Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout70-43 ZONING 2 OF 3NUE aauM nARNIN8 COM. SEP 1,81969 OROVILLEo CALIF; September 17, 1969 MV. sack McKillop, Chairman Board of Supervisors' Butte County Court Hous; Orovi.11e, California 9s965 °ar Ma~. Mcic ilop. In response to your letters of September 3rd, and 12th, regarding cadnty--wide water• -sewer planning, We would like to , ndloax,te that osar District is very much interested in oudh long range and oo- op+rative planning It Will be to our County's benefit to develop a water akid -soutor maoter plan regardless of financial considerations, howevor in light of the financing Po6sibi.litiee through the Department of Housing & tirban Devolo ment it would seem now is _ the time to coni - Sider immediate aotiori Plans for the future which we have are in the form of preliminary inveatigr ;:Dons and feasibility reportii. We have few, if any, long ranee p? ,ons Which havo boon teduced to plans and e�pec�i�i �tatacani�: General areao of long tango requixomoilto which we feel areimport- ant to our community's further devslopxtiont include: 1. MaJor source of supply: eq,, the 1967 Bulloti.n #137 prepared by the Department of Wader Rdsourcea sugoests an important water supply to the Cohasset, Vorebt: Ranch, and agali.a-Varadialo xi,dges could be the Jonesville Project.. 2. Intermediate aouroo cid supplYt c.g. 0 the raising of Paradiso Dam to increase the capacity Of the reaerv!oi.r. 3. Water filtration facilities of 4 ai.xt~: to 'handle total Production prebently and for some time into the future. 4. Sewage collection and treatment fmcilitie6 within the community and in thooe areas 'where public health and nui,safteo 16 in jeopardy. 'these are40 arcs not 000000arily li.stOd in Order Of importanco* MY OF CWCOv CAUFORMA fdIp-j OFFICE 4F THE MT'/ MANAMCR - P.O. SOX 34213, 9S92G E)CHICO TELEPHONE (9161 343-4401 — AFTER S.pO P.m. 343-7331 o L-+AGkt-5-].4/272 September 15,I969 °Sncrnmen 0", Son Mr. Al Walsh Planning Director County of Butte Courthouse Oroville, California 95965 Dear Al Reference is made to Chairman McKillop's letter of September 3 1959, wherein he requested copies of 'planning and projections?' related to sewer and hater facilities ,for the Chico community. I am enclosing herewith two reports (1) "REPORT UPON THE COL- LECTION OF SANITARY SEWAGE OF THE CITY OF CHICO AND URBAN AREAS" dated October 1957 (copy #3) (2) "REPORT UPON THE TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF THE SEWAGE WASTES OF THE CITY OF CHICO" dated March, 1958 (copy #12) I believe that the above reports will provide you with all of the information concerning sewage facilities in the Chico area. I might mention that these reports are in_theprocess of bein, up -dated but the up -dated information will not be available for at least six months As you perhaps know, the City of Chico ;is served by California 'Water Service, Company, therefore, I will assume that you are in contact with them for the purpose of securing the information necessary for the water facilities plan. The: City of Chico has some long- term interest in securing water storage facilities in Big Chico Creek. Since these reports are taken from our file, I would appreciate your early return of them as soon as you have secured the itrfor- mation for your planning program. Of course, if you wish to obtain copy for y g our program, ple$ e feel free to duplicate any of the information thetoin. In answer to Chairman MCcXi:lloprs letter of September 12 7:969,; I will Attend the meeting scheduled for the Butte County Planning Office on September 19 at 7.300 PM, If, for any reason t am unable to attend, I will S6,ld a representative. If there is any additional assistance l can provide you pertaining to this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. inc ely 8017E ANTY Pima of F avis >iD%ntib City Mar'rager SEP 16 1969' o0c 3 Chairman Moxillop Cl if Mickelson OROVIUX, CALIP, enclosures DCM/A lnWM -25-69 September 10, 1969 0""?o NOHT11 FrnST ST14VUlr Srx JO -9t G CnzzrO»rvrn tARvA 40() w 09001414 lit,. Jack MdXillopw 01111 ,rman Butte County Board of supervisora Cour thous Orovilld, California Dear fir. tic°�illoto This Will 14c:lrnO1OlC'd8e receipt of your letter of September 3 regarding infortnatian to be incorporakod int !41t !Aft far I -later fpr, BU�te Com, I would be better abie to respond to your latter if you could Siva us an idoa o4, the form In which t11iO information is bei providod by other agencies, (fe have, of coursa, provided for tFlta futura water requirements for our Orovillo nypt,em through a contract with )3ut.ta County for Oroville Wim water whj,elt pxovi 00 for our requirrcmonte as built uta over the nexttv7et}ty� c)u]» yaars. you are also 414are, I ata oure, that elle hater su 1 far I'p Y Chico system is derivrcd from wells located t roughout out distribution system and that the rechargability of these aquifers 4p.peara adequate provide for our requirements for the foreseeabla future, ul ate, too matteru were Alludad tro ire. the report dated klovemi or 1963 prepared by Leads, mill and Tewett, Inc. covering Water requirwanta and sources of supply for Butts Coul ty) California. VOVY