HomeMy WebLinkAbout77-93 A 14 4
_
3
i�
Status Re -6Y t alf A;f^tfal iniq Re'Fp hoolPASW
URTSbCfiYON
_
0 TYE
A_A
C
IOTA
N
UNY7 5 nITY - TY�
USn
_
NOTCH :I
A. A (COW t
r OS
PON � 'COST
T
I
a
i
Richmond
1f1
P
710
C't y
p
40
Housing Auth
I 1 u9
P
200
Housing A0111I�
,
200 EJ;H
5 8
14'
rodeo
1959
68
2S0
County
0
394,
'Hou57ng' Auth,
I
San Pdhia -
1.951
_
-71
40
C t
r
=
40
Housing Aot,
L
1965
�'`
.:429'
a5o
C�ty
-
H"
aus n: Aut
Walnut Cree�C
S
co- unity
Housing Ruth,
;5
Hous? ° Authdri y''plans special
West
I
refer`ondum i>n VM-y neap^ future
P�ttsdur
I
195.4
b
5Q
County,
,�
5U
,
Housing Auh-4
...
'.:
MAR
30'0
C`
aunty
I
o
300
I. �
Husing Auth
'
1951
I
41
3U0
County
y
.oust
H n ut
196 4
I
72
I.
200
.
county
I
_
4pU
,
1 oUt 1}�g.. AU �
t
I
7
County
600LII
I ,
t
I
Ho'
,.usting Auths
,
5oY'to Mad&
1
43
75
O .en
75 �
I
♦,G
y
H=Hnd,ca
t_
F
L�LoW Incbliie M`I�Fiodeate tncote
I
�
4
status Report ;of Article 'XXktf Referendum
I
JURISDICTION
DAT8
FAIL
UOTE
'UNITS
/�UTN01tII"Y . TYPE* USEb'
OT S
ABAG
M�RIIV :�cpri ��)
I
hlilti V, .1,1
197;7
P
NoUsYn � �uth:
9
and 1dcl
200 E/F
32 F
108
Vicki eweedMul tip Fame LY
duel aper
Sec, 8�' 20�'
NoVa,to97
F
33
5 OQ
Prtivate
.
de" Ve10,
rlot,yet
de terms n'ed
MI/F
No. ember!eleetio n a� a_:
k e b
'-P 9 ei►1g
put together
(CbBC mogey Vsed for' i and write
I
peed restovtion on saI e,)
i
I
,
J
E=Elderly
U_Handi a p
r
,
Fa i1
,, y LI=Low' Iticohie: MI-hlodehate Ih
w
''td.
Status Report of Artt'cle
XXXIV R' feror7 u Ir
�uRrsbzc�gN
bAr
Rr�
�qT
ur�� rs �W 7R Nr
AUTNORT:TY
�
ABAG
�„
-
_ _
r „
Y P E tSE,
LE.T NOTES _
MARIN (cont)
San' ROW
1.77
P,
75;3 120 Opens
12p E 0
Ti bliron
197E
P
120
NAPA
S tHe l aria
1976
R
'74 SO 0,
�50iE
SRNr�,RA
5q
b
1964.
1968
P
p
�'S5
% 3;OOq Hoiisinq AUth.
Elf=
2,500 NouOhd Auth;
E F' 1+241
4,259
— 1976
6s%,3 000 Open
— —
30.0q EJf= 112
—
1,8$8 Non pt�f�t o►^ a ._
on
SAN MAS EO
I
OFA lah With Secti8 subsidies
Half Moon Bay
1961
p�
,ri0 COunt y
No�asi�ig .Auth.
0
50
Pacifica
1956
F
38% 200 Count
.V
Nous 7 rig Auth,
1966
F
46% 2 00 Cu
ounty
Musing AUO,,
60. San Frand
SANTA ck.APA
co 1 7
p
l
100 Hou 7 n... -
s g Auth.:
,_
100 .E jp 40
,
6q
Ca m b e ii
p
1976'
p
-
200,:Nqus 1 ng ,pilth
20i EOd
i
H" He n d f�a
err".��,
it low Incom 1��`J�h1o�t,1���'39
n
ttrryy.µW
State'Report of Art7c1e �fi�XlV`Refe►=ondum
JUBI$bI0ON
OAT
�. FAIN
VOTE,
UNIT GR, O
�S AU 1Ii0R
LSGD
AAra
I.�FT
N_7O5
SAfVTA :CLARA
(Coh`'t)
Gilroy
1h78
°
7,3,i 1%
75 C
UO uhtY, ...
0-
�.
ta51rig
75
Sec; 8,': income 'estrctiorts
1978
F
41.5
5b County 5r� 'Frm
P;vusing !uth.
E I a Al td'
1976.
� p
69
San' tjto Li,1968
F
45,'7
69 E F
1,000
�
1878
_�b0I
Lobation ncc"nrclanHip
�
12bd
city 1'�OO F%IF
N6veMh0 1975-:p1 aced on ha� 1 ot�
�
ay Senlbr Citizenscoh�n�ss;�bn &, `,
city_ttaff
Sahta Gla1^a:1977-'P
195 - -
Open 5 E
-
.
0
195
AMBAC,
MONT`f=REY
1976
p
62
; 300 Couht
,.v '300 �l�
0
30
`
dus�n.g Auth:
A' i's 1
1959
18
loo Co unt
Housing
Auth:
Gonzales
1 "0.5,1
p
6 2 �
5tl Cou hiry
1561
p,
72
��
H6using Auth,
50 Cbuny
0
5
HouM09 lAuths
'Oft ell fi pl d
176
P
60
50 Hous hg Au. 50
0
Kti'ng Cit y
*t-tIdeW
�72�
r
50� 0 L1
5a
y
H �Na Bicap
)+-F6'm1�y LtMIovRotne t;t =i�' do.tor; en+�rr?
z:
T
I I
I
5tatus
Report " 0'f Article
XXXTV R0fd�4endun1
I
�uRrsarrrON,
D�1T'C
FFl I
C
7R NT�tI71'
AU1'H�I
NJ1ES - .
AMS
�
,
MQN'TEREY
�,
,�J
(coni)
,I
I
Monterey
1,976
0:7
R
15'0
Hausn-g Auth.
15;9 C/H0`150
-Sal Inas
19IG
P
61 ���,
300
H6usinAuth.
g
o0 E/r'
150'
150
Soledad
1951
P,
85
50
City
50 E/F
36
12
Housing Auth,
�
I
1962
F
2b
C �i ty.
Hods. ng Audi
-
I
SAN'TA.' CRUZ
1978
P
f6.�
300
Co linty
3t�0 F/E
300`
Housi
I 9
n Auth
Ca to l a197F3'
p
�
59 .3
25
County
25 F/E/"
0
25
Housing Autt�
Santa Cruz.
5�
77
200
HousingAu h,'
200.5/l�
C�
20n
1978
P
2%lOQ
County
100 5%Fj
0
100
I
Housing Auth;
.
ScottVO toy
1978'
43�'S
25:1
County
Ho isih9 Alith !'
WatsonV��lp
I
1975
P
60
24
Housn Auth,'
2 F
4ar m
19 8
F
0,2%,:
75`
County,
5.F/H/
lh
l�oUsing Auth'.'
Ei.dehly
N=iarticr{
�?
YfAat ily I�I,ALo��
I
d
ty
Y�Ct��o ` •`I•�4J r:.1 'i7 {5:. Mr9f,,
e
i
y,..
