HomeMy WebLinkAbout78 - 39 4r d :
t It
I
Level c
Location Ca acit� Service Volume
state Hwy 99"E @ 770000 ADT_ 50,0100 ADT
Eaton Rond
Freeway On --Ramps
and Orf -Ramps 71000 ADT ?.0 500 ADT
Twlo--Lane Urban Street`' 100000 ADT 8 000 ADT
Four, LaneUrban Street lei; 000 'ADT 130 000 ADT .
i
u 14ot s-
n., 1!rspro: !,matoly 'comparable to existing tiick:1 Lanep
Eaton Road or The Es-planade wUl th p,roVision of
full urban improvements
B- Comparable tc expected conditions if Eaton Road
T The Esplanade were ;aielaned to 4 --lanes with
full urbon irtprove menu
111� S t Y 1 A � r..J }l.'. •� � , ,M i I (�4� i' - � f - 1 . �, J �� � a �l f4
«.
N ��, �F �.14•{ ��f �e q ��
�//.fr�
1 , � ..Y
!.) '!'"4���
�4wM
...ter
,. �Tj a, 'Dat4 « o
•
Al/A
--1978
Cal Trans AAD'
.._1977
butte Co. DPW Traffic Count:
111A
' '-1979
Huttae Co. DpJ! Traffic Count
NIA,
-•-1995
Chico Trans `jortation P-lan Est. ADT
-_1980
Estimated ADT w/o project
-1980
Estimated Peak Hour w/o, project
0
. --1980
Estimated ADT vi/pro ject
--1980
Dst:imated Peak Hour w,/project
"-1980
Est. AOT (n) a ncrease w/project
r�
*
--1980
Est. Peak I-Iour (° )increase w/project
—1979
Estimated, 85 percentile spoecl
ti �� mph
XXXnh}, y♦ . • •r V Y / i! X 4.!\•i X XX l Axl ,x Yui♦ xx «.
�}•���hi�il��r�i«���•�.{..n,{}:}:X}��it�h�{.�:��}.}:}C.1.•.:�+� .Zit �}�J'�}l i�i�Ii .moi }a h1•lV x1x
!
Site No.,
/ �Ci•�a�, .j rt lr.,JG, A)-"1A!71)
Traf a«c Data:
--1978-Cal
Trans AADT
A/A _
--1.977
Butte Co. DPW Traffic Count
-"1979
Butte Co. DPW TraEf'id Count
-.1955
Chico 11. an iportation Plan L;st. ADS'
1 980
EStimat d ADT w/o project
w
.._1980
rntimGated Peak Hour tr/o Project:
-.1980
Ei!U- meted ADT W/ptojoct,���
--1900
P'st «m atoll Perk Hour W/project
"-11900
t8t« ADJ. (/li)in J.eea L 07/projb Y
i
- -19 30
D:ct:. F'(110k Pout Milacrea ye W/projac;tr
•#, ZA
—1019
%imp tecl 05 porcontile Speed
� �' mph
,.._,.
V
AV
ADT w/6 project
-41980
AJ
Hour w/o project
—1980
tstiMatod
J
ADT w/pto)bct
I
-1-.
- 980
b'1A
--1978 Ca I Tran.9
AADT
--1080
--Ic)77 Butte C.o.
DPMI Traffic, Count
—1980
Butte Co.
DPW Traffic Count
CJ CC)
1995 Chico Transportation
'
PLan Est. . At"'
0
--1980 Estimated
ADT w/o pto*ect
--3,980 Estimated
Peak Hour w/o project
0
--1980 Estimated
ADT w/project
—1980 Estimated
Peak Mout w/projectell
Est. I\OT
wincrease W/project
4./6" 70
-IqGO Est. Peak
flout (%)Increase w/project
+ 18 yo
—1015 Estimated
65 percentile speed
.4-42 _Mph
Sita flo,--f),
F]� 7-0 eld
TraffLc Data;
.."197,13 Cal Trans
AADT
--197'1 Butte Coi
DPW Traf-fAC Count
4P UJ
--1975 Butte Co.
DPtl Traffic count
—.1995 Chico Transportation Plan Est ADT
C�e-�O
--1980
tstimatod
ADT w/6 project
-41980
Estimated
Hour w/o project
—1980
tstiMatod
J
ADT w/pto)bct
-1-.
- 980
tniU imm4od
Peak Hour v/project:
--1080
Let ADT (Mincrease, v/projtcL
—1980
Est# Punk
I -lout tvWndroann W/Projbdt
4.
--1,979
tatitoated
8-5 Vordontilp spend
t
M 6A.
Q00 i? 47~U+!-�+V".. CrC r, V
a r;, a
+r *�„� �i r9 Pp �k�Q la !,l b5.v n4`dp9
,.n.. 4t,
•.
z,r
l. 7-e)A)
Trak-fic .DataN
--1978
Cal. Trans AADT
4_1CIO
_...197.7
Butte Co. DPW Traffic Count
*•
1979
Matte. Co. DPW 'Traffic count
�I(%i,4i
N I
1995
Chico Transportation !)Ian Eat. ADT
... 1980
E'atimated ADT W/o project
_i-I'580
Bstimated Peak Hour w/o project
__1.980
Estimated ADT w/project
I4• � -�'Q
' __1.980
Estimated Pear Hour w/project
1000
Est. ADT (l)increase W/pr.oject:
+/%Y
--1980
Esh. Pear I•lour (%) Inorease iq/project
--1.979
Estimated 85 percentile shred
�►d, mph
7.r,Xti}:X}.StXX.L:CXR::tt::XXC>::XXXX?t?:Y:St;:X.`LXX};XXXXXx
Y;cX?C;t};:{XY.S� XCXXXY.XXXXxX
site oto .
/VCR-r,9 O C 7"D J I�Or
Traffic Data;
--1918
Cal. Trnt8 AADT �
�� goo
_1977
butte. Co. DPW Traffic count
� 1
••- 1979
Butte Co. DPW Traffic Count:
A-
"-1955
Chico Transportation Plan Est. ADT
/l, L0'0_
w»1580
Estimated IDT w/o project
�
--1900
Y at,'imatec ;voak hour w/o pr(j ),oct
Estimated Pook Hour t`/projact
_.-1980
tut: A'il's" Wincxrons" Wprojcc�.
4,
.
--1900
� G � Ec t
r�t . Pork, flour ( %)tlCre0do, �/p+'m_/
,
/a
--.1979
potck- '/ I.J le SpQod
r t
M 6A.
Y Site, ITo. --»
a.
Mt.W:.r.�w'^a . .1rr4M+1 ."..; wr.l�rw�+riit-}�!...vi.rl�.,..�r,.ry""wi aWwrwrw++.w'+ri.'w".r,"✓+r!'
"
Trofgic Data;
—1978 Cal. Tx anti
AADT
w-1977 Butte Co.
DPW Tr a4fic Count
. --1979 Buf.te Co.
DPN9 Tra: ffic Count
J�C7C7
--1995 Chico Trant:voortation Usto ADT
x,60,0
-»1980 Evtimated
ADT w10 project
J'
-=-7.980 Estimated
Peak Flour w/o pro jest
—1980 Estimated
ADT w/project
� 79-
' --"1980 Estimated
Peak:, Ho"t w/project
��.�� _
---1-980 Est. ADT (p)
increase w/projec
C
.--1980 Est. peak
Flour (%)increase w/project
4,
-..1519 EntiMated
85 percentile speed,
mph
i ..•...�IXI*I.ti .xisxX*X.Ii',".XYXXXX XxxxxxxxxXXXX�C?{X CXXXX7CXXxxxx,XXyY-XxxXxXXXXXX}t?
/Vi♦MI I41 Y sv.rer
M
....
site
Cal •
r
/1:=' a ! apt % , , + } : , t-
/....�.
��; tJ ,1 i l t'•y`r G" ri t�'ot ,tl' L�+�'r
'Crat�'ic Data:: _
--1978 Cady Trans
AAD7'
..1977 131,1tt0 Co.
DPCq Traffic, Count
--1979, Butte, Co
DPW Traffic COU"It
rzC-)
-_1995 Chico 11ra'ns-po.rtatioxi Plan Est. ADT
y
-µ7.9E10 Estimated
ADT w/o Project
---19I30 Estimated
Peak lloux` tv/'o project
y--1980 t8tiolated
ADT `cr/project
--1980 Estimated
peak Fluttr w/pro 'ect
--1.980 �".'/st ADT � � h 1lGx`k C1CJG e:/ �rr� ject
yi, . r�C
88timat06
85 percent -11.10 speed
mph
7
site
Traf:UO Datat
1978 Cay. Trans AAD7!
�=---.
�►w.... ��
,1977 Butte Co4 DPW 'Tx affic COUnt
..,_19,19 Butte Co. Dp{V gira,,�tiC Count;
,.�...
__1995 chico Transportation Plan Est* ADT
✓u ri
1980 E8timated ADT W/O Project
✓ 2
__1980 Estimated Peek Hour w/'o Project
__198o Estimated ADT w/Project:,
el-
__1980 Estimated Peak Hour w/project
�fa�
__1980 Esq:. A')T (%)Increaso o/prbject
r�
+
--980 Est. Peak Hour (b;)increase tv/prod
45-
--1979 EstiMated 85 perccntiln speed
mph
site vo..
Alter%/r3-,)o,v��
Traffic Date: '
//GD
__1978 Cal Trans e`1ADT �
/j
--1,977 Butte CO, DPit Tra:6fic' C.,unt
Ov�
1019 Butte Coi DP{,l Tra�f c Count
----7.995 Chico Trarisportata.on Plan' Est- t AD'S'
_ ...�:..
Est mat O6 ADT w/o project
--8nar,,d peak Faur7/ pz,�t;
•
..w19�39 D air�,mat;e�i s'1Dt' �;/p� o';1cct
ry
•-- tr18d ;�t 1i1e1�C'E� Peak,fluu'
AP".,, 0.!) increaso w/project
G
t`.....
�EiO Est P% f'� t3o 1 )increase W/pto jolt
•1, ��. ° �
�.=7 t)79xwatud E3a:ertrt�t:i:.7 e deed_.
4:._,� =;mph
site
• �'��.��
I%/I,%%',-?/tl%�
Traffic Data.
POO
.._1978 Cad. Trans AADT
-1577 Butte CO- DPW Traffic Count
__1979 Butte Butte CO, DPi9 Traffic Count
P. i .
b•
__1995 Chico Transportation Plan Est. ADT
..-1980 Estimated ADT w/o projects..-.�,
,._1980 Estimated Peak Hour w/o project •
goo
__1980 Estimated ADT Rv/project
�---_
--1988 Estimated Peak Roux w/project,,.._._.
__1580 Est. ADT (%)increase w/project
•tom..:..
-1980 Est. peal -7. Hour (%)increase to/P-tOJOct
+
r
..��,979 Estimated t'35 percentile speed
.. l �_.mph
}:,1: �: Y•?C?C?ti?.:tl.'Y.i::{.:'� :: i::L �CXi: }):XX::X Y.:: � }?{ }C.<X>C� X Y.3C h :{X X X X3t }C}C
}: k{ it}: X �7{ XS�X;K}
}Z.t
�
J
,
Tra:fffic Data:
x--1978 Cal Trans AADT
..-1977 Butte Co DPI -7 Traffic Count •
N
--3-979 Butte Co,, DPW Traff Count
-
/t�LI)
A)A
,
1995 Chico Ts`an,�8p ortatx.an Plan Est.. ADr
ated ADT w/o pro joct
..3 ,580 Estimated
_
"_i9f o Estimated Pcak 20ur-1,1/n project
.�� ✓ J
-.1980 E;;timatod ADT to/pi.djec
(-•'
x,:1900 Estimated Peel! Iibitr. W/project
,�►
5.980 Dt hT>T ( )inc�'eMSC ,•� p o�ect
.M. V �� �.,
`�
Lwr'w YrfM.wY1W �
�..int30 Est, p0a). )lout Wirrezensc
•1.__..--='
-• :9'r�J Es t.i ins! t�+1 X35 pc�'ccnt� �.e sp�ec�
'c',7 mp}1
.._.:�........._.,�
State df California 7110 Resources Agency of California
e m o r a n d u m a.
Dote t 28 April !980
To i Mr. James Burns ( ti) 'Butte County Planning Department'
Project Coordinator 18-F County Center Drive
Resources Agency Orovi.11e, CA 95965
From t Department of parks and R acreation - Office of Historic Preservation
subtach DRAFT EIRs : NORTH CHICO REZONE ;SCH #80041514) and REZONE FROM
A-2 LTD. TO C-2 (SCH #8001}1515) BUTTE COUNTY
The Office of Historic 'reservation has reviewed the Draft EIRs
referenced above.
