HomeMy WebLinkAbout67-283 (2)„. � �. r �fy�F >: iiF'� i S ay •: � _, ^p � y.�,a, w »r.—«••..;,�D � h � � �� � � '�',� t” � - ti .��
fi' cl�-t..< ...'���+.�.d�� a...t:�:: �,. ,�_.n_.. .. t �+`� n `�-. ., �1� .. .e_ _ .,. z'�_i r}� .�in3:�' r;a.y'._. "t' ._. .,, .�.. '�'r.
M
P.
Action was deferred at the January 23rd meeting,, pending
a report frora the Butte County Health Department. This is a
request for a variance from the lot depth requirement. Since
the area requirement can be complied with, and the proposed
development w 4 7.l meet, the s zmx tation requirements the Staff
recommends approval.
4. 67--262 Oroville Action Council Use permit fcr
community center, V-8 Road, AP :06-11-06, Oroville
Request for extension of time to submit plans. The Staff
recommends approval of an additional. 90 days to submit plans,
j and that the applicant be advised that this will be the last
extension.
5. 68--13Lewis M. Dodson m Variance from County setback
requirerrent (10') and minimn.un lot area of
(7j,400 3q, ft.) for duplex., SE corner of White
Avenue and Bomb and Lane Y" 144-14-19, Chico
The Staff recommends approval of the 10' variance on the
ground that there is a hardship created by the State of California
in the construction of the freeway, and that the proposed use, I
if permitted, would put the lot back on the County talc rolls.
6 66-12; Frank A Shipe Use permit for auto wrecking
4 yarn, east side of Palermo Road, south of
Wyman Ravine, AP 26-05-23, Oroville
p
There was considerable ob�i 'ection expressed at the hearing:...
A similar use was denied on the west side of Palermo Road just
opposite of the proposed site. We recommend that the proposed
use be dem on the finding that the proposed use would be
detrimental to property value, and investments in the area, and
it is the intent of '
the property owners to upgrade the area,..
Motion was made by Commissioner Stott, seconded by Commissioner
Wattson apd unanimous!y carried, (Commissioners Anderson, Gilbert;
Xennedy, Rypkemaa Stott, Watson and Chairman Roberts) to acoept the
Staff's recommend;, ions on Items 1r 2► 31 4, 5 and 6 subject to any
and all requiremofits of the b . c Works D' eTpartment and,- the Health
Department.
t
B. 67-263 Willi'm BettenoQurt .. ReZoning frpm (sliiq .e-
Family Residential' to I'C-1'' (Light commercial),,
West side of Larch Avc,nu�e between .Looker Oak Avenue
and Vallbmb-rosa Avenue,, ALS 45,-+133,-�69e, qhio
A
W
0
0
Mr,, Al Walsh presented, maps before the Commission for their
cons'deratiote', point out the number of people for and aga'nst
i n.
the rezoning request. Mr. Chan stated that the proposed use would
not be in harmony wit:` the prpsent use. Commercial would nobbe
well accepted in the area, It also would be in conflict with the
general plan, and a commercial use could be detrimental to property
values
alues and investments.. The, Staff recommends that the rezoning
r
request be denied.
Motion was made by Commissioner Stott to grant the "C-111
,(Light Commercial) as requested by,Mr. Dettencourt. His motion
was based on the fact that the proparty was previously zoned
seven (7) years ago as R-towith C-1 (Light Commercial) uses
for Bettencourt's property subject to securing a use permit,
and Commissioner Stott felt that, just because .Mr .Bettencourt,
had, not(developed his property within this time, the privilege
for the C-1 Zoning should not be taken away from him.
Commissioner Stott's motion was seconded by commissioner
Gilbert, and carried by the following vote; AYES: Commissioners
Andersons, Gilbert, Rypkema, Stott and Watson; NOES: Commissioners
Kennedy and Chairsanro*berts.
This item willgo before. the Board of Supervisors on Tuesday,
February 20, 1968 in order to set up a public hearing.
IV NEW BUSINESS
Ai 68-55 Forest Tiull - Variance from Ordinance #431
for lot depth for two (2) lot -so (93' X 881 and
1071 X 881) with frontage on Wagstaff Road,
AP 51-011-04, Paradise
The Staff recommends approval of the variance for the lot
depth. Thip variance must meet the, minimum arearequirements
and the sanitation requirements set by the Department of
Public Health.
