Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout82-62 SPECIFIC PLAN & REZONE 12 OF 15rW, _ _. M \� Auditor ► s 0£f ice = Dave Kell' Tot y - Planning Enviro'nmGntal Reviow. 480-005 FROM' Trans f. or of E.I.R. Trust Roids sut�r rr: October lip 1J83 DAT Fs please transfer thefollowing funcls From 'the E. I . a . `I14ust' foll0l' ng 11,5ted xevenue account: Fund F-1110 to the 1. BIdWell fleig-alts Land. Co: AP 46-71-18, etc. File #k 82-62 Log # 82-03-02-02 Recci.pt #6515 (Planning) . 1 037.77 to F -l0 61,7202 #48385 ,0 4886 (E.R. j Receipts 2. Ravenwooa (Shelton St. Glair) AP, 44-04-100,101,;1102 File # 82-1 Log, # 81-09-03-02 Receipt # ? (Public Works 10/25/7$�,000.00 to F-10 617202 r — , • ,,,DRi TO: County /Administrative O=ffice Bettye Kircher, T)irector of pl.annr g.. $UBJ'ECT Bidwell Heights Costs UAtef Octobor10, ,1983 The Environmental Review Guidelines, which was 11doptod by several resolutions, pl ovides for the costs of the Environ . - mental Impact Report and the s:z1mi.ni.strcl i 1,vC C} r�r p using of that x eport to be bor,�e by the 8P1,)licailt . Thc+ T'0S01tIIt.i 0 also provides that these costs must be accountod for up to and through the filing of th(,, Notice of Determi,rxtttion the project. on The Bidwell Fleig}itsproject applicant was required to deposit an initial amount of $600 toward the cost -and preparation of the environmental document, It is obvious that this estimated cost: fell .,Kort of the ultimate cost that Would be incu-'red. I am attaching a copy of the applicable section of the resolu- tion regarding the environmental review cost structure. The Notice of Determination is the last action by County staff after the final decision Onthe project; therefore, it is not possible to notify the applicant of'th,� exact final cost until after that action. The applicant does benefit, in the event that the cost is underestimated, from the time lapse of the draft environmental document being prepared and submitted to the County and thecompletion of thero'ect. Hei p J The Bidwell Heights due g project J to the extended period of time between deposit and the filing of the Notice of -Determination;, reg sulted in the additional administrative cost being borne b the County until Y reimbursed by the applicant, The resolution does not clearly provide for the method of collection in the event that an estimate of the project cast is exceeded: The ,department hats, as it"a Own policy, no applicants in the event of excessive costs being,incux'red in and some instances, as with• Bidwell Heights has received additional deposits towards the fine /.L costs. The de.partinent s policy in collections, in the past, has been to provide two 30 day, notices and then in tc�e event of no, response on th,e part of the, applicant, has tuxned the 'rile ove.Y to the Couti County Collection. Divsion. , , Ask County Administrative Office Page 2 October '10, 1983 It has been recommondca to supervisors Lon Fulton and Hilda ame as a committee on environmental, 1Vlaea the x-evi.ew process, the the amendment being proposed for consultant jon. that of mental impact reports also include the amenaiient totthe feeestrucct�-- ure,, and that in the event that thO environmental review process does not become the responsibilityof a coxxsu7.tant, that the process amended to provide for additional doposi.ts to be quired foe re- I—cior to the Notice of Determination being filed: BK: ].k 'i cc: Accounting form ;Applicable Sdction of Resolution Regarding Environmental Review Cost Structure, Copy of letters of 11/10/8'2 F 4/1/83 c,S HtxCli�t ,�o�n�pte items r, 2, tutG 3: a" Add your fi&x .0 in ue y RmR, T0. ep�a on lowszra �t Tha tnllowIng prviee Ix ret}�teste i ct�eel<or;a.j X , show to �,1 hltaw to whom, date Bnsl ad6rau of dvTivtir:...� d I�PS'MIC IMM I7FLIVERY t° show to whom *nd datA dohve ted......, i Iri MICTM DI LI`TRY. show to whom, dater and ad&es3 ut;&jjvcty,S r ... (CONSULT POSMAMRfOR.AGAWURD TO. m y Nand k'ritikin Z! 300Montgomery St, Su: 723 S.RTIftR'FIC C�rancisc t'j kE �pE;SGAIP'�'!C)P.1, 7" $.:EttlsTEgvD NO, CtwAT1FTt;A No tNWHEp NO, P1 9971969' f.�T.vn r� ahtAi�i aT ratorc Otsddra=o of ej0Faint)' I haus roceirad the At9icte,tTtwpdbed IhM. SM04'ATURE arddromo clnntikarx�t. ,c b, A DtMg,�,;, tm� etr tt v A, ry 14 � �� t�ratt�s.>_ ra ttr�.tvrA Ft�cr:ust;: I.EAtC'S tr�trtats #c�at� ; tn�a ann.t�tr FOR MAtL idU liAat�YlAti GF LQUAt�GE i'ft4}Ylt `: . FOitINI'll"Alkol� 9s1 r Air xa C F,T jVjQ11 ;Qil, � �� r r i•�xf; �f G 4 r 1,06 ltQ gC l ti Tgt�6PGi•, y c. PO$xlViiii4WiiaF�f7Afit. Rt' i x. - .131`D1V13.�a� 1-I l� C Glf 1`lS 1.1/30/$ a List Of .Itch's sent to Nai- cy Pritikin .fid Supv. NH .nutes 9f20/$3 1?cl Supv. Minutes 8/16/83 1.7. C. 