HomeMy WebLinkAbout71-36 REZONES PLANNING V. . . . . . . . . - - - - - - -
, 41
Jw
t
Harmn
?r i nce 'rte= 1.109, adopted by Board of Supervisors
MIust 3. 1971 for interLu zoning for:
Lot l thru Lot 107 of 3- utt: Creek Ustates r rad
reccrced in Flap Book 34 ovi pages 34,E '33F, 36 and 37 in
tille Office Of tile Recorder, County- of S z.:t `e v Smote
cllf California,
27oneY fr Z-3 to
Y-
Y-i _s` �{ .M � �'y` � !4 � � �6.. pysw' �` � Ft> (` '4 i�i��*J+r•
eT � fT
� 4
•-rte- / S 7r
11
71-2023 PUBLIC HEARING: _EXTENSION OF INTEPD "R -I." ZONING IN BUM GREEK ESTATES
The public hearing, for the extension of interim zoning in
Butte Greek Estates,, for area described as Lots 1 through 107 of Butte Greek
Estates,, per .mp rc corded in 21ag Boole 34 on pages 34, ?s, 36 and 37 in
the office of the Recorder, County of Butte, was held as advertised-
a im Taerson, P3anning. D rect€�r, explained th.e actions of `the Planning
Ccu—mission in this matters
Hearing opened to the public at this time.
Appearing in, opposition.
1a Kira Charles Purchy, Jr. He safe owns lots in this area;
his: lots are ;designated as a. multi family lots He said he could see no reason
to extend this interim zoning. He said he proposed to build a: M -o -story
structured
Mr. Lawson: explained the purpose of the extension of the: interim
:on rga He said there were some: 12 or 13 lots in this area that were
deli laated as multi -use lots, Mr. Lawson, summarizedthe: feelings of the
Planning Commission in this matter. If the zon nging is not extended, the
land will;go back to a A-2 District. Mrs Lawson said the question in this
matter is: the number of units that should be allowed. Planning commission
and the developer are negotiation as to the exact number of units that Trill
be allowed,
2. Mr. Bob Tiinc6la Chico, lie sajt l ire i,tnr�s it -ojvk_jEi c>i.t'h 1, is 54 % 55.
lie mei. out 4; 0P'F-vgit;ion to til€'
extension i+a` t�t:$ `�i2ii�y;,
lti Mr,' Al Pi.cl€l:ind, ji 1"lir Way Drive. Ha- said "try is Chairiman o_
the AL !IO(; Ca lramF- t tee in this Area. He sp;k'e on the extersi on t;f tt_a interim
z0ning; H e .plaiiied -what has been dona in the'past 90 days on r_h?.;s tonin
situation-,� lie regtieste€l that the ward grant tT-Ye zaxtensi alz ipf i6ar _'nteriz
/f�{v tC�tr�; {[ v :ret"r
he
:{.t Tx{ Ftf]L.^�} t:#i�T:: and Cut tx. tit_._• irtv �'?'C� 4
�.VL di.a�,cK.`Rt.JY-��LLw >.k }. 3.n,aAn It#'�i�I�a-ij'iY lLLi G.,:L• l_#I f. A. '� [. ��e':� ;SII..�'iY i'F+'a .%^.t `T146�� t..n grant
the cOnLIM-7; n E- 0C flu-- fntf' in -oninI , tY rf he
��L �1i�-�Ij E•'1rf..PJ .g�'fe �-.� iY.a� [R� _:"11.Y'y sFy-la. „i .:,���II1"y fa� i. €!�+i �{`-- dka. _
�'E 7n"4 ,e � c� , _ z � s .. _s-.zn�i,L} ty - �, � I _. _ w .. � �,�• i 2; '� F`t '#`o�'. r "S'. ! s,-
r Y V.