Based on an archaeological sensitivity map published in 1974,
Butte County states that each of the abovo-referenced projects
will talce place in areas of low archaeological sensitivity.
Howevrer, each proposed project area lies a.ijacent to .areas of
established sensitivity.
Because of the possibly dated information provided by the sens-
itivity map, we recommed consultation with the Regional Officer
for the California Archaeological Site S'urveyo who can provide
up-to-date information on the Location of archaeological, and
other cultural resources within the project impact area.
The Regional Officer for Butte County is Dr. Dark Xowta, Chico
:State University. Dr. Kowta may be reached by calling (916)
895-6192.
If you have any questions} please contact Nicholas bel, Cioppot
Office of Historic Preservation, by calling (916) $22-8%3.
/i�_ kA-W,
Dr. ttnox Mellon
State Historic Preservation Officer
cc: Mark Kowta
California. State University Chico
Chicon CA 95926»vlrbhnan}�l ttantnw 4op},
+:J UN 9 1480
D►Iwte C�►,n1v
SOCIETY FOR CALIFORNIA ARCHAEOLOGY
district 2 (Aearinghohse
o/o Ddpartment of Anturopolo , May 26 1.980
California Stato University
Chico, CA 959.26
Earl D. Nelson, Director �.nviror"mnrtlel Rartera De�,�,
8ut•t;e County
2mviroomental. Reviow Departmet.-it MAY 2
1.8-11 County Center Drive
urovil.le, CA 95965 �ltrtt® C: ►!-
Doar �3r.4 ialson
Pl:easo accept tie f ol.l awing comments regarding tqo
Proposed projeot:s in Sutte County;
Co,mmoroi al Poz,one A2 -Lt -d to 0-9
pttradlso "
SSD Loi #f 79-01-12-02
Although there and no previously recordad sites in
the Project area, and although there has been
heavy imp8ation ;already, the project area lies in
Proximity of historic featuvosz such as Clark load,
one of the earliest roads built on the ride; and
a one -room log cabin, roportedly one of the earliest
homes in the aveA,which is said to have stood Until
rb60n'0l.y aoroa$ Clark Road.
Because proximity to fd6eures of hiStOric nature
suggests the possibility that land disturbanoes
ralatod to the proPosod nrajeat may encounter s -
di"f icant oultural materials # the R.I.Ri should
contain Provisions for investigation and m ti anon
as 'warrantade
Tel (416) 60.66 102
MAY 2 8 1960
rv�Mrho` Caun}y
SOCIETY FOR CA-141FOIRNIA ARCHAEOLOGY
Mitrict 2 Clearinuho'us
Page 2 tmay 26
North Chico Rezone
,. tRD Loi; # 77-11-18W01
Although there are no recorded. Sita, within
this project area, Sycamore Creels does pass
through it. As a mater source located within
a traditionally fa,voLed zone between the vdlle.y
and foothills, it is archaeologically a highly
sensitive area, and in fact numerous sites 11ave
been recorded along other stretches oT the creek.
It is highly recommended that an on--site archaeo-
logl6al roconnaissance be performed, by a quali.ti,nd
archaeologist in order to assess the presence and
significance of cultural resource materials In the
area and that recommendations for appropriate
mitigative measures be obtained baf ojre clearance
be arantede
S5. ,,erely yours;,
riakoto Kowba
13istritt Coordinator
Tel 14161843-61-92
Y
IIx h
Bnv:i.ronmental Review Directors s respop,8e to 't%he letter fxom
'the Department of Parks and Recreat i.onOff i.ce of I'listoric
Preservation, and th,� letter From Malcot'o Kowta, Djs°trjct
Coordinator for the Soc et fox Cala �'ortia A--chaoology.
Arcg y resources
that may exist in the prodoct area
can h'beodiscovexedsand rotect ed on a Project b
I � y prod oo L 'basis
as actual land divisions occur. Much of the land area adjacent
to Syeunluoro Creels in tho project area has already been developed.
»LSI a
MY OF CHWO4, CAUFORMA
7 4"r Clf"I' C CIP alry PI.ANNINU — V. U. DnX Z14213, 95927 gwlco
Tal.k:PHONC 17161 :341-1-44,01 -i Trp wi:C3['1 p M.:3#4 *79DI
_ °Sacraman
San
fmircmmonral Roview NO- Francisco
MAY 27 1980
Earl Nelson, Director NO County
Environmental Review Department
18-F County Center Drive
Oroville, CA 95965 May 23, 1980
RE: North Chico Rezone Draft EIR
Dear Earl;
At its May 21, 1980 meeting, the Chico Environmental Review Board reviewed
the above-named EIR and raised the followitig inquiries and comments:
1. P��a__gg__e __5__, 20
A good portion of the Rezone area falls outside the area
for which City of Chico Sewer Service is anticipated
to be available in the future, Specifically, any parcels.
located 200 feet north of Lassen Avenue and northward will
be oxcluded from sewer service. This northern limit 'rine
is 'both a recommendation of the 1979 Master Sewerage Plan
and a policy of the Chico City Council, Therefore, the
potential build -nut for the rezone area will be less than
as stated i'n the EIR.
2: Paqe-,20(b)
Clarification is needed of the reference to County Service
Area #46 No one on the Environmental Review Board was
aware of such service areas.
3. Pate 26
The need for developing Eaton Road to four lanes given the
proposed density of the Rezone Area should be discussed,
4
Page 35-A
Cnrven the projected 3-8.,000 ADT fur Eaton Avenue by 19981
there is no justification for expanding it to four lanes,
Particularly because the average projected ADT falls some"
where near 6000 and 10,000 ADT is the service level for a
four lane road.
In summary, the ERB feels that the draft Elk should scale down its build.
out projection for the rezone area based upon future sewer availability,
In addition, the ERD feels that the EIR fails to substantiate (reference
demographic data) the need for the proposed rezoning and resulting future
urban papulation,
The Environmental Review Board thanks you for this opportunity to comment;
Sincerely,
isa.M, rin ..,
cA
L
v
XV` b
I I
Environmental Review Director's xespor1se to the letI J,,Or from
the City of Chaco.
1. '.G'.'he North Chico Rezone FIR identified two different levels,.
of development: potentia: in Order to identify a range 02
possible development intensities.o
a. One, t!-- p; tential based on existing area, development
densities and ex; Ming sewne disposal capacity.
(line 11,5 in Table 1, page 6
b. Two, the theoretical maximum development potential
based on optimum development conditions and maximum
site capability if sewer service is ever available
(either community sewer line or some other sewage
treatment facility),
2. Counter Service Area # 46 (Sanitary Sewer) is identified.
in the Sphered of lnfluea,ce maps, Local Agency Formation
Commission., Butte County Planning Department, and covers
the northern Chico area between Lindo Channel and Sycamore
Creek. The service area was proposed by 1AFCo in 1972
but was never formed, according to Bill Turpin of the
LAE"Co office.
and 4.
The need for dr --4 ~ding Eaton Road to fout- lanes
the redone aver cased on the county's plans fo al
extension of Fw wn R;,ad further east of Cohasset .' .-Id
further west of The Esplanade to provide the nortr,,. , n
urban fringe with a major east -west arterial circulation
router thereby ;improving total Chico area traf wircu a
Such
vnothe area -wide l.tation
network would relieemovecentralroutes tbt ecurrentlYintensively travelled, many of which may be appioaching
capacity traffic volumes (many even with four lane
improvements).
The projected traffic volumes listed in fable IV on page 35r -.A. are
estimated traffic .increases qLly resulting from full bui",d-,out
as a result of this project and other identified projects in the
area. Actual increases will be greater as additional development
occurs in the northern urban area.
4 4
Inter -De art&h, a�,, � emormdu
'ryas Butte county Assessor's Office -
FROM.,
ffice FROM Butte County Planning Depart54ent
SUDJEM Forth Esplanade Rezone File 78-62-I3
pfi`r s April. 21, 1980
Purlu4nt to Section 635x;03.5 0.9 Lhe Governnt mt Code, the following
parcels identified below were rezoned from A-20 to C-2
44-Ul-21
22
255
26
31
68
the following parcel was rezoned from A-2 to C-2 and M;,l. t
44-02-44
the following parcels were rezoned from A-2 toH-C;
44-04-16
17
18
the Ebilowing parce], was rezoned £rota A-2to H -C and C-2
44-04-109
the following parcels were rezoned from A-2 to C-2
44-03-6.1. (pt) 44-03-29 44-03-165 44-053-18
1 12 0 31 44-053-1 10
1130 164 13 27
44-053-34
70
71
7
44-41.05 44-41-24 44-43-04 4443-17
07 25 09 44-46,-n4
03 27 ll 20
10 33 (pt,) 12 21
11 34 13 22
12 44-43-02 15 23
21
gg
44-46-44 44-48-10 44-50-0 24
47 1.3 04
48 14 05
03 44-50"01
44-45�0�02
NOTIC8 OF DETERVINATIOV
Rezone , _ AP # Book 44 -various, Book 48 Da*u-e 2,. XQrth.'Chico
State Clear i-ngh�sIse Number (if submitte'-- to' tate Clearing House
80041S14,
80.
SEP W9 .
t Scretar}'for Resources
TO: 1— c
E -.1 1). !,olson, Director
F.{
�4_4?7'?
/ 46-5 _.
1416 Ninth Street, Room 1.811
Road, oTt the north b)i
CLARK A. NINON, County Clerk
Sacramento, CA 95814,
Project De5cription:
By H__0 ------ Depuly
Rezone of 465 acres in the Northern Chico
area to form several
Urban residential zoaiiig districts-. R-10
% L:7x County Clerk
County of xt.1;'
FL OM: (Lead Arency)
%Ievievel
25 County GenEer rive
LnviVormental 777r�);Mr_�;rjkt
Ur6":il . I
<8:11 doiTl y -Center Driye
Orov:Llle, Z
SUBJEM Fiji -ng of Notice of Determination in Compliance with
Section 21108 or 21.152 of the
Public Resources Code
V,RD Log # 77-11-18,01.
0
P it—T
Rezone , _ AP # Book 44 -various, Book 48 Da*u-e 2,. XQrth.'Chico
State Clear i-ngh�sIse Number (if submitte'-- to' tate Clearing House
80041S14,
atact Perswi
Tellephone NUmber
E -.1 1). !,olson, Director
F.{
�4_4?7'?
/ 46-5 _.
Project Location Bounded on the east by Cohasset
Road, oTt the north b)i
Eatort Road and, Sj,camore Creek, _and on the
west by Hwy 99H.' and the -
Project De5cription:
Joshua Tree Development,
Rezone of 465 acres in the Northern Chico
area to form several
Urban residential zoaiiig districts-. R-10
R-2, R-3 A R -4t S-Itp
and-NITIP, aswel.1 as one small area
of. C7Cz9'niTi2i
This is to advise that the BMUOIICOIU�f" -
_Boa `d of Supervisors
(Lead Agency)
has made the. Eollowing deverminations regarding the above-described
project:
li The project17,K7 will have a, significant effect on the
will not
environment,
2, An tavironmeq.ta 1 1 Impact 113,epott was prepared - or this 'ptojoct
-he ptovigioils of ct% 3.
PU'rguartt to t , and was certified as
required by Section 15085(r,)i 14 California Administrative
A tdegative Declaration was a, S p
'tepAred for this bro ant bursuarit
' Neg't
t the provisions of CFQA. A copy of. the a ivo Declara-
tion may be exanUnod at the trivirotimental t,eview Depaftrnent4
7 County Center Dtivdt OroviI.
llt, CftliEOMLI: 959654
L7 A Notice of Exemption was filed indicating this projeo-t it,
exempt from environmental review.
1-16-6
ikppetldix' t -I - page 1 of 2
y
3
y
4. A statement of overriding ConsWtration /�vraa, Z-7 was not,
adopted for this project
5 Mitigation measures adopted by the Lead Agency to reduce Ehe
impacts of the approved project are.:
None
OvEhItZDING CONSIDERATIONS
a The present zoning is worse f {om an, environmental
standpoint than the proposal;
b. The roosed zoning facilitating planning �for ll droads, efine adrainagelimits
and. utilities.
J
S�.gnature
tart, D. xelsoxij Director
TIM
.i.z•�.�..�L��1_4�. t.IA \a�1. +G1 �': �.�. �+:� L�,�a�\51c.
