HomeMy WebLinkAbout79-40 42
t"1P"DIUM 'DNI.41"I PY 1{i�;��"f l7hN'I'IA1
4
l,'y! InaliTa 11"loy;
1
2
3
4 P]
5 o
6
7
8 "3
9 7)
10
11
12 S
13 1
14
is
16 -3
17
18
19 5
20
21
22 T
23 M
24 q'i
25 U
26
27
28 0
29
50 z
31 1
32 2
33
34
35 4.
36
37 5
30 6
39
40
41
42
41
44
45
46
47
48
49
so
51
52
53
54
55
56
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
4.0
50
51
52
53
54.
55
56
IM1111
2
1JITUITA Ili ghor-d on,",i 1,Y Urban. Vo"I'MOnti,"I U."I.,01 iradudl,nr
4
11;.I�Iilct,urnfl, mobile home; park'I",
5
'Ot'.1k (Juar"tor"I and (tare hom(!f').
6
7
c, o i i (I a ry IJ s Home oacupr.tUo,,,ir,,, -Profosr.iional. :-Ind buril,T)OSSA
8
oatdoor rocrotition fr'Oilitiuleloi 'Utilit'lo,11 PUJAI�.; and
9
lbo,i-public ur-"ot')�
10
ii
ito Do,.ignation Criteria:
12
fox, hiCher-den0lity urban rosidontial devo-lopmontwithin
13
14
Within service areas of community water systems.
15
Sewers available or natu:r,,al conditiono well su.*i-tod i;o septi..'�.
16
tanks.
17
Adjacont or near existing utilities and urban d(ivolopment.
18
E%cellont accosoibility to commercial services, ','�rffiools, fire
19
pr,)toctiori and other community facilitio."'.
20
21
,itonr
A ty of Use: Zoning allows parcel, sizo,,) of 61'�00 ,quare feet.
22
aximum dori,iity of 12 dwolling units, por gross acre with group
23
arters and care homes limito�d -to oiroilar dr-,nsitior,. Home occiapa-
24
ions, commercial usos, othor uses and -setback's regulatorl to main-
25
all rr!_Idontial charactor.
26
27
onoivvt,w�nt Zones: A -R, AR -5, AR -KH, R -P, 12-.3, R-4, MTI -l1, IA -C.
28
29
onin Vrictors:,
30
Eyftsting
, parcel sizes and rosidential densities.
31
rl,-�thod and capability of sewage disposal.
32
El?(�cts, on adjacent uses, water quality, air quality, noise,
31
11raffic flow and safe-ty, and general environmental quality.
34
Proximity -to major s;roets, commercial sorvices and public
35
facilities.
36
liistance from airpovto, railroads and industrial ares.
37
exioting utilities, walkways and drainage facilitirt,,;.
38
Local dosirns.
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
4.0
50
51
52
53
54.
55
56
CCMMXiIVOT � L
2
1
3
2
4
5
4
6
5
7
6
8
7
10
0
11
Site :C1t°!€7ignut On Criteria:
10
127
111
�A7
14
�.......,tX t�L`��•1�/�y1yy'ryry�1 i�//qqy�'ry��fm+y���}.1�ry/���}i'(�]1j1y���y��,[4Y�y}�1`+��Ctry'wi�}1/`'l.�Fk ".�; "'F%���1 �������.
1 Nct�c1od for
1
15
commercial d(,,,v -.+.J.4/��il uT t Y�'j� l/�l.L y.� l�,k! �r!CA,j ���i •.
Adjacent or neav u'L� 11 �� cis.
.L
13
16
1
5
17
16
13
17
10
18
20
19
21
20
22
21
23
Consistent Zcnco C-1.7 0-2, C --C, 11--C, N -C, PA -Cl, ��-�t., �-�1i.
22
24
25
24
26
25
Z7
26
28
27
20
28
30
29
31
30
32
31
33
3?
34
33
35
34
36
35
37
36
38
37
39
38
40
39
41
40
42
41
43
42
44
43
45
44
46
45
47
46
48
47
49
48
50
49
51
Sn
53
5`2
54
53
55
54
56
55
56
cmnae�amxrr.nrar��
51
' 7R�Asa�n�na�o ' �_ -
Ell
t
TNI)TRO I'R'l A14
1
2
3
2
4
3
5
4
h
6
8
7
q
�
10
. Dof."ipna`t ion Critefta:
10
_Sito
y.
12
13
1i Nc,l for induol;ri a1. t� c va LC�l�rtae �� t,' within ;20 .
12'
14
,yeax�
13
15
14
16
is
17
16
18
17
ly
�
1 a
20
1�
21
20
22
21
23
22
24
Consistent, Zones. M-1,, M--2 .
23
24
25
26
255
27
2
28
27
2929
30
2n.1031
32
31
3'
1
3
34
333
35
�1
36
353
37
38
37
3 �J
35
40
59
41
40
42
41
4 .3
42
44
43
45
44
46
45
47i
15
4t3
4
45
8
SQ
4
51
59
52
51
53
52
54
5.3
55
54
56
55
52
P�
p
56
g +,
2
2
3
1
4
p
5
6
6
7
7
8
$
to
In
11
12
Site Den gna- tion Cri1,er a:
11
12
13
--Net�red-��,-ut-wk��A art
13
14
1.. Nooded for public use within PC :worn.
14
15
15
Su-itable locaL-ion and road access dor 'type of use,
16
16
17
17
18
is
-);i
20
usP--end-a-uveae,
.Q
21
No standards, except whore necessary to protect
21
22
adjacent uses and public welfare.
22
23
23
24
24
2'
25
26
27
27
28
28
20
z`
2 9
29
3 (l
30
3]
32
33
33
34
34
3s
35
36
36
37
37
38
38
39
59
40
40
41
41
42
4' 2
43
43
44
44
45
45
46
46
47
47
4848
4�
49 49
so
51
52
52
53
53
54
54
55
55
56
56
1
1
2
2
.3
3
^,'�
4 ;cr1; .
yy p Apr/ ry
T 11 gm,;
1,� n ill ,; v wi 1" A i,,,. J
A
6
'� . NALE AND'I' `l'1�;1�1'l I�;'1'A7' l C)N
6
7
7
8
'1'ht� (,,omj)ruh(.n,,I vo ,,And use mtrip for I'lut t o Couri l,y
8
9
o'rf1c:ial 'map. Tho land urea nlemoat;, llowrvrr", corat"111I:;e�lat�r.�tt:�
9
10
Earn u�,t„ plGari. map, for o ach of �tho arc;tat around t;l(.' four Inco-I'p -
10
11
orabcod cities and thn community of 1:7rar Idi_"'o,,'raezted. l,rara.tl
11
12
usns for these art;ra "" are displ ayc)d on map", having ti 1,argor so alo
12
13
than the over -.all courit;y comprohotik4,1vo 1 an(l m�xZ,� Tho pu'vpc t;o
1.3
14
is to providc, gr"oator detail for t;ho urban and coTrmurai,t,y arott ,�-
14
15
The smallor colnmuni tiPS in the: county will have mrapc; ()f lar[Tor,
is
16
scale and de Lail prepared for Lho m az the map .vevi t, i r,rr procrt oo,
16
17
is undertaken for these aroas,. As eeoh urban area ;and oaeh
17
18
community area map is amended and adopted, that dr�tal l of 1.rand
18
19
ukat a for tub�:: o arc: -.s will br, found on their r. e; spooti vt � Land
19
20
USe plrarl , mRap.
?0
27.
21
22
The dorsi natod. band, uta pratt:ern, on thes-e maps rcprf k f,nts an
22
23
of:f':Lcaia'l �stratt;me,nt tay Loci 1. govornmontloadors) on thr. div'.Ction
23
24
o.V county p,r owt,h in the rn�,xt PO <Yoar s. Tho land map depict-;
24
25
gr�aphioral.l,y tJho concorns, pu!icim and otl'�t�.r.� 1`rirlci.f,1F; px�oron,t;c'd
25
26
in LhIti, toxt.
26
27
27
28
Due to their "genoral." and. long -norm nature, lran.d utct., plan maps,
28
29
do not need or ordinarily show proci -ir, locations and difinite
29
30
boun.darios as zoning maps do. For reason thc.. or.,ale of
30
31
lana use mal ., pr oclude , the idt-anti f . on of Specific. parcel
31
32
L•oundavieo) At the same timo doe i.*,j.uu-makers muot br, gable to
32
33
intr•rpr. et the maps; and apply them in their roves- 0w of rr,=ning'S,
33
34
u�bd.Lvisioriv and tater dF�v lopment �at�t'ti.vities. ThK, flexibility,
3.4
35
of imprecise boundaries must be known ,,,o that it is r.ossibl.e to
3S
36
decide which land use cafe orie s apl,:lyt�tfrto agiven d6,-ir;lopm,ent sitct
37
a
37
38
Because of the �nrrralized nature o,[ land use plana -caps; many
38
39
small nonconforming usoo cannot be offective-ly shown. Bites
39
40
suxroundcd Ly tht;yse undfisi gnated and nonconf'ax-mi,ni Uf'r.S can
40
4.1
frequently bc- developod with Similar u --c-.,;3 without; r t rlif,4rantly
41
42
violating policy objoc-ti•vos or impairing thr intendr:d prUmary
42
43
use in the a'Vea. Such development would riot :xpand the
43
4,4
Muter ,�dge c,t nonconforming uses but tq)uld alloy- tht., I�igical and
44
45
reasonable convorgsion of vaeant land, too oimilir a ar.,.
45
46
46
47
Implementation-,
47
48
a. Land use plan maps are and shall be priri,tF,cL or'w'' a ::ca'? r� of
48
49
l" - 4 nxr l�� :for rural. arras and 1.11 -- 1`',000' for ur ,an areas
49
5o
b. The dec;.i pion -making agency shall d.ec"tde= which land use caat-
50
51
e ory is the mere appropriate where developm-F:,nt, ,itt.s arc,
51
52
:: alit, by or adjacent toi�xr�rYfiXaitr cat cfrary boundar .e,s not
52
53
following known phy ica:l foature s or prop ;rty 1.jr,,F-s.
53
S4
c. rroposed uses that would be inconsi otent with thy hand: use
54
SS
plan map d 3si na ti ora.. , but are surrounded by and contiguous
SS
56to
:.,imiliar existing uses; shall br, considered consistent with
'
56
the land use plan map.
P-
MAP i I-V1'.i1-ON
Thn land use, o l.errnr.n t; of 'Any (P, a,rre>rral. plan, an PO f l ('c:'t;A in ria Conc;ral
3
4
plan land uoo map, in Gh" moat ;;ranGi.fic uxprernioL of kho 10N.,l,al:i 0
4
5
t)ody wl'th to the use of band within the purvi(v or they; plan.
5)
6
Govornmont Code, Bection r f;qulr(�,o:
6
7
7
"Thee (-rone''ral pl,nn slaa:l.l, e;on& tali of to nt;ratvriorlt,' of` d(Iv(±Iol;)-
8
9
rriont 'l')ol.,i,cl,o , and. 4,lxra'l l inc:ludo ca di ngrsam cap" diarr %mr, and
9
10
LM sot tint forth ob jeottive -, priuolp,lon, standar.is and
10
11
plan propooals."
11
12
12
13
Butto County €adoptod its Wnt 'Land use plan map in 1900. A now
13
14
comprrye9hc+r,vivo band use mala wan ,radoptnd with they 19YI land use elompnw.14
15
Only two amond onto have been mado to tho :Land uso map n i nce 10'11..
is
16
An amendment of tho land use map for ones of Butte Count:,j'r, small,
16
17
communities could bako many months.. Due to the di.verrit>y of Butbo
17
18
County it's obvious that to formulates a new land usr! map for th(�
18
19
oati.re, country could take, rmtarr.y yoar s. li"or this reason a urogram for
19
20
they implementation of amending tho comprehensive land u::r pian map
20
21
rmst to stated.
21
22
22
23
For the reador and docision-makor to really understand proposed hand
23
24
use l,r-attorn'r , land ur e plan maps must: show wholes c;ommunit,.ios, whather24
•25
thoy rarer nmill, rural vorident;i.a7 communitins or complex urban are ac.
25
26
Focusing can an entire community area facilitates l.itat:e s under at finding exist--
26
27
int; Gpowth tr'e'r'reis, futur o Growth obtimatEts and cal l.ocatinr suf:fici.on't
27
28
land. A eorrrrruniLy--w.idr focus during the devolopmenW of =.Ian maps
28
29
similarly builds community identity and pride, and ong,,nrlors a wide
29
30
bnsv of public :support for plannink propos,l s.
30
31.
31
32
The designation of land from one category to another requires conside:rm
33
able research and analysis. Doterrmiaing the ,re:lovancy of each adopted3l
34
policy and chop ing a catebory both requires evaluation of a variety
34
35
of sp4 cific data :such as oxisti'nl development, natural resources,
35
36
soil conditions, utilities and growth trends. Only when this infox-
56
37
matron is presented in a complete and well-o.rganizod Y h'ion is the
37
38
public able to participate effectively and the County prepared to
38
39
render roaoonatle decision';.
39
40
40
41
Implementation:
41
42
a. Planning staff shall prepare and the commission .hail adapt land
42
43
use plan map boundaries for each community or arta of the county.
423
44
b. Before holding public hearings, planning staff wh6al.l prepare and
44
45
present a. comprehensive report of all role want poli.:i es and
45 .
46
e;nvironm;ental considerations. .
4 6
47
c Tho County shall seek wido public participation Ware and during;
47
48
consideration of map ameradmouts throuEh the us o of j+,e lic meeting.US
49
local groups, questionnaires and othor mothod ,.
40 .
5Q
d. Before. approving :Land use plan map amendments, thy:- Commission
50
51
bnd Board shall each hold at; .Least one public herring after
51
52
notifying all affected property owner 8.
52
53
53
54
54
55
55
56
SC
55
1
1:
3
3
4
5
6
C
7'
7
8
8
to
1.2
12
13
13
14
14
15
St- ate-lRw-hag-always -allowed-ssning-te--re;feet-adept04
1.5
16
geh�;ral -plane; --bt t -l -t- t e- et -u til -1 ' 4-bh t�- Beal --son ng
16
17
lens -ware-required-ta-be-eenM-etents
17
l.$
18
19
ercliz�xnee- rand-#�h�-mere=11n--r1 eet-evPt1ir#-aet
1
20
tyee-e-leznn-roebl erre :
20
21
State law had always rocommendod zoning to reflect adopted
21
22
genoral plant-, but it was not until 197LI• that local. zoning
22
23
Ordinances Bana general plane were roquircd to be conoistrnt.
