HomeMy WebLinkAbout79-40 10i
12 September 1979
Butte County Planning Commits. -;ion
7 County Center DvIve
Orovi.11e, California 95965
Dear Person:
Yesterday we received a letter frorn, Mr. Josep1h.1,1. Ilobsntl
informing us of a hearing, ,;.chedul.ed for today, at wliicb the
aci.opti��i1 of a Land Use Map designating Rural lResidential land
as Open and Grazing .Land with a 40 -acre minimum paroel size
is to be considered,
Ouviousl,), we are uriable to attend the meeting, but we are
concerned ,Tout the effebi: this will have on our property,
10 acres on Mentz Road,,
"."le would appreciate hearfig from you and learr:ing the results
of the hearing and how it may affect us. Thank you.
Sincerely,
Mr and Mrs. I), L. Johnson
2012 Ruhland Ave., Apt, 2
Redondo. Beach, California
90.278
'fa.x r,aret Arnold
d
Box 1574
Ionterey, Ca.
RO: AP 41-01-107
�aear Ms. Arnold:
Reference pis rindo to
your telephone inquiry 4:,.)ncOrjj rzf'
igro jacsrty locn.te d adificent
to Clark Road .I, zYity
'`1'�iia is
G�pnrryf{3�.j1'�",T��y,Vry
�'(:V"♦;�q,577.7],•'!+*1 �j1�' �,,!17.�u � aw' ��t �'a+��;� of
fCCoiim.-1X
{
thethe `.IS.�J��y"'ral L',,,S+g��GIyyyl #.},�. it#lel
C4:f -Rurnl � si'lCwnti'a.l
y pq
�166i� ��4�ibtli�A�tive 4y?nM-ir�Ly+dA
',
55�.tth a ¢�l r'—'.01 d.�.e, .��i3.i �c1a•1 jf,�i '/G urd�r� one
a p:tjX`ty EJcres
n th:,. a -.recommended
Jos3g;aiation is adopted tj is property
WOald lilt�f;Iy be iarOposed for rozon ng to a mi-,Jnun ptircel ni-"C
within this
range
If YOU rhould have airy questions, pj,e�
our office, re--1freeto contact
4�
Larry Broc)!! s
Planner
ir^%iasi
Intor-Dwrtinental. Akamorand'�M
TM Board of wCupervd.00v.9
FROM Bliviroximorital Rev"low Director
UON ECT - BIR Xor Propoced Rovis ions to the Land Use Bloment of
tho Butte County General Plan
OATO Septembor 14, 19?9
Tho BIR for tho prop000d Goneral Plan revision consists of the environ-
mental rofor(yncus pr.intod within the document itself , plus. any comments,
repponsfo and ohan,s that have boon received or might coma out as a
rots,ult of th(.-., -upwohnG hearing. The BIR is presently in "draft" form
,3o tin,
Y- 'add it oomiTLents received at the hearing must be summarized
and :r.-nspoxAded be writing prior to EIS, certification and adoption of.
tho GoLoral 111,,w B,'lLount itself. Comments which have been received to
date nnd, tho, chaff renpon.,,;es to those comments are enclosed for your
i,ef c.3%,noe, and r( -,view.
It J,,-, likely addit.ional comm zits will be roccived at the hearing. I
havo W tried to anticipate the hearing outcome or the Board 1z intent
o f1ndA,:ngE,,, which must be: made puxquant to the requirements of the
CalifornIA Bkojironm(-in!:a1 quality Act. I would appreciate instructions
following the hearlso Sao to your intent so I ran work with County Counsel
and tho Pl.fannIng Direetor to prepare the nocossavy wonting for the motion
which wiAl moot tho rcquirements of the law.
In liio qpproval soquonco, the first step is certification of tie Final
EIR. For the next step, projoct approval, the required findings are
an follows:
(1) Whether tho General Plan revision and development projects
whinh Rre alto-viod pursuant thereto will result in significant
adver,,,,e enviroivaental elfect,�- (I would anticipate an affirm
-
ritive "Answor.)
(2" If ti -to anzwer to (1) above is yeq then the finding must be
made as to whether there are feasible project alternatives
capabl, of voducing the anticipated adverse environmental
efTects. 12 so, these altenaatives must be selected in prof-
trance to tho oriCinal prqposall or reasons given as to My not.
"0,,ror-ri(UrLtr, --on,-,JA1,Grationz" most be formulated tc, justify
I.,roject appa�ovul in ",he face A potentially significant adverse
onviro2mcaital off octs, In thia case the finding mIght _ simply
bo that devolopm(at pursuant to an up to date General PD.n; ic
better for the than undirected or misdirocted
growth that might Lowur u0cr the preoutt plan or with sc plIal-TI
it all.
SIP OCW
19�
Oro 9
r
r
a � f
J
Board. Of SuPerva.sars
$ep•tt,mber 14, 3.0,79
og .tjja throe req;u.J.red findinfr,a, itom (2) above relating to enviroxi-
mental.ly supora Or alt(,)I'YIa•t:iveQ cot•ld potentially be the most con,tro-
versial. We have written the alternative (contaixied in the addondwn
to the LIR at tho back of Fobmary 1979 reprint and also at tho Haack
of. — to., commonts and responses packet attachod o., this Memo) to (� vc
�tho Board max:i�rnUm 97.exibility in mak.ixi map c�����es �ra.thou� the necera-�
t ity for extensive revisi=S to the BIR. The present map proposal. 1,
far ;Less environmentally adverse than the original proposal of 162,00
acres of rural re sid.en.°tial
look forward to irrprl�inS with you to bring this project to completion.
if you have any questions, please do not hesitate `to contact .ane.
Sincerely,
Earl D. Nelson
Environmental Review Director
Enc.
cc c Bettye Blair
of :Garxay Brooks
Inter -Departmental 'Memorandum
'M Planning CoiTiminsion
PROM-. Larry Broolto
SUOJECT; Status of Land. Use Blemc n't Review
0 AT t-: - September 21, 19'19
On September 16, 1979 the Board of Supervisors conducted a public
hearing on the Land TJse 'Element map. Although -the map was generally
well received. by -the Board, staff was instructed to meet with some
property owners concerning possible changes, and further to develop
a Planned Area Cluster concept of development in the Timber Mountain
and Grazing areas, incorporating density bonuses.
Staff has taken the position -that substantive changes involving
expansion of the Rural Residential areas must be accompanied by
text changes in order to comply with state mandated legal guidelines
for general plans. We have -therefore re -written the Rural Resi-
dential designation, changing the name to Agricultural Residential,
reflecting the upgrading of agriculture to a primary use. The
Agricultural Residential designation features stricter development
and zoning criteria for review of proposals below a twenty acre
density, and has somewhat less stringent site designation criteria.
We are also developing a proposal -to strengthen -the development and
zoning criteria for land divisions within the range of 5-20 acres
in the Orchard and Field Crop deoingations, in response to
criticism that the five acre minimum parcel size carries -the
potential for significant down -parceling of prime agricultural land.
This will be forwarded to your Commission shortly.
The Board has continued the hearing until 2:00 p.m. on October 16,
1979. We anticipate that specific changes proposed by the Board
will then be returned to the Commission for possible ratification.
elm
Sep bar 5,1979
Dear Property Owner:
I am writing to you because :[ am concerned about a matter which
is of great importance to all owners of property in Butte County
in particular owners or parcels in triose arean which are presently
zoned Mural Residential.
As you probably know,pr.ior to changing; the zoning; of private property
the Planning Commission must give written notice to each owner or
affected parcels of the time ani place or hearings to be held to
consider such zoning chant e:i. Written notice is not required when
hearings are held to consider changes in the County General Plan
or to adopt a new General Plan although, once Adopted by the Board
of Supervisors it becomes mandatory under State law that all lands
within the county be re -zoned to conform with the General Plan,
A`hearing is scheduled to be held on Wednesday,Septrmber 12,1970
at 7:30 P.M.at the Board of Supervisors Meeting; Room to consider
adoption of a Land Use Map which shows large areas of the County,
now zoned Rural Residential to be designated as Open and Grazing
Land with 40 acre minim, parcel sizes.
It is important that you as a property owner be present at this
and subsequent hearings affecting the future use of your real.
property. I intend to attend and will look forward to seeing you
there.
Truly Yours
oseP N..Hobson
Concerned property owner$'
P.S. If unable to attend the hearings you may write to the Butte
County Planning Commission at 7 County Center Drive,0roville
95965
min4,
gat j-'.M'i �`"�•" ��,ka� , ?� �xs.i'; (xt�a..7f+b.
t< r'. -tou "Y"Al I t"orI i �?
i .r a ;�" a'L13�.a��nr�b�,� �,o±"���� s�lYt}r,,9 i�j.u�.L1r1�t131.'tls:�Jti�
rrY, 41 1 4 ,. 1;5�'r, rr 7 t'F�x �, .,.c��,tJ�:�? ;ilv+
5 `tF"d a 1 e st (l 1!<i iSll C x l� ' �+
iii. ..
+ yy ;a
t GFI' ' ! i'. ' q.l f",. •. i• "1 PZ s i} i Laa4z
9,E�,s?Tl'+•t:1.rk�> lii+rSt { �. $ia'9 AiW�iaii,L�;�. •,4L. A.3 i-`+
x
�t/•ir f'O. F#r13
have r,, �Tj"��. AL;tnipi r
f 11t �i ttS..i�,S,vB�r
et
7�1 Ali t6,F{. .M .I laitl
kani be enc-ouragod find+Jiat f eveloPulent 0 Gho,` aertaflz erthat
af,ticu',ttural loni�,s be discoura e, �t certain y pA '
th:, = Land Use �14ap does the opposite.
lrorare is anti has beem a dontinuing demand Poµ pa.rOel:s In the
rural wrens c��' S to '10 acres to be used as horn` sit,f:s tjy peoisle
..1• ti? 'livu :t.n ?'1 r'i,1ra1 '3B�tSr1r.�. 'it5:ii. }Ao jld pra,!'ar hilly
�. r, }.
' :"1( ,1 In r i '} ".1" ".' 1" J • V r'y
L
n�yla ad r t propo,;ee, map , tv p �`:xy yn :., ;r7� devel o},n
m,t o
ti r •offs 1I i 1 L causf-. devL�lopv r'a to �t: ,rf, buying; u�r the
oothJl�. p t�k: the> li res.7'x .Ga
KaJ `.i1y {id ~iq +l. ks4i:7:i� lavi�1Rnr` itM `/Is �Li .^ l i�.;� T 5 k
,. 1 i`it. 1['t: Vii.^. i `i.•r 1,,'r pr'v �,C% .i,: w Y..i.
1'.
r• l�<.;; 'tiny- I;i�F �.r• �,' t,l� o th ° r,�or h�.7 1 a,'�^�;•
e.. .ori �?al Ln rcl w }� ;rj<rtc: trio foothill
t laoul ��;1 tci7arsh star r ,� Flctual sine,
'areas an ,r X"�,t l' G`l;a .,tint},3 w l th 5 or � ti" Glc re' i
x' r }Ji rr 3L;iK•rl ! rY W 4Ftlf? can certainly
of pci.rce s i.:rk'.i' � `� 1"s" c, o.1�.ro i.^ . �?� CUltn y 3Ft n,.1z•� j��.si::T inv
t:e .PXpx, .CIO
d cn 'fcr bL-Lt- r job { fl.g {� }ra}
staff.
°lhr,n,r< y 3'.1 ''i� , your
in 1Y
Ve
ot�l �p�l Y• raler,;lo Road
guile CO# Monti'
ing
't, 1 i
Pbyi�lpA,�sttr$q
4319 Marl virly
Carmichael, CA. 95608
September 16, 1979
Butte County Board of Supervisors
1.859 Bird Street
Oroville, CA. 95965
Re: General Plan Land Use map
Gentlemen•
As owners of several parcels of land in Butte County, we
want Itou to know that we are in complete disagreement with
the Planning Commission's proposed General Plan Land Use
Mal).
While our foothill parcels are not economically suitable
for any type of farming, the proposed plan still would not
allow us -to divide them into small parcels. At the same
time, you are allowing good agricultural landz to be
divided into small parcels. This we feel is discriminating
against non -agriculturally used lands.
We hope you will consider our point of view when you meet
Tuesday.
Very truly,
Louis M. & Jacqueline Duncan
TO Butto County Board of Supervisors
PROM: Gooxge (firth, Glmir man -Butte County Agricultural
Advisory Commission
SIJFdJZOT: Commission Pecommendations for Board Consideration
C 14, Scapteamber 4, 1979
The Commission respectfully recommends: (1) That -the .Board of Supervisors
consider the attached letter for submission to the hearing officer of the
California Department of Food and Agriculture public hearing in regards to the
implementation of AB 3765.
Implementation of this law as proposed, Will require unreasonable increases in
mone'tarj and time costs for the individual pesticide user, Viand the County of
Bi tte with respect to pesticide use enforcement costs. Said costs Trill greatly
exceed any public benefit which may be derived from &B 3765's implementation.