Dat
Appendix 1 - page L
a
kill
Inter-Departmental Momorandum
Tor Planning Commission
M:
vaunt► Staff
suaJr.cTI Re oiling of: 1. Highway 32 West Z North'tsplaria.de 3, Lowe:: Clark
Road 4. Northwest Chico . 5. 'North Chico
DATE: Aug. 3, 1978
If the Commission's determination is to suspend, temporarily, the
azorementioned projects--see attached memo--t a formal motionn is
needed.
BP/hd
Attach;
6nerDepgtie t�!enru ��r
TO:
Bettye Blair, Planning
FROW Kyle Butterwicl, Advance Planning
su4JEcr:
LAND USE PLAN MAP PROPOSALS
nArf July la, 197$
As you know, several: months ago the 'Planning Commission
conducted preliminary public hearings on land use plan
map proposals W.1111 were predicated on the existing
General Plan Subsequent to these hearings, several
proposals were forwarded to Environmental Review for
examination.
Due to revision of the County's land use element,however,
which proposes new guidelines and policies for managing
future growth, the homology of this new docv-zent with
previous land use map proposals remains uncertain. This
subject was recently introduced to the Planning Commission
including the potential conflicts involved between 'old'
map proposals and 'neer' policy and category text provisions. +
After r,cnsiderable discussion, the Planning Commission
elected to postpone further consideration of previous map
proposals. Therefore, please be advised that the following
map proposals which are currently in Environmental Review
should be temporarily shelved until completion and Board
adoption of the Land Use Element, expected to occur some
time in October:
1. Highway 32 West
2. North Esplanade
3. Lower Clark Road
G. Northwest Chico
5': North Chico
Ia er•benairtmental Memorandum
rat Planning Commission
FROMI Kyle Buttej:wic]
iUBJEcr, North Chico Rezone
0O"rCt April 23, 1979
In November 19'-171 the Planning Commission and Staff formulated
a zoning proposal for North Chaco for the purpose of establish
ing specific zoning in the area. The proposal was then forwarded
to the Environmental Review Department and a draft Environmental
impact Report was prepared. In August 1978, the Planning
Commission erected. to suspend precedings on the zoning proposal
due to revisions to "w Land Use Element.
Planaaals000ffershrecommendarionsforvland useAmidodensity stand-
ards
Air -port
and.-
ands in the rezone area. The recent adoption of several new
zones has also affected the status of the original zoning proposal.
The North Chico rezone has been reexamined by Staff in context to the
above -referenced considerations and several minor changes are
proposed. The specific details of these recommendations will be
discussed at the forthcoming meeting. .After an agreement is
reached, the zoning proposal will be forwarded to Environmental.
Review for final inspection of the E.I.R. Thereafter, the project
will, be distributed to the State Clearinghouse for review.
KBnw
Inter leparthiental 'Memorandum
Tot Planning Comnlissioll
FROM, Bob Gaiscr
SU(JJF-CT1 Ravisiol's in North Chico Rezone Proposal
bA'Mi May 2, 1979
The intent of the original rezoning proposal for the North Chico
area was to rezone "A-211 areas to more specific zones 1�,'Jlicjl we're
consistent with General Plan dosignations as well as reflective- of
T000nt development trends, After a review of the original pTopoial
shown on "Exhibit T-1ap All from the perspectives or the now Land Use
Element and R, Dixon Spoas' '"Chico Airport Environs Plan't, stafE
now recommends several changes in proposed zoning, As shown on
7 r
I 1B 'xh, 1 ibit Map B11 the revised proposal, would dolete two small areas
from this project, add two others, and change several other proposoct
zones,
The northeast earlier of this project arca, bounded by Co; assot RoaLt
Sycamore Creek ancl the 'Pleasant Valley Drainago Ditchl should be
deleted because the desired commercial or industrial znning is
inconsistent with the residential designat ions on the Land Use
Plan Map and. thus requires a plen, change. At the April 18 meeting
the Coimitission decided to initiate both the 1111l4wqtiiftl" Lancl Use
Plan designation and a "L'mitod Industrial'
I I zoning for this area
,as part of the Chico Airport Area project,
Also deleted is large parcel originally proposed for 11R-3 adjacent
to Highway 99. The parcel is now developed as part of the Joshua
Tree Apartments" complex and was rezoned to 11-3 in August 1978 at the
owner's request.
We recommend extension of the project north of Raton Road to include
an "A-211 area OF about 30 acres, Because of the existing single-
family devolopmont-the horses found on the larger parcels, and the
Low Density Residential" designation, we recommend an 11,9-R" zoning.
The proposal an Exhibit M41) I I I itc].Uctos "MI -IP" zoning for 4 mobile
home parks along Lassen Aventio. This classification was proviously,
applied to another park in the area: and is obviously Moto reflectivo
of existing JeArelopmont than the "R-3" zoning, originally proposed,
The Commission s' t,tj note that one of the par . Ics proposed for NUIP is
now 11C-1" (Light Commetcial))a zone which, because it allows a
,variety of commercial uses, 'is not Consistent with General Mtin
designations, _The portion of the existing 11C-111 zone not included
in tho mobile home park hai, recently been deVeloPdd with apartments
and is thus proposed for P,-3 zoning.
A cluster of singio Mobile homes off of Godman Avenne is now prnp6god
for 'IRT -111) a simple change from the original "R-111 proposal, In
addition, ane large parcel on tho west side of 11urnap Avonua located
between a mobile home park and w3otilet group of single mohile$ I.,; also
d
Planning Commission
Page -2 w
May 2, 1970
recommended for "'RT -l►' zonIng.
An area, of 10 acres onthe west side of, Morseman Avenue wrts orxittally.
proposed for "R-:" bvit, because of oxisting development and adjacent
zoning, is now proposed for "R-2" zoning
Finally, a large area just south of Raton hood is rocommende(I for
"S -R" zoning rather than the originally proposed: "R -l". The
justification for this change is the large) semi -rural nature of the
parcels involved and thy; extent of horses and ahricultunal uses ill
the area.
Jl:r .
Inter -Departmental Memorandum
TO; Earl Nelson
FROM$ Kyle Butterwick
8UBJECrr North Chico Rezone
DATE.,May 9 1979
The Planning Commission, at their meeting on May 2, 1979, expressed
Support for the North Chico Pezone proposal which was recently
modified by staff to reflect the new Land Use Mement, the Chico
Airport Study, and recent devt_lopment patterns in the area.
As you may recollect, the original zoning proposal was formulated
in November 197? and, a draft E.I.R. was subsequently prepared
but never circulated. In August, 1978, the Planning Commission.
suspended preceedings on the project due to revisions to the
Land Use Element
I am enclosing two maps which illustrate both the Original zoning
recommendation and the "updated" proposal.recently re, -ted by
the Commission. Also enclosed is a memo from staff
the specific changes involved.
As per the Planning Commission's recommendation, please be advised
that this project is to be reactivated.. For purposes of future
scheduling, could you please inform Our office as to the anticipated
timeframe involved in revising the E.I.R. and its distribution to
the State ClearinghQu.se.
::f you need additional information or should you have any questions
Please contact me. Incidentally, we do have a current Land Use Map
for 'the rezone area that may be of value in your analysis,
n: nw
Enclosures
4w.
y
inter -Departmental Memorandum
roc Bottye Blair, Planning Director
FROM furl D. Nelson, Environmental Review Director
u�.►Fcrc 1rxB. Preparation Scheduling for -Street Parking Ordinance,
.
Off
s North Cbico Rezone, South Chico Rezone and BiSGS, Gridley Area Rezone
�n'rr December 191 1979
As I indicated to you earlier today, scheduling of EIR preparation
for the above -listed projects is anticipated to be as follows:
:Parking Ordinance: EIR draft is ready to be finalized. We
sax icipaTe THeTroject will be ready to request scheduling
within a week.
North Chico Rezone: Revisions to the previously prepared
MU Draft are necessary to reflect changes in the rezone
proposal: and to update traffic statistics, etc. Draft ElR
will be ready to circulate for comments before late January.
South Chico Rezone/General. Plan Amendment-. EIR, draft can be
completed by staff in-house prior `to March 15, then circulated
for comments.
Gridley -Biggs Rezone and General. Plan Amendments EYR draft
can be completed in-house by staff before mid-May, then
circulated for comments.
In response to your request I am enclosing copies of the environ-
mental. determinations for South Chico and Gridley -Biggs.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT'S INTEBDEPAR MENTAL. RI~ I WLF
TOy C1oxorva do Co CCha ro
+ y
REQUEST; viaw &-QQ` M9nt
8-39 V'r hTbUR A #-s IN q
DESCRIPTION Ot, Rovioxne 'rw T '1 RT -1 and R-3 rola, n, _il
districts,__ and C --C Commui.- �L runarca.al
-.- ,
LOCATION::1:rom Sycamore Creek to tact Ave. & Sttate 7' y. c)q to Eof Cohassc,���
north 09 Chioo urban area
APPLICANT; BlItt;e 00unty, Plann.i�Commission
ADDRESS:
County C(,,n°dor I)ri7e, Oroyille, CA - — -
OWNER; . VARIOUS -�
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION SCHEDULED
LOCATION: - f`r+nm r,�rmamor+a 0rpplr to, T'
north Chicd.urban area
APPLICANT; �.] tU Fp (ni,n - ri rinrin
ADDRESS.- rn,trii' r f';�'TL�ta� T1r„t.��o 07 ,'A'tri I I oy { %1, I` `Ar �v �•
V
OWNER:
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION 8CFIEDULEbY�av'r3�,��::,: r
RETURN DATE REQUESTED, ASAP
GATE DISTRIBUTED: - 5 -8 -go
ATTACI- Mr -NTS; COPY of ap0c8tion & plot plan.
RETURNED,
COMMENTS.,
No COMMENT
PLANNING DERRRTMENT'S.IN1'EFtDCf'ARTMENTAL RE~Vtl*W
To,, QA Dimision, of 2005trl"
1'.cr -f I
REQUEST: 11t % ` ���1��`TN I
MW'r4f E
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: I omone frnm t 2 '170 B-11 PrP-I,,81]dPAl rn. i dent i ial
nnr3 01 C Comimim'
LOCATION: from _E�Xramara Or.m rincd, 9. Stat; Tt���, F; n ` CD]] aF 3;_$$. •,.
north on giban area --
APPLICANT: -Butte 0 Uj-,v P1-a]iril lid' o mi ami
ADDRESS;
OWNER: VAIR1011S_
PLANNIN(,., COMMISSION ACTION SCHEDULED
RETURN DATE REQUESTED: ASAP
SATE DISTRIBUTED: $-R-490-
ATTACHMENTS: Copy of applicatlan & plot plan,
RETURNED:
COMMENTS:
V*( PLANNING DEPARTMEf
T0: V anJv-ir,L Environmental Health _ .r�
REQUEST: 8ev!ew & Comment pcoVjllos' ,,A ipttu� MAY 1980
AP NO, r 98-39 VARIOTJS AJ:Y1,s OroVJtta,C�lllornle
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT-, Rezone f:Lom A-2 to R-1, 1111-1. R -2Ind R_rLresidential
distrists, and C -G Com 0-2cial da.sta r- i at
LOCATION: f:""*em Sycamore Gree;'. o ,Case Ave & State flwy. 99 to 1 of Cohasset Rd. ,
north Ole, %o urban. area
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION SCHEDULED
RETURN DATE REQUESTED: ASAP
DATE DISTRIBUTED -5=8-80
ATTACHMENTS., Copy of application & plot plan.
RETURNED; S "F*? -0
COMMENTS; , ezdA M Cdtaji'las ml
Cf it 'l ndQ2i�a Ui LIC WORKS
.AP NO.: 28-39 'VARIOUS .Akft
DE'yCRIPTION OF PROJECT: 01"le
f'rhm 4-2
RETURN DAT5 REQUESTED: ASAP
DATE DISTRIBUTED.
48-04-5
y1\✓+f?
'off
1114
i
440605
11
p y
lf�
44-05-11,
06
IP
38
6
x 1?
13
P9
J,
9,11,'Q
01,
30
27
t128
44,,,09-Y
y)
411
04,33-A.bb
1
11.14
3Q.
3p
le,
45
1.4.4._34 -ALS,
35
46
36
48-40-7
44 -PI -8
/.1.?
44-35—ALL
37
8
11
118
36
15
29
Z1.9
1
/.4.14,_����..Ar.,lr
23
39
50
44-65-23
42
51
�1°Z1•-3V ALL
24
48-23-21
43
5 IP
25
A
A
53
44-38—ALL
26
31
61
2V
�r
6d
Li-4-39—ALL
28
d
63
56
29
X14:
64
!`)V
14114-40-A1',1..,
30
65
5,8
31
44-44"Al
32
48-31-33
07
iCU
c ,�
-33
�14
68
V
p
4-
38
6
62
35
X35.