23
24
111ho many remaining inconea stencies be Ween the County zoning
24
25
ordinance and the land u,,ea plan map reflects oeveral distinct
25
26
';ypeo of planning, problems.,
26
z7
w7
2s
28
29
30
-TM a- text --Pevl~lien-and-related- ehenges-in-tl3e- Ion d-•us,e
2.0
30
31
pian-ma}�-were -made-izperative-b-the-diel eltiee-e.fi
37
32
32
33
and-seeu.ring-eensletent- ell ev ed --that
31
34
Bening-een.sleteney-ln.-Biany- are ae-will -be -greatly=impie-'ed.
34
35
35
36
36
r
eval"u.atler3.
37
38
2. This now text was made imperative because of the difficulties
38
39
of trying to use the 1971 land use element as a Guido in
39
40
securing consistent zoning and in initiating land use map
40
41
amendments. . It is believed that; zoning consistency in many
41
42
areas will be greatly improved by tho clarification Of policies42
4.3
and standards and by future map amendments reflecting current
43
44
data and comploto site evaluation.
44
45
45
46
senee-and-the-rep
46
47
be-remwiled-threugl-rather-ei1 e-ehanges-in-the=-anl ng
47
48en
l
aare
48
49`
_• There a�number of minor inconsistencies between existing:
40
50
zones and the existing land use categories which could be
S0
51
remedied through rather simple changes in the • orting regulation,,51
52
52
53
53
5.4
54
5S
55
56
56
56
57
1
distinct -,-Ion In Cl,f'nri ty ,.i..���itat I ono E?,�.�,��''e� ir�tigo t
2
!,`.�R urban donij;nnta._ono and l: l:�>wi�ii���.�.�k�ror, tho T������mC,l�'���„1.e 4-+oX�.V'f'�ryg—,joll of
3
vo,,',o'l r(.(I pr'(>G3ua ton tix'oas to IT1C7ro .1'rI,tfnrq,,0 ut,�, sa -the
4
NP �'4 0 R� Fll,-0;r'bWilno-fft Ht -be -v' -?ydt^ d -ii ;6-e)il-•aFiW+a-dev4—,•�o4
4
pee-4:�e-4-a ad-utie - Wat- a,1 Ho-aH-a-metherg- ear- ;u - - e l,rittova.-Had
5
6
,Hquera.e -e -c men,:6-4-n-4iiie-w�6th- oeu'rity-po l !c:40s.
f
7
7
8
�
9
T'mp'l oinorit ati on-..
9
10
Rv--T1* e-Eigun iy-OkR-11-0 te--the,-»-UA,,,rP-U-and--'IA-2-Li m+;6-edeRes
10
�;�,
�l:a�o�x��-t1�e-��aoeraing-��-�u.eh-r��eat��ta--m,�►;��-�ee���ol���f7w�n.d
].�.
12
cPfekez-eaee1✓ean
12
13
a. The County shall oliminate the "A -e,)" and "A-2 Lima to(J" zones
13
14
«hrough the rozoning of such aroas to moxa consistord, r.lI ass-
14
15
ificationo .
15
16
16
17
1.7
is
18
19
10
20
20
21
21
22
22
2, 3
23
24
24
25
25
26
26
27
27
23
25
20
29
30
30
31
31
32
32
33
33
34
34
35
Implementation:.35
36
36
37
37
38
38
3.0
39
40
40
41
c, ;All Land use plan map changes should be immediately followed
41
42
by consistent rezoning.
42
43
pvopesals.:
43
44
44
45
45
46
46
47
47
48
48
49
49
50
SO -
51
51
52
5
53
53
54
54
55
55
56
56
57
** Addition 58
1
1
2
2
3
4
r
5
6i
7
`i'"he s,o
7
8
use ; ;arra also enll.ed ta.so , bocaurie tho approval o1 a
5
9
une, pc rmi.t may be condit,tonod upon spec; .:f'i.c roquiromen,f;o for houro
9
10
Of opr;ratioir, ferrcin,GG ray rki,nG, si zo and location, ,dodi,c,-Utiorl,0
11
s'Lreot improvoments, d.rui v.nzaro f aci.l it i o , and other cortidA L:i.oas
11
12
reasonably rel.atod to tba, proposod uso. **(.A, use ZiormiU .l_ also
12
13
required, when a lts a`J, ncnc:onforming use; is changed to sa more rt<str;i ott 13
14
i.ve use or a use of the samo nature.) Applications for use permits
14
15
ares presently administered °key a throo-m ember Board. of Zoning Adjo,st,-
15
16
mc,nt appointed by tho Foard of Supervisors, although tho, law allow
tri
17
this function to also bo er:formod by el.ther, a zoning,.administrator
17
18
or the planning commis"..ri orl.
1.8
19
1n
20
20
21
21
22
22
23
23
24
24
25
25
26
26
27
27
28
24
29
2h
30
30
.31
31
32
32
33
3[
34
34
35
35
36
36
37
37
38
38
39
39
40
Implementation:
40
41
e1�-appreval �a-ase-permits-aud-arahees-sl�al l-hs-eensi Ment
41
42
!th-the-peri:ei:ea-and-standaVds-ef--the-Tand-'t oe-B1ement
42
43
b:--Cen:rli ti ens-ear--spprecl-ei -use-pormi ts-and--canes-should
43
44
serve-te-maiigtain-p lmery-user-i -the -area-and-seeure-th(�,
44_
45
45
46
a. `alio approval: of use permits and variances shall, be consistent
46
47
with the policies and standards of blue general flan..
47
48
b. Conditions for approval of use permit and variances should
48
19
serve to maintain primary uses in the area or 'to allow a
4.9
so
continuat;'j.on of a legal nonconforming use.
5n
51
51
52
a2
53
53
54
54
55
55
56
56
** Addition 58
�1
�t
2
4
4
i
6
7
5
8
in
12
12
13
1.3
14
14
15
15
16
16
17
1.7
18
18
1.9
1.9
20
20
21
21
22
22
23
23
24
24
25
25
26
26
27
27
2n
H
29
29
30
In 19?4
30
31
the Butte County LAYCO adopted tentative spheres or long-range scrviw.:
31
32
*plans for all -the cities and districts in the County, taking into
32
33
ao ;ount existing, boundaries, natural and man --made fc ature , sex'vioe
11
34
capabilities and they probable future. service needs of the, aria based.
34
35
on growth trends, population projections and the Butte County General
3:5
3'6
Plan, * * ( acrd appropriato City Goneral, Alam . )
36
-7
37
38
ass
39
39
40
40
41
41
42
42
43
43
44
44
45
45
46
46
4'7
47
48
48
40
4
so
50
151
4 051
52
52
53
53
54
54
55
55
56
56
* Addition 6
2
2
*f 4
S
5
6
6
7
7
8
J
Imple.montation:
10
14r-- +' 1 3't -+ 'F � E3T3Ei- 3-• ?% - f? i -C t F -- a �-( .F��*E? E3 1 # 1 �µE fc1}c
10
12
eerie eipia ep:6
12
13
a. Future vovioions in thi;) text and :t"utui veva.sionf of _l.tind
113
14
use plan map amendments shall be cor-oolatod with obatit.d
14
L5
concerns and policios in all ad.optpd. elements.
15
16
16
1' 7
17
18
18
19
1
20
?o
21,
21
22
22
23
23
24
24
25
25
26
26
27
v7
28
25
29
29
3r,
3O
31
1.
31
32
32
3V
33
31
34
34
35
35
36
36
37
37
38
39
39
39
40
40
41
41
42
42
43
43
44
44
45
45
46
46
47
47
48
48
49
40
SQ
56
51
51
S2
52
53
53
54
54
55
55
S6
56
6
1
2
2
4
3
5
4
S
7
{'
8
7
8
10
w�ri`1--1f�iH^=,�1'ft-®%—rt�tk�E`3abcHH'w7 .EkH�i�t�-�';ifi�'�=Ciw�ht
it
y�.1
Ek�tl./�� •: }''
�y1z
,7{-!--���i y--;�r yH�?�t+��
'i.hk`.��'}77'.�.y'.'�^H�.��H'f�i.�'2'3.�rF����3kt"'
ry�.�
y12
4
15
Con ;c,quontl.y, t,he Govornmen t Codi: rtr,w
r(IgUires the Planning Commiorliorl Co ('i,le an annual.
14
15
16
with both the Board of 'luporvioor.; and the Sta o Offico o of`
16
17
Planning and Re.,e arch on t ho of t;ra.(, z) an, th(c pro froorls;
17
13
in DMI impl.omentiat,ion and itsc;omPli.anco with Gononal .f1I11ri
18
19;uidr.linc�r.
20
19
21
20
22
21
23
2
2
24
2 5
�
Im 'l. r;rt.s f,Lpn:
L4 -:-Z-rrrr-Cemtit�n-hz^l��i-a-}�1 i-o%lari n -tu
24
26
of^ a k-, r r� r �-r., v��w-a� � ,u€rE r on -- -n �c d-�; r� �s-gin
5
26
27
rrt�kY-�t�r��Y ern^r�kti^<-1/a-ot--�zfirev+"-®cNxrt
28
H3k "?f31AEi&1^ir-^F�Ht?^UJf3�i* k�—ticir!—F3331CHr6iT
27
29
a. Thn Courit;y will coruAdor all .21a.9Gc>nUono for rr(,,cado d. change .o in t hr,
?
30
Gfnm-,.ral_ -Plan arid o -hall initiate formal, approvcal proc r� orllrlgs on
3�
3]
1�ro oc,al i d F.m;-� worthy of fur;hov con.,icloration`
31
32
--nd�-4®Ahalleaed®c�tkiSd6eh�3earr1-
32
33
34:
34
35
SGuIerv1seve -aFt4- he -Cf fi o - f-1 nnin ^i nr -. Hr��t rot- n
35
36S�}�m�r-eF-Hael^year.
36
37
b, Th(,,, rc.,port required by Government Caodec't�or: X4217
37
38
arid 65q-00 nhal.l be prepared by ot�aff ar�cl Su`i mitt ed t the
38
30
Plannirie Commi:,oiora, Board of Fupe.rviooru and t,hr St�to Office
39
40
of Plarmi.ng nnd Dees -arch.
40
4
41
43
42
44
43
45
44
46
45
4°1
46
41i
47
49
48
60
49
51
5n
52
S1
5A3
r"
54
53
5' 5
54
56
55
56
6
0
4
i
5
6
6
7
7
5
9
1n
10
11
5.15 County PolicY
11
.12
12
�'�.�;-5e�xn.t�-�.�►�ereka�d��.-�����-��� 1�2�d
;1, 3
13
14
�zee��.�o��aa--bla1b-o-eue:-rgcu�t�-�-a
1.4
i-a1•-lt6a?-ae4:an--weul(-be-fillewed-em-a V�ealtuv
16
16
17
eu ra z : x -t a --a e . S-RIP0
17
��
�.$
��-���+f�-a£�^�%1�,�,�E3�f�--�1�?fit+,-��.Pw�wQ-��--'k�,k�-��,i��i.
They Countcy towards orcharrl and field crop Land.
19
10
2h
y policy
use is to maintain the viability of pioductive,, a�ricul,tural lands by
in. th,c se areas dps,ignatrid.
20
21
2
ax'e3ventixa non-agricu.11�ural. devol.ormr:nt
Areas dei�ignated on the Land use lialp fOl' orchard
22
22
23
for - riculture.
and field crop will allow ntcncive� agricultural op ratiori� �xr,e1 rc Ie�l.fe127,
24
24
a eo only. Some conflicts a may a�}� r,e near dc,�,� designated �xrlars ��� e��aa.
could serge as buffers botwerm �hn two
2
25
"Rural-Rosidc�ntial distr.ietll
26
26
land use typoo.
77
27
28
28
2q
29
30
30
31.
31
32
32
33
33
34
34
3.5
35
36
36
37
37
38
38
30
30
AO
40
41
41
42
42
43
43
44
44
45
45
46
46
47
47
48
413
4 ()
40
Sn
50
51 .
51
52
52
53
F3
54
54
55
55
S f,
56
71
-mss.
r,.� 4f1flF4ff$t ,"M of %°y F�f3 izj Ar Nifi 4�1,vf, Arf`A,r l rFD yav � w,Y1f7Jy4f '�rpF*.A;/1 Ir�i'�r if.r 3+M,1,.;`�n SwF f r C f 4�Y rr
w r r � � t rk t�f ��, ra i•u1 r ih Fl i�* I �r14 "da J�°` e 3 <f'�q r r R ''r✓ M1 r1�f r ar V! I ,z1 r
1^ •i, � F rir, r r r}, rad s N • ri ,t J a 7,rf �� ,t d",' }} l �,L� r Ott wi �4 �v t s,
} '�1y7 em
1
ry4� 1 1 i
64,
4
4
fa
] t ►t�`L t -�Hr-- t�d1,e, E1- ;H- n-- to -� c�
6
7
and the use of good ae--,rcul tuv al prae• ico.a. Tinpacto, reoulting from
7
8
c:onfliat ng land usob can be rodu,cod by triot implmnwntm t;:i on of
8
9
tho land u, -,e pol.icims rclated to agricultural crop land, arid, by
9
10
roO.L-rictime urban oncroacbruont by use of an oxcl.uSivo
10
11
zone With such rna..t igat;ions, adverso impacts, can be o:ldmt.ttatcd or
1.1
12
reduood to an acaeptable lovel.
12
13
14
14
15
15
16
16
17
1.7
13
18
19
19
20.
20
21
21
22
22
23
23
24
24
25
25
26
26
27
27
28
28
29
29
'10
3 0
31
31
32
32
33
31
34
34
35
35
36
36
37
37
38
38
30
39
40
40
41
41
42
42
43
43
44
44
45
45
46
46
47
47
413
43
49
40
50
5O
51
51
S2
52
53
53'.
54
54
55
i5
56
56'
}
41
iq�
UNA
+G+f�yy
4
4".
5
6
6
%
p7
9
9
10
10
11
11
12
tit '
13
13
14
14
15
i5
15
16
17
17
is
18
19
(1) Impacts associated with grazing
operations.
19
20
20
21
**((a) Mosquito production and loss of
for. ago :from oxcc ss .vo
21
22
irrigation.
22
23
Mitigation: Avoidance of oxcessivo
irrigation should be oncourago(IZ
3
24
24
25
25
26
26
27
27
23
28
29
29
30
30
31
31.