(2) That the land use element of the Butte County General Phan reflect the
fc�llowj.no ;
a. "Agri cu -1 tural Uses" be redesignated to a primary use rather than a
seccndary use in the "Rural Residential" category. (This Commission is
in agreement with the Planning Commission's recommendation relevant to
such redesignation„)
b. The total amount of "rural Residential.” land use designations should
be minimized to the greatest extent possible by use of the propex critexia
in the evaluation process.
George Wirth
duo �Q P/ahnln
Opp �mlrrd
Ig
79
C, ULAINCT MORUY
R. PATRICK SMITW
00I4N RQGUPS SURK
OA110ARA U• PARRIWW
THOMAS 0. ROJA
September 25, 1979
Mr. Larry Brooks
Butte County Planning Department
7 County Center Drive
aroville, CA 95965
Re; Butte County General Plan/
Revision of Dayton -Durham Area
Dear Mr. Brooks:
This letter will confirm our telephone conversation of,
September 21, 1979. As I indicated, I received a copy of the
proposed Agenda for the Planning Commission meeting ot.:heduled for
September 26, 1979.
I became a bit nervous, as Item VI of the Agenda indicates
that the Commission will consider the proposal for land use and
zoning changes to the general plan for the Griddly-Biggs area.
in your. August 7, 1979, Inter -Department Memorandum to the
Plaiming Commission, the Grid:dly-Biggs area was scheduled as the
number two area to beconsidered after -the Chico urban area and
just before the Dayton -Durham area..
However, you indicated to me that the Department had already
prepared a proposal for the Griddly-Biggs area and had decided to
go ahead and process that area prior to the Chico urban area.
You indicated that the Chico urban area will be considered after
the Griddly--Biggs area and that the Dayton -Durham area will
follow consideration of the Chico area.
You further indicated that it was still your estimate that
it would be early 1980 before the Dayton -Durham area comes under
consideration,
As we discussed, I would appreciate a telephone call or e
letter as soon as the staff begins consideration of the Dayton -
Durham. area. Attorney. Gerry Hermansen, telephone 533.2662, is
also assisting` us and would appreciate being notified also.
T�
.. ,� 1979
C?rvvillaa G'alfot.�q
A, 1 1, , L, 03, j0. , , ,, , , "I "A
ifif, OW 1 76.
1Y 32$
'V
T I-,
i
Iii
N r
TO;
FROMI
SUOJECT;
Inter -Departmental Memorandum
Board of Supervisors
Larry Brooks, Advance Planning
General Plan Land. Use Element
DATE! October g 1979
At the September hearing on the Turd Use Element several objections
were raised by developers or their representatives concerning the
map proposal forwarded by the Planning Commission. At the direction
of your Board staff has met both with developers sud represonuatives
of the agricultural community in an 074-^mpt to formulate Man
modifications which are acceptable Go developers while still pro-
viding
ro-v ding :.For ample protect'an of open space and agricultural lands.
In keeping with a desire to maintain conformity between the map and
the text, corresponding changes to both are proposed. The recommend-
ed changes are as follows:
1 Chanre Rural Residential cate ory to Agricultural Residential
In addition to the name change, which reflects -the upgrading of
agriculture to a primary use, the list of consistent zones has
been shortened by removal of all zones which permit parcel sizes
of less than 20 acres. Zones which permit parcel sizes within
a range of 'l to 20 acres are listed as conditionally consistent,
subject; to findings of conformity with five conditional zoning
and development criteria. The criteria address agricultural
compatibility, public service levels, physical development
capability and proximity to commercial services.
2 A ricultural Residential Site Designation Criteria
Three of -the site designation criteria found in the Rural Resi-
dential category have been omitted:
1. Needed for rural residential development within 20 years.
4. Natural conditions suitable for wells and septic tanks.
6. Reasonable accessibility to commercial services, schools,
,fire protection services and other community facilities.
These have been omitted because they imply suitabil ty for rural
residential development. Since the new designation implies agri-
cultural suitability as well as conditional development potential.,
all areas so designated need not necessarily conform to these
former criteria. Conversely, a new site designation criteria has
been added to the Agricultural Residential category recognizing past
official actions.
The site designation criteria changes have allowed modest expansion:
of the Agricultural Residential areas on the map without compromis-
ing the integrity of the text.
3. Orchard and Field Crops
This category has been revised utilizing the same type of format
r
General Plan Land Use Blement
Page 2
employed in the new Agricultural .Residential category. In
response to criticism that the 5 acre minimum carried the
potential for down -parceling of large tracts of prime agricul-
tural land, the category has been divided into both consistent
and conditionally coasistbnt zoning and development categories.
Zones allowing minimum parcel sizes ranging from 20 to 160
acres have been designated as consistent, while zones allowing
parcel sizes of 5 to 20 acres are shown as conditionally con-
sistent, subject to findings of conformity with three conditional
zoning and development criteria. The three criteria address
existing parcel sizes, proximity to urban boundaries and the
effects of the proposed, zoning on existing agricultural produc-
tion. The rationale for this is a derj,.:re to accommodate
.,7rtain smaller parcels (5 to 20 acres) within the Orchard ana
Field Crop designation while providing a greater degree of
protection from down --parceling; for 'hard" agricultural activities
on larger tracts of land located in more remote areas.
4. Planned Arta Clusters (PA -C)
In line with a desire to provide reasonable development options
for ol/mers of land irk the Grazing and Open Land and Timber
Mountain categories,; a policy outline providing for implementa-
tion of planned cluster development incorporating density
bonuses is proposed. Although specifics would be addressed
within the context of a new PA -C ordinance to be developed
following adoption of the new Land Use Element, the general
framework would allow density bonuses ranging up to 100% for
projects which permanently set aside za minimum 80% of the land
ATEA
Prefwithin a project for open space and resource conservation
ores. The percentage of the density bonus would be corre-
lated w:tth the percentage of land placed into permanent reserves.
The higher bonuses would be awarded to projects utilizing less
land for development.
5. Map Changes
Revisions proposed are in accordance with the text changes
outlined above. Certain specific changes are proposed in order
to place land under single ownership, which is currently under-
going private development planning, into a single use category.
The bulk of the revisions pertain to the southeastern part of
the county which is currently zoned A_5. While the Agricultural.
Residential category has been expanded, by approximately 30
square miles from the Rural Residential category on the map
forwarded by the Plw;ning Commission, the policy content of the
new designation has significantly shifted toward agricultural
conservation.
North Esplanade Proposal
Subsequent to the September Board hearing the Planning Commission was
asked about reinaorporatin.g their previously approved map proposal
General. Plan Land Use ;dement
Page 3
for the North Esplanade in Chico. The Commission hearings conducted
several months ago were relatively non-con.troversial,4 since there
are private projects pending, your Board may wish to consider includ-
ing the Esplanade proposal in -this revision. A specific revision to
the map forwarded by the Planning Commission which changes a portion,
of Land along the western side of the Esplanade is outlined on the
attached mala. The change is .from a Commercial designation to Orchard
and Field Crops, asthis particular property is under a Land Conser-
vation Agreement (Williamson Act) with a forty acre Minimum parcel
size,
elm
ll
AGRICULTURAL IMSlDETIAL
x
2
3
Primary Uses: Agricultural uses and single family dwellings at rural
—ns
2
3
4
dei,t1 s.
4
6
SecondaE-;Z Uses: Animal husbandry, forestry, intense animal uses, home
r
6
7
5
occupations, mining, outdoor recreat;i:on facilites, environmental pre--
servation activities, airports, utilities, and
7
9
public quasi. -public uses
:;roup quarters, cane homes and. transient lodging.
,8
'9
10
11.
Site Designation Criteria:
10
12
1. Beyond service areas of community water and sewer systems.
11
12
13
2. Less than 30% slopes.
13
14
3. Adjacent or near to existing roads and public utilities.
14
15
4. Not within flood plains or known active faults.
15
16
r Past official actions.
? tens
16
17
ty-of Use: Minimum parcel size of one to forty acres. One
17
18
single -fa mily dwelling per parcel.. Home occupations, farm animals,
18
19
other uses and setbacks regulated to maintain rural character.
19
20
21
Consistent Zohesz A-20, A-407 TM -207 TM -407 FR -20 FR-�40, & CP.
20
21
22
23
Condition ally- Consistent Zones: A-5, A-107 TM -1 thru TM -10, FR -2 thru
22
23
24
25
FR -10, SR --1, -MIS--3, RT:lA, & PA -C, subject to findings of con.formity
with Conditional Zoning and Development criteria listed below:
24
26
25
27
Conditional Zoning and Development Criteria.
2
7
227
23
1. Ccmpatibls with neighboring agricultural activities.
29
2-• Evidence of adequate water and sewage disposal capacity.
29
3.0
3. Availability of adequate fire protection facilities.
30
31
4. Adequately maintained approved road access with sufficient capacii;y31
3
to sexnrice area.
32
33
5. .Reasonable accessibility to commercial services and schools.
33
34
35
Zoning Factors:
54
36
1 Existing parcel sizes and residential densities.
3,536
37
2. Slope.
Soil conditions and water availability.
37
59 4.
Effects on adjacent uses, crop production, livestock grazing,
3,9
40
forestry, resources extraction, and wildli e.habitat.
40
41
5• Proximity to public roads, and of?:er public facilities.
40
41
42
6. Distance from airports, railroads and industrial. uses.
42
43
7. Existing utilities and drainage facilities.
44
8. Potential for surface cracking, landslides and erosion.
43
44
45
9. Effects on noise, traffic flow and safety, water quality, air
45
46
quality, wildlife habitat and. general environmental quality.
4 5
47
10. Local. desires.
48
ll. Potential for pest insect breeding,.
47
49
4,7
so
.49
.
S1
5o
52
S1
53
52
54
53
S5
54
56
55
56
I
OROIJARD AND FIELD CROPS
1
2
2
3
5
4
Primary Uses Cultivation, hax-vest, storage, processing, sale and, di -
4
s
tribution of all plant crops, especially annual food crops.
5
6
7
Secondary Uses: Animal husbandry and, intense animal uses, resouvee
6
7
8
exl;raction and processing, hunting and water -related recreation facilitie.98
)
c9
dwellings,, airports, utilities, environmental preservation activities,
10
publl,c and quasi -public uses, home occupations,,
10
12,
Site Des igna ion, Criteria:
12
13
1. Soil condl -ns -w—e:Ll suited for plant crop operations.
13
14
2. Adequate water supply.
14
15
3. Average parcel sizes of 5 acres or more.
is
16
4. Used for crop production or secondary uses.
16
17
5. Adjacent uses compatible with primary and secondary uses.
17
is
18
19
20
Intensi of Use: Minimum parcel size of 5 acres. One single-family
Ltz-
19
? 0
21
ng per parcel with additional housing for on -site -employees.
-
21
22
23
Consistent Zones: A-20 thru A-160, RC, & PQ.
22
'11, 3
24
24
25
Conditionally Consistent Zones: A-5, A-10, subject to findings of con-
25
26
formance with Conditional Zoning and Development Criteria listed below.
26
27
23
Conditional Z,.,�ning and Development Criteria:
27
28
29
1. Average existing parcel sizes range from 5 to 10 acres.
29
30
2. Adjacent to or in the general vicinity of urban boundaries.
30
31
3. Present status of agricultural production will not be significantly
31
32
impaired.
32
33
33
34
Zoning.Factors:
34
35
li Existing parcel sizes and dwelling densities.
35
36
2. Proximity to urban development.
36
37
3. Effects on ac',Jacent uses.
37
38
4. Potential fo,- pest insect breeding.
39,5.
;.ti.
Economic viaoil'L
39
t0
6. Local desires.
40
41
41
42
42
41
43
44
44
45
45
46
46
477
48
48
49
49
5050
51
51
55
53
54,
54
55
55
56
56
,
o
1
GRAZING AND ORM LAND
�
2
3
4
PrirnaLMgv) a; Livestock grazing, animal huoband.ry, intense antrnal. urn-,
4
5
and d animal matter .i voce s s ,.ng.
5
6
6
7
S(-,condary Uses: Resource extrac-bion and processing, forestry, Plant
7
g
crops, agricultural support services, outdoor recreation facilities, air-- 8
n
ports, dwellings, utilities, environmental. preservation activities, pub- 0
1.0
lic and quasi -public uses and home occupations.
lea
12
Site Designation Criteria:
12
13
1. Natural conditions poorly suited for plant crops or timber.
13
14
2. Average parcel sizes of 40 acres or more.
14
15
3• Used for grazing and secondary uses.
15
16
4. Adjacent uses conducive to livestock grazing.
16
17
13
Intensity of Use. Minim -Lim parcel size of 40 acres. Where _a PA -C is
17
is
19
sed ., i 1 _from o� -19
20
inF, janitzprovided at least SO°o of the total acrea e of a *0 is
70
21
s2� :for' open 'space uses. One single-fazn� ly dwelling per parcel with
21
22
additional housing for on-site employees.
22
23
24
'3
Consistent Zones: TIM -40 thru 5'M-1.60, A-40 thru A-160, IPR-40 thru FR -160,24
25
R�-0 , C -F , TP --1.60 , PAC
25
26
2E
27
Zoning; Factors:
27
23
1. Existing parcel sizes and dwelling densities.
29
2. Livestock carrying capacities.
29
30
j. Slope.