'Minutes 8/1:1/83 id Supv. Minutes 7/12/$3 P.C. minutes 7/7/83 13d Supv. Minutes 5/24/83 13d Supv. M1.nUtcs 5/10/83 Bd St.1 v. Nf;iiiutcs 4/19/83 "THE -2 BAD LITTLE ROADS Or LITTLE CHICO CANYON" Resolution No. 83-1.57 9/20/83 Appendix Irl With attachments Findings forApproval q':f 5laecifl;c P ] an Letter of 8/2/83 RIVQCB }v:ith Agenda, buff sheet ",Ind st�y,;I�;f xel�or.t Memo of 6/30/83 to P.C. Aiemo of 5/6/83 to Bd Supv. Meffto of 6/3/83 to Bd Supv. Latter of 5/25/83 :from Richard got] NIomc) from Ly'nn.Vanhart 5/24/83 Letter of 2%8/83 front Dan Hays to 13c1: of Supp Exhlbit imp 3/3/$3 Letter of 1./11/83 from Sierra Club Nlomo of 2/28/83 to P.C. 'Letter of S/12/82 to R. Groh., PGF] Letter of 7/8/8-2 to Bidwell Heiglits Land Co: Latter of 6/2/82 to Bidwell 'I-fea.g:fi;ts Land Co: .189 Form 4/26/82 'Memo to State C10a1'ingh0tise 4/28/82 Mailing List y Lotter of 4/29/82 to Bidwell, Heights Co. EER seat Letter of- 4/28/82, ` ,' :8idvell-f-Itivights Co. Availability of D1R,: Notice of Completion 4/26/82 " Notico to the PtIblic 4/30/82 Letter, of 4/27/82 to 'Bid1Ve11 Ho` Oits Band :Cry,. Lotter of 4/21/82 to Bid�vo1,1. heights .faanc1, 'Co Nfcnto of 4,/16/8,2 from p. IV. NOM ofi 3/82 From Ch rl c, IVoocls to Steve Streeter Man,o 0r 3/1,6/82 from 1snv. I•Icalth Lct.tor o'(` J/18/81 frcnl lanv. fCca.ltli to , all Hays;. Nfc o 01 ,3/'1-6`t82 from Uji.v Health Komo of 3/11 /82 .from Inv., FIea;l.tlt Lotter of 3/10/82 from PG&E - Lotter o1, 3/10/8°? ;frol-a PGf,B (copy) Lester of 3%10/82 from City of- Chico Comments fr.6m l'.'1V. 3/82 Cgmmerit irdrf� 'bureau of Lon d f4la�la�cfitcn`t, lZeciclin;� 3/22/$2 1.�ct0r Of 3%5/8 to Didtvell Heights Laird Co tottor of Rept. of Fish an, d, Game Lett0r CUSC Lbttot� bf 3/12/82 froln Dept. of Transporta :l,oYi F� s �"apr�5 lktap NQ: Abbots. (4) IOWAN WELL T-T%;iCNT5 p 83 I'ta»�s sena to Nancy Prltika.n; Page, nio oL 12/11/81 f~,rom Dept. of Conserv`ati.on Notes ax1 Px'c~Development conference 12/11 /83 ( Iei 711ts Land Prof 1 eGt llescr7,pt'On for prcw.l)Ovalapment ;►li lia;elWc�.1, � N1aijto of 12/2J81 .fron PIall n.Ln 13 c1. Supv. rinutc5 Q/ZcJ/81 Nd,,j,S of Pram Planning to d Of Sulay. t11ru Appendix K Appendix t;';Iil2 dated 2/83 Aplacndi.x L tll1.u, Ap'P l l7`i,sc,I. Impact Analysis 6/82 '1lpcxcl.:�.x h -Speci•f1c Plan rcc" 3/23/83 Nemo of 8/12/83 to Bd. Of Supv. 2 81 �fxom Imhoff F Stone Lettel' o� 11/ / _ Pet,tiort of Consent dated 3/2/$ 1Ma.:L1. ng ListpacjfHone Lotter of 5/1.4/8 �Cxom 1alen1Sanders 3Q 82 Letter Of 5/25/8,. Letter and responses 32om larl Nelson dtccl. G/ staff Findings ��2 /82 P,C. Minutes /29/2 82 P, C. r4�.nutes 29 82 (Amon;decl Amendment to Staff. Pindi,nvs of 7/ / P. C, T'1a.nutes 0/23/82 P. C. rl4nutes 1Q/7/82 minute's 10/28/82 P.C. 1.1/4/82 rl ilrut e B6. SLt v. gintttes 12/1,4/82 Bd SLipv. M,Yx.utas 13/21/32 Bd SUPv Nlln tes 1/11/83 Bal supv: Nia.nutes x/8/;83 P. C,, AtizYut e s 3/13/83de Letter From 'Mlary lute`Yf eV s11 cl Game3 dated 3/14/ 85 Wl Letter ;from Dept. o Letter fxom 11ayj Ne,','. ht >lutes/oF/3/ 7/8S and 3d Minutes a,C 2/8/83 Rezone Report P . C.. 3/24-j83 83 F�0 Minutes Of Nemo of 3 7/M NUdito'r P.C. Minutes Of 3/17/83 • 1 / demo bT 4/7/83 -1. o h.0 7 8� ' 1:icies � l3i,d�+re11 14e��11ts ,Speci.�ic 1�1.a�1; Pa P.c. minutes 4/7/83 Memo' o 4/13/83 to P`. G. P.C. 1`lnutes cif; AP xld x S Lotter 2/0/83 From ,7oxl�ncicrson 7083 :I. s l`nLttos 4'/7/83 ltosaluton No, �',C• 1 C. Ranch. ,Ar- Ranc�i Qct i on Col�r'm�'ttce T'ottei, o,f 5/18/8J From '11c California Nat:i:ve Punt Society .l.,otter_ o,0/ 2p 83 to Iid ari' Suv. �i�mo �o ; 5/' / oa f� 'Chico 1lnterT� ise l acoras5/ 7/33 l y om From John LLtva - Lette7r o:f 5/21/83 NMIi r:.rr� i "'w'Yi a ,�, � 7"" < s # _d3r yes t '"C'9.or�''ey R i:�'`ks's''te- 'S v� �_�^��yr � �.fY ," Y9.j�.'. �L�eff���•R.ai'1i�N1'uT F� S�.L i� ©{e ��f `r3:��{K� Y�����i = O N Resolution. . ' ._:. •_ • 83-157 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF BUTTE, ADOPTING A SPECIFIC PLAN PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE § 65350` WHEREAS pursuant to the provisions of Government Code §653:50, et: seq., public hearings were held before the Butte County Board of Supervisors on a proposed Specific Plan for Bidwell I Heights and; ft WHEREAS,, the procedures of the Califo:Lnia rnvironmerta Quality Act and ;=-he Butte County Resolution implementing the act, - have been met, and the hereinafter, listed matter was discussed with testimony and documentation presented by the public, and various county, local, and, state agencies; and, WHEREAS;, the Draft Environmental Impact Report provided an adequate analysis for the Specific Plan for Bidcwell Heights. NOW, THEREFORE, L.ET'IT BE RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of the County of Butte in regular session assembled on September 20 i9$3 makes the following findings on the utter: 1. That tee Specific Plan is in conformance withall elements of the Butte County General Plan. 2 The Specific Plan, as proposed. .with policies 1_1 thr__lgh. 4.4, will mitigate concerns enumerated in the Environmental impact Report_ 3. The Specific Plan has left a substantial portion of the project site in open space including deer m,gration corridors. 