Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout82-62 REZONE 3 OF 7BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES October 28,,,108g Collins: "Well, I have heard a couple of them tonight, but I am con- cerned about access of emergency vehicles to the proposed project.. We Are not concerned- about wildfires in the wintertime, certainly; but, if a house burns and a fire truck can't get in on the road, we lose a.. family. The County does. not want to be responsible ;Cor that or any other kind of loss of property or lifedue to the i7ab i.ty of the County to service on an emergency basis, police and :Eire protection, at any time. It is just too remote. If you stretch that road out you would place the 'development a much greater distance from Chico than it appears to be on a map." Schrader: "Yea, but do you have .faith in the County Fire Department? Condition NJ: Meet conditions of County Fire Departitte,11t or other responsible agency. I guarantee that Mr. Tei.e is not about to let that happen." Collins: "I don't have faith with the reduced resources that are available today; and this will reduce the resources even more. I believe that they would do their best." Chairman Lambert; noted that it is 11:00 P. M. Commissioner Bennett made a motion to extend the hearing 10 'minutes. Chairman Lambert noted that she was not prepared, or ready, t0 hear a mo� tion tonight, and suggested that if the Commission is satisfied with testimony that the hearing be closed. Commissioner Bennett's motion: was secondcd by Commissioner Schrader and unanimously carried. In rebuttal,,, Dan'Hays commented that this project has been in the making 'since 1979; that cost of services will be provided by .their community services district --`already have the fire truck there and plan to purchase more; ctuestioned that anybody will ever be happy with a £iscaa. impact report --something new to the County; that 30 thousand dollars worth of sal, evaluation shows there are soils up there --the question is to what degree can we put density;' that, if necessary a school construction fee can be levied that a project in the area was stopped ,3 years ago until a study is drone, and,, to date, nothing has g been. lone;. that the General Plan designation is A -R an most of the property; that this project is something thati was not conceived overnight; thatilve know we have the finest development that Butte_,., County has ;had so far ands it should be used as a model by developers to pay their own: way so that they do,not burden other, taxpayers,." In respons0 to a question from Chairman Lambert, Mrs.. if telae ^ said that a letter dated 6:ctober 26, from rrr: Uanhart and'e6ceived by the ap- p7 cant tonight (Later read into the record), Brought up;some concerns Whose concerns and others regarding the location of lagoons and residences, concerns' about mosquito abatement, and others that may not beaddressedin the specific plan Leave some questions as to whether the Commission has bei ore the:gin complete plans. She also commented that concerns ofthe�D'epartment of 'pishand 'Game'hadnot been discussed by the Commission, aria she would have some questions about' 'I-osing the 6. * * A, , * :- 1 - _ i BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING C01"221SS'ION 14INUTES --ctobex 7, rt �, 2 2. Bidwell Heights Land Company - Specific Paan and Rezone from "A­2" (General) and "A-160" (Agricul ture.l - 160' acre parcels) to "SR-211 and "SA-3" (Suburban. Residential - 2' and 3 acre parcels) , "N-C'' (Neighborhood Commercial)`, "PA--C" (Planned Area Cluster) , and IP-Q+' (Public - Quasi- Public) to allow the development of`an approximately'385 unit cluster and c,,Mventiona7 residential land project with neighborhood commercial and recreational facilities on property located on Doe Mill Ridge, approximately 7 miles south of Forest Ranch, one mile east of State Highway 32, 7 miles east of Chico. 82-964-620 F,^ Jim Snowden continuing his comments from the last meeting, again emphasized the cumulative effects of this and the many other - projects, pending and upcoming, but declined to comment on what would be proper land use for the area under consideration, He did express concerns concerning the chaparral program now being usod,, Dan Flays, Jr. said that they had met with Mr. Snowden recently and were woxking!on some. revisions to make the project more palatable to Fish and Game Department b' providing widest deer, corridors possible. Earl Nelson said that a meeting had been set up -with his, people and staff. for 3:00 p.m, next Tuesday to work on the development agreement and he was hoping that th;e agreement could be completed at, that time. Mrs. Kircher commented that the agreement Might, requ, re-pliblishing which would be gime consuming; that supplemental environmental info has been sent to the Clearing (louse and a 15-day turnaround requested; that LAFCo can not act without art eni;ironmental determination. Opponents: Tom Alden, 829 W'4th.Ave., a graduate student o£ Geography At Ch c6 State and was concered about the scale of the'projeCt and cumulative effects and asked that this projec should not be passed without complete ,plans fox the entire areae, Roger Cole, representing "Friends of the Foothills. expressed skeptic=5r About the feasibility of ponds for'septic d'spo;sal.; Commented that r 3UTTP COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES September 23 1013,2 To: ":Butte County Planning;, orovi,lle M Toni RdId, Environmental Health, Chico SUUJECT: Bidwell Heights Rezone - APs Various DATL: September 20, 1932 + The tentative Health Department recd mended conditions of approval prop rod by Planning staff' for discussion purposes are only tentative. Reconirriencictid conditions of approval will be prepared by the departmciit m1d, routed t1wough The Subdivision Committee when the 14ater Quality Control I]c�ard has £avorrtliXy commented on the project,►� and a letter, dated 9/2,/82 haat 1.:� County p1.atlni.tjq, 17cptirtnt�nb 7 CiJl nL—,y Center.