HomeMy WebLinkAbout80-70B ROCKWELL, LYNN REZ (3)e
790"03 'a2`
sUGGE TED MT ITOAT'TON MEkS (coxi�in� ed)
u
1
g.:Empjoy energy gonservation devices In c.Anstruction of liouseso,.::,
Oriexi bua ngs' to' allow passive ,solar
kieating.,,
r
r
A
a
1�
r'.
,
r
'
,
r
r
I
M®morandum
Ing®r-D®prtn��1.
TOI Advisory Agency
aRUM: Steve Streeter, Environmental Review
Agricultural Value and Potential in Area of Valley View"TSM
njEcTi
t
oKrEs January 111 1980
t
At the Advisory Agency hearing on"January 7, 1980, the question
raised about how approval of the tentative subdivisio,.�► tight
�
was,
aff ect agricultural users in the area over the long-term. In the
est week I_have contacted and discussed this issue with Joe:
Bandy - Agricultural Conmis,sioner, Clem .Me th -.retired last year
from the.'}'arm Advisor's office,, Jerry `Smith - County Farm Advisor,,
.Bill Turpin I LOCO coordinator for the county and a resident
along Skyline Blvd.; Joe Topping - orchardist (citrus and olives)
on La Mirada Avenue, Sharon Wedin - property owner to the north
and D Blake project proponent, resident'on Oakvale Avenue and
.
-on
an ,orchardist` (Sid to 9 'acres of $evillano and Mission olives).
'
An air photo of the area, taken in 19751 was examined to determine
the; location and extent of orchards grid other agrictiltuxal us$s.Y`
The air photo will be available as a resource at the upcoming
hearing.: A field trip was also made toilook first-hand at the
agricultural activities within to l mile of the Valley View
?,
_.
tentative subdivision 'sate:
A copy Of, a letteris attached from Jerry Smith;,. County Farm
Advisor is, 'the agricultural value and potenti al in the
Oakvale Avenue area. ie cites reaso`np n his letter,w he
believes the tentative subdivisi6h would not adversely affect
nearby agricultural pursuit's.
Agxacultural ;activities in the area, include primarily orchards
(olive, navel oranges„mandarintangelos, ,and almonds), and,:
to a lesser extents some' g 'acing; for cattle and,; horses, and rad sing”
of ;chickens and raising of hogs. Along Oakvale Avenue, the mean
orchard 'type is olive. Most of the remaining orchards have not
been actively' maintained or irrigated. for the last 20 years. 'fhe
Blake's 8fZ to 9 acre olive orchard at 270 gakvale Avenue, between
Crane Avenue and Ophir School is ah ekcept on an that it has
been fertilized maintained and Harvested in recent years. Ther:e
is not an actively maintained orchard bordering the ;project site
at present. The Wedins may begin ,to' maintain
olive trees on the 42 acre parcel tb the,nortki the 1and;may be,
used in part', ' as pasture for horses in the future. A .young
almond brldhatdl belonging to Bill Skierman 'nn La rIa rade Avenue
13.es :about 700feet to the uorth"northeast of the project 1311 e
at 'its nearest point.
Advisory Agency
January 111 1980:
Page 2
,
RE:: Agricultural Value and :Pbtenti.al 'in Area af" Valley il.ew TSM
One• concern raised by Joe Bandy, Agricultural. Canvnissionei is
the situation that arises when low density resacdenUal subdivisions
are established near existing orchards utilizing pesticide spraying
as part of their operations, For any spraying near residential
areas, the restrictions are more 'severe., Wind direction and other
climatic conditions must bet carefully taken into account for any
spraying, but even more so for spraying with resdQnces nearb,y
The availability of water for irrigating is,a concern expressed by
Mr. Topping, an or in the area;. If a trendy of loW density
;
residential uses develops in the area, he is con,oconed that O.W;I.D
may have difficulty justifying the expense of maintaining the
Palermo Canal and other, O.W.T.D. ditches in the area for..small
�
farming operations According to Milton Emerson, O.W.I.D General,
Manager/Chief' Engin.eer,:. O.W..I.D. has, an obligation to provide
tion water to , customers. and a time is riot foreseen when
irrigaits
tha.e obligation would ever change,
r l Plan as well as the City, , of Orovifte,
The .Butts County Gene a , 3'
General Plan;; ,,designate the project site and surrounding area for
resident' 1 use at low to medium low densities. A designation
of orchard and field crops, is not found .in the immediate area;
the beginning of this agricultural designation is about 2-;8, miles
south of the projoct site.
