Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
80-26B SOUTH CHICO AREA REZ
' a ° � � ^). � 1 YS�.'f . 0 . � 1 - �I I , 1 ' � � � 1 �� ,1�� � i "�� ';�' .�, `q .. l •o A;+ C. a. - A �i �'���. , 1 .lAs: K , �.,. ' �� .� .Q YI, / � Y � I. A'�'0 ar:. \ 1 � � .♦ . N J REZONE 8ZC'A �,. 'C. _ SOUTH CHICo p 7 4 v < _ _ j r J o 'Ile J R5 vI� rr. i i f 'y » r , Y ci 1 f V 4 n s, tl �` r: a ' �74s ,� . ,•,� i �.,.,ac....,,..�.' -.- , ...,:,.,.. ,• •` .^,wy F -.,, .:k �`n.-.:w - ' _ _ _ " i - 'rye- i L, e i � a i '2 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION,, :. April 11 1079 MINUTES p i - o ,. fp t Ul. ADDITEMS�'�' South Chico-No A„ "". x,th of Durhatin-�.,T iid flee Mafia F k Mrs Blair said that 3t had bee, requeste khat this area be p1'nced: for r ; ; Vo. �1 on: the"13st for study. Chalirman W Bier askdd vollinteers of April to meet with Mrs. Blair for a short time• ifter the meeting 184 _Covitissioners Lambert and Bennett yt'tunteerad. rh v \C p t t, i April 269 1979 Butte County PlAnning Commission Butte County Planning Dept. ,J)Director: Bettyc BlAIr Board of Supervisor's - Planning Comi�issian This is a request to appear before _the ; ut`the meeting scheduled for May 2, 1979• :> I would like to review with you boas of the recolmohda iohe of the` Committee and Staff on the proposed Midway Rezone. Perhaps at this Lama it,might be helpful to the Comm so ohetb . ; to have mObe input and information regarding ti numerous non conforming parcels,,which would be cxeated by the suggested Ap5 and A-20 being considred for this area. It would be more ,reasonable and equitable with so many of - p g� p brvA•an �� ' � agriculture /,residential, type oni.ngosuch2bi AeSuR6-L g h6 A-5 to the smaller parcels would be a hardship to t• .he blinetrs as the majority are senior citizens like myself living (tin a fixed income which is beingeroded Iby- inflation,., Thanlsi �g; you for your consi.derati.on of this requests 5 t Since ^ety yours, .°. LoW.a .C,,, Cat. ziiid Jr. X Ruuye 1. - BOX 275 Durham, cA6 95.938 Ap � MIN'U HOff' SVAFRVi;F�O%Z CiA�tD r `19 APPEARANCE: X:OUi3 CxMEt1ZIND. JR. fir. Camenzind spoke regarding the proposed rezone of land on Midway and' iiwy; 99E. As Chis razont,�wol; d affect the future :a:s well as a large number of neighbors the arej,ihould be studied' And reviewed. ' It appears that consideration is not being given 'on an equitable basis.`" " He 40eitionad the number of signatures on the pet?ltions"preaented. There'is a large number that do not live in the rexdhe area 'There are,. also several signatures that represent a lot: of owners of small parcels residing on Jones X'04nue outside the rezone area. The area between, i Otoville and Chico Highway was recommended for "A-5" zoning. Thane Ari h 44 parcels in the area"and 32 will be nonconforming, He qudationed the. ioard ragardi;ng ed to study this matter• the committee that was form act Camenzihd, thea thi Supervisor Winston advised Mr. ig ion wee Before the Board a couple of weeks ago. There was.,a request for a continuance. The Planning Comujiasioit was instructed to give priority toplanning problems in"sdiith.Chico area. He understood that they, have given priority and staff has made cettain reconmendations that vAll be considered at the Planning Commission hearing tomorrow night, Mr. Camenzind Dtated that he had been advised by the t'lanning staff that he would. hot be able to speak at this hearing. He would like to -,V. -,,able tri speak and requested to be placed on the ,;agenda and was advised that the agenda had been made up. ,Everyone is concerned with preserving prime agricultural land. He recommended that the Midway and property between be placed in ''A -R" zoning because it is Alnatural transition, taking plata. He recOmmended that the hast aide of Midway be, zonad "A»160" so theta would be no oppo,�hunity to telt 20 acres. It would he nonconforming under the Bettye Blair, planning director, stated th_%:` �'e recoaatiendations of staff will be considered at the meeting. It will iia "'commission''s decision whether to holt hearings. These are pxali,m£nax�► S;:inga r, y slow" "BUTTE ' CO -LINTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES May 2, 1979 .! VI. 5OU'f�, CHYCO REZONE Committee reporti. Mair announced that the committee working on this prop oral Miss ., f was tammiSsionars Lambert- and Bennett . � Mrs. Lambert cal] edf�atterition to the maps pr��ited on the wall. Commissioner Bennett said that land east and'north of Chico proposed for development is now being rez Add which removes the pr sing need for axeas :For housing in the ChiFt� area and added that the Com',`�w�-. mission must look to the 'protection Of the faimers. nurih the ensuing discus:>ion 99 to the advislsability of requesting a 120day interim zoning pan this, area ii: was pointed out that theca wigs no way to physi�rally achieve zoning in that time but that it is possible to haVe a :Firm proposal at that time Phil Mace, attorney for M3[dway Orchardy t-rou-1 t Up a point of corder' (1,92) stating 'that therrsMras nou ested penditRg on which the Doard ,,: pr.��, pct could Lase urgency cdeapplicationsgg that the area be monitored'` ` through y g g` , .1p J idle not g g partme�t for ro'ects' that wa ordinary o to the Plann�n Commx sion, similar to those held, for oth o Y g held - Commissioner Bennett su otted that a t6limi'nar hearing be g8 er areas of the count and that ,in. g p he area: y formation be sou ht from tihejpea 1e in t Commissioner Lambert made a ),iotiatir that preliminary hearsngs be set as soon as possible to r'onsider possible general "plan amohdments and rezoning for the area..` Her motion was secondod by Comms ,,s, loner Bennett AXES: Commissioners Bennett' Gilbert Lambert and Cha rmah Wheelers DOES No one,, ABSENT: Commissioner $Verhard: Motion �8I'ried. i is r . .u.., r . .., , .....led . v, "� //► "_�. � ..r - -. ,. ..... .. .-. -... . _ ,. -. .... ,.•..... ,.^•.,n ,, l,i:� ,. M.n!:.n�9,"yW.Mtxfz'Sl11'ad�l��'�'hY�l'O1i?��'*{ti+y� , TotBettye, Blair, Planning Director Vanhart 4 au.,Kar� South Chico 'R®zone, f, r oAr�� 6/6/79' r Except fa isoUted instances' soil conditiono ai:e excellent fot septic tg4k system operation in the propoesd reziane area. We would anticipate no problems with the rezoning. �iy,land divis'Jon; t Anus o course with the requirements, of the 1' scomply' q and d3.vio3.bn, ordinance. VC— Chill \ 4 , � t '► it .m ,eyira 4 " ,..,,: ._.,.. _.-.,.. .,_... .,. ...,... ....•6.. .__ .__....... ,_.. _ . _.. ... ... ...... . UTTR'COUNTY PLANNING COMMTSSTON MINUTES .Tuna 6, .1979 establish a firm line between urban and agricultural uses. Dave Hayes, said the property is. being supported ay the; people not su�aportinp' the people--cited cobbles and clay coupled with a high, water tatile.on'his proaperty--said_thb averse person cannot afford ,5 Acres -asked for., 5R-1 .;'. tonin on 42, M just north of Dr. Coates. Bob West (493)I, till Coatest neighbor, supp6rtt, agricultural Zand in the :. study area. td McLaughlin, Durham, .asked what an economic unit is"t0' mei tsd that 46 i1cres might be art •Jconomic unit for nuts but not for cattle. He' said, the entire stud area Lias the potential of farmin int`ensivel and profitabiy+�. y P g Y a bvj. Gam'bla `agriculture toAdhor in Durham 'High School,` said small acreage is in'great denand by young, ;armers ,just starting outin btxsiriess=-and emphasized that there is a lot; '01 interest by youngsters in farming; point " ing up 'the incompatibilities betwaen agriculture and resiaohiial,develop- ment Wayne Bartram owns 14 acnes of walnuts adjacent To Unit 2 Off Sorithgate Acres Subdivision and would like to continue to farm. WCLOMenz`ind, Route 1 Box 2s4, Durham,, called-.attentio�i..._to 'the. numerous `ekk'istaog, iron-conforming parcels and asked that the whole area of Tuscan forMatior,, near the creek, be allowed to develop in either 1 Ocre or 3/4,acre ` parcels. ;' Joe Schrinaley Route 1, Durham since 1965, said to leave it is 'or stake 41t l-acre in He farms about 5 acres . Mr: Camentind claimed that the entire area-,� as shown, for low, density resi ::culture to residential developmen " g g gri dbuti,al use on -the General Plan Ma is undergoing a transition from a Raymond Jany, skid there etre gt6lt areas for homesites east of �r7 a Chico and asked that mis; tkes not be rpade that we canh6t 'IM He said that, it made no sense to 'rezone the entire area for small lots just because a fdw may havemarginal soilsy j� ; Ron r;a�go, corner of Midway "�, Oro Cliico Highway for 36 years, said it z ,shouldR- ono bless than 20 adzes 01 each side of the highway:' �(.... Garden Road A' save the non-renewable J•an Ho1maK, , atilt south of Gro Garden resource y;} Alba Houges man, corner of Maribell Manch, 17 acre-asked 'that it not be changed. Attorney Phil Mace (678) representing Midway Orchards .for whom bill Cot'ting 11am fiaxtagOt i presented an 11-page "Soil Report for Midway 'Ori chards'' and stated thdt the 10"adze 'Midway property was totally undconomkddl aS an : rchard BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMISSION MINUTES June '60 1.979 ack lM�l ine, „ a vfhob%y6. farmer" of 7n ' acres o � nlmands on Midway, s' J aid, Otha lamer thel"=a&I�ter't Mortis Keene"(79-2-91) said he had hulled nuts for both'Maline ana Dixon and both had beautiful `"products Hd suggested leeping the area in Agri Cultuure. ;. 