` M-ivC? x0? 51.-01-437 !1'( ntaL:Jvo Par;ca,!. t+It"1. j L7e!e�,7' �,y�14'�1,Clttell: l' y w i l:a incl 1: Orm I hu prop,o Lir r ofo red to anci Ixe rryIng i_o clivi cle a t into I: .rot; u�7I-10.i,ng, paixtals as i.s licw shown key the pro�osccl i*p. �'tt anc� Ll1e p7>cc�k��� �a nfonrcd that aur tl�,s of the Work is n h t,� bfl a i ncludcd in, art of, 1,cv:ge.r, p].atY, ��p}, ar.'ct�L-J1 uu;�:i.clt7�t-t:(�cl �s Llie fiie(v�jc11. r:ei.rJl�t:z, i?rt7j(~o'h. ; SNlti..cz �1r� t►r,cicqsL-,,jnCI L110ilit-or roe a11.onah ,p b( Lc;cCtt the prorpertios, a,L this d int ?Al I In}a, ve vnul.cl rcgt.tr-_st tho L- ou`c pro o ,ol division or, prop< r.`Ly leo tl.etz oaLn of t je let:gc Vot.gIAL-s ProjecL- aad 11.(ncUc;cl oti; at i..ricli_va.du'a1, ba[;ia. F'.0 believe- that .gc,;. hal/6, G thax br through r3tcon ulvleora, ltingel As-,7f sc�c:};rtr(�:;, C►1c. cc cpl.icd With the various ji)o8t al xto obtain ap; PrOVa1 aC1,1110. &01.1',,si,on and v:c would rL ror:iz(t_� it very ►(tt((:lt. a.;C i:lie it!�a�I er t 1.C1 k;e l)r:('Cot'se d on 1 1 th^, cn C ml� zC!�')1.(:CtI 4^taLa l.0;'` or �) o,0.; �{ c�t,� p. asc J:CQ!. frc ci coinL C'1 c ,.t.ta, t'b pt ►.`c.�c�11_ Cir cotta ;e0.. of Ri ncjE4 & e1„oc ial es, Tnc, i n C}ii tea. r0}tanlcyo0Cor our cott,Liri- r, 0 B1.�V�'� t2. ((7�I�.I.1Cr5 0.l 4. FJ.1e No 82-62 BIDWELL HBIGHTS BUT'TJ., COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FINDINGS Septomber 2.3, 1982 - y , 982 (AMENDED Re; Aman,dtnoxlt to tor, Findings of Jul 29 I' ANALYSTS Due to t:41e •trceYlt submittal f larger scale plo 1 17:1.7131-s -Lor thr• proposed Planned Arca cluster re7onos and the dcsi: a a� ;'.. applicants its '+:0 41ave the rezone considered ,siMUlta.xloot"Sly Wtt h t;Itc! Sp(,,c:i.r`i,c Plan, additional analysis Of the: Bi,114011. ljoights pr« j Oct is, being forwarded The previous staf=f i indis gs did not 2 x° �:tve at a ct��xcl.usi.ort as do staff- recommendations. The fiscal analysis is being sent to you as rev;.sed by the CO -1-1- sultan'C or the applicant. Note that staf=f comments are attachod rr. h 41j5cJaimor as to the ct)zlcl.lasions reached. The Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo) Lliscussed this pro JPC'c. tit their June and July meetings. Considerable discussion Occurred as to ijhether community $0TV COS di �trjct or a countyservltie area tsoul.d be most appropriate. The minat:es from the perti. jt;nt LE3.1=Ca meotings are incov orae cl by reference. Tho status of idle tOxxtaiive parcel maps in the northerly portion of the pro°jcct area. J.s as follow's DicJc Chappell, 'AP 51-Ol-141, Appeal hearing to tiro 1�oa.c`d of Slapel— vasor.s continued toSeptembt r 28 1982, AppJ. can•L :t,)pea10d 3 conditions from the Planning DCpartment : An additional. caxldi-t-L On fx�ont t'lltr Planning Zlopaa tmt,?l • camp :Forth, to redesign tfte parcel atxd clusto`e homesites iAi accordance with, recent input from '4lxe Department; of 1?i.sh and dame F1.ynex Jexini.n�s,, AP 5l»Q1.�1,3/. !Advisory Agency approval of a 5-�>ar�o� t4an1e5it;es 1•;t re not show:1 i3x c div.1,sion occur=red on A,u,gust 9 , 1982 , cJ.la.st r a:rrallgemen't as ye=t, `though a condition to ac:campl incl r cs Was added as a rlanjii. i.g Depattmen.t t�011d lira alx/1tt L1�:1 �tlt l.t)n fli��.�1•�''� dii t,T lMid divisions include those , for 'Chuck Jacob o'i AP- 5:i L -army `LvdWi,g on AP S1-07. <1�.3, Carly rtcllaro on Ate �S6-"I'1 Doe Ivlili Vineya:cds on AP,:X46 71. Z5, Di Ft:ant cs viK1 ro.a ds a7`ld tr�tve;l times arc a., follows : lli i,hwty/44i,glxw y 3'2 sa�itos .jay/1'It itJer 99 a'ntorsecaJ,on to I1J.;h��ay / 1lx i ve` 7 .'1 nli.l as R lnii utos'� . wil.do t� Drive ftont ti,ghway 52 to' th'= �rt:styeral t;tlge.at: he prc,�r~xty1 3.7 miles, 16 mL»ute5 Dt?c: ti l Pa;acl/,t;en'�cr. Ga=p Aoacl 11it,ersecta.on �to fife 1)oe D1.al.l. 4:u�ad%Cro�r�r � oiYtt road 7.nto;rs ect`:ion, 3 8 miJ.as ] �4 m i,nutes ► at mtli�nulxt a, 15rnalt - L°� Poe t�f;ii Road/'Cc�rit:or�Gap Roac1 to t;aiyt;i;rvlle Road, 2 ,l- ;lti7ttatf::�� DOC Mli'11. Road/Center Gap AO` to tlont<y R,Unl Roladf els kyway, ` t t7 , 2 Mlles, 25 14ixlute sa BUTTE COUNTY Planning Commission STAFF FINDINGS - September 23, 1982 File ;82-62 (Revised 921/82) certify the E'IR as being completed with amendments on cumulative effects; ;and B. Note that the project may have a significant offect on the environment, and this significant effect can be reduce(]., but not eliminated, by the adoption of the mitigation measure;; pro'posed for adoption; and C. Recommend that the Board of Supervisors adopt a reso;l.�rLLoz for the approval of the Specific Plan, subject to the land trust for open space being in place and a county serv:i,c-.e area or community ;services district 'being formed; and that they adopt an ordinance for rezoning of the property to SR -2, SR -3 N -C, PA -C and P -Q on AP 46-71-18 (portion), 25, 26, 29, AP 46-81-01 thru 17 AP 51-01-127`thru 143r AP 51-02=83, 98, 99 and 1.00: Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. So bid t roach an(] drainage: plans tothe, bepi rtmLn t of Public Works for ap'pr'oval anal install the rogtiirecl faci''I i tics. 2 . Indicate a '50 -ft . bu i l di rr.9 setback line front the center -line of all st'ro0ts. 3. Sti,00t sIgns sliall be p'rovicled by Vie developer at all street intersections per• COLIn'ty r-ecluir�oments. (Subilr'i t 5 (Ilternate streel, names for tach street to thO 'County addr-OSS coor(li'natO for approval of sti,eet names.) 