In .summary, there are agricu'7 Lural pursuits in the project area
which would be affected to sbme degree ,y the praposil. it would
'6eil reasonable' to ,say, that, none of-�•theagricultural uses wiihinii
tr re ' ect :site re reset a ma omit of any on_e
to l of le p p n y
_mile
family's annual iricoine.; In 'terms; of 14itigation measures, ,we do
not 'have; spe'uific .one•,s to recommend. Undo Alternatives to the
�a l
Proposed Pr,ject on page 34-` of the EIR, you wi1X need to consider
alternatives tahch'would have a bearing on agricultural ufles in
the area incluaing;,no project which could ;possiblynvotvs replacing
�.
the re=maining olive trees and �availsbls acreage�'�with, mandarins or
anothertrletable' crop- or the redact on of living ani•ts which;
{
could v a 1o'i�er densityof;' for :instance,: acxe,pex• dwelling
,invo1e�
unit (30 unity per 30 acres: .rather than the proposed density off'
2.67 DUper acre.
;
CC, 'Doti slake
Mike Gla�e� Cook Assooiates
«•
nAINASIAN. MINA SPFtUANCS & SASOwR
ai' MONASIAN,
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
1061 lIHD �TRERT'AT OAK STRE¢T TELCpNdNll'633-teas.
AREA CODE•41�
p
!. O, sci 1{70
JN6kfON HAS'1
jN "COI.Y1Nd RItIMMR 4Q
AiI1D NAN! MINAfIAN 6116VILLII. CAL1.KONNIA fi0ats
KIN
T
(
AUL 'AYAN MIMASIAN. [•ILez WO.
ILL,IAM N, 6000ANS!' J
IL61'AM N. YApBIb in' januaxy a, l9e'o (
�t
Butte County
Board Of SOpervisors JAN 9198p
;,,
1,859 Bird Street
California 95965
orovil.le.
Re: Rezoning Application
Avenue/La
O,akvale
i. pereeMiniiuum
:Proposed Rezoning One
Ladias and Gentlemen of the Board:
osal has been filed by a large group of
A ing Prop Orovi'11e� Cali-
nett
in thQ rural area near
landowners residing ed Bxhibit. That rezoning
the attach
Lorna and described on urements to a one
the dense ty req w1 11 ith
proposal prapc�ses, to ,raise
acre minimum 'xdhing within the area in conformance
the rezoning and
The Petition proposing
the 'exist: ng .uses • licatidii have been
thin app
the ;fees :for the p� ocessang o£ rox inate�ly 85%
by the landowners �o£ app
�V,
paid for and signed
o£ the grass acreage affected.
liCatioLL n will take. some months o process.
This app it would be advantageous
Lt
Pending the,COMP of the.prccessing�
to an interim zone pursuant to
gL
to dln5 this matter placed o
Butte County .Comprehensive Ing
Section 24-30 o£"the ,rif
Ordinance No. 1750f hsavet:od' tleaBoarI ofm"superviso4s,f°r
adopted by £our fi
the Petition; will:, allow a `four ,
this
' the' area. subjeat't+
the date of adoption for processing; of
month per�od,to
n
zoning change applicatio.
Lt is a rather unusual
As you are no doubt aware ► art of a great
the p
circl�mstance ,to have agreement Qn
of landovaners wa th`in an area as to thjoee' ed.
majority
requirements and minimum density'whieh.shouIp - r, to that
it'�sould seem aponth
.In this 'circumstance interim.
{a four (4) `m
the Boaxd o£' Supervisors, provide
pursuanftce 33i
t to your
period ssonacan in factclete'rminenwhether
Staff `aw%, planning Comma
4
NING DEPARTMENT." RtQUESWTER EP NT EVyl
u :1) iv of Tore�tPYL
Bobob Paulus s
J1,
REQUESTI,
L
JAN b 1,198o,"
AP.N 80"70,
DEPARNMT o F- Fo
OF FWStky
BUT TE GOUNT
0 t 6T'e from N-1 to 5R-1
bE'SCRIPTION,0F PROJECT: -B-
LOCATION the SF corner f OliveANY oakvale Aye Ordvil,le:
'(N Lvn
APPL',lbi" T: n
trOvAlle i- c a..9 5955
ADDRESS':''
OWN E A
;PLANNING ACTION SCHEDULED
.COMMISSION
REQUESTED: ASAP
RETURN DATE T
DATE DISTRIBUTED: ffiB
ATTACHMENTS',, Copy of a lic-ation & plot O'W,
RETURNSDi 7,pv-/7'-'
COMMENTS:
•
4
+ PLANNING DEPARTMI NT'S INTERDEPAR�"IIf
tNTAL 1R IE • �iEQ E T
F 1
John Mendon-aPublic
Noz•ks'�
s
:_...