t� f�-...:s _.�"{fit- .=•:sa i.:{`, 'ri§ i'_., ...E... - _ _ - n:•.�6.+ x zY _
P:'
t7lt,*. s; rftl=��;- �I ri" �,'•%.fl,�.,.i�' i •.`a�P' �• _: 3..._ &s: a.".'�ii t"+_ t`z y.'e�` p
i.. Loti0•! i13fASi L.L rrt"F[ Sis# r) C7L. • Re'
a
.i� +,�:s i�i:[- �h* � :^i_ •i '"e*�: x �i'�<: !='
S:ig ! i aim .Ari Flar iin 7j,rectklr VIX rj?F_ C1��ri�� �`y�, r � >, �,
camle 1-117, V ith an appzf;pi gate este for the land in; this area.. 5.^�snpervisors
McKill ors .and Chairman .l ey BOE 4 i UP'c__Tsar iL= I
t3`UI-v 28, JC!71
*x. C`.-Tifford Michelson
cc-my Akdniistrator
Butte C=t 07th
€lro ille, Califon 'a 95965
Dearit has cam— to,
, Alk
the a+t-te11 Cm o,
Butte the ressde-js of
Creek E L� ,� «ev_raIR r .
rsr > . fha� jLY} �c � LA 'M s- L-eir reSid-
- c€.es at ? t des ars: 3i behalf of -Ile
residences liVis-ja- n _ ehalf request
inter r11 re�inrr fc� rc ? ria rss �' �u s
c' sar- ci as: _ �articalarly
fb� 10
iFiall) 3riGaiii f7 "'� At {?l1 �e5341, , r 4_
. -� tie ce of Fecar rr .(btit, of
SheStu l I allar ' m for a przc n
ing
"S t
is er a Jest to be o�acec� on the agenda
for +-&- y _ Ors -
q to 1e held Am9ust 3, 1971.
finnan P neem
,tis
August Z3, 1971 �t
Pianning Director
Butte County
Croville,, Calif.- 95965
Re Ordinance ;,1189, Interrim R -I Zoning, Butte Creek .Estates Sub -division fiZ
Dear ;sir:
This letter is to comply with the 30 day requirement pursuant to Ordinance ir�75
as am.endee.
Representatives ofth.e,Butte Creel: Property Owners Association have met- with
the Hoard of'Dkirectora of Butte Creek Country Club: and Butte Creep Estates
(the developers Of the subject property). As a result of these rae-tings, the
Butte Creek Proparty Owners feel that permanent zoning on the 107 Ict sub_
division should be a allotirs
Lot I through 107 excluding lots 20,2I,ZZ,:
23:, 53 51, 55, 1106,and IST R -i {single family -cezji.dCnrOil-
Ireva ZC f ZI, ZZ, Z3, 5�, 5 , 55, 6, and 107 g.eZ (duplex)
We also respectfully request tha4 tae Planning Department further stud file
zoning o* Butte Cre¢K i'3tates Svb-�divisios� fiI as well as the aurrou di � area
that is earmarked for residential, development:.
'lour '"29gest ons and expert>i; e .vill, I aamn sure, be of great assistance to al1
parties concerned.
Sincerely,
BUTT h:iz `E},xf OWNERS ASSOCIATION
Irving Dour cr
IDIcIc
R9 10;11
3' 4 1 i 7 1
October 27, 1971
Herman Pink.4am
10 Fairview Circle
Chico, California 95926
Bear Air. Pinkham:
This is to advise you that the Butte County Board
of Supervisors at its- meeting held 0ctober 19,
1971, set a public :gearing date for N.,.---wber 2, 1971
at 21:00 a.m., Board of Supervisors` Chambers.,
Courthouse, aroville, California., to consider extending
an interim IR -l" zone for an area described as Lot I:
through 107 of Butte geek Estates, per 'map recorded
in trap took 34 on pages: 34,,. 35, '36 and 37 in: the_ office
of the. P,ecorder, County, of Butte.
if yc-- hates any questionsregarding this matter, please
contact our office.