1st mice President of the Butte CoUnt� Fa'rm� Bureau, 'ta.id (lu lughaanttt:��; yP 8; , p rn to tnQ t"au members. _ncehat" reservation Of a land as a resource is of rime co Mar Aadebhigh called attention to:,LAFCO Spheres of Influencl'and qua�stiohec that under" Proposition 13 the urbaas-type r•✓�nue gen..�atng capacity would not be as 14rgti. as the cost of the servicais by the Ooun*y Od asked that r Planning Staff'devolop a methodology factu, to, mak" suci�determinations wh6h, project is considered: Y pp g ''Ann Eailej► X194) expressed concern abc�u� °the raid1 '' disa eariri life style of farm-"' » "the area due to encroachMentr b" urban development, Y Ails tour Cott ng ager,, of 'Midway Orchards, invited' anyone interested ,to MiawayNI ti _ t Tom TleCreOdy,t ..rn'iea.2000, suggested 7m;teri,y Aw26 for the entire areaCI, lLchard . `.-., you- ht sai ; d he thought viaile aZ�xiculture should be preserved but �aant is` property to tso into small parcelsi jadhii Luv; ad also C.4ixcn 2000, staff X that for the first time hisz&t on had had a backjng� from''rfarmers, banker, and „business. men,.whv 4iaere normally considered exi r a�-conservative c`�rl of whom went ..ag and protected . .IN gAestinn�ad the Pormatkon of new service districts wit]CFlocotiohs beyond \the Chico Sphere o�� Intl'iaende, and commented ths,t Midway could "not handle traffic volume j� the area is developed with homes. r r4 -.�t A='study r 5sion (CCmmissibh and Staff) v!3t, set for, iJ ine r na r 3 - r 7. e Al Inter -Departmental, Memorandum tea Planning Commission RnoMr Kyle �tttterwick, ,Advance Planning suMJrcr:, Ceneral.'Plan considerations and policies regarding, Land tlse 'in `t South ChicA, = ,..DATLt r. June 20, 1979- 'The of future land, use and development in:the --,consideration "South Chico Area" requires a thorough understanding and ax . rr" amination of many factors uniquo to the study area,' for example -� , Physical, Characteristics - Soil conditionsI climate, topo- and residervi grarTry�p, water ava a ty, existing paxcel sizes tial densities, existing land use, public roads and other public facilities and nxisting utilities and drainage :ii�vptlltias. , / Social Characteristics - Existing and projecte4`1population wwithin thi ChM Urban Area, location and distribution of this population,-housingsupply and demand, employment opportunities, wishes of the citizenry; Economic L:aracteristics - Cosh vs. benefit of resid.entiah,; eve, opmen ncome -pro uc ing capability of agr ik;.ultur al, land. , Environmental Characteristics - Water and air quality, acoustic ,,anvisua qua Zty, trafficMbw and safety, and in general the `anhrncement 'of the natural ,environment The consideration, and application of new zoning is largely based' upon the evidence presented above. However, the sequence of implementing new'zoning is of particular significance. The State of California in 197'4, passed legislation which made its „ g incumbent upon local overnmeFtts to zone property in conformance,,, with adopted general plans. this reason the don. .;yon future Sand use in South Chico should first e�camino the County s existing General Plan. Map to determine its accuracyin representing prospective land use send ronin After establ' hip this uidel3ne � for development, specific zoning should them be implemented on the basis of both the Fact;: of the area as raferonced above in addition _.. ` l to the objectivesof tiro Genera]. Plan= The Govetfttent Code stipulates' that toning cons,Astent with the Gen�qal Plan must be accomplished within a 'reas6hdt�le time period ,foilbwing adoption of the Genera. Kan Map The purpose -o'E" this report; t�erefore, is to present excerpts .frtjm the County's existing, and pro used, Land Lsse Element Texts to assist this commis on in..r,t a evaluation of the existing Go -neral Plan Map and in the consiAdration o9 future zoning. No attempt is made here to recommend apiroprxate land use or zoning, but rather to illustrate the spectrlxm of information that is appli'chble to this particular roj ect ,., r 1 1.... ,......:.1. 11.., .. -0011M �� 'Planning Commission Page -2 0 June,-40, 20, 1979 The existing General Plan Text and,°in particular, the pro�iosed Land Usa B1 ement" T6xt, 'both ;speak very directly) ait> policy. , form to the major considerations involving future development in South Chico AGRICULTURAL LAND -:;USE r Rxis ing Gener,af`' Fla Text ' .. ry Policies'��' , A. Agi.cultural land should be protracted, for its own econoritic benefit. (x.12) B., Urban growth should be directed away from agricultural r, laud. (1'0, 6) C. Agricultural land should not be available £or urban w�e, (5.5)� n. Every effort should be made to preserve those--sr"eas rr 'where conditions are conducive to sound agticulturgl development". (5,11) E. Agricultural lance should be preserved against ',piecemeal``. - urbanxtation which rsely effect the potentials (if this�importan't segment of the ' w u .j( County's base. (S 12) P. In providing for urban growth, and expansion, the fertile areas should be preserved, wherover possible, to', encourage, prior use of ;land that has agricultural 'notential . (Sill!) Proposed :Land Use Text Policies; A. tIaintain agricultural crop production as a major sourde food, employment and incomo . (P AO) B. Retain in an agriculzural designation on the Land V96 MaV"' areas where locationj. natural conditions and water avails bil.ty;;make lands well suited to Orchard 'and Field Crop use, while coinsidering;for non6-agricultutdi use areas where urrdn" 4ncrocr��Hnt has made inroads into aa;ricultural areas and where past official action's havo planned areas for ? G 41lowe'a wideerange rof''Oagricultural., and necessary accessory uses in crop producti n areas: (P.30) D: Maii,tain mix ,mu:n parcel sixes in designated agricultura3 areas by following comprehensivQ zoning principles. (P.30) E. Encourage urban sxpansion,toward the least productive soils. (P.30) E' Allow ruga"]. residential developii ent as a ''buffer between urban development and intensive crop lana. (P.30) Plarihing Commission,." r - "'4-;sage -3- ]tine 20 1979 (f RESIDENTIAL `LANA _ USE � 7, i 1. Homs ing Supply Existing General Plan Text s� Pml is ios A. Vhe,,Coui�tto moet f7 A9 ushould encoura, e a 'Variety of 'hou! future needs B . ` A "variety Of ,residential types AdUi'A bee en6uraged ' within each major segment of the urban area : '- Proposed Lana, Use Text PaliCiesi ^a �r A. Establish appropriate zoning to'provide sites �\b (including various choices) to meet housing, needs ,� � �. foc the ensuing 20 years. (p',33) ;7� B Provide a diversity of housing sites varying size, .density and location. (P..33) 2. Mousing Location Exiting General Plan Text ;. Policies: , A. The location of the various "usesshould st rIVeo�`, r' avoid random isolated developments. (S.0) Bi Urbanization should prooeed in an inorementrel fashion u With the expanded perimeters reflecting a growth in population.S,O C Growth should` exppand orderly from urbahized centers to" avoid tax burdens in agricultural areas,. ($:12) �i Proposed. Land Ilse text Policies ' Ai Entodrage ahhok,,)� Ion to existing cities and existink districts: kkohbcefa�cilities �,t lilzl ion of sites served /b�, existing I�4ourage develoPjtnt in and around existing eomn'Whitles U:th public facit..i' ies (p►30)' t Planning Commission Page -4- Junb 20, 1979 3 t; 3. Housing Density Proposed Land Use Text,.