t:rulY youra, C�,9.l,xV" RNTA 14ATEP SEt`VICE e,,ajR)AVY J'aptha .A IWO, Jr, �3ce ['reaidc�t t gtd t;:hjet Ehtlineet yl'Aw v p eta �.,X-try A��la#�-`""`' . L. Grant OUi76 WONYY PLANOM COK SEP 12 1969 OhgV1L1E, CALIF 1735'MONT30MERX STREET OROVILLE. CALIFORNIA 95965 AREA CODE 9115.533.9961 Orcice Or THt CITY ENGINEER. September 5, 1969 r Albert J. Walsh, Planning Director County of Butte 7 County Center Drive Orovlle, California. Dear Mr. Walsh: Supervisor McKillop's letter of Septflmber 3 1969requested we send any master planning of sanitary sewer systems to your attention in an effort to satisfy the planning requirements of HUD prior to the October 1 planning cut-off date. Attached are two prints of the satitat'yr sewering plans for the Thermalito Area as envisioned by lour Sanitary SOk� r Consultant, Dewante and Stowell of Sacramento. The plan illustrates the platrqed location and size of all Pipe necessary to effntively ,sewer the Thermallto Area to the Lowen termal ito Bridge crerslag the Feather' River. from this point, the sewage could be piped either on ^P,Wille Dam Blvd. to the existing outfall in r-ifth Avenue " SOutber Y down reather Liver Blvd, past: the cemetery and then Easterly 4ntn6s the rockpiles to our ekisting treatment facility, We also have some preliminary plays for sewer ftg Bast of Oroville in the Canyon Highlands area. The attached prints with the proposed sewer lines own in red pencil illustrate our tentative plans in this area. In 96 far as future plans for our sewage treatment facility itself are concernedy we have our consultant working on the problem now, We have vas:+ious choices such as (1) Bnlarge plant by addition of Secondary Treatment features and resin 'x 11ere we are; (2) Construct a totally new plant- at a different location, (3') Join with Forth Burbank for an Outfall System with treatment facilities located in the Palermo Area. • aR01111M-wY4#P0rrE IRRICAlrION VlYrRffir • s Domestic - WATER Irri alien� � .,P.' � .Hydro = POWER - Electric Commercial . , .... Industrial Lakes for Storage and Recreation P. o. Box zn9 O R O V I L L E, CALIFORNIA PHONE 53Y.$978 September 4, 1968 gIi' "^t►'�T� FIPbNIgt� 1; SEP 4 W69 Mr. Al Walsh Butte County Planning Director VlLLE, GA1,.11F. 0our°L•house Oroville., California Dear Mr. Walsh: We etre in receipt of a letter from Mr. Sack McKillop recommending 'that we furnish you with a copy of our planning and projections for the further development of the Orovil,le--Wyandotte Irrigation District facilitios. Attached is a copy of the Maater T'it'an for our domestic Vater system as prepared by our consulta.ng ongineors, Erol n and Caldwall of Saxe rrarcisco. This study is based on meeting the future requirements of the District through the year 2010. .Although the report is noir two year, old, there has been nothing so far that world necessitate changes in this plan. Our request for a loan and grant from the Department of Rousing and Urban Development is to cover our immediate requirements (Phase One) as included in this overall: plan. Ae of this witing we believe the plan to Stihl, be very a.ccurato, although much further delay in proceeding with Phase Ute co7ijd necessitate upgrading of the estimates duo to rising costs of construction. We believe this plan is in Sufficient detail that it uIll 'lie of great assistance to your, Planning 00mmission in formulating long -,rage plans for the area encompassed by Oroville-W'atdotte Irrigation District. Any ,assistan" you can give us in soouvitig fin=ial aid Will: be greatly appreciated. if you have any questions regarding this enclosed: report, Please do not hooita,to to calf: on us. Very truly yours, Ri V. GMTt1 , General Manager ]+ lcloaure: ReportonDomestic Water System V i W i at i AJ� oLlVrit CITkUt — NUT Chopt . WrLt 00ULTAY AN HOMt SIttS IN BgAUTIPUL tit4RA PooTNILL LANb A 4 Inter -Dep arfinej!+tIMemcrnndum a �, TO; Al 'Walsh, Director anning FROM; Administrative Office SU13ACr: North Burbank Public Utility District application DATei August 21., 1969 Per telephone conversation, application of NBPUD is herewith forwardr.for review by yourself and other members of the BUCAG tk- J-Iical committee. Please preLsaro report of 'o mime s,� p� your review so that we may distribute E. W. Bosworth Asst. C A4 04 BUTTE 90UOY PLANNING COM. AUG 21 1969 ORovtLLeo c ALV o r533 '?2'0'00"p North Burbank Public utility District 1960 Elgin Street OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA August Ili 1969 Cliff Mickelson, County Administrator Butte County Aosoci.ation of Oovernmants County Courthouse orovale, California 95965 De= Cliff': Enclosed, f r your ftttther action am tt>ro appl,ioE:ons :dor Federal, "ni:stance undel:,. the Housing and Urb,n Development Administration. Application No. 1. in the a+nount of 411103y100 grant and $103,500 lo,", coders the North- Eaot study, vein. Application NO. 2 in the amount of $31.8,950 grant and $318,9511 l.otin covers the North- East Eas -stuRy AR ani. the Villa Verona Stady Areal. The Utility District feels that these projects are consistent with good overall area and regional. planning. Tho aroa of ooted by thea projects have a 1014 per capita assessed value and the soil " conditions within the arca are very poorly suited to individual sewage dispos a-I nystetris The 11txli.ty District thomefore) xespectivel,y and urgently requests that the Butte County Assooia�,i.on of Gov, rnments roview, approve, assign b SCh pri.oriiy and Tomard your comments to tno Depatti ,,ant *if` flout ing, and Urban Development Office in San Francisco Very truly yours, NORTH BURBANK PtJMTO 'UTILITY DISTRICT +,ho nomm WO.