HomeMy WebLinkAbout79-40 11mining idea. zoning to allot, such parcel sizes belag 20
acres could be found consistent with the play., b similar
change was made in the Orchard and Field Crop rategon
for the purpose of preventing development of small parcels
in i napropriate areas. Both of these changes result in
an environmentally superior plan, and do not involve the
creation of potential for new environmental impacts not
previously addressed.
2... Although mitigation measures to reduce potential environ--
mental damage are described in the environmental impact
report, these cannot be implemented at the time of adop-
tion of the band Use Element, but rather should be consid-
ered for implementation either as conditions of approval
of individual land use and development p2 ojec ts, or as
indicators of possible need for new regulations whi oh
could be implemented through subsequent legislative action.
3. Although there may be significant adverse environmental
effects resulting from implementation of the policies,
guidelines, and land use map categories of the Land use
Element, there are overriding considerations which just-
ify project a7proval. These overriding considerations
include:
•=t a) The General Plan ?land Use El' emend' is required by
State law, and a revision of the element presently
in effect is necessary to update factual information,
and remove internal inconsistencies and inconsis can
cies with other adopted elements of the Butte County
General Plan.
tb) she current text of :he land Use Element was develop-
ed in conjunction with environmental considerations
as set forth in an environmental impact report, while
the Element it replaces did not have the benefit of
an environmental impact report during its formative
stage therefore, the revised Land Use :dement is.
-4-
expected 4o guide the intensity and distribution of
land use patterns in a less environmentally damaging
manner than Mould be the case under the previous
Land Use Elem� nt.
q, c) Much study, analysis, discussion and public input
went into the formulation of this Land Use Element
revision in order to produce a useful, effective,
beneficial Planning tool. which is reflective of
public sentiment and reasonable planning principles..
4. Where feasible and des Lreable, environmentally superior
alternatives to the land use element revisions have been �
incorporated into the land Use Element. 04er alternatives
considered are either infeasible or undesWreable for he
following: specific economic and social reasons;
(a) To substantially comply with the Land Use Element
tem vh- ch sets f orl h specific site designation
- criteria for the purpose of determining desi.reable
land usages-,
fib) To provide for a reasonable surplus of potental
development sites in order to avoid artificial
constriction of market supply and unnecessarily
high land prices as recommended by the lard Use
Element text
,C) To provide for adeaua t e lard for free market c -cm
petition among land suppliers and the provision of
plans which allow reasonable "freedom of choice" of
sites and faci li L, es far population growth;
d)
row :h, -
d) To allow wherever possible a profitable economic
use for each parcel and to maintain surrounding
property values,
.
That the Nand Use Element Text, identified as Rehibit A
attached hereto are hereby adopted, -effective iediately
as part of the Butute County General Plan;
E. -Zha t copies of the Land Use -n6x . and. Ya ado p ps-e
..o herzby
shall be kepi on file 1n ,he office of the County Clerk
and she Planui,ng Depart ent -,
That she General Plan Band Use Element '2vxt, which t:as
adopted on. August 10, 1971 by resolution 71.178, s
hereby rescinded, repealed, and superceded
8- ""Ila the General Plan Land Use Element Iiap, is hereby
amended as reflected in Bvhi b -i is B, C, & B.
:PASSED AND ADQPrEJ bac the Butte CGurTIUY Bogie of Cnper.�sors,
State of California, on the 30th
�ay of Ucfioher , i9�9 �� she
following, vote.
AYES; Supervisors Qofa1, Moseley, Wheeler and Vice Chairman Winston
NOES None
ABSYNT• Chairman Lemke
ABSTATTED: None _---j1
Robert -Lemke ,Chairman, of the Butte
County Board of Supervisora
ATTEST:
CLARK A. NELSON, COUNTY CLERK -
RECORDER and ex -officio Clerk of the
Board of Supervisors
700
I i
SHASTA . ,Ai/E
wrJ.J.1�l�La�U i.
roEaJE
i
EAST Av£HUE
17-
t
J
i
PROPOSED LAND USES LL
COMMERCIAL
INDUSTRIAL {`
4004
LOW- DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ° 4
MEDIUWDENSITY ,RESIDENTIAL �s
t
�1 I�
�jf �
� 1
I
GENERALJ N PROPOSAL
HIGHWAY WEST
cat WERCIAL
Lit
01.1
INDUSTRIAL
RR'. BRIEN` MEDIUM - DENSITY RESI
QENTIA
•
5-8 D/U ACRE
RURAL RESIDENTIAl
-
I ACRE MINIMUM PARtlCL. SIZE)
M
L41
im
—7EAST AVENUE
4
N\l,
A yr 0,1
— --- /
---------
-J
Jig
Ti
il'JL if
PIG
-15Y A
?
U h I it A 5 1 T Y
cHtco
jn
El
W>,7 m
WANAPEMAW
r #1s1-1N6,l� ��}� xi-s rlN G 1.
ORCHARD %0 PEA)
I I'
(7 RR- /,416
1�AN Q '11 G:)eYSTIN011
FIELD C R O IP
I
% M
% . � ��
y }+
��j PF—t4
`VP i C t4 ✓'*'
G RAZ 1 NG
PRO pa.s a 0 �' /' oPt7 0 n
LAND
RURAL �a RURAL
sio r► t- {�, RE$jDZWrlA
GRNZING --
%� N
OPs.'N LA:Nb '
el. stiraC2y(r, L,+►
�4
it
i I
I�
it
rr
` 1I
��
=aK== EX15rIN
GENCAAL
PLAN
BO UN DAK
FILE No.
BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
HEARING D St /2 Sl:pT, iq-7q
APPLICANT -'R. V=A M)LI-lo" OWNER-,,5 Aryl r
--
I�lEOUES'T, GZNE9A i. PLAN ING ZONE: "AZ"
-XISTi
1i\'ni�4t fix..
, / �.
Kill
GENERAL PLAN PROPOSAL
NORTH ESPLANADE
a COMMERCIAL
Ell
INDUSTRIAL
�- MEDIUM-:DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
a-8 DIU ACR E
LOW-DENSITY '
S1i"Y RESI'DENTIAL
PL
UMCIVAL
• - AIRRORT
C®,/' `•
\�q0
tj
. to '�' ri•
I
x _
�jt i ,%r rte{ +,`•
�j
IL
A
��� .Y - _
7771`77
GENERAL PLAN PROPOSAL 71
2
CRAIG -MOORETOWI3 j RIDGE *34
COMMERCIAL
PuDi,.lc
f • �♦: -. ..yam ° ,�,�1�-1'^y ii:,
14
TIMBER— MOUNTAIN
r
4vt '"14
49 GRAZING AND OPI�N LA�Q A0
01 0
rel .
# ' p .. tl a W +�� I j
�URAL RESIDEN'rIAL
0 4;--a
IACRE MINIMUM PAPCEL SIZE
0
j .
f t 0, L-0 :N
r
1*4 U
000
cl
fip+
IV
•
0 :�vx'::
4-4
0 L
jr
w'ji 1A Ig k
Wk
x
'VA'� 61 !g'
Pot
WOO
IL' I �♦'i F01
yrs
CY
10