30
31
4. Proximity to urban development.
31
32
5. Effects on adjacent uses.
32
33
6. Local desires.
33
34
3,4
35
335�
3
36
37
a"7
38
319
39
39
40
'10
41
41
42
42
43
43
44
44
45
45
46
46
477
43
48
49
4.0
50
so
51
_
51
52
2
53
53
54
_
54
55
55
56
56
l
TIMBER -MOUNTAIN
�
2
2
z
4
.): ri mYar;y 'Uses: ;[++'oreot management and the harves tang and processing of
Y.
4
5
y1
oro'o t produc is
5
6
6
7
Secon,daL:2y Uses : Animal husbandry, reoource extraction and processing
7
s
enviroronmental preservation activities, outdoor recreation facilities,
S
9
dwellings, utilities, public and quasi -public uses, home occupations,
and 9
10
airports •
10
11
11
12
Site DesiMation Oriteria:
12
13
1... C imates, slope and soils generally suitab=le for conifer forests
and 13
14
commercial timber production.
14
15
2. Average parcel sizes of 40 acres or more.
15
16
3. Ownership by U.S. Government or timber companies.
16
17
4. Adjacent uses conducive to timber production.
17
is
19
Intensity of Use: Minimum parcel size of 40 acres. Vaiere a PA -C is usedi a
20
'the mi.nl.niiim gross density could vary from 20 to 40 acres -per dwellinf
?0
21
unit provided at least 80°0 of the total acreage ,ect =E� ,
,sj:1021
22
FoFor open space uses. One sih.g e -family dwelling per parcel with addition
-92
23
al housing for on s to employees.
Z3
24
24
25
Consistent Zones: TM -40 thru TM -160, A-40 thru A-160, FR --40 thru FR -1,60,25
-,
20
C , C -F ,` TIP --19"0 and P
26
27
27
23
Zoning Factors:
2s
29
1. Exis-ting parcel. sizes and dwelling dez si,ties.
20
30
2; Slope.
31
31
3. Elevation.
31
32
4. Road access.
32
33
5. Effects on adjacent uses.
3'i
34
6,. Local desires.
3345
3
3
36
36
37
37
S ia
39
33
39
40
-
40
41
41
42
42
43
43
44
44
45
45
46
4
46
477
4'
r
44
49
4 n
50
5n
51
51
52
5?
5.3
53
54
54
55
5S
56
56
G'E'NERA' PL4jNN PROP SAS.
i
NORTH ESPLANADE
�•:: C0MMERCIAL
L
N D U S °T R I A L x,
Y / �
MEDIUM-DENSIl IMA'L
S 1)UADAt
LOW-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
MUNICIPAL
AIR90Rr
FIELDD
\ i ;I� 'r c
16
' i! 0ti�
it
y
_ t
I
__j
b �
Y
In er-00partmental Memorandum
M Planning Commission
FROM. Larry Brooks, Planner III
SUILMM General Plan land. Use-tl.ement
DAM October 19, 1079
On. October 16, 1979 the Board of Supervisors closed the General
Plan hearing to the public and sent several Land Use Element modifications
back to the Planning Commission for a report and recomlr.endation, pursuant
to Government Code Section 65356.
Most of the changes have been worked out with. developer's; agri-
cultural representatives and various other interested parties. The Board
also passed a motion of intent to adopt the Land Use Element with the
following modifications on October 30, 1979, and have continued, the closed
hearing until that date at 2:30 P. M.
In keeping with a. desire to maintain conformity between the map
and the text, corresponding chages to both have been proposed. The rec-
ommended changes are as follows:
1. Change Rural llesidential. category to Agricultural Residential
In addition, to the naris change, which reflects the upgrading of
agriculture to a primary use, the list of consistent zones has
been shortened by removal of all zones which permit parcel size!
of less than 20 acres. Zones which permit parcel sizes within
a range of 1 to 2.0 acres are listed as conditionally consistent,
subject to findings of conformity with five conditional zoning
and development criteria. The criteria address agricultural
compatibility, public service levels, physical development
capability and proximity -to commercial services.
2. ASricultural Residential Site Designation Criteria
Three of the site designation criteria found in the Ruxal Resi-
dential category have been omitted
1. Needed for rural residential development within 20 gears.
4. Natural conditions suitable for wells and septic tanks.
-6. Reasonable accessibility to commercial services, schools,
fire protection services and other co=unity facilities.
These have been emitted because they imply suitability foxy rural
residential deve_,)—oment., Since the new designation implies agri—
cultural suitabil.ty as well as conditional development potential,
all areas so d.esi,rated need not necessarily conform to these
former criteria. 1onversely, a new site desig:na.tion criteria has
been added to the Ag icultural Residential category recognizing pass
cfFicial actions.
The site desiration criteria changes have allowed modest expansion,
13
General PJ.an. Land Use E33,e=it - Memo 3,0/19/79 M ])age 2
w.
of the Ag
,ricultuxal Residential areas on the map without compromis-
ing the integrity of the text.
3. Orchard and Field Crops
This category has been revised utilizing the same type of format
employed in the new Agricultural Residential category. In
response to criticism that the 5 acre minimum carried the
potential for dowa-parceling of lax -Se tracts of prime agricul-
ta=al land, the category has been divided into both coasistelit
and conditionally consilt6nt zoning and development categories.
Zones allowing minimum parcel, sizes ranging from 20 to 160
acres have been designated as consistent, while zones allowing
parcel sizes of 5 to 20 acres are shown as conditionally con-
sistent, subject to findings of conformity with three conditional
zoning and development criteria. The three criteria address
existing parcel sizes, proximity to urban boundaries and the
effects of the proposed zoning on existing agricultural produc-
tion. T'Le rationale for this is a desire to accommodate
certain smaller parcels (5 to 20 acres) within the Orchard and
Field Crop designation while prorv-Lding a greater degree of
protection from down -parceling for "hard" agricultuxal activities
on larger tracts of land located in more remote areas.
4. Planned Area Clusters 'PA -C')
In line with a desire to provide reasonable development options
for owners of land in the Grazing and Open Land and Timber
Mountain categories� a policy outline providing for implementa-
tion of planned cluster development incorporating density
bonuF-as is proposed. Although specifics would be addressed
within the context of a new PA --C ordinance to be developed
following adoption of the new Land Use Element, the general
framework would allow density bonuses ranging up to 100% for
projects which permanently set aside a minimum 80% of the land
area within a project for open space and resource conservation
purposes. The percentage of the density bonus would be corre-
lated with the percentage of land placed into permanent reserves.
The higher bonuses would be awarded to proaJeats utilizing less
land for development.
5. _Map, ChZM, ._s
Revisions proposed are in accordance with the text changes
outlined above. Certain specific changes are proposed in order
4 -
Go place land under single ownership, which is currently under-
going private develoIPent planning,, into a single use category.
The bulk of the revisions pertain to the southeastern part of
the county which is currently toned A-5. While the Agricultural
Residential category has been expanded by approximately '3.0
square miles from the Rural Residential category on the map
forwarded by the Planning Commission, the policy content of the
new designation has significantly shifted toward agricultural
conservation.
a
AGRIr,UrMI ATa�T-5-72EgTV
3
�1
^� ,y 7 �ry y
.CEl—In171-
-t--.UR'�%�: „t:.. �.c�.1tu�"al uses and 8�.,ngy.�,e fa�.�..1.,y di���i.�J..L�.�.gs air
denbiti�,.
ry 1
5
ruraJ. ;�
6
7
Secondary UsLIS: Animal b'U'Sbandry, fore -try, �T]ten�G' animal uses
occu.0a° ion , mi
`" n� zag, outdoor 'rc�.1
4
5
home F
g
recreation tcs, environncntal
serer° tion activities, airports, utilities
,
pre- 7
10
group quarters, cane homes and transient j lodging. and quasi public
g' g•
used}8
11
Site Designation Criteria:
]n
12
13
1- :Beyond sexvio e areas of community water and sewer systems.
2, Less than. j0/ slopes.
1
12
14
S
5. Adjacent or near to existing roads and public utilities.
4. Not within flood plains
1.3
16
or known active faults.
5. Wast official actions.
14
15
17
18
ntensity of Use: Minimum parcel size of one to for 16
single-family dwellin per -�J acres: Ocie 17
g p parcel. Home
19
20
occupations, farm, an.iWal$,
other uses and setbacks regulated to maintain rural, character.
18
21
22
Consistent Zolies : A-20, A-40, TIM -207 TM --40, p.R-•20,, FR -40, & CF.
1a
..
2 0
23
24
Conditionally Consistent Zones; A- A.
R -ltd, SR -1 5 7 10, TM --1 thru TM -10 FR -2
-I`1i-S, R�'-1A, pA
21
22
thru 2
25
26
3
-C, subject to findings of conf ormits 24
with Conditional Zoning and Development criteria listed
27
below:
Conditional_Zon.in and Development Criteria;
1.
25
26
23
29
Compatible wit"h neighboring agricultural activities.
2. Evidence of adequate
27
30
31
water and sewage disposal. capacity.
Availability of adequate fire Protection facilities.
4- Adequately
24
29
32
maintained, a
to service area. approved road access with sufficient capact 31
3,3
34
5. Reasonable accessibility to commercial services and schools.
l.
3?
35
Zoning Factors:
3'
3Fi
37
1. 1, xxsting parcel sizes and residential dennsities.
2. Slope.
34
3 5
38
39
5. Soil conditions aad water availability.
44 Effects on adjacent uses,
36
37
40
41
crop production, livestock gazing,
forests y, resources extraction, and wildlife habitat
5- Proximity to
`�
39
42
public roads, and otheries.
6. Distance from airports; railroads pindustrial luses.
40
41
43
44
and
7. -"r°.Zsting utilities and drainage facilities,..
8- Potential
42
45
for surface cracking, landslides and erosion,
9. Effects on.naise, traffic flow and
43
44
46
47
safety, water quality, air
quality, wildlife habitat and. general environmental Quality.
10. Local. desires.
4S
48
11, Potential for pest insect breeding.
46
497
50
48
5i
41
52
So
53
51
54
52
5553
56
_
54
55
56
3
4
5
6
7
12
13
14
is
16
17
is
19
20
21
22
25
24
25
26
27
23
29
30
31
32
33
34
13
36.
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
S0
51
52
53
54
55
56
a
40 GRAZINr, AM) Q -PMT T.Alan G
2
3
2�rimaT-,y Use�-: Livestock grazing, animal, husbandry, intense animal usG-c 4
and anima -1 --matter
processing.
S�,condary Uses: Resource extraction and processing, forestry, plant
crops,
7
agricultural Support services, Outdoor, recreation facilitie
ports, dwellings, utilities, environmental
air
preservation activitiess'
tic a,�Ld quasi -public uses and home occupations. pi., b- 9
Site Designation Cr: l:-Iria:
1. Natural conditions Poorly suited for plant crops or timber.
2. Average parcel sizes 40
13
of acres or more.
3. Used for grazing and secondary uses.
14
4. Adjacent uses conducive to livestock grazing.
is
16
Intens ����Use.' Mini -mum parcel, size of 40 acres. Where a -PA -C is
used the
17
18
min;.mum gross density could vary from 20 to 40 acres per dwell-ig
ing Unit provided at least 80% of the total
acreage of a project is set
aside for open 'space uses. One single-family dwelling per parcel with
additional housing for
?0
21
on-site employees.
22
Consistent Zones: TH-40 thru TM -160, A-41.0 V"hru A-160, FR -40 thru FR -16q 23
R -Q, C_ -F, -TP-2760-, P�A__c. 24
25
Zoning Factors:
26
-1• E roel sizes and dwelling densities.
2 Livestock carrying capacities.
27
28
3 "Slope.
29
4. Proximity to urban development.
30
5. Effects on adjacent uses.
31
6. Local, desires.
32
31
34
35
36
37
38
59
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
43
40
50
51
52
53
54
S5
56
I
ORCIDUM AND FIELD CROT)S
2
1
Y)
2
4
5
Primary Upys: Cultivation, harvest, stOrage,, Procel�-',Iag, sale and dis-
t,,.respecially ibution of all plant crops, especiaannual food
3
4
6
crops.
5
7
ry
Seconqn, - Uses: Animal husbandry and intense allimal uses, resource
6
8
extraction and ProcossinS7 hunting and water -related recreation facilitior.J87
9
1r)
dwellings, airports, utilities, environmental preservation activities,
public and quasi-pilblic uses, home occupations.
9
11
.10
12
Site Desi=ation Criteria:
11
1,3
1. Soil conditions well suited for plant crop operations,
12
14
2. Adequate water supply.
13
15
3. Average parcel sizes of 5 acres or more.
14
16
4. Used for crop production or secondary uses.
is
17Adjacent
uses compatible with primary and secondary uses.
16
is
17
19
18
zo
Tntensity of Use: M.-`.nimum parcel size of 5 acres. One single-family
19
21
dwelling per parcel with additional housing for on -site -employees.