32
32
33
31
34
34,
3'S
35
36
36
37
37
3$
38
39
39
40
40
41
41
42
42
43
43
4.4
44
4.5
45
46
46
47
47
42
4,9
49
4
50
s0
51
51
S2
.52
53
53
54
54
55
55
56
56,
Additions
74
1
122
4
H
7
6
6
7
7
i3
8
h
10
10
11
3,1
12
12
13
13
14
14
S
15
16
16
17
17
1$
18
19
10
20
.44 Charact or:i atics and Environmental. (k)tut3traint s
20
21
21
22
Moat -anal-t=actae - G: -,Rd - --why 'G' _
22
23
�Hd-1e..ri is-c�ea�n- w 61n-9-3zc�a3-aan-
23
24
ri a s-- eta --a ; t7fe ^, - a � -ftn�- z r M�� 1.e1,m,c�
2 `i
25lt?3?'�
E?EsE -'' (iil�6 F3 — •� 3 ?9 iF?E� i e
25
26
an l {�kNx�--e€�m tt n ;� - t ac i t s,
26
27
Positivu locational factors include `'.anal;,, which arc:
27
23
nooded for residoritial devc:l.opment within PCS years adjacent or noar
29
20
existing utaslitios,, road; and. rewidc;n�tia.i c'.c;�crE;l.opmc'znt,; and reason-
29
30
ably accossiblo t;o crmmorcial service , schools, firs, proGection
30
31
and ot;hea.., community 1'rari l a ti r: � .
31.
32
3?
33
33
34
34
35
35
36
36
37
37
38
38
39
30
40
40
41
41
42
42
43
43
44
44
45
45
46
40
47
47
48
48
49
49
.50
50
S
51
$2
52
53
53
54
54
SS
55
56
56
I
OPINION
2
3
2
4
3
5
4
6
5
7
6
8
7
10
11
12
pn Pa0vts, rosu^tin Prom conflicts.with
adjtient,
](
11
14
Agriculture a�d Livestock Production. ��
PqstS $) smok07 Pesticide de drift, odors and
Duo-v,(:�x�c�c`L
12��
13
15
noio�
livestock production acta.Uities are frequonl;l.y
o1 a�;r� cv.l °i.ur� i aa�<�
offensive or b-- j lour
14
15
16
to r(nsidonts on adjacent proper-tips.
16
17
15
17
19
18
20
1()
21
20
22
21
23
22
24
2;3
25
24
26
25
27
26
28
27
29
24
29
31
30
32
31
3.3
32
34
31
35
34
36
3.5
37
36
38
37
39
38
40
3`l
41
40
42
41
43
42
44
43
45
-
44
46
45
47
46
48
47
49
48
50
49.
51
50
i2
51
53
5w
54
53
55
54
56
55
* * Addition
56
y
Olo (1ounG 1'l�c: (.c,La biiinhtr (1 ,>,lto day 't't%1 l'Ij
3
; p � v•�
�� : I l; Ptl'1 t,„�' l L+ I i ,i w1l i [.il .l riG 1�� �1c,
r1cjjj,
i;l�t :'it�rri;t'1p{°]]�� I,ilil' Y'1'ho (In"Ii(Tl f:t:(1 foyi Alit'; iarld
2
.5
u::f.' t;11(�[:Xl(l l�cY
"... (r (Yf1(�f:a Pol, tlr-trrtr( ki mpl)"w' .:, tatl(lod) l'o;,i(bilti CAI (1+( (lr,l..�rrbcrrlky
wx`�llr
3
4
fj
rl k� , �.r�r.r;�” ! L kl c,1(,�,Nr' I,y f-v,i (joaa.•k, that,
rYi r , w-,L.YIiG?:i
ol,� 1 f i �':1lhY, 1mid. wit) LO Wi L111rr '1lr'l'1:(.Ci 1
5
!
cl(..�� 1 t ul'.:axl Glx f.�A ;,Y �Yt�4?
"C7v �,�.;a.UilCi C'1'+ t ll( Irli�i•(:rtl("1t;�ti;�,C�rl l.'a�c and .r , ,. orl1a ,
6
8
,�'r�am�
1a�nn(l. M.w C,�a,�l:r'(acr l (a:'. :ll001t, i. on ,rc:w.i clr� f'rxr,�' a.m ,] cYr��ani,ra�rt ! pir.� I,�r�t �t' i.k�r�
x llia1Gtht+I1 Of Lhirr,f7�aJ.ic,
7
8
1.0
.
9
I1
10
12
11
12
14
13
1s
14
16
is
17
16
18
17
19
18
20
10
21
20
22
23
7'1lF':;o i.mp21
acl;n include: incroasern in domand for waber, „i;orm drain.rap;c,,
,yr5wcyr.'
22
24
, gas rand c„lOc;hri.c by; urvrice domancls on police arid
fire Px'otec tion
23
25
,,agrin0l- 0V; wmd gretx'Lcr Lraff,i c votilmor-, annd rr'latod.
aiV quality noluc,
24.
26
(rand :i,nipaci;n. 1n-a�C1i#���r�,-d���1�j�Hi�n�-t�1-Tl��en�i-rt�t�; 2 5
- 1 et;-1-tcl-peri
27
, pFy;-zata-mpg-1 afi�1.
- ;1sc -1 h �-env�venm(�n.6—mt p.h4-�H eu3?-,Y
26
28
27
29
4.3
3
2 n
y0
11 1
30 .
32
31
3.1
32
34
3 .i
35
34
36
35
37
36
38
37
39
38
40
30
41
40
42
41
43
42
44
43
45
44
46
45
47
'1C
48
47
49
48
s0
49
51
so
52
_
:51
53
5.
54
5
55
54
56
55
56
83
91
�10
2
3
3
4
4
fa
6
7
7
10
10
12
12
13
13
14
14
15
15
16
16
17
17
1$
18
ID
19
20
20
21
21
22
ZZ
23
21
24
24
25
25
26
26
277
27
29
29
30
30
31
31,
32
32
3.3
11
34
34
3.5
3.5
36
36
37
.1
38
9.0 GROWTH -INDUCING IMPACT
.38
39
39
40
40
41
41
42
42;
4.3
4.3
44
44
45
Howeverl by directing aevelopmont
towards areas with existinG
45
46
services and. utilities;, ;he proposal_ will
roduco ovorall. growth
46
47
pressures on productive agricultural and
tiiiR)Or l Linds, and
47
48
on other natural resources and open, lands.
* * (ny encouraging
43
49
development towards the ma.rgiaa:ll;y productive
lands,11hex e Oriviron-
49
50
mentally fiasUilo, the proposal will re'ducc growth prcz.,Ure on
5o
51
deoignated agricultural land.)51
52
S2
53
51
54
54
55
55
56
56
Addition
,
91
v
i TAIr'P (x)MM'-,PIT," AND 1'�Irrty/��i�1 Naz
LAND 01,111;
.t1ANG,'Nill r€'0 '1 lll.; 1111,N D 01 Y11; Ir IJ1rYG"11�rNT TI'..hT
�slr,allrlirltl, 1�ia.CrJa�7t'r ,s kal; 1,11 i1; L mClt'. 1lcawf�ar'm°, ;; :; t,lals ,yt�t�ar� ;1000
Jlrlur,'I t l (7,Ti, of' 11h:h', (at'll(' mr'u l P i iull, wa.1.1.
d7'otblr`
e(l -'Lo 1.1w point, w:fi,o:f'('s W,w 1.) ] ;)1"111'1)'1€0, 1>r T t.,C)(�t w l I 'l
l.vsall'urzt ly twC`.C1mf". lo"vl 1�11AUT1 C1rW pau' C"sCY1lt(zC'!s11,'T11J.lV' 1�1i;11lml lat'"�
Gcont i M-uoa1kD p11OG0 ,] I'l:LtLI,Y: t':i�.Ta€! 1�C;x': C7�i r�, .h�e'V.1,Eat� nj),(l ovabv�1Jojl
farad .ail to l.O. bo 1 int'd u"porl n Ir1ovi JAcs, t��i tri 1',C. aTyw+ GO n, -, c, q ill'Y11,rlrjT �
,Staff wou,ld 1,ho 1 o-l.'L zwbi(, al,to.rot,lon t()
".P lwl f ov d.rfv,-,1 ol)rllorlt., within Couri l'y (*or, k pt-.a.�Iod.
of 20 ycur , givl,lig omlplJ,lsii"� to Ulf IIm:T'+° mruflodi-aLC�>
,yo ax,'o, whi.lc ,vt; the s`4:arml,-'- U 4.njo c oru'11C er'a?t€r i'l:ira 1.:ons
11.an t-I,,u faoi-"ors and t;roric'l:l. I,
J:'ap'' l"!") .41e1.rtsTc.1pabiort"
Policy ire .in, ad.drnsr ocl ort V a€v,, 55 ` uL.i lil.od "Map
LTt llo*Li ci.c,,-" D rind1;, and 1,7ood 11ot be, tf 11(wo. it, a.'1`f
'( of 1d .zuggont thc dt;1.tildo�,j. o1. Poj.l..c,;y 1;S 'oil PakrI r1I
30 ' "P(.!w3oui co, Mrll" af-,nlllciliW1 ^ AV;.r'..cu 1 t;l.lvrjJ 1'al'lfl, Crop band,
flrmlf'i tnr-li.rlt;4ai,m1; tllrat, PQIG� , r ik, a1rl;nt'c,E -nary in IaV;111Of 1'01!L,','/
b w1dc.h, al T"en y uddv(.,w' J'dS'1110' 1.0C:x1"t .l Or) fdl 01«i Pf 1, 1pC_T 1 r, ti G:3 O.1'
atrT'':c'u.it a�.vt) 1. i r°anl i Mor(iov 1'� t�l1l' ��1nr'T'ta1 rli l:taa"i.tlll t;i otl Cyt' .�La114
.1.. 1,0 lkt', Lpoll "i T'f view of (ihe arl(1
and an, cc la t cl i,�,tc,rlda,Pch,> fav d v' J opinont, in
a,]Aitj, ou to rtnlL•vzar.t; _1'1011."c'1C1!,,,4 i'li.cj t'horoup,11_ '.t ".arml>r1ufl iorl rat'
t'.h . iraf,ornialAon shotil.d. dost orm. rlr.• thc,, moot.. rat,t)ropy,iat(! j,te,n
f'or'rc.,in:1.C1on:"tAal and ag,C"iC:.u.1,tu.1:'al dc.,1T(7:1.C71:.C11.nt.
4.
Pr<ago 53 - ".Ra idF:rltial Doorf l-op ,,,,n-V - llolic rlf ".,upply , rann vavi,( y.
'ph(,, propo.sod lariguag�, is Pol.ir,,y A p r(,�ae;nt.a a -;.i.milar Problem
to caner: ide.rita.fied on rage ''fi of the Draft xrr q,ordiii thp "Time
1i' ciTml>'"• Staff WoOd suWb t, the foliob"J'.ng, Modification.
"Establish appropriate "oning to providt-1 tA,tr-st, (including
: ) 'co moo-1- housing x���cdo, for r. i�r7rlod oC
v-ViPO
car; �l.oxc
"PaFj.' 5 - "Commercial. rit;.C'V''_I.cos,iI
Thf' int,e: ration or grouiai,rt of' convenienc- an(i '�r r=vlce f cilit.1 a;
promoter, tht, efficient dolivory of laul)li.c Nervi- a andt;11c7�:.
fore mnin.11n7 zVv, Public cost-,s tis ,'iJ' A.l as t;l'l.r consumer
ni r,
. �s of � �.rr1 w p o f-'st��.wi`'`"k;t
�CA�rt- i,s.
tc"�r�.rl+.-d
,at1C,ppi rt!`i r rldgr. ' �' �'..• � .y
parking orn W -1.1, t.+ili.° (,Iourltty radrnit tf --d.ty
a minimal ee control tete, facTIL 1� s tyI>t-"
myy;}}a
ttt''� yams jdogi }o.i 3� rytpatc., �th.i
iJ I'' MVFLV % 1.1: J.d � aci � 1. Jai A ..: K�..�tl a I'. �' 1, �_.�.:Y...:,F, f;"' ,t .� j..t i..1 �.:i. VG�a..L 1,A, glla1a
,1hO term 'needed for development by the ,,pear 20001 resents
]Ami Ln ions r r r tw s .rr nr T
to the; �'�.lo rarl;rl`1.T1 �7' x1 C`ot'€ .,.� �..,� �i�T T�. Chu l;,j' f:1.tz�.t~d �t�.
..jj { 7�r y`
Iv%EI/43,ff �Vo M'y.(l'd vigee t; c�ha/nelrig thr. t xlm�y"t;;$W ��-,i^1f. t^;o,rgy
l,,
ittl,i,lhin .tom-- y�,dr�+-Y" i/.i...!"".'k"".i.ch :of the c;V�}�d��opriate Lzuri�.`J tli."..(',�,':.. r:.rc�l�q.govji,�°,,. .
p'yr:rw Use
'V.
�aiT1r.`r' IG:Y/4, Wit, G0',r('vTtr11('Ttt it,Y+',,<A b"v- r•"aEtuir-f"A lw—mt ;r,c)T;1r'.lt';
c�ml111FAIItrC't; thrill. G('Tt(-rra I 1.'t 1ATA,a I,CA tu-1:1,. A ' c,oirr; is t t-('ut; `
I,(1,Tv, 'I t)1, whi('ll 11G-I1,1.I.t,�/ 'prq)rgo j-,(!1 't.�7�' I)T'1ltltIlW 11".Xrlt�
rill r,l')ct;:"(, ol,(A F' iv"";A. It=Al�ttt Ott talo Gortr,C't l I'h.rr�A.
.1.x7 refor4;nae to c'ra�;c, ��., l rArleo'1the Coun.'Ly" cl:tv:rtentt IT -311 gorll q��
w iYf'l i (.v� ;, lh�it,
vorl(' tnrroi ld riot ('jiA;iI.;1t-p�/ 01 " 1"i1 -tato( "f3
k3.i.mllax, i.l.-y, cant ii'rxgo ;,�?, l.lac,� 0ouritly, r0 -'? 1"q.;���rrAirl� ,�ta�'L���.r'� c��a«
rtoL T>I-r)V:rd(' nxp t;e7ii1. or, It if :i 1('IrIG�r' . o Uho 1)�'flf'r'li'ri1.1`ltjy
tllerl'1T1.1 ITC 1AI - t il., ]'7ia c).kagja„ :r itJ't:'i l t. andCi.1 w;�i x 7. Jl.l is i Art f7'I' [iGTf�d";
and-r'V,'1c-(.t�� C�r'oritauquor tlly7 Gho oori-y, ;en(,,y of d1+." Il(y?It
f'
s�onts in ,hr, Indu.atri,al c.at(igo ly hl,rhly qui,,,t,ional)J,0
Ptlma 54 "Land tr oo Til <t -rt Mapo," - Gc,4tll0 and Irit:r`rlwr t. 't,l.oil.