'-
cFCG
WIAIVI\1
NOl
RRESNO` (.cotl,Ft
D'el Rei
1963
County
40 / �"
$a
10
Hou'sin9 A ut h
Frebat►9h
X968
p85
40
� C()unity
0
d
Nouse A,th,
40
T9 5
5
p'
v�
36
Oount
0
30
,I
Housing Auth
s
- —
1976
p
77 �
4 p
Hbus1n 9 Auth
40 E F
0
T
`4
4 0 — — -
Fresno
1969
z9
400
county
k,
Hou s'0 9. Auth,
;
1969,
3
4 r6� 1,000
lona cj�`
'
1971
1
50
'
M61aga water
5a /P
,
�15t}"1C1r
I
is7z
�'
$too
HOW o Auth�
$oo �jF
375' ,;, '
149 u i „
n is Glen Agnes 4 W1th
Huron
1959
p'
7 8 d
z
COUh
CH�A 'funds
Hooirtg Aut
$
�
16"
9 6
P
40
40'130
1p
is7c
P
8�
50
liousirg Auth,,
50/
50
0
La>on
1905
P
55�
z0
County
Housing Auth.
*F=Lj'4 ly`
H- antic p
-Pahiil
LI�-Law Iomto e r`iI-Modai4atO IncotO
v
' i
12
St bus Report of, A�4tloe XXXty Refereedui
_ v
IURt� tiICTtON
DAi 5
pAS S/
F`RIL .
�'OT
UNITS
GRANT
AMHORITY
�TYp *
.�
USCU
I.CET
- -
NOTES.I
HCAG
H1`Mg01.OT
d
Eureka
160P
55
60
County^
0
60
HogsJnq A th.
I
966
Fig
200
City..
Housing 1uth.
�
1976 "
p
6
250
CytY
250' E/F
0
250
Cu►�k'e i in vaj�j out: 9e
_
_
-
.
Hogs ing Auth.
�
_
1 nr ngyfbr X00, n tsta
P s
I
°' KCCG
KERN
Arv�ih
I,
1974
p
5O
Housing AuWe50
Farm
50
0
19601.
1pb
_.:
Hou�ng Auth.
100%FI
0
l0O
Bakers :end'
1919 ;
p
200
200E
118
nl aho'
196E
R
54
1"6
CO141ty
0
16
lou Auh,
I
Lapiortt
1'974
P
5�
Honing RUth.
.50t
50
0
Fi�ricopa'
I'
1975
40'
100
Housing Auth,
100 t
I c Ar1`�and
1 962
F
44
40
Gbuhty
'Auth
HoUsitt g
1 96
p
61
50
County:
oo
Htiu i hg AAh'.
Wesco
1962
F7y
0011,
1Gbunt
��
II
Hbu'sihg Auth'a
*E-ElderlY
H'LHapdieap a�ni1
LII -LOW
Ndbitt N�I.1 bderato Ineohie
I,
i
I I
I
i:'St
tus Rep 't of Arti0'1e XXXIV Referendum
JURISDICTION
R
- -
- -;:
I'
BATE .
FAT
DOTE
UN S
.H
RUT ORITY
TYPE*.
USRD .
LEFT
NOTES
KCRPA'
KINGS
X$61
P
52
2y
. 5
4 \
county
n
,
0
2,76
Housing Auth.
1963
R
25
Couhty
25 C
®
25
orAuth
Ong ,
I
A�'ana 1
I
1976
`
��
' 4 0
HOu51n 9 Autt,,
40 Farm.
_
Coraaran. _.
_ iss
5 �
96
�
H ousin'g a0th,7-9
6 Larm%
Kettleman
1976
P
67
40
Housin Auth.
q
40 Par
rnl
0
0
LI
-
LCCAPC
�I L AitE
I
I I
�
I
Lak�ort
i97.5
R
45%
.�3 eo�� f
R
d C� ty %ql ub
I
L%iii I
MCCPC
,
I M EN DOCINO
•ort Bragg
1956
P
43t,
50
I
COuht
I,
I
i
6u5
�� �n Ruth,
19`6
�
44
50
Couht .
°
I
Housing Auth;�
1
Wi, 7s
195
P
5
60
Ctlullty
A
I
t i, Auth�
F
E lderly
H=l�and�cap
�.pam1I LI -Low Il�cbin mi Moder
�� - ate In o;
l
I. y
14
5t�tu
;Refet;nhdum ;
ir�TCtTC rON
�..
OATS
F AIL
VM11NfTs
.
AUTHORITY
TYR'�
USEO _
L. '":r
KO`fE5 ,
MG G
MERCC
D as ,Palo
1964,
P
��
40
,.
Ijou ting Auth:
40 LT
20
20
1916
p
40
Hp'o sl ng Auth:
40 . Earm
34
6
1578
20
CatntY
Hausir�g Auth,
20 E H
/
0
20
Na.Veinber el eC', 110 t
L.iV j)jstiup�''.•
1.968
P
60:;8
6O
�
60 E/
o
has O'hr�s
1952
69
6O
Nousin Ruth.
9
60E /E
40
go,
Merced. _
-1964 -
-
34
-166
County- -
-
—
-
Hg Auth
NOW,hg Auth
ago
0
` X75
P
64
50q
City
500 E/E
7.5 E •
425
�'Merc d COO "ohs" - A E. Errahs
Ca/Natahai Mortgae:Partri:ership�
5d. D6 Pa +$'195
'
go
2 4
County
CIiFA
FloUfl 0 Auth:
-
ShAPC
SACRAMN'TO '
195
6;x,5
1,OObautty]b3
`
E
f39"'
�ederul.avet�nrnent Pu'b1 `
Haus?Fi A
g uth,
Liaus�h5 (ACC)
198 '
Couh y
Fiou 1h �
'u h
g. A
�N,v. �!e�aatltih is beim g ,
cbhs� �, ,ered��`
51der'1y
N-Handid Ap =Fafni I LI-LIInc viii
�� a �� ewate Incahie
Y Mx Mod
15
stat u� R e neo f Article XXXIV Referendum
di1RIS0iCT10N
• , j
DATE RA�1L►OTE
_ ; RAr�r
llNzTS AUTIibRI� 1YPE'{WxD
— - -
sc_ R_A con't
42,
I.EF'. NOTES'
sAcRAMEN O
�--�-
5acramentn
19fi8
p
g00 Open 800,EjC1
1971
R
,
770
30
'
5'00 0 p en 5 00 E/F
40
460,,
SUTTER�
1975
p
842
1 .000 Open 1;000 VF
500
500 Federa'1 goVe�^ninent
Eric Ni cc aus
_ _ _
1956
'43�
- 1b- y-
Co nt
Housing Auth
LiVe Oak
1951
F8
4
j0 County
�19�
i
Hous1n9 At "h
- -
51
f P' .
3bCount,
Hous , g AUth -
0
34
Rich�a d
n
1g'
P
85�
10b Caunty
Hosin
u s AUth,
0
lOn
suttee
1977
P
9i Nousit n Aut
- h.`i
91
0`
195G20
2b County
'
f 956
Hous�hg Authfudot^. .'