Sincerely r
LAr TONCE J. LAWSON
Director of Planning
Lj Lf sn
to reach an° am caopg cim-
sacm>se 2Fh other property
.- a .0
Owners oil the, dens,tY r53'91e
_. a-Al
Tsw ard.of 50- Faarvietc
tCQI, CINC? ch2nrmair of
--or f
- �.
i file properEv tr�rner;' ad li5a'
coiruaiittec, said
16oa
it, ha
a Seco n .
eanticipated fiatButte
-
mendation that eai4:d ha .'
settled the 1F,sse %as to have
,90-&Y interim, �;esidentiaT
br-en forLi -oral r; fro:*. t : e
P �nm C°:n a t .oma lie said]
{{zaiie fbr, Butte: geek '.i'r-
Cr-m.TF.S_`Qn L'%teadz
tater south Cl reo l as
Suggested a "aday coo'.ing all:
'
;approved yes.terdaj her e
Gi' .{if
He sa"d di pF. �g €4ct;nass
'But% ty Board of SU_
� mare ine- ai?d F at ft•� map. -
pQrvisors itlr _a a
kas bean e.�ed' oar ,a n w
to the Plano ig Depart-
_ fP aRC:33 ce ls� x eiii He Ee d
x tent alld' the_PLa. Ii T1I T1'
? L e ,
t ET€.' «i .,�.. ��. � da 3� �;�r-s t.a:
'Fe
i,'Q%IIIIi18ai0II W Qy i S tip -
T �J7r Ef} irsta is pig{ ury
with a TOMAmended Ia�td :
tul
�' rai ries tFe Uiat� TJ.i ' w
use plan in shdt-t order
potential taeze;are=a but tva.=
ifie exiensr� eras re ested
b rn-
"awrer 'in-
file Butte C.ecn I;a'es-
and the leve. zrz also havei
ProlY the
vtllidivision -2ttemPting to- block
a fiarmal oh"lg'Toia
Iran c�ensifg� tuunTtiple am i�
=development on some the
Chai.^nan usere
gR��s sa..d he d!d rot
of
dots
ba3r�i sbJd a vr.e
_
The hatter, hanging lire for
b'a
Fi aiicial issues but
F r
Q Ekt matter
several mo>atiis, has caused
ail app%! t-i et
zrinin� -t
prQ � controversy aintJr
He rei,el a ed ts n
`
The ori IR-cam
} original siiterirx zzmal
designed to- hold the
iJ`a:tr 5t
tpF¢ C"€ a se
statim quo:.q
instil permanent zowg can be
approuedx was, passed 6.
' F•� 1 : ,
ir• F . . c 1 .�
-dug
The Planning Coinniissa6ii had
held public heirbgs - t I nht
brasey>� c.
pYr
COwe P With 8 recommended
tea,
The Veit 'zow Is zoned
(A-7),�y� the most
c?Ggit fi- S1i the
r:
y��e��ryyi+$��r���a�lSS p�r1�
. _ missive of c0u+i� LLSL� �+.ic..:.L �
��i ]
Ja LIZEIi�Ai Zone to
�t� t i W (22d-T�ri&
are deed resfrictious. on the lo
giahxb'ItFng hiph=den J'
,:j.„r
Claw. F�.':a3
developmetlt liuf fhe county has
rus e{ fai^2 Ei-r
tri
taken$ Co4sis',EIIf QSitior.
p
ffiaf sorb convenanfs -a•e legal;
,n, sa:o he r� d ¢ s
hTiLT Ram oz ja,
. M that the,
torewmenc would �av4 to be
r € Zez4 _ai bF
,L,cef'MS' �lS n
Ihxcra .fie eoirr,v.
,.
s de or ma ouser.
