The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About64-362 CARD 1REGULAR PUNNING COMMISSION MEETING December 14, 1964 a CALL TO ORDER: The regular meeting'of the Ohico City Planning Commission was called to order .by Chairman Puller at 00 P.M. iti the' Council Chambers of the Musfcipal Building, with the following in attendance! Commissioners Browne, Burnett,, Ni;sson, Selvester, Sherman, rand Chairman Fuller; City Planner Glover; City itz. Commissioner Boyd was absent. Attorney Price; Secretary Sav Bt1T�F CWT Y . APPROVAL OF MINUTES Chairman Puller stated that ;f, the .Comission had been furnighed GF .IES copies of the minutes of the rags meeting of September 14, 1964, the 6?F3o1�Ld-� especial meeting of `� tober 5,,19 ;.a'nd the regular meeting of November 9, 1964. He stat!. copies would be provid fnr Aersons in the audience wishing them, He inquired if aftone in the aii3,le..a_� ,or `any member of the Commission had any corrections to be made, or wished to'have any portion of theminutes read. Hearing no comments, Chairman Fuller deolaredthe minutes approved :as submitted., R1:x0NZNG NO. 55 (CHICO CITY PLANNING COYMISSI01) REZONING OF VARIOUS`ANNEXATIONS, �r �i T STRICTS, SECOND PUBLIC HEARING: FROM U UNCLASSIFIED. 0 VARIOUS DI � Chairman Fuller stated this is the second public hearing on the 'rezoning of several annexations, andhe declared the hearing open-.` City Planner Clover reviewed the proposed`, zoning, for,,, the various annexatipns as follows: A) Cohasset Road Annexation D16trict No. 1, to ,R-1,` R-3,' R-P, and C-1. Lir b) ,I East 20th Street :Annexation Distr#ct No. 33. to, 'R-3 and M-1., C) ''Linden 'Street Annexation District No. 1, to R-l. d) Skyway Annexation District No. 1; to R-1, R-3, C-2, and M-1. e) F:iyst 3rd Street Annexation Aistri ct1'No. 1 to R-:3. I City Planner Glover stated that notices of the hearing had been mailed to proiperty owners in each area, and had also been'poEted ift the vicinity of each p'ropose,d rezoning; Chairman Fuller stated the Commission would discuss each annexation district separately; Cohasset Road Annexat.on_District No. 1. City Planner G1ov!r reviewed the properties proposed for annexation, stating that the 99E Freeway right of way from East 1st Avenue to north of Cohasset Road is proposed for R-1 zuning except four a "small area; adjacent to Fast lst Avenue, vhich,'is proposed for R-3 zoning. lle added that several excess parcels are included for zoning along with the Freeway right of way, and that these parcels will later be sold to various property owners He further stated the zoning Includes portions of the Richardson property and the site of the f,"ttico Community Memorial Hospital along the north .side of `Cohasset Road propo .,ed for C-1, zoning, and includes property on the south side of Cohaeset Rood odcuplgliX, by the Riverside. Convalescent Hospital and the California eater Service Company proposed for R-P zoning. Y p - ] Cit Planner Glo�3er advised the Commit sion that correspondence Bind been receive+ from Mr. Jerry Griswold, ;requesting tits Commission to consider R-3 zoning for the-parcel immediately ea.-t of zhe Vr'+etway right of way, and fronting on East Lindo Avenue. He stated Mr, Griswold: has purchased this portion of excess property from the State of Cali','fornia, And that the proposed zoning currently property ng y He ;mbted th.it :the adjacent zoning to the east �s R-1 Si le Family Residence. of theis also R-1. Chairman Puller stated there were no comments ,regard ing the progoa;ed zoning for the Oohasset, Road Annexation District. No. '1 daring the first 00>11.c hearing; lie added that;. the Commission had receive4 the letter from lex. Griswold request- iftg consideration of R-3 zoning} land, he asked if any other persons in the audience Vished to speak either ,for or against the proposed rezonivig for this mwoxatioii district: There, beta& no tomments, 'Choltman Faller taped for a discussion of Nri, Cris,.-oldie regnost A^y other existing apartments in the general i P` P y'ere areaofMr.z1Griswol.ddsifLopert_j to which City Planner Glover stated there are P l ,Rejust south ' ofveral i ,, East LindolAvenueh which. havoc been develo,eddforWs al.so Papartments,g ,stated that the area between these apartments and Mr. Griswold's property ;has been zoned and developed as a single family residence area. Commissioner Browne questioned how the Commission could tie in n proposed R- , 3- zone forr Mr. . Griswold's property existing apartments in view of the e the R -I uses which would lie in between, -mow, Chairman FFG Fuller suggested that if the Commicsion desires .to review11r. riswold"s ._ request: (uller, her, the particular annexation if,n which his property is situated could be deleted from consideration at -,this" and held over for further study. In reply to a, question from Commissioner Sher matx City Planner Glover stated that, l+ir Griswold had recently purchased this',property, whicl,r is, an ext`ess porti11bn of the Freeway area, from the State of California. lie stated he believes Mr. Griswold was advised by the Division iof Highways that the rezon- 'considered ing ofthe property vas, being by the Commission and for than reason Mr, Griswold has asked the Commission to consider Ft -3 zoning rather than R-1 as .first proposed, by the Commission., _ °> Commissioner Sherman stated it appears that the R-1 zoning would be ' appropriate in view of`the adjacent development and the adjacent zoning. He stated that several hearings havf*:been held on the xexonng °of` tl+is annexation district, and that to delay action further would merely retain the properties as unclassified. Commissioner Sh+eiman.suggested that the matter not be held over for further consideration, but that,,i.f, eft some future time Mr. Griswold should desire to submit 14 ;separate rezon1, nS-',,application covering (, his; property, the Comr.iission:would cond'ider the matter further iat that tine. Other members of the Commission expressed agreement that•;the property should be zoned as originally proposed by the Commission,,!that being for R-1 S!,-ngl Family Residence. l East 26th Street Annexation Di.trCity Plict ) Rezoning No.: 558. y +iNo. _3. auz�e!� , e Gloverstated t annexation district includes property extending betwoerr' East 2QthStreeteand East :fie• tti Street, just west of the Sacramento Northern: Industrial. Subdivision and the Chapman School. He stated the northerly piirtior of the property, fronting on East 16th Street, is proposed for R-'3 zonit*' and the southerly portion of the property, facing on East 2ptlt Street, is proposed for '.X_1 zoning. J There were to comments From the audience relative to this proposed rezoning. - Rezoning No. 556, Linden Stgeef'-r Annexation Dist tie t No._1. City Planner Glover reviewed the proposed zoning for m single lot at the southwest corner of East - 9th ,and Linden Streets, stating that the!' proposal is for R-1 Single Famtly Residence. There ware no comments from the audience volati`ie Co this proposed rezaztt4ng. RezoningNo, r 1 y 5_5D, Skyway_ Annexation Uirttrict No1: Cit,' Planner Glav,,al reviewer properties included in, the Skyway Annexation Distr4„t NO r 1 stating thct.k most of the property is to be developed as a portion ai< the St�tyway Park Subdivision He stated, that several tnonthsago the Planning CotrWAsior, had reviewed and approved a tentative map covering most of 'the property in th,14 anrtexation :district and that at that time the Commission had $Yuen ten,k' tive approval, to several proposed lan4.t}sea within the subdivision, City Planner Waver further stated that. the zoning .as proposed at this time includes R-3 C-2,'and r-1 di5trict's foz� tete properties Ohich will. be included in bait No. 1 of the Skyvay ,Park Subdivision. He stated that the remainder of the'property which will ),-.ei,rcluded in subiequent developments, is note suggested fot: K-1 zoning until a final trap i:s prr�p�r:eel, and detailed developitent pleas c�:n be reviewedo He futther noted t' 1at', kc zotaq kilo. 55 D includes H4 zoni'ng for a -strip of property alb:ng the westtc�r,,� pd"ti;rtn Of the annexation districts whi:�;it is the right of dray fk8r, a P'O'e"ifli:Y lhd' Eleetric Company power line, tutu also includes k-1 zoninw strip of property connecting tee pxoposed Sky ray bark SU",�' Industrial Park Subdivision, : .. v, _ a iva, U W� 3 Thee were no comments from the audience relative to the proposed, tonin the .skyway Annexation District No. 1 g for Rezoning No. 55E r , t 3rd Street Anne Xation District No. City pl, Glover stated this annexation is the site of Y»he rec,nntly constructetlaCnci,, Hall dormitory �acil;tL•y, and that tele proposed zoning is for R-3 Multi . le Family Residence.p There wete no comments :from the audience relative to this proposed zoning, Chairman Fuller stated Chat each of annexation atb/as considered for ` the rezoning had been diNcussed by the Comcnssion du:.ittg oe'veral meetings, ...and since thero were noiurtlter comments from the public this evening, the ;a public hearing Would be' osed, g� edond Following some additunnl�=discussion by the Commission, CO�missioner Nilson moved' that tlxe Commi(�sion a :55A 559 55C, 55D, 55E and adopt az°ring uo 55, includii`� approve Re g Rezoning Plats` resolution recoWm6-ndii7g the rezoning of the various districts as to the Chico City Council. The proposed during; the public bearings fol r submission pp .ion v►es seconded 'by Crur��iaaioner Sherman ` y vote of all members and was a xoved��b the unanimous { RESOLUTION NO. 113, ENTITLED "RESC�:TION ZS ON PIRECO>.tENCtING REZONING" LE ,IN THE CITY PLANNING CP'F,ICf;, ( USE PERMIT WILSHIRt' OIL COMQANX TO CONSTRUCT A, NO,433 X' 701 WEST 5TH STREET: FREE STANDING SIf>N ::' , a�4Le permit o�constr�'iewed r,ie ppl cation of the Wilshire Oil Com patty , �' g ft,• standing advertising sign to advertiseyanor sta ed the; uct x st corner of St and . exi tin service station at the southwest .property is zoned C-1, and that such a si �n ,':ts I�'�' Streetb. Ile a 4", permit. Members of the Commission reviewed plum showing tted thQ elevatfon an ,location of the.� ,ct Go proposed sign, Chairoan fuller noted that while this is not a scheduled application, he would welcome any comments from persons inutheaaudience on the were no comments. There -COmmissio er conditionnCkathgxllman moved th t Use onstruction and development, 433 be approved subject to the to acco an Use lopment be in accord with the plat mp Y se Permit No. 433. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Nisson and was approved: by the unanimous vote of all members present. USE PERMIT NO. 434 (GENE .BORING)TO OPERATE A PRIVATE RECREATION CENTER AT 154 FAST 2ND STREET: Cit Planner Glover reviewed the application to operate a billiards, City a private recreation center, at the northwest corner of East 2nd or Streets. He stated the use 1 hearing is n_c+r Permit is required for this use, Although a g required unless the Catnmiselon desires to conduct such a heating. public City Planner Y)ecer read a memorandum to tine CO=ission Brom the Cit , Flan Office, dated lyecember 11., 1964, which recotumended that theapplicationJ1 �' ring � approved subject to the condition that all 4evelopment and operation of the use -be, in accord with the plat t�=, Accompany UsP e ermit No. 434a COtMlissioner Shea';Ian inquired if `this type of Use is allowed with providing oif-street parking, to 'which Givy Planner G'10v'or replied that there is no Parking requirement inasmuch as the 'propeftt,. is situated within a vehicle Parking distract. Chairman Fuller called on Mr. Boring, the applicant, for comment. Mr. Boring the infotnatian necessa wound be leaseatO answer an u stated,he feel's the Commission has p ry, and; that: he Y questions. koll.owing ,further discussion- Commissioner Sex,�esteW �e►ve►d that the permit approved s Vats to the condition recommended by the. City, pl.annl,ng Offtce, ha 'The motion was seconded by Commissioner .chcrman and vaspprauecC, the iinaniraous vote of hl1 members prese t, r 4 - r � UONIN.;' NO. 56 (FRANK M. CRAUVORD) .,TO RMONE PROPERTY BETWEEN .SHEPYAN AVENUE AM SHERIPAN AVENUE, GENERALLY SOUTI OF EAST 5TH AVgNUEO FROK R-1 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE C-1 RESTRICTED COMMERCIAL, DISCUSS IQNs' City Plonner Glover stated that the Commission has conducted tram'public hearings on the t;=plication, and that numeroun comments in opposition were woxpressed at each hearing. He stated that during the second public heating on 10ove-,.flier 9, 1964,, the,Commi,asion 'received a recommendation from the Zoning atld Permits Committee against the requested C-1 zone. He stated the Commission had accepted the uvi-.n ttee ;i6port insofar gag it pertains to the denial of the C-1 zone, but that at that time the- Commission had declined to forward tha ;natter to the City council inasmuch a.s sev'eral members asked that the matter be held ever for fiixthet.study of possible R-3 'or R -P zoning foi`�the; property. 'He noted that ..., Mr. d,' ' '' a applicant, on Brown ehalfof the town ad re jested such `" c cnnb.,dexatian on b Chairman Fuller, stated that at the Last meeting, the �Cotrnnissian<<accepted the recommendation agait'1,gt the C-1,,2�ne but ha ?held the mattr'r o1+en for further ' stutj.y since the applicanthad pbU the rezoning fee and had indicated a desire to hove some other zoning, perhaps R-3 or R -P., considered in lieu "of the Cyt. Commissioner Burnett stated that she had opposed the ouggestion during the previ tius mi'a,eting that the matter be held open for consideration of a diffei; 80 - S - Commissioner Selvester stated that if the Commission tames a:tion in opposition to the 0-1 zone without holding hearings and also taking action relative to an ;R-3 or R-P zona, the applicant would be re i7uired to spend another 00,00 in corder to find out whether or not the. Commission would be opposed to R-3 or R-P: Commissioner Selvester stated he still reels there is some reason to hold the matter over for further consideration and for hearings on R-3 or R-P zoning. Commissioner Burnett noted that the Commission might initiate a rezoning at any trine, and she stated that she feels the Commission should do so if the Applicant is extremely interested in the possibility of R-3 zoning, Commissioner Burnett further stated that it would not be necessary to keep this matter open for arty extended amount of- ,ime. following additional discussion, Chaircuan"l.4ier asked for a vote ;on the j motion before the, Commission. The cation v"as approved by the unanimouo vote of all members p,'resent RESOLUTION NO. 112, ENTITLED 01RESOLUlt,!ON NOT, RECOMMENDING REZONING" IS ON FILE IN THE CITY PUNNING OFFICE REZOtr`ItdG NO.,, S7 (Hl'vNELL AND STRANGE) TO REZONE' PROPERTY AT 1273-127.5 EAST COMMERCIAL, SECOND PUBLIC HEARING: FIRST AVENUE FROM A-4 MULTIPLE RESIDENCE-PROFESSIONAL OFFICE TO N-CNEIGHBORHOOD City Planner Glover reviewed the applicatian.of Hignell and Strange to rezones two lots at 1273-1275 East First'Avenue from R--P to N-C, stating that the lots are an t,e south side o,f East First Avenue adjacent to the existing N-C ,zoning of the Zo1 `l,r-�ngfellow Shopping, inter; that the property to the west is zoned R-1; and tijat property to the south is zoned R�-P and is currently being developed of professional office use. City Planner Glover also stated that this is the q,econd public hearing on the application, the first hearing having ''been-.held on November 9, 1964. He stated that notices were mailed to props t:y 1) owners in the area, and that notices were posted in th vicinity of thexlroposed rezoning, Chairman Fulier declared tho public hearingL open,and noti tg Mr. Fred Hignell in the audience, asked Mr. Hignell if he would like to submit any cotmnents to ,parcels under the R-P'zonin and he feels a suitable developmentna these the Commission.- in reply,,Mr. Hignell said he had been unable to develo g> ,an be encouraged if the property is rezoned neighborhood commercial. Mr.'Hignell stated there are olderresidences on the property. „ Chairman Fulleit asked for other comments fro; ` '`,e audience Mr. Donald Stokes, 132s jSherman avenue, (,,stated tlt. ` 'Aication should be turned down for -reasons which he stated at a pr6Vious hearii,, Mr. Stokes stated the existing R-P zoning serves as a 1yt,;-5ftr; that a Change'" �, neighborho;od commercial would encourage further rezoningto commercial albAg Pikst Avenue towards the freeway, that people with comes in the arra will eXPerience changes in their :�-Aes as the property is rezoned: to a more'svaluable ,commercial zoning, and that First Av6- ,e.will--become-less desirable for residential, use. - Mr., John Kennedy, 1196 Kentfield Road, presented a letter from Dr. and Mrs.: William Chiapella of East First Avenue objecting to the rezoning and stating that the property should remain zoned R-P as a buffer zone adjacent to the shopping center. Mr. Kennedy stated that he alv r,,grees the property shotld re= train R-P t}s aL bu f fer area, +lr, Robert 'Laksont Road, spoke in Opposition to commercial zoning for the property. Airs; Sylvia Longacre, 1271 East Pirst Avenue; stated her property adjoins' the area 1proposed for terontng and that site would rather live .adjacent to pro- fessional offices than she 'would adjacent to a:btisinrass use, and that she opposes thr,,s rezoning. Q.%airinan Fuller inquired if Mr. UiSnell wished to speak fur0ero to which. Mr, Hrgnelt stated he had no additional cotmtentso mairman Finless +culled for ditcussi.otl by other members of the Cowlissioh (r it r , ; 361 G .. Commissioner .Browne stated that it made sense to her to have a professional area between, N -C and R-1 districts and that she feels the zoning shnuld remain as it is. Commissioner Nisson stated he generally agrees with Commissioner Browne, adding that if this property is rezoned N -C he could see no reason why a, future applica- tion for further e;,&;ension of the N -C zone should not be approved. Commissioner "- N'isson stated he feels the zcjing should not be changed. J Commissioner Sterman rtated e,,' -at the+th his ideas present zoning conforms,with as 1.;y providing a.buffer adjacent to commercial areas, and he stated that if, the property is rezotied to hT-;C the .result could be detrimental to the existing a: residence adjacent bn the west. Chairman Fuller stated that.he also is in agreement with the ctr=gfits,of the, ;other members of the Cammissib . He suggested that, the :matter be'teit�rred to the Zoning and 'Permits Conintittee for a recommendation either for or against the rezoning. Commissioner Browne inquired if the Commission might take action at this meeting, to whish Chairman Fuller stated: the Commission could take action, `however, he feels it would be best as a matter of procedure to have a written recommenda- tion setting forth reasons either for or against the rezoning prior to, -final action by the Commission. City 'Attorney Price commented that the Commission is required to stale reasotns;'/f only when a recommendation is in favor of a rezoning, and that if the ' Commission's recommendation is :against .a rezop nE, specific findings would not be necessary inasmuch as it would be tin derstod"i that the Commission fe`�ls existing zoning is proper.. Chairman Fuller stated that it is his feeling the Commission should,develop written findings in any event, especially where there has been controversy or objections expressed to the rezoning.. Chairman fuller added that the Commission would be more prepared to make a final decision on the rezoning after the Zoning and Permits Committee had reviewed the recoti of both public hearings and bas submitted a recommendation to the Commission. With the concurrence ` of the other members of the Commission, Chairman Fuller referred the matter to the ,onin and Permits Committee for stud and recUlmendationa REZONING NO. 58 (WATT, PECKHA,M, AND GRINNELL) TO REZONE, PROPERTY ON THE NORTH SIDE Or RAST FIRST AVENUE', BETWEEN D014NI14G AVENUE A ib NE,'�L DON AVENUE, FROM R:=3 MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENCE TO R -P MULTIPLE RESIDENCE -PROFESSIONAL OFVICE, SECOND PUBLIC HEARING: City Planner Glover the application submitted by the firm of Watt, Peckham, and Grinnell.; requesting rezoning from R-3 to R -P for property between Neal. Dow and Downing Avenues,; on 'the north side of East First Avenue. He said the property is "bounded'on the north by theVeal Dow School, He also stated that notices were mailed to propetty owners in the area, and that notices were post•,�d in the vicinity of the proposed rezoning._ Chairman Fuller stated that a number of people had 'expressed t pani,tion daring the first public hearing which was held on November 9, 1954: Chairman Fuller .declared the second public heating open, and asked Mr. Grinnell for comments Mr. Bruce Grinnell spoke on behalf of the rezoning application, and referred to the opposition expressed during the first public hearing. Mt. Grinnell stated that Mr. Stokes had objected, 'however he noted that Mr. Stopes does xr- live very near to the property, Mrs Grinnell also said that sevetal peopl e residing close to the property had objected, and that since the fttsA t be.aLing he has discussed his pflans With many of these people, Mr, Grinner. ;,`sta 4-11 he >, has found most of them area ;fearful that the rezoning would be a steel, tFVarig cosimercialixation and that they feel if this request is approved, thenext step will be a petition for C-1 ,zoning. Mr. Grinnell stated he has ipttempted to assure these 'people that cbftPO-rcial development is not being cbk4Ldered, and that it is his! objective to develop the property initially for 'tho 140 offices of hiss' firm, and: p6thaps other similar profe6sional offices. Mrz Gr°inat•all said he, wants to asture tiro. Commission that 'his i,ntontions are .firm � ; ag p mfessxonal dl velspmtwnt, and re stated the firm has ahead engaged' jircltiteets Y, to designthe axropospd building, Mt. Gx'YntleXl iso commentQ(d that if ��d1e jrsfessgn zolaing is not approved, that plans will be made' tri build �i'�>titrtments i Ott the property which would be pc tn,itted by the present R�3 ZdOi,'ng} Orinnull stated the property had been owned by his family for many ;iacs} and that it is now tatest;aty that it be deve` b dd in ono wa- o r ar,�r►ther, ,. a 7 consistent with curroundling uses in the arra, lir. Grinnell stated that in his opinion, professional offices would be more desirable in the area, titan apartments, Mt, John Yennedy commented that it is his opinion a professional y°rice de- velopment would be better suited to this residential neighborhood n a multiple story apartment complex, since there would be :Less traffic density 4v1d there woul& be less noise after business hours, Mr. 'Kennedy stated he has no interest in this particular development, and isl not supporting this particular application., but that it is his opinion the professional offices would not be objectionable in the area.. Mr. Donald Stukes,, 1323 Sherman Avenue, stated tha& while his property is not adjacent to the site proposed for rezoning, it is :located in the general Vicinity and could be affected by the additional traffic which would result on both East 'First Avenue and East Fifth Avenue 'if the property is developed for office. �1 Mr. Stakes also, remarked that the rezoning would be a step ;towards ,commercial. z L oning on. East First Ave" o. Director of`i'ublic Works A. 18avit2 advised the Commission that a high volume of traffic can be anticipated on both East Frst,Avenuie and East Fifth Avenue regardless of' the development on this ;particular(property. He stated that these streets not only car.Yyotraffic generated on: the p'r'operties immediately adjacent thereto, but that the streets also serve to carry through .traffic from other residential areas., Mr. Savitz urged the'Commission to consider a rezoning on. thee basis of eland 'use in the immediate area, ` and, ,not on the; basis of the amount of :traffic it would generate :on any part;tcular street. 10 Ccs Missit-r tr Sherman inquired as to theGsi.ze of the property, and Mr. Grinnell state ccZ y about four acres in area, and is about 60b feet deep. Following some additional discuss -ion among the members of the Commissions, Chair- man Fuller declared the`public hearing'closed andol"',iith thiL concurrence of the Commission, referred the matter to the ''Zoning �cnd Permits Committee for study and recommendation to the Commission. THIRD ANNUAL REVIEW OF CHICO GENERAL PLAN., SE�'OND HE" VG r City Planner Glover stated that the Commission yad cdtiducce%� a public hearing relative to the Third lAnnual Review of the Ch��u : encr.nl }?�.1tY an November % 1964. He'. said that tits Commission at that time ingid ed its desire to proceed' with an amendment to the General Pian relative to Chido State College expansion. r., City Planner Glover reviewed a memorandum to the 'Planning Commission from the City Planning �'.3f,fi.ce dato-4, December 14 1964_ which set forth proposed changes to the adopted te,;t of w tChico General .Plan, and to the General Plan map, He stated that the proposed changes to the text and' the map of the Chico General Plan are in, accord with the college expansion „urogram. set forth in the Chico State Cdliege Matter plan, which is now bein4,- considered by the Board of 'Trustees of th�.°,,�"alifornia State Colleges. He also noted that the Planning Commission and City Council had previously approved the proposed Chico State. College Piaster Plan. Commissioner Browne noted that ,the proposed map does not indicate Second Street passing thtough the college area, and elle asked if the closing of Second Street is a definite policy expressed 10, the proposed changes to the General Plan. In reply, City Planner Glover stated that the map should be considered as a general f future development, and sha4Id not be considered in precise terms'., He further'sta d text g illustration o ted that the propose imcludes a statement that through traffic should be routed around rather than through the campus, and that on the south side of the campus, trafficways ahould be planned to provide convenient access to both the college and the downtown area. lie said that there are many factoirs which would bear upon closing or relocating any streets in the college area, and that, detailed study would be, °required bt.zore any changes in traf.ficways could be, accomplished. City Planner Glover added that Ue City is not obligated in any way to close or relocate :any s'treet Chairman 'Puller noted that the downtown! businessmen and property owneri! are c6ii sidering an extensive. study of the downtown area and the preparation of a downtown plan`; Chairman Fuller stated ,the results of .this study wotil�d be i r p in the college :and the ortant. in relation .to `tilts dVdtal`l triffic. attern business.areat .7 �363 13 Commissioner Selvester asked why the proposed text contains references to the number of students to be Housedon the campus and to certain existing facilities which would not be disturbed by campus expansion. In reply, Commissioner Browne stated,it is important that some facts be included in the text as they provide a'measuring stick for f�,iture development, i Commissioner Burnett stated that,she feels the text should include sufficient information to show, what the overall ploy is based upon, and that she feels the statements mentioned by Commissioner 'Selvester are. appx)priote .for inclusion in the text. Chairman Fuller noted that this is a public hearing :relative to the third annual review, and he:'presented several comments„relative to commercial development adjacent to freeway interchanges. He said there has been some question as to the policy expressed ;in the "general Plan relative to deveopment *' around freeway interchanges, and he suggested the Commission.should give further study to this matter and if necessary consider amendments to the Plan. Following some discussion �y the Commission, Commissioner Browne stated she feels the Commission should give;,more study -to the questions raised by Chairman Fuller. Chairman Fuller stated the Commission could take action at this' +` meeting on the propo°sed changes relative ,to the college expansion, an& that review of comme dial development adjacent to freeway interchanges could be deferred for sturdy at a later date. There 'being,no further discussion relative to the proposed amendments to the General Plan relative to Chico :State College,, Chairman Fuller declared the public hearing closed, ` Commissioner Burnett moved that a resolution be adopted rticommending they proposed changes in the text and the map of the ChiCo 'General 'Plan for sub- mission to the Catty Council. The motion 'wa.s;, seconded by "Commi;ssioner Sherma, ,. and was approved by the unanimous vote of ail members present, R, BROADWAY F � R);70N.LNG NO 59 (d'AMES DEEN) TO RDZONE PROPERTY AT .1384 pOM R 1 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE. TO R-8 MULTIPLE FA ILY `WID EHCE. City Planner Giover advised the Commission that Mr. Deen'.has submitted a rezon- ing application for property at 1384 Broadway. He stated that since, the property .ic not immediately adjacent to an existing R-3 district, it %could be necessary to, include additional grope rties in the rezonin, in order to' avoid spot zoning, and in order to have a logical area for consideration of rezoning. , Members of the Cgmmission reviewed,.a map of the properties adjacent to 1384 Broadway, and agreed upon the inclusion df additional properties in the vicinity of West 14th and 'Broadway Streetts. City Planner Glover stated the first public hearing would.be scheduled for the next meeting of the Commis.e ion. RESIGNATION OF COMMISSIONER BOYD City Planner Glover stated that Commissioner Boyd has submitted s, letter of, resignation to the City Council. He said that Commissioner Boyd'is moving to a location outside thE: Cityy"and as a result, finds it necessary to submit his resignation to be effectiv�,r after the January meeting of the Commission, .ZONING ORDTRANCE REVIEWt Chairman Fuller suggested that in reviewing the Vy„rmous: sections of the Zoning Ordinance for possible revision, the Commission consider changing the neighborhood commercial .zone regulators relative to permitting a bowling alley subject to use permit,. Chairman Fuller stated he can recall only one proposal to construct a bowrli'ng alley in a neighborhood commercial zone and he said that proposal had generated considerable opposition .and that the project was eventually dropped. Following additional discussion, members of the Commission agreed that a rcvie: of rhe neighborhood commercial provisions of the toning Ordinance would be iri order; and the matter was referred to the Zoning And' Permits: CowMittrie for further study, CO�riITTEE 1"IERTING A Committee >ncet,ing was btheduled fotr` Januhry 60 1965y at '7:30 :P,X, in the Cihy CounciChambers: 10 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - �. .7 1' 'To t t ". `lM'a'�i rid@�;@tl1 'k� `'► k?tti+� ''f±�7t.6.*s1 C$y j?lntt� bt:cr {iar,' 14 0 `SII, +'+� PdMs I i1 the Council � C Al6d M ,f R�YRP�eR1`ps -ts1,i�t9 W'•9.Y�. �ldt ClCOt�.d�ethe . �iL�S AK1 &tai ame. app e 'tita` be beo�c�. y 11 �].