Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout79 - 107 B (3)September 12, 1980 'Butte county Planning Commission ? County Center Drive 0'rovIlle, Calif. 95965 To Whom It May Coijaerns This letter is to inform Irou that Mr. Jay Carner owner of the property located on north side of Sycamove Lazio, Chico, Calif. and, Gordon * Mellne & AssooieAes have come to an agreement to develope Mr. Garner's -property. As you are unqtiestionably already aware of, But -be County , as well as the entire Nation, Is in need of affordable housing, In order to meet the demand of today and the future, it is vital that you (i.e. Government Agency) and land developers work closely together. On November 4, 1980 the voters of Butte County have before them a Agricultural Land Presprvation Initiative. Our recommendation to preserve our precious Agricultural Land, as consd:ien-tious devolopexs is to increase the zoning density of marginal and non-ag. lands. The zonings will mean our being able to build more units per acre, which will help slow the demand of our prime agricultural lands for housing, With this In mind, we ask that you not accept the planning staffs recommendation of one (1) acre parcels and that you consider medium density P.A,C. for 0#4_01-37 and 44-02"43 up to eight (8) units per acre. Our company has done extensive research on this property and have found that it is presently in the Shasta Union Drainage District. After a preliminary perculationi)-bes-b we have also found that the soil will be able to handle the density requested. With the proper zoning we feel we will be able to put together a housing unit of around 1200 square feet for under $60,000.00. We are presently trying to arrange financing vthi�b will provide for government financing which will provide for government assisted loans for low to medium income families. Also, would you consider low density (1-4 units acre) for AP#44-01-36, as all that has been stated above is essential to this land. In closing we kindly ask that you help us to once again provideaffordable housing for the people of Butte County. Respectfully, GORDON MELINE & ASSOCIATES /J//1' Sidney,Bi Gordon G� Kev'n S. Molineo Managing iartriers SBG/XSM/bjz GORMtLINE 112ft Mangy rovo 4 ASSOCIATES Chico, Calif, 95926 September 12, 1980 'Butte county Planning Commission ? County Center Drive 0'rovIlle, Calif. 95965 To Whom It May Coijaerns This letter is to inform Irou that Mr. Jay Carner owner of the property located on north side of Sycamove Lazio, Chico, Calif. and, Gordon * Mellne & AssooieAes have come to an agreement to develope Mr. Garner's -property. As you are unqtiestionably already aware of, But -be County , as well as the entire Nation, Is in need of affordable housing, In order to meet the demand of today and the future, it is vital that you (i.e. Government Agency) and land developers work closely together. On November 4, 1980 the voters of Butte County have before them a Agricultural Land Presprvation Initiative. Our recommendation to preserve our precious Agricultural Land, as consd:ien-tious devolopexs is to increase the zoning density of marginal and non-ag. lands. The zonings will mean our being able to build more units per acre, which will help slow the demand of our prime agricultural lands for housing, With this In mind, we ask that you not accept the planning staffs recommendation of one (1) acre parcels and that you consider medium density P.A,C. for 0#4_01-37 and 44-02"43 up to eight (8) units per acre. Our company has done extensive research on this property and have found that it is presently in the Shasta Union Drainage District. After a preliminary perculationi)-bes-b we have also found that the soil will be able to handle the density requested. With the proper zoning we feel we will be able to put together a housing unit of around 1200 square feet for under $60,000.00. We are presently trying to arrange financing vthi�b will provide for government financing which will provide for government assisted loans for low to medium income families. Also, would you consider low density (1-4 units acre) for AP#44-01-36, as all that has been stated above is essential to this land. In closing we kindly ask that you help us to once again provideaffordable housing for the people of Butte County. Respectfully, GORDON MELINE & ASSOCIATES /J//1' Sidney,Bi Gordon G� Kev'n S. Molineo Managing iartriers SBG/XSM/bjz �' @?.1l�Am.r�T.sru•warno.�a.r:..••.�r!,�,.,,.Y..,..o.--+�.�.-.._- .-.. 9/23/80 Chino, On,. Butte County PInnning Commi.ttce Regardi.na Parcel //OV -26-0-10)0-07 20 acres M/O Dart 1,n. Kiwis loeated on Garner Lane Turnquist,Charinc R. & Dori -9 J. 4tal ate have beon informed that you are considerinn a chance in the zoning; of our property along with other nroporty in this location, We want the rocorda to Indlo'14-.0 that ,i,-, am TO-quenting 1.jobe(A abr)jre bezoned (SRI) SRT /,or't.nP,- Thank ;you for ynur conoi,d:erhti.nn, Sincerely, Ch,nrjgs R & Dors J. TurngiAst, 1�ta`L Rt It box 522T3 Chico, Ca. 95926 342r-9118 Z 061f r I/ , / k), 1(1,7 � -- My name Is Jay Garner and I aio a property Qlqrler neat: to the airrort. 1. am goirlLy to plead for hi-density buIldinF. sites. The population of C)alifornia is high and growing higher. People have to have a place to live and at the same tire we have to preserve as much of our farming land as we can. The kind of land adjacent to the airport is the type of land, that building should be done ono but because of lack of sewage systems and water systems the Health Dept. is forcing builders back unto our prime farm ,and. As for the airport and safety, the F.A.A. and the rlity of Chico have a clear zone the width of both runways and, extended out quite a distance on each end, 11 am a pilot and I believe this is all the safeguard that need be taken for the airport. In areas where building sites have a mi niftium, acreage of 1, 5, 10, 20 the occupant can't make a living on this size par- eel so must work out, By so doing in most cases the land is not Used Very efficiently and Inmany cases even becomes an eyegope, Therefore I astf. that se-wage and Water be planned so when land Is taken out of production hi—density, living can be inau.- guratod. 1 .win, �. 555 Ulf":ffl11 IMAD a 1'),0, TIOX 1()K YLIBA CITY, ('A 95991 (916) 671«�t05 If�f'�At 1f pI i;1t 1[ 1 f it i 1 � 1 AAitEth� 1 �r 1t:A14tt1� 1! t 'i 141 A' I V {t fR t MICS 1 RAY it t ♦i1Ri t itI NH$ it t 1 % 11011% 1111/111 {1 t 1 1 ! 11u5i I ANI It i r u,ts-NI1,It ItjfDtjII41 iti i - 11ttY61A'• t 1:1tiwn,tl l t: IfA�f14 N11`1111 11t 1 i Sopto giber 24, 1980 Y. �'1tjntjing Com n�issiox� County of L'ttttc 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95926 Attention: LaWrence 3, Lawson, Director of Planning le:Crolaased•oni,r>g Change Assessor's Pared. Numbers; 4744-05 and 4744-0b 1 Dear 'Mro Lawson: a,m, an owner of two parcols of larAd located an Garner Lane. One Parcel is 20 acnes (,AP No. 47-44-05) and the other is 35 acres (Ap No, 47=44-06). strongly r.ecomm.ei these; two parcels nn ooned SR�l. to the North and zoning would be, consistent with existing adjacent Zoni g West of said, parcels. x support the C011.znxission. initiated ,a:ecorra- enda tion: to SIS-1. SIncer ely, .. Z,-Iln rn uis1 Ronald Tu. : g, professional Engineer 2425 Huston Street lYZarys�rille, CA 95901 _ RT:m Lnc11(ti, CI 9"153r ►CMAIN 'StII(701) 20,$489 _ . 6 gL1,,,1ETT HARRI NCEAWASSOCNA 'k �6. 't C. w v I FU —T-5 TR—T- —T,- —CT 1, A. N N Pill R—S 55.'1 ONS"YOFF ROAD,, 1".0, ROX308 VUBA ('11Y, CA 95991, TUA- (916) 67, 8-645 ,)ONAt 1) 11 (All I I I 1 '11 I A% It, Nt t 0 RAIMIN it I Oltltl'il W RAM I At, A I A I V I it f I f M 11 it `1 It I I hf J'JA I I if(NHI It I I 11,11my I ' 11) 1 It it v I RO TSI [ AIN, it ( I IMSAIJA It I 1'I SQ1 Ill I It t I ,110MAti I KiNDAil I 138% if) C I RIN I If, lit I ti So,ptember 24) 1980 Planning Commission County of Butte 7 County Center Drive, Oro ilii, CA 95926 Attention,, Lawrence S. Lawson, Director of Planning Ro,- Proposed, Zoning Change Assessor's Parcel Numbers: 47-44-05 and 47-44-06 Dear Mr. Lawson: I am an owner of two parcels of land located on Garner Lane. One parcel is 20 acres (-AP No. 47-44-05) and the other is 35 acres (APNo.47-44-06). 