4. Constr Lict full s'LY•ect section on 'intor�ior sLrrets to section 5. Provicle monomontatiori as r"e'Llir°rel by tf)cDclsartmont of PiIb1icWlorks' in accordance wi''tl7 accepiecl st,an(I rr(l G. Stror_t grades and olhCr fe<ItLrOS ,Intl' co`nlAy aril the Butte COLD)I,y ord i ntojces, clos i re�,ol rr t i on and o flier accoirtcd Ong ;i ►7ecr ng. ,rgn tindards 1. Provide rbmianen`t so:l Ii L i ba for dra'inoge. R. 1111 rsrscnirrtts o record to be shown, on tire f i nail rrrair. _`;4 a,, M ti . �urx�. CotjrtrxONING r�aiia�tx�,�xoN S'I'. P� F FINDINGS - September z.3, 10132 (REVised 9/21/82) � 9. Moot requirementsof (3utte Cottity ["tire t7ol7arttjcwt or other responsible agency.; 10. Provide cif,culation. 11`. Pay oft= assessments. ' 12. MCCt 00' reel tires tints of the ut l ity comp�jn os (`i .e. PG E, Pacific Telophone, Water,, sevier) 13. Pay any dal it'icitic:nt to?:cs., 14. f=ile a, tontative ai,d fitlal !ibdivision map and pity appropriate fres, 15. Recoiaiior d thataftF+� i(lC dire 111110 units are construcLocl in these projects, no -furthcw clwellinG units be pc:.r^mitted until the main access road is coostructod to the RS -4--B County pavecl road stanclarcl Recourrwricl that the developers wok art th tho COMIt:y 'to sot up a machallism where the dkvalopo7°s of the -first 100 (Iwelling Units pay their fair sh,.irc F01- ti;ri7 con trurtion of the fu urc l)aved road as VICIr respcct'ive wilts are recorrc[ed or WIL11 thei;r> bui'ld'hig ponlit. 76, 4ficlor} b~idgo to lu ft, and place Guardrail an suite. 17 Pravada a coritmunity dolilcastic tiiatczsupply tlZa.t complies wit}l the California State Safe Drinking Water Act and tllo code of Butte County. (tentative) 18 Provide cottmunity sewage collection, treatment, and disposal f.aci litics •that comely Witit Ca''! :i forma State Regional Water Quality Control Board,, the cods: of Butte County, California State 11palth and Sa-r-ety Coale, ar.,l oi;izex appli.cal)le cocles and regul.atIQns governing,, tlin desi.j,n, coilstruction, and operation of tlao facility.; (tentati<ve) 10. Provide n service and Mai.ntenwice dist;-:i,Ct or other legal, on-tity or entities adequate to insure the constructa.on, maintenance repair, or improvements oveents of ti,e dotttesta.c water supply system and +110 comntuni.ty setrer collection trocx'tment and disposaj iacil.ities. (tentative) 20, Appli.cant must a)AAYA c0lilply with all otliex` applicable S to a loca1 stat�ites, oxr1J,3iances, andr'cg�,tl�ttio�,s N!T:TI(i!\Tx i•7 4�WIASURES 2l . tatti 1i7c tandard or6siot, cot7,trol incas,Yros arnct construction practicos to, marl i:iil ze oxo ,i.otx ;endoti,� a" construct'4ran� imi�acts- ' Gvaclingr ractico;,, ri:t►ogo ;�+; c�a an.cl use �ol; etcter4tion Ponds -,fox 'otl�o x4ai aai:--colltral riio,a'bu,re8, a v o too I)e i.iatp,l;ertten rd a, dIsC'us5ed oil' pard 21 of the 1i J.It. File No.; 82-62 BUTTE ,COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION - September 23, 19$2 STAFF `FINDINGS Re: Amendment to Staff" Findings of July 29, 1982 ANALYSIS: le lot plans fort e of larger scale Due to the recent submittal g and the desire of the Area Cluster rezones , + proposed Planned Ar to have the re2analconsidered applicants thesBidwelleHeights1proj�dOt Specific Blan, additional y findings did not arxivo is being forwarded. The previous staff to staff recommendations. at a conclusion as i The fiscal analysis is being sent to you as revised by the con, - The that staff comments are attat ed s sultant for the ap licant. Note to the: conclusions reached... With _a dig sclaimet as, The Local Agency Formation Commission �LA'Cbleddxscussionhoccis urredct Consadera. at their June and July, meetings. to whether' community services district or a county sex�rice area, - the LAFCo as minutes from pertinent would be most appropriate,- The minute meetings are incorporated by reference., f The status of the tentative parcel maps in the northerly portion P of the project area is as follows, to the Board of Super Appeal hearing p - Dick Chappell, AP S1-01-141. ApP Applicant appealed 3 AAn t visors continued to SeptembexDepartment�: 1082. additional condition the p conditions from the Planning arcel map' from the Planning Department came forth to redesign p m the e with recent input fra accordance homes�.tes 2n acc Departmster ' hand Game, ent of Fish xoval of a 3 -parcel AP 5101 Elmer Jennings, -137. Advisor Agency app 1982. Advisory were not shorn in a division occurred on August 9 omplish this as though a condition to acc cluster arrangement yet, Department condition/mitigation measure. was added as a Planning Pending land divisions include those for ChroRonaAPr46-71 28 rand139 Carl Ma Larry Ludwig on AP 51-01-143 Doe Mill vineyards on AP 46-71-25« ravel. times are. as Distances via roads and,tfollows; -------- wilder 32 Hx hwa 99 intexsection to Highway 32/Sant0s WaY Highway /„ y Wilder Drive from Hi.g 'way 3� to the '+�i ,g Drive; 7.7 miles', 8 minutes+. Doe ll edge of the property, 3,7 miles, 15 minute,�r. int westeyrn Road/Center Gap Road intersectioni to the Do eat 1maximum of1,a ph 3.8 miles,; l4 manutesr, 9-10 Road antexsecti.on, Zit mi7�e;.s, Doe M4 11, Road/Center Gap RenteroGaenRoaditoeHoney�Run Road tiie minutes+. Doe 'Mi Road/G p Skyway `. 