HomeMy WebLinkAbout81-81 OROVILLE AIRPORT ENVIRONS STUDY4 .��
_
e- = ;r a ,y
r•.♦
.
r
l'
AA
I
- 0
6
4
1 1 !y1
♦•
- 0
�'~(
•
` a '{
s
GENERA' L files F Ta
oll%ovl� LLERPORT*
air
6
WE
•ems
.ice.
WA
I
pill
PREPARED FOR
I
0i
C I T U O F O R'- 0 V
I L. L
CITY COUNCIL
CTTV PLAURING COMMISSION'
ROBERT A. WINSTON,: MAYOR:
EUGENE F. SYLVA, JR.
LEROY BADER VICE MAYOR
HAROLDKROEGER, SECRETARY
ROBERT (0, BRAMLAGE
SAM B. GIRDLER
DONALD 9, 9ROW9
HELEN HOLLENBECK
ROLAND A.- LA9USGA
CHARLES 'F.. HUNTING DN
BERNARD C_, RICHTER
CARL P. LITTLE
EUGENE: F. SYLVA,, JR`.
UEL B. MARK,- JR.
DON L. WRIGHT
ROBERT A., WINSTON
1
y
STAFF
JER901V R. GONCE, CITY' ADMIMISTRATCR.
HAROLD KROEGER, DIRECTOR` OF
PUBLIC' WORKS
GRO VER. WTdG, AIRPORT MANAGER'
LIST OF FIGURES
`
FTGURE
NUMSER
T17 -LE
T'AGE
✓
BUTT COUNTY PILOT'S LOCATION` BY RESIDENCE
30
2
CONSTRUCTION- COST CURVES
31
LIST OF. T/.'BLES
TABLE
HU149ER`
TITLE
PAGE
`-
I
TEN YEAR' CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT' PROGRAM --ESTIMATED`
CONSTRUCTION COSTS AND RECOMMENDED` CONSTRUCTION"
SEQUENCE FOR WATER, SEWERAGE AND STREET IMPROVE-
MENTS
24
2
TEN YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM --ESTIMATED
CONSTRUCTION COSTS AND RECOMMENDED CONSTRUCTION
SEP IlENCE FOR AIRPORT IMPRQVEt{ENTS"
25
3`
TEN TEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM --SCHEDULE
OF PROJECTS
26
4
ITINERANT'AIRCRAFT ARRIVALS
32
--
5
ESTYMATED CONSTRUCTION' COSTS AND RECOMMENDED
=
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE FOR. WATER,. SEWERAGE,
DRAINAGE AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS
33
MY1-
LIST OF TABLES -=cont need'
TABLE
�J !;(BEIZ
TITLE
PAGE`
r-
ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COSTS FOR WATERSYSTEM'
IMPROVEMENTS
36'
7
:ESTIMATED C,-!1STRUCTTON COSTS FOR SEWERAGE
IMPROVEMENTS
31
ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COSTS FOR DRAZNAG
=`
SYSTEM: IMPROVEMENTS
39
j,
g
ESTTMATED CONSTRUCTION COSTS FOR STREET
SYSTtY IMPROVEUEMTSrF
3`
- ._i ....-� _�."+�_+.. a -s_ -•-..-.+-^_:^^QST"_: f"'. -.':.t
-
INTROD�r�FTOlJ' --
The City of Groville made major efforts in City planning
r -
during 1972 and 1973. InFebruarT of 1972 the City Council
retaned:Lampman and: Associates to prep are -a General Plan
-_
of Oroville and an. Airport General Plan.., This General. Plan
}
for the oroville Airport deals exclusively with the airport
property and isi a companion plan to the Orovlle General
Plan.
The basic philosopliy used in developing the plan is that
the airport will continue to be a. desirable asset and the
industrial development of surplus airport property will
contribute; to thei economic dell -being of both the airport
and Oroville .
Appreciatgn is expressed for the excellent assistance and
cooperation extendedby all of the numerous agencies and
individuals contacted. Their cooperative spirit has enabled
the preparationof this pian.on the basis of the most cur-
rent information avai_lab?'e .
'I
I
3T7
CONCLUSIONS rtNU RECOMMFNaATTOMS
IL
CON.Ct_-uslONS
y
,ity of Oroville Airport has potential to be
- -the best General Aviation Airports in the
California., ;
is a continued and growing use of the air=
- pr-tt by both local and, itinerant aircraft..
There is,no airspace conflict between. the Oroville
Airport andany-other airport or airways, nor is
ani airspace problem anticipated in the r
.foresee-
able future.
_
With proper maims-tenance and thephased construe
tion of moderate.improvements, the airport is
capable of accommodating the future General Avia=
tion traffic demand.
The airport has more: than '200 acres of surplus and,
--
vacant land.
Industrial
development of the surplus land-is
both feasible and. desirable.
The surplus landcan be developed for reasonable
_
improvement-°costs and can be completely compat-
ble with aviation use.
F
y
._
COM-c-AISIOM AND
RECOMMENIATTOUS--contcnued
RECOMMENVATIOM&
FContinue
to maintain both: vunways to assure the:
Oroville-A rport of being axle to accommodate all
General Aviation aircraft inclucL=ng business jets,;
commercial jets and transports.
-
Maintain existing facilities and install ami;-
tional taxiways, tiedowh aprons and.navigation
aid's (NAVATDS) as sha..n in the ten-year capital
improvement program..
Request the federal installation.and.maintenance
of a terminal radio navigation aid. (TVOR) .
Obtain federal release of surplusland to allow
industrial development to take place in accordance
with. the ten; -yea?- capital improvement program:.
Require all funds derived from the use of airport
-
-
property be used to operate,- maintain and improve
the airport.
Regulate the development of the airport so that ,
f
each part wILll be compatible and complementary _
to each other, -
IT
4
a, -
-
ORO ILLr- DAMN BOULEVAPD WEST (STATE AT 162)
'.t• V..... 1h' 1 JJr r..}.. �. N 1..... � �: ....... .W h 1.r1.�..J.1J ..- .........1. .... J .... .. J tI
ryr .......... ......: . .... .. Jy ,
TAXIWAY <
INDUSTRIAL AND
r cY o �J is 4 Q
COMMERCIAL. USE.
,< ti
-- 141v : a:
t ! ��APRON -
f
/ ® AVIATION USE
,�• r o
r r P
SCALE t,=1000,
-
X. fid' -
k
=cxLTI ATE DE ELOPMENT of
f, <AIRPORT PROP�fiYY
��. ll4JJ J j• J • S Jt r •:: - - -
J.J•ti••1•, J•..VNJJ:. l.JlJJ .JJ. J.J J. J.c JJJJl ... J.• J
OROVILLE AIRPORT
a�saews. +►rm; �
-
EXISTING
�iArITlES
_"'" - •_ his
i
_
.