REQUEST: IR ieut&Comment
80-70
� AP NO _
DESCRIPTION OF pROjtdT,, Rezone from A-12 to SR -1 .. �1
LOCATION: on the SE sorrier of Olive 1.111y.
t Oakva'1e
Ave. , Oroville ` 4
4
M PLICANT: Lynn L . Rockwell
ADDRESS: 215' Oakvale Ave. x ;' Oroville,
OWNER: Various
_
r
PLANNING' COMMISSION' ACTION SCHEDULED _
- --
RETURN DATE REQUESTED: MAP
1
' ATf'-VSTRIBUTED:... - /10/80
HMENTS: -Copy of application &'plot PAn.
ATTAC l
1
RETURNED:
COMMENTS:
s
i
_4
rj-
9..y�,�N7�6'nhYFiv{.t,,anw+`�+.'rtt..:�.gc n*rypesrr�. uu- •.,
Lynn L. Rockwell, Etal
Page -Z-
January ll,, 1980
It is unfortunate that this conflict"was not brought to your atten-
'tion atthe time the application was received, bu't sta'f£ has been
ingtructbCtd suspend any activity an this plictien go then vie
may lotify you of .the conflict and the passibility of result'il
difficulties.,.?
`iota may wish to apply for an amendment to the County Goneral Plsn for
a land use designation that �iotild con£orrt to the densities you 'wish
to acheiv, "S and in E-inat event I would recommend that you contact Mr.
Larry Brooks, our advance Planner,
Therefore; this application will not be r
,
cessed p.andin'g,,your acknow-
'.
lcuooment of th.General Plan non"-conform
de
y and'yaur desire to either-
or amond the.application to inc1
o the"'Gonetal Plan amendtant.,
This 'letter, of course, will rescinc a ter ybu received, dated
J`ar'mury 9., 1,980,
'sho.uld you have any questions 0c contact this office.
tettye Blair
n`
Director of P"lannin
H ilr
cc. Envir®nmental w, Earl Nelson
Min's ian; ;'Minasian,. h9inasian,; 6 sftdanee
a
t.
1'
<t
I
I
1
' "
I
e
y
t-
1,
Y.
.
Al
<s
P,
l Sf
APPENDIX F.
ENVIROI&NTAt "CHECkUST FORM .,
XTo be c6mp•1eted by Lead Agency)
ERD Log # 80-01-04402
1i BACKGROUND
1.'Name . of Proponent, ,n:� Ro ekwe7 �. e tal
2, Address
and Phone Numb e o Proponent.:
215 'Oakyale Ave lg Orovi i`
1�
PO 130X� 1965
3. Date of "Checkist Submitted
4, Agency Requiring Checklist; _
5. Name of Ptoposal; if applicaTe ani ri of 200
acres ,o t ,:nfl
from AR to
II, ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
(Explanations of all Myes" and ''maybe" answers are
;requirod'
on attached ,sheets.)
�. YES MAYBE NO,
1, Earth; Will the proposal .result in significant
a. Un table earth condition.-, or in
changes in seologic substructures?
X
b. Dsruptions.: displacements, com-
paction' o t' lwercovering oi',; the soil.?
X
C, Change in topography or ground sur -
farce relief -features or removal of
topsoil'?
X
d, Destrue'tion; covering or rnodific'a,-
x
tion of any unigt geologic. or
e
physical fea'tur.es?
X.0
e. Increase in 4,lind or waster erosion
of s,oili ' either . on .O off the site?
X
'
£: Changes iri cl;eposi-tion; or erosion
of beaelisands s .or changes'��.in, sista-�
ti.'on, ciepos.ition.ar erosirn Which
?�
may modify the ch�annei o 'a. viver or
'61
stream) nor , the, bed the ocean or
i
ahy bay, inlet of 1ajc '?