` policies: J <; A. �therinaturalresidential ;to soil, elope find charactedensities characteristics-. (p 34,) B. Correlate resictantiai densities to availabil'it y t watdtl and sewage disposal and proximity to ,other �� �bli+c. farilities. (P.34) C. Relate residential densities to intensity and cQn#p*att' 7 I• , bilit of adjacent uses. (P.34)." D Balance residential densities with traffic=carrying ,. capacities of existing and proposed circulation on Plans,. P.34) p ( INDOMIAL DEVELOPMENT, Existing General Pian 'Text Policies . • .. ... is A. They should 'be operated to minimize external dkfects ., of traffic con noiseestioni g ,glare, air and water ; pollution, fire and'safety hazard$. j5.31) �,'U) A. Industrial development should occur on at 'least a ; secone►ary Arterial. C rh order that residential areas may be free from industrial traffic, industrial areas should be located• ,,..' with access provided only to major transporat on routes which .include major arterial truck, routes, Qkp,ressways, _ freeways, major railroad lines and,�' , ngo`i b-,e bodies of water. (5.31) . �,s; ustr al areas should bo located where they can did Add nuatdly served by necessary major utility lines', sueh as electric power stations and transmission 11ne84, trunk sawer'lines, truftR water lines, and trunk gas Proposed Land Use Text P611c"ies. : A. Promote the development of heiv industry in the county. Di Locate industry near major trans'port'ation facilities which carr► racy materials, finished Products and -commuting workers. (Piss) biroct Iisw industry to Idda ions adequately sarrred by major utilities and and j provide sufficient services •• utilities to meet future indu-str'ial needs, (P: 3s) 1 Planning Commission Page -5- June 20, 197' D. Promote the 'full utilization of existing industrial areas. b..' tncouvage the grouping of industri' 1 and heavy commer- a cial uses into integrated industrial parks,. (P.35) c CQr9PATIBftlty OF LAND.USE ;Proposed Land 'Use Text;, Po icier; ` A. Relate the intensityand variety of commercial uses to the market accessibility of each site. (P.35) B, Limit light commercial uses in planned industrial j areas. (P.36)Y C. Limit manufacturing and �tholesale activities in light commercial areas. (P.36) D. Limit residential uses in industrial and commercial areas. (p.36) BO Encourage the separation of heavy industrial and resi= dential area, with other uses, natural barriers or public facilities. The determination of appropriate l-. 4hd use on the 'General ap should involve the interpretation and use of these policies in combination with an evaluation o the ''"site designation criteri-T which appears for each land use category in the new text. T.,',Ais' ` criteria represents the preferred site characteristics of each category and serves as a basic guideline";for .judging the suitable location of diet category. Therefore, in your deliberations re, girding land use 'in South Chico, r would encourage the Commission to review the provisions of each category, found on pages 41-iS4,i Also contained within the provisions of these categories are -' Otonin'g Factors" which should be considered in the evaluation of consistent zoning and in the choice of the most appropriate zoning classification. , / 1r r Ince Departmiii 1, n�n.lt M®morandum M Planning Commission ffROM, Planning Staff' " 3 sumilicts South Chico, Rezone r pkTEs iiihe 20,, 1919 r. r; Two Basic elements are involved .in eonsideration of a aossih le rezoning; of the South Chico Area. 'these two $dements re:• "Present Factors" and "Near Future Proposals"'for land„use: }: PRESENTFACTORS; Soil tyres and, distribution, Lot snits approved'tithir past ; Land Use,year �: ie 1T� Zoning Currant ttdffcounts (A h. General Plan Designation Current taxing districts Water table and water availability within area Drainage Spheres of Influence Agricultural Contracts Fire Sheriff” �R inf ormat ion School - information NSAR�FUTURE FACTORS:_ _ q. Proposed Subdivis ?n.s proposed Sewer Plan N A n, ars impro ProPosed Roadway �tits PRESENT _ FACTORS A. Soil Typos and Distribution; There are seven distinct and identifiable soils in the sibaect area. 1 Viria Loam -Approximately 35 of the area is covered with This rich brown soil retains moistufeS, ana Loam top soil. is ',",nd is t.tell adapted to irrigation easilydeortivated, 21 Vina Fine, Sandy Loam - This'soil is found to the eastern area o subject property �- usually along Butte Greek near Oroville Chico Nichway; This,brolm to, rich brown soil is 2` to 3' deep, retains wAter fairly well (not at well as Vina i,oamj , It is considered d6tparritile to the production leval and value (if Vina toaThi � ",•z 3 Vina.Stoir� Loam The only, area where this soil occitrs is it Mi ce tr��ri1rt o t the subject oropert'y and- 3s not ektensive 10" to 20" cteepi retains Moisture rather lioiirly, , not considered valixable crop land, contrato Bina. Loam. ,i mood Planning. Commission " Page -2- June 260 1979 4. Nord Loam - This occurs in one area of Approximately10 acres, approximately 1/3 mile southeast of. He antLin g Lane near west side ,of Midway. It is re is;h brown wi�h�sandyl woll,,;and texture, retains moisture fairly is ver as to cultivate, Considered a valuable agIT'icultural soil. S. Redding Clay Loam -,.Small area of "subject property is near center of area. It ;is ;1S) to 20" deep,. retal tter fairly well, easy tocultivate. Considered averWe cropsoil, M1 6i Corning Gravelly SAndX Loam - Small coverage in southdrn part o su yect area along Oros?311e Chico Highway. 1Q" to .g p g gravel.. usPd-,mai 20" dee with hi h percentage of my for 1 pasture land. r 7. Tailin ss - Coverage in far eastern section of subject area. ,This :soil made by deposits from dredging. Ro cultivation ' possible: B. -Current Land Use: Northwest -section of subject area has a mix's ture of small lot residentilAl along Skyway Avenue and Cessna Avenue Cemetety on the southwest 'coiner of i#egan Lane to rid:vay - Contractors $ Electricians eiffice-.across Midway from Speedway,,. Entler, and Oro r9lle, Ci►'!'co Highway: The center area is occupied by a Little League Baseball field, eastern sideof Highway 90 is dominate d by U.S. Plant Introduction Facility and Neod ighborho Church, The remainder is Orchard and Field Crop, and irrigated I asture. C. Current Zoning: A-2 D. Current General Plan: Northern portion is de§ignated Industrial, southern portion is Low ;Density Residential, western ls'% 15 ,Orchard and Field. Crop: ti Water T,Ale C, Availability: Perched wate'i' comes close to the surface in maliy ateasi The domestic water table begins between "r 20' and 40' with most residential wells at about 1001. Agricult- ural, -wells are much deeper at 400; to 600' which produce"high ' at66tits of water, Most residential wells produce Approxiviately 20 gallons a minute, The Improvement Standards, for SUbdiVisibn ( riii� nance allows some wells to pump 1 1/2 gallons a minute, F. Dra,xlage: The South Chico area has no drainage district, The on3y'natUtal drainage"facility is Butte Creek, To drain .tunof£ %rito Butte Creek requires gravity flow or a pump. Properties which mast pump are also stabj,ect to flooding if butte Creek overflows, �iRiMS.fl'��i'd�4..Y:4 hhA±.s"+Y4�1?Zt4N�,dnWal:i:..,,J.."N`:'iK ht• -:'X,"• M.. ._.,. ''�•will ` fii • r 1 nye, , .� j1 yy Planning Commission ,. '..; N ri page ' J++ne 20,,, 1979. G: Agricultural Contracts: The subject area contains two Land Conservation Contracts: AP's 40-02-39 -(Dixon) and 4,0-02-116 '(Midway 'Orchards) both are orchard contracts covering 150 acre . Contracts date from February 1972 for Dixon,,and Febrrxary, 197x" . t.. for, Midway' Orchards• v. • x y t H. Lot Splits within past 2 years. There hive been 5 approved, lot splits since July, 1; 1977 and an additional: one is pending. w These, in total; cover approximately 55 acres creating parcels yf from 11.24 acres to 0.68 acres. These smaller parcels were ,V;;.0 created along Oroville-Chico Highways , :.. j h�- t; JR E I. Current Traffic Counts; The largest current dally traffic in this area (other than 99E) is ou Midway where 'the Average Baily xl ' Traffic (ADT) varies from 9,680 noar Park Avenwj, to50350 next to the proposed I'Greentree SubdiV'ision", to 4,000 just south ' of Oroville-Chico Highway. (Estimates show an increase .o£ 1,120 ADT if f'Greentree" is approved,) J. Current Taxing Districts: The subject area,contains the following . taxing distracts: i Butte Community College j . Butte MosquitoSchool Abatement Chico Area. Recreational D,,stract Durham Mosquito Abatement , yu Maintenance Area i5 Zone 2+`^ Maintenance Area M:S Zone 3 Ki Spheres of Influence: Thv city of Chico sphere of influence as identified b LAFCo) include a relativel small ( y y area in the northern section of this area. The northwestern corner of Hegar Lane and Midway is with -in the Primary Sphere as is the western r portion tho area between Morrow Lane and theG.`Southern :Pacific , .' ,`of Rail;road. The residential develop'tnent along Cessna Avenue and t .Skyj,ray Avenue is within the Secondary Sphere of Influence: L: Fire be arttinent. area No data is availao1ethe�Fa�irsStx�eet .� the number of reported Rdspomses to fir regarding p Staes generally require 2 to 4 minutes from _ tion ,, ` or. Durham Stat ion : 'b `v -t area is within the` Chico Un tit -i School„ Schools. The . fit . .0 ,� District: Students attend ChicoHigh School; Chico JiiAtor thigh School and Chapman School and Parkview School. �1•. .. L ... .....