4.: The Specific Plan includes formation of a special district to provide a legally binding mechanism to assess property owners for needed levels of services. 5. `be Specific Plan, with the conditions for :circulation, _ access drainage, erosion, sanitation, -water, fire protection,: open space, geologic 'hazards, wildlife habitat and: services to be provided by a County APPENDIX }l N0'i I C, FS or, DFITERM I NA,r 0 F TO Sc.cret,�r'y for Resources14,l6 Ninth, Street, Room 131 Y., Sac:r&tincirto, CA 95811 FYFYFY Cnunry ClOrk, County of Butte 25' 5' C I Jtcy Ce n9 e r D r:i ve GLFANOR R BECI\Lr, County Clerk 8'l-----&-UACiiM_:, Deoul f FAONJ Planning Department 7 Cot.rJ7 ty Center Drive (V i;i.(ic'L), Orov. ll e, CA 95965 SUJ3JECT Filing of 'Notice of Determinatio'rt in Com,pl•irtnce with Section 21108 or 211,52 of the Public ReSotJrrQ(,--, Code 82-03-02-02 82-62 Project Title �w Specific PLgnrt AP 46 71.-18 etc: 13Yd�,rel�l.. llc. r x'I�ts Land Co. w,L - -- _ State Clearing[iouse Number (Z F submitted to Stato (; (('gtrl.ni itouso) 81 1027 .,0 2, .. �.._�,.. Contact Person T'elophono Numlier B. A:Kircher, Planning Direct-0r .-161 _ 5..4-4601 Project Locatl.on On Doc Mill Ridge, approx. 7 mita,.south of Fore ;t Ranch, 3 miles east of State fl1V-32: 7 ..miles eas ,gLf_ Chico. Project. Description; To provide for the development of up to 337 unit cluster and conventional residential land project with neighborhood com merc.1al and recreation facilities, zoned A-2 and A-160, This is to advise that the Butte County Board of Supervisors (5a,d Ag ncy) has made the following determinations regarding the above-described, project: - l. The project will have a significant effect on. the environment , will ;tot 2. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared .For this proaect pursuant to the provisions of CFQA, and was certified as rogpived by Section 1.5085 (g) , 14 Call'; Adm;instrativo Codt,. A Negative Declaration was prepared £orthis projv pursuant to the provisions' of CEQA. A. .copy of the, Negative Declaration may be examined at the Planning Department, 7 County Center Drive, Orov'ille, ;CA 95965. 3, A Notice of Exemption was filed indicating this project is exempt Front- e►iviraniitontal review,, A statement of Overriding Cons d?erata on Was, F,was not,, c`dop'tod'for this pro jest. - 7 (::see attackt}trex 51 tigation mea:t,tixes adopted by the Load Agency to reduce the impact's of tite appJ.roved project Wre: See attachment 5684 ;t 7' a t'ci t° o � ch Stopilotl A: Str ester w';�y omter s l�)S3, Senior 11iilt�c6, Bidwell pa.rr , l,ei rrts Land Com April 22i 1083 � _ � 1, a ge: alid r►i. ra.nli.r,c it=])acts of tlic dc►v(;],ot)rie:nt. 1.7 t'i►c lat°rd a(Ijaceirt to the orl-sit' i,orrrl t�it�tin tire: clot Corridor trill relilairi r :Lnter£ere with migratory Wildlife AS athat711iia, htnuse ,Is �ondoas a source Of water. I 21.0 I`11CZ1,IT11:5 M -11l S!'ItVICI: 2.1 1'to�rd ;�.�trdork h'ilder Drive and Canyciir Shadows Road, eateridinn from project site to 'Santos ".'ay and to Ita�iiz�ri 3� y � � t r V � rr to rnairntained to at least ail RS -7 stand rd y 34 �seal1�ce,at in tire Short -tern. After 1tiJ dltellitt0 units arc corrstruct;ed t o f,►trtitcr citirel.ling units ares to leo 1)Lrr attr;cl a„ i1 }tlt4 main access road is Collstructecl to tits, ,< , Star, I.,�- 1 h County navel road .dard, the applica�it i.5 to to set tit, tror'i, t�itlr the (bounty a ,n�cilrrisr rvrrt��re develotrers of t, 110 1J0 iltrc ]lxrttt ujtits �?ay tlr_cir fair S` construction of tire- firturo I�avcd roadrk for the develo Merits are a�orove r i as their respective 1 dor ik'it.t t�1e issllailCe o£ vuilcli t Per'lits (See the attaclhod slydot for sections descrilacGl ,inch diagran', of ani clt1roadRl rstart,cross aplrlies to eacir portion Of tho road nctj.orr�,) Z.l.c 111te.ri01, strr'c:is to o Constructed to a full street S ta.ndard t0 sectio;r:, S; iotvrt at ttre tinct: Of subdivisio l . or issuance of tiu:ildinu irermits, subject to i'u'ulzc al�iiroval, "ollector roads extenairn sotrtil 4v.orl:s Drive to be constructed to t;to RS-7rstar:dar�irl�lusrlad�r sisal, coat irta.ti.ally Mid up,graded to t}re RS - 41 -B 1>aved road standard after I,UU divellir g units are constructed. aStreet grades and other fcaturGs shill comltYy with the ccented enc . County Orclinar.ces, dcsis;n resolution a'nd other accegi.necring s.tandards,. 2o144 Tire bridge across Uttle Cliico ct6ek is to be iriclerr a to 26 £iset and a I;uardra,i.l irrstalled ort �itlicr sine. 4,13iJwe11 Roil ',Jts Ia,'►cl; Comlarty +' ApT.L.1 a .. s to bu tollstructCd ill tllE' clo�''n�1 11 �\ 1c11� tut•} lane 1ligkt�M�;y 32 alter tlta coJIstruct:ion ( vostlloond lartc o The Cou�tt titin assist to esta��- o C 10() clti';oili.ng ullits: �ei•s of- the first lis}� ti mec lanism v;lhere t q develal 100 units gay thei1.,�air 51>arc for th'r C0,11Stt`iic:tion of file left turn lane. �..1 .ear -round standard traversahlt acCesooth�Countys to e provided via Doe ?,1111 Road to tile north vai.ntaine,d road. as s OS 2,1.7be Provide that t'11 area Will. d-forutiletmaintenance an eltts, or Leos, 1v}licit may be imposed development of Highways 32. 