39
G I
JG
40
44—M—AM
14a
40
39
41
65
41
56
414-S3-7
66
144
57,
8
67
45
40
i
512
68
59
53
69
44— 4.5—ALL
14--66-11
60
54
70,
let?
61
y8
44-47-A.1'.,L
13
6
66
44-2V"ALL
Q
6
67
44-50-22
15
66
68
14.4..30"AL1,
16
44-=3110
17
48-35-
44---P-4-'10
44"31-11
is
3
y3�
19
Ll1
36
6
5
1L
1411
48-02-28
48
20
43
38
13
4
?1
39
pp
yo
- Y 2
t
�4�114"56=-Atb
14.0
ray
;bel
23
41
R4
511
24
44"57—AL
14°2
65
25
43
33
66
26
44-61—ALL
14
34
6?
38
46
39'
44-6 2—A1 r
4
4
4
it
Inter -De artme'�
at..I�emorandnt
p
TOt Planning Commission
PROW Bob Gaiser
SUBJECT; Revisions in North Chico Rezone Proposal
OATtEi May 2, 1979
The intent of the original rezoning proposal fog the North Chico
area was to rezone "A -Z" areas .to more specific zones which were
cons :stent with General Plan designations as well as reflective of
recent development trends. After a review of the original proposal
shown on "Exhibit Plop A" from the perspectives of the new Land Use
Element- anA R. Dixon Speas' "Chico. airport Envisions Plan", staff
now recommends several changes in proposed zoning, As shown on
"Exhibit Map B", the revised proposal would delete two small areas
from this project, add two .others, and change several other proposed
zones
The northeast corner of this project area, bomded by Cohassot Road,
Sycamore Creel: and the Pleasant Valley Draina.,,e Ditch, should bre
deleted because the desired commercial or industrial zona.,,O is
inconsistent with the residential designations on the Lanni Use
Plan Map aLd thus requires a plan change.At the April x18 meeting
the Commission decided to initiate both the "Indus trill"' Lancl Use
Plan designation and a "Limited Industrial" zoning for this area.
as part of the Chico Airport Area project:
Also deleted is a. large parcel originally proposed for 11R -3'; adjacent
to rIighway 99, The parcel is noir developed as part of the "Josftua
Tree Apartments" complex and was rezoned to R-3 in August 1978 at the
owner's request
We recommend extension of the project north of Eaton Road to include
an "A-2" area of about 10 acres. Because of the existi-.g single-
family development.,the horses found on the larger pard -y8, and the
"Lour Density Residential" de-signati,on we recomme-nd an ",S -R" zoning_
The proposal on txhibit %lap B includes zoning for 4 tiobile
;lode parks along Lassen Avenue . Tl is cl"ss ificntiorx t,tas pyuvidusly
applied to another park in the area awl is obviously more reflective
of existing development than the "R-3" zoning originally nroputed.
The Commission should note that one of the paras proposed for 14 up is
now "Cyl" (Light. Commerci il), a, tort^ w]Iiich, because it allowg a
variety of commercial user, xs not consistent with General Plan
desixnations. Tho portion or the existing '`r�l'' zone not included
in tl�e mobile Isom. harl,ha.q recently ►aeon rSe�veloped with, a;ia.rtments
and is thus ro used fr— R-3 zoning
A clststot of single mobile homes off of Godman Avenue is now ;proposed
for 1"ltT-111, a simple change from the original 1'R-1" proposal, In
addition, ono large parcel on the vest sid-, -1f BU'tnap Avenue locate
between a )"10bile home pat'k and another group of single mobiles its ai;
Planning ComMiSs on
Fa,e .2
stay2, 1979
recommomded for ►RT -111 zoning.
An area of 10 acres on t]le `test side of Morseman Avenue was originally
Proposed for 11R-311 brit, because of existing development and adjacent
zoning, is now propoi;ed for OR -211 zoning.
Finally, a large aro; just south of Baton Road is recommended for
'►s -IL►' zoning rather than the originally proposed ►'R -a,.►►. The
justification for this change is the large, semi -rural nature of the
parcels Involved and the extent of horses and agricultural uses in
the aret,
t1 /lr
��'•e y ti
'w'd 01:z pu
uTgog 04 paTnpattos st puu rTu OSTT-00 'oTC.noxo ' JiTaC[
xa4uuo Aut'rop 58 `,;,0 uao u0Ta.va.10tutt0py j�qunoo 'tuooa
sxostn.xadns To pxV09 041 uT pToq eq TTTM SuT4 0Ow 04
• I.sua 044 uo *P8 ;000111 goo PT' ' qq xou
auk. uo 31aaxo e10wg07ts '4sOA 9ta4. uo 66 'WAn 'imnoe aqq. uo
'any;s-eq �q papunoq -evau (TvToxatuwoo-sq.Tunwtuop) 110-011
' (ixtd awoN @TzgoW} 11dIIW11 ' (e otnxaS ped aTx saH- Trt uaptsaH
fi tsua w>:twtxuW) 11�-g11 ' (1V*c uOpTsad fi���.caQ wnT *
n�I�St3T` (awoii TtgoW-T t' uap sa T� TsTx0 wnwTu ,
r1�i`�T11 T �uapTRG xa cTn vTr ua T9O uu tn
�W)
iil-W11 `(TuT:.uapTsOU RTTMn,,T-OT9uTS) 11Lia11 01 (T10To
xawwoo gsTI) ll4-011 I (Tejouao,) 112-'d11 woxT SUTuazOx pun
4aodaa 4ondwj tiuj.uawuoxTnuN uu xepTsuoa 04 09614 `�? STn,p
',Rt3psOup0M uo gutaveq otTgnd n PToq TTTM uOTssTwwoo
2utuuuTd .94unoo a44nq, eqq. Iuq:, uwaS sga�taq s- eoTgoN
a zaa 00MITO maom-NonsTWW00 DIUMNVI XINI= �q1TS;n'q
•w°cT o�tL �u
ttT aq o4 poTnpatTos of putt ntu,xoSTTV0 `o CTtnoxp ' antxo
xagvoo k unoo 62 1xa4uao uoc�va4sTuzwpV A;ut'to0 'wood
1 sxosTAaOd-aS So pavog aq; ttrp pTati og TTtM But4oaw oql
• geve oq4 uo • pH 4 1ssattoo pun t g4aou
q� uo, %O0xo 9xow1204Z 4499A 0144 uo 66 't nos ati; no
any peg Sq papunoq next (Tv,toxowwoD_s;Tutlwwob) 110-011
' 0fand awot.T OTTgoW) 11dI 11 `(aotnxog paq0Txq!3Oa_ tquapTsard
SgTouaq wnwtxnW) 1177'211, ` (T>3 c uaptsOd � tsrxoo wntpOW
X-ao ` (TR Cqueplt Oa xoldncl) lie -all ' (TnT4u8pT08a tvaq,xn
-qng) r12I`511 `(a[uoH aTtgoW-Tut uOp sa R;TsuaQ Whwwt,W)
1r 1.=s2I11 ' (Tnt uaptsad xTtwu -aT u°ts) ll1 " T11 014. (TBto
-,zawwoo 44V't'T) 111:•-011 13 (Tux'0uao) lie -v11 wo,xt OuT110%0x pue
I.xodOa 4013dwT tvIuawu0aTAug ;uu grOPTsuaO 04 0964 XTnr
';kt#psOupaM uo guTxvr q otTgnd n pToq TTTA uoT09twwh0
Sutuuu`CcT9�uno0 a4Itiq etA4 411214Z uanx2 Aja,tau et GbTloq
' ut' d o� ; G IV
utgoq 04 paTrtpattos OT pun VxuaoxTTv0 `aTTTAoao ' ap'Txd
J04ua0 4 unoo g? laa4uao not rix t Tutwpy h4unoo 'wooH
1vaosTA,Todn5 jo pxuog 044 uT pToq aq TTTM suT�oew ottj,
'-owe all; uo 'PkT 10f3setloo pun 1114aou
Oq4 uo 3100xo ax0tut3o-Cs1 ' 4e9m au4 uo 66 'WM11 'tignos 0qj uo
,OA.y 4egg Sq papunoq noav (*(vTo,xawwo0--Rq.Tunwt4o0) 110`011 'R
` (%avcj awoN T?goW) r1dHW11 ` (aOTnxOS po:}o T,z�.s1aZT-Tt:t uapt ad
S4tsua(I wnw�txt3W) 11.17 -fit„ ' (TGT1u0pTUOa P,;Tsuad wntraatt)
11r�.^?I11 ` (TnTWOPTaad XeTdnQ) r1 - T�1 ` (TQTquapTsaa uugan
-gnS) IIH-S11 ` (OWOH, OTTgoj4-TvT;uap` Tod 41T.quod wnw caj.W)
111.-LlH11 ' (!vT4uaptsau kTTwu,T-Oj2tgS)
1tL"ZT1r 04 (Ttttb
-,zowwoo 4ggTq) ,11.-011 I (Tnxeueo) 112-y11 wox,T Butuozax puts
'qxodeg govdwZ Tt3quawuoxtnua uv ;zapTsuoo oq og6L 1�e wTnp
Npsaupaj4 uo su.p;aq oTTgnd t? pToq TTTt'1 uoTsstw uo0
utuuuTd 4Un00 044-aq ?144 40144 uonCS Wqaaet eT aoTqoN
agomi l On= HIHOU-NO195TWWoO DMINNv'Td MR00 Mng
.wld 0cQ In,
utgaq o4 paTnpat(oo sT Pun BTuxoSTTVD ' OTTTAbaQ ' anTaq
x9�ueo f,4unoo 52 140q.U00 uoT4va1q,0Tutwpy .�4unoo 'wood
lsxostnaadns So pxVag aq� ut pTaq oq TTTM BUT40OW Oqj
awry aql uo `Pa 400sugoo pun ' q�aou
aq4 uo 3taaxo OJOWVbWg '!.00A eqq uo 66 •.KAi4 'g4noe atiz uo
-any 4sua. Xq popunoq veav (TvT0aOwwo0-SgTunwwo0) 110-011 IS
awoN aTTgoW) iifflN11 ' ( otnx09 PG40Ta46aa-TBTquepT9aa
s4TOttect wmptvw) 117j -d11 `(TUT4uapTs0a S4TsuaQ wntpaw)
11�-all (,tnTTuapzsa?T �,eTdna) 11�`2i11 � (T.uF4uapT9a9 ungtn
-gnS) r12t•-511 t (awoiT oTTgoW-Tvt4uap as YsuaQ tuntitzutW)
uL-,TI11 `(Cuzquapcsa�Ttwud-aTutS) 111.-9,1 01- (TuTo
xewwo0 +gsTrl) 11L`0n "? (Txoueo) u2-vt1 WokxT Sutuozax pun
jaodog gbvawT tn4u0wuo,1tAu8[ uu xaptsuoo 04
o96l. ` 1 Tnp
'SvpsOttpOM uo SttTaaoq otTgnd v pTott TTTM uaTeetwwoo
ouxuun!,T R�unoO 044ng a'q4 41MJ !IOnT2 Rgaaoq Ot aoc oN
a NOMU 001H0 TIMONlNOTSSIWW00 JNINNYId ZIN1100 5111fis
1 IPPIPX C10TTNr11Y PLANNING COMM ON
ITT IT, P: oy P013'177c 11MARTNO
Notion in horoby g1vun by the Hutto county lqunraLng commission,
that ,17trblin hu ar i.ngs wl .J be .old an Woelneaday, July 23, 1980,
fits 7:30 P.n., in tho butte County Board of Su.1,e.rvisoral Boom,
BUttO Cr>ur L`, .Adm1rai0tVt1tai.0r1 CL:rat0Vj x?;) county Cenci -':r brine,
Qx'e7V 1 1,c , x'F' '7:'(lin1,'` th fol 1 owi i
ITEM G)�N WI1 i OH Atj j,,NV 11iCiNKMEM
TM1'AC'J' 1 1,1''C?h'i' lJtl�, It"i� r�1,TR11.'0 ` 01) PRE1:Ah°ED
llutJte; County Planning Gatttmissa,on-,'Nor'(-;h Chico 11azono from
"A -P" (Creaxt0-Va:l.) & "W" �,�,i..Sh't Commercial) to "R--1" (8� gle--
Family Re o i donti,al) , "RT -11 (Minimum Density Reoident inl--
Meal i e? Horny: ), " -h" tlY�url an--1�e� idc,n t i:t O ��[Rw�'�� (uplox-
I obidWia1,) , "R-311 (Modilam 1) nsit;y Residential j , "R-4!1
(Maximi.rm Density Rani cl,c��z tial:_Rost rict;od ; ie�r.'Y 0 ) , ",MAY
(Mobilo home pa':k) & 110`0; (ComtnLlna l;,y- ���nmr.rc i r 1:1 a.re,
bounded 'l7y Boat Avenue on the south, liw;y�. 99 on t;bo we ot,
yoomore Cvook on they north, and Cohnooet ltd.. on they east,
wore: particularly described aw
Q -1"t boto 4, 5, 6, 11 and 1p of "Hobart: Sulo" per Map of
Poco:rd in Mal, Bcok 4 on paG 24- of the liutte°a Courty Recorder.
