Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
78 - 39 5
2A, E .�..-SUM " I iMCTION 9. This Ordinance 1hall he and it is hereby 2 declared %.o i,� in f1111 farce and Offtct from and after thirty. (30) 3 days after thr.; date of its pnssap, and before the expiration of 4 fifteen (IS) days after its _passage, this Ordinance shall he 5 Published once with the names of the members of the Board of 0 Supervisors voting for and against it in the Chico enterprise Recon 7 a newspaper published in the Cotb�ty of Butte, Stato of California. M g PASSEL AND ADOPTED by the hoard of Supervisors of the 9 County of Butte, State of "al forma, on the 19th day of August 10 19800 by the following vote: 11. AXES Supervisors Dolan, Moseley, RJheeler, Winaton and Chairman Lemke 12 NOM None - 13 AD8ENT'; None 14 NOT VOTING: Noire ! 16 111tI; LEMIM , Chairman 18 Butte County Board of Sgporvisors 17 18 ATTEST: CLARK A. NELSONCounty Clerk-Recoxdov and Ex -off icip--� le of the fiaard 19 t 20 i BY 5 `y 8 9 10 11 12. 13 ':14 15 is 17 18 " 19 w0 21. 22 93 24 26 11 06 1i 6 ORDINANCE NO, 21346 C AN ORDINANCE WNW,R A PAR.''`l'ON O�' Tf�i�'� Ct�itt��t""Y Oi, BUTTE 0 STATE 011 CALIFORNIA,. AN �'"'RM3"" (MBI�IIJf4 DENSITY RBSIDEN"TTAL) DISTRICT's PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 24-29 Tho Board Of Supervisors of the "ounty, o'r Autte p `State of California, under and pv r,,4uant t•� Chapter 24.29 of the 'Rutt„e County Coda of said County Int? ORDAM SBC TION 1.. T0 hereinafter described. area situated in the Count of Hutto State of California shall be a �" � , fid it is hereby zo»cd as all "R -31t (Medium DOns».ty Rosidential) District, and suc a area shall be subject to the restrictions and restricted uses and regulations pursuant: to butte County Code Section 24-141, Sala area so zoned being located in the unincorporated area of Butte County, Chitop more particularly described as follows: Lot 5-S and the northwesterly 1/2 of Lot: 36 of "Hobart Subdivision" per map 0e record in map Rook 4 on mage 24 on file in the officd of tho Butte County 'Recorder, 0=0ting thea frora the fallowinp four parcels 1 The northerly 225' ft. of Lot 35 of ,said 1111ebart Subdivision" excepting therefrom that property located D of u line described at beginning at a. I}oint on the N line of s air' I,r,„t '3 , jocAtOd +'rt ft. W Of the north- easterly corner of said Lot 55 thonce southorly at a night angle to the N 11ne of sale' Lot 35, 22.5 ft to the end of the herein described line 2- The south"Sterxy 200 ft„ Of LOO 1%5 0111t,bart Subdivision" excopting; therefrom tate northerly :2S Vit. Of said Lot 5,$ and also cxcept:in;g t;h.e s011theattorly 113 ft 3. The soixthwestorly 300 ft. of the nor�,'%Uagt;erly 141 ft. of Lot 36 of said "Hobart ion It o . The southwesterly 413 ft. of the southeasterly 104 pcti of the northwesterly 330 ft o of Lot �6 of said "Hobart Subdivision". ShCTION 2, This Ordinance shall bo and: it is hereiry doelared to be in full fordo and Froin and. 'aftoi^ thirty (50) 1 pas da s after the date of its sago. and bofo�ro the oxpitatio Y � � n o' _1�, sll: 5 `y 8 9 10 11 12. 13 ':14 15 is 17 18 " 19 w0 21. 22 93 24 26 11 06 1i 6 ORDINANCE NO, 21346 C AN ORDINANCE WNW,R A PAR.''`l'ON O�' Tf�i�'� Ct�itt��t""Y Oi, BUTTE 0 STATE 011 CALIFORNIA,. AN �'"'RM3"" (MBI�IIJf4 DENSITY RBSIDEN"TTAL) DISTRICT's PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 24-29 Tho Board Of Supervisors of the "ounty, o'r Autte p `State of California, under and pv r,,4uant t•� Chapter 24.29 of the 'Rutt„e County Coda of said County Int? ORDAM SBC TION 1.. T0 hereinafter described. area situated in the Count of Hutto State of California shall be a �" � , fid it is hereby zo»cd as all "R -31t (Medium DOns».ty Rosidential) District, and suc a area shall be subject to the restrictions and restricted uses and regulations pursuant: to butte County Code Section 24-141, Sala area so zoned being located in the unincorporated area of Butte County, Chitop more particularly described as follows: Lot 5-S and the northwesterly 1/2 of Lot: 36 of "Hobart Subdivision" per map 0e record in map Rook 4 on mage 24 on file in the officd of tho Butte County 'Recorder, 0=0ting thea frora the fallowinp four parcels 1 The northerly 225' ft. of Lot 35 of ,said 1111ebart Subdivision" excepting therefrom that property located D of u line described at beginning at a. I}oint on the N line of s air' I,r,„t '3 , jocAtOd +'rt ft. W Of the north- easterly corner of said Lot 55 thonce southorly at a night angle to the N 11ne of sale' Lot 35, 22.5 ft to the end of the herein described line 2- The south"Sterxy 200 ft„ Of LOO 1%5 0111t,bart Subdivision" excopting; therefrom tate northerly :2S Vit. Of said Lot 5,$ and also cxcept:in;g t;h.e s011theattorly 113 ft 3. The soixthwestorly 300 ft. of the nor�,'%Uagt;erly 141 ft. of Lot 36 of said "Hobart ion It o . The southwesterly 413 ft. of the southeasterly 104 pcti of the northwesterly 330 ft o of Lot �6 of said "Hobart Subdivision". ShCTION 2, This Ordinance shall bo and: it is hereiry doelared to be in full fordo and Froin and. 'aftoi^ thirty (50) 1 pas da s after the date of its sago. and bofo�ro the oxpitatio Y � � n o' _1�, Y 1 fifteen (15) clays after its passage, this Ordinance shall be 2 published once with the names of the metabers of the 'Board of ' 3 Supervisors voting for and against it in the Chico LInterpri<se 4 Record, a newspaper published in the County of Butte, State of 5 California. g PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Supervisozs of the, 7 County of Butte, State of California, on the 16th day ofDot) teraber 8 1980, by the following vote: 9 AYES: Supervisors Dolan, Wlieoler, dos oley, Winston and Ohaivxtaa Lemke 10 DOES Ilona 11 ABSENT Xona 12 NOT VOTING 1�ono 13 ROBERT E. LUMKE * Chait man 14 Butte County Board of 5upertrisors 15 18 ATTIM': CtARX A. NFMSON County Clerk -Recorder rj .,d BTioft,ici Clerk of the Board 17 fL is B ., 19 go 2i 22 23 24 28 a 20 s{ �' Inter -departmental Memorandum .�., Toz Butte County Assessor's Office Fnow Butte County Planning Department subjECT. Glenn Williams DAM October 2, 198`0` Pursuant to Section 65153.5 of the Government Code, the following parcelt/)Q$zxjz*x identified as 44,-53-44, 45. 