�. p� LQY TUIIi+A}: "'bad P , F ►� wo c lovers Weve tied . city Attaroey City MonagorY n ` i Info B0116 coutify. atd. $3€�em}'aex' i0 yP�dn� nTn ' �ot� ntcsiaa «,(Fdlacticm��, bUcto ink+imw UNNEit ., "i. RANNING ft t _ CQOWN Ime � k t.' �,. daax iia'ak RECULAR, PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING September 14, 1964 CALL TO ORDER: The regular meeting of the Chico City Planning Commission was called to order by Chairman Fuller at 7;30 P.M. in the Council Champers of ,the Municipal Building; with the following in attendance*. Commissioners Burnett, N'isson, 'Fuller* Selvester, and Chairman City Plariner Glover, Commissioners Boyd, Browne, and Shetmdjj were absent, REZONING NO. 53 (EDWIN SZYMANSKI) � TO REZONE" PROPERTY AT 382 E, 4TH STREET PROM R-P MLTIPLE RP!SInNNCE,: VAORL8s1oVAt orr=4 TO C-1 RESTRICTED COMMERC SECOND PUBLIC HEARING. , , Chairman Fuller noti9 that the s!» rst public hearing on Rezoning' Na. 53 had been conducted on August 13, 15,4, and he stated that this is the second public hearing on the proposed rezoning., Chairman Fuller declared the .hearing open, and asked for a re'riew of ,the application. .City Planner Glover reviewed the application sUbmitted,by Mr. Szymanski'to rezone property at 382 E. 4th Street from R-P to C-l. He stated that Burin; the first public iteari.ng hold on August 13, 1964, objections had been'varced :i G. IZ. boomer, 396 b , E. 4th Street,, and by Mr, Nelson Watts, 3)3 E. w Street, a City :planner Glover read correspondence from Air. and Mr-s. James 381 1r. 4th. Street; setting�frth; d'bkject:idns to the requested C-1 zone. X2y further reviewed the repoiMt of the Zoning and Permits Committee, dated' September 14, 1964, which recommended that Rezoning Application Na. 53 be t' denied and that a "resolution not recommending rezoning" be adopted said fotzaardad to the Chico City Council for final action. The Committee report d stated that: a)_ The rezoning would not accomplish the desire of the applioatt (i;a construct a commercial building oktenditto the front "n«aperty line} Unless the adjacent property at 396 E. 4th Street 3s included in the rezdrt:"..f. i b) The requested rezoning would constitute an expansion of the existing 0-1 i istrict• into an established R-F district,, which includes properties along both sides of Orient: Street, E ,�Vtber, the requested rezoning would represent a departure frot: the exit°iris wooing patten; of the area, in which the easterly boundary of the C-1 district I$ aligned midway between Flume Street and Orient Street, Chairman huller called upon the applicant, Mr. Edwin Szymanski, for co? hent, \' Mr. Edwin Szymanski, 3841 v., 4th Street, stated rba,t i;1 answer to objections " f'�r+si5f � tci rhbt,rir, vitt � 6perty otanera rplr,-f ��. ."� dff-street patVldtig, be would prow ode uatg q `� p ig, on the t6t0'v.or�.ion of his property to 'he needs of hit proposed building. lir. Szymanski further giptee. that while t.,+ev rezoning of only his would note allow him to CoS'. to tate front " ropartylino; it would be an advantage oto hiio2aa,. _ °colt as he. is operating his business at that location at the present ,tiwa. M., Szymanski � stated that the C'-1 zone would permit him to continue his present business a r' t,l operation in the existing residence on the property r City Planner Glover stated that Mr. Szymanoki is now opeg, rati a business of providing store fixtured conn, remodeling. services, rtd that the work is carried on in the various stores being renovated. !to ad?,ad that Mr. Szymanslc:� may coitti'nue this type :of business in the Present R-P ;,one, but: if he should dL:sit;o to maintain a show room or to conduct retail saalet on the prenise;'� then. C-1 Zoning 'ttould be rLquirod to allow' such: use,: 4, -In reply to a question. by CYai=aa i=u%10x, 'fir, 34yM4n 1ti stated he Hata boon OPOVAtblr lois W61406s at: 302 4. 40 stroot rvr 00ut on and one 431, ogro. Chairman Fuller inquired if thein 'were others in the audience wishi%q to exp' *ds V an opinion in favor of the application; liearitig no reply, `he inquirlbd if a,ayone visbed to t?xpress dpposit:iod to the, proposed rezoning, There being nt� co=aot� , Chairmtra gullet declared tete public hearin cooed, It rt»as moved J�� ,Cnistisoi.Ont r Soivest ar that the Co isaion accept tha roport of the Zoning and llo it:g Co=Itti:es Lind than a "resol.utiou .not roc+cat vn4ing t'earoning" be atdoptcd unci fow4rdo-d to the Chico City Council for final; action. The inotton teas o�ceztdcd M „ 2 by Co=aissloner Burnett„ and etas approved by the unanimous vote of all members present. RESOLUTION NOv 107 EMITLED "USOLUTION NOT BtCO: JEND1NG REZONING” IS ON I'M IN THE QITFIO.r� OF TRE CIT)' PLAMING COI' aSSIONy 11UMCIVAL HUZLDING} CHICO CAUFOUXA. Cha:,rman Fuller advi sad rzr. Szymanski that the action of the Planning Commission c(1taotitutes a recommendation to the City Council. Chairman'Fuller stated that at least one additional public hearing will be conducted by the City Council) t, attd that 1.1r. Szymanski, *,till be welcome to appear at that time. Vt� }1A iCa^, i' iMIT 1`t0. 4 1 (AkDYE J.'l'tll t ), TO VARY THE RruQUIPMD LOT WIDTI AND AY"ikt , UQUiREMENTS AT .1722 AND 1730 ;tMM LOCK STRUsT. PuBac IiEAIixNG": Ch:yirman Fuller declared the� en ublic hearing o and requested a review of the P p ' application,. City Planner Glover reviewed the request of Airs. Ardye J. Buff to; divide an ext,4ting parcel. into two separate parcels. C$t y Planner Glover read-the report of the Zoning and :Permits Committee, t od tothe�5follawing conditions,* pp of the variance subject ,. September 14, 1964 which recommended approval o �'. a) The division 'of the property into two parcels shall' be in accord frith the plat entitled"Plat to Accompany.Variance Permit No; 431. c! b) All development of the' two pareels shall be in in accord with the pro- visions s,ot�s of the Zoning Ordanance of the Git of Chita and L}�e variant grantedby this permit shall not constitute grounds for any additional a variances from required setback, aff-street parking, lot coverage, or other applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. Th�� Committee report further stated that the Committee has determined the '.riance is justified for the following reasons; a) The resulting parcels) 50 feet and 48 feet in 'width, will tie in accord with the general pattern of existing proporty ownerships in the surrounding area. b) The area was ori.g nall.y,,subdiviaed into lots baving a width of 44 feet, and these lots remain as legal, building sites even though not meeting the current .lot width requirements of the City of Chico. leach of the proposed parcels will ;he a greater width than the legally permitted original subdivision lots. Chairmn Fuller noted the applicant present in the audience, and asked 'if she had anything to add relative to her application, to reply, Mrs. Toff Utated she,, desires the variance in order to sell the property for residential devolopmerit. , Mr. Carl yiochat� ItW ilemloclC Street) inquired as to who may apply foo a variance permit, and also inquired if the property is for sole at the present Lima. It reply, Chairman puller stated; that the application for a variance is uuttally. submitted by e property owner) or by someone who has wage interest in the property or plans to purchase tho property. City planner Glover added 9 tivi.t according -to the records of tete City Assessoris Office, the property for which the variance is requested is atoned. by .Ardye J'. and Milton Poff, :. P.0, Dox 5571 Paradise.-illyHe added that the plannatn�, Office t�su.,,oil:l «'egeat that: a variance be submitted by the property otsner, or if the ares .; is subititted by an agent of the property owner, teall ask that a from the property owner be tuba itted with the variance request. Air. t1o: apr stated that there i:: a for sale sign on the property which, has „ 11101d." %,r t:t:o across the sign Chairman lrvl, i, t~ -tated he did not feet it is a material facto to this. hearing -.tar the Ca�;�is�'.;Y:�tt 'C"o .rot*, if the property has been scald recently. lie noted tbat.� the t ; k1 W13 !s 7�xds indicate Mr.6 and lits. r Ef the. r and `t at tho mariantetmn file by i' ra. 1`off. - R I Nt para ~ lir,--1-pcher inquired if the applicant is alleging any harOhip, : and if so, why,-.: oertic:ul€ r hardship is btIng stated, City .Mas ter Gi°over statedthat the applicant feel. it watild covtotitut e a hardship to � ecp the entire p�.'rcel as one lot, and for tbis reason has re- quer tad the w riance`'49 allow tho lot to be diVided. Fa furtber added that the Z01114g` and ,pdrmito (00MAt ted is of the Opi tion that the variance is ;justified, and if tite Variance is riot approveC the applicant will ba required r' parcel��ould be urger thatr Vbe o -neral size other, p � �' "tar r ,p � aintainta which o Commissioner Salvester inquired, an, to the current zoning of the tbk,'irty, p ` and what" uses the applicant mtV desire for the, property*, City Plann&,r Glover replieit that tel. property is zoned Rely vultipla fart- y residence, and'that r; only the rises 1 ermitfi ed und3at R_.3 zoning would be allowed for the proper:;. Chairman iuiler added fir. FiSchex Vt 4t his interest is in the vi " enca permit application. f Nr. Fianher replied that he resides at 181.3'Hemlock Street, which is one block to the south rthe thlicanOis , pxproparty. , Chairman Puller atkedMrs, gaff if> timr is Import:ant''in the,:processing of the 4ari4rtte applicaation, j o which Ili$. Poff replied that .one of the two proposed lots has been sold subject fv tile, approval .of the variance permit, She stated that: the sale would not be coipgeted until the variance has, been approved. Chairman Fuller 'trl`j tired I the ;lot hea been. sold` at the time S"irk. Toff sub- rnitted hear application, to which Mrs.- Poff ,statd that the lot was noi,''; sold at that time however the sale is n w a �S pend;ittg in escrow until such` time as , t2ief permit has been approved. Chairnantulier noted that if the variance is not approved, then the purchase `sail.l.:,riota be completed« 1,1C., -further notedtf,tat I4:r; and yrs. 1'Off are the owners of the property at the present time: Followingi , ~ � - uxt.bo r di,5cui�s,�'on, Commissioner ,Nistaon moved tR . '�e report of the Zoning and '9t,rm ,t.s Co=it.tee be accepted„ and the varian,, ;,.reit be appro iod s.. subject to the conditions suggested by the Committee. `T'imr motion was seconded by CoWissianer,-Sel.vcstaro ,asci was approved by the unanimous vote of all members present, Chairman Vul,ler "decla-ad tta-i public hearing closed, adding that the variance will now be fotewarded to the City Council for final action, PROPOS8D Ai'SMMIENT % ZQNING ORDT14AN'CE RELATIVE TO OF,V-STREM P,61RXING REQ- gTJ1U4CENTS, PUBLIC MAPIXG: ,ad Chairman IP Puller opened the second public hearing on the' oproposed amendment, rind ,asked for at review of t c amend ent. City planner Glover stated the asner.dmdnt would add to the off-st:reet paving pro,jsiotis of the Toning Qrdi.nance a section which would allot,* a property dwner or developer the option of paying a sum of money to the City, oft a per space. basis, Itt lieu bf providing off-street parhing as required by the Ordindate. ie stated that if upprvved, the amendment along~ t:Iy existing prouisiofis in the O Vdi N;;;ce WouW Pei-witanowner or dtvelopet to provide the required off-street parlr�ri in op_~ of the x..l"1oc in* manners: a) Construction of teff,-stre.et VaxkitYg f'aci,2'^ities on the same s£v: as' the :toe vhi.ch such facilities till serve, . Construction of aff-streot parltin; futilities or, �' nea'ri�y Site, ' subJect 'to �tppravai of the site by the Pl anning Commission. o) ?or thoad properties located within a whiclo partsittg district, " pxoviai,on of paxkinZ, f'aciliti,es, by the vehicle parking di trict" with no requirement that. aePtltate parking' facilities be provided on the site, d) Payment of An in -lieu 4,Vt to the Oity, on a per space basis, 1-Arh thea City to rise tuth payment totzarus, the construction of tiff-stroet g facili,tten is the Cettei°:l area of the property for thith thy+ pa .Brit tiascele. elf 1. H f lkb 9, 4 City Planar Glover stated that the first three methods of providing off-street parking are now included in the, Zoning 'Ordinance, and that the proposed -MondmenL xould oiLl.ine a procedure for the fourth method of providing parking described above, Ile further stated that the Ordimmnq, atr'� now drafted, pro- , vi,dea that the amount: of in -lieu f'ee to b llbj�ld per space ibuld be establ`ishekl by the City Council in relation 'to the hi "'"'e�aally projeet;cd coats Aich the Ct, lon of proper"ty lit rli0, 4140 01,dpt",q�, vats` , t tstxrtdnp dia',,,><'ict:a had paid F for the 'golutructi.on ot the c�:itat tzt,� dotantd�xc.,�arl�fir� ��i�itir;d" lte �ur#.i1er added that on previotas ooCa ions 'when this aatttor had bot -n discussed, the � Gosifi lSsloa had generally felt that ;x procedure such. os propated by this Ordimnco would 'encoLl.x`aG,e 'the ciaveloOa' ett of smaller parcels, of C6i=eraia w land, which are now -Aifficult to develop if boar a building and, the required off-street panting must be providtad on the same site. He stated there ate 'many suchparcels located In art area ip which it is not expac:ted that a vehicle parking district 'would be formed n.` proposed dr.ant t-ras initiated as a xesult of rCc:rmiission discussions bylthe rel.ativeatonthe„pa.rlcin - facilities for the , Thunderbird 111otel, to be constructed at• 7th ar d Main Streets. Ile-eurthar noted 'had 4 that P,ho Comtnissi:on approved a Use permit for this developmentt,.with a provision that a portion of the required off-street parking would{'� A6ca.ted � On. the. site of tlae motel andxestiauzant development, .and that thee'remaning y `parking; f-acilitt., would be provided in one of the several manners set. ford � in the Zoning Ordl.nance. wit an one year of the date of the permit” Ile noted that if this amendment is, approved by the Planing Commission and City 1' ' Council, the owner of the motel Gould consider this method in addition to the » others already outl`}.ned b the Ordinance. �; ar Y p r� Chairman pui l et called for comment on 'tt he proposed Ordinance amendment. Comr+tissioner Burnett inquired if a motel development might desire to utilize y� << the proposed procedure: to a::count for all of itq.- required parking,' and thus provide no parlting on the site of the motel. City planner Glover replied that a rotel would be subject to a i.se � `out the Cott�rtissiejn, and that the �+Com _�rm�t lssion could spedify that all,:, or a portion of the regtkired parking be pro. vided on the motel, sitO. He further stated'fhat other uses,, such as public " ^ssembly rases, ti4ou"?d be "subject to a use permit and that the provlis3on of ),arking off of the., dtte of the use would 1; ,subject to a usepermit., : Ghalrmn n Fuller that airy use, which is not subject to a use permit J p would be �t�lr to utilize the proposed procedure without review by whe Planning lir. t` :thew Myer, 1255 Salem Street, inquired if an owner Fright now provider � arlting elsevhera `hail' on the sane site as a building, ;:o cdhich Chairman Fuller replied the Otdi.natce provides such a procedure but that the Planuing � on must review and approve the non -adjacent parking facility to �etet,mi.ne {�otid�ion that it :irs rewsoxaably close to the use which it will serve. Ur.. Ted Vi.ggett, rAsc Xzotel.odge inquired W.f Mr, Drew had beet, granted per» Missiot, to construct the proposed Thunderbird 1*total on the 'basis of this propoMrd Ord.itiance amendment.., in reply, CirPlanner Gl,ovax. K,ta,ted. that a bats., d ih . permit g p has been issued for the. motel only, and that `u' permii, '; for the restaurant and 'bar will not be itsued witil. the. matter^' of offs-stratst parlsitig has bcon s+ettldd Ile noted that the use petmit issued b.r the toCmnission prOvIdes for art optional payment by, the developer, lir. .Drev$ to the city for. OPoh spare t.hich he does not provide on the site) and that the tare perni,tr iurtYier includes a provision that the ,full Awa,4nt of off-street park- itl-1 mutt be provided within one %,car, ho stated that -f this amendment i s s iopted, lir. Dregs w -ill be able eo utilize thin procedure to account .for M8 Tequircd of,f-street parking. He farther added that if this amendment; is not approved, Mrx Drew will be requircd within the year to secure an additional ttoa,^-by site -fear 'the parhin,a spaces iihich he cannot necommodat+e on trite 8itc of tl' atotel, e5r will be required to have his property brought into a vehicle parking district, 14r. I'li,g�ett„ stated ho has no objccttxort tto thel p::opated Ordinance amendment, n¢td void he tack it gill enFable property owners to develop their property and trout ireprovt ' 111; City. , 111 r. Don lf»:sont Pat` 4k~ide, inqui,rod ' if Cheers: oould lee a 1, loo on tkie property in the event the property owe ter refuced to tseke tris paws -O. tt? itt the future, City Planner Glover stated that this w°ould not ari,_O� sincb there k oul.d 'be no, Tutu: -d pets l,aftts taew stated that under the proposed orditatco., the its -.lieu ceo mu t. he rw'eposited before a bui,ldiw* permit could be issued, sand t,l�J4t. If t 10 tM'OMY Y 5 not deposited 'tthtte. ��ould illi! no po'a"t it issued3s �; i Vc 9' f . w a' r building could be con, trusted. He noted, hat,evcr, that a property owner could; still provide all of his required off-street parking in the same tnarmer as tnotia ,set forth by the Zoning Ordinance and that the proposed in -lieu payment system is merely an additional option which the developer u�A t select if he so desires. a air, Mnwy d GaYlorde 1241 8,310, inquired if a ftpre has been stet for 'trio ;.Mount of the ifs"lieu payme;tt, City Minxte Gloyaat replied that the proposed a amendment does not, etstablioh a figure, since it is anticipated that the amount of p,;lyment would be deterrined by the. City Council at the time an area da;91re6 to utilize the invlieu,payment procedure. lie added that it may 61 be a numberrof years before one or more properties in an area desire to use - this procedure, and that the 'Ordr;nanee leaves the matter flexible so that: the Council could re -,view conditions at that timik and establUlt the fee ,accordingly, lle,�noted that tha proposed amendment does include, as a guide, y a prgvision that the amount of in -leu Payment per space should be camparabl,e to the cast: (if construction in tie existing two -vehicle parking districts. D ComxAssi.one`r Selvester questioned: wthother,:the proposed amendment would allow for review of ea>=hire oast Y the. I'lann.Lug Commission, Comi s use Salvester stated there m3 be � � sinesses x y .q se the i.n-l�.eu ,pa�entr procedure b ro used for which it would y required parking be provided the bthat a ut where of the proposed P expect q P g' usiness, but where the... . owner may desire to ,l)ay thein-lileik fee for all of the spaces and provide none on the site., Com�issionex Soivest:er suggaated the Commission. consider < a provision which would require "ll.anning Commission review of each request Y to utilize the in -lieu payment procedure. Commissioner Selvester sugbeste°;; � ? thaf", such a provision be included for consi.dexat,io iia the amendment. a �"err � Commissioner Selvester suggested that., the ameadm:enO" also provide that., the p in -lieu fee per space should not be, less than what. it would cost the property , owner to provide, the space on the "same site as °the ,use s�kt,i,eh it will serve. a Tie, suggested also that the in—lieu fee, when established by the City Council:, would h,#,re to ' e in relation to land values in the arc' -- ,t the time tl'e " fee is c -tiablisbods liollowir.; yurther discussion relative to the proposed amendment, Chairman Puller requestedthe City Planner Bio review the items discussed by the Commission with the City Attorney for possible revisions in the proposed amendment prior to final action by the Planning Commission. Chairman Puller declared the public hedrinL chased) stating that additional review of the proposed amendment grill ba undertaken by the Commission prior to taking final. action on the proposed amendment. p REZONING VO 54+ (CITY PLAIMING 0312518 10N) o TO REZONE VARIOuS PROPERTIES ALONG SOUTH I3i20All1JA5i, SALE. STie T, AICD NUt2ML AVENUE, PRO- R-1 ,�,ND R-2 TO R-3 MTIPLE FMILY'TtgSIDrXCZ aISMICT, PUBLIC MARING chairman Pulleys declared the hearing open, and aplced fox, a review of the proposed rezoning; City Planner Gloversts"ated the rezoning lams been initiated by the Commission - following several -evquests from pars.<ns in the area interested in rezoning. lie further stated that during thvo t►-revious several years the Commission has approved the rezoning of 'residas-..pial areas in the vicinity from single famil to tzultiple family, tie also stated that a notice of this hearing was �taile to each property onset of ...c ord within the area suggested for rezonin:; explziinirt j the nature of Jia hearing and roquest:ing that those with qut strions or cotrttents contact thy: City Planing Offico 7 Chairman, Fuller advisa;, those itt a^ttettdance that the hearing to be c --ducted is more of an explojaltos~y .,aturey in, t hi t the Comtti.ssion riesires to ,secure the opinion of property *t -,nay's in the area prior to tahi,ng any a.cti,oA on the rvzonittg,p ke stated 4ukt the. Co=, -4 �t� ttlq hold at least twro public hearings and PCrht; s the Cos,waission. m k" holrk hear 53;,s, and he also noted tbat the Co=t ission could tmadify t~ho, i �povect re zoning ,foll.otting:' its hearint s if it .finds_ t bat- there arc su tt4nt ialaob, .anions ire any particular •aroft, Chairman Full,or ' as%ed for commx-a k on tktc vt zonin . s lir. tly.er, W5 Salem, stated tItnt the a'roa has lest its potautial as a sitl^lc family 4; strict And +thea« h,e favors the proposed -3 zoning. qtr. Myer stattod t bat lit has purchased proporty fortmerly otlnod by Mr. Varli,nsity j *too raw.. ii „� f1 t Misr, x`tarjorxe Little, 1406 formol, stated 0.%P -also owns property, at 1445 N0=141 and that she favors the rezoning. Niss :Lt-. a� «:��:=.reci if her Property were, rezoqoal if it would be passible for her to buil;a an a$4,tLioctaxl reridett- building, to which Chairman Pullets .stated ' Che numbed` df cos dances I{{ t would sop*nd upon thr size of tho property and on the setbacks”. Chailcman )`idler flai6l or sta:ttd it Mould appear reatottable, that she trig i� *V4 able to = trust WO or three Idditional roni;tertit�l units an Ihmzr'lotw , _ Mr, Henry Karasiniki '11,25 tAjemo stated he favors :the rezoning and said t' o theyatagenerally anti ce p , the while lees, trtheiareaowi�Izwelc.oaalen the rthP ch�xseras pz+operty valueshinc'irease; �-,� {' " Naude Yates, 1 15 Broadway, spoke in favor of the xo;=i.ng to R-3, stating � she would Jike to do. Something; with rhe retaainitig portio tt of her property, She statoW there is ani older house on oho portion of the property but it' has. , beer, difficult to rent because mast renters do not want a large :,yard area. c, Mr. fiusseAl Kidder, 151T`Broadway, urged the Commission to 'preserve the ares > as it vdw exists. �1r. Kidder stated this .is a single faioi�y* area and that' 'the people would like to have it remain single family, fir., xidder referred to the,, Ivxge amount of �t-3 land now available in the southern portion of the _ city,, -,And be stated that rite R-3 development has continued to encroach upon the A-1 area; Mr. Kidder referred to the problems which wata�id result :from' R -3 -zoning, mentioning inadequate sanitary �uwbrs;� lasts of !wase and quiets:,. signs, attci other factors. fir'. Kidder further suggestedfifer zones are It , an the residential area and the commercialtd3atrict along park' � z•e ii»ed `%etwec , �4 Avehuc, i`, Ctrs. Morrell iteynoldsb 1425 .Zroadway, stated she is opposed to the rezoi?;ag as she would like, to maintain ;he existing residential district along 8c�+at by Broadway Street. Mr. John 1:assel, 1714 Salem. Street, stated 'tris opposition to the rezoning," noting that if the rezoning it approved, he will be forced to moue, Mr, ; Hassel referred to a recent rezoning of the: area betweeta lath and zflt+h Stree'ta ° stating that most of the people wepi not is„favor of the rezonin,:r but did not know that it was passed'; n Fuller remarked that notices Ci1ai>_�x�.l � • a L-a.ces pati*ebc:en ,inai].ed to the grog;exty owners of all Properties proposed ;for rezoning during the past fm7 .years, and in addition, notices have been posted in the gtcinity. He stated tN-, residents should have had ample opportunity to becomeacquainted with the proposed rezoni,n. j !.r. Karacins%i stated that i,tt the vicinity of his property; about 60 per cent of the hosmets ate owned by people from out of town. ltr. Ja yne Gaylord, 1241 Salem Strad t, inqui-td, concerning the setback regula titns, to which City planner Clover stated the setbacks for the R-3 districts ,ire the ,ate as for any residential districh:,, tht sty being a 20 foot front, and rear yar4,, a five foot interior side, yard, and a :tett foot street side yard,, t.r. C,-,, lord stated his opposition two the rer tni.ng, stat kng t=here are too many opar ;mont:o in the area now and that more apartments are not needed at, the p�'osextt rim<e. .$k. 1%,Uder inquired about off -sheet p:srkiift requ rtmortts for .apartments, and he not=cel an apartment project in the vicinjtX of his propottry. t,+hJdh uses the r:.`: watc drivavay of adjoinintL otknors dor acr�ews* City F,lat:thor Clover stated the situation. to tihich r Xidder Streets, and rectors i in the y� A �-�loc1; 4aetzracn 15th15th,and16tht�a?�.dale and 3rt�-�ctc�afl'ih!ere c4ch of t►ao prop4rties have a °,right os, tray acrost of r.ar properties in the block k4 reating a private allay, Ito said that tinc,e each niece of,property has the ri ,%t of ingre s and egress aloh^ this ml,l;ey tl°te Use of the .alley to teach tiY the part.i.nt; a -nm for an apartnwent f, -In tt:irg do Oakdale St. -tot is a legal cress. leo noted tact;t t'Whnre is a prohl on o f rai ttwr tictn'e of the alley dura to ibtr.' 'Ounber of vehicles uoiti1t,y 7t t: rOucAtr t ttww, holevet ,,AAde it is rwi.vat,e alley tho ntintonanee 16 VI reslaonsi.'billty of all of the adjoining !'*4Ga"r stated. the, Vi ty t1wUld td-,* dvex7; ''thcte 4.,11eyo it a"l3u';:��",. a3L'tg '.°Ari oistg to e 'built; dlatI3 tbtm. 'Cap a x'”"'rn�.�ararr.niw�r.s�orrrr uir...r wrr:rwv�. ,.... .•.- •.. �..... :. • 1! r, -----Mrs. 1 ' y,, :olds i.nquived hoc many units could be built in. an p-3 zone, to �ic:s Ctta it mn 'duller rep,, ij!`d rhe nutaber of units would only be 'limited by the sept- b4cht building pc•vara# e,, ,grid off-street parsons requirements of the Zonitz' ; Ordinance. City} plrnoor 016' x added that in the average apartment develop-ment now 'beiaxg within t'he City, theta 'is about 1.10U square fee-,6' f lot f., area 'got a€�oh xqs :dant141 uo-It, or in another wards a lat c� 12,000 square feet may ha 't6 iia dovoloped for about 10 apartments'. Cormni scone,:! Burnett inquired ifl"the front setback: area might b(4 used for 1,, w parking, •tb Which City �Ia ioer Glovetf' Ntatea that,the xei�iiired off street � parking of one space for oach, dwelli4g unit must be providk_;1 bk,h, -1nd the front setback.. Ike'' further stated that once the required liarkiug has been pra- , front setback may be used for additional parking urea: sided that the tx°b r 1. 1+tr,if Kid"4r questioned the provision of drainage facilities for aparrtment's* to ; wahi�h City I,'lanner' Glover stated each apartment must pro'�ide a complete Storm { ry " drainage system frons the de--alopment to the nea•r-st City, 'storm, drain, � �Ir, Donia.Csan, paradise, +,wired if the City CoTatle%l has a poli ay of re- d 4; qu�ring,` the approval -o,f a cettain peraertaid of the property owtt ,Zs prior n , to 'passibs a rezoning. Chalr�an Fuller replied. that the Council does not $ � g- , es action _,.,each rezonang to follow a percents e nolo but rather takes on, the merits of the individual request` Mrs, Jane Ow•lens) l�l5pBr8' ,dwfi�y, commented that if the area is rezoned to F, 3 y ' it ,will encourage Ke ext• i ale s t4 remove tiie existingw' lder houses- and. rebuild with a. small apartment such as a. triple.., which,would be agreat 0 improvement to the area. firs. Owens stated that many 'of the ober horses in the area constitute an:e a sore although some are well y g maintained: riffs$ Matjorie Little stated that she feels a nmi, buil,dfng is a better r set to a rdoighborhood 'than an older house. ° She :also stated that. if the area is r'ezoned';,to R-3 it does 'not follow that:1t will all be developed for apartments. She stated that only the oldest buildings would b4 removed first for con0truction of,, apartments, and that there would be no immediate clian;e in the rieighborhood Mr. Lott Marson ^gated that the City of Chico recently started a study for urban renewal, and that the area would stand a ,goo4 chance at everything ban& torn dotrn if this agency is bthught into the. City, of Chico: Chairman Fuller repliLd to OSx'.' Maxi° -that his co=ent is noE necessarily true however it: was not the ur.oL moi;''this iae�irz� to dxscl�?i� t r -`g h' merit^ of urban re'nawal, Mr. X,idder stated that many houses alojtg, l6th StMreet are old he,,ii ses but: tbcy loolt nice and could be remodeled to product income if necessz;y. Mr: Gsjrlord stated there is A-3 zoni.ne all around the existing It l area, die stated further that: he oorks for a contractor and that lie is aware that _ apartttteut buildings nowt hainua t ake of mistimm standards in order to cut corner:; as much as possible, He stated he s:oui d not want to see sucks buil4i rigs in this area. I tj1FN Vlorre'll Reynolds again stated hot zoning. Mrs. Owens st€aated} that 'ymany �yxao#xi�cWir�yy, ; o eAtsad{eyleaµd y yorpfy yt1a}e ry .a�rladMjr�eylte� again, and that if the owaa 4ao eiou.,h. Allh'�.N• •1d the hon,.e u13n �j)t p1M0 �rci line somethtog. She ferthca stated tbat er 'houses' axe. rennet av a newt bgilai.ng constrmeted, then i.t vould ba � ,��"set to the nei.ghbo !,00d, firs. OWens tated' she tould not aceopt the ob actions 'ohich ,have bei' �:�•pa�essed to It-3 zonits, ; Mr. Myor urged the Cot issi»oa to plan Lahoad for the needs of the Cit-r rc'Eorring to the anticipated ;row•ith of the College enro}llmenti .. '. sixty 1'lniane; '1Y V Vy..L LeY YtuN 4dL 4N,4i2+ II�Yd M�iw�ViV l=..VJ=Pi Owe '4 4\W#'.nMF a M1h'F 'I i�� iA[1 beer ubmittod to the City Plana),,& Office either byr telephone or by t Ail, :± These toil tats eXpt:es>ted both opi+rov,al and opposition tri.th respect tet tho i i �y° � Sv.,, T'i'iti' _ '`. �. r(p ,. ,,.,.• ,. ,, 11v��Y� ,,,,,a-._ .... .,. ..,:.fit .� "'_ _.'.'-+w" ^ +{" � A r Tb.CV4+` be nib further xozent�g Chaittrnn Ful ler dcciared thy: hearing closed, and r der �r�� ),hat a set-ond h� ; ex`s will l a scheduled gay thd� , Commission and = :again be r,:a I. d to e„Ah property' ♦ H r AI TZ IIIY,;.G V� O. 55 "(CITY PLA.'�t 17 ltlil`.t�, a r%;r a TO R.EZ09, VACUOUS ANNUATSONS Fvol.-I ;a ray x O VARIM DISTRICT$ ,.rdr, tura r several ,r ir�o�,._, stated tlt:...� e,o s_vera,.:onne �t3t�. ;�� which will �� itin �p � xe .�3 ed,;4 wring the next ,Fejt onthc O��:amran %ul�ei? z.ttated the matter twill ba referred to'the Zoning and. Permits Cofor d`:?busb?cr as to sugges';ed oi;ng for each deaf and that ,hcaring,s will kfxe ached{r,,rid a a.,later date ilk r Q TO G Ii�It t?�ENTS 3 RL.SIM ��kt.", ErQ�1�TTC S,S��ry��Yl�3YA.YC�tS�Y�/ IN'O: lS�Tl�I{°"a.$ tLJ .U.41 C' CiL+['sJ, ' , Cha tman. : !declared the ubl G heari open and asked fci,r a vwt 'tv of, the px�posed �itr t cC..rt~nt" p Git:}r 'lan te”'',.,&over stated theaprp pled ,emensiment taould "eii�te the required rear yard frame 20 reef: t o 5 i:e,'� .. all residential districts (R-1, lt- 2, It-�3 ate A -P) # and'' would also ea itrk�+.a t- ""the maxitaum front setback now specified b , the Ordin� ce at 83 ieetr4 A he,;,VIIVddea that pti6i to c raftins the Proposed amsenc�cneztt he,d revxewej,` ��';;�prbvisa.ons ox tlitir;residant ial districts relative to coverage permitted, and that the `City PLaanniosdoff;t'ee feols 612 6xit'tin coverage ze q,t Irez6:nLVs asp) y;equote, lie �` advised the 'bibY=isslon txta.0 the prosont axasntanti building co e is 40 percetit ,> ' in l'a-3 dist rsats;l X50 percentn.