EXTSFING FACTLITIES
{
The Qroville Airport is a former world war II military
airfield acquired from the federal government. The pro-
perty ha.,an area of 804 acres of which approximately 300
acres: are leased for various uses,. including, a golf course,
riding arena, fixed base operators and. a, mosquitoabatement
district building complex. There are over 200 acres of
surplus and vacant land on the site.'
The two runways are 12-30 and'1-19. Runway 12-30 is the
most frequently used by light aircraft and is 4,825 feet
Tong with an effective gradient of 0.37 percent. Runway
x
1-19 has; an effective gradient of 0.57` percent, which is
-
- less desirable thanrunway 12-30, but .is within the limits
for runway grades set by the FAA. Runway 1-19 with its
5,925 foot length is, preferred by aircraft suchas business
jets and.transports... Both runways. are 150 feet wide and
are in good condition but are in need of surface sealing.:
The two major taxiways were constructed by the military.
The taxiway paralleling runway 12-30 on the northeast is-
now the main taxiway and, the taxiway on the: south end of
the property connecting the thresholds of runways 1 and 30'
has been abandoned. There are also several abandonded
military har'dsta-tds and, minor taxiways' on the south side of
the property which are of no present use. A portion of the
golf course. access road. south of the clubhouse area has ,
been abandoned to use as a taxiway that leads to a. ti:edown
--
apron; near the golf course parking lot. The: golf course
ti:edown apron is ur-improved,- butis popular and used fre-
quently by flying golfers_.
EXISTING F"ACitITIES---continue
y
With the exception of a smI amount of -Portland 'cement
• ,_
concrete: used for aprons near the terminal building, the
pavement of the runways:, taxiways and aprons consist of
asphaltic concrete laid'on aggregate base. There are
g
approximately 2..3 million square feet of asphalt ;pa cement
now at the. airport.The majority of runways 1-19 and.12-30`
were con eructed of three inches of asphaltic concrete ;on
six ir_ches of aggregate base. Runway extensions and most
taxiwijys consist of two inches of asphalt .concrete on 12
nche f aggregate 'base. Both runways have pavement
strengta:: in excess.'of the wheel loads imposed by business
lets and transport aircraft that would frequent the Oro-
ville Airpo:-t.. In addition to the pavementconstructed by
-
the military,* several areas have been paved to provide
additional taxiways and aprons. Generally speakna, the
pavement is in good condition but is in need of some main-
tenance work involving patching and surface sealing. if
he pavement is not properly maintained, it will eventually
deteriorate to a.point that costly reconstruction will be
necessary.
Runway 12-30 is now operated with medium 'tensity runway
_
lights- Runway- 1-191 is not. lighted'. There-are no taxiway
lights at.the airport. The present lighting system con-
lists of the rotating beacon, runway 12-30 lights, the seg-
mental circle lights ' andsome outdoor security_ lights _ The
_
system: is in fair condition and is greeting the present
needs. A worthwhileiaddition'to assist landing at night
and during low -visibility would be a two-box. visual approach
'-
slope indicator (vAs2) system for runway. 12-30. As aviation
activity increases in future years,, revamping:o`f the pre-
sent-system and the installation of additional lighting
will be necessary.
f� �
E
d
-
_c
r
EXTSTTNG FACUMES--continued
There are numerous buildings on the property used for u,
variety of purposes. The terminal building is a moderrr
and attractive structure built in 1965. It consists of a
lounge auea,; an administration section, classrooms, rest--
rooms and a repair hanger opera -r3 by one of the fixed
b,*_;e operators, the airport manager_ Another Tela-�vely
new building is t' e stna!71 frameO structure. at the ,z.orth
end of th lirport occupied by :slicopter service -
There complex of modern bc,: 2-ings on the mosquito
aase that fronts on 'Larkin Road'. The tee
handers north of th> terminal building are of corrugated
metal, and are in good condition.. All are occupied and
there is gresenzly a demand for additional tee hangers..
I=
-lephone, gas and electricity are served by public util-
3.tlr companie- Water is provided by a smallpiping: system
fed a well 'ch has a ca `t '
s paci y to elver. 30 gallons
f '' .:�= tninut . ata pressure of 55
p poundsper square inch.
.
Yore i ono sewer system serving the airport and sewage
disposed of by the use of underground sept a tanks.
The present water and sewer facilities of the airport
r will riot allow any appreciable additional development to
taike place- Drainage is provided. by a system consistinq
Of a combination of catch basins, underground pipes, cul-
verts! and.open ditches.. Storm -water is disposed of by
discharging to established natural drainage courses. With
minor exceptions, the present storm water disposal system
f is adequate and win meet the drainage needs anticipated
for thee airport in, f -he next ten-year period.
_ A ccmprehonC1lve analysis of the minds, was conducted in con-
formance with, the procedures recommended by the Federal
Aviation Administration. Daily readings of wind direction;
and vaocity were obtained from the forestry station located
9
EXIST ING FAGT'LITTES--cont hued v
two miles-, eas_ : of the airport for the period consisting of
the years 1965-, 1969, 1970, 1971, and: 1972. The data were
compiled, reduced'and.plotted to construct a wind rose
which is shown on the Airport Layout Plan.: The wind rose
graphically depicts wind direction and velocity and is
used to orient runways. The new 'wind rose was compared
with the windrose prepared as part of the Oroville Airport
_
Layout Plan in 1965 and only minor deviations were noted.:
The orientation of runways is ideal for the winds observed.
In accordance with the Federal Aviation Administration's
—
criteria, coverage for the two runways were computed on
the basis of eross`wind components not exceeding 15 miles
per hour. For the winds observed,- runway 12-30 provided
r
97.6 percent coverage and runway 1-19` provided: 94.8' per_
cent. coverage. With a combination of the two runways, the
coverage is ^xcellent and is greater than 99: percent.
An analysis of the airport and its environs was made to
investigate possible noise problems which could be created
by aircraft.. Rased on the assumptionbusiness' jets and
�-
medium range jet transports will eventually frequent the
airport,- preceived:' no se level contours were plotted for
thefour approaches and departures of the two runways. it
was determined that the land uses proposed by the recently
adopted Oroville General Plan will not be adversely affected
by the anticipated noise levels for the assumed jet air-
craft use of the airport.
` The airport is located approximately three miles southwest
of. central Oroville. The airport property is bounded on
—
the north by Orr,--.Ile Dam Boulevard West which provides good
access to the ai�:port.from Oroville and its environs. The
access road.leading from Oroville Dam Boulevard. West to the
terminal buildinc is a two-lane asphalt surfaced road in
'-
10
EXIST;IIIG FACILITIES- continatd'
good condition with unimproved shoulders on:each side. The
road presently terminates at the south end of the existing
_ apron area. The parking lot adjacent to the terminal
building fronts on: the road. For present needs, both the
access: road and the parking lot are adequate_..'
There are no unusually hazardous + obstructions to aircraft
using the airport. The airspace in the vicinity of the air-
port was checked and no; violations of the requirements of
the Federal Aviation Administration Regulations Part 77 were
found. It should 4so.be noted that in performing an
inventory -of the existing' airport facilities, no violations
of the federal Avi.at on.Administration or California Depart-
ment of, Aeronautics rules and regulations were noted. An.
additional clear zone waiver, however,should be obtained
for the approach of runway .30.
