HomeMy WebLinkAbout79-40 711r,L)`lr,mon rt7.a
a. Tho Oesunl (11,90,11aLo •t;ho "A-1)" acrd "A-en hirn,itted'l
,orreuI t ra��,ugh izar, xtrxcrr�i 01 .Mch rr11ea.l 10O 111or(I con-
Mi. tEl��t C. ����, 1 �1,� �t"l`.'.I fl�r ftf��)lt Ufi practical.
b. ci'hr� zoning ordl,n.anc o ���r�ai � 'bc_y :rov7 (:awed and aA.ended a
standards of this c,l (amt xat;. poIi,Cies anti
2. INITIATION 0V:+J PMONING s The zOning o;rdinancr, allowt
change .n zoning dintri ct boundar ion. Only ivrh ;n requested
by 'the Planning Commisg.i:on, by tho Board of Supervl:sox�s
or by a petition o ih0 owners of at least 60 of the ,
Property to be rezoned. Until recant ;years most rezon:i.;ngs
were initiated formally or informally by the property
owners affected. Since legal consistency with the General
Plan has become an issue, several lard;•;, x'ezonings o
Valley agricultur, a1 land. have; been initiated by the
00unty planning Commission. Developing and initiating
consistent zoning proposalsconcurrently with sand use
plan map changers improves public participation, clarifies
consistency relationships and int' grates the Environmental
review process. Indond,
plan change, state law requires that consistent
zoning be adopted w:ith�n a l?"�sozrablP °tames after a general
xmn1e aneantation
a. Plan-ming staff shall' rr.1vi. (aw consistency of zoning pro.:-
posals with pri,.vato applicants at tho timr) of applica-
tion and. with thy; Planning Commission, before initiation
of rezoning.
b. The County shall establish pre,ci.se Zoning of all unin-
corporated areas consistent with the proposals of this
element.
c. All land use plan map changes rhould be :immediately
followed by consistent rezoning:
4 _
60
0. DEVELOPMENT REVI W
USE l:':lbpM: T AVD VARIANCB0 in =Ut of the County's zoning
c a1 s I.cat; ana, a U$
e peZ•Ml� 113 regUirOd for Soma into
which might be incompatible or ob;joctionable to the other
permitl;ed uses. Tbeloe uscna taro a;loo c till od "c ondAt onall!
uses because the approval of a use permit may be conditioned
upon specific requirements for hours of operation, xencing,
parking, building size and :location, dedication, street im-
provements, drain.ago facilities, sand otber conditions reason-
ably related, to the, proposed u ,e,. A use permit Is also
required when a legal nonconforming use is changed to a
more restrictive use or a use of the same nature. Appli-
cations for use permits are presently administered by
the Planning Commission, although the law allows this
function to also be performed by either a zoning admini-
strator or other special committee appointed by the Board
of Supervisors.
According to the County's zoning ordinance, the Planning
Commission may gva:nt use permits w1ton it finds that: the
proposed use will not impair the integrity or character
of the zone, will not be unreasonable incompatible with
or injurious to surrounding properties, and will not; be
detrimental -to the health, welfave and safety of the County
and people living or working nearby.
The Planning Commission also reviews applications for
variances to zoning requirements for lot .: i.ze arid. dimen-
sions and building setbacks. According to state law,
variances can be granted only when the requirements would
deprive the property of privileges enjoyed by nearby pro-
perty in the same zone, and when approval of a variance
will not constitute a special privilegO. or permit an un-
authorized type of use. Tike use permits, variances can
be Subject to reasonable conditions and, are not now re-
quired to be consistent with the General Plan.
xmxilementation
a. Condi. ions for, approval of use permits and variances
should serve to maintain primary uses in the area or
to allow a continuation of s legal nonconforming use
2. SVBD1VISIONS ,AND LAND, DIV:i SIO ) The details of °the ul-
timate arrangement of individual land uses are largely
con -rolled by regulations on the subdivision of land.