20
22
21
23
Consistent Zones.: A-20 thru A-160, PC, & PQ.
22
24
23
25
Conditionally Consistent Zones: A-5, A-10, subjeot to findings of con-
24
26
formance with Conditional-72-oning and Development Criteria listed below.
25
27
26
23
Conditional Zoning and Development Criteria:
2 7
29
1. Average existing par-nge fr
parcel sizes raom 5 to 10 acres.
?R
3n
2. Adjacent to or in the general vicinity of urban boundaries.
29
51
3. Present status of agricult-ural production will not be significantly
'3 0
32
impaired.
31
31
32
34
Zoning Vactors:
3 �
35
1. Existing parcel sizes and dweLling densities.
34
36
2. Proximity to urban development.
35
37
3. Effects on adjacent uses.
36
38
4. PO-P-ntial for pest insect breeding.
37
39
5. Economic viability,
38
40
6. Local desires.
39
41
40
42
41
43
42
44
43
45
44
46
45
47
46
48
47
49
4,4
so
4 !)
51
5 r)
52
51
53
54
53
55
54
56
55
56
1
TIMBER-M0UN%IA SN
2
1
3
2
4
primary Uses: Foreot management and the harve ting
forest pygpUCJJ.
end processing rC 3
4
6
5
7
3
Secondary. Uses ; Animal husbandry, resource extraction
and process-ing 6
9
environmental preservation activities, outdoor reoveatton
dwellings, utilities, public, and
facilities, g
10
quasi-public uses,
airports.
home occupations, and 9
11
10
12
Site lleLmation Oriteria:
11
1.3
14
le 0ates, .9lope an,d sails general
commercial timber production. Suitable for
conifer forests anc1. 13
15
16
2. Average parcel sizes of 40 acres or more.
3. Ownership by U.S. Government or -timber
14
15
17
companies.
4. Adjacent uses conducive to timber production,
16
18
17
19
20
Intensity of Use: Minimum parcel size of 40 acres.
the
WherQ a PA-C is used18
21
minimum gross density could vary from 20 to 40 acres per dwelling 2.0
unit provided at least 80/0 of the total
22
acreage of a
for open ,space uses. One single -family dwelling per
project is set asde2l
parcel with addition-22
23
al housing for on-site employees.
24
) 3
L
25
26
r 5
Consistent Zones: TM--40 thru TM-1.60' A.-40 thru A-1.60 FR-40 thruFR-160 y24
2
-C , C-k' , T1'-160 , and PA-C. 5
'
27
2
23
Zoning Factors:
27
29
1. parcel, sizes and dwelling densities.
30
Slowing
2. p
29
31
3. Elevation.
30
32
4. Road access.
31.
33
5. Effects on adjacent uses.
32
34
6. Local desires.
33
35
34
36
35
37
36
3s
37
39
38
4039
41
40
4?
41
43
42
44
41
45,
44
46
_
45
47
46
48
47
49
48
50
49
5]
S0
52
51
53
S?
54
S3
55
54
56
55
56
Pill
x
GENERAL PJOAN PROPOSSAL
NORTH ESPLANADE
COMMERCIAL
G,.lo,.1l INDUSTRIAL
MEDIUM -DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
LOW-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
NUMICIPAL
4IRsvo"r
FAD
7
o� 1 JL 199tA
1`
a 5EH dvEKu � y
I�
FA
..� •� Wil. -.i� Q•' ..r
1
„
r
a� .l
lie GENERAL PION PROPOSAL
HIGHWAY 32 WEST
j
COMMERCIAL
INDUSTRIAL
MEDIUM- DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
5-8 D/U ACRE
RURAL RESIDENTIAL,
IA M PARCEL, 6RE MINIMU '6E
SIZ
---ALL
HENSHAW AVENUE inn
ul
ul
�[�(�jf
U Lr
opo0
7 -Irl DFfF
_v E
f�G� .1, a ❑ P
*, I il � jut
�Jlu i
Qa
ST Apt
oc�
j b�
AA14CHACRO07
u
ILI
CAuFo IA
STAtE
UNIVERSITY
ollco
00DD
n
r
COUNTY 0 PLkN'N G CO.7-miSSi(
#`s eSELB{{5��.±±LLITiNT si.' APPROVING E7E-NILE-R-I L A` +l :•. LAINI UIE
'aip !.IAP
11,11BREAS, the County of butte first ado` tGd a General
Plan
.L11 Pabruary i- 66, and has frog �-'
csr�e to t .;re arended said Plan;
` EP nS, due and
�o the passa e of tire;, �,a:�r �ing con _ti
L i
ate County, ens 4-
Y� and the adoption of State ? e�is�.atien Mandatingosti
eta:iled anal effr; Lige
land useplans; and
wu'r-f�FAS, ��� Butte
the Count P n DGI 'Ii �ment 1 -has } ii�-rr .� �.
draft � e� aced �.
est, a e. CoraPr ehensi-ve la. -ad 1 .ie text and r.aMe''Fidruent 3 ax3
MIL -RE -AS, the Planning
Con
mission and Departmental
consulted With numerous c;=e i staff have
� ..res
and groups and: have sou; .t
Pi3Jlic participation_
a—nd ut in t' �
n r ;jt aT�-' t le 11i epara ion of said aralft
!asele . .s
rent # c`irld
AS, trt Z nniZsrD
t, e "ari ri
aen is s con �u ted
j%'2%�B the cities
located,
�i�� - � ' _
th'n t.re �.ounty d
txt� Local ene=o -
at�o__ Ccszssi4:a
after PlIblieatiom and native - G«
zur
n - F S . an to
12 Section 653SI < re i N
e _
a� iti�'� 9�' �.3Iti # �'e .�
yrs .p hearingIic � ivnr3 <'� t�i.�s" ,r ? ss ion .eR
regarding said Land Tr �
�$�. e (Lz-ty I.-hich hear n e
ncei
15,
IP78 I ct 2 5 's S I I15 ie tY tile-eQt r: a ring tt tal of
�ye^
Planning eo .nission reetin.ass extending
o
TArY�st '' I7
,TIE anj
_,EAS, too Plann�. g Co��;
sssiQn ��s Carefully -:��._i
e ewed said
r;Se Element and
van .t in light of kl Publicinplu t s
i ter ` T_ a- T -F CIRP-4`�'jY PLS k..>.
AS POLLMS, TO ITIT:
That the re sett La...,7 Use Eleyt'3ey' t
.{ rh=+ n
.: d0 ti i.ed V z -er to
u'xat=
as ? x a ?it- £x er= is hereby approPty d
ardc�,'a.
Dar d OF Supervisor f0'. consideration
That the Land Use a. n:° e3 C -Aga iE' s?+3 z attacl-led Hereto an,!
0 0 0
September 14, 1979
Hon. Board of Superviors
Butte County
Oroville,, California 95965
SUBJECT;: General Pla.1Land Use Element; Requested Modification
Honorable Membe.iV of the Board:
we hereby request that Camelot, Spring Valley Ranch
Subdivision and the adjacent 12 acres between it and Concow
Lake be designated as "Low Density Residential (1 to 4 units .Y
per gross acre) " and C--1 on subject- Land Use Map. .
This subdivision was approved by the Butte County
+ Planning Commission in May of 1969 and by the Board of Super-
visors on August 10, 1971. The Final map was recorded Septem-
ber 10, 1.971, and we have been selling lots since that time
�- approximately S years.
Camelot consists of 251 lots on an area of approxz,m..'e1y
125 acres. individual lot size is 1/3d acre but lot yield is
2 units per gross acre; as approximately 30 acres are in parks,
streams and common areas. We have been using a low pressure
sales campaign and to date one--hundred-eleven of the lots have
been sold. There are currently seven houses and twenty mobil. -
homes on the subdivision.
Our sales rate has been slower and our sales costs
higher than we originally expected because of competition
from the incredible number of lot splits and parcelizations
of other kinds in the Lake Concow area. otherwise, we would
not have to make this request as we would probably have been
sold out by now and also completed the development of the
adjacent 12 acre parcel.
The twelve -acre parcel is unique in that it is the only
reasonably developable parcel in the entire basin where the,
lake extends onto private property: In addition it also has
two live streams on it. Because of this uniqueness, as well
as it commanding position at tete head of the Lake, we believe
that some flexibility in planning the ultimate use of the
lairi is proper. A planned development including a, restaurant,
boating concession and PAC (Planned Area Cluster) would be
justified by the aethetics, location and ready access avail-
able to the site. The: zoning than would be appropriate for
Ir
-this appears to be C-1, with conversion to PAC wheft a plan
has been developed.
The lots on each side of the entry gate to Camelot
have been planned and designaLed for commercial use in our
Restrictive Covenpnts ever since the filing of the sujjdivision,
eight years ago (Eee attachments). The south lot was planned
for a grocery -gas station and the north for Headquarters of
'the subdivision a,.Id riding stables. (There is a huge old
barn on the property which was used tor that in the past.)
We ask that these planned uses be preserved by appropri-
our requested zoning is summarized on the attached map.
If one function of,the Planning Commission is to en-
�
courage thoughtful long-term planning, the corrolary is
that they should respect that planning when it has been done.
More planning has gone and is continuing to go into Camelot
than into the entire balance of the Concow Lake basin.
By attached letter we are. also asking your Board for
the formation of a County Service Area to permit us to pro-
ceed with the planning of community water and sewer services,
Very truly yours,
, °
E Dorothy Ring's�_ � \
'- .--�-'
Encls: Map of Camelot, showing zoning requested
Portion of draft Lan4 Use Map
P19 of CC&R's
Semi-final subdivision Map, (Portion of) _
`
^
,
`
'
'
`
'
'
'- -
September 17, 1979
Hon. Board of Supervisors
Butte County
Oroville, California 95965
SUBJECT: Formation of County Service Area
Honorable Members of the Board:
We hereby request the formation of a County Service
Area for the purpose of providing domestic water service
and sewer service.
The area to be included to be the 140 unsold lots in
Camelot Subdivision and the 12 acres between Camelot and
Lake Concow shown on the map attached herewith.
No assessment or County taxes are proposed for this
County Service Area -- merely the opexating powers to pro-
vide water and sewer service. Construction of a nucleus
system for water service and for sewer service would be at
our own expense, and operation Costs would be through user
fees. operation would be, tentatively, by Camelot Owners
Association, Inc.
By limiting the Service Area to the lands described,
it is felt the formation and initial managementwouldbe
greatly simplified. We would propose permitting annexation
of other proper -ties after. the Service Area is operating
successfully, but feel that including lands other than
those we can speak for at this time would cause complica-
tions of such severity as to make it unfeasible to attempt
to provide the services.
We have discussed this in a preliminary fashion with
Lynn Vanhart and have his verbal concurrence in the thought.
Part. Please advise us 'what actions are next required c, our
Very truly yours,
Eugen A. and Dorothy Ringel
1,187 entfield Road
Chicoj California 95926
EAR/ka
--
r1, AI
I x•yu •, /,/'u�.t.5�a1 r t,cn �,,,.•I
N.. Zi ,1J' YtrrlS' t u'1'' 7V"IFw'"•"°••��� 1 , �n rG u a:.
a 76 15 Ira Ir� - ''lt:�` rr7 >. u,t !J• .Y tN •..Jars+Yt-:1t5'1!J '�'r;F'°'� 7 7U tt` •.,... Y... '.. '
ria 1 _fff;i 7a V5 TI�'•�J� lv 'rt ,n
i� rfr r"\ } n `.� 5! to t� tt• p u At r'rwi W/44"r r fr7
t1[ r f4i N J t Aa r
riA. ,/SrjAy}r� fin, i
�, { 1 M 5r 15 l •ri}'` .l ^ r 11 [. ) I' 12
t •,^,Cl ^ µ ^ •, r•w+�F 'ri• ` r."c ,J ..tib. �i 1 r` t.�,l,�'.;r. rjVF a. '.F tike " .l.L r�...lf•r iu ,; rj5 tt ilr }
1 1? lir •lrar It.t 41 .%. "rt ft K/,• r ,e r/ tY rl •s S~ �p Y',.,•n5,,:;,a u . V i� tt
f .;tib • rr �S i t t r «'• r YlY u r(r a :r r'� j
I v 1 �
fy'i J^ T • !h y "-, 'v ,�) ! 'P, UrpY a Y4w w" n •
t • � �'1 `' tt3 15 �, n !�, , �tGiy'. :ifM. .- {� 5 kt t Fv/t "i r 5 " L,r• tuw, Vt� lip
z f
!rl a I^ Y . j .« rw• «;t k t. ) t 1r ran A I . } titi 1, t
. Y r • h /r1 l ... Y i F Y Nl. �. .. h 'Y • 1 , •% I ' n, 1 ! { . i v+
^iiilr 5war � ' s;J 7 rl 5`I 'r��.1 /1i ld, y � t y �i5 ' S � r } lr`� d Vl 1 .�' • wM �{
�,, "lll [r+Jl r tvi'�)S* y R !*[
CIO' i r, , ! '" "♦ i i t4
it ' .1. Iiirr;:i. .V��"� tIe'Fya.,5i !�t(5 /�a ,�fJ;� a r'•"' y '� �tiSr Kj '.� f� / ��/•�b5�,f i,' 1 j.