53 61 ,�c/sere It Rezone from A-2 to R -S zoning district Granted a variance to Allow Issued a conditional: use hermit fo,r cc Property Owner i Infer-Doparn- fat �lemorand TO$ Butte County ssossors A'Office PROM1 tutte County PlaTining Department subject: Albert wad} AP 44-33-17 October 2, 1980 Pursuant to Section 658635 of the Government Code, the following parcel/,jxrxx;tx identified as 443,3-17 Rezone :From A-2 to R-,3 ---- zoning district. Granted a variance to allow 0—. .. Issued a conditional use pe-rmit dor cc" ProPe-rtY Owner tr Inter-Depar tot But • ",)unty Assessor's 0:cfj.ce . FROM$ Blit to 0o1.1nty :Manning, Department, auoj'Ecrc North Chico Rezone - pile 78-39 DATEI November 24, 1980 1 r 3uaaza"t to Section 65863.5 of the Government Oode, the following parcels identified below were rezoned from 0-1 to R-4. 44-21-29._ the following paroel was rezoned from 0-1 to r'np: 44-21-5g the :following pavoels were :rezoned from 0-1 to R"3: 44-.21-6'I 62 6 the following parcels were rezoned from A-2 to R-3 44-05-3-92 44-2'1--"11 44--53-2? 44-35-5g 44=+-' 44-21-65 9L4 59 73 ?3 74 66 67 95 60 97 44--55-60-9 44�-38-8 9 44-33-39- LI.O109 9 61 4L� Lb0-3 62 44-3L44-'14 64 1 2 w 44-35-'15 44-36-25 13 1 41(1 53 1 16 4 1 59 20 21 10 18 65 27 16 19 71 29 '17' 20 2i " 44-38-11 �L�4 �� 238 2 44-56-1 L4. 4 41 39 26 5 2 77 L�5 92 28 47 7 a7 48 31 8 48-02"4 % 34 I 42 51 35 Ii 12 43 53' 39 13 44 44-30-48 54 40 55 46 14 1 51 56 '16 i N Chico Rezone peso -2- Nov. 2- Nov. 24 � 1980 the following parcels vor.e rezoned :1'K-om A-2 to R-3 (aoni.,.); 44.-56-17 44-56 32 z{.t -5?-3 48-02-38 18 35 L} 139 19 37 5 40 20 38 6 24 39 7 26 40 8 27 41 9 28 t{:y-`-' 10 31 2 the following parcels were rezoned from A-2 to R--4 411-21 � 8 42 43 44-30-50 the following parcels were rezoned from A-2 to R-1: t1.4--2- 2-`1-5 Ljlt -PP-3-1 ? 44-22-5-1 44-27-39 6 18 2 40 7 19 3 41 8 20 4 LFA' 9 21 5 44-30-1 10 22 6 2 44-22-2=1 23 7 3 44-22-1-1 24 44-27-13 4 2 25 14 5 3 26, 15 4 27 16 44"22",2-2 28 17 8 4 2 119 10 33 5 34 20 11 35 21 12 7 36 22 13 8 44-22-3-10 23 14 911 24 13 10 '12 25 16 11 13 26 "17 112 14 27 1 13 15 28 c q 14 16 44--� -102 40 15 44-22-4-1 44-� l w-1-11 21 44--22-3-�1 2 44-, 7-29 22 2 3 30 23 3 4 7,1 24 4 5 *5 25 5. 6�Y, 26 6 34 27 8 35 r 9 36 29 9 X10? 0 3 11 Chico ]Rezone c?4I,1 1980 'the 1'0110wing Parcal$ were rezoned from A-2 to H -'I zl,tl.-30�'�2 L1.LH.. aB-'1 44-68-25 L111-68-4.9 2 26 50 3� 3 27 51 35 26 52 6 5 3 7 30 54 8 7 31 55 39 8 32 L1.0 957 LI�1 10 34 58 42 11 35 L1.3 12 36 4'4 13 37 ,13 14 M.6 15 2 411-31-39 16 40 40 17 41 11.4 18 42 45 19 45 45 20 44 44-4 0-9 2,1 45 44-47-27 22 46 69" 23 4 70 24 48 the following parcels were rezoned from A-2 to MHP: 44-21-64 44-,31-17 LN+ -33- 8 44-38--7 10 the following parcels were rozoned from A-2 to CC 44-27-1 2 3 4 5 8 10 11 12 - 4 N Chaco Rezone Page -Ll,- Nov. 24, 1980 the following parcels were rezoned from A-2 `4o 13-R., 44-33--6 L111-45-15 L111..-45-66 79 67 8 17 71 9 10 74 0 11 18 75 11 13 20 78 1 21 779 13 44-37-6 22 81 14 44-39-'15 _ 23 82 23 19 32 86 24 22- 34 44-4.7 24 24 e 23 39 25 r 25 0 28 26 42 P-9 27 43 30 28 WL 31 29 32 30 46 33 34 48 34 35 50 37 36 5 49 38 54 56 40 57 57 41 _ 58 60 43 6`f 44 60 100 45 61 102 46 63 47 64 48 65 the following parcel was rezoned from A-2 to MULTI: the following parcels were rezoned from A-2 to RT -1 44-33"78 4LH-33--89 44-47-38 80 91 3g 82 92 50 5'3) 83 LELF-4r, �-43 5. 84 2 85 30 56 86 32 57 88 33 Anter -Departmental Memorandum 'rot Boars of Supervisors FROW marl D. Nelson, Environmental Review Director suDrECT: EIR for North Chico Rezone DATE, August lei, 198 The BIR for this project is presently a " draft's until Tuesday's public hearing has been held and all comments addressing sufficiency Of the bIR and concerning any significant environmental; factors_ have be6n responded to in writing, prior to pTR certification, There may or may not be additional comments received at the hearing since this project is not too controversial. What controversy exists relates to the proposed choice of zoning districts rather than the content of the BIR. I have not tried to anticipate the hearing outcome or the Board's intent as to findings which must he made paisuant to the requirements of the California hnvironmental Quality Act. I would appreciate instructions following the hearing as to your intent so I can work with county Counsel to prepare the necessary wording for the motion which will meet the requirements of the laly. .A denial of the _project can occur without making environmental findings. If you decide to approve the project, findings are necessary as listed below: 1. Whether implemt ;ation of the project will have a significant e, ct of the environment. 2, If so, whether there are feasible alternatives Which will reduce the adverse environmental effects. These must either be implemented, or findings made as to why not. 3. If there are significant adverseenvironmental effects which cannot be mitigated., "overriding considerations" which justify project approval in the face of anticipated environmental damage must be formulated, If you have any questions regarding this project, not hesitate to contact me ► please do Inter -Depart ent"'l 'lewandu To, Jim Lawson, Planning ' Director FROMi Larl D. Nelson, Environmental Review TirsetOr 54JpJ EGTt Iforth Ojijco Rezone (8outh. of La.ton Road) oATEt January P61 1978 We have completed the initial study for the forth Ohico Rezone and will proceed to prepare the Draft L.l.R, $ unless come othev Planning (;omission project has a higher pi-iority. A copy of the initial study checklist is attached for your files. M y ra r f y. t III t 11 Ct g q �T V0104 ?UVIRVOq e Thr, (11111, �1111 WO b0 C(XIIPIP7'-'ed by Lead Aqr�ncy) BACRGROUND Name cs r x xa ° uL Cotua t;y '1 annixJ9 Crms . an Na. Chico Address clY1Ca .e� i .2. # `% COUnty Center Br a.ve rovlle _Ca foxn a 565-.. . �.. 3. Date of Checklist.. mil ja.il}i 'yj�� ��!!��ygy♦ p pprr yy i yyyy fifi 'R M flQ 'F T�,,Ayy�S,�F44��,pJ.6�{��49�i4.i.�+i .S} 4 Nue Z" u t'a. RRezoneo r aid C�C p.ay�.y�gqyff�.. j���'l kya` pay�y �?+}�E).l i ..�. _ �« Earth. YIIS 11 � •h_f � S � - ..,_., 0 . wvl a chiarwo,: '.F! > '},''� f 7v �.�, 3'i r �,u .1 r !' f,, ` j�. `° C-•j.�".M' � .c :r M - _ - ' or ��"�f..�7..'E,., V«!`�;'�;�$'"S, i�i<'x' €'!�" a- u�F� :..d 9.➢.� �' �'' '4. y� 1. r 1{:c�a X14 '1 t a f'Qd�u����.�,�"�, ��_ n� ���°Nye rC,! A..",w..�.l'l f��.�. A � , III) «Y 00 YES MAYBIS No ii Exposure of people or property to ger,logic hazards such as eart.ilquakes, landslidear mudslides, ground failure, or similar hazards? ._..._ 2. Air. Will the proposal result In: ai Substantial deterioration of ambient e air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors? ...._ c. Significant alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally?' �.._.. 