HomeMy WebLinkAbout65-342 (K-156) PARCEL MAPS PLANNING SUB V'[**Wil,"'N ",�,PTY ..
COUNTY OF BUTTE
County Engineer's Office
SLMMIStON: REGULATION' ORDINANCE Na. 431
Effec"►.Ye, July 1, 1949
`` SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TIME MAP Date received - I2/2.J6-5
'
I'
E: C,
Rami of Subdiviisiori
f
( Mama of Record of Survey
1
MEMORANDUM TO: Butte County Planning Commissior Date; 1/10/66'
In: compliance with :Subdivision Regulation Ordinance leo_ 431, the subject mop has beer
examined by this office and is submitted herewith for your consideration.
The proposed subdivision plan meets the requirements of Ordinance No. 431 with t'.e fat -
lowing, exceptions:
s ProvidQ conto=s.
It sloes not appear th=t county cads could ba constrifctad on the 10ca ns
shown, in fa, same of the rt.gats of Tray provided are verwally impossible
o-t
to construct, roads thereon..
COUNTYENGINEER RECOMMENDS- denial a requests that the tent at .v -aa
resuigri-ted showing a road pattern on which there could be constructed comity
roads.
DIRECTOR,
DEPAR i MEN . OF PUBLIC WORKS.
CQ LPs e`Q. larng (:oIIIiySS7o31 By
John Hamby
File
Jan.- 12, 19 E6 - Re lar PC E -It
Considerable discussio was � end on�xce at ions
by
Ptr regarding .grade and possible road
constrLcton to County standards.
Health Department recommends denial of the
subdivision p --ding further check of the area.
Action deferred to the next PC t+ltg on
Jan_ 25, and Planning Staff to comer with
County Counsel regarding matter of a parcel rap.
Jan, 25 - Regular PC Meeting:
NO action* Granted developer AD -day extension
for County Counsel: to further-study-
Feb.
urther study -
Feb _ 9, ig66 - Regular PC mtg
Action deferred to next meeting, -,s 4sr_Caldt=ell
not able tai be present at this r eeti ng=
Feb... 23, 1966 - Regular PC Iitqz
(Feb. 2, , 1966 = John Hamby called this morn3.ng
and asked that Caldwell S'ubdivisiorx be taken
Off rhe agenda for Feb. 23z-!, as- tiir. C's
attorney Will not be able to be Present.
Hamby was reguestzd to send a letter to this
effect to this offic=e.)
,larch 9, 1366 - Reg- Tar PC Ufa.
NO action taken. John Hanby apoeared and
remueste3 that action be deferred to next
PC Meeting on Mercb 22, lg66<
March 22, 1966. - Regular PC' zitg
The Engineer for the subdivider requested that
action Ae de±arred to n=ext PC 14th on Apr -12,1566
April. 12, 1966 - Regular PC %ftgr
Chan reported: that Staff has found there is
a violation of State Map Act & County Subvd. Ord.
and recommended that matter be referred to Hist..
,A;tty° for Prosecuti=on. OVER ------
7-- Hutto COM111
Iif`!V Of 4YfFAf...TH AND BE � I:� l
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC ..ARKS
t .7 County Center B -
Qh- 1;;*e+ California
LEzsox 3�3�-'cxtens , �•#
December 22, l
Plann s elan
in y Center Drive
Groville, California
k
Re: CALDWELL SUBDIVISION
_a
s.
Gentlemen.-
Enclosed
entlemen:Enclosed. herewith is a: copy of a tantat-i_ve map of the: above—
mentioned subdivision. for ,your review. If you have any cor—
rections,. additions, or suggestions concerning this subdivision,
please contact, this office.
Vei_T truly yours,
Director cf Public Works
F. Glander>
Assistant Director
Enclosure
MIE COUM PLANN6 C'IIFk
`196a
OROV1LLI� CFLIF.