X
g, Loss of` prime agridtilturaliy proms
duotivVe, soils ou.L:si de, _designated �
urban arecs?'
Appertdix, F .- page
]` of
ti..
L"adv
o a`ded x !Pt
C5
X
LsuoT3an:Vaxa ,xc sIno Axajtrtbe T
us $o uo-c:Jd.aaxaquT 1,2n6.xtl:l xo ,,
'
sTaMaxptl TM zo suoT13PPa baa zTp
qsnortj4 xau�T +slequm
ptino,iV jo
All t?nb .xo 'fqTquanb auk uT 92
r
�
u
LszaqWA P.Uno.a S go MoTg go a��x
xo;
uo-poaxTp 943 ,To uot:luxa'-qT5' •'�
X
ZA:iTpTq.%nq xo ua Axo
pat Ycss cp ' a.zngL-xadtua:3
oq p9gtuiTT,
30LI nq 2uTPnTouT `I ltTVnb -aaq�eM
r
aoai'xris gouo"P,E,xa4Ta XTIV uT
'
ao s.zaltaM aoa ns o u e a xat�osYq
Lpoq xaqaM huv uT xe'aM
avv4.%ns go :l'tt1AQu s Ur alt( t17 "d
�sxa�aM pooT1 go .'
toT zo asznoo auk o3 suo iu,zo t r
�xaATno- xo uoCI'azTTauttat;o T�notuaz +
uoz;s!b2bA �NTpnT,ouT `'s�uauiano dtu;c
q uiz cuzp aZ)L_ ii agrts--go lour paal<I a ,
r
L Jounz aeq oA fans
o unom pub .a�ax, arta zo ° sWL 0':14 d E
oauTzp '9a1a.z uo-zzd:aosgv tit sautl� •q i
X
Lsitatiianatu xa��tyo uoc�oaxtip zb'
as znoo atiq xo .+ su�xxna ux-sa§utq� • a
:TaT uagns;tzr �Tnsax rtasodoxd e,.u s
TT?M •xa�aM £
X
4XTTaizo-r2a4 .to XTTaooT
x.at�o: ' auiTTo u t alivac�a, �Cus zo
a xn� axadrua� '.zo- a zngs rom + :IuatuaAoui
• T o � ,
Q 4w
all ♦'oTaaxa L'uE T TIIC i
saiung 111-igo ul. sxgpo
aTquoz'oa Cgoo uo c�aaxa a ,
ux .q
Y,
L �z 't?nb zicaaooT; xo.ttaTgtua
go uaT4t.LOI xaap Tai�ua�sgn . •a �
s:
;uz aTnsax Tasodcxd auk L T"TzM .xt •Z
�spxaza: xaTutTs zo
' a,znTTa punox + eaPTI`spntn sapTTspuE ;
sa��anut�xsa sr; tj�rts sxaztt a roo;$
o �xatoxd
zo aTdopado axnsod
�.®
YES
MAYBE NQ
h. L•xp6sure a 1-aoP pro `arty to
^e le or
hazrds such as earthquatces,
,
geologic
landslides; mudslidds, ground £a'iluxe,
or simular ,hazards7,`.-
2; Air, Will the proposa] result in
;
a it
a. Siibs.tantial
Oil of ,
local air, qua7,ity? =
amUient or
,
V. rhe creta,*ton. of objectionable
odors; smoke orfumes?
>>
c. ',Significant alteration of air'
tempexaure,
movement, moisture or
or any change in climate' either
aacal y or regionally? ----
3, Water. Will the proposal result in substantial:
a:. Changes in, currents;, or the course'
X
or direction of water movements?
b Changes in absorption rates 0dtain8,go
amount of
patterns, or the rate aYcd
f? ,_,
�
---
sutfdce water rtino
c;'. Deed £or off -,site surface drainage
including vegetatz.o
, �tI
improvements ,
removal, chanrelizati6n or culvert
41
x,nstral atia n? ' ----,
s, Zil�erations to the course ox flow`
Of flood 'waters?
k e; Chane in the' amount of surface
g
iaater body" ---
.-�--
water inany
f Discharge into "surface waters, or
surface.
in any alteration of
water quality, including 'but, n6t _
dissolved
limited tics temperature,;
X
oxygen or turbidity?
g. Altexaton.of the dir.eetaan or
rave Of:,`flout. of ground' waters?
qntity 6.r quality
1j;, Ghange in theua
then the ugh,
�p
of ground waders ,' e?