-2 districts, and 75 pL'+-cu4 11-3 and .,R-- , ff n tia City 'Plnnner Glover suit ed the Commission had initiated �h�'+'a�aendment atter " w d Scutd ng nu-merous i.n,3ttnces' iri Which � atiiftces �h"Id beef, c�pxowed by 'the, Got fission xcl,rati.ng to reer yard setbacks. He also rioted Oat the proposed 1' at tiltnt: would clarify 41je present unc4t,,Ii situations as':+to tequireu setbacks on. odd h- ape lot -,i havz.,r cit h' � or $ `�,adcs rather than the standard reet sngul r foul; ,sided la., Chti n l<ul'ler asked for. comment from the audience relativeo'to the p;'oposge s6eoocl s and the changes '4upgestcd by the ,nmb-ndme;nt, There ,1 ei,tg no .;.ommen frim the audience,, the ma ter was dis6Assed briefly by the d,-!vt0i8sioA t -ped. waar referred to I�he Zonink., trid permits Co=ittee for study au l the zecond publV+' . h,earig, , -,u the matter L ICBM= NO W ;6 AND �� CNxG0 5��'� OOLLNGi;) TO C0t�5TRUC l;. ♦, t i (fi jjny ZU—M'D V �D t;'Tty l'lannno*r Cvf'3 reviewi'.,,`'za repos"t* from the Zoning wad VOM„tsl commi:tVae Cnte'd Soptariber ?.41964, Qlw dh reedt�,tman8ad that Lyse .re'tmitt�,' 426 and 4,27bN ntproved sulbjriet to the $6' cI Ang cooditi.ous; Use Permit 426; a) khat,, ala construetion and ddvelopment be s+ubst,an.t ial ly in accbrct vi.th the plat eatitled "Plat to Accompany Use .permit: No, 426.x�' b) That the adjacent pkibl c ,Vht of tray be developed and ampxoved in acorrd v4 th the st4ftdaarch, , u,nd re uirem><:ut s, of the Department of Public T"I'04ts of the city of Crticor c) That stro-tt ttee plaxttit'gs h installed in accord with the reu qui.r outs of the VArlc* Ocpertmoot and the Deprsrtmant of Public CIorzkt of tile City of ch$ ---o;, Vro- permit E0a- L7 a '%at all cons.tructibxa and development: ke subs:att,aliyn accord t:ith tha pkat eutkitl,ed ITIat~ to Accompnny Use Permit .No 427,11' bi That tide adjacent p�ubllc right of tray bin dovcloped; and improved in accord tw at thL- standa r±da and rersa-regents of the Pep�iartttent of Ilubli d 1 orlt:s of the City of Chico, , /I r � �I C). That Street trea plantings .,e installed In accord with the require .`'mentis of the 'earls Department and the Department of Vubl.lc. Works of the City of Chico. d) reservation for future :street widening be maint;aitred free of boil dings adjacent to the westerly side of Warner Street, Vaith sulci :' to bo re,terved ;foo# otroet Ido ax`liug Until aluch tiza, as " Wattdj; Street Day be closed to through trO fie and an OlterYta.te traffi, faci• —Itty may be provided. U + Commissioner Nissoa► moved that tK6 Comsnisgion adcept tlie.,xeport of the lCo►tnai tt ee>. and that Use V6=10 No. 4,275 and°427 be appzoved subject 'ta the conditions °- recotrsmended by the Comrnittte, The motion ttas seconded by Commissioner' Burnett M „ aid eras cppzoYed by the ckh"nitnous Mote of all mei,kters present. ., a USE VAR, Ci . PEI iIT ItC� 422 (D" 'D:cAI.0 }, ' C0LNSIDBRATI0N oz' aV'lStb, P"OT 'PLAN ql TARAMT IENT AT 440 NC.IIt SI, AV==-' City '�a.anzie`r Glover revietraOthe request of Mr. Drake for an autondment to Ude err j j 1'erztt �:;,tQo« 422 tido sutIztitUte a revised plot plan. for the plot plan Originally ?r a Sp,xoV � s a conditirfxt of th,e' )ermi t. Pollock: die cu cion, Commissioner, „ Selve rx Moved that Use an' amended by siabstitttting 'No. t, t 422, Revised the li j entitled Plat to Aeeotitpany 'Y;sc, and VariancebPorm '\ �a fuz the oral really approve66',use and variance permitp la.t. Corm ss`ione Ilissort and�was approved lxy the The unatiir�ous- a iaotioe v%s secopde:I by .. vote af,�all members vettnt. dhairman rullor noted that i*t tb�s action the . Cox2ssi on load detexmi ned that theppraval of the use and: vizince,ermit 't�f �� ea rel with the p'kovisions Section 27.20 sud platisin the, a: a h1ch.,praV151ons aze relwtipe to use and, 6ct j o, re2on n l t =- ,• C variance porm"t.ts. y CII Co ;gMRI.-PLAW� i`I&D M,:ILiAI RIrVIW Chni xman Tulles Staged that the third ° Annuai review of the Chico' General. Plan x�y1l be sGhGaule'' for the Vovember meeting of the Commission. WIMET NAMING STUDY, VA,I'.TOU5 10CNTZOUS•. .. Ctoi.rman Vul.ler stated there are several street n1tnPs which should be reviewed fps c possib._- change, sevaral :LI connection with the cup-ront freeway constructi.ou. no ,s ,�,gested that this matter be „efdrred to the Zoning and permits Co=ittee for ,recoemmndati.ons prior to baing zubmitted tO the Co=ission. ... ,1` r 7� {T � �y� y,��y ryy,�y;rye /'y }6,t�{r} y CgLIgT l'i.itli.NrNJ1'I0 CVJ:l.`A.1.S.SIOIN I-IA.6a4'I:fiS . If ahc» Cnr�tttJssi.on discussed nattar.s currently pending before the County Planning Co�i'ssi.ort. The Co=ission, following discussion, requcoted that the City's repxasontaati,vc to the County Plancli.ng COWi^si,oti express the opposition of the City 'Planning Commission to, the proposed cornneretal zoning, for property at the northwest corner of xirst tivenue and shor%dan Avenue. The Commis„ iota indicated that: the ofojection should bjj made fez t'he some reasons',, -,as 'set forth to a previous ob jcct on to this s.we arczo(�inr, action several zonths a"so Av g �° . w W, . n eetiral; : a adjourned by Chairman I ulloa TIh re I as n , no furtbot liu.��aaC, � ew 1 1 X y� MCI P;C. 1 .a w«.b.w SUCI AL VLtM NI NG C0=SSIQN �MBTING October $, 19(--4 carr, TO Otogkl 'The special meeting of the Chino City Planning I�)mmission was called to order b Chai.rman. > ul let at 700 P.M. in the Council: Matnners of the Municipal u pd n , txtlj theojo7natcndancee:Conv,sdsiopeers39.7d,Bxowne, fl3neto gi borij VdIvodtdro $etaiij Ud ChdillnAt N*11%tCity Pltihn4b 010VO-4 " reta�:y 8avitx; City Attotaey prir+e. .,�oa AIIpItOVAL OT MINUTHS Chairman huller stated that copies of the minutes for meetings held on hu,gust 13, 1964. and on '$e tember 11 155 +, had been provided for members t r p � or 'the Commission. rHe asked if anyone i� cote.>�t�ions� additionsdesired nor deletions. r of rT minutes read or 'if ' there were an Hearing no comments, Chairman Fuller declared the minutes..approved as submitted. g FraPOSED AXEMMIENT TO TkLV ZONING O1bItWC5 REUTiw; TO OaJ�-5x1Y1;5T PARKING AF4MIUZEMSI.. PUBLIC ItEOR NG a.aman Fuller stated this is the ''third public hear.'i.ttg '40 be conducted on a , n ptoposal to amend t'he Zoning Ordinance to pravide for ,payments to be made, to the City in lieu of providing the required in ,tommerci.al !' areas. Chairman Vuller declared the hearing open.` � ' C -ity Planner Glover stated the.Cominission hada conducted two public hearings Io ri u the` proposed 7=endtnent, and had suggested several mods fications` to the proposed amandmei�,t on the basis of discussion during these two hearings.. He said he u hail xev;'�.ewed these suggested changes with the City .Attorney, and that it Vd�ild appear the sugge'stio'ns of the Commission can be incorporated into the proposed/9rdinance amendme'n't, Be further noted that if the amendment is R desire n matte thin qty trgdacil by the Plann3,ng Commission, the Council. may s cled to the desire ter changes 'in the proposed Ordinance amendment. He Ifu,rther noted that the City Council would: conduct at least one additConal public hearing on the proposed . am(:ndment. CityPl:nner Gloverreviewed the provisions �\ of the suggested_ amendment, r ., , at .ging that it would establish the basic procedure whereby 1� developer might � ; payments to the City, known as in-lieu payments) instead of providing off street parking in the manner noir required oy the Zoning Ordinance. he notod that the in-lieu payment procedure would be optiotal, and that the prtsent provisions for providing off-street parlting Mould remain in, the Ordinance. Re further stated that the proposed Ordinance provides that the � Ccuntil .may determine the fee to be p-Ald per space on the tsasis of several fact ors, including the cost of providing off-street parking spaces in the et:i.sting vehicle parking districts, land costs in tho vicinity of the property for Whieh the payment is to be made, and the equivalent cost to the I developer of providing all of the required off-street parking on the same site as the use which such parkin; would serve. He. also nested that the prcisosed amendment provides that the Council shall conduct a public hearing i prior to determining the: -area or areas within which this procedure might be utilized. City planner Glover atated that one of the purposes of the proposed amendment. t is to provide an alternate means of satisfying the gaff-street pat:lting require- rtcnt for the many small lots in the commercial areas, pa.rt_icul,arl.y in the central i r, bwttnass district, which world be difficult to develop if the required off-street parking must be provided onthe same sate as the use: which it will serve uy C"aazimnn Vul,l.etw inquired if anyone in the audience dosi.red. to speak regarding the proposed astendment, and hearing no comments; he inquired if members of the Css i.ssion have an ► further questions; ° { Cozz_-�Iis*sioner Selvester noted that the proposed Ordinance: is in a tenuati.we form. su'b,j,oct to further review and modification by the Counci.l,, and he xtquestea� } that the members of the Cotruniasion be kept; advitod as to the progrtas of ;fiction On 'the ti0t1etenti City platter Glover stated. that zembers of the Commission xrould bo provided with copies of twliel proposed aztendatent prior to any final aCtl n iso ug tecon on the amendment: by the City Council Tkore being no further oomi4tnts, Chairman rN llor declared t lte public AYearing p M* a Se t crrelative r na,;opted reco=etid1t cic " ro od atencmentofthcsninOtdi�tancerelkxtveto k.ffstt~eeta parting roquiretatts and a procedure .for paywonts in liaMu of the regti red pukiog space3, to the City Council for fi tiai action and approval. V10 mot:fM+ rraa setooded My bfY`ia4B i copy - 2 Commissioner l zownp, and` vas approved by the unanimous vo :l of all members preFenir , , _,�� "1a SMUTION NO. 108, ENTITLED "RESOLUTION AE -M MING � JUZZ,MENT TO ZONING ORDINANCE," IS ON FILE IN THE CITY h MUM= OFFICE, MUNICIPAL BUILDING, C1iICp CALIFORNIA. l'R�`vSRD A1ei1i3 NTS TO T1�18 ZUNI NG O�,; INAItC1; RELATIVE x0 REQUIRED BUILDING SET- Bt",>.CI S AND PERXITTED. LOT COVMAGE xN '�`�.SnrNTIAL DISTRICTS„ PUBLIC REAMING: F Chairman Fuller declared the publiche."ring open, noting that this is the second k public hearing to be conducted by the Cos. #,ss� on on the proposed chanes to the Zoning, Ordinance. i ° l City. Planner Glover reviewed the proposed Changes, which would include the 1t, following: ' `p+ I ) l;t � 9xtate the present provision for a maximum front at�tbactc of n 35 feet except where a greater setback may be approv•!'d by , the Architectural Committee of the Planning Cot.' isoidn� in the R -i, %L -Z, R-3; d0d X P districts: 2) Reduce the requiud reap yard fat main buildings from 20 (-het to ,. at 1 5 ,feet, in R -1."-R-20 A-3, and R! -P, districts. City Planner Glovertated that the prapaseil ar,:endment would not cttange the .. : ,;card requirements dt setback requirements for accessory buildings, nor would the amendment Imake any changes in, the present provisions Xrd ative to the a a^^^��+unt of arra of a lot which may be covered by butildings. He further stated ' thai� the proposed amendment would simplify the problems of determining regitixe t y6a areas on irregularly :shaped lobs, such as lots which have 3 or S sides, sincer'the a=endment Vould ,retain the 20 foot front setback .and would provide fpr a,3 foot setback along all other property lines except the street side of C a corner lot, in which case the present 10 foot setback would be retained. He tthepqseveral ysid4xapproved ousred th d 4 vaiancesfrom�setbackrequirementsfor wouldbeperm`itted under the proposed revised setback regulations, C"nall,&an Fixller calls for comments on the proposed Ordinance amendment. limi► rsione:r Sherman inquired if deed restrictions would be affected, to which ry Planner Clover stated the proposed amendment would not: affect any existing �., �estrictionso lie added that whcre the Zoning Ordinance imposes a greater retback requirement than.a deed restrictions the Zoning Ordinance would apply, lie further noted that where the deed restrictions are more stringent,. such restrictions would apply, Russell Kidder, 1517 Broadway, inquired if the amendment would allow, a person to construct an apartment house to the rear property line or within five feet of the rear propet:ty line. He stated that if the new se,tbaclts would permit such construction, the buildings would be fairly chase together it case of fire. I;i -reply; Chairman Fuller noted than :such build -Ing s may be five ` feetfrom the property line.: or 10 feet apart, along side property 'lines at the present time and that it i.+ould not appear that this situation would be any more dangerous in the case of two buildings being 10 feet apart along rear property Rings. Mr. Xiddcr stated that poople would not have in uah of a back yard under the new reftul,ations, to which Cotmttissioner Pherman noted that a back yard would not; be ma.n!dat:ory btit would be optional with a developer, Commissioner Sherman noted that the sat e< outdoor; area might be provided by a wider side yard, or perhaps by an interior court rather than the usual back ;yard area: There being no further cottriiertts either for or a airist the pre+posed amendment, Oantnissionor'Sherman moved that a resolution be adopted re'co=endi:ng the proposed amendment to the 'City Council for final action. The motion Vat seconded by Comm'.6sioner Selvester, and ty,as' approved by the: unanimous 'dote of " all members present. =SOLUTION NO. 1001 mrTxTI n ItR uOLUTION =011k RIDING A%tDUMM-NT TO 'ZONING 01iDINA►rOO, t I$ ON rnt IN THS CITE' PLANNING, OPFICF., �:�sRi�PA� 11ltxLI1:G, C11ICO C�d"il,"1"O�ila ,...w�i..._.,...... ... .. 4¢. ... ..Jr�..tLaw._.. .'.. ..._ �.rc. war .. - ,re IOUS PROPWI;ES ALONG IiEZONI:NG 90. 54 (CITY PLANNING COWS NAVCTO AEZONE SOUTH BROADWAY, S.U. tM STVSET, AND ICOR , � 1 SINGLE FAMILY PESIDENc . V AUD R-2 'TWO TAMxi,Y RG�IIJEi�CE TO Rw3 MULTIPLE FAMILY RES:IAENCE 17ISTR7CT TWO , ,S i , s PU13LIC l ARING, F Cha:trman Vull:;er stated a first public hearing was held or,,. `he proposed zoning oto SeVe giber 14, 1964, nd thu this moWng i,a the, sleeond public hdaritig do e the matter, He declared tete hearirig open. R Ci, y 'P'lanner Clover reviewed the rezoning, which was initiated by the Planning Commission, stating tbdi the proposal would change all V 'the existing Rtl and R-2, zoning in the southwest Chico or the palC4ale area. to P-3 Multiple a F Family .Residence zoning. Ee noted that the rezoning was initiated'�by the A i Planning Commission, after interest h, d been expressed,by property dwners in f r . as the area,. city P(,.neer Glover, stated that num),roes persons had contacted the Planning Office to submit comments either for or agai'ns't the rezoning proposal. `i lie further stated that notices were mailed to each property owner prior to this hearing, and that ntiti.ces were also(,-,posted throughout the area. HE also j� x suggested that no action be taken by the 'Commission >on the rezoning proposal asp this meeting;,' and suggested that following the '64'r, g the matter be rt,drred to the• Zoning and Permits 'Committee for a detailed review of all. the 4 corm eats submitted during the two hearings and of the correspondence submitted to the 'Planning office, f , Chairman Fuller noted that after revi,e&ting the comment$,, the Commission may r desire, to modify the proposed, zoning and conduct additional hearings'. Chairman ruller,called'for comment from the audience., MV, d.,,. V. V0,11ins, 15.0P i 6j=al Avenue, stated hIr favors the rezoning, of two lots which h`e owns in the area., lCarasinsk *1225 Salem street, stated that someone had circulated a petition in the area which implied that if the zoning is approved, taxes will be raised and that it will be neceetary to build near sewer l noe in the area, Chairman Fuller asked Secretary Savitz, the Director of Public Works, far his cor.=ents in this regard. Secretary Savitz stated that no sewer districts , a-- improvement districts have been proposed, and that he is unable to state whether or not new sewer lines woul: be required over a long period of time. Secretary.arelief line had been constructed through a ceduringavitzCaddedhat years.swe City 'Planner Glover read a petition submitted by Mr. Kidder in opposition to the proposed rezoning, and signed by a number of residents of the area, The petition stated there are many reasons why the area sotth of 11th street should remain as now z000d among them Che fact that the South Chico sewer system z would not carry the added load that apartment houses would require. Co=ission.ar Visson questioned what affect rezoning to R-3 would have on the sewer sy tam at the present time, in reply, Secretary 8avit4 stated that it the area develops, as a high-density residential area, perhaps some additional' relief lines might be required but he questioned the statement that a new ,system would be necessary. Co=iosioner Sherman inquired ifadditional sewer lines would require an awsassrnent on properties in the areas to which Secretary Savitz stated that °�► ? additional sewer lures might be 'wilt with gouarpl City revenues, or with funds obtained through d bond issue, or through an acoezzment district procedute. He stated that if the area is rezoned, there Vi11 be no new so -mrs required immediately, rind that in order to determine the sewer require- ments it would " be necessaryto tinriexta,ce a dot ;'Idd study of tho area related to its rate of development:, City Planner Glover ridded that as a. general ' POliry, ir:pr0V*aients such as rtwero bavo both installed originally at the euvenne of the property .owners, but that in the older creat v hich hnve been developed for ,some time tlio nocesnary itr,provc:ncsits tea 0 1 tir:g U ilities have 'bOen fi,nnnecd by Mac -Wtthod OthPr thdri Ott the property, Cot iwsi ner Vinson inquired if tt has baron 11,-.he policy of ;the assessor to C114tit'e tbr- t` rz-esoF tht of propart es, in 3;mlt'Splc ro't'"iidet, 4 di ntri ore, City Planner Clot.#er replied that the assecoad N,oal'ue of p,top rty ass based upon the estimated =rhot value of the proporty, and that a hi-her assess,ront is not neceszaril.yw the result of rezoning. He stated Coore aroo wmy Zuictorn which H_t, ht ,affect ptoperty, voluo.r, acid that, razotiing 4 only one of diode„ factors, 9 rf Chairman'ruller rtrmarked that the question of increased tastes has been raised in,G,lmost all rezoning matters, and that the City Planning Commission is. unable to answer such a question, although it is always of concern.to the people in r the affected area. , Commissioner Shermat inquired if Nr. Karasi.nski :favors or opposes the rezoning, W WIWI 'Ut. 'Xatooifloki ranpli.ad bo io, its favor of the remligg. 1 Mr., William Rebzer,. representing M. Gustafilt, 249 '14, 16th Street, stated he is r in favor .of the xe�,Qning Mr. Iic:tzirr stated, that traffic oto W. lb th Street is quite heavy, and that he feels the rezoning-,vould be appropriate for his client i s property: Mrs. Jane Owens' 1715 Broadway, spoke in favor of the proposed rezoning Mx: Richard Pond, 1518, Broadway, stated that he also favors the rezoning, orrell ire � Mnol .rs ' M "' y ds, 1425 Broadway, stated she opposes the rezoningas she r eelstt,he a-tenashould remain residential. Mrs. Reynolds stated she does not 'watt see is constructed in the arca,' Mr. Russell Kidder stated that he'°`bjected at the previous hearing and wishes to object again;. Mr. Kidder stated he does not want to scare anyone' regarding r the sewer, however lie is certaixi r City planner Glover reviewed a memorandum to the Planning Commission dated October S, 1944 w1hi:ch suggested the ioll.4c7i.ng considerations to the Coatunission `in connection with Tiso 'Permit 'No, 432; a a) The permit should be subject to construction And development in accord � with the use permit plat, h) Same for of. lrxndscaping dr grottnd cover shauXd bre required along the front portion of the property, similar to that pro, 3dayd by adjacent service station and shopping center developments, c) The Commission should consider a rOq; reetttent that a sand fence dor wall be provided, particularly along "the wastezly and northerly Property lilies due to proximity to residenti»;ally zoned property. d) The Commission may desire to discuss proposed hours of operation with the applicant end should consider a limitation upon the hours of opera tion as a condition of the use permit. This is particularly .important ,.,...•e d tbp .. ; in view of the neighborhood ;character of the comt-d tial �?�a adjacent residential properties, q y pp pro applicant t�aould careutaeaddnani�eurthenc�ommentsant was resent and if the r to `Cir; Cobert Briem stated that he had previously operated similar .drive-in f' estaautcarts it Tacoma, Washington, and that. he is qui.tc fam riliar with this type a'business. Mr, Briem stated he had ;purchased a large piece of land, which Aucludes, additional property to the west and to the north of the portion he proposes to use; for a restaurant lase. Mr, mom stated he proposes to place the restaurant. immediately to the wost of,the existing Douglas Oil. Company sorvice station, and that the restaurant area would extend about the sxamo rtepth from Virst Avenue northward as does the service station, Mr. Brioni added that he will leave a 30 foot area for ingress and egress"Along the tte;;terly side of his property into the rear porton of his property, which he anticipates developing for professional offices or perhaps for apartments, Mr. Zricm stated t►+at the building would be of modern design, and would be so constructed that it can be cleaned easily each day # fir. Bziem added tit fools the proposed use gill be an improvement ill the neighborhood, R In reply to a question from Chairman Fuller, Mr.. Btiem stated the drive-in u restaurant would not abut any taridenti.al area. City Planner Clover noted that: the arra proposed for use is shown on the plat s*kmitted to the Commtission along with the t^:morandutn from the City Planning ! Office, and Haat the plat , f ndicates the area tan the t+restr and north of the l restaurant Site Separating the restauranti:rom the Adjacent res�alential properties, Cammiosioner Sherman inquired if Mr. 35riem intends to dedicate the 30 foot access area along the west si4e of his property to the City of Chico, to v-hich ylr. Brien rel ed that he does ndt propose: to dedicate this area but would tnaii` twin it as a pt" to dri,"Ycway p Property, to the rear portion of his :a :capplies Corx�iisa:tiona�r sh+tirman inquired if the application ation a ppes t o the entire property. olined by Mr, Driem, to which City Planner Glover roplied that the. applitatiot applies only to a portion of 1Ir, a property, t' at portion being 180 leek b*, 1.17 foot as indicated &-t the use permit plat. City Planner Glover further noted that; the rcmoani,ng porLioa of lir. Briom's property is zoned neighborhood - and may be developed a;atrx4tot*cial ly, 'but an a xtension of the prow posed drive-in taould require sin' oma:r+ment to the use perayik> C.rnJssioner Sherman ingoired if tho Zoning Ordinance provides for this typo of rasa itt a neighborhood•-do►tmaercial, ditttic.', to 'Which City Plar4ier Clover stated that the Ordinance lists ca,tttaiti pa-Wittod u" 8) �.atd specifier, that other similar uses or services maybe permitted by the Planning Conmistian, to also n4ded that the propasoc; oigns would require Pla ming Commission rovic�r, anal that in previous matters the Commission has allot• oa fret standing signs only in tlttr instance of the typical sorvico station insignia. Com. icsi,ontr Drovne inquired if the propatseci rowdcyay mets City sttinslards, deciic1ch otrosat but iszadequatesit I:ould taut bo of wtaft:ici.cnt t�idtlt for a. to titich boa:retaxy ;zvit�. sk�t;v , ' aas a driveaaay to the re -t 'Partion t f the �arpert*711, YmR 4a�, - 6 Cornissioner Shorman, inquiL'cd of Mr, Briem the number of cars t~.hi.ch might be accommodated by his proposed use, In roply, Mr. Briem stated that the proposad operation'vould not include carhop service, but rather would bt a type of self-service operation where the customer must parte the car and come ',into the building; t,o order. Mr. Briem staged he anticipates a parlci.ng area for 24 oars, ComAmliotter shaN.h' tt itqui:rcd if there wild: ltd ioO,4de taatit g, or if cu;ttom re will cat in theft bars, to which qtr.. Briem stated thcr6. would be an enclosed eating area, hoaaerner if the customers desired they co}Id t*o the ,food to their cars and eat in th1� cars Chairman rul.lev rtot'+ed that Sahile'the Zoning and l'errniLs Committee has not had an opportunity to review the proposed use in detail, the Planning Office had Submitusd several it�tctma for consideration y the Commission, Charman Fuller astrc:r Mt. B'riem if he would outline his proposed hours• of operation, and any p�posed landscapitYg. Mr. Briem stated that as to landscaping` he'v-oitld 4e, agreeable toolandscap�ing the. area along' 'First Avenue..110, � furtherthat ,\a insofar as hours of operation ;are concerned, 1: 00 A.M. teetlze t'ro,xldbvery ry latesti,time the business might beopen. Mr: Briem added that: during weekdays,,_ the restaurant would probably close at a much earlier hour. lie noted that the restaurants which he had previous operated itt V�coma had a' , K sharp drop in business after, Bt5 l',l'.tR and that they were general xy c1UcPd j /� y� t 11 i 0-0 .0 i - C;ommissiotta*°; Brown'o Y.vV 5,red Iolative to proposed sigi s. Mr. Briem stated he has considered it>stalll sig `a frbe standing sign adjacent to the street, inasmuch as the building it sel '\yi11 •; t ,,rt~•tpe distance at4ay from the street, 1` however in this patticular area 1,N:e stattR4 " slicl;.:�ot feel a free standing sign was vital to the 'business and that he 4V requirements the C'ommissiori might establish. Commitsion a; the sign -could be placed on the building, to -zhicb Mr. Briem 'toplied that .:4i c' , 2-iui ding will Have a flat roof, it will be difficult to install a sign w"t .,r.. ,',, ' ^+ . ixtond above tht roof: line. In reply to a, queotian from Chairman Fuller$ Mr. Bri.em stated he will have cooling equipment situated `on the roof of.Che structure. chairman fuller noted that if the walls or some type of extension of the building were provided to screen the cooling equipirent, then perhdps Mr. Briem wr tld have additional area a on which to plate a flat sign which would not extend i eve the roof line. Commissioner sioner Xioson inquired. if Mv, )3ri.em, had considered placing the drive-in along the westerly ,,,ide of .his property, and reserving the 0 foot driveway Mott; the .easte3:li tide of the property, noting that in this way the driveway would line up with 'Village Lane from the standpoint of an intersection. Mr. t Briem stated that it would not make any difference insofar ;as the operation of the restaurant is ,toncatnod to locate it on either side of the property, however he had su=est;cd the 50 feet be on the westerly side to provide a greater separation bat*i kt the restaurant and adjacent properties. - Chaittian Ful ler asked for cownents from the audimeo. Ar. Cgil,'liam Chispea.la, 1273 B. First Avenue, stated he feels' stron ly that the busi.tess wouli he unatt:racti,m an an essont ally nei$. hbo hood residefttial arcai Dr. chinpclla staters he it, proud of the arca, and he has' seen many drivuwins, ,nd no matter how hard the owner °attempts to tccep thin clean, they will always be irioity and cluttered. Or. CChiapol.la ,tatted there is already a restaurant : :ten the Lott fbll.oxi Shoppin,r center and there it a drive.-in ttear Mangrove and BabtZ 1!iri1G Avenues. fir. 'Clti.�vpclla stated roto three yea's ago a botirlini,* alley tyram proposed for the taiga property, bu,4- the opposition - utas overtlyolmitig and the ptojest va t,dropped. !to statod he is fquolly convinced there will be opposition to tlto proposed drive-in onde the word gets, Around the neighborhood, Dr, Chi gol'la soated that, some of the appli anU a natetneiattt mere vague, such a,7 his thehours of aperatiott for `t'he drive"in* ltr. John 1"onfto, v 11 " ntfiold ltoady stated that he ons Ch ee residential lots vhieh abuts 14m, applicant's 'property, I+ r. Xtynnedy stated he foola the pstropmst d use t;otIld be datrittnotttal to tris property, and he stated that the drive--itis 4ready operatiin in tha Chico aroa are a source of problems, to tlm l'olit;o Depiart%rtnt,. tr. Itvutacry stated the ,goad residential areas in the City choulcl be prat oct ed y7 Mtff L7Ci - .x- 1 .YeMw.'."". -1b�-'C'.. .• ryv .:-: ,,.-k�w'�.... "Rrrww', .x, r'-.."aHi. V+e.•.SIMM'aff+.w�.4r-ei�tadt'�'."bnn.. ...-.. r•�✓'- ... ... awww+ .w ,vr ,. ".�wwr ...tea al... Y+ewMM•x..LYr.vswvMr-s�wr✓rv-+weP"r�'oFauw-.-«.W-...wrtMkr+�wf' ye 7 - telsc'I lava ,_ :"' . ' J.ben ,Avco,., �O-qt�"d Oat East Vitat Avenue carries a consi'cierrtL le+ amouri 'c i x... r � »e, z :h — �,hn Inas two children who rust aroo-s the street each day wit -it Mrs, David said the drive-in �,. "In! att;raet: nota traffic to East First Avenud, She further stated that she ' bought herAiomo so she vt,,ul,d be n a quiet residential area { IIm Alm O `atty arca y 3 xi',okloton cttcle# 4tatod 0116 13grob oith PV, Chtapalla utid Xtra. David. Xtb. OffWtt: futthat It4ted, that dtivc*iim are ti P1 ace tahero youngeo l:e co►�rega` at tiiLlit+ and that such a wea -hould be ooi.ded in P p n this particular neighborhood..; , y . tars. Ao E, Garris,ere, 964 ]Uomiw Avenue, indicated her opposition; to the cs proposed drive-in. Mr. Robert Xtihenbull. 1220 itentriel.4, Road, statod the ueigt'borhood doean't i5 � a need, thit3 type of �)qp ness, and ile stated his opposition. . r 0, Mr. Lloyd Basslor, 897 East first Avenue, stated his oppose.+kion and indicated ; he would not like to see anything change the residential character of the 9 n1ghborhood. r t (driis. 'Ro; rh�r►elder, East Virst Av4itues stated 'hero osi.tion_ addi.n that `^-Avenue the s is used for racing sometimes at 2por 3 in East �"irs rtbrnin�. i 1~ ; �y .w r� She .said Ezts►�Fi>±st .Avee. nushould be 'kept as a xeWential street.. Ur, Jarrell Madsen; ` East First Avenue stated the area i's resacietial and that theproposed use will only incredse�•__°,'S1e traffic problems along J~ atrst ' Avenue: Xr4 Ual Bramsen, 1.,301 14anchester Road, staged that a drive»in restaurant 0 sootrall.y depords upon ,transient trade. Mr. Dramsen said he feels most vehicles of East First Avenue are going unci fromhomes in ,l he area, and that the gqt�o present traffic will '.not SUPPDXL this type of bus7.ne138�'-and in order t0 " succeed the business will have to attract people from other areas. Mr. Bramsen " r indicated he feels such a use dons not conform to the essential character of. the other other types o es in the shopping area which serve the im adiate �� business nee l k ` Mr. C=eorgc Burton, 5 Xingston Circle, stated the proposed use would increase the noire conditions in the area and therefore he: is 'opposed to it. _ x : . ^ l°tr, * �entl""� yi 1192 Uartch,ester liaa.dS stated he formerly livid on iia,z#el Street .4ftl left C, j , :.