P'
50�,
20 Ouhty
H6u�irig Auth�
Yuba :city
195E
F'
49Cb
100; u t
n y
Housing'Auth
1'959100
county
1ousing Auth
-5ldehly
H NandicO
�'�-;Fam 1
i Y
[;Y_L oto ihcome t1r:.h�ode'rate 'income
y
,I
I
16
Status Repast of Article, kXXI�i f?ferendum"
,.
JUrISDIG?10N _-
_
.
E
_.. BATE -
PAIL
U0. TE_,,
_UNITS _..
fi
GRANT F
AUTHORITY - TY_ 1u5Cb
SCRApG (G611 t,
YQLO
1951
TO
Ciro 10ty Housg.
Au � tori ty
I
0
10
Davis
1975''
P
53
,600
bpen
600 E1
32'
,
568
Pedeea1 government Publ°iC
ouS PNA-'scattered stit
g es
Bhoder Kik
1951;
p'
71%50'
Count .
I
Houslhg Auth
I
,
1959
P
, 601
26
County
,
I
Hbus i ng A01h,
Br'yte
159'
- R
- 37
25
Cbunty
-
Housing 'AUt: ,.
�
ar to
1951;
P
s5
•
I6
Cbuktty
:
0
16
Hbu sing Autfi'
_
ki gFits nand
g
1951
P
0$
10
County,
Hoti'sing AV :h;
.
I
sW`nter.
i_
�. 95 9
P
�
�
ourity
0
26
HOUSI Auth�
g
r
l66dl avid
1959'
P
94%
72
Cbuny
0
•_
_.
Hous Ing Ruth
UA1976''
P
57%75p
ben
p.
I
�75b"P%HS
/
75"
i.
P.EIde -ly
i
�H-Handicap
-Pai�71y
I I
tl-LOW I�ntoina Mf�'�-�odeY�ate I come
I.
I
I
I
I
I
>17
I
�+VG IuJ ry
a
Vit, p rt of AHt.�c7e,�XXM Referenouln,
JUR"ISDX"CTXONDATA
j,,F f 4uiv
PAIL
DOTE
ONITS
GRANT OF'
AUTHOR11Y,
TYPE*
_i' US b
LEST
NOTES
SOG,CC
UN
-SAN jOAQ I
Stockton
1955
P
57
300'
Count "
Y
O
300
Housing Auth
1966
p
5
206'
Housing'
0
` �00
I
Auth"
— _
—1961 _
F-
1n0
County4
i
Housing Auth
1965'
42%
226.
County
Housing Auth
1971
p
225.
O�o►i "
X25'%`
0
225
Th01^ntan"
1953
P
88%
50
County
00
Housing Auth
I
1953`
P
$1
50
I
CoUhty
0
50
Hous i
_ n A�
g u h.
, I
1966
48
25
County
.
Hou sing Auth�>
Trac+
1956P
59% I
60
County
60`°5%
65
5
Hob's
h Aut hb
,
1966
5440
4bl
Cau►ity
6
Hausi ng Aut�i r
1956
40
Gounty .I
0
�
Ho 9 Auth�
,4b
I,
er1.
:_
;Hund o �p
l P=Family LOW fft0Mu.M��Modew�to Iii�amo,
I
`
�
,I
I$
,� tide XX`XIV Re�fe 0' Qm
t t Ar
Status' Repo 0
JURI`SgIGfION :: pA'C FAIL
VOTC UNIT`S
NT
AUTHORITY iYP;C* USBO
LEFT
- NOTE
SLOCCAPC
SRN LUES OBISP
1.962. F�
� 0
12G
County ,
Ho lstng m.th .
1968 P
66
120
County 0
Heu�siny ;Auth
120
Obisp
1973; P
63
150'
f
Gity 150 E/F !a
137,
Pub1i.0 housing �= under pNgram
res�:rvaton
San Luis
Housing Auth�
F
i;
SBCCAPC
SANTA BARBARA
1
„
20
U.. e,
Guadal P
- _
155
0
20-
Y,
Count 0'
Housin g Auth -
1982 p
56�
2d
CgUhty'
Housing Ruth.
1972 P
5D'
H nUsin, NUth: 50 F%F0
,0
Lompoc
9 P
1 .58
_
7,6%
a0
Couh,ty ; 0
U ,
us- Auth,,
9
5Ci
1912 P
68
Housing Auth 68 6 24
44
Santa Barbara
19689,p
57L1�
600
0. en 600 t/F' 342
p 113E
258
e� t
der�m n
� a1: go ..
hoot cit
�IOJeCtsthroug y
�eniia Maria
,1962'Co
unty' O 60
MUSi rig AUt
*F -R1 derl y,'
HSN ndi oAp
F=FM01 y LI vL6W
1'nco�i� Mt y�lo:derate IhCotne
Status Report "of Article XXX IV'Referend6-
I
_
-1 —
riU RISDICTION
t r__
pAT E
SAIL
V
VOTE
O�fE
UNITU,THOklI"Y
R OF -
-GRANT -
�. -
TYP5
USLO
LEFT
NOTES �,
5P0
I
Pl acervi 1 l
1976
�
P
7
67CNFA
67 ` E%H
_
67
0
SCM,
l ERI
TERIA
A
I
I
"CATex
p
57
3 0
Co��ttty, ,
0'
I
30
_
_
Nous t
ung -Au
I
i`95b
R
4I
30`
County
Housing Auth
6-,I�7�250
EjF
100`
150
iiUD Clit off funds questoning
the 16§Jl f ty of el ectiori'+
I
Appeared on March 16 ballot
?,esul unlihoWn'
Cali 'at ria'
Po
1956
P
8O �
I 4q`
Hous3n Auth
�q �L1
��:
I
El Centro
1968
F
55;,4
25Q
Open
250/F
:�6
214
1978
500
500' yH%F:
Novembe. elct,`tion, I
�J t tmorl
1968
P
,
k -
;.,9.7
50 :,:
Housing: Auth;�
50 Ej�'
3$
15
L05 ANGELES
1976'
h
62
O�Og0
Housibo AUtht,
10X00 E
1071
8929
X978'
w
NoVemb"e1^ eecion
Aioa
r
1978
p'
77% 1hspec�rf�.
d 0 ler
P
5
0
Glehdora
0
I
20q E
0
200
*C_Clde:r�;�%
�-Hardi,cap
F- amilV
LI
-Low 'Ittcome h�T-Moderate li�como
1 i
LOS ANGEL�S
1ogl6w-ood
10,75
.p
57%',`
500
City'
500E
105
395
Nous,7n9Auth
Long Beach
1978
NElecti.o�
Los Angeles
1952
F
40L
104000
'
Housing Auth
1973
p
81%'
7,500
cit
7,5G0
11b5
6395
Flouring Ruth
€
P
69.,1
7,500
City_ _
7- 500 J�
300
% .7 00. _ -Ad
709 units co*itted
Housing Auth
c
by CH FA
1977
P
7,$00
City
7,500 E/F
$98
6502.
€
Housing Auth
Monterey. Park
1976
:p
58
126
Opeiff
126 t/r`H
126
0
Pasadena
1977
P
73.9
5;10
50' P/E
258
242
CHFA.'
Pomona
1975'.
P
70
X180
Hous n9 Aut,
80 6�
164
1-6
I
Santa Monica
1978
1'
51.4
463
Cityl, CouHcil
231 E'
0
231
TaX `i'rsrwement 'souhces'
I
1
ORANGE
I.,
lull ertoti
1977P
96 7
300
Cal ��Core
30�
0
30O
sai to An"
a
974
B
56
200.