3. Water. Will the proposal result in substantial: a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements?, bi changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? c. Alterations to the course or flow ,of flood waters? _ d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alterhtion of surface Water quality, including but not limited to temperatures dissolved oxygen or turbidity? f. Alteration of the 61 -rection or .rate of flow of ground Wat:.ers? g, change in the quantity of around waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by Guts or excavations? -_ Appehdix l-1 page 2 of a` shellfish, bont1ji.0 c� ga.�a stns, insects (,`I microf i aurid) MAYBE N ) h. Reduc,'-Aon in the amount of ,ate r�r rare or i�ndanae,j-ed :;pec i. ,s of animal"'? Otherwise available for pul)lic �a+*.a+��yucty are", into an are", o result in a barrier o the mi,grati.c',11 water supplies « 9xpcsure of peewit or property to wildlif(.T hahiLat water related haZards such as fl.eaodinq 6. Noise9. �� ill the Px opas,al resnIt itj 4* Plant Life . Will the proposal result it. rncrt"-a,ses in noise l Y'G'.l q �_-yy �'« a. Change in the diversity �1i f spj-,�V.jows., o number of any speCies of plants (including trees,-h,rubs, grass, OaAopQ" tni,oroflora and aquatic planta) b i RedVction of the AufW)er- of any unique, rare or enrlange red srw—c eu of plants? a C. Introducti n of IletJ st3p ' e, CJt p_jants into An area, ()r in a 1��jrripr t o tljrw .. normal replenishmont o el�iast`��c stajciOS d, Reduction .1 (Irenage of any € gri.cultural crap 5 « Animal Life. Will t.tlt pro."sal .result i,p, 5u? ta.nt1af, a. Grange iyj the diversity of species, o nuttt}�N in f ,c A. sa, 0Aty opec1.P.j 0,L a>aXma1,S fhIzds land animals inCludinq xeptilesA fish and shellfish, bont1ji.0 c� ga.�a stns, insects (,`I microf i aurid) b?. Reduction of the slumbers of e$I'1y unique, rare or i�ndanae,j-ed :;pec i. ,s of animal"'? C* 1I1yt,. of new s� eyycieys cj: animals �a+*.a+��yucty are", into an are", o result in a barrier o the mi,grati.c',11 .. or rnavp.;,�,,rjt of �eniimalr, d. Deterlora;tion to exi sti nq f njj car; wildlif(.T hahiLat 6. Noise9. �� ill the Px opas,al resnIt itj it. rncrt"-a,ses in noise l Y'G'.l h. Exposure of pocple to soy«prf� ra,llse levels' �'« YES MAY$E NO 7. Light and GlaVe. Will the proposal produce significant l ght or glare? S. Land Use. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the planned land use of an area?.` 9. Natural Resources, Will the proposal result V— in su stant al a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? b. Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? 10. Risk of Upset. noes the proposal involve as risk of---an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oilj pesticides, chemicals: or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? ° 11 Population. Will the proposal significantly alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an .area? 12i Housr io Will the proposal significantly afeect existing housing, or create a demand nor additional housing? 13. Tran6portation/(qirculation. Will the proposal result in: a. Generation of substantial additional Vehicular movement? b. Significant effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parkinq? c. Substantival impact upon ex)':,5ting transportation systems? ._.� d. Significant alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods?`° e . Alterations to waterborne, -rail or air teaffic? Appendix F page 4 of 8 1Se1C�l.?C l 'ter+ of YES MAYBE NO t-. Increase in traffic hazards to motor veh,lole.oj bicyclists or podestrian? .ewyear s. .r,.'nrw.sminy,+.r:p s-.y 14. Public Services* Will the proposal. T)t,ve need for new or altered governmont;al sp'rvicgs in any at the following areas a. Fire Protection? b. Police protection" Ab— c. School s d. Parks or other;: recreational __facilities? e. Maintenance of public faoilities, includina roads? f. Other governmental cervices 15 r ne�ry a Will the proposul zf-%ial,t i,-j a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy; b. Substantial. inorc —ise in demand upon existing sources of energy, or re-,,u .re the development of new sources of energy 16. Utilities. Will the prop. i result in reed for new systems, or substantial alterations to the fol.lowinq utilities: a. Power or natural gas' b. Communications systems? c . Watery d4 Sewers w_ 17, Human fieal.th . Will, the proposal result in; a. Creation of any health hazard or potential lyoalth hazard (excluding mental health)' w r x11 osure of People to pot.ential hea.l:tiy.. hazards? - 1Se1C�l.?C l 'ter+ of YES MAYBE NO 10. Aesthetics. will the proposal result in the obstruction of any public designa�ed or recognized scenio vista open to the public, or will the proposal result, in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? 19.. Recreation. Will the proposal results in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing public recreational facilities? 20. ArcheologicalZilistorical. Will the proposal result in an alt�eratidn of a significant archeological or historical site, stru,ature, object or building? C' 21. Mandatory Findings of Significance a, toes the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, wabstanti.ally reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community,'' reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or }prehistory! b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short term, benefits_ to the detriment of publicly adopted long-term environmental goals?'' c. Does the project 'have impacts which are individually limited, but cumula- tively considerable? (A project may impart on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively smalls but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is Significant.) d. boos the project havenvironmental effects which will: cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, eithor directly or indirectly? .. 1 Appendix; p - page 6 of 8 C I IIT, DISCUSSION OF BNVXRONMLNTAL EVALUATION This pv0posal is a rezone for about 210 acres of land bounded by Eaton Road on, the north, Highway 99 on the West, Cohasset Road on the east and Tjassen Avenue and East Avenue on the 4ou6-h. 'the areas to be rezoned are presently zoned A-2 (General). The proposed zoning districts for the rezone area include R-1 (Sin.gle Famlly Residential,), RTl (M,tnimum Density Residential - Mobile Dome), 11-2 (Duplex Residentisl), R-3 (Medium. Density Residential) and C -C (community Commercial The present laud uses in the rezone area include single family rp-40.ential multi -family residential, orchards, dry farming, general cov.