1 strongly recommend these two parcels be zoned SR -1. This zoning would be consistent With existing adjacent zoning to the North Lind West of said, parcels. I support the Commisgion initiated recornme-r.tda. tion to SR -1. F n 1 i " i t .:( i{ r i :�,. •. JI 11 rV� IG.,r /(� ( I I 'N' 'N ... V� " '�� R1 C oN :Pf�INI�S 7.S , nll'Jtit —I. 'rh w'ru I in Ar' y.r• f r • w..r.w...+...:""r""^A,..Y=•+s+nY.+n "Y' ,vf unr 1 L r...rY /.M ,•1'1,.i 1 f14,� Jt„ jjj .• J `' i .Y4.Mir �r ,_acv wawoa, .i,l ..,�,wi Je+r• F..�rr a.'v r ;ray .[1' 44 (11 r,, ysRph ��UI{d� � � % �,a. ' ` � CJ Ai t4N #A...ota f•TI. gAp•'F3A1 �• t r ,t , ! °h}tialnl�m ' '" krrr�t d f �uS SON °. � J t �>lJ;,, ♦ 1 ..�,.«�"'"t,t v r� ..'"' �, ,. «r' p i Flnr�tr:� aTI , „fid ,,..e + _ ((( A✓' � n ,.N. +'^:li JJ.TC t #. ,-..r.....�, +,M ".+i ✓ �TM k+...:+,a.!".-•� w..,,.f.,..� � „y, # ' r. 1 •.Ar i t.rtC,t. Gal fpTn�B: . (( � .• bctirlt�,r "�3, 1 aCq I � l X� ' l.."4w+ ,� ,.,�� s. •yr � ti 4 to «..+'iy. A iw 1 ! i 6FktY COti�'1wTF'f:Ah 9rdrrtljhtGintyrF! Nrdjedt Y .` '� f.'``�••iif� ' � X� �, . ��{ J `• C'_t YS,: PdlVf�a: t { I `Re Ca1ir,a�rG aPp13t3tlon tlasteen J#ecaiacdby this'dffice., 1.I . ^,,'ii46Jt' Leown,Rdc7nt re 9 1 1 c h nAto i i bdz A76 Gree,�ville, California 95W Via Of 4pproximatel 7 � acres t0 r �a�v Prd,�cµt Cexeriptionl g. r �:. �•. ,. � , Ai Mme. �.� r,r y G1 a s in ' w•� a 4 t.fty df Chico, Citan C 1r 1 hff,d o 4 j, ��•`+ �, r l ne^,al Plan Land 9 n the C ' l�rV' to CG) USI) .and „"I)here of nf'lu�:fjc/,, E+ T a.t Al�C .x- , /�,,. � "W, � • , d 1�atfGlf dt l�nrlPV,a,d;ld,t •tQnlfSr F'USSiCIle ' !� � � f I �� R Y a_tx dhuG1 fair 1 ?. r afrcU atior rig,• �nT tJ C S.IW1Cz$ 1 and f(ICI'ereiCd t..� A" y+,� 4 1 I `• rer r Ind :J tf,C Ghff„ •�< Jcrw, 1 4 A rr'("rnf61thtal R, Cadill Alt r r 4Viesl IluJtu Thu L;i1f>=dM'nfa r' YJ��tif �T �� �?✓"� i � � .• W. \.� t4 nr. J Y•er u LJ ad ACnrtcY td consult vith yCci Itutare 4 cr"• a raft71'r#rani rn' al JIrQdCt ��r 1 OFA rawauu .....W* � r % dl^ VoUatrfye "e-Oura- 1 4, ` t f ,�. • urx , Jt t fir" t r', f n ,r �rJr t t t t t ° X p., M CfYf-e,� tft�dulla�; �r 7r1 r1{� � i fes' rasps ?tc 5 ti " l C t r 1 • l� y�� q ,. �JrcOtfice. cr" ` Y ar rr N o r,aticn dr, 1� qa .. , p N.-Nre tine rh0romorital kcvievr'f3aa� . 1n tfle near fllturEl. 1,0 vlill am d IOL' ., _ r, • . . dtfng, _ .iurrr. YC no a r ,hp for iot'r ' 8rr:':Telyy Y JRrV 1� wRl •� ' ",! 41 � l,�{ 1'f, f `i� t". Y 1 �t 7 ` •� A 1, t �,, f•" (, i FI' _1 'Fir a c r �ro et*: , . �'• ° " ylin , 1Jalrillrf 7 n! li w.r1.t,.r,s"tu , 1 v t: r�;. S u t , N u r �� . S!"r. A t' int 1�'d,irier r a ` a r YSt. 7 n S.P •e., i./wil is �S���JU Ilt, �.� •�t �„ ilJ li d,,p, 4• ! 4 ��'+ InR''r "N /y,.• .[N 11r 1 �•.. r Gin,h i �4r'A`� .M i 1a 1 NAf A� t t i 7K• :..,, .: i B l M1� S: "'^`i' y �"• °� 9�i YJtr � •..4}iw�.i• �I J* �Jn�N� y �6 1 • \....M fff ll '• F7N7io Co. P18hTr�11��"�►jjh •. a, i 4 HSR}J"K ,A �'.�� y (�I�ry � ' �.J , OCT 2 9118 .0r0V 110A CAIiIMI 1 77a err 1A) .r . 7f IVA WAI'T'ED & E3RI"r"r t ;` Firfiixhy svit y flLJAi- W. WAITlti... A L.AW COfAPORATION RONALO J. MMITT MIAO PIRMUITF 10019 ROAD scarr J. WA4.LACC SACRAMENTO, CALIPORNIA 06820 PHONa (,Did) 4a0•J103 September 22, 1980. i Butte County Board of Supervisors 25 County Center Dr. Orovill.e, CA 95765 Re: Public Hearing set for September 24, 1980 Gentlemen: I represent the owners of approximately 750 acres involved in your di-scussions set for September 24, 1980. We accidentally discovered the meeting by having a friend see it in the news paper• The owners of the hand I represent are Cecil McIntyre, Mary McIntyre and Fletcher Brown, and the land is represented by parcel numbers AP -48-02-02, AP -46-32-10, and AP -46-34-26. As you people surely ,should know, we have been in the process of spending a good deal of money trying to help the city of Chico determine feasibility of a sewer assessment district in that area. My record's show that county officials should: be well aware of the sewer assessment district. I have been informed that there has been at least two meetings attended by supervisors, public work directors and public health directors,, and I ani sure that you know that engineer, Ellis Rolls, has been Fran tidally working to determine the feasibility of a district: We have been relying on the fact that the normal procedures and arrangements for annexation between, the county and the city would be followed, and we cannot understand you allowing a, + rezoning hearing of our property at this particular time. We strongly protest and ask that our, property we withdrawn, and we remind you that,rel.ying on our previous meetings and contacts, we have incurred ions detabl.e expense for aerial maps, legal fees, environmental impact reports of our own, traffic studies, etc., 1198+0 CSraville-A CAirfgs'n!A .I DAVIP W. LANTIP nT. A 10113 QAK PARIS AVIZNUR CHIM CALIFORNIA 09020 Butte County Planninf Commission. orovillo Ladies and Gootlomen., Oct. 25, 1060 As a, geog raphor my profosr, anal interost is land rase, z Dave been stodyins land tasr,, first in America, more recently in California, and still more recently in Butte County a.tltt C11ico(since 1957) and around the world for 40 years Wo are blcssod here In California with perhaps the worldl choice climatic environment(dry-summer sub- tropical or I'tied iterrancaA) , On 5 continents this environ hent tovors Ina of the hand Mass yet contains M of the worltlls poople, This is the west enol of the American ''sunbelt," Continued. popu;ation gro+vth is inevitable. With sadness t am predicting(and, hoping, T an, wrong) that Chico w1.11, have 2O0,O00 by 2(100. Affluent senior subairbLLn- ites want to escape t)Ie problems of metropolitan California (Southern Ca. and, the Bay,Arca) . T, hope we can accept this growth in an orderly manner with the minimum of sprawl, I believe we can do so without destroying our fine Vina loan farm land, Stopping sprawl means that someone getsfiiurt-(i.e., cannotsell land to bo converted into housing tracts),'If some people are not so hurt, there will, be no fine farm land at some future date, As a. geog;r'7:phor, as a member of the Citizens Advisory Committee for the Chico (,eneral Plan, as a member of Chico 2000(and as chairman of its Chico Beautiful committee) l urge you to designate the area south of llegart Lane, on troth sides of the Midway, as A-20, sincerely, David 1V Lantis Baha Co, Planning Comb. OCT 2 8 1580 0;oville, California WILLETT HARRIS DURA. CEAU/ ASS OCIPIES N F' R R 9 A R C I I I I T 1", C T S - P t. A N N 11 R 9 555 ONS'r0l'1 ROAD - I).(). BOX 308 1 YU10A CVYY� CA 95991 - 11-1., (916) 673-86,45 DUNAI U If tilt ( I 11. It I I IAWRItit t t. HOPI% It I I I OUR I S I 1111KAY I At Al A I ', I R, I I III R10 it j I It I I if IN If% It %: IIAR141 111111 It It I t t ItOSI I ANI it I HONAI 13 It Tf I(%QI-JSI It t I IJ(Jk - I KI NIIAI I I November 5, 1980 ,$Nkjt , 111 1"L 1. 