F .
11;
USE ANU CAPACITY
`
The use of an airport the, size and type of the Oroville
airport depends upon many factors.
To estimate existing
use and project future use, an investigation was mad
determine the e to
location of licensed pilots in Butte County,
the use of the airport by pilots considered "local",
the number
of itinerant aircraft and
i
using the airport.
s.
A record search was made and a List compiled
residing in Butte pilots
County- of the The
--`
place of residence of each
Pilot was plotted on a map of Butte County, included in
Appendix
as Figure l the
than half s - , page 30_ As may be suspected,; more
eside in the vicinity of Chico:
22 percent of the Butte Count Approximately
�' Pilots are living in the
area of Oroville-
The vocation of pilots is not a fi re
measure: of airport use,, but. does
serve to .indicate trends.
Interviews with local pilots indicate abouthalf of their
flights are made for business
reasons+ with the balance
of their 'flying activity divided between
training and plea . -
sure sure flights. The number of local pilots and the
the airport
use of
hasincreased rannually for the past several
y
Itinerant aircraft can be defined as those other than
local„ for the
�!
years 1966' through 1971
g (and Bart. of 1972)
pilots visiting the: Oroville Airport_
_
were asked to complete
a. questionnaire which asked his origin airport
and the rea-
son for his landing at Oroville.,
naires for the six- ear review of the question -
Y period showed
consistantly that 5o
percent of the flights made to Oroville were
reasons.:
for business
Lt is noteworthy that portions of the:
business.
K� �
13
----- -. ... . _ ....,.. . .....
,
T7
- USE AND CAPACITY--conti.naed
sector of Oroville are frequent users of the airport.
Table 4, page 32 in the Appendix shows itinerant aircraft
arrivals for the years 1966 through 1971. It is unknown.
—
what the true number of -arrivals were for the period tabu-
laced.because only A portion of the arriving pilots com-
pleted questionnaires. ,A conservative pro4:ection of the
_
available data indicate arrivals during the year '11-980 will
exceed. 6,000 _
Another ifidication•of airport use is fuel sales which have
f
increased steadily ,Qach year with major increases; in the last
?€
two years_
_ -
An aircraft "operation"' is defined: as a landing or a. take-
�
off. Existing aircraft operations are usually projected to
determine if airport facilities will be able to meet future
traffic demands- The number of operations per hour under �
`
visual flight rules (VFR) is the key factor for judging the
capacity of the airport system of runways and taxiways_ It
is. estimated peak hours at the Oroville: Airport have approxi- i
mately 30 operations, and aak days have approximately 100
operations- The present annual number of operations is
approximately 1&,000- Calculations were made and. the capa-
city of the Oroville;Airport was found to be in :excess of
150,000 operations annually. The airport runways can easily
accommodate the projected aircraft traffic demands for the
next ten-year ,period, but. the :same cannot be said! .for the
taxiways and ramp areas-. It is anticipated that in the
future no congestion: will. be encounteredby aircraft landing
or departing, but as airport use continues to grow, the
shortage of ramp.space for tiedown (particularly for large
aircraft) will become more acute than it. is now. Further-
mare_, the need for an ext taxiway to serve: aircraft landing'
c..- runway 14 will becomemore critical.
- 14
-•
`:A DUSTRUL DEVELOPMENT
At present, the surplus and v4,ant lands of the airport have
a total area in excess of 200 acres.. This surplus- land has
a potential to develop as industrial sitescompatible with
-�
and complimentary' to the airport uses. Incorporated. in this
general plan. is the subdividing of 145 acres of this surplus
land into industrial lots varing in size frost one to twenty-
_
eight acres. The Airport Layout Flan shows the, three areas
planned for future industrial use; the 36 acre area at the
northeast: corner of` ai-rport;F the 8 acre arta south of .the
existing mosquito abatement district 4u -`incest, and the 101
acre area between the -two runways. Separate plans for water.,.
sewer, -`drainage and street systems to ser=e all of the air-
port properties afe included with the Airport Layout Plan.;
It hasbeen. demonstrated that industrial punts are mo --
attr, ed to r-_^ununities that have planned industrial air
parks and can ,quickly provide ready, sites than ta communities
lacking` plans' and negotiating solely on the basis of good,
faith. To this end the airportgeneral plan, has been
developed to meet the needs of both the aviation .functions
of the airport and the: proposed industrial: development of
a
the surplus lands. Cost estimates for all improvements have
been prepared and -priority items have. been listed in a ten-
year capital. improvement program.,
It would be economically unfeasible not to phase the develop-
rent of the surplus lands at the airport to keep pace with
the need for industrial. property.. The most log cal, site to
develop: first is the 36 acre parcel at the northeast corner
of the airport. It is considered to be in the "core area
{�
o 'airport and could serve asa seed effect to encourage
-.
1 T
AIDUSTPIAL DEVELOPMENT--caiair_tued
-'
further industrial development. ,l The parcels fronting Oro-
Ville Dain Boulevard West coule .r ,?nceivably develop commer-
cially and this option has, beep;, flineated on the plans.:
-r
The ten-year capital improvement progra,:r has been prepared
to develop the 36 acre core ares;_ �� the first phase of tie
;<
proposed, airport. Indus triz.l area. The cost of water, ewer
and street improvements needed to develop the 36 acre area_
has been estimated. to be $275,700, excluding any costs
required to extend water and sewer lines. to connect_ to the
systems; of the Thermalito irrigat:i.on. 'District.. The develop--
merit cost. including water, sewer and; street .improv=ements-,
is 'Tess than $8,00'0 per acre.
It will benecessary to carefully regulate the development-
evelopmentof
ofproperties at the airport so that each part will.be com
patible and complementary to each other. Studies of the
Federal Aviation Agency show:industrial developers now
recognize the desirability of locating on: regulated sites...
Developers want; andexpect their investment in an industrial
plant to be protected in the same manner that an investment
in a fine home is protected by zoning and other restrictions
from the intrusion -of incompatible uses. It is equally
important that the aviation use of the: airport be preserved,
andprotected, by regulati..g such -items as 'building heights,:
smoke.emission, and night lighting.
fi
ti
x,
a_
`
ao �. - . e
f � ,� 'Q. y
�.
I
I
4 ,
0
y
_ EP!
- -
PROPOSED TUPROVEYEUTS
7.
The _Airport Layout Plan was developed to st1aRr all existing
facilities along with proposed new improvements and: land
:
uses:. The Airport Layout Plan is the basic plan for the
airpw ;_ It complies with, all current Federal Aviation
Agent and. Cali bzin a Department of Aeronautics ,regulations..
Separate. plans were preparea 4ozW,s3 ._ y � o� �o�eT drainage
and street improve—max-&-5 ultimately- a?-�d d t' _ .•� = beth the.