Opponents
Eiiap. Fiicidys a L ileo
general contractor, said he: had
irittested in
u^ the nix
f imiit . g
hiDirdea rly
Ithact,ts have efnr. aced caiicerli
the purcfrase of los
ttfe
�R and 55 and that aro �ensiori `
rtfia� �onL:,ry club .at,
{of the ; eeze wonid cause him
naaciai loss,
mosphere damaged.f`bd=yea
_ meso- ar
tagainst - fhe eat s=oa was
abort coln of its Estz`�
IWay#" Glx€to,:�vba said lie?
aisrr was Involved h! the
,
deveIaprtent of the two, para=%
He skid offers have beea-r
made 16 'void this :sale *h;c
i�ras orlgiIIally - ciiri�-urt»aat�
wit the Adear of ` mutt% am f
jdeveTopinenti
Me —0;V,
oirl€p a �`�ea
�itE,6eanfiisfi:cv "gip
�Cfuop,Oit ] ntetvA-record `tiea,.ay,
or,
d e -v e t a p e'r s to prosper iye
gurehasers, lois- ife tltd rtott
or,
Butte Creekfor
names sw& reaMs
developers allegedly reapo p ->'de
dibn�gthe map. 1
chairman ;Tere Reynolds of
Area Auk `
Bigg mid, "We've' gotten this;
contin ot�sly," and suggesied�
the district attorney be asked,
to review the situation with thei
8u MCK ELLENA
idea of crating the c oun't
possibly enact laws aimed at
tEmern r:�aecotd stair wrireia
OROVILLE — ApprOv
preventing misinterpretation tn'
_
ITT the requestur petition--
.,Zoning matters by land
salett.
the Btitte County
Board. Fete_-scrs this
Robert Sylvester, vi W9
Ramada y' C cot oppos
ed
mortrrrt ado ted aU-da
interiru zoning
Its aIrea r had znCeStedfortl,eaCk
�rd_rtcesa.d
ms's-hea
ily to the prgvsed apartSAI)tli�`I
that sparked the zoning; �
ZfItuth all
Chict�� ► nrmt
fSdaption follawcd lengthy,
discussions that
Why didn1 they say€
something before I s�,elled out#
indicated at
Possible controversy over '
all this money?" �ylver
asked.
Propossed perm citing 20
restrict the in
Ire said he could not cone ike
.its the -
subdivision,' to gIe-
family residential Ir't-l3.
why anyone would aptness �`,.e
type of "beautiful apartments
Approval of the temporary!
he propc�es that would inchAe
a swnn-nmg pool tennis court
zone wilt limit. development to
,and probahiy a sauna bath and,
single-fzmiy residential:
7t carne by unanimous vote
rent fair over $300 montiiIg
A_ T, Bramwell of a$ fair-
L14 :ct witli the understanding that
the
way Ili e, said he was one
lxoper. owners and :
Prospective derelopera,, as. well
of the ins=estors and a: forever
director of the corporation,
as directors of the Butte Creek
stafescorp-
that be urged €,ate interim =e.+
which stilt :owns ;
some of the property, will meet
in order to draw all the groups
involved together to decide
urin,* the interim to work. ant
what would provide the beat
a permanent, zoning proposal:
This
permanent, mutual protection-
would hopefully b� Zia_
ceplable to all-
Robert McGowan of 1691 .Bark'
Proponents of the inteuai
Vista Drive, a director of the
corporation, s:;id in the deed
zrwe, 43, of whom signed t: (
restrictions. nine of the 127 lots'
petition£ voiced the fear fftatt
are designated for multiple -
a pend Ir,AltipTe 3asnity� btu
d+a Eu rieayt`«'
fa- y dwellings limited to one
�n.c1 7
d
alter the character e
story, while two lair are
designated commercial-
stbdvisioa that now consists of
fi�ghar-prleed homes•`
He asked lite board to rt`elay
.
ilpervisors Aon nlayoa, tfT
a decision ung the directors
have a chance to meet.