I': , r nM, ( %'. 1P AA 4' ��( r�VY ,. 5 r t x j
r!N't-X"�T 1' k q ny .)t )r7 1 t t ru Cr J! M �� �•. ; t1' s Z. �, r. r Ir i� jr
r'1 }t 51Y.$w u.r v\ !. Y) +r -r• ^ rl r ♦ «f',!r',rd•/ r/r1111-' r•r,' ��' Ll�' k
IA, --t rr H r 1! rt}r "� rth 1�
N\t /�h a yh . r+ 11 y, 1.V� i r r r
w •Y4H Ut r [ 5 rni 1 r� .!j! /10 1 r. '}�' f !3! � " tv,. ' \� iN {j.• r.'4,
( of � rr 1Y1 tt.t q.. ,� "a/,`^! �d 'S1 s� t� *ir r ' ,i •S. � i /y'!. � �
k .i't !t� , 1r`-s:>�%•.,.. y r/1 - 1y�, 5rn5 1.:,r t ,[ t
IDi• . r ti ;i '�I�YI ! •° b :r t� ��,� 2/0
uu t«C rr / ,r t•
110i,I �'. +� !m ! F / ,, .1 • • t r 1 „ , ! tr�4 rr Ali
n.
r i {lJa Jt �1. •*�1,`+r ��l'r 5! �r: !L Y,�r1111;1-^/ty
ii 1 t:i` 1 ,r t, , 1!
• u -r, -Iw♦S rur"'^ ,d 5 I.. �. ••+ "a Xyy i /J r/
II r tt nv r`yi+' T�i F /I 1� P.
l �r,.A/ 1� aY {i i a` •M1r• it r 4X X dam;
i l' t r 4 > 2 it ` ?1 1' Iba *�. lrY7 y 5 ;T: r /7i a; yd,.rn-•rt4
� 07 � � 1 ,rt t, f . / . }+ t �� �' �1 t,N�l�;t r1 /. ,1 p . ( 5 ! •.Iv xr '
it .1 } 1111. �rry a f ` r r Fr / t—,TSNtr 41
t r� •, 5 j 4, t/K Y fib
r?' d! p .;Y v t •Il�rr Y,�\ } r 11 x
•�'llil 'ii IYr {' 1 S ItriK� '� rIr \ 11 Sy' I r e T lH'�t •I„ 1 I
rw
�r ba 1 p{{d I� 1• i n rf � 1� t ,tr• y .M}ice t •, 1 �}•�• 7r., qty rrr I ���l.
• ;t4u l a >( trtld'1 rt i 41 i Iti • ,� ,
f >` t^r, 1 r �' rtT�
t¢; a1,+:[r :'�• ! q't tlr.:Y,''iyt 1' r-,� h �+t` t{�'r� '1 r' �' :rtt r,r,.ry ;fix rr.».rr'y
rYli 'f I. � ; �lfr« � 'Ih t . irt'r �rr�Ar)• .,,� {4 ly e/, r' a, �`'S l t I `r+' .. 6r tit
'r
(•t !lr ,r IMrI .., t llr �:'f�' r'• /! IY ! \N� '+. •`%P'/Yf i1 -r- xr {5' I Y ,rn 4//1� ��, I ,;r r.1r qr /'�••'4' ,, I tin ,.
ED y ..tr : Y .trf h, '•r Ir j. 1y,' ,.�1Y •+•,- " 5 ^` ... i.
-Y.•tV`.%F 1}} I ,t., "".., rr• ,u.. Jf,T i r)1�Q" ,., r.
!bL r:iuPlYx'r.r.. 11� 11 �tv 4'I'�• 9 fr1t1 ^ h 1 rrr v»,. idr c 7 1
! � t •r YO , � 'V ,t t• 5 � 0 ".. "`v1i7 t I R
to t r it t r 1 � , r J r. {,r,a � {t }r. � ,,``11 3r �•' v I• Jt;• , / t ,a;tr , r [ 4•�+n Y .+/
t t 1 r J :7 : f l r r�r�,.
♦riw r rr. 1 II? 'til l• 1 Y T \ '.. �y, I� t
ar ,A�r„It•�! v, rr,. 'ri, tlt5 r. if r Ir��5 3'�'•• lti1 1 {a \ K.?�r «ri. �r rr{�. 10 - C^ �S.{a:tL1-c
`.
r.lrr t Af �1 f tr� t P' ! v ?. f, T tf r by t% t+ /Z/
"�
+ uII:vlfir.?" :.r� \ •, yti �I^t r �F�.!J,t l,r ti. %'
sn X{r ��� A° �' uT,`US: t•J "tx '�.r ^'•' ° u.1 ,,iltt` ;��� ,1i%;r ` r / _•„ti t�/ d"�: ✓+elf ip r'. :�r5• (.J t iGl %.itl'
rr.
1 r « 7, V It t,t •„ r t /,tt'y? Y!`, 1 X.v 1.. ,r A (fl >)
, :R r tr i,
uN t. • a 1l tf-. a J1 1 f (` 4 5 { 1
, 1 �<x •is yj �t�n5 rf
1It ' 1 ✓ ✓''r I'll y'% yr i
fJ `iir «. � r� � 5 Y r*4•r lj�� A:::'1 1 !1 r-.L'\.i
•.4r t. t�5 Il., rl 4trrJ II T ! ,/��ri.�� o-,Y�• ♦V •.r ixtY 5,' �f' j,. l• `�J i '.�t, ?•• ,y / ^T tl 1
I rw 1r'' 7 ti�yn5 ♦ S' , rC V..) l.lwl
••4•r r, ♦n tr• :1 v /Mlr t n. r f r \rr / 1 •rti� r e i r\
'..,
!Y •51 v. 11 iY! ill i iti+ ID9/rrr`y �/�`li� �a•%;.yt j•:•j 1.. �,` r I�.iir"`�yd r•1�'' ''��++...�� r jtiv ?+F .i r� �4;j 414 /r
y Lt71 C e r 1 r1 •r 1 xt } / H ,1 r 1.1 F n1µ1 k4 ♦3 Ade/
d% lit AA /'t '�
,r r v r , t. (,
��''.y�•"1 t•'�IID ✓ 5�5^'1' s:: �, ..'.� r.y d rar���.'4�, Ityrr �j '• ., -tet. % %�f
,.rLr �.x•P 5
i
J � v r: �ti.o•"�1 �1 k\. r�F''t� ::%r.� M — � :r 5�'-tir " D 5a., i;r�:5 L tr
�• ;"/'. (t, S5 u: aw ••1,�! �� X1..1 t i+."« ,\.�,.r)�>� ,DANJ,1'..,.L.'' Ftj t9r.,,.q �f`�.,,trt 1p"1FCGtr/
• dF. if 5�. .[ A l ,S �('S ,� r•r rl x ".!'• r' .4%rw /*. (( �ti _.. a.. r; _ tea.: 'Y� �.� ���
r t fr:� ..' � '• 5 . t .. •'1 •t r Nf is,r'+ w ' •p kl • r a,�,y Y.. e �,�.[ 1 ;' r > ,,,1.,,""•.�
rAtil'i-, i c r " 1 1 i• ."� `5 T a1 . t ...ti , 1 '< Ir wr ladr t '�(I,c - '� F 1 �� 1 1 5
.1 9 ie•.t v. + r•'+' ~4 7 l97 15/(d Mir. r _.\ •,�-'"":y J di+'lw, /11,,Ntiy,.
y • ° 9� a,i f rr,1 ..f�tt,. t '' / a a ' _ ,r...=.:f...' f+ utc '.w,•r'r�, `'rn. , [ 4��'
'•M... �JYi''`'Nrrr �A,, Vr .? ?�R✓� 4 ,.•��y �• 1 1 r f�nlr .rr_ +.rx 1 •„It1r ,_._ .,+--D•T'... Yrt�X:,...!., u
Y ,%t
`r,1'.•.. xrr
da v 'i' �» ,�•1 � r• d ,/. mutt Y, t'i• • .l' f�/ /F�rlr YI "- t ;
T •••- i+ A i�5 ?j `} 5r. Tt r, ! • P u�,r t ,,,; ./ y ;..1
r yz.. rr llr
�YrrrteY l ,>'. .•.r(t„ J� tai LI n^?. " a P C• /Y. �1p, �r I YY l rY ""'Y.,..�'"•''+• r�
�7'?6t 'rb r}�:;•+. a{.r--�,r.
At i�� l ,•IA`F•v/P yr-' , • �f•+ri:. ""r� •-
M to t _ r
t l VY
r
.11
I r `� RLiD U� ••
'-•ra hrN.'r15� t t .1r tl f ���J//
f. i/
'� � b� 4i ° 7 ' t � �.� »�. � d Ora t '� �' w •� � �t��
�, , � "6 � 5 v •� r tf•a 1 r
i''*!s ,DrrtsY'�rz tT>ti`I.7�1 f f,r',.y " 5V 1` 1\; .+ �G ✓, � t'7; ,rY
L
r1 , A, T"'Al, pyi ►6 r4. \, r OUELW.
kr.r
494 1
'4TT , i t�i ,: i r1,';_ Vi'``a Y� (�Yr� "'•�i1,!'� t y� ` �:n� v1yyy./ ''y.`` 1,
, ',l14�1„r,, j r} 0 50 '+tit /"r'1. �'lt r 4� �rrr•{t � ^e1 v',,r- �.r-. '',�T ��q.,4 •"
,. -r/' •! 1� f r .;,,-, t � p°v� �, ' r e a, y r � ".r ^`t' Sri .r', X' a'4.Y \I' _.,.���, ��.�.
Ia ,. � !� !2 rx :�. ""�U.r' ,ri' ( � w>r ,5� ti, �;r ti; / �/41 ��� •. '"���,, fl.Jr t'Gr,l ait re r:CW[•rYt` r �•�
r -• ^; , X' W J• .� Saroi+r v' .r r..Y
:..5 Y� -j.yr.r �'v51 ,t''�'^' vCfr' ! '•,,f.. �.` ,.�` ._., ._..,,_„ ..._. t, l�iG+)IA%JL5ISOU
• 1 ,
E tK r rC ,rtN <%,.•'r riM;! d5y.t '4r�t tS\) 1.' t i�^C ?
1 f''tiw,;v`,;,,�..Y, ,r`,a�.`na '' `'` `, �E o cN ,r ? •SPRING VALLEY RANCH
' r t) x1C=ns c 1 c YN
^ mr•r't',tw fir r 3 y,,r •'".� •► 14� :9 e� - J{ w .. rl l C AC',h'u!.o:.orl T.
All.
- + .v ^L t3d:l4ti,rtY 1. Y. r 1 r.wt+Quart+ ✓rwrw; ossterGY i [x7V,e.f.�rleDM
" ' � ""•U 1BVtft tUU1r1Y, Gllltary A
y ,�^ �•' �„/ / t, r4, � l I[ r r/' n rMGiti Rti rrr t Crlr[FD !. iU eVrrYl
'h ).
4. d1 ��• rT I'j
17'T'Y'fe+twPwrr""rr►r T!tmlr. rr+.•er++r•r..tr•�-r.,n 4 r .r .%�4 J x = k t,.ertwr dtr. } E.
W1.41
. {J+G B d M, R
Mh.r+LY t r"•ir^YfN•t.Yti. ,1„i•�sr7frar INGEL
wbr'#•wrs+.rwrr °gr' 'i'•f'r�':r dr r1D }n [t a
lOt1ATt6r IMC
'rr�err.•�t�••'^`rti^�'�t,�,�'+vj,<hr1's�r5� t i�,�r;�•»i,r,Iwu�y.[..,
.fie+'1 F\ 1. ,,,,� lr, Yi1•. •r.,1 1 , ,. :'�F �'' J .� '" 1 �.{
.1 v
7 �y � ,, } �.� i 1 , i~ '�+ , , ` �i Gds .o. .....:, t ' (1-40 AC
r . • . 11 RURAL w
1.1� �%: r a» a ,. {� c` pt � � e v` L V i �
Yf N.o• h "iw `•+ x � tt •�� � Y t �wr�4" 'f �X // '. F
I. ^
j� f,-4 UNI T
SC /j y MEDIUM
NIP , tip' 'V' It•.Y ti ,, 'a f `� r
hr.
°,� �;.��'v�r � �;�? ",�,^�,:'• �.,.�. ;. ,":�y Il� •yt^�Ft. � :r� -- �; �Jti(j"c
,� rr
^f} ; •• }'r »n`ry� ,l — 4a.:.`l s,`r ». * . Crr.{ 7 ,,.'Wl �. . y w 1 1 1 G H I.J
Y
t I.r •iy "'1 �i " 7' +ri°� Gni w r � � , ra, 1
II i
1
1
. r '�• r i
<' f 'ritT j r• n 4, �,•� •,,, ,r {/'�J tg `. .. . i e
yj 1"' r, � 1� `�/V}� 1� w� '� ,; a� • �•••�.�, �/ � �1i 1� `�_1.
p ��{ INDUSTR
,
, t . rid• � 4�` 4 !"1 ,I,J wx• �,..«f
i✓ .
aiy,!, r
y' YI +4r S'1 3 f •+a l�w a^)'.T {,.f�i 1 ��,r.., , ,� fa .> i '� E)Pl r/.,,,;q1
" w.