- -�,T.Aal manufacturing, neighborhood commercial and several churches. A good deal of the rezone area is already developed with the land uses that would be reflected by the new zones. However, there are some large areas of open land and land devoted to agricultural uses which would be affected by the rezone. The Butte County General Paan, shows this area for low dens'(; residential (1-4 DU/acr ), medium low density residential (5-8 DU/acro and the area near past Avenue for commercial as part of a regional retail center. The rezoning proposal has the following cumulative impacts which are potentially significant: 1. The compaction and overcovering of the soil by resultant projects. (1h) 2. The exposu....e of people or property to geologic hazards in- cl.udix.g subsidence, expansive soils and earthquakes. (1g) 3. The localized decrease in ambient a..ir quality. (P -a) 4. The effects on drainages in the area, particularly on facili- ties of the Shasta Union Drainage Assessment District (8.U'.D.A.D.) (3b d 5. Possible effects on surface water and groundwater quality. (3e) 6. .The effects on public water supplies. (3h) 7. The reduction of agricultural acreage and; the introduction of new plant species through landscaping. (4c, d) 8. The effecta of noise from the airport on the northeast sector of the rezone area. (8b) 9. The relation of the ovrerall proposal_ ' to the Butte Coutity General: Plan, and also the City. of Chico General. Plan. (8) Apppnaix F - page 7 of 8 III DISUOSSION OF E NVIRONME NTATj B ALUATION continued - pg. a of 10. The increased use of onergry resouroes some of wJ:,� oh are nonrenewable. (9a, b) 11. The inducemexit to population growth created by the rezone.. (11) 12. The demand for additional housing which may be creaj,ed. (12) 1.3. The increased traffic from resultant projects in the rer4one area and the effeats on the roads, cirwulatioll and traffic safety. (13a7 c d, & f) 111. The increased demand for public servicer, and the capabilit, of the various agencies to service the rezone area at full de- velopment. ('I J+ a, f) 15 The increased use of fuel and energy.. (15) 16. The effects on lAil.ity companies and their capability to service the rezone area at full development. (16a -- c) 1.7. The possibility of aircraft hazards, articularly in the northeast sector of the rezone area. O' b� 'IS. The change in the visual appearance of the rezone area, particularly those areas now in agricultural: use. ('IS) 19. The effects on public recreational facilities and the possible need rnr new facilities as more people use the eAsting recreational; areas. (19) 20, The Lbility of archaeological relics or sites. There are no reg. A sit es in the records of the Society for California .Archaeology. Most of the land has been previously altered by farming and other activities, thus reducing the chance of relics. (2O) In, summary; the rezone proposal seems sound for the area involved and will bring the zoning into conformance with the nutte Oounty General Plan. Honrever, since development may occur more readily following t1l:e rezone, bhe possible and potentially significant effects should be considered in more depth. Alternate proposals for poreiar.s of the ro- zone area may be in order. The proposed C -C zones for instance; may be more suitable for a different commercial zone. The, effects on public ser'vicos and utilities is another key area which warrants i`urther study. Ask 0 TV- DET MINATION (TO be Completed by the beach Agen�y) Cid the basis of this initial eval,ua-tion4 X find the pi. oposed project COULD NOT have: a s qbi ficant, effect oil the environment", and a NVGATJVF, MCLARATION �s x�.ri�llx.tiG rrt p 0 1 finch that although the Proposed w s'gri ficant effect: on the e>rrVironmentj thereld be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measure] described on an attachod, 'sheet have been added to the project. A NEG TIVB DECL;kRATION 11-01 RIII0CI'IVV1-1EMDIIID- 1 fixed the proposed project MAx tlave a significant, effect on the environment and an BryVIRCrNAI� NTAL Xt4PAC` REPORT is required.� Datecember 22, 1977 " (- r gnatjre For: ENVIIIt(AWIMIA1. iEMl+W DEP16R't`MMiT Reviewed hg_ Earl, D. Nelson 10ivtronmental itevIOW Direetor Appendix r pale 8 of 8 Inter-DepuatmentalMemorandum Ta, Supervisor Milds. Wheeler FROM: Earl D. Xelsony Env'i'ronmental Review Director sueJE", Processing Status of North Chico Rezone (Includes Lindo Manor Subdivision) DAM January 71 1980 Per your telephone requeet I researched the statue of the North Chico Rezone EIR and the interim zone for Lindo Manor subdivision which was adopted 'by the Board on November, 20, 1979, The Draft EIR is substantially complete,, but needs some updating to reflect a change in the proposal which occurred after the original draft was written. I expect we can have the draft finished in two weeks. It must then be circulated for cotuments (6 weeks) and scheduled for hearing by the Planning Commission (3 to 4 weeks). It would then go the Board 3 weeks later and become effective 30 days after adoption. It looks like the earliest t:i'Pae the permanent zoning could become effective is approximate.y the end of May. Any delays along the way would, of course, extend this target date. Since the interim zone for Lindo Manor subdivision is due to expire on March 194 1980, another time extension of 120 days should give us time to complete the processing of the environ— mental documents for 'the permanent toning proposal.. I hope the above information is helpful to you. Sincerely, Earl D. Nelson Environmental. Review Director EDNIkt FcQEF1;L CR" ANT ' LlCATIO ilA' lARL� �IOTIriCATtO_31, 134T •AI`s S.TATEOFCAL.IFOPIN 'BATF CLEARINGHOUSE 1916)4' 3 - - . ,TE1.•.S i 3T TO i3c CU':tFLE wEU liY r-,??LiCi.:et; t 73'�`�r '��'_� 3 APPUCANT--Gmaisirrtaanaf Unit r �_ _ A J^rF,ESS.-St:ea; orP_C_Sax: -DcRAi 'euPLOYEi'r to Na r _ ��` �it^i�1r `%LTs t. Cr �z _ ' • r 7 5, CMT 6. COUNTY 7-STATE _s_Ztt> CODE ett� CJ k1G. TYTE.OFACrfOV f [� TYPE OF CHANCE (Co-pore itjob or TCCwascnxkedl ,`aF.rfi7uw cT"_. sem' - i3_� �_t ._xJ3 il 'iGfE7'..r..3D.::3C TNaditr=at,an Ya inarasea Dollars fncre—d ouratto t a Ltl rtar5coce ars' s Y ; t✓i Continuatinn - tt 0Oecreased Dollars. creaseC Duration b f� - Da`µ z �C4neerlatcr TS.APPLICANT. TYPE .FJhL+Si�-CUcirDlrorCar. ,. a .f. 15.REIIUES7# ED:FUNDSTAFr1S_ EruerLet-,er • A-Stste F- Schoo:District L?