-i#,ion because of the noise. Bir, tertt le,y stated the proposed t use vc,f, ld be an c ii v-nbmont cin one of the finest areas in toren, and would taring additional `raft~ .c ,-t) thp, area and contribute further to the noioe. Mx. 4 Dantley said a more ouita,'blrzt a�'e;a, .,rind be fouud for the proposect drive -an. Mion , slted for further comment by Chasirma;i N,rtller, Mr. triem stated `he had no police problems at his drive-ins in Tacoma, art" that ba would not anticipate aty f problems with the proposed use: on Just First Avonuc"= 1,1r, Priem otatod there are wsaya to praVent a drive-in frora becoming a gathering arej, oily.'' being. to have only F11 bae€ gi;ound musia. t&r. Briom stated' he does not ' 1cc trouble any V more than anyono else, and that he would talwe every precaution. to keep the ptrcpo ed usn operatin, in a quiet mannor. In reply to a question from. Chairman fuller, qtr.' Dri,am .otatMed that the sale of the property is 'pending action on time use permit, and that tha matter has been placod in erscrow. At the raq,uostw of M Fuller, City Planner Mover reviewed the Zoning pzt;torn iu the area, nov, ing thst the property to tht~ west of lir. Brie 's property io 11-P (tial.tip-10,11'an'il.y, ''Rotidence-Professional 'Office) card pattiallly -1 Sit1g14 Vami.ly ltcs i.dence). lie ;statod that the property t'9 tSl1i nor't'11 is tzotod R-1, uhi,l,e the property to the south on the oppoeite[o Fast; rirstM Avenue is zoned X, -C (M; ,irla'borhood Cott+sxexcial) as is the proposed '. +deivo-in s'to Ctwairvan Ftlllor :,'toted that the pu rpote of „lle h G zone Is to provide an atea s, tovirtg ao� re.rcW ser ices for the no g.tborhood rather than for the cot. -Maty at larnr" Chaimin "Ful,l.er stated that vIler'. poople purchan-e property atotind a llt ah y +rltoctd"�ce croi;al Norio, they e Acct that the U'roz pormitted, in that di, 1,x'.Act cult be compatible with their to os. Ii .YeMw.'."". -1b�-'C'.. .• ryv .:-: ,,.-k�w'�.... "Rrrww', .x, r'-.."aHi. V+e.•.SIMM'aff+.w�.4r-ei�tadt'�'."bnn.. ...-.. r•�✓'- ... ... awww+ .w ,vr ,. ".�wwr ...tea al... Y+ewMM•x..LYr.vswvMr-s�wr✓rv-+weP"r�'oFauw-.-«.W-...wrtMkr+�wf' Cottoissi;oner Browne requested a review of the zoning of the area, In reply City Planner Glover stated that the area along the south side of past First .venue noca zoned ll -C 144s originally zoned C-1 after it wasL ,annexed to the City. °per stated that about 1955 the, property was rezoned. as X-C, after the ! neighborhood-counotcial district regulations were in ireluded in a revised Zoning Ordinance, Ila Grated that the property a4s ng the north side: of east Fivat Avenue bad boon Zoadd N-0 after itO aintl(1Xt1d2n -•to the City at a: later date. 1 r C ztis IBoyd Inquired if the holding of a ' ublic. Y -.a, ng was a matter of t di-icretion Frith the COmtnission, to vhi.eh Chairman ; er 'replied that a use i Vernrit doex.� :. rr*'tl�* a public hearing except rn c;'Ag ain' .instances,' but that the Comm�sion may, c�e . F, ;publ3 c hearing if,. i.t ,''>e k ; such a heat' ng is i t-om.missioner Selves ter noted that the property ig1 tzoned lox carrarercxal i# i4$ �_1 be, able to dglop the Property ;. and he atated that a property owner should ve .accordingly. lie noted that thence is on existing restjlurant �;n the shoppin,, it ce4,,ter. lie farther stated that the property is on a major stxrrruL, ,hut the proposed "use, would be at least. 200 feet from any existing residential homes. y' ^, Commis sioneiselvestez stated he can see no objection to the proposed use. Commissioner aelve.stp%r s rL: C tatea that the area has been zoned N -C fo:r ;some tirtie,l and that adjacent 'property owners- should be fully aware of the zoni`.ng. t Connissi.onerBro,ne &dicatud that the Commission should consider' that there axe litany uses pertnitted in the 14' C zone which; would not require review by tha: ' 11 11 )Planning Commissi6ui, She stated the Commissionshould consider that these u? es , would ,axd take that into consideration connect on . ould be ,permitted on this site-, ne with the appmifor thipaticular use ConLri.is oner Loyd stated that Mr. Briem 'had been in the sated business previa, sly,. .and that he must have some knowledge of tb:s business. He stated that fir. a Briem had commented previously that: a large free standing; sign was not essen lal., jnalsmuch as ti -w people desiring; to patronize his use would do so it any ever - Cottui 9 ,- n. The motion was secon-jed by Ccmm�ssioner Boyd: Cowni^sioner Brot•mie asked if -the „„=ission saould lncl ► c . ' to sign regulations, tL which City Plan-Aer Gloster repIV d t, r unless spy tific coedit .oss are sct forth, the proposed ase and any signs f, -Z such use mt:&t be in acco.cl wiith till~ provision$ of tae neighborhgPd-,co=PrciUl xone« lie stAr d t thin ;c u� ttx�a.l roquik'oxotw that tit" alfa btu ", :rind tC cli t, parallal tO the bUil;dirlg. w Mr, Ital: Bramsen ' 'ni that he foals wi1en. a substantial number of people have �s s t � x .. e :px� ssecl a .desir�t J,"t a pub .3.c iris `ring, a hearing should he scheduled. Bramsen noted that there had btQn no notice given to residents iii the arca of this tmodting, and that whi,lo h' realizes such notice is not legally regiireds # , abras to give notiee and cos'7uct a ` it would r��speur to be and public, xelaC hearing. 1 .: Bramsen s.:tated that the -b iS6r;: s could affect ,.the ,,Y rtes off, N � z neigt►burhaod residents until eaxY each morning$ ar►d that m Y earang should be: 1 �. 'held to. allow all, the their opixa,; �'ommiMeinner Sherman stated that he respects 4r. 'Bt'=sen° s th iikin , and the t ; to doers not doubt t;hare would be a good -nut or of peapl€ show up -at the hearing. ; a ntanis latie�;.) Shei m$n stated furthe-� horxever, that the Commission trust 1s: �+ t �,ecogn.Za that -persons i4ho Have res donees 3ci�" lie nearby area purchased their r tn_kull knowledge. that a comtetdial, zone exists, and .that they should y aware that commercial deJelopUIt6nt Would e^�^nt�xa�ly tape place. Commissioner g ! � Skzexmaxx stat�d he feelscat is a matter of opinion as to whether the,proposed ' s use is mord ob j'actionable than -,pother type of use which slight bre ''�'rermi tted ,! t tin the pxopLrty. lie stated he dogs not feel the proposed business would be ' any more ,pb jecr i6vable. than the se.rvjr., station which a.cists on the adjacent r Dompwertsy� CQminojssioner Shaman 'i�nd%.'ated this Commission has heard many regarding the propo6ed use, and should lo!;)able to make a decision an the permit. ,. Cha•t r men Puller inquired if the chairman of the Lommissi.on would have the authority to refer, the matter to the Zoning and peWits Committee ;for study, ! City Attorney Price replied that a motion had been mdeie and seconded, and that*. the otion must be voted on before. any other action en be falcon. Comtzissione*,: Solvestot staffed that he does not wash to withdraw his motion. G,,Ehi zrtan Fuller req,ue�ted the secretary to call the r6l on Commissioner Sal- s vestoe!s motion, The motion was approved by the following vote of the Coroi;s'sian AYgS, ;ortm ssi.oners Boyd, Browne, Wissoo, Selvester, and Sherman r lv'OLS Coi v.itsioners Purnctt and Fuller d ADS ENT Commissionevs, none t Chntman Fuller stated the permit id apryroved -ub�,ect to the three conditions incl;sued ri the,notiatt� He noted that the fourth' condition Suggested by the 4�.. City pl,� njnt Gtfite, that relative to , time liam t an the on r .t an of the ; Isropc:iad use, h:A not been estaul;, bed as a condition of the ermat. : N'I' TO 7{}14_NG pl',II� Cts;' TG PE1' IMT iQ:u �C HALLS, SU)33t;M TO Ush r P l T 11~ Al D ll 5xUMS, ';%M,10 I1BMIN0`• and 1'�Cy:T(ll7y!�tA C I)�`to � .ay&v Yyi��tt}C'T7 . Y yCr%&Jf"yt~ ORD)�0 TO rlryiBt7t.ON't`ltj?9C�" S�l't Y �tigg'#'t'l yt� � SY..� SIX= riA�pti�kY} t . 5yt 'wYc+ eL�§aai✓t>>S:Y4�,tsr4�y+i�l4d?ySy ♦�� 6+rri,�}Yv4rt� Mkt .+4ryrr��wl,,ih 4rnJyrr4.lt*J,Y.'S4�ta��f++:4Man }3t.'�.v�1: r�+4[A ItipY w Y}4J3,�l' 1. OIZI 14�. I S�A.l'h�laLL'a J,'R�I..e,�L y r8,SX 1I';Cr, TO C- I Lta.)Lh.111�y�t,CUD Ci3;�'� PAC PI�I; n"^- C.ani� son,'ulla�:.-t4,c.r>iowed the two ";throb nr tbea a eiida and ata .ed h tY�auld can 4 dfant tlxc pulalici'ltcari.ngs s multanoosssly, ixxee the tum Matters are related. ' 't3 ac%*gel ,fora da,�cri•ption cf C'��ct ltc:m, +Ctylsn;ter Clover reviecrodeaoatin riappai+~atiort toW .E•i, ostbmi,ttcd by )~raic ia, Crit fo d iviact Crawford, am', WiliaM L 'hurfurd, tacluestits, czaning tat k*kts 12, and 11 OX the ;344s,ell 16b11 Subalivi.; arse, fro+ $1.-I to Re ettatod t'hatw Out, of the VrWrtlr ocrazcrs, 1410'n Ou'bzittit g the aapp l'i tion, i,n ieuted that 'a, lodgo hati to a contes^arlated u: * f.or thjr property and tliat "ince e loigo Nall is' only ermAttad in a co. erc .al,: tone, the requost is boin tub- ,it;t~eal f c1-1 City planner +ays�r furtltur st r: ;rl "lief t%e reprsi~ntntie t y 1• P. , „ 1, J } CYYYt -•--- 4, IA ... ,..'-..v. e -o-+. «w � ...-.>..,..:;:: .°,eye.. w •-- ',..�.e..l�. t•:;h+:.0 Kw -...Y.......,. r of the property oI�sner, t--jr. Dort B=4% had indicated interest in an amendment to t%e Zoning Ordinance �Csaich would ;permit a lodge hall to be located in�an - R-3 or R -l' district subject to a use per it Citry Plannchr Glover stated that in discussing the rezoning application with qtr, 3rot zt� 'he had pointed out that the ,,oni.r:g of purroundin,, pMoperlies ddi�ctttiala Both A tete Uty 0f 011ico end �ft �� Galeas which ��e outside the City n tis. kite rt atad. further that as a result of his cc�vexsabio� _,lith kjr. l3roTm., he had included on this agenda a public hearing on a sed 'R-'! the -'! amendment to the Zoning Ordiri ance which wot:ld permit~ a lodge hall a n the Fi-? "1 'since itaterest d 1. He added that the# strain or It»7? districts subject tro s xse is the coinstruc:tian of a l;otge hall an the property, that of the applicant iii the"(;oittission may desire to consider either :-3 or RMP zon'i.ng: in lieu of the rt ' requested C zoning, anti than at later, time if the proposed amendment s is accept;abl.e� roceso a use permit for a lodge 'hall on the piroperty� Jle C-1 zone Could permit a large number of co=Uercial , pointed the xequasted irk additlA n to a i9dge hall, and that in considering tkre requested C-1 uses p y f' the pckia.ttsed Sc8 may be anticipate that .ata o zon%n the Cosa issaan intrst an g constructed 6��the property i f �t is evtntuall commissioner Oh' erman stated that i,n order to permit. a lodge hall; fit» would � n� a'opear nece1'4 t + t0 either rezone the property to cOn'mdkcial4' aa- to rezone t1ie, time amend tx'he Zoning Ordinance to y ;? the property :a t-3 or R-1' and at soma permit O' lodge h`t�ll in,twhe R-3 0, ir-P distr4 ct City �] uxinex Glover stated " that Commissioner Sherman t interftetation =a.s correct sinco the proposed amendment does not contemplate p&'mittT.in a lodge hall its the R 1 district Which : 's now applicable the xo p. err Y ;10 r, i - tine Chairman `Fuller, inquired if the COMmissit�zi litight ecom texas: a more restrictive Rel' V,�-1, 'under oniytg than the C -].tone requested by the applicant, such as or this current application.City Planner Glover replied that the COM-lissiola tray recommend R-3 or It -,P even: thou , -,h the application req{testa a C-1 zone. He r, added that i f the CaAmli:ssxan xs soinclined,the Suggestion, should be shade .� cle'tr to residents in the area during the public hearings. City Planner Glover stated that notices were Trailed to adjacent Pnoperty,., owners in the vicinity irithin the Cityl.isnits, and that additional notices were posed _ of the proposed rezoning. i^ir. Doan Brorm spoke oto behalf of the applittant, 1��. Crawford. lir, 3rou�ti stated that 14, Crawford desires to develop the property, but does snot feel he can do undo rho present R- zoni: gig. sir. Brotm stated that there are other Li yds in the area_ -asaicki are tacit Str:. Yt1.y single family uses, and he cited several apartments, a nttrsery' school} the Childrren's Home society offices, and a hobby, shop. fir, Brotm stated that t��:. Crastfor3 desires to use the property for a lodge hall lac UitY. Commissioner Browne inqu:rel, if a lodge hall is the Only proposed issa for the 1' property, to `rilich Chaixstan Fgller replied that this has been, indicated by lb: Brol"My however) the Cot-Missien should remesrber that if the property is zoned Cil, any ofthe ,zses permi.tt,-,d under C-1zoniug could ba constructed. A;, Cott ssioncr Btotmo $rated that a=ttAt5 the construction of a Lodge hall on the property,' it VoUlcl appt~ar that Guth a lodge halal tsauld be located t'7i whin a xeai dentialllr des, l.opcta arca, and she stated 41ae Ccrosstissioti should duo consideration .to the opinion of residents in the area in cora 1OCtIttg _iVa 'both the requestad rawfting and the suggested atnr ndma:rtt to the Zotiin i?rc� srsance. City Attorney Price ho ed thct if the SuMAc5t0d ina onititancl also consider n usedu, the�tt titµ t"^mss►issioia �ti-?it consider F. 3 or p t;► d Cit At,torne PriMce stated it troai? >tgspeea* permi.t fq the propotedur°erCs ulwll, It €y;rt!atcr d e tee to iiarrt ghat obis pti� p, t; of control titan a:czttiing to C-1 woeld aff6re. since the i�se pc'x'�p �o allow the Cottiraist;ioti to xevi a ti t ,,3' taint the s3.te development plans ih rolaa#ict a rounding uses, i ottsctissiotaer :''rot e,'^ :atdctl ahe Vould +. 'Ito to see a C-1 i=o .for thlc property regayrdless,oi the use propmctscd for tied' �o erey s`inco it is in a are,i,deti:ial. ne�:glibo rPiaOd. At the to ;ge t~icsit of Co ksxtsxoner Slteas�icna Chait tasi rullei; atated the Cont sr'lva would co'usider the tt:o ttattera ooparately, orad lie athod lbr tb m:sents fry tile etuelience rtwitati �e to the rcquar tc rezortinrr f� +�tt A-! to C-1 Chftit,-t;:s n 7ullnr aA :stanr erl t1 a ro in the tue; ncn tta st under tate Cwl oniaig there .c�acsl d tze do t��'arnntce that the use of tUe pxsspert�w; VOuld bO a lodge.* hAll , , 1 f 1 t �-. Lloyd 1nasler, 897 Past lst Avenue, stated he objects to the proposed rezon- in, and that he feels the zoning should remain R-. firs. t7lelsoo David, 1031 iiolbon Avenue, stated: she. i; confused as to the arena boi,ng contei.dercd for cormtercin.l. City Planner Glover stated that in addition to the application noxa being considoted 'by the City Planning curry jt. 5jon for . N tbarequea kotliur,, or, tile. Jl submittedto ti ro "'ttrtinm ails 3itrert re , re nonfat .. the County PlAnnitit Com:nitflion to rezone the nor:tlarsest corner of East xir, t .Avenue and Sheridan ,Avenue, City Planner � Glover noted that the latter application is a County tatter, ;and the hearings � will be conducted by the Butte County, tanning Commission, lira. A. ' , Garrissi-re, 964 Naomi-, said 6o_ ,area is now lt-l. and should remain 5 11-1. Mrs. Garri,sseze stated that when people buy homes -In reside=ntial areas the~ * _c rtgect the zoning t o r,e;en i.0 residential.. She further stated there it; 5 SuffLciettt commercial area elsewhere: -Pox Any uses w1lich should be, in coiYgztexrcla ,.i areas,, Mr. f'arre411. Xadsdn, ,.957 East First1AVenue slated that he also opposes the razoning as the; area is now a trice , xesidantial area. c 2r ,'Hofschne~i4ev1 East First Avenue, also's19r1 in opposition to the :cozening. There being no further comments Z414tive to, �ezzdni"l7once�to alio ll er � e:tskocl for ,.Cc��nitteh,nts �on >rlre prapasal. to .amen t1-. ng Crd na w xn' R 3 and R P rtistricts sUbjec't to use permit. ' q ea 2tissxoner Selvester stated he cjut3.rtions the g, roposed,,thange in the Ordinance. Commi sioner trowno staked he* opinion that 1odj*o halls; because of their" particular cha,actet;isLics and�tha type of actioity conducted thordin, should � b� required to be located in coemnercial zones; - � �an rte �coofrnon�resictenkia3,astseirfproa residential xea�ise acre in sug,�est;i.r� y up Pollow ng ftrrt hex discua5sxon by the members of the. COmmissi0n, - Chairman ruller noted that the proposed amendment was not initiated by an individual 1 . Leaoli�saon mabudroattter was he matterifrom further co and the j� P P i�9 i - > y p erati..on it 'the Commi salon . 1 so desire±s." Cozvir,41onot selvester stated that he fi:ol s the. Commission shoul4 take no ; Curtner action on th6 suggested amendment, .and. he 'moved that the matter be. dol: cd from the aenda for further na.tsideratiotr.,. The motion was seconded byf Cotmissi.oner Brctane, and Was approved by the Utianivotts vote of all members pre ,er.t _ Citly P annax Glover noted that should the Commission desire to give any further ca.isileration to the suggested amendmentj the Coremipsion may- again initiate , pu'blr°,c bearings at some future ti.rme. S 4%'G1**1NG llo. 55 (CITY PLANNING CCi:�T�5S]Ci��, TO �C� VARIOUS AN-KCXX IoM,"a SRM "U" UIXT-A SII`IED TO VAP.T.011 S DX$TPIC-TSt DTSCUSS1011� Ciklr x'xannex Mov'dr: reviewed the tuggestions of the Zoning and Pearmiks Committee rolati.ve to tite rozonioS of several annexations to the City of Chico, lie stated that a public he~aribg on the suggnstcd gothic ta+oult? 'be ,advert;i,s�d for then nextt e5ct> g end the Co t ssion, and that-sroperty otgnarn t,�oul d be ratifi.e a. V IIMNIIT 190.1.. 409 (MR8. W It WMCKIN) ,x Ta CC►Ti%UCT A CO,,maMT�601 ACTIVITY IN ' A "u" CtiCY.ssll'IS T1,ISTI�a:C"t',ke ilETG xIik W city Plantar Mover rovir-wed ;e Permit Nd 405* statin the permit bad been, Ir"Ouod SuMoct to a �rno}year ita : knit. lie ,statcd the omit Allows the x:; pl icartt to sell calte dee}orating tquipo nt f'rea� tier resideatco> which �*as SiLtd -In a "J"" U=Iassifl MtOld district trhett the ti plre tion tk.,� first :rt M.ti,tted,, bre added, that the prt6*4 tt *to ate QcelueMntly been zczon�d from !, T�.Cd»U'ztclassifi.ewd -. t l��l fiz�dagl.e i��" �l� p,��e?i.rle�nGe.. 1'011er.zinf. fu,rtltor discussion,. it vzs r�ovcd by Corvitvioner Dzot-10 that Usct 1"emit Vo. 409 bo appravoez fe>r att n rll ti sae�.alr ono_ ear period 1ho motl. n Was :scop e., by Co ;times onat S jva4tor and: ^sacs ftpproved by ,the Markt--t= vc, of �. v 1 0 ,rv' Pro -cont. r rib arx;e.r n , f,V REGULAR'PLANNING CQrf ISSION MEETING nvetaber 9, 1964 �. CALt TO ORDER: t The rceular mooning of the Chico iCity Flunaing Commission was called fi c%der ; by Chal.rit In Fuller dt 11-30 PA ire the Council. ClWrOcrs 0i the t�iunic�� a, �u4lrT�vn Stith the following in atandancos Commissioners Boyd, Tatowfio turttod 1 , !Mason Selvester, ,.Sherman; and GJkairman %Puller; City Planner Clover, Secrets Y " .�vitz City Attd;;ney Price, 1:+; t APPROVAL o19 '` 1INU" SS Chairman Puller sbatdO) t�,A minutes for prion meetings would be c,,,4 .�d �e�at .:: � the htoatt meeting of the CommUssion 1}+f F Z -O NG N0. 47 (EMIL i'/HI�), AO REzOI�E T?ROPEITIRS ALO9G E. 010 li' �T 15' HEW OLM AND VINE STRMTS � ROM 'R-3 MULTITU rAmILX RESIDENCE TO C ,,r V > STR COMMERCIAL, (1B�PBRRED BY 'CITY COUNCIL POR CLARIFICATION OF PIRD' A "Chairnan Fuller stated that Rezonling No: 47 hA been." referred ba.&A-to },h a„ e Planning Commission by the City Coun;lil .for a statement,;of the ' t7" 1ngr ' the Commission in support of the recommendation to rezone three a ��"� 3Sot� '»r tiered 'by the application from R73 to N -C Na:ighboihood Commercial. C�Yaa;Evan �,��-l.et stated the NSC zoning had ber.�n pssse�i,b' a, 3w� voce 1 ��'an'f , �I b y� a f the Comm q �1 then stated his understanding that the, 'ter was .not, a referr� 1, -b th x;Gzaning for reconsideration, but. wa,rLL :i on1y a 'rg, clarii-16ation? Cf�M4saion! b l"ffar �C. findings. fl r 1i 1Z�_ City Attor_ ey _ E11by' a u 2} vote Attorney Price comment" -4 ,bat the, rezoning was recommend without any supporting He said the Cdwicil has reque'0)f`ed tt- t the reasons for grantin&,the rezoning be set forth by those member ,( who VOted for the recommendation 1.o rezone the three lots to X-C Iiei6boncol r'd ercial. City Attorney Pricy xeiterated thaxL,�e Commission 'does not h,'-'vLi bef rrG it Y tonight a reconsideration of the previous action, but merely .-i reque�it to state the reasons for such action, and to forward such reasons td , '4o. City Council. Ne said the Council may_ then change, add to; or go .along wi,tIr- the Co*��nissi oni s reca=endations, as the Council has the power to da: i p City Attorney Prise presented a prepared list of four findlni,s to ,pupp.ort the recoutnendation to, rezone, adding that he does not wish to fsu4.zgest thi mt to the. Commissioa unless they trere considered by those members in favor -of the r t ezonin to iti-C. 'Sate reasons furnished b Gia Attorney Fr fi .re included g y y Y Y> ii;e , following: � l i r 1) That it is parr of the Over-all zoning plan ai t. City aa. Chico to rovide commercial areas. at locatio:x� most convenient pneighborhood to the neighborhood ., 2) That ak, commercial busines�l has been ,conducted a� r�a..,d loc+�rion for over 35 years last past, �f„ the samlr character do that de; -,fired to n be coni»inuerl' } S) That as indicated by a large number of householft�� in turf community, ! the continuation of such business at said locatioct°,pias deiable and communit. ngcessary for the best interests of the immediate/ 4 That there has been a dofinite chance in the neteek,borhoo since the oxig;ivai zoning; Ordin�xt'ce was adopted in 193v, because of the osis yw 4 traffic provided on Bights Stroet and on Tine Stroott and that in order to roxttinue said btt,siness it is nedtosary for the owner to redesign and relocate tho business improvemoots upon the subject property, in Order to continue to provide service to the community, and that further, the area is no longer a typidl residential area bowcon Rtod Street and the nearest business area Chaatirr= Puller stated its 4.p his recoliectiott that lthoaa who votod in favor Of roworaing to U -C vgra: Coit t as3aners Nittoo, Sberran and himsa'1f. City plannor Glover 'repli.e4 that Chairn;an Bullor is Correa. C isaiontrs Z ai.rotan Vul,lor st4ted his uo4'mrstaudin that the three �i ,ithea ,butt nontiondd t,bst Or sot forth in writing tboi,r-a0h.-i 4i for this it Attorney prito tepli td that the thrdei,+»o i�oi`�+mens should state t'ba .crounds they 1'nanr to use to st--° ort their recut menda4on, eddio , that they ma use thost which he W, s w ;fitted os exampl o of-Ovordt rotinds c'h might 'iso used a Ccmmisi-r'.bnct 41.sson stated duct he had offered the dtig nal motion to rerone the tax c 1z`,S, anti he said he feels tha.t;: i 6 ,A : ,tuber of residgnts in the a ea 'spoke in fav)r of having; the market � tjvk'rb becau,e of t'he number a4 years it had been there and had ; thf m,' and that: �f trho of m.. wrann" C there Sat vould ba a tit to tho x e gbboarltddc ' 2)'Tb �t�C zone goes along with other zoning areas in the City of Chico, � � V, o there are a Put3er oller conteercial a,rets that are ; r!1 %' ;ficial to the now x:�{hbor o vr%i'o are tenable to travel a great distance - i to the marlrats. �� ."here were fete' eo le here gat Y the ubi,ic hearin to s• { + ;p p p 4d p@dy,C againsiw`� it, and the zonings will maintain good. "will with the neighbors in the. rea.� (D Y Commzs�ituer Sharman stated that his reasons byt fgvozing the rezoning conform,., to items, Jius►b.x; 3, and of the. City Attgrtq',ey! s mems: lie stated further r. y that "he :els'Iit istt good area for a market. ''' He stated he was itrp�essed b ah the Awmbct of people who spoke in favor %f harririg the market remain,: and for allowing the applicant, qtr. Behr, to unddrtakd the exparikc,n he desires q which toot"A necessitate I change in zone. Coi,�4;issioner Sherman stated that j` the foU#4L item on the City At:torneyt s list a]:so applies, and that it is a part of t „ over-all robing plan of the City to provide local neigh' oihood aa,, areas.,, 0 ;<! Chairti6l t" c�H,y stated that if Commissioners Nisson,'and tierntan axe in agreestent,} the reapo:lW sE=t forth in the City .Attorney's memo could be: i:orwardeaU to the City Counr;i' ` as the reasons for the: recotraaend;'don to rezone from R-3 to N -C. Ilith the `k, at6urrendt of Combissioners Mason tjind Shgt�han ' Chaitman Vullar, directed c,txat jthe`ti=cindings be forwarded Co t .+ City Council. 1" REZONING ,' .51,,;CITY :I:AM111C COWUSSION), ", 0 RE, ZONE VARIQUS PROPERTIES MhONG E ` yi STIMT AND t. 9TH STMT ANO `VICINITY (REFEI2REA BY CtTX COUt3CxL P a, Poll REVORTI ;tit; Gil,, Z)I'E AT E, $Tei AND PAMLET;C STRMTS) t Chairman Z�:"al a stated ttt�t: Rezoning ilio, 51,, ha& included. the rezoning of. a number of along E. 8th and H. 91th Streets,` dud that the Council hits requested Commission to state in detail the reasons for_,recommending the a rezortin o, f),no ot these propext3.es from 'H -C Ni.ghwr_7 Commei _ ial to 0-1 n Rott•rictrd Chairman puller stated the property in question is located a.as 'pie southeast corner of t. Sth and Bartlett Streets. k City Plartt)O, Glover. read a report to the Planning Commission from the Zoning »' and Pcrmit v CotWi.ttee, dated ,november 9, 1964, which report `a.nc oder the following tiatettents of the Cc+mmittee: 4) Tine Zoning and Permits Committee met ow Novembor J, 1064, to review acltiio3l of the, Commission relative to `Rezoning No,;,,��l.o' and ill thi€t 1 re ?,eat. the Cotrstiittee subbtits the following commentsz r ', On May 5, 1964, tha Planning; Comroi,spion approved '"in, principle11 t a t;ug es ted rezoning plan for the and 9th Stre6t avoa, w1lich 1pldn included a limited area for commercial uses adjacent to the 99E Yreatiay interchar , 1wxing public hearings conducted by the Planning'Cotmt�nsaion on Y,ezoning no. 514 num-tout objections were voiced t' dI,, i:tve to &:ommercial o::pansion along P,, SM. Street and in tl)t vicinity of Woodland Avanue, It should be 'noted that properties on the 'rth side of B. Sth Street in the, vicinity o,f °Bartlett Street ' . band t, rough fret J3. 8th 'Stroot to Oaodlarid ',knee, and frith 13 r ome e ;cep'titins, these pr +p'erti.os fronts upon tVaodla,nd Avenue and face lai.e oll, Park, i o„ Tttc rozdnln,g r1an. arixiett In C opproved in Principle by the r tortrtisoiori ren t ty 5, 1'9(4j faro �osod that the area along 2. 8th and ,9. 9th Sttcat s be reta ne-4 pt$.zartly ffir residO�nti;al and/or profotsiotta;l office development. 'The plata propo-toa corzorcidl areas ooll,t' in the Central ,tausiuens Distritt: to the vcpt and ',;i „n a. limited aroa. to the coat nd, acatt tti tha t u .0 fredy. The »-1 jzona wNproved by the ?I tn:tiinq Co.'tt� Ltsiom,mbt nearly zeet;t tato :egtli.xetaantn fOr A I ftttod ,qo e,t`eial arta adjacent to tha Gram ' c K R � � a Ccmmisi-r'.bnct 41.sson stated duct he had offered the dtig nal motion to rerone the tax c 1z`,S, anti he said he feels tha.t;: i 6 ,A : ,tuber of residgnts in the a ea 'spoke in fav)r of having; the market � tjvk'rb becau,e of t'he number a4 years it had been there and had ; thf m,' and that: �f trho of m.. wrann" C there Sat vould ba a tit to tho x e gbboarltddc ' 2)'Tb �t�C zone goes along with other zoning areas in the City of Chico, � � V, o there are a Put3er oller conteercial a,rets that are ; r!1 %' ;ficial to the now x:�{hbor o vr%i'o are tenable to travel a great distance - i to the marlrats. �� ."here were fete' eo le here gat Y the ubi,ic hearin to s• { + ;p p p 4d p@dy,C againsiw`� it, and the zonings will maintain good. "will with the neighbors in the. rea.� (D Y Commzs�ituer Sharman stated that his reasons byt fgvozing the rezoning conform,., to items, Jius►b.x; 3, and of the. City Attgrtq',ey! s mems: lie stated further r. y that "he :els'Iit istt good area for a market. ''' He stated he was itrp�essed b ah the Awmbct of people who spoke in favor %f harririg the market remain,: and for allowing the applicant, qtr. Behr, to unddrtakd the exparikc,n he desires q which toot"A necessitate I change in zone. Coi,�4;issioner Sherman stated that j` the foU#4L item on the City At:torneyt s list a]:so applies, and that it is a part of t „ over-all robing plan of the City to provide local neigh' oihood aa,, areas.,, 0 ;<! Chairti6l t" c�H,y stated that if Commissioners Nisson,'and tierntan axe in agreestent,} the reapo:lW sE=t forth in the City .Attorney's memo could be: i:orwardeaU to the City Counr;i' ` as the reasons for the: recotraaend;'don to rezone from R-3 to N -C. Ilith the `k, at6urrendt of Combissioners Mason tjind Shgt�han ' Chaitman Vullar, directed c,txat jthe`ti=cindings be forwarded Co t .+ City Council. 1" REZONING ,' .51,,;CITY :I:AM111C COWUSSION), ", 0 RE, ZONE VARIQUS PROPERTIES MhONG E ` yi STIMT AND t. 9TH STMT ANO `VICINITY (REFEI2REA BY CtTX COUt3CxL P a, Poll REVORTI ;tit; Gil,, Z)I'E AT E, $Tei AND PAMLET;C STRMTS) t Chairman Z�:"al a stated ttt�t: Rezoning ilio, 51,, ha& included. the rezoning of. a number of along E. 8th and H. 91th Streets,` dud that the Council hits requested Commission to state in detail the reasons for_,recommending the a rezortin o, f),no ot these propext3.es from 'H -C Ni.ghwr_7 Commei _ ial to 0-1 n Rott•rictrd Chairman puller stated the property in question is located a.as 'pie southeast corner of t. Sth and Bartlett Streets. k City Plartt)O, Glover. read a report to the Planning Commission from the Zoning »' and Pcrmit v CotWi.ttee, dated ,november 9, 1964, which report `a.nc oder the following tiatettents of the Cc+mmittee: 4) Tine Zoning and Permits Committee met ow Novembor J, 1064, to review acltiio3l of the, Commission relative to `Rezoning No,;,,��l.o' and ill thi€t 1 re ?,eat. the Cotrstiittee subbtits the following commentsz r ', On May 5, 1964, tha Planning; Comroi,spion approved '"in, principle11 t a t;ug es ted rezoning plan for the and 9th Stre6t avoa, w1lich 1pldn included a limited area for commercial uses adjacent to the 99E Yreatiay interchar , 1wxing public hearings conducted by the Planning'Cotmt�nsaion on Y,ezoning no. 514 num-tout objections were voiced t' dI,, i:tve to &:ommercial o::pansion along P,, SM. Street and in tl)t vicinity of Woodland Avanue, It should be 'noted that properties on the 'rth side of B. Sth Street in the, vicinity o,f °Bartlett Street ' . band t, rough fret J3. 8th 'Stroot to Oaodlarid ',knee, and frith 13 r ome e ;cep'titins, these pr +p'erti.os fronts upon tVaodla,nd Avenue and face lai.e oll, Park, i o„ Tttc rozdnln,g r1an. arixiett In C opproved in Principle by the r tortrtisoiori ren t ty 5, 1'9(4j faro �osod that the area along 2. 8th and ,9. 9th Sttcat s be reta ne-4 pt$.zartly ffir residO�nti;al and/or profotsiotta;l office development. 'The plata propo-toa corzorcidl areas ooll,t' in the Central ,tausiuens Distritt: to the vcpt and ',;i „n a. limited aroa. to the coat nd, acatt tti tha t u .0 fredy. The »-1 jzona wNproved by the ?I tn:tiinq Co.'tt� Ltsiom,mbt nearly zeet;t tato :egtli.xetaantn fOr A I ftttod ,qo e,t`eial arta adjacent to tha Gram ' Sj in addition, to the comments sett forth above, the Committee rds'otmmends to the Comslis, on tliiAt the following additional. remarks be fonta'rded to the City Council 'with respect to the rezoning of property at the southeast corner of 'E, 8th and Bartlett Streets.; 1 a) The use now�git�uat�Vb e7d��yyyyon the property (r,�:xvico station) is per- 1' llittted in �ttIi, ld C-I e, b5. The Ii-C zone Mould permit uses a11owad, in all other commercial zone`";, including the C-2 General Como'tcial zone. Limited retail comma:-ial uses, such as permitted by the 0-1 district,, would be more appropriate for the area under discussion that would the general commercial uses permitted under C-2 zoning, and thus per- mitred byreference under any R-C zone. 60 li--C tonin xe uXators as noir set forth b the Zany c g y ng Ordinance are incomplete, and lack any provisions relative to required off-street parking or off-street loadi.ng,,facilitieaZ' setback suchlsio�'s. or building land structure height limitations. � p the -C zone wou. dbe incompa>ribl6 with surrourad).ng resideniially zoned ptopeit'i&i." i d) zn relation to the land use pattern proposed by the Chico Genera: Plan, and "in relation to .the ,zonlnS plan which was approved in p incipte by the Cowmissi,on. on Xay 5� 54 the reco.mmonded C-1 Limited Commercial zoning would be �; 4aost app,xopriate commercial" ; classification for the property at �, t` southeatst earner of E, 8th:.1 Street and. Bartlett Street. 