-.... - _'", c,1g:'*r'k=P#i9^,�!*ki{N:'!k 4yV`3'}'a..N14+41iiMµd�53'ei'�f"tf .�!S"�{"'a'ya...'4. t ' sPlanning Commission: ` c4 V4.`. Page k' June 20, 1979;,y le. California , N. Water Service: Yater Service area follows Comanche { 4 Creek to the extension of Bruce 'Street to Morrow Lane westerly to the Southern Pacific Railroad.,i pr f I id NEAR FUTURE FACTORS , A. Proroseda8ub�od visions:' Midway Orchards is proposing a 201 lat: 4p ; subdivision on 110 acres, called "Greentree Eststes" ocated on the east side o£�Midway, approximatelallforntaitwent south sub y j 1� Jayred and Towne have received approv Y, f division on the south side of Entler called "Southgate Acres'+: •C4S 'd, '. {i+ r � -.v '� .e f n FT.S .t � •'(,I �1" �,7� i���+ 1- B. Proposed 'Sewer Plai: Butte Creek Estates is proposing a °Sanitar�l; Sewer System for areas along Highway 99. This would connect f with the, City of Chico. The project would provide 2.7 million „R `gallons per day of" sewage when fully developed,, including re r sidential and industrial users Construction would be financed by property owners and Butte County at a 35% to 65% shared rate. operation and maintenance would be conducted through a'proposed County Service Area ' ;•' (contracting done with the City of Chico) LAFCo has not•been »e proposed County Service Area. approached on th C.' Proposed Reclamation Plan: Butte Creek Rock,,Corp. is currently t proposing a reclamation plan along the western portion of,Highway 99 north of Butte Creek Estates. The estimated Ufa of the P is 10 to 2U years removingg aggregate for crushing. This area includeSAA ,orc4arde which••wou,ld-be excluded., r This is labelled "bre•a 4" of tr,�ir plan.- from�ahe, pro�;ectGu: (Information_ on total torage ,atemoval :for this area is not curxen-' ly;available) ~ Y` totint ns And Cal D. Proposed, Roadway imps°prmimtroveman �,, orchanges withinatheasubnot 4 currently planning m j p ject area The closest major work will occur early In the 1980+s 'on,Lott Rohcl Which is south of this area. Unspecified plans from + Cal Trans provides for an overpass at Peterson Tractor to a Frontage Road along the western side of Highway 99 to Neal Road. This does not appear to be a "near ft►turei+ project. 4 y, r ,y .. is , BUTTE COUNTYPLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - June - 20, 1979 „ B. STUDY. SESSION , South Chico Area - To consider planning policiea and future laird uses for the alrea generally, described, as located south of Skyway and Humbug' Road, eait of"Bruce 4 'mile south ofrand parallel toth of a line cOroviix iatedlChicotH ghwzj► and a west of Butte Creek. (79.99) 79-82-2-489 Dors. Blair turned this portion of the meeting over to Steve. Smith who will be working on "this,praject, Using large exhibit maps, Mr. Smith pointed out the Study Area, the ` Orsed Butte Creek Service Area, Bette Creek -Rock Company's proposal 'ion Plan, and propert3.es" a.n the 'Williamson Act. %t t{y!=� M4+ sited a memo, "South Chico Rezone+',elated June 20, detailing the t d, b ��. t ob;,,mants involved in corisidoration of this rezoning which are. ''Presents°��� �, `,o ; o . ,�r1,"Near Future Factors`': He also called the a'i:tentiCiyn f.' mnissioners to a me0dranduin from Kyle But.terwick, "General ,'v" an cvj siderations and po�:xcies regard Ing Land Use in South; Chien," whidh, had been presented earltr in the evening together with the above v f,-Atioried vf-tp.randum Aster a short discussion this matter was".rig; tinui W, . '� Apgust8r in view (cif C&MvIissioner Dennett's announcement that it,zii' not bo, 'a *as1b16 him 'to attend the meetings of July 11, Ju i -d', ,.end Aug;vx. � .�;. !a Y y W "' t June 25e 1979 Butte County Planning C'lematissior Cot7lk5it`T Center Driver ; Ore villo, CA. 95965 Asan Conmla�onero� c ' The mem?I of 'Preserve Agricultural Land .hxvi6 ' drawn up , our reco=Ohdatloftsic;for appropriate zoniAg In the mouth Chiao area. We feel that the zoning We ,propoes will beet help to preserve the fame In tho area and ntM be oohalstant with than majority Of ex - sting parcelao We feel that (if approsed) Would provide an effed.tive buffer between large I blooke of farm ground and those areae to the north with 'a `! highor density of reeidftoep our primary oonoern is to protect aemuch of the 51 farts grouted In this area as pos etble. We f6 61that t ( any, paroelet zoned smaller than iehat we propoea 'could seriously jeopardize the farmers ability to etr.3egt atel ► care fox hie land. va Aincetie�.y �;. Y.e'ri,n V re�nibl e cies-dha,ixmion/Pre mervo MAdultura] Land } 7rC'1w �y. I't i 7Ero Obio N CAW: r. ; UN 11 tl 10 s E Inter De artnn®nt®1-,M®morandum p Plannine; commis Sion, To: FROM: STeveS� th Planning Aepti. E: suaaecs:.Soutli Chic© OATEt 'x/16/79 � '• intended to Tile„ maps showing pending algid appscved projects ars, ra ardisg,the:5outh assist ou in dotermining tho Proper action 1 Chico ara.a. ��Y Planning Offic®,, ,ur des �e to revie�a an project 3 the you Te additional information, free to cantact mo. 4U, ssltid y 'a Inter -W pactment®I Memorandum "— To' Y Cmunsel P&A 14ack3toi rlaora: . �ottyeBlah, bireE,tor of 'Planning ' aun�tcTx "' � Planning Co mmissioi Meating o£ August 8, 19V owrat1$�9 ;.? , "Au sit 7 t, 8u •' As result of d6hciarns expres.jed by membets� ofthe Plan Commis 'ion 110 Mtou,,id requOiki that CAunsel sot Mitch the Cepa "sii* at their- *eeting;,oxi AugU$t 8. At that time the dam*ission, viii "s be serving as a ,committee to Consider the zoning�xgpojal for. `'the South thieo Area. ' :, 4 I r 'njgTK..=w. BUTTES COUNTY PLAAINiINt `t' MI 510N I MINUTES _ .Augus t 8' r `., n A. STUDY S}'S411�' W,, Co�1:taniaeci From Jona 20, 1979 h 'Ca consider planning Poli�ios anti, South C ;l11.�i O'tis for the area g moral y described as.,,-, future, 1�, �W , .,. ROI least of �Hruc ,. andumbug n located,�;�a tt►�r, - _ S y�ray dd LAne_F to � th off, ,a linellCQa�ravillr�Chi toe iyi phi ay a179»99) , J Si011t}"p an(j.�j'+'�.'ul8 1 r. twe s t'wry 44 ut reek. „, So,8�.1-366 r _ �t �'� `.��rMrs•_Blar ex d- t this hot Steve advc.:Lxsed public hearing. Knd, 1 ' -'turned the meet 1r.g. rv,.�r to Stev Smith. r 'sr,, d a, ,composite ®dpsewer� Stix ctuband the recently 4 M' and the area on wht oh, h r,roved in .t}t� sired, the propos. a Ractamation, P tan ,}ids recently been fCi�d° o�`�ChicosC-eneraI Planm� theVih�.ch, e outlined the G,k'xent Intexin► Zone, the Y perimeter of Pirie "A" surrounding Durham, a zoning prOposa.] by the Preserve A racul>rural nand'! group and two blank maps whx�:h could be used by the g,.. Commission te./de•velap their own proposal. ' d have I N ''d In response t'sa'r `a `u'�stion: Mr. Nelson commented that tgl'aireracar11- Ended to be studxe to dej,:ermine if an BIR is needed. Mxs. an lax is t# prepkrod and that if the COmmis: sn felt an impact .sport thatrjr :, es+� one at 'this time, suggesting also that i is requ.lrecP `� hat th6y requ the o4ui3.ssi�., n could ask the board for financial hell) for the runort necessary. 1' � report could encompass both , t:he area It �w'as",det)fp neo` ghat one impact ,- d i1 touth' but that the areas i +tA. er study hnd A15Q the area t pro sent hearing purposes, ire area except fo t'arat�e pxot7ects for should be s� r omm3"ss cne.,� Lambert outlined a plan to have the entire Chairman Wheeler some industryal`"zoned to A-20 to preserve agriculturei felt tha+, there ;should be a buffer 'zone which could be ;maintained by A-5 oning•. After a le�zgthy t}scussi'on, duping which time rir. Smith was m dkirg an tion of the Commission, Commissioner. Lambert made' e�thibit m�}, at t�,� direr Exhibit A}ap "All as to a motion ` h t thy' pxoposaibe motioccePas'es as ded��b` OCom ;iss bher�lBse Bennett +. zon"ng anis , l'and, use Y ' 'pc�E , ert rlax and Gilbert• AYES; Commi;ss�.oners Ben ett, Iamb Ir`there �1QS5; inhai.rntiwn Wheeler who vote notnbeca�iseuTe'amlaSaintfthe pxa�lct.'' should die a buffer ion, A$5SNl iso One i' Motloili carr ori. Y t. comm �sianer Lan�best, then m dea smAofopt tttam bees udaeaone}ktof HO motion proposal`s to ,Oro Chico Etighw Y_. Wa` secNided by'CQiatri issioner Be1►►�ott • Avon 7 _ R APPLIf�ATION POR VARIANCE or ZONING r Bwtta County Planning Commission File No. _ 80-26B > a�Trp Data .filled Hearing dale AR Action by Plo eningoinmis;lou Action 6Y.-Board of Supervisors 'ORtESEN,T I AZ InterimA :' elsor Map Boo{.'. =. Page No....--� Parce),Ne R, :. no :to. A. i0 A= Pi- C-2 M-1 M-2 ��.� r :, Q, 4 , 01 A(PPUCANT'S NAME.,Butte County Planning Commissa plONE: SU-4601 , 7 �Coun yCenter Drive, .Orovzl,le, Ca. 988065: Ab6R' ES, ....