- Fad Eno "r `M i c�i h Q 03 y t a.. M r •. ,� ,� Tr„lc hone. 5” 3 �ZQ00 North -oui �mnk Public Utility District 1960 'Elgin Street OROV;ILLE', CALIFORNIA August 11, 1969 Mr, Nemschoff Department of Housing and Urban Development P. 0. Dox 36003 _ San Francisco, California 91x102 _ Dear Mr. Nemschoff; -1 Chairman and Co -Chairman of trp Croville Action Council visited with you 14 Ity 1969and discussed the subje6t application. Mr. Harris and Al Swift have repurted on your very encouraging comments and suggestions. The District ap- ' prc,.c ates your help and cooperation in this very desirahlo improvement to our oummwnity. The subject area is located just south and east of Orovi.11O. `ale Horth East Study Area, as the 'District calls the area, is Located about 80 miles north of Sacramento, California, our closest neighboring city of 25,000 or greater popula- tion. The Oroville Action Council is a well organized and directed group that is making a meaninful contribution to the growth and development of Greater Oroville The Council's efforts have already been the necessary catalyst that was required to accomplish certain road, drainage and street improvements. The Council is also working towards the construction of a Community Center. The Center will be loca- ted within the North East Study Area and the proposed project is required to pro- vide sewerage service to the Community` Center. The North rthe �J t Study Area contains approximately X76 acres ;in a watershed drain `' • , contributing, sound citizens of the comm TheHoever` ci.rcumstnticeseand some have g people caused this particulai area to miss)out on some of the good living that is enjoyed by most of Greater Oroville. l"atk� cost of the piroposed sewer, construction is more than the area can support. The Utility District offered to coney Cruet by "clay labor" Certain of the sewer proposed herein; however,, evert with the assistance of the District the costs wore too great. .y The cost of construction has risen about 1.5% during, the intervening period of time. Federal assistants is required; in the opinion of the Boards to accomplish these necessary facilities- RESOLUTION OF T11I3 OROVILLE ACTION COUNCIL WHEREAS, the above said Action Council has been seri- ously er -ously concerned with the lack of sewers, sewage facilities or the like in an area adjacent to the North Burbank Public Utility District; and WHEREAS, North Burbank `.Ublic Utility District has issued oral statements of intent to annex to its district such area and land not having sewers, sewage facilities or the like; and WHEREAS, officers of the aforesaid Action, Council have been in contact with the U. Si Department of Housing and Urban Development regarding possible grants., programs or assis- tance to said area and the North Burbank Public Utility District for the construction, installation Rrxd development of sewers, seN.Oge facilities or the like; NOW, TEM-REFORE's BE IT IZTISOLVED, that the aforesaid Action Council does join the North Burbank Public Utility District it its annexation statoments and procedures there- after to be followed which seeks to annex to said Utility Dis- trict that area of Butte County as more specifically shown in Exhib.L't l attached hereto; moreover, this Action Council joins with said Public Utility District and hereby requests and velosnlent anomand�all fznanc�.a].�1air� or eht of I�oi•A;�ng I Urban De- p y assist ar .e that possi- bly can be rendered to the aforesaid -'rea to bu annexed for the pu pose of constructing, install ,irj and =, -,erating sewers, sewage facilities and the lake. $B IT FURTHER RESmvpD, that. the of said Action -.7.10tincil are hereby author ' 7ed and emp ,)worso on, its be- half to •xecute, sign any and all, applications, or documen'."Y to facilitate the procest 'Ixg of any grant, car finan- cial asp .stance px.ograin from the a i:,oresaid U. 8i Department of Urban bbvolopment DATED; k7ul:y 1969. y P u _ July 312 1969. 111BEREASTBE OROVILLE ACTION COUNCIL INC. has explored and has become very seriously concerned about the sanitation problem, because of no sewers. Sewage facilities are very poor l because the area doesn't have this service. This section is adjacent to the BURBANIC PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT. The NORTH BURBANK PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT has offered the annexation to this area, but the taxpayers located in the area can not afford the tremen- dous increase in taxes—because of the economic condition that exists in the area; because of a lack of employment) seasonal. work, Pal, -%u work; lack of Skills and low income people. The y employment p yment rate is twice as high in this area as in other areas. Individuals lave