""." . _4 e-
q�port arra the proposi3 industrial. 4- _as. 'ifae
assumptions and cr?t*-_ia, were% used in preparing the giaas-
'
WATER
Water will be served from the existing airport
well, the: Thermalito Irrigation District system
and. the Table Mountain Golf Course: wells.
Water will have first priority in improving under-
developed: land.
Pipeline sizes- wil be 12 -nines ,and smaller with
:
no dead -ends.:
The total '-water requirement at ultimate develop-
ment will be 450 acre; feet per year.
Thea system geak hourly demand will be 2,5010' gal-
Ions, per minute.
The required fire flora will be 2,;500 gallons per
minute with a minimum residual pressure of 20
pounds. per square. inch..
PO
�u
-
PROPOSED IM!'k0VEA(ENYS`-cent. nued7
The maximum system demand will be ;5,000 gallons
-ter minute..
SEWERAGE
Disposal, of sewage will be through the: SCOR West
Treatment Plant..
Septic tanks will be used as a. temporary means of
disposal:.,
Seweundeveloped willsecond priority in impro ring
g ..
lahave
nd-
-
Collection of sewage will be by two gravity-flow
systems. One system will serve. the: "core" area of
the airport and will discharge into the existing,
12-inch, sewer in Fresno Avenue_ The secGnd sys-
tem wi?-I discharge into: an outfall: to the West
- Treat_: nt Plant_.
Pipeline-- will: carry sewag.4 based upon 'a. design
—
flog df 0-10 cubic feet per second per ,acre of
property ,generating sewage
x
DRAINAGE
Drainage will continue to be provided-by the
existing system-until after the "core"area; of the
airnort is developed.
Drainage: facilities have third priority in improving
F
undeveloped land.
__7 --------------
PRO SED IMPROVEMENTS--continued
The system will convey the storrm water runoff pro-
duced by a storm of a ten-year frequency.
Discharge will be to established natural water
-
courses.
-
STREETS
Streets will have structural sections adequate-to
carry heavy ttruck traffic..
With the exception of the "core" area, streetshave
fourth priority in improving undevelo.ged:and.,
.�
The--oroposed street section allows the phasing of
_
the: improvements..
All. streets will ultimately hatre cobs, gutters
and driveway-approaches-
rivewayapproaches.Cost-estimates
Cost-estimatesfor the water, sewerage and, street improve-
ments are shown on Table 1, page 24_ Cost estimates for the
aii-port, improvements Iare shown on Table 2, page 25-- The
combination of these two tables is the ten-year capital
_ -
improvement prograim proposed to meet the aviation needs of
the airport and also develop: the 36 acre surplus property,at
the northeast corner of the airport. A schedule for the
-"
proposed projects is shown on Table 3- page 26.. All cost
estimates have beea prepared: using construction prises sur-
rentt during 14-arch,, 1973- The estimates can be converted to
other, years by the use of the. cons Lzuction cost curves on
—
page. 31 of the Appendix.
2`2`
_ -
PJZOPOS'U� TUPROVEYENTS---coatEnued
The ten=yeaL--capital improvements Nave a total expel l
of' -$430,600 which can be partly financed, with tF:e assistance l
AU
of federal and state grants .. Theindividual grant programs
:ixe not discussed here due to the constant changing of pro-
.-
cedures,. eligibility, funding and requirements: to qualify.,
The Federal F-.viatibn Administration. and the California:
Department: of Aeronautics: are the 'ewo agencies: ,from which.:
airport development grants have beer xvailable. For the:
development of the induce tr al sites .-n the: airport pr_^perry
there are: currentprograms and a great deal of pending.
legislation: that should make funds available to Oroville..
f
Consideration could also be giver, to Wither sources of funds
IL
such as revenue snaring, gas.tax, the general fund and:
participation" industrial concerns .locating on the airport
- property.
23
r
r ;,s
TABLE 1
GENERAL PLAN FOR' THE OROVI LLE AIRPORT
TEM YEA -9 CAPYTAL TMPROVEatFNT PROGRAM.
g., �.-
ESTIMATED COItISTRUCTT01! COSTS AUDI RECOMMENDED CONST CT SEQUENCE
FOX
WATER, SEWERAGE AND STREET TUPUVE klENTS
CONSTRUCTIO
Pu�T�C
ESTIMATED
r
SEQUENCE'
dUMBER',
PRpJECT DESCRIPTION
CONSTRUCTION
COST
f
l
W-1
6" diameter water, main in R-1 (w): including
$ 41,000
terminal loop 'and 'well connection. I0"
diameter water main in Oroville Dam Boule-
vard West from Larkin. Road to R-1 (W) .
2
W-2
6" diameter water main. in R -1(E) .. 8"
25,2C,
diameter water, main in south end' of R-1.
En diameter V,.C.P. in R -1(w) and alongr42,700
north property line of Mosquito Abatement
District to outfall in Fresno. Avenue.
'
ST -1
T%'est side of R-1 and south end of !cop.,73,2¢0:
S_2
G* diameter V.C.p. in R -1(E) and in Larkin
3,900
_
Road from -Mosquito Abatement. District
north.
ST -2
East side of R-1 lrop,,
E0,700:
TOTAL.
$275,7170
24
TABLE
_
GENERAL PLAID' FOR 'TNE OROVLtLE A.19PORT
TEN YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEUEUT PROGRAM(
ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTTON COSTS AND RECt�' UERDED CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE
_
FOR AIRPORT 'AfPROVEkiENTS
ESTIMATED'
CONSTRUCTION PROJECT
CONSTRUCTION
a
SEQUIENCE
NUMBER_
PROJECT'' DESCRIPTION
COST
].
A-1
Taxiway from tee hangers north of t-xminal,
s 6,000
building to runway :19.
,f
2
A-2
Expansion of existing apron west of termiaAl.
21,900
building (40,000 sq., ft, for 12 tiedowns) .,
3
P_=3
Taxiway cannecting runway i-19 midfield with
29,000
runway 12`-30 midfield..
4`
A-4.
Expansion of exist=ng apron west -of existing
36,000
transient parking (120,000 sg., ft.' for 36
tiedowns)
.
5
A--5
Lighting of all apron areas for safety ani
L`,00Q
airr=3£t security (approximately 14 light
staadards)
6
A-6
2 -box VAS'1 system each.end of runway 12.-30.
14,000-
—
7`
A-7
Golf cour3e. taxiway;, tiedown are_> for 221
45,000
aircraft.
TOTAL
$ 15 4 7 -Fr:",
L
s
YEAR OF CONSTRUCTION'
74-7-1075-76
75=•77
77-78
78-79°
79-80
80-81
81-82
82-93
83-84
to PROJECT
m W
w
$41,000
H E-1$25,200
Lra_
S–,I,
442,700
{
Ak. U,
S7-1
573,200
-
S—
�w
$32,900
rt En
ST -2
$60, 700
WROJECZ'
A-1
$" 6,000
Hi 7:
a z A 2'
$11,900
_
E-4 i A,-3
$29,000
s'
cm A-4
$36,000'
A-5
$13,00:0
r H. A-6
$14,000
=_
E A
$45,000
TOTALS
$17,900
$66,200 $29,000 $42,70"0
$36',0-U�=
$73,-200 $27,000
$32,900 $45,000 $60,700
—
TOTAL TEN Y AR EXPENDITURE.