2.,2 InterlIa1 Circulation 2.2.1., ger Count' 'internal access roads s}ia11 be constructed edtvt)ical road sec- r rentziret:lents as amended Apr 1082. e t � tion .)Cul-de-sac roads Will Provide adequate radius' Cul-cic-sa r for turning maventents oC ,emergency ve}tides. 2.2.2. • • dmanistered by'a CoulIty � `Che ntc.Jia1 road systc.r„ sr11,1 be ntant�Jxrteu tltroLi }t a r road maintenance agreement .i Service Area or other legal errti.tyo 2.3 Sc'tool Pacili'tic>s, .._ ..._. 2.3.x. Any. building piarniit ap0lic;ations £or residences to this project s�i�11a be subject to an}� school mitigatio fees establis}iecl ley an ordinance e1ContinunitPrior .oil.attaesle �Act ii � of 'such anlyli;catiot1 unless a of icJ32 District is created, purwtaa.Jit to Cali fornix Government Code Section 51311,. ct. SO(,, cc,�vcring the project area prior to t}Ye issuance of, ally 1Jt�ildirrg p`ermi'ts. rt agreement is to be wnxl:ed otit with tilt: C}» A co UnifiedSchool ]7istr ct for residents to transport students to ; an appropriate lacatiacl Ciix bussin.e04 , 2 , 4 Water Slhl)1y 22.4:1. :� water- system i.mrJrovoniutrt elan s}al,l. be do Vel ape:t� for t}�e, iluLztaiX i�`at,er lt'oxks tilutual ie cesslxoy�i�v1>tcr sy}5tera plan trill .coo rd' nate ate cl ;tl1ase n Y 1: _ -s��iiensn�t® 9 DATE: TIME PHONE nT'elephonod C} PleAsa Cail 1 l WOA in !1 Returned Call ( Will Call Again y" y1notw 'fa :Soe You �(I,nlarntatran Ploto end LJ Roply �(coolmnir Re-route j si ra;furn lnveshodtc ;. Return �1 Approvol Contact hla ��, File Per Request (�AT� PH6NE '8/22/83TIME TelapltQnufl L Please Call 'Nae In Raturnail Coll Will Loll Again Wentz to See You nInformaYan wq Commont Nate and [ j Ra•toure Reply "i Signarurd L. Investigate ,.j Return r3 Appeeval Contaol Me rile Farv,ardod Per Raquasr bTATE OF CAL1POR'N1A_vVp � �x _--'=---__— :. EJIhN Governor CALIFORNIA REDID REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CCJNT( OL BOARD--- - �---GEORGE DE2KM CENTRAL VALLEY REGION `=--- 3201 S STREET SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 9581Cr7090' PHONE: (916)-145.0276 art'. �`Cd' ' �+ °���!,�:I DLl44n <' S "f vnr`fnti r1o(11W 2 August 1983 Y `I93 drirvurcr, +.rnr.waaJ1(11✓y Mr; John L. Luvaas, Jr;; Attorney at Law P. Q. Box 3276' Chico, CA 95927 WATER QUALITY CONCERNS WITH RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IN FOOTIiI'LL5 EAST OF CHICO, BUTTE COUNTY Enclosed is a coPy of the agenda, buff sheet and staff report which wi11 be submitted' to the Central Valley Regional Board for consideration at t e' meeting on 12 August 1983 in Hanford, Ca ifornia: heir Unfortunatelt', we were not able to discuss this report with you prior to it to the Board. If you have any comments, you are Welcometostate theta report the Board meeting, However, if you do have Major problems With, the report, we would like to meet with you prior to the Boad meeting. . K71- 5LL J: MARSHALL Senio)"r Engineer WJ1141 CC Enclosures cc: Mr. Lynn Vanhart, Butte County Health Dep'Irtment, Oroville w e Betty Kircher, Director, Butte County Planning Qe,partinent/ OroYilJ1es W/e'nclosures ITEM: 12 SUBJECT; Report on. Water Quality Concerns With Residential Development in Foothills East of Chico, Butte County REPORT: Mr, John L.uvaas, Jr„ representing the "Friends or ';he Foot- hills", requested that the Board hold a special hog in the Chico or Paradise area. The purpose of such a hearing would be to review the cumulative effects on Water quality from proposed subdivisions in the Butte County foothills, Mr. Luvaas states That water qualify is threatened by sewage contamination, runoff, siltation, overdraft of ground water, and blockage of natural stream channels. The Board can deal with sewage contamination, as well as erosion and siltation, through wastedischarge requirements. However,- ground water overdraft, runoff,, and blockage of natural stream channels are not within the Board's normal Functions= The staff report discusses those areas in which the Board has j uri sdi cti on. RECOMMENDATION A special hearing is not necessary to protect water, quality. STAFF REPORT Board-Butte County Relations Board staff and Butte 'County staff have enjoyed good working relations. Butyn sed bCounttte County Environmentalaradise hHealthostaffted goftenines assistopo Board staffaby notifyingtheCounty (bard when development projects need WDRs or when existing WDRs are being violated. Unfortunately, subdivisions are proposed and brought to the County's permit process one at time. This makes it difficult to analyze cumulative impacts of proposed projects as requested by Mr. Luvaas. All major subdivisions