F rY f j M
,�"!:A ,e Ira• , rif `f ,� - ` i „('•`` 4 • . w'. •' �"" j F"`' r a ap
J
„ • , „ r.- ,,;� , i +•� Fes, � �
It
••,7 V ,J.�^+�^.ilk �7 1 r.Y' .i:� �4►n'� S tr,l `11'.:7 1 Yi,� r z,1N
At
0'
is � '�+ 1a` J k • • , • ` ° � {'� � � . e•' I �� C , f f` �4 •y' ►j+•,' i . l 1\ �Y �� •A.
• 4 Y t.
'k � ��«M th �"�/ w11 Y^,. � � N �� F' � a I'� r ', • j � �• •+''r h
It x' t'*j .LY �F + h `'. G►.j '�,3Ya x'� +� ray
a
xfj!1
(
' ti ,!u'•� f� E,� F•} ,► ::�,r t'� I !h M. i` If ;.'+ (.• •� Iti `' .r�i ,_� �, t,
1. �� �1/ J±
1 ,� , r � . , •n 4'�' (.moi"..-
.1 {�^ � n� s ~ i 1 j �;1 � fy:e I',. `1' •r,{ I. ,�` � 1, ;J 1 't � , v
•
• j' r j"' � � �{ � .r' 1. '.,� � t1''1. r* , �, t : '1 �' ,,,.+. F r ai- �, � '� 'j} yf`
•
1lal
l� pp{CCC i+ A/J ,_' �.`,, ". ( :;� �"'� `�l.:'.� �'4� ,'`v1•'� i- `•` V Ji' r�•'p�
!Y14,7.0 - ,h y ( tf ,I✓ i •� J 4%r. I . � J S J J Ii Yi 1 'rfi �+?• ,'�!� 1"rti �•. •,J jr`Jy' W.. � 4�. � • >II 5`•� h... �i
a '7 �✓ 4.F
r ,1St ��^F•, aF' �n, Y G• t . n3 �' rl,i.• pl _
I -+•... ....�.. � *�� `•FiI •� •IY' I• � , � n.1 " �•"Ir�. y'1 :�',� r�r ,' j � 4�; c � w. .: �� ��'i � F .� 4 sl ffi iC
�•+, �`„,+ �+. Rr,"1 •?Y � � S
J . r�f� ,,,",� 4S I� 7 1 I t ' . C1 I.. c
tN �� � „•* "i” � +Yh �• i`� f'r � "� `� � � Il,,�+ rf l . „� !^� '► ..i �,� � 1, .y �.` '� f }� ': ' y
�; a w �r� M �"1 ✓ 1 3 , 3 f a""'J i� y>, r
I r .�� j • � �` � '�" i'`'G i i •`�_ �� I\ � r� ••.� � � t• � , Fr�, „�.. i Yi: •� F•v� �.• '"S LC79 74L'i'.
r<�S'
IV
HHI 'RI ".�+� 1ril�r rp. •�fl�-` •'�,F ,72 y.1 .•4 .i. I 1J' �.,� .l of !-� k: P• T„a ira,. r, j•d Ft
J � �'J "�„ t'"' ' F• +t•`���<t" 1� J'� i,��,•;� �.�� r r �' �,�I� of h�,,i,�^S 'r4J i 2 * ,. �..,t� �) . � I,
iri �• ,r`' ':�� `' , '_,: } �/f , , _`t � Y_"�1 i y ''� S 'tT ) ,'; ,� ,i�. +,� ,,1 :i, , -'�, , �s. f y .
rrT a G A' w'u.t { •..;` "j �' 1�4 t� r ��J rn°yfF.k�c�� v.n •` F4� !I I ~?..� .i a tI.
' t` f. • � a, ';I i, { LFI. f • .
ni.-F r:• 1 T"'� r. t�'$ ,k � f _ � i� •w. 1 .1 p � µ� .ti `� 4y ,''..
a.tr• j - >, , 4r'i .... ,I rte.
a
t�ui.l�rir rr, l 1tc)C�I�i s, of structures or signs necessary
or convenient to the development, sale, operation,
or other disposition of property within single
[Ctnli,l.y 11"C`i5ri This OxemPt'-iOn l)01.] tormi nate two
0 ���+� r��tt ,� I{ r' n t h C
single family lots in the subdivision have been
sold -and conveyed to Public Purchasers.
0 to 2 O
Lots 2Q-50 ,end 251; Lots -244 and 251 are excluded
from the single family residential restrictions
herein and are designated for commercial and other
activities relevant to the servicing of the
subdivision.
ARTICL5 V
FASB: TENTS
Cil
a.l In n.rdur to 1)(11"mLL thc, orderly and full use and
of the lots, and in order to provide easements
occupancy
or edestrian, equestrian, and vehicular C
for utilities and f p CJ`j
ingress and egress, it is necessary for certain easements
to be created. 'There are, therefore, hereby created
the following easements over the lands, and for the
purnosos, as stated:
A. Over and under all roads, future roads, lanes, wayst
and streots,_as shown on the Map.'
1. for the non-exclusive right of pede-,trian,
equestrian, and vehicular passage and ingress`
�'
and ocirci 3.
P �
2. vor installation, maintenance, 'ope at ion, anal
�� �,
repair of public and private sewers, storm
/
it
mill
` SNE•-�9.52� �'d'
227
'�i
228
k4lC3 45�S7
OD '�^�." �' ��.h •o �� � it �, 6r`�'S /Oc7. dp' /'ad. C.{:7'
lot
Q' A
l
Is
41.
74 , y�l
yam✓ 73 .�= ���s' _5j `�,. 5� � � �'..
j ?'oeA•%��� � � ,f) � •' s'k'i ' •V"
Vk
i
V
Vii✓ � � � �� �► - Q � � ����%`- ,
p� N •
W
lV E4e ` 30 lot
33 cxi' /moo.10
,
/96.43
T39
CHVA LUY RAM
SUBDIVISION NO.. A SUBDIVISION of THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER
E--,
OF SECTION 3T 22N R 4 �, N1. D. B. & Ivi. • � I
LA---._
N
TO T111 TWTTE COUNTY PLANNTNG COMMT9ST.ON
h
ATTEINTIO,N i LARRY :BROOKS
i,
This is to advise you that TED CRIV1 LLO is hereby authorized to pact on
our behalf: in protesting; to the proposed Land Use Map with respect: to our
property in Butte County,
We hereby protest the changing of the zoning on Air 71-01.29, 640 acres
We wish that this existing zoning on this property (AR) he retained in its
entirety, because the reason that we purchased this property, that is now
in escrow, was to develop a planned unit development under existing zoning.
To re --zona this property into 40 acre minimum will create an undue hardsbin
on our investment group.
DATED: October 9, 1.979
I
ri MMIE R. FE SO".
Duff, Cd, Planning C
51979
OrpYila rn�
rctfi,Sd')IU "LQ "t4l kUit- t/Lf, UK ttp� i6f
4? c
gu'�® Co, pr�hnn9Co;
cC,r 1979
�rov(le� G�Gfoxnr�
I have been looking at the latest changes in the land use tont and
I have noticed 'that the last ch ages that the Supervisors refered back
to the commission caused a .few inconsistencies in a couple of places.
If you could have the commissigo to at least consider, or perhaps recommend A
the additional changes, then the board could adopt thein at their last meeting
without any more referals coining back to the commission.
Page 28, bine 35: Change the word "cooperate" to "consult".
The Supervisors changed the implementation section on pagr 62 because they
didn't like a policy statement that said that the County "shall cooperate'".
On mage 28 Line 3$ there is a policy statement that uses the word "cooperate"
that should perhaps be changed to "consults'.
Page 57, Line 22 Delete the word "many".
The Supervisors changed the word "much" on line 22. to "portions". :Gets
remove the word "many" on line l$.
4Page 56, Line 15: Delete the sentence "Only two amendments have been made
to the land ;ase map since 1971".
This sentence shoUd perhaps be removed completely because there now has
been more than two map amendments and the number would be always changing
in the future.
age 56, Lines 16 to 26 Delete lines 16 through 26.
Lines 19 to 26 refers to large-scale map changes. Since the Grazing land and
Rural residential areas appear :.j nearing a solution, it's questionable -whether
this language should be Lett in the text. In the future it could be claimed
that the county should still be processing "large-scale map charges".
Developments will have to continue to be processed in the county and the
county could have people claim that the text requires "large-scale map changes"
of the land use map where ever someone opposes a development. For this reason
let's consider deleting everything down to line 26,
County Counsel originally recommended 'to the Supervisors the deletion of
Page 56. But x think that we should retain some of the implementation
requirements, especially the one that requires notifying all affected property
owners.
ti
Inter -Departmental Memorandum
'roe Board of Supervisors
FROW Larry Brooks, Advance Planning
SUOJECT: General. Plan Land Use Element
OATS' October 8, 1979
At the September hearing on the sand Use Element several objections
were raised by developers or their representatives concerning the
map proposal forwarded by the Planning Commission. At the direction
of your Board staff has met both with developers and representatives
of the agricultural community in an attempt to formulate plan
modifications which are acceptable to developers while still Pro-
viding for ample protection of open space and agricultttral lands.
In keeping with a desire to maintain conformity between the map and
the text, corresponding changes to both are proposed. The recommend-
ed changes are as follows;
1. ChanEeRural Residential catego, Ey to AElicultural. Residential.
In addition to the name change, which reflects the upgrading of
agriculture to a primary use, the list of consistent zones has
been shortened by removal of all zones which permit parcel sizes
of less than 20 acres. Zones which permit parcel sizes within
a range of 1 to 20 acres are listed as conditionally consistent,
subject to findings of conformity with five conditional zoning
and development criteria. The criteria address agricultural
compatibility, public service levels, physical development
capability and proximity to commercial services.
2. Agricultural Residential Site Designation Criteria
Three of the site designation criteria found in the Rural Resi-
dential category have been. omitted:
1. Needed for rural residential development within 20 years.
4. Natural conditions suitable for wells and septic tanks.
'6. Reasonable accessibility to commercial services, schools,
fire protection services and other community facilities.
These have been omitted because they imply ,suitability for rural
residential development. Since the new designation implies agri-
cultural suitability as well as conditional development potential,
all areas so designated need not necessarily conform to these
former criteria. Conversely, a new site designation criteria has
been added to the Agricultural Residential category.recogn*zing past
official actions.
The site designation criteria changes have allowed modest expansion
of the Agricultural Residential areas on the map without compromis-
ing the integrity of the text
3. Orchard and Field Crops
This category has been revised utilizing the same type of format
h J
General Plan Land Use Element
Page 2
employed in the new Agricultural Residential category. In
response to criticism that the 5 acre minimum carried the
potential for down -parceling of large tracts of prime agricul-
tural land, the category has been divided. :into both consistent
and conditionally consistent, zoning and development categories.
Zones allowing minimum, parcel sizes ranging from 20 to 160
acres have been designated as consistent, while zones allowing
parcel sizes of 5 to 20 acres are shown as conditionally con-
sistent, subject to findings of conformity with three conditional
zoning and development criteria. The three criteria address
existing parcel, sizes, proximity- to urban boundaries and the
effects of the proposed zoning on existing agricultural produc-
tion. The rationale for this is a desire to accommodate
certain smaller parcels (5 to 20 acres) within the Orchard and
Field Crop designation while providing a greater degree of
protection from down -parceling for "hard" agricultural activities
on larger tracts of land located in more remote areas.
µ. Planned Area Clusters PA -C
In line with a desire! to provide reasonable development options
for owners of land in the Grazing and Open Land. and Timber
;Mountain categories, a policy outline providing for implementa-
tion of planned cluster development incorporating density
bonuses is proposed. Although specifics would be addressed,
within the context of a new PA -C ordinance to be developed
following adoption of the new band Use Element, the general
framework would allow density bonuses ranging up to 100/ for
projects which permanently set aside a minimum 80% of the land
area within a project for open space and resource conservation
purposes. The percentage of the density bonus would be corre-
lated with the percentage of land placed into pernan.eaat reserves.
The higher bonuses would be awarded to Projects u-sil.izing le,,;s.
land for development,.
5 Map Changes
'Revisions proposed .)re in accordance with the text changes
outlined above. Certain specific changes are proposed in order
to place land under single ownership, which is currently under-
going private development planning, into a single use category.
The bulk of the revisions pertain to the southeastern part of
the county which is currently zoned A.-5. While the .agricultural
Residential category has been expanded by approximately 30
square miles fro the Rural Residential category on the map
forwarded by the Planning Commission, the policy content of the
new designation has significantly shifted toward agriculta.ral
conservation.