1� r Chairmen Fuller inquired isinv: member oft the Commission head q- ,aestions regard- ing the rocomaaondationof the. Zonitig a:i d PermILts Committee ComAocioner Burnett inquired as to the location of highway commercial zones Within the City of Chico: City Planner Glover replied that in addition 'tn the property under: dis- cussion, there are two half blocks along the 1,-test nide of the Esplanade, between 5th and 7th Avenues, which are also zoned .ii-C 1Ti.ghway 'Commercial: He stated that these two half blockr,, and the one lot under discussion, are the only prc.perties zoned H-C within the City of Chico. ; Chairman Fouler noted Mr. Jazzes Roth in the audience, and he ; tated that in re-reading the minutes concerning the rezoning of la. 8th and E. 9th Streets, he could not find any indication that Mri Roth had expressed opposition to the change of the zone to C-1 when the matter was before. the Commission. lie asked Mr. Roth, the property owner, if he had changed his feelings on this matter. Me, Roth replied that after reoding the Zoning Ordinance more carefully, he reals his property-should remained H-C Highway Comt, Chairman Puller . Iod if the Comm.ssion may reconsider the rezoning, or if t',d matter was rei?.rred by the Council only for a statement of supporting reasons. In roply, City Planner Glover read as meta;oraodtim from the City Clerk which ctatod that the Council had taken no action pending rdee, pt of a report Er om t.'% Planning Cottstti:ssion as to why the CoMz ission recommended that tine onitl o Jjmes-toth's property at E; kith and Bartlett Streets be .changed from 'hi:,�;hlaay cotmtezciaal to restricted commercial. The rtmorandum also iftdi- cata l tthat Mr. Roth had told the Council he faaels the zoning designation of high�tay cozaorcial. allows the otiancr a broader use of the "prop, 'ty Citlt ttvrney Price commented that since the ;Council did not request recon, aidcratAk.a of the zoning, it would appear that Mr. 1<oth should 'voice: his Tarty objections lxo might have to the Council, C6=' i ti.oner Selvtstear moved that tlta Cotmintion eccopt the roport of the 20aaing and ro=its Committce�, nand submit the findings set forth therein ,k* the Crunch in support of the recoanr 4t4nied to- onito from '11.0 to 0.1. The motion -vat, socon,ded by Co; issi.o`nter But" tett, and 'teras carried by tete una,ni-=us veto of wall inexibora of the Cmvoission, u r 4 FA REZONING Ivo. 53 (EDIM; S%3'AWSKI), TO REZONE PROPERTY AT 382 t. 4TH STMET rRO-% R P M• TIPLE RLSIDENCE—PROVESSIONIL OFFICE TO C-1 RESTRICTED COM°iERCI;AL (rLFyRRED BY CXTy COUNCIL FOIA ADbITIONAL STUDY): Chairman :Fuller stated that Rezoning No. 53 has been referret`to the Commission fXorr the Council for further study, City Attortidy l tjoo tttited that thit nidttrht has b+~an submit �d to tho tothAsaioa for reconsideration, rind not gust for €i statement of finditigs =� City Planner Glover mead a memorandum from the City Clerk which stated that at �J� the request of Mr, V,;umor, owner of property at 396 D, 4thSti:�et�, the matter ` of rezoning ��the property at 3132. E, 4th Street (which the planning Commission had rocommcrI4dd be toti rezoned) was returned to the Planning Cottr�mission due to the fact that Mr.Lautior withdrew, his objection to the proposed :C-,1 zoning, ' and.''now wants his property included in the zor.kng. Thd memorandumj` stated ti�at 1 a t r.,bacf, to the Plannin Coayni,ssowing�lRhe hearin� i had - returned the entire 1 -t e, the �;Gounca 1 hard condAiated a fteari«r on the matter an followi fnr e heari sing, y g Cit Plattner Glover Also,' the action taken by the Commission oti 3 1 September 14, 1964, to recommend Against the re"op,ing, Ile stated that �hc 5 reasons set forth by the Commission at that: timi o 'llere as follows: a) The rezoning would not �t,Ccomplish the desire of the applicant (to ranstruct a coumerciaL._,b,leildi,ng extetidtog to the !>'cant,propert;x line) unY s's the adjacent property at 396 E. 4thA ree*i i intluded "in the rezoning.; ' b) "The requested rezoning s•�,ould constitute an expansion of the existing - C»1 district into an estAblisf:ed R -P district, whiff«h includes properties atl.otg both s:i.les of Orient Street. Futlthe�, the requested rezoning would represent a departure from the existing z6_61118 pattern of the area, In which the eastorly bounda y of the 6 1 dis- trict is ailianed midway between Flume Street and: r'.;rlent Street, City Planner Glover also noted than during the hoatings" coinducthd by , the Planning Commissions objections to the rezoning :.a:re exprs ssed by Mr, Laumex the ownur of tfie adjacent property at 396 9. 4tb Street, and by Mr. i�atts and Mr. Turner, owners of the two properti,tg on the gouLh side of E. 4th 8tyroct opposite the property conside,t ed fok rezoning,, Commissioner Burnett i.iqu.red if additional public hearings would be necessary, to Which City -Dinner Glower Staten t;ltttt if the proposed rezoning is onla`rged to include Mr.. Laumer's property, the Commission would have to conduct at least two additional 'hearings on the enlarged rezoning, 4 commissioner ;Sherman inquired. if t4he Commission had alx 4y. hdId two g116,lic hearings which included sir. Laumer's property. City Planner 'dlovar st.,ted in reply that ,lair. L�aumer's p7operty bad not been included in the proposed v rczbnit,;g on whish hearingo wera Conducted. C11aitmau Fuller stat,id It t.as his recollection that the Commission discussed the possibility of includiing Mr_ Launitr'M property -ins the ,zaniit, . prior to the tt,t* public 'h; xitg lout 'had decided to i:n,.luda ouly* the appltcant's property, Corn.issi.oner Avowne i�iqu'lred as to hot•, the :o=Assion might consider rezoning rr. Laiunarts property, and Citypl.rannor Glover stated that the:C011mliision could initiatethe mattor or could wait v. tt•i,l Mr. Laumer files -a rezWng nppli,,at'ion. 0.90i.rmati Fuller noted that: Mr, La%,mer was not present at the meeting. n, t~catissi,ot�er Sharman notedt�ti�,t the t,"am�zitysion is now being asIted to reconsider the rezoning of two parcels, A:alc the cot=li,rsion has Just recently reootamended against the rezonitlg of only ont of the p; rcaltt. City Zl.antor Clover, stated tl.e roquest for r4_tomsi4o* ati.on wda t_ -Ida by the Council on the basia Haat oni of the proporty otnttrs who previously objected noxi d°tsi'res to have his propoi�lty it the Vezo'nitig, Got hiss ones Brolwta 'stated tb4t if Iir, Laver feels nXbngly an to hiss r0tonirZ ,of hi.s property}, 'lo r?ay r"Whnit a ,,�-Vn, d appl'icatior At ,any time, t o r it;as*caner Sfia n int hired if fir., Lr nor kind cb eeted to the re -Zoning of yw.I3nnhVa property) to t hi,eh City' M. er Glover to nl i.cd t �?�a rt cs'bjectiou had beets sul=_I :ted gat tans Of t.ha t•.t.o PULlic h�G.,� �vn c stied by the to ninoilo! r S City Attorney Prite stated he feels the Council had 'returned the matter to the Commission 'because the Council felt that the Commissioz -should -have an oppor- tunny t!o xeviet the situation with respect to Mfr. Lacvmer0s apparent change of opininri reeaxcliva the rezoning. t Cost�sissi,ox;er 5ei.vesGc�x stated that he does not Ebel T�.r« Lr�umcx� s more recent ' aa, ted fV a mgtovial. f-4rtor In the romi insionla racommendation against the reta�ttitsg, alnce the bee d retito t Por rccotexnonding 4gainbt the rozdi�atrig is that t it vould be an insZttWA into the reai:dential ivk!a and ' .ould not foft,nW a good pattern; of commercial expansion. I! Co mmissioner is submitted trot-me�o ote Commhested perhaps the ii�sion might a ait ission byM r, Laumer. Commissioner Burnett alto reg a.lsovest suggested the matter be held over until the next ,Tteoting of the Ccjmmission, 1 Chairman .%`oiler stated that 3,f Mr. l;�►umer feels strongly regarding rezoning of his Property to commercial, he could have submitted a rezonitttg application to the Coatmissi.on or he ;should 'have appeared 4t this meeting to personally q request the Commission to in�;;Itiate the rezoning of his` property City Kanner Glcve • state's that in fairness to %I - 'LaUmcr,.. be may have felt: that by appearing a:a befo1:iI e CzLI' ,Council., and my the action of the '.Council in referring the matter back to the Cctmmissian, .he was in effect requesting the x C manission to initiate the .tezo, leg of -is property. Co=issioner Sherman noted :hat the`Commis.siun had previously recommended 1 against the �ezoqing, and he asked if a recommendation against rezoning ik,- 4utoma'}ical,,I,i. submitted to ti*; Council, or if it, only goes to the Council 1 u+oon appaa l,-„,lTn zeph lr, Cxty Pl.abner Glover stated that the recommendation i o the Cot:matsaio. 3.s\forwarded tof the Cit Council for a F i'� � y public hearing {` 1?*ry fthor such reco. endat'it+n is for or against a rezoning. t t,aaissata,or Sherman stated he does not feel that its would be consistent :with the origginal findings of the Ccsmmio cion to now consider enlarging t?ng 1e zoni to inc�udc an additional piece of property, d g S Co isdi.oner 'Musoo stated that he agtees with Commissioner Sherwin, in, that the Commission has forwarded a recommendation to the City Council with supporting reasons, and he staked he .can sae little xearon to now reconsider ca tha basis of a larger area for rozoning t Corm issioner Sherries moved that C ezoning Application yat:ion No, SS be returned:to the. City Council, VI 11 a ``tatemant that the Co, missjon feel $ the rrasons pre vdously stated agai-8t the, rozoniatu. of V,,oparty at iG2 >i. 4tt, Streetw<<uld apply also to any rezoning of thio property and the prapt;xty at 396 g 4tYr Street, The tiot:ion tias seconded by Commissioner Nisson. M Chairodn, Vuiler noted lir. Slvymansl i in the audience,. and ''kAshed X'r, Szymanski for his comments .Prior td .callitlg for a vote 'an tha r it:twaoin< }>tr, Szymanshi ''stated that i an provcment8 are necessary to t;he prop O rties, and thaw IAO proposes to construct n sathstant:ial nate buildi,ng,'� ti*aith adequate off-street parltiut, and at considerable expanse, LtW4 Szymatnstt.i, stat Ad that unless the lj- property is r_=,icd) it voul,d -be difficult f . hip,► to tr ko w;:v i:m-vents to the property, and it would be difxicul '- for him to operatI"is businosa at that loci tion under the present zoning regulations of the t -'P district. * tirr` tt razllor Mhen called for a vote can the Ulotion of Cowmi.s.sioner bhermzxn, Baa r^oticrt t;ras dp�,=vod by the unaani sure 'zmtc of all 'ttez bets of the Commtssiott, s cunt rao.,"# mayj S.ktr mm b -Tin's :T, AND I'zon,aL Amur. 1 aol, 1..1 41M 111-62 TO R-3 C�asi an ru%x.„r st:a;ted than the Platanir{g� Qa=16sion his Conducted ttm public crrirtgc on this rc rain nlatfwrtr> and utast- the trattor . fit rofarred to the 41"oa°a ne, o std Vortoitc Co*, li'f't cin! for Jtudyo City Vl nnor iovcr stc. d 411'at tltc vattiox had boon reviet,�od by the gonitt, a?t"�Ck 1"a its Co rIttee on Vovorawor 50 1964, attd, in a rcport dated Xoverber 9 :tC4* thOt = itt.c:o ttatod that i.te rcvl.�z of t'he tt c Vublic I earitt r i.ndi- ek=d that of tea, 250 r-nr'cels itt thO aarea ptopttsrt4 for tttvniat£t� objections r ze aw r seed w 0,1mut, or! 41 pertel c,, cnd favorobleeo catt~s *rano e�;prested : of 2 parcels, 'Vito Cc °i.tteo report furt1wr inoluded rtho, ,fol:” W(J.it r , comments and recommendations 1) The Chico C. -mer -al Plan indicates "medium high density" residential development as the appropriate land use for the general area, The 4 General Plan, bovever, is a lung range guide to d&=,elopment, and zont`ns decisions crust relate to current laud use;, deai;res of property teased b ��Cral Plan. xa•,nge policies ems, p y L`kt�^ r owners and similar factors as well as tothe long Thi number of properties zoned for single family use in the rout b0est Chico area has leen gradually reducect during the 'past sever'.l ,yearn, ' I through rezoni:,gs to R-3, The Committee ia of the op'inian that any further rezoning to R-3 should preferably include: all of tha xemai.ni g k A-1 titid R-2 properties, since fur~tUor "piecemeal" zoning of indi,'Udual blocks, while in accord wit l- the General Plan, would shrink the A-1 area to such a small size eboxacter would be ditiir exit :to " zoning applications which are .filed by a property` ownar, evenhowever, Commission mus continue to rev'iLiv� and ass upon re y ttiidu lit CaYmrniu d _gh h result, lt, of such consideration may be tur -her, "block -:4y -Bock" rezoning.), j : 9 3) The Committee recommends that 'Rezoning No. 54, as initiat= A by the , Commission, be wlsapprtfved ari,j that e\j"resolution not ret:omnmeoding w rezoning" be adopted and forvraz�dr~d to the City ouYici'1 x Ax final aat• nn, ' . 4 T'he Committee f ioher recommends that, at such;' future time as a stirstantial interest in zezoni g, v. ay be indicated on the part of � property ototwers in the area, the Commission again initiate :a rezoning proposal and conduct Bearings thereon; 1 City Planner Glover also-Ittated that prior to the meeting he had received an additional call. -from fir. Robbins; representitxg property at 1403, Salem Street!, f ri .? speaking in favor of the, xezoning. Chairman. Fuller called for commeat, ttr. J. V. Reynolds, Tacoma, Washington, spoize on bebalf of Janet Perry, trho ovary; property at 1.384 Broadway. Mr. naynolds stated he had spoken to tete City Planner sometime ago regarding the rezoning of the proporty owned by Mrs. Perry, which its known. as .the W 1liamobn property. Mr. Reynolds St:'jted there are several large Homes which, if they are not rezpoed for multiple fatmily use., gill be difficult to sell or to utilize'a.s sii, ale fs mUy residences as: they became older, fir. Reynold! stated many of thobe homer; can be 'nicely remtidcled into apartments, Mr. Reynolds suggested that the Cor;«ftission migYt consider only a small rezoningto R-3 which'gcul,d include the tailliamson property and perhaps other rroperties along Broadway in the vicinity of lath avd l4 th Streets. Air. l'leyno'ids stated he krkows there are �:A hers in the area who aie interested in rezoning, hovievor they may, not baye enpressti 14tei.r opirti.on d`ydng tha public hearings. IN Chairman Fuller k`.tated that the Commission did not get an expression of opinion from all of the otjnary in the area, and he supgosted that perhaps the course of action whi:eli Mi,, Reyttolds should i+ ,:Clow v duld be to su ami" rozoning request on an individual baAio, Chairman Puller advised Mr. Rcynol, .of the procedure for filing; a rezoning?, application. Vollow ng further di.scumsion of the can-,siants submittedi'lby the Zoning atd Permits Committee, Ca mmi; ittnow' Solvaster moved that tt. a report be accepted, cud - that €t "resolution- ttor-�-,,commtending retoninCs' be a4,,►ted and fott:nr;ded: to tltc City Cnurtcil. 4.4 xa.nbl- action. The motion. vias seconded by Comminsionor rrcatme and wag 4pproved by the unattiriirus roe of all mo6bers of the Com.ion I M, $0 ,IiTI *t NO 110� ITlr'.�I�M 7tp.R5uL "`SOW 'NOT IMCO12—M- DING n vvo,4iNoP p. is ov rxVt TW Tim ornm or Tu, PLANNozo COINISS' ON* iaCiN1MA1, BiixLDIVO, C11100i CyALIFORMA., LG I G Pitt M3 (CITY �VL4V' 'VI C(i11gi1S ldlrtVAMOMS ), 1' gONll3C or VARIOUS li li 4 AT7Ci 5 City plannor Mover atatod this, is tete .f'irnt hearing ori the rct ouing of ' property in a;��n r�n�.Mx�n"ion +di:�tric'tttY chai.xzmat't rull,er� declared 010 hearin3 o, cn and slfiod' for a. review and "di&aUstion, p r relative to rbc rezenill,�; for oath of tete, fivo districts sit f 7 „ Rozoni. g Plat N,. 55A. Cobasset Road Annexatio.: Diattidt No, 1. City Planner 51ovar Mated this area, had been pteviousl y consi daVed for rezoning with a .? previoa group of annexations, hor,Tever k d been deletdd £or further study "a xelati c to the zoning of CohaSset Itoad adjacent to tho 99 Pr=,ay. Ile stated the prosent rdiboing propaaAl includes R-1 zoning for �j properties curreptly owned by the Stlte or'Cal,,�fornia, b4ch will. become a portio 0� tho 94%, Vro w��ay{�rry�//�� and SEG} �td+s��ition ��{1�ry��}p��aW��i�!�/d� �1yf�? �� rdoiei~e ro �,h ` P " +' a -0,0ria for property Ott the ad}� old Of Vh V�i 11fA�+�J�ir ��%i�� N'. 'tatS5�oo the Pr�4. , ;a proposed C-I zone foi a po w�'ion of the Richardson Iy�sropk� 1i:y o0�n 4t' "�e o.f Cohasset Road, also immediately west of the ta y a 11o4 Richardson spoke on behol f Of the proposed. C-l., zone for 'hi a ' �,. proper Vy statim he favors the prop ; osel zone. tit. Ricliaxdson stated the g p P k �.aa,� riogt ouxrentl.� br�.,ng considered for t his property fa of the nature , � v , ,p; _i Tua1?Ct ,a3uid fit into a C Zoaie. s; , Aezoninn Plat 'No. 55B. East loth Street Atnexdtit�n Disttidt No. 3. City Planzier Gloverstated tbi.s groposed,rers�ning ttnd a'i.ao bbeti included in a previous p rezoning matter, but been debarred„xox' additional. study, He 1y started the proposed zoning consists of ;'�'sma . 'Area of %t- 3 zortiDg fronting � k OA taut loth Strdet, and ,ati area of zoning f;vonti,03 on East loth Street, i/ ;te note', that during previous heari& s, the entire pr's* e�ty •had been proposed f,= I( for' is-3 but the oxmer`'had appeared during Dine of the L I'- N, cgs' to request t1-1 dor that fronting; P zoning portion oti laatt :lona Street. ,•Y4�'Yurther stated that �the e an euist4,ng auto wrecking yard on, the pror3�';kong loth, street„ `1thore were no comments from the, °dience relative to Re ,,aping No. 55B. ' Plat Ro 55C Linden Street y , Reston%� , Anrte:tatfan District �ca.__1, City P]gannex Cl,aver stated the is a single dot the sAut tw str corner last tl f property .fit of t 9�ln Street and Uiidaen Street, and the xo osod , p p zone 3s it 1, Single Family �Z Resi.d a e. �,, Ne stated :there is a residence on the property, and also a small 1� co--nercal use on the, rear portion of the lotr: facix7g Rant 9th Street. Ito \-' j nddod » ,at if the p. I zone is approved, the co=ercial use 1.7oul d become a , !� nonconl.43:atting use but mtY continue to op'srater'rJ = 7;cre Isere no comments from the audience on this portion of the. rercottine Titzonirs;t Plat 'h-x No. 55D, S61: vay Annexati.on Ristrfct go. 1r. City �1 armor C.Iover staged that m'Qst of the property included i.n''thi.s annexation,t a poxe�ion :of the S°�.r y Park Subdivitioti development,, HC;eviewed tY� l roposed zonin&,.or vtriOtws porti.otis of the anrawation district, which toning"'"iindludes R-1, R+r3, tairm---n- Puller stated that ax po'ttion, af,, �#�e property leaid 'pireviously been; onecl by the aunty; and to hit; 1ztiOtoitsdge the ptoposed zrni.ngunder City rebauIn, tMon6 �-s ,sppea rt a ,mtl t to the zoning wh3tdh. had been adojited by the County. I ; Cit? Pianner Mover {stated t);tat the property which is covared''bv the Sk [iaaw 1",etk Subdivision Unit No. I has been indicated for proposed zonznk in ac;;cixd tzieh the land use E31hmni foi.3 rho property on the t06 a<tfve mapy and also it<;,, i, � ravidus re maty ra.view of the st* division b 0• the Cd. 1) a ;tdtodyt'hat the remaining property which rill be"Atr'luded in unis�tSn. ttni�� a.f�' � y y � h Ptimily the � .ywaa Park Sttbda,visi.o,:t as been proposed for kt,-1 slosle dmily a, _tidewzo' zoning until such t�ma as, a tori'tative subdivision reap is `filed and zoning in aocord �3 th such a snap can be �s,crrhed Out by the s*cise r�r ,.., r;*Lty P aianer Clover :iotod that in adt itiort to the Sayre?ay Park Subdivision VrCper...yf tb� ann"action distri.tw tut des a, strip of land 14'hi,th ,joins the it I-diviolon area to the resent Cit its*whish area Is proposed .for P Y � y �oxai * , and alae a strip aid acent �_ t'::a tiestern Paai,fi:c industrial w1lich if, suggested for M�,! zoning. �� .�� CottLa;dn�tt3 frrxri ��►�, raa;d:i,ni�ice reta�eive �o �� l'I�'t ��,� s5�. t PI rtt , eerc rian i .de . 5'`L` ovrtril� 1 er �'stot(yd thisantic fon cti utrict is t,ite site cif the recently constructed C.,aig i4ali, 'Ohich is 4 doro# ito ► fadil.it. I�c'or' �Chit:o Straee C l xogd stud. tt., t: saa,4 the p�:opgp , � . t�oai" is -5, an - hitt tho proppntt�p is aad j��;ci,tit. to tto aµ��sdMn aite ch hat) laoon in Ona y xt fbr some timet y or.oy.�y�yy�e`a+.r'ty U0 io ot�y onto from 00 audi.tpC6 rolative to tilt pro-V�r1 4 R--'tooiui , N, y f� 1 , chairman Fuller, state that there being no further O=ents on the suggested zovi,ng for sany of k11,e five annazation districts, he would close the public hearing, lie noted' that an additlaual public hearing will, be held during the o December sleeting on eaoh of the five areas. =611 NIG N0, $6 (P� 14 Cp�►WVMtb), TO ZQ PROPERTY 2ETv = Skmm At�NU iaill � la i � rt a r%:l afy SCUT or PAST FXMI AW41 , rRO.-1 811IME iIIJ SVIZ Chairman 'l idler opened tfa seconel public hearing attic astced for a aeview of the rezon slag, City Planixer Glover rend a letter from the Super of s � d0!,?Olo me Schools dts ject,ng to thy" pzopoced rezoning and stating :"hat the of the property in Accor i with 1.1-t present zoning would be more compatpblet frith the school, and tFlould teVd not to increase cc ercial traffic in Ii vicinity of the existing :Hooltr r 0*, Memeritary School.;' City Planner Gloves read the report of the Zoning and. Permits Co=ittee tcliat u-:V'^vnmber 9, 1964, wihich report recommended that the rezoning be dis `pprOVtd and that a "resolution not xecommonding rsznning" he adopted and; ;✓ - t x-srarded to the ,City^ �:ouncil� tae report further set forth the,.Einding of th�� Zoning pe,4 Petmits.''Cottmittee, that the requested rezoning from t-1 to w C- ,could not ,be in i , aiay wi th C cotnprehtansive zoni3ng pl4xn of the City ;, of Chico, and that the proposed rezoning would not be in the 'best interests of the public wel.fnrc ;for the foll.ovang reasons; , 1 l) Zoo rozouing"would not be in accord with th:e land use pattern, ` �( �1 proposed for the general vicinity by the Chico General Plan. . proposed for rezoning has 'bean. ?, Pre,, .,..�y surrounding the site ( developed for residential uses, and is turrently zoned for such use. " 3) This requested C-1 zone would not be coepat ,ble with the adjacent land uses, and in particular would not be ctimpatible with the Ilooker Oats Ll cnefttary School, which is l.orcated 'immediately to the Vast at 3rd Avenue and $berman Avenue, ,. 4)Xt has been the policy of the City planning Co�=ission to reco .l e'nd against co=, orcial de,,ielopment of properties in the vicinity of the requested 0-1 zone, for the purpose of maintaining, the residential character and i;ntogrity of the surrounding neighborhood. 0 Cltatrmata Fuller reco,gni,,+md fir, Ikon A'Fown, reprosenting Mr, Cranford, the applicant for the xezonirg '�( is the Brown property which Mr. isnoted Avenue r� xsaninp si,tuated socr�feetfnortia" of Mux t First,d , ed, ted tha4 on thi.6 basis the Cornissi.o:a may question the proposed zoning. Mr* nrotm stated, hovover, that Ur,. Cratiford does have aft opportunity t-* develop f the property, with one of the uses considered being a lodge hall, and thrtt rafter c'hooking the City ordinance it was determined that such a use would only be permitted under C-1 oni.ng and that the. request hat been subtzai vicinity does not help the residential 'wand owners. t hairmctt F Alar noted that the hobby shop mention,cd by Mr. stokes is situated on the nou'theast c,,,,�ner of t. 5th, Avenue and Sherman .venue, and WAS located t`hore under County zoning regulations sand thW property is not inside the City of Chico. } t'trsC Ddvitl, 1031 Polbe:i t'lwzuto aub>s>ittod ttYS�Pot;itior%s i,- oppm; tion to the rozonlug. Mrs. 'David stated that one petition has about 152 si;natuves and the oce=4 has about 55±9iEn4tures, Nrs David also,sutbmittcd copies of tu70 letters froth out of town property owners: who also object to the rezoning on the basis that the area is now a resirdent,ial, area. Mrs. David ;commented that earlier in discussing rezoning No. 47 the Commission eonoidcred that a small neighbrirhood `)stole would be a convetilence to a . no,i.gbborhood. She added that there is such a store located on iirst'Avenue not ea'�t of the freway, and that it does s& -ie the arta, Etre. David aClde,a,, a �Y'iever, that tho residents would not like to see any additional ,:.�» commercial in the, -,area, sines; the present .s,.,all, commercial area is gtxite satisfactory, Zirs. David preset ►ted to the Commission a map indicating the properties owne by persons in opposition to the reroninE. Mars. Davidalso otated that the nursery school. Ines es;-pressad opposition; to the rezoning, Tnti following persons also spoke in opposition to th,e requested C-1 zone, henerally stating that1 the area it of d resjdeeatial, character and, should remain .zoned residential: Dins. ! E. G4rrifsserej 964 Dicomi .Avenue' ' firs. Lou'i s Bassler,, 879 'East: First Avetatie Mr, Yararell Madsen, 957 East First Avetwe Mro. Offutt" 3 X-Ingston 01,4cle "Irs. Cunlcle, 610 Arbutus G Chairman rulldr asked Dir. Erotan of he lJould care to add l,any further comment, j to which llr. Brown stated be feels he has presented the i7.4quest of the ; applicanA TIere being no further comment from the audience, Chairman �ullec declared the second public hearing closed. C.ommiosioner Sharman Moved that the recoma:endation of the Zoning anti permits Co alittee be accepted, and that a "resolution not xecommandinG, rezoning" be adapted and fonv-arded to the City Council. The rotioxi was atconded by Cornissi.oner Selvester. Commnsi-cner Selvester stated he has some reservation reEardiig the one cor,=ent ron'tained inthe Coma`nittCt report relative to the proposed G-1 zone not beizi cowspatible with the aajacdot school. Commi.asi.oner Burnett stats - she feelsi :the cti4a�ent is appropriate since commercial a ovel+opmetijt is Cnntltrally not desirable near ail, elementary, sohonl, both be 'Ulta of tate types of stores which mi ht be permitted and because of the heavier traf i.c thibh corm-orcial uses would Etarerata. Cotinn osionor Shlawtt s'tIated that: in-ubmitting bin motion, he desires that the co=nOnt tosat k'ihdd in the Cotr.iit tete rzpory ba included, ao he thinks it is relev,nt: to this rezoninC. Co=i: ti oner Sro;,nle atatcd that site also agrees with Cn "issionsar Sherman. Corr iissionttar $elveoter then sta,ttd that hiss 80.0 nd would rata as ori5inally r1adlex to include the entire Corit;tee rcp'oart for accept;anc!n. M.3irri:an puller o.t:ated that lht, toot' beli,ordtraffic and t"E"s the question of tra e atldacont : chool. �ooul.d be a jII ")ole in tW: t a F zoniuG- matter. C0=1orsioaner Solvester i.nquiroa if sir. CravCorci hdd paid tli-a $50.00 applicgtiolt frc, to rhich City1''ldnntt lover ntRltod that the frau head been paid -cwmiutioler selvestor thou ine" iced if the only rcooaa vino of the Commission is to approve or reject the gpIilea ti.ott, to which Oity Manner Mover stated that the Co='i.asicA fray cart -Aider any uonln t;hick is ator'o rostriwctive dawn, C-1, ouch tsa R -t, R-111 or ti»�. Ila stated, 'hoc;oVor, that if the t�r=ioaton feels ehitt o;Gz% other.• zotd chould he eonsidarcd, it may be advicable to conduct an asl<iitic>aai h�a;i vi,ath that jparttdul.ar noa.e specMU'do itlawmath ao the public f rt ;,.siloti a given previously referred. to C_l Zon nG and that perhaps the residents of tate area woult -Iso have opinions to e:tpreoo relative to some other more restrictive zonin;, a C"ttai an Fuller noted that Ur, 4,ovm, xeprecent:i.ng the applicant~, has already Y stated that if the 0»1 aw not acceptable consi.derution of an alternate,,zone such as p* tNuld be Coictuis si dntr Sherman :7� �� "oc�, thy' *',, he dertires to amend his motion to state that the would the C-1 zovie in accord with the request of c the committee, but hold the matter aver fez fttrthtir study as to pass3lble li-3 or 1�_p zoning,* Commissioner Sherman further stated that, there shonld be ac di.ti;anal public hearings so that the: property owners in the area tuigh-t c r7 euprocs their opinion re, atdiuZ any other su,rgested zone. � Commissione,. Brow4e stated she feels the Commission should make zC decision on the. reque's`ted C-1 :one, and fbr-w&d that leci s�bn to the Council._ She ,then � stated if the appli.canb wants ko resubmit an addi.tion€t� application rec�txest%xtg R =3 zoni. , the Cor=izsion would consider a t ,,.at that time. ; , Fol.lowir,.g�s�d4itipnal discussion among eche members of the Commission, C6=10s over Shormao resp ted `Chat her dohi res to revise his moti.or,. to include atep Sante of the comm twkee report �tisafar -as it perttains to the: recommended'" denial of ' 4J ` �, �, If i tde do-1 ?�3tle, ''and. to deny thea C�S,one, but .Co rek% tk:e rexsnisx matter,, bore? f1C comm, cPsxo�n for fu�rt'hes tonsiderat' on some other zone. idler Commis Sherman stl6teed his motion shout1d not include the adoption of - ° a "rep'61ution not recommending xezonitt" to 'e sent to the City, Council, `b sel,vester he ivy%ez zee isle to tl�'e, revised motioin, and that he txould €acon,d sucbll a. revises \6r_ :hat.* 'ammi,gsi"a Brovrh�s eoi reed , yen r the motion noxi bef oho the Cornma ssionr there are :rdAllyItwo parts to the moti ., She stated one could be the datial pf the: requested C-I zone, and the seed park waula b� holding it, owr for xe_�cons ideratign a's to Some dither ;gone, as a note, that if- a commissioner :,.P .Vors' , thedenial off "the 0•-1 zone, but opposes " ��1d xt; over the matter over ,fox is ,Ther s udy, it wouj cl be di:ffioult to v4 *e on the ta6tion as note' wprded. Following further .d.iacussion, Chairmzit; pull* called for a vote,, The motion of Co;tissxcher Shermanwas approved by the011ot.ing vote, ' ff AYES: comm. zssi.oners 90yd;,�Brwno, oxOson, Selvesterj Sherman, and Chaizimar- 'Fuller NOBS: Ca=issi;oner Burnet,; ABSENT; 1Com 34cioners t None ' �sted been Chai.rman fuller stated that t*n.Q re v; C-1 zone has nied %�,* Comntissicin, ftawe^rter the mati.er wot3 ti be contxntted for conffideration_,,pf s� alternate type of zone:: lie. st<t�d the matter would be refertred'-'to 641 zoning, and Permits committeefot -a roco endatiu�t as to wfra.t alternate gone rsf��iald be considered ft7r: isttblic hesrinCs. City nauno:t` Glover athttd tho scatter would ,go to tbo Committee, and tate Ccuuitittee `G'roui'c� re~cdomond an alternatb zona to t'he,"jCommissirrn, at which time the Commiosio t Could accept or taject tl:.at raeoomieodation and teat a public, hearing date it- applicable. Ne stated that the public hearzng voul,d not bo- eheld held.at the rlxe;,tt ineotli * of The Co-.. i.ssion., and tai: property o�cttiera iii tete arta tiould be uotiffled j4hen tlu2 htatinu is to be held. F sovt?ral persons -in tlto auatence requested t6 cowtdnt to further on this matterr. Chairman. Fuller advi.sod the audi.onec that the hear:i.nn Clad beet: closed, and be requested tlie, so* ctasry to tbccl� tie nuti:a t�hich'`had been tatacn to dotermiwd whether the h'ecatiu s:ctualiy had been el,ose,d. Follot"itis a review of the nor esu they sacrotary 'ad,vi'aci:�.=Ch4i»r;,wi , Vull..'or that the hearit,-,, had been closed' Ch4irm t�a l<ullei "-e��tod the Cold sioat vould iotr co,itssidez the UOUt i.tcL on Ij 14 I'.g'at:tNVIX No. 57 (RIGA LL AND STW."M;), TO W3ZOE P13.01 RTY AT 1.273-1275 X51' ` tar-NMUE 1•r.OU R--3 MI TIM, r. SIDEANME PROFL ONAL ODIC TO N -C MIGItl OUZ OOD ` COMXMICTAL, FMST PWLIC Ii1iE-4'INO 1 Ct-,rairman Fuller declared the hearing open and asked fox a review of the rezotxi,ng. City Plannoz Glover stated the request is to rezone property frothing on I tate ii of AwtWo and ltdvitI3 a depot of IN X'oet 1refi R -J? to tIA60. it'a atiftt:ed that✓tete Vzoporty id it-,odiat ely to the tvost of the o-irting sCty, ce at�t4:ion :oared N -C, vhi.ch is "situated at tie southwest; cornu of East First Avenue and ��ial.age ,a'ne • i' Chairman Faller first ached for cotnentc from the applicant orpersons :f€vor in,,, the razotting. There beim; no representative of the applicant; present, Chairmau. Vuller asked for" comments fry those i Ia a ositi.on." � D' -w 11ill .am C iia . ells 1.2259 ]Cast First Avenue stated that he � `p pA � 4 objects strongly` to the ro jscd rezoning, and. he added that here is a considexablP area in � the it tdiato vicinity already zoned h"G which has not been utilized. Dv. Chia elle stated that; in View of the vacant land already zoned IZ�C, he could p , see no reason for axtencting the zoning, Ar. Ghiapcalla stated the property 11 is note zoned. R -P, an that this sho:ald be maintained as a buffer zone between � .F. theSlaoppin center and the residential properties to the west. Dr. Chiapella.:stat:ed that citizens oming residential properties sh�)uld be, given a better opportm,'Aty to be heard. He stated they bought property iia ,good faith ea.