to travel as far As Bakersfield, Los Angeles, and other long distances in order to acquire employment. Those who work on farms only mare enotigh to exist and thGy only work during the fruit season. The sanitation is very bad. The BUTTE COUNTY HEALTH DBFARTMEXT has issued statements to citizens that the ,peptic tanks are inadequate) ands therefore, they will have to pay for a dry well, that costs about nine hundred to a thousand dollars. The citizens can not afford this, as I have stated above because of the low economy and financial, condition Of law income people page 1r pa-ge �y Soy therefore, the OROVILLD ACTION COUNCIL INC.1 which consists of low income people will explore and will seek other means of finance for these people who are handicapped because of poor conditions. We have contacted the U.S. DEPARTMENT of HOUSING and URBAN DEVELa OPMENT for possible financial assistance or other program grants for annexation to the 'NORTH BURBANK PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT for the construction, installation and development of sewerz, sew- age facilities, or the like. in conclusion? VMj the members of said body above certainly feel than the area we have mentioned has top priority. So we appel to you for your divine consideration and quick awareness to our sanitation problem in But' -J County. Signed C► ,� nrj f CLL... �l�t�� � ��� � : �+ AF I oust -_ - LAND OF NATURAL W[ALTH AND 'BEAUTY t OEPARTMEHT OK PUBLIC HEALTH 1. 14*1041.:11.D., KP.H., binelw AJJn❑ 695 01-*Qir Av*"-, P,O. B" 1100, Chi", C-111-1110 95926 s T -1 -ph. 3434211 nilly 1•.'M 2436 5" St"t,.OrodH4; Ce1161114 95963 • T•6phm 335.1230` July 31, 1969 Qroville, California 95965 North Burbank Public Utility District 1:960 Elgin Street Orovil.le, California 95965 Gentlemen: We wish to comment regarding the present method of sewage disposal in what is known as the North East Study Area of the North Burbank Public Utility District. The present method of sewage disposal in the area consists Of septic tanks and primarily leach lines. . Soil conditions in the area are extremely poorly suited for the operation of this type of system. ConsegUWAy many sewage overflows result. The use of seepage pits have been tried in some instances but have only been partiall)r effecti FORM APPROVED : del iAU tie THE DUD— _N0. 80- pO176 5 ' ^+p a0 NOT WRITE IN THIS AR .Ak. FOR E; -Nr USE O ONLY a ftllM A.PPLIC'AT10N C 0 R A L AGENCY DATE RECEIVED nor hLr mo TO FEDERAL ASSISTANCE FOR PUBLIC WORKS AND FACILITY TYPE PROJECTS (Please read the Instructions before completing this appl i. AGENCIES ASSUMING JUR i Sb I CT'I ON cation. Submit application on original and one copy, AGENCY DATE PROJECT PROJECT AttaCOMPONCNT N0. ch additional sheets if necessary.) APPLICANT (l:'xnrk legal name ar propnscd panic i//not incor znrn'I d) North Burbank Public Utility Dis "r':LR IA. CITY OR TOWN r - (C.nanty) (Slate) OrOaill@ ButteYip code) ID. TYPE OF ORGANIZATION (Check appropriate box) CaliforniaC� �9[��965 STATE OoV. AGENCY NON•Phor1T FT Gov. UNIT �ORDANIZATItlN �07NER (Spccl1y) 2. LOCALITIES To BE SERVED C I T I E" TOWNS, OR AREAS P O 'P U L A T 1 0 N (fast teparntely) COUNTY 1060 CUR"tjT To DE SERVED ' (Estt BY PROJECT, North Burbank public Utiny Districta Butte 4000 45oo -0- North Hast study Area Hutto 500 ].00n 1000 r S. DESCRIPTION AND PURPOSE Of' PROPOSEDPhOJECT r1 At DESCRIPTION _ A. sanitary sewage collections totem is p y proposed to be constructed within the NarthDas Study Area Of the North Burbank Public Utility bistrict. The system proposed will congtitute all extension Ot the existing community- sewerage system. br PUBLIC INTEREST AND NECE551Ty The NOk-%tact study Area is seared potable water by the of^ov3.l�.e 'Wyandotte Irrigation l DistriCto �HoweVbr., there are na OOMMunity sewers w� yin the area. 1 U The soil conditio within the area is, extremely dense and porrly suited tt� ind�.vidulal Walt6 disposal i systems. Health xauxards exist within the area. The arca ,can r1btbe deve apedrthou sewers, r C. PLANNING AGENCY Mcohiy. Ahtltkbuhtyt lteg andlt el- p HCY1EWEb Olt PLANNING AGENCY (,Attach aoMments)t Not RtVitWEb 0Y PLANNING AGENc`Y (if Aot, etptolh) APPLICANT'S CDPY STANDARD FORM PRE5CIIDato BYRTHE bUkEAU of THE hubftT f 011ICUL�R N. ATd IRM I AMf.. _._.,.... 4. IAETHOS-,, F 1► ANC I NG ((n thaustands a dollars) „ ,. u ' ,OF C0MP0NE'NT5 OTHER TOTAL SOURCE W A S T E WATER (Describe in OF FUNDS TREATt'tENT COLLECTION Cr. below) A. FEDER!,. ;RANT REQUESTED -i�- $ 103,500 $ -0- $ -o- 10 ..5 00 B. FEDERAL LOAN REQUESTED 10350(>lt C. OTHER FEDERAL CONTRIBUTION None _.... j Q. STATE CONTRIBUTION None l E. APPLICANT CONTRIBUTION 103,500414 _ ,$ $ 20•I', 000 $ $ 207 000 1 F. ESTIMATED T'TAL PROJECT COST 1 G. *Loan preferred, a*1911-{13 Assessment Bond if necessary. S, OTHER FEDERAL ASSISTANCE PREVIOUS OR F'END,ING NAME OF AGENCY' TYPE OF INDE©TEDNESS AMOUNT ASSISTANCE OUTSTANDING. IF ANY REQUESTED 1 ENorth urbank D3 PL8Lt,66oNone Zntey^ce for Sewer _ I Utility strict North Burbank G0 Sonde) PL8l�•-660 5$,000 16 000 .ct _ Treaitmen Fb,�,-JjLsf to the best of his knbWledge andthat artk represents Thatthe data in this application are true and correct by the