North Esplanade Proposal
Subsequent to the September Board hearing the Planning Commission was
asked about reincorporating their previously approved map proposal
General Plan ;Land Use Element
Page 3
for the North Esplanade in Chico. The Commission hearings conducted
several worths ago were relatively non -controversial. SinoO there
are private projects pending, your Board may wash to consider includ.,
ing the Esplanade proposal in this revision. A specific rovision to
the map forwarded by the Planning Commission which changes a portion;
of lanc'4 along the 'western side of the Esplanade is outlined on the
attacDvd map. T'he change is from a Commercial designation to Orchard
and Field Crops, as this particular property is under a Land Conser-
vation Agreement (Williamson Act) with a forty acrd minimum parcel
size.
elm
�`ioax�•� oa' �'ulq%;r^vl s�rrs
OravIllo, Q"IiXorniu L.�Li) 1!01", CC+s"i'L'AOL
ja'Ai tx's Unli w:u:ttlurt.e�rx
Although a staff person at tsh:a PL,nLin& f)opartymeat it Formed mei that
12
the new master plan will not al'Not commere aazl an3aa Tort, v tithi.n the limits
of .ane pca,r;canted towns of Cherokue aria �rug�urw C"ty, lz� �.,k,;,terl �1�� � 10 Lor*
be written to you so that, there will be no ruitbi idtie3 dur na your proreedi.ngs
As you may know,there 1,3 a gift shop a :G ti, ac,t, ',m Lereta iy Qper'aa.t;i-
at; Ch(sro'�ee, and another is planned at Oregon Cli. J .
Yc�u}1 .i tV""'.
Xi
�9 Xir, fi Yk nttT
"'.0ritgomery St
Buffe Co, Fla, 1IM9 corr'no
W9J .W
Orovillar �dlir"or'rtt�
T':l;:NDINCS FOR 0141TIFICATION OF VI
:Fi,Wj ;RONVIENT..AL IMPACT UITORT
Finding that comments and recommendations from thepublic have
been attached 'to the e environmental i,mpact�reports prepared t environmental �foor the mpact North Esplanade
, which �.udEz.�
i�h
rezone and West Highway 32 rezone as well as the environmental impact
report integrated within the 'text of the sand Use Element, that written
responses to significant environmental points, raised by the comments,
have been prepared and attached to the draft environmental impact re-
part and that a list of the persons, organizations and public agencie.
who commented hac been attached to 'the draft environmental impact
report, 1 move to certify the final environmental :impact report as
having been completed in compliance with: the California Environmental.
quality Act, the State Environmental Review Guidelines and the Butte
County Environmental Review Guidelines.
Z
4„
Inter -Departmental` Memorandum
TO. Board. of Superviriorn
Fn(M; Lara,,y Brooko, Planning Dopartmont
SU0JECr Ge11exal Plan :band Urio E'l omont,
DATC1 October 26, lc)79
Pursuant to Government Code ,section. 65556 the Planning Commission
has reviewed the General Plan Land Use Element modifications which
were authorized by ;your Board at the October 16,,1979 public hearing.
Attached are the changes to the text in addition to the Forth
Esplanade and Highway 52 map revisions. All of these modifications
and the county -wide map presented to your Board by staff on October
16, 1979 were recommended for approval by a majority vote of the
Commission.
The Commission's acti6n also asks that your Board consider the
following minor text changes
Page 28, Line 35; Change word "cooperate" to "consult".
Orchard and Field Crop category, Line 29: Change '"average" to
"predominent"
Page 56, Lane 15: Delete the sentence "Only two amendments have been
made to the sand Use Map since 1971.."
Page 56, Lanes 16 to 26; Delete these lines.
Page 56, Line 53 add. "... and modification of affected property
owners.
Page 57, Line 22s Delete the word "many".
The Environmental. Review Director has prepared findings and a sample
motion (attacked) for certification of -the environmental impact reports
for these revisions. After certification of the EIR the attached
resolution may be adopted.
el
Attachments
' �1 I,. I a , •' r 1 ' y a'1 h� r.
1 Il fr' ,,I' Y• 1• J `�� � �I
L'7r! I•+S ;.+.y 2µw 1^' 1`` y r 1 .. hrlt , , kir t } '�"`' � r�.,.� .
hJ x "vx'� rw�. f�y "1'" ,hr r,l N 1`'r`.'` /'3 ti•'x •r 2r,` '/^` ra 1.�' '+..h a r, �r '
. R 1 .v7 .,,/ xr, �,ti .�? kl• •• { +rr ; 1 , r `' ! ,�.', r
.'A `�/� 1'IJ' r,. r"`} tr•,, 1 � ", F� f� N ;.l . ".ti in :` 4 a t„�,
Q� 1 �� �i'7 � �� �irx 1,. C..1" cry 1'1•' y,.! /^,i ��,�'�r'�'.r 5' lr �� � .,.a�� , r r � r;
4 r,yy' I^ . 1 ') n F,l. r•,, N� ,r� .f1 �` •i �i •.+ i •rt; 1' /'��� 1 ,+t /' �t
tT IN
'�, � •r� �J �� � Irl. ^./ ''� tr. ,f� rr•t�S tv'1 �/ j'".,
1 � y/ , � r,'1 r) k -•Y, �! C 1 +f �x ,{ w: .,�- Aw, ' .� .. ..'�
�'C � i ttx.rl • yS a ,, 0 rte{ 'r r� r , '4 1 r 1 � /��d !r'ti r� �r "'1 \r �•:r5 "' "4, v jwf ' ,j y r+ r ..
rix trl'�. r7D (,:}
F 6 v i 1 � � '^1 � i^ \. r � v "1 ,, }r;' +r!~ r ✓ : tr`>1{ ,rpt' 'i � \,,J Jl Ir, .
P
+ S C tvT "y+ , � ,.. � !+, . � v..••. ...'•r. r 1 "S •t'� . �•° i i yx1 ."{ „`"r ^' (q h
y ✓ , r'" 4:'.. f {r.». �� y' �.' A , ((` 'r
Iv
° � •. � 1 '`� � .1 ..Ira ... "� 1
°• Ir i ' r i' p•�./' t^j` 4 1 ,t. 0�/
.fir v� 'n 'A i !`I e • rd 0 0 ... rl,>) 1. /. + .� 6, � f `"i i ''''
,.� •� n +. " r' j ,,.r ••_, r, r rte, •,
Q • ,,rte r'1 �1 r "
r.>.1l'i�.in�,
rr e - r, •w r 1' e..v d 0 p 4 G p 0 r• C t, #� > ` . 1 : ; r L \1
Od I..)
n0 ! , � i•, �2�� 3rd. ' � ;{�y�t.�-}'i. `� � F �•-
"' '' ^
r. �/a+° o '" dAa °Sda� l ' _ �w f�k � •`„� �' r.,'.
„1 • .r ra o D ° o It n �`�•!r µ�5 ~,�.� ,c
Z
0 Cl �0' Gt k. •� , h C .> mow.. R.. rh h.
y ' 4 • / L x111 i` 1' , ✓ 0.
` ° btl„Q a• 4 G _� 1 � 0 d 6 r Or � Y e ° , r RI,r �, � ^� n L v.„} t4 .
✓r Q b •� � °d a °� 6 � ltl .^ r 'r4 'l
• ,, o �o O ° Q e 0 it 0 prf •a rt , • v ��:1F� .7. `•• .v,l T
, .•r •• �°� °� do o� �. t r 'r.ry ��, {d �.,', �..`. ' ,"`t
a �� .w.• � 7 O A 7 1 a • � - .. tr
d e• nr0 0 . 0 r^ n u e� G f�+ �, a 1 `f!/nY.-1,�� a ft'„ Y ."''L 'k,..
.,, a J' +� lJ �' � • i' ,
�„ `•,. rte° �!�'? Q d okny. rbG •H ' „y'.. �G'^,F7 .�n° i+✓ •t i>^G'•..IH •te 1 y4r`/ ��iws ��. r• �'
..a . • a N aA p '« b o •. O b CW (ii 1 �•� \ t al►r,.•:itp Gi !� 1 a•'•t `.a
rY
to
4 '�'nn �, .n„ oQ 4' bA �'a ir.f•y S+.St } 5. r1. H % •� �I r .i t r .� ,
o
•
, +? Q 7 O a U. ,OH{i..x� ) ..+ • .. ` ^ TAM
e 4 7 � •f ■■ pp
r•' `Y . Q .fl Mf o » 'ri'r°•r e �� \y DIY
t
,��� . le Or � rr n f •a .''•+r• r e' 1 , . � i t k
" `�'4.� 1(fb Mir u �: . .ar I`. _•••� •i.}t CI 'V p�
�
«" •• a ��'. yvr [r•,«v yr . .. ::a ° rJ �...«,' F+,'1•.".t rt7.; r?*;C•^. i '„�r-
�•+'�" �.+•1 �..:{ �. r;' � 1 . � /• , S 4 » / f '/, � , ' Y ! i / ' .H `, a ( ` / �4 Y �1,..: ` #'. ♦ r °��1 � t
.w (� 1 . . fel, (! A �•'If MM �{ � � 1 � ,� ~, � � 1..
'r �y / °r . } r,! n .� r;c t� r. t "�„�1� L,•Jr.Y ,tf•,,.
74
rrlti1I (y; _
ri1. y y ' t r r St. �r . J " rr M •r` r 7 C:r'"+, P^ Gt"`� Ca1 i". r+•... i.",i rj'
s r .r a ,� n' ! • ,r i1 A i r La,� t4` „/'r� +,�>;
L«.ri ,:'F« " P J. r,.ir'�" ,, .i '�/ 0 d H + ' d y :. ,{ .Y .» ; .... •. - - , . " 1• - ,J
09r o °0 d ' 70' .+ 5 j. i ��y�
o 0 4j,,. '., r r'1 ..«.•"'.. J G` Ii ° 0 D C A 1, *' I i r� .� .` t. ,h! 1 p ♦, i
o a
A0,00
�!'l�4``{�^ ��
a 0 0 0 0• ° ° 4' 7 ° . ° O'° Q ,+ 1, n r, !�' .: T `• '' i' r •,1 1 5
�'
�j�'ao°Ao�a•0 o•C�•'r?ry
•� ,= 0 a ' 0 p.J p ° .) l,. I G°.+t G �"a ,0 a °, f � it . C"� � i„� ! �
,+3 nLr 9 to °O J dph z 0 pP ry Oa � P� ,, t �r it 1y•� �� • , .., � �+ +.L
' b P -0 0 " r O C • ` JOG 0 ae � � � a ! a yJ+r ^ r a+r, ,^'�' r ♦�' +� ° 0 IY T .r ~w.t t L ~•..r v *' ` f •-,lYf � .r
►a n a 0.
a AO d 0' F.J h OA n , P
P '} -ri + � !f 9 ° L . w +,A,�, -•i... + -) � ( ♦ �.�;,?
l`�( 1) ° o 1 {, w P x � ! ' eY« )) i M„ t! 1 f ��rrL 7 ( 1,• S
r• _» P � / J l7 ° G q. tit° 0 '� .! p P r'+ .!i•',,la ,J 0 ` '�,' ?Fye x'i.'r"j `ti� jv
"1 Fa^: T•"'S l:'_?:ir we n , G ,7 r1 °- n r a0 "tkkPo ', . c !% - r.i;,•y, r.7. i'•� ` a L, 5r ,/ �r� i� 5 tlS,. (f
,r ',_.,- �"�'+, r 7 pBLA `�% ,.4•r !) •"'• v• � i�,S, " tj'�}rLL..w/e"L, ��;: ,+
BtAvT
' p r LNl .WGIa:!i! p " 0 i1 a»�tt��P .,,.' 4 � , u l [[SC ss •T C "♦i `. + �J t � `T �, . � r'' ` �
ffP
w 1�
c,
1 -..Y-. �. . • p � + rt � R r r �
r e ,
r
- r °
o
o
u �a
',YY.-':.-_...1 ��' 'l".�� � � T j � N ,r• x • a •. • ./r•! 0 �,F dr �., a ,� �.i t� ; , ° \ ti j.
�r--++a.r.• ,_... --'fir. •ti � ��` O / �� , y^ ,� G G '. 'S � !.' °' i` •i 4` 1' 7 ;
w..L, .'-_'...,, L �.- _ 4 • `+ � ,� • r °.., ) .. � ,! ry u 0 9 0 ° ,Y A i �l �1
•-yr. '_""rLi t h t.r 1 J- .� r fr• r ?. y A'd 0 Pp .? w C
a, d cr
r xh
•h��7L-� r_-..., ;�� ., .+,+ .... � V ' ay 1, - �.. ��� � l^
LP'vr w n M tA
Yr� F i
Le
......... _.,�, �. � i ""` �_ ,......_ _.. ..,,.,.,,•,...�— a ,r...�:.K,' "�` . �,
TO
—
�+�� +••'•• ,.,rte ,.moi. .`� '".Yfy s.
