The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About83-30 ORDINANCE 16 OF 16bTAIE Or �AwoANIA--IRANSPORTP- 4, AGENUo DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISIRICT 3 F, 0. ftOX 911, 1,%Arcy6VILLE 95901 'relaphone (qlG) 6721-4270 9, 1.977 WMUND G. BROWN M, G—, 03-Btlt-32 P14 15.2/3'(.75 Mr. Clay Castleberry .L W01-1,18, Director Of Public County of Butte 'T County Center Drive Orovillej CA ,5965 Attention lir. Hal McDollaid Gentlemen: The Dictrict has forv;ardea your Res�clut-jon No, 77-182 to Our e for their information. A,5 Sacramento HeadquarGers' O"fic wte have discusse��'t,tl��es Resolutionhefst of many steps requirdtoonve private openings to public road connect:*Lons . Mir. Torii Fenley of our Envj.romnentual Branch has been in contact with Mr. Earl Nelson of your Plannjr.g Department regarding the . rec preparation of the toceOZ8�VY envirOnM011J-- isa 606jarftentOft subject. elpt of that document, �,,,e ;jill proceed further writs'' th Very truly yo -ars, LEO DjB1.-vj,,,t Director of Ttan8portatioft A .'ren e n�l StAidies 6; Lias.ionEnLInser ^ti .er . f .th k��l��YIiM 1,�,�,.. Jk�Mttl �yuyrw_ .�way�.►w M""�C"'�C-SC.''l tl#' .2��Ct Qil F/��V LniV D GF NATURAL W EALTH A N D a �. DF-r'ARTMENT OF H)r-311.1c V%i0R1<S CLAY CAST L.EW411C Y. Dir(jetar 7 COUNTY CENTERDRIVE,.OPOVILLL, CALIFORNIA95965 fielepl,anat (+i1G) 63A -A6111 H. W. MrDONALD November 30, 1,977 Deputy Dietoor Leo J„ Trombatore, District Director R7: Additional Public Road District III, Dept, of Transportation Connections to Sit 32 State of California P. q. 'Box 911 Marysville, CA 95901 Attention; Earl Galligan Deaf; Mr. Trocnbatoret Transmitted, herewith, is a certified copy of Butte County Resolution #17"182 requesting additional public road connections House and Garland Road. This to State Route 32 between Ten Mile resolution was adopted by the Board of Supervisors at its regular meeting of November 22, 1977. Due to impending developw-ant along this controlled access highway, there tray be other locations where other pub' u road Lnn:nectl.ons may be requested llotrever t.e locations mentioned in the resolution are tha urgent ones t thi time This matter has been discussed` with meitbers of your staff.. Your e,trl:,y» attention to thia request would be appreciated, I J Very truly yours, Clay Castleberry Director of Public Works J'tivirohmehfal Rttviow Dibott H• W. . tDonal,d ; Deputy Di.ructor APR 1978 Braid County 3.9.5 PROJE �EVELOPMEN7 PROCEDURES MA uaN Janr 9ycy ---- W (9) Approval of Rough Draft Vr,,�izway Agreement. After receiving written notifica- t1on of acceptance of the final environmental. document from the PIMA, MID approves the rough draft of the freeway agreement for presentation to the local agahcy fe-. execution. (10) Execution of Freeway Agreement by Local A encu. After execution of, the f�:'ee- way agreement by the local agency, the agreema_nt is torwarded t0OP&D. , (11) Presentation of New Connection Report to CRC. The new connection report is presented to the CHC wit a recommen-crat'xon that the 7,'ttached resolution be approved. CHC action is by approval of a formal resolution. OP&D will notify the District by teletype concerning action taken by the MIC and transmit certified copies of the. resolution by route tag. tThe District in turn is responsible for notifying the citien and counties con- ` Urned and should send a letter with the resolution. In special cases (for example, for a theoretical connection to ph adopted route where no permanent connection is to be made to the freeway lanes`) one or more of the above steps 1-•9.4(1-10) may no.t be necessary and may be omitted as appropriate. (12) Execution of Freeway Agreement by State. Freeway agreement is executed by -s State after CIIC acts on new connection resolution. �r 34.5 Procedural Steps For Processing a Locally Initioted Request For a Mew Public Road Connection Per CNC Policy Adopted 0,-to6er 