0 .2 miles , 2 5 minutes+ . i; BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION S'l'AFp FINDINGS w September23, 19182 6; 9, Moet requirements of Butte County Fire Dcpartrncrtt or other responsible agency• 10. ; Provide Circulation- 11. Pay off assessments. 17. Meet the requirements of -tile utility companies (i.e�, PG $it B, Pacific Telephone, viater, seder). 13. Pay any delinquent taxes,; 14. File a tontative and final subdivis on map, and pay approt)r•iate fees. 15. , Reco►n�nend that after, 100 6 yelling units are constructed in these dt,rel l i ng units be po rmrt ted until these-the main pr•o jects, no further is constructed to the RS,4-�B County paved road standard. access road Recoi►r,ricild that. tile develoe tfir firs1nOndye1ling'to setuni'ts pay , the developers rnechanisnl %.,hers.�`rofl`if�r for the construction of the futL1Y'L paved road as their` fair share fairesr s arC: ortllits are recorded. or with their building permit. their 16'. 4fitlel trr'd5e to 26 ft. and price guardrail on sa►rfe. 17. Provide a community domestic water supply that complies, witl, Water Act and the code of the California State Sa..e Drinking Butte County: (tensa ive) 18. Provide community sewage collection, treatment, and disposal California State Regional.. Water facilities that comply with Quality Control Board, the code of Butte County, Cal ifornia and odes State Health and Safety Code, and oonstruther ctionabandcoperation he design, c regulations governing : of the facility,; (tentatirte)ict 19. or provide a service and maintenance aistronstruction�theT mainteleinance,tity c or entities adequate to insure the orimprovements of the domestic water supply system repair, and the community sewer collection treatment and. disposal facilities. 20. Applicant must a1jo=.�; comply with all other applicable State and local statutes; ordinances, and reg,ulati j AILTIGAT ON HEASURES 21.; Utilize standard. erosion control measures and constxuct;on a, Andtuse o fndetenti._QA, pondsts. practices to minimize erasion reve.getatzon Gx.ading practices, for other ruriaff'wcontrol measures are to be' implemented ;as discussed renpago 21 of theS' • R•;')' 4 6uffe Co. Planning Conon, AMA + SEP 21982 �. oroville, Calif DUT`1'F COUNTX SUBi7] VISION CO +INI:I:TTEE N11NU1 September 1 l? p�.(:;SEN • John Mendonsa, Ton Reid and Steve Streeter E1LS'�;UL�tT' Stella Spoor, Dan Hays, Sr..and Dan Hays Jr.,, Earl Nelson 1 --------------------------------- A , pA -C PRonC`>~ FOR AEVMT hts A .and pro j ect consisting of 7 'PA -Cs), AP 46_71-1.8, etc,, gdvtel.L Heim 385 dwelling units plus a small commercial and recreational area on 1200 iles east of Chico. acres located on Doe NIa17tRiLand Codge; 7 m, Engi oer: Ringel and Associates Applicant: Bidwell Heigh �pndonsa stated: "I don't think that anybody here today' Assoc -- is ready to malts John �5., final comment on this matter.' quite a bit Tom Reid stated that he had some general soil infOrmation tdi,sp sal. of the main area. There are no specific design for sewage d�.sposal. At this ttr response would. ha re to be .general in nature. Our comments are- essan�%�-ate point o p _ the same as far as water supply goes. disposal requirements. Zoning in area wa" There was some discussion on sewage discussed at this timeo x i; f>O't Hay, Eastttood Avenue, ys stated that the rsrl Chico. Mr. Hauaremer�txv Dan Hays, 755 F,gE3- zoninrequires a tentative g informatXon for map, which wa;� discussed b��'��`e• rA n rY zximun density knowing full Wall- that; final density is Our _goal was to sea t desist, thing less than wha� is on the map or certainly not exceed, then �t�? wooly system, with adequate percolation test with approval of Water gt1alitf the y on a project by project basigo. There was some discussion on requirements of Water 0,ualiY Control' 'earl Nelson, Consultant From Chico. Mr. Nelson stated he thoughtfor vthe uM-=ingw to have sufficient in for the policy decision :Zeces�nr� s ecifics to be nailed down on the subdivision znsp. the developer' "�'ant_ and the p He could go with SR 8' but trn'�°t 1s to ,go wjth FA -C because there is clustering. as desirable. VTe have xeguired much more information than a S �_8 �tr�ui'":; x+eq�=i-t not that youe L gnat We are loolong for a little: caopera ospecific ec ficsecouldtbesmade at the blat&T, vision you have "enough information, that t p level; so that we -can get the zoning out of the way. There was discussion or, zoning. Bari Hays stated that the one thin that you have to understand is GJe armehkiar at, 2p year ;build out on this , we axe ;not lookinS to build a t tomarror,�� with s nes way, that it is eoonamically feasible to go in for a zone find go thxak. et 'is certainly not pola-e�/ as��' "t what perhaps ha•s been policy„b fore. Ob;hers, y 11 ,subdivisions that have been Z5A-J,, ordinance. rt is not policy as to a ata 10 term it uhe;pant did not ha�re percolation testydone. We are lookanunder e d�ea1. build out and what we have shown is the absolute maximum It ai based' ctnditians gv�-n. an approval, by Water Quality Coritral or, a certain d.ez. Oft the' ; ercolation based ori the datum and final soil evaluatii.ons,” In o'er» consersa4i= PA -c Mo. cx 1,0R RF,11.[ . icl�-ihts (A 1az1 pxoecconsisting of '(xF�-Ct s), AB 46--(1-18, etdwelling. txlt9 plus a small ca:^�srcial and a,^ecres� iartst area on 1?