All of "LinlJ,o Manor Sub. Unit No. "I" pe=er map of revoozaa in
map hook I? on pages 21 of tho Butte County Recorder.
All of "bi ndo Marcor Bub. Unit No. 2" or map oP record in
map book 19 on pad°e: 5 of the Butte County Recordor.
All of "Lisdo Monor Sub. Unit No. " per map of rocord in
map book 22 on pad os 2? & 26 of the Butte County N,e eoroer:
Bx00ptjn,g therefrom Lots 103 through 114 of said Linda
Manor Kh Unit No, 3",
All of "Hacienda Oaks Stab i Unit No. it per map of record
in map 'book 24 on pages 9 & 10 of they tette County Recorder.
All of "Hacienda Oaks Sub. Unit No. 2" per map of recd d
in map hook 35 on page 84 of the Butte County Ne,cordeP4
That portion of Whiter Avec:, and ad jacont IaAd lying 'between
they W l i nes of the vightl- of- way of the Werame nto Northern
RVIrond, they 8 1.:1.ne of hot 23 of "Hobart Subdivision„ per
map of r000rd in map hook 4 on, pa6e 24 of they Buttto Covntty
Recorder, and the linea of Lots 124, 105 & 127 of the r"Bel-
Airo Subdivision Unit No. " por map of record :in magi book
23 on poi>os 40 & 41 of the Butte County 1000r40r
Contai.nitrg 102acres, More or less, North Chico*
iii"`f�fl'�'! rl'1'ar� oou.ta=rouotc_,r:•,ly 495 ft. of Lot: pry t' f i']fr�bar't 1a1,�l;:r,
T 1slln"' l,c ori Map of` Record W Map Book 4 .on pop;tj of tho
hitt. County Rharcfori.
Tho� 3 , w. s iR �... t , n
�Ckl� �:�c)ta,'f,titYr.113'l,'� rly a� �'? t.L. of Lot , ' of f1c�r.t,�r I, �aut.�.irr•S.�i.c911
per Map of Hcyc orad inMap Bookii. on pa(t,o ;4 (if the 1°utt:o
County 1Zmord r
ConLai.11ing 13.5 racrony Moro or loo's, North Chico,
11 ,.E t1 Tho f'lor,`thwos torly x:700 f t,. - � p'Ind '01(fl)O 411woste rl.y
QN-ft. of the southr;as t Orly 460 ft of Lot 25 of nfaid
"Hobart, S )ub i.vi si can" .
Parcel 1 of that; parcel map recorded in Map loots 49 on page'
81 of the Butto County Ro ordor.
Lot 19 of :aid "Hobart:Subdivision".
Conuaining 18.0 acros, Moro or loon, North Chino.
1IR-3" That portion of ,bot 10 Located h of St. Hwy. 99, ai t all
6 :l,ot. '14, of "Esmorai<da Tract" per map of Recolld in Map f OOk ¢I
on page 33 of thy; But't o County R� cordor.
Lots ', 3 3`1, 38, 39 & 40 of "Hobart glut,." pcT Mali of Record
in Map Pcook 4 on page X of t;hc, Buttto County linoml-dor.
Tuaht, porrtiondofthe outh esterl.,y x'10 ft. of Lot: 13 of sAid "Hobart
t, �� and within 1�5 ft. of thr 0 right -0 -
way line of San Gabriel. Dr vo .
That t portion of Lot 14 of said Wobart Sub." do aoribed as:
Begigning at the most southnrl.y c;rarrIOr of said loot 14; thonov
W I PO' W 235 ft.; thence No52o20' E 330' 041 thence � &I
20' B 11.24 ftq ft.thence N 52 20' E 163,0 ft.; hhr rrc o north-
westerly along a curve concave to the W having a radius of
200 .f:`'t . to a point- which boars S 52"4.0' W and is 147 ft,
distant from a paint on the E line of said hot, 14 that lies
236.5 ft. distal prom the most easterly a0snor or said Lot
14; thon.cc; No 52 40 E, 14? int. thence S 37 20' t,' 236.5 fly. ;
thence 6 52 40' W, 660 it. to -ilie point of
Lots Pq & 30 of said "Hobart Sub."' excepting thorof'rom that
portion of the southwesterly 132 f0 of oa.i.d Loto 29 & 30 locotod
north of the n aram4.Ynt o Northern Railroad right—of—way.
All of that portion of Mat Pia Of Onid "kfOWt UK" located
6 of the Gacrnmonto Northern Railroad right-of-way:
All that portion of Trot 41 oP said "Hobart dub,"_l.ocatod G
of the N boundary of "Front:a or Village Sutr. " pop Map of Record
in Map Book 38 on page ?6 & Y7 of the Butte, County ltonorder,
All that. ,1�r(a 1031C;y t,aouildt'd ora t,hE, N la r 1`�o I, :,t �?fl �� ti
tlula. " jtAT. �� If) ref ll01)ri 1
Y Map o Roe() in Map tjo0k 11- on }'�a� h� j'14� of thE�
County 1rE�cor(1c,"', t.�rl t:h� 14; IV QOhal;.a��ot Cid , and earl tho W &
1',,,y 94101(11)(M ( akn �)ub No. �1 11 Pt"'f Mah ot'�' a,r*Cr�r�', �.�ri Ma Book P4
c�rt laaxt, i & 10 Or 1,itra Iiaxl;i,ci 0011rat.y lit (.OI.-clor h, "Ilac'1 raxdaa*
a,ak� �ut.< No . �� a aE. �, �. t tY
7 Mala o f li"OOMi ill MVP Book 35 on. paa�<, Wi.
c tl3r., 13uLt,(' 0Qurlty Recorder, rarlct by "Lindo Mr .aox� Sub. Unit
No. �1�� , Ma�D of R000rd it Mala llooa °'1`? ort sago PI ori` the
Bit 1,t�f,� County 3RF:�c.ordov.-
Tho XA, of LoU �' of "Bidwoll 17th Sub" por Map of Record i..ta
Map Book ',� on pago G7 of t'11E? 13uttE; LOLl7114 RocC77"C1:c r.
111 of tha L Portion, 01` faaa.cl c.1�a�,. i, S Ubdivi o ora" lying S &
W of the Cent erl inn of tho .ala aa„want V01.1.e:y 17raa.i,nago ChaaxYno.l.
Thu port}heast(.vjy poo ft. of Lot 'I of oaaid "Hobart Subdivision".
ion".
Thai a0'ut hwostorl,.y 8,8 f'ti of the northwE"storly 11,95 ft. of'
bot 15 of vwid "Hob arl; klubdivisa 0n."
Lotca 1, 3 & "I' Of UMIL- 1.faal{col. Map of ffiE ord in Mala li0oft 50
Oil •taaGO l25 01:: than BUGt, County Ronordor aE-3 Modified try that
l'aa"C'01 M P Of 1�c cord i.rj Mop Book '?0 oil l�a�;�° ia.1 .a f Lha, l�uL.Lr,
County R000rd'er:
'hrory.3t.11wE3;t:caxl,y r LI, ft: Of the-ooutheast,,,ply :) 0 i'h: a
tho noa'YFlawaa te�rly 1Ei5 M o ' thonox�'Lh yaa..at,� r1,,y fa ct It. of
the routhkaiac,t,Fa ,1, 30 ft of Lot 1�1 of ,said "llobart; Subdivision".
The smthwf,,strr.1;y "157 ft,. of tho nort;hwootorly 203 ft. and
the nort;hwt_)atce.rl,y 53'0 ft. 0f the northoaatot'JY 330 ft: a: Lot
51 Of said "tIO14art mbdivi don't .
Farct_`1�9 11 2 POP PaIlcol` Map ' of I'mcord. .iri Mala Look 40 oil
,Paga,' 79 0f t;he Butte 00unt;,y R000rder.
Parcall s It 2, a& Zi -M ,
laE�� Parcel Masa of R0cord it, Map Book 40
on page ...VT of thO hu,t;t;E-. County R(:i .ordeiv.
Containing 150.0 ncrrr,s, move ori 1E��3a, Nor Chicca
TlvX nort,henstOrl;y 208. af5 t"4; 01, Lha: racax't,hw�:: t ;r
'17.50 ft. Of Lot 17 Of ;a d ".11obart; ASubdiva r,i ora".
Conta;i n'nr d -O c� .r`E`C; i mrarO Or ,100',,, Nortl3 Ohio'().
Lots '103 th.r�u '1111 Of "Tat,ndo Manor �GUbd�.virs
i'1C7`_ ) rwl Mal:, of Record in Mtop .Book PL onry1�ar sE. b; � �0n Unit
� 28 of
the liutt`� t'lotarltW Ro,E vdrr%.
'haat f aavor,t of .land bounded on thr• E by Pi l l obury Rd, on t hu
tii by Fast .Ave: , on that W 1,y th.i Sa,cryamon,t;o Northrn c3Railroad
and on tho N by the 8 MnO Of Lot +115 Of Said "Linda Manor ,
Stzbda.v'i Bion Unit, No. 311
COilttlilling 3-5 acro , TY1oro or War l -oh 0h Loo i
•
" D1 I - I Irract" T,,f(W Mal) (A' Rcoord int
11 "' , 0 t 11E.,1111cra , (Del
N a �T Book -1 on Pallo 33 of the Butte 001111ty Rnoorjt'r.
That portion 01, Lot r) of S(.11d "E't",moraldn q1vo.a-V lyiTig 1,; of,
Hwy. 99.
por Map of Rocord. In M,,;ip Book 50 011 T,0fr,
)0 P5 of th(,
Coullty do
RocOrv, as m0difi&J by the MaPof Prcord in
Map Book VO on page 41 of the Hutt(, -1 County Rvoordev.
Tho, northw(..,stevjy 330 ft., the southouoterly 165 ft. of tht
northeastorly 390 ft.) and the northwPstorly 165 ft4 of thi
northoastorly 264 ft. of tho southoastcr1y 330 t*t. of Lot
18 of oaid "Hobart SubdiviNon".
Lot 31 of said "Hobart Subdivioion" OXCOPting Wrofrom W
northweotorly 330 ft. Of thO nONNOWAY 330 ft. and tho
northwostorly 203 ft. of the northeasterly 157 ft.
0,ontaininr, 55.0 cactus, movo or loos, North Chico.
" : Lot " 8, 9, 101 Us 23, 34. Iq 36 & 45 of "
iHobart
Subdivison pov Map of Record j? hap' Book 4 on 1,,nfr cu
th(� Butto 0ounc
ty Voordor. o ('14
Tho nor thwestorly 33o ft. Of Lot V OP said, "Hobart lluldiv ,sionll.
Tho rjortheaoterly 330 ft. Of Lot 33 of said "Ilot,ort. SuL,di ision" .
The northwestoviy 165 ft. of Lot '�,2 of said "Hobart SuLdii-iision".
Lots I through 9 of "Sycamore Subdivision" Poll Map of R0000d
in Hap Book .32 on paE;or, P3 & 24.
Parcels is By 3 & 4 per Map of Record in Map Book 55 on paj.,,e
3i of the Autto County Recorder,
That portion of land bounded by said "SYcaniollo OulvdiviNon"
On Uirl E, by Eaton Rd. on the S, by the W lizio Of the M. of
thou WWW of 10, MDB&M and Parcels 1) 21 3 & 4 per Map CC
Rocord in Map Book 55 on page 37 of -the Buttu_� County Roo rl�p
on tbe W,
, and by Wonmoro Creok on the north.
010",nininP4 120-0 ac"U's, molli:� or leso,, Wrth Chloni.