Butte Counter's subdivision ordinance was first adopted
in 19497 5 years,; before tho zoning ordinahce and has
been revised:'many times since* The stated purposes of
the ordinance are to i.nsuro the orderly development of
:land to: implement state subdivision laws and to
611
c
"... ref t R:ctuate .tka , Goxjoo rcal, Phan, npoc.lfic plann and
�
doptvad�oomme���+ty plranc, of .t,ho Clount,y r��l&Uvo i,o the
r:
'the review, and approval of subd1.v.i„ aion a _POr orclInance
requi.rom,ents was porformod by tho Planning Commisailon
until 191?6 but, now is admin otorod by a commi.tte�n of
County staff memboro. Thi. s "Advloory Ageney" is re-
quired
,aa-quired to reviow a roport from tho planning director
can the relationship of each propoRscd oubdi,viston to the
to the estate Map Act, the County'to subdivision ordinance,
the zoning ordinanae, othor ordinances, the General plan,
specific plans and community plans. If 'they determine
an application is Inconsistent with the. general pian or
any other applicable plans adopted by the Board. of Super-
visors) the Advisory Agency must disapprove the project.
The subdivision ordinance sets design standards not only
for lot dimensions and configuration, but also for the
locations, widths, alignments, grades and surfacing of
new streets, for the improvement of existing rights-o
way; for the installation of curbs, gutters, sidewalks,
fire hydrants, private utailiti�s, sewers and draa nage
facilities; for dedication of park land, and for any
other aspect of the; entire subdivision "aa3 may, be neces-
sary or convenient to insure conformity to or implemen-
tation of the General flan or an adopted plan
of the County". Land: use plans, zoning regulations :and
community preferences are now considered in improvement
requirements only as far as they influence 'the above
size and locati_on of lots. The Lack of specific com-
munity plans for streets, parrs and drainage facilities
has often delayed or prevented installation or dedica-
bion.
lmnlementation
a. Consi stenty with the provisions Of this element shall
be a condition of p
approval of all proposed divisions
of real property reviewed by the County.
b. Subdividers shall be required to meet all design
standards necessary to''implement this element and
provide improvements made necessary by their project.
c. Nand use designations, zoning classifications,, street
functions, and community preferences shall be con-
sidered. in the development of improvement standards.
The County shall prepare street and drainage plans
for areas which are designated for urban 'uses on
land use,,plan. maps.
e. The County shah. work with local. recreation agencies
',o properly amend the Recreation. Element of the Gen-
eral Flan so as to permit dedication of land for park
purposes.
62
'The C,,O i forn l a 1r;� �x :,i �urlma ni,rs"I quality
G
1 wzt..acio,.mt aYa 'CYC tKa yxL,str4� Ghat fc,vc;,1�]ac.:n
�try�yr,""3y��?�,1�`.,ry11 os ('.1..�%o #1d��rys(J -"Xtio C'�(y��x/l.ly]•C�,@J,�'a1'1 oil 4, f.5/q;�)oEi`L1.+�-y&j'o pS`+x],+v:i.d",'oyn- y�
AIM, Chat (,'Pl'oY.dtfh in t�Li.�.br d 4-��l i'vw ",111d "IPPa".0Y al o,'.r
ac iviti] op, and domolupmonO],noo 'IT/3 lh(,l County
has Pulrilled CE9& Pv()vi vLOii4,'s by vequirAnr, onvironmontal
rcviow for Public faC] l_,i.i:.i,(I , t;o'nolAal. Plan c.hango.o, rozor].!Dg2,
uSc permits, va,rvi>ance.o, oubdax..sion:i, 1 nd diviujo r, annvxa;-
tions and other typor of dovc3:iopraQTl't Proivetxs aro
reviewed 'through an initial f Ludy 'to c101,ormino po-r-]s i.ble. cif-
fac=to on the e:nviro1'lrtentr. The 1111 tial otu.dy must npoai i..-
tally de torm:i,no if the. proposal will a:�o.,,3ca.:lt in Siguif i can
alteration of the planned land uc E of an area or iti i rl
significani conflict with fa ,tablishod use;. If a substan-
tial advcroe. onvironment t i:mpac-1 if, identified, then an
Bnvi.ronmon.tal, lmPact ROPort i.M'j Prepared d which do-ocribes
all. significant cffec°ts, Ospecially thone which arc; un-
avoidable, irreversi.blo cumulati.vo, oonttrov(!r Taal or growth -
inducing,
Imp.1 cam en,t at i, can
a,: The County's environmental roviow ;pa:"ocosc shall. consider
the concerns of all, of the clut;ire gcneval plan
and poosible c#i`feeb s on all uxisting and plannod :Land
63
D. 200RDjDjAjl0�T 0p pLAN�,
I- CITY PLANNINGt`�C'i'xV 1 l`C.I� i; The, 10ur. ciI ,Lel in Butte County
have much. 't;h(3 sar�a � ,•
rair�t, r�r�d zoni.�ag powFrs as the County.