Paradise and Zack ?+�I;i IV
&ovale tentatively,
na board decided 'to go
suggo ted
that action be w1inheld for a
ahead with the interim zine
alter' McKillop observed that if
week or two on: 6e .interim
a `building permit were
Zone.
McKillop observed, iwweven
requested, constructions could
proceed even if .later found nOtr
that if this were done, _a
building permit be
to he in the best interests of;
total 'community
could an.
-plied for by developrs of the
the
Reynolds: indicated the final
density housing and that
contrucYion could their proceed.
zoning might have provisions
for, multiple -family residences
h e final' vote wasrbut
that this should: result from
unanimous, although Maxon
mutual discussions Planned dur-
laid this was going against
narmal -hoard policy, of waiting
Ing the 90 -day interim
The motion to approve the
at least a week following an
interim zone was utade. by
application %r air interim zone.
Supervisor Art Gilman and
Al Wickland s{#Fairway seconded by Supervisor incl:
r Drive, chairman of the Butte Nfadigan, both, of Gbico.
(reek Esiafes Rome and
Prop-* Owners Assoei��tti;im
said a "wide-open sitnafiatc"
'now exists under the gwerajT
f A -2`t zone covering Butte Omek
Iff said there had ben
'general inipressfoa that trite
area was aiready zoned m-,stly
f`-` R-1 with some jobs bL4xa
reserved for multiple dwellin-s
whlclf deed xestrjcUqug vr,n d
limit to a single. story.
"LYe Z 1 we need this 9p43_v
` period to Make a poi loon at
this situation and provide for
adegnaYe planning; me said:
M wed the board to
at�thorire #ham sFv s lar
�pazfi:,end s�ff' t� �or��.
the grope y ajvnerq in order
to achieve a cath<-adar "
marenf zone _ Y y P p
Irving Dowty of K FaImwa
Drive showed the board: a rttap�f
linsicating
residential zoning'
already, existed in. the sail ;
`diy,isidn.
He'sa-th€s tap was ;Wade;
, •
vailable lv eat ors tin
i
P
�t
L
ORDINANCE NO. /A
=3.
-
.a
TO EXTEND AN INTERIM ORDINAINICE ZONING A PORT]LODT OF
_
v
THE, COUNTY BUTTE kq "R -l" (SINGLE-FAMILY
2
RESIDENTIAL} DISTRICT':', PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE NO.
� g
475, AS AMENDED:
The Board of Supervisors. of the County of Butte, State of
5 .
California, under and pursuant to Ordinance No. 475, as am, nded
n
6
and declaring an emergency ES ORDAIN as follows --
7 (
SECTION 1. The here=after described area situate in the
al
County of Butte, State of California, shah be and it is hereby
9
zoned as an "R-1" (Single--rami?y Residential'- District,, for a
x
10I'
period of V;W days, and such area shall be subject to the re-
lI
strictions and restrinted uses and regulations hereinafter
12
specified and provided. Said area so Zoned being located in the
1:5 I.
unincorporated area of Butte County, near Chico, California, more
14
i{
particularly des -}gibed as follows.:
15
Lot l th Tbt 107 of Butte. Creek Estates, per
i
map recce_ in. -�-ok- 34 on pages 34, 35, 36
10 i
and 37 in the o ` tbl!� Recorder, County of
i
Butte, State of iia.,
y` 7
SECTION y, The ft, g regulations shall apply in an
-
-R-I "' (Single --Family Residential) '' District c
19
nn
2.1 USES: PERMITTELI,
4
a. Single -family -dwellings, not including tents or
Y
2I�
trailers.
h. P cnssory bu.,-41dings pertinent tol rhe permitted uses.
c� Household pets (fit not including livestock, poultry
'
�.
I�
23 ;�
or, poisonous reptiles . }
ME
It
1
2 _ 2
LOT AREA:.