which do not discharge to a municipal sewer system, apply for, and receive WDRs or waivers from the Board. These WDRs or conditions on the waivers prevent or mitigate adverse impacts. The following is a discussion of the major foothill subdivisions mentioned by Mr. Luvaas: Canyon Park Estates (109 lots on'1050 acres in Little Chico Creek Canyon) WORs Were adopted in February 1983. Soils in the area are not good for standard septic tank/leachfield systems. The proposed system Will discharge 22,000 >gpd of domestic sewage from septic tanks to stabilization ponds and spray irrigation. WDRs provide for impermeable evaporation ponds in order to 'protect ground eater andprevent surface water contamination. During the spray irrigation season, the WDRs provide safeguards to control runoff of contaminated water. Erosion hazard is high. Last winter, with severe rains, large amounts of erosion were ,caused, mainly at the roadways. Complaints were received. Staff contacted the project consulting engineers, Rolls, Ellis and Rolls, and were told that soils Would be stabilized after the rainy season. Although construction has not started, staff Will inspect the project site to ensure that proper erosion control measures are taken before 1 October 1983, Bidwell Heights (337 lots on 1000 acres 10 miles east of Chico on Doe Mi 11 'Ridge) The subdivision has not filed an application for WDRs. We understand that 'Butte County cannot issue ,a Plan Development until prior approvals are obtained from the Countyy Health Department and our Board. The method of seWage disposal has not been determined; The proposed subdivision contains very limited areas of suitable soils. Most areas are on solid rook+ Sewage disposal ,Will be. a controversial iasue. this,project Was already heard by the Butte- County Board of Supervisors, even though it has no approvals from the County Health Department or our office. This, project Wil 11 require, great care in Writinq WDRs Since it is a ldrge development in a sensitive area. Staffwl'i include provisions to control erosion and water contamination in the tentative WDRs. I h 3. 12 August 1983; Agenda m. Tehama County Vlood Control and Water Conservation District, Sacramento River Bank Protection Repair, ty ountand he U.S. n.; City of Dixon, kiousin& Authority, Migrant Center,e Department of the Navy, Solano County e. City of Hughson Stanislaus County city of Camanche Regional Park Board and East p;• Northshore,_ Inc., Bay Municipal Utility District, Amador G,ounty OTHER BUSINEISS 12. Report' on Water Quality concerns With Residential: Devel,opitiolt; it, ''00tH ll,e East of Chico, Butte County 1,3. ' to the Request for Exclusions to the Prohibztz.on of Additional D1 �3cklar g ,et Shasta Dam Area Public Utility District, Shasta County 14. Report on Wastewater Treatment and Reclamation try the C;1,ty of 'Balcersfield, frern County . Corp.,�"y Busch Industrial Products and GFlrone Farms, 15. Report on Tulare Lake Basin Class I and 11-1 Solid Waste D'iispos :l. Sites 16. Report on Southeast Regional Solid Waste 'Disposal. Site, Fresno County 17. Executive officerls Report 4 18. a meet in closed session to discuss 'matters in litigation The 'Board � 1 `11126 (;q) [Authority-. Government; Code Section 19. Adjournraent to the 23 September 1983 ;meeting CALIFORNI EGIONAL MATER, QUALITY CONTR OAIZO: CENTRAL VALLEY REGION Fc,ordon oard Members y', Residence Appointment Categor Cit of V hns, Chairman Hanford irrigated Agriculture , Vice Chairwoman Sacramento W;:alor (duality Capoxzt, Member Fresno Undraslgnacetl . Hanford, Member pavisParadlGreek Municipal se f1Governmentrsh or ild ife son, Member Pratterson, Member Strathmore' Industrial Water Use Plfs:cO $=Olniego; Member Visalia County Government W, Steve 7'ornpkins, MOTber Corcoran Water Supply Clifford Go Wisdom, Member Stockton water Quality SACRAMENTO OFFICE RBDDING O FIC_E Address;' 3201 S Street Address, 100 E. Cypress Avenue Sacramento, CA 95816-1094 Reddin8, CA 96002 Telephone:: (916) 445=0270 Telephone: (916) 246-6376 Slate lease Line, 485-0270 State Lease Line: 442-6'376. William H. Crooks, Executive Officer James C. Pedrit Supervising Engineer William S. Johnson, lead Supt'. Engineer Jack E. De].Conte, Supervising Engineer FRESNO 0'1=FILE Paul E, Jepperson Supervising Engineer J. I.aWrence Pearson, Supervising Engineer Address, 3374 E, Sbields Ave,, Rooth 18 Jerrold A. Bruns, Planning Ftesno, CA 93726 'Lee, Jr., Surra Regulatory Telephone:; (209) 445-5116 William J. Marshall., No. Mtn. Regulatory, State Lease Lina; 421-5116 Merrill, San ,7oaquin River 208 Study Larry F, Nash, Centrad Regq ,Jatory Loren J, Harlow, Supervising Engineer t(aren A, WHaire, No. Valley Regulatory Sargeant J. C,teene Ag Wastes/Planning/ 'Thomas R. Pinkos, Toxics Technical Support George E. Schmidt, Grant's F, Scott:. Nevins, South Re,gu,latcry A, K, J. 