11 IR I Planning Commission County of, Butte 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95926 .Attention: Commissioners Max, Lambert-, Wheeler, Bannott and Chairman Gilbert Re., Proposed Zoning Change Assessor's Parcel Numbers: 47-44-05 and 47-44-06 ,Dear Commissioners: I am an owner of two parcels of land locaLod on Gjarner Lane, One parcel is 20 acres (A. P. No. 47-44-05) and the other is 35 acres. (A. P., No. 47-44-06). We support 1.1 -ie Commission ii-iftiated, recommendation for SR - I zoning for t-1-1ri s c two parcels, The easterly portion of there two parcels, containing the best soils, have been developed into Xiwi Vinyards. The remainder of these parcels contain very shallow soils with limited agricultural uses. This soil would be considered marginal agricultural soil, at best. The econon ics of farming this undeveloped acreage is not favorable. The adjoining parcels to the north consist of I acre + lots on which residential homes are being developed. Consistent zoning of the area and the bes+ utilization of the ,I,ndcveloped land would favor SR -1 zoning. We strongly urge the commission to inc!14de these two parcels into $R-1 zoning. Sincerely, Ronald Tiarniquist professional Engineer 2425 Huston Street Marysville, CA 95901 RT:jW LAKEPORT. CA 9$453 160 MAIN STREET 47071 163-649q Fran Shelton tV J iI-j5tX,k'Jt0ci Real Estate suoolalisis 180 Collssaot Road` ""hico, California 95926 1916) 4916786 Noveinhnr 5, '1980 Butte County Planning Commission 25 County Center Drive proville, California 95965 U,: Proposed rezoning of North Chico property to A-40 .from A-2 Dear Commissioners: This letter is to express my opinion of possible rezoning of .an area that includes proper4y I own. My 1.60 acres of almonds .lies approximately North and South of Keefer Slough, being divided by the slough being the east side of the Esplanade. The 60 acre parcel lying north of the slough is poor soil and I have been told it will never make a good orchard. Also, there in currently 47 acres under development; adjacent to the 60 acres and across the, slough from the 100 actes. X am actually in an area of active development and without question will have problems in the near future from the noise and spraying involved with an orchard operation, I own other orchards and do not want to develop good orchard ground, but with this property our planning started too late to protect me. Alao, the property was appraised for Court purposes a year ago and the professional appraiser gave it a potential subdivision vsluati.on. I've attached a copy . of his comments Therefore, I am adamantly against any zoning that would prohibit my right to use the land as needed in the future Sincerely, rran Shelton FS/v1 Ranches - Acme& - Resiantial - income Propsrty - Cornmerical - pevelOoment x � > c c 4 �, yjx:•. � `-.x cif'?' ir�,�Z{�•Y ��. ��-�+ - a *.ate ...•k eJ `` 8 E. ., •..� i �r r s lei u`.��. �o�xn` fi3ar._.i. �� _ _ _ . �a �• f :z� • d ~� :irr _;a rf land y J . _ 31ouc±; ..° u Rt, `ir= public M ..ac. tNEl zer ti ir? Asad vat of `_ k3 - l clatification or tai.: a.xfir-5 t3 d_ai. a�- 'it-rlt`aZ as it -N l$tes tc: fey` }� n,, property andn' ad3a^r.n€ neigr•�.c,�. `„ Frank Bennetts Y)sLr -ation r .a` Jz^petty soutt of Veefer yam,. slrugh has no draina ,,h is in error. ltr ,.t and 7unson parcels are z� u adi-scent to the r,4ud r.s =c : Drainage �' 1. I :�e�_:t rases rains o been researched, a9d tIs possible ir_ praetica I hold a drainage (; eaeement on. both sides of thc Su -sr k zRrcal, 1-r-a^hi.ng fron my land j south to. the drainage C.iannel. i can us"' t y3S 'r3SI--iiBllt.9 or I car move off-site drainage eaters dire- tl,. f=i the south-west corner fs oftr"y Land across to the chagnel by waycf a ru .ing Station. A more locgicel soTuLion for tt.f devaloper rF t'.a t:,,. Parcels, is to engineer one systans for both. the sane -i.,-es car, then drain both ,parcels of lard., Bickley also has a short frontage on yh= Mud Creek Channel. He 71 could wove water via a pumping station intr'#the channel. Or, he could: participate with Munsen and Minto parcel developers and have a lesavxbensive_and more viable systen. x My reasoning on "soil vs homes" I'm doing to add here also.: It � may at leas, be of interest to Ron Maxx :rho voiced the fruscration of � trying to sort out owners claims oft bad soi1Sul-wich are really bad�3 from augers who may simply r��snt Zoneing for more valuable development property, Our sail,, with a well and .Berl-li nes, totally fenced to keep out pocple and motercycles, could ;�.rbduce fair to mod wheat rropsi, or grain _lay crops. Income would then Eexcecd costs uhTch it does not often tic now, but it mould not exceed costs i, adequate amount to ammortize payment on : he cost of the 'i` � �hrel lin-as f a4out gCiJ f. u{ b anct. a well and pumping system and main lint (about _25000 to 301,000_%)�- Even if the well and cguipment were armc-rtizcd over n 30 year ge_iod, 1. doubt the plan would' na sc any ecanomic :: onaa. , If seems rest logical to na to c ntinuv dry crap. hap f =ing orals' anti: this land can be put into proper residint'ial use,, and to keep all housing, off of all Cuttc County Columbia S_nar: and ViLoam soils, toAl .. � _ ♦ , I••rr•, ✓.}. r: r rr, y^,In � Te,r,r•M I'' F ^ a y r • r' Nrw. Ww .0 ! ..'tr ,,vr«, dgl Fs•r 1 M M x+ +rf' „ kyn. tlr• • a.Ar �r d, 4w '1; t'.r - �: r :,. .. ,.. .,..i.-S2•�r..tT •,l/a'.. r,Y. •r,,'•'� ><'a.'. MrI 'd, e. F, «�. 1 / rr •i�;r'�ar.rj: «.1 nt. r�Nr.J''rt 1`N1�� "•`.r�tl vY 1N' 1� , t ,4 .. "" v J .�1 :!.t,�k4y1 .tviir da. A#1 1 r±(` ,} .F. '(Y ,.,,r,•+ „M M /f iA•,w... 1� 'w, R' , ry n f .:S;a. ra V,J�.t.•;".R, 'a + ''' .+.....+....u..,..... ..�+`�,�J'�'i�; .'»°G'.•H„ ,yr,�#wry�}!y_Ik rr'v �• �;., `S "h.. - dC ;'.rt r":Y41r .�` .[' {,r�'M RY "• / ..r �'A y'C ?W`•.,.r',t,'{I ;N _.V M��., r.� ry'•�;ipx -.�y {t�q,µ .. - a.. ''a yft �1r`'Kr � 'S � ,`'jam r��(, yry�•r 1y� +�itt �C ^.. .- Ar ''}H ,°l Ti:ia,xl'`4� ,I�Mi n1%r i, f.vr/,{, ' S%T1 ♦ it i- r ^S T •A'"�ri r, Ytl{ly'�f+i •,1,�rr+'�"t. r(�k r•11f OD! fta t " ` i ! �• ,t w° M•"?.� '� : Fr. • ' •fi . ' '.r'l yr y «. ` { r f ,7 {v J* •''i *47y �Ej�•"�i 6r1 '� Y' lrt�f t: Y , r:• r t W4 coo Nr t r .�,F•y,, or..Wyf`dv},..,. r ,'«..r;+ •r•.,.t 1 tjr !I f.•r:.: .11 '�,,,(rr.,�• 'Y„ '+>tI ,w. ,:€.`{ �4: V,•!':�, '+:,,_'. • Y j{! .;w Vit, r'r' .'r� ..,rr �r,.:! I1. qf, �!' r d tv,,�. r 1 1.,,/'+ y:r• �jf1y r '!, ♦ If, '.�F» ,. , „yij r y', �`f" Y, 1 17f+,rN'�,:•'y{",�,,}+ra,V,rY .f »^' "' I"1/' 1'h p,. - rr,yx,J 1 f' ., ,�. ;'ti 'r..•.� ♦ , � r •:! ,] .h �«,,4 - y �.}y .. ry) !1 .y ' 1 �r •'I .�: r r , ' 'iu,. r, � l.• d` .Y11' ! 4 Y r'r+: FYI. ,,.rr}Ar1 / �.t.�a:! :.ti ,rx{,41j�. 1'Y �•C1,a1!,.r i -y'1{rr i; �f `''''1.�-:'^%t '• •Y =�..0 P, r f... ,% - tlt � �• r, r `4 F' i• � '�r: " „ ' ." .5�;', _nl' 9, ''1',r r4 «r I,�rl„ ,?. 1 �, (,!°y w1 t •4i`ii `St,. rt :f', t' F �Y wt F.,1 ��r'�rF r�ld+ ♦,''�' rPt1� fu•fr'" •T,C •l. '.,".r.Y 1htl,.,9% t},Y ', ,•' :It s< ';t . ;' .a "+t, w • « . 1' ,rr ,,'3"�,, a }rl•�i'. ltt r. •n al:!'Y' y.,, a ,,Ct �r, :s.: , ,l,,y l r a r al '. ii" r. i.... y v .1 r try. rFv, '� •-. f t ti r)w "'�. •f ; C'. t ',! 'i s.. 14 „Ilf tat. rl'" :# f , t'•, / 'r ,d f� ,4 1' «.k ,. i•�"i" 1 tt ti.r.`y ,1 `«I T,°t , t 1 tr�+ .'t.`1µ ,pt '' .'r !' �.`t Rr�•,"�Y, .. L! 1AS u' - " w• /Ai�;.,� ! 0 . A' `r,. rwr' ^ fr.' 'r,� ,. frig f,t. r°w•r fZr'yr:•lr p. , ♦ 1y 1 « t r, r«p ,,.. wi r tirrl It +r"{ r r „ I/a4-1'. 'Ja UApfi dt'1'«1 x r j mina'. y�` y • , • ,..✓, r.I �1 a. , r,r.�. L-�r� �i�ti ,•�F;r« I „•. i.«'«:. 1 .rr .1, ryI tl� •r, N v,a'�' •..: �+ �, '+i br. ., ' rr' ! N•t fatal " !'" /Y /� r . s'` * ... 1 . i. �„ , , r. PARCEL •. 1 rr. 1. Jr rr. N . r ,y.. L •I, N iry rl . U a 't}+".G SI _ .+:.A ! „rA 1 a ,4fat+ai•A : s ,!}' « ' • •'i3 •ra s`.�,"s , y, *N,Isa.:yN,9t'R i ' �� K ` i�r •� , r. i. .....: it • .. y tr 1 L. � , r ( P . , tl Fn ,r. �t' •11l1'0/s0 v trt', r;, 72.79 ACRESWf' ; +' '•�t'ir ",f', ,tf.u!rX.,l: „11;t:• i t +'4:,�r, e.; •.y..: .r r. ,, ,r .its b�, +r"ar %,.,kv , Ifi R N ; Sltp 41a Jt tl t Y4 p0 t F.Y r ,rr. i... ( } r �,yY f• , . MM•131 it •) >7 '?- « n,r• t 1 rf �, f f7t fr' .. I ) tats' ".der «.«.,,".'4.4ra,.- .� ^y.,,MF; •�♦: .Y� ;I 9j ry)w,'. ,�.��r+, x fSpu.e„ t •'f[ �+ y«, ,•f I�M`Oor r. r •f Wvsl.•t sa'Trr h 't.,i + �t,.l r t.. •r t 1, W 1 e, `�/ {t._ ."•`,` •/. s` l pv r r. 4 f f 1 '1' r r. 1 e r. rr 1+.,,,,P-^.i oMao'W`r rN W' i .• . • `; «.. .•ia r , .j,• S .• y, ,. , " � v/ r Y, , �'b' M 1 tf Y � v !w. 1 1 t� ' 'R " j, Ir t ' �"' -•M�� } t ' }i' `, �;. ""w.., '• ,. �. '�+�•' , ,. ,q� er,'.. ? •r•..y."'x {;�-1e i4'y rl''/.. rr' It rN1i^1'►0 4 foo oo'„ L !!t ! P �' '1 •.��• Vii,• N /•,�:I.rA =4 o'r'..r s•l�a` r d • !o•lOrt{w !.. ♦ + A (- ti tf ►t a. •F• r t•, 'Qi '�« r i . ! 9 r / 1'" .`�" J , toot� i , f 1 Y '«.' rANra !' w. iAi'fA' , 1 '• "'`q,«''!. t t 1^ r /,. '.A r ° J ":ti .sl.{ { t Rt lf�w r •� ft. yor ,y'' r r ' fa w rY. IU,Ia r r _ '1 ,Ir • r"r+ f t / ..r Y;+ _ r A 1 N ON) j * '• 1 v: f`ot'rf f.1 ,' '„ h 'Y . t r+ Vol a , r . r f r toot$ ` y A w !ib► , • ,, ^ { i1'1:o 1/• � Y N Ot r 1..�., N e sa' a"t N Sn It "-' . ,-' / , e' (r, v1oo� fl to'�.r' t?i{ntt .+�r♦ p�`�.A.