including dc;ve�,()Ping general plans for areas baa
Jurisdiction bouTidaric;tj if the n:r.serd a,s appr�ror�t`�on�hth inial
enforcomall-t of zoning and subdivinio l.:Lit-n`�arent. hewactu
is l,atnatcd 'L'o areas within currOnt OlUlderior, of each re--
spectivO jUrisd? ction. Cons(.,lquenrtl.y, noither °the County or
cities mairit-ain absolute authority to implem nt their
general plans throu8hout their planning areas. T1xc obvious
need for cit
y --county cooperation in the Tile
and
fact that all
implementation of plans is made even more apparent by -the
most one-third of Butto County's residents now
reside within City boundaries, another -third live in adja-
cent urban areas, and another 2C'% live in a community with
growing support for incorporation.
The Government Code provides several mechanisms for co-
ordinating the plans of cities and eounti,arl. Both are re-
quired to seek comments from the other when considering
general plan amendments and consult with public agencies
generally to secure maximum coordination of plans. Plan-
ning law also allows the cities to adapt applicable por-
tions of -the County General. Plan and the County to adopt
city general plans
Since the county currently controls development in areas
which may eventually lie within city boundaries, cities
which are comtemPlating future expansion can s.',
benefit from the coordination of cityg planning and county planning
activities. Their concern in this regard is often focused
on differences in zoning regulations and especially on
City -County variations in standards for the: design and
improvement of subdivisions near city boundaries. the
acute need for frequent city -county consultation during
the implementation process can be filled only
es-
tablishment of regular J' by the
rezoning and development in -these fringe vareas.
iew Of proposed
In. the S roof_ Cooperation
a. TheCounty will review development policies and pro-
posals for both County and city general plans with the
incorporated cities.
b. County Planning Staff shall review all cit
agendas and request consideration of County planning
where necessary. y Plans
c. All proposed zoning activities .and development pro-
jects within a City's generalp
len arsshall be re-
ferred -to the City
for review and commant.
d. County subdivision standards shall conside^ city
standardsin areas designated for urban development
both oth city and Chun
_ general. plans.
6
P CITY AND :l).Tt.:4THIC'T' :i3OURDAll: EZ" : 1?svc l calam+ xa 1, cr'1' u �Tyarr e;haa+r�c-
1 er and don.li t io;, urM,'x ly xr�tu�rct� drxmrc�°U i c wrxt,�c:z• and, a>'wt�r
9ys'ts i'�Ir s and 'a va 1 o ty C).C" TYr�c� i dc��l. primarily,
by cat:ir�s, t c;ct.al ctt:,Ix�i.;ltr and Cou�nl-y
Slnco 19('3, all fOr~MalA oxio,, annox (11 L i on;, d�.1 ;�. olj-�+
m�;ntS OV d.:J)"';()1-u'W�aU of local govo.rnraon'l; agoncior') in C"lli,
fornix Ml "t be, r°we vi k�wod by a Local A�;c+racy Com
mis ,iota. (11,10) in roach county. TO m(ic.at Ito .r,e.,�pohsibi-
litioo, to dJ-scourcjgn ux'-tan r-q)r awl. raxjd c�xa<cxOux,agO the ordorl,y
fox,mabion and devolopmont of local Tgovornment; agencies,
each LAVCO it recluived to "X'evi(-!w €axad VIPProvo or disapprove,
with OP without amendment-Irl, wholly, T,artil;j,,jj1.y1 or condi-
t:ional,l;y" all proposals fo.rj boundary charl[,c,:s i
The general principles adopbpd by tho But.to County LAFOO
establish policies ora intexigovevnmontal cooperation', on
prefea:rOd servi.cr-� pr oriticlx., aarnea5aat.t.ora of irl,andas, straps,
streets and valuable properti.ps, and on t.h(--� pro ,('xvation:
of establ.iohod agricultuval and OT)i-M :rpaco aroan. The
LAFCO cri.ter .a for Ovaluat ing raxxnr-x at;lons requires con,si-
derat ion of adopted city and aouaby general p`l.anca, needs
for services, 6,110, rOsPe tl,vta cFap�ab;il.itLes and
roaoonable altr;rnr'aL°:ives.