governing body of the applicant. the filing of this applicctton has been duly authorized TACT LEGAL Gvp ordtc NAME OF APPLICANT (if untncprpordted; elite; proposed name w North Burbank public UtilityC)istrict, a State agency. ATTEST (Signature of att"ttng officer) BY PRnature of autbortze officer TITLE Orson C. Shepard; TIT E ois Lowe Board President of the Board Secrdtary to the Board , NOT& idditional,(n atolation Ain b i2etittestrd a Su ort T11111, A licntion{ . __----- IN THIS SPACE' FOR GOVERNMENT USE ONLY) WO NOT WRITE { , it � { {• { ^ ' � M ! • , , Y Lr v:.::wisY a 0 0 ® iC ASSOCIATES aI� n� s )K ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS Isoo ono DAM DLVO, BUITC OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA easels MIONE It 16) 533:6407 t`ALIP-W;NiA NI'VA1)A 'r, c 4tle4ou 0 E August 1, 1967 North Burbank Plxclic Utility District 1960 Elgin Street Oroville,California Gentlemen: As requested during your regular July meeting we hFve reviewed the feasibility of sewering the Northeast study area of the North :,arbank `?ublic Utility Dietr c. We find that limited sewer construction in the study area is justified. The average costper acre is less than $900.00. The ;limited construction proposed will serve 94 of those structures and homes now existing in the area. The estimated cost of the proposed improvements is ,$130,000.00 and the total- assessed value of the study area is $216, 868.00. The Northeast study area, as shown on 1bchibi.t A., is bounded by the exi, ' 4 ng district boundary on the West and by V-6 Road on the South and by the watershed limit on the Easterly boundary, anpro);imately 300 feet to the East of Lowen Wyandotte and the East, line of Claremont Drive; The North limit of the study area is epproximatelyy500 feet Northerly of Lower Wyandotte at the intersection of Central Drive: The study area contains approximately 276 acres and 76 ex,sti.hp homes and businesses., At the present time the estimated population of the study area is just over 500 people. The study area population will increase to 1,000 by the year 1970, at which time the rite of increase will decline. The population projections indicates that there will be alightly over 1,500 people being served in the study area by the year 1990, Por study purposes the area was subdivided :'Ato four major watershed service localities and two of these subdivisiUns were further subdivided into feeder lines, The A line, as shown on Exhibit A, serves the watershed to the North and East of collectornand lines0intthi.siThe A servi.cetarea, The collector lines in this estimates indicated below do hot include any 4 will be, constructed by private capital to servibb predominately the proposed 18 acre mobile home park to be constructed at the intersectioli of Lower Wyandotte and dentra� Drive: The ;B line service area contains 51 acrenj however at the prosent time, there are no homes or dwellings within this sub area. The cost of tho B line is estimated to be $251000*00' and the cost per acre of service is $190.00, it is jot IS GOOK M, It MAN J. C601t C. C, M recommended that B line not be. constr►t:,ced at this time. The C service area is further subdivided into the C Line, the Cl line, and the C2 line. There are approximately 120 acres in the C service area and there are at the present time 47 homes and some commercial establishments. The Cl Line serves 34 acres and has only 3 potential hook-ups available to it at this time. We therefore recommend that the Cl line not be constructed, at this time. The 'C and 02 line will serve 86 acres and h4 existing homes and business establish-. meats. The unit cost in th,e C & C2 service area, is $1,020.00 acre served or approximately $250.00 per lot, assuming � acre lots. The estimated cost of the C Group improvements is $92;400.00. The assessed evaluation for the areas benefiting from the C service area construction, totals $116,275.00. The estimated construction cast of the D group improvements is $35,700.00. The cost per acre served in the D service area is $615.00 or approximately $155.00 per lot assuming a acre lots. The assessed evaluation of the D service area is $68,050.00. The estimated individual assessments for the D group improvements is included in Appendix A. The existing collection system through which the Northeast study area sewage must flow consists of 6 and 8 inch diameter concrete sewer lines installed in 1936. In 1959 certain relief works were constructed of 10, 15, and 18 inch diameters. The majority of the flow from the Northeast study area will enter the existing manhole at the East end of Elgin Street. The capacity of this line is Limited to 270000 gallons per day. It is anticipated thatby1:980 -.1990 the capacity of the existing 6 inch line will be exceeded and overloading will result. We therefore re-commend an inter- tie be constructed in Burlington Avenue to connect the existing lines in Elgin Street and in the alley°of Ft. Wayne. See Exhibit A. The combined capacity of these two laterals is 675000 gallons per day". The ultimata required Capacity to service the Northeast study area is'393,000 gallons per day, thus a 2822000 gallons per day surplus would seem to