_00, �tex•eW on Doe M'11 Rid e, loctt'tetl 7 miles eaat o' Chico. .Applicant B3.dtVe.1<7 )Ieights La.nt1 Go. Tw1k. Mendon:^a rioted tha u- this is nano PA -Cs rzoI ., 7etn I►ays, Jr. 755 EastWodd Avenue, Chico I�Ir.' Hays sltiowied the comm ttei~i ; small changes on his i a two nap, one s charlge in a small._ cul-de..Mac to aceomoclEt(;(r a ,fond area; ' change other change wrap to move ttao units to znalcc room fax^ sept�tg� a�lrlw ieit}1cr change ic��kes a change a n clensitr. p , Mt Hays then displayed .spJ.ayed his ma as des;igrzed b p shotai.ng the axldatioil Ponds far the aevo:1.45pnjetit, y Ellxs Dolls Of Ro11s, Anderson and Rolls . y the saint as fox Ca lLforntz par.,k wa h changes made to aecozoUdateThe ethet heavi r�1 waq F^i.ca.1jy fall, in this area.xy�,, s1=' x tizt- T11t: maps were looked at and diseussetl by N1 M Hays. It was noted that the x!. Rein he eVeloter, bzr. Mendonsa �ttrd vidual OWAGrsh-i.p and separate Ponds pwere ldesigihled to keep eeverent a Ye under in;ti- y g clear. Mr. Reid told Mr. flays. that a r package c Oxidation ponds would need to be, haw�i;ng the design ettJ,ctrlations, for the he 'Water Sacramento and to' the Butte CountyeH althtDepartment4ua-fty Control Hoare? in There was same discussion about the oxidation ponds. Mr. Streeter stated that this project would make a zriajor enough change in Ponds - area to require a 15"day revieV. Mr. I: ays replied li.ed that Bunte Cat,.. g the try Counsel did net consider tllti traject a significant crzurigc� but. Mr. Stxeater fel'v' that rq��yb he should talk to our, County Counsel. The quiguirenaeztrs. kl re was mare discuss;i:oh about the oxidation ponds and Health Do artment xe- I�r Streeter comtrzented he vould, check cy: Bass of the Clea_rIng House re ax'diing these Dchangeel sr and�thatrlhe v ould ty ,a:, and Ron, y a g'wg daskfora r COzmoissil = could aQt 031 a rezone. 1, .cia z evea.w before •Lha, ,Y1alni...z r4ox•t discu85a on about the Oxidation ponds and the ,Possib•il;it3r Q:� c}zaztr�an lizl cs, at a later, date. g g to lca6 that, Mthe roa stated that most of the `qublic Works conditions t7ottlt� be � , •Lh�tl� •Ghe road...sectons p:e��,�Qscd on the stand azt,I Wr�r!ks will ask i`ar and recOzt urs projeo:�, reaps were basically taj but' 'ubli be ;tnnin of the, pr oject. Ike zeal i zec�tthathe atile � 7 airy 'f Woad be P�,ved at!.the +✓azzr�ni ssiQn and t4 Boa d and. I.)? cant �Vat.ld appeal thea to tlt r}tit. come u r it v�oulcl be theili decision but that p 't�ith a good teasori trh the } X'tl�I, ,Works cau„ld it. etc, ^ y nth unit sltou.1d do itthe. ;5th unit shOuJx1 t ri x _bla Clax`lcs would x�ecozzzraend the fi.x^si, itiz b before any x^aad skrOuld be paved; the access road all t ,c a ' o?te gels ii1, the 11tiotticl a kr w ix am Hwry. 3� ott ApjlicaiL said ppea•l, Lh:i s to the J3oarid artcl b4r. Mendollsa said that 4tatilt ' r r �pp� icarits obi ':ected to this, s ctridikx:ar} and bit^r be the be'� th�za;;, G�orlc5 Director could ehahgie thi. l c'ondi,tian, 'it cwoulG abeahttls decisiSt oneb�rry,, SUBIUSSION COly [TTTirE MINUTES '` 9/ 15-182 Bidwell Hei rhts (continued) More discussion about information requ: remen1Ls and the oxidation pond mans by Fart Nelson,nviranrnentala,st :From Chica, Stt:Vc Streeter and Tom Reid. Mr, Nelson wanted to know how so ll the 1"lanhifig, Gor=1.9sion could act on this project and Mr.. Streeter said if thQy received allthe inforimtion needed they col:r�,c1 possibly act at the meeting of October 7, 1988 Mr. Read stated that the two Hain conditions, of the Health Department S,Yot1.1A be 5 to set up a district of some sorb; :and that Clic f:nal gond design meet Wat,e ). g Quality Control Board and Health Department roclutir ---ment;s, there may be one, car two other requirement?, but thorie would be the two man requircment8. Mr. Mendonsa said Public Worics would, get the onci itpm, thenmajor access woad, at - which time it should be payed, to the Planning Commission before the CoMmi.e s:i.oz acts on this Project. Mr. Streeter clarified that Mr. Mendonsa`s condition: would be to provide cireulati;on, Mie. Streeter said he. would amplify that condition. Plaiina ng Dc partmnnt' s conditions. should be ready by September 23, 1982,2, they y�ill have to consider input From the Departmeexit of Fish and Came xegaxding possible �.' injury to fish and wildlife. Mr. Mendonsa said if rish and Game found there Flau]d be injury to Fish and wildlife, the Advisory Agency would have to recommend a denial and the developer would have to appeal.. .It was decided the applicants would meet with Mr. Castleberry to clear up the Public Works condition regarding paving of the major access road. There 'was 5oiue discussion as to no5sible dates when theproject could be heard befory the P Lanni ng Commi ssa.on Hearing Closed . ,i h; h � vzSx N cor�Tx rE M'TMts 9.IiSl82 Nine A.P. 'No's; Legal Des Xitions 46-71-18 vk'.� 1. SE'k of the SWk of Section 12, MN, R2E, MDB & M 46-71-18Ov� 2• SWk of the SEk of Section 12, T22N, R2E, MDB & M 46-7.1-15 J:{W 3, SE's oc the SE's of Section 12, T22N, 112E, MDB & ri 51-01-127. 4i 5Wk of the SWk of section 7, T22N, 'R3E, MDB & M 51-02-9$ 5. Wk o,f the NWk of Section 18, T22N, R3E, MDB M 51-02-99 6 NEk of the NW'4 of Section 18, MN R3E, MDB & M 51-02-100 7. SW's, of the NWS of Section 18, 'T22N, R3E, MDB & M 51-02-83 8. NW'sof the SW'k of Section 1$, T22N, R3 E, MDB & r 51-02-83 9. SW's- of the SWk of Section 18, T22N, R3E MDB & M NamedRoads• Doe Mill Ridge Road' B Central Po:rtion. Three parcels and a subdivision as follows: Parcel northwest of vineyard: AI' No. 46-71-26 1.eaa1 Description p he SWk' of Section 12 , T22N RU ";jj B & M, of t h, A ortion of Por recorded Califn and mord nparticularly described as Parcel. 