-�FEaFiT.st- tb_FUAfOS OURATfOSY=_}htorschs3 3'_ Interstate G_ Community ActionAgen Z1. STA Yr ma C. Su3StatuOisr H.SPonsoredOrganization ZZt.CCAL tT F�PROtcGTSTART 1�_ D_ County 1- Indian ' 2zorxew,- TB_ ESt'. PROJECtDURATfON lMonzl sf E. City J_ Other (Specify in Remarks` 2a TCTALJM_2* 22 -1 ( jS 2E SRjEF TtTLEOF t RPPLICA� NTS pRPROJECTQ� (,h �-vim. LCQ Rezone OiiS � Fs r7 7 1--- :18-01 25 DELTCRIPTION OF APPLICANTS PROJECT (purpose) Rezone of LL65 acres in the Northern Chico: area to form sera—ml, urbp-,: residential. zoning districts,: R-i 8-2: R-7 R-41, - ? , and r as vrell. as one small area of C-Gear n� ARF-.4 OF PROJECT IMPACT {indicate City, county,State, ezc } � - tSTAI Chico 'Butt CalTOrTa - , = j:�Ust,-Y 23 CO:+tGRE,ratONAL D1ST.Ric t, c Y 'T i Y.$ � +, 5 t a 293_-nvtronmentatAssessmentRequired 30_CLEtiRlNGNOUSEfS} ,-£YWfiiCHSU3%t}xict� LtApPlicanx Distric-mgmpacred B i rojecc BYStatefredaral Agsnc f7 �f ^ � L1 Yes . , - 3.ostate b. []Area Wide comcne.s- 3i-a iVA6ME/TITLEOF COt4TACCPERSGi'1 Is ADDRESS-Streeror P: 0- sox . t< iEL�PfiOfsE 2v 0. _ • Earl D_ Nelson:, Director 18-8 County Center Drive rr-i r. 31L-L 77 t #fY +.ttIes MNV ON IENTALOOCUfi ENT REVIEW, REQUIRED YES [7 NOS e' il!1ht -pro' trequire h}fproject isFriysirafirinatiueorr ,wre=aai. En'_V=rnentalIMMMStatemen-,(Repor,,}Attached (20copies) eavircnmentaldocunent„listT:IeU.S_ MZDraftElR Q Final-EIR YES- Ei NO r Geofo—� ra giCS yQuaang a r:ap inivhiczr ['- CQ NegativeDeclaration Attached (20 copies) 10 Copt e f Does your ae>ncy have a' proTec is 10caed. r €7_ Nonattached.-DocumentMifBeForwarded On - anfrights.arirmative - r' action potecyand pian? - F App N praximately. YES I d irl - NO Mom Da Y' Year gTs xote� coveredby Ir 0.d F +erat Program Does Not Require An; Environmental Docurnenr A-95' et 1 V? ,. t Q. Project Exempt UnderState-Categorical Exemp-Mon, Class YES ► e`dO' ` YES Q NO L tTE ,tS 372.33 TO Sr- CMMPLETED By CLEAR11% GH OUSE MULTIPLE 1:1 CL�5AFUNGSOUSE 10 LJ. CLEARINGHOUSE { j 1 } € _ 33. s �f C i 10N BASED 6N 33_ 5 ACT EVfEVIOF ON TAKEN eZ s i ❑ With: Comment c STATE APFLICA r tON �QNotificatfon a” []LVaiyed f � j 3t_ i tr-�[ r�---77 IDEsNTIFIER (SAI Q A ®'A ticatfon b: LJ Wf trout Comment d L Unfavorable i State Number ' STATE WIDE Countyl City Cau rty: City Coun t 35. CL€ARTNGHOUSE Pliig'Area LY` City Counr/d 'City County City C=u-1-.vC.-.y Ping Area Ping Area- IMPACT Ping Area Ping Area Ping Area CODE yes Na ' (' 36ST)CTE PLAN it=v 1t ?Er`r r 37, RECEtV1NG DATc = 33.aSIGNAI URE r1:7 CH OFFICIAL • :T CLEAR: EGHOt S� i9_ d YesEl'No 33. FINALC:i ACTION DATE Yr mo day ' tTEtvE5 33 x2 TO S`c Cc]zIPLETED 3Y APPLtCs iTSEFO�E Sc1t_:, :.a rOAM TO FEOERAL =-7:E VCY 39 CE�tT►FICATTON"- 4h�bp l;'canTcer;it'las ttrztta the aFr of tees knawie�+go and belief ,he above daa are tree and corms anei filing of this form has beerr duly authorized by the governTn 'Chefs =iz if � i yirat se g:•ed{.aitheaporican^ - c t +resconse :s ataC;ed- f4i3;.-'NAMc(PsirttarTyo•i} bTITLE _ t ' cSli"a:�f.STUflEof.,.;3thonzedR pres?nratrve +d:Tt E?H":�dEtifS.SlocrE. r Earl D. I -.son t,. OJt,1TE MAILED TO FEDERALISTATE AGENCY Yr ma day 42- NA:4ls= OF: FEDE.riAL ; STAT E AGENCY t�84 04 TQY14101 THIS AFPL!CATtO:v.SUsi(ITTEO- Sca ( +fTEMSd3-54TOBEC01.iPLETE0BYr-EDERAL0FFICEZVALUA.Tt1rG,Al. Dn=:O+,r .7c`.pes.G C,-a'�L"jTit_ S3 G tjA, APPLTs ATfON lD' 52. Apoltcatton Reed. c #Assigned by Federal A enc l: o.a E.a -;a;- D3..' � � � zz _ F _ 4-- Yr _ - yr mo day . Yr •rri3 d i - r • 'i` Al,.vays CompTer2 t �` r`' �as_GFRAnTORA vy ,! S sSTE11 FO�7 a m! ... � _ ; i A CONSULTOPTIONA SS JERK}CR SES � > j� Tq } a , _ N p &E7tiRH: RECEIPT SERVICE i c N •_ # ss: sewn f3 l'45.,aTjGANIYAT spa " t�� ` ty c j -+s� p as of = gag:: me, day a - }c z�•;+x .:Ar , d S } r # F i-• tai G 4ttNISTE m M�F T9. i I ; t3 I <Z, AIDC �` S ZtP'CJD= 5+, Tc! !:::i O,LE�ii3xtEcfl } > Flirro.L ACTT - r �5, a _,I ta.aJrife ba rYy vis r 1AI Xd & ^rnn a L"M `rrtii. # }� a' J :.� F4r"Ir +`v-. uAt•s t� �.._�--�---=- 3RE f ° FL_ei•-AL Yom: VD-S.;_31s L -.._� -- ,�_ v �:R: SENDEI1., Complete Items 1,'2 andfl. Add -your addrew it 1bd "PETUON TO" space on reverse. i, The ..fol lowing service Is requested ;(check one), ar CxShow to whom om date.dellvered........... x ` L] Show to whom, date. and address of delivery—';, 0 RESTRICTED DELIVERY Show to whom and date delivered- ........ _' 4 0 REEITMICTED DELIVERY m Showto whom, date, and address of delivety.$— (CONSULT POSTMASTER FOR FEES) Z Z ARTIGLE,ADDRMSED TO, r n State C1earinghoube M '�� 3, ARTICLE 6ESCRiPT1ON., m REGISTERED W-,CERTIFIED NO. INSURED NO, � - A 656606 Y M (Always obtOl signattn a of addrmea or agent) v I have received the article described above. SIGNATURE q P.ddress�— a AutF or¢edagent rn Q DATE OF DELivERY . h r S. ADDRESSfcomptereomyllroquestpd Cz Ak41r t;t3 , G UNAwiET0DLt, '11 BECAUSE; RtK'S v INITlAt 5 N� sPn! 1977-0-24M95 Sate Clearinghouse � � "rl. n .._ ' „\i e ' .aa4 Dis- Calu .�V�.74F. V�.i++.vn V11.1, L. t�� y �y r,, jyr� State Chico Area R crOA-,i +� 1 '(�T�1 CT *545 V.(A�.107T1b1.bsc�. 1��t�1'GCrpb3"ogy Dep„ .;,i aI _nto, 'California .lirVC=.nut Chico, Ca. 95926 Ch,l.co Ca. 9:0929 958'14 '.. `Tsar lflic G"'Ar, & Electric ti.,la AVaa1zn�ue "r a Calif. Water Service Co. 4 Calc.$ta- 4 Univ.,GIb eo ' 3W Salem Street 7 1Jwpt/.y,W���`�tw,�Anthal'y y fib:.ld.ca, Lab 592`,1. � /311g1�.0 � Ci-aco, Ca- 95./26 " (B"!�.,b1,a � ` bico, t,• �+: 5929- M i^ iC el C' 1hbx1G` Co.. 'a .� .Ag:ricultux;c '. ..;•:i �nre Seri., t. 3, Box 73 ttV" Cal. Stato T.�n.I„it. , CICLC o Geograpb dr 2" Yf1 8";cee�r b%r1.L �, �1e7a 'Gmk'? � ,t,W.cQ, +�alifornia °5926 p( Chico,, Ca. 95926 Ch;°,ca, Ca. 95629 " ~ d. ins �; Publi e - ,,° Bt1tte Co. Mosquito Abate.-' Cal. State Univ. Ch .co Woz}"�.s Departments i'"ast Off ir e Dox 5420 Y a Rt., �, Box 204.0. " Orovill e, Ca. 5✓965 Library ' Chico, Ca. 95929 Ghz.�co, CA 9592.7 r X 2' � ,'L: Sao City Eibr,9,ry fi Butte College lribrary Cal. State Univ.. C1' ico *� . 1: Salem Sts. " t;hi.ca, Ca. 95926 i Route 'I, Box 183. 0 1 Oroville, Ca 95965 Physical Science Lc- t. Chico, Ca. 95,929 2 2 r , i x:if'x ed :"drool Dist Pp,trick Porgans ;a Cal„ State Unlv.. CYi wo �•���;E. 7-1hStreet Post Office Rox 1751 c/o P. Davis 95926 j Chico, Ca 95927Research Center for Dus.L1 ness & Economics Chico, Ca. �459P9 F'i -h & Game �. Cal Ilivr Forestry B B�rx 551 (Snaiacien) Ca. 95926 John Wilt 1 2589 El Paso way Butte Co. Fire Dep- '1 6 Nelson Avenue 7 . � :%biro , CA 95925 � $ Courior Qravi.l? + tl, a Cal Audubon Society Hr� ra ♦ . .ra {a W ,; I R,i.ohara Slavicl Environmental. Flea.1,h rL+4p l 3671 (Kimberly),. , Butte college t :hrco, California Agriculture Dept. " a; Court er Orot�.11E " 95027 Rt. l:, Box 1834A v' .. [] Orovil.le, CA 95965 .L. .t tt Cr,. Sier.ia t"i,�b 1 Air r_ r Pollution Control ' ZAFCO - Planning lfo T KcCreedy LN1Circle Aricultural oomtissi one: 16 NeisOl a� Bu0rrp�3v Ave. 