exist. Heavy infiltration into the existing system will reduce this indicated safety margin. The capacity of the 8 inch main that traverses to the South in Roseben Avenue exceeds the demand by an acceptable margin. Here again infiltration in large quantities will reduce the safety factor in this line. The additional burden that the NortheAst study, area will place oti the existing treatment facilities is minor. Vre anticipate an early pear loading from the construction of the mobile home park, however, the percentage increase in flows at the plant will not be appreciable. VJe anticipate a 1967 average sewage flow from the study area of 31,000 gallons per day, with a peat flow in the order of 94,006 gallons per day, These flows gill increase to an average flow of 68,000 in 19703 with a 1910 pear flow of 264,006- Attached hereto is Lxhibit A that indicates the approximate alignment of the VdAOus collectors in the Northeast study area. Attached also is Appendix D which id the enulimated construction poets for each of the service areal and the combined totals, Approximate assessment amounts are indicated by mate and users number are tabulate in Appendix A. Financing The financing of the :improvements in the Northeast study area may ?. j by far the more difficult task associated with severing of this area. ;,,, of the most applicable means of financing' works of the type planned for 14, study area is through the Improvement Act of 1911, the Street I t a N.rthe,;tat Act of 2913, and the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913. t'sj '"nt believe have been authorized for use in Public Ut"ity�Distr These facilities such as are under consideration. +, of the .total cost' of the improvements among the �pro ertxdesnbene i,,3as'Ltieading Proportion to the benefits that they receive from the s' ciftc: r The assessment constitutes a lien against tbq individualepro�- a i' �so,;t�dualthough. they may be paid in cash they are generally -secured by a bond„ t Special assessments are normally used for financing of improve�a,,:►ts teat serve a Specific area by the formation of Special Assessment Districts the t" t�•ict in this case would be the general 13 mite r� the Northeast study s, t exr�itrict service area A: and service area R. Bonds may be issued under the Improvement Act 1915. In either event, the ;,taa;iof mum bond period i0 1 or the :'NP'ovement Act of realistic standpoint they ars usually limited to l5*yeyar.�t' prove , from a salability and to reduce the discount rate on the bo ds o imprave the used, which we suggos,, bonds are issued against individual f gxi�h©exsxa£Aland s and are secured only by that individual parcel. On the otherf;hand) bonds issued under the 1915 Act are issued against the entire 3mprovemenLtistric►^, and are individually secured by specific parcel o£ property. However, i,n thl', ].atter case the agency undertaking the work is obligated to le'y a, 9,0heral pax on the whole of the district not to exceed IN per hundx,ed d P t UA.' he paying of delinquent install ttient' ollar assessed ►valuation r principle at�d intF�:rest. Assessment bonds issued under the 1911 or the 1915 Acts have a maxi Nj.M rate of interest prescribed by law of 6%. However, the bonds May be :iiscounted raising the net cost Of the bonds, The discount rate depends eo relation 62 the amount of bonds to the total ass».side; rably upon the essed evalua.,ion and reflects the risk of the venture As seen by the bond purchasers. Tex, this reason .financing by special assessment bonds is usually more expensive than the other type of bonds. However; they often present the on1 for areas Such as the Northeast study area. y practical method of fiha;oing , In round figures a 1911 bond car rylhg a 6% interest rate fox, a period, of 15 years, 'Will have an annual payment of principle and interest thut :xs appro;,,imately lrj,p of the total Assessment As set forth in the Appendix 'below, 1 would be leased to discuss this st �S' w th p p y area at your convenience, u ynu and th© eta �e in the stud BnoloaUrea t7d�� Ya :x J tj APPENDIX A B GROUP IMPROVEMENTS ' Estimated cost $25,000.00 (Approximate Subject To Adjustment) NAME CODE COLLECTOR ASSESSMENT Jacksondean M 34-24.009 950 � Hurst, J.W. & Falba A 34-24-011 95o Stevens) Leola 0 34-24-012 95d BridgemanjDoyle & Carolyn 34-35-018 875 Wright,H.O. & Rose 'M 34-35-019 5025 iatoa,Harold F & Melba 34-35-020 11100 , S monds, Joseph C & 'Lyndall A-35-028 1075' f ; Wood, Paul & Ruth ttal 34-35-029 415 Knox,Luster & Bernice 36-611-001 1j30u Y Knox, Luster' & Bernice 36 -or -002 3,650 Anderson$ James A & Thelma 36-011-005 325 Williams j James L & 'Maria 36 -oil -"006 21475 , Smith,W. J. & EdnaX, 36-011-007 1.400 Brown; Flar6ld J & Gladys 'M 36- 1.02011-008 , 5 Toney)James Etat. 36"011-012 a 2x325 ,vao 0 GROUP IMPROVEMENTS Estimated Cost $43,900400 (Approximate, Subject to Adjustment) ,NAME CODE COLLECTOR MAINS TOTAL. ASSESSMENT .ASSESSMENT Scott,Virgil & Lela 36-011-010 79" 122 912, Lacy, Sam & Ionia 36-01.1-017 4,610 710 5, 320. Lacy,Charl.es A & Vivian 36-011-018 966 722 1,088 Roberts,James & Scottie D 36-01.2-003 31205 494 3,699 Bradford, P'lal,ine 36-012-011 ' 1:,976 303 2 2 , 79 Thompson) James & Mel.via K 36-012-01.2 1456 272 21028 Sanders)Charles G &- Isabel! 