3, in Butte county, in Book 63 of Parcel Maps at. Page 74- 4.Named N . att6dRoads: Wilder Drive 2, Vineyard; AP, No 46-71-2'5 LEsgal De"scr.iption Section 120 T2200 R2E,, MDB & M . and a por't:Lon of the SW's: A ,portion of the SES of R3E, MDB M in Tette County, Calif. , +and more patt`ioularl.y, of Section 7 y T22N, , described as Parcel ?, j: corded in Boole 63 of Parcel Maps aC Page 74B,-eGc.i�lam,ing cmm Named_ Rooads: Wilder t)rive (200 to ,the N) _ _ �jja� r`eliforaia Parcels Representing 60% of Bidwell Heights Land Project Assessor's parcel No. Owner Acreaoe Howard Isom. and Guy Hall 120 46-71-25 Paul Petersen/Doe Mall Vineyards 93.22 46-71-26 Dan Hama 86.2.9 46-71-29- Howard Isom and Guy Ha1.;1 20 46-81.-1 thru ,17 _ Dan Hays 96.15 51-01-127 Tony Picchi 39.59 51--01:-128 Dan Hays' 49.6 51-01-134 Dan Hay 20 51-02-83 Jeff Cusick and Dan-HaY s, 78.76 51-02-98, Al Batt 39,58 51-02-99 Imhoff and.Stone 40 51-02-100 Je'f'f Cusick 39.5 Total acreage 722,69 i Butte; Co. Ftontning Pomm. MART � � 1987 - Qroville' Cafifofn(p Lx d�ve11 Ife:.grits Lana Lo. _ 3040 nary neem r P. 0, Box 3034 P. 0. Box Chic;, CA 95926 Chico, CA 05927 AP 46-71.18; etc, AP 51-02-0,96 11 . H T otiv41xd xsbm ; I , G F, N. Medina Box 159, Nimshew Sago P. 0. Box. 321 Chico, CA 95927 Chico, CA 95926 AP 46-:53-57,,S9AP 51;-36-028,029` II. F, A, 11a11 P. 0. Box 1638 Michael Wimer a Chico, CA 95.927 I 1209 h Lincoln St. Watsonville, CA 95076 AP 46-35-0040023,46-71-17 AP 51.36-064 Jack Moline. Donna Winslow 10045 Midway B.ox' 210, Nimshew Stage Durham; CA 95938 Chico, CA 95926 AP 46-3S-006 AP 51-36-065,066 M. F J. Hzxris J. & M. Tutnex 175 B. 4th Avenue P.O. Boa' 3651 � Chico, GA 95926- Chico, CA 95927 AP 46-77-007 AP 46.71--001 R' r Helen Rawla'.n i J. & P. Williamson g 1691 Pai`kV3'..ew Lane Rt. 5,, Box 90 CC Chico, CA 95926Chico', CA 95926' s AP.46-71408 AP 46-71-04.3 Carl Anderson nail Nelsen & Assoc. 1.74 Nimshow Stage 330 Wall Street, Suite6 Chico, CA 95926' ` Chico, CA 95926 AP I51-01.-105 , viron: Dew. Inc. P. 0. Box 96 Or incla, CA 94563 ' AP 151.-01-11.7,118,119 } ': Roih. Investments 2521 Biscayne Blvd. itiami, r'L 33137 4 4.P 51-0'1 14; P, I lu. mmc r � P. 0. tox 629 Chi.co, CA 95927 AP 51-0`1-1.45 Barn Bunce P. 0. BIOXI 1450 Chico, CA 95927� LAW. OFFICE OF Jom4 L. L:uVAAS, JR. X+ ATfORNEV, AT LAW 525 WALL ST. --,P O, Box 3276 Bgff0 Co, Planning Comm. CH1Co, CALIFORNIA 05927 (918) 893=1758 May 81 1984 Qrov%ll©, Calitarpiq r. 3` Butte County Board of Supervisors 25 County Center Drive Orovlle, California 95965 Butte County Planning. Department 7 County Center Drive , Oroville, California 95965 .` 'Re Bidwell Heights Land Company Specific Pl;n r. File No. 82.-.62 Dean Supervisors and Planning Department staff: Thins letter is in reference to fire protection condi- Bidwell Heights Land Company specific tion 2.7.3 of the plan for its project, on Doe Mill Ridge. I note the require- the fulfill- ment that "a bond is to be posted to guarantee these requirements, within 30 days of the approval ment of, of the Specific Plan." The specific plan was approved on which to post that bond September 20, 1983. The time within therefore expired on October 20, 1983: This to inquire whether the bond was posted as the approving the specific ^is Board of Supervisors. required in plan. I noted with satisfaction that you have taken legal environmental fees assessed a- steps to enforce payment of gaanst the developers by. the County. I respectfully request that you immediately take all available legal action to en fully adequ. if y ate requirements .a force the bondin re uyrement as well, bond has not been post_ Please advise me in writing at your earliest possible status the bond posting and as. to opportunity,as to the of in which you have determined the adequacy of the the manner amount of `the bond to be posted. I respectfully suggest that this bonding requirement that; ,if is` a condition of approval of the spec,i fic pIa,, an.a Inter-Departmoofal Memorandum }',�clacG�,a Ile:i�a11�s 5}�cc.a. t":i,r l�arltx }�<<c 2, G 17i=�1'i.nty:eTld ) 7`eS,i.pll 2, G, l DI"aJ-11a9C PICLns o..roto be, 5111.7111].-t,tod t0 1;11(1 Doo-ll-tmont dr Public 1v�01"�.5� ;nl Call ` vV l t. l rCi IIl p Clllq ) Nil. CL})p'r'ava''I clT1d ills tall ;1.i ;Loll of the roci`l.l:i.'j"Od, frac LlitJ os' &1r.f:ace vaitor i Llnof:f is to be coo V'Cycd. to t11e nca:rest natlll~a1. valor coLlrse for clny pG,a'ccls of J:css than 3 acres t 1�'C7l5of for ally PA -C deVCloplllcsl1',ty p: lass t.hclR 3 acres per divel,l.:i:ng uIl L'l St7nd4rd o osi.on cojit7'pl. mGc15111 CL+ alld CollStrUC'tlon practices are to be utll a,zce to IdA1411117, erosfl on and atS Graclillgpractices, 1Otlo7llri}aLl?C C�Cttia on aT]d use. of detCaat ion ponds Cal' p1�1CT" 7'1171 C) (I `cCirY't1'O:I Illfil~1.Sura are to be iltlplc'anolltecl as (115cusse oil p-►�,c 2l of the. 2.6. 4 Resident 1regC Lc'1tx p11 J.S �0 1)C; rCtcl l.11ed Cycl�I.? c1S I1CGC5Si1I')� for building sites, roads and seIviL&;C di SPosal areas. Graded a't e6s care to be '! eVt`f;CtcttCd Iv, 1lnt;LVc vegetation pr'01: to the 1�';I.nteT rainy season (1`1CaVC3rVer to Mc'-Tch)- 2. 6.0. The devt;l.opment slid l be !)art of all), dTaial.age district formod for off-site dram@,@. 