In 1971 LApCOs were given tho r. ospon ,'i t), , l itsy for develop-
ing, project ed ul.t°ilaate Orvi.cr, ax�o,a Uoundrar°_i_c,r, for each
government agency. The.-,o "sphc r(; , of :inf l.uerxce" are to
guide LAli CO decisions on s POci;f'ic Proposals., at' yell as
promote cooperative intorgovernmontal planning of services.
Butte County TACO adopts r,phex o+ s, or long :range Service
plans for all, the cities and districts in tho County,
baking into account existing boundaries, natural and man-
made features,, service capabilities and the probable
future service needs of the area basad on growth trends,
population projections and the Butte County Gener Al. Plan
and appropriate City General Flan.
Implementation
a. The County-shall ensure adequate considorat:ion of the
Provisions of the General T';1 an in LAIC CO :r (:':view of all
proposed boundary changes.
b. Planning Commission and staff shall work with UFCO
to develop mutually-supportive spheres of influence
and, land use glans in all ax-ca,,,, of th,a County.
3 OLE AL PLAN ZLETSNTS : ThrouFh lour scrparbte ac-
tions in 19?1, -19`?3, 1K4-74 and 197, the County hats adopted.
the nine roqu,ired generol. plan ala:�rrent s. (.S'610 "Introduc ion."
for 'dstail>). At this writ trig, thr_ ;3ousing, and Public
L'
elements are also going updated. B��,O Use all
the elements 'are cono,orned with the f t 0;ure.development of
tht: h ame area; they are intend 'pende�n � and :.should logically
bo con. intent with f-ach other'i To thio end, the develop-
ment of this elommt has taken into account, the information
65
and pol..Loios of the other adopLod alrimont,,z, caspoaial1 L, 110
four now elements, added in A11 ful:uro vovioiono of
this c10MGMU or any othor will, r(:;qu:i.ro a dotall.od revlow
of other olonin.' a.tm 'Go f ir)(1 rind 01181190 Conflicting
policy
statemonto on thea samo subject.
Implementation;
Fa. Fu: rev gluon., in th.i s text and ;f"ut;uve rovisi.ons of
land use plan map amondmonts shall be oorrelated with
stated con:rerns and po2AcJ.c s in all adopted elements.
b. The County r haltl review and, amend, if necessary, .the
other general plan elements -to minimize conflicts with
y
the provi;3a.ons of the land use element.
4. OTHER C 0M11?Ywl:Dh PLANS
B . C . A . G . AIR_ QUALITY :CMPLBMENTATI~ON PLAN: Pursuant to
thefederal Clean Air Act Amendments of'19771 the State
Air Resources :Board identified Butte County and -the en-
tire Sacramen��o Valley as not having attained national;
ambient air quality standards for several types of pol-
lutants. In response to this designation and the Federal
mandate to achieve attainment, -tihe Butte County Associa-
tion of Governments agreed to become the Lead agency re-
sponsible for preparing an implementation plan for attain-
ment of national ambiens; air quality standards by December
31, '19827 or, given special. circumstances, December 31,
1987. The plan must describe; pollutant sources and
emissions, require certain permits, contain emission
limitations, implement control, measures, and commit the
necessary resources.
The ability to minimize air pollution from rrioving,ve
hicles will be critical to achieving air quality standards
in the county and makes transportation and land use plan-
ning very important considerations. The efficiency of
transportation systems, the distribution and density of
county residents and the proximity of homes to employment
and services will all have a long-term affect on air
quality.' Air pollution control measures may also affect'
the location and extent of industry and otherstationary'
sources.
Implementation;
a. The County shall evaluate potential impacts on air
quality in the development of land use plans.
b. The County shall ensure adequate consideration of its
adoptee. General Plan policies in the development of
the Air Quality Implementation Plan by the Butte
County Associa-ta.on of Governments.
CAPITAL IMPROMENTS PROGRAM: The Government Code con-
.tains very specific provisions for planning Commission
review of all public facilities projects:
66
Secti.on 65401 t,a ty, o'pec tal
diotr.iot;, board, c:omid ;�r°,i carr 'arid c,e�tinl,y dr.pol" mouta to sub-
mJ t the County a l i t;t: of t,hc l;u'tyl:i c �crorl. , prcajoct s proposod
for planning i.ni.ti ati.on or rc n;'it,rual cin duving 4boa clialaing
fi_,ical yoar. Ail offiolal agony deiE,,Ittnatod by t,'ho Board
moot clansi fy all propo;,ra i is, ln-,oparo a coordi n atod program
of public works for t ho noxa yoKar, nno. oW)mi.t the
program to the County Planning ComraiS,' .1011 for their TTVisw
and report as to conformity wllh t;ho adopted gonoral plan.