- f,rlN !', f 11•aY al`N la! 01 ^'•wy . kr,, 1 iY•1!'It+ `' . Nt1*N't t `n _+1• M1 ' / ,� LI •' wN,+/ 9 " faN,' ,« ' ' N.1 M� III , 1N N'1Q' Q• ,fel. t « ; ++ , A I III J ' t I } Ma1ol' a/TNIt'rf" kljsa{t' f Ita' a for» ! +' r''t� a,Ivu!Y ur su• }vr`r 11 aY-- Do Fr }/r L tu'lf. 0. ., a r! n ,• - r , 1 1114 " r}f+r fft r !T n rip fTt•sl r' rrYl LI tt 1, r _� , reFf faN lr aPr too' { _ » L I tlt n` I I rlF lf,la, • , S °trtF" ""' "•SACRAMENT0.81 SAN JOAQUIN ilsrrJ r DRAINAGE DIST�tICT r. t al• f �.. �. r' NIQNT 0F WAY H EASA+ENT 4t '�•1i >9 �' � •,� f � i' { aooll uN.oa,la ur t' ta► ! o..t . .�> , • r p IAt t z... ✓ * ' � 3a � " p ' U 1 !ft•1!'a1`a loo aa' i«'' • �`��l•IOOiQ' � 1!A pO t1?f rt 11 / �•� ♦.,r• 1!, i . '' , ` •A `^f /f Nl1[1100 (rtw I 1.• .f F .,a l!'NO.. J A•MP it! F'�r' . rte'• Y',\ :, }f t "*rAii+ils let srst 0.1 Irt{' ,_.+j "'`"+w..._,.......-..,'►r , r r `.«•..,�. ,* } r yr v .1 j �j/ .a.' (.� t C' �` 1 l,S• `�j r ,! i Io•!T S� ` ' 42, v,, •tt 1 f'.�r ��"� 0, j, .y PARCEL 2 .' hS,ACRE.�i , N \� 75.38 ACRES 1 + trlj PARCEL RAMP > , , THE N.E. I/4 THE N. 1/2 ` E � '*,r OF THE S.E. /4 Btl A o�tar/.pttacrra �" 1 .. PAROL 41,':; PORTION OF THE S, 1/2 , ►! fr N �a. l OF THE SIE, 1/4 SEC Ioi haN.7`Nrt rtdA*t or /urrr, a.:o9 a.oa,lra u} » ,+'i �'4C , �i rF 8,60 ACRES r ! T ' fir, r4W,4/'!/`t 70 .Ir of loTO•ola,n•r ,,.w." ... ..,y.....:..w-„,„.a,-NooV 14 W'1.:^b....wl-...,. Ita00f��^-,. '--•":+..r .! �__:... .....,,V:-: 11%�Y.�Q�-, y�� t Ja M,F[C,h.'+ttp..r"l lYt `+f. .1'R.1 K.,Y1'/+,4 M. r ' Y'yr� 4 r.r .. .GrGN ►w A. _1T. s. 4} .! BUTTE COUNTY .__.-o",-�.1_.P.-..�...». r.,,...»---•�3a�la..._a _._;. Af'`N Na!•!r"N'4 _ wfw•Sf'9l`♦ ! r�r..�.... CARNE 1_.�'(.,-.. afar ,. !!i's ;.m":. , �o .: t , w oo• frol`. -- -- CALIFORNIA vA tot � t0 "�., .. 1tt 1 � .. Saa•1 }/,. ' y •let " f!•f " w r 1QGEND ►n•tf'+1 LANE I xf r' FOR r • ) • t4 ro iil for ts4otto r !'S. ” ,• sat ! RI L Pi��� Na fAt JY futt0 • . r GARNER, YNDE, &t .:1.• +001JAI A wwxs.. r t» , tt 0 I 0 A1 to at i,1410! '` yyY� AAcCAIN ASSOCIATE t, t 44163 CI t . ,L W.tM atto ►art t rgtl,na. Nt 1 • ' ,, , e +t, + ++ , Y+�� '�! t 1 ! " i r. Y ,, tr7NSSlttlMf [ �G'NC p5 R Y •+•.. ",:. '+»..ar.rmaA t i +t At,M :, r1 r 11 .° • r, r , 0A! 1411 AVE- Y, SHEET Zii,'t , IR jpll r e 4 kk W *Oom LL ✓' ma=y- 1f16 iwi r...,aa7,�,•, ;, . CZ t CJ�it_ l/CJ . • 0 1*1"�k tL, L �, ? » a^Y! [f lee-.F'�Jl:t� � ��i4r :Ni ',''.ePti�lV .jr rJ. y.:• 4 it ( I 13ui a co, planning COMM, t7roYille� ��iitorni a, COMM. �?ravrdltr, t,:nidt�rr„;,x November J5, 1980 Butte Ca. Plr,nning Conm go on 7 County Center Dr, Oravillo CCS M65 Members Of the Plpming Cotmnis,sion l ar.: writing this letter to iterate severa spoke against n -j+0 zonin for Points l made nnan T writing to orbic � ' property an Gn rnar Dane. sx� also concern about- several statemonto which were mead, by you, the mcmbc�Y s of the Pl��aua n�. Conuui onion, during the Closed Por- tion of the hoarin& on the xozoftina of o- `�-_a Lurie aroeo. far, Carnor and xiol' s received the �r,�<oss3nn, front the st,E;oraerats mcdat that there elan sono doubt as to trhother this area jaa,a nese nary ar ready to be; developed. xt is my opinion that this 18 a: priMO housing area and deM11tel, f not Ag land. SPcaJcing as a; farii er, this is the typo of soil aur homo a ohould be built on so tro can protect the pr:4le roils 1400't of toim. The rood is hero noir and sinra such th:!11z;s as oolvino drama -a problons, telco tiro nna>nox-ey to eared egad/or re modya, no1r is tile t3e10 to do Vzo ixeli.t ina2.r plonninc. ing also the n gad om i?�17roNsiOn th; t there t�rds Wne favorable feel.- to let the nort�aarn parti,on of the area dovel.op because of the l aolc Of dra ZGa probltrnas, Inn mind, this Mmauntd to lesp,fxo61 subdi vizi.nn and 'rill tend to penalize those and eastern 'Poe tions of the arcaTraditionally nroPort;�- a�rners in th© southern tr,x ti:e xo ortsr rr�dxt oiaal r ~� too er,,.es; or will p w in b0tween as potential subdivision regardless of the zoning. z reaerd to nrotecting the farmers ill the area, it"s too date: The soil is ,duct t�,o t��.ro�t�l to Pi�r�uco TI of the Petr fnr),ers an the artea shOWS. I a�r�otQ eady as the eotrimctxy as to whrt chemicals x a u- p beim ro„ tx�cted sass alla;rac 1:o i;ct ti its Maar oa0 e ai�aps. 1'ho sr�rays' for insect x for me ,tillr .,.et trona, not better, in close to beu:� worthless. This as I requested, ars - 0. �p ate of ,rhotiKer l ars zanerl $R -i, ��/�C i,� juut gin al0 no � an econoalic°,unit for this nk�r areal soil., YOU ti'rill be a:cconPl sh no4-i n�; to as 41ona l favor corc areas. _tkmt, section, an a .t}�alt+ r^ u�aox tkvf: �,ttez�,rrt�n� to restrict t sas °n areas. l t�rould l,ii:a to 'CEer rr„ €5ca.,vlcas to perconall.y conduct a tour so You enn see first hnnd, the topo,�;raaphy of the Irholo ax6a uri fog, rozonino. l fol it would be vox7 bonefioi0-1 in holping, ,Mol rorck: your doaiaiO4. Sincerely, 73-, Harold G. Dic1cley lG6 Fran HIl.l.ard live, Chico, CA 9592 w w._Y 312-6309 e BOARD or suptavx`soIts COUNTY Ori BUTTE, Ttt 1}:tmt NOTICE nate NoVeMber 18, 1980 rt It l a SOX -twAxxl,y rx ' E3D.xt,t xa t�r3i WUV 11280 Orovil lo's 06b v x tDIDiQrtDr, lrraS:l,,l c,�xrD��, 41th a^ s ; l� t�:x y�'. � � = �xx rOn;a:I:4ois.7tio rl Off' V()vr�r'z3nm, n aw, ,a o;j A;Y4zxr_, I' ort;h t�'" t }', cra �;<t;�v}' rz t3 11-44"Y NNE mmi Coha3:qt tt, jinn yrarticlllr,,rly wrt tD °z vonloct< to my 1P� r:x�ra� 2t�rx��rn r3.3 /�,; ��r;- �,.�° 4� ;"' MY Yet' � . �.. `.. /4_ � Nlol J,,i boundowl on tho °� o , l; F nr3 :r,vlrv3 1r t t;.� rit3 r"(jt y G'r or",3c 'Intl ;"/Y6%}itD?t;7rra /4it''si;� * Am qir:}'t th 'r=t7J k?'?C�!i�i'i no lAa*y,+an s.3x°'t93.rl,jl-e The s�)j3, On trjjk j 9^."'.kr����i11?/'ri.pla.2y ait be It, fr) NIrzxiy ;y' r Thr x^r fix= bo�an no rrofit, la tho ,1C3;1��1 F"sI'F" T:" x'Fr'=rxE,1� f0v f i',.`'tri.l` g, G?'Df;'•' :I'tt t� rC' 7�1 °tE3 fo 14)Ll`a.il�, • TI; ono o 4 j + T t'Or f-'ut u"O xx tri k Yi n �7i1 ,�.r7,t� t'4�r t<;kx�a t,l°x�,r�t ;t,�� 'S �.�:� M F� txrr;:�: t,r,� ,<<:: the good f,irr3.njj j,)jIs gind the no4. Pvr; fUlly lut,iort 31l-1 z�3w "ter .. t. :r� �t�rtya 4th . txn? xis£,=�rzt tD that tion, 11 1,1 , roct�,tjex ; � c�tv (or zaxrJr lls on ow:, ant; tt t 'W 4.'-`lll,Y 3' ,-T Ojlt ''ti�`C7'E3 j x°U C13'A, 4w far ».1 r'h r.. In th� ri.a v i T')1. � be C7'C �rCt','` t,!}' raxl") "zonly,, " .,h -"r iaa�i�fl .i1 r tixx`?i than "M-1) by tp ;�rrk;'a� � �� ����.'"t� tht"J cl'r?s✓'" rxO ,)r b,,on t_ / t l 'j-uld y i1z z�e��rrx tsDsrz,.. Kir /.n,Dn w "wr" .t, ;t, ":t c; t; vc'� h D� 33W on thi•1 ..� y. °T'kijxi; yz u r;ion of _.* Ours I'. JAW014 MINASIAN 4AV:Iu HANKINS MINASIAN PAULItYAN MINASIAN, WILLIAM H. 9FlnUANCE WILLIAM 11. Q.AHR$ty III a I>im w MINASIAN, MINASIANe MINASIAN. SPRUANCI> F BA13ER ATTORNC YS AT LAW Iqu) hino A'trIECRi' AT OAK t3Y'RagT F. /S, 114)C Id7o aHovlt.LFL, CALIFORNIA 05960 butt Cbv;nryty Plarinint coi9 rai8n iron 7 C:Ovbty Center bri v e orovrillo, California 95065 proposed .PezQn ng Dear Bettyp TL'LI PHONIX 033-2110D ARITA Coag oto IN R rm.YiNca Iiavorl yO FILB NO, As you thio off ice ropy lsents a number Of ayrici31tural Ia,PdOlInOrn located in they area of Rock Cr;oek, WO Understand that a. rrapo n l for reconinq of the area abov o V*VhWa,y D9 And draining into Rock Creek is Presently before the Planning Commiscion 1 as surc you aro aware that ttjic lando rne. s which wig roproaen•t havo propooea the �ormat;ion of a drainage distratr:� and the ostabli shm nt of the institutional machazti.sms in the form ra.t 0 Cc 1"Ity sorvi.ce area Or dr,-rUlnage district in they arca above Highslra.y 09 prior i -o any i, ttenZivr urbandQ Irel aper ez�t such a SR -1. . As you ye3xea4,r thane stens are. Pracnedtnei both by the landownoxs b low Highway 99 and in aocordana e v,ri.tn a rirai.nage ��tudy cuairliaUDsi,onod by they County Publiot worlts Department, Our cancorn is that to approve a ono (1) a0rc mini>a I..m pian of dovtel- OPMOnt Within this 4roa without having thol institutional me thod i.mpl emrnti ng 'the drainage plan, incl lAdina a co -,tract by the drainage entity above 111ghway 9q With the entity rospo sible for gVera,ti.oa and maintenance of rRoc 1c C;Coek below 99 and to the 1 >�.tt7 " c31i1 ntC? River, 'p V1�.11 �w'S,.I��%``7ounw� an air+er'4jdy +`r_.rjotjj T prtf*ob3,e'm. eYe ;.a01-taVe that this probjen can be worked ot1t. Tb r6j)o al ire regard to retaining agrioul,tural type Joni ng Within the Anda icsr the present is cana t►teat 11 th an ultimate solution to the drai.naglz! problem whidh MaY vary well a.l:loxaj jtaore, intense urban devt'o1.onment at some lator time, To i.nSteMad propose to allow for 'thci ittense. urban dr_rvejc.pmant ijz the form air' ono (,) a.ctO minimum l.0t$. At the present t.ima without those mIU x ean,3.t� s for solvritq the drainage problem is si.lnply not P • 'd$'IIIgi� iei�'meeaeeuxa.:.. __ ...,... _ H C 't'f1 0� /� �z-r �.