Thi) above meet ionod application z, POUtions, Mnpsj draft onvi-
VOMOUN impact roports and/or nagativo reports aro on filo
and nvaliable for public viewing at the Office of thn Butte
County Planning Department, 7 County Conwor privoy opovillp
California. Environmontal Impact Reports at, also availaby ,
at colleg(,, and county, libraripi,
BUTTE,' COUNTY PLANNING CoMil-1,80010N
BETTYE BLAIR
DIRECTOR Ort PLANNTNG
NOTICE OF COMPLETION
CLARK A, NeLSC+IV "
(of Draft Envi,, onmental Impaot Resort) ' Co"4' CIQrk
y A, JJACINTHO
"�.. Deputy
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: DEPARmNt ;NTs
Count c Stitt Environmental Review
=0 XE—C-1 T X T L E
Noxoth Chico Rezone ar�.ous 1�PEP
ZD _lP
=L1 01
ADb_RE8Se CIM,COUNTY:
18-Y county Center Drive Oroville Butte
CONTACT PERSON: AREA C008: PHONE:
Earl D. Nol ail, D.i rer far 16 53
..:�,.,.� � 4
PROJECT OtSCRIPTION 0.�" NATURE, PURPOSt o AND �. w..y" _ N1� �fED7CE`IFIC TI,RIES'
Rezone of, 465 ec.r s in •th.e NorI ,"n
residential di8txiots: R-.1, Ri-2, R_3 Rr-41 C-R R`�--� , an clap
as Well as one small area of C=•G zonit,� ,
PROJECT LCC:ATION
CI.T.Y. ,�:} G+�• 0 7CILOCATION . .
COUNTY:
����• Flute
i.'Z6iS PEATOD PIMIDED rOR RE'VXUWt
115 days ending May 257 1980
.'�Dl�itE55 +7IfERE COPY Off'. DF'.APT tIq IS AVATI, t8t. thV'ronmentA1 MV eta ~
DePar tu'Ont,181'Cot;ryty ��riGe� [?t•itre,y nxoti l.le CA 95805
.4�U41l 1:P4. e�8'�1 L441, AJ� �•a +,6JJ«««rNJ, I'y�j :J WIQiw"�.X..iZ��e lurk«
� �,k.)i lL""y Gento'll lJwa vej
�,a�il'iGuGy
3V r
l'ov
Orl< v"11 cli iiI.JorOpte 71xl«i,tctl 10
1onlut;c;dI dot the noaxYt1a.iU;.;t corwil, of ` bc;
Y
Our
,j t ^ry�q �r ,j-.ry,....J part
's3�' the+ �',yo�iL,,t.�OoCq�v1•�pt���"Pu�l�yr1/1yi.:�C1
.l`i�.r ii t'Ja uM;t w �`�i 14:1,4 �l J.i `J }-,4� L�y .l,.i ly1f.4 d.+ J. }. ll .I..y t ,)il Y14 Pp.i A�t:�
"
illtcc'rltl Pail «U�l to tuo nor ; ptu L'r"Cl ly for
. Tl.x "t� z .:IJF •;i�11 r` �' ".AE f il: 4 rl► I,u v -c tjU ;'UUt iY t(LIJI to,
oil
C-
vc r.' '! Lqal .lyi 11 1 iiecd to poj'
i
c,, togory b`. to
l 1Yyrr, Cr'f3 l a' 7 tYy"dr 1117 �. c.w5' iii'' -.:�kr i,l • S "'•
l){ �,+t i"... t(,G,-u y �,,I llld i G'.l��s"�ll�` Pit; x''.�+ 19roY r iS7i'@J "�iµ 'S:fa:
T1 tiro "i r a ;n a FJ N" a, v` P'lt}il e 1)
k.;•< i� 4a: �t�7t%a Vida, ll r�"}
Cro 1 r�.nz'', III 7.'v'P: C"lIa .a�,i vCIPA. rj firs !I,l n1 �.=r.3
�10
ll�Jr.wY ��vRX •Y 4�w,";
�f y
�m
r , �,.�tf1�49•
�d�,l�ris�„h1A
Marfa R. Sisk kryler
26V Burnap Avenue
Chid,, CA 95926
July 14, 1980
Butte Coun*hy Planning Commission
7 County Center Drive
Oroville, CA 95965
RE- NORTH CH1CO REZONE
Dear Planners;
We are the owners of the property on the southwest corner
of Cohasset Road and Burnap lWenue. This 9.5 acre piece o
land is undeveloped, except for our two homes situated therei
tae are pioneers in north Chico development. Our development
of the original, larger piece of land, included Linc', -o Manor
sub6ivi8ion, Hacionda Oaks subdivisions and the Apartment
buildings at Cohasset and Pillsbury. These we believe to be
outstanding in their attention to beauty in planning and
engineering. They are older subdivisions, still a pleasure
to view as you drive through. We extended natural gas and:
water to the North Chico area. We also were active parti-
cipants in the formation of the drainage districts:
our plans now are to use the remaining land for attractive-,
well -landscaped, quiet office buildings and/or small businesses.
We have a prospect at the present time for office buildings.
We believe the land and location are well suited to this use
and that it will be in keeping with our concern for a well--
planned community.
we ask the commission to zone this 9.5 acres commercial.
This consists of the land owned by Norlie & s'sk, jointly,
and that owned by each, separately.
Sincerely,
Mar�af� R► Sisk Miller
a
rwtx
dog h e D. Norlie,
Robert N Norlie
`yy{
jo! �i
r,.
CITY OF CHIC0 �,4am31,�, Me"1ce" t:F
INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: BETTYE BLAIR, PLANNING DIRECTOR DATE; July 14, 1980
FROM: TOM LANDQ FILE REFERENCE; CP6677 JA-aC-M
SUBJECT: NORTH CHICO REZONE
MESSAGE
From what I gather in talking to Jere Bolster, the proposed rezoning is
compatible with the County General plan, as proposed, We, of course,
the rezoning consistent with Chico's General plan,
would prefer to see
and believe that it's important to work for maximum compatibility between
the two Plans to promote both logical development and a logical-rti+ebl-00-
of services to the North Chico area
Should my uhderstanding of the rezoning be incorrect, and it is different
I would appreciate knowing this
from the. Butte Count Land Use Element,
y
so that we can study more closely the implications of this rezone, Obviously,
we'd rather have some defined zoning, rather than the A-2 which now exists
over parts of the area.
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter
.
,& .�
TQM LANDO PLANNING DIRECTOR
TJL.gc
11440 Co. Planning Comm,
JUL 2 41980
Orovillo, Calif'o'nJ4
eI
jrez
✓L . G `GCS. �'�t'�,r f/1�t=trGtG%C� � -T���i.��c�"7'y
,p,,. �> '�st�* fir`.-� .rr Za ,.?� �"�.c"l�C� e•.c,,�''�i
L ✓��.�C- « eov
07
tol Piles
i ROW Bettye Blair
SUMJKCtj North Chico Rezone
DATE: duly 2.. f l q $'O
This date, Cragg Vist ca phoned and asked that the southwest
r g r
corner of Lassen. n I� 1. Paso he zoned light commercia.l-` service- type
Stores, cleaners) etc. —neighborhood commercially
tB/h
I
N � ,• .w dy-k M,, �%: r x a ,,;;,�a»rw..y.[i j rvy, �
1
-. ♦ � fp`P x A�1, Y 4� � YJ,} f
��L A�`�
1 Q)0
u�# �. a E
wwr 1, a`A it a �%'r tm.4a,�a%.1tl..K est `
.r11,ir C'��if%('+1�j�A'
y x
C
P y „
art profit corporation dedicated to careful plarming for growth
P,O.. Mtw- -566, Chico, California 95917
A �r"41 yA •�' Y. �'w I.%.f V!' A� `�`• k. A`) 4
C .a� ,i.9R t y. %%i • i' r4 { ♦ i"r t _ y
�'r �'✓tju :`�'# 1tt ''' j'SM1 (. � 4�1•�� r. rr.,.
swl, 1980 » .-. ...
r.• w �;i t r .I ,� � �� � ism, r 1 �� wl r'.w . e�, r. _raiy,dd r � .� �i ray . � ��.� } n s' [ ,x r r ,
, wr. w4z r. r F r 1 a..• y *7 ;r,% ,�, a a.'.. "'t kW , rSM P .aksS ♦"4' w�.r�("'..,,JirY 4 ",� .yf" ♦ ' .a Y
♦ w w + w
„ t Ft..r ,. L k as rr: w' .A�.T '+ [y M� r,i ., ♦ 'fr : +5p A 77� y ,},�.! "f ... ' � d x
County o f Butte
County Center Drio-re
�`.Oroville, CA 95965
-
M�tii � y ,� MW rt •L nw ptxy�" `4 _y 3 GM;• n
t r' `w��{ • Re: Alrport Environs/Nosh=Gi3a:eo
G a es
General Plan Zonin�a Chang _
Dear ^Chaa.rman YLemke end Board .;
assume you art! e awax.e from previot:5 correspondence of
we ass
our interest in the Airport Environs planning Area north of
Chicu. 'The General Plan changes for the airport area east
-and for the portion east of Garner Lane appear to be well
` thought. out -and generally quite appropriate., They have our
support. L.
During
the rezoning process, however, we will have reser
vations about the possibility of zoning for several thousand
more 1 -acre lots, as has been proposed by the Planning Commission,
The great majority of our housing needs do noL require such
large and expensive lots. CounCilman Hays of the City of Chico
lik.-ly because- state requiremer.rs that the have are uou
also has suggested that lots an smaller than 3 -acre
� t y underground
utilities. Mich of the 1 -acre zon,ng proposed thus 'may be un
realistic and unr.?cevsa rhe questions of need and public
landsof use mapILd��signation�zoning ahowevere��.s�.ia.ne� cons�.ciei:ation. The
,`n the area generally west of Garner Lane, staff has idem-
tified roughly lj500 acres of high quality agriculbural soil:
Ev-n though tate area north of. it on Xeef'ee Road is largely
developed; the 56i7 on this 1,500 acres may be of higher quality:
Although mmch 6f it iz cut into relatively small parcels, the
agricultural p,utjshtl"Al may very well still be there4 our
organi2ation strongly advocates the preservatioh of all agri-
cultural land, if there is any reasorable possibility that it
can be kept in agriculturei If there 'is no such possibility,
' however r 'We. certainly wish to. be realistic about, that. w. We under
-_,stand that.your Board's committee (Supervisors Wheeler and. Dolan) =w.»
`,,..""have tentatively- agreed with Ithe City of Chico committee to ser--
,". iously' study all potential farm areas ' for an agricultural. desig- ;
�k..:nation This particular area certainly seems :o require more
serious consideration as`to whether it,realistically,can,be kept•
in agriculture. �
4 � T
: w .n � wa. S',v. Y.,;` s :-"0sfi� kt�= g a`'1»s,..'�ia, •�," . .. .:' .. ?1x_ '1
he area" west of Garner•, particularly toward the north end,'
further from -the City of Chico than most of the rest of the '
acreage within the planning area..' It has few eic s^„ing roads and
other services'and parts'of it have significant drainage problems.
TI)ere also seems to be no present or near -future need for any
farm land there to go into housing. If you receive contrary
info�-nation, your conclusion may differ from ours. For now,
. however., there seean, to be serious problclnc west of Garner which
�<require further• consideration before. you act la
the land use
' deszgnation or zoning for, that portion. ,l
The only change in the land use element map which we suggest
is deletion of the highest potential agricultural portion from
b the map change at this time, so that, it may he given due consid-
eration for its farming potential. A little m ..� o '
e t �.me to study
this portion cannot harm, while avoiding a pote:itial regretful
de-,icion which could be difficult to change later
we wish to congratulate those responsible for the land use i
designations east of Garner and hope that you will approve the
designation forrthat portion as soon as possible.
4Very ;trulyA yours,
CHICO 2000
By 7
fir` OHN Lr �IIVAAS, J
v Presi. rSt
JLL:pm
15o4td Supervi
f=
of
7 County of Butte
`' `r3'uly 111 1980. ;.n *i,�, H
1 M. ;�"
,v
,
Page 2 ♦ K.4 � d'Mi V
.
17
� 1
41a .,
, s n
fi
�\i �,
4.
,.',. .a � ,
k r
' however r 'We. certainly wish to. be realistic about, that. w. We under
-_,stand that.your Board's committee (Supervisors Wheeler and. Dolan) =w.»
`,,..""have tentatively- agreed with Ithe City of Chico committee to ser--
,". iously' study all potential farm areas ' for an agricultural. desig- ;
�k..:nation This particular area certainly seems :o require more
serious consideration as`to whether it,realistically,can,be kept•
in agriculture. �
4 � T
: w .n � wa. S',v. Y.,;` s :-"0sfi� kt�= g a`'1»s,..'�ia, •�," . .. .:' .. ?1x_ '1
he area" west of Garner•, particularly toward the north end,'
further from -the City of Chico than most of the rest of the '
acreage within the planning area..' It has few eic s^„ing roads and
other services'and parts'of it have significant drainage problems.