Cityz
200 E'`
X199
1
Pr l Va:te "Fehdiog sources seoured,
"Hous €ing Auth:
by �deielc0o
1977
P
unl °imi to
0
u -,
8 klderly
I
l Nandica `'
p FFatntily Lf4aw Yocome, IN1:-Moderate Ihcnme
'
I
, A
1
_
Status Report
of Articl e XIV R eferendum
-
FAIL
VgTE
Ft—
R -T �F
Uri N RI i Y
'UN A 6
USED
TYPE*"`> USE
LEFX
NOTES
JURISpIC"c?gN'
DATE
.5CAG
IDE'
Blythe -
1963
F
- 39
100
Housing Auth
1965
F
38%
100
County
Housing Auth
C oar,,hell a
1 97 6
p
53
120
Qpeh
120 E �r� 0
120
Intlio
1978
P
75,3'
150
Opeh
150 ElH 0
150
,
Mecca1975
F
40%
10.0
1Q0 Fa
Palm Sprahgs
197,8
p
65
400
Open
400 is/H 0
400
Ri1ey
1958
P
G9� -
50
touhty .. -
Housng AUth,
LLLJ
50
SAN OCRNARDINO
1976
P
350
350 E/F 0
350
X978��
„
1 ess the;
`board of SuperV._sors w"i i 1
consider
5fho;
sin g
.on
stook
Barstow
1960
F
33�'
C unt
0
SO y
t.
Housi n Aid h
g
II
1965
i'
57�
Q
25_
dt
Cou. y
0
25:0
;
5�
,
250
Houin Audi.
5
Go�lnt�f��21Q
F 1Q0
110
4 y_. �^ ticked 'by
Q ea bonds, b'
968
Housin5a Auth.
40 40
X49 addit anal
y 0
p dingy
HUn s Sec : 8
'heal 7th &4�ti'11i his
54 i►�i i acs ne ,
86 units neer Rmrock Road'
.
C� det 1Y
..
►�
r m 1�'
� � i
0 dei��t e In oohie
L �-Lo w Income M M ,
'
22
Status. Rejigt�t. ,ut' A,rtiCil e XRX I V''R deOro
JURI`SOIGTION
pA`rE
AIL
S
VOTE.
GRNt�%-""_.._._
UNITS
s
��
SCAG
-THcarT� T'YP
s �
�
DEFT
NOTES
SAN BERNARGINo7777�7��
Colton
19.61
P
60�
40 county
Housih 9 ACth.
0
40
- FO tana n
196140'-
-
60 toGny
-
- - - -
'd' I a
- Re _ d
n s�
1978
�lousing Auth:
�i
,
2GO 20 0 EN
NOVempeN' ;lec'tion
sponsored by
,i�OljS'lll� �„�'�►nll'�5S'IOn � LSt
Sat3 Bet•nard:n
102
F
45
300
l3aptist `iIGrt;h
Co�inty
Hous n9 Auth.
d,
6'
p63,9%
350 County 350 L1°,
49
VC NTuRA
Hoilsi'ng Auth,
Pending
301
73
160 IIoUs�ng Auth
T % -- - -
968'p,
75
7 o
E u ing AGth,
G
160
66%
160 sing Aute;
`P..ort.'NUenetne
is
1958
,60
'
bHousln0 z
�
200.
I, 1E0
p
reon
1966
p;
70
�•
u0 C;ty
1972
0. Fious7ng Autit 120
90
30
*C-eldor1
H� Nand3cap F- ami1J'
U6Loki Income MT Modo at "Incotnt
i
-
i
,
y
'
23
t
Status Report of ArticleXXXI '
V ` Ref e e
JllRISOiC`CION
" ;DATE '
FAIL
VOTE
UNITS
AUTHORITY,
TYPESUS,i
R
�,i
SLAGcon
� t
s`
.,,..t
N OTCS '
"ONTURA
i
San B
n Ue -a'
ra 1 97Q
300
Htausing Auth.
t.25Ll
""
71
,
1977
p
0
Housing i.nv AUth,
300
dhtU
V���t
1058
p
80�
80
County
`
Housi ng Ruth;
,,
1961
P
80
75
County
0
75
i
NOus, injAuth�
1970
p
55
30G
Housing Ruth:
225 LT
21T
83 11
1977
p
�
300
oUsing A
A uth,
300 LI
20
28
- -
- -- -
,
SANISLAUS
C�^es
1961
P
w
30
CQi.nty
-
Nous n9 ;AW 44.
U
30
HU'ghson'
1"952
F
30
Co'8 f`
Uh y
HoUs7ng Au h
1959
R�
51.'4
5a ,'
NoUsi "
n AU`t h.
g
,
50 Ej'F
5 �
46,
Modesto :
1972
P'
300
H'Using Auth
300 E�
/
0
30
El deny
N hd.cap=Eami�y lI4Low
Indo'..
m�., MIi ome
iderate enc.
2TbbbbbDDATlATjj
i
� '�'..i r l
;#
status Repot^t of /Ir ice X"X Ref ndu
JURISDICT,TON
DA1 F
FAIL
ilOT6-..
JN�TS-
AUTHORITY
rYP6
USCn
LEFT, 't
�SAAG (ren
' srAN
Pat'te rsan`
2
4 0
_
County
,
_. -- _--
-
Nauss
`ng Auth
71%'
10
ounty
Hr�using Auth
0
30
Ri'�e6ank
1 fi7
P
79�
30 Ci t y
a
Nouain�g Auth.
0
19.2
P
30 Nousing path.
SOtN
30
0
Westloy
1:96 2
P
769
2--County
1
Hdo t h g AuthW
O
20
a`�APC
I
Wi 11 iar s
1962
P 26
20 Ca Y,
H ou si rt g "Auth:,
GLEflN
'1976
p 1-
34
100 'HIPUsih9 pubs
100 Fa%m
C AG
r
lftgR8
r
I " C Utt r
1955
p
8
yc
_
30 County
0
I
�
1
i�ous�tlg Auth
961,
P
63
25 C Dunt y.
�25
1 Dinuba
1962
p
80
o' us
H � g Auth,
1
$0 Colnt '
y
;
,,
Uting 'Auth
0
80
r
E
n ap:
I
r �m�ly L Logi Ih �Ine` M ,,o, a gate Income
,
-
-
,
A
"
e
I
atu� a pc�.t� of ht c1e XhXz:V aef
e���
f
JURISWCTION
DA, C
FAI� _w
E =
UNITS
T
AUTHORITY
uSO
LEFT'
t" ;
'.
TAG coh't)
NOTES
TULARE
,
Cab S he n
1961
1
20
County
nt Y
Housing Auth.
0
20
Lind. _
_ _ .
F_`
46;d
2001.
NoUsi►1g push-.
�2bQ �Jfi
-
78
F
35;7
6,01
Gouhty
H
60 ��
ousing Auth,
New Lohdon
19'61
P
716,
30
County
`o
F# u 'ihg Auth.
0
30
1967
p
75
10
county
0
10
'
Housing Auth•
partervi 1'1 e
197:5
p
65%
200
Housing Ruth,
200 E I
/
0
LaC
Spr4ngvi1le
194
F
95%
300
Housin Auth�
g
300 E/F I'
119>'
181
W
.