Motion was made by Commisslioner Rypkema.- cohded by
se
CommisSioner Anderson and unanimously carriedo (Commissioners
Andot,adn,i Gilberto Kennedy, Rypkemao Stott
0 Watson and
Chairiman gobettg) to accept the S�af f I s rocoxr,.:nendatlon on
this item.
B. 68-61 t7ame5 A. Pinocchio - use permit for oxpah8iloh
of existing drive-in reqtau.,ranto 6929 Skywayi
AP 52-=0'6 46 acid 17 Paradise
T, h,,h Staff recommends approval of tho use permit for
expaftsioft of the existing building, and that a public hearing
be 'Waived,
�3
'. k ;
I
i r4
property on Latch Avortuol 40 followall
��: ,
�.;,,��. r �.�
.`..�
x,,,;q�rs;�� ..
• - t.
a '41 +t`4'h ,c 4'.1r r Iti,�� 5�.a Y ��.
fid: } 1 s. ly t, b.K1{l �'?i+ 4 r -at iPr
5.. 1� �;i. y 4 -f 1 1 '�Y1 M
:.:J..a �FS.Lea}tii. ..W.., if� /...��.. ,� .t, r ./.i� it....tl}.n r..lei.. A4..
,Rr-��..
,�;;
• • :�
a
a
-,:; ;
.•-.--• x. .....,.. .. ,.- ..,... .. �. ,�, ....,..,. .. .. ..,...... .. ...,...,-. .,.. _..... .:�.,. �:.,.... :.,.. +.::,w... ., ..;:, .. .. y .,:H t ,.,. ,n � ta.--.,,,.yr �.. »:r �. �. r oya, ,..:awa. ,si x-+. e-u+�u ...xc .. :� ..i.�ans r. �.e�. 1.ea .,,
.I ; . S ,, C, a . S, i .;. �: w a et r r M+ Y - t� v `v' R e:.. -r+ : ,r r � a tr w.r � .� w a �
,i.:t 1� t. -.,r• tf ,.i � a"':l ,��;��1,'. rnr. + 1tn��d '/ l '+ `i�te Rei �.r .� � r y.k��r t 6 ;wX �`�'� ,.
,. �. �, •.
_ ,
.,
.., k t �• � .x ��. � F ,t,4, . ..` . .r �1• A v N J :, ,�ykN,_ ice! f
t
�. . u
.�.:........: _,�_.�..:....:.'.�...L:. 't- ..;.S.._..�c.. �ut�s. ..:� h:..a.a�-..Yrx�. ,, t; E.:,_ :, n..'�s�a�Y.��x�:ieJ.uL.icw.,�L.,.s3,ra.....::W, c....,,.:: .,.. � ....uisL51:,., ....a_..;.....,. '��s1�...:.:.._a�__.�4e:..14._. .,:�..'.._ s_:.y_..
..L
�r
�, �.
., . "�a�
Rpit
' ^�
`: ` :'
�.1t0:. t.'pr� i, . .
SU 7,0 COUNTY ORDINANCE NI O. 903
AN ORDINANCE ZONING A 'PORTION OF THE COUNTY OF
BUTTE, STATE OF (ALI,FORNIA, PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE
NOS, 475, 522 AND, 616 OF SAID COUNTY AJqD AMENDING
ORDDIANCE r*OF SAID COUNTY.,
The Board of SuPetvisorls of the County of Butte, State of Cal-
ifornia, under and pursuant to, Ordinance- No. 475 of said County as
amended by Ordinance Nos. 522 and 676 and amending Ordinance
NO* laiDt-of said County,, Do ordain as
foil {;vs
SEC f N
m Butte,
The hereinafter described area situate in the County of ,
State of California, shall be and is hereby Zoned as a "C-1" (Light
-as hiereafter describeA and subject to all of
Commercial) District f a "C.1" District,
the restricted uses applicable to the uses 0
said o zoned being located south of the City of Oroville,
al ar-on s
particularly described . I as follow's'- -172-05) and as shown on
As shown by -map attached (AP 36
Butte County Sectional Map No. 4F, Lot 12 of Hill IN Dale o8ub-
div , tsion, I Unit 1, as showlin the office of the Butte, County Plan-
ninCoin IssIOn and in the office Of the Butte County Clerk.
g
SECTION 20 "C-l" (light, Com'
tria
The following restrictions shall apply in
mercial) District:
2,1 Use permitted: ct to the
a) Multiple awell,, n gs and. dwell,,Cg groupso subit
O
height limit, Wilding site., area,,. average lot width and
fled, for DistricW',
yard requirements specified.