)Gt, at,T' would sugt c;sL chlanging t;lv, (arrd o1' thc,l
(1irrv< L(?) to ,road ""... di, rnc;bior) of ClotinLy [ayr,ow�t;ll ['or th(
ot:tAIT would olrg{`;c,-L crmtar,rli,t7{; i'ol cz°3 r r, It, Ji aT+cl C lntca orAt+
it Cirr tik�'rl,o c.� t,o rn;ad. i���-8 I..o 1owr,
"I,raTI(l T'1110 PJ f tIll MST) ; rar-s- sand :slisa Ll. [wx,.,Lnt:.s- cart a
;:scrrlf., of 1" 4 m9lor,, for, rur�x�al rtxoa� ,.. atd l'" "Too, 1�ar
tz.r.-t,i;ut 1al-(earl,
pvopomod l fanguagO =i r, I: Q i.o,y I',, T)ar bicuiarl ly th- phra,;(,
hk-.Itw("(.?rl ov Contxyi guouyr: (i� o ;/�i,rrci.Jar ((,xirl /I���i,rtryt� �I�:1.yr.�r:,ry' cnura�/.fid r rc .->rrl t,
1 a t✓he .T�lA���.f:( �. i oii oil outward E,xr) 3nrAo Ir of lzr ltayt LA F.`�A which av,,
irtcsortr7iS3b_InL with, the Land U;.,io Plan Mal) by, virtue', of locatbir
cotlt i gmous -ho oarh other. St-aff kW 7 i cyvc,-tt t bis provision
o riously Comprom ,-'s the l;asi o validity o f t hr! Element cart
would, roc;ommend Lh(, followIng modification Go r.,rcourago such
exI)ausions t'o occur in 'Ideations compat l)`l.ct wi t li �=rroun,da.ng
uses,- "Tvopost-d uses that would 1:e .1.Xlo()nsir-A,; ,rit, with the -
Land T1s,:, M4a.T) dr-:rai na,t on , butJ €arr-, vurrotartdeld by "girl con,tiguoml,
110 F!ImIlar�� (tXi.c,'l irl usos. sl'iall:
bho ryt7r ooXlcl�;C��'i'FN'� oC>r ;';l tyt;llL w'T X71
rl_ Pam:, 55 -- "Mai) ilev'olopmc'�n.t;�"
Sttcat"." w;)ul.d vocommmd t ho ca.ol eti.on of t l't ; vjord `futyur 0 'onx
Staff would ructorr>Mnd am( -,n iirig tdh, l Kang'ata c. :1,rr I�ol i.c�,,y A .Lo
rr:rad I'Pl.rarlrlinpl St xrvf ' A KtAl ltl PlIfJrPtazr-�1 arld thra rrorrim! ...;:ort shal..l.
T))')r'oy Land T;Trs`e 11an Map hound ar axw, 1,011f:-`.-'.1�11 commtanj ty or
7C't` i
of t`,h(. County. #x
IIIA i I.,; 1"°o l.ic-y B wav 'vw. the, mor3t oT N, c;t L-v1�) approae,-h iln t;ho
Vit,?v,..l.or merlL of' Land Plan Mays, for t;h�,
coram-an'i.'tico touch as Grid,W;y, .fFir['_�c;, rJVC'it
iricor,poratKion of--ntivT ur4ar, aroa l s in Land lJ_ Plan Map
bountlar: QS fOV comMzzralt;:i 0;s, s.rzoli ac,3 Cha.co, Orlovi .1 1 r -f und Pav adis(,.
may prove to bk;� Staff 't�E l i f;yvc rs thc,� appropriai cv
pl tinrli.tat�, av(", , for ' Lrand. Use, Plan, Maps sboul.d bu judCed on a
lud v:iydurll bao s °according to t h(, c.ompl exitai.4As of a €�ivc°r7
ravi� a Staff would 3 CLClcctiorl Of Poilr;y k=
4.
10. aj-."o IlT )!�vol oaoxlt
REv.i ! 1
..TJ,, trtt
Ex;l;4
M,arl., would
'J,,.a
ill.,-vtlori
o
Lyra rrl; .1 � al't"str bho
r,!>rt�l,oa, oo orld l ylp"
W11-11 ' Pr"OPA.", d
ant I
11A ll,,o Vo7'1T l t III a l .clo
'C'oqu].J`od wl'.wrl
r! 1=trlY,4't-�_ rtUr, 3 _ ri 'ti
3'" 1,� fl("; ►�.t.t
LO.{ t;',hiaxlp; d to a Trw ro
r�vt," mr,-o
rrlbt�.�.9 ����e,
or it w,,e tt '` t, the:"
�iix�1 ,
11UuM 4.1:
i
i
OF CHWO, CA U F00 �
47rr'rCr: pr' CITY PLANNING — R, q, CICIxA2G1, 9!i 7
i Lf»la1ICiNG ( Ill nq»f•fi�lA) - AFTER blao P -M. 340.73PI
October 4, 1978
Mr. We Butterw7ck
Butte CoU11tY Planning Department
7 County Center Drive
Q.roville, California 95965
� RE: Proposed land �.;^-
p element of the Butte County General plan
Dear Mr. Butterwick:
Reference is made to the above -noted General plan Element which was
recently submitted for review and comment ley the Chico Planning Com-
mission and staff.
Please be advised that members of this department and the Planning
Commission have had the opportunity to review the proposnd Elemen
and are pleased to advise that we see no problems with the document
and we are generally in agreement with the numerous policies and pro,
posals. Both Commissioners and staff are looking forward to reviewing
the proposed land Use Map when it is Completed by your department
Please accept Our appreciation for the opportunity to review and
comment on the above project. Should you have further questions,
Please contact the planning Office at your convenience.
I?hn
rehy,
C1
JPl'I: ntd P. Hoo e
CP 489!/A -BC -3
dr�vi��t�
September 27, 1978
U IVP
r.,
2279 poi oy,p Avb,R
Orovlller Cnftfnrnia 95945
7`alephons (910 534,4201
To Kyle Butterwick
Planning Commission
7 County Center Drive
oroville, a,ifornia 95965
7
From• ferry D. Smith
County Director & Farm Advisor
Subject: Land Use Element. Butte County General Plan. August 1978 (Draft).
(Page 24. E. Public Facilities and Services)
Z see no reference to the University of Californa Cooperative Extension
mentioned in subject document. Possibly E. 2. b. (page 25) could be
changed from schools to "Education"and could be listed in that category.
We have contact with several thousand citizens of Butte County annually.
Staff response to ,ferry D. Smith,
Agricultural Extension -- ilnivorsi.ty of California
The public agencies listed on pages 25 and 26 are generally
oriented toward physical facilities, buildings -xnd locations
which provide tho more common types of governm(�it services
IVO elieve the "Schools" heading shouli'A be rets tied and no
rc �rence made tote C Extension Service;
The University of Calflomfa'a Agricultural ZMennfon Programa are ovallable to all, without regard to race, color, or national origin.
Co•opatallve Werislon work In Agritufturo and Homo t+cWtnmlcs, Uniled $tatos tloporlment of Agrl2ulturo and UnNorslly of California 2-oper4 ;ay
t
STATE OP CALIFORNIA- WOURCE5 AQ9NCY
Siov�rnor
DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAMS
C'enlip V
13t% � 4! e 7'1v , C
171E �✓��C�J1'�iC� r�urf•7!9?y,"r.l?�� G:Y'(� G�1Y��.1�1� �4'y4G:S"fL ,�3lt�I�:.Cr4Lh�"� �1.�1?Gi V:�C,•".
Ljt`a17C11' e r i -he. C:-e.rie),cej 101,,, j
R,-"eje 'Loll He4&'i-e-/, i-iC% 11'11%!t"�l►Gl
117 �L�GiNJI �'G1� .�CG'>' Gi�CY`G'S 1'J
b) e.. n L o!X ct el ( m3 C'.✓ el at q e r,,eG j e r rlx e
r
ail o, M 141' S f'G pc It C - y Ci
5
1 rt 7 7 e-
A r
�lr�Lt17 fr 131c:iG.�� y �
'
Staff response to James Ff. Snowden,
Department oi' Fish and Game
Staff agrees with jMr: Snowden's suggestions and recommends the
.Following wording:
p. 41. C. S. h: "Prevent development and site clearance
of marshes, "valley oak groves and significant
riparian habitats."
p, 41i G, S. do "Regulate development to -facilitate survival
of identified rare or endangered :plants and
animals. rf
1► of Callfornia
1. L. Frank Goodson, Assistant
Secretary for Resources
2. Mr. Earl D. Nelson
County of Bunte
#7 County Center Drive
Oroville, CA 95965
From t Department of 'Water Resources
The Resources Agency
Data I
1970
Fila No.,
Subject, SCH 78091196, Butte
County General Plan, Land
Use Element
We have reviewed the subject Butte County General. Ilan, rand Use
Element, which was transmitted by the State Clearinghouse Notice of
Intent, dated September 15, 1978, and have the following comments
and recommendations:
General
A geology map is needed for evaluating the effect of geology on
land stability and on the occurrence and movement of ground water.
Inadequate ground water supplies and inadequate leaching capabilities
of some soils may hamper development in some areas of Butte County.
A discussion of this would be useful.
Seismicity
The first sentence of the Seismicity section, page 7, should be
clarified as to why it states the area is of relatively low seismic
activity when the remainder of :he paragraph describes recent major
earthquakes and major faults in the area. The first sentence is
also in conflict with the Seismic Hazards section, page 42, which
states that most of the County has a potential for intense ground
shaking from earthquakes.
Hydrology
The last sentence of the Hydrology section, page 8, should explain
that in some foothill and mountain areas of Butte County, ground
water occurs only in highly variable fracture zones of granite and
metavolcanic rocks.
Conservation
Some areas of the County do not have adequate water supplies and
water and ene-,gy should not be wasted even where plentiful.. We
therefore recommend adding the following two items to the Water
Resources Policy at the bottom of page 31.
L
L. Frank Goodson, et al
Page 2-
d.
d. Proposed new developments must have a demonstrated
adequate water supply before approval by the County.
e. Conservation of water and energy will be considered in
approving plans for new development,
',+later Resources
Under Part IIx of County Concerns and Policies, paragraph c
"Resource Management", subparagraph 41 "Water Resources" should be
expanded to show the County's plan to farther minimize the potential
of degradation of water resources through pollution and erosion -
sedimentation for all areas. Watershed areas contributing to the
Oroville Reservoir are of particular concern to us. A discussion
of Butte County's policy to control development in all watershed
areas should be :included. Development policy, including minimum
pared size, rural residential, agricultural, etc., should be pre-
sented in this policy section.
implementation
Part V, A-2 - Map Development - This section should be expanded to
discuss studies of sedimentation and erosion control. Maps should
show potential areas of erosion, slides, etc., so that this important
item will not be overlooked in any planning aspect.
Part V, B - Zoning - Zoning of watershed areas should reflect the
concerns for the protection of these areas. Use permits for
variances should be denied for these areas unless they do not
contribute to the degradation of the watershed area.
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment.
4. r
dld B. Robie
Director
(916) 445-6582
0
Staff response to
ate,
Oartment or w, 1�cgcotjr
"'1111a1d (1, Roble) Piroctotr
Gencral: A general Tijap of jY
,cologic.tj formations is containod
in al_17MT-hie, introductory section. of tjjc General Plan entitled
Land -Use overview
The Safoty and Seismic sjr-oty 1,1�
t 10 C
,Oa� Elements adopted
ty 'n:977 contain very adequate maps of all seismic
and geologic hazards, Staff bclives that ad(Ung a county-wilde
geologic multito the Lftnd Use Element is 1111110cossary and that such
a map would be too general for proper site OvalutUtion. Available
geologic maps will be consulted during the development of j.,qnd
use map proposals.
Perhaps a reference to the term "land instability" can he
added to the policy on 2921-0Lic Hazards on page 412
_
a. "LiArlit devolonment in areas of high -t)0tantial for
landslides, erosion and Other types Of land instabilitv.1,
StaFf believes that ground w,:ttcr and leaching capabilities
are adequatoly addressed in 'tho, proposed text. Lines 41 and 42
of page 6 state that shallow Soils arc a factor limiting develop-
ment in mountain and foothill areas. Soil drainage characteristic.,;
are presented on a county -wide map in the At)pendix. Oround water
supplies arc adequately discussed on lines 6 thr(,ugh 11 and 21
through 27 on page 8.
Sei - smic.1tv: The information presented oil seismic hazards on
pages 7 ancl 4Y seems Impressive but it i-, nonetheless true that
Butte County's Seismic hazards are relativelylow comnared to
other parts of California. Staft suggests eliminating the aPT),Irent
conflict by rewording the tirst sentence on 3 Seismicity as
follows:
"Despite the numerous faults Which traverse the Sierra foot-
hills, the County has not experienced the high levels of seismic
activity characteristic of many other parts of the state.,,
Hydr 0 10 According to Environmental 11WRIth personnel, the
Department Water Resource's statement is generally correct for
some foothill areas but not all. Accordingly the sentence start-
ing on line 8 of page 8 should be changed to read "In the foot-
hill and mountain areas, ground water is generally not abundant
and occurs mostly in fracture zones.,'
Conservation 4 Although it is not clear how requiving, adequate
water supplies conserves water, both suggestert policies merit
. ril
c on s !d e ra t ion The Comity has for several years requirp.4 adequate
water supplies for the creation of parcels of 5 acres or less,
"Adequate water slillr)ly" is also proposed as a site designation
criteria for the Commercialo Industrial and 3 lResident4al categories
in Section IV of the
proposed text. It would thus be appropriate
to add a policy for Water Resources;
"d. Require adequate urater sunnily for all now (iovelopment.-
We boliove water conservation is addressed ndogua-tely in the
draft iiolicy to maintain adequate quantity and quality of w,,Itol-
resources (C, 4. a. on page 31) - The proposed TbIal-gy jze.5ources
Section on page 32 is now limited to c0nsidelUti0n, of developable
resources within the County, but could be expanded to cover
energy conservation in general We suggest adding a policy to
the effect:
I'd. Consider conservation of energy resources in reviewing
proposed development.,,
Water Resources: Ure believe that DUIR's concern about controlling
devo.lopincitt in watershed areas is adequately a(ldressed by policy
C. 4. c. Allowed uses and minimum parcel sizes will reflect policies
anti will lie determined during the development of land use and
zoning; maps
k1ap Development 'Maps of erosion hazard will be included in
the comprehensive report recommended in measure A. 2. b.