Srathmare
1975
�`
1 %
lab
-'
-
10'i/F
= _
Terea'Be11a
-
1975
F
5�
50 C
5
Tralier
1957.10
U:
ounty
0.
i0
I
Hb 081 Auth
Tulare
1959
F
5:1
125,
125'fF
0
12.
i9y8
p
54,5
150
Count Y
r �
0,
50
,
Hbutih g AQ'th
Vi 5a1 is
'1972 ,
P
54
20C
Ga'un y
h�Usin `Auth
2a0 E/F ,
115F
85.
Lac l bonds & fedehai ,g6Ver mom
liah -fon41 fibre relit ro r
p g ahi
wF 1der'ly
H=Hand""",icap�-FaM,
y,LTA-Lav Ihcame hit Matl r'atP
o hcohtle
reservat
1
I
,
1
ab a of �C
T ontent$
r
r
I.
I t
n roduct inn.
The L.egaIl�ties of Art c)e 34 . ,
Attorney Genera) Opinions &._CnUrt::Cases:- .
- _
- - -
Present Application
r
Unreo)Ved Issues°for Article 34 Application
, 14
Putting Together A Successful Ballot fNeasure
Framing the proposal K
1
• :' .
Seef,in9 Support . •
• 1, 8,
r
.' :t
On the Ballot=
i • •- .I 19 (�'
rTlie
i • . • ,
Campaign, • • •
Y i • 25,
rI
i
Adx i ,
�
• •
��jj
AC;A47
• K ii i i
Article, XXX V
Y i
F�ealth5afety
t,
Code 5ec�tion 37'3
,
r
5aeramen't0 195 Hdusiny Rei'e1^ehdum ': •'' • Y ,
-. , K 35 I
�
SOT edea a 1 of Wor dings
�
Article 34 Clearinghouse K
53
r
I
I
i
1
I
,
I
.I
,10, On atiOMPto, help U6 i ti ei de`l 'W fth ttc1, e,;3 activity,Department '
of., HI0oopgan OIMMIUri tY, Pe V 0 p, .M.e 'hthas compiled this in forma t 1 0 0dk n
a et: It
.
is divided` "��,j "n to j, LogAT Se0fl,Qp,' a hd' a Me a sre, Sect 6hT L
. �ga1 Section,
outlines the COnditfohs heceS
s, ', a rY for Art Ic 16 01 apply to
34, t a hnusfr,, development.
opmen
t also es'cej s,..
d berecent. coif rt decis,to -s WhI0 have: .a dd 'the- issue.
=This Section1S de tj R0 'di'nO Ohl' to help d6 the aPpl,icabi
terMIhe" h Ani vi:
$4, to, 1OW., iftome,`,hli
ous,ng production and W, a,I so to suggos't how ways'
in Which hausirtg plans cah bett,�Octurod_, so `as tolimit t f
Artrc1e 34a on y, 4, o P.ncOu.N,§e 10,4'determined i a,
Ihn6VOti6h., Onto t,� b.ag; be 8) t
Aj'e f c,'- 4. authority 1: -os§A*;s,tho"rd: is a d' Ifni^ an
'06e: rganfie Opt ,;to
U,
'gaih 'vote 0,06v, al;The .8 al 0 Section o tl'66tthe ttoit i
We
ce, 8 s f U I ballot
project by cohvertinghd rehabilitating existing aider buildings'into low-tncoe
family` units, Article 34 authority wast; r6041 ^ed because the public' entry Vat,
develo q pr6jects from e�isti'ng 'ho.n_
i.
ping, constructi;i�� and ac �iring`neW low -rent
Iow'_rent pt^oject.s,.
0 5 (Lai' Atty: Gen: 17 0' 66 Leasing .o'f Sectio'► X23 units ,does not
thi gger Art cic 34 because 1) such l eases i nv_ol ve a scattering of l o�w--i�eilt units
1
not contemplated by Article '34 vo:t'rs.land 2)'such leasi7 ng involves; neither acqui-
sitiohl nor establishmeht of °a low income project"! ih that,the units are scattei^ed
and result in ,a loW-density of such units in existing developmehts.
' 51 '00s,. Cal Atty. Genc n2 1968. LeaserpUkhase agreements by Lowy
pers, With Section'
irtc .le persons in a project ;Owned`' or developed ,by` pHVate deVela11
23 subsidiesi frcm.a Housin AuthoHity, da not reiiuire Article 34 approval, because'
the No;using Authority is is a s;'ubsidy, not'rent,ng the units; because
ownership 'is contemplated, there is no creation of a, permanent rental resource for
f
loW-income persons; ahAl because there, is no ;s)kUH ty imterest taken by Ithe authoHty
51. Ops. Gen. 245 1196.x' agency is. reibcating
Cal Atte:,
y
,. _ Where a state a e
10W-inc6me persons displaced by a public project, ;4rticle 34 authnrity,is is he
,fa."typical public IoW rent housing project" is'developed; but other Mqahs]o
providing housing a`Ireedy "a proved"by' the 'Attorney GenOaT; mLj, be used withntat
At tidle 34 aUthbl^ity (i.e. Section 2$
52 Ops. Gal. Atty. 'G'en. 133, (is6'>. A )ease ptlrcilasQ agreetent program
!j
on behalf e lbW int to persons pursuant "to,24� U.S. . 1421 'b�� With the H0,us,jhg'
Authority leasing the uh'its a'td subleasing` to low income households; does not trig-
,
er Article 34 b.ecauso there f' hot creation of a '"pe'^mahent' esource of public
t e ousi
hous7(n`g accommodations nor the taking of a' security interest in_; h h h9 :I
`5.
j'
'ids V�'Val't�.rra'�19.71' 442`li�'S.'''1.37�,91 S,:Ct 1':331. Article 34;
does not' viola;te either the: Equal Prono
t' t�' Clause r the Supremacy
Cruse to that local governments and citizens may otain some power
a
over de�lel�prnents which have tart and 'rl'ated ldcal effects:
1,834,
Winkelman v. City Of Tibo (1973) 32, Cal,. A"pp, 3d 1.,08 i al 4
tr. M hear ng uction by
i?' ( deniim). Constr. prjvate developer-
p i.
owner of a Section236 pnoject in Which:30% of the units would be
_. _ set aside ,for. _1 oW come farm l i es , and the Land. for: wh: oh"
sold to the developer at below-market cost on; this condition, ',does'
not re ire t` e 3 .s
qu Arti 4 authori�y in that ti�pre i not sufficient
localpublic entity involvement'to constitote-development,
constructs on, 9:h' acqui s i`t's on and there was no ;basis to
le',r a th'e rt i:indin that the�setti
' ��g ,trial cou '"s � g `n�,a5de of
3,4, of the units Fo'V,:'! oW-''1'n,c6me hOWOU ;,ds was, Itot sufficient
to constitutes 'j""inW. nein housing. p'roject!�. -_
r
Board of Suver isorsy. _:Dolan :(1978') 45 Cal : App. 3,&T.