-pecting that the residential zoiEx Mould be maintained, and ( " sha, t the or, ,pnt;i obi of the N -C zone t�=Hold be haxmt ul cc lye aced. and to the t I y of Chico', Ur. C4liapella added that he knows of p opert outs�de..t a City who would hesitate to be annexed into ;the City without assuz,' j;nce �,64t the City Plonni-ag Commission Mould maintain their I 11 l antfield Road stated that he agrees with Ar. Chiaptlla �J) . 21x. d'oho, Itenneaiy, ��* , 6 � ansa also stated that the Commissi.ort must protract residential areas Xt;s. ©ffutt,, 3 Itinsaston Circle, also objected to the rezQninaa lir. Jaett Brown, 1193 Xanohester Road, stated that when he built hi home j he teas assured that it was zoNexved as a residential area. He stated his first encounter vith encroachment in the area was with the matter of a 4 bovlin alloy ;several years ago, and then more rocently with the prot,o ed drives -in. Iir. Brom started Iia; opposition to ony change in zoning, And j agreed with the st:atcittonts mads! .by Dr. Chiapellla, Mr,. Bt+ovin also stAted he j is disturbed by the prcvL,aus action of the Commission iia not alloviatt further l con-smeaat from the opposition on the basis of the technality that a public I hearing had been closed. " remarked that elative to Mr Brown's last statement, the public Ch.�irrt�.n 1au11cr ramar4 eel r r t heaxin�on the picovi.ous matter had beet, conducted on the basis of the appl.i.ca ii tion for C»1 zoning. Ile stated that since the nlajoxity of the Commission did ,y not approve of the C-1 zoning; yet felt; t4tat there. should be additional consider- ation for snze other typo � r _ � , that the Coivtissioould hold additional yp e of zone, :t w hati rir-t and that such. hcarirk�s tra+alrl'bt ad*acrtined- Chairman Fuller staged t his ac"�iot: trzas not a t>^*ter of cutting anyone off, bL+t itorely a question of t s .idles tri,sn a re -,Aced zoning ha been I 4rolcrin�� such ..ommcaat �at'"il a fort='tier iieaa.i.r� Chairamr, Vullor also romarkod that the Contillesion hat to alternative but, to hold. � pW)1rt, hear ings ou -the xoqueots of any property otifier ,"'�r rezoning once the propor'ty ovnor had filed t;'tte dpplioablo r0toning fee. Uo stated that such 7 tappli.catiesns tray cootitue to be Mod by va��ious pro+)orty ottnors, and that � the cc=isniotl cannot refuse to bold hearings on the ae o pl.icetiona. a} ,�4ru4 M. David.,$ 1031 tblben A mut, teat—ed the also objotta to thi.tt rezon4 � for the 134ma teason t;liat scar has gab jeetod to tbe5 preVious rexoni.nps, Octroa rain; �boirls i Fraat #phd are slJol?t. l rc^wairt i.trcdenti44 . to tyhc+. ern ent y in opposititao to the rczouiitg yore oefeted by the foll.oving 1` �a l�+iwrao�ts. lr. 4leraaltt 5to°yes, 023 She zn Avtaua' 4;lrs. A. V. Carr nsereo 964 Mcmi � lar. `ouis as�ler� X33 mast 1'art�t �.vanue ; f ext. 1'at siell ;ta tn¢ ttx 957 rest vi,rwt Ave'nut i 1 1 sir, R. `. 13ci+,t ley, 1192 Mancho-vter Road, stated his concerts is that in so irony cities when. t ravt lin from one area to another one must use otreet~s vhich have become clogged wltla so vice. ota.tion,s and drive-ins and gaudy electrical si..t,,nc. iirk Bentley urSed that t-Ali,co koo-p streets such as East First Avenue as residential boulevards between c ne &,eq and another, and not allow them to become cluttered with, co nercial uses and Signs. tit, zetat le". 4&rthar 'Itned Ont the C in lt3aJon would hnvo to hold 'W141. t h000 oommorcidl atons that attempt to Opting ttp, atrati.ttg trigs it is voz°y onoy for one td argue that beeau o there is a dormotcial use next door why not extend the co mrcial .1reaa one lot:.. lie stated that this viould continue along the length of a street:. Mr. Bentley sta.tod ivo need commercial areas 'or shopping renters, but ve should be very careful about 4eVel'oping streets that are lined with commercial uses. ;R Chairnrat'r Fuller ingztir:ed of :Mr, Bentley if he realizes that the lots Are, currently zoned professional, and ki' at professional offices could be i'oitstructed there. 4r. Bentley stated that he understands this, but that to further ciiang,e the zoni%r to covpercial would be a step in the wrong, direction. Chairman F'ullgr inquired if sherd.. were any further cons, ent: and there being none, he declared the„ public hearing closed. Chat ' an "Viul,l,cr stated a second public heari.ng'w4uld be conducted during t:. le next regulattr meeting of the _ q Commissiom,,on l�ecember 14, 1964i, StE?.oMNIG 10. 53 (RATTO PEMAM A13D CAIi tt):9.r,: RE-ONE P1dol'WY Oil 'PIS VOM 'SIDE OV Z&ST r1RST A !V a'' U , BE'lIMEIN Dowl,110 „At u` M1L M011 AVENUS, FROIs 11-3 . 1iULTIl P, Fri:may RESIDENCE. TO R-P 't`lilLTTPL>✓ RESIDENCE-P17ox 5ibNATa .Oi`FTCE, FIRST 210BhlC H AE, NC; C3a.i.rman Fuller declarred the hcuirig open and asked fora review oi- she atppli oati.on,, u_ r City P'laranor Glover stated the area coi(*:red by the applicati6n it the .property along the north side of East Rust Aveoue betwaen Neal Dow and Downing Avenues,, extending from First Avenue northerly to the edge of the Neal„ Dow. School property, fie added that the entire property is now zoned R-3, 4.,d rhe request is for R; P zot0ift in, oder to permit' the construction of a professional offa�ca devo lopment on the pro,party. lwx. Bruce Grinnell tpolcc vxr behalf of the application, stating that: the only chaose t•7hich would result from the requested zoning, would be that a professional t f�-ice might be allotiaed its addition to any of the uses which would be allooed under the present zoning. Mr. Grinnell exhibited preliminary plans of the proposed office facility) stating that there taould be no neon signs or, other rndenirable featurea. Ile (aid the tentative plans call for the off-street parking area to be on the northern part of the property:, with tl c building fronting along First Avanue. Ila further stared that the property w tl.d be, tomplettly developed, includin7.. tuxbt ;, g-utters, and drainage facilities . x4r. Grinnell ocard the propo ed buildin:S t4i'll be a erne-story building of ranch type construction wihich will blend into the ;area,, Chzai.rman rul'ler asked for cor=czrt from the audience. _ Dr. Crj .apella stated to M.u.1irman Vul,ler that he t"rould l'.ke to know if X&. Grim( ll Vould care to state dofinit:oly that he has no anti vtipat•i,an of over devt:lopita arty portion of this property for a cop.racrcial wine. At the request of Chnitmin Fuller, IWAr. Orinaiell replied tbat theca was no intention to put any dot—marcial user an the property. Mr. Gri ntol.'l. further stated that- at sorts futura (late they umuld hope to t:on8ttect apartmetrt a across the rutthittly (' portion of the protterty►, udjacettt tot;l e school property limy or perhaps alelrr�nc»i ng upon the hued for additional, oftictak (could cortcttuct an a:'di,ti.onal Offi..:a lability on that portion of the property. Mr, aobn Ronnedy, 1156 l ontfield ROLA, stated he ' i.s irk Eavor of the oppli.ca.tiorl ns rte dooc not: fecl that a lrrofeaviona'l ofs iyce, devel,opc- int vrould be arty ,more objcctaona:ble than aoartna, ,': vthich av,* tmv permitted b, the R-S zoning. Commissioner �SharvAn inquired if the bui.lditi�a in a it dish#ci~ ani ;ht he score t.n an erre atox . to vhicb Cw.ai"rman Fuller replied that the hci,,,ht litrit» itr the r�-3 di. trict lm-4 �C T!ect, mnd tho, hclght limit in It-V,is -z1to 50 poet. Ciaai,rmt. Full.ar futzlun stated that kor a prorep,Aitrrt*1 offito, the ci,t'a Platt and builtli:tt plant ctoul'd roquire d uaic per,:tit and troul.d requiro approvt'by the pl=raaix C=n11t00i.0u., 1Ir. a orral�d t(tx�es, l Ch(± ane •en:ac sta;:ed that; Onto the area ire rezoned h l'� the zrerttr request vould be to fo one step further to 11-C zoning, Mr. qua occur in Stoll to st4tod the zoning from rasidential to corradlorcial, could/various stzffes, anti lie objected to the proposed R -I? zone, Mr, Stokcs salsa stated he feels such a 4,:rt-elop.,,ent would increase the traffic on the adjacent streets leading to the. V0,11 Dow sc" 101, lira. Prances TKIliou, 1041 Aovning Avenue, stared her opposition to the rezon- irg,, slie indicated liar feeling that the provo0ed W;a Mould only encourage the ad -wince of other budinconea ft trims artm, lair , TarxelX lis d,en, 557 Fast: First Avenue, indicated his objection. for the reason''.that; any move tov'ar4t this tIrpc of development would be a step farther at -my frG% ghat the people ikt the area appear to desire, Mrs. W, , Tyrrell, 1255 Neral Pots,. :presented liar opposi:tioi to the proposed zoning c4arge. 1Sscs. Tea rail stated that insofar as a14mialks, curbs, and gutters are conct:rned, the,$a improvements would be ;required for an apartment , >jAich could be built under the p!casentr zoning firs. tfurrie 1 'kioffmaxx,, 1.51.5 Neal Dov Avenue, stated she opposes the rezoning inasmuch as iAth office buildings on the property, there would be increased traffic all dLrinS the day. Mrs, 7loffmart stated with Apartments, t ho traffic vtould be increased mpstly At 04.00 a.m, and 5«00 p,m. rxr. jita Watts, 1009 hear Dott Avenue, stated the area is residential, and - r; should remain residential, rig. Watts noted ;than only about a year or two ago the same: ownars requested a change from Rx -1 to -3 because the school next to the property would make it bad for sin;le residential development, Ur, Vatts .said there appoars to be no assura co as to ghat will be daveloptd on the propdrty: Chairman Fuller as Ited lir. Grinnell, i s he would care to comment on any of the statements presented in opposition to the rezoning. Mr, Grinnell .stated that stay dcvolopment of the property except 1cr p=ing it As vacant would increase the trdtfi,t: Rd stated that ,even if it were made into a park, there would be somb additional traffic generated over the amount of traffic which it ;generated now by the property when it is vacant, ttcre 'being no ft tthe'Y comment frbm the audience, Chairmen Fuller stated an addi.tianul public heave ng wouldbe held at the neut regular meeting of the Go;i.f~s ion. tS p7N�iMIT�t1JO.. 372t•1TR Vzt�SM (t7yILyL�3ai�.Mp�rS.. YlRLt`�),,,� MQUU'T FOR tuX, {iDkv'T its pl�i;�: . dr-NNI dd NIG R�i/trJ:�aiLISING SIGNS FM AA:,a�i�'dA.«L+ D VSZS- City Planner Glover staked that U&e Perttfi.t No. 372 had previous barn approved to allctr the coast'vuetion Of a motel, rostaa-ant, and 'bar on property at, 701 and 71.5 N ain Street. He stated that at the taits,e the parmi.t was app4,pved, tlic plans indicating th;z proposed fxae st:andltg a,dvartising signs had rot bo -en au6mitt:ed,, and t:hAt sari Ke the Plans and elevations of the proposed signs h37vo 000 1 been prepared, it wottld be necessary to revi,no tho permit to specify ;gray raquiremant;6 for the signs. Citi* planners C" :vet" enad the report of the 2ouinr* and Permits Conimi.ttee dated :over.. Sar 9) 19ia4, which recorrmen,d6d tLat Una Forvtit V0. 372 Revised, an npproved by the city Planning Coruttitssic►n on Auaustz 15, 1964, be i'uxther remised by therat o An ad4itiotial ceanditioli number eight, to rend as frsl cess « free pttuding advcrtisin sigtts, adverti>t xt; linen conducted on property Ott 701 And 715 11aiat Street shall be permitted subject to o=t :ora, VI- o, ,and reuornl dn.alnn, in accord ttit:h the plot entitled rl upplrvr*~a�ntal flat to Accomparty Use. Permit to, .372, Revised,` +Ccr-nfy^ioncr tarnett inquired if tiara tt,a proposOtd si�,rs V«.uld interfere t�itkt talan p;z l,it- area, In reply., ait"yt Planner Glave, st.atacl the signs will be, located batvetn the pazrki g area atd time aidwvlallt, and that if it is foutiad that, the si„ t q trill in any vay- redu6o ,trig. raur nr of spaces ,vhich can be provtdod ou the p:hrkiu lot* the Applictuat tmuld be tequired to Accou.:nt for t,,%Or j� -)paatjs by meant« of An aaddi»ti.owl in -L au paymont e«inch has: been npoci fieri by shepermi<ta At iteras pravioualy oppro'n.d. Trtcto boirt; r4 f'urtber iiolveetssr r'!)v-cel thi t the report of t0�;:mi tee sn atwcc.ptedo aryl that that revirrich to Vca p 4.t 1`.0. $72b hgo ral'I "I'S e to 't h ttf-", to Le c` "Irrovedo :mbjoct to the 4Cot'ditio tp-C="I�ml' eil by Uto Oor niteee. The ctiti.on eras wlcm.K4Qet by t.o iw txi.od er !,herr-n c—ld vow, :pprovQrl %J.." t1to %m anIx"atxn votra of all c:; esu, of t:he Cmntnvinn. d L4 w. USE VEMMIT N0. 43^ ,JAIIMS ROTH), VMQU13ST FOR k0Xt MM— 4-T RE FREE STAIMING ADIT2,RTISINO SIGN rOR PE4,11TTED USE. City Planner Glover stated that this request is similar to the previous vattor reviewed, inasmuch as the plans for the sign were not zjady for review at; the time the use per mi.t to construct a service station a't i3,tintzrccCwas taria.ztalXy approved, lac btixCQt3 that the utter not bom ro-A od by tho. Zc -IAg uC 1 I'trwita Co,=ittoe, but:, Eras boort ro-do sod by the City fl a etxir> Offim 1% toad d Mcmlo�.o>,aduffi from 'the Vltlnn�w Office dated 11ovember 9, •1964, 0hl.ch recommended that Use Permit No, 430i'be revised, said peirmit as revised to be cuib ject to the following conditions 1) All construction and ddvolopment shall be substantially in accord with the plat entitled "Plat toAccompany Use permit No. 430, Reuised " _ ' 2)Landscaping and street tree plantings shall be installed in accord with the recommendations" of the lark Department and the Planning Office. - lit. James Roth stated that he ha ; - nd comments to add to the request a� outlined, and there being no ftirther comments or questions, Comma,ssi.oner Selvester 'moored that the repot 'from the Plawi.na oOffice be accepted and r that 'Use permit No. 430 be rc-%i ed in accord he recommendation and cond°::tions set forth, by ttm pla6ning Office.The motion whs seconded by Commissioner Nisson and Lias approved by the unanimous vote of all, members r of the Commission: TF RD AiV A RtVI129 Q�(!' CHICO,GME AL PLANT FIRST 1'U13LIC I3EARa1�iG; Chairman Fuller stated that the City Council, in adopting the Chico General flan in October of 1561 has specified that the 'Planning Commission shall r annually conduct a public hearing on the Plan to ascertain 11 any changes or modifications are desirable, r y City Planner Glover stated that the hearing had been advertised, and that the hearrin; should inolud',ny comments ,relative to the proposed masker flan , for Chico State .College. He nested that the proposed masted plan indicates Collo-a expansion into areas hick are root sh«urn for college expansion by the Chico General Plan, and world Alto involve the changing of some ox tho major traffictaalys which are pre:ienuly drawn tin the General plan, Chairman ;@"ul.l,or decl a.red the hearing openand asked first for comments from the audience relative, to porLiotis of the General Plan other than 'those relating to Ae Col.le,gr. y Mrs. Cunlcle inquirj�d regarding the site for the City hall, statin; that ,she a; heard that it i}s proposed to be located opposite the recti Fost n-ft can Vatllombroaa Awenue:, City Planner Glover stated that the General plan indicates a Sita aloe; Vallombrosa Avenue opposK tt the -P*rLt Office ce for future development: -as a cultursal center, He added that at one tint this site had bpea ptoposed for a civic confer vhich atould include goVe .;rent«al buildings Nuel, ns the City ladll and County buildings, tbtat that durin . the preparation, of the Chico General Plan, the Coia.sinoiori =•and, Citlr Council had determined that the _ City 11611 vould be moto ; uiitably 'Zocatrd' in the dot�atot-7n area* and that a policy stattmont to thio offect is ix . °,uderl in. the Gonoral, flan as'it in now, g rittco, C ha.', mai Puller recognized Ur. klcarlen Adnms, r-nocuti,vo, Dean, Chico State College, and asked him for any corzont 'ho would care to offer. r Ur. Adams stated be came to the moeting Tr'rF t h 'Che pu pa8 of azzst'toring iftny afar stions v-hick t"aight �riao relativd to the pro" +sed Collego plan. Ito- the re sated theW-th has beer, proovl ".ed to the toard cf Trutrtceo, ana that it is being rwvi eel frith action to �aprove the pl-ta anticipated during December or JP"warjr. Ile stated Rate plan ouL*nttto4 to trate' arustoea is very murk tho sa mne as *.c plan ullich teas proses .>cd to the, by Mr. rcorge p9atNttrizae in Atittjus t *r r, 1 �wn, w Mai:rman Fuller stated that the members of the Commission are familiar -Ath the College master plan. lie added, houevez that the Commission may wish to consider conducting an additional pul-'-ie hearing dealing specifically with the matter of College e;:pansion into ''Ghia Mansion hath -ares: Corw�ttissioner Browne stated there has been " ons d era �7 c unto publicity rnlatwiva to t.ha pVopo,00d Coll ce o expmtsi.ott into the, x410=;Uzi POrk arena) and 64t this tattittat: iku 'bogy M dcurt ed rpt: wrfioroud Medtriut s of botch the PlAwliti Cmrzeoion and thin City Council, Cotmissioner Prow- ° o further stated that the Coxt.jjss'i.on and Council have agreed to the principle of College expansiop:'' into tlt:s axes, ':ai;Jsl could not see the necessity of conducting a public J,,e xr:Ln3 on this sped fio. expansion plan at this Live. I•It;, Damon itoth,stated hr, feels that such a hearing wouldbrad+inncsessary, and he added that he, fecl:s`tertain Haat property otnnexs i;n Matiioaxk are well arare ol! tt e propooed expansion of the College, �:nta ;that area. Comma ssioncr Sharman stated that he is a resident of the XdnatonPark area, and that his first krotAed,ge of ;the proposed expansion, plan was gained through nevspapar and radio reports, and that he was well oatisfied With the coverage at that time. Commissioner Sherman stated hQ feels the Mansion Park residents are well aware of the ptoposed a tpansion 14t., Elliott Johnson, 522 Yao�t "Frances "Willard, st=ated he is 'both a resident vof klnsioti Park and a College faculty member, qtr, Johnson stated the General Plan adopted i.n 1961 i=ncluded ca statement that Mansion Paxk sbi4uld be preserved icor residential uses, yet:,the Commission took oo,st:epo to guarantee this preservation, Xr,Johnson roferred to the panting problems ;n Mansion Parik, stating that the xray it exists now the area dons not resemble a good single family residence area. City Attorney Price ,f;bted that the- coot o � �a �;itz�. on the public streets in the Monsiort ,Park area is not the,,duty, of the 1'l:atniin� Com=is`sion, City .Planner Clover stated that at: thetime the Gene-t:aj flan was first adopted, t4a College was snticipati ig a particular enrollment, and it was anticipated that the expanston of the College to that enrolltiont 'could be accommodated With- out O" pAnd nt;' into the Mansion 'Vark area; 'he furtheradded that. on the basis of aetr anticipated enrollment figures the College in preparing its master V1,N-q has determined i.. ii;,otilFd be xtacossary to expand into the 'Mansion Park area Its :,"4ted that the College requested the City to, re'viev tho propo.,gad master plan;;and that the Commission and Cata'ticil had subrnitLed their recommendations on that, plias on the basis of informotidn currently Available. Dr. Adaars tatlted the procedtire relative to amending t Iia Ceneral Plant. ?:n repl=y, F Chairman Fuller stat=ed that the Cont�ission 11tonducto one or more public hearingt and then tzould submit its recorn.aondati.on to the City Council,'Ile added that the City Council would hien reviowa ;;he recommendations of the Commission, and xri Nr conduct add#ional hearingo, and then Mould amond the Oenrral: Plan by re;tolttiti�axx. '.� �-; Co.tisniatter S1o�ian noted, that the General • `]Plan has not been atTtez r�•�d ;since it tnio adopted in 1961; Chairman Fttllcr stated that Commissioner shrerman p teas ctirxreot, and he further ,stated that earlier dut ir►n this year, the ~ `1 Comnirsion had considered Ncveral revi.siona to the Gcnoral Paan in eonm cti.on t�ith the roquest of the City to the County for adoption of the Plan by,the �;.ktty. Charman Fuller noted that the hoard of Sulaert€isors has not: ta�ert aa'tioti on t%%o• request of the Cit and therefore the Cotzission has not proceeded to retommend,zhd chnngoa on h for=mal basis, Comii.stionor Shorman asked if the Co nissivn coup, chnnga tha General flan tAtboux•t gaiting for County approval, to ..hieI Ciairnt n Culler stated the C©srtrii,aoion and City Council could amend the Pldn without County appro'v x1, hwueacr, the City in 'hopefu=l that- duck ch-- cups as may be necessary to neoure joint dgreement on the Plan betz*enn the City and the County should be trade at tach time as the County zaccepta and approves the Chico General Zion. Comilv4lonor Ilurnttt: quebtionod tho ralatio.,ithip bdtcrocn tltt Contrail Pian std thy" toning within the City, City. Pldmrr Clover otated that the Condtral. ,i'tnn inoi'tated pro orod land uvct in Iendr.41 terms, and dotgt not-aecdsoaril y ,: z � de t t d int `' t. ,n ! it, x'eU ted to a � , t t.,.a.�.t �. � ..ti Iaoutt ri.e�.`. � C� a e R*� �# sa:^zftr of Fact;ora . tncludi.ng catrront land, �uoc, otai,*-44ena orf property ottinern in tho arena oad tOnI.3ax fartor�-, as hell do o re l.at l-nothip to, the land ttoo pattern proposed by the Cameral Plan, ,1 q � m 's Commisnionex Browne suggested that the planning office reviet4 the various actions of the City in zoning during the past sovor4l yea.rr>, to sea if any changes rmight: be desirable to the General' Slain in that respect. CityPjannar Glover -stated it Mould be necansary for the Planning Office to prepare a map indicating propoued x visions to the General Plan, as wellas t;o p p pro'ponod rev£,7ionira in title 't0Xt of the PIM Fro Qkatcd that the C Millon Aduld doodut dit Addidolid ptt%�� aa��tl� frh�tt �h�� have i3, an prdpa.r+ed, so that the public may h&vri the cpptsxt:uAtty to cormloot on s�eific changes. x Q Mr.\\Bcth suggested that the Comnussion consider �actini\nti the modification of tba.Gen,ral Plan relative to College expansion. at- �J `acting, and rronsider n moda i:jcat ons to the Plan in other respects at auD�� x .. neetingw, in order to ox c�ldr official app o rad. of the Colles a �naster- Chairman ' ull.ee stated it Taould be difficult for,/the Commt6sion to take such action at this meeting eince a. specific proposal for' modifying the Gtrnexal Plan has not been dtafted, lie stated this matter could be taieen up by the Commission at an adjourned meeting, or at the next regular greeting of,,,the Commission* Commi.saioner Sherman asked Dr. Adams if the Board of Trustees is anticipating � immediate action by the Commission to formai .y emend the General Plan,,,.,, In reply, Br. !dams suited that the letters submi::tte6 by the City to�tho tlolloge ' F indicated that action woul4l, be token during October or Xovember, 41�d he> stated that the Vrusteos tjould appreciate: formal modification of M\ VAn at \ an early date. ' ;, Belloring ddditional discussion relative to the procedrtro for amondi.ng,\the i _ k )?Ian, members of ^the Co=Assion agreed that the �t<ter co�zld bo Coll - General sidered further at an adjourned meeting to be held on a esday, November 24 1964,' 2.pCi, }?.� Cha.ir ian Fuller irequested tho City Vlann g Office to prepaze a revised General Pl on trap and to prepare proposed rovisions in the.:General plan text for roviaxa and for action by the Commission at that time. There being r.o further cowment' Chairman. Buller declared the public heaxirmg closed. CbiNTX PLAMINGr MWSSION 'UMMSI: + Gormitsioner Sherman revir-wed matters 001 pending before, the Butte l:orittty' PlanningCam, iss, n ralat ve to the Chico a'-04 A.DJOUMR1.8ENT', Thera, being no further business, "! s, the meets _`�1�6�ng asatd��0anpati.yin tkte Chairman at 111t20 P.T-% until, Jas. V y, �o�,4arn�-:�t , , Cimambcrs of the Muga cipal, ZuilOing. -< Chai rmais Strre teary r ,t _ s Il Ck1Co, MON w4slitubQr, 9 1964 _. r . � APPROVAL OP '� , . Regular $6e!tinjj�tember 14, 1, 964 Speail Meeting =obdr, 51 196%+ Q ZONING Ate' RiZoNtRia ,3 ATr tl Resoniog Nod 47' (WW"l 'OPhO tv reaopte,pro ti . , -lmig East Eighth Stroot, ' f�etweeri '01ive n PiA a Stteeta fromia, Multi�`lee Family Reialdonce to C-# "(�,�t3' clarifiegCioza Re�str,i }ed ocismercial, Pref rrod b CauxtiG3�� for of. Iixadi a) _ a oni~ng Noy 51 CCity P,1a" ng comi"ion) t res�orae various p dpesties ai ung east 4th, Stti het -dud fast 9��' Stscect azsd vtcin�.ty. �j�eferrQd by. City Co it fir reqogt re .0 1 o at I��aNt 8th aztd°BattQtt B�xe+ata� C1� Rezoning too 53 (EdwinSs�ysa#a1t� to a property' at 382a$i4 4tra SC` 1�►P to �C eatr!�ted �:ozmarc het ia9. , . yM{uta�EtpXeR�r,f Inc+-�'ro{ee.lio��y�.o, �yotra, s?�Referred y�� alit 4Y�is:�'J.b.4 i�4l�i.i:�i�i $ W�'r, ., ! eei sCit G�i�li lining4VJeri��:7��. �1:�1 i�i��io��.� �ia��ous prOpert 4y Rera�oing i N . ( y S gy long; " .� _ v South. roaci�r�►y, sel« �►treet, and lion i Avenue frprQ $-1 and R:-2 to R-3 n�lir3 .1@ family, re:sidenco, DIS SION- (5.) Retoduk W. 55 (City_' Planning Gommiesion) reton*ng of varitsus' annexat3 xram wuno�.ofaft$d to var�otsa dlitrfotsw r"i-R;s �►I,TC , {6 .e cinfAg Arca. $fi Fzsntl�s M ` ir2�d��uzd) to rezone prdpe�rty,; be�crean Sher�aj Ave'�itae Avenue, from R4 atxd Sheridan Aveaueo gette�'ally south of B aj;t 5th s xatjie family rts�idegce to C-1 restiridted `eosmmercial„ SECOND 5131►1C %n ti � te�onni g No (High* & Strange' to rezone property at _ 1273 �- Lei Earist in Elvenue from R-P ,multiple reoidencewprofeassional office to 9-0) eighbor- ood, coMierc . T. MST MLIC HFAkING6 _ �g R an ng No 5g WWatt Pecldxam,iu Criftell) to rezone property sit tho. nein th side o€ Eadt Pitcst Av nuoo 'betwo-en D sing z�nd ' e€tl l?cr�i Avenue, from R multiple fame iy raesid'o- eob to .R«$ muj ti,ple residonce-pro fessional office. IRS2` PUATC d+u'k;dA u 'VoI*� tyb'e p1erCStt1 a1z Revised- (WLllistn 3'. rirtw) reques for anend�uent re &0-0 t. ttand ad rtisihj% tago, for permittcd uses* (0),trto permit Mia* 436 (jami is Roth) taquetitt to fred standing IJ ;. S„ sigA: forprat;Cta Vie,, 1 d u�► r svle�a of "Chico Oenertal kiavio MST POWC Itat0do 42). to P1a. $ + ; sitt rs ttun� Coatity (for Mien -.v,2, pl�nnln � C«.ie n cmmd .�-..._�....,e,i ..or.F 3�iOMM4 xUax R fe nP J �,ef�is 1.= I LANNEA OCT x;l PLA NING TECH, SP CS►�3. aG C 7;:',�ixCsl4ltl nth 1'lir`G $ECRErARX 5aptettbe.r 11, 1.964 a QROV ILLE, CAL IF..., WNO(;$APHER ML TO i, MM; , The appcial c ting of, the Chico Oicy Planning Cb%Ti .ssion was called: to order. V by Citaiemax► Vul.ler at 8:10 A.tff, in the Council Chambers of the Municipal H t Building, with ,the following in atteudancos' Commissi.oncrs Brotine, Burnett, 1dis to% selv'ester, She"na and Chairman, xtzllez= City .planner Cl 16 or " 4 i3oyd wa 1 obse:nt. CGiirC(ki�uiVl�F,'ter 77 C.it�y Planter:ovor stOted that th,a "honing and -rnits Cot aitt:ee hart met on. ^ V. dnesday 5r pt ember 5'i 1964, to 4,,a,in reviao the proposed Xastar ,plan for the Chico State College cwmput x a� ;4ubtni;t tad by err. George• itocitrise, consulting. j !� architect: foi: the colltSe plan, He ,added: that the, purpose: of this special "Mootiog is to reviov the coutg6 plan and to take action on several t;ecommonda- tions Jt6m the Zoning and permits Conn t:tee rtlatiVo to that: pld4, iti order to tubzi�it the recontmandatiot s of trite' Pl,annin- Commission to the City Council prior to the Counci.� meet' g, to be held cit Septra ser �5, 1.964 Cit Planner Glover said the zoning ' • y And permits CormryitL-ee :had ravievjed the plan, 14ith! particular eecphasi.s on those aspects of tfie,, plan which 'Vary from �i t. the Chico General Plan. as now adopted. Rd explainod that the proposed Co17e?ge ' Master plan varies from the Chico General; V164 t thivae 3 ea$, these Cbeing . the proposed expansion into the liansiorc tyar�.residential: area, t:h� p posed wt closing of Wiest 1gd atr6n and minor vhangf,to in the ali.gnmetit of, Warner Stroet t and :ivy Street. !!a futtrizar staled that t:ha 'proposed campus plant anticipates an ultimate enrollment of 10,000 students (full -tine bquivalet�t) rather there A 3 Co students rahich was the esti,�rtated enrollment figure ?t the time. the Rico General Plan was prepared. 144 also added; that Cha proposed, plan is 'based upon providing oto-cG arpus 4housi'z3g fop !40 percent of the st ttden't;s, vllove€ts at: the time the Chico GotiozAl pldh was prepared A, figure of 10 percent to 20 percent bad been anticipated for on -campus %casing+ :lie fart>hor ,staterl that the proposed plan calls for a campus of 168 aoree., rather than a campus of 134 tures as envisioned by the Chico trerrera:I "Plan. had rPlanter Glover stated t ate' � Permit 6 Cammit�ee on dept eMber, gL 1SC•4, r d the 3oning and' t following comments be accepted by the Commission and b; ;u^ forwarded to the City Council in the fora. of �x recotmenda.ticri on the prog000d Master Plan: I) That the propol;ed extension of acadamic and housing facilities � into the rtansir�n Darla area appears necessary and reasonable., and a should be fav-.jrably coosidered. 2) That the hate of California should develop a. reasonable land aeq' Ujtion program in order that property owners might knota vhart acquisition is ,scheduled;' 3) That appropriata steps should be taken to make available to the p rocedure now f , ''utilized b the state College a procedure. for acquisition in circuinStr�ncos of 'hardship r' * tihich would be similar to the K Division ;of iii9liva +s, Yriztcipid$ traffic should be routed around rather than through the campus area, vibile at the same time the requirements of city wide circulation and accoat to the downtown area must be. considered,. S) That the closing of 'Wost 24d b"t:roet to through traffic appoart agreeable, provided that. A) Detailed traffic studies indicate tho street* U not< necessary for cress to the dovntotan area, and the closing would confoxm .to d a comprehertsi:ve Central Dusineas bistr pn; triclaorad yF b) other streets to the south of the expansion arta are adequate to accommodate the addttiwonai Inst*-gest trAffic tshich Vould result ,�rorn Z+he eipai,zt� �� ttd �tre`t That rho propor,61 of the aster plan to ,shift "toajor north -sough' yr°a fftc fr0j4 jvy Street l to Chetry Stitrtdt« attd/or 'Orange street), nnecting tiji.tdh the ro posed ra'l+acati.on of t&rn v street: alori the westerly sada of thee carttpus, is ��#aoabloy a , Prat ho Cor isoiortt. '�jill totta appropri.ato taction to m6dify tine Ch i�co Oonatal pl tttjt ptzt out ,int to toquj :ad, pu`,lit hoot it�ta, to int~lttde irrich +�hnn 06 at tu,.y bo nocoa ra to ttccovi lash the expansiot`i of the i11e moµ .maga �..... �ri� ,::.r.ru. w -y. .r: , .... _+r..w sa.,.-... _ % � .alk—=-,.. r ±w,.i ..l A%-. z...:t-:. ..b_e •---'_-- ,.. .. m,.::c...�at,::.'<.rri+M. Oa3n } �t3rt'AX * err d Additio4i. l discussion lotjed concerning the proposed college plana, and the recd=ondat,:ons of the Zoning and permits Committee, In reply to a questipb, Iron CommIssidner Sharman, City Planner Glover otated that the actiti;t of the C:ommi.csion would constitute a recommendt- ti.on to the .City Council, and that the City Council wad submit its w recomnendf#tion to the appropriate of is-ials. He added that , the proposed plan twill tie presented to the Board of Trustees of the- he California California State Colleges fo>^ r*:fez" roavies and approval. Follw-tI.ng, further discussion, Chairman Fuller stated that the 'n`k' T" tb m�. *, received the recommendation of the coning and Per- mi'ts� mitte�„ and has discussed the proposed Colxeg�, Plan otk r ,neve rat ,pa s in detail., and that a motion would big, in order.'' S Coz.ssidner IV.e�tez- moved that the recommendations a14dcomments of the Zoning knd Permits r-'- 4.t4ea be accepted; and th4t a report' he forciaried t Chico Ly - ,fl sattitg forth these .9 recommendations ad`'the revemmendatioiis of the ,C C tannin Commissnon. 