+r^• �.., r � i t d r i f 1 1 '`_ �A "'"""4�r"r`""`."_.�.,......, � ,r' y r , 77-4 1J.*53 iY' MINASIAN, MINASIAN, MINASIAN, SPRUANCr & BASER � / TTORNCYS AT LAW R JACKSON MINASIAN ET STREZAllIOHANKINSMINASIAN 1tlOf 1lIFiC1 r AT OAK 9T€7f: T :#AuL r1YAN MINA51AN P: 0, PDX f 0l) rml ItPHONK 1132^20110 WILLIAM H, 6PRUANCF OIiQVII.Ln, CAl.1N'OifN1A 011960 ARCA 0009 Oio WILLIAM H. DA'UCR III IN RitPl+YINO ►fe!;Wg17 `rO ,: OKIrRLY A: MOTH November 19, 1980 OILIS NO, Betty Blair WfoCo. ,P%nningCotntvL Butte County Planning commission NOV 2 01980 7 County Center Drive Oroville, California 95965 COroville, Carifof•111a Ile: Rock Geek Drainage Basin Proposed Rezoning Dear Betty: As you knot' this office represents a cumber of agricultural landowners located, in the area of Mock Creek. We understand that a proposal for rezoning of the area above Highway 99 and draining into Rock Creek ,is presently before the Planning Commission: 1 am sure you are a;,are that the landowners which we represent have proposed, the formatic�z of a drainage district and the establishment of the institutional mechanisms in the form of a County service area or drainage district in, the area above Highway 99 prior to any intensive urban development such as SR -1. As you know these steps are proceeding both by the landowners below Highway 99 and in accordance with a drainage study commissioned by the County Public Works Department, Our concern is that to approve a one (1) acre minimum plan of devel- opment within this area without having the institutional method of implemanting the drainage plan, including a contract by the drainage entity above Highway 99 withthe entity responsible for operation and maintenance of Rock Creek below 99 and to the Sacramento River, will compound an already serious problem. We believe that this problem can be worked out. The p oposal J,n regard to retaining ;agricultural type zoning within the area for the present is consistent with an'ultima-te solution to the drainage problem which may very well allow more intense =ban development at some later time To instead propose to allow for the intense urban 'development in the`form of 5R-1, or,'e (1) acre minimum lots, at the present time without those mechanisms for ,solving the drainage problem is simply not a I ' ■ MID f i�1 f4r7Y , i' MATATA p 6-dt .0 is, how y ply 41 ., ),4� t W IVA .63 4 9 10" Ann K N 13� "A "00: VAIN ­0� W"n M71 YJ 04 44 At =W 11, M-9 Clb Nj da" Ton A no Whilipur-W"O" OVA krqt A Ca `bo,��; Mt IN MYRA"s TO' 44 v_ Waywhy-1 AW How& 'D1 Olt 4114011.04iT( '130 D 13U, W�n Owl! ah to so �jjkjjw if 1 't , '' . jgjbgMggp. AZT �V,, M Mon SON. A,q na" 771 AM" 04-:14", A son 1, iah ........... ........... It "Ba ,,, Ri 0 1 "1 -"- - is Map Tyn L up ppy in py 1 111. gnuq! wx�,� q—W W; n v V�n W ty n "oil t 1 n� t r i �� ��`� a li .. P ,. Wan w r i Y� VIM, lira r t r 11 tC- ; I i�'ti• + N{ _ f r+�r W, p' r t a yJ r I , Ir i iy if rl 10OU 7— rl Butte, &Ouni.• . LANa OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY PLANNI14G COMM) SS)ON 7 COUNTY CENTOR DRIVC - OROVJL L4 , CAWFORNIA 9$965 P'N qN E: 534.4601 January 21 1981 Hilda Wheeler Supervisor 3rd District 1653 Filbert Chico, CA 95926 Re: Information. on the property of Joa EI. Bechtel East of the Chico Airport Dear ,Ms. Wheeler: I This information on the plans, policies and: zoning of the property owned by Jon H. Bechtel is provided as per your request of January 20. County records indicate that Mr. Bechtel, owns approximately- 21061 acres in the area east of the Chico Airport anal Co basset Road. Of this approximately 960 acres in the eastern halt is covered ban existing hand Conservation Agreement (see attached map�. With -the Board's adoption of the Chico Airport Rezone, the westerly portion not incl.udea in the LCA is zoned "A--40" (Agricultural-40 acme minim1,,m parcel size) and the eastern portion in the LCA is zoned A-2. Only the western portion of the property was included In the Chico Airport Rezone. The purpose of the Chico Airport .Rezone is to implement through consistent zoning the County's land use policies as reflected in the Butte County General Plan and proposed Chico Area Land Use Plan under agreement with the City of Chico* Ili addition, the zoning is`intended to provide land Uses compatible with the operation of the Chaco Airport as described in the Chico Airport Environs Study - a planning QfXort Undertaken jointly with the City of Chico and County of :butte Conceptually, the General Plan establishes policies to er courage industrial and agricultural, land uses in the areas most impacted by airport operations (areas immediately ad- jacent and within clear zones, etc.)e Low density, large w �r Hilda Whot lex Page -p- Jan. p—Jan. P'l , 1981 lot afr. cu'ltur'ally related residential ;land US(4}5 are eravi:sioned by the Agricultural Residential designation covoring tho balance of the Vrea. The Agri cultura1.Residential designation has a wide density tango, spaning parcel sizos from ono to zl0 acres with pafool sizes of 20 to 41.0 acres clearly consistent with the Genr.:ral Plan's Policies. Within this broad range, 'there, is cons lderable flexibility to encourage or d:lZGourage orderly dove lopmonk: through the application of aPpr.'opc'iate, zones. Ortthe basis of existing development, circulation system capacity, Prevailing parcel sizes,nr ;Oing ,publ,ic works Planning and overall community need prio.z*.L ty was given to the land between QTS 99 and. the Airport. This is reflected in •thr massive SRS') zoning in 'this area. An exception to this policy is the area southeast of Cohasset Road and contiguous with the City of Chico. The SR -1 zoning in this area reflects the land use of the planned area development proposed by ban Drape,. 2n addition, this area is proposed for inclusion into the no.rth- east assessment di,st.rict for sewer service and eventual annex- ation to the Oil ';y of' CMco, Except .for the, few existing areas of more intense zoning (SR -3), the area east of the Airport is zoned for large Parcel agricultural, use,consistent with the f,eneral .Plan but at the low end of the density range. Mr. Jechtel could maker` application to rezone the .Property to a more intense use and/or higher density. However, the Planning Department would view such a request as inconsistent with the General. Plan (conflict with and infringement on the adjoining LrjA), Premature and not ' i keepin with the land's physical characteristics (percolation r8tes5. The City of Chico "Lone by oxpanding i.ts sewer system and, annexing rad- ditiol,{,. territory will provide enough land to accomodate residential development for in excess of twenty years. This combined with the 21700+ acres of land zoned for residential development between. US 99 and the Airport will be more than ample to provide for .residential development and assure an unconstrained free market condi ti on the immediate future. Com,litments of land beyond 'that reflected in these recent act Loris will. likely be more unmanageable, perhaps preempting fut3xro higher density development throu h the :xtension of sewers (annexation- to the City of .0 i.co ' and contri'�)ute to urbsn sprawl. in conflict With County policy. FurtYiermore,, the designation of land for residential development clearly beyond that needed for, housing, including ail allowance , for comPetitive economic conditions, based on reasonable forecasts raisE's important legal. i=ssues (see Government Code Sections 65561 of so9., Coalition for Los Angsles Planning in the p�xlilic .e rst vs c and of Supr�ryisor�s, GSL Superior Court NInteo. _�3�18, Savo E `lloro Associ.at on vs Da; s App. did 64 (1977)) . 