$430,600
26
U;
BTBLTOGRAPHII
+it
ATnan6po�ct - 1972" The Air Transport Association of'
America,- 1972.
"Adpkatt Pavemen.a ion Light Acxena6#" The Asphalt.
Institute, 1970.
"Land Use PZann.ing Retati'ng% to AJiacaa �t No.i3 e" Bolt,
Beranek
& Newman, 1965.
--
"Oxovitte KunZcipat A.inpont - Aeronautical- Etta ten Ptan"`
k
Reinard W., Brandley- 1955..
"The A.inport - A Communxy Raae"Joseph A._ Foster, 1969_
r}
"AdvZ6axy Ci&cu a&6, A,ihpoat Ptann:ing Sexiea 15o" Federal
Aviation Agencg.
"O&ovZUC Genetat Ptan" Lampman and Associates, 1973..
"Fedena.e A.idb to £ocat. Gove)wment"' League of California
Cities:.
"CataZogue o6 Fedexa - Domezt c 4a.i6tance" office of
Management
f
and Budget,, 1972.:
"Oxay.ittt Mun.ic.ipa.e Ai- pont Ra.Zes and R'egutat.ione" City
of Oroville, 1967.
"Commu' ty' Ptann.ing So& A.ih Tnanspon.tation" Robert E.
Redding, 1960;.
`
"A-bt Tica6 jZc ACtiv ty" Department of Transportation, 1970,
.
1972, 1972.
"SZandaxd Specs6.icatiana Jox Const&uctjon on' Ai po>tt3":
Department of Transportation.,: 1968.:
:AZApa)tt Management"' The Institute of Transportation and
Traffic l ngineering, University of California, Berkeley-, 1970.
2S
BUTTE COUNTY
`I
1
l
PS'LOTS _ LOCATION BY RESIDENCE
Locotion _
RIQRVALE
22
PARADISE
71
OROYILLE
134
GRIDLEY
31
DURHAM;
I6
CH1CO
32:4
PALERMO:
I`
RACK:ERBY
BANGOR
1
BIGGS
9
BERRYCREEK
2
FEATHER FALLS-
1
FOREST .RANCH
2
PAAGALIA
t
NELSON.
3':
TOTAL
6194.
x s_
� t
.. . ....... .
.:....
.-
BASE- MARCH r �zrZ3 =1.a> � -•
< .RANGE OF PROJECTED
CONSTRUCTION COSTS
RECORDED CONSTRUCTIOI
PER, BVC% Iz'ERhVG MEWS-
COST INDEXES
a COSTS
RSCORD
'i '64' `65 'fib 16T '68 '69 '70 '71 '72 '73- '74 '75 '76 STT' '78*�Q '80 -'81 '82 '83
YEA31
Lli
I
I_
I-
f
x s_
� t
.. . ....... .
.:....
.-
BASE- MARCH r �zrZ3 =1.a> � -•
< .RANGE OF PROJECTED
CONSTRUCTION COSTS
RECORDED CONSTRUCTIOI
PER, BVC% Iz'ERhVG MEWS-
COST INDEXES
a COSTS
RSCORD
'i '64' `65 'fib 16T '68 '69 '70 '71 '72 '73- '74 '75 '76 STT' '78*�Q '80 -'81 '82 '83
YEA31
'
aFanucu
-
15J
February'
i21
21,
104
74
146
180'
March
(21
31
124.
59
87
207
April
85
14'
57'
48
74
157
May
66
24
64
96
164
163
June
11.4:
29
Sl
69'
165
179
j"
July
53
(2 )
106
59
174
193
August
38
24
51
38
168
174
September
37
(2)
74
21
66
192
October
38
23`
137
48
145
249
November
28
20
76
81
166
144
December,
26
12
31
65
80
74
TOT -ALS
485,131
214 (3)
954
702
1,511
2.037
(1 Local. aircraft not included.
Data
takenfrom
questionnaires
complete& by visiting pilots. Since not all
non -local
pilots completed questionnaires,
the number
of arrivals
are;
not totals but are:indicative.of
airport use.
1Z Counts. not. available-
(3) Total of'counts avalabla-
j
32:
TABLE
>;
i�
GEMERAL t'LAP: EOR THE OROVT LLE AIRPORT
a5TIMATED
CONSTRUCTION COSTS AND RECOMMENDED CONSTRUCT;=ON SE2UENCE
FOR WATER,,
SEWERAGE, DRAINAGE AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS
ESTIMATED'
CONSTRUCTION:
PROJECT
CONSTRUCTION
SEQUENCE
NUMBER
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
COST
I
W-1
6" diameter water main in. R-1 (W) ,. including.
$ 41,000
terminal-loop:and well connection.. 10"
diameter water main in:Oroville Dam Boule-
vard : West. from. Larkin Road t:;i k--'(W-I.
2
W-2
6" diameter water main. in R-l(E). 8"
25,200
diameter water main in 'south: end of R7-1.
S--1
6" diameter V.C..F'. in R-1(W) and along
42,70C'-
�-
north property sine of Mosquito Abatement
District to outfall in Fresno Avenue.,
L
4!
ST-L
West side of R-1 and south end of loop.
73,200
L
5-
3-2
6" diameter V.C_P. in R. l (E) and in Lark-in
32,900
-
Road from Mosquito Abatement District
north..
ST-2.
East side of R-1 loop.
60,700
7'
D 1
Beginning at the catch basin at the south
94`, 000'
end of R-1 (45" diameter R.C.P.), South in
R-2 to Larkin :Road 'to natural drain (51"
1
diameter t.C.P..)
3
_.
33
TABLE 5
COUSTRttCTiON. SE2UENCE- continuc-f '
COITSTRUCTION
ESTIMATED
CONSTRUCTION
SEQUENCE'
NUMBER:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION.
COST
L,
W-3
£s" diameter water main. `in Larkin Road from:
$ 23;,300
Oroville Dam 'Boulevard West to north pro-
=
--
perty line of the Mongz to Abatement District
and the ' e along the north property line of
the Mosquito Abatement District.
9
W-4
8' diameter water main in Larkin. Road from
29,200
north, property line of. Mosquito Abatement.
District to R.-2 and the connection from R-1
=-
to Larkin Road; along R-2.
-
10'
S-3
6"' diameter V.C.P.: in Larkin. Road. from
16,000;
Mosquito Abatement District -to outfall to
SCOR West plant.
I1
S-4:
G" diameter diameter V.C.P.., in R�-2..
11,500
I2
ST -3
R-2 cul-de=sac from Larkin Road.