Zoning: Zoning of watershed areas will certainly reflect many
of DWRIs concerns as zoning is the primary tool for implementing
policy C.U.C. and the many other policies sttltert in Section ITT.
II(,*O[JNTY CONC F RNS AND POLICIES." Since implementation Section 113,
n Nj I.,9N q M
Ills WitH procedural matters and an action program bnt
not with content and policy, there is no need to modify it to
reflect DWR concerns,
}
sof Collfornla
Aemorandum
Oato ; SEP 27 X978
To Mr. L. Frank Goodson
Projects Coordinator
Resources Agency
From : 00POrtment of harks and Recreation
4he� ReesoUrees Agoncy of Callfornla
Mr. Earl Nelson
Environmental Review Director
Butte County Planning Department
7 County Center Drive
nroville, California 95965
$11bjuat SCH 78091196, hand Use Element
Butte County General, Plan
The. Office of Historic Preservation has reviewed the Draft General Plan
submitted for the undertaking referenced above.
We noted that the Countyls policies will be to evaluate known and discovered
archeological sites before development takes place and to preserve significant
sites or require their detailed investigation by competent archeologists,
These are commendable policies; however, we recommend that the policies be
expanded to include reconnaissances of Proposed projects, during their
earliest planning stage, to identify all, cultural, resources which aright be
within the proposed impact area:
This inventory and assessment of potential cultural values, in compliance with
the California Environmental Quality Act, Executive Order 11593, Section 106
of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, and 36 CFR 800, should be
conducted by qualified professionals of appropriate disciplines as outlined in
36 CFR 64, '
We look forward to receiving copies of all cultural resource assessment
reports, to be incorporated into our review process. 7f we can be of
assistance in this matter; please feel free to contact Nicholas del Cioppo at
(916) 322-8703.
Dr, Knox Me11on
State Historic Preservation Officer
Office of Historic Preservation
—:4 .a a..
;lames P. Tryner, Chief
Resource Preservation and
Interpretation Division
O-0U78C
Staff response to
Office of ll:i,storiC Pres ovation
Dr. Knox Mellon, ` ato Mstor�c preservation Officer
')opt. of Parks and Re;crcrttion
The letter summGrIzes the t1vo 1101,cies 17ronOsecl under ''C+ 7,
Ar�rcha o�lopicaSites" an(I roC.ommenclM; that the poli.oi,os lie nxpar�rtc�l
Q include'"! e rl SCCC�x],21aiss�tnce, aXd ident'1.'�'a.ca"Cion of ct11t,,,,,( 1.
resnUrr~es in the :impact areas of proposed Tiro,
ectsluxe t tl � the
CHQA requirements re�ferancod in the letter pncl, allu(eci to in our
statement of concerns ("C<aliforni.a, late now requires .0..,") OUr
policy statements about evaluating and preserving si 111 fic, It
archeological sites assumed tlta.t tho required reconnaissance and
identification had already made such sites "known and. discoverocl.,,
HoWever, this point shoUla be clarified by substituting the sugpostoo
language for policy G. 7 a. in this fashion:
a. Identify and evaluate all cultural resources impacted
by proposed projects _before approval and devolopinont .
BOARD 01 TRU511.I r
Ty, N. rru,ll At14 .,IC41lkNr
�rIrr fir [01440
riti OUR 9, 1. 11t) r1+ Vir'.k 1',Atl7rA•la',
rlutit
JAWA is, A1113 0y,qtr rA k" 1.tr
rl f t 5 t
Kt;NNr.711 M.A11ILWtl Wlt. 3P' "W'""
vslr'ar r/11U11,rir
r. n, r:vANq
wl.v,krfl:,v W1111' I it
,. rr nr BlAi vl++k
ALL A14 1011141001
110rt
A6E1r:r47 d, 111HO[
Clrr qM 1311.41
tri Yriuli U. rMI TrN
uIT, GuuNry
BUTTE'00UNtY MC $OVITO
ABA'(9M,E'NT DISTi IC9T
L LA�
ITE 4.OURY MU'.O `O 1 ri o� ovm0t,xC.,461 41itt�X�i95041 �
M
ROJ'T'E 3, DOX
OROVILLC, CALIF -0h WILLIAM HAZELTINE, Ph. 0. r HONG+ lural es3-oo3u
1.fANA11 k'ri^GNVIHtlNId CNrA6.1bfi on 142-11h0
September 26, 1978
Butte County Planning Commission
7 County Center Drive
Oroville, California 95965
Subject; Comments on Land Use Element, Butte County
General Plan - August 1978 Draft
Gentlemen,.
We, appreciate the opportunity to comment on this draft, Our comments
all ,focus on the need for additions to the final plan which more adequately
fulfill your stated purposes (on p 27) and recognize the health effects from
land use, particularly how land use encourages or discourages mosquito
production.
Our comments will be keyed to pages of the draft;
1, p. 11, Add the heading Health, and consider how land use can
impinge on human and i.vestock health, and how good planning
can reduce health risks.
11
y
2, pM 31. 'Under Number 2, Grazing land policy, add; "d. discourage
irrigation of grazing land with poor drainage or which has a high
risk of mosquito production. 'I
3, p, 37. Under Drainage and Vlood Control, add I'd . Any planned
drainage should consider the impact on downstream aquatic life,
including mosquito production."
4, p. 39 Add a new section number 9, P„ ublic Uti_ lit Lines, and
note how these can be controlled thru early planning. Zn addition,
undergrounding of utilities can produce health problems by creating
breeding areas for mosquitos in transformers and switching vaults.
In this case aesthetics can produce health risks. We suggest a
policy statement which would, discourage underground utilities on
any land which will not drain sufficiently well to prevent standing
water in the proposed facilities.
5. p. 40. Number 1, under policy, add: "such as production of insect,
pests, 11 or add "insects" to the list.
6. p. 41, Number 5, adds I'e.Balance regulations so the needs of health
protection are considered at the same time that the needs of wildlife
�. are considered. "
MEMBER CALIFORNIA MOSQUITO CONTROL ASSOCIATION
7. p. 41, Numbor 6, add at the end of the policy statement, "in areas
where they will not produco pests which adversely affect ,humans,
8. p. 46. undor zoning factors, acid numbor '17, Potential for prod:ue»
tion of Posts.
9. p. 48, add a zoning .factor considering the impact such residential
encroachment will have on the health of people moving into such
an area. Rural Residential areas have higher than norrns.l, riwks
for past insect brooding and, once produced, -such posts are
difficult to control.
10. p. 72. under 5. 16(2), add subsection (d) "Health impacts which can
be caused by poor land, slope, agronomic practices, or production.
Mitigations; Require drainage systems to carry water off of tight
land or land with poor slope characteristics, when irrigated for
non -aquatic crops to avoid standing water, and if necessary, require
crop selection on such land which will .not allow insects, such as
mosquitos to buildup and Later migrate to inhabited areas."
11. p. 72, Under 5. 16(3) Mitigations, acid, "An alternative or companion
.mitigation is to impose some control on the kinds of land use
allowed in the residential -suburban buffer zone, and in the agri-
cultural areas near urban areas. "
12. p. 72; 5. 17 Adoption of a, land leveling and drainage ordinance is
necessary for health protection from mosquitos, and should be given
more amphasis.
13. p. 73, 5. 23 The current trend on pasture irrigatic•i, has been for
water waste by some, and good water use by others. Excessive
irrigation and water waste in some places has caused replacement
of good forage species with poor quality plaints, and this trend in
some areas of the county should be discouraged. (see also 5. 26(1)).
1.4. p. 74, 5. 26(l) add part "(e) mosquito production thru excess irriga-
tion,
15. p. 80, 5. 46('1) Mitigation. This is excellent, particularly the idea
of constraint maps as part of good planning.
16, p. 80 5.46(3) Add the word "insect pests" to the list of offensive
problems, in the first paragraph.
17. p 91, 7. 0 Add at the end of the paragraph: "Marginally productive
lands should be used for res'identia.t expansion, within reasonable
constraints, saving the better lands fc r- agricultural use; "
18, Some place in the planningprocess, a Health Element should be
prepared and adopted or as an alternative, a Health s cti.on should
be included in each other element. We would slre`Iiappy to assist
you in preparation of a separate Health Element as a way to improve'
your planning system.
We trust our comments are not too detailed.. We believe such changes
will strengthen your draft, and makes it a more effective planning tool.
Sincerely
Wil Hazeltine, Ph. D.
Manager -Environmentalist
Staff response to
Butte County mc7: ivii:,.o r111-cttement f7ist'ri.ct
14i1liam E. 11azeltime T'ir.rt,
1:.. p. ll : Tt i.s true that. land use anc'� fila Ming; af`Fcic'r. Ilealtll
and that an .add itiMi l section could be a;ttopteLl ciui.te easily,
])tit the Commission should remcmlDer that this sect,lon on the
rtNatura.l Envi,rollillent" is only meant to present baclzg rotlold
,n f orm.at i on oil the "rlc rol,onmen t 1;ott inF " and is not mcxant to
consider all pl.anni.-jig relat=ionshIp:s "end concerns. A nOw
section could Ito put wogYoti cr to presort cli:,ea.se ,>tatistics,
mortality ratos and other indices of 110a,'11:11 but rtarf feels
the relationsh,p of these statistics to 'land use nianning;
in this rea is not as important 'is the licraltc, affects of
climate, income clistri.blition and the local sysf-c'�m of medical
care.
2. 1, ♦ 31:
3, 1?. 37:
4. p♦ 3h;
G. p♦ 41:
7. p. 41:
5, p. 40;
8. p. 46:
P. p+ 48:
in Biose five instances, Dr. Hazeltine has suggested
adding policies that woulcl properly express his concern
about the effects on mosquito production of livestocl.
g=razing;, drainage Facilities, utility lines, wildliFe
Tlabita.t and natural areas, Although wo agree with
his concerns, Ave helievo it would he confusing; to
add qualifying; phrases about mosquito production 4o
simple positive expressions of policy on other sub j octs .
To maintain the: consistent for).i it or this section and
the unqualified "one -thing -at -it -tine" natilre of the
policy statements, staff recommends that the title
119. Insect Pests" he added to the "S, Environmental
Preserylti �n"section (pap es 4n and 41)nl.lc�wer «_
a statiement, of a,pnronriate Facts anft concerns and ti hitt-
ever care Rtl ly - worded: policies are necessary to
cover the s1111ject of mosquito production incl control.
If the Commission agrees, we will meet: itamedia.tely
w4: th pr. Hazeltine and other representatives of the
three mosquito abatement districts in the County in
order to review their concerns and suggestions and
to develop a. concise statement or Facts and policies
in the proper format concerning, an issue of wicle-
spread concern and a government -Function requiring
significant expencli.tures.
,Staff; concurs. Chanpe the policy to read, "a ♦ "fain..
twin puhlic heal-th and safety by rcouiring; -proper
location and design for uses with offensive odors,
dust, smoi.e, l.igrirt, trarfic, vibration, oxolot ives,
pollutants, insects an.1 similar hligl,ti,ng influences."
We Ao not see hotry the potential ,)r proeluction off' insect.
;nests is significantly offectocl by the chnice betu-cen
the three lora' densities of no dwellings, one dwelling
per 160 ,acres, and one alwelling; per 40 acres. Is not
the potential far greater in "Cyrcbard and P'iel.ri rron"
areas, especially since that category allows densities
in irrigated 'areas up to one (Ivelling per 5 acres?
staff recommends that a density �Fzctor worded "Potential
for production of insect posts" be "1160d to the lists
1
r
Jutte C:ourxty Mo z ito ANatCmew. District
Potge, 2
for "Orchard and V i.a l d CrOP S 1r oil Page 45 and "RuralResidential" can. page 43 but not as a donsi:ty factor
for "Orating and Open Land" or any other pronosrcl
category.
M p. 72: Staff generally agroes and recommonrl; the follorvi:ng
wording :
(d) Health - .Agr.onovoi c practices in areas with
Y1 -00r tfra 'lla ;e have the 110tent ia:l. to increase
production of disease-carryi:nk in:5r,,cts,.
Mi„� atii.on„ - Require adequate drainage ;der
rentova,l o standing water eahere land with Poor
natural drainage is irrigated for non -aquatic
crops,
Staff believes the suggested mitigation measure regard-
ing crop selection is inappropriate as l.oca,l. govern-
Ment presently has no established means of controlling
crop selection,
1.1.. P. 72 The ,uggested mitigation is rather general but does
merit some coils id.eration. We sugfyest ^t- rI .np i;he
Col iota"J.n mi.ti a�tion measure:
Agricultural operations can he regulated to
minimize negative impacts on adjacent residential
areas
1.2 p. 72: Staff believes this topic is arlequa,tely covered in
the draft r1R,
13, p, 73, 5.?I: Staff concurs with pr. Hazeltine "s comments
1.4. p. 74, 5.26(1)and suggosts the following inpact he added:
(e) rlosqui,to production and loss of forage from
excessive irrigation "
A mitigation measure ,should also he added:
"Avoidance of excessive irrigation should be
encouraged,”
P. 80,: The comment is noted..
P4 80 Staff concurs. ,Aad "insect pests" to sentence to
read:
'tAgriculture acid Livestock production - - dust, smoke,
pesti.c:,.des, insects, odors and noise of agricult-
ural .4 .
p. 91. We believe this policy is adequately addressed in tho
proposed text,
lie recommend that the Commission seriously consider all suggest-
ions for policies on health-related factors whi.cil have -a
significant relationship to lanA use planning and which are
amenable to local government control or influence. xfe agree
that a Health element would he a ra,luable addition, to the
County"s General plan, especially to consider medical. facilities
Butte County sJo, auto A'batement. District
la;e 3
and health of facts of various land uses Staff rracommvncs
not adding t "llealth" section to tha Proposed lend use
element at this time because the sttb,ject is far too comnlox
for concise sttmaimary and t imOly ,inclusion, because some
important health tactors are ,already considered and because
the entire subject deserves comprehensive tx.eacment at a:
later cta.te by a wide-based study committ e .