"or,withdrawals,'
direct ddditibli
or through intereepllon of an
aquifer cuts .r .excavations?
Ap po,ndix
r e' 2 of 9
PaS,
ww
i
' 'YES MAYBE
tin
6.
DTotise�. Will the proposal result'in
7
substantial
a; increase's, in uoise,I' Vels?
"b. Expasui:d"";'off lneopl.q.1, to severe not"se
X
e 5?
7
;GiAht and Glare„ - Will theproposal
X
pro uc gnicant light,,or glare?
8 .
Land Use i' Will the proposal result -
-
in a significant: -
S
a
a, Alteration of the planned land use
of an area, or, establish a trend
whichwi l demonsttably lead to such
„x
Alteration?
b Conflict with uses on adjoining -'
properties, or conflict with
establi,chad recreational, educa-
-
tional; eligious or scientific
".
usepan area?
9,
Natural 'Resource's 1 .the proposa
resu t >in substantial:
a: Demand dor, or increase in the tete
}
Of use of anv natural resources'?
b . Dep1e'tion, of any nonrenewal le
'
natural resource?',
l0
Risk .b set, - noes the ptoposal
invo've a risk o, an .eXplosion or
the °release of 'Hazardous substances
(including., but �#6t litnite'd to, oil,
�r
pesticides, Cheri Gals or 'radiatJ.,
accid
in the event of an ent or upset-
conditibn?
Po:''' i tLori Will the proposal
.
�z
signs ican"t1 y alt r. the 1 ocatxon,
dlstribution, di Ly_, or 'grog,th
,
rate of the htitnan ,popu.lation o an,
area or physically,divide an
established community?
-
1,2.
Hous in W3. 11. th'e proposal
sg�Cantly af:Eect exists dousing,
create a demand io,r ad �tiolal
housin�7
—� x
Apperidi x
-page 1+ of
�,
.451'Xr.�,t17ir.'ilu07'''+AG-I+a1„tms,x:>;��a'."h.-«-�.'+ws°su5
r
1
* /� �+
YES iiNliBli NO'”
13.;
Tz"ans orationJircu]at on.. Will the
proposal resu;ft,Iw`
'
d. Generation of substantial additional
vehicular, movement?
b.. Si°gn.ficant ef:fect's on existing
Parking facil ties,, or dein•and far
°X
new p"arkingZ
C. Substantial impact upon existing
K
ttrkn'sport'ation systemsZ
d. Significant alterations to present:
patterns of circulation or movement
of. people and/or goods?
�X
ei Alterations to_WA terborhe, rail or
air traffic?
X: -
f , Iitcrease in traffic hazards to motor
X..
_vehicles; bicyclists or pedestrians?
y—
14.
Public _5erv.ices' W111:- the proposal have
(
arii a ect upon, or result ina sUbsL•antial
need for new'or, altered pavernmental"
services in any ofthe following areas;
a. Pine protection?
;p : Police pebtec.'ticn' >
C . SCho 10 j,,
•y'
X
d.. - Parks or;, othei recreatr.onal
�
e, Ma'intene.nc�e of pubr.lic facilities
including roads?
f.. Other governmentalservices?
X.
15
gnerp .` 6Ji11 ,the propasal result in,
W.a,
se Or aub tantial.amounts of fuel
X
ar energyZ
b. Sulistan, ti.al increase in demand .upon
exis,ing sources of energy; ox
require 'ttie development of new
sourc.es of energy?`
_..
16"::
Uti] iti es . ?Jill 'the rP osa.l rssult.
n a 5e6T:, or riew systems, or Sub-
stant:ial alt,elations to, 'the fO1LOWirig,
utilities
Appendix I' '- page 5° of
- .w„.;w..attkt�A:rte,.Yif+kFN.-?Ni717M1Y.'eat+Y.h4'vt;SM. i[TR J•muP`.enirvre...a—�--.�. ....... ....._.
f
ytS 14AXBE
i
Na:
.
a , Powe o r natv,ral gas? _ .