App'. , ll9 Cal . h tri 347 heal?iii de led `.
p j g h ) The use; cif M ks
Foran long-t r' 1ow Interest loans to owners of property Ilfo`r
rehabililsation 1oahs does not:reuir� Arcie';4 approval'
thatthe'.City is notdevelopjhg; 6 n, gj or acquiring
Ow of c onVered housing'for 10-income family purposes, ;and no,
,
1 ncome tests �Vi 11 `bn used to determine e1i'gi bi 1 i icy, to res;i de i n
I�
the propolty which is to be rehabilitated with'Ithe bonds;:
Call fo" n `a o
W, 7 H tisih f=in"
o ante Aget�cy V' El l lot (l `976 � �� 7 Cal 575 �
,3d
31Cal AW* $61 (inotiified)» 1'he�� State Supi^eme Court ►^tiled
that de'velopmehi s which would be 100and 75 lo, ncome Ah d
I�
re'sauons'e to that decision, 'the Legislature enacted the public Hous'hg E;l:eotion.
s 00 - 1'002 St s; 19 ,6 c a .
: Impleeent ' �► (_ al �afetyy�' Code ecti.�an 3.7 at., 7 h _p
ti oh La He th' and S
133,Seot;'fon 3. (see appendix:'. 'this statute stater i�n,releant partt
III'Section 37000,. The Leg, s l atu 1 e find's ,and decl ares that 'Article 34', .
of the State Constitutioq was approved by the voters for the purpose;
of providing a Mechanism for expressing community concern re94rdlh0
the development, acquisition; or construction of federally subsidized
06030t.onal p'ublic�housing projects. St�'ch de elopraaents typically
were different from and inconsistent with; housing developments provided
by the private sector, Such differences included architocture.; designs
01
and locationalstan;zkods :as Well as the level nfarnnities provided,
- Such dVelopments-�uere-occupied :entirely �by persons of low income,.- -
an'd` usually Were not subject to ad valorem property'taxes,
''The Leglstature'fin�ts and declare" that `new corms of housing assis-
tame cava pro,, i a housi ng for persons of ;low income:. i n a 'manner, coh-111
sis;tent with and supp�irtive of optimum community improvemont, such
farms of�� housing assistance. may allow for in�xed inriome oc cu ancy in,.
p
.
duel opmenti i^opfoentati've of and comped ti ve Wi th s imi lar market
rate devel'jpanents. provided by the private sector. Such mixed income
devPl.opmFya�ts are frequently cotparab16 to market rate projects_,in
terms 6 architecture, dEcsign, and locational standartls as ntell as
the level of aMp-rilt� es Y t to a
ovided, grid mai be sub ec d 'ualo
p y J � " ,em.
property taxes;,
Re_ 0-9ni.;ing that new for; oaf' housi�jg assistance pY,ovidd new ;approaches
fore housing persons'of lo'Wincome, it tis .the ihtent�af the Legislature
1 h eraacting Secti ort 37001 t6 cl arif`y ambiguities relating to the scope
of the «ppl i cabi 1 i ty of Arti c1e 34 �whi chnow e�xi st, Therefore, and .pur-
suaht to Soctf6h i of Article 34, this part is enacted in ordel^ to If
cilitate the operatlohi Of Article 3 and 4 con M stent with the proviy
�sighs of:thatar�ticle,
oe terms 'state pub1116body",and'pprsops of low ineoane" used in thiel
part have the same;:meanir� as iri 1�rticle' 34
;�Sectioh 37001. e te`r ' i l o- e t housing ro 'ect'i as defined a n
ih m. Wrn h gp
Section l of Article 34 of the, State constitution; does hot apply td
.any development composed !of urban or i^ual dwellings, apartments; or
oth6r l i vi ng accommodate tris ; Wei i ch iiirrets ei th eta of the fb11 owi ng
'
The developmeht �s pr,ivately owned,housing
receiwiii no ad vi'orem
phoperty tax e�temptiort' no's'
fully rei�hibiirsed to
al l 'taxirng ehti tie ; ;and
t ere than 49 percent 'of the dwellings , epartmen, s,
or other, 1iVing accoir nodation , o such tlevelopment may
becC ed b ehsahs o:f low income, or,
:o upi y' p ,
(b) The,developmeht #s privately'owned,housing) is no
exempt front ad val.owem t0atioh by red"o►i of any public
Oner h p and i s not fi r)a l ce With di reCt l on'g term
»l0
�reatve '1c
-r isia.
n effect, this ��it" p �g tiara Wouldexempt from' the;pirior'Ill _
fet,4endum reguirr:riri'. any d0Ve,lopmeht which reserves hot in etcess of
bf thol unit's far°'low into-me; porsons, i`s privately awheu, and pays' the aotiaal
or equivalent to full property taxes
Thi'scope and corstitu1ohelity of ►his leg s1ati;on is presently ;'under chat
y
Lenge ,iii a, new OFA, validation actio;;, Callii'ornia Haustg i;nance.Agencyy.
i.°;
p titocci. C;c,ivSF238O, which has, beoh argued and 1s awa.iting decision
by the ' upri e C�eurt. ' It shiaul d be no��cec� that not on1 Y ;the expl i,ci "tl statutory
,
interpretation has b66 raised, but through an amicus bril6 , .the° Western Center
-
-
on LaW and, Poverty, LoI8 An La4ers faq^ Flousing and several Legal Services
Programs, (gave challenged the necessity fp:r the statute; arguing that ,CHFA-
i:inahced nousing is hest the intended subject of Article 34 because of"the lack. of
property tax exemptibm than the ,application of Article 34 a noh-tax exempt
, el
ro acts violates oor e.o ly s ht to travel- and that t.be a ticatioh of
p 3 P p p,. p ,
the referendum requirement°of Article 34 to housing develap,ments subject to
'the
ful'1 property tax liability' cholates riEhts of potential low- hcome re.;i'-
dents of those projects'to equal 'priectioFi; of tie law';, io that there is nb,
ratio`al basis for ire referendU re uirement eiv n thL social a.i'� fisca1
n a m _q �,. _.o n.
impact and structure of..CIMFA-fihehced-housing;
f,
i
Ih that the' Supreme Court granted i r nodi ate Sur, i sdi cti on, scJ, clavi fi cation
of the s tan'dards, ah' thre,shbl d§ which' gavern the apply cati ori of Ht�ti cl e 34
.
is ,ahticipated: the participants present at the'hearing believe than the
chart! 5 decision 'wi,l l' ,go 'i,eyohd the mere Validity ofthe code isec;ti on thal -
'
lenged' an d, may re'cti�y same of the damage of '�llint or''rule dii^e�,�tly .on the
points raised in thcamicusbrief regarding °tht:� status 'of nnh-tact exempt low
I hcoMe' deve'l opments
' '
s 5'' 1 1
nus ues +i a s a s i tuat b. re to ra w c
th h. � burner t�, n _ hd i_ n p n h h
t . meari't�me thero are
Obclear answers exist; Where there is no such mgoIUt ons the 6or;S.fia-ket
and public counsel dit6h tend to be tom ' vati ve , ;thus d3 scor�r`agi n.9 many
attmp''ts to for""ge new.'and innovative projects: 1'henlowirga ertcet�passes
h
a dei ailed description of .the. Wans,,of ;analy,z. 0, the applicability of,Artic1e 34
to a hypothetical proj�,ct and ;an. outlineaf so' i.mportatlt uhresolwed.
�e of the more
or, 'uheloar, Rrtiele4problOMS .