0:1 LittIC C1ij co Creok: 2 7; Piro Protection 2,7,l A fire protect'.on plan shall. be dcvoloptac1, In c.on un tio3i with the }Butte County }''l.re 'Departnlent, to prov1de all adequete level of fire protecti.011 aS resa.dent:ial develop- ; Ilient occurs. 2.7.2 Nonflammable le llf lte,74,EtlS ave to be 11SGd. 5. l YoC1 E;t.Jlo' Of Strllctlires . 2,7.3 A, .F:I.re 5til l ip11 S=ite is to bC C1 Ca C1 LCii I EICi, - and a V0l 1rlt�teer .St itjcan CC)ll stI Licted. to fire dep3xftiivent 5'pocificat,i"'Ons S'}lal,l: 17G 1.1'O1�l,CleCl pr'i.or to, the OCCL1I7t111C:)! c'I' 25,,,Gr more, of t1ye living Units, A sere c'eal�:le fi—Ally-et`ulpped:Circ ctls;icro ;Ball lie pz`ov:LdOd pra,o7- Lo the i 51,M]lcC .of f,j.Y'S'tt 17uilc1ingporit1;i.t: after approval OF the SpccilIF C Plan A bon[ 1.S to be poStc,'d 't;o 9.vwil nntoe t11C fu -i": ll;'Ilent o:C t 11 Usu 7. cgLl' •r}csrnentza tier i'tla in aQ of the apprcarvl or the Spec.i: Ca.c PIC".11. 2,'7.4 3 ;F:lxe kl')rCl'J' Lllt a'r0 to be p]"C3"i�iAod lk'1l't spot ;;paLCing. kl.ycl:1�41nti :loC.11tl.ans U,11,;l ba �5:elesa. 1�.�1 eel ley the fill o '}l6partnlcalt. ' (;CXCytl:t2.7, p lie pl'C)lr;l,dC`d tt3 tllA; I.10rth toIva v(1 Foros t Ra:Iidl 011 Cl to t1 0 t +t to l3lat C>t`C:�1` G "Lny orl . 4 , BID WELL HEIGHTS SPECIFIC PLAN List of, the Plan Policies As Adopted 1.0 :LAND USE Land uses within: the boundaries of the Bidwo,1,l. Heights ' Property shall conform to the Specific giantµ dated Sept. 20, 7.983, 'which include:4 wildlife corti,dors and designated open space. l.2 Residen.ial,density shall canl;aam to the Fa:l:Lawing . -fol' standards the - of Butte CoUnty Gene_ al Plan ; Agricultural, - Residential, 1-40 acres per dwelling unit (prige 49 of the Land Use: Element as adopted on October 30, 1979). The `ito >rhedent relpro�lec9 a.nd development Cx.lt 'applyeria 1.3 _ The design and placement of residential units shall be compatible with neighboring agricultural activities, primarily grazing to the south-southwest. 1.4 Heights of residential structures shall be varied with two stories being the maximum height. l • 5 Open space areas,' including the wildlife corridors shall be maintained in perpetuity through a land trust. 1.6 A resource management plan shall be prepared and imple- mented for all the open space areas as .and. trust to ppart of the > prated and maintain the Y'' biotic resources and mirlimito impacts. of the devel:opment5 l.7 The lana adjacent to the on-,sito pond within the deer corridor �a1,11 remain in l.ts natural condition so as not to'.interfere with migratory wYdlle that might use the Pond as a source o:1r water. 2.0 FACILITIES ANll 5RVICBS •l Road Networ,u - 2 1. l Wilder Drive and. Canyon .Shadows Raae project d, xtendingr om ''the site to Sant os Way' and `ta Highway 32 shall be maintained to'at least411 RS-7.-standard:, a plus in coal coat the shot t- oxm _lr - Tidwell Heights Specify c Plan page 2 After 100 dwelling units are constructed, no further unti to be axoadin ccess permitted dwelling un'i`ts are to redhe road is constructedicanthisRto4Workowith the County standard. The app mochani sin w here developers of the first con- to set up a 10.0 dwelling units pay their fair ..share for, the road as their' respective struction of the future paved are approvod or with the issuance of developments` building permits. 2 In�.er1.01* streets to be construchEdt mono u ubd vet'sign, at t .. standard to se�:t i ons shown or issuance of building olrtroads extendingaSouth ect t �from Works approval: Coll the be constructed to Wi.lder_Drive to .radedSto the RS -4, seal, coat in: tially and up, are plus a units paved road standar d after 100 Lwelling constructed. 2.1,.3_ Street grades and' other features ,shah comply ,tith the design resolution and other Butte County ordinancos, standards. accepted On, 2.x.4 be The bridge across little Chico Creek ?� �ithex sideed �nstalle o to.26 feet and a guardrail A lett turn lownhill ane is to be cons7tructyedthe cons'the aruction 32 after Yl• (Westbound) Lane of HighThe County will assist to 10G duelling units. of establish a mechanism where the oer vihepconstxlicti oniof 7_00 units pay their fair sl-a,re the left turn ;lane 2A 6 A ear"round standard traversable access ootheyCottntys to e t o the n yY xovded via Doe Mill ..Road maintained road. 2.:1.7 provide that this ;area will be subject to airy assessments, be lmpo5ed far the maintenance and, or tees � w'hicl may development of Highway 32•' Z:Y Interna Circulation 2.2.1 Internal access roads shall be construseedtypucal road Ap TI 1 102, requiremonts:as amended section.) Cti��desac roads will provide adec�icate radius Eor turring movements' of emergency ,vehicles.. -2" s ,t Bidwell Heights Specific Phan mage 3 2.2 The internal, road system will be maintained through a road maintenance agreement administered by a County Service Area ar other legal entity. ' School Facilities 2,3.1 Any building permit applications for vesjdti,rnces in this z o ect shall be subject to an school ma 1 i, at;i.on fee project ng stablished b an orinance enacted riot t the f�.1i$ - of such application unless a Community Facilities Act of 1<982 'District is created pursuant to California' Government Code Section 53311,et, ;seq. , covering the project area prior to the issuance of airy building permit's. 2.3.2 An agreement is to be'worked out with the Chico Unified School District for residents to transport students to an appropriate location for bussing. 