00 00
UN1TrD STATEV5 DEPARrmENT or A rticuk.Turirw
F'ORRMT SERVICC
Plamas National Forest
P. O. Box 1500
Quincy, California 95971
L.
Kyle Butterwick
Butte County Planning Department
7 County Center Drive
Oroville, California 95965
L
Dear Kyle:
Pub+o Co. Plarining C OMT04
1978
oroviile, Cai'ifornid
2700
October 2, 1978
M
Your letter of August 30, 1978 requested comments on the August 1978
Draft of the Land Use Element of the Butte County General Plan.
We have reviewed the draft and find it gives a comprehensive discussion
of all factors involved in land planning. However, there are a few
areas which concern us that might be strengthened. These have to do
with development of timber lands for other uses.
The U. -S. Forest Service, while managing public lands, has historically
been concerned with the timber resources on private lands. Our State
and Private Forestry organization operates through and in cooperation
with the State Foresters office, Since the majority of the nations
timber resources are on private lands, they are an all important Factor
in the national timber supply. Butte County, in turn, contains some of
he most productive timber land in California, which is the second
highest timber producing state in the nation.
Therefore, it is important that the prime timber land in Butto County
receive protection from urban encroachment and conversion to residential
uses the same as prime agricultural and crop land does. While the
majority of timber lands in Butte County are in large ownerships, there
are numerous small parcels scattered throughout the timbered area that
conflict with timber production and harvest when developed as residential
properties, These conflicts materialize as objections to the noise and
dust of operations and damage to access roads by winter use.
We agree with and support a minimum parcel size of 40 acres Economical
operations on parcels of smaller sizes, especially considering the
conflicts mentioned above, become extremely difficult.
The question of identifying the location of prime timber lands may not
be easy. We suggest the county consider using standard timber site
classes, Site I or IA being the best and Site V the lowest timber pro-
ducer. Site III and higher could then be considered prime timberlands.
6200-11,(1/69).
try�'v
iv
2
hlUDIas County used this approach in their 1974 update Of the general
plan, a copy of which is attached for your convenience.
Another factor the county might wish to consider is the economic cony
sequences of converting timber mountain lands to Rural Residential use.
The increased cost of providilig services for residential use as compared
With the low level of service needed for timber use, and the loss of
related employment and manufacturing opportunities,may mono than offset.
any gain in property taxes. There may, of course, be overriding reasons
For the County to go ahead with any ,particular proposal, but -they would
have knowledge of the ultimate economic costs or benefits of any par-
ticular action. Enclosed is a sample of such a study we contracted for
in the Feather Falls area a few years ago. While this was done for a
large project, some of the principles may be equally valid for small
proposals.
Our last concern, but no less important, is fire. Wild fires can destroy
millions of dollars of timber values, not to mention wildlife, water-
shed, and other resources. They also pose a direct threat to the safety
Of rural residences and can cause considerable damage to residential
property. While residential use of timber and brush covered lands can
never be fully assured of complete fire protection, any development
should at least meet the minimum requirements spelled out in the book-
let, BE FIRE SAFE (enclosed for your information) adopted by the County
Supervisors Association of California. Adequate road widths, surfacing,
grades, cul-de-sac lengths, fuel breaks, and water supply are all vital
to any development.
We appreciate the opportunity to comment on this draft, and would be
glad to supply greater detail if needed.
AcId
R. 0. CARSOiV
Lands Officer
Enclosure
buita Co. Planning C`,.::-,.
ix i7 p � r r 19 ? �`r ���,� t jYli � nfa 1 rt3rM r �r�?Rr l tT � ds{�X� p{eft laT� �l�$�Y/ry r r1
�r r ii J t� M m�'y_aa< �� r �� A� r
��Jrr�.a�nSH :�+�`r'.r��;��+'P�t: rwt�.'i`�}�ttid, A"'�' `r TTr'� ��:rY�t,r� rt�7� ��'N;'t,
� x t 4 � � 1, . e r. ,, , �,'
Inter-Depadmental R, emorandum
M V I'llittorwi-1c, Mvanawl w"Innnint,,
PROMs M.,irk Rndabaiigh, LVV, i-,taf r
$UBJECTI Land Uso Flentent c(,),mment,.i
DAT M 3optombor 2P, 1079
Xyl o .
I have the following comments on tho draft 'Flittp County TAnd lisp,
Flement:
A 6 Discussion of LAY00, pa 62.
The Implementat4ons suggosf.ed on page 02 arp comparabl(3 and compatablo
with LAFCOls basic Jntontlons and goals and should be substained.
Regardine your :craft's discusnion of UPCO) It should be noted that
LAFCO is mandated to Antorprnt Ito spher,�s of influence determinations
so as to encourage and promote orderly urban dev-1opmen+, and thr preservation
of open spanrj particul prly prime agripailtural. open ipaop. This mandato
Seto up a dictomy betwepn Californiats local, plabni-nC process which
giver city and county planning ngencies standard land use tools (general
plans and zoning) but no LAVOO type rmandate as to orderly development.
Howevor, UPCO dons not havrt., the tools of loctal planning a-encien.
W
Also, on page 62,line 36, some referp-ace should bo made to WFOO's
iioo of city general plans, sn well as that' of Puttf., County,
L. 3ection 1, Tntroduction
1# pCo 2, 2ine 12 - The draft should Andicntr, that n1though the text
does not hav(, to be Specific or precise, the land use mnp is precise as
to general uses of land within a given land use pat1-x.rn,.
2. pg, 5 - bf-.Ciani ng t4ith 11ne 12 and enouinr
j discussion - This is
clearly rational to postphone all large, contra-,teraial, rind/or
siCnificant Zoning chantrpo until such time that staff has prepared and;
the Planninr (.'o-,YLT3.ssion and Poqrd have appro,-4d this rovised lind use text, and
any ensuing 1nnd use map chap ,-4M.q,
C.
3. pg.. 13 Reasons `or growth: Your drn�Pt oould br� Trore spea-ific as
to grog fli In the county'.-, urbqn ar(aao on an indi,ridual bpsis. T think
we all shoull roico47nizo that tl.e character of (Wco, Oroville, Paradise,
and Gridley are slgnlicazrkly dlvarwe and so io th�r naturr of thoir
tr
r-rowtho
ITT, r,)ncorlvi and 11olioici
4,. pg. 28 - Planning Area: Tho T'a,itte County Kannin(,* Comnission jhojjld,
In ardor to promoto an iPcrea,4(,4 public, rorivi for dincileming- pinnning.
Innuo-o in a nomprohenoivc, mannnr ;in each of County's urtinn n.rtAn,oY`
rocomend "aronvido planning aounclloll or "advisory councl ],Dill *
5. jig. 29y lines 1-4 - 7t should be noted. that California Dr.:partmrnt of
Fi.nanne popula:bion projections --gor (middle rango) for r3uttn no'�I'nty &0 Licit
indirl,ato a aubstained LO perornt growth ratr, por your ptk,!+ This
should be taken into account in khis soction, as to the probl(-mt; Incurred
to future planners by using high growth ra-V projectioms.
6. pg. 29 - Compact Development: Poliloy. (a) ahould road: 117neouragn
annexation to exinting cities and special di-stricto so as to pro-Vido for
logical and orderly development.,'
7. pe. 33 - Housing 3pply and Variety - Policy (b) should be amended to
road "Provide, a diversity of housing sites varying in give, density, and
location with appropriate cons.lderOdon for cost and design rrite.ria
the bonefit thn -renoral public lntnrost."
8* pg. 33 - Densities: Tho draft should add a polioy addrr,�oqin'-' how
densWea relatn, to the officlancy of providing government oervices,
partiin
cularly when addressg, urban dnnsitinq and service -hip could be
expAnded into Policy (b).
9. pg. 35 - Property Rights: 7nhancine the value of privf�tq property
usun,.11.y brin,-s bensfits to both the privatc, and public sool,ors. The
next line should be revised to indioat(e as follows: "The.'.m-Arasan
concept of propor,t-yrights require thP Coat-4ty to allow, when�7-vpr possibla,
a profitable, economic use for each parcel and to maintain surrounding
property valitps so as to best serve the publica h(-Ftlthj safety, and
welfmm" Policy should be voiced sivnilarly. An addition such as this
can help clear up a vaggie sand arguable statemon't.
10. pg. 35 - Manufacturing and Processing: Policy (a) ahould be revised
to say "Promote the development of eAviromaentally and socia.11y compatible
new industry in the County.,, Policy (d) should havftl added ',o It
1... before allo"rn''
creation of new induotrial
11, pg. 37 - Circulation Oystoms; it is important that th- Land Use
Flement state elparly the iignificance and deUyee to which not.or vehicle
, ure of land use patterns, r
transportation nodos affect the nat and Planning,
particularly in �jrban areas. 7-ner,7, eonservatlon could a? so be mentioned.
12, pg 37 'Vator and "'vier '2yatems. You might conslek!r -somehow adding
the phrase logical, and orderly provision of in this
disauzziono
13« P(',,. 38, lino 1, Policy ((,.) ahould lye rc,rtond to qay 11 eourare
improv€amenty of flood control Paci.li.t,les al.onl tbt-� ",norFAWO Mver While
at the same time proserving, the riparian haabita4 of t tic ri-vor. rr
14. ws. 40 - Opon Cpracn-. The Land Use I''l emont should in,dl,cato that the -
County should, whon considering upon opace proservation as relate -d to
urban development, choose to preserves prime aae.ri cul.turel open apaae ower
other types of open apaceva partionl.arly whoa options exiots betureea.n the
two, Phis policy would corresporad to oaae of LiUP(O's mandated
comasdera.tions (,'lrcti.on 51090.2) California rlovernmen+ Code)
,..0ti:on TV, Land Use Ca keaorf os
1a. Cenorally - The proposal; t s mothodol ot,7 for da,teitiinzng land use
cate orieta is vory vpasonabloo however, L��rCO ata.tf Iseli3 more: l-q-titude
and zoning options should be erorate;d botwwon 1 ra:l. RosidentA it and
3nCle Family Residential categories ins atxch a way so as the County can
facilitate and Impleyment, hifforn, as wipdod, between aagri.eullural emd
urban uses, particularly in ,jurisdictional oon lict. areas In the: County,
16, pgs« /48-5.3 - Thpoe land iiswi can be lucated in or near i.noorporaa,tc d
urban nrea.,s and con;anquontly, Ate dosimration crita~ri.t> and Zoni.nt* factnrs
ghoul d take into account, .spoci ftenll,y than play and zsni nw of the
incorporated citi ns.
e;ction *', Implementation Program
177 58, line 43 - Tmpl.ementa.tion (ai) :should be ama3nded by addin
and ."pa,n ;pnc
1€1, pg, 59 - Subdivisions and Iand Divisions: Policy should ataatr the
onvouratrement of the oxchanEe of subdivision map information between the
County and adjacent cities as applicable in the Subdivision i`pp Aot.
'This policy could help proanota= bettxx intergovernmental exehangre of
important development information.
19. rig 61 - City Planning � ctiviti eo -'the Land Use. Y.lement should
encourage area. hide planning or advisory councils in urban areap,. Such
comails are the most reasonable way to bring together different interest,
I when two or acreo vernrtent Inti ti es have ,jurisdiction in
the same planning area.
20, pg. 65 - Sarplementtation (c): This i'iire v�,ir caapitel improvement progrw.
shotild also includo Justtlfica.tions and need of proposed projects. Such
desci"ipti.on would be r. artremel wr helpful to planning a.wencie r and in the
coordIta,tion of their pl,wns. The lack of ,year to year and fl -re year
cap:i.tal improvement pro7rams has been foimd to greatly reduce t;h,a thoroughness,
of Ta;WC.Or� ,pheres of influence deterr nations, particularly as related
alo public worsts projects, ,Mich detail should also ,,reatl.y raid "O.AG's
regional transportation pl:annin�- aactil t les.
--I%
/Y
r
Marls ktsda.baauSh
LAFOO sta` f
S
MMMIIN`l'S TO LANA IlS:1�, IsLI MINI'
A xli, the discussion o:C ''City and District ,Bounda,rie;" on, Page
62 of the1°ilrment, tle tort recognizes that r. 17r;inc%ple ;function
01' l,AFCn is to cl,iscourago urban sprawl and encourage ordly
url)an development. (Line 9)
Staff,concurs that some rof'c°renoe be mado not Only to LAPCO's use o:f
Jho Butte County's General .Plan but to the City's General Plan
a.s well in the formulation of Spheres' of 'Influonce. Staff would.
suggest the addition of the following language Ort the end of
Lane 36, Page 62 ". and appropriate City ce'neral Plans."
1 Page 2, Line 12;
Stallconcurs with the recommendation and suggests the :following nrodi-
fication to Page 2 Line 11 Of the proposed text: ''Al,tlaougl the land
use text need not be specific or precise as to the Locations and
boundaries of proposed uses, the 1 -and use map is Precise as to the
general use Of the land.
2,
Page 5:
Jlcicnoivledgement of comment.
3. Page 13:
t is—generally beyond the scope Of this Land Use Pl,oment to discuss
in detail, the social and economic conditions of individual urban
areas. The Land Use Element addresses itself to the County at large..
4. Pae 28:
IV ile tie text sloes recognize the need for intergovernmental coo
tion in the planning process, and proposes several policies relative to
this subject, Pages 61 and 62, the special means of accomplishing this
goal is a decision of the elected officials, particularly with respect
to "a.re,awide planning councils
6.
7
Page 29 Lines 1-4•
The State Department of Finance estimates that
tain a 3°6 growth rate past 1980. However these
the county have been consistently low and it is
Use Element to encourage a unrestrained growth
of past policy.
the County will not sus -
state projections for
the intent of the Land
in population, reflective
Pa_ e 249;
STaff concurs with the submitted recommendation and
'ng modification of Policy 7.a "Compact Development:
vexation to existing cities and special district so
logical and orderly development"
suggests the follow-
IfEncourage an -
as to provide for
P ,c 33
Presently, the county maintainsvery limited ability to influence the
cost and specific design of new housing. Staff believes that policy "A"
on Page 33, Line 13 which reads Provide sufficient housing sites
:for estimated housing needs." will indirectly influence housing costs
by assuring on adequate suP,14y of ].and for housing conalrJa(;tion.