Y
b. ” Communications systems?:
X
G: WateY?
d. ' Sewer �Ni"11 t'runlc line -be extended
providing capacity to serve.new
X
development}? s
,
e. Storm waber drainage?
X'
17.
Human Health. All the proposal'
result _ in:
;A
Creation of any health hazard or,
1'
potential health Hazard (ex clud3x
mental. health) ?
b. Exposure of people to potential:
health ha
1E"i
Solid Waste.' Will the proposal -'result
�
many sj_gni£icanb impacts .assoG.iated
t
itter
with solid waste disposal or, litter-
control?
control?
�
3
19
Aesthetics , Wil1i tlin proposal result
in Im B�stzuction, .cs.i any public
designated or,recpgnized scenic vista
open, to the- pub l., -a, :or will; the
a
,
r.oposa;l 'result. in the Creation of an
aesthetically offensive site open to
p ublic view?
X
20
RecreatLonz CJill; the proposal result
ir% an impact' upon the quality or,
quantity of ,existing public recrea-�
� ' ' i
tion iacili.ties`?
21.
Ardheolo i.cal/Historical. Will the
p,oposa resu t in an—texat-ion o
a 'si Hifi cant archeological or
,i
historical site, structure, objoct
or btiildi.ng
22`
Mandatory I'ndings of Sigriiicance,
a Does tlie, project :Rave the' ptenbial
to -degrade, the quality of the
environmento subsbantiallyreduce
the habitat of a fis17 or.wildlife
species; cause a :dish or w# lldlife
population to drop boYrvn'self
��Apper d' x V
6'' of 9
- page,
ti
., AYBE
YES:, M
} NQ t
i sustaining levels, threaten to'
^%
el�.tninate a plant or anitnal; COW-
am-
Muni
munity,'reduce the nuTabe,r of restrict
the range of a rare or endangered
plant or animal or eliminate Important
examples of the majorperiods of
lif
Caornia history, or' prehistory?
I
�
b,' Does the project have the potential
1
to achieve short,, term benefits to
the detriment of 'publicly adopted
long-term environmental goals'?
c.Does the project have ;impacts which '
are individually limited, but
cumulatively'' considerable'' (a project .
may impatt on two or more separate
resources where the impact_Oti each
resource is,,relatively small, but
where the effect of the total of
those impacts on the environment is
significant.).x:
d. Does the project have environmental
effects which Will cause suUstattial "
adverse effects on Human beings.;
either directly or nditect:l' ?
X"
i
1
I
Ilr
y
�
2J
1'
n�
l
App eidixL
page 7 of p, 3
f4 W { +,^C4 :i 3 y i W r.` �U 4 a:Fn tiV _ - u -J lk._,S..Ip�.-:�-'.••.a'.Gd.'SFliil'n:R(4RM+fnRw� f -r+'+`
a.
i
7101)
These P,0:1 to are especially interesting �riien 10^k gag into the
tiro, p Oroville
`
future. Accorclin�; to the planning department, when`'rthe
is reviewed (high priority iteiti) there is some
area lana use riiap
specUation among stafT members that some of, the foothill. lands
;oeide.ntia� Use (� $ DU,aOre),
noir designated fox' Medium- ,ow Density
Brill be xedeSignated fo;V Low 'Density RegideAtial 'Use (1-� DU aero).
Most of the residential use in the east fcoth, S is of the lour
View qualifies as lovt density). If
density character*.(Valley
is the cases then a genu -cal plan attendment for the rezone 't,
�.
this
R-1, UrLl7 not be required. T the amendment is carried h�ou�l1
A
a•t this time and approved, then the number of planning options in
,
this area; vIll° be reduced. The applicat� on vrould result .in an
LOYr„Dens:.ity designation surrounded b Medium
1
isolated district of
Density aesi natiox in all airob-d-Ons. The approval of a ;general
nlxti achane tr equired before rezoning) VYoulcl not effect the Valley
:confuse Planning options at
View Subdjvision and Jrotld Only future
this point. Should the applicants proceed jirith the..genera] plan
i
change at this time, ail- GnVViomnental 'impact report %could `be in
to determine which of th.e
j A
order to. study, theentire Brea so as
two land use designations �Tould be more appropriate in this ,area.
Subseg,uent to the new OroVilie land use map beim; ,approved after
(and by th;e ootnty)jan environs
G
revieN by the county preparation
Mental- impact report on this xozone may not be warrented.
i
G
�.1 _
1•.