2'
t
a. Minimum required a,-za of a lot per dwelling unit
3 i'
shall be no less than eight thousand one hundred 3
g
twenty-five (8,125) square feet,
2.3:
LOTWIDTH
a.
Minimum lot width shall not be lesss than sixty --five
7' 1
1
(65) feet.
8,
2.4
FRONT 'YARD:
g
a.
Minimum front yard shall be fifty` (5o) feet from
10
1
the centerlineof the roast, except where the road
ll
is classified by the County as a Federal. Aid
1�
Y
Seconda._-y Road the minimum building setback require-
V,
meats shall be fifty-five (55) feet From the center --
14
line of said road.
15
jjf,
2 3 5
SIDE YARDS
?6
a.,
Minimum side yard shall not be less than five. (5;
17
feet.
I8 �
2'.fi
The following uses subject to securing a; use permit I
lg
1'
in
each case.
20
at
Golf courses_ and country clubs.
21
i
b'..`
Public and quasi -public uses including churches,
22
Iff
firehouses, hospitals,
parks, playgrounds, schools ,
23 l
and public utility bu-ildings.
24 r
I
SECT_ON 3.. All uses of land within the district not
25 4 specifically
F
authorized and permitted in Sec': c- 2' are prohibited,.
26
{
s
Y
c
SECTION 4.. The penalties for the violation of tha zoning
2 thereby imposed within the district shall be as provided in
3 Section 15 of Ordinance No 475. :n compliance with the provisions
it
4i of the Zoning Enab..ling Ordinance, this Ordinance shall from and
a ;`after its effective- date become a supplement to and part of the
61 Zoning Enabling Ordinance~
71 SECTION 5.. This urgency ordinance shall take effect
8 ' ;immediately upon its passage, and before the expiration of fifteen
9 (1511 days after its passage: shall be published once with the names fF
l0 of all members voting for and against the: same in the Chico
11 Enterprise -Record, newspaper a news a in general circulation in the
12 1 CouTit of Butte, e, State of California. The facts constituting
15 j theurgency ort:hich this ordinance is based are
14 The existing A-22 zone
permits uses incompatible with
15� the recently developed single family dwelling nature
l� y 9 r of the: sub -
16 ject area,
I
IT! �.; The Planning COmmissan 3s oQnsidering a petition
l8 requesting rezoning of the subject area to R-1 and R-2. ° !
s
Z9 3:. This urgency ordinance is necessary to precrve the
2O� public health,. safety and welfare in the subJect area until said
21 rezoning to R-1 and R-2 is decided.
22! PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Supervisors of the
231 County of Butte:, State of California, on. the 2nd day of November,
`
24-1 1971, by the fallowing Mate::
25 fi
26
r
3. k
ii
1#
] AYES
�c
{
g
:TOES
A!3,SE �-
4 ,
e
I
r
(
-:a Z. REYNOLDS, Ch..'_ a of�
a
? ,
the Board of Su ery G.�-rs
'
8 }.ATTEST;
c
,
CLARK A_ NELSON County Clerk
and ex -officio Clerk of the, Board
12
By
125
�I
171
4
18!
19
201
211
22 �p
�
23i
2
241
_ 25
26
4' a - -
ORDINANCE NO.. 118
AN INTERIMGR.DINANCE 7ONIkNG A PORTION OF THE ODUNTY OF
BUTTE AN "R-V' (SINGLE -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) DISTRICT,
1 PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE NG.-,475., AS AMENDED �
The Board of Supervisors of the County of Butte, State of
4 nder and
California., pursuant to Ordinance No. 4,75}: as amended..)
5 and declaring an emergency, DOES ORDAIN as follows:
SECTION 1, The hereinafter described area situate in the
7 County of Brr.tte, State of Californias shall be and it is hereby,
� zoned as: an "R.-111 (Single -Family
Residential) District, and such
9 area shall be subject to the restrictions and restricted uses and
TO `regulations hereinafter specified and. provided. Said area so
13 ,zoned being located in t.*he unincorporated area of Butte County,
I2 linear Chien--.��
California, ire particularly dcncribeo as rol.lew� ;
13 Lot I through Lot LO: of Butte Creelrt Estates, per
. map recorded in laap. Book 34 on pages 34, 35 36
1
and 7 in the Gaff ice of the Recorder, County of
Lutte State of California.