'ACotuter]; Ca. 95926 y,,�!*Courier - Oroville it080&::Y . er ll:e } r ;,+�y��'nal yrsts 0, i Butte County Sheriff 'Dept, Pl.atnli.ng; Departzent i . iso ,.o llV? '/� «: +a«":Ib, V,.i.• 5927 Courior .- Orovill.e « �Orov 1.1 e 00a u,ri er AI+Iw Mq MMMMM { M./.1 i. MJM li1411 .Y /rl irvi 1 Fubl is Works Dvoart-nsw, Courier � C1rCO�,r��lG 41 Butte County Library a� �J'« C. `arm Advisor �r " + t�ker yllr C v Stab � '� Cin el.y Ave.. , Cour..er Orovi.l.le 2 ,279 Dol. OVO z W Aooupi er k aaT* » q x ar v a x♦ J Di roti t,9,r. _r,..... .Calat. ��tive Mo a8Se �'1ar� c. Ura :�er�ari � Chapter So Chcc��95 <Toh,o eh 'xco �vaas 2000 ch -co BOA 3666 _A 9592 »' Will Bishop 157; Hooker Oak Avenue Ohico CA 95926 TRW Mortgage and Development Company 585 Xanz'anita, Suite Chico, CA 9592 n: McCa:i t Associates .,.. _...., 492 Rio Lindo Road Chico; CA 95926 Esti e 11,11141 Will 5 , Y LAND of NATURAL WEAL ZEI AND BEa �-y ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW DEP4,RYMENT EARL D., NELSGN, D7,ector April 11, 1980' RE: North Chico Rezone ERD Log # 77-11-18-01 To Whom It May Concern.- The oncern:The enclosed (Draft) Environmental Impact Report on the above-named application is four your iii,zrmation: and review. A Notice of Completion of the Draft E.I.R.- has been filed with the Butte County Clerk and the Resources Agency of California Secretary, Comments conce-rning the material, contained in the Draft. E.I.R. are solicited. Such comments can be submitted to the Butte. County Environmental Review Department at the address listed below until the close of, the 4S day period of review on Monday, Ua,- 26, 1980. Should you have any questions•- p3ea.,e contact this department. Sincerely, Earl D.: Nelson ` Environmental Review Director EDN:lkt Enc. Ill - c' Country enter Drive Oroville, California: 95965 Telephone (916) 534=1777 NONCE TO THE PUBLIC All Interested persons are hereby notified that an E1vironreLtal Impact Report has been completed for the following project: The North.. Chico Rezone AP #s Book 44, pages 0-, 21, 22, 277L 307 31 33 34 35,' 36, 37, 38 - 30', 40, 45, 4-?, 56 and 77 and Book 48, page 2 - Rezone of 465 acres in. the Northern Chico area to form several. urban -Te si denti,al zoning districts: R-1. R-27 R-3,; P--&, S -R, RT -1, and YHF, as well as one small area of C -C zoning, bounded on the east by Cohasset Road, on the north by Eaton .Road and Sycamore Creek,.: ani on the west by highway 99E and the Joshua Tree-bevelopment.. The southern boundary is irregular and traverses the lands between Lassen Avenue and East Avenue-,, north of the North, Vali ey Plaza commercial center. Copies of the abov -mentioned draf t environ -,ental imr-ict repo., are available for pu:tlic review at the Butte County E-nvironmenta Review Department at 18-P County Cenver Drive, Oroville the .Butte County Library branches, Chico State: University and Butte College Library. Public iaomments concerning the material contained in the draft E. Z.R.: G re solicited. Such comments can be submitted to the, Butte: County Environmental- Review Department at the address listed above until the close of the. 45 day review period at P.M.-, '►_'lay 26 1980. yarl D. Nelson Environmental Review Director To be published, in the Chico Enterprise Record. on April +Gs 198G- � . s- ;v.+.k•" 777,,,,", r , «. �ti.'ta ANO OF NATURAL WEATif AN[) BLAUI, ~. 4EINVIRONMENTAL REVIEW M-E-PARTMENIV EARL p, NELSON, Director April 11, 1980 ItE North Chico Re zoic 01 To Mxom it May Coilc.e1"11: The enclosed (Dra;ft) Env% ronmental Impact Report on the ,give -named applic,,tion is for your information and review. ti Notice of Com l,.tic.n of the Draft E.X,R. has been filed with th Butte CovAt,'t Clerk and the Resources Agency of California Secretik My, Comments concerni-g the material contained in the Draft L.I.R. are solicited. Such comments can be submitted to the Butte County ;lnviroronental Review Department at the address listed be: pow ur„til the close of the 45 day period of review On Mont'ay, May 26, 1980, Should you havo any questions # please contact this department. Sincerely', Earl. Nelson Environmet.tal RI, view Director EDN 66 lkt Enc, M, P'County ContaP 11tiun Oret)uiiie, Cali�r)wniri 95965 Tolalthotte (915) 554417T NOTICE . TO THE PUBLIC All interested persons are hereby notified 'that an Environmental Impact Report hae, been completed for the following project; The North Chico Rezone - AP #s Book Ll4, pages 05, 21, 22, 277 30, 317 33, 341 35? 369 379 38,, 39, 110, 4 1 477 56 and 57 and Book 4a, page 2 -- Rezone of 465 acres in the Northern Chico are- to form several urban residential zoning districts: R-11 R-21 R--31 R-41 S -R, RT -1, and MIJPy as well as one small area of C -C zoning, bounded on the East by Cohasset Eoad, on the north by Eaton Road and Sycamore Greek, a..d on the west by Highway 99E and. the Josliva Tree Development. The southern boundary is irregular and traverses the lands between Lassen Avenue and East :Avenue, north of the North Valley Plaza commercial center. Copies of the above-mentioned draft environmental. impact report are available for public review at the Butte County Environmental Review Department at 18-F County Center Drive, Oroville, the Butte County Library branches, Chico State University and Butte Coll;;ge Library. Public comments concerning the material contained in the draft E.I.R. are solicited. Such comments can be submitted to the Butte County Environmental. Review Departmento t the address listed above until. the close of the 45 day review peri ud at "> p.m., May 26, 1980. Earl D. Nelson ' Environmental Review Director, To be publi.s` ed in the Chico Enterprise Record on April. ;- 1980.I�0��.�asµ \h 1 NOTICE OV COMPLETION AP9 111180 ����` rwrulwwwrl^+••swt.ato rc. Wi +. pert (of Draft Environmental Impact Report) CLARK A. NELSON, Couilly clary A. 