b) Mbtdisi cribs and lodge lialitik, hospitals,
clinics, 'a! tharacter
p f a light cOMMOrc,
,& I stores and shops 0
- ) , .al 1,*1clt "ing appliatice
c t�'n a building,
and conducted wilt I
stores, banks, buber shops, beauty book stares,
clearij:z i)t laundry, agdfit8 and laundercttes , dress shbP85
i stores, tillinery
jultnitujL
drug sure, food stor
ptojess"onAl Offiddso
shod shops, storage gars es
Ial do
stands, service stations, metcl
and. tallot shops, public Utility dom
fico,j and other uses which tire of sinjillar dhaftictet to
those enumerated and which: will not be detrimental or
obnoxious to the neighborhood in which they are to be
located:
2.2 The following uses subject to securing a use permit in
case:
a} AU uses permitted in "R-1" and `aR-2" Districts.
b) Automobile courts and trailer camps:
c) Public and quasi public uses,,
d) Animal 'hospitals, auto sales; dance academies or halls,
open air retail sales, theatres, pet shops, wholesale
stares or storage, undertaking establishments, used car
sales, used or second-hand goody and: other uses which
j are of similar character,
2.3 Building height Limit required.:: Forty-five (45) feet.
2.4 Minimum'Lot Width required! Twenty-five (25) feet.
2=5 Front Yard requ-Led: Same as required by Butte County Set-
back Ordinance No. 506.
2.6 8%de 'Y'ard required: Non, except where the side of a lot
abuts upon the side of a lot in an "R'° District, ars which
case the abutting side yard. shall be not less 0 -an five
(5) feet, And except where the gide yard on the -weet side.
or a corner lot abuts on an "A" District, in whicb case the
side yard on the street side shall bt: one-half the corres-
ponding
orres-pondi g front yard required in such "R:" Disurict.
2.7 Rear Yard required: Twelve (1.2'' feet, or five (5) feet adja-
cent to an alley.
2,8 Any use for which. a use permit is required in ars "A-20
Distri t, upon application; for and granting of a use permit.
SECTION 3,
All uses of land within the District not specifically aurhorixed
and pews' 'pd under Section 2 are prohibited.
str, TION 4.
O dnalties for any violation of the Mining hereby imposed, within
the b, strict shall be os pra`vidGtl in the Zoning .Bt tabling Ord'in:apce.
.In compliance with the provisions of the Zoning Fnablit g O�vdi
iieLricej this O dint;nce 11mall from and after its effective data be,
conic a supplement to and part of the Zoning E.iablint, Otd nance.
Ordinance
This shalll bo andl it is hereby declhred to be in furl
`'r' •'�;
k
,:, "',. ir.,. ; ' ,.a-,,-+*nn±;t^�r;;R�'R"'^t+rr•+�++,rur,•newd'r»}$`}PI!!!B�krN„ :,..5.
u .
t `
a
,
t "
„
,
ne+a.:.'1«'�,-,gin.•.«,,,»«-.'�"—'e�.r,..:hr%�ro-w«.-��:�v-+.rn..n•-'.'ir...,-r•-r„r,-,*�++��-�r."i �_..._..... .�:W,.w: ..... ..,,, �.tl,,....,..,. .. '
..F ;�',�,. 'F '. .,�y�. yy, �- f i ,. , :i M ,. ,.. i""p'4'`�^+^.,"•�'1',^f'r-1„�'LM�'.�� ,+*�n!ym�.er�,.'.."'_' W. 'ti, .
'1 1! tl 1111121i I
C:,:�" '�w,, , qq,,' ' 4.: , .,41� �'"�"-*-3n'`'�r,«',« ,.�,.«;,w;•-'i"-T-�'�'�=i�sav '"''.":g�
r,.
:
,
tk
a
ja
y
'
•
a
fig, y x ,r z
35
t4 W tip
o
4WYtt ++i. 4 rxi k(.yr
a
Uo
1
fin
� { � j'' � �'` ,+�' ' ,lx:� , �
. >� !'"•�` �� ,i
�w'
,
:d p
� �?!�'`
7�.
rv&� lift -4 ., , w, ��h � yam• � �yry�y��t
4S ` mar o'
y��,"'► n
{p ,
�
,
�' q'
��' qq,,, , " 4i;•+ w`+dt:,yam , . . a .�g � g ;.