COWTTY OF BUTTE
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS'
NOTICE OF TENTATIVE MAPS AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW
FISOF SUBDIVISION
r=�
NAME: OF RECORD` OF SURVEY - --- - -'"`
DATE RECEIVED
M WOFtANDUR TO Chairman. of Butte County Plar..aing Commission
and members of Subdivision Committee
DAz,�::#
In.complance with the provisions of Subdivision Regulation Ordinance No. 431
you: are hereby notified that the subject tentative map has been filed and is avail-
able for, your review,-
!r nlhd!rlsl-cmsUtz of- 10 3etr. frenti , s
Aa Via # .V- -r4i.tr
Copies to it t .
- AME, COMP PLAXOG' CON-1 ' DIRECTOR,.
DEPARUMT OF PUBLIC WORKS'.
OROVjLLE. C¢ LIF. BJ / ,i
IOlIS:: _ft ':. pl&-Man Date: +d ax-7 0 . 196!6
- °�--'
s6jecr: Wat'ativo FAX Time:
t is tka ori qrn of thu *-,Of ice fat the tentativa parcel
Map t eta by Nor- oyd Caldwoll fta.3 not **me under �a parcel
map .a$ OUVre d 1'a the. Staff SubdLviaioa Kap; Acto
Ur t 'i .l bag Sold; at n ic-ma ly sold nightparcels.
as ShOW4 on 00- st sUtnd, nis dubdiv.-".*U And Maw
atom the x uiro WtzbU e%, d 1,'n"�` n t�r+� - ',
This:OffIC4 hum c a d, the x94ar t a far*; that th
110wi10tS haVe Alred bow" 1d.-
I:
u #2 to tv. Culp on August ' g ' nv
07
so '� 4 a
04 sold to RX., n on ua7 27g, 1963
08 X14 zot h !� 10p j n;� 19 & .
1 WId ta W. AnW2.1mirm an June is, 196
tkOt P"Ce'l MQ't SIUMn On t =S gold W ft. Klliaza BIUStq..
Ztxtha pressed foap a% Zhu is Surly designed and
there, afar 4� lacit of access to, 80a ` tbw pressed Iota.
MU oaf tbe f,9rAPy. of the AreA, camplttg, apmeca*i-
3 j4j,5 # P Whiieb Ute; ado t of a: � � � � " to,,
bO inpos3lblv,4
r m-md that the 11arcel map ar. Ott not te appr
and that ll r and submit tle map a.-
subdivision., subdivision,
&I-3igned by
W F. Chan
r
OPINION TNO 314
SUBJECT. Subdivision. Map Act
PREPARED FOR e k JG EEE. CFT,AN, Planning. Director
PREPARE} BY 4 Robert K. Dower, Assistant County Counsel
DATA: January 28-, 1 -66
The following question is presented by the Butte County planning
Director .- 4
Mr.. Floyd Caldwell, Paradise; has submitted a tentative parcel ma
which. shows: Lot 2 sold in 1960, Lot 3-sold in 1961, lot 7 sold in 19-6
Lot 4 sold in 1963, Lot 3 sold in 1963, Lot l sold in 1.9'65, and still.
another lot was sold which does not appear on the submitted parcel map.
The Planning Director has raised oroblern 5 of access anddesign
The Planning Director has recommended that Mr. Caldwell redesign the
map and submi- the map as a subdivision.
CONCLUSION
The Planning D-Lrector is correct in his analysis and recommendat-.on
A Butte County property owner who divides for purpose of sale five: or
more parcels, since 1957 Tmist comply with Section 11535 of the Business
and Professions Code and other pertinent sections of the sabdivision law.
ANALYSIS
Subdivision has been defined as any real property which is
divided for the nucpose of sale into five or more parcels. Prier to
October 4,. 19563, the s--bdivision law did not apply if t1 e division for
the purpose of sale by -he subdivider into five or mors= parcels was
completed within any one year period. On.that date Butte County
Ordinance 421 was amended to del etc all reference to the loophole
"'within any- one year period`° Accordingly,, from that date forward . i.e.