For, example, assume .a situation in which a t6untyl hour"ing' aut'hbhity Wil1'.raze '100
eXistinn units and replace them with five'20-unit complexes throughout' 4e county,
with, two such complexes on the original property: Th' evaluati'ngthese developments
for"brticle 34 appl`icabi'1"ity,;.it ft important 'to keep in mind the referehdwo require
ment is !conditiohed'upor the existence of:'l) ah actor -'a state public entity; must
_ -- _ -
be ihvo7'ved; 2) anacti.on = the state public entity ihvolvemen:t mus be fi;n the form
of~'development, cohstructib.t, or ac'uisition; 3) an object -� t"e hous'in Ihvolued
q -, h
Must be,a "i°oW hent: project foh persons o� low, ihcorre:"
S our, example, e might start by asking uvhether the complexes' are 6wil-income, renta'1
r►
p ...
roJects '�ihe, "object, as contemplated by Ariiele 34: By its re the
the
housing will be intended fo,r 1o. "income 'persons, le is, .a permanent. rental resource,
- and it -w � be exempt from .16,1041 =property taxes. The faCtD that _each 'complexi may be
=!
aesthetically the same as sur roundihg complexes, an'd may be sural ze t
,i
troditional publi"c"��ousing, does hot exet�pt the developmeht. The referehdum require-
= - -
'howevel^,
�
merit might be, avA�ded, w6i^e the, hau5ing aUthority to ;develop ten 50-un,t
pomple.x�s, each of Whchcohtained 20 low-1 bcphiehousing sten; units With the�t^e-
ma` hder'availa Qo at market value, this Old appear to eliminate the hedessity of
um giveh'the Winklemah test which su e omP.ht5 with
a referehd ost ' ' to : oss
gg s that dev
1;hah 4% of the units being 1 oW=i hcdine' do hot const tUte "low-`ihcoh�e projects
i
ur os. si'mi 1 a'riy; the l oval ty tni ght reserve th'e com l extes, for 100 ,I
p p ,.
l r1w.:i,hcame opcUpahry, but pa i d, for cooperati ve oWhd�,th ps of thee chi is by the
occupants: $tech a`development could take advahtag' of tie federal ectioh' PrO04M
and, at the sama ti'me; ,`void Article �3� ^equireme�)ts which apply only t0 W"income
.rental projects. ,
,
_ _,
made it a,co-adevelaper of these projects. The cases suggest however, that on,
cour^ageme:nt or`facilitatirop tsech as� land''Write-downs)> w'ithout,.e11 xtensiv e�re.gl��.�
latony and supervisory in olVemegfall short of suc '"deve o" e
h 1 pm nt. As the
foregoing' paragraph indicotes,, pubc agenc ies°A,i'chlease low-rent ;housing (asp
in the HUD Sectiori 23 'pro.gram,;: are 'not covered `'by Art'ic1e� 34: Thus, it ,is passible
" for a `1 octal i ty , to Provide a pr vate,,deve1 open With i`:ncenti Ves to build l old-incoh� ,G
r
housing Which wi11 be leased to a public agency Without involving At^t°ic1e 34,''
The fact ,that there"is to be "replacement's of�100 existi;n units does not coo"
Ing, m
- -' pletely override the necessity of osis ahalysi Fo;rty-nf the units: (tire' t►o
complexes on the origio'al, site') would requite no hew authority, but the reniaini;ng
three complexes 160, u►ii ts) are "new .pro "eas" h that they, have: new of e.cts on the
f
,
comrnunit
,and: therefore wo
y u1d require A►^ticle°3A authority.
Unresolved Issues for Rrti de f34 App'1 icatian
the � p .�
1G �In E1liat„,. Supreme Court found a develo went in Whish 75 of the units:
is
reserved for low-income households constituted a !'low. relit projea;""
- - ' wi nmi man, 30%vias hft s uff %1 ent to tri gge'r .a referehdtim; yet i n San pabl o s,
the court ,might, be read to suggest that, i f 'any units are set,, as de; a refeten
dum might be required, Ir ".Pati"tucci , ` as fi glare hasbeen adoited for a`r
gement, bGt 'requires full property tax ,payfnetits, What percehtage it ratioh-
'.
ally related to the purpose of the At^tile? ,
2� In Article04, "low-income�nrson`' is defined as ,pet^sons lacking the amount
of income necessary, (as detet' ihed by'the state public 00,ihvo ved) to ens
able ,a ,household to live in deceht, safe, and sanitart' dWellings'witrout'
finance al ass i s Gahce oW bVe:rcrowdi hg. pccordi hg' to the fecle.ra govet^nment and
the statoi ng P1 an �
t 1oW hcome is
de .Nous', , defihe A. h,0 hg` an i� ;.ome of less
thah ;80 of. the 'area Median, n Los Angeles $12,000, prei� year), based
on the trad .tint al yardstick of 5peridi'hg trot mote than 25 of adjusted' income
_14�
i
I
residehts hai> no rolatiohshi to "develo ,construct av` ac uire:"
p: q
6. Should all re. acejne �t 1a����tncome housi '�' be exem ted fr m Art;i.cl�+ ? For
p _ ,. �. P
-
example,, where 'iaw-itieotne units are lash; from�axistng houaingstock due to,
code ehforceiront, abatements; public impravemen"ts such as parks or highWays,
1.
redevelopmeot` agehcy activitios or °the 1> key ,replacement housing - partil-
cularly';1ast resort. i,pus,rig - which is aesthetic and a s substahtallyl'full
p
pY'tiperty tae's is basi'a:a11y ,nodi ffereht than' the payn�eh;t of relocation hetie .,
fits and has the addtti0511al 0dvantage of prov'ding`better housing which also
contributes to the cha`rac6r of the surroum in hei`ghborhaod,'
71,In spite of ah Attorney:Gen��ra1';5 op.ihion concluding that Article 34 does not'
apply 'to coope°native ho.using;`some,cohfusioh stjll eXists on this point., This
co das ion is Parti eul arly cri tic° it j;whore a public body hot ds a security n�
teres` t or right of, first refusal i rt Oder 'to proteot equi ty w hdf`a'11 s'by''pri ol^'
a►vners, and cohtihues oth r forms pf ovewsigh:t .and Jnvolvement.
8► Standards of eycossive- gove^nmen� �r�valvemEnt were found 1n Flliut and San
�.
pabl r�+su1 ti hg i n referendum autfori �.y be°� hg requ,i red Y T s there any way to
doltmii. the maitimum involvement " ermisst'b1e ter thout ti^iggering such` arequire-,
p
ment7
What fo,l^ms o I governmeht livol vement s h u u e V l .pmen _ r n
cons''
struction?" Cah' such ihvaiWheht. at least conform it
to the 'level of tnvolve�
merit nf a pri vote fiiiandi, r7 ' Shaul d. the stag for Poral governstent, be pehsnit'ted
-Volvemeot bahk
a 1jr,cre�nehtall'y ,gr`ehter 1eye1 ofthan>a because of respom•
Sbi l i ty for the publ io;';purse,?
Y
11 0811ou1 d federal , state at'cl loyal �eui cements .aecompahytng financial` asst stance
bjr'a loyal goverhment body .•- which do' not haveladverse oeig-ghborhood or '1ooa1
tak conseyuenca be d6hsi&Wb, in cetting the permissible threshold for the
de tt, oh of "develophient7"" For axample� 11(b "finahctng, tai a eniptiortis
th't^ou=h 1kiterrial �evellud Code Sect1on1103� ublic rehabilitation fIh,anotng and
� ' p
y
�" YI 'u
s 10i!ar program t�7th benefits acc�^otng' to phtvatei owners crho �1d be eeh�pt
'i
I I I
I
i I
i
3 An ` al i s i s of eoonompi c i M act'. Hoy► many gobs will ' be c►^eated':
n
by the 'cohAf, tioh of these` units? What are current 1o%al uhem-
01:0yrnent l eve's 7 How much money Zvi 11 be speht i h, 'devel upmen t?
or Peder<il
What ire the local costs, jf„any? What,are the state
ii
contributions?