� . STATUS OF APPLICANT'S INTEREST iN PROPERTY; planning Agency 6w, S NAIVE Various a. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: Approx.1600 ac; that A"tea south Of Mottow,-east o� Bruce mane; north o£ Southern property, lines along Orov311e Child Highway; west of gatto Creek. "• EXPLAIN; PULL.v i ASO FOR APPLICATION; The above y/unddle1gno •ob�correct:tafomenti 6t6cerfifiod b the y L S Bna.uro of npplh t 1i01'!rt Pledoe submit hoitwith a check or mohi►y order to the amaow irhown 6e6t paysaie to Govilty of Butte; also a i, detailed pini",plart i6wing fhe location of ekli lnq and proposed sfructures,on your'propsifyand an the adf hcant 006pettles, r. Reeelpt Nti. BU1TE COUNTY , C IMMING COMMI BUATE _ `oSION ./ APPLZCATiON FOR GMTEI 'PLO AMENDMEN'V V. and/or ZONING „ Y , JNG: - Interim �l }Li�w Y G� PLAN LA fTh USE E7 E1 T DESIGNATxOIi f density, residential,, ....itxiF�"�' p �rarChard. �'"field cro14 s indL 20, A=.R, �'�_(, C-2, NIH M %211 and/or ` �R41'SFn, r�ON�.NG: j^. r .. — "Mr.`" 'i C►xchard Fief Oho = iil PRl1X'C3SED GENERAL PLAN WD,E, DJMIGNA � x _ r Rux tial, Corunexca.al a'nd Pi ib is al Residen rt_.,.s,���.�......� .. k, i 1 nn :i:� Commissi'ri SONE: 5S �i�„d1,.,_. APPLICANT' S NAME: R„t± C'di. % rf)tintv_ri`ja-�yr7.]'�lyer OVi11 i .iROPERT.n,A�enoYgTkTUS OF APPLI�WTT'S INtER2S'1'i.. s l� i RKNE NAME PROPER.M.iEGATi DES;R PCTON OF -See attached, mau.s_.,.... �.. ..... E�tPLAIi�X :ET71rLY Rr1A ON ''QR APPL.l'OATJOT1+i _ o preserve a=`tc� i tuT6, an�tb .k it �b ` t�G �.. —5= - """'""'�'” ixfi' a e .1 onz s'tencv with. tete General plan. anc iohin Th,6 above statemori„8 are cLttiri ad bbd' 4 t 1 yy ��Ct� C rr �F atti .t herctv�-.fin c et; or uinney b:rdex; r n o amt�Un ; alit��rn ` -p. bv�,, ; payab!6 bo t; Rt. 3 Sox 32 P' China, CA• 95926' Aug. 8, 1 97.9 }( u futvi-county Planning Comcjisslon 8 OcUntT Center_ Dr, 1 oro+�rile p CA. 95965 ., ;-` CammAeionexey .;Dirs�' As a representative of Preserve Agriotatural Und `L Would like to make some final comments on the south Chioo-Durham.kM& xoning i After confering With other -. members of the group and other farmersin the area We , have some revised reoomm6hdatons rt Io out belie ' that Butte Countyhas a tremendous ou Opportunity to protest Agriogltural grnd due to the vast quantities of marginal land bordering all of the iimaor Population 'aenters,. With this in mind we see no readon how any further development into our s8- r usoevel land. We would like to see the south CYhloo-Durham area zoned in suoh a stay that it, Will be clear to everyone that this ground Is, ;'for rood production, ano other purpose. We feel that it will teks a blnal: anket zoning Of A-20 to.aahie*0 this purpose. We want develaperO to underst and that. tutte CouhtYy f&%'m ground is totally off limits for residential oonetruatiane We think that a (zoning of Ae-20 will best accomplish this. In alosing we would like to thank the planning� oommission for the time and oonorn they have shown this 'maces. We espaolall� appxeai 6,.e the evening session that was hold in, Chioo. Also We Mould like to oommend the efforts of staff member Steve Bath who of his time to meet with the residents St ova farea-6 8inoarely yours kovin J-4 Gamble .,., TPA jy 'i a 1 17 i� y M! �f�';e /��1 � iii f , • �/ x R i:. _ i p r " C {'. :.. • " x,i-� s t�N yam' ,�,. w , x r.. , t k •, r� f+t A no! profit ccrporation dedicated to cnrefuM planning dar Qroi))tithY�" ,, '[ a• - t, Y.7`J+ lnf�Nlf r /� ii r +'. .O. @ox66Xr,ta96g27w `=1,1 wj 4'0��1a��1'rj_�jreT� r:.� `,9*�; + "F'p.. v d 'C .7�JJ/*`'�,{}�'r■r�,,!! { "rs,v #! .`� 1f "1� �•i�'�ug u8"1+ 14 �•i+��%^l °x'�••Itu?� �ti i b� , r e Ms3 ^7. F ''7t "' } M , 1 : , M U .. ` rip �y T., `~ �� 1'v�a".•� e 1 :� fy1 .♦ i�a.l' , *�'•��3,'n�wa,� �. � � f.:.sA !t ir..1 r 1 1 ' t i� st�I�"'b+{l�,lu i' P,� i�:,t�l rr�tF 4.iro+ 1 1'�1. i ,.� i 'x t t }' .�` �e>:il ` �F'Y� " ,• { w�, { ' +��� `t }a «, r+�,I`'i1t✓Ki , 4j y,��r �'t}� IIT :�yr: A K }a{l.�p ti �s wat , u + , bi `-%��N' �1 # +;e;,, �srtrti Kr J4tr,«fi p,e `},' ,xYSRu v453Yh"tisdn; 1''�t+A3 1 y� i'da«�• � 1"+ ��, "� + ...,, lit 1,�,�^� , Y•r °�� �» W Silk '�7!!� � rty�YV7 �, "'1} s{•r "'i: Butte 'County Pjanning'dommission Drive i Countg Centr a04 tj-,I-r�ilil CirovilleL CT":` 95465 b` 1 b� Dear Commissioners: ,On behalf' of the membership of Chico 2600 we wish ` to ear�ress our appreciation for. your courage ani f,oresiglit' deciding to go to hearings On A-20 zoning proposal for"the entire agricultural, area south of Chico. It is clear that you have the strong backing of -the ` nutte County agricultural community in this actiipn. We also, i of agricultural ]Land protection.This is certainly -a major 1 know that the communities of Chico and Durham are Ve su ortivn first step in protecting the agricultural economic base of b1 ` this county with proper zoning. k Sincerely yours f 3 L 1 0 C91CO 200 ,x H . �1� i 4g.,� e eganli ��•a. P1�1�e �q� ���,p{1C,�'1 LUVAAS � * mairan o• - A + ',Milll.r kl.; rli rlf � "1 IZ1��} +f 1�Cn,'t11�/�,. n 1 M 1 r1•r 1019 U" • f �, f 4� Inter D®pd4mlontn, 1 Memorandum ' toy Bettye Blah Pnoml Steve Smith, SUIPJEcrs South• Ch�� Rezone Clarification -v bAtal August 14, I`979 _ a The following items deserve further clarification regarding } the recent South Chico rezone proposal: 1. The Butte Creek Rock property on the east,sid�oy, Of Skyrv�cy ' was overlooked in.the proposal: Butte Creek` 6:k Co. has. A Current proposal for '-rezoning,to "M-2" (Heavy Industrial) '(PI and "PA -v anhed Area -Cluster) for this parcel (see map , i 2 The Glen Oaks Cemotary would not be able to-exgand undbr the "A-20" (Agricultural - 20 acre parcels) designation. I suggest "A-5" (Agricultuxai -, 5 acre pareels,)" or !tCa2" (General Commercial) to current property lines, It the cemetary owners wish, -to purchase more land, they, can re - ,.e nest a Idtger are& to be,rezoned during public hearings. (see map). � 3. The "same problem is ofidUantered by the Little League Assoc ciation<, Jim Glander suggests a new zone which alloWs qqutasi public uses exclusively �'Q-P". They are negogiating a k nine (0) additional acres surrounding the current ball field: ., 4. Prank !Vorad Sheet Metal Shop appears to be in full operation on Megan Lano near Cessna Avenue (See map)', -, ti r F y� r y IA 21 0 Fl R;. yy yY t 1 „ 4,7TTE COUNTY PLANKING, OOI�I S S I ON : �s NiICiTESAugust� LS',19� - staff wis, iiat�rixct�ac� to make the Fallowing cnrr�ctign to the minyt'�s of Aug, aat '8 . - ` � "lo the Jmotion regarding' South 'C co Area Pa e fit'_ pact 6 Para r► the folidwin : ".and that g .. an RnN ronmentai Im 'kep©rt be pre p., areddd } .1 } 1y 1i it •': 1 LI. I ,r .. • `fbki 'a. v„1e M+a �..euilYLtit§'di +.4:- . .._.. ., r-i: :■ n .a F « j Receipt �E APPENDIX E Date Filed, Environmental Informatibn Form FSE (To be completed by applicant), 1 GENERAL INFORMATION w 1., Name and address of developer or project sponsor: tMt COONTY PLANNING COMiI I SSION -r LY Address of project'.. roja t'. AIIfo 4S Assessor's Block and Lot NumSer 39-n6 39-44; X40-02; 4 03;4U f 40-11; 4n-Ag (nn}2TIONS OF THE PPFCUDINCI) 3. Name, address, and telephone number of person to 'be contacted concerning this pzo j ec;t ; STBVF S'lYTf! .- -. PLANNI?ti,^� ` YP Y 1� (i,e: rszonin subdivisiotl) T .e o£ , ro. ect: L st and describe-any other related permits aniother public -,pprovAls r required for thia project, including those required by,. cit , regional, state'knd federal agencies: � CPR COM M"'I'S f Existing, zoning district: A-2 l"Nr;�M (�•5 .j roposez use rf sit'e: AGRIMIT.TITRAL A"1n Ln►' DV�sTTY RESIl1�NTYh1a . . 7. P _ PROJECT DESCRIPTION COMERCIAL; INDUSTRIAto PUBLIC, MEDIUM LONi nENSz' `--S- 841te site. ArPR0XI`IATFLY '1606 acres. 9, Squm're footage of building(s), 10. Nuin6r of floors of constrttct�.ari': N/. 11.. Atnowat of ofd`-street parking provided. 12, Attach site development plan And location map, Aerial photos ,and '`W As sossor s Parcel, f4appages ages stay be re aired in some 'cases 13. Proposed schodulittf,, 14: Associated projects. 15 Anticipated ihtroindntal developmonC. II/A r Appendit r Page 1 of 3 ,_., Anneric�i� ,t+ � n�ttre 2 ni A1'i'ENDIX E +. t�. ',. 16. If residential, ,include the number of units, schedule. of Un`�:t sizes, and type of"househald oize;, expected:. 