,
October r, 1956, the subdivider into fivo or more parcels for purposes
of sale must comply with. the Butte Coimty Ordinanceincorporating by
reference the State Subdivision Law- Now true,, the Butte County
Ordinance became more restrictive than the State Subdivision Law in
deleting the phrase "within any one year period." as early as 1956,
whereas, the State Subdivision Law did not drop the phrase-until 1963.
Therefore,: the validity of the Butte County Ordinance is not subject
to attad' during the years 1956 through 1963. Mr. Caldwell must comply
with the present wording of Business and Profes,sions.Code 11535 as it
relates to the subdivision of five or more parcels, and he must file a
sub(iiivisian m p as recommended by Wing Pea Chan, Planning Director.
11r. Caldwell r s tender of a parcel map within the meaning of !,
Section 11576 of the Business: and Professions Code covering four or less
parcels of the new State Subdivision,Nap Act of 1965, will not. suffice.
Such -will not satisfy tine statutory and ordinance requirement of the
. -Tivi s on law applicable to ~property located. in. Butte County, during
the time in: question
BME, caumy rtpall a
JA 31 X966
OROV!�I uk1 &
'TO .c
A 'FOAM
SSO
.�Li .II�Y ;.1��► tf"� _i.�%::... v..;ai a.T.WliJ �. Vs.J RAG,
}}. _
r v 310, QJ7'1 2 o, - R AG3G��rr��,, 31mt ±? 1
W.D.- n0m
.. vain x s`art -
s;¢ are � $ 'ts€' ,' -m m- 4 rio i" on t � ' K `" �� � °�t£� so
st- �+U �:.•s c< Wim#' -e:� _ c. .� n -p....
MAIM
Feb.
` "
Feb . 23, -966
u r
AAnowl edgi ng receipt of above request. The C-zl dwel l Subdivision
Is being scheduled for cons iderat"iun zt the Miarch C, 1966
regular rreetir�g of he Planning C€r:;��issi�rn.
E_F!f [7C4. Rc E7LF fiJIIet.. PR1:Z. PA. E9f _.D - -' - •. •� e= w,» .. a=
February 25, 1966
John, UHamby & Associates
0_ DOx Hit
Paradise, California
ATTENTION: John Hamby
Gentlerep-
Pei Caldwell Subdivision
Ender '4eal Poadc paradise
This :sill ack-no ledge receipt of your written
letter request for a two weel delay o -i the Caldwell xap
map that the r attorney can he present
Ecra Tyi req with your request, please Ise advisee that
the CaldweT1 Subdivision is beim scheftled for consider-
ation at the liarch 8, M6 regular �eeti ng of the
PTa ring Commission.
`eery truly yours
9VITTE C UITY
Cling Fee Crary
W'FC/P Planning Director
iitrlsi� rIon
n de outside Req
rs yests
de the OHS -
By _MQIIk COOKS � tric augT� �o be
tEateroriwReeoreT Stasi � T
feasIble at
pARADI,W — T<he question this time and I#hat arY ad&
orf whether tracts and acreages tional water that, alight bee oa-
€ land outside the bound o€ tauted through studies- curieI;
;the Paradise Irrigation District under w2kv is being sought on
It, pl3Dk can he taken into the direr iia basis o£ needs of the PII3
ts, _
rzct and recce the -benefits of district in future dears- �;
iL4 water supp.Y comes before The board of directors
UOURI
the Pi73 1 a a r d of dtreeazs. lands, U n d e rr sections of the
fgeriodicaily' and election Cali€ornia mater Code but is
f -h a s generated s►song
pGzms4= far candidates and required to give legal notices of
earner<;�recroTe cam- the hearings to than effect.
pate Ito vever, if owners of Tann
#-eptly thecurrent PID with the district object in-
Jbo . _ i .f d z r t< c t,,_ r s was ap- elusion of outside I a n d. the
t proached to eider furnishing dater code, makes provisions for
nater tar a large tract of land, an"election to determine wheiTi+
known as the Caldwell property er outside lands can be taken
!on lower meal Roads outside of in
the Pfd boundaries according to wafer code pro-
tirnetC Wiggs, new owner of three pemoons, it petitions I ed by
_ cent or more of the
the acreage. advised that Die owners of land in the district.