17, 1973 Preliminary reetincs are held between the local agency and the District to deter - mire if the proposed new connection is feasible from both an engineering and Finan dial viewpoint. if the proposal is considered viable, the following procedures are followed; (if the local agency has requested a new connection by retolution and the proposal is not considered viable, stop the process and wAimit.a report recommending -� °disapproval as outlined in Article 3-9.4(4).) a) Local agency passes resolution requesting new connection. (This step may have: preceded tine preliminary meetings.:) (b) bistrict sends copy of resolution for advance information to OP&D: memo briefly states the situation andindicates anticipatedcourse of action, I (c) Appropriate (draft environmental. docuriaht (to) is prepared by local agency. .it is very important that all necessary consultations be made by the local: %.. x agency anis includes the District Project Development 'Team and the MIA ;r area representative if Federal approval will be required. The ED shall be r �$ prepared in ,accordance with current instructions, r. (d) ED and resolution are sent to District by local 'agency. ' (e) RD is reviewed by District for sufficiency; if unsatisfactory; returned to lot'a1 agency for revision. (f) Project Report is prepared by District when ED has been found satisfactory. (g) Project Reports draft to and resolution are sent to 6P60 by District. ED is reviewed by office of Chvirohmehtal Planning (Ore) t•1eW Connection Project Report is red*ieWed by 0-176D G' (h) Chief, Optt), approves the hots connection for public hearing purposes. connection Authorization to circulate the draft ED and to proceed Wirth or waive the public hearing process is given to the Distract. This may be�done, by separ- ate letters or a 'combined one, r i .((s •l r PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PROCEDURES MANUAL 3-9.5A 1 ` October 15, 1976 (j) District notifies .Local agency to proceed as noted above. (k) Notice of availability of draft ED published by Local agency: (l) ED is circulated for .comment by local, agency. District will furnish local agency distribution list. r (m) Comments are received by local agency. Decision to pxocaod with hearing pro- cess is made in consultation with District. (n) Notices of Public Hearing or Opportunity are published by local agenc' and mailed to parties on District furnished list. (o) Presiding officer selection is made by the Local, a5ency subject to the con- currence of the District Director. District notifies OP&D of selection and, hearing arrangements (p) Public hearing is conducted by local agency.. TherYce hoax,ings can be lengthy and tend to interfere with normal. Local, agency busitless when combined with a regularly scheduled business meeting. Therefore all efforts should he mode to schedule the new connection hearing as a separatb heariiig. The presenta- tion must cover all the required items and will preferably be made by the - local agency with the District staff in a support• capacity. In any case, responsible District representatives will be present at the hearing. (q) record of Public Hearing and the final ED are prOpared by the local ager, y and se;it to the District. (r) Above are reviewed by District and, when satisfactory, sent to OP&b. bis- alsoptameand sends draft freeway Agreement and Project Approval Reportat this , I (s) ED is reviewed by the OEP. OP&D. (u) TP FMIA approval is zequir:ed, when all documents axe satisfactory, all' eXC'Capt the freeway agreement are sent to V1111A with regt,est for DD approvall (v) ED approval is given; final ED is disi:rbutecl by local agency to C►stri.et ( furnished list. (w) OP&D apPeoves draft freeway agreement to Distract.. (x) Freeway agreement is executed by l.oca). agency. (y) New. connection is approved by CHC. (z) Freeway agreement is executed by Etate: (aa) Cooperative agreement between