'Me motion: was seconded by Cowmt ssa oner Sherman,and teas approxi d by the unanimous vote of all members present. a the notice of special meeta.t�b..;.ttta�,Z�,Ae`d Chairman Fuller'stated thatc� „r 'all g discus 101,0 and q l the matter o£ the Chico State College Plan for d3scu there bgin no further business the tneetitt, vas ad:�o,rte d at, G 8:20 A. �� Chairman Secretary „ w ii � II i M I. ail 'y l OU TE COUNTY pagg.10 90 REGULAR PLANNING C0101TSSTON 12,ETTNG' QKOVILL5, ZCAL10- August 13, 1964 y {.� CALL TO ORDER; u "Bei r"Cf`� ou�ty `" Ci"or,�ction�T,"2, 3) Planning Commiasian (For l m�tl )` DIRECTOR PLANNEk PLANNING'TECO ' by Chairman IA at: ?130' P.M, in the Council Ch0berd of the �Iunic�pal SECRETARY StENOGRAPh1ER _ dtte�"Oityrz�� Browne ,and The regular meeting of the Chico City, 1114nning Commia:ia by Chairman IA at: ?130' P.M, in the Council Ch0berd of the �Iunic�pal Building, Vith the following in d6tend€tncc; COTA- issfOriers BOyd, Burnett, l9issOn, _ dtte�"Oityrz�� Browne ,and �ab Isherman, City Aorny'Pr 'Price, ofdSecretarySav#tzwersent. Chairman ori scheduled for Monday )(i, ex plamed that r,,his regular meetin was gu g ginaj�ly ',uller August, 10, 19 however, since a quorum was i�5t.present at, tchat titQe, ., evening, Af�4, ' the meeting had been ajijourned unt.�'thi,s date when a quorum of the Commission:,. a9Lsiness, ,,►" could be `present fa;t t�►e purpose of tr.ansscting APPROVAL OF" MINUTES: �m sion had been furrf.1shed with .' Chairman Fuller stated the members of the Cori s copies of the minutes fir the regular meeting of July 13, 196+, and the special meeting of July 20, 1964. He asked if any person in the audience or ,, read,' an member of the Commission desired to have any portion of the any �--,-� requests for a there were any corrections or additions. There.being norequests reading,Chairman Fuller statedthat he .has one it,4 as a,possible correction. \1 lar meeting or the special; Chairman Fuller stated that eier ,+hduring the regJoe N ) meeting, in connection with dIscussioxi, regarding hermit Na. 372 for the f. restat�avas 715tthehe 5Ci n of a motel. arecor�ateadrtOtthe madet hat �he Commission `&i yMCouncil' thata ysofoChico provide off-stzeet parking spaces prior to tt;.o, pa; went of :an in -lieu. fee by q a develop,4r for' such parking. :✓ Commissioner Selvester stated he remembers the subject being discussed, however, does not recall it was 'Committee tUse gofn ' Permit No. j72'her edor-during�one mmissi toreview hCommission meeting held meetings. Commissioner Selve'ter further stated that he had attended a r�icent City Council meeting, and had offered this suggestion to the Council: (''Following additlunal discussion, Chairman Fuller stated the minutes would be pP P d submittdd to the Commission)k without correction., approved as rinted•an .l REZONINO'NO. 51 (CITY PLANNING COMMISSION), TO REWRE vARicus PROPERTIES ALOrG E. 8Tkj S, BEET AND E: 9TH STIIXET AND VICINITY, PUi3 IC HEARING: �i Cha iinat huller opened the putili.c heating on Rezoning No. 51, stating that the hearing :is to be conducted'aa revi$ed rezoning proposal which had been modified by the Pl'inirg Commission on July .13, 1964. 4' , City Planner. Glover stated thea lication was niti`ated b the Planning a Co.mq,r+.soion following interest expressed by several. property owners, and, -� due to the necessity of reroninS several, annexation districts ohich had been annexed to the City of Ct,:iilo duting the previous year. He said the Commission conducted a first 'public bearing on June 8, 1964, on a proposal; to -rezone u large -,lumber of properties along both E. 8th Street and "R. 9th Street, He further stated than o11otdng the first hearing, the Zoning and Permits Committee had reviewwr„d the proposed rezoning and had recommended to t"he Commission I.,hat'the proposed rezoning be modified by deleting A 'number of prop-erties included in the original proposal. He stated that the Committee redommendatie't was accepted by the Commission on July 1,3, '1964, and that this hearing is to be p conducted on the revised rezoning, r City. Planner Glover st6dd that notioes of the hearing verb mailed to property .�.,� owners, pnd,i that noticey" Caere posted in the vicinity of the properties proposed for rezoning,. City Planner Glover :stated that the a.rei`,Along E. 8th Street between ':Olive and ori P,.Ae Streets had,orev�ousl.y been recot�mended to the, City Council for 'rezoning, fi as 4 part of Retooing`'No, 47, which Was the application of Mr. Emil Behr for :ott►ane::oial zoning. ;ie added that these properties woc,ld notbe included in the ” g meeting. ��.� �� this ear � Commissioner N;sa w �1 ik'ed if the City 'Council has discussed the matter of o.. d.n u Rezoning No. 41- as'reques"ted by Ht, Behr, to 'whitic City Planner Glover stated the recommendation of the: Commission, has b",een ssubm:tttOA to the City CouiiciI and a, pUblio htnti.t g has been scheduled for $%tdmber 1} 196140 by the City Councilx R r COPPY {; k -0 -a� ;M. 1- p "rp se of, this nearing i.s to consider the Cocvatissioner . =lveste>• asked if the u �: ., rp=ning for Oji areas shown oil the plat entitled 'Revised Rezoning Plat No. 51" °�itth th^ ei ceptlan of rile property already included in Mr. Behr's rezoning applia' � ' - � cation City Planner Glover stated that CommissionerSelvester is correct. ' 3 from persons in the ,audience, Cht�%ratan Fuller .:Asked,:" ar comm�.tt4, , r Dr,' Charles Felver, x.069 Wobdland Avenue, inquired if this would be the final g y proposed g now stands. Chairman hearing b 'the Commission on thea ro osed rezonin as �.t r Fuller stated 'thatthisis the second hearing, and if the Comission makes no ¢ . i:uwtiter changes or mod ficatr.ans it could 'be the. last. hearing.C1iairman , Puller added hQ, ewer, }real the `Commission could hold addit a onal hearings f d sucq► hear.nds r�2;re deemed neccssa�c . � elver stated 1,t hat he favors the proposed rezoning, as revised by the t � Dr 1 Co. �t!Jssa.on. He statad it repiese�nts the desires of,.a large number ai citizens who shad petitioned against .thn original rezoning proposal, and that the revised proposal generally retains the same zoning as now exi6ts in much of tt,e area alari,Wood'land.Avenue and. 8th Street and E. ,9th street. Dr 'elver further statt'd that the revised proposal shows a considerable concern on the part of (f� the GUmmission for the desires o£ some one hundred'geople who had opposed the original. ,rezoning at the previous hearing. "" 4 Chairmo`n Fuller asked Dr. 'elver if he also is ih agreement 'kith the proposal for p0perty on;, the sbtietx; side of E: 8th Street, at Bartlett `Btreet, to be zonedIn reply, Dr. Felver stated that a pervice station exist.9 on each' cornu, and that these stationf3(will remain rega'��dless of the zoning,. and, that for this reason:Ye has no•-particular objection to the p6posed C-l. zoning'. a Mr. 'Grandon Kellogg, 076 E 9th Street, stated he has no objection to the change in zoning from Pine Street to the a� v ttown' area, Mr. Kellogg added thaii the propo.s,2d rezoning is more in accord,,,," h the swishes ii.f his i'eigitt ..; s "ttisln tate or iginal rezo ing proposal had been. ', persons o' �< Chairman Fuller asked if there are othc:� in the audience in £aver f the rezoning, 4nd hearing no comments he inquired if there are pe7rson.4,' who wish to speak in opposition. ,Again *hearing no comments,:-he inquired ILf the members of the dommission; have any grestions. ,q .y Commissioner Burnett stated ;that a recommendation has ali`oady been"o' 10"Mitted to the City Council in favor.ni commercial zoning for Mr. property at"9ih and Pine, Streets, Commissioner Burnett stated that this„iezoning now being con- sidered by the Commission includes properties in the same vicinity, and that perhaps the Commission might desire to wait until the Council has taken action on the rezoning of Mr. Behr$s.prJperty before acting on this rezoliing matter. Commissione�,8elvester asked if at previous meetings there were objections re-ceived fro> property owners in the area between 9th Scree''.,and the downtown area, 99 which is proposed for t-P zoning. 7r. reply, City Planne�'Glover stated that there was one. objection submitted by a property owner` at the corner of 9th and Pine, streets . , ci”. Kellogg advised the Commission that it 'was his understanding that this p" property j gs the owner is not resent ata, this heairi'n t to the *.ronin hat+re'ver, articularowner does ob er. `. p g. Chairman Fuller noted thateVoxt with R-P zotiirtg, _eny plans for a professional Office would require a use permit And review by the Planning Commission to insure that t the development will be ir, accord with the residential chareeter of the neighborhood. Following additiornl discua ion Commissioner Se7.vester moved that the revised t Rezo'ping No. 51 be approved, 1�and that a resolution be adopted and fti+ar carded to the O�Xco City Council recom,.iending the rezoning; of properties as ,ciovti on the plat entitled 'advised Rezonib$ flat .Now 51." Commissioner $olvoster *toted that his motiot, docs not include the property along Z. 801 Street beoloen Oliv.: and Pine Streets,, which has been previously recommended to the Cou,4cil :Eon rezuni.ng pursuant to Rezoning Application go. 47, ttibmitt;ed by fir. Emil, Behr. The motion was seconded by Comm .ssidner Mason, and was �tpprotred by the unanimous', Grote of all { members present � .. tt � ,',t `tip ��" , "SOLUTION NO 105 JWI'iLED �BS�?�.UI+I�ON i2EC(?�i>•iEN� �k;G IZCZQMPG • � xI,B TX THZ Qxk'ZCB BJP W CITY AIr� 8B AUGUST l,f, '1954, IS P , n YC iiN}F .yv1 �,� � �' �tPY^ .::r -^.. >:.�,,.w �=a r• �, ., r- � w.� � �"cir� -." , �- �r �dCr w � COPY ,,: �., ,..fin: �+ag.i;;;x:,.r•-w.+� k ( o � x� , REZONING, NO. 52 (CITY PLANNING COMMISSION), TO REZONL VARIOUS. PROPERTIES. ANNE'.ED TO THE CITY OF C iICC, SECOND PUELIC HEAR,ING:, ,,City Planner Glover reviewed Rezoning No. 52, which was initiated by the City hanni,ng, Commission to rezone property in eighteen various ana'exation districts from "tJ" Unclassified to various zones as follows , �1r Ntasle o� Atitit�xcttioty $istxi,dt �tr�9t5sed zone 5V)A - Margrove Avenue No. 5 52B Bryant Avenue No 3 R-1 52C,, Mangrove Avenue No. 6 N 52D East lst. Avenai< No. 7R-1 ". 52E Cohasset Road No 1 R-1 & R-P r 52F Chapman Elementary School .., 52G Fair Street. No 1 M-1 52H Citrus; Ave Aue No 1 R-1 `: 521 Sherman Avenue No. 2 guI 52J Citrus Avenue No. 2 R-1 52K E. 20'th Street No, 3 R-3 $2L 71oral Avenue Na: 2 R-1 52M Vallnmbrosa Avenue No 6 ;' R-1 1! 59N liooker Oak Avenue No. 6 R-1 520P. 8th Street No, 6 R 1 Larch Street No, 2 •52P 52Q Filbert Avenue No, 4 R=1 B. 20th Street No, 4 R-3 City Planner Glover stated that a first public hearing had'been conduct,`,' on deleted from July 13, 1964, and that following the hearing, the Commis,--tion had the proposed rezoning the properties ittcludod in the Xa` grove Avenue Annexation Distr'a'ct No S (Plat No. 52A) and propertzt,,q�; inc luded in the East 20th Street Annexation District No. 3 (Plat No. 52K). "Ftt! added that objections to the p,roposed rezoning of properties within these two Annexation districts had'been ` voiced by the respective property owners, Mr,. Tom, Mason and Mr. Geis Biebert. City Planner Glover read correspondence, from Mr. 'Ned Richardson relative too'thc „ .., proposed R-X' zone for property in the Cohasset Road Annexation District No. 1. 4 (Plat No. 52E). Mr. Ttchardson's letter requested the Commission to'consider commercial zoning for his property on Cohasset Road adJ,acent to the 'US99B Freeway. City Planner Glover stated that notices of this hearing had been mailed to the ' P6perty owners and u Cher; that. notices had been posted in the vicinity of all properties ihdlc,,ed in the proposed rezoning. Chairman Fuller aeclated the public hearing open, and asked, for comments from the audience. _. -,Mr. Ned Richardson,statc';that he feels his property is well suited for -' commercial development due to its location; and because it is bounded by the Sacramento N'orthe'rn Railroad, the U999E Freeway, and Cohasset Road, Mr: Richardson added that commercial development on his property would not i:ttterfere with other properti� anti she asked the Commission to consider" favorably his r requesto q qCommissioner Boyd noted that the portion of Mr.. Richard son's property proposed G for zoning is adjacent to the recently construtted Community MQmori.al Hospital, ? and he asked 'Mr. Richardson if he, felt commercial ,development: would be - appropriate at this locations In: reply, .Mr. Richardson stated he anticipates a u high-quality retail, business`s and not 'a mU'nuf:actur;ng activity, lir. Richardson added he does not feel that the t:3ndw;& a retail business would be bothersome to the hospital, tii.th the of the Commissidns Chaixknan '.) fuller stated that the zoning of ,the Cohn _,. et Road Annexation Distxict No, 1 would be deleted from this rezoning applidations and 'would be held over for further study by the Planning Commission. , Mr. Duane, Potaers� tepres`enting the Chico City Schools$ stated that the school. disttict has 'io objection to. the ptopzised Pyr! zone 10k the Chapman School' t in the Chapman El,tmcntary School Annexation,�D isridt No. L (.Plat No, 52F); 01located 1' { l' There being no further com=nts from the audiatee, Cite,li-man kaller' Stated ho would 'cu,`artain a "Motioft 'Commi'ssibter Ni.sson roved that the Cosrtaission apptovr the tdzoninE of the war; ouis annegataon districtt included under Rezoning go, 52 as ropdSO4* with: w.... l� "..74. C£F�Y�� v t ii. 1 4. Y I" the t'.xetptions of the Mangrove Avenue Annexation District No. 5 (Plat No. S A the Cohasset Road Annexation District No. l (Pkat Na 52E�• 2 ), � Street Annexation District Na. 3 (Plat No. 52K), wh;ch sh!tuldnbetderast 20th deferred for further study by the Planning Commission and reconsideration at a later date: Camgtissiartor Nisson further moved that a resolution recommending rezoning to �h adopted and :forwarded to the City Council for final action. The motion was seconded h e y Goeodht z�er uxnett, and was action. by the unanimous vote og a��• metnbars �x��ne , ° RESOLUTION N0. 106, ENTITLED 'in, LuTION RECOMDIENDZNG REZONING,►; ADOPTED AUGUST 13, 19G4,, ZS` ON I'II,E IN TIIE t7�'FZCE OF TIiC CITY PLANNING C%Z1ISSION. % " XEZONING NO. 33 (EDIIIN SMANSK xi, TO REZONE l'ROl'EItT AT 382 E, a R -P MULTIPLE' RESIDENCE -PROFESSIONAL OI'r`'ZCE TO C -i RE$TRZCTEb COMMS STREET F tOM AILING: RCZ4t,, PUJ3L•IC City anner postedlin rheGarearand were alsderned the ap,pr? idatio`n, adding that noticer� were . n mailed to the adjacent property owners: He added that the.Zonlaig and Permits Committee had reviewe", the application and discussed the ,Possible inclusion of One additional lot adjacent to the ,aPPltcant' Pp property, tha`t being the lot at the northeast corner of E,., s Street. He said, hotaeyer, shat the Committee ha%f not requested Orielot be included, r M Chairman iiuller declared the. public, hearing en ati Audience. open asked for comments from `the Mr. Edwin Szymanski, 3g2 E. ' displayed plans to the Cammissi6n indicatingthebuior•of his a PP1,catioxi a- construct on the. i , and he Property the-,re..anin a llan�; which he proposes to g pplication is app,oved. 1�ro err i�f . ro`nt ss.aner Selvester noted that"the P oposed building would be located on tli�, front property line, and i,'e inquired .if such if the adjacent property remains zoned �-p. construction would be permitted that if the cornerins Zn reply, City Manner- Glover stated prapert os in the block on side oft a thesOreett andbthaGtwthed,'*P I �. t � Ppl1 to al]. i Proposed by ;the applicant, wouldna+ 'be,permi.tted, s-c_.ian Commissioner Selvester then noted that if the applicant desires to construct'a building on the front property lind, .tt taould be necessary to obtain rezoning of the property at 382 V. 4th Street and also the ing 396 E. 4th Street. Property on the corner at, i Dir., G: IC. Laurner, 396 E 4th Street, stated that he owns •Cite corner property, laumer said he also intended p petty. NX the question had already bee>~� ranstoeredq 'Mr. Latmter added that h t '? ask a question concerning the setUaeks but: that t to the commercial zoning of the property owncu o tole applicant, the docs not object fro-havecsnMAO eCline sinccstion to a ilding which taould'beyconstructedout but that he does' 'property t towards the, ch a building would tend' to impair the residential,' character of the property,- Mr: Lautner also -statedL that he has no desire ,at this tihid to change the zoning of his r Prop,:=rty to .commercial. Chairman Pulier noted that: at tide.-. coi"nex of E: autcmobile storage lot has A. �� n the p P y' Street, the. y 4th Street ind plume fuller asl.cd the c4rcumst&iVes under vhi.chcthasofence was permitted z line: City Planner Glover 'stated that the fence was s ecif Chairman the use permit for the on the ;property P ied as a e Medcondition of structures insofar as the setbeckai� concetnedUnceOhere all of the antato +�ebe particular block is 11at in •u cottnnercia7 zone, a in I°ir: L&umet inquired if the setback for court propert ad Y ° property would a , y jacemt to residential ,' t Pply on the south side of £tote street oppnsit e the `applicant's „ property. In reply, :Ca[t-0 by -inner Glover s.tattil the sotUitck is only is effort on one side of the street and doer not, apply to prc�n�ties on the o ou pP, ite side of the street;•: unless Properties ralong the oppositG gide of the.. streeare also partially in a cottmtercial zone and � 4 partially it a residential tont Mr. Nelson Watts, 393`E: 4th sit '�cet ta-ed that he trent in his property in order• to remodel tan xis Einghreside�::a substantial tavcst i building fstnil residnre: " d�wiono buLh �asi w � �' D�� C1TE3tt,u stated, he hay �� oboe "' €3 proposed by Dtr: S�zyi,JtYski$ however, it is ls��ssible the e particular sold and there would be lit tle:eont;o1 as Property could be Ioced. on the property: lir. Ida' l stated that he Other oU,j;rat to Lha^uid be raposed eotranerciA! zone. Aron � �w.uF �N-� ... � . F•,Y, _ — :tx•u-r�� nri, � � �, ,rm� .,,,_ `^�"" -- +� n Vitra s . • i ratn� t;u • O 5 i id redotUn his proposed Commisianer,Nissan ask�id Mr. Szymanski if he could building;"in order to co0ply with the 20 foot setback on the property, to which Mr. Szymanski replied he did not .feel he could. redesign ;the building. ` a'- a building o +the ro err at resent, to whi:�Y 'Chairman fuller asked �.;� there is i .g �. P P Y P F '�• ++the Mr. Szymanski a, e, , Mr, szymanslci replied tonere is an older home oe propie,xty. that h�. closites to bu 7d, the now building in kx'�pt: of tho older home, and then pt „ a let ii7';;ictta terdat+e 'the hatne at1d Oti ar9d tha cot mdteidl building towards the zo!ar t af: the xtt, j Chairman'Puller inquired if are additional comments,, to which MrA Watts r' ,thete seated. the t Mr. Tiirner,, who owns propert5 at 381 E 4th Street; is also oppose,' to the rezoning. Chairman Fuller stated khat at least one add tionall public l hearing would be `held,land that Mr,. Turner should. submit his objection either 6 the Planning, Office or to the, Commssion' at the next public hearing, 1� ` (M�r. Szymanski; spoke f rther stating he does not feel his",,:proposed b `riding y would be detrimental, to the area. Y"ir. Szymanski noted tract the, rooming house' while his 'busix3 is f} owned by Mr. Watts could. cause a parking problem in' the area, ,fis and thus would nd1 L a consitlt�tng ;business, and would 'alec," have adequate. parking, �. 1� create, :arch parlting difficulties= ,. Followi tin f'rther discussicsn, Coaimi;ssianer Nissan moved that Use Permit *,��2g be approved Sul ject to the conditions that oXl construction with the; plat entitled "Plat 'to Accompany Use 9POrmittNo. 44290" andnthatlal�n accord n enter az rcnVation of the uiiding shall, be completed within six (6.1 months of the date pf`epproval of T11e. mol ten w48 aoconded by Commiasioner AP y Boyds and wrza a roved b th fo11o. O votwe . AY1s. Commissa.oners«; Boyd, Burnett ktisson tnd Selvestet� NOES: aJommiss`loners«; Fuller AB U.14T. Commission ers« Browne and Sherman` h TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION NAP OF tdC)OI?AE5T gsTAxS :' _y t` Gil y P;tariner Mover reviewed the,proposed T^1oo�t Crest Estates Subdivision, stating that the plans wErZ reviewed ' i previoualq by kl�e City Planning Oiiice and th;e, I7epart�ent of Public works, He stated that the Department Sg of Public Works had" bu ested to the subdiva.der that;- minor realignment of the - proriosed street in the ;subdivision be made, and the developers have submitted 1 a revised plat in accprd iyith this suggestion..., He stated that the proposed subdivision appears ptable and that it complies with the subdivZsion requirements of the City of, The members of the Commiss,iOn revi.eved copies, of 'the proposed subdivision map, �6 and discussed thedevelopmentJTfith :,proposed Nr. `kobert Broom, representing Chic g ssociation, the subdivider of the property. � 'map i t Commissioner 5elvester mQ1, that th(E , tentative of WOOd .Crest: Estates bo`, a , proved with the street: re -alignment ► as sugge3t ed by the director of Public, Iaor1cS. :Ghee motion was seconded byCommiz siw er Boyd , yr,,,:taas approved by the vote �, unanimous of all members pxesZ,26NINC; i PRCIOSEA Alw1END%fENTSt TO ORUiVANCE RELATIVE 'f0 OFT'• -STREET P.ARztxNG E'EQU.xR1fitENTS I+lITHIN,TME Cf�Y OF CHICO, PUBLIC HEARING: City 'Planner G1 Tat reviewed ;3 proposed ordinance amending Se -tion :27.15 of the ot;ing Ordinance 4Q prova d for payments to the City for parkin s*.,.ices which are not provided in accord with the 7,onin Ordinance, g t n He stated that the proposed" ordinance had been drawn up by the City Attorney it, accord wt th the the Planning request of , ; Commijsi,on. q f i y Cit Pl,atricr Glover stated the propo e „ follows,« d amendment would rov`de generally p i, ly as f In -lieu of furnishing tine off-stract panting facilities: required b y .the Zoning Ordinance, the q Y requirements could be satisfied by the payment a rWm of money to the City for each parking space wise provided. required and of other- t3:a The WWunt of the a P ymetlt per ;.tpactti. ,would be determined by the City Coin ;cil by '°resolution, 1 ;wAd it, detercni.ning the aWount, the Council would be requited to consider the cost to Propotty 6vmtrs tdthin vehicle ,exi,sti'. parking districts, in the city for providing- the ex'istin facilities iii those districts, g parking w, C, 'The funds so dt pasited with the City woald be Zt!ta,iued by the City and Used only for the purpose of anquir,fn,g And deuel.oping off-street parking iacili4gts local -ed in the vicinity of the use or uses far t+rhici this in -11 -cu pdYmeittt oras; made. .,, C 'r `.�hQ c.ri-_lipcu deposit could be "returned to an otrner or develo o� p per i£ the.. re Mixed arttitifor which the in -:lieu ; , payment tic made sub3equently i;ould be provided in accord tzith the Ordiranco, beforo the iv*l.iett fttt�tl3 tt could have brsen spent by the City, f The CouliC-il UOtIld make all., do e=r.�t7ata.ans ��; to the boundaries of aroau to be in,clUded in t:hd vi r, -� City 'Planner Glower stated the Caupcil hard recently discussed the concept of the 1'q 1lleu ;pa„tr e ` proccdurc, and hadigenevall,y agreed that such a provision should : bOadded to°'Clxe .Zoniug Ordinance, He further stated that one of the purposes O>, the proposed in -lieu a i • p Yment prbceduxe would be to encourage development of 'sr a1] conrrercial parcels tahicit_ would.be difficult to develop if the required par#cine, for each use is located on each pexcel of property. v Cttairrttar Aul,yer doc10ed the 4,rst publ$,; ndmdnt p i c hcarizt on the proposed t;mr <, nd he asked for cortmtenfrs ft'otr the audience or, frpm mdtw� ,rs of the to bz� a en � ' Cammis,,cxon, postw d with t q r 41 p_ ym nt° be do her 'City p,rr ort r a e -- ns the requirement that t1ne;' in�lierz , Commissioner Nissjo�n .Stated that h,� uestsxoo issuance of a 'bgzi �-' N, prior to the constxuotior4 ,n-, -trn , lding permit, .and, Or'`st•rcet parking lots in the adjaccnE area. Com tissianer Pliston 'qt, toed that, the paikirxg areas min^ the City, for, a. -nu;nber of years `&, fter a do.veloper havI' paid 'theht not ein-l1eu feed by P ty ,planner Glove* .)jtated that the a p yment of the in-lxeu'foe should not be v etaed as a Penalty `on the developer, but . rathet.� as an. ,dddititrnal alternative' which may be used at the option 'of a,dzvdloper to°assist,in the construrtiasr art. his, property withoutha�*Ca to novice :a7;;� " �% added that .i p hof, ,his required<;off-street parking. area to parking�anduaasaclresul� •�rauldehAvedlcSs�areaper toaoUid ha�re to devote mote c actio e axlable fox his bus �noss 01 City Planner Glover natoa that the parking a the City with the ixz,? leu .pa},merzts Which would bQ developed by �be restricted fr5r, use by ,any ,pari icular u .'Ypubl c parking areas, ,atter would not'l ; ��ir>ess: Camr,;°ssioner Ni'sson remarked that no tiste. limit has beer« determined the City must provides r within which o e' Parkin • .. P. og. He also stated, there has betxi no deteznmin#- developed CommissiaazerY� f e ' as to hata r�»ach moue must ac"umu ate 'in a (unci before a. paxlt'inb ,facil it:y^ is M s. tot y he does not feel .that a parsofl 'OhO desires li to de;,rclop his' pj}operty shotal, t+e requilred to put' out .money In adyarxce of the til.10 h. n h rstxcet p ka i� ;;. g of "` `in "is lance t at tt ar Chairman Fuller suggested t' A, g ;hats instead of deposit;t'xg of the cash 'that pa1•iraps ° a 13tveloper might 3,vbsixt a bond to. ,the Cit at a lc`ex date. City PlanrtE:r Glover adrisd��tha Commith the xssiormount to be paid that .this smatter tract been discrzssed with the C tlr'Attornev ,a.ld that. the City Attorney hid idol; ed that i� would be necessAry, to re uxre `r"e cash a jai ldirig permit, since there is p yme nt prior to `ssuance Q f a no z,ray that a developer might be obligated to •.. a :the a for time. matt Payment at a xa 2: r. J: Nod Alchardc0n Qohasso, ' > " load; stated that :the Commission should not apyrase a procedure which t q a'Cd';allow d, proporty owner or t,eveloper to a irrr the City to provide his off-'sttrcet. parking than it would cost the developer tit) Y QVi Viae C p t1z s Cat• parlci•ng; Fac!Uities. NIr, itic:Adrdson tated that the axnouttL per 9 space should be estdbl:ished at a cast tah,ich cti�ould be higher Haan the cost .to rile develop,.,- of suppl :t:ng his awn Parkingg urea: Tt1 reply to auost�.a q ty ,Iron, Commxssiartr r tassort, Uri kichaxdson stated he 3 ` r do n#tely feels that ,4 pots on h amarrnt +r� ttr the City to isauanee of should be to to depo$it the ful.l.,cas y po nt using the sea ested procedure pe.,,Mits, any building y Cocmtyiosier, St lveste: ttaterl that alae cast of constructing parking facilities ties x could Varybetween, different portiomc, of the. pity, and he irauired hover the amount y .,, y 1 in rcply, , Of payment per Space corxld be es�»dbl fished consider ttg this aqui rp Cit Ma.trcter Glove stated: ,,.at the Cit xaord,tng cr d,ch would wturney h'ad suggested gener,a,l pezxxlt thr City Council to establish the ivr lite fee to be paid far, each parking space on, the basis of factors such as the cast of develop r ing paulcirtg facilities, the cos, of land acquisition itid the cost Uhich property owners in ea.r sting vehicle parking di.stric providings had already paid for similar off-street panting ,facit.es eo :serve the parking distrz;cts, hetebeing no further discussion,haian puller declt!Yed the publ,c hetrin closed, :and 4tathd that at, adtioki:tal hvFt#;rinly- tf+auld be d by the alt t, nal ttctior drPused mm msiun before 0,n the pt Ugh bMatlVq NO. 426 AND 421 ( , . :. %*1LDING i ,,b AO 9001 ti G� zIs° ,„u4V i\yT p #U UC•MAM� MO,-,bors .af the Cofi,imi4li ion brir!h b g LL. dtmit aI>plicat3ioub submitted y rev ected tre 'ust. tic -drama b�ai� a�.l.ittg •and ' an ,� �tiicc 'tate Cone o rot r�': � cr�x��atxut�t�: war of a trot too engineering building. City Planner Glover suggested that the .Commission defer, n thas ead eced its reviec� of the proposed n r College. Mastrer l�l,anhfbreCh.ica State Col' g owing additional dzscussiazt the ll C(rmrti�sxon a reed to 8.. meet eithereas cai�ittee of the tohole or at a special meet! duIring the last week of August, to re"view the proposed Master Plan the G :and use permits with college officials. vat 11BITM NO 428 OWOR d0v>t` out co,), USC }N AF ff ryA co, �u oTFf*1Uir9 VORSL j7 4)i .,COMICL JJ ln L'cxiVo J. City Planner Glover reviiWed theapplication 'Of Mr Torn Mason on behalf of the Macon Chevrolet Co. for a use 'enl.argepexis;ing permit to buildings inthe unclassified district. He -Gated that in this +district use i a permit: is re- quired fa,r,'sll uses of property, - '�.� Y tyPner Glover stated that thea � City Plana,�rl�� t ion has been �� ?dewed by the City Planning Office and that. the Planning OL3:x [(� 4e-10 ! f recommends the permit b',.,)Approved subject to,, the ,,following, conditions: l) All construetioth and development the shall be substantially in accord withiwith" peat entitled "flat to,Acct'mpany Use Permit No, 42g:428i"- t Commisszciner NissOn moved thw t3se Pez�nit Nb: 428 be approved subject se to the condi.tion'' recommended 'by .the City Plannin Office, Planning mto The motion was seconded bs ` �� x�r and kaa,, t� 1 Cnmfiissaoner Sc3lveste 1 s Pproved by the unanimous vote of>all members p present. USE PERMIT N0. E 372 (S�ILL7AM S. DRxR�, REQUEST Folk AMCi6MENT :l2EI.l:x'IG� TO OFF-SZ7ZEST pARKxN4 R QL'IlZi iJEiVT5 FOR MOTEL AND 'RE- STAU'RANT, 715 MAIN STREET:.' h City Planner,Glover reviewed Use permit' Application No. 37.2{�stating < that the per:nit;,was approtred by the Commission on May 28, 1962, ;for tho construction of a motel.; restaurant and bar at'715'Main Street. approval,lie added that the original pproval Of 'Permit was sub'ec.t to szx�,ccinditions, one being that off -scree;:` p be e J s proud_ on the basis r space fur each fded of one space for each rental; motel unit plus one n- our seats in the proposed restautant and 'bar. 1 Gity.Planner Glover stated that since the permit ,as first approved, the applicanti has prepared more detailed building W far d plans submission for a building and that on 'the basis of the off' -street parking requirement established iZy�he' Commission, a total � of uO parking spaces would be required to serve the. proposed development: City Plannc� G„quer further a� stated that the present plans lsubmitte1' by Mr. 'Drew indicate that �63 ,off-street parking spaces can be provided i on the, Ptupet'ty, leaving_ a deficit of 11 parking spaces: City Planner Glop r stated,that Mr. Dred is interested ii� utili:.',ng the suggested in -lieu payment procedure] hcwever,s until an- .amendment to thh Or.tina. processed, tHc Department, of Public trorlts ican be without xs unable to issue a b-ildir. ncc ` permit the total numberof parking spaces being indicated on the plans,, lie addod that this nla;t;tei had been reviewed with the City Attorney, and that y the ctt Attorney had advised that the conditions of the ` use permit might be revised to ermit the construction of the facllt with3 0 Permit y `, off-street parking spates subject_ to v and a -cash deposit of :a sura to be determined for each space to take care of the roma nxn s aces i g p xe aired but not. r amended., p Q P cjva,de:d until the Ordinance could he city Planner Glover stated that if the Catruniasilan is Ono and agreeablej conditions number three of k7se PermitNo,372 shoVU be revised to read as follows 1) Construction and development $hall be substantially it ,accord ,th the Plat ontttled "Flat. to Accoripany Use Permit No. 372 August lt!64. 