'JACHTHO By Deputy RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: �--. DEPARTMENT: Count of Butte 'y ~ Environmental Review PR0;7EC.m__TYT, r. North Chico Rezone Various Ap Vis_ ERD -11--18-01 ADDRESS: CI'x'Y: _COUNTY: -18-F County Center Drive Orov l.le Butte CONTACT .PERSON: - ~-- ---� , AREA CODL: PHONE: Earl, D. M.11.son, Director 916 5 3 4 i�77'7 PROJECT DESCtIPTION OF, NATURE, PURPOSE, AND DENEE'ICIAPIES: Rezone o 6 acres i;n the. Xorth rn Ch i_rz, ar�� o fn rn„ ro si.dentia1 distrlcts: R--11 R-2, R -3 R--4, S -R, RT -11 and M[Mj as well ao one small area of 0_0 zoning. PR0,7ECT LOCATION CITY: PROJECT LOCATION COUNTY: Dutte TIME PERIOD PROVIDED F(?. ytVIL4,: LH5; days ending May 26, 1980 ADDRESS 11HERE COPYAVAIL,E Environit,erital Review Departrtent,l k'Gdu,� venter Drive, Orovifle, CA 95065 ._ _.., Pao P a l ot I s OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR OFFICE OF PLANNING AND RESEARCH STATE CLEARINGHOUSE 1400 — 10TH STREETavitkgntanlp� SACRAMENTOr CA 95814 . ll�Yiuµr+q�it. 1980 04fla c"uhf, BUTTE COUNTY 18--F COUNTY CENTER DR'+,;� OROVILLE CA 959 5 ATTENTION': EARL D. NESO' DIRECTOR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT 04/21/80 REPORT IMD45A PROJECT NOTIFICATION AND rAEVIr'W SYSTEM OFFICE Qr" T:'IE GOVERNOR (910 445-0613 PROJECT: N09TH CHICO REZONE STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NUM18R (SCH) 8004151.4 PLEASE USE THE STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NUMBER ON FUTURE_ CORRESPONDENCE WITH THIS OFFICE AND WITH AGENCIES APPROVING OR REVIEWING YOUR PROJECT DATE RECEIVED! 80/04+/14 DATE REVIEW PERIOD END," 80/05/s0 �r^ THIS CARD DOES NOT VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH PREAPPLICArION AND/OR ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT RFVIEW kr—QUIREMEN-So A LETTER C014TAIN NG THE COMMENTStONFIRMING NO COMMENTS WILL AF iERLTHTEREVIEW PLEASE CONTACT THF CLEARINGHOU5'F IMMEDIATELY 1F YOU DO NOT R*ECEIVF THE LETTER BY THE ENO OF THE R'E'VIEW PER oD M f it NrN� _ PtP Np, q �`SC�r/err �� �, �o p�s `�I�� pr�� .g l pF P d`h cN ON 7 q •Cr� d�n �1/2! Cp /SS pq �q TF ��N q C0 lsss �` q rr r orsr® UEsr� p. r70N SCy�p T�rp4 -1 sip U RTqC �"'�'N rs,. FNrs,'� gat;ph & h; S � r�i 441 , .. lo`PLAMNING DEPA MEN ' INTERDI~PARTMEN' Al R a-- - - E. (� EST TO: I. n Vanhart Envivonmexital Health REQUEST: Review � `CQlTln =,� , f .cry° HOZO �7 .. AP NO.: 3-3 ► AY VARIOUS A��'�a 1980 Orovilb, 11 1m DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT; `.,,jie from A--2 to R--1, IZT-1, R- ? and R--' res i cleat aal_ . d1.... ai�� C -C i �-na.t;v qua .c.ti a1 ,�st,�cta �t�•t"'?,.� 1 y ,� � �.�;� � LOCATION: from Sycamore Creek to East Ave & State Hwy g9 ; _ t�r0ohasaet Rd. , north Chico urban area APPLICANT Butte 0 ntPlaxan.in: Contr a ss on ADDRESS: 7 _,o ` rt,er DriYe _ �2v11 CA OWNER:. VARIOUS I'r_A%,' MING COMMISSION ACTION SCHEDULED c'rURN DATE REQUE-STED: ASAP DATE DISTRIBUTED 5-3--80 ATTACIAMPNTS Copy of application & plot plan RETURNED; COMMENTS, _/G'0 Tbe ReKowces Agency 0 California Californi Memor an, du m Cala 28 Apri .. 1980 TO t&-. James Burns (2) Butte Counter Planning Depar*«meM Project Coordinator 18--% County Center Drive Resources Agency Orovt,lle, CA 95965 From Department of Parks and Recreation Office of Historic A�,t.se'rvntxon Subject: DRAFT EIRs : moRTH CHICO REZONE e(SCH x)041514) and mon, S-R01M A-2 LTD. TO 0-2 (SQH 7118-0041515) -- BUTTE CCU%1TX The Office of Historic Preservation has reviewed gyred the Draft EIRs referenced above. Based on an archaeological sensitivity map published in 1.974} Rutto County states that Each of the above -referenced projects td1l. take place in areas of tow archaeological sensitivity. Hotrever, each prop a, ed project; area lies act j acent to areas of established sensit i Vity. Because of the possibly dated information provided by the se:ns- itivity map, tee recor�tmpd consul tats efn t��Ith the Regional. Officer for the California Archaeological. Site Survey, who can provide up-to-date information on the location of archaeologic:ai and other cultural resources 'thin the project impact area. The Regional Officer for Butte County is Dr. Marl; Korrrta, Chi.:o St to University. Dr. Kot,ta may be reached by c tl-ling (916) 895-6192. 92. If you have any questions, pl.:ase conta^t 1ticholas Del. Ci�jppo, Office of Historic Preservation, by calling (916) 522-8103. Dr. F'nox Mello ► State Historic Preservation Officer cc; Mark Ko4a California StateUniveroity, Chi do Chicoi CA 9, 926 ED w I�. 1. Stmt: of California Memorandum Doto r 28 April 1980 To I Mr. J'a-90 Burns Project Coordinator Resources Agency The Rnaottrces Agency 'of Ctadifornla (2) Butte County Planning Department 1841 County Center Drive Orovil:l.e, CA 95965 From i Department of Parks and. Recreation Office of Historic Preservation Subject: DRAK BIRs : NORTH CHTCO RHONE (SCH #80041514) and REZONE, FROM A-2 LTDe To 0-2 (SCH #80041515) BUTTE COUNTY \,V4_ X41.1 yr T, µ3 The Of"ice of Historic Preservation has reviewed the Draft EIRs, referencQd above. Based on an archaeological sensitivity map published in 1.974, ` Butte County states that each of the above -referenced projects will take place in areas of low archaeological sensitivity. However, each proposed project area: lies adjacent to areas of established sensitivity. Because of the possibly dated information provided by the sens- itivity map, we recommed consultation with the Regional Officer for the California Archaeological Site Survey, who ;w ri provide up-to—date information on the location of archaeological. ;and other cultural resources within the project impact area. The Regional Officer for Butte County is Dr. Mark Kowt;a, Chico 8tato University. Dr. Kowta may be reached by calling (916) 895--6192. if you have any questions, please contact Nicholas Del. Cioppo, Office of Historic Preservation, by calling (916) 324703. 001,;inal 8! �;ried by lar, knox tat:J.1an Dr. Knox Me1on State Historic Preservation Officer cc Mark Kowta California State University, Chico Chicon CA 95926 fat bw tory. .h Wid Ccuniy t ! �m®ra�ndur� Infer-Depurwan Tor. p1 0. s �Ovlrnnmt nfai ROVIL,w C JUL 0 8 199.0 804d CnUn-�j � T : June 25, 1980 The xoj1olgi nc� pvo j oc-t is roadv j ur schedui ir The North Uco 1tic:v,o11 a,-Ir.L LOU, { 4 BUTTE ONTY ENVIRONMENTAL RrVIEV PARTME.NT expense LCcoLntjnn, Foran For E.I.R. Preparation and Sub-''vt,on Initial Studies PROJECT: 1'4o:rth Chic_ o lien ni�e APII `� 1.PAU 'Log SUBDIVISION INITIAL STUDY EXPENSES: �Professional & Specialized Services; Staff wore: completed: hours @ $_ hours @= hours @ $$ Initial Study Total X 2_fi Note: Initial study surpluses onc©nnot A rrefunded, only Credited toward E.I.R. Fund: ENVIROPJMENTAL IMPAC -i KEr-O bl' PREPARATION EXPENSES: Professional A ervices: $ , Staff swork completed: RCTf S 7_ ours @' 7 24 = 5�8 RCM 100 hours @ $ 7. �'r' RCM 4 hours @ $Z.2:I.=$` 31.An RCM 295 hours @ $_79.31=a._2.Z4,6,5. =11 18 hours @ EDN 3 hours @ s 12 . 82..— 38.46 E . I ..S To t a�'i. X 2' 7.61 41.86 :, $. _aZa aj= 2. 7 S0. 