'Vorster, Delta Regulatory James B, Wolfson, Nrortta Regulatory Dennis la. We&tcOt" Agricultural Regulatory General Statement Fbeneikoial, minry duty of the Regional [3oard is tq protect the quality o�f ►ire waters within the Region for elf rises, "this duty Is imp+emented by formulating and adopting water quality pians far specific Surface viateC ba ins and by prescribing and erifbrcing requlre,menis on ail domestic:: and industrial scharges. 5pedlfic responsibilities and procedures of the Regional Boards and the State Water Resources Control poard are outlined in the Porter-Cologne Water quality Control Act. The purpose Of this rneetfng is, for the Board to obtain testimony and inloernatlon froni' concerned and affected p.jrtfes andmake decisions after 'considering the recommondatio:ns made by the Bxecutiv.e offloer, ,any person alleoted adversely by a: decision of this Board may petftfoil the State Water Resources Control aoxrd to review rile decision, The petition must be received by the` State Board Wllhin 130' days of I Regional Board's meeting of whfoh; the adverse action was. taken. Copl'as o} the law and regulations applicabfeto filing petitions will be provided upon request, L e Board anti start weldome information on pettinent problems, but comments at the meoting should be and directed to speoffies of'the case, to enable the Board to take appropriate action. Whenever pdsslbldy testimony� should be presented, to the -Board .ih writing and' only a summary of pertinent poinfa ntedverba.fly. Calif. Water 'Serv. Co_ t. OATS tffAG PHONE �Tolaphonod ( Please Coil { 1 Wne In ] Rotvmod Call ' Will Call Again i { WanTs to goo You �y� In�brmbhory Note avid (J Reply }�"l Comment [, ; Ra•roulo Lj Signalure t lrtiyontvgoto .: Raturt5 U Approval �.a C dila Fatwarl{od Contact Me z Per Request Sy ; zw To: Butte County Planning Commission Brom: Steve Streeter, Planning ub j ect : Bidwell Heights Specific Plan and Rezone, 11il,e 82.62 Date June 30, 1983' The last discussion of this ;project before the Board ol; $1,1laorviso11-s tvos. held on June 7, 108.3. After considerable discu-si ,on and public input, the Board referred the project to the Planningg' (Intttntissi.on. Six' items were outlined in the referral,. These items arc.; T. Consideration of r -R (Foothill Recreation) ratitior than S -R (Suburban Residential) zoning in the northerly (I ea,. 2 R -C (Resource Conservation) zoning for the dOOV Corridors and open .space areas. 3. totters are on file for, the withdrawal of two p�trcels from the specific plan. Tentative parcel maps were approved for ]Dimer Jennings and Dick Chappell within the past year. The specific plan ivould require modifications, of its project boundaries unless these two properties are added back into the original specific plan area. 4 In the areas proposed for P -C (Planned Area"Cluster) zoning, Board action is to be delayed until the completion of tests and special design of the sewage disposal systems for the individual. PA -C proposals. 5. A consideration of t 11 mitigation measure relating to the Chico Unified School District.. Robert Moss, representative of the school district encouraged' the Planning CamMi.ssion and the Board of Supervisors to retain the original wording proposed by the. V school district.. 6. Phasing of the specific plan as it relates to the timing and densities of the overall. project. The Board continued their hearing on the specific Pl,a,n_and rezone, in an open hearing, to July 12, 1:983. 1llibits will he availablo at the July 7, _ 1.983, meet i,71g dcpi.ti,n P -R rather than S -R zon�ig in the north, r'y arca, 1t" -C �oniig for t11e do or corridors ani. ope spaceareas, and an eth'3.ba dept i,ctilg tlzc Jcianirl s al1d 'C happel.l parcel.$ along vith a.dJacent parce18 yu11 i c11 have beezi 'tsidered for e;�.clusiot from the wpec.i:l:ic plait. col The original wording for the 11TIti;gal"ion measure fot the Chico Unified bier -ro; Board Of Sctpo visor s rNdn,c l? axar�ilti i7epartmen for Bidwoll l�leight`s, 52-62 suc��i.cT: 5pec-l�ic ,flan pnT44 may 6, 1953 7'he following revi, i,ons/cla'rii i cati ons are jJo7•i: .7lent to tlae Specific Plan The �.ana ,I4Ilj acetal to the on, -sits pond wi thi7l the l.7 1 co tio11 clecx cc5r. t :I.clor' 1vi17 1 elrtain in �. +. 4 �_ « h 1n1jratory 1V I OT i e�lat a0 QTS not t0 interfere with (The use the pored as a source oi; tivat�c,7:�+ 3 used letter to �tlzc applicant datetat her t halril l in its�natura.l the word "undisturbed" condition". The Co1nln is s i.nn' s i nte71t "S to adopt. the above wording.) 