� I
'Su
3eeki'h ort
9, per_
After___the gt^oundwark-_i.s done,, the care group shoald set .4 _seeking S-,, opppr
Froin key,community groups who could be helpful in persuading tiie City Courici
or Board of Super visorS to,place the measure 'on the.ballot. The core group ll
shoul'o also attempt to meet with those who may pose potential problems for the
proposal. if the proposal'emana'tes from the housing authority staff Or other
local gaveinment staff, then po1'itical' wore. subsequent to hitial proposal
othing prevents,
ji�st�f�.catlori should hot be done by staff on gorCernment time. N'
r e;nt7hg the roppsal directly to the Nausing Commis.
= . - p = _ si on, the
the _s tai'f from p_ es
:City t6uhcil; or Board of visors and rtothitt9 prevehts lstitff' from giving
technical assistance to cit 2 hs: who'�request such ass stahce - but the, direct
` s a f ;i n ca' ai ` hs mus be avoi de'd..
iktvc�lVement of. t f ,
mp g_
arm�'tion of a citizens' steering committee to get the lneasu,re On the'baliot ono'
to preempt ah,y POS b`1 a opoosi tion i s, a task that i s h65 t "performed early.: fioo
sal is on
often, ro” onehts Wait to' forme a sur�port o`rgani'zati4i afti?r the propo1.
the ballot' or untilrobl.ehls develop..' R key elemerit'tc4 retcmber is that an
' early'start in organizing support usually has its re4�ards, Earl; discuss'iohs ith
passible opponents can often nitralfid negative fealings that height blosshi into
strong oppisytion.
I
_
I y
b use the
641
'6n, d' hoW should � aGl� group be approached,. 0 v�o Jj
I Who sho!�1rd ,he c�intacted lip,
I
-
nature' of-comnuin'rt, politics end cast of characters i' sor�ieWhat differen,4 in
,I
4. :La 4,o r Ju s t, a,% the b0 I ding i t� be "upporti ve of
indust'r'y i's Ti kely v_ t PM41
p td n ose', ne��.�c-onstr�lt-tio.h0 �,,:',s.,. Wjjj��lth :Paido� 40.0, s:, wh,6 so, members 'lil
are ekperiericing
high unemployment Idvb throu bout the state: i3Obr has W
nsJs en,,
tupPoft,"I've. of public Of r '0a the hbugA
fb t!;s to i'00'r ng supply.
Slj Ci rganizatioht� s�u 'h,
0 a tho eague of Women: o ers,0 ltde AtO froan
As s:od'iati u f tly.
06 Ol I n ve rs Women a nd goOd oeoentl ,ve.Oft
d �Qupsh
0 h provided
mucholl the .d rg0l.�zatibnal skills an e
`dffort�: n eded to referenda d
Win re en a cam pa'i gns,,
Such C MIPS a"ed960eattuned 01IY l,to "heed 'ed' a6`8 sh604' be active :supporters
S6hN,oP ZOPS Senior c,'I'tiize,ns,:bav'6 been amcq t1he6
M st, active campaigners
for lout come housin s
in k,i I
9 PMPOsal,,'especially those fo� seniors. ?heir and
00,gy t ho', u I d be tapped
7.., Real tors; Although thetatfO�A Ass od ati on of Realtors $Pontored Afticl e
34, some ICUT N7_61toi� groups have, been supportive Of refbeOnda'0
upPbr .81a
, 'prop I
in' the iiviedbht. past l: A n d neutrality Q _S ht6,
is, hot uncommon: P010 Mfnpll�:l the Ocrame,
of Roal tors tu ''t -0-
pporLP mdum:iw -that C m. m- hitY d
61 1 e s: Boardbf Rea t6 ;remained 0 d 'a Vj Los
the"'16's Ah'g., 111 I I Angeles propou
h6Ut� 1 ioh the I
Pi^Opoh6)),tv,OoUld meet b 6rly, Stith 'Rd Realtors t. S,i 0000 , 41: S
the s di'
0, and to
attempt. to s6TV6 any p r00eftwhi h might cause S`,e H 6 u t pi^oblets Parr thei c a m paig� o
later poll
6mmuh4tY` 6 rOuws, A,Vviety Oda service b
t: ev� rgan'liati NnSAJ Vo"'
d ' cto 16to,
to N
W"j.hCOM0, hbusehbl&: and 64 fl u 'tial 'b 'd
h,,, have I h en: �P 011'6 b6 tbtl boards: he 6
Uhitiod W
O'grams i , dYi: 690,t les 3 church 'aux ori es tett
Their energy 8h,bul'a be (01' fOr' thed
Oe en u q
M,
Aire th !of d eit S, to." pot, together asteering q am mt'itbb are go IT, hq, '64 the 0
e i n,
ft htt .should thou Prkdo&�t get Aho t
t 'he 'ballot: '
r
CountYW'ide referenOa!;Ak hest placed on the ballot at the time of the statewi ..
de .
"
pri104 «y' or general, el ecti ons - e'l ecti ons whi ch coi;nci de' v�., th the aunty `s pri'tnary
and general elections. Ain ordinance 0: r,001 placing an Article 34 refer-"
endum on the 'ba 1lot must be adopted according to a'schedule of notification 'esd
tablished by the county, clerk. `en al's ^k must allow ample time fol^ submission
of .aryumehts,a printing, mailing, etc,. pccoraing to the Ch1ef of the State's
Election Divis"o!►, William DO 1 , > clerks may require up to 1`31 days,"depends:ng
_ - on thei-r "ewn -nee At -any ,Ir+, =te, he suggests trtat c.l,erks "be -c ns as., -to- then^=
own requirements, ,
Mindful of these time constraints, Article.34 proponents should approach local
governih"g bodies to place the measure the'balla at the earliest possible
mamentltt many cities and counties, the housing cat t!issiat7 must act upon such a
1
r solut onor Odinance pr'so:r to governing "body oha: The additional time
vih1' ch this process takes should be` ,taken i oto account,
assuming that the board of supervisors" or the` city Count0 acted f4Vorab'ly Gp,on
1�
the ordinance or resolGtion placing the measure on the aallot, the proponents
should he cor1cerne'd W. th two `,addf tonal fuctars .
: k
I
The first of these, tis repartioti �f the actual 1a►i""
p _ guage ,which Wil I a ear on
pp
the ballot, Great attention s"hogld be given to tha ��ord;fing ��f the:ballot, tnea,lsure
to' insure that it ,itiost .faVc;)ftbl.y presents the housing proposal . The actual
wrting'of thy" ballot summal^y will be done eithtsr by ache city attoFney o by the
county counsels but input to,those people is crucial, In the`appendiiau will
find a p�c.ket; of materilals from the Satramento 1975 referenda as,We l as ballot
WOYM �g from several other cities,' As yoG will note, the Sacramento proposal„
Y calls fist de l optnent � acc�ui si ti on JoIr cbhstrGd,tioVt of lc -refit units fore low income
S.
!M, a
a
AL