1 17. if commer%ial/, - :ndidate 'the type, whether neighborhood, city'<- or regionally orient,,�-d, %quare footage of sales area, and loaditRg , facilitie:4. ,it -�,�� N/X '1$. If 'industrial indicate type, estimated employment -per, shift -:, and loading ••faciliftess .. _ 19. If institutional, indicate the major function, estiinated , employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loadia facilitios, and coman��n ity benefits Go be &,loved from hewprafect. Kf.A ; ro ect nvo It the involves a=variance, conditional use or ic eonitq� applcation,ps6ate this :and indicate cleArly why the application ite required, GENERAL PLAN CftANGE TO REFLECT CURRENT LAND US k;> REZONE TO � { MEET CONSISTANd� REQUIREMENT OF GENERAL PLAN: � Are .,the following items ��applicabl'e to the project or its effects'! ° Discuss below all i'temsi(ichecked yes (attach additional sheets Iii �a necessary) YES"NO. X 21 G111ange �i existing features of any beaches, lAkes =; or'hilis, or`'sub�stantial alteration of ground contourg. � 22 Significant change in scenic views or vistas 'fr tit' 1 � P o existin'..residential aireas'or ublic lands orroad s . ' 1 X_ 23. Significantly chari?,e pattern, scale or character tn:f s general area of project. 24, Significant amounts of solid waste or litter. , 2$ Change in dust, ash, sir;eke , fumes or odors :Ln vicinity: f +;` 26 Significant change in lake, stream or ground. water' gatternsor quantity, or a1terat3on of existing drainage ' 27, Substantival change in existing noise or vibrnttor► levels in the vicinity, 26: %Site on .fillet% lr !d ,or, on slope of 30 percent or more, Use or di§posal of potent ally hazardous Materials . such as Coxic st,bst antes, fl..ammables or explosives. Ic, ;i ,_., Anneric�i� ,t+ � n�ttre 2 ni ' /"� Vis ;,....y� 1`'-•,. i� , .; 3v. Substantial change in demand for municipAl 86 '1 `police, fire, water, sewage, etc.). 31. Substantially increase fossil fuel consumption (electricity, oil# natural gas, etc.): i 32, aflp ojnahip to part of ii,�IairOtr project. or ;saerloes �.-r' i. ENVIRONI&NTAL SETTING X331. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, n�61uding information on topography, soil stability, V ants and an��nals;, and anyculttiaral, historical or scenic aspocts.(3 Describe ani exis. f ng structures on i :�e site, and the us of the seructtivis SEDC E '?t ON 'SC.ItTT1irATT A"41) C??Ti NTREE S►f�lil M"()NS (see attachment), 34. Describe the surrounding properties, -ineludihel information on plants,,and animals and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. + indicate the type of land use (residential., commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one-family, aQartment houses, ehope, depatt�vnt stores, etc., and scale of development (height, frontage, set back,, `. rear yard, etc. SV-,P ETR ON SOVTWIATE Amn rRUNTRVV Sit1 bIVISTONS see: attachment)) CERTIFICATION% I herek�y omrtify that the statementaa furniished ) �{ above'anc�'ii n the attached exhibits presen4, the data and infbi-nation, ; required For this initial evaluation to the best of mp ability, an that the facts, statements, and infornlation p"resented are true. and correct to the best, of my knowledge and bel cf. Date _ VST 30 1�970 For ` Appandyk E W 'pa g"t 3 -OZ 3 , 41 1 a LANN INQ;F,,��q�jTMENTS INTljQ, IEW REclUE5T To., :Bob.Paulus- Diu. of Forestry 'REQUEST; mjW9 ki AQP No.. Pana pESCFfIPTION aF PRAJEOI. GancrAl 1 —,� bange - dram Low 'non: itesi. tiu CrGharl,,,, i , z ,Eigla + + 1. e; ` ., t a � �------- LOCA7I0Sce man AoPLICANT<a' y' 0, 1 nning d�mtn ADDREEs: 0LANNINCWM.PAI$tIOI4 ACTION,nNEDULEa ¢iE1'UP,,N DATE IBkQt1E91 ED AW Q�►°I'E1`DIS 'FlZ6UTEDt 6u I�,Co. f jonnfnflComm, j•,}�i+ ��,,jjT j 3 A TAi.►Idt�lE I �J Copy of ap i cstion i plot pl n r.� COliAMENTS: M PLANNING I-EPAHTNAi~fU j?'f aRDepArITMgNT' L RR J.EW.AEOU • public WorLs - ,john Mcifc o n s a OuEST;hmjlew & �ammant .,8 0 �., RSCRIkTION OF PROfCT; GenerolF1�n tYan.."© front Lot. Den,. Arrr_;S"' t0„ * C? : , Field CxopS. Dural Desi,.. Commercial r iLOATION;So attched.,map�. � r AC'Pnutte County Planning Cammi�sion -fob 9`Outhyito ADDRESS;' , OWNER PLANNING OOMMISSION ACTION/SCHEDULEp RtTURN DATE REQUESTED: ASAP DATE piSTRI$U TEp: Bottd Ca: Oohf my Comrro ; ATTACHPIIENTS; Copy of.eppiceLlQn_& plot plan, ? �` RETURIVE D:-• .� %� C1io+�illoi'elilornle 'COMMENTS; �. l /P r” !J )� i,, ,il .:L� 1� L� ,!� r.1:1i' f�%'? 5"', , ;LY —. r� :�1•sy,l7 . , 1 1 1 y. i yA.. .._.... .. _. y... i� . ,... ......, ._. K.. ffi)'(Il nter- par m ental M,smorandum, o _ tot Earl. Nelsonvronmental-Revla" a { ,;! rpoM� ( Bettye.Blair, Dirootor of Manning _ � ruaJECri r Smth Chico Study Area - Rezone ' j 60i! September 20, 19;79 �r '.Phe Planning• 'Commnission on, Au'�,us� $ � 1979 directed staff to �;. initiate hearing for'the "South. C3hico Stud �r Area's aad reque;eted that an impact reportbe prepared for, the ''pro f eot. Should you need adddit ona11 'funds��for e pyo�e' I c y wi11 asl� the , � oard. � �� B o , .. � lji I Hwy � , J/ :dt lei `1 Lex.. �r' AANNING DEPARtMENT'S INTERDEPARTiVIENTA�L REVIEW AEGUEST To:L Lynn Vanhart - Bnvironinental Health Y RtOUEST 931Ci nmst t AP NO,, ; 80-268 DESCRIPTION OE`PROJECT:Re_ zone fr6m A-2 0 Interim A -S to.. "-20r A-Rr'` M -•I-, 8 'psi 2�., ;; �.- -1•J „ v r �f° OCA?"ION'� of Morrow E of Bruce L .� a Ln.,.N M of Southern ;i nro ert :lanes aloe OrdVille Chico HWy, W of Butte Creel v °SFr �u ba ,c AP,RLII:AN7: BCPC. -South Chico ADDFIESS y County Center Dr., Oroyille, Ga. 9596S ,.. OWNR:� Various *, 7LANNIN6 COMMISSION ACTION SCHEDULEC,_,'. f7V REi dRN DATE,REQUESTED: ASAP cul{o Co.Flannin! n m DATE DISTRIBUTED: _ ] l/6/79 C�� ( :. �� � i3iJttalCc�. lxv, tf C`nv. F;o6lifi s CTTACHMWS, Copy of app�icatidn i plotMilan, OroYiilacaiitpt�iq NO'K . RETURNED: / � - / 0 % Orovllle�'Ca�ifornh ' COMMENTS, b 4 3 c r7 e tj TO RA zerlrxs ,ds P�emd s L uis . .S 40 i r , i . 1 1 ' ,.. i:.. ... _... .:'.. 1. • I:7 i , , yy it PLANNING DEP\RT ENi'S INTERDEPARTMENTAL REVI'E�W REQUESS Bob Paulus -'Div. of Forestry RE't1UEST: `�mrlsv� & Re,mm�n ; AP N0.:. 8'0 - 2 6$: Sh bESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Rezone from A-2 - 4 Intsrini A-`5 to A-2Q, A-R, _ PI-Q, r _ M-1,_ P,_M-2 �.. S of Morroty Ef Bruce Ln. LOCATION:, , N of southern property linos along F; Oraville Chaco. Hwy,, <<' of Butte Creek - F' Y APNUC ANT: BCC "-. South Chico yj p AD.pRESSi 7 .Count_ Y Center. Dr . , ..Qroville , Ca . 95965 �. OWNER: PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION SCHEDULED ,;. Iii.. 1�' 'nnin RETURN DATE REQUESTED•, ASAP Coal",, °�°o'�"" 9 •,� {IU' DATE DISTRIBUTED: 11/6/7914 EJC I V E ATTACHMENTS: Capy,of�;�piiaation & plotpian. RD D NW`?1979Ij ;. TU NEb: pEpARrM�Nr OF Forlrsrr�Y` 3 _, � � co(mtN`rs:., � . '° �' � BUrrC COUNTY ' s � y � f _ rl I i i41 1 -- --___: — •.k,*„ .e .., ., ...-: .. ., .. is Y.M A�'¢'1� PLANNING DEPARTMENT'S INTEADEPARTMENTAL'REVIEW 0.6 ��sT TO: John Merndonsa rr» P.uri'ic h',or.ks REQUEST'' Aeview & Comment APN&. >•,,_ 80-26 (various I DESGRIPTION:OF PROJECT —,zone–from A-2 P 7.47itsrim A-5 to kwU' ; A -R; _P --Q, .n 417 M T ' - T N FP ►RTMENTAGIREV-1EW`A'9QU " Y � U y� . � (ahn n "Comm . rV�Tohn "Hooxd . i1 F1 ied _14 RFoutsT <Fttlyiltw$: 111' gti' k t',:' a R AP'N©� + DESCRIPTYONO.E PRO CTO t� oinp #r'sat z= tY X.ntaraita S 't A-2U�c "'` � 9 p w of nn' • 1' 77777 ' LOLAiIONs' 'S,o'fr 0t,tow� ^S .aid Bx�i,co. Ln�,, l�`,o ,x'a has�n xp oxtjr (1 �ly 313 t Cii305�; of k 'Y a. APPLICANT l3CCg�tii C3co t �'. ;ni �Lrtia .. AbbRE53f 7 County Cantor Driyol, Otbv ll�n, Ca. 059,0`S ., , �OWN�R 9opts ca141 t r ✓!� 2� n h7 PLANNING :;OMM3ISSR AarloN'SCHEt ULEU'" RE:'CI;RN bA�TC RWU.EStt'D. ASAP 7 DATE DiSTRi�$lITEM'il%600 AT1'ACl�IVIENT$i Copy of application i plot pl$li, RETURNEnE! r y 4141 y. , 11 ' �w V1 c� ,� f Y . Mww�YYA,Wr�+r , n - may__ :II 1 ,� e "�' ,. "gyp a �� t� k•`'� r :..^ { ')��W� f:Ya* �� *'fl.. Inter"-Departmental Memv'tAuna Tor Bettye Blair, Planning Direct 6r, �a M Earl A. Neisi.n, Environmental Reviow Directoi tr C i SUGjFcr. EIR Preparation Schedulin for 0 n g Of Perknge fr North'Chico Rezone, So7,1th Chico Rezone and'Biggsrs, +n1?an�ceA, rea Eek r E k� i DAM DeCr3mber 197. 1979 r 8 aI As I indicated to you earlier today, _scheduling of. ElR' preparation;' w �rfor ',he .above-listed projects is anticipat6d to be as follows: ����i; �P » p'" Parking• Ordinance : ECR draft is ready to be linalizedA ' We { �a, 0 --an-Zczpa ethe project will+,be ready to request scheduling x within a week. > North Chico Rezone: Revisions to thepi re�viousl iR raft are neces;�a to reflect'chares., in heepare�� rezone y ` propdbal and to updatetraffic statistics, etc,. Draft EIR w y, will be ;ready to` circulate gor eomments before 'late-'anuary. South ClziooRezone/General Plan Amendment: FIR draft can, be t for comments. stain-house prior to March l5 „ them ca,rcu:ate completed ydA Grid.ley.�Diggs Rezone azi_a General Plan: Amotdment: EIR draft can be completed fir.-rouse by staff before mid--May, then circulated fox cornent,s.� In response t' �;` ,� request x am enclosing copies o' the environ- for South. Chi r' co and Gridley-Biggs. ins �j1`• • • Y. +w1t.]Awaao°+v.,13�-zr�•'>�r <- __`._ ,....,,.... ' • ,..' Y--*aiter +,.etr.,,n4tia'eVwar w.Yrm- I { f z`4.. .