2 -1.7 Provide that this' as c<1 1��ill be subject to any as5csslne nts, or fees, lvhic h may be i.1�l)osecl for tlac nlaintena ace and development of Highway 37.. (Refer to page 6 of the -April 13) 1933 Plan 11.1119 Co1m11ission 'Che Co11ma ssion intended that this lvortl.ing' minLitI e added to ' the Spec:,iic 'l?l.a7z b 2.3,1 ,1tay`liuilding ptlrltlit r'rpplications for residences in cation thishrejec.t sha,l.l be, subject to �t7ay school ),litigation foes est<ibl:islar;cl ley :-1:11 ordinEi ce elaacted pry 07' to the filing of stich. application or a Cu11n11uni.ty Facilities Act el 1952 district 1v11ic11 ma be created pursuant to California 982 (iaverninellti C O e Section 53317:, et. sc?1 • , covering a project, area prior' to tion a"ages1llo andco of- 11 1) g, pe1.m�t$• (l�ortiang sl1ov11 Pages of the pr�7 13 a, s3 Colnmissioll 10,11,ttties and 7:n the April 22, 1983 i,otter to tlac: applic�171t.) 13L1icii.n'J le°mi.t app1.icati.ons for aYeS,i.torace:s i.n this g t:co>Z • n school 1n' ga subdi.vi,s i.on 111�v —I subject to any l`ecs e5t�ab7.;.slticd l;y X311 a7-Qi.nctncG ellttctccl 1�1.i.ox: to the on , or a Community F wil sties filing of st:tcll apPli.t~atiol he ►crated ptrstant to '1932District 1vi111ct o Calitor'ni.a fowl �nmcnt cwti,cal x3 71 , et= sc%d• � covcri,nt; the Project;aa;ea pri,ov to tile is uance o3 any bil ldia g permit. (l5T'ord.inta s1lown oil 11ago 8 of the hlannvili,ly Colrunision 1n.i,rrutc�s cl.<►1..cacl\h7�i�a. i, L9S3.} 1� cieci 5i.on tec:cls to be 1tt�trlc 'as to which Ivo 1'c1 ir1i i s to lie adopted . SAS ; lkt i Bid}veti1 H _ca.ghts 82-62 APPl,WDTX S List o,, Pei -sons C07-qment:i.n , � on elle ll7:a,Et FSR Jtil'Y wJ, 1982 Plannana Commission Dan vlays, Earl Nelson August S, 1982 Planning Commission Alan Burchett Xelly Meagher Earl Nelson Roger Cole September 1. 1982 Subdivision Committee Dan Hays, Jr, Earl Nelson . Se te'rr[her 15, 1982 Subdivision Committee Dan Hays, Jr, Earl Nelson September 23, 1.'982 PlainninQCommission Dan Flays, Jr. Jim Snowden Earl Nelson October 7, 198,2 Planning Conimissi;on Jim Snowden Tom Alden Dan Hays, jr, Roge Co1,e Earl Nelson Kelly Meagher Octo� b�8 1982 P1 annin CLO imiss .on Earl Nelson: Kelly Ivieagher Bill Collins Dan Harry. Cozad flay- , Jr.. ^ Tii/�' Nov= ember 4 1932 p:la-nni.7 __.. Y� Co�ntnisson rww� march24, 1983 Planningmission ICe1ly Meagher Bidwell Heights Ank December 14, 1982 Board Of 'Supervisors Earl Nelson Kelly Meagher Jim Snowden John Luvaas Ron Imhoff Llon Ilwnmer Richard Redmond December 21, 1982 Board of Su-eryi sors Ellen Sanders Bill; Lurch E r1 Nelson Art Oilman Kelly Mea,ghor Roger 001,6 leve Lantis John Iauvans January 11, 1983 Board of Supervisors Kathy Ivey Earl Nelson Ellen Sanders Roger Co1c a Kelly Meagher John. Luvaaa Harry 'Cozad February 8, 1983 Board of Supervisors Carl Nelson Gary Simmons Flo Op,atrnY Roger C010 Pat Burke Eva Xncaudo Margaret Speer Bill Collins Shelton Enochs John Luiaas Ke11y Meagher nary .Ann. HouY Ellen' Sanders parch, 1,983 Planning Commission Earl Nelson Roger Cole Kelly Ifeagher Ellen Saaidexs John Luvaa5 March,, 17, 1983 Planning Commis ion E`ar1 Nelson Kelly Meagher Roger; Cole march24, 1983 Planningmission ICe1ly Meagher .rid 7 1983 Planning Conunission Earl Ne.1sol Rol! Imhoff Kehr Meagher iii 13,-x.983' Planning Comni:ission :earl Nelson Apri.l_:19, 1983 Board of Supervisors - Earl Nelson John Luvaa Kelly Meagher Dan Hays, Jr. May 10, 1983 Board Of Supervisors Earl Nelson Michael Jackson Kathy Ivey Darian Delu Kelly Meagher Barbara Rodden Steve Evans Roger Cole Bill Burch Richarcl• Roth Lane Moeller Richard Redmond Bill Nichols Jane Martin, Doan Hummer John Luvaas Barry Meyers lied Whitehurst Ron Imhoff May, 24 1983 Board of Supervisors Earl Nelson Clinton Caywooda - Bill Burch Miranda William Kelly Meagher David Joe Smith Robert Ross John Luvaas Barry Meyers Fla Opatrn Harry Cozad June 7, 1983 Board of Supervisors Earl NelsonRobert Ross, Kelly Meagher,,, Bill Burc.11 Pat Burke Bar'zy, Meyers Richard Roth John ,Lu.raas Hoard of Supervisors Bidwell Heights 82-62 Page 2 July 6, 1983 Comment 3; Access is rccommonded to act join:i,ng i)•K•oper'ties for future road development per Section 20-132 of Ific Subdivision Ordinance. Res onse The Specific Plan is an effort to comply with Section 7.0-132. There are about two dozen property otin'ers involved in the 1200 acre project area,. Circulation is a concorii as part of the revlo% of land divisions. Right-of-way easements w°x.11 be recommended to property lines, where topography will allow, r�rthor than allowing cul -dc -sac roads. Compliance with Section 20-1,32 is not pteclue'd by the current Specific Plan. Comment 4 Designated locations should be reserved for a Fire station, any recreational facilities or other public uses per Section 20-144 of the Subdivision Ordinance. Res on$e The County cannot require dedication of areas for parks and recreational facilities pending adoption of the Recreation Blement to the General, Plan. A fire station site has been set aside it is identified by a P -Q zoning designation (northwest of the pond and northeast'of the vineyard area). The fire station and other public uses would be reviewed as part of the LAFCo application for a County Service Area/Community Services District. Comment 5`: Bike paths and pedestrian way