1,—Mated)” dated 3;1 One (l) 04f. -street parking space $hall be provj�ood for each: rental motel adc3 inion ,; bff�-Atreet groin x fo,r +*aclldfbtll" ' eat5 xn theal 5 � pace tho' r, be provide�x + restauxattw, Qnirg roots) and cocCtail Ibuugc (bdr) iri accord with the rdVis;#ori of the Zooni Or .inance cavi ad • 1 ► however t1:8 follotas p aj A total of 0 of.f strcat parking spacds shah, berovided on the slime site as 0'a motel restaurant, linin+r p .end c : roaa»� aci,tttil louse,, fi 1� en - 140 cf ' 1 9 y b) With,4,1u. one year frorl the date of approval of thi revised permit,, eleven (11) additional o£f-street parking spaces be provided if the cocktail lounge is not operated, or seventeen (17)additional off,- ! .. street panting spaces be provided if at :any time the cocktail lounge is operated, said additionaloff-street parking spaces to be provided. in the manner provided by th;z applicable provisions ofthe Zaning C�xdisnatice of the City 6f C idoi either as nov dx{sting ar Sid may hereafter be awanded ii c) In order to guarantee and insure compliance with the terms Aro R conditions of this permit, the applicant shall deposit with the ' Tiaeance Officer o:lt the City of 'Chico, prior to the issuance of any d building or other related permit, the sum of One Thousand Do'l'lars " .p ($1,000.00) for each off-street parting space required by thi , permit but not provided on the same site as the motel., restaurant, dining _ ,:room, and cocktail Lounge: d) The condition of said. deposit shall 'be that if the applicant shrill not have complied t7ith the conditions of this permit, said deposit shall y.. be forfeited to ,the City of Chico, otherwise upon compliance with all conditions of this .,permit this provision shall become null; and void. City Planner Glover further stated that a new condition- number seven should be added; to xead as follows; 7) The conditions of Use Permit, 'Na. 372,9s originally approved by th s' 1s .ann .ng Cot; fission on May 2$, 1562, shall become null and void U� on accep'anc.e ' of the foregoing. revisedconiaitions by the applicant. . t e;- �" Commissioner Selvester moved that 'tJse Permit No. 372 be , nded b . „�batitut the revised condztidns number 7x . and three and ;by add, ing the proVaVed condition number aevt.4 as outlined by the City Planri.ngj Office. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Boyd, and was approved by the �nanimous vote of ., .:l.l members present. I «-a USE Pm1o= ro. 430 (JAMES F. ROTA), TO CONSTRUCT A SERU'ICE STATION' AT 635 MAxN STREET:_" City Planner- Glover rd iewefa%,tho application for a use permit to construct a service sta:tioai on thoonorth�ast cornet' 'of 7th and. Main Streets, and. he ".- stated that the Planning Office recommends the permit be approved subject to the following conditions 1),A1`I construction and development shallbe substantially in accord :with the plat entitled "Plat to Accompany Use Permit No. 430.'x' 2) Landscaping and street tree plantings shall be installed in accord with the recotftneridations of the Park Department and the .Planning Office. Commissioner B01 moved that'Wse Permit No. 439 be approved subject to the conditions outlined by the City Plantilt Office. The :notion was seconded. by Comnmissioner'ldisson, and was `4 ,proved by the unanimous vote of all: mcmbers pr�;sent. � 6 RUVIER OF TE+TATIVE' W OF M 11 ,PERS SUBDIV18ION ' Members of the Commission reviewed revised tentative: map for the Watots Sub- &4vision, to be situated on the ease gide of Aigh ay 99E North, south at Eaton goad. Members o. this Cb&sti.s9i6A ",miced no objections 'to the proposed tubdivigi.otiy, chic i voul i be located our.cde 'the City of Chico. City 111 d'aner Glgver stated the tentattive trap is a revision of a. previbus t,; tative Itapr upon which the domad8tion had submitted no o'b j eotions to the L' ttte County �� 1'lanni»,g Cot�missionw AMAL T'' s.�W4 OF C11TCO C' NEML PLM4 City Planner Mover advised the Cowin i9ssion that: the inatte of the *06S Annu4l gdview of the Chico GentirAl Plan had boon continued on the Cor=i,ssionts atgend for some, tiate. Ue said that a publild hearing vo held on x0veraber 12 t963 to consider proposed revisions or additions to the Chico Co nar,al Plan, and that subsequent to that bearitt tho City Planaur, Com- issiou had conducted ,joint studies vi.t"h the. Zutto County Planning "Cbv=itsiort and bad arrived at agreemeztt'; on sev+erdl mtdiUcatiorls to tl.a General Pl. in. 04ty Platt nor Glover added than the taodifi.cati„ono Metra; submitted to the Eutte County Bon . -L' of Supervjz*rs by the County Plannju*,, Coc+stti.,sitait with a reco;=andatiori that ew.,_ Cnito General P:at �i:iKx4' II �W.It�f ... .q, y^1{ -.I;;. �+:d:r ..a, -c. +wry::_st++r,e+.►,e wtr»a��e«a A� f, Jl ,t � be adopted 17 � P the County subject to the several mo diticti. Y ons4 City Planner Glover stated that the City Council had endorsed the ac u, tion of .the City P101 teing Commission, and thpt the COUncil had also reques to t,ako action on adoption of the Chico General flan" le addecietBoard , SuSupervisors Get, rx1a, Ian, o adopt or nodil y the Chaco date Gaunt .Board. of Su ervisorshas taken no Plano City Planner MoVer stated t1lat the z0ning and i'eta7 is Committee had` disc 19.53 Annual Revie'V at a recon ,. usstd tfie: that s$.I,cq t meeting, and that the Co=ittea had enerally agreed tl the County has taken no action on the Chico General, 1?lan, and since the .1964 Annual Review xriot�ld be initiated by the. P?,anning Commission, during (?ctobe,r and iVat�e er, the Commission should torvard to the Ca ty Council a recomu�endat ion er an a made in the Chico'General Pan ,;�s a result of the 1963 Azzrual peview�, es �� %a maid �the bCity Planning Oti~i:ce xeto atTA ds that the Co= ssion Hca ward a rep- rt totheCouncil, recoittaendn no chane > s an the Plan. and polnt� 1, ng out that the': ! ¢hc event the. Board ok Supervisors ('hou2d IrMati-ve, is �o nth Ian �tzas on is agxeeab],e io earit:Xnuea cansdera�„�, o:� arandmen n action,o a n L1�j Plan. 1 g 1 iolTo�� n motion be a tied. a `_ssion, Co�rnnissioner Boyd moved' that the `' y '�,1' osa*3ng further di sic s� tion U' the Coacrt \ , y v%ng conuttcted a public 'hearing on November 12, 1463. ,far q eonsiderZng proposed revisions or�additicins to. fhe 963.o or ther ei ]„pPlan, eaof nd d ., �7 leaving re•v%e0ed and "concurred w th the ter ommendatjdri ox the ,Butte d�sunt P3annir►g Commission ;to the .doard a� Supervisors that the Chico :Genet l Plan be adopted by the Board a bject to certain:moditic tions thereto which ^ ac.tian, however, has not'/�t:-.a �r CITY PLAN9ING COn %n taken .lie BoardSupe sort THE CHIC? .•1I35IOl�i I` , ti C ico T144T' NO CHA1ti,TGES 13� I � x�B� 12ECi}r1l+iBri+� TO THE COPXIL OF � CITY OF ADO_ TED TEXT OR >_ jjEl F CC, 011P r 'rc MAP oz� GHICO, GFDl>�PAL `l' Al, ursuant rote 2i�d Annual Reva.ewl j,,ad,`ze.' vo The motzonof Comrsxss'iianer $o"d' sat seconded b C�� #:ppxoved b the un\nimous to of all members by ss�oter uelvLster, and was' P s AD30UE1EivT: (, j, m at 10, . P M. � •n, kat ad e+d b i y ChtRl.rmatl Fuller " There being no further bu M� meet,-t s..x=est, the m r Chairmass SSC ta2�r m I al I V K noTior minim ' �� V�I.ty Fi',F.�i.k�7�G��r i.. =Is JMRfty GIM that a .spec i w-ot- ngof � (yg �jyH � Ca=i0slon vill to. held .on October S,$ M4,, .4t the houV of 7:X the Council l6i yrs of the %inicipa1 'au$ldi, ,, Chico, California f;%r r#4i� �� LE'�� mattes as `att fo rthori this, Attnchod i�t.��y-s/4-a�. n yL{� ti:�i/ �t'/� /1p �l��pppeeeu�y�rr�... r {q mSen�S,'! �`0 4P�1�.. �i ial 4eti of e Chico Pity PlAnni 60 ��s.�w ; , ate 4 on SctoUtr, St 1964� iw0ganbN vAy be obtitmed from the Cite p.rix ag Office i h tete o cipa.l Euildi. ,�.r Ali. persox�si'iute�e�tad � ix►�it ' to App t Anil he >} �'M'nd forth 'heard at tho (ft + a pl c+e stet Above.' •_CJ, "� iIS�.1.yM`✓�i# fii �.IR84 ING 4t'U'C�iR:i,�w�lAil.��Jl'rtM1 . �,� _ N , An N. vtdl.ar, Chairoart 1MWR T1M1nn1YMlgIRiMtlwWeM► Robert W Glovorb CitctiTl wmelr �, .r+urw.Vrw.waO er�MMMrw.r is RaR`ra+r,�.VMwrw w.rw;wwRw'/Iµ M4Ya1K+Nw wldni OOl MIM A41 MrrMYw01 Yl IiF y►W#YwA't4 ii M}rnM al�Wlbp6 iN Mh`M.��M prMM F . Flan>.' $ Cs isasiGr�>ei� ,e> e a , News 144a / City @tt`xney ',i �! City Cl.ar:31 / V. G. tsk11l1clj.. DepartSeEt ��9 icanG�•µ`" A-vc- r. WO// (1 tedi Ocibbl ' 9 'a zr, , Sill, 1k#� DIE ctt r 1J , Qctober S X36 � APPMrAt OV MWT it gegolnr Meeting, Auwxj�: 10- 1964 (Heid August.,13, 1964) Apecial Meatings,; Saptembar 110 1964 )� r " o Moir �' r �' '� • \tib �)Califorhi r� 1958 }P=Pooed Men ment�� Cter27t «.Cod of City Of Chico ' Outitl�� o�:uog xelve� t6 offNoxrowpet axkx reu�; ments„ PUBLIC MARING (2) Proposed a u nts tb 'Clsi te'r ?7 of tlwode cif to city Of Chico, cal fo ia, 19584 entttled n6angte ztlative to vaquired setbacks Gadd perw tted ' lot coverage t,, Y" � . e ui a nts to Vasiden'�� aist:rirts. MMC � !i/ r � r ,pra d esxftents :tee` Chotsr 27 of the Code of be City of ��$i �y Cn3�fornia, 1958 entitled "Zon ra relative, to po- mittilodge halls, subject 0 +fie -permit, in -3 axid R-Pdistvicts« PWLIC MAMG 1/ , 4) Rezordna No, % MYPla_nbgC is _ot3 retoiae af/ptapaes' alpg South trosdrnysal= St , in 3 )ve ,fr e Rr oigeaily Residence ,*aid R-2 Wo Family Residenee,. to A-3 -Maltiplo Vdmily tpci4eaca District �60E',I Rte: ; "� Recon ; 1.40. 55 (City Vld=ing Ooram.sP.1�n), tewn,itg mss Naricus atxnoxations from rrUM: Unclewoffied to various diwtrict�(. ' P,1'4SCVSSIQX Reacaa tics. � s xs� fnrd , ` i �� olie proportg betwaoq Sheman ;Avenue anOV saexl n Avenues rQuerally scuett of Eot Avem.a, from R.»%' Single �rsz��,ay 70�;�.�feracc to "J!, Restricted Cosa exci:aatl- „ MTOIX �t (7) CGe• perm t 10,E 4M fts. E fie grockin), t�o conduct 4 co=ei :-,w cat�vity 14 'A 11 if aaiv fted 4istrict r4yql act for at,9howa 1, Ung Verimit, 30. 432 (Hr. Itobart It. Rries), to construct a drive-in roat;%urazlt at 12,70 :R'. ''first wWat 1 ; _wird ' �n Re es rrf Chico C&Aara1 Man x' 11 to dt. rwmitng Stud �re.axxza��, �3a 4ss��ss� Re�ie�n; -. at er c tta do ►rdo' 4%04 '$ice ' gulatlolu" , ��.y�Cq.��t�/y�uy��,by,��y� �w �ly� �y�/ y�.y �y.q ym y�y� wq y �ryj ,µ� ,�y ^� {y #vim yy }�.W�r �a �r yy ? O�.*'�i��k 1:ijr+ .oe a1+.W11Wv' =aiw re oo!V�Y6�haial v► adj X+1#�at to �„4.ia�ML�outial ,dist,Wicts, 11 1J , Qctober S X36 � APPMrAt OV MWT it gegolnr Meeting, Auwxj�: 10- 1964 (Heid August.,13, 1964) Apecial Meatings,; Saptembar 110 1964 )� r " o Moir �' r �' '� • \tib �)Califorhi r� 1958 }P=Pooed Men ment�� Cter27t «.Cod of City Of Chico ' Outitl�� o�:uog xelve� t6 offNoxrowpet axkx reu�; ments„ PUBLIC MARING (2) Proposed a u nts tb 'Clsi te'r ?7 of tlwode cif to city Of Chico, cal fo ia, 19584 entttled n6angte ztlative to vaquired setbacks Gadd perw tted ' lot coverage t,, Y" � . e ui a nts to Vasiden'�� aist:rirts. MMC � !i/ r � r ,pra d esxftents :tee` Chotsr 27 of the Code of be City of ��$i �y Cn3�fornia, 1958 entitled "Zon ra relative, to po- mittilodge halls, subject 0 +fie -permit, in -3 axid R-Pdistvicts« PWLIC MAMG 1/ , 4) Rezordna No, % MYPla_nbgC is _ot3 retoiae af/ptapaes' alpg South trosdrnysal= St , in 3 )ve ,fr e Rr oigeaily Residence ,*aid R-2 Wo Family Residenee,. to A-3 -Maltiplo Vdmily tpci4eaca District �60E',I Rte: ; "� Recon ; 1.40. 55 (City Vld=ing Ooram.sP.1�n), tewn,itg mss Naricus atxnoxations from rrUM: Unclewoffied to various diwtrict�(. ' P,1'4SCVSSIQX Reacaa tics. � s xs� fnrd , ` i �� olie proportg betwaoq Sheman ;Avenue anOV saexl n Avenues rQuerally scuett of Eot Avem.a, from R.»%' Single �rsz��,ay 70�;�.�feracc to "J!, Restricted Cosa exci:aatl- „ MTOIX �t (7) CGe• perm t 10,E 4M fts. E fie grockin), t�o conduct 4 co=ei :-,w cat�vity 14 'A 11 if aaiv fted 4istrict r4yql act for at,9howa 1, Ung Verimit, 30. 432 (Hr. Itobart It. Rries), to construct a drive-in roat;%urazlt at 12,70 :R'. ''first wWat 1 ; _wird ' �n Re es rrf Chico C&Aara1 Man x' 11 to dt. rwmitng Stud �re.axxza��, �3a 4ss��ss� Re�ie�n; -. at er c tta do ►rdo' 4%04 '$ice ' gulatlolu" , ��.y�Cq.��t�/y�uy��,by,��y� �w �ly� �y�/ y�.y �y.q ym y�y� wq y �ryj ,µ� ,�y ^� {y #vim yy }�.W�r �a �r yy ? O�.*'�i��k 1:ijr+ .oe a1+.W11Wv' =aiw re oo!V�Y6�haial v► adj X+1#�at to �„4.ia�ML�outial ,dist,Wicts, 11 MNGGRAPNtR f cm I ,Lil A I 1XFcsi+ - f� „IAu It 10, 1964 °II1! "iso I?, V4 A=Ma jj 6 �IAt, oil en of 'ti , Jolt' 2040 �0 r I, ZOMM MM MOM MM ] nom 51 (Ofty �'Ianniz& comiaglo t to rOZOIAG �r��+u� ;;�►�;n��rL�e Oth Sweat oW ,fir 9tfu StIca t and-60111ity. . MW '"a #neVarious z . : I �6dC' to they Oftyr of lm+ IMO �0 � � o _ 5 , Lariat to 0*1 %astriete d 0 Px*=Ing cdmitsi lt)$ to rezono woriaus propavtios along soutu iog& AY-i S#sm stroat *nd .'Wov I A nue, grow R-1 'ami 1 . t om « i3S101 5�e c 1. to off-traequret:�s. 01,E city"Of Chico, mv. d- IMOM USA, AM VCM pj9MT Use pO=it No. g >t'Construct �i Y�Q�y� ..'yam., :y it' ypi� ®1 - "1CXiRL "'1 P� W �P.i�l 0011 to V90, rs=ft *. '427 (Chico �tsto c6110 to donotrue an e%inq0ti" v ` II �o�.� sz�c� �r,� �► "�j'e Lf�ao�z��,�� d�x��, ��: „ rt 1 for mot4 *ad 715 maft,#irstet. Use "otmio*i29+ax� t. v ?xa��d:tcrr5i u o $r40at to 1023'0. 30 Street for uto Ots a 6014*61tia1 struattwe to of OuWivlolbu zvx %)Od Ovowk 'Ustates Ovuw -of -1 jaylawon gpNOW Flan -. h My�� I/ L1 }y�r ��pp 1. aut uows of rvi tAtion ' ji�>l ar+� :sip at lon °dam , �tb*4#I �) I u-u W'Ise $43 4TLt to 3 1 ll v Y �n27 =� F : t &MMS VIAS . 1 CUUMMI =100 Joly If CAU � oniwiw R fie �"O � et n ,� the .chite City � �txn� y �4r�s��Lou ,t� ��e � � Order by Oy�a ft`wW�a y{yt �.l�yerry I�t 7, 1s i V'4 ,y to the Court try +6&16{6-orcyy0tt'ye11ry�Maic4paJ�yil g+ �, r�>+^ �iM�i �wl"'4i! MiO41� WMT., � FIM�Ik►+�' �;A Wl��ll�Lw"� 1Y�iY11Ai��i11 /RJ'A++,A 6➢ q?#M •Y+r ,^T� ��RV1 G+i�AS� .: flt' stesc� �'ti a�n a � ad cha#� An NA10r; Otte Attovaq PrIce SUd .Citylmaev �'�.Kl`aJer. igs anota goyd sand Ummido end $eeretery 34vt Vero „ C114tramo, pnil �` �t��a�st 40 to earp of the �+issloa; ward furaa�.s�±�d ts,"�h �d��,�� of of` VILOUtas of t��t tapdaa l tiaaoetLug 09 Y gas, 1,00, "And B:he � C;�u�.t�v'm�� of ` Do 1904,, ked aroeux tie e>d�ende �....aer e� + I dogITed to "b", r paa:tfmn Of tha oltauteo vaAdt or, it dxssara.vr e r eta oyC ,ed t +�'tw t o tb taitaust s- ? bakes a r pt 0t v �a ead. of n6 -diorrattto , to bo �declared „ ` r �rca�re l�aaf �.taas dee �a�e � e raataantem ; rr Z=10 XO , 47 Mit 13 � t TO T PROP i V900 A4 M�4'TO C1 RESTRTC"AU 4 oftwad% (ACTMIH`jgrg",” �Umw on REZONVO W. 50t 044V W,n Yulto stated; zotiats reQnegt of til�t � ou� Ie heatis�e cru tie Vie., mt. 'tm ;� oh� 'hao been ua3�et#4 f �� )to flual �tetiaa•l ja 'bout 46fd asd.• :,ta areq�adrt a�th p�.+asnt�e tgee, fir,. star°- t uost that .aet no by .ft tosle b def"$tred' until 6, a:et the tied et�aac t.ud the to3igi c of publics ��eaVill 2011108 ft ttse. R" ► ri ' a � e mot df w ert .es lo, ,V% at r + +rtet d tho reZ�sax�t aye 'iutt 4'4,od 6 oa oft ofty y4aru 0000VO to tha arm gi-stated tt e.t csa pe'blia. tsesiring, C,*># the rotQnigigl wea &w.doctod -o�d Jaaxae 80 19640 aridchat I t, rat mzhtr Ori, geed? 401: dat0;f at cixt hoArI110 to: 1t Vi a : � . Xaw Chit th& tmttar Lva-,� tefcaraieat �a� t� c�txaa� �►,.�.�� ,t� Com�i�ttoob �r,��.�,�Y�a� the itdArti6, rev atudy and aepazt U4 to the PI uvd coliv ,evtbn. city vidamwGlove-p'tMewod a ropott i -am 00 " ?-Qd ;'sed otmit� Mitt -A dated .�tt'��, 8# 10641 %ftch tocG ,1t�ded to ttae 600i'60�e 00 64 that (�; t� �OV0004 rwwu ' e s r00s t said. d;. t�ad'p011e Waring be C0%t4UC'tdd OUL 600h "VI"d ' ea; t�. r � $tta Stteet �art�" ,. to t .0t 0 r f` bs � era a apt U6"Ve'Street�+�� tl B��# •a;�6 thtl Ote+� baa by Or.' (2. Propertiag. r%teaady min"Od tta c; e Ofty, 09 mteobo ter b61 ft t"t 4atoxatioti'Diattifat M" 10 to 111-14 to yet ,din toa,1a fts, ret No* 4o to h,4 u, ate w trout �wowti&u MotVtot V-0. 20 to a - L." tf"f .tt i3t Armolzatiou rkattt dt Via -4 Iv t w Izo, stu, ;ret Aw-t tkeu xo t Get lta# Ous''I i; os>r� at the truth;��t fou ► t .s xt 7 NVUott, ftw4 rl�y gi �p7�}�y�.k�fpq{,�j,y�ps�" %f �y y��] ply 1 Yf{,,1, RtiNyyyg�,.,?:�Y'YrF.Piyyl^,,iI.,X�.4 }}MIN' �1+��'yl/Fry„4,��51h'gtry+.yt,yrk:.g17'�411y1}yY-ary1'W'py{Yka#+4..A . ,1.. " p'i,YJK'��IS�i3`�RS 0m� Ydi1.Tb►�. ,Rd+FY�tWrL Fj 59�� +W. ��.'•, �r 1r^b�l' fk�.J+i SMfi.:iii �ii4�;al.a #��' the it oca paala'tfunhar ota tod the r;i %nioa of thea catz tttee thot thom tra Asa i0muf ateot support. oar -the Part 04-thi, propettg cr�anr�xs and a�r��at a tie :i'urthor cowide rawttio 'byr t`he pia Ax g Ommirmion mz the ONA�raajl r'a jTjg, plan Upau uhith the public h0j3,rjre g9ao conducted o "rsai�aa S. 19 t�, i r t xi ar asdviaed ern Co=lsaiop that OddWOWI c0i`00 Of the $b.:."tcsaa $ +pppctaition to t�xe proponcd rebanit ha<d beeu aubMW0d to 6o PAaarazai08 office C;JU04 the p'tbt,ic heraring Use oonductmd on Juane Ue otated f at a$OrQ Werd V4 41805tul:08 Oft the'patitiono co$,mlcol sturin$ th� h�a�rts •� ._ �:.� a�uuoett0 - 'oon Additieanai 37 49mitumcci on tha potitica id Vora P onted ♦yarn w 9`3$V,Mt t'JVG of fhaa oaame':'A'00ft'l a r sae the ovisinal petition% t I� iAA k CU yan Fµ iVYv bUt d.45�-e 4007 are, III:. g� lRp �y,�y �y y{ y� p rq�y�y�y I �.�.ty �1a�nptc3r X53. fact gdaeaduiad *a n 0061ie. j� hcari o>�rr, thy! propoated ro ui o brat that, thoiia a o aou d dtb Sd . t eats etia vildther it vishod to fiftept the ra"1t ammadatli.)n 09 th. zo�i d d Parmito 000=Utoo And dipp the rezonirm propp"Gal prior to, arou ua.#128 sl ee6� 4 pub'' .cx hoarw� .in AugA#z . �o rad�r�raed t8oz ��i�di� Oat vaxi� one dd .i:ic teias7�ia ac ,o ,��44 i*':'prdpoaAl „mins tho ca« �e or t1i Wd;fidd to at 'lGoto 86 'Sttat'64 that if 60 teshm n ' e iia�Ci se to 'O ote o' lois v trice! ve zone iA anv pta<rti t.�zr er g 1 thea tsars ` ditiozaui h c ri t bar tel 0* t�ao p c foo xc3 t ar e� itPa� xie for much an area. `� 1 (bairmm Fullor 'acid t�'e�tthdte sate "pe oad in t*ao a�uet��uwe,;saRat�: Qaca i boen iilltegosatod � n tht tet,�I of ag thiaa parti'dUl a:r ,adreno gad that sinco they is tckea tba time to Appo airs the chair vo ld vacC4gi' im mVmild Wto V9OUea, , to, voe even .,t:tjoaa , r"it iv ,dot: a Sohoduied puia ea Vii1i Ds4saol►c, 403 too .nth ' >Mre t� ota�ted ho feclo it is ehe dosair^ of thr r e:iu�tznt,s in the Mos Sth and 9th Stareet&$ b(4traoeat p"tao and 17iu Streetso to ha "mremi zzm% . a P�4v* Don0ho elated lad ha a tt%t taa;lkod to myone yin mat --.7mm rho dooaa not favor a chth*0 to ca .+rci.�, VA aia stated t�'gt he tt €q�ht *c was cuzdcaratoc�d Orbs .0 04 that hrtaa pro sa rt3�' rr u7f.d 'bc3 ' d for cosaterdia l 00 an a,aast'sit of tho bo^onto gaarobwatod at tha pz-,w:.*Ub heaviusd 14r. Dovbb0 atntod at that tie it a-Ppeared d1mest c rYaue 1,40 to a mmontag for tomo aehrlo prr a tY t nick Wousid gao i t him It ca%drga of r0cotWtruct h a ra�auirseo !w Chaltao" vullor otatad that tjsow r9ap tars eVroozion 9:96mCaevoral 0610 iax tha mudionco at the m iouo h a rtna in eazvor of Dour. Golutiom to qtr. lldhz a vobl 0ht-ii utaea ;�0 to 641argar or wtpa na hiv present n coOo i . Me- chc�j a.�n ydilI or stated that the Zai uj ng scud i"owito C=nW1*'ee, hand a 04MVItMad U41 Miltiplo baideuca 4-- Propmmotoal Oca) go nivis v a;'►hsnr than Cas soniv whioh it ht bad x eaated,, i . b ii hg t a gUed thn ho uudetaatoodo hi dorsU1a Prof038LOU01 Ogg#r en buildif4, und4r the Wntlig roc xdMeh� the , tttoo$ but uU*t has bath yea dqaty.�d' Baa ob i„, ►ad�aov�y'b6 41t4mad mdor coum;wC�, I nt _tot hewed d 111 00 to. Ia►stimOt It M0; CtOrO bui divrsu ptC ao l� �+ d aacoait to the Prooent of 'ren and thou tittli o ieao pre0ent $tot* Otto .for a fflowatroot paarkingo iassios er Se`s aa8tara 4 emm d >t' aat t►cnt t,ve 14r4 Sthr could d sa116 eat pt000ut bud ldivtS spud r ui%,fj n otw butldia$ v�ich voaaid e the 04"wo uito res the tndotiog buiidiost to uhtoti City ' anuor dlavor ototel tba:at this vo04 scoot bo Powittodugaor tho pxo mt L�ni� te�uia ta��uc or nude ��ac �ro�:o Ott h*p tour , osr Mr# Dthrva prope'vtY. City ot,2too41w&z t f r.. whr para provto ay :R.di+�a�tod hu'0ouid iii to u t� et a no-0 tui�d��u [� qty �y��yyy� �!p �y p� }y �y Vyy� �} }� _+y,r�, �y te�,µ� �yy� p��r �, pi,µ �w. airm @. JFall�,�.0r: ':_ AA 'rLed ��C azpfa a tbo WwR ]k\ 'CMS 1.d�71."n a. K:S+R {.TSN 1xY,iK.GiH�' S..cCY +�.�Y G4 .v *y U% 'tb,, of i wt6nt pra�poant of ,gth z�nd� Otto St,-V * ,-o* rntbax dao tb vosduovd to sant pro; not ou=, ;,•tod �W tho Zaoiva awud INn ito i't o z. i Ilk. 174 14. aid, Itaechba Rbble4osj itAuir4id if the �06=ios3loaai had atatavd' at the; IWt ho_4riba that at 'least otto +aaore`haaaxr 108 x-youO be condectcd on the o ati m pa,resproaaral. Chairmn Vuller . e?X ed thct she Qs7, aisaa jon hod iudi, tcrd it t;t uld taakO &'t least tato ,additional ho4rtva bofore aaoy masrsiza cssudd be awccccr eWecd to the Citi oacii, ho-oevorj, it, a Jithin the .Sur'i.adizeJou og tho Co alaajaaa to it reduce the area propsaCed f r toaazni'aar to 0 inaate rarear� gram cta'nol d ration 14asmulb aD .fie raarraning propotirsa'1 Boas Initiated by the rathor tfift IVOn a ubmiDsi*n Of 4n tapelicatiou by individual proporty orb,"tu.al.�as Full `z added that the Coottoo.ion vill d+tct$do follovivis this diol;uaatoll 1rhai ar W=Ilduct a second bearing,on a razoniatg,propoi c zl ldentic4l to tdaot prescstted gat tfi, first hearing', ;,t �� a di.f ied resuaanprovosal,, Vx. DoMh6 igoired U, is Vou#td do any good fo>a'rcis in fMV0ar OR oRa=erciasal 904,0,12• 4 ai=an Fuller ingot red ,hair 1�rge an aron Mr. Doubho 0A9*t= izAVa0 iu >�i to$ too VUch, 'd, Hca rop�l i.ed he to Chit* aasof the Prop ertia s al otag ____ ,ana - ith Wigeta rpp tha business aistr .cz to pit Stroot* RX0 ho 4180 r ticed :.drat , Behr hag operated a bu inoop at Sth dad Pi.tio streots for ma;ly rho and :ehe t000 operatis xbustuads popertgep e�rr a'ar riewowost �it ridicuiouo ;fo,r . Behr te...'ba opet&tiaag for .,All these yea'ate Ota n perch or, jog m €aria conf6rada,g u0p tai iaa irad' that . :hr ehrrtisd Wper eairitcd as a tciaa Wni In order to eaai�t��o tt 'store,; to pit r Ln 0Y WAS 484k and to ar ca an inorol4ftdtnt which would be all Asset to the Iftoighboi d. le. Donohn , ,stated 'that,under thacireumotziftrds neithaar, ha not tl 43hrclsladsell theiraziatirg lbtassiaaaaoas propaart ioKSair3nfwQla3 ;r 'putpos�esp aizacc „tie buildir►8c arO worn, out. stated the C rriesiaao oba�ud.rd f r, be, realisti.o za.>(Iut this matter*,-,U J i mis sionarn Silvesster" stAted Oat the problem fteiage k'Laza 018 C f�eioax ,, iss of .a 4esiro .to petnii 1is.:,. 06010W operating, boat at the tank; timne be fait- in ita trreatwbut to 411 itopaxtlr tAincr€i Lan .telae '". r4,i 3inity. alis, at4tvd the Commission could not app wl a� r:�mt arcual s:ooi4� ma cotdd�.rcioaas, vnlop only o .grocery s to or only ca rtat n ' -o cara�d that once a omesrciair bar s Lo ea Arca +d, ,say of the vv� could bo allo-.40 oo the Sel :aster ada'd th to ra quesst ono ,ncattler there tahould be comPArejal ufloo in the aaton or not. CbtaarrIooi.onar Shdwaa nb ad tit it appearrc the' di.racuosion haao c'.82angod Prow tho Icastter of !Wwnidg 'lea~ 51 Into-4, diacusara as of tela= a plteataork-oubmittezd by :f-tr. DAr. which he aaandero>f oo shad 'been daion-'ad until aftov, the 4atioivniot.k of hadrints 00 dlewais V6* a1.Cda�ais��.�:caner > wan 4mucaned it i�aaaUl d be difficult to deparatm diaeumoton of the Me item oluce� DW. 'd36d1r l ptopsarty o included in lboth ,azo nia,; applicationo. M otaated that Cdr. IAOi has applied for co er`cial 3ocsiaaB'A that Hr. Behr boo Ind€oatdd dna to t intere.,anted in R»p coa-ins ac atloodoted by"the Binz aatw PenAte Corumitte0,0 au d that perbapar the ComaLooioa should reader a sdaclvico on Nr. DOW$ +origirtal application at a lm.tov date Ctt�r Planner 0.+s~;rlrerr a dVieod the ciionion. that ;chile «t. dWIT 'has "Ouli.tterd his aaWtOtiou add p llo hattringss hava;6eean donductedb action On the r zsaela had beano d6laaryed at Hr* Bohrroo request Uhtid. aftbr tho C sai�cior+ her, atudted the tnuiog prroblemo aag the cntiro nrea "aar eoiane . S ►ers asa V0=, i cd that hoz 'fecal, Xro &XII. taquaadts, Atha delay io; hopes thatr the CamidiAon woudltdSpr ove w=oar UW stoning f�� AU provdrty� �iersio r Sherin ata added that tbore 'had "ba:sa> i -r coc4ai tea �eparta r e to the. ',-eating of Kr* vo 3 pr opcari�yo aaatd that asci t`her h as recommanded marded the cat rclasl tone'Watch Xit. Behr dea#aa,a Bio i intik ShOZ012n au ento d the ion diascussa with dna;. gthrz, vtether or not Lao vould detii?>«e to. Esau a detioion on his requ tdt et oir as Vta11er rrecgtii.jacd Dr. Cserl,ets 1701mrj0hp iir,240LIP.4 vshdthor h a q.r ali t,% bea peMitUd to adtwtruat x law buildi v10% a p seam a aroa Lfuder a Uoo ' OWO:r, i�. }� �M •y�� y�y, y7 yq,�y p�{� y� yr ra �y �+yyy. �y ,y y F':4 u o iFYgr 'erW at Mr, � Y+'#-tti 'toold tat i:FF�6jarg,* Yjjo 0:ftj '�[ti raos>"> anossafo o aas:d ted t �t at n est lsuild wader baa e pa;lt Provtoa. U'; Pris;o ,fated tbdt v0rr&C9Ttf0W1d:: U300s Wing UtCO t" ich :ii.ot04 ptioe to zoang# mny douttwo to opordto but =,y lto't dao zu'b 41 'lli F'I „ 11r.. W41% inquirad, ig it 40 a Praett a l y "Monittaw do'cicr a 0 -tat C-1 ZOIAMS ba granted �urp toglob �igmail Puller roll mgr '600.1.01MI tied t mm, 011d 'by the ov= loviou, Mr# fire im rioted tustl t Val r.0 VaVa Mary pr:-Cple at tho previous hoaviga fAzo woro in favavo the vpquwt m * �!hr, fd C.C""; Plamer Mavarr of atod tit ollc*ins foe Wo publ is liwriqa on the 'razooiog t'aquested by VIV, Bebr� the 7*600 dad tlarmtto C0=1ttea r ovi o the matter nod 'batted a. ro3pr:r+t to tb mlurtlon zow v ding; a,0ain st the C"l Bono* lie a4ftd Lt VaD tho foolitV of the Cott-miso,4ou that in order to reaodiad apgimw- l for: rotaolng of Mr* 80h,0a propopt:1 to4ozz-arc to the ,saw oftmWirattm foouid have" to be I Si'veva to Other: Ptoportica in 00 t=0dizt+ VLCLu,i,ts'r OU4 forther` that ura this 640100 the Comattou 11ad rwoaoftdcrd Asa tb� t .tel. rxl mvo dk the C�lttoo did tot foul the tua adjfgeoatc�rrt�:a +� ry � 8v%aor# Id, -bo- ed for ec=aV lrza iax.lurc Itc2d frsz:o!ata� tborr trr�d ruolt �.vc�»a . the rca ill of p; brtles>s ald , Ea . 84 5 mid. t a S r tats ttst u.?c. caat the CwAXasion 0ould .diewoo t pii t '. p o l Mer dual% thio otica , . t' d d tUm r :; a . c 9.tt+ ' for tp"�iaig into oonrsider4t t �. n terest of t i 1 lxa t er au M1 tbou t sdnirs Chol:114 0-VOS V"14. Dro , retvor, a dd ed 'tbot ho f b `FIT t� , the persons who Signed the rotftiom 'whiab die pYr"Mated;o 't'he,ua -,hersrius, ° 41601vior :I hiverlba Vaal: slop, bo q0god to f smia UOUL04 -0104-4. S".4d 8Stoots"!f,fIb ate:Cd mcc "Wevo �% z SWIF people in timo�� :J, � ��ur� ��W `�� c� ax�►xf.�e� ai <� to di�ouv�rw ,la t thui p oPer'ty 1189'been ne oS .; oo m ystra� uv hmd thought than vera o z� ��. �� fa £1y +di�t�.i�t�� rres� „�:iha�� dco�ra tm rrot,ola 66 stuele f id 4A�0btgv of ho might";0A s sa . .,a�'"t,,�� '�p�� :y��},�'yw,�rb y� Rµ:d a/t. tsiar<�Qoa -Got irr�.zj Gkv+r.7.. befel 9: ol. � iM C` C�''4�C� day t �4?t. N i'Ca A.`iJr ia4+`b4 G', ti4+i i�Ci ll43. j the OppIiC44ion of hio f athoret mid`. Emit 110hr, ,for l °amid,. Mr. Behr, stetted ha, would 111%i�i W bacit up Hr. Ronobb s otatoWat tett it vrould not be oxisible to rwode-I the, Previcuo buil i and s o atiM1a tho pr esep-t busino-aa oporatiou 400 to the U%itattom of the Otto* no fit: ted the Baas arrcidl tofta, could allot; the obnottuction of a a star e! and A POrkin lot to 0c: i'o the 13 or o ChaaUWn blur re&4 0 i tbat 1—* ftahv Wac Comet in hiu g roviouz atatawnts, but that it should bo -notod hm vould d1vaa bo peavaitt d by av=orciml emnir to aouduo4 mtkv/ ottwr type of do=araial ontar:prise potmitted under the � ��t'arL� �aod �r�uld b�� no lmta4l� '�� 'b�a~�a t'b� ��;� buo�arse fo ` s % N#xr, l'a��l '��' �t�t�d that t�i� ��4, d �p ��[! a iN aL" butl,'US6, e. stared t'lat they o uaely in e s d �n Webuil IP -9 a naw otore mattaw ZUT10% 40hed if W000rr ok tine Comavdion had my d 16",est4s3m 0V Comrrantu to-sarditoAlu,„ Ro*' 51. Those bolug rhou.c. Chttimati .Vuller !� ota¢tod bo would opou diawu ion on 9pootting X --d: 47, the 'application of M , Bohr ul a�° :-3 to C-10 talmatr llor COUCd + lt�r �11a"oa r I, lee -C to Tovi tato part of the u�.� and ,1'ezvllta �1„tt0 ' rul�tiw to this �ppi��tiu� Cltr yl 2v alavdr tead the roporrt of Dia 2011tva a Powite t" �ittea d�C4�,tad Vey 10 1ry904o M�Vb{td. Vida f0 t 6uybl.uted two ttbdyy��p .{. olou{�o+U y4t y lit '11 , .. 2'& 0 4�b POIW ' .tiW.'t��ir +� :1�. the �1si�r1x1 tvi a`.�a"`.MkwO rni Q>iY, zz o th'o Fe, i{,�t�'t435q� (a) Ut 0.a QWm lab 'disopprova the reltlootod =tanirr, to C-30 Ott the toicotot' � ro°�044 =r:IA to ttm City Council th 1%40 . ott ttat-:d tta ppitttdu 09 the zoatos dad Vdttfts '06=MC-a Om the uoatod V e r to ° l Obouid ba dl t pzo wd r kbe roilool -I W Wr r -o1 talo 4th no 06t 'o tb 41, this M140 C-0-oo=l ki k , 41 J It mild tmt I)a n logical 0%,0ion Of, the C.I.district vezzalm would Ourof2v t 1 #L-V.A06=0tc 't dovo%c aze- t aloes igtzmtt,v ag OOZ%6130r d by the, Obv ttoo to 'be f' c1) I rP� 11 . �► tim beat it r sts Gs$G�3p or to I the ze;'` adjuent ;-w tho propw tion �uaxudcd tb roe repoti fUTrt%t:t 2;tatiod. the op n 4o kwAttt ri sttex sx(x +u d �rO ,: Ompris.to $fir the It vv4d 41100 Oreatee Oppottuo t;r for sof tha area, thtm Would b* ft 6u otd. with that Ipgg! Uz go ossed 100, tha wma b tNe $ it dQO14itaZ014d bCompatible .vti thd vevlae�t `` Y06�ta4'r of hills circ 14614to goperally east t4 00 Cesttral %Mtmm 'Chit iulte .otw [mast ta vi%%�` Of MO IM h�* ditz USS W 'Db'LQ i AVO ♦);Qp� sy{ pyyawl r9►y;a, vkw 'of ;they s�Y (lq{�,ssty �w:p ildbyyb ��y zzww��'ad .at�grgth ��.,, Zt:Qptjtjg� _ 1 a'Y.4A�+'�q' to, to i��4.?.oA Why *,to met 4 oftire c�ta k r fit a : S c I;` Kte. m .cs s.�» prosesitvpj 0 ' ; s Ea iziOL 'a i of l,h C a da t: 'r pj, Va�i'+Qcl .> CiJ t I iil.w4�! Iota owned gw tavrt Z 6,1t ate wtru t ger- t1aa ramfA108 lots included # fie *CA rtalialy Oympathine 'Oft a the prc�bl faced 1 �7 '. 9e r� h,�e"r� 3' a do'ea t f'ea'a' thin ffj a quaatjen; cif PsCUJVg for partioular grptat;r stor6 tit rat"hor ra gwrnion *9nt":R,, tho ganoral Brea fol: 4mi=-racial, U300" Be ad&�%at 'Uile t in t 4406dr to be an p':rob am of � cmEw��.�r��t�cs as the jai$ that at: tIhu ssanc-b ti �.j the prOs€trt�y"'r�C�.ae+ g the parisratt atai0 saaatka,,d far;rrrx it, Would appear tri 1a tet1.ni.: . �livtoner Salveotsr radii dl that if a tEz r priaOmrty, Winer 410p.otnt or, aerpsa 'at Otroet &hGU14 treats request cot;rclal M0,0Sm he mAd Ana a lost'itm' ata tawa a itr r *t. CpProviias such as r Mue at '. U1htOOLOUQr SO1V$A+.a;,1r 4trst Od It lu wt a WtOr Of Or ars dov vr 69 Opevetion of as pr • 'avoNo ��yult'a,� �Qy�sept80 but is}watt �r. c�cat}a�e tiz t2aa a�tl+�a�fi�v�y eAtm� tt ttga tor 1. 3s-.0isitiav vtssm'.fi�t :St0d ohta 11w1 the ".gzwartioa to mt oaa of v:"aathm". thorez hlpt14 gruc*lt;,,► a plru tut L-D In real-aty a que. ton oil ' athev those alliin, @seart�; usaastturturtat,c«'sroa3r :urtt Iotated the #mot i=uzetho 'proplatty, 'vxuld be 'ustA f'str d nVoemy Andw, cry' that the pwpo ty bU%d' ttosd Z01r 60ys u >3a Uv, ftl B-Ar io%t Md the OOM1,001On that sines ;4 VOwvy OtOTO la t4a Oidy �a tzas h th ' t :f&zjjy kt€ ! iK d tharo wott' d 110 no 'Otbar va* rtaatC t�a�s1tate 96 stdat Ilia, to x,ttd Baa eta tt° the Oiler-ati-41% 09 a, vvzv ;Stop-ary stove: at .010 me lofmtiovo. Cm° nalc t a ss. s t td the � loap a a tivzr)pw ta�th 'the fwpono till y of irti"a iaAllCiintus broad zoaftq. lits COW U* OMMO^40 htlP Mt thaw: Oh � rayy}'{��yys�!� J ell a�Yr4oy�f�ry �S, ta� m gtstit4 on t�"i"& am a.�y, yy�ty}ry �y�'orw , yyzro$ } W'd thzst, f:ditteo i '040p�y'uiGt d G0JIo tho, p=isou +Rout iil ai`J+ 6YnR.i.S'.W W:1{I iS:` Sf J.�'7Y.tS hath�.�t� �� 0v6d to ;��TwQ, And,hit than l z+ �t en t uld � t h va tt , u�r � a t tdtht rk t was 410 p7mparty dod itt;toa vacdot loto, i�W tae o to the c nmAC 00 t b .n .rsjuost that 11to ponalttdd to r