1)
i. The relati:ousiiip betwoen, the of*ficiont delivery of government services and
popttla.tion, densit;;i.es i's 7 eforenced in several sections or the proposed.
text (Pages 29 and 33) . Tile consid.erati.on Of government services a.-nd,
Public expense in the d.evolop111011t of land use plan maps is, in the
opinion o�C st.af:f, Satisfactorily addressed. ;in policy .Corm,
Il. Page .15,:
T t� i e concerns introduced here, regarding Property rights and the publ r
health, safety and welfare, arc addressed on Page 28, "General Welfare''
of the text. Admittedly, tho concepts of Pro)ert Ri- 1 is and General
Welfare share an intordependoncy. Ilowevex, t- include the ph -rose
Pt�a� c he-ElIth, safety Incl welfare) with the subject o:r "property Rights"
results not only in repetition but when evaluating all the policies,
this concept is clearly evident.
10. Page 35:
With regard to the recommendation to include "environmentally and socially
compatible" new industry in the County, the text references these con-
siderations on Page 4.0, en,ti•tl.ed$ "Environmental 'Preservation". Staf-f
would suggest the addition Of the :following language to R.4.d., Page
35, to include:"..before a�llowin.g the creation of new industrial areas".
Il. Page 37:
Staff -recognizes the important interrelationship between transportation.
systems and land use planning and believes this point is adequately
addressed in the text on Pages 33, 35, 36 and 37.
12, Page 37:
Staffelieves this concern is implicitly stated in the issue statement
regarding water and water systems on Page 37 of the -text`.
13 Page 38 Line 1:
cpncern.` or the protection of the riparian habitat adjacent to the
Sacramento River is addressed in 5. "Biological Habitat, Policy", Page 41.
14. Page 40
The text indicates the many and diverse benefits that can be derived
through the preservat=ion of open space. The particular value and
function, of open space, however, is based largely upon: the physical,,
social and economic condi.-tiolls of a given area, The particular need
to
preserve agricultural open space is clearly delineated on Page 30
of the text which pertains to management of the County's natural,
resources.
1S • Staff maintains that the provisions of the Land Use Categories, when
combiners with and: related to the appropriate policies, ';,)xovides the
criteria to properly measure the distinction between the Rural
Residential and Single Family Residential. cateRorieg.
16. Pages 48-53:
Sta would' concur with the recommendation to consider long-range
plans and zoning of incorporated citiesin the provisions of the Land
Use Gategori:es,�' Accordingly, we suggest the following addition to
A.2.
tle Zoning C{actors w1j:ic1L appear in t17.c La.ncl Clse Cate9yori.ow on C'a.ges
,�8,.5 t �(;oii7ar. `i1 xla.ty with city goileral glans and re7.tatocl zOnj.ajg"
17. 1 a tes 58 lino 4.3
5ta,I ag cos mat use poril i„ts and vwr. iances sliou l.c1 rot 0r,r'1y l.�e coa��
s stoat with the policies and standards oaf' the Landti.%c Iil,czrncnt but,
mO" generally with tho County's Genera.:l, "Plan. Staff sug�',csts tlae
following amendment to Policy A, under "Use Perriiits and Variances, Page
58, to incl.udo the foll.ow,ing; ", , . standards of the County's Central.
Plan..
18. Page 59:
t �a.evcs that he Proposed listed. on Pages Cl and
involving "Coordination of Plans" provides adequate measures for
the
exchan.gement of information between t11.0% county and the city govern -
Monts sn as to facilitate tnu�ually supportive planning and development
pra •tices .
1n, Page 61
-;ta -�• would refer to comments addressed. in Numbers 4 and l8 in this
report. s
20: Pape 65;
Presumably, the development of a 5wyeax capital improvement program would
be based upon systematic and integrated program incorporating alae reeornmCI
ations of many Participating government agencies and departments, 'result-
ing in a comprehensive and representative capital, improvement program.
finer-Deparflue tal Nawar""JU
TO: Planning Comms scion
FROMc Kyle Bla,ttt3a<'wi ak
SUBJECTi Correc t i ons to Draft Tend Urso B l oment Toxt
bATE: D000mber 207 19?8
Tho Planning Gornmission on December: 13, .978. , rovi (sW(,,d, proposed
changes to the Land Use Bilo Rent Text and made recorp!arndations
accordingly. These recommendations and proviouo oorrections
to the text have 'been, consolidated into one doeuman°ta i; enclosed) .
Staff would encourage the commission membero to again review
'the text and, the proposed changes to make certain what the
contents of the element are satisfactory.
KDsnw
enclosure
Inter -Departmental Memorandum
To: Planning Commission
FROM: Kyle Butterwick, Planning Department
SUBJECT: Proposed changes to Land. Ilse Element Text
DATE: December 5 1778
Enclosed you will ;find a draft of the Land Ilse element with
pages inserted in appropriate locations to identify proposed text
changes whichwere submitted collectively be several Planning
Commissioners. Staff would encourage the Planning Commission
to review all. the correspondence that has been submitted, to
date, in response to 'the Element and :formulate -their own
conclusions as to the suitability of these recommendations.
Attached to this memo are staff comments regarding certain
aspects of the proposed text changes furnished by Planning
Commission members. Por the most part, staff conc;—> s with -t}1e.
recommended modifications.
KI/hd
4
iia"+ �'C►. .: _ �
ffu #0 coun
aa
� (1 , LAN?f hJ-ATURAL VJ AtTkl AND 6CAUTY
r„4
PLANNING COMMISSION
. t LAWR15NCC J, L.AWSON
DIIZCCTOR Or PLANNING
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVl o oROMLE, CALIFQRNIA 9,965
Telephone. 534.4601
near Citizens of Butte County;
Tile Butte County Planning Department is currently rewriting and
updating the Land lase Clement of= the County's General Plan.
The new document will ultimately represent the County0s
official policy for future growth and development. You
have received this questionnaire to provide your organization
the opportunity to articulate its opinions and attitudes on
growth -gelated issues. Your responses will also assist
the decision making bodies in determining important land use
Policies necessary for guiding the future development in our
County. This questionnaire, which is 'being distributed on a
County wide basis, will serve as a measurement of citizen
Preferences in order to adapt planning goals and policies to
citizen based needs.
This public opinion survey is but one segment of the entire
public'participation process involved in the General: Plan
review program. In the months ahead, the Planning Commission
will also hold. public: meetings throughout the County so that you
will have an additioi4al opportunity to ask questions or present
your views directly to them concerning the future of Butte
County .
In order that we may obtain a large and representative
cross section of citizen opinions, you are urged to share and
complete this questionnaire as a group with your organization.
Enclosed for your convenience is a stamped self-addressed
postcard, which serves as the answering card Simply circle
your answers and drop the card in any mail box, You are
encouraged to complete this questionnaire at your earliest
convenience, for we are proceeding on a specific timetable and
would like your responses back to us within a month.
Should you have questions regarding any aspect of this
questionnaire or should you desire additional copies,
please contact the Butte County Planning Department, Advance
Planning Division, 18 County Center Drive, Oroville, California
Phone 534-4540. Thank you for yolzr cooperation.
Sincerely,
f,
y
Lawrence J. Lawson
Director of P ,. "t- ing
LJL:1r
URSORNNAIRE ON LAND 11SE P : S
�,.�... __ � IST
]., Which three things do you like
most about Butte County?
A. Open space
B. Recreational opportunities
C. Low residential densities
D. Clean air
11. Business opportunities
P. 'Trees and natural, vegeta-
t i ort
G. Educational facilities
fl. Lower living costs
1. Climate
J. Diversity
2. What should be the County's
three main concerns about
future development and land
use planning?'
A. Tndividual property rights
B. Employment and sales
C. 'Transportation needs
D. Housing needs
F. Resource conservation
F. Open Space
G. Government costs
11 'Tax rates and assessments
3 in recent years do you feel that
Butte County has been growing?
A. 'Too slow
B. Aboutright
C. Too fast
4. What should the County's general
policy bf} can future growth?
A. D .scottrage growth
D. Aia.&aj' ain current rate of
C -r wt h.
' �,courage growth
5. y111,;vuld growth be directed toward
oxisting communities or toward:
new locations?
A. Existing communities
B. New Communities
6. Should the County encourage compact
development anis discourage isolated
development?
A. Yes
B No
r". Should growthbe directed toward?
A. Valley agricultural areas
B. plat grazing land
C. Foothills below 1500' elevation
D. Foothills ab6ve 1.500' eleva.ion
B. What type of housing is most
needed in the County?
A. Single family homes on lots
of one acre or more
B. Single family homes on small
lots
C. Duplexes and townhouses
D. Apartments
B. Mobile home parks
P. Rest homes and group quarters
9. Should new residential, development
be limited to areas with community
water or sewer systems?
A. Yes
R. No
10. In what order would you rank the
following considerations in the
County's review of proposed sub-
divisions
ub-divisions and other development?
(List letters with most important
on left and least important to.
right)
A. Traffic on public roads
B. Location and capacity of
schools
C. Distance to shopping facilities
D. Availability of power, tele-
phone, cable, etc,
E. Proximity of parks & Recrea-
tional facilities
F. Police protection
(,. Piro protection
H. Distance to hospitals FT medical
services
1. Need for pedestrian walkways
and bike paths
11. Subdivision :Lots shoo be of
what size be fore the County
requires paved road access?
A, Five acres or less
B Two acres or, less
I,% One acre or less
D. fine -half acre or less
E One-quarter acre or less
12. Subdivision lots should be of
what size ,before the County
requireg curbs, gutters, and
sidewalks?
A. One acre or less
B. One-half acre or less
C. One-third arce or less
D. One-quarter acre or .less
13. What would you consider as the
maximum housing density for
"rural'' residential develop-
ment?
evelop-ment?
A.
One
house
per
half acre
B.
One
hoiisca
ner
acre
C.
One
houses
per
two acres
D.
One
house
per
five acres
I,',
One
house
per
ten acres
lit. In residential areas what size
of parcel should be required
in order to keep chickens,
horses, and livestock?
A, Two ac re's
B. One acre
C. One-half acre
D. One-quarter acre
15. Where should the County allow
mobile homes?
A. Only in mobile .home parks
B. In areas where the resi-
dents approve
C. Anywhere
16 At wr�at parcel size should
orchard aril field crops he
allowed to Convert to resi-
dential development"?
A. 'Twenty acres or less
B: Ten acres or legs
C. Five acres or less
D Any size
17. At the ou edpe of communitiesin valley agricultural areas,
what type of development should he
adjacent to agriculture?
A. Publicly -owned green belts
B. Rural Residential. (one to ten
acre lots)
C, Small .Single-family lots
D. Apartments and mobile home parks
E. Commercial development
15. If the County's general Plan de-
signates an agricultural area for
residential development within a
ten -yeas period, should the area
be zoned for development:
A. Now
B. Five years from now
C. As the property -owners request:
it,
10, Should the County allow Williamson
Act agreements in areas designated
for future non-agricultural
development?
A. Yes
B. No,
2n. Which types of commercial facilities
are needed most in the County?
(hank in order)
A. Home businesses
B. Neighborhood convenience stores
C Highway strip commercial
D. Shopping centers
B. Other
21. Should future industrial develop-
ment be concentrated in a few
large areas or located on scatter-
ed sites?
A. Concentrated
B. Scat',:ered
22. Should industrial zoning allow
retail stares and services?
A. Yes
13. No
orojnancG ►,tio%*
commercial uses in re;' Lent.
in;l arotw,
A. No businesses
B. dome businesses
C. Limited rerr7.ir services
I). nff.ices Fi smxrll shop$
24. If yotir property is now zoned.
For general use such as AA2
or A-2 Ltd. , would you favor
a more restrictive "oning?
A. Yes
13. No
25. Should the County encourage
a mixture of housing types to
meet all economic needs?
A. Yes
B. No
26, When considering the conversion
of orchard or field crops to a
residential use, which of the
following factors should be taken
into account by the County?
(Rank i►r order)
A. Adjacent development
B. Soil characteristics
C. Availability fo public
facilities and services
D. Housing need
E. Profitability of agricultural,
use
27. Should billboards be
prohib ted along highways :in
rural areas?
A. Yes
o
28. Populations of native animals
in rural areas, such as deer,,
bear, raccoon, porcupine, birds,
etc., should be
A. :Maintained at present
levels
Bl Allowed to decrease slightly
C Allowed to decrease sub-
stantially
ub-stantially
I1. Increased through habitat
improvement
E. . Ignored in land use de
visions since they are not
important enough, to merit
consideration.
Ctrri,tieYvat uw ►.► rare vianti ana
i►
land owi . s' rlx)ht to remove
trees or pl,.ants riom hiss nroperty,
this .►11ould be rasa V(,,d
A , In favor of th(! land owner
)3. In favor of conservation of
the rare plant
C. By a reasonahio compromise
in which hath skies make
sacrifices
V) . If there is a conflict between
preservation of a unique historic
or archaelogic;tl site and a land
owners' right to grade anti develop
his property, this should be re-
solved:
A. In favor of the land owner
B. In favor of site nreservation
r. 8y a reasonalile compromise in
which both sales make sacrifices
31. Rate the importance of the
following environmental concerns:
A. Preserving wildlife in rural
areas
B. Preserving agricultural land
C. Maintaining; clean air
D. Maintaining Clean water in
lakes and streams
I, Maintaining a noise -free
environment
F. Preserving the attractive
appearanco of scenic areas
C. Preserving rare or endangered
plants
H. Preserving historic or
archaelogica.l sites
(Rate very important concerns as 111"
moderately important concerns as
"21', and unimportant concerns as
113 ")
i1 -w- .,.. ..1 Myr i\rr. r. -r.ar, �
Co,,tira tt(.x: o f Ag ricrrl kutr�tl
ve....
Advisory Committee
. y..
Cor tater
31C� c:I c. A v o . �
�roVxl i:`, rc"L. �J�+i65
Cit) .1aT1a;;ers Office
MunJ.cipal T�uilr1in
l l.",J Iiarcl Street
nrouillc,
;
!"a. 95�qt5
Chico, Ca, 05926
Cojrontitw 1 4-,• Devcl . Advisory
Historical Advisory Cont Lank!ronscrvation ror117
C,omriitt0
1859 Bird Stroot
� 316 Nolson St.
1559 .�ir,,l Street
Oroville, Ca. 95926
Oroville C.a.. 95965
Orovi; le, Ca. 959£+5
Local , :!otxcy Formation
Overall l conortic Devel.
Riding u Hi?;ing Trails
Counts/ Administra`c vc 01.E
Progran, Committee
Committee
County Admin. Bldg.2275
Del Oro .Ave .