TI)ere also seems to be no present or near -future need for any
farm land there to go into housing. If you receive contrary
info�-nation, your conclusion may differ from ours. For now,
. however., there seean, to be serious problclnc west of Garner which
�<require further• consideration before. you act la
the land use
' deszgnation or zoning for, that portion. ,l
The only change in the land use element map which we suggest
is deletion of the highest potential agricultural portion from
b the map change at this time, so that, it may he given due consid-
eration for its farming potential. A little m ..� o '
e t �.me to study
this portion cannot harm, while avoiding a pote:itial regretful
de-,icion which could be difficult to change later
we wish to congratulate those responsible for the land use i
designations east of Garner and hope that you will approve the
designation forrthat portion as soon as possible.
4Very ;trulyA yours,
CHICO 2000
By 7
fir` OHN Lr �IIVAAS, J
v Presi. rSt
JLL:pm
.REZOX RUORT
s
,Aljplicant Butte County Planning Commission - North Cltico
Owner: Various
Request Rezone from A-2 & Cl to R-1, RT -10 5R, R-2, R-3 R -Q MNP F
C�c
fjoca.tion; area bounded by East Ave. on the south, Iiwy. 99 on the west,
Cycamore Creek on the north, and tohasset Rd, on the east
Date Action Requested; 10-24-77
-Numbe i, of Parcell: Various
Acreage, 464 more or less
Planning Commission Findingrg the Environmental Impact Report which
had been revised in June had been considered and that the proposal
was.11i conformity with the General Plan
Planning Commission Action: motion for approVal of the project as proposed
except that properties known as 2901 Burnap Avenue and AP 44-33-18 be
i
zoned R-3 noting_.urther that they are both contiguous to R-3 zoning:
Vote 4.:1
AYES Commi.>sioners Max, Lambert, 1Vheelet and Chairman Gi:lhert
OI; :
Commissioner Bennett
ABSENT M No one
ANSTA N ; No one
n Ccs, Planning, Comm.
AUG :� a 1°8
Bruce Norlie
10132 Jones Avenue Otov+ilo, Gal tprrsla
Durham, CA. 95938
August 11, 1980
Mr, Robert Lemke, Chairman
Board of Supervisors
Butte County�„ 1prrO
"
25 County Center Drive ' "'�
Orow, lle, CA. 96965
Re Re -Zoning In North Chico
Dear Mr. Chairman
I am writing in behalf of my parents, Robert and Josephine Norlie, and
my Aunt Marja Sisk Miller, ovtners jointly and separately, of four parcels
of land on the southwest corner of Cohasset Road and Burnap,
The Planning Department has prtposed an R-3 zoning for these parcels,
We would like to request that the zoning be changed to R'4,
The area on the east side of Cohasset Road is presently zoned R-4, so
this would certainly be compatible.
Tri: request was discussed with the Planning Department prior to the
Planning Commission July Public Hearing and, with Supervisor Hilda Wheeler
during the week of August 4, 1980,Both parties indicated no objections
and, felt this was acceptable
We Would appreciate your considoration in this matter.
4Yodr truly,
Bruce Nor!ie
BN/cs
M t�
REZOVE REPG
Applicant; Bute County Planning Commission North Ch;,,00
Owner: _.ous
Requost, C-1 zoning on AP 44-21-39 and property belonging to Albert
8 Glenn Williams be considered for R-3 instead of S -R as proposed
Looaton; North Chico Rezone area
Date Action Requested 8/:19/80 referred back to Commission by Board
Number of Parc 41st 2
Acreage ,mow
Planning Commission Findings
1'7.annin ommiesion Action: After discussion, motion was made by
Commissioner Wheeler, seconded, by Commissioner Taambsrt to concur
«ith the Board's recommendation regarding Cil bet this would be
the extent of the changes of :.:ie original recommendation.
vot t 3 b
AYES Commissioners Max Wheelers and Chairman Gilbert
NOES b
A138ENT ; Commis, loners Bennett and Mai
ABS ATS
Inter-DepgrtOO, d emoraodua
TO, Butte County Planning CommxssIoa
FRAM' Butte County Planning Department
SUOJeCT: North Chico Rezone
DATE: September 17, 1980
At the regular meeting of the Butte County= Board o" Supervisors,
held August 19, 3.972, Qrdinance No. 2133 was salol ted which
;rezones from A-2 A C -Y to R-1, RT -a, 5-R, RI -2t R-3, R-4, I�ItIP tj
G -C, for area bounJed by Past Avenue on `the SuUth, Ilighway 39
ora, the west, °ycamwee Croek on the north, and Cohas:set Roach on
the east, excluding the Thomas P. C anipt6n property AP 44-21-390
607 B. Lassen Avenue was referred back to the Planning Commission
dor consideration of "C-1." zoning; the Albert WaX and Glenn William--;
property was referred back to the Planning Co mmi.ssIon for consideration
o:C IIR-111 zoning instead cf "S-Rr` zoning:
cc: Public Narks Dept,
Health Do -pt
IS
Y
f?
&0aft
M _. r ...
LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY
u a, CLARK A, NPLSCN
L COUNTY C412-I1K „ RECORDER
a ADMINISTRAnON EUILOING, DRAWER 269-OPOVILL.,H, CALIFORNIA 95065
Telephone; 534.4561
Assistant county Clerk, Nicer Lindquist 1334.4551
Assistant Clark, 904M of Suporvl#drs, Cathy Pltts 534.4371
Assistant neoistrar o, votary, Eleanor pecker 534.4761
Assistant Roeordpr, Gwen Farland p34-4691
September 17, 1980
Glenn Williams
Rt. S, Box 65$
Chico, Ca 95926
Re: North Chico Rezone File 78-39
Dear Mr : Williams
At the regular meeting of the 'Butte County Board of SupervIsors
held September '16, 1980, Ordinaace No. 2136 was adopted which
rezones from 1'A-21' (General) to "R-311 (Medium Density Residential)
property identified as AP 44-33-44, 45, 53, and 610 located north
of Chico.
Should yo, have any questions, pleas feal free to contact this
office.
Sincerely,
CLARK A. NEL80N
County Clerk -Recorder and EX -officio
Clerk of the Butte County Board of
Supervisors
H
A:;sistent Clerk to the Board
_.
r+ l 1j
i
}
y
Butte COW
LAND OF NATURAL %'EALTFI AND BEAUTY
CLAAK A, NELSON
�» t COUNTY CLIiRK •.AeCQRagn
a t ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, OnAWER 269 - oROVI.LLE, CAL.IVOf NIA 955965
Telephone, 534.4551
'Assistant County Clark, Nlcae Lindquist 554,4551
Assistant Clark, Board of6o tt+�nvlsors, Cathy Pitt% 534.4371
Assistant Registrar of Votors, Eleanor Backur 534~1761,
Assistant Recorder, Owen Farinnd 5344t#91
September 17, 1980
Albert Wax
Rt. 5, Box 656
Chico, Ca. 98926
Re: North Chico Rezone Vile 78-50
Dear fir . WAX
At the regular ;meeting off- the Butte County Board of Supervisors
rezones from "A-2"'.6,930, Urdinance No. 2'136 was adopted V11ch
,
held September ex 6, (General) to "R-31' (Medium Density Residential)
property.denti ied as, AP 44-3.5-17 located north of Chaco.
Should y Y questions, p matt this
Should you hake an uestia.ls lease feel tree to co
ti Sincerely,
CLARK A� NELSON
County Clerk -Recorder ari.d Ex -officio
Clerk of the Latae County Board of
Supervisors
By
Assistant Cl'etk to the Board
4 Intar Depart'�u emorandum
-01 Butte County Planning Cbmmii 1 ort
PROM: Butte County P1a.nnailar, Department
8UNECTt North Chico Rezone
DATCt September 17, 108n
At the regular meeting; of the Butte County ? oatd, of SuporvisarS
hoed September 16, 1980, Ordinance *10, 2136 was adoptatl which
Te toned from A-2 (Genert-11) to 1IR-11' (Medium Density Ros7:dentl1al)
that property owned by Albert Wax and Glenn Williams instead.
of the proposed "S -R110 property icient£ied as AP 44-33-77, 44-33-440
44-33.451 44-33-53; and. 44µ33-61,
cc: Public Works Dept.
Health, Dept,
r
ORDINANCE No. 2133
AN ORDINANCE ZONING PORTIONS Qin T119 COUNTY OF BUTTBO
STATE OV CAL IVORNIAo PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 24-29.
The Board Of Supervisors Of t110 County Of Buttd, State of
2 California, Vnd.er and pursuant to Chaptor 24-29 of the Butte County
3 CO" Of 541d County DO ORDAIN as follows:
4 SUCTION 1. The h0-r0jnaj+^-vk tlocr-t-41,.3
10
11
12
13
14
is
,16 'j
17
18
10
90
21
22
gs
24,
2!
26 I
area oituatud in
the cam-Ity of butte w Stnte Of California,,
shall be and it is hereby
IZ0130d fC3 �A "R-111 (Single -r-dtily Residential) bistrict, and suclx
'area shall be sub jb'ct to t] 1 1 0 vestrictio'ns and restricted uses and
regulAtion.s pursuant to ButtO County Code Section 24-152,
Said area so zoo,ed being located in the unincorporated
area of Butte County, Chico, more r -Articularly described as follows:
I-ats 4, 5, 61 11 and 12 of 1114obart Sub" per Map
Ot Record in MOP BOOR 4 on Page 24 of the Butte
County RecorJor.
All of "Lindo Mawr �"4b. Unit No. 1 w per ILIP Of
record in iltLP 'book, �7 on Page 21 of the Bjjtto
county Recoraer.
All of "Lititlo Manor Sub. Unit No. 2f, per zap of
VOddrd in NO Book 19 an Pa&e 5 of the Butte
County Recorder.
All of "Undo Manor Sub, Uyiit No. 31, per m4p of
record in Map Book 22 on Pages 27 6 28 of the
Butto County Addoraer, nxcepting therefrom Lot�,
103 through 114 of said "Lindo Mitfidt tub. Unit
No, 511,
All of "Hacienda Oaks Sub. 11nit N 1116
o, l" per P
Of record in MAV took 24 on Pages 0 & to of the
Dutte County Recorder,
All of "Hacienda Oaks Sub, Unit No. 211 per Imp
of record in Mail 11001-, 35 on Pao 84 of the gutte,
County 'Recorder.
That portion of White Ave. alld 4djPtent land lying.
betwoe*tj the W line of tho right-of-WaY of the
Saoramentij Northdru Railroad, tura 11 lifto of Lot 213
Of "Hobart SubdivisiOn" er McA. rocord in Map PoO,
on Page 24, of tho 1guttpb countap y Aecordet, and, th6"J*C
A
2.
3
4
5
6
7
10
11 1
12
14
165
16
17
19
22
23
24
2$
213
4011� lisle Of Lots 124o LZE ef 177 of the "Del Aire Sub.
division tl"t "10. 3fl V" uIaP Of I-POCOrd in Map Book
23 on Pages 4o & 41 r,jj t1jo Butte County Rocorder.,
COnt4inilig 102 acres, more or loess, North Chico.
5ECT1014 2. t Vie hereinafter describod area situaterl in
the County of Butta� StRVO of Cali fornial shall be and it is Hereby
Zoned as an IIPT-I►, (Minimum Density Residential' -Mobile I Rome) Dis-
ttict, and such area $hall be Subloct to the restrictions alld rew
stricted iisc.g and regulations pursuant to Butte County Code Section
Said area so Zoning I)eIng located in the UnInCorpor4t ed
area of Butte Countyf north Chico more Particularx; de,,icribecl as
follows, -
The northwesterly- 5.30 ft. Of thc southeasterly 495 ft.
Of LOt 32 of "Hobart 81,Uirlsion" per map of record in
Map Book 4 on Pago 24 of the Butte CoUnty Recorder.
Tht 5out)j,,jgt0rj) 320 ft, of Lot 7 Of "Robart
Sub4ivipio d,, per map 'of record iTI MaP Book 4 on
Page 24 'he Dutte County Rtcordor.
Conti in'Ag 15-5 9cres, tnore, or lost North Chico,
SIXTION 3. The hereinafter described area situated in
the County of Butte) 8tatO Of Cabrnla* shall be and it is hereb
Z�'lit
Aud as a "R-211 MUPlex Resident
tial) District, and Such area shat
ba subject to tla restrictions. and restricted uses and regu,Ifttiwqs
PUT."'Wil't to Butte C""ty Code SOction 24.158,
Said atoa so tojfted bdlug located in the unincorporated
area of Butte ('OuntY# north Chico, more Purticujarly described as
501lowt
The 40fthilesterly 200 ft,, a',nj the southwest 0 'TI Y
11
2
3
4
I
e
2
9
10
1.1
L2
504 ft., of the southeasterly 460 ft. of Lot 25
of said. " Roba'rt Subdivision",
patcol 1 o:f that r arcel map recorded in Map MoY
49
on pass 8 of they Butte County Recordor
Lot 19 of said '"Hobart subdiVisiOnt'lr
Containing 1.8.0 acres, more or less, north Chico.