36-012-015 1054 165 1,,2�,9 Ru.f.fin,Wil.liam & Nominee 36-012-016 23414 375 2489 Nash,Eddy & Lulu Lee 36-012-017 1,668 258 1 926 Dennis,Theoplis & Beatrice 36-013-o!4 485. 73 558 , Davis, Port L %-013-015 68 12 100 0. W L D. 36,-013-01.6 17$ 2!i 7.99 0. W. I. D 36.013-017 ..965. 148 1 a 1.13. Ford) Harriet M 36-022-006 1,536 230 1,774 Blackmon,bldn P 36-022017 307 la0 355 Dace)George & Ledonia A 36-013-018 0985 �i�l� 3,'Wt9 Blackmon, Glen 36022.01.9 307_ 1�8 355 Blackmon, Glen 36-022-020�t 395 60 Babino,Tholma & Corley N 36.022-028 3 )�3 6 515 3 i 85i � Babino,Thelma & Corlq, i# 36»022-029 660. 99 759 Gipbon,ollie 36-022-032 2 S02 384 2, 885 46nes� Delphic, & Ruby 36-022-033 ' 527 80 60'i e y� ; ANE CODE COLLECTOR 'MAINS ASSESSMENT TOTAL ASSESSMENT Blackmon, Glen. P 36-022-035 395 60 45`" Blackmon, Glen P 36-022-036 395 60 455 Blackmon., Glen P 36-022•-037 790 184 974 Dennis, T Bernice 36-022-038 2,590 422 3,012 Dennis T C & Hattie P. 36-022-039 658 99 757 Harris, Robert Jr.& Linnie M 36-401-033 11932 2109 21231 Elston, Henry .& Sallie 36-013-013 1,62h 250 ` '1'11874 Floyd, James 36.401-008; 790 1.20 910 Eiston, Henry & Sallie 36-013-028 11624 248 1x872 Elston, Henry & Sallie 366-013-029 X95 6o 455 4 I .. . .... Cl GROUP IMPROVEMENTS Estimated Cost $8,4004GO Main Only NAME CODE MAIN ASSE,SS14ENT Shannon,B.M.& Bradfor.i P 36-012-002 963 Nash, Eddy & Lalu Lee 36»013.001 h9h Toney,, James & Alice 36-013-031i6 Carreyy John & Sebell 36-013-001. 357 Forbes, Lewis C & Lena Mae 36-013-005 118 Williams, Marie 36-013-006 178 Frison,., Harvey 36-013-oo? 178 Davin )Lester & Pauline ' 36-013-009 329 Williams, Charlie & Mollie 36-013-010 108 Jordan, Dock & Fanney 'Mae 36-01.; koil 669 Elston, Henry & Sallie' 3b -Q13 -q13 5S� , Dermis) Theoplie & Beatrice 36 -01.3 -pill 165 Davis) Port D 36-013-015 27 Grant, Willis 71,5 Harvey, Hardie 36.013-02h 177 Elston,Henry & Sallie '36-013-028 Tob„ag)iOhd�r & Mack Roby 36-013r D30 .✓ Ta ho ^ 36.1aG1-V\tv - h46 Olark,�tllie & Vxr��.h�a 3�-1�0"L-qq7 161 ?.Sr C2 'GROUP IMPROVEMENTS &stimated Cost $26,500.00 (App, 4,ximate Sub je%:t to Adjustment) NANi� CODE COLLECTOR MAIM, TOTAL ASSESSMENT ASSESSMEINT Anderson)James A & Thelma 36.011-005 186 5.5 ` r 211 `L'lliams, Janes L & Marie 36-011-oo6 742 227 969 5mithW.J.,& Edna ;M 36-011-007 795 241 1,036 Cambell, Melvin G & Maxin 36-011-io!4 583 177 76o Daco George & Ledonia A ! 36-011-016 583 177 76o Toney,James & Alice Etal 36411-019 `583 171 760 Carr, Charles Henry & Margaret36-011-"020 583 1.77 760 " Stewart,Nathaniel & Hath L 36-011.-021 583 177 760 , Nash, Wdy & Lulu Lee 36-013-001 315 lo4 449 C urroy3 John & Sebell 36.013-004 292 89 381 y 7orbes,Lew,ls C1& Lena Mae 36-013-005 159 203 Williams, Marie 36-W-006 l59 `1111 203 Frisoh, Harvey 36-013-007 1.59 hh 203 Pail, T:R 36-013-000 344 107 G5l bavidson,Cleo & Martha 16-C13-0217 583 177 76n Orant) Willis 56-413»02,3 583 177 760 . Harvey) 13ordie 36-013-02L► � l59 44 203 Aogero;Floyd S. & Maggie 36-013-02,5 03 177 1760 F Rogers Floyd S. '& Maggie 36..013-026; 583 177 760 doleman, Jameg 3641.30-027 344 107 u5l r Taney, James & Alice 36•D 3.03] 238 7h 312 Toney, Jantes & Alice 36-``013-p32 50 177 76S NAME CODE COLLECTS ASSESSMENT MAIN ASSESSMENT TOTAL Middlemiss,lray & Hazel P. 36-39-012 ,Roziere, Leon & Ethel M' 36-39-013 822' .254 1, 076 Washington, John D4,284 36-39-015 3,286 998 Allen ,Byron &Emma.. 36-39-046875 1,749 532 2,286 Allcsn, Byron & Emma 3639-047 268 1 1l►3 Allen, C7arehce Lee 36-39`-0�t8 875 268 1,143 McGee Walter & Isabelle ' 36-39-oh9 , 1,166 357 . �-9523..... Gbson,Stewart Jr. & Edna 36�-39..050. 7l2 223 965 Gibson, Si�ewar't Jr. & Edna 36-39,05 1, 033 31.2 1134;- Acuna,Frnnk & Alice, -39,052 3636 795. 2111 , 1, 036 talkerBooker � E �' Se Elsie .,4Ol-QO2 7t� 2 222 964 M1�.`ton, Leon C 36-401-003 87 ,5 268 1, a.G3 . Toney, Samuel. 36-401-004875 795' 24 o 1,, 035 Jondd) Marion ()y 36-1101-034 268 _ 1,143 Jonss, Marion G 36-bo14o35 583 177 760 1,537, 475 2,012 00 8, 06wo i • D GROUP IMPROVEMENTS Estimated Cost $35,700 (Approximate Subject To Adjustment) CODE COLLECTOR NAME ASSESSMENT 36-012-05 393 a Roe,Minn3a � V.N. Couch Orange L. & 36•-012-08 57l Hill,James & Daisy 36-012-09 464 Hengy$Alta `D 36-01210 607 Zaoodson,rrank & Irma 36-o12-13 464 • SCog�3ns, James & Elzi.ra 36-X012-14 536. . Sanders Chas.G.& Isabell 36-012-15 ,�012-� 7:,; 250 Ruffin)Williant & Nominee 36-01216 h6h • Hengy Alte n 36-012-17 535 Grant & Evel $roadway, yri 36.012.18 571 , Perry) Harris T 36-021-02'e 286 Taylor,Willie & Cleola 36-021.61 643 Edwards)Mary & HAti 36-021"08- 113 Caldera Henry L 36-027...04. 143 , r j�iilliams, A thur Rc Leaner 36-O2X -1l 60 Ilobina6hn Curtis & Queen E ` 36-021.12 643 Ni3.x Bert, & Byrtle G 36-021-14 892 Warren3 Oza & Ora 36-021--19', 535 i 0t & Ora& Ota �6-b21�-20 10Warrent Stovall,Way.ter J E 36-021-22 7'r8 Pert HarrJs T & Vaicenig 36-021 23 17 it NAME CODE COLLECTOR ASSESSM UT Broadway,Ellis & A 36-021.-24 46 Osby, Lillian 36-021-25 393 Osby, Thado ,: Annie Mae 36-021-26 393 Dillon,Hollis & Myrtis 36-021-27 892 Mims, Ivory L & Ess3.e B 36-021-2$ 892 Williams, Arthur 36-021-29 464 C1i.ff,Tnvestment Co 36-021-30 500 Ferry, V'alcenia 36-021-32 a 113 Thomas,Farnell & Dorothy 36-021-33 285 Archer, Ethel 36-021-34 750 Mona,Rosella 367021-35- 4 93 Christopher,E & Myrtis 36-021-36 ; 78,E Christopher, T.J. R& Mary 36-021;-3'' _. 1,250 ' Christopher, F & Myrtis 36-021-3$ h6h Broadway, Ellis 36-021.E-39 285, Curry; J H. & Sebell 36-021.-40 1-, 035 Brahnon, Willie & Matilda21-41 36-0 678 Brannon, Willie & Matilda 36-027.-42 2$0 0610ih3 Gladys' y 36-022-01 750' Martis,Mattie N 36-02-24 143 Cooly, Mayne 36-022-40 1,:320. York) Evano H & Clare A 36-022-41 643 Markhnm,Mary B ?6.;014-01 2!927 Gentt)Norman W & A.A. 36.023-0 5712 Lurch Paul Dorothy. 36.023-03 2,106 BerrytBuel 0 & kathryn 36.023-0 1000 r00 APPENDIX B Preliminary Cost .Estimates , A GROUP IMPROVEMENTS The sewerage facilities within the A service area will follow the street pattern as developed by the developer of the proposed mobil home parka B r"'iJP IMPROVEMENTS nMY 2.,400 L.F. 6" Diameter Sewer 12;000 6 each Manholes 31000 900 C.X. Excavation4 ,950 675 C.Y..Backfill 5 050 Total ` r2 , 6-00 C GROUP IMPROVEMENTS C LINE 700 L.T. 8" Diameter Sewer 7,000 t 3,300 L.F. 611 Diameter Sewer 16 50o 10 each Manholes 51000 2,600 C.Y. Excavntl,on, 14 1,00 2,500 C.Y. Backfill.:4900 Total 7577-00 Cl fi,INE 26600 Li Fi 61, Diameter Sewer 13,000 7 each Manholes 31500 1,300 C. Y. Excavation 7,250 1 f 250 'C. Y. Backfill 7 u5G Total `31)20n C2 LINE 2;200 L.F. 611 Diameter Sewer ll 000 6 .each M6fihole8 1, x:00 Coy. Exd avat on 6 000 1050 C.Y. Backtill 6400 Total '261500 D GROUP IMPROVEMINTS D LINE _w 2,000 L.P. 61' Diameter Sewer 103000 5 each Manholes 2 1 000 C.Y. r6tcavation 5,500 950 C.Y. l3ach.f�]. 5 800 Tot412 00 FARM APPROVED + 11MAU Or THE BUDG 20 NnT WRITE IN THIS AREA - ro - ET No. SO-RO178 A NO: VERNMENT USE' ONL'< FA P P L I C A T' 1 0 N AGENCY ERR p L DATE RECEIVEDDATE REFERREDToAL ASSISTANCE FOR LC WORKS AND FACILITY TYPE PROJECTS (PleOse read the instructions before completing this oppli 4, cation. Submit application AGENCIES ASSUMING JURISDICTION in original and one Copy, AGENCY DATE PnojtdT PROJECT Attach ridd4i'onal sheets if COMPONENT NO. necessary,) -- APPLICANT (l:xarf legal nama q— r proposed n Inc i%hnt ingPrpnrdtcdJ North Burbank Public Utility D.i_str i ct CITY OR TowN QrovillR(GohntyJ I(SlatcJ Butte County CaTi£ornia b, TYPE Or ORGANIZATION (Gheck appropreatc baxJ STATE CCva AOENCYLOCAL COV. UNIT ('1'16N+PROPI ` -------- • I 164GANIZATI6N ]OTHER (5peni/y) 2. LOCALITIES TO gE SERVED ---- : _ CITIESt TONS, mQ .AREAS P 0 P U L AT I O N j (Gist sr. parr tei COUNTY ------ 1880 CUQRET To AC SERVED r by P00JECT' North Burbank Public Utility_ District fi Butte 4QQO 1500 Nc'rthEast Study Area -0.Butte n 700 700 , Villa Vero na Stud Area - ;' —Butt e lot . 1000 1pQO A, tlEscRIPTION 777-.UESCRIpTiON AND PURPOSE_:OF I't�OpOSEO ptUJECT A sanitary set,Tage Calx,eotion system is proposed to be constructed w Villa Verona Study n the North>aas and systempropbs6d will constitut aac of the North,Durbank Public Utilit hist e arict. Ti n extension o!f the eXi"ting comm"hity sewerage sylsten s Or PUME IITF.nEST ANtl NECESSITY The Stuffy Areas are aortrod pctab�.,e water by Lne 'Oz,ovi�.le Wyandotte Sz�r�.gation n�.st ` iaroavery there are no et1mmftn,ty 8ej4drs �rithin the area ric, are Bards xi dense and poorly suited to indiaidtzal The thin th Hsaii;h hazards exist witlyin t!Ys area. The area � � be Waste d ped vithbut Eewej,-s, 1 cz r�,N INr� AGENcy (C.ut,Rt;; d/nttt•cduht Y. Rcsionatj Gtr,J �/Jubm.i.tte•d wJ. �!yro��� .. � ' RLy1f WEU BY PLANNING AGENCY eA?Iach mimmentri r NOT htVItWrb' Use PL'FdNl' a AGINC5' f/jpotr Wxptntn) . Di i10� ut ANUAkY 16eh wYCM.-yii7HE BUREAU OF TNI, bUDDEi` ;•. ;ergs____ ...._ 4. METH F FINANCING (In thousands of dollars) C 0 M P 0 N E N r S SOURCE W A S T E/ OTHER OF WATER (lJCscrlifc,;- TOTAL FUNDS TREATMENT COLLECTION G. beipw) A. FEDERAL GRANT REQUESTED -q.. 318,950.. -0- -o- Z 318.,950 8.. FEDti4AL .LOAN REGUESTE0 318!950#` C. OTHER FEDERAL CONTRIDULION None D,, STATE CONTRIBUTION None E APPLICANT CONTRIBUTION 318, 950;iif F. ESTIMATED TOTAL PROJECT COST -0- $ 637,900 $ $900 7 *Loan preferred. 0.1911-13 Assessment Bond if necessary. S, OTHER FEDERAL ASSISTANCE • PREVIOUS OR PENDING NAIVE OF AGENCY TYPE OF ASSISTANCE e INDEBTEDNESS OUTSTANDING, IF ANY AMOUNT REOUESTED North Burbank J l Public Utilit .District Interceptor Sw4er None 187,630' North Burbanlc PL84-660 GO Bonds Public Utilit District Treatment Plant 1.89 000 58 000 The applicant represents that the data in this application are true and correct to the best of his knowledge and belief and that the filing Of this applichtion has been duly outhorizod by the gbyerning body of the applicant. EXACT LEGAL (Gorporntc NAME OF APPLICANT (If unincorporated, enter proposed nanie.) North Burbank Public Utility Bistrirt, a State agency. ATTEST (Signature of attesting officer) BY f H nature of aut,iortaed oJficct -' 6. wv.. TITLETITLE. Leis Loge, Orsali 0. Shepard, 7`�8ecretary,to the Board Preoident of the Board -- NOTE. /Idditionot In orototton May fic Redyeslt.d' Po Su art Iris a Itcntloh: (DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE FOR GOVgRNMCNT DISE ONLY) ­4 p r ��