I;ox 116 w Coha sset Stage
Orovillo, Ca. 695965
I ,
Oxovillc, Ca. 95965
'Chico, Ca. 55926
Solid %ante Revieu, Comb.
Civil. Disaster Counsel
Bconorlic Oppor. Counsel,
7 County, Center Drive
2255 Del. Oro .Ave.
2279 Dol Oro Ave,
Orovillc, Ca. �JS96S
OrovIlie, Ca. 95965
Oroville, Ca 959615
Paradise Municipal .Alvis Cr
Agricultural Advisory
Butte County Devel . Comm.
Advisory Counsel
Commission
2255 Del Oro Ave.
747 Elliott Road
2279 Pel Oro Ave., Suite
Oroville, Ca. 95965
Paradise, Ca. 95960
Oroville, Ca. 95965 B
Chico ,Airport Comm. F
Fish and flame Comn.
Set-teragc Comt;tission
Chico City Manager's Off.'
1 153 Palmelto Ave.
Oroville Region
Municipal Bldg.
Chico, Ca.. 95926
P.O. Bot 135p
Chico, r"'a. 95926
Oroville, Ca. 95965
Biggs-l'�'est Gridley lVater
Butte Water District
Butte County ,josquito
District 1
735 Virginia
Route 2, Box 2040
Roate 2, Ba,� 787
Gridley, Ca. 95948
Oroville, Ca. 9;965
Gridley, Ca. DS948
Chico Arca Recr. Dist.` '
Durham i?osquito Abate,
Durham Fear. & Park Dist.
54a Vallomhrosa Ave.
P.O. Pax 386,
P.O. Box 564
Chico, ra. 95026
Durhar�, Ca. 959.18
Durham, Ca. 95953
Tal ,`.edit Tire 'District
Fea.tl,cr giver Recr. hist.
Lane Nadrone ►,rater ?)i.st.
3 300 Sneacer Ave.
2862 -Olive Hk•;y. Suite Ti
C/O 'Paul Minasian
Orov:.l:tc, C.a. 9S965
Oroville, Ca 95965
1681 Bird Street
Orovillc, Ca., 55965
.Iaga1i;t-County ';eater Dist
Oroville V,osquito Oate.
Paradise Fire Plot. ?gist.
71 Cet ctaryr 'Roa.1
'765 F:t; ?,a:,.
767 Bi,rc'i Street
`.agal. L.. , Ca. 959:1
nrovil.l�, r; , 9596..5
Paradise, Ca,. 9'..6^
.`r 'ecr. t f13rL
•
Ric'lv"ul,o n Cc . r Part•,
T
.1:t r Pollution �4
'�ai`in�*
662, .:•:.<<y
� Y- �r,n�
P.n. )o,ti .)�.,�
�c�_1.utz,on
31h C!soil Ave.
parad 1- Ca. t9(9
Ricliv,0o ra. 9..74
Oroville, .15 9 !'
Government
C o un t Adlnl nldg.
lllstreet
lc, S'? lirtcoli
�,
r C,
Oroville, Ca. 95965
Clall-Comia State Univor.
Chico
Citizens Advisory Task
Grand Jury Butto County
Chico, Ca, 959126
Force, Housing Element
7 County Centel- I)rivc
I Colirt Sireot
Oroville Ca. 05065
Public 1J*orl7s Dept.
nrovilIc, C.a. 95965
(I i o
P.O. B o.,r, l(c. vin
KUM Raclio
California State Vniv.
r011ntY Service Area #13
(Palermo Sei-mr)
Pai.-adise , Ca. 95969
Chico, 95926
P U!) I i c lo T'll.: F, rl e 7) t .
7 County Center Drive.
Oroville, Ca, 95965
S t North B-arbank
Riclivale Sanitar),
1960 El�in
P.O. Box 302
Oroville, Ca. 95965
Rich -vale, Ca. 95974
Butte Crook Drainage
Drainage District futl
Drainage District 92
% Jerome Peters Jr.
P.O. Box 3509
% 446 RentUCky Street
Gridlcy, Ca. P5948
% Jolrome D. ,Farren Jr.
P.O. Box 3509
Chico, ca. 95927
Chico, Ca - 95927
Drainago District P100
West Road
Drainage District 0200
Paradise Irrigation Dist.
Rich,vale , Ca. 95974
3rd and 8ro -
adway
Riclivale, ca. 95974
P.O. Box 128
Paradise.Ca. 95969
Richvalo Irrig. Dist.
Table "fotmtain Irrigr.
Box 147
lZoute 1, Box 151
Riclivalo, Ca. 9597d
Oroville, Ca. 05965
Chico Enterprise Record
Orovillo Mercury Register
BUttfl Ca. Bugle
700 Broadway
Chico, Ca. 95926
!
1740 Bird St .
Oroville , Ca 95965
1224 Mangrove Ave.
Chico Ca. 95026
4
Chico ►ears & Review
Biggs Nees
Gridley fleraid
231 Norma Ave.
117 B. Street
630 Wash ngton
Chico, Ca. 95926
Biggs, Ca. 9591.7
Gridley, Ca. 95948
Paradise Post
i
Sacramento Bee
Ridge Gazette
750 Fir
905 B Oro Dam Blvd.
5974 Skyway
Paradise, Ca. 95969
Oroville, Ca. 95965
Paradise, Ca 95969
r
Butte College Roadr nne
I
MSL Radio
Butte College Route 1.1
180 Bast 4 Street
Oroville, Ca. 95965
4
Chaco, Ca. 95926
KNVR
KORV
KPAY
5907 Skyway
2854 Olive Hwy.
Raab Lane
Paradise, Ca. 95969
Oroville, Ca. 95965
Chico, Ca. 95926
KRCI2 TV
George Gilbert
.john Stutz
► 7,200 IV.. Sacramento
157 Acacia Avenue
Route 2, Box 1575
Chico, Ca. 95926
Oroville, Ca. 95965
Chico, Ca. 95926
3
'
I
Dr. F. G. Bennett
k
Rae Wheeler
Gerald Everhard
173White Avenue
e
Route 1, Box 117-M
8 Wycliff 69ay ,
Chaco, Ca. 95926
Gridley, Ca, 95948
Magalia, Ca. 95954 .
KFNIF Radio
Hazel
P.0, Box 266
3
Chico, Ca. 95926
r
i 03 A ,t Co
998 El Mon to Aire
Gilstrap Ave
taco, Ca 95926 Gridloy, Ca. 95; 4,3
Bu','+C COUnty Almond tI.Ill
I)ri(,.,d, Fruit Assn. Calif.
P P4 E
C,
Assn. 1wr"Ilal
E Ilth Avenue &
350 Salon,
Rwy.
E s p 1, an ad e
Chico, Cao 05926
95938
Chaco, Ca. 9592.6
P G E r
P G& t
999 Spr"Ice
2150 Bird
202 Poarson Rd.
GrIdlov, Ca. 95,948
Oroville, Ca. 95965
Paradise, Ca. 95969
Pacific Telephone
i
Pacific 'Telephone
California Water Service
2195 Baldwin Ave.
25) Nfain St
340 Salem
0-roville, Ca. 95965
Chico, Ca. 95926
Chico, Ca. 95926
Calif. 111ator SErvice
0 IV I D
Durham Mutual Water Co
1755 Bird
2310 nuincy Road
Oroville Hwy.
o-Mville$ Ca. 95965
1
Oroville, Ca. 95965
Durham, Ca. 95948
Gridley Union School
Biggs Unified School Dist.,
Chico Unified School Dist
429 14'-iisimn Ave. Dist
Biggs Bast 11ITY.
1163 E 7th St.
Gridley, Ca. 95943
Biggs, Ca. 95917
Chico, Ca. 95926
Durham tT,-iified Schools
Oroville Union High School
C4
Pioneer Union School Dist
Putney Dr,
2211 Washington Ave.
HIVY.V
OYOVille QL(inCI
OuTham, Ca. 95948
Oroville, Ca. 95965
Oroville, Ca. 95965
,
Thermal.ito S4,-4hbol Dista
Paradise Unified. Schools
City of Biggs
00
1050 Sierra A,re.
566 Pearson Road I
216 1/2 B Street
Ca. 95965
Paradise, Ca. 95969
Biggs, Ca. 95917
city of Chico - Ci y Hatll,
City of Gridley
city Of Oroville
5th c Main,
1
685 Kentucky
1735 Mlontgomery
Chico, Ca. 95926
Gridley, Ca. 95948
0 roville, Cr. 95965
Chico Bocrd or' Realtors
Oroville Board of Realtor�
Paradise Board of RealtorL
1L026 Sheridan
1440 Lincoln
61.35 Cencer
Chico, Ca. 95526
Oroville, Ca. 95965
Paradise, Ca. 95969
Durham Irrigation Dist,
Butte 1,-'a t- e r `Dist. 4
Ther-malito Irrigation
(3 OX 7 (-o
735 Virginia
410 Tbemalito
Du rh an C a 95948
t�
Gridley, Ca. 9 5 0-1
Thernialito, Ca. 95965
,
Chico Ura'1190
A Ayre0
489 11 io
2825 Fir
Chic'* r
Ca. 1-9) 926
fico,ca. 05920,
ive Oak, Ca. 95953
Therrialito Grange No. 729
Womens Club of Gridley
Yuba City Womens Club
47tj Plumns Ave.
orov lle, C,,A. 95965
4211 11,'ilson
Gridloy, C"t.
8.53 Plu'faas a. '
Yuba, uty, c 95991
Butte Cotinty Farm BureaU
Cannery Dried Fruit
849
Grange Hall 490
Chapel Drive
2558 Poather Piver Blvd.
95965
Nut Vlorkers Local
3557 Oro nam 'Bl,vd
p r a -r d.L s e, � C a . 95969
orovilie, Ca.
Oro,,I.11e, Ca. 95665
Odd Fellows Temple
Palermo Orange
7600 Irwin Ave.
Butte County Superini
tendents o[ Schools
Garner Lartes
Chico, Cta- 95926
Palermo, Ca. 95968
3 Cotmty Center Drive
OToville, ca. 95965
Chamber of Commexce
i. Chamber of Commerce
Chamber of Commerce
1789 114ontgomery
95965
585 Vermont
Gridley, Ca. 95948
5580 Almond
Paradiss,, Ca. 95969
Orovil'Lo, Ca.
Butte COLMtY Farm Advisor,,, Butte County Agricultural Chico Production Credit
0 f 'fl' C e
2279 Del Oro Ave.
Commissioner
316 Nelson Ave.
Assoc.
352 F Ist Street
Oroville) Ca. 95965
Oroville, Ca. 95965
Chico, Ca. 95926
Butte property Owners
Lions ClUb - Zone ChalTma' Doimtown Businessman
Assoc. % Dave Kilborne
Assoc.
Harry Clark
Crocker Bank Building
1,900 Oro Dam Blvd,
% Clark Studio
300 IMain
Oroville, Ca. 95965
.169 Cohasset
Chico, Ca. 959276
Chico, Ca. 95926
Audobon Society
Chico 2000
P.O. Box .3666
Butte Environmental
Chico, Ca. 95.926
CS11C
i B 1��te—jZDJ 1 e g e
Sierra Club
C/0 President
0 rcrvi-j-j c�,—C-, -,r;--A-5a6 5
Cly Bi-Ff Ingels, President:
Chico, Ca. 95926
Butte environmental
708 Cherry'St.
Chico, Ca. 95926
League of Womcli Voters
P.O. Box 297
Chico, CI. 95927
Paradist l rrJugat on P�st.
Richvale Irrigation Just,
W11C.Q ,Gharrrber ot" Conmerc
6626 Slzyk•,ay
iclavale, Ca.
500 Mair..
Earad,ise, Ca. 95969
.hi.co, Ca. 95926
.
A
Orov.il y� Chamber of
Taradise Chamber of
Butte County }sousing Atit.
Commerce
CatnriercED
1.040 W 1101.1
1789 Montgomery
5589 Almond
Chico, Ca. 95926
Oi'ovi,lla, Ca. 95965
Paradise, Ca. 95969
Butte County Housing Aut.
Eco -Analysts
i
Sacramento Valley Land
1680 Lincoln
2255 Esplanade
,
Owmers Assn
`
Orovi,lle Ca. 95965
r
. Chaco, Ca. 95926
j
21.5 Wall
Chico, Ca. 95926
Butte Property Owners
Chico Housing In►p. Prog.
Cali'k,',rnia. State Univer.
Assoc.
' 449 W. 9th St ,
!
Chico Housing Office ;
1909 Oro Earn Blvd.
i Chico, Ca. 95926
Chico, Ca. 95926
Oroville, Ca. 95965
Butte County Housing Aut.
Butte County -Calif.
Eagles Club
P.O. Boat 326
Building F Const, Tracie
►
1940 MulbeTry
Gridley, Ca. 95948
1.1.6 W. l7toh St.
j
Chico, Ca. 95926
", Chico, Ca. 95926
Elks Lodge
Masonic Hall. Assoc.
t
notary Club,
1705 jManzanita Ave.
131 W. lSt Street
215 I►lauZ _S't':,
Ch:i.co, Ca. 95926
Chico, Ca, 95926
3
Chjtci` Ca. 95R£}..
r
tj
YMCA
Veterans Service Office
s
Eagles Club
1.66 Cohasset Roan
196 Memorial. Way
2010 Montgomery
Chico, Ca. 95926
Chico, Ca. 95926
Orovilla, Ca, 95965
Tilks z,odgo BPOE 1484
Moose Lodge;
Masonic Hall '
i4,45 ?,Myers
1462 14th St.
1462 `Myers
C:ov l,e, Ca., 95965
Thermalaito, Ca_. 95965
Orcvil,l.e, Ca, 95965
V
Veterants Service Office
Hammam Ral Estate
YMCA
2765 DeI, Oro Ave.
608 Kentucky Street
Oak , Robinson
Orov•i.1? c, Cas 95965
Gridley, Ca 95948
i
Orovi.l.le, Ca. 95-065
r
Eagles Lodge No. 2960
Ells Lodge "Nth. 2n26
Moose Lo,-1ge No. 7227
9291 Skyway
6309 Clark Rd,
5275 Sk),igay
Paradise, Cit. 95969
Paradise, Ca, 95969
Paradise, Ca. 959E9
Vett rams %!cnori:al Hall
!Masonic Tenple Lodge x250
Moose Lodg:- No. 1594
i=r Elliott Rd,
Sycamore Fr Vermont
227; Highway 99 J
rrSclzoy, Ca. .59,8
Parz.disc, Ca. 95969
m G'rid7cy, 95948