Eli
r
•�
.��.:� � .�+;K° - � r � L�%F" 'rid' ' ; ,a+!� ,. �j
�^wM d ;fie .. .0 y
.
*2
AN
�,.t., �r
�, : w.' y !
�r
io
�`' , � �,�' ,� �. ' '.. :� .��'' s �,.... ;� ,.
f'z' , ; ¢,f4'
t� y,�,' ,�. Ire, .;� "I�:
"En .
-�I'.a „K Vit,
�w y+ �1� �!� MMR 3# ' ' " • ;. �� '�:X $r14 'U� *BM4� :�: �?;e?.. ;9,' � 'v�. } '�
Me,
.� +
�f�
!k y
y�y�ypy�
e�
� Sal r'. - „' �•,
k .,. a
a..
,-,. 7ecN wM _ . 'k: :, M 8t � :.' ikr :. ��'�4.�` T'.'7.. 9+a �A' A'mr �.. "�:%;J; '•,' •.:,¢,!� a'�- fi�rr,,,
,,„�« �,', 'Wi 4kY •M fbj�.;�'t � .. � [ 'I.Tt+ �,
y�a�rP3 �a„ w �'
,� ",; r', 3n' IswY' fb M•' ; 4 '. .. a+. ,^,p�
y W �` ki4K. '4 ARY V t� s
foo. Al
Palp;01 �.pp +'a,
I- ',,'. �' M''kh'1Y�+`�' 14'P• '�! is.' i R a
ilk, 4
14.
ws
ol
Al
iA
On
.- � r, ;,,,. 4✓Rk" �'. �.. �^'f� fi'� �^ �'i�# �t� - 'qxi 4 �a '�aV,
06114
w
,
'tl,1
wr.rw ,�� - ^,�^ w.YwrtwpY!!rW+:•Y�.,r�.....�.y..�.M � : � 4. aY6 i.
.. ... :. .. _ �.�+—,....r,....,.-..r+�+�.:--..,+..',+-.+;':.-�..,....,..•:..«.�»-..+7w-»,+,,.•....'rr.+..,�n-.�+-.,'.-aw-�•---.,ti. ...+ter - ...,. i"� +..... ,
coa—
St
now �1,0:
Irk at MIN son 1
0
*d 1% Volt Q
Of
moo xna OV to
A ICU,
too �v NAK n
_ i � �f.. 14Y a '`�N a�ty I �- ei t _ � -., I' J� �! Y `�. t .1 .I � 1
MINy. .'I� t4;r I"�� ?.I ,,}.., ,rid. 1s ++^'. , '3 �'Hrsat I. i' ' s, I r �
ril
ZEN $1 1,
It'll,
IVol ON WAS mfg,"
tog
it, to,
Ia!Jul 0 Y
fIIi10 dot 0 F Um llIaslow oil" at
d, i
E mA get
nI w "R11
n
January 14, 1968.
To The Butte County
Planing Commission
Gentlemen!
I
In the matter of William Bettenoourt rezoning
(No 1 on notice of meeting for Tuesday,, January 16 ,
1968), please place the undersigned on record as soundly
objecting to any change From. R_l zoninp,• on the property
mentioned above (AP 45-33-69, Chico)
I consider it to be a rank injustice to allow any
change on this property from R-1 zoning since the adjacent
ropertios to thet south and west have been developed at
considerable time and expense into 53 residential 'lots
known as Mountal,yi Nista Subdivision ''o 7. and No 2, located
In the city limits of the City of Chico. To allow an
adjoining piece of property, not in the city limits, to
change its zoning from R-1—esperiall after
� � Y practically
all the development has been completed on th.e Mountain
Vista $1abdivision---would be unfair,. unjust and, detrimental
to the subdivision developer$ and other nearby property
owners...and not in accord with Bound planning practics
To permit such vacillating zoning changes would place
nei hbOrin
g g property clvners in constant Jeopardy for the:
safety of their investments and for the maintenance of
the home-like c3haracter of the neighborhood.
Accorai.ngly, 1 respoc�fully urge you to give you
best consi,d.erati,on of the facts as stated above--and t
%he W18hes of the signors of the petition sUbm1ttod by
Ar. Chas. Turns its June, - 1967-and thenrecommend a deni,al
"orrez0hillig of the subject property.
Sincerely yours,
"N'tch.o I's
t Boy;
Chloo , , rCaliforhi.
if MURV NNW 00M.
JAN A O
r40,V1LLVjALIV4
Yv-j
. ) I