'+ • _Y � ., a `� '' k. +r .� `�. fv ( ..,� `, � «
•
f 1r 'ra+ir j Out r -
L n u ((�� •� ) ri y
tl�sap 01 �n Y p gip. n r+ C aru " 1rj«✓ r .; C �jC+pAj.,,11'
r. 'r 9
00 ., a p J o°
�n
Barr w
n"at •r aW ,n %' rn� •+ , �" 0 n Q p 0 tt 0 A i}
p yr r 111 r k 1+t
..a0"y r]r]n. o e0p► ( `o •. , ..!4 '.#'".' _ ',
no 46,
(^nh n An •,te Ca�y^r, '�"'. Y� r
r OO I) e0'0 ppf+ 0 0� 0 ° .'a n ° Vis. ♦f1..]>n, *'!'a• 1
tl'•1. tl () q a nIs
,0 00' O.iO V9ti. i ! n i. 0 O iE) '.kjo,6 ^!�
ale , n , q",0' 0 tdbp000G.0AP0�aA� Iq' UtF a
1A
,r ° n n R� •a. o � 0 6 p Yt n u y d - + � ° n •. , `)
>p n""^. rr pow; pa a t0. P,Yb00G o°n Partlaa t>° rp:> a »a•}� -Yi ]r c 1 nr!
P n nu,« L .A •",,.{„. �,"rr ;n. n.^ e' HPonU r�P00 ppr rYa Q} ] l,. f na plR L0i3 '.t r
A
Fe t y 4•�'ti"� ' n„ n ^' p �f1ry0 o .'Poy f]u p A 0 °(1 r) 0 o tl
"
+ o: n 0 0°p0
A,•,.•r'rI.: _n�
la. n rr{ . "r,.i3, pA ",f.`o ) n ,r "A. ^., w+ �. n P400,� p 0 p•ry rr /«a s, p 0r "r t -..op.00°4
p,
yra1 O, p
n 6 p
q 1 0 1yf
It L 4 a 0 Uep
yn n 6 oo n^)0.O
11"�},»�"•
nr)...� pJ a'A
,(c+rtrOkp .y�,o0gp0 , b 0 np`] ]0 n i a
rsµ n 1 n e O tie . o r7 C,1 .Lp' n. n a p r4 0 0 P ° U q° p.P
n I •' 1' L A o n b o„ A. o o. o. 0° Q nap
,p y p o g p
It o n ern ryn oo 0
tt t
n o �' �' p p,� 0 U 0 e •h - ,] 6° 0 e a u° {J ,
p . rx ,t t + p o 0 0 0 rr 8 1 A qa 0 0 u p r. n x w r t
a °.' 0
c. 0 A o
n •. . ti,� p ra s e n r'i 4 o rr , o u a P 0- 0 ;+ y 00
no o b qpn n eo O np0 or 'd
1 t+ i
up ° oto„ a ,o P o b 0 .,e tLa "h ..j . �' �Plriil� ,l r�
n .
:e. 1X '`•�: ;a je zr r he d ' n s��"�'���IL q ry
�.+J .a"• �"Y•M. NM �Jt � �� ^I „ ,1 , r� .n �y +' p r] ,� ' 1 � Y ar ' n (., : „ p "y a i) »
« •LY,1.''rL]jL J r� 4 ,1 r. IA i] r rt f] n+ ^ ,'Y '�> �.
• , R� ,]co
r
,
" p e
• , Po .r , 1, it L
It
,rr r] t r 0 �• r' r
' 1•
,r � \ � �,e.✓ _(r., +.d Ir,tir', :''n, 'ry�n f � r 11,,.. �t' r " 'i p:
� ' N' ,. �J [� r , II .�r.l J..v 1 1, 1 °, (` ._1,•, rl f1/ J'! + '
0 u oy •+ ry ., r i ` �l rsF
_ S^35
CHICa a n ,y' .
r � u'o hrr oS1r Jr� ,fr
'p o, )� ,tR ai iY
>>0� ,o. y AQ.•':c ,-..� J/`Ir rn Al 0 + `t '• t C»
o
1 � �i 4-cc,aG ')Jtl`"nr On, B?'p tc l•� 1 I ' �n�`4y~ +' � .«.. ` ! ,
p oJ,
, A
• F ` r r �F wt 't�"n C o• t'w e ° �"o
n� I �. ' G. a "ti 0 wr•( �dCRn � 0 1` q•0 rr. p4Cw � i c ..
'\ , 1'h • ,� tl`�p +r Ct 1 � Otl b.�trC >�.)( , r�+, S '• �,.
i p h 0 •y �.
.. �y , �,� ' • . ,r... -M 1. i tr .r 0 ` e' Q h . � 6 p i` t'"'� } . � i ' • r a
�_ �— � `w .... r �tr'">' - "'+v '" ' �ms's n , ��` ,]» 0 °' o r� c r '.. • C J. n• "'r � � ^•,,;..
-s ..0 � ,�.��''s'...-.� wJ w� � ,�"� i- w �� �ti 1dCL «' ""°w ��� �ar�....,+ � '' f� �•• � ,.%'` .
J
... ..A. _..A,� 4,..�.«•--•-+� �,1"N t `•s kr 0
t��ii, �y +r `'`+ '"' i�a7 ,`t .e-.. x.1'1 P o•� ��' P? � r~ i �.. � .
1 ,.»�.^Y'„r«X; _".�5 i t :.r+ ,,,1' _.,,V J•..^r�t ,+�ru'�tla.'�:+1 .Cyd ,,. r s �, .��
1 h. , r � �."7•.,-.- �r `n , 1 rat r' 11 1. ' :a' s 1+ + , •t��•J
_ G .,L. � >��'"'” 1•�� ~ +t, ' Ulr o,r ��A•]Y ,'1 7,1 + t1 " '� 1 i .w"
...•G .�.�✓..-�-•+^,_•..-r .. -• y� .....» � _...+ -"' � p Y' tr ; n -;H y"` �5 n p � t r i `� _ 4 ,
_
,L. --- --
�..�i w+++-, .,,,, ....--..w".."'.. ",i.� '�.•.. "" -
.r _
�rw�wrmamxwua;.mm](enarm�nswnl.ur�r�rm1YY'e�nri�'� )if'fcM ire—. .. •
Inter- apartmeit l' emarandu
Tos Planning Commission
FROW Dave Hironimus
.9013J ECT, Planning Commission Minutes, July 25 1979, Pgs. 7 F 8, Mr. William
Burch
DATE: April 7, 1980
During discussion on March 26, 1980 on Mr. Burch's rezone project,
he stated that his property was determined by Commission action
to be Low Density Residential,. The minutes for that date read
"Rural Residential". The tape recordings for that elate are of
poor quality and the motion itself can not be heard. All of the
discussion, however, involves Low Density Residential for Mr.
Burch's property with the dividing line between Low Density
Residential and Rural Residential to be the east-west centerline
of Section f. It is recommended that the minutes be amended to
clarify the issue,
jir
3y Kuau, t,iiicv, sa'ia t.na tl.0— - T -TT z- z.'T` .a�
T114111 far the .But t O County From tturoa t %lith more than 2,500 family members,
Tre response to alis ques, n as to themeaning ofr ++(WIOPmOntll gas used on
Page X12 oC the Landunder "Flood Cont:roIthairman Wheeler said
that to iy m it meant "Hazard to hutnt.n 1i.Ve-�rusiclontial devel,olamenC.++ T.hc
Other Commissioners generally agreed. �
Mr. Gilman stated that the rltirraa:u feels that there is 'too much. Rural Resi.
dential- ^that them, Land Use Committee as well as the Agricultural. Advisory
Committee, recommended that Ir'ural. Residential be changed to Open Grazing; and
that Rural Residential, be confined around already developed arras lie
added, "You cannot apply the criteria :i.n the document You just blessed and
come up with all this rural, residential."
Jim Snowden (370) Wild Life Biologist for Fish and Game department, again
pointed out the adverse effects of rural residential designation will have
on wild life which will result in a,dvorse effects an the economy of the area.
In response to a request from William Burch (467), owner of property at
7 -
BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COWITSSTON
MINUTES July 25, 1979
1-lighway 32 and Forest Ranch Road, :for clarification as to the category into
which his property lies, bars Blair said that the scale of the map defies a
hard definition.. (535) Don Kalhack said that about a year ago request for
r 1�Y i Fl��t1r1 �i�= ^_a? `,7 r:'J`ty `,,"Ini—I bdt it never care through.
After discussion, motion was inaae by Comm ssioner Bennett, seconded by
Commissioner Lambert to terminate the Rural. Residential classification
in Section 6 at the east -west centerline; us p acxn� x�, Burch!s property
in the Rural Residential category.
1
AYES. Commissioners Bennett, Lambert, Max, Gilbert and. Chairman Wheeler.
NOES: No one,
ABSENT No one.
Motion carried.
Nicholas Garcia, 3300 Grubbs Road, Oroville, said that his 330 acres now
designated as orchard and row crops and the 1500 acres as open grazing land
were not suitable .for such uses and asked that all. be Rural Residential. In
response to a question .From Chairman Wheeler concerning whether he would
consider a'PAC zoning for his proposed development lie said that he had asked
Mr. Fluskey to present the plan .For hint.
8:55 P. M. Recess
9:00 Meeting reconvened.
Gerald Geiger, President of the Butte County Farm Bureau, said (203) that
the farmers have enough trouble now without having to work arouikd all tbese
rural residential pursuits. Fie introcluced
Hugh Santos, 1st Vice President Of the Bureau, who caller( attention to a letter
from the P1a.rining Department, dated June 6, 1979, about which there was some
mistinder8tandinf, of_ what toriht's eet4n
Zh-n s n ,
&6*"9jW&
W01
.T
As-
g`� . Y
pew,
zz
�a�.3����' Resolution ���_ 79-222
RESOLD IO"'VADOPTIUG GE�-"MA-L Pte, BARD USE
FFO'E"I R.EVI-OION -"TD IAP' ,AMIDY T
the County of Butte first adopted a General :P an
? u .i abruary 1966.) and has from tine to time amended said p? an x and
'WHER�''ASs :he passage of time, changing condi. ;fans in Bute
County, and recent Beate legislation, have mandated more detail eco,
updated, anc� effective land use plans,: and,
W -M -EAS, the Butte County Planning Department has prepared
a draft comprehensive land use text and map amendment; and,
W L&-5, the Coun-cy Planning Co I ssion and Department staff
have consulted ;,rich numerous citizens and grOups and have sought -gide
raging public partciLanpaton and __nput in the Preparation of said draft
d Use Elemsnt •, and..,,
WHMEA.�, the Plan2rLing Department has consulted with the c; ti es
located within the County, and the Local Agency Yormation Go sgion..
and,
IffEREABs after publ cat
Code Section 65351 as recpuf ox and notice pursuant o Coven ent
oy law,, the Planning Commission helda:
publc hearing regarding said Nand Use Elerent, t;,tich hearing commenced
on November 15, 10,x8 with sessions held thereon during a total of ;eight:
Planning; Commission meetings, extending to 1 --larch 21, 1975 and,
WH ` ' S`, by Resolution 79-5h the. Planning Gommi ssion, approved
and forwarded the revised .band Use Element text anali�lap affiendr�ent Vc�
the Butte Country Board o.f Supervisors on Iiarch 7, 1975; a -ads
�-kS, the Butte Coun G,y Board of Superv? sors, upon receipt
of said Resolution 79-5.A conducted a public hearing pursuant to Govern-.
memo Code Section 65351 on said proposed. General Plan revisions, -which
hearing began on May 8, 1979 and continued for a total of four Board. of
Supervisors` meetings; and,
WREREA.S, at the request of the Board of Supervisors the
Planning Commission subsequently initiated additional hearings on said
Land Use Element General Plan revisions commencing on July 25, 1979;
and,
WELMEAS, the Planning Commission had received applications
for specific General Flan Band Use Element revisions from John. 3einke
on May 23, 1979 and from Richard Vermillion & William Brew on: March 7,
1979; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing
on the aforementioned John Hese application on August 22 , 1979 pur-
suant to Government Code Section 65351 and approved said application
by Resolution 79-14; and,
WBEREAS, tho Planning Commission conducted a publ-ic nearing
on the aforementioned Ri cha rd Veryi llion and William Drew application
on. September 12, 1979 pursuant to Government Code Section. 653 , -whish
application was approved by Resolution 79--11; and,
WHEREAS, the additional Planning Commission hearing on the
county-zaide Land Use Element next and Hap revisions which commenced on
July 25,; 1979 was continued to September 12, 1979 on which mute the
Planning Commission approved the ravised hand Use dement text and Hap
amendment by Resolution 79-1.2, and forwarded said proposed amendment to
the Board of Supervisors; and,
WHEREAS, upon receipt of Planning Commission's Resolution
79--12, the Board of Supervisors convened a continued hearing on Sep,ember
181 1979 and,
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervj-sors heard substantial public
testimony during the course of said public hearing and propoeed various
map and text modifications as a result of ,his .rev3et.7 and,
MS, the specific modifications proposed by Lhr Board os
(' Supervisors were subsequently- referred to the Planning
�, Co -i. ssion for
a report and recommendation JLn accordance with. Government Code Section
65356; and,
WHMEA_S, ;he Planning Commission reviewed the modification.
s
-�
a
{ °lL t
-a -
— -
•