25,500
--
13
'r1 -S
10' diameter waver makin_ .cross -runway 30 from
90,800
A-1 to lCt==xi tee northwest of R-3. 12" dia-
meter wad- -main parallel to Larkin Road: from
R-2 to intersection. of R-3 and R-4 and
along R-3 street to Ir."x12" tee_
14'
S-5
8" diameter V..'C.P_ parallel to Larkin Road.
52,500'
'-
Road from: SCAR outfall to intersection of.
R-4
:and $-3 streets.
'
15
S-6
6 "' diameter V.C.P. it R-3.
26,500
16
n -s'
Beginning: at the catch basin: north. side of
274,500
rur.
-way 30 to R-= (39" diameter R.C.P.), along
R-4 ;(54" diameter R.C.P.), and across Larkin
.Road; to. natura? drain (84" diameter R.G.P.) .
34
_
TABLE 5
CONSTRUCTTON' SEQUENCE--continued'
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT
ESTIl�i1}T£D'
rt tCOPT
SEQUENCE
NUMBER'.
PROJECT`.DESCRIPTION
STRUCl`ICW
COST
17
ST-4
R-3 from Larkin P.o?:i to cul-de-sac and East
'noo oo
portion of R-4 from R.-3 to cul.-de-sac.
_.
18t4=6;
l0":diameter. wdler main, in orovil2e Dam
Boulevard:
72,,100
from: R_1 (W) to R-5. 12." diameter-
iameterwater
waterm:: in. R-5 from Oroville Dam Boulevard
_
West to 10"x12" tee,,
191
D-4:
Beginrrsng at the catch bas.'-n north: side of
64,100 -
"'
runway 3Q to the eases side- of R-5 (34p dia-
meter R.C.P.) ,= and: south parallel to R`-5 to
crossirig of R-5 to natural draiR. n (42^ diameter'
D-2
=latch basin.at the intersection of Lark n`Road
'Oroville
=r
and Dam Boulevard west across Larkin:
Roadto natural dr si (24" diameter R_C.P_)..
20;
ST'-5
R-5--from Oroville Dam Boulevard west to joif
69,000
course.:
21
W-7
10"' diametc_ water main in west .: aq of. R-4
54,200`
and; parallel to runway 19 to the 10"x12` tee.
22
S-Z'
6" diameter, v c_P'. in west side of R-4.
27,500
_.
23''
D 5
Beginning- g at the catch basin on the northwest
121,504
side of runway, 19 across runway 19' (51" dia-
meter- R.CP.), to the .Larkin Roan. crossing
(66" diameter R.C.P.).
24
ST-6
R-4 west portion from R-3 to cul-de-sac.
71,800
TOTAL
$1,500,400
-
35
f
ESTIMATED:
PROJECT- CONS TP= -1023
NUMBER
PROJECT DESCRIPTION POST
f �
W -I
6' diameter water main in R -1(W)', including terminal
dop and well connection. 10" diameter ° water main in
Oroville Dan Boulevard West from Larkin Road to R -1(W),..
W-2'
S' diameter :nater main in R-1 (E); . 8' diameter water
�=
main in south end of R-1.:
8" diameter, water main in. Larkin Road from Oroville Dam.
Boulevard West to north property line of the Mosquito
Abatement- District and the tie along -the north property
line of the ;Mosquito Abatement District.
V-4
8" diameter water main in Larkin Road from north:pro-
perty line of Mosquito Abatement District to R.2 and the
connection. from R-1. to Larkin: Road_ along R-2,
W-5
10'" diameter water main across--unway 30 from R-1 to
1V'xaZ"' teee, north-west of R-3. 12:" diameter water main.
-
parallel to 'Larkin Road from R-2 to the intersection of
R:3 and R-4 and along -R-3 street to 10"x12" tee.
W-6
10" diameter watexr ka�.n in. Oroville Dam -Boulevard frezi
R-1(W)to R-5. .1 " diameter waterl main: in R -i :from
<, -
Yi.�...r:T• :d-. T►�rs A..i'Tacr�rii Wnc�- i-i� 4 i1"x�`. % R'
41:,000
25,200
23,300
29,200
90,800
72,100
54,200
$335,800
36
t
TABLE T
GENERAL PLAN °FOR. THE OROVILCE AIRPORT
-
ESTIJt�aY r. ` OHSTRUCTI'ON' COSTS FOR SEWERAGE 'UPROVE9ENTS-
ESTIMATED
-
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECfi'
NUMBER
PROJECT DESCRIPTION'
COL`.
S_l
5" diameter V.C.P in Fc-L(Wj and along nortr;. property
42,700
line: of I osqu to Abate -Mie" it D str of to outfall ire.
Fresno Avenue.:
S-2'.
6" diameter V.C.P. in; R---1(E)and in Larkin: Road from
32,900
_
Mosquito Abatement District north.
S-3
6" -diameter V.C.P. in Larkin Road from Mosquito
16,000
Abatement District to outfall to SCOR West plant.
11,500
6" diameter V.0►P.: in �. 2.
—
S-5
r
8" diameter V�C_P`. parallel to Larkin 'Road from SCOR
52,500
outfall, to intersection of R'-4 and R-3streets-
treets_6"
6"diameter V.C.P.- in R-3.
26,500
Y gj
S-7°
a ide of R-4.
6 :diameter V.C.P.- in west s
27,500
—
TOTAL
X2;09, 600
- 37
r
TABLE �-
g�
GENERAL PLAN FOR TO OROVTLLE AIRPORT
_
ESTIMATEV CONSTRUCTION' COzJ'S FOR DRATMAGE SVSTEM. IMPROVEMENTS'
ESTIMATED
Yx _
PROJECT
CONSTRUCTION
NUMBER
PROJECT.DESCRIPTION
COST
ry
h1
Beginningat the: catch basin. at the south 'end. of R-1
94.,000
(45" diameter R.C.P.) , South in R-2 to Larkin Road to
natural. drain (51" diameter R. C.P .) .
t-2
Catch basun at the intersection of Larkin Road and,
1,900
Orovile Dam„ Boulevard westacross Larkin. Road, to
natural drain (2'4" diam-ter R.C.P.).
D-3
Begimn ng at the: catch basin north side of runway 30
274,500
to R,4 (39"' diameter R.C.P.) _,,:;long R-4- (54" diameter
R.C.P.), and across: Larkin Road to natural. drain (8:4"`
diameter R.C.P.)
_
D-4
Beginning at the: -.catch basin north side; of runway 30'
62,200
_to tete east :_ode of R-5 (30" diameter R.C.:P..) ,. and.
}
south parallel to R-5 to crossing of R-5 to natural
- _
drain- (42"' diameter R.C.P.)'
D-5
Beginning at. the catch basin on. t;ie northwest side of
121,.500
runway 19 across- runwa'ir 19' (51" diameter R.C.P.) , to
- —
the .Larkin Road crossing (66" R.C.P.) .,
`
TOTAL
$554,100
3�
t;
E f
.