2.4 IV, ater Supply 2.4.1 A water system improvement plan shall be developed for the Buzzstail Water Works Mutual 14ater Company. This plan will coordinate and phase necessary water system improvements to serve the project. The plan shall establish Gervice area boundaries, and provide a pressurized system adequate for domestic use and fire protection. 2.4.2 A community domestic seater supply, is to, be provided that complies with the California State Sa-fe-Drinking Water- aterAct Actand, the code of Butte County. 2.4.3 A service and maintenance district or other legal entity is to be established for repair, or improvements of the domestic 'water supply system,' 2.5 5an:itation 2.5.1The requirements of the Butte County Env.rbnmental iieaith Department and the State Water Quality'ConttoT Board are to be met for the provision Of community sewage, collection, treatment and disposal of same. ?.5.2 Adequate soil data is to be submitted to the health depart- ment to !ensure the Eea-sibility of the numb'ex of dwelling units propos-ed for each -aa, cel Such information is tv be provided prior to tentative action on .a PA -'C xez.one by tho pexvisvparcex orsubdivision Board o Surs or a'' tentative map for' those areas proposedfor zones other than PA4-Gr 2.5.3 No evaporative ponds or oxidation ;ponds 'will be util%zed`. , �3_ IN Bidwell Heights Specific Plan Page 4 2.6 Drainage and Erosion 2.6.1 Arainabe plans are to be submitted to the Department of Public Wo�CS, along with road plans, fox approval and i.nstaliation of the required facilitie,s.. 2.6.2 Surface water runoff is to be conveyed t':o the nearest natural `nater course ;Cor axiY p axcels o:C' less than 3 acres or for any PARC 'deve'lopment with an overall d,ensxty of less than 3 acres par dwelling unit. 2.6i3 Standard 'erosion control measures and construction practices are to be utilized to minimize erosion and other, construction impacts,. Grading pi'aetices revegetat on and use of detention ponds or other runo`Cf-control.meastires are to be implemented as discussed on pale 21 of the TIt. 2:6.4 Res�clent vegetation is to be retained accept as necessary for building site,, roads and sewage disposal areas. 26. r Graded areas are to be• xeve;getated w+ith native vegetation ` Prior to the winter rainy season (November to March). 2,6.,6 The development shall bepart of an drainageg e district formed for off -sate drainage of Little Chico Creek. 2.7 Dire :Protection 2.7.1 A fire protection pian shall be developed, in corjUnctian:' with the Butte Conty mire Department, tci Provide an ade uate level of` fire Protect as' r,es dental ma p Bevel ops ent occurs. 2.7.2 Nonflammable materials are to be used in roofing of all structures. 2.7.3 A fire station site is to be dedicated, and a volunteer, station constructed to fire department sppcificat,ions shall be provided prier to the occupancy of 2°5, or more, of theL living units. A serviceable fully -equipped fire engine shall be provided pTiOr to the issuance of the first btiildi4gi permit after approval.of, the Specific Plan. A bond is to be posted to guarantee ,the fu�l,l`:illment Of the el Ir eq, u,iemerits, Wit}la.n 3 days of the approval of ' the Specific Plan, 1. 2:7..4 A minimumo:f 3 'fixe Hydrants are to be provided wa.th $00 foot spacing. ,Hydrant ''locations will be 'as designated' b y the Fl, re Departme,nt:. Emergency aT1-teat}e^ actress is to be provided to 'the north toward Forest ranch and to the east to Butte Cxeelr. Canyon. -4- Bidwell Heights Speci.£ic Plan Page 5 3:0 WILDLIFE HABITAT AND GEOLOGIC, CONSIDt� 4a ONS 3.1 Wildlife and. Habitat 3.1-:1 Locate homesites in a cluster arrangement, near existing or proposed roads, to minimize the adverse efzf?ects on migratory w ldlife; 3`:1. 2 Provide a minimum setback, of 100 feet alone °tY ipr5,ax corridors, Retain riparian corridors in a cojltinuous pattern, retain connections between riparla;p corridors and major open space areas. (See the attaahod f? ap) 3=1.3 Preserve the connection between water b 0 d i 0 S (the on-site pond) and the related drainages (the wood r�1vinG to the southwest). (See the attached map) -3.1.4 Coordinate open space corridors with adjacent lands to leave n connectios of continuous habitat among the projects. (Refer to wildlife corridors as shown on the attached map.) 3:1,5 As a condition of tentative subdivision orparcel map approval, developer to submit plans for off=site or, on-site habitat enhancement program Subject to the approval of the, California State Department of Fish andGame, 3.2 Geologic Hazards 3: Z. T. `Verify geologist g isL that no lineaments traverse any of the proposed building sites, particularly those in. the central and southerly portions of the project area. 3,2.7 Provide a minimum setback Of 50 :Eee't from the edge,o£ bluffs unless cleared by a geologist or engineer for a lesser setback: . 2.3 ]Design and locatenew road ° and driveway locations so `as to m:inirnize cut and fi11 requirements., 4.0 PHASTNG AND IMPLEMENTATION --------------- 4:1 A County Service Area is to beest;abi igslled prior ' to the filing of further 'tentati.ve-pavicel, any or suiidivision maps for any portion of the specific pian area. Such' a CSA to assure the prova�siorl of adequate. "sewage treatment and disposal facilities `Water and dist abutaon system,, Erre xotecti p on, drama o and sbkutity protec.tioin. g 4.'2 To the extent feasible, changes and a,iteratzons sha11.;' be required in, or incorporated into; the project which mitigate or avoid the significant e1'Vi,tohment-al effects s.s ideriti.'fied in the final.' ETR