7 Cal. $13 SANISORN ROAD YUBA CITY CALL, ORNIA95A91 i'}ION>a (916) ,673=6730 inter-Departmental Memorandum Board of Supervisors ERow Environmental Review suEWICTI Chico Airport linvirons Rezone onrrli January 9, 1981 o Attached is a suggested motion of approval for the above- environment referenced project, incorporating necessary J6 findings. These findings airy subject to your concurrence, if you have any questions, please,do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Earl D. Nelson Environmental Review Director EDN:lkt Attachment Having reviewed and considered the final environmental impact report for the Chico Airport Environs Rezone as certified on July 22, 1980, 1 move we make the following findings: (1) Development which occurs pursuant to project approval. may result in significant effects on the environment in the areas of traffic in- creases with a resulting need for road improve- ments, need for additional school facilities, increases in surface wager runoff with a result iazg need for drainage improvements within and outside the project area, possible loss of archaeological resources, loss of prime agri- cultural lands, possible loss of riparian vegetation and rare plants,,and possible failure of sewage disposal systems in areas of soils Poorly suited to proper functioning of such systems. (2) Significant effects related to loss of Archae- ological resources, loss of riparian vegetation and rare plants, and ,failure of sewage disposal systems can be mitigated at the subdivision approval level on a project -by -project basis. The loss of prime agricultural soil cannot be mitigated (although the extent of this impact has been limited by a change in the rezone proposal. which applies A-10 zoning to a portion of the prime agricultural soils). Impacts re_, lated to traffic circulation and drainage can be partially mitigated on a project -by -project basis by developer's contributions, and the balance of funds required to achieve an accept- able level of'service w ll have to come from other' funding sources, such as gas tax, property tax, assessment districts, grant funds of other public revenuesources. i - ( ) Except as listed above, mitigation measures aae not applicable to this type of rezone project, although project alternatives can serve to reduce environmental damage. Project alternatives which reduce the potential for environmental degradation have been implemented " to the greatest extent possible consistent with project objectives. Specific findings with regard to alternatives ;are as follows; (a) Alternative I - No Project.This alterna- tive is being rejected because it would retain A-2 zoning over much of the project area, which would permit development with potential environmental impacts more adverse than the proposed project. (b) Alternative '2 - Zone specific portions of the project to PA -C (Planned Area -Cluster) zones. This alternative is being rejected because the detailed site specific planning necessary for a PA -C zone can more appro- priately be done by -individual land owners at the time of development. The project as proposed does not preclude owners from requesting PA -C zoning at a later time., if cluster development more accurately reflects their development plans, although such re- zones will have the greatest likelihood of approval if the gross densities of dwelling units per acre are not increased. (c) Alternative 3 Lower density development, from SR -I and SR -3 to SR -3 and SR -5. This alternative is being rejected because the environmental benefits are not great when viewed in connection with the los; of tax base needed to finance improvements f such as roads and drainage systems, which would be necessary in either case. l- (,d) Alternative 4 Residential development at urban densities. This alternative is being rejected because the detriments outweigh the benefits as listed on page $3a of the E; I It (c) Alternative 5 - Preservation of prime agricultural land. This alternative, while not feasible to implement as pro- posed because of the location of-exist- ing f existing parcel boundaries and Land use past- te'rns, in relationship to the distribution of the prime agricultural soils, did influence a modification of the original proposal resulting in the application of A-10 (Agricultural. - 10 acre minimum parcel size) to a portion of the project area where the best agricultural soils are found. This modification represents represents a reasonable compromise and has become the project under consideration. (4) Although there may be significant adverse environ- mental: effects resulting from the approval of this project, there are overriding considerations' which justify project approval.. These overriding considerations include; (a) The proposed zoning is environmentally superior to the zoning currently in effect, and represents a major step forward in the phase-out of A-2 zoning. (b) The proposed zoning was developed, to provide - a measure of protection for the Chico Airport, by establishing compatible uses and densities near the airport. (c) The zoning as proposed will bring zoning of this area into consistency with -the Butte County General Flan policies (d) The project will establish harmonious land use patterns, appropriately zoned, which will provide areas for future suburban growth of the Chico area. I therefore move that the zoning be adopted. DPAFT -T S F. CT f ON RMOULATTON'S FOR' A:,,' "L -T" DISVR � I T' e following regulations rhall artily in an I'Ll-11 CLIn.1ted lnustrlal) District: (A) USES PERIMITTE-0; 1 Storage and distribution of goods and materialb-, .ncluding 'vholesaling) warehouses, moving servi,_-ps vohicle storage, mini -storage, doliVery services and similar uses, but not InclUdin,9 Storage of inflwiml- able-, e,<plosi'ves or materialsi,..-hich create dust, odors or fumes. 0 neff-site c nstruction awt naintenancd services, in- clucling btill(iing, electrical, plumbing, heating, rcof- inrr painting, lan+ scpni.nq; excavation and similar C11) contractors and janitor'ial, fumig�lting,, septic tan"". L pumpirin, and sim- ar services. Assembly and light, manuFac-turing uses which are not 0 h j ectionable, obnoxious or offensive by reason of emission of noise; sroke, dust, odors, fumes, cinders, heat, bright lights, radiation, refuse matter or water-carri-ad iiaste anci which do not in - Volvo the handliiv 0' explosive or dangero%is naterials. Per-mittad uses includ' wood- anct, cal'inet shops; 5'.1eet metal wrork;, pri-itirtcl, eagravingand sigi na:lufftc Lir-; 'Lad r.A.'Flc- uro of c I o t Kin 4i:t hawl i1c ra f I Instrurerits, fixtures, ts , 0 Iy n re n.- r 'A rt Erc-. r t! 'cr IA bvt d-" not.- inclu'2­o' Ca s t q;;, el t a re- tann In rCftt!C r 1-1:' or aw.- chemIc"al r 4. Public uses and utilities, not incxud;iriv recreation f-tcil,i.ties, rl.i,-posal sites, seg age treatment, -1nd pov,,cr plant S. Residence of caretaler or proprie.aor. 6 Advert is in s igns u (E) Site 'Requirements The requirements of Section 24-35) of this Code are modified for all building sites in "L -I'' zones in the following particulars 1. 'Lot arta and width: There i� no lot area minimum nor lot width minimum except as may be required for the building and for Off-street loading area and parking. 2. Side 'yard: None, except where the side of a lot abuts a Resident- ial- zone, in which case the side ,yard shall he not less than five (S) feet. 3. Rear yard: None, except where the rear yard abuts a Res idential.zone, in which case the rear yard shall be not less th, five (5) !Feet. 4. Trucl- loading and unloudirg space vriv'ate o, f -street loading space For the handling of an woes rat*oriols ,:rs? eqt ip~ensu fihall be provided. such Fpntre sl.a.l? re of su`ftc tent area and WE slier,, SLS t(7 7{1 Cf p rl:inL i'« d �,�,7c1'J n:? of C!",iclo i �i,GG:;QLt'w e:Ctt.ndJnµr i,60 arty existing atreet �tiC�j'O d she 4.lrhl.i;nc' �7 v SEE=— ra�NJ,gg�' fff /r{jfi'4/ colul 4+' 1. BASO QF supet'1`i isons ADMINISTRATION QE-:NTES 25 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95955 Tatctahona 914/5'4*L•A1�1 ALFRED J. SARAC'SN1 BERTHA MOSk EY HIL.DA WHEELER Dlatrict Jrlct 4 district 3 Dhnirntuo JANE DOLAN ROBERT E. LEMKE District 2 District 5 February 20, 1981 John H. Bechtel 70 Lincoln Road Yuba City, CA 9599 ]dear John i I have been advised by County Counsel that the action taken by the Board of Supervisors on the Chico Airport Rezone was final and that reope113.11g the hearing or modification of the hearing would not be proper. I'fully understand your concerns regarding the development of your property ano would recommend that you contact the County Planning Department for their assistance :and advice in pursuing; your project. I have spoken with the County Planning Director.