dedications are recommended per Section, 20-140 of the Subdivision Ordinance: Response; Dedication of bicycle paths is an option for subdivisions of 200 or more Parcels. In this case, there is noone project in Volving, 200 or more parcels; however, there are X37 total dwelling. units potential within the project area. Since there are numerous property ,owners, implementation of Section 20-140 is more difficult. Comment 6: Specifics about the dra-,nage solution and the sewage disposal facilities should be included as part of the Specific Plan. asonce: Standards fox a drainage solution are specified iris the SUMOrdinance and improvement standards: Any of the parcels which are 3 acres or larger in size are not required to provide a permanent drainage solu't'ion. The PA -C rezone parcels would be Subject to drainage re:quirement,5. Those parcels are being se, aside for action until 1`urther information is developed about the sail capability for sewage disposal. The County has deter.,miried that extensive soil information is not, required as part of the Specific Plan; Such soil information is necessary, at the land division: stage, whether for tentative parcel maps, tentative fiubciivision Wraps, or PA -C rezones%tentative subdivision maps. jai � X Board of Supervisors Bidwell Heights 82-62 Pages July 6, 1983 Comment T: The County Service Area should be established be;('ero y'ct:i.cjn on the Specif- servicesi c Plan and include a fUl,1 range of ptii)lic Reslaanse The County Service Are a%'Comiilunity Services ili.stx9c'L application will proceed as soon as the applicants submit a s�:xtis- "factory feasibility study.; This re-c{uired stucly ;i.s the main infar- mation lacking in the present applicatioin 'process. Staff has Previously recommended that action on the rezoning° withheld pending action an the GSA/CSI) kn LAI�Co.� of the area be could be adopted in tentative form .followed`by action oThe i�etihe�CSA�an CSD. The possibility of the drinking water supply goig dry is subject to review by the County Health Den partment. Oi a year, lower than normal flows are quite likely. Responsibilittytof providing any supplemental water `supplies w individual property ownould be borne by the ers as part of the CSA/CS'I) to be, established. Comment 8: 1 A bond should be required for erosion and revegetation management. Respnce : This subject was previously addressed. Comment 9: A bond should be required for downstream water damage use to tie failure of sewage or septic systems. Fes onse California Nater Service Company has been contacted about the relation of this project and others on Do.e Mill Ridge to their source of underground water supply, Mr. Grant; manager of the Chico office, has been invited to the July 12- 1983 Board of Supervsorsr hearing tQ directly respond to comments. Reference: Chico Area LandL ?1se Flan EIR, File # 80-72, S.CH #-8009 2314, IIydralogy: pages 7 ,-94. Comment 10: The 50 foot .setback :from the edge of bluffs is it ade_ Lute. Res onset Though a g greater setback might be advisable for geologic consi erations, a sufficient setback to eliminate v b homes from Little Chico Creek, Butte Creek Canyon,, and any tandfall scenic highways would not be feasible. Board of Supervisors Bidwell 11eights 82-6,2 page 5 ,7tily &, 1953 - Resronse to Comment 4: Individual or small: projects do not involve The criteria for mandatory Specific Plans is set . Spc.cafac Plans. forth, in Section 110o0.5 of the Business and Professions Code. 50 land x o ect (a subdi.vi or more parcels_ Basically, a ►� p ' j - " subdivision of than 1500 raj�iste'red voters within 2 miles of in an area with less the boundaries of the property) must prepare a Specific ;flan per by the Government Code. Lands owned or beneficially controlled entities or interests are deemed, to be part substantially the same of the same subdivided lands or subdivision. After the Specific individual Plan is in place, the permit process is comparable to or small projects. Res onge to comm.ent 5a:. This comment is I1,0t related to the environ- the Board of Supervisors may, mental review process. A member rof wish to respond. Response to Comment Sb' This comment is not related to the envixon- the Board ofSupervisors may mental review process. A member of wish to respond: r - SAS:Ikt cc: Planning Commission tidwoll Heights Land Co Earl D. Nelson Assoc STATEMENT REGRADING PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OP DOE HILL RIDGE Y speak to you today as a concerned taxpayer of Butte County. In my review of the proposed subdivision, x have observed that the potant.al negative impact and liability on Butte County taxpayers as a result of thxg project could be stagpring. T mould like to express to you. some concerns, suggestions and proposed conditions for development that you and county staff should consider to help minimize the potential economic impact on this county's taxpayer..