15
SZCTSON 2 The tol,lowing regulat
16 ions shall apply in an
"R-l" (Single -Family Res-ide ztial) District:
X17
1S 2..1 USES PERMITTED
a. Single -family dwellings, not including tents or
19
trailers,-
2Q r
21 ba Accessory buildings pertinent to the permitted uses.
Household pets (but not including livestock, poultry
22.
or Poisonous reptiles.)
23 ;
24 -
2.2 LOT' AREA.-
as Minimum required area of a lot per dwelling unit
23 _
261
shall be ,no less than eight thousand one hundred
twenty-five (8,125) square feet,,
25 11of the Zoning Enabling_ Ordinance, this Ordinance shall from and
26 after its effective date become s supplement to and part of the
11 L.D.
- - & rl
2.3-
Lai 90TH
2
a,
Minimum lot width shall not be less than sixty-five
S
(65) feet.
2.4
FRONT YARD:
1centerline
a.
Minimum front yard shall be fifty (50) feet from the
s
of,the road except where. the road is
: p
7
classified by the County as a Federal Aid Secondary
8
Road the minimum building setback requirements shall
5
to fifty-five; (55) feet from the centerline of said
1O
road.
11
'
2..5.
SIDE YARDS,
12
a o-
iii nimum side yard shall not be less than five (5)
13
p
feet. i
14
2a 6
The following uses subject to securing a use permit
15
in each
ease.
16
a,.
Golf courses and country rlubso
17!
b,
Public and quasi -public uses including churches,
?i
firehouses) hospitals, parks, playgrounds; schools
j
19
and public utility buildings.
I
201
SECTION
34 All uses of land within the diZtrict ,not
21
specifically authorized
and permitted in Section 2 are prohibited.
22
SECTION
4. The penalties for the violation of the zoning
- 23
hereby imposed
within the district shall be as provided in
24
Section
15 of
Ordinance No 4/75. In compliance with the provisions
25 11of the Zoning Enabling_ Ordinance, this Ordinance shall from and
26 after its effective date become s supplement to and part of the
11 L.D.
- - & rl
I I !lZoning,
Enabling Ordinances:
2
SECTION 5. This urgency ordinance shall take affect
4
ti
3 €iimedi:ately
upon its passage, and before the expiration of fifteen
4 11,
(15) days after its passage shall, be published once with the names
5
of all members voting for and against the same in the China
6.l`rtrri
s -R _c�rtT s a newspaper ire general cres�la--
7
tion in the County of Buttes State of California, The facts
8,
constituting the urgency on which this ordinance is based are:
9
1,. The existing A---2 zone permits uses incompatible witl
�_
1G
the recentlLy developed single family dwelling nature of the subj ect
w
11
area
12
26The planning commission will soon be considering a
13
petition requesting rezoning of the subject area to R-1,,
a
3,This urgency ordinance is neces..ary to preserve the
15
public health, safety and welfare in the subject area until said.
16
rezoning to A-1 is de ,ided,
1.7
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Supervisors of the
18 .
County of Butte, State of Calif orr.ia on the 3rd day of August, _
191
1971,, by the fole•owing vote:
2G-
AYES: Supervisors CilMan, Madigan, Maxon, McKi'ia-D,
and Chairman Reynolds
21
NOES • ikon::
22!1
ABSENT: None
�,
/r
JEE R. REYNOLDS, C a i!man o
24
t e pard of Supe risors
25 1
ATTEST
C'URK Aa PELSON.. :county Clerk
26!
and ex -officio : ? of of the Board
1
3.1