* and the department, is looking forward to working with you. If I cern be of further" assistance, please Montt hesitate to, contact rte, Sincerely, Hilda Wheeler Supervisor - District 5 �,._ `�, ; M a{�!!.AS1 January 21 , 1981 'moi'.: /Q Voun LAND OF NATURAL WIRALTH AND BEAUTY PLANNING COMMISSION 7 COUNTY CENTER. DRIVE - OROVILLG; CALIFORNIA 93965 PHONES $34-4401 Hilda Wheeler Supervisor 3rd District 1683 Filbert Chico, CA 9592 Re; Information on the Property of Jori H* Bechtel East of the Chico Airport Dear Ms. Wheeler. This informatio'a on the plass, policies and zoning of the property owned by Jon H. Bechtel is provided as per your requeNt of January 20 County records indicate that Mr. Bechtel owns approximately - 2,061 acres in the area east of the Chico Air-oort and Co haslet Road. Of this approximately 960 acres in the eastern half is covered by an existing Land Conservation Agreement (see attached map). With the Board's adoption of the Chico Airport Rezone, the wasterly portion not included in the LCA is zoned "A-4011 (Agricultural, -40 acre minimum parcel, size) and the eastern portion in the LCA is zoaed A-2. Only the western portion of thepropertywas included in the Chico Airport Rezone. The purpose of the Chico Airport Rezone is to implement through consisirent zoning the County's land use policies as reflected in the Butte County General Plan and proposed Chico Area Land Use Plan unds�r agreement with the City of Chico in addition, the zoning is"intended to provide land uses compatible with the operation of the Chico Airport as described in the Chico Airport Environs Study - a planning effort undertaken jointly with thb City of Chico and County of Butte. Conceptually, the General. Plan establishes policies to en- courage industrial and agricultural 'Land uses in the areas most impacted by airport operations (areas immediately ad- jacent and within clear zones, etc.). Low density, large Hilda Wheeler Page -2- Jan. 2-Jan. 211 1981 • lot agriculturally related residential land use, are envisioned by the Agricultural Residential designation oove;ring the balance of the area. The Agricultural. Residential designation has a wide density range, sparring parcel sizes from one to 40 acres with parcel sizes of 20 to 40 acnes clearlj• const Ment with the General Plan's policies. Within this lex .>ad range, there is considerable flexibility' to encourage or discourage orderly development through the application: of appropriate zones. On the basis of existing development, circulation system capacity, prevailing parcel sizes, on going public works planning and overall community need priority was given to the Land between US 99 and the Airport. This is reflected in the massive SR -1 zoning in this area. An exception to this policy is the area southeast of Cohasset Road and contiguous with the City of Chico. The SR -1 zoning in this area reXiect.3 the land ukse of the planned area development proposed by pan Drake. In. addition, this area is proposed for inclus-Lon into the north- east assessment district for sewer service and e=ventual annex- ation to the CV, -,f of Chico, Except for the few existing areas of more intense zoning (SR -•3) , the area east of the Airport is zoned ,for large parcel agricultural use, consistent with the General Plan but at the low end of the dfinsity range Mr. Bechtel could maks;' application to rezone the property to a more intense use and/or higher density. However, the Planning Department would view such a raq:aest as inconsistent with the General. Plan (conflict with and infringement on the adjoining LCA), premature and not in keepin with the land's physical. characteristics (percolation rates. The City of Chico alone by expanding its sewer system and annexing ad- r di.tional territory will,provide enough land to accomodate residential development for in excess of twenty years. This combined with the 2,,700 - acres of land zoned for reji.dential development between US 99 and the Airport will. be more than ample to provide for residential development and assure an unconstrained free market condition for the immediate ,future. Commitments of land beyond -that reflected in these recent actions will likely be more unmanageable, perhaps preempting future higher density development throu h the extension of sewers (ann;exation to the City of ,Chico ,and contribute to urban sprawl in conylict with Count; policy. Furthermore, the designation of land for residential development clearly beyond that needed for housing, including an allowance for competitive economic conditions; based on reasonable forecasts raises important legal issues (tee Government Code Sections 65561 et ;eq; Coalition for tos An tiles Planning in the Public lnterest vs Board of Su`omrvisors; LA Superior C"burt oto. 76321$1 8 ERC 1249 Q1975)); Save El Tor:) Association vs Days.l 74 Cal. App. 3d 64 (1977)) r .Hilda Wheeler Page - Jan. 2", 1981 In summary, Mr. Bechtel is presently precluded by the A-40 zoning applied in the Board's recent action from more intense development. Since the County Plan forenees eventual de- velanment in this area the issue becomes one of When rather than if ?or reasons described above, the lands in this area are not needed .for development at this time, but may at some point in 'the future as the needs and conditirrls d�otate. I hope this will assist you in responding to Mr. Bechtel's concerns.. If you have any questions, please dont hesitate to call. Sincerely, Charlie Woods Planner IIx CW,Jc ` Lnc. cc Bettye Blair 4' =till ,2 1 48,101-x5 _ ¢ 48-0ih�,�. _ etaco Vavms G . H . r G . H . Olson 11. M. toe 2421 N Nlameda St, Comptoa) Ca. 90222 766 Hast Ave. cl-lico, ca. 9$.120 555 Rio Undo Chico, Gu,. 9597.0 48-01-17 48-01-19 45-2-2 It, L, F lei. ;Brawn .108 p N}nxanitalas � Dan flays Jr. H� st.�o � �� Ci J. A M. A. McIntyre Rt. 1, Box A76 Chico; Ca. 959926 Chico, Ca 95026 Greenville, Ca. 95947 48-02-45 � 44-x-53 � 44-4-105, -1 Q'6 Jo lin J). Drake G, V. F A. D. Curry Prod Davis Cit of Chaco P.O. Box 1448 Chico, Ca. 95927 , Rt. 3, Box 175' Chico,, Ca.. 95926 , P 0, Box 3420 C1aic0,CA, 95927 r Norman Hope W 1201 Monument Blvd. #77 Concord, Ca. 94520 µa 1 � r r r 4 J M. l4 D. P. Garner Rt. 1, Box 437 Chico, Ca,. 95926 44-1-38 Ri M. £1 K. A. Comptan Rt, 1, Box 437 B Chico, Ca. 95926 Patrick M. Ted -Ford 265 Cohasset Rd. Cb.ico, Ca. 95926 44-1-37, 44-2.41:, 43 J. M. F, I1. P. Garner Rt • 1, Box 437 Chico, Ca. 95926 44.1-54 44.1-56, 58,44-2-72,73 Pace Family Trust A. D. & D. Lynch Devere }pace 2.260 Ceanothus Rt. 1, Box 4409 Chico, C.a. 95926 Chico, Ca. 95926 44-1-59 44.2-1 J. M. F, D. P. Garnor Rh. 1, Box 437 Chico, Ca,. 95926 44-2-28 C. Meredith Guernney 874 Vallomh'rosa Chico, Ca. 95926 44-2-29 44-1,-36 J. M. & D. P. Garner Rt. 1, Box 437 Chir,O, Ca. 95926 44-1-39 J. 11. F, 8. L, Hassell. Rt. 1, Box 4378 Chico; Ca. 95926 44 4-57 C, B. Reiman MD 1.803 Mangrove Chico, Ca 95926 44-2.76, 77, 78 T. A. & Mi K. Moore 489 Panama Chico, Ca. 95926 1 44-2-37 Assoc. Farm Supplies- D. to M. Grissom Chico Odd Fellows BJ.dg.. 0. L, F, 0. iCenlp Xi°vin. 1, Box 440K 973 M P. Sc:1. laf Hast Avenue 130 :A Rt. Houston, T.X, 17001 Chico, _Ca C111'.c,o, Ca. 95926 Chico, Ca. 95926 44-�02-58 44-01.20 44-2--61, 62, 44-1-21 1V; J. F4 M. 11. llexseth 0. 11. & G. tle��setit ; Rt 1, Box 4,37C 220 t4` 5th Ave . Chico,, Ca 95926 C11ico, Ca, 95926 J M. l4 D. P. Garner Rt. 1, Box 437 Chico, Ca,. 