�� �.. r —•.. -'xwaX once YM.nmAc..L.E .... "' 'Y .... .,. .n.._- 4..wr.t•n*e, a<a�H�+Fx ^__i_."."-Wrv.+- .b _....3 \ H�'v��G ffa me V U ; LANo ,oNATURAL NNEA TH AND. 1 6EAu'TY. EN,VIRONMENTA►L.R VIEW.DEPARTMEMI'• EARL p. N@Ls0,k,VIreo_t6Y. ,� a May g a 1990 a; RE: Prod Rez•one and Gen@i"a;l _ � ®rW„ ' Plan )r," .-Odment Off' County land s -of �� 0 OV South Chino r _` �� ARD Lo � 79 09-1� O 1 9 p�- ✓ r ,: r., r�. To- Whoin It May Concorn �r The"enclosed-'(Draft) EnvironmI1ental pact Report nn the above- named appl,i,cation is for your information and:reView:'r��;, A notice Of" cotOp.Tetion of the Draft E.I.R. has been filed with r z, c. 4 g the Butte County C'�ei'„ and the Resources ' ency of California l , Secreta-r�,�,.,. ; Co.mmQrits to the material contained !n h^, graft E.I.,. ed solicited , Such comments can be submitted to the butte - County tnvi ronr�,ehtal 86vi ew Department at 66 'ad,dress, l i sted, it ,below until the j�c`l ose sof the 45 day eri od of revi a an M,gnda,y", June 239 1980. � Should you have any questions, please contact thi`' department.,, Si'ncesrely� Earl D. Nelson/,.'," Environ iental ,��Revi ew Director , f EDS) I. 1 me �. ,, ;? Enolosure(s) �n id "` P coati 0 ndnu'(9:fi)S34i.i7T ' ,�CanlacL)rlur �� �niuillif,Caltfrirnr�l9.5�?�;� Poiei f ;�- "M1H M °"^"�wy.wrwr ++N^..+.:.nw.•.. ......r..k ...i` n.Mwsa.. gra.,. � ,A i,� :is'f° ,� r tai: C16aringh0use Oej;h St. Rte.. i21 ChactArea Isecrc�tioxt Di On -1. - t;; =.• V� lYr,� � tri��n _ Cbl;fr�as -Xorjibrc v ;v co, Ca 95926 959r�, S :to, EaCU r)95Z _ - : f �' c�,fxc Gas & Electr? c x Calif . Vater Service C&? i Ca!A-bate Univ , Crn4 coV, 350 Salem AV (...t .. , ,- C.tiZ'co, Ca. 9592 � 340 Salem Street � C � r 6 '4 hic.o, �i1a' 9592 Biology,,D0pt. , L kr— zi .� C]��i.co Car.4 G � �. ` �elephoneCa.racifi c« Agrultotal .Sci��zce S`er'., f�, Cal. State Univ. co t; Iain Street,3 Mt, (xo, Av$ Geography Depaa, eoC t2$ 9kA60,,, cal iiornia 0,5926 Chico 2 Ca• 95926' -Chx,co Ca. „9 9 9 q w �' ? t. (7Ms{ I Gl �'1'•� 1"`fl+t}:i:^.� 'we ' x.TAF1lMv.wYN,•[M1.A:T.r+.w"aW , : 1 `{{ �.ha.ce 1?lar*uyi�iag ', PL:nlle }. �lorks Departments 14utto Co. Mosquito Abate. 0 al,. Stato Uu�v,.,. CI1ti.00 bl 'ost Q,fifice Box 9597 5117. Larkin Road Orov.11e CA 95965 Library „ ,°�, ghr'ico Ca. 9y929 ;f � r t•,I3utte College. Libra.g �' �� ca. 'Sta'Y IUniv. , Ch co 'oute 1, Box 1.83'0 Physical °bcierice -pt. -1 f Orovi7.1. Ca b A, 95� 5 �} CY>»i.c0 C a� a ti a- 959 ..y `l, , a z • b I� 2 a , School D_s1k oZ E. 7th Street Patrick Ror,ans 11 � Cal_ State Univ. r Ohdct� +Chico, Ca. 95926 ,Post nf.ei.o'e Bax 1731 Chico Ca. 95927 t c/o R« Davis , . 1 Research' CenterY for >tjjL N 11*r ness &r rcom� cs Y 95929 ' Rept.CA. `Nt BOX 551 (Sno-:,den) John Wirt �►1eY;'•o°r!'atZ�r• 2w i Butte Co., Fire Dept. C31 o, Ca. 95926 0. Box 10A5 '!76 i2:son Aveuua.' d Chico, CA 95927 (} Ceurit , "All Cat ALld�1''7on��Sc^iety ,Richard 81.avich i., }, . EnvxrOtnmerstal iiealiEh Detit ChJ.CQo Bait `j07 j, But`t e 0,011 erg e j ,walifoirnia M c/o Agrictt`l;i'ure Dept r a Courier Q, ovine y 95927 , Rb. 1, Box'183A ;, ; I s Oruvil.le CA aS965 1 I�y`yn. t llttte co. Sierra G-rUb `McCready Air l'o?�lUt On Control & ,Z �`CQ -- i'l nnibg c)4v,m� 1,AV 4'16sema A;ri.�:t.tural Commi.ssios�e� 'Atte: p �. l Nelsoia .. Csrol ., d+hl.ezlua. 959 3'16 Ave. r I " CO'U.r(.dr �f Ot6ir 110 Courier Orville butte CO'llixtShnrift Dept. 1.jPlabn,1,ng bepa.xtntehu l l87 \"W.7 lr.�Y 11 y• j"� k Ctsvrs or Orovil l e .,�. L�rov i.ii. e �- Coura. o 11,f MIrM.prw�,IM14 MIM Iri M1w NMMM M�:A iMMl+R ".tli t1:1��'aM.yebbM::Sr.4i•.+q.w-+#AiW'i�,Y•.'aur.:1'+w,4 alt, t..+r„1Ywa ,.n. 1 •1 ht'f� r... p J1 'CIw � �;", . �,��we r� ��t soo , y ott(�h Coutty Library � U C. vur� Advi 66;tr ,Ia o • �y. d0 l3ot�Sd7I3 �r��l a ,'txs, U. d ,i.l;Lo I 79 el t �•. tA;.�'1Ctfy�:,. ., r ..,�,,,._, � , ,F fl....i �fnu`J.�.�1:`. �. C�Y+C'►'(t`II � r tRIP 9 't4' » � „ , � 1, 1i f• ' r` ;s Chic0 y I GR Bo:x, 35Q9 C r ; ; jf hico� CA 9S927 NbR / ally rovjtyYative f Plant Soc CS/� 4 V 4 UC a Herbarium Chico, CA 959291 5'79 "Hoofer Oak Avenue Chico., CA 95326 r ti, Butte � Creek., Rock Baldwin Contra Gti;; P' 0. Box `72r g Inc. � Chico, CA r i Thomas E. Edgar 1 �� 682 E. 7th Avenue 11 'Ch ico CA 9,5926 LOU, -S' C 2194 Orovi.,11 Chico ,H , amenxind� Jr. , , Durham, CA 95938 wy Nancy Skith)1br, 97U Haomi'Aveinue r Chico, CA 95926 a �'*-;.+n r- ;ri.'a 4 ,{i `r,'��tt� �,�•w.�vw+ws•�v`l<�r^-�'�`N -sn--v:-,w,.V- .. �,-: _,gdktes.f=."i1 Mt�ixfi. "`rik�' �"+itat�n�+lf'i+.elw.r:iria Y, .. - .r+rWiL.elcn,�4,;f��.:,. r�iVs fir .Ysati+�."... a*rwr��rwR��.e�- F.wr_,. Nm s.,w„�.. •I �.. ....,....._ ....mw •.Rrn. e.p.m,+e ,i,.r+: ++karRNm»..re�m.....nrw.;..sR r.«+i�-..,;'... �..:r+`+tn+.ni.... :.... ._�...., Y _ _}.p r �ynnin0 `. ,a IrniuR�oGo.C1 Q �i ,a NOTXCE OF COc4PLETTON .SAY t 2 ------------ _; iiC Ont - r��t1ti' (r i Dre, f t Environmental. Impact Report) CLARK A. NELSONA d'ounty Clerk A X CINTND RESPONSIBLE A�,EN1.1Y: rE NT: �... DEP'1RTI� ;n Cw,)arlity of Sutll ee ro mental Rev e�'t FAWN TYTT . ERD Log4 79-09� l t3»O1 ' p9 a ent of County, Land :South' of Chico 9Rr noosed ,Rezone end G neral Plan Amendm "eADDRESS: s ' ;,:CITY: CUtyP7TY -" d� Count Conter Drive O_otril ' �.� F ,� �- •7.e.: Dune "CONTACT PFP.a0it1;' 'Rr^.i.. CCDr PHONE: l da l D. 1Glson, Dixecto�" 916,_ - 531— 47?? ` ;PROJECT DESCRIPTION OF'._NATURE , PUf POSlu, At -'J 13FU801CMA ES e`tte Counti'y�'1�nnin� �ommiss g on has proposed aer�eral Plan a�iendment and '1 C r' ire -X ne. of i:he p"ro ect area in, order, to: _`preserve an,d enebUrage a r§ci�l '``i a r�iculturai hands, and 2 revise the General P1 an p`rod�ucti p. g � on; ori :ri rrp.<, � � �� zoning ordinances',:4yo'rding to state guidelines, Which require consistency et�een zones and General Plan categoriEs. PRO PROjECil LOChTTON COUP tTYe JECT LOCATION .CI'T'Y'; r � Gh i'co Ixtxtte i� 'Ylvllw'PERIOD PROVIDED VOR `18VIL•:Fwf':" ; 45 day comMenc ng Fri day, May 9, 1980 y. Departrrtent�].t3iC utth}���.mcer�tJ�y�����,(.�1rL�1,E31:,E: En�ri.ranrieh't�ti. R�^t%].etv , 1 WgESS WHERE! COPY' OG QRl1w' � '" ��` Qt�ov Lte� Ch 95065 Appendix d 5G 0 91 r d0 not type to that loft of gnttad Ilne,�iJ�„.•�__��,,.,,M, r T r rr GA•115 FLDtiRAt GRANT LICATIAN/A4�AF{D NOTIFICAT rr^LicA frill dwE""""”" r r �✓ STATROP CAL IFORNIH STATR,CLEARINGHOU5F �D1G) 4.45- 5 9 ~� ITFAIS i -Ji Tt5 of COhiP�,IMO BY APPLICAN r, 2 pt:0 6RJ+L EmPLO` On 10 APP, LI 7 Organ Aa t On•` Un t 4, AODRi;n5 3traet or P, Q, tlb• ;environmental„''Rech ,I #18 F County Center D'r _ 5, CITY S. COUNTY - � �� 7.STi' i t "FL i!Il' COf`dt •• 1J, FHOG CITI.L;•'.G. (Cul tlWj q1 `til i�attil4tlC 1*tst�nbe) 1� Orr,Ville Butte CA (9'965 {{t TT �F ACTIO Modlllrat( TYPE L1P CfiaNtlr tt nmPl,att It 10 b nr tUa vraw. atF.tdl L i i� O 11' Mn4raayrNJ OnE�� rs. a ricraated fUarntlon a t��jlAthur4pgpe 1 n I . �-+ 4-+ _ r t�t �°1 .ci r , IA U Cotntinuatinri b Y J Oecrt nsed 06 11411 b l CEat'a1+aa purutian d, CnnMtltatltln ` { yr mo 15.APPLICANTV;t OF OV1 tlE UESrgol acMdokshowC..rfsm4o rnGfrlarpa.( Enter Lotter j`” h�jsiiRE¢UESTEDFUNOSTART 1�----- A.Stato F, Sthoolgntritt t� 7U.f(WAL. 18. F�i�lpS q't.F AT10N . Months) B, Intarstato 4. Cotrirriu644 Attibn Ag4nk 91,SrA%E ,i S' ;� 1� Yr mo C,'5ubStdn4�ilft4 it, SponsoredQroanifatian 77,1,017,4E i �5 17.iESI.PROJE)�T STAR i�J �ttt�. . _ O CountV 1. Indian 7l.OrHEA L l $— y�,,,,,,,�,..„ .,�•E 18,ES'i' PROJECT&URATION :.� (Months) E. City J, Othar(opecl}yinRonlvrks,7 {�1TA41?D,77,J$77t .i_:S 1 A 25,BRIL^r71Ti�EQF �'l.' PrO:(iosed Rezone & general P�•�' �merr���dm�tent of?ZCauoty land APPLICANT'S SOU h of Chi Co E'RD Log 9^09-18-01 T< 28. q fCRIPTIOM,OF *!?,I.ICANT S PROJECT (Purpose) The- Butte .Cr.r�rl.�� p;Jann ng Commission has proposed a General Plan amendmentr�'�„ EI f 1 500 acres in tit e' south, Ch;t! o area to, (1) preserVe ,primer/, .:r aqd re<or, o agri��altural ''lai.ds�; and (2) revise General Plan and zA,�n9ng ,ordirrarf'ces�'tp. . Icon�orm,t;o state~c�nsisetency re.�uirernents. Propos(�d zo'n{ s include A: Or%� - v' r + :A -R. -C— .-2 . M '1 �,_-2 and_;_,, YQ�. , ARF OF PH()JECT 1IAPACT;llrydicata Clttf, Count , 5Wei ate.) q� t 274 ' Cali fprni a �� _ WIO{' �W�ICiC COU NX ;',lCh.� co > y Butte (v 6] GRE5510NAL t3i5}TRIC,C 29,8nVlranmenwl A;sessment Re4utrod 30, CLEARINQHOUSE(S} TO WHICHSU�t�11WTT 1D By Stata/Fedttal A9ancy2' , YepNi— SOW O{ Appttbant Cistrldts�tthp�eted By Project �-y ,�, QNo' alJ3'tata b11AC��'.'I{ida cu on! x,_ ?."+1, AMElfll'LE OF CONTACT PERSON b AOOREw �-SStreet or P, Q'. Bb,K G7fI1 EPHUNE X10. 9i6-534414 7u ;F,arl, .D. NOs,o.n D4re.ctor 918-F Go`unty Canter Dr'��e i _ )y.� 31,d'I E��V �ggONh1ENTAL G� CUNIENT FIEWIEyy :ii 0U1R D Y�.