0 _ MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSES: Typing costs @ $1.82 per page (Initial Study) Printing costs (Initial Study) Typing Costs @ 1.82 per page,(Draft E.I.R.) 51 $92,82 Printing costs (Draft E.I.R.) $ 69.78 Typing costs @ $182 per page (Final E.I.R.) 4 7.28 Printing costs (Final E.I,R.) $ 33.60 Legal Notices 4-16-50 y_ p Circulation - (Initial Study, Draft or Final EIR) $_ 37,54 - Total Miso Expenses $ 2S6_.02=$,`. 256,o2 ACTUAL TOTAL DEPARTMENT EXPENSES: $, 3,006.0 Total E.I.R. Expenses $ .006.04 Tota'i initial Study Expenses TOTAL AMOUNT DEPOSITED TO DATE Amount to be Refunded Amount Owed by Applicant �$ (In the case of subdivisions, Includes actual cost of initial study,) Date,: 1019'/80 NOTICE OF DBTEoRMI'NATION TO. L/7 Secretary for Resources 1416 Ninth Street, Room 1311 Sacramento, CA 95a14 I R7 SUBJECT; SEP 0 51980 CLARK A, NELsON,, County Cie* q Deputy County Clerk County of ut t e PROI-1, (Lead A$en�y) 25 00=, 'y Uenter ra=ve eviow TIr Mew- 07_t�o , L LL 01 QaI'0:0:rXI,'W Filing of Notice of Determination in Compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public Resoirces Code ERD Log # 77-11-18-03, Proi e6 -7E x t e Rezone AP # Book 44-various.-BooL', 48 -nace 2 North Chicg — -9 -(1 - Srace Clearing House Cate Clearinghouse WE er itred to 80041514 ffo—ntact -Person Project Location Bounded on the east by Cohass-st Road, on the north by I Eaton Road and Sycamore Creek,.- and on the vest b-,- H -,,v 99E, and the Project Description: Joshua 'Free Developlileftt'. Rezone of 465 acres in the Northern Chico area to forin several urban residential zoning districts: R-1, I R -2p R -3,'-R-4, S -R, RIP -1, MFIPj_ as well as one small are. of __qn d I C -_C ::an-jng.____ Tkiq iq to AAvinn that the Blate Cot"A"'-- Board of Supervisors (Lead Agency) has made the following determinations regarding the above-described project 1. The project LIKT will have a significant effect on the = will not environment. An tnvitonmehtal. Impact Report tms prepared for this project ert,f, L putstiant to the provisions Of CEQA, and Was c J -0d as required by Section 15085(g), 14 California Administrative Code. L-1 03. L7 A Negative Declaration was prepared -for t'his otoject pursu�tnt to the provisions of C82A, A copy of the Negative Deciar�a- tion maybe exaMined at the 8nviron-Me-tital Reviw Dopattrnenti 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, Galifort"nia 95965i A Notice of �,Xemption was filed indicating this project is exempt from, erivironnental. revlew. #6 0' Appendix ti ;ry 4, A statement of Overridin Consideration( wasp //7 was not; adopted for this project. 5. Mitigation measures adopted by the Lr�=ar! AV, icy to reduce; Ehe impacts of the approved project are: None OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIM4S ai The present zoning is worse from an environmental: standpoint than the proposal, h. The proposed zoning will define density limits thereby facilitating planning for road.;, drainage and utilities. _4"',:.�.. Innature Earl D �;wlson, iI)irector Title tRovieki Director Dat Of 11ppendic ii - pato r, TOTAL UPEN 1I "x, BUTTE4 NUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL i,rcVIEl EPARTMENT Expense ACCourttjng Form For E.I.R. Preparation and Subdivision Initial Studies 4 PROJECT. North. Chico Rezonr ArP11 Vn j!.1,1LLog LL Al SUBDIVISION INITIAL STUDY EXPENSES; '_ofessional & Specialized Services: $. Staff work completed: hours @ $ =$ hours @ =$$ hours @ Initial Study Total X 2 y $ =$ Note: Ini tial study surpl uses cannot b% refunded, only credited toward E.I.R. preparation or to General Fund. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PREPARATION EXPENSES: Staffwork ted: jzc Professional Services: - ours @ CM o0 hours @ $ =. Total Ri 4 4 hours @ $ 30006.04, Total RCM 2 9!j hours @ $ 9.31 Z74 -.65 TOTAL RCM 18 hours @ Amount �LDN 3 hours @ $. 12,_82 mag: Amount 4 55% E.I. 7ota'I X 2�--"-•–n�'$._2,750.02 Applicant 7.61 s 41.86 MISCELLANEOUSEXPENSES: case of subdivisions; Typinq costs @ $1.82 per page (Initial Study) $ Printing costs (Initial Study) $ Typing Costs @ 1.82 per page (Draft E.I.R.) 51 $___22 .82 Printing costs (Draft E.I.R.) $ 69.178 Typing costs @ $1.82 per page (Fina' E.I.R.) 4 $ 7.28 Printing costs (Final E.I.R.) $ 33.60 Legal Notices 4-1.6-80 $-15 00 Circulation - (Initial Study, Draft or Final Elk) $ 37.54 Total Misc Expenses $ 256.02=$, 256.02 ACTUAL TOTAL, DEPARTMENT EXPENSES.! $�3 006.04 Total E.I.-R. Expenses $ 30006.04, Total initial Study Expenses $ TOTAL AMOUNT DEPOSITED TO DATE Amount to Je Refunded Amount Owed by Applicant (In the case of subdivisions; includes actual cost of initial study,) Date. ._ 10/9/80 C SINCE JI: LY 1� 0. BUTTE f&UNTY ENVIRONMENTAL R8VI54EPARTMEN"i d F,xpense �ccountjnc1 Form For E.I.R. Preparation and Subd vision Initial Studirs PROJ5CT: North C1lico [ elzone AP# Vari.oLts Loc' 0 77-1.1-1.8.01 SUBDIVISION INITIAL ST[IUY EXPENSES: 107.58 $ Professional & Special;xed Services: Initial Staff work completed: hours @ $� _ hours @ S = hours @ In tim—'lLudy Total X Z Note: Initialstudy surpluses cannot A refunded, only credited' toward E.I.R. preparation or to Gtneral Fund. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REP0i3T PREPARATION EXPENSES: Professional t,, Sper,ialized Services._ $ Staff work completed: EDN 3 hours d $ J.1S 3 .86 11 hours $.8O=FIT. 70 hours @ hours @, hours @ $ =5 hours @ $,=$c E.I.R. Total X 2 $ 52:56 =$ 105.1.2 MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSES: Typing costs 0 $1.82 per page (Initial Study) � Printing costs (Initial Study) $� Typing Costs @ 1.82 per page (Draft E.I.R.) $ Printing costs (Draft E.I.R.) ('Memo) $,,� Typing costs @ ,$182 per page (f=inal E.I.R.) 1 $ 1.82 Printing costs (Final E.I.R.) lx8x.08 - D .64 Legal Notices $ Circulation - (jiJ-tial Study, Draft or Final EIR,) Total Misc Expenses - a. Z..46 _$ 2:40 ACTUAL TOTAL DEPARTMENT EXPENSES: s 107.58 Total C.I.R: Expens eS 107.58 $ Total Initial Study Expensc-s $� _ TOTAL AMOUNT DEPOSITED TO DATE Amount to be Refunded Amount Owed i Applicant $. `k (In the case of subdivisions, includes actual cost off initial study.) Date+ 3/5%S1 .� � _ - �. �- .• c s " '� .. � � �� .. �, .0 ------��....�...�„a---�--� W � � � I X41 �� � , 1 � . , _ A /� �ti'' � � a �'a da � �� � (' � �� s� � . ,. � �.. c� .. �. .t a - � 1'1 � _ i. � - �� ... �' �.. � � ��, � .. , � . `• re . Gotutty of stYte PIr.ri."Ing commiasiort OxavI IJ a i CalifOrnla 95965 {y 44-68-41 Mark G Mc . aughlin nor FEB 12 1581 • .4 4 `x PLrouant to Section 65863.5 os the Laver ftmcjjt 00,1,3, the As =oaeor'Parcel a.dent�.fed on �l�a address label Was rezoned fvom to zoning d:i sari c°b ,