Al
u
}
t
M
Intnr�D�par�n����ta� ����r�o�d�um
totL'ynn
Rockwell, et a1, P:i1e
FRooi
Larry Brooks
sueJecrr'
Genoral Plan Amendment
cA�ttt
February, 21, '1980
Lynn Rockwell has been verbAlly notUled that
the petition
to rezone the subject-roFer,ty must re. -initiated to
1`ect
re that the application also incl.ude,s a.n
dmendmi f tQ tiio�
Butte County Qeneral l�la.ri.
,
,
M`
,.,�,. ,_
���,,, .u...,,_i;.,
ri;? Or 5EF_ 14>
3 75
/8-
1.56:AG 27/ t
1364
jpE8�. '�-s' IG r s:•
�'9 � ' `� - -
'/
115
tom-:• �27�.
T x� 27�
y
,,�
op•
100
3 :c. 0 4.!;!,j
1622_!4
y, i.VOacC 11.9Ac
ss/'
4
o
1,5
2592Ac
ioa
`
J
2_02 AC: Ss, a1
03
' 21,23A�
( 546.97 " :4
9
i3s.s rbl-a3 i JO i y''�a +
M
In
5SS �
mar 29 y'" �
7tp
N
18 .
31
PIM,68-57 66 21
= 64 8.16
390.35
'
1.
r•
t,'
••�:4'a
,I
II
F
l'
r
i�
r ..
! ' 3
�r
i
4
t
vti
U
g:.
!
1,
r...a..�...:-�.....�...J..:,....
,.....,..W .r,...........a......,.�.;.. ,.r.��...a��..
,..�M�.... .i......a.., a..r�.. 4.,...
a.a. x.,.._.
...... a. ,. ..., s.�.,,..�..,...d,.....��:i....�.................-...>a
mam...mr�.e...,...��..r....�.a....R..�.,..... �....
' ' ' At l f` `• w ref. �� ! r°c .�.
� �� , � a�� � � �.- � G ^mac � �• �-
jF
JA
E
a
i
x
RT - AR -MH
•
A.-
A`K
r• r
IT&M
' ...�+�"'�... - - fi' •1;..^Ytt:{'r• ;'r{: '• '•,$t. t t
�W.
r:•:•{}�r};} {;'l,.•r{:••r :J+•• { � r r .w�-�•�s•- '�'
--� L,=,. • . {.t. r'. t {r•. f;:�;{} � • -0r•�• t ,� 1 :�j::lxN,.tY_ •}:{;:};;'{•.. r ; �• }. �L
� 1 � _ r�•fr St1Y St}� : .. t }St S :��r .•L{r;•• Y .•••••',• S•Lya l _ _
7;{;�;.-}?• v:•tr fri .v{ ,• • • J }kvJ.+ y::. }:,� Y::ti•# }•,r -}•r t .. '• `
'fit :?v }r.;vs{.•{} � •:ti}.},}'��'ti}}Y �}}r�G� i ttv''`'•" ,,•,. ,•}., _
S{$ •' •.•_{�f'�l,SJ.�•fi r�e,'{:1YS, }. �fy ••t''}��I:lt''}�}l: Y: � `,tom•_ S�L• .. � L' r✓ ..
r c_e .� • �.• r : • }••• h iX•} JN'•Y. f•• T * {.ti 1{� GG.}; �,ti• :;fit; •::,{t••r..r-0s� �'•ti• •y
` �'-. � . .. t• , ;�• {t?.•: SL:.titi. y• •�,t•'{; ,::}t..,•.� , t {}t� ,.Y ,{t •��}�.,.i}t:,• y •} ti Y
,,,, rt t f;r,;fr•.S•• •;t `•ti;7::}fiT,~,•�l.�v ' t �;r, �' :{y .}t ;•t; •. � •
:. - 3.- '} f...- - Y, ~ - � eF- •'•�t}ti:'I. S{�.,�✓ti{�':f'•"•{•r � 1; '.'. WXf
a �, r •t ,. r �_
:1.
r
I.
t
r 4. 14 P, E, QRESeATE D
•: t
r1?
_ - _:fir::},•�
•. '4 ti
� 8Y p F -T iT10 t4
r.•: r:: •ti ' �r
.: Y{rx• . v{Sy
t