local agency and state .is entered into. (bb) Funds are voted by C11C and notice of l)etevmihati,on i;i filed. TO: Board Of Sspervisor's PROM: i�:l,ann:Ln Department• r Public Road Co�zl.ections April 10, i-lea�':Ln Ellgiiwa t a.1 5, 1g81 _ 0A7 s o5e o the public iiearin is to allow ;iiftptlt on the throe The pUrp the assistance: of C;�it�,�li1� rept'o" 1. p1oposEJ road conncctzons with sentat ve a in a su'ppoi t capacity . Since the road' colz iovi' a zs tivthe oulcl ultimately be reviezred dor approval be abletot'Csponcl� to Y poxtat on Commission, Caltrans Vital z4z ll u cation on tips to be taken subsequent to the ��LUI.:,c hearing q At, the conclusion of the public hearinj on April, the zvctrlc� occu�r5�"t 1 that the uiTes Bioardrmakf-', s v ecommend that i E public znptttw uld 'x cl r l)i moti n f lose Cpip�T o CeI tine „ aCt7 Qli' on Cert, Cation motion of amen final ,,.. t to certify file QTR subject to xesponses to i tile spec E� c conirnentsO and continue}'. c � t sp i�Y'R dor at least tutu ~~reeks to allow staff to prepare the r0sponses , at no xes oYise is necessa�: p .• -fir then cr I E your board det'et°mines that p mmended motion to cep° i y the 1Et }i;oul nEnt�t`k Imp ctsRel7o�rrG 'have cl x eco ? reg*�et�+erg the contents o the clraft Gni t tont ottittortts z`ece�red thereon, and tho responses to those comments, t#h h refbre, MO that tive cet.'tx�y that the fing1: i;1tvalie Calt4L1 _1 ; w ones and Butte Cotirtt}' Bliv:i` 0Am nla impact ltepor ,�rtS been coiilpletecl in coi�pllance �vith, the Cali Coerital Snvironm�ntal Quali t;r Act Cua el Review GuideTz.nos :it would a�.so bo appro�an�ate �'ox the,Boroacltconnect%olis at 1011 tion that ei'tzer A7 t'lie thz eeiroposecl L astttn ) itve anfi� Altat�na Drive be appro%er1 try the Holjse y : Cal oa•nia Transportatior1.x Corninission (CTQ ox I3) ziec.omin�:nd dis tbe v the 1"0,'W1e mouse Ro d s icl the �1laa'toattnoct5in 10n'Mileot1ou�se :e cot ottl, the CTC tiv�.th a frcntage VO ars approved by Road �vith tho resider ces in the �vicl li t1te�B��tjCast�tns Drive> (Telet to altetn t vo t€ pn p t +� 1 i.ort tlio: �oa,�c1l.�l.a.�tc:1 Tn acl�t , 4 ptlntn t n the i:lh V, �t la lay: o� ita rL <: t to 00, on Pago l c� '- h a ►iteC i�anxGn:�r�r �.i�t[ty of erxtent tit thc.nt 'r rectic�tlti ��`. 1 a1"k51 zn.� itk�io" �.L�, CtSI� CGIIn£�X t iCjl o L a l � �".k. 3'G,i�� of h�. glzfi��,,t�' A Mho, l�attnly' .t��i' it��r�•c%..;�tz 111.41` �`C' lyy w ii s i tCi x tti.r t 61iy1f 1`CaQt h w �E ;4 l ; x �c ; �ta'1nttk `�zriu i ion `fit�t«1ri�ili� a s �iis �i I ► car '��i 1 zro��,eGl 1131 .�� ` a��1 t ;r Board of Super1risot5 flighwv ly32 Ptigo 2, April. 5 l984 - I�iitl �at�.on Itr:oasur,c #3also 111x;1„ntC�'lallCe. ]ias bearing Oil road const,,vactioll and: 3+Q�OLi71t standards. m an assessment C�15tric to -Maintain all' p Y s . roject 41M 'x Dads .In summary, this hearing is that the Board holds in that $ometivh t different :Groan other hearings Public road connections I ;i �ub13c a the decision to actually, a _ Y' pp'rove thy. t�r� thin the jurisdiction of enc �r> this cas g Ys e The public hearina is being another the California Transportatiot Cottill,:Lssion. held ivithizi facilitate local. input. - the County in order to 'r you have questions about please contact the planninn the procedures or the April IOhearin , Lle artinent r�or p p to next `Tuesday. SAS : Ix° Attachment '.G t r':: k'.- l , � .q, .;:r.. ,. ,:' , ,.. - , .. ,►,. ;IMA ;!/�'.1, 1 � f 'f �1 i',�� : J 1 t'. , TT - ~f �lrNow v r a � fr , l 1 y y �1► �Tjl LYS 4dY9 ,toror's o, 1, Ldrz ,.40 C�� a'n"' + aw.� l�vs �+.rr�; t..e� rr.+� wee► �.....n.w�. ips lr.o tiw. w.�.As +... ww�.A�.� n.+.r w.ws e...0 ..w...�.,..,,rh Y � - !7 if 644 Aa 420,66Ac. i /P A, ►; 59 37 AC 49 AC. 4 WAC yi 0 r 32 NP a r 6=56 -?0 A p tit it �. • ii!.': 1 U: GkiwQY rr tit r r 40r� tv • a �, 59267 NOTICE OVERSIZE DRAWING , HAS BEEN REMOVED AND FILMED ON 35MM ?�(OTICE O'VERSIZE DRAWING