SECTION 4, The hern3%►aftex C4escribed area situated 1n
the County of Butte, Stats of California, shall be and it is hereby
zono,�; as a "R- ;-' Ct4ed-ium Density Residential) 1)istrxctr, and such
urea shall be sul)Joct r4 the restrictions and restricted uses send
regulations porsu.ant to Butte county Code Section 24-141.
Said area; so zoned boing located in the; unincorporated,
a;rov of Butte C'ountyo nortlj Chjcot more particularly descrlIbe it as
r 1; r0110v
14
1�
16
+17
18
19
20
21.
22
23
24
2'd
26
u
That portion of tYost 10 located D of St. '.mwy. 99,
and all of Lot 14 of 'Insmeraida. Tract" pet' mnp
of Record in Ajap BOOR I on page 33 of the tutte
County Recorder
Lots 2s3, 3'7, 38, 3cJ, F, 4r1 of "jobart Subdivision"
per map of record in Map Dbok 4 on Page 24 of the
Butte County Recorder.
That po tio-a of the westerlyt 210 ft. of Lot is of
said r,H jb4rt. Subi:ivis ion" located south of and
within 125 it. of the 5 right -of -Way line Of San
Cabrie 1, Drive.
* hat port iolt of 'hot 14 of said 111•16bart Subdivision" �
aoscrIbed as Beginning air the most southerly
corner sof said Lot 14 thence N 3710 20" W 23a ft,;
thence N 526 201 B 330 ft « thence S. 370 20, L 11,24
ft.. thouco N W 201 R 163.f1 ft.; thence northwoster y
along a ourve concave to the W having a radius of 200
it. to a point which bedrs S 520 40' W and is x41 ft,
distant from a point on the B 1,inc of saiI Lot 14
that 110s 235.5 ft. distant from the most erastorly
cornor o said hot 14; thou.co N 52° 411' P s 1.47 ft
r
1
Thence S 37° 20 B 238,S ft. thence S $2' 401 Wt
660 f ' ► the point of beginni,ny, .
2
Lots 29 7jO of said 1111ob;%rt Subdivision" excepting
3
therefrom that portion of the southwesterly 132 ft.
of said 'Lots 79 & 30 located north of the Sacramento
Northern Rail.roa' right—oaf*wa.y,
S
All of that portion of Lot 28 of said "Hobart Sub,
division" located 5 of the Sacramento Northern
6
Railroad right-of-way.
7
The southeasterly 1.65 ft, of Lot 32 of 5aid 1111abar•t
Subdivision"
8
The so-Atheasterly 330 ft. of Lot 36 of said "Hobart
5
Subdi:visiot " excepting thor, Irwa tt.e $0uthwesterl.y
200.1 ft. of the northwesterly 75 xt., and also
10
excepting the southwostwely 306.9 ft. of the South-
easteriy 7t ft. of the northwesterly 16il ft,
11
Parcel 1 of that parcel map recorded in Map Book 44
12
on page 1 on file in the office of the Butte County
Recorder and all that ,Property bounded on the north
13
by said Lot 1) on the east by Cohasset; Road, on the
W 5 by "Hacienda Calts Sul) No. 211 per map of record
14
in Map Boob 35 on Page 84 in the office of the Butte
County Recorcter, and on the south by "Liodo Manor
15
1.Book
Subdivision Unit No. '' per map of record in. Map B
1.7 on Page 21 of the Butte Coxmty Recorder.
16
All that portion of Lot 41. of said 111oba,rt Sufi-
1"!
division!, l,ocatect S of the N boundary of "Prontier
Village Subdivision"per %ap of roc, Tel in Map Dook
l�
38 ots Pages 76 f 77 of the ilmtte County Recorder.
1s
The N 1./2 of Lot 2 of "Bidwell lIth Sub" per map of
record in Map Book 7 oP Page 67 OIL* the Butte Couptty
20
�t�cordex .
21
All of that portion of said, "Hobart Iubdiv°i.si.otilt
lying S & 4 of the contorli,no of tho Pleasant Valley
22
Drainage Channel,
23
The northd4st Orly 200 ft. of Lot 1 of said "HOb4rt
Subdivision"
24
26
W w •W
140
Ll
y Lots 1, Iv 4 Of that Parcel Map of llocor4 in map hook
50 on 'age 25 of the Butte County Recorder as modified
2 by that Parcel. Map of Record in Map Book 70 on Page 41
3 of t}xo Butte County 90corder.
. The southwester) 2154 ft. of the a southeasterly 330 ft.
4 and the northwesterly l.:S ft. of the northeasterly 264
ft. of the southeasterly 330 fit of Lot 18 of said
6 ""A—hart Subdi.vi,sion.0
g The southw'ezter1y 1.5" ft* of the northwesteVXy 203
ft. and the northwesterly .130 ft. of the northoastor-
7 ly 330 ft. of J,0t 31 of said "Nobart Subdivision".
g Parcels 1, 20 & 3 per Parcel. Map of Record in Map,
9 Book 40 on Page 79 of the butte County Recorder.
Parc6js 1, 21 3, 5 4 per Parcel Map of record it Map
10 Book 40 on rage 80of the Butte C611nty ,Recorder.
11 Containing 150.0 acres, more or leas, North Chico.
12 SECTION S. The hereinaftor described area situated In
13 the County of Butte, State of Cul fOrni.a, shall lad and it is hey-ohy
zoned as a ""R-4,"
i4 (Maximum Density Itesidoftt,ialwXtest�r3.ctea Service)
15 Disttict, aad such area shale, be :subject to the restrictions alld
16 restricted: uses and regulations pursuant to Bate County Code Soy -
11 tion 24-144.
is Said area.:so zonoa being located in the unincorporated
19 arca Of Butte Count north Chino- moare s
y, ` , particularly described ��
91 The northeasterly 208.5$ ft, op tho northwesterly
92 417.50 ft. of Lot 17 of said ►"llohart Subdivision"..
All, that
Property bounded on the N by sats 20 0
23 40 of '"Hobart Subdivit ion,' Per map of record in
Maphook 4 on Page 24 of the Butte County Recorder,
24 on the 8 b Coha.sset Road, and on the 1V $ S by
1111aci.enda Oaks Sura No. 1" per map of record in Afap
0 hook 24 on Pa,gos 0 0 10 of the Butte County Rocorder,
by "Hacienda Oaks Sub No. 211 per map of recor,�. _� inn
26 Nap Borer 35 on Rage. 84 of the Butte Cbun.ty Recorder,
i and by parcel 1 of that parcel map recorded in
Rap Boole 44 on p4ge 01 an file in the office of
The butte County Recorder.
-3Containing 2.0 acres, morn or loss, North Chaco
4 SBCT1hN 6. The horeInafter described area situa.teet i:n
5 the County of Butte, State of California, shall be andit is
4. hereby
e zoned as a "C -C" `Community -Commercial) Distri►c'(,, and such area
7 ,shall be subJect to the restrictions and restricted uses and re -
8 944t ones pursuant to putto. County mode Section 24-10xj,
9 SaW area s(� zoned be-Ang located in, the unincorporated
10 area of l utto Coun4,F, north Ch3ob, more particularly de51ribed as
it fo];�.ows»
12 Dots 105 thru '114 of "Liado Manor Subdivision Unit
No. .31, per map of record. in hta,p Book 22 on Pages 21
13 4 28 6f the Butto County Recordero
14 That parcel of land bounded on the B by pil,,, Zalbury
16 NortherntRai.lroad�aa'nd�on the NnbyhtheW Syline he of Lot
Rd ,
f Lat
it S of said " Lindo Manor Subdivision Unit NO, 3 ."
1�
17 Ce»ntaining 3.5 acres, more or lots, North Chico.
18 SECTION 76 The hereinafter described area situated in
19 the County of Butte, State of California, sham, be and, it is horeb
20 zoned as a. "MIP" (Mobile Home park) District, and such area sh,sll
91 be subject to the m tractions and rostricted uses and rOgulati.on:s
22 Pursuant to ''Rutte County Code Section 24-:120,
23 Said araa so toned being Jotr ated in the W%i,ncorporatod
yj_
24 area Off llutte Count� north Chaco, mraVo Particularly dosrihtd as
96 foIlows
1
4-R f
Lot 13 of "Bsmeralda l'xaot"' per: Map of Record in
Map Book 1 on Pago 33 of the Butte Cour. »y Abcorder,
That portion of Lot 0 of said "Esmeralda Tract" lying
3 B of ,Iw . 99,
e4 Parcel 2 per mai or record, in Maptook 50 onPago 2S
of the Butte County Recordar o as modified by the map
1 of record in Map look 70 otk Page 41 of the Butte
County Recorder,
8
The northwesterly, 3"0 ft., th.e southeasterly 165 ft.
7 l of the northeasterly 396 ft,, and the northwesterly
165 ft. of the northeasterly 264 :fit. of the south-
easterly 130 ft. of hot 18 of said "Hobart Subdivis►on".
9 Lot 31 of said I'RobfArt Subdivision" excepting there-
from the northwesterly 330 fti of the northeasterly
10 ' 330 £t,. and the north�,r#-+��"� `A.v 20A ft,, of the north
sa.sterly 151 rt.
Containing S5.0 acres, more or less, North Chictr
l
13 SECTION 8. The hereinafter described area situatei In
14 the County of Butte, State of California, shall be and it is ` ero'
15 zoned as an `"5-11'" (Suburban -Res identcial) District, and such avec
10 shall be subjoct.to the restrictions and restricted uses and ro-
ll gulatiuns pursuant to Butte County Code Secti.otL 24-150:
18 Said area so zoned 'being located in the unincorporated
10 ` area of Butte County, riorth Chico, more particularly described as
g0 follows
21 Lot a, 91 10► 221 23, 34, 6 45 of ""Hobart
Subdivision" por map of record in Map Buoy 4 on
22 Page 24 of the Butte County Recorder.
23 The northwesterly 330 ft. of Lot I of said "Hobart
Subdi.vis ibn'° .
a
25
2
3
4
e
7
i g
9
10
11
12
13
14
16
16
II
18
19
PO .
21
29
03
24
2Q
TF* northerly 22S ft. of Lot 35 of said "Hobart
Subdivision" excepting therefrom that Property
located east of a line described .as beginninly, at
a point on the north line of said Lot 3S located
90 ft, west of the northeasterly corner of said
Lot 35 thonce southerly, at it right angle to the
north line of said ;hot 35, 225 ft. to the and of
the heroin described line.
The southwesterly 200 ft. of Lot 3S of said "Hobart
Subdivision" excepting therefrom the northerly 225
ft. of said Lot :.S and, also excepting f;Ie , Cup heasteAy
ll5 ft
The 5outhwe8to7rly r ` k' ��.,� northwesterly 141 ft. of
M i. L 36 of. r, w'i v e ^ '.tsv l,. )$'ion++
The :;v"atAi� estarly 415 ft. of the s )'utheasterly 104 !t.
of, the northwesterly 330 it. of Lot 36 of said "Iiobi!;rt
Subdivision".
The southwe,sterl.y 200.4 ft. of the northwesterly 75
fto of the southeasterly 330 ft. of Lot 36 of said't
Hobart Subdivision".
The southwesterly 306.0 ft. of the southeasterly 75
fti, of the northwesterly 150 ft. of the southo ster'.�.y
330 ft. of Lot 35 of said. "Hobart Subdivision".
The northbasterly 530 ft. of Lot 33 of said ',%obart
Subdivision".
The northwesterly 165 ft of Lot 32 of said +IIIobart
Subdivision".
Lots 1 th7rouglx 9 of I'Sycamore Subdivision" po main
011, rocord in. Map Sook 32 on Mages 23 & 24
Parcels 1$ 2* 3 b A 4 per map of record in Map too'
5S bn Page 37 of the Butte County Recor,4or.
That port -Ion, of ;land bounded by said "Sycamore Sul) a
division"" on the P, by Caton Rd. on the S, by the 11
line of the h 1/2 Of the NW 1/4 of Sec . 100 MM&R
and Pareels 1, 2, 3, 4 4 pot map of record in dap
Soak 55 oil Page 37 Of the Butto County 9ecordor on
the IV and by Sycamore Crook on the north.
Containing 120.0 ac os a more or less, North rj-i:�o.
I