{
--- TABLE 9
GENERAL PLAN FOR THE OROVILLE AIRPORT
r
C
ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COSTS FOR STREET S`VSTEbt IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT'
ESTIMATED
CONSTRUCTION
NUMBER:
PROJECr DESCRIPTZON.
COST'
West side of R -I and south: end of loop.
$' 73,200
ST -2
East side. of R-1 loop;..
60,700
ST -3`,
R-2 cul-de-sac.from Larkin.Road.
25,500
ST -4-
R-3from Larkin Road to cul-de-sac and East portion of
100,700
_
R-4_ from, K-3 to cul-de-sac.: '.
ST -5
R_5 from Oroville Dam Boulevard west -o golf course.
69,000
ST -6
R-4'west portion. from R-3 to cul -dc. -sac.
71,800
-~
TOTAL -
$407, 900
_
3
{
17>ti moNT60A16NY eYRKIkT
OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 96965 AFICA CORK 916 eaa•sgof;
OrPitt OF THC
CITY ADWN$StNATOR,
January 6, 1981
t,
Ms Bettye Blair
6u}}oCcM.nI,�
Direct= of Planning
County of Butte
�� 1
1 County Center Drive
Oroville, CA, 95965
C4fgr*
.
Rei Air2ort Environ Study
Dear Bettyes
Thank you for your letter of December 29, 1980,cphcerning
"
the development of an airport
environs >3tudy.
At its meeting of January 5,
1981 the Orbville City,Council
approved a pre -application to
'
thc- Federal Aviation Adin
tratior (FAA.) for various airport
improvements including a
g
$40,00 environ study.
tt is hoped that FAA responds
to our request within the near
future to assist the City and
County to responsibly plan for
gtowth at and ;year the Orov.11e
Municipal Airport.
cerely
Zi
Davi M'L dinkens
City Administrator
DW Up
dc*,City Council
Planning Commission
4='
WORK PROGRAM FoR `nEVELOPING
A LAND USE PLAN 7"br_
L OROVILLE MUN.IC`TF'AL A1.11PORT AND VIC1,11i7TY
A. oB,IEr,TzVE
Develop a comprehensive laaac'_ use plan lo;o the Orovil.le Municipal Air-
port and 5urrouri4ling area.
B, ASSIThiPTIONS
*�.
1. The City and the County bath have legal responsibilities fol-
i' romprebensi,vc, land use
planning in the rea.
2. Unless otherw16L- Astated, all work shall be performed by City :and
County Staf With technical, assI�;t�� ice from other puUl7,c agencies' and
oonsitlta:ats As h0cessaYa part.
r cuxarl y , from the State Division of Aero-
nnauti:s5 (Do.A) 0,a3d the 'Vodt.,"a:l viation Ilninistration (FAA).
S. Tho development, ,00htent and a;ppl,ication of the plan shall be
a cOrdillg to the "Airport Land Use'Commi:ssi.nn'' (ALUC) requirE�ments of the.
Public Utilities Cod` and ,other applicable State and reder.a.l rOgUirements;,
4. The work shall be coordinated with the General Plan revision Unddr-
ay tG .faci,litatc: a comprehen, ve approach, efficient usn_ of limited
resources and. timaly cacmpletior..,
5. The plan shall, be Adopted by the Butte County ,Aivpo:tt Land Use
Commission (BCALUC).'
6, This work program .shall be approved by ROALUC, Board of Supervis
Ors, City Planning Commission and City Council before work commences.
C. A19P0, RT DEVELOPMENT PLAN
1. Objoctivo: Formtll.a.te a long-gunge do"velepm?:>7t xylan �Or the air-
port and related C, ty owned land (Citi, Irnginooand ol;Iter City Staff):
2Update description gi;istin.r . ,
g ftac,ilities and uses.
3. Detc rmina i'tlttlz�e devezlopitiont taectcls for aircraft relatrvd facilities,
A , Analyze e:�i,sting deficientlies in .Cacilitios I�rid operations,
b,. Estirtaate :future; {Ise and ope�•atirzns.
c, 17escri,be faci.l.i.ty ;ifnppovc5rnerits needed In next 20 years,
d. Est3ttiate costsand fatiding soUl`ces,
4. t)etormine Tutu" uses Of City OWhed land not required for air-
craft related fixeilities.
I1. t: Ml4 .b ex.7.w$i, ting uses,.
w
b. F�+eluate tt,terna,te Usos err ctncomr,,ittod band,
r
tom, Designate apprcyl)i•iato uses,
5.
Solicit input ut; for ftbov � " y
p �. �'�'Citn u5t'1" p.nCl l7'thG ' ll��t�l +� laarfi08 at �
.
4
6, pz ilat and distribute "horsier I)CAA Ql.opjneilt plan CUI� Arr �>�tlle �futi <
citral Airport" to str fl'S, 1a�exi:5, ►rt aarUy p'+r�spez"ly caatnr x�s tanci dncisioh htilhea,s,
7. tIcarin9 and al)Proval by City pltttrnl116 Collun;i.ssi.otl,
8. Ileitriaig and aldo.pt,ion by City
.Cotihoi,].. �~
-; .71 TX'ansmit, adopted plan to 8CAL, � ai plan
tan�� ``'� 0019 alll��
UC DSA FAA and Brie
r7
bRAVT
D: A1kPORT ENV,i'HUNS PLAN
1: Objective: j Formulate a plan of allowed uses and development
standards for the surrounding area affected by planned development and
operations of the airport.
?,a Establish airport',s projected area of influence as planning bound-
ary for environs plan; and BCALUC review;
a. Review DoA and FAA guidelines on obstructionand safety stab-
dards, noise .imparts, compatible land uses and land, purchases eligible
for funding.
b, Map above perameters on 400'-1" bvie with airport: development
plan (City).
d. Outline
eter edge of airport irn, perameters (City).
g
p boundary' ward to include whole parcels and surround
ung land whose development is related to use of affected parcels or other-
wise affected by airport operations,
e, ,Solicit comments from DoA and FAA on proposed planning rt
boundary.
f. }searing and approval of proposed 'planning boundary by C1,ty
Planl,.Lng Commission:
g. Hearing ands adopts n of boundary by BCALUC
I
3. Determine appropriate l.imitationn on structural"1,eights.
a. Develop regulations restricting structural heights per DoA
and FAA guidelines.
b. Map extent of restricted area(s) (City).
c. Map areas where no above•-ground 611tructUtes would be allowed
and areas allowing various structural heights (city). �
Evaluate aircraft noise impacts,
a. Estimate sound characteristics and levels associated with
projected aircraft operations.
b, Compute Community Noise .Equivalent Levels (CNEL);
c. Map location oi'CNEL 55, 60, 56, 70 and 75 (City).
d, Review State and Federal guidelines on compatibility of var-
ioUs land uses to'aircraft noise,
e, 'Indicated compatible types of use for areas 'between CNEL lines
on flap (City).
