement affected, and forage and space needs drop below the level to sustain herd numbers, Subdivisions have adversely affected more than 40 percent of the winter range (i,e., critical and designated winter r0,n9bs) 1h Butte County. In an effort to resolve the sub- division/deer conflict in Butte County, the Department has recommended a series of actions for the Board Of Supervisors to implement.. The Department also so identified a `'Designated. Development, Zone where development. may occur, provided certain M'E'5atiOft mcasures are adopted and implemented by the Board. The TPM lies outsill e Of a D08ignated Development Zone in ail area where Elie Department has recommended minimum patcel sizes of 40 acres be maintained. Unless the TP�M is redesigned to pa rcols of 40 acres or greater, the Department recommends that the TVM be denied. If we can be of further assistance, Please contact Patricia Perkins, Wildlife Management SUpervisoro telephone (916) 355-7010, 81hceroly, Jc'iMes .0, Regional Manager ........... California O0OR aura Den rtment of Anthro Archaeological olo GLENN 'NAsrA P 9y Inventory � u u�@(f QLUMAs SISKIYou California State University, (;hioo LASSCN tEMAAAA Chico; CA 95929 !aogoC rkwitr (916) 895.6256 F3�if�es��pr. 1 Q . 1gRR FFO CO, PlnnningComm, TO: Butte. County planning nning BU 47 county Center Dr. APR .I Orovil,le, Ca. 95965 Orovilla, C«allfornla re pr7�-11-?�/H�rirnrh Dear County Planners A review of the above project has revealed the following: XXX The area indicated as within the archaeologically sensitive. Presentproject are:bou''daries is Considered to be XXEasy access to natural sources of water Flat .meadcKoiland or flat land near water XXX South and/or east facing slopes XX Previously recorded sites in the vicinity Other: �._._.XXX We strongly recoamend that an archaeological reconnaissance be condIucted of the area by a qualified 2rchaeol.og st and appropriate mitigation treasures prepared. A known site or sites has/have been previously recorded i Project rat` n the project area... operations call have a negative i 1 We recomiend that a qualified archac ologisstt be contact-ed to assess Stural siteces. Con=, nents and prepare a "nitigative proposal. Other, ------------- Thank you for the opportunity to , -''view and us know what decisions are made k ardi cxxmnt on this proposal. Please let n9 the project. Sincerely, txlr. lam- Or, Makoto Kowta Northeast I1"11150t7natio Center CbO t'lnator