95926 44-1-38 Ri M. £1 K. A. Comptan Rt, 1, Box 437 B Chico, Ca. 95926 Patrick M. Ted -Ford 265 Cohasset Rd. Cb.ico, Ca. 95926 44-1-37, 44-2.41:, 43 J. M. F, I1. P. Garner Rt • 1, Box 437 Chico, Ca. 95926 44.1-54 44.1-56, 58,44-2-72,73 Pace Family Trust A. D. & D. Lynch Devere }pace 2.260 Ceanothus Rt. 1, Box 4409 Chico, C.a. 95926 Chico, Ca. 95926 44-1-59 44.2-1 J. M. F, D. P. Garnor Rh. 1, Box 437 Chico, Ca,. 95926 44-2-28 C. Meredith Guernney 874 Vallomh'rosa Chico, Ca. 95926 44-2-29 44-1,-36 J. M. & D. P. Garner Rt. 1, Box 437 Chir,O, Ca. 95926 44-1-39 J. 11. F, 8. L, Hassell. Rt. 1, Box 4378 Chico; Ca. 95926 44 4-57 C, B. Reiman MD 1.803 Mangrove Chico, Ca 95926 44-2.76, 77, 78 T. A. & Mi K. Moore 489 Panama Chico, Ca. 95926 1 44-2-37 Assoc. Farm Supplies- D. to M. Grissom Chico Odd Fellows BJ.dg.. P.O,, Box 11.85 Rt. 3, Box 130 :A P.O. Box 292 Houston, T.X, 17001 Chico, _Ca 95,926 Chico, Ca. 95927 44-�02-58 44-2-59 44-2--61, 62, 63 Uftited Pentecostal Church of Chico D. L. F, M. n. Nix M. L. F A. M. Albert P.Q. Box 3447 Rt. 4, Box 527 146 Tonea Nest Chico, ,Ca 95921 Chico, Ca. 95926 Chico, Ca. 9"926 44.2-64, 65-, 66 67 44-2-70, 71 44-2=74 David IV. Dresser etal P. K. F, C. M. Minto S, M. & C. R. Norris 2041 1:, 'Floronce 'Ave. P.O. Box 17.35 Pot, 41 Box 427 11 Los Angeles, CA., 90001 Chico,Ca. 95927 Chico, Ca °5926 " 44.2-75 44-4100, 101 44-4-112, 114 R. G. F, S . L. Dicke IAf Affairs • s Debt. of Voterans Florence L. ,Siti'an J. F D. P. C;arner Rt` 4, Box 521D 604n Linda tray Rt. 1, Box 437 Chico, Ca. 9592.6 Culver' Chico', Ca. 95926 44-34-1, 2 44-34-3 44-34-1 City of Chic,0 G W. K. & P. G. Rhodes itt A. t;verett 36 Franciscan {day Box 1032 Chico, 'Ca. 95977 P.O. Pox 5' Chico, Ca. 95927 Chico, Ca. 95926 (;he s x or Shultz 1 i'63 E"r I,i�?dr Ave Ci,.3Tles tt. fl rmt nso�x 4952 Warner Ave. ' . t" �'s, G. 1fa�,�]�n. Rt 5, Chaco Ca. �J5926 Huntington Rch,Ca..02649 - BOX 661 H CILaco, C;a. 95926 44.34-17 44.34-21 44"-35-63 Ti`s . Of Chico Con r to � � 'I`. D. F, B. 1. Long (A. L. � A. Goi�xse•Y' ! . Box 12 Rt. 4, Box 427 16,'9 Upland Drive Ch a .co, Ca. 05,927 Chico Ca.. 95926 Yuba City, Ca. 95991 44-42-1 44-42-2 44-47- R. E. F R. M. Akerson R: D. L. Everba-rt Terryy L f, S. J. Nelson 1 Caballo Way 2 Caballo Way 3 Caballo Way Chico, Ca. 95926 Chico, Cts. 95926 Chaco,, Ca. 95926 44-:42-4 4,4.-42-5 44-42-6 IV. L. ,F, B. L. Richards W. P. F D. A. Consani G. B. 6 A. M Sell o 4 Caba.lio Way 5 Caballo Way #6 Caballo Way Chico, Ca., 95926 Chico, Ca. 95926 Chico, Ca. 95926 N. L. & K. A. McAfee D. L. F, J. V. Sadewasser 44-42 7 Caballo Way 8 Caballo Way ' Chaco, Ca. 95926 Chico, Ca, 95926 F. R. F J. A. Lane 9 Caballo Way 44-42-7 44-42-8 Chico, Ca, 95926 44.42"-10 ; 44-42-"11 44-42-12) 16 R. E. & Ni. M. Points J. E. e,, J. Parker ; , G. S. F, S. K. Dimas 10 Caballo Way 11 Caballo Way P.O. Box 271. Chico, Ca. 959`26 Chico, Ca. 95926 Chico, Ca. 95.926 44-42"-13 44-42-14 44-42-1.5 Dept Veterans Affairs; C. R. F, J. G. Ahlemeyer S. L. Fj E. V. trock K. C. F, C. Duree 13 Caballo 'Way ` 14 Caballo Way 15 Caballo Way Chico, Ca. 95026 Chico, Ca. 95926 Chico, Ca,. 95926 44.42-17, 18 44-42-19 44-42-20 P. M. F, G. J. Tedford P. G. Fr J. B. Oxley K. SV. F, S. Halstead 17 Caballo Way 19 Caballo Way 2213 42nd Ave: Chico, Ca 95926 Chico, Ca. 95926 Capitola, Ca. 95016 44-42-21 44-42-22 _44-42-2 J. & S. Skibo L. D. F, E. C. Wasinger Thelma A Warren 21 Caballo tray Rt. 1-, 22 Caballo Way y P.O. Box .333 Chico, Ca. 95926 Chico,- Ca. 95926 Chico, Cai 95927 44.42-24 44-42-25 44-42-2, J. B, F, C. A. Haws M. T- Fj M. Lo Wooten M- H- f{ iJ. F. Rogers r 24 Cabal.' o Way 25 Caballo Way 26 Caballo Ave. Chico, Ca. 95926 Chico, Ca. 95926 Chico, Ca. 95926 44-47.-2.7 44-42-28 44-42-29' R. A. F S. I,. Davidson C. D. F, R. A. Scott Nt. R F Nt. NT. Waehe 27 Caballo Way 28 ,Caballo flay Rt. 1, Box 438Y Chico, Ca. 9592.6 Chico, Ca. 95926 Chico, Ca. 95926 ,.,,.t,. -..t 4 [. Q _.. ... _.. ..... ., � .r..t I. V ,..._. _... .. -('�'�'•-n-"'�^.v�.,'�"!.: ': �wwar�awrwgawurdwm� awcime7 D A- Connelly ltt. 3 Box 661 .1., 1). & S. 15 Mayfair M. Hamilton Dr. City t)C Chico Piuni,ci,pal Bid Chico, Ca. 95926 Chico, Ca.. 95926 Chico, Ca, 9S 76 44..4.5..33, 84 44-49- 44-49_1n Et%ene J. Butler R. G. F S. ri . Nel son B . C, 2:. I)ro r. 23/5 Morseman Ave. Rtr. 1, 13o�r4°i8T Rt. Bo, 4:�'f A Chico, Ca. 95920 Chico, Ca, 95926 Chico, Ca. 95926 44-49-1.3 44-49.15 44-49-16 Church of Christ of Butte t)ept of Veterans Affairs Dept of VotcransACfair.s County P.O. Box 1912 .'. E. 6 J. L. Mann Ji* C, C. Jess Rt. 1, Box 433-C Rt. 1., Box 436-2 Chico, Ca. 95927 Chico, Ca.. 9592.6 Chico' Ca., 95926 44-49-18 44-49-19 44-49-20 Mid Central Calif. inc. It. G. &, 8. E , Nelson Delilah Gonsalves P.O. Box 23672 Rt. 1, Box 438 T Rt, 1, Box 436L Sacramento, Ca. 95828 Chico, Ca. 95926 Chico, ca. 95926 44.49-2.1 44-49-22 44-49-23 G. S. & D. A. Curtis T. C. & S. L. Needles C. G. P, D. L. Riad Rt. 1, Box 436M Rt, 1, Box 436 N Rt. J., Box 436 d Chico, Ca. .95926 Chico, Ca 95926 Chico, Ca. 95926 44-49-24 44-49-25 4=4-49µ26 Dept of Veterans Affairs P. J. F, S. S. B;l.iyma;n 1V. E„ F, A. P. S;;n,-Lth D. R. & N. E. Myers Rt. 1, Box 436 P Rt 1, Box 436th Rt. 1, Box. 436 R Chico, Ca. 95926 Chico, CA, 95926 Chico, Ca. 95926 44-49-27 44-49--28 44-49-29, 34, 36 R.'E. G J, M. Davis IV L. & S. A. Burton _ Davis Development P.Q. Box 386 Rt.. 10 Box 436 U P.O. Box 386 Chico, Ca. 95927 Chico, Ca. 95926 Chico, Ca., 95927 44-49-30 44--49-31 44-49-32 L. J. 6 P. A. Stephenson G . A, 6 1. L .Johnson A. E. F, B. A. Hagan Rt . 1, Box 4361V 773 1V East Ave. Rt: 1, Box 433N Chico, Ca. 95926 Chico, Ca. 959°26 Chico, Ca, 95926' ' 44-49-33 44-49-35 44-40_37 E, F. 6 J, E. Davis B. K. F S. R. Welker E. D. Fi N. J. Kimbell P.Q, Box 65 Rt. 1, Box 43811 Rt. lj Box 437 K Chico, Ca. 95926 Chico, -Ca. 95926 Chico', Ca. 95926 44-49-3.8 46-32-10, 46-34-26 47-25-31 Imhoff-BIindhur"y C. J. & M. A. ,-1clntyre Rthel Clare Yo1um 45 Covell Par}: Rt. 1, Box A76 Rt. 4r. Box 525 Chico, Ca. 95126' Gr{eenvil.le, Ca. :15947 Chico, Ca. 95926 47-25-32 47-25-22 47-25-18 E. {V. �t R. Li Johnson Dan W. CoUtolenc S. D "F, Mal C. Maddux 451.8 9th Avo. 6008 St Johns Ave. Rt. 1, Box 442 Chico, Ca. 9502'6 Fd?na, MN 55424 Chico, Caj 95926 451- 3,2 .. _.7 "25"'42. & R. M. Bickley 11. Evans 166 E France's Willard A0 Rt, 1, Box 440 flarry E. Pahl, Chico, Ca. 95926 Chico, Ca. 95926 1057 woodland Ave. C114CO, C;9. 95926 47-25 4C. B'fw/•��' rs` V;-q;.r� 47-25-1.30 47-25-x.52 Sac* h, ,Sats joa qu in lira in. D st. 1.416 0th .St.1 S. Fi D. Oleg $975 Bartee S. P„ t, D. Anderson 420 aiexi•a Sacramento, Ca 955:1,4 1 Arleta, Ca. 91331 Ham,�l.ter City, Ca. ►5057, 47-X25-153 47-2$-754, 155 47.25-137 K. 0. Underwood 1.20 Menlo Way #60 tC. . F 0. Martin 1.96 Conners Ave, E. 0. Coutolenc Rt: 1, Chico, Ga. 95926 Chaco, Ca . 9592.6 Box 441 Chico, Cit. 95926 47-25-141 47.25-143, 144, 146 47-25-145 R. L. & A. C. Stephens Rt. 70 Landmark Investments J. B. & P. A. Counsil. 1, Box Del F.O. Box 1.724 Rt. 1:, Boat 444CC Max, Ca. 92014 Chaco, Ca. 95927 Chico, Ca. 55f'26 47-25-147, 149,150 47-2S-1.48, 1.51 47-25-48 S & A. M. FedorRo Rt. 1, Box 446 5. F, A. M. Fedorko Rte. 1, Box 446 Emerald X*wi Frilit Corp Chico, Ca. 95926 Chico, Ca', 95926 11,10 Glen Au1a,n Ct, Carmichael, Ca. 95.615 ti 47-25-26 47-26-5 47-26-9 Ronald F, Domi,na Owens A. K, Fi M. L. Said R> F. Fa R. T. Martin , Rt. 1, So. 445R Rt. I, Box 457 A Rt. 1 Box 453 A Chico, Ca'. -95926 Chico, Ca . 95926 Chico, Cil. 95,076 47-,26•'46, 47 47-26-1.38 47-26-139 T. i1. F, M. G. Underhill J A. F; J. L. Tuttle R. S. F, F G. Brumbaugh Rt. 1, Pox 452B P.O.Bo.x 234 Rt. 1 Box 47.3 C Chico, 'Ca,. 95926 Chico, Ca. 95926 Chico, Ca.„ 95926 47-26-154 _ 47-26-155 Wayland McDonald Mary PQzR Crti.tlt 151;0 Pa.rlc Ave. P.O, Box 24 Chico, 'CA. 05926 Crescent City, Ca.. 95531 47.26-1651 47-26-1,61 .y D. K. F A. M. Clemans L. B. A L. E. Lucas Rt. 1, Box '455A Rt. 1, Box 4571~t r Chico, C,a, 95926 Chicon Gag 0526 47-26-1:42 47.:26-153, 184 47-27--3 A. F. & 0. L. Marquardt Mc€ inney Bros. Inc. Damon Ray Lambert Rt. 1, Box 454 1002 E 16th St. At. 1, 13ox 474-D Chico, Ca. .95.026 Chico, Ca. 95926 Ciiico, Ca. 95926 47-27-4, 5,• 6 47-27-7, 8 47-27-9 MarthaR. Nfrcarty L. `r. � �, . F. McCarty E. J. '& G Blaylock Rt. 1, 11,ox 474\ Rt. 1, Ca. 9 C Chica, Ca. 95.26 Rt. 1, Box 474B Ci�i,do, C:. 95926 Chico, Ca 95026