pians to divide the property zu`o re esenting also three peg cent
four= or live acre plots.. a ' ofthe assessed valuation of is c
create access roads to the Pg ' `rad: are filed Opposing: a tt s
eels. He said he would be will l v
trig
to pad
e___�,� ,��.-. �¢ipro ed inclusion. the hoard
and wanted to know if there of directors is required to veil
would b2 a possi'bilitF of the ad election to deiet-iriine the wi"1
�*in the tract with of -tile people in the district.
district suppl_ g also . P..rsons wishing to have land
water in the future. Griggs included' in the district must
a k}a
board lir consider the j e peu5o« to 'that effect, and
SUM Of 2t 600 if the district p.,
should agree to take in any ad. the board is required to lilislt
shout al: reef legal notices of a hearing inditiottte
ointea out that a ` saint mater as is done for
Directors p bond .elections.
studiea conducted to date tom- If no objections are filed, di -
corning avaiiiable w a t cr gad rectors can tale action they se ,
future needs for the growth of fit on the inclusion app*a±i"
ttieZtstrzct are based o tiie a -Iffe—€ime set fer the mini
needs of land: within PID bound hearin� - u
arses:
Griggs caged theboard to giv
sus additional thought
during tri=axe sessionsand to
keep ltxY4 WuGgitesi til
pay P ir�rtn of itis :and
this action i
ever beec.- ggreeable
DISa vetera3i
giber o t P
Gs�".ed
that the
had cane before the board tirrie
,afte` time and ranged from
crater serVIZe• in
�ztnlated 41��` �1' $I"� tiitrl�'L is
V= at Comm-rfeti t h d t
t wmurt tl` f'IIr 3y about 30
t per ,cent of the Detract is currently ,
¢evelopl. aid' I a n d owners
LL
within the dish ict have paid tax
fi asseasme. on their acreaf'
• since the , dzst i(It was -fof-e .
entitling thein to ctirretti �d
? futuro water est, ca their
l elo>lands-�. of the
PTD, ;telt t h � t district
could not takcv, al' -other
comrriiitnents at this time to
un
the
e
furnish wafer outsides the 41s-
1hat that the re=
Directors agreed
quest fror.? Griggs be denied at
this time for three=Jor reg
softs- first, that the PID policy
has been for munY Y I - _ and is
that all waters a€ the
BE TE. COMITY PLANNING COMMISSiC D1
Regular Imeeting - Tuesday, April 12, 196
The Regula-- Meeting of the Butte County Planning Commission was held
on Tuesday, Apr .L 1.2, 1366 at B P.m in the Board of Supervisors 'doom,.
C .uxth,u e, oroville,, Californian
T ROLL CALL
Present :; Commissioners Cooper', Deinnis,Roberts,. Sherman,, Stott,
Watson and: Chairman. Rypkema
Absent Commissioners f% derson (cin leave) and. Gilbert
Also present Messrs`, Glandis, Toussaint, Blackstock, Walsh and Chan
tsito;rs Mr. . r r n Hamby, Mme.. Charles Johnson,, Mr. .r , rxgn:,,�cc Y
Mr. Oliver Cron and Mr. B. Shuping
11 MIIgT''iSS.
They -nirtu-es of Ithe Regular Meeting of the Butte County Planning
Commission heed ori Tuesday, March 22, 19x,6 were ordered filed as submitted.
Co
The mi tes of the Special Mem ting of the Butte County Planning
Commi.ssi n held on Tuesday,: April 5, 1366 were ordered filed as submitted.
I
111 PROCEDURE REC;c.I$LNIENt7ATION BY COUNTY COUNSEL.'
Mr BiaGkst k tecommended that the Commission present its finding
in writing to the Board of Supervisors when the summary is submitted for
its acjenda., These findings vv < l.d make the action= of the Commission more
meaningful to the Beard when t" -.e matters come before it for action.. He
stated that the stag law and: *eunty Code require sack findings: to be
presented an subdivisions... The findings could be included in the staff `s
report, and, if the Ccmnission: concurs with the staffs report,, these
5_
findijags would be thsse of the C cram ;ssion,.