•:-, NO 'Ga e iorihpproject,requirR h len nnn ental dnurral I. Irst heil«aI<�r a ` If lies L.: Eilvir nmanttl�lmaact.atatemgnt {Relwrt) Altachtd (20'eoplas) I� Nf? GeologtcSurveyQuaF't' ngla nlopinwtiic{tt 1 a Draff C;IR !F' CCJ7I Fine) EIR f Uoas your an r1ave n project is to*:�teti, l' r I1(( ' Negative Detla;iationrAttache. (20 copies) , g �ftrt. abve KS,, o ti\ 1 9'1t U " I! j• Gl Nona aired htkt.1 GocumentE,Ni11 Be Forwarded On .act ,n paiicy an� plan7 1T' 1„ ! AD oxitin�toV N0 �_ , If Na F6derai Progratjr Mon oar Year g is r eLK covered (1Y �� A•`36 Wt , c 7 ' 8 State CategoriealE xenmption, Clupcutnent , ProjectExomp'fUndcr _ � It YE�s�OArNbGLJi , t noes Not Raquitib An Erivfronmanra e ITEMS 22,38To a _ E LoP,tpLB'tEt7 BY Ct,EAitINGHOU5E 32.CL(EARINGHOUSE U i LE �\ , " i0 � ©CLEARiNCiNOUSE pp - t� l_ �l.l w 1. pEV1EN A b ACTION TAKEN 33, a CTION BASEp ON 1; 33, �+�, STATE APPt.ICAitION ,I P ., ijONo leation a ❑With Comment a W4Vaivtrl n4' it1 ikMFICA (SAI) r C A, rr-9q I State Numbel ' b LJ1;'IthbutCbrnrnent d ❑UnfavotAEle,L bC/1 Ilcatlon r . _. } A , STAT,E lN1i�E CoUnty/ City COUntV/ Clty r ounty/ CR7 Count ! City Countvir Cit Ctiuntyr +t 3B.CLAR►NGHOEISF_ " Ping Ai'e'a Ping Area Ping Area Fina AteJ PInF) Apes y Plrig Apea Y T IttAPACT`C,OCl� Ybf NO L 36. STATE PIAN REQUIRED 37, REULl EI VINiG DATE yr t'+a Ci+v. 38, it SIi NATORE OF CH OFFICIAL t At'Ct.EAHINGHOUSE t'g.,_...». -- ( Ya; Ntt 3B. FINAL CH ACTION DATE 1If mo day ITEMS 3E'42 TO BE COMPLETGO BY APPL,rrAVT OFFORF $ NOING EUFiM_70 FEpFtiAL A" CVCY' 3t7, CE 71PICATION This applicant certiflas that to thft best r1t his knu+viedgn and Uahai the ribbon data Ste fiat} acd ithe�icboit t{' Ott 'iti%Ejo�+Str � correct and filing of this fntm hes been duly authnrized by, that gav train¢ body of the appltchnG ;te,fiogsn Ii 6irarwhlid. ( s b TITLE c 5 NAT RE i1f Authbrit ad tlopretbnwiv�5 Tfe 4 E4 4Q, it AME Print 1 r Typa) Jl i Barl I�. , K �{ �` el5tlh' :)_`y D�rl"P aOd a,NAh1E OF FE~q Al TH i#4i� e`f J xr, .. �� t1,} 1 R1: ?jTE MAILED TO I PE S A E iQIfN y y j �t"�-..� �°'�..{; i a1 r ITEMS 45t r1Nt?`+` 43.�G4ANT APPLICATIO ,ty� 4��Ja• cwt t n.•dt�g,xf'. itAtsignodbyFcUetolr re s! / T jaF 1 1 r ,t' i i 44,Q ANTORAGEeNC1f r «+..a ..:... 1 r LTAll v i t Rl•t l P qtr, ice,: n t a +Ito aaftl � �� .a.�..n j Ct.Av...I ZA1..w...., �, AB,OyO,AN1A710NAt U i+ '� t r � �n � 1` � t+'� il�i� tD �, ryq�ir z ;1 AtE,:A MtNI3TEHINt3OF 't 1:47�t�t • yyp �tt i kW MM. wa« xis:5 1 r VA (y 47. AQIJf1E3.+ St►r+at ora I3 yr�}p+]{ ! 11 f1 L ) � � �YI rr ,l-•'.. '•t,r1w9RM 4q �• ,W-1,' ,T�tTNµ ° n01 1 r, t iii', ,if` Coo, 1 t`i ',.� I� Py.�•� - fstl. et �J �SyAVA11LAn'� F? �gmli.1i11 :,, ..,,.�..URN,Ri~GCIPTi REQI:TER�b, tNUW17A D L FITIFIC? . AI bo r} T, s 4 o& re. .r �IrdO til t'it '{ ,i "iB FG 9C!tlpr 61RANT It) 1 �w, { neww:s` tq rat xa+wrsrcwu `[) P 3 ; � ryy a� w.w.w.v:«a.»,,. , .,[.wi.•a, u� :#i,i .u.,+iir i,i�Wm-Y«ini iu � a '1r Hi�C)�yri'riC tsJ'N i t '+ jutir SIV it/ l+ I Uii 4 Lal t0, 1,p !t t , r1 r., y $\ NOTICE TOPTHE PU6LIC' All �� ntp��jested persons?rare • hexeby notified than a Graft E'nvi roninen.ta , "a X�mpa'cf�Report has .been c�nntp.l'eteu for the following prnjectr ` n The 'Butte County Plann'i'ng Com Assign 'has peoposeii a General Piave, Wnendment and re-zbne of 1,ti0'0 acres in the, ' south Chi:c�J6q`afd'La to; (1) pres,erve, prime agricti�ltural �' land's, .ar d ''2j revi,se General Plan and zoning ordV antes., �, � c „ � 9 to, Confl^m to state con istency %equiFements: r4 - q zones include A-20', A -R, t-2, hI-2 ar'dq� P --Q. "op'fes of the aboved-mentioned draft envi ronmen�'�tal` Impact report ares ? avail able for public roview at, the Butte County EnVi ronmpnt.aj RevieVI Department, at #184',County Center Dt ve, Oroville, the Butte County y Library BrancFies, Ch�?co_ State University, Butte Col lege I.ibrar'y .and Chico City Library. rr" Pu 11 comments concerning the material contained in the -',raft t E.1 -R. are solicited, Suchcomments can be submitted to the 'Butte County Environmental RevieW Department at the address listed above until the talose of the 45 day review period f`at 5 'p.m.� it on Mo,pday, June 23, 1980. 1 Earl 0 Nelson Envi romflental Review Di rector e published in th"e Chico Enterprise Record on Friday; May 15, 1980. 5 i 1'L 4 „ ��i��rtaC3a..a,.rxP�.�ir�r�iau rc r' '•fit . J� '�3 I + MIN �OuftL� r � LAND O F -'W �,.,� N A TU R r L A ` (� �r�ITH ..Atelia �BAUTY „ ENVIRON REVIEYV DEPARTMENY EAHL D.,NELid W'Dtractor' i, Tune 4� 1960 „ 1in v IvOt7" V41 Supplement far Proposed Qrovilia, atitorttia t Rezone and; Genea.al Plan ;Amendment of County Land' South of" Chico +� ERD Log # 79-09-1,8-01 r To.Whom It May Concern: go The enclosed checklist forthe above project 4as omitted, s mailed May 8, from ETR. which was 1980. ,the ., �. 5 Please include this with the Elcjyou;received on South Chico Rezon .,-.and General Plan ,Amendment ETR. „ ,. z �`a 1 We regret any inconvenience this may - have caused, f Thank you. /r ,. ,� fJ -1 t-_ 18 , P dounC'rntrr Driun 0 Wilk, Gail j`u nia 95965 to!►,pkjhd (016) 656-777 ['DuTfdOaa f' �vnmtj or . JUN 5 (400 ti L� APPENDIX.F o f Otovlllo� calf f itrlq ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM f (To be completed" by ...head Agency)' k' „ ERn Tog # 79.=05L' "Ol I' MCKGROUI1D 1. Name of Proponent. Butte CoWaty Planning Commission 2, Address' and Pttc,,e I um bl;: 07Proponent,* Proponent r 111 7 Count;Center'Drive rroyi.Ite, UA 3. Ch_c Date o' �� klist Submitted-,., ~ , 4 Agency Requiring 'Checklist i 5. Name of Proposal � Pt 'arid Rezahapplic`a a South Chico {�eneral an Ame x1<r"... 1 �. 11.ENVIRONMENTAL IMPAC : y TS ona'ttachednaheetgll ""yes" and `'may>"e" aritwe��s are` requi't�d' "1 YES MAS 9---,' NO �.. 1. Barth, Will the proposal, vestiit in sign ficant y 4, a. Unstable earth conditions o::,+in ' changes in geologic stibstrucbii YES VMYBE NO., h." ExpoEit-e of people or property to, , geologic 'hazards such as earthquakes, k �landslides, mudslides, ground failure; (IN r or similar ha;ards? ' 21. 'Air. Will the prdOosal result .in: a.._Substantial deterioration of �> 1� `ambient or local air quality? r b. The <creation of object „onable odors, ,smoke or fumes? -00 Significant alteration of a movement, moisture or temperature m or ,an,�rr,:change an climate, either < local<�y or regionally? 3 Water. „ Wi11 the Fropoaal� result ihi :substantial, «. �. a Changes in currents, 'o the ,course 1._ r or direction of water �his.�vements? J/ rc. M ,, b i ChAI�F, F, 1'n absore 4 ,,nr + t ,FJe4 2,"'t p ` dra, Kfih� �s"i? t 1i`� SN (qt r *M kn t„rte u r , - 7a erfi or Vii£; 1tG A L a{,614ftt',,16f � , surface water, ruhbi 7 ;'' ]Need for :off"= s'iLe urface drain L, improvements, 3'.n' a, ing' tiegeCation removal, channelitation or culvert installation? � u. Alterations to �! he cour,Pe or of flood ;waters?', e Change in '�:he amount: of surface uny waltt rinnater body? t i, f bscharge into surface waters; or - in any alteration of surface dater quality; including but not y'r limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? r ,j2 g. Alteration of the,idirection or ” �.. rate ox £lour of ground waters? h 'Change in the o-1dantity or quality of ground waters, either through) direct additions or withdrautals,,� or through interception of anij k aquifer by cuts or excavations? Appdndik F page 2 o!! 9 ' 4 1 u y 1 : YES . MA BI 146.. ; ... i, Reductiob,--,ih the amount: of water oth �wis ..Aavailable for public water supplies? i sure o€ people proper,'y, „ ' water related "haza-rde such' as to W ' . c�� 5 flooding? ,�L, \� 4, ° .ant'. Lif e. W11, the propo 41 result l); A Loss of vegetation or chang., t.h the diversity Qf, species or' numr)ex' of any a} actes of pians (Licludinig ,���, U ¢� � �, .,,� • ;yst «trees, �rub'r- gras,8, cops,,' � w m araflara and aqu4'tic plants) 7 q, p ,i r �� b. Reduction of tliknumba s,�^�'; any` ', e���� a.. _ ,tntiqu� j} rare oto endan2retly,specierl w t rr k. ♦ NI Intro adf ,t n of new cpee.ies of 0` plants into an area, or in a barrier to, the normal replenishment of 'u 64l ting sp,�c 'ies? Reduction to acreage of any: .1 cultural: drop? � ,Animal Lifer-,, Will the proposal ;result �: , n ssu Stan` tTal t a, Change Iri the diversity of epicies,` a, i" � „ w or numbers of any,species of "~ animals (hii ds, land animals Q including-rerep tiles f ish and sheIL.- , ar f s G g nisms, insects or i h lieri or s , microfauna)? b: Reduction of the numbers of any unique, _rare or eY dangered species animals? r� of ln;roductionof �ciesnew b",f animalsittb anae a, esti resi► lt� �n barrier to them iErafi� 1.iln or movement: of animals? .` d; Reduction of, on dr( pt�u on or (, to existingDish ot wyidj:�.fedeteriorahahtat?tion Appendi�t F ..a e,�3 of 9 , to ..