s
' �ffr"tiv.Hess. and feasibility of noise-reduction and
mitigation measures
5. Develop an appropriate land use pattern,
a. Map existing parcels and deve;topmoht (,City and Gp consultant),,
b, Evaluate capacities of roads rind utilities,
c', Review site capabilities for drainage, sewage disposal and `
agriculture,
d, Assess envl,ronmental impacts of compatible uses.
e, Present height restrictions, noise',i,mpaeth, compatible_ uses E
and area characteristics at public meeting(s) and solicit preferences and,,
ideas,, ,
f, Taxed on all above, designate ;recominended uses on map,
6, I^rint and distribute "Land tYs'e Plan i+a'p Oroville I�iuhiaipa,i,l Aix-
port And Envi;rdbis" (County), including the fr,tlowing
a, summery of airport devel6pmeht plan;
b, Adopted planning boundary,
C; proposed height test ;Ak. ti'obs,
Estimated noise levels and impacts:,
eR Description 'of ,planlubg .area,
f, riroposed 7,and tine pxt�,n�
g, Assessment of ehvironmental impacts,
"r'
t> 7.
Hearing and approval 'dy Ciiy :Planning Commission.
8.
nearing n.nd approval: by City Council,
9'.
Hearing and adoption by BCALUC:
'E PLAN I MPLRMENTATI,ON
1,
City adoption of General Plan amendment.
2.
County adoption of General Plan amendment,
3,
City adoption of consistent zoning and ordinances,
4.
County adoption of consistent zoning and ordinances.
.Si
Airport develi pm nt by City;,
a. Include facility improvements in capital improvements
pro-, . __.
gram and
budgets as necessary,.
b. Prepare and submit, applications for '" iA grants for e?':igible
activities
c. Purchase land fog• facilities and d'le,,ar zones.
6,
'Development review,
1�
a. Require appropriate conditions of approval fQ''r
1. Subdivisions.
2. Use permits and variances:
3: Conditional: rezones
4. Conditioned environmental determinations-,
Con corn ingt
I
j: Avigation easements,
L, Noire insulation:
3., Undergrounding of util,iti.es
A. Restrictions on 'Lights, smoke, dust, etc,
T3.CALU6 review ai all above impiel:hentatian act-ivities,
inci,uci;-
inn
g, g
enb,
cy notification of possisble inconsistencies with adapted
plan.
s
.i
j
,1
! ,l
r e ark
Infer a p " ,I�emorandam
r f0;
Planning Comity is s ian
Planning nepattmenirl.�
sue�E rs
Wn, k Prograhi for Peveloping A.Land. Ilse Plaii, for Orovilie Municipal
carport end Vicinitjr. Pile 81-81
pA mE
pecek,, `lex 4i, 198
The application of Phil Rauch etal to rezone property adjoining
i.
the Oroville Municipal Airport revealed spvpral problems with
the existing land use, plans and zoning around the nro'vill.e Airport.
This controversy was ifor the present defused by the withdrawal
of the application: Since that time the City of Oroville has
authorized the appraisal of the portions of the property needed
for the clear zone for the exis tang and proposed runway extension;
Inadditipn the City's Planning 'staff has dora;cciped a work program .
for the p%. ep'aration of a Land "g !se Viim-fo the Oroville Municipal
Airport and Vicinity. This work program; attached„ has been. re=
viewed and approved by the City's Plarini.ng Commission and f71ty
Council .
Thework program details the various .major compoients, *pecifi,:
Thi; P1an;,ing Delpart-'
steps, outputs, and ,agency responsibilities,
,.,.
ment ',s committed to a r6v-ision of th�i Open 8pad'6 and Consertration
Flemenis (nnvironment4l pesources Vlep,ient) and fither ongoing ,
projects see hemo on rrng-ess Report on Cie i. Plan, Laning, and
Other"Special' Projects) and can not gi;�rantee timely part Itiptition.
it will, however, try to assist with the project 11hele possible.
CII., Ir
Attac'htet,t IVarl Prograem for lievelopi.ng A Land Use Plan
For Orovlie ttunicipal Airport and Vicinity ;
1
;
1.
':3
1. l
BUT7E COUNTY PLANNINO COr'0188 OH
MINUI!S - December 16, 1981 P
B. PR.IORITTES
Chairman Max asked'for any comments the Commission might have concerning
the memo from staff 0,,ted December 7, 1981, and noted that Ms. Blair h;lA
requested that all Commissioners review Zhe memp, adding that this ,atter
would again appear on the Commission's agenda for,Jan,uary $ or 13.
Commissioner Wheeler reported that the Cridley-Biggs Adione would go td
tho Gridley City Council on next Monday, December 21., should be back to th.e
Planning Department soon; and questioned the project's standing as No. 1.1
oi� the riorit list. It was explained by staff that the projects covered 1'I
p y arranged i n priority order; and he was assured !i
�i4aththe memorandum uld not gg In
matter�.��jotild be on the Cor�missaon's agenda as soon as possiblE
response to a request from Chairman Max, ]ie agree,'- to work with staff Cin the
zoning proposal.
Chairman Max announced that he and Commissionor Schrader would wofk as
a committee to aid staff in the "Revision of the Zrni,ng Ordinances" --listed
,,nom the middle of Page 3� of the Progress Report.
�CommissonerSchrader also expressed, a dAsire to work on the "Orovi,lle l
\Airport Plaanil, but no official ac:ti..on was taken by Chairman Max.
Commissioner Bennett expressed the hope that tlUvestodk, in Residential
Aneas" o Page d, would soon be 'for thcoming--part�iculariv for 8,i -1 zon~.itig
ureas in Chaco; He reported rccenrly noting 53 violations in the Keefoz
Road area, 17 on' Bl Monte Avenue and IF on fii,cks Ladeal1 visible `without
even getting out of the car:
Christopher G. Wilbur presented a map entitled, "t�t;stc.r DAvelop meat Plan
Study Neal-EggUon property, proparod for Parrot Ranch Company by Foothill
Design GroUp, Master Plan Consultants". 1-1e also presentod copies of the
following letter to the Coirimissl�jn;
-gw
r
011
i
BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
MINUThS January 17,, :1982
k�. �iir�nrTIFS'
Otoville Airport Plan.
In response toa quety from Commissioner Schrader as No how this Com-
mission can be assured that, they are aware of what 'plains the City has
e' . :Blair commenced that as long as,i` is Commission
adding
I ar the airport,D1s. xss.xo
acts as the ALUC i.n,,iormation is supposed to be comm
that we are working in concert with the City Planner, and, made reference
to the memo dated Aocember 4 vegardi)ig tliis matter, to which was attached
the. draft for "Work Program for Pe.velopiag a Land Use Plan for 0•roville
Municipal Airport and Vicinity" which was; acceptable to tho "Co'thwission
at. their meeting on December 9 and was to have been presented, to the
City Council soon thereafter, and 1n the,absence!, of word to the '�O:n'ti•�xy
would assume that th.6 plan was also acceptable to the City..
j
y
a
,