------------
2V CONSIDERATION OF SLBDIVTSIONT S: �
A, 65-342 Caldrxell Su-bd vision (10 lf..tts) , cff Lower Meal Road,
a.
Paradise
Chan s� ated that action: an this matter has be --n deferred a °
nu:.-aber of 4 imes at the request of the subd vridero the Planning x
eg t there is a violation of the State Nin
office, has _or�.�d that P Act
and the County Subs..: vision ordinance.: It was also learned that,
e,n riar to the, sdbmiss 'an of this reap: all of the property
'aa Wa
i
7 d 'MT -
tc, ths plazzld -It',
Was Pfesented
Orlate
after
that there w --s a
was found
St.- -46 a Map Act
QZdjn'__MCjL_' f t7.�p and Subdivision
Ur-, cald"ieli
it. was the intention
a m4r_w
nat theki
tn TY With bi'�Izh ;_
laws and it was
r-larri"YN
maP was !%reserlted with Icna
the map, S z M C 0 f W -e'
z: say.. be rea.c.-hed by the access shown cn
ruatter ba� referle�d to the DIs4%.--r_fct
0IiI*,7e-_- Cron, 6ne c_f *he prope-ty 0-
inquiring Tners I appeared t-.�,fore the
beca,usip of this h�'s hIIII-ling Permit was being held up
t -'y Mr. Caldxell, Mr. _41ack6tock informed
hiz�k t:lalt tr,,-- Department Cf Public Works is;
de --I building p rm'ts r_r� 11,1 _ian uY State Iaw to
_ega, Sjj-jadjV_j
On by
Roberts an�d carried (.4 by, 07:-Mmiastioner
Car_
lanqrr8 Casper, Dennis,
Sherman, St�tt and Wa41--=0n; j7,i0B5_, C7r�,arman
m��r, wa% d�inie�' Rypkemal the tentative
b-asis Of the kAowledge brc�a'
that Ithe 911--t tO Out attention
that the Subdivi"der
IS t pzesent and that there is n. -t approved asci ss to
A n7lh 7 a r. rr -7 TI
1. SaVq-Mill Road, Paradise
and stated that
F -k
e Lare t,7 C Unt37 St.nndards
of the
DaPi r tment
easexe�nt to e- -nat2ral
S:rc-ek i. t
cf the subdivisil'r; and.
3 proposed nr.
d 4. L, Daw;i
9 t r e6
a leas-- twc ponding areas
which pvtt-��f ha�,e de2_I I
ls
�!:OkZd --hrough which s-ionxm
5.ictc macwa,*e
WX end8
hrigeriz-..q., v-? -f lowing.
t
-rids denial of tj_�e tenta-
i ve anti}' TVal- -"Ch,
ider -n ec_-Djy
.ith the
��;tatfed --that t!�-:ce z? x S �Fl wa:y, UVIn:ic h
rZ"R.er%,7 Swller totett � -
thz-_ rpropprty - - �n. to drain
'a flewage eas_gment,
a _Zjta'�_Ij; C4f &
the tym P I , J pe,�_-ed
for t provision
ed, rmarv_ rar_ec* 4
E;f the V?upart nei7it ic
N�
CpG
fes` •�
t_ f
on
{}1 w7 I d s - naernft o s.�u
z
-.� ? e P-��iLt. �F cY V '�w 4.i to fi s e V41ez�t, �,t it
-e e'er -LI ? ^ssr --n Tom? �;�.r�'z' c e ix"�0 �i
-c�-xn.,tevcr is necez7ar� to relieve
on property.
Piave : of €?evelo- in' t?_a e e ts,
1 t�' ? tt5 :� 14G5S : ?- in- E1x'f3c'' that tL S
a -n- be sold i��th o t Ilsb l at-� to �se1f
ACE' TSALE
5
5550 SKMAY = 877-3963'
PARADISE, CAUF;, 95963'
Al
�`t
WO