Section G 4Q") a.1r,o r,tipul_ator.r that no property sha;l_1 be
acquired for public pu.rpo men, no public ��ropc�rLy' cl. rpo�ed
of, no streets abandoned, and no publ.i.c structures construe -
ted or authorized until. the Planning Commis7sion has reviewed
the project fors conf'ormi ty wi tka the general plan.
In 1976 the Board m,ovod to impl omcant Soc;tion 65 401 by
designating the County Departman't of Public Works any the
official agency to receive propoisala and submit a coordin-
ated, program or public workrt to the, Commission. The Board '
resolution also established annual deadlinop for ,submission
of projects by local Sovornment agen.cior, program prepare -
tion by Public Works, and thea Planning Commission review
and. report as .wel.). as requiring public Works to transmit
the: Commissionlo determinations t;e the, Board or project -
sponsoring agency. This revic w procedure has riot been
consistently followed since its initiation, largely be-
cause public agenc:ior, have rcpt boon, ,ubmitti.ng de ,criptions
of proposed projects to I'lubli.c Works.
The magnitude of expenditures, they pLLxmanonce of public
facilities and their significant; affect.- on land use plan-
ning demonstrate the nood for augment i Tig year--.to-year
approach of Government Code ;r, qui_rom(APJJS with longer -
range programming of public works projects. Development
of a capital improvements program similar to these of
other California jurisdictions would faci:litato sound
fiscal maxxagement and. the i:mpl.ementa`t ion of the Ccundy's
adopted policies on future development. The program would:
describe all desired projects, estimate the priority and
cost of each project, and formulate a schedule for con-
struction and financing based upon forecasts of future
revenues and expenditure capabilities. By planning public
facilities in this fashion projects can .,e ocheduled
when most needed, funds can ire ac oumul.at ed for large
projects, >and interested agancie q and the general public
will know about projects in advance of construction.
Implementation:
a. County staff shall notify vIT local public agencies
of the Government Code requirements for review of
pudic works projects and: sol.16i.t: their assistance
and timely submittal of proposed. projects,
6?
1). The cai`l"icial agency doMg,pat'od by UJI(N Board, of Super-
vil: OM sbal L Prf)Paro a c,00rd°inat (g.1, pr"o(,rarn of all
public: works )Peaj()(;Ufl proporriod forn��uing Discal
Year and slaali submit; tho prop,!ram to the I'l.anning
Comma's ,ion for the a,r r"i (-1w Of itta 00T),l Orlaity with
the General Plan.
c. The Count shall
County prepare, adopt and maintain a
year capital impr. ovoments o pendi,turebs program which
takes into account the provisions of the General flan..
:C.A.G. REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN: Foli.owing the
enactment of the rl'ransportation Development Act or 1971
(SB 325) , they Butte County Association Of Governments
was designated by the California Business and Transpor-
tation, Agency as the Regional Transportation Planning
Agency charged with -the responsibility Of Preparing and
adopting; Transportation .Plan for the Butte County Region
and administering, the Local Transportation,Yund.The
Regional Transportation Plan is directed to -the achieve-
ment of coordinated and balanced regional -transportation
system, that are consistent with the regional needs and
goals.
In 1975 BCAG adopted a Regional Transportation Plan for
Butte County ,and submitted the document to the California
Department of Tvansportation for ,incorporation into the
California `1.'ransportat .on Flan. Thir same. plan was sub-
sequently readopted and resubmitted in 1976 and 1977 and
is undergoing a major revision at this -time.
The goals of the adopted plan are to develop a trans-
portation system which satisfies the reasonable needs
for movement of people and comm6dities via all. roads .
rail, air and all other transportation modes. It is
also intended that the system "support, the physical
development, urban growth and land use patterns_ pr aposed
by regional and local planning boda.es" . Though the
Regional Transportation Pl,�n is closely related to
general plan concerns and even duplicates the focus of
the Circulation Element, there is no requirement for
Planning, Commission approval. .
Implementation:
a. The County shall: ensure adequate consideration of
its hand Usk policies and plans in the development
of the Regional Transp,)rtation Plan, by the Butte
County 'Association of Governments-
68
AND AMEW)NCi 111
I TEWP, REVl STON: An tho T>.rf,rx i n i t arii 't' i cralc o and r.)ract:i,cal.
app Tic Ii ► M o Lho Gotiora 1 1`11111, a.r.10.1',aa.1-10 i, 11, has
boc;ome much r►1orn !jnj:)() rt-aII I, Lo wain tai l 1, rrn up --'t o--ila'l; o
do c'lurrloni lI aaeurti f;(I.y i1o't' j ,"C t 1 1�t�b f',11.�T,I'� °r1't� lsc: i.,.1. t, o. *, . Corl-
soquontly, t;ho Govnvr)U)r'Id; Godo now a`oC1L11ves- tho Planning
(7ommi.s.s ion to filo it, ,rjj)u 'P(,ll()'rt w�Lth "t4ot;h M),o Board
of Bup)< :r'v7.fidrs ".,rrldl t lv� ofI':icoof and.
Ro.,v,-arch on. thr.' of i;h(` pjrlril 'I'lQ+ j)r'ot;r .xi.. in :Ltd
l,7rlplc.inc�nt.a'tic�rti and 11;s etnupl] anc o w:l.t;h Goinex'-al. Pl.arz
g, u�i (I(,.Li:.rir w
Eiralurrti.on of thf, P0110i tAVI and sLtandal"ds in thx,rN, text
will. con'l;inuo €ft;r,r adoption no a rrrrtural pavtt of the
day -fats -•day i..nterpr otat i on tinct apj,al i c ati gin. of if :,, pro"
vir,iona, Lg otaff and It lt,°, likely
Lhai; chanE inp; condiLions, and r xporLCtr CIO In policy `1m
plemontiat:ion will uncov(,r a ratrmber of adopted policies
ro uiring modification ,nn(I the rrt?od, fo.t.- wr.i.t;ton policies
on Gadd t: i orial 1300,aunO the provir;i.ons of the
Gen,(�I?al Pltiu at-(., do,ril;ru-,d .fOr 'APP]A k,atioli to Wir dovel,op-
mc'rnt, of Iniir' ell vo ("Ount-Y , t,t' xl Wrltal(jlT1unt,ii care-
ful,
are =Ful, c07.a."a dorati on kly t_ll� , Glomrr)i_, ,si.on MId BOaTd o:i' all
j)t�3sitlf, ix;rl.�l i cr:rt� ic�ra.,�;.,
.ism _lomentati on
a. The Gourrt;y wi ;l. l conr,idr%r. all for needod
;�Y,.rari rtf .in the Gant ral Plan artm:l r,ha l .i rzi �; i�tr ftp ramal.
<�l,llzc v� Tsrr�r E r li zfr; iarr worthy
of i'urthi,r consi..dc,rat on.
b. T''�1'''y, he arinuaj. repovL .v(-qux ,rod by Goverr�rnr ntcod(- 8� ct;ions
and 65400 shall be pr(ppred by
mit"tod to the Planning Commi,. slon and Board of Super
2. MAP REVIOI:IbN: County rE-�gu.l.ati,ons now allow rr,,vi sions
ilrl the land uioe plan maps, to b.� i nitiat(,td by th, Gou'rl.t y
or private partios at any time with applicationP, and
foes similar to rezoning. California rlannin.g l.a,w some-
what rE-�:stricto Uie reva-s on procoss her. pormit"t:ing the
actual, adoption of am'Mndme nt-s to any mandatory elf ment
no more than throe tF:mos por ,oal endar year. However, ,
since the Board is :f roo to ,�(-,cumuT„ate numerous revisions
for adopti,,,n on k: ach amR-Tlt'j7;vai# fir tae, t iLs, restriction
may in only a c11oXt for rrr o amendments,
a. Sul; t o t;he and adopt ion o.f a land
u,xo °iara trMaXt fol- commurg Lty: 'ar(:,,R, t;ho county, will.
rot : icltr.,, l'r,IT1 rRl,.Im1 a.cai,iOrt, for r h at' ge; s